Patent Grant
11483665
The present invention is related to systems, devices and methods for communication.
People like to communicate with others. Hearing and speaking are forms of communication that many people use and enjoy. Many devices have been proposed that improve communication including the telephone and hearing aids.
Hearing impaired subjects need hearing aids to verbally communicate with those around them. Open canal hearing aids have proven to be successful in the marketplace because of increased comfort. Another reason why they are popular is reduced occlusion, which is a tunnel-like hearing effect that is problematic to most hearing aid users. Another common complaint is feedback and whistling from the hearing aid. Increasingly, hearing impaired subjects also make use of audio entertainment and communication devices. Often the use of these devices interferes with the use of hearing aids and more often are cumbersome to use together. Another problem is use of entertainment and communication systems in noisy environments, which requires active noise cancellation. There is a need to integrate open canal hearing aids with audio entertainment and communication systems and still allow their use in noisy places. For improving comfort, it is desirable to use these modalities in an open ear canal configuration.
Several approaches to improved hearing, improve feedback suppression and noise cancellation. Although sometimes effective, current methods and devices for feedback suppression and noise cancellation may not be effective in at least some instances. For example, when an acoustic hearing aid with a speaker positioned in the ear canal is used to amplify sound, placement of a microphone in the ear canal can result in feedback when the ear canal is open, even when feedback and noise cancellation are used.
One promising approach to improving hearing with an ear canal microphone has been to use a direct-drive transducer coupled to middle-ear transducer, rather than an acoustic transducer, such that feedback is significantly reduced and often limited to a narrow range of frequencies. The EARLENS™ transducer as described by Perkins et al (U.S. Pat. No. 5,259,032; US20060023908; US20070100197) and many other transducers that directly couple to the middle ear such as described by Puria et al (U.S. Pat. No. 6,629,922) may have significant advantages due to reduced feedback that is limited in a narrow frequency range. The EARLENS™ system may use an electromagnetic coil placed inside the ear canal to drive the middle ear, for example with the EARLENS™ transducer magnet positioned on the eardrum. A microphone can be placed inside the ear canal integrated in a wide-bandwidth system to provide pinna-diffraction cues. The pinna diffraction cues allow the user to localize sound and thus hear better in multi-talker situations, when combined with the wide-bandwidth system. Although effective in reducing feedback, these systems may result in feedback in at least some instances, for example with an open ear canal that transmits sound to a canal microphone with high gain for the hearing impaired.
Although at least some implantable hearing aid systems may result in decreased feedback, surgical implantation can be complex, expensive and may potentially subject the user to possible risk of surgical complications and pain such that surgical implantation is not a viable option for many users.
In at least some instances known hearing aides may not be fully integrated with telecommunications systems and audio system, such that the user may use more devices than would be ideal. Also, current combinations of devices may be less than ideal, such that the user may not receive the full benefit of hearing with multiple devices. For example, known hands free wireless BLUETOOTH′ devices, such as the JAWBONE™, may not work well with hearing aid devices as the hands free device is often placed over the ear. Also, such devices may not have sounds configured for optimal hearing by the user as with hearing aid devices. Similarly, a user of a hearing aid device, may have difficulty using direct audio from device such as a headphone jack for listening to a movie on a flight, an iPod or the like. In many instances, the result is that the combination of known hearing devices with communication and audio systems can be less than ideal.
The known telecommunication and audio systems may have at least some shortcomings, even when used alone, that may make at least some of these systems less than ideal, in at least some instances. For example, many known noise cancellation systems use headphones that can be bulky, in at least some instances. Further, at least some of the known wireless headsets for telecommunications can be some what obtrusive and visible, such that it would be helpful if the visibility and size could be minimized.
In light of the above, it would be desirable to provide an improved system for communication that overcomes at least some of the above shortcomings. It would be particularly desirable if such a communication system could be used without surgery to provide: high frequency localization cues, open ear canal hearing with minimal feedback, hearing aid functionality with amplified sensation level, a wide bandwidth sound with frequencies from about 0.1 to 10 kHz, noise cancellation, reduced feedback, communication with a mobile device or audio entertainment system.
The following U.S. patents and publications may be relevant to the present application: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,117,461; 5,259,032; 5,402,496; 5,425,104; 5,740,258; 5,940,519; 6,068,589; 6,222,927; 6,629,922; 6,445,799; 6,668,062; 6,801,629; 6,888,949; 6,978,159; 7,043,037; 7,203,331; 2002/20172350; 2006/0023908; 2006/0251278; 2007/0100197; Carlile and Schonstein (2006) “Frequency bandwidth and multi-talker environments,” Audio Engineering Society Convention, Paris, France 118:353-63; Killion, M. C. and Christensen, L. (1998) “The case of the missing dots: AI and SNR loss,” Hear Jour 51(5):32-47; Moore and Tan (2003) “Perceived naturalness of spectrally distorted speech and music,” J Acoust Soc Am 114(1):408-19; Puria (2003) “Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions,” J Acoust Soc Am 113(5):2773-89.
Embodiments of the present invention provide improved systems, devices and methods for communication. Although specific reference is made to communication with a hearing aid, the systems methods and devices, as described herein, can be used in many applications where sound is used for communication. At least some of the embodiments can provide, without surgery, at least one of: hearing aid functionality, an open ear canal; an ear canal microphone; wide bandwidth, for example with frequencies from about 0.1 to about 10 kHz; noise cancellation; reduced feedback, communication with at least one of a mobile device; or communication with an audio entertainment system. The ear canal microphone can be configured for placement to detect high frequency sound localization cues, for example within the ear canal or outside the ear canal within about 5 mm of the ear canal opening so as to detect high frequency sound comprising localization cues from the pinna of the ear. The high frequency sound detected with the ear canal microphone may comprise sound frequencies above resonance frequencies of the ear canal, for example resonance frequencies from about 2 to about 3 kHz. An external microphone can be positioned away from the ear canal to detect low frequency sound at or below the resonance frequencies of the ear canal, such that feedback can be substantially reduced, even minimized or avoided. The canal microphone and the external microphone can be coupled to at least one output transducer, such that the user perceives sound from the external microphone and the canal microphone with high frequency localization cues and decreased feedback. Wireless circuitry can be configured to connect to many devices with a wireless protocol, such that the user can receive and transmit audio signals. A bone conduction sensor can detect near-end speech of the user for transmission with the wireless circuitry, for example in a noisy environment with a piezo electric positioner configured for placement in the ear canal. Noise cancellation of background sounds near the user can improve the user's hearing of desired sounds, for example noised cancellation of background sounds detected with the external microphone.
In a first aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a communication device for use with an ear of a user. A first input transducer is configured for placement at least one of inside an ear canal or near an opening of the ear canal. A second input transducer is configured for placement outside the ear canal. At least one transducer configured for placement inside the ear canal of the user. The at least one output transducer is coupled to the first microphone and the second microphone to transmit sound from the first microphone and the second microphone to the user.
In many embodiments, the first input transducer comprises at least one of a first microphone configured to detect sound from air or a first acoustic sensor configured to detect vibration from tissue. The second input transducer comprises at least one of a second microphone configured to detect sound from air or a second acoustic sensor configured to detect vibration from tissue. The first input transducer may comprise a microphone configured to detect high frequency localization cues and wherein the at least one output transducer is acoustically coupled to first input transducer when the transducer is positioned in the ear canal. The second input transducer can be positioned away from the ear canal opening to minimize feedback when the first input transducer detects the high frequency localization cues.
In many embodiments, the first input transducer is configured to detect high frequency sound comprising spatial localization cues when placed inside the ear canal or near the ear canal opening and transmit the high frequency localization cues to the user. The high frequency localization cues may comprise frequencies above about 4 kHz. The first input transducer can be coupled to the at least one output transducer to transmit high frequencies above at least about 4 kHz to the user with a first gain and to transmit low frequencies below about 3 kHz with a second gain. The first gain can be greater than the second gain so as to minimize feedback