1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to AC corona ionizers for both positive and negative static charges neutralization. More particularly, this invention is relates to AC corona ionizers with a relatively low byproduct emission, such as, ozone, nitrogen oxides and the like, and that achieves a low rate of ion emitter contamination.
2. Background Art
AC corona ionizers are commonly used for static charge neutralization of charged objects. It is known in the art that AC corona ionizers include the features of, for example, a relatively simple design, high reliability, and low cost. These features are particularly true for AC ionizers using a single ion emitter configured as a line thin wire(s) or line of pointed electrodes. However, these ionizers are prone to a relatively high ozone emission and higher rate of electrode contamination by collecting debris from the surrounding air. Electrode contamination decreases the ionization efficiency and may affect ion balance.
Accordingly, a need exists for a solution for static charge neutralization that has a relatively low rate of emitter contamination, a relatively low ozone emission, and/or a combination of the foregoing.
An embodiment of the invention provides an air/gas ionizing apparatus and method that produce both positive and negative ions for reducing electrostatic charges on various objects. Embodiments of the invention may achieve one or more of the following possible advantages:
(1) Providing a sufficient level of plus and minus ion currents while limiting the ozone and other corona byproducts emission(s);
(2) Reducing the buildup of particles on the emitter points or wire electrodes and minimizing the contamination associated with corona discharge particle emission from the ionizing bar;
(3) Automatically maintaining a reasonably close to zero ions stream balance; and/or
(4) Providing a design of a low cost power supply and low maintenance ions generating system.
In one particular embodiment of the invention, the high voltage applied to the points or the wire electrode is designed to be of very low power and high ionization efficiency. This is accomplished by using very strong, micro-second wide pulses at a very low rate. A flyback type generator produces such waves naturally in a resonant circuit. Each wave includes at least three voltage peaks: a beginning low amplitude peak, a second high amplitude peak of opposite polarity, and a final low amplitude peak (wave). Typically, only the high level wave is used for ionization. The first wave and third wave can be reduced greatly in amplitude by a proper damping, as explained later. The use of such low power reduces ozone generation, corona byproduct production, collection and shedding of particles, and wear of the emitters.
In yet another particular embodiment of the invention, an ionization method includes providing a pulse duration that is relatively short such that an applied power is enough (or sufficient) for a corona discharge to generate positive and negative ions but not enough (not sufficient) to generate ozone and nitrogen oxides, erode emitter, and/or attract particles from ambient air
In yet another particular embodiment of the invention, an ionization method may optionally include providing a simultaneous application of voltage to a linear wire or group of linear emitters in order to reduce the usual ion density variation effect between points, and allow an even ion balance distribution along the length of the ion emitter structure. In another embodiment of the invention, this optional method may be omitted.
In another embodiment, a method for generating ions within a space separating an emitter and a reference electrode, the method comprising: generating a variable number of small sharp pulses and rate of the pulses depending on the distance of the target from the emitter.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, an apparatus and a method for generating ions within a space separating an emitter and a reference electrode, includes: providing at least one pulse train to the emitter, the pulse train pair including a positive pulse train and a negative pulse train the alternate in sequence, the positive pulse train including a first plurality of ionizing positive voltage pulses during a positive phase and a second plurality of ionizing positive voltage pulses during an ionization frequency phase which occur after the positive phase, and the negative pulse train including a first plurality of ionizing negative voltage pulses during the ionization frequency phases a second plurality of ionizing negative voltage pulses during a negative phase which occur after the ionization frequency phase; wherein each of the first plurality of ionizing positive voltage pulses has a greater magnitude than a magnitude of each of the second plurality of ionizing positive voltage pulses; and wherein each of the first plurality of ionizing negative voltage waveform has a greater magnitude than a magnitude of each of the second plurality of ionizing negative voltage pulses.
a shows schematic diagram of one analog/logic base embodiment of present invention for an ionizing bar with one wire type emitter electrode.
b shows waveform diagrams into various inputs of various components in
a and 4b are block diagram of a microprocessor based embodiment of present invention.
a, 5b and 5c shows multi-Pulses in three differed modes to optimize high voltage waveform (pulse trains) for different charge neutralization conditions, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
d is a flow diagram of a method performed by a software executed by the controller of
e is a table that shows multi-pulse settable parameters and corresponding definitions and exemplary parameter range values, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
f, 5g, and 5h shows multi-pulses in three differed modes based on settings different from
In the following detailed description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the various embodiments of the present invention. Those of ordinary skill in the art will realize that these various embodiments of the present invention are illustrative only and are not intended to be limiting in any way. Other embodiments of the present invention will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons having benefit of the herein disclosure.
An embodiment of the present invention can apply to many types of air-gas ionizers configured as ionizing bars, blowers, or in-line ionization devices.
Pulse mode ionizers are known in the art. For example, patent application publications JP2008124035, US 20060151465, and US 20090116828 describe AC ionizing bars. U.S. Pat. No. 8,009,405 discloses a design of ionizing blowers with high voltage power supplies generating periodically burst of positive and negative pulses.
These power supplies include plus and minus DC high voltage sources and a summing block connected to an ion emitting structure. Low frequency pulses (in the range of approximately 0.1 Hz to 100 Hz) are generated by independently switching on and off each of high voltage source. However, these AC pulse ionization systems are complicated, have low efficiency, and are prone to accumulate particles on the ion emitting structures.
One of the main features of an embodiment of the present invention is the use of groups of predominately asymmetric (in magnitude of positive or negative voltages) short duration bipolar ionizing pulses. A train (i.e., pulse group) of positive and negative pulses is applied to a linear emitter or group of emitters.
The short duration pulses (in the asymmetric waveform) create a high voltage gradient, which reduces ion recombination at the emitter, which in turn increases the emitter ionization efficiency, thus allowing the use of a relatively or extremely low power consumption method to generate high concentration plus and minus ions.
In an embodiment of the invention, positive and negative ion clouds are periodically generated by trains of pulses having variable pulse number, for each pulse duration, train pulse duration and voltage amplitude. The number of voltage waveforms can be generated by a small high voltage transformer with primary winding controlled by low voltage pulse generator and secondary winding forming a resonance circuit including an ion emitter and reference electrode of the bar.
As shown in
The positive pulse train 105a includes the following: a plurality of ionizing positive voltage pulses 106 having a period of Tupulse_rep and a pulse width of Tp during a time period 115 (positive phase 115), a plurality of ionizing positive voltage pulses 107 having a period of Tupulse_rep and a pulse width of To (where To<Tp) during a time period 120 (ionization frequency phase 120) which occurs after the positive phase 115, and a zero value during a time period 125 (negative phase 125) which occurs after the ionization frequency phase 120.
The negative pulse train 105b includes the following: a zero value during a time period 115 (positive phase 115), a plurality of ionizing negative voltage pulses 108 having a period of Tupulse_rep and a pulse width of To (where To Tp) during the ionization frequency phase 120 and were the pulses 107 and 108 are offset from each other and are not generated concurrently, a plurality of ionizing negative voltage pulses 109 having a period of Tupulse_rep and a pulse width of Tn during the time period 125 (negative phase 125), where Tp and Tn may or may not be equal in time magnitude.
These ionizing positive and negative voltage pulses alternately create voltage gradients across the emitter and a reference electrode of the ionizer and generate by corona discharge an ion cloud that include positive and negative ions. As discussed further below, the positive and negative ionizing voltage pulses 107 and 108 during the ionization frequency phase 120 results in an effective emitter signal 110 having small magnitude alternating pulses 130.
As shown for time period 115, waveform 110 includes a high positive voltage wave with amplitude higher than positive corona threshold for a given ion emitting structure. At that period of time, the ion emitter generates positive ions in a gap between the ion emitter and non-ionizing (or reference) electrode. This gap between the ion emitter and non-ionizing electrode is shown, for example, in
During the time period 125 is a negative voltage with amplitude significantly lower than that required for a corona discharge. This voltage creates electrostatic field which slows down movement of positive ions and decreases ion losses to the reference electrode. The amplitude of the negative voltages may be adjusted by damping feature in the HVPS (High Voltage Power Supply) circuitry.
A positive ionizing pulse is followed by a high amplitude negative pulse (also shown in
The effective emitter signal 110 includes the ionization pulses 142 and 144, where the pulses 142 and 144 may be followed by smaller negative and positive oscillations 146. The negative and positive oscillations 146 are due to circuit resonance of a power supply used to generate the signal 110 and are not intended to limit the present invention in any way. The oscillations 146 may be substantially reduced or completely eliminated by, for example, used of a damping circuit as disclosed in, for example, to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/023,387.
The non-ionizing pulses 148 and 150 has a polarity (negative) that is opposite of the polarity (positive) of the ionizing pulses 142 and 144.
A solution for static charge neutralization that uses few, short, higher voltage pulses 151, 152, 153, 154, and 155 in the microsecond range has been discovered to provide sufficient ionization with a low generation of ozone and reduced collection of contaminates on the emitter surfaces.
A pulse train is disposed to provide alternating positive and negative voltage waveforms with each pulse including a first non-ionizing voltage level, a second ionizing voltage level, a third non-ionizing voltage level and insignificant further oscillations due to circuit resonance. An analog or logic type switching circuit (see
The use of flyback generation of high voltage (generated by a flyback-type generator) in a Ferrite core transformer provides a simple, efficient and inexpensive ionizer high voltage power supply which can use a very small transformer (e.g., about 1″×1″×1″) with moderate turn ratio and without the need for a voltage multiplier circuit for the positive and negative ionizing pulses. The use of a Ferrite core with small gap between core halves and proper voltage oscillation damping reduces core magnetic memory effect, allowing the use of multiple series of ionization pulses of one or the other polarity pulses.
As a result, trains (series or group) of ionizing positive and negative pulses provide efficient bipolar ionization for at least one emitter electrode having length in the range approximately 100 mm-2000 mm or more.
The number of pulses of one polarity can be adjusted for the best object neutralization discharge time depending on air flow and distance to a charged target. The concentration of alternating polarities ions is sufficient for ionizing bars for neutralizing moving targets at distances up to approximate 1000 mm or more.
Pulses repetition rate can be adjusted depending upon required ionization power level and velocity of the moving target. This screen shot demonstrates that an effective ratio of high voltage power “On” vs. power “Off” can be about 0.0015 or smaller. That is why according an ionization method disclosed in an embodiment of this invention, the corona discharge typically exists for only a tiny portion of time (less than about 0.1%) necessary for ion generation but less than required for ozone emissions as well as particles attraction to the ion emitters.
Experiments with one wire type ionization system (or ionization cell) showed that the voltage wave form with micro ionizing pulses provides approximately 3 to 5 times reduction of ozone emission at approximately the equal charge neutralization efficiency. For example, an ionizer similar to described in US application publication 2008/0232021, powered by AC high frequency supply generates ozone concentration of approximately 50 parts-per-billion (ppb) or higher, compared with approximately 10 ppb to 15 ppb for same ionizer in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
a shows schematic diagram of one embodiment of an analog/logic base 300 of present invention for an ionizing bar with one wire type emitter electrode 305. Additionally,
The power source 306 may be part of the analog/logic base 300 or may be a separate component that provides power to the components in the base 300. For purposes of clarity in the drawings, the reference node (such as ground) is omitted in
In circuit operation of the analog/logic base 300, a timer chip (U3) 315 provides short pulses for a pulse drive circuit 317 (or power supply 317) formed by a Dual Delay logic chip (U1) 320, Adder logic chip (U2) 325, transistors (Q1) 330 and (Q2) 335, and switching circuit 340. The transistors 330 and 335 may be, for example, MOSFETs. However, the use of MOSFETs (e.g., n-channel MOSFETs or other MOSFET-type transistors) is not intended to limit embodiments of the invention in any way.
The timing of high voltage pulses from the high voltage output transformer 345 depends first upon the clock signal generated by the trapezoid oscillator (U1) 320. Its oscillating frequency determines the alternating switch from positive pulse generation to negative pulse generation, called Frequency of operation. The frequency is determined by the fixed capacitor (C1) 346 and adjustable resistor (R1) 347. A frequency range of approximately 0.2 to 60 Hertz is commonly used, with a low frequency used for targets at a distance and a higher frequency used for targets at close distance.
The output signal from oscillator (U1) 320 is fed to Delay device (U2) 325, which generates opposite phase signals at half the frequency. The output from device (U2) 325 is then fed to AND gate (U4) 340, which is used to flip the possible activation of transistors 330 and 335 (e.g., MOSFET drive transistors (Q1) 330 and (Q2) 335).
The main activating pulse is generated by timer device (U3) 315. Feedback (signal 351) from the output pin 3 (of timer device 315) is fed back to its trigger pin 2 and threshold pin 6. This allows a very short positive pulse to be generated at output pin 3. The pulse width is controlled by the fixed capacitor (C2) 350 and adjustable resistor (R3) 352. The pulse width is generally adjusted to approximately 2 microseconds to 24 microseconds, depending on the design of the flyback output driver 317. The repetition rate of the pulses is determined by the fixed capacitor (C2) 350 and variable resistor (R4) 354. The repetition rate is equal to the inverse of the pulse period. This pulse repetition rate can range from approximately 20 Hertz to 1000 Hertz and thus determines the power output of the high voltage generator and is typically approximately 250 Hertz.
The AND gate (U4) 340 mixes the flip flop signal and the microsecond wide pulses from the chip (U3) 315 and thereby applies activation pulses to the gates of driver transistors (Q1) 330 and (Q2) 335, alternately.
One output phase from the pin 7 (of comparator 356 of the chip (U1) 320) is used to stop the oscillation in chip (U3) 315, thus interrupting the output pulses from Pin 3 of chip (U3) 315. This interruption can be used to provide an Off-time between the positive and negative ionizations. This interruption is sometimes used to decrease ion cloud recombination at large target distance, or simply to reduce the power output. The Off-time or Dead-time is adjusted by the bias applied to pins 10 and 13 (of comparators 358 and 359, respectively, in chip (U1) 320).
A formation of a micro pulse is achieved by the following operation. As an example, a short positive pulse (in the micro second range) to the gate of MOSFET (Q2) 335 causes current to flow in high voltage transformer 345 primary winding coil (2,3) 360, producing first a small negative voltage pulse across the primary winding coil 360. At the end of the negative voltage pulse, a large positive flyback pulse of voltage is produced, along with small negative and positive oscillations due to circuit resonance.
Alternatively, a short pulse to the gate of MOSFET (41) 330 produces a large negative pulse. These pulse voltages are magnified and phase reversed by transformer 345 secondary winding 362 by use of a large turns ratio which can be in the order of about 50 to 500 to one. Thus MOSFET (Q2) 335 initiates a negative high voltage pulse and MOSFET (Q1) 330 initiates a positive high voltage pulse. These pulses generate positive and negative ions by the same wire or a pointed emitter.
