The present invention relates to a compact light source based on accelerator technology with straight sections for the implementation of insertion devices. It will find its application wherever floor space is limited and the wavelength range provided by this facility is of interest. Exemplarily—but not limited to—a compact source for metrology application in the EUV range, in particular optimized for actinic mask inspection using coherent scattering methods, is presented here. A compact light source is for example proposed in the International Patent Application PCT/EP2016/069809.
A drawback of compact sources with small footprints is the limited space available for the integration of undulators or wigglers. Such a small compact source has usually a racetrack shape with two long straight sections where one is used for the implementation of an insertion device and the other one for the injection system, the accelerating cavities, beam manipulating devices as a higher harmonic cavity and large size beam diagnostics.
It is the objective of the present invention to provide a compact and cost effective light source with a small foot print based on a storage ring that can host more than one (in the present case three (but not limited to) insertion devices.
This objective is achieved according to the present invention by a spiral compact light source, where a plurality of storage rings (but not limited to) are connected in a spiral configuration that provides a corresponding number of plane straight sections for the implementation of insertion devices.
In detail, the spiral compact light source (SCL) according to the present invention based on accelerator technology with multiple straight sections for the implementation of insertion devices providing exemplarily (but not limited to) light having the characteristics for actinic mask inspection, such as at 13.5 nm, comprises the following features, wherein:
a) the required floor space is not larger than for a conventional compact source with only one undulator;
b) a plurality, i.e. three (but not limited to), of storage rings are combined in a spiral loop form;
c) the spiral loops are connected by rotation of the quarter arcs without the need of vertical transfer sections;
d) the return path from the uppest loop to the lowest loop is displaced by introducing a matching section in the arc symmetry points of lowest loop and uppest loop in order to not interfere with the storage ring structure;
e) major accelerator systems, as injection, RF-accelleration, electron beam manipulating devices and large size diagnostics are only required once, as compared to a planar arrangement of three storage rings;
f) the average current limiting ion trapping effects are strongly alleviated since for the same duty cycle as for a single facility the gap in the ring filling, which is defining the ion clearing efficiency, is three times larger, or
g) alternatively for the same gap as for a single loop facility the number of bunches and consequently the average electron beam intensity can be increased; in consequence, i.e. for three storage rings, the overall central cone radiation power is not only tripled by three undulators but increased by a factor of 5;
h) for the top-up injection from the booster ring into the storage ring two anti-symmetrically arranged Lambertson septa are used.
A compact multi-bend magnet structure is used for the storage ring to generate a small emittance leading to high brilliance and a large coherent content of the light.
A booster is located on a level below the spiral storage ring and receives the electron beam from a linear accelerator placed in the central area of the booster.
The booster is continuously feeding the storage ring by top-up injection and keeping in this way the intensity of the electron beam stable down to a level of 10−3. Top-up injection is not only mandatory to reach the required intensity stability but also to combat lifetime reductions due to Touschek scattering and elastic beam gas scattering. Both, the low energy of the electron beam and the small vertical aperture gap of the undulator strongly enhance these effects.
These measures result in a sufficiently compact source that fits into conventional laboratories or their maintenance areas and is designed to have a footprint being about 50 m2.
In addition to space saving, there are numerous other advantages as compared to an installation of 3 separated compact sources. Major systems are only required once, as injection, RF-acceleration, beam manipulating devices and sophisticated diagnostics.
For a single compact source the major beam and source parameters are collected in table 1. One crucial performance limiting parameter is the beam current. Higher single bunch currents are exposed to instabilities and consequently there exists an upper limit for the storable bunch current. The average current, which is defining the central cone power, is then limited by the number of bunches which can be accumulated in the storage ring since for the clearing of trapped ions a gap has to be introduced in the bunch train. It has been demonstrated in [3] that essentially the length of this gap defines the clearing efficiency. For a compact source with small circumference this gap can extend over half of the circumference.
In this respect the spiral compact source has a clear advantage. For the same gap length the average current is increased and consequently the central cone power enhanced. For the same clearing efficiency as for a single source, assuming a gap length of half of the circumference, 250 mA average current can be stored instead of 150 mA. In consequence, the gain in overall light beam power for a 3-spiral compact source is not only a factor 3 but even a factor of 5. Other embodiments having just 2 or even 4 or more loops of storage rings are also possible providing a respective beam power due to the number of undulators corresponding the number of loops in the spiral structure.
+)Intra-Beam-Scattering blow up include
Preferred embodiments of the present invention are hereinafter described with reference to the attached drawings which depict in:
The basic elements of the spiral source are three identical storage rings positioned on top of each other, which are connected in a spiral form as shown in
The design of the booster synchroton follows the racetrack shape of the spiral storage ring and is positioned below the lowest loop of the spiral storage ring. The injection in the storage ring is performed vertically on the slope between SR-1 and SR-2. The beam coming from the booster enters a Lambertson septum (LS) with horizontal displacement and angle and points after the vertical deflection of the LS to the downstream located pulsed nonlinear multipole kicker (NK) where it gets captured in the acceptance of the storage ring.
For top-up injection from the booster ring into the storage ring two antisymmetrically arranged Lambertson septa are used. For the injection into the storage ring, a pulsed multipole system is used which leaves the stored beam unaffected during the injection process.
The linear accelerator fits fully within the structure of the storage ring. This measure also contributes to the demand of reducing the footprint of the source.
Accelerating RF-cavities, beam manipulating devices and large scale diagnostics will be positioned in the second straight section connecting SR-2 with SR-3.
Further preferred embodiments of the present invention are listed in the depending claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
16194829 | Oct 2016 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/070696 | 8/16/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/072913 | 4/26/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5353291 | Sprangle | Oct 1994 | A |
7329886 | Siner et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7382861 | Madey | Jun 2008 | B2 |
10201066 | Ekinci et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
20030202546 | Hartemann | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20140048707 | Liu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140098919 | Kumakhov | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20160270200 | Hosler et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3219376 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2017036840 | Mar 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Craddock M.K.—Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: “The TRIUMF Kaon Factory”, Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference. San Francisco, May 6-9, 1991 Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference, New York. |
Rank J. et al: “The Extraction Lambertson Septum Magnet of the SNS”, Particle Accelerator Conference, 2005. PAC 2005. Proceedings of the, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE /Knoxville Tennesee. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190254155 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |