The invention generally relates to MEMS microphones and, more particularly, the invention relates to improving the performance of MEMS microphones.
Condenser MEMS microphones typically have a diaphragm that forms a capacitor with an underlying backplate. Receipt of an audible signal causes the diaphragm to vibrate to form a variable capacitance signal representing the audible signal. It is this variable capacitance signal that can be amplified, recorded, or otherwise transmitted to another electronic device.
The area of the diaphragm has a direct relation to the total capacitance of the microphone. If too small, it may produce a signal that can be relatively easily corrupted by noise. In addition, a small diaphragm also may produce a signal that is too small to be measured. Conversely, if too large (but having the same thickness as a smaller diaphragm), the diaphragm may bow and thus, produce corrupted signals. Microphones having bowed diaphragms also may have less favorable sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratios.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a microphone system implements multiple microphones on a single base. To that end, the microphone system has a base, and a plurality of substantially independently movable diaphragms secured to the base. Each of the plurality of diaphragms forms a variable capacitance with the base and thus, each diaphragm effectively forms a generally independent, separate microphone with the base.
The microphone system also may have circuitry (e.g., digital or analog circuitry) for combining the variable capacitance of each microphone to produce a single microphone signal. Moreover, the microphone system may have a plurality of springs for supporting each of the diaphragms above the base. Each one of the plurality of springs may extend between a support structure and one of the diaphragms. In that case, each diaphragm may be spaced from the support structure.
In some embodiments, the base has a top surface facing the plurality of diaphragms, and a bottom surface having a wall that forms a single cavity in fluid communication with each of the plurality of microphones. Alternatively, the bottom surface may have a wall that forms a plurality of cavities. In such alternative case, each microphone may be in fluid communication with at least one of the plurality of cavities.
The diaphragms can be any of a number of shapes, such as circular and rectangular. In addition, the base may have a stiffening rib.
The base can be formed from one of a number of conventional components. For example, the base may be formed from a single die (e.g., a silicon wafer that is processed and diced into separate die). Among other things, the single die may be a single layer die (e.g., formed from silicon), or a silicon-on-insulator die.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a MEMS microphone system has a base forming a backplate, and a plurality of substantially independently movable diaphragms. Each diaphragm forms a variable capacitance with the backplate and thus, each diaphragm forms a microphone with the base.
In a manner similar to other embodiments, the MEMS microphone may be packaged. To that end, the MEMS microphone system also has a package containing the base and diaphragms. The package has an aperture to permit ingress of audio signals.
Those skilled in the art should more fully appreciate advantages of various embodiments of the invention from the following “Description of Illustrative Embodiments,” discussed with reference to the drawings summarized immediately below.
In illustrative embodiments, a microphone system has a plurality of microphones coupled to, and essentially integrated with, the same base. Accordingly, compared to microphones having a single diaphragm of similar area and materials, the sensitivity and signal to noise ratio of such a system should be improved while maintaining a relatively thin profile. Details of illustrative embodiments are discussed below.
The packaged microphone 10 shown in those figures has a package base 12 that, together with a corresponding lid 14, forms an interior chamber 16 containing a microphone chip 18 (discussed below, see
The lid 14 also has an audio input port 20 that enables ingress of audio signals into the chamber. In alternative embodiments, however, the audio port 20 is at another location, such as through the package base 12, or through one of the side walls of the lid 14. Audio signals entering the interior chamber interact with the microphone chip 18 to produce an electrical signal that, with additional (exterior) components (e.g., a speaker and accompanying circuitry), produce an output audible signal corresponding to the input audible signal.
In illustrative embodiments, the package base 12 shown in
Among other things, the microphone chip 18 has a chip base 27 with a static backplate 26 that supports and forms a variable capacitor with a flexible diaphragm 28. In illustrative embodiments, the backplate 26 is formed from single crystal silicon (e.g., a part of a silicon-on-insulator wafer or a bulk silicon wafer), while the diaphragm 28 is formed from deposited polysilicon. In other embodiments, however, the backplate 26 and diaphragm 28 may be formed from different materials. For example, the backplate 26 may be formed from deposited polysilicon. To facilitate operation, the backplate 26 has a plurality of through-holes 40 that lead to a back-side cavity 38.
It should be noted that the chip base 27, which includes the backplate 26, can be entirely below the diaphragm 28, or, if the page is turned upside down, entirely above the diaphragm 28. In some embodiments, the chip base 27 is distributed so that the backplate 26 is on one side of the diaphragm 28, while the remainder of the chip base 27 is on the other side of the diaphragm 28. In the embodiment shown in
Audio signals cause the diaphragm 28 to vibrate, thus producing a changing capacitance. Conventional on-chip or off-chip circuitry 19 converts this changing capacitance into electrical signals that can be further processed. This circuitry 19 may be within the package discussed above, or external to the package.
Each diaphragm 28 therefore is considered to form a substantially independent microphone that produces its own variable capacitance output. Conventional on-chip or off-chip circuitry 19 combines the output of all of the microphones to generate a single response to an input audio signal. Among other things, such circuitry 19 may provide a sum total of the variable capacitances of all the microphones on a single chip.
The primary difference between these two microphone chips 18 of
It is anticipated that the rectangularly shaped diaphragms 28 can more readily have a larger combined diaphragm surface area than a same sized microphone chip 18 having circularly shaped diaphragms 28. Consequently, the microphone chip 18 of
Those skilled in the art should appreciate that the diaphragms 28 may take on other shapes. For example, the diaphragms 28 may be octagonal, triangular, or irregularly shaped. In fact, diaphragms 28 may be shaped differently across a single microphone chip 18.
Although their diaphragms 28 are shaped differently, both microphone chips 18 have a number of features in common. Among other things, as noted above, both microphone chips 18 have four separate diaphragms 28 and, as such, effectively form four separate microphones. Each diaphragm 28 thus substantially independently vibrates in response to an audio signal. To that end, each diaphragm 28 is supported above/relative to the chip base 27 by means of an independent suspension system. As also shown in
More specifically, in this embodiment, each microphone chip 18 has a space layer 30 formed on selected portions of a top surface of the backplate 26. Among other things, the space layer 30 may be formed from a deposited or grown oxide. A polysilicon layer deposited on the top surface of the space layer 30 forms the diaphragms 28 and their suspension systems. In particular, as best as shown in
Accordingly, in illustrative embodiments, each diaphragm 28 has an annular space 36 around it that is interrupted by the springs 34. As known by those skilled in the art, the size of this annular space 36 has an impact on the frequency response of each microphone. Those in the art therefore should carefully select the size of this annular space 36 to ensure that each microphone effectively can process the desired range of frequencies. For example, this annular space 36 can be sized to ensure that the microphones can detect audible signals having frequencies of between 30 Hz and 20 kHz. In illustrative embodiments, the annular spaces 36 of all microphones on a single microphone chip 18 are substantially the same. Alternatively, the size of the annular space 36 of each microphone on a single microphone chip 18 can vary to detect different frequency bands.
Discussion of the specific number of springs 34, as well as the exact placement of those springs 34, is not intended to limit all embodiments of the invention. For example, rather than serpentine springs 34, some embodiments can have springs 34 that extend entirely from the edges of the diaphragms 28 to the circumferentially-located support structure 32, eliminating the annular space 36. Such a spring 34 may give the diaphragm 28 and circumferentially-located support structure 32 the appearance of a drum.
In a manner similar to other MEMS microphones, each microphone chip 18 has a backside cavity 38. As shown in
Having multiple backside cavities (rather than a single cavity 38) provides at least one benefit; namely, the extra, retained material of the SOI wafer provides additional support to the backplate 26. By doing so, the backplate 26 should retain its intended stiffness.
It nevertheless may be beneficial for all microphones to share the backside cavities. To that end, some embodiments fluidly communicate the cavities by etching one or more channels 46 through the cavity walls—see the channels 46 in phantom in
Other embodiments completely eliminate all of the separate backside cavities. In such case, the stiffening rib 48 is eliminated so that all microphones on a single microphone chip 18 completely share a single backside cavity 38. Such embodiments should provide a minimal airflow resistance, thus facilitating diaphragm movement.
Viewed another way, this embodiment has a circumferentially-located support structure 32 that surrounds the outside of all four diaphragms 28 and, if the diaphragms 28 and springs 34 were not present, would form an open region having only the single anchor 50. This is in contrast, for example, to the microphone chip 18 of
Compared to MEMS microphones having single diaphragms 28 of like materials with a corresponding area, these smaller diaphragms 28 are less likely to bow or otherwise droop at their centers. As noted above, bowing or drooping can have an adverse impact on microphone sensitivity and signal to noise ratio. Bowing or drooping also can contribute to stiction problems. Also, compared to their larger counterparts, smaller diaphragms 28 are more likely to uniformly deflect (e.g., mitigate plate bending issues).
For the same reasons, plural smaller diaphragms 28 may be formed to have a lower profile than their larger counterparts because of their reduced lengthwise and widthwise dimensions (i.e., they are less likely to bow). Despite their lower profiles, which is preferred in various micromachined technologies, such diaphragms 28 are expected to have sensitivities that are comparable to, or better than, microphones having a single diaphragm 28 with substantially the same surface area (as suggested above).
Moreover, it is anticipated that multiple microphones on a single die sharing support structure 32 will have a synergistic effect on microphone sensitivity. For example, four such microphones should have better sensitivity than four like microphones on different chips. This is so because each of the separate microphones have local support structure that degrades performance. Accordingly, four separate microphones have four times such degradation. This is in contrast to illustrative embodiments, in which parasitic capacitances and other degrading factors of a single microphone chip are at least partially shared among the four microphones, thus reducing the impact of the degradation and improving overall sensitivity.
Although the above discussion discloses various exemplary embodiments of the invention, it should be apparent that those skilled in the art can make various modifications that will achieve some of the advantages of the invention without departing from the true scope of the invention.
This patent application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/466,669, filed Aug. 23, 2006, entitled, “MULTI-MICROPHONE SYSTEM,” and naming Jason Weigold and Kieran Harney as inventors, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein, in its entirety, by reference. This patent application also claims priority from provisional U.S. patent application No. 60/710,624, filed Aug. 23, 2005 entitled, “MULTI-MICROPHONE SYSTEM,” and naming Jason Weigold and Kieran Harney as inventors, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein, in its entirety, by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2179361 | Von Braunmuhl | Nov 1939 | A |
3980838 | Yakushiji | Sep 1976 | A |
4420790 | Golke | Dec 1983 | A |
4429190 | Stockbridge | Jan 1984 | A |
4653606 | Flanagan | Mar 1987 | A |
4751419 | Takahata | Jun 1988 | A |
4825335 | Wilner | Apr 1989 | A |
5146435 | Bernstein | Sep 1992 | A |
5335282 | Cardas | Aug 1994 | A |
5388163 | Elko | Feb 1995 | A |
5956292 | Bernstein | Sep 1999 | A |
6947568 | Tanabe | Sep 2005 | B2 |
20030133588 | Pedersen | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030210799 | Gabriel | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20080212807 | Wang | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130236037 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60710624 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11466669 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 13871177 | US |