The pulse voltage amplitude for both positive and negative polarities is determined by the following parameters:
The high voltage output pulses from the transformer (T1) 345 have a wave shape set by the inductance of the primary winding 360, and the capacitive load on the secondary and primary damping components of damping circuit 363. The shunt resistor (Rs) 365 and inductor (Ls) 367 placed between the transformer center tap 2 and power input (Vin) prevents a rapid rise-time of current in the transformer 345, thus decreasing the peak value of the first part (part 115 in
Referring again to
It is also noted that the pulse repetition rate may be adjusted depending upon the charge density and speed of the neutralization target. Other details regarding signal transmissions (e.g., current signals or voltage signals) that are known to those skilled in the relevant art(s) is not discussed further for purposes of focusing on embodiments of the present invention. Various standard signal transmissions occurring AC corona ionizers are discussed in additional details in the above-cited references. The wave shapes are fixed by the resistance, capacitance, and inductance (R, C, L, respectively) values of all the components. The pulse heights can be adjusted by changing the pulse duration which is set in
a and 4b are block diagram of a microprocessor based embodiment of present invention. As shown in
As an option that can be omitted in other embodiments of the invention, the microcontroller 400 can also receive signals 410 and 415 from a spark detector 420 and a broken wire detector 425, respectively. In either of the embodiments shown in
a, 5b and 5c shows multi-Pulses in three differed modes to optimize high voltage waveform (pulse trains) for different charge neutralization conditions and
Mode A: As shown in
In Mode A, the pulse amplitude 529, micropulse period 525, and pulse widths 530 and 535 of the positive micropulse 505 and negative micropulse 510, respectively, are adjustable, by the software executed by the microcontroller 400. The positive micropulse amplitude and positive micropulse duration is adjusted by the timer/counter with Load Pulse MP_P value in block 563 (
Mode B: As shown in
Mode A+B: As shown in
The positive micropulse width is adjusted by block 563. The negative micropulse width is adjusted by block 566. The negative ionization pulse width is determined by block 560. The negative pulse repetition rate is determined by block 551.
In all three (3) modes, the user can change the ion balance by: (1) changing the pulse width of the positive or negative or both, and control the amount of ionization in OnTime region (Tpmax and Tnmax) independently of the OffTime region (MP_P, MP—N); and (2) changing the ratio of time between the Positive OnTime region versus the Negative OnTime region. The time between pulses (Treprate) is the same in all regions and is adjustable to control the amount of ionization power. A high power is where Treprate is small, and creates more often ionization pulses, resulting in more ionization. On the other hand, a larger Treprate creates less often ionization pulses, resulting in less ionization.
Therefore, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method of ionization and associated schematic (apparatus). This embodiment generates very short bipolar micro pulses and creates efficient bipolar air (or other gases) ionization with regular emitters at normal atmospheric pressure.
In an embodiment shown in
Another embodiment of the present invention related primarily to ionizing bars design.
The design of high a voltage section uses the same driver circuit for the MOSFETS (as previously discussed), but with the MOSFET transistor Drains (M1 and M2) connected to a pair of high voltage transformers T1 and T2 with opposing connections to the primaries.
Control Resistor R1 and damping capacitor C2 (in
In
The ion emitters connected to the transformers T1 and T2 have exactly opposite polarity voltage ionizing pulses. The voltage waveform 602 for this dual phase ionization system is shown in and simplified bar cross-section 605 with emitter (1) E1 and emitter (2) E2 is shown in
This embodiment in
This feature is important also in cases when ionizing bar should be positioned in close proximity to the charged object. For a distance between ionizing bar and object duration of, for example, positive pulse train (pulse duration, amplitude or pulse frequency and so on), the distance may be longer than for negative pulse train in one cycle for one emitter; and to be opposite polarity situation in the next one cycle. That will crate ion cloud “pushing” effect and accelerate their movement to the target.
Dual phase ionization system has another advantage that it not has bulky reference electrode at all and avoids ion losses on these electrodes.
Moreover, the opposite phase voltage source significantly (almost twice) may decrease the required voltage amplitude at each emitter for producing corona discharge. Therefore, these transformers may be identical in design, or may have a lower primary to secondary turns ratio. A lower turns ratio may be used since the emitters, being close to each other, tend to increase the electric field between the emitter pair.
The difference between embodiments shown
Ion Balance Control:
In one embodiment, the ionizer may have self balance system in several different variants (shown in
The linear ionizer also may have active ion balance system using external ion balance sensor(s) positioned in close proximity to the charged target. In this case microprocessor based control system and HVPS of the bar may generate primarily ionizing micro pulses and ions of one polarity opposite to the charge of the target.
A general view of linear ionizing bar with wire type emitter shown in
The air orifices 804 supply air flow to help generated by emitter ions move to the target. Therefore, ions are moving to the charged target by combination of electrical field and aerodynamic forces. The result is short discharge time (in the range of seconds) to neutralize charge of the object.
While the present invention has been described in particular embodiments, it should be appreciated that the present invention should not be construed as limited by such embodiments. Rather, the present invention should be construed according to the claims below.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/210,267, filed 15 Aug. 2011 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,605,407, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/049,350, filed 16 Mar. 2008 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,009,405, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/918,512, filed 17 Mar. 2007. This application also claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/584,173, filed 6 Jan. 2012. This Application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/023,397, filed 8 Feb. 2011. Applications Ser. Nos. 13/210,267, 12/049,350, 60/918,512, 61/584,173, and 13/023,397 are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3875035 | Lowther | Apr 1975 | A |
| 4138233 | Masuda | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4417293 | Larigaldie | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4442356 | Ludwick et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4689715 | Halleck et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4781736 | Cheney et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4878149 | Stiehl et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4901194 | Steinman et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 5005101 | Gallagher et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5047892 | Sakata et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5055963 | Partridge | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5095400 | Saito | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5116583 | Batchelder et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5249094 | Hayakawa et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5388769 | Rodrigo et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5447763 | Gehlke | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5535089 | Ford et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5550703 | Beyer et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5630949 | Lakin | May 1997 | A |
| 5847917 | Suzuki | Dec 1998 | A |
| 6145391 | Pui et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6330146 | Blitshteyn et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6504700 | Hahne et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6636411 | Noll | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6653638 | Fujii | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6671161 | Nilsson | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6693788 | Partridge | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6807044 | Vernitsky et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6826030 | Gorczyca et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6850403 | Gefter et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 7031133 | Riebel et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7057130 | Gefter et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7126092 | Lin et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7177133 | Riskin | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7180722 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7339778 | Gefter et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7375944 | Izaki et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7479615 | Gefter et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7649728 | Fujita et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7679026 | Gefter et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7751695 | Decker | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7821762 | Yasuoka et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7822355 | Schlitz | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 8009405 | Gefter et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8038775 | Gefter | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8048200 | Gefter et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8063336 | Gefter et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8174814 | Yasuoka et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 20020125423 | Ebeling et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030007307 | Lee et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030011957 | Nilsson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20040130271 | Sekoguchi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20050052815 | Fujiwara et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050083633 | Riebel et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050225922 | Gefter et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050236375 | Gefter et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060018811 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060021508 | Kwon et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060071599 | Curtis et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060232908 | Izumi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070279829 | Gefter et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080151465 | Fujita et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080199208 | Schlitz | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080225460 | Gefter et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080232021 | Gefter et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090316325 | Gefter | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20110299214 | Gefter et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120200982 | Partridge | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120224293 | Partridge et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 386 318 | Sep 1990 | EP |
| 0386318 | Sep 1990 | EP |
| 0386318 | Jul 1994 | EP |
| 1142455 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1 547 693 | Jun 2005 | EP |
| 1 547 693 | May 2012 | EP |
| S63-143954 | Jun 1988 | JP |
| 2005-328904 | Mar 1989 | JP |
| H03-230499 | Mar 1989 | JP |
| H0435958 (Y2) | Aug 1992 | JP |
| 5047490 | Feb 1993 | JP |
| H06-275366 | Sep 1994 | JP |
| 7249497 | Sep 1995 | JP |
| 2520311 (B2) | Jul 1996 | JP |
| 10055896 | Feb 1998 | JP |
| H10-156213 | Jun 1998 | JP |
| 11273893 | Sep 1999 | JP |
| 2000-058290 | Feb 2000 | JP |
| 2000-133413 | May 2000 | JP |
| 2001-085189 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 2002-025748 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2002216994 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 3401702 | Apr 2003 | JP |
| 3536560 (B2) | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2005-216539 | Aug 2005 | JP |
| 2006-12520 | Jan 2006 | JP |
| 2006-196378 | Jul 2006 | JP |
| 2008-124035 | May 2008 | JP |
| 200939893 | Sep 2009 | JP |
| 4465232 | May 2010 | JP |
| 5046390 | Oct 2012 | JP |
| I384905 | Feb 2013 | JP |
| 200939893 | Sep 2009 | TW |
| WO 0038484 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO 03100932 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO 2013103368 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Young, Lee; PCT/US08/03488 International Search Report; ISA/US; Jun. 9, 2009, pp. 1-2, US,. |
| Office Action mailed Jun. 10, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,446. |
| International search report, international preliminary report on patentability, and written opinion mailed Jul. 23, 2008 for PCT application PCT/US2007/065767. |
| Office Action mailed Jan. 28, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,446. |
| Notice Allowance mailed Oct. 28, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/623,316. |
| Office Action mailed Jul. 22, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/623,316. |
| Office Action mailed Oct. 30, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/623,316. |
| Notice of Allowability mailed Dec. 1, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/821,773. |
| Office Action mailed Aug. 11, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/821,773. |
| Office Action mailed Mar. 10, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/821,773. |
| Notice of Allowability mailed Sep. 22, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/136,754. |
| Office Action mailed Apr. 30, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/136,754. |
| Office Action mailed Jun. 1, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/136,754. |
| Office Action mailed Mar. 28, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/136,754. |
| Notice of Allowability mailed Jul. 12, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,446. |
| Interview Summary mailed Mar. 9, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,446. |
| Office Action mailed Dec. 13, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,446. |
| Office Action mailed Mar. 11, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/456,526. |
| Office Action mailed Nov. 21, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,267. |
| Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/049,350. |
| Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/049,350. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for PCT/US05/09093, Jul. 28, 2005. |
| International Search Report for PCT/US05/09093, Jul. 28, 2005. |
| Office Action (Advisory Action) mailed Apr. 11, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,267. |
| Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/023,397. |
| PCT Application PCT/US2012/033278, Notification of Trans . . . , International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, mailed Sep. 14, 2012. |
| PCT/US08/03488 International Search Report; ISA/US; Jun. 9, 2009. |
| Webpages from LIROS website, pages, date unknown, available online at http://www.liroselectronic.com and http://www.liroselectronic.com/documents/NoStatic-2009—eng.pdf. |
| Search Report for Taiwan Invention Patent Application No. 101103565, dated Dec. 16, 2013. |
| Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/456,526. |
| Office Action mailed Jul. 5, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/456,526. |
| Applicant-initiated Interview summary mailed Oct. 5, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/456,526. |
| Advisory Action mailed Oct. 5, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/456,526. |
| Notification of transmittal of the Int'l Search Report and the written opinion of the ISA, & ISR & Written Opinion of ISA (mailed May 7, 2012) for PCT/US2012/024095. |
| Notification of Transmittal of the ISR and the Written Opinion (mailed Feb. 19, 2013) for PCT/US2012/064045. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISR (Feb. 19, 2013) for PCT/US2012/064045. |
| Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISA, and International Search Report for PCT/US2008/03488 (Jun. 9, 2009). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2008/03488 (Jun. 9, 2009). |
| Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2008/03488 (Jun. 9, 2009). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2012/024095 (Jul. 5, 2012). |
| International Search Report for PCT/US2012/024095 (Aug. 16, 2012). |
| Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2012/024095 (Aug. 13, 2013). |
| Written Opinion of the ISA (Sep. 17, 2009), and International Search Report (mailed Sep. 25, 2008) for PCT/US2008/057262. |
| Office Action mailed on Aug. 2, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/210,267. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120224293 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60918512 | Mar 2007 | US | |
| 61584173 | Jan 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12049350 | Mar 2008 | US |
| Child | 13210267 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13210267 | Aug 2011 | US |
| Child | 13367369 | US | |
| Parent | 13023397 | Feb 2011 | US |
| Child | 13367369 | US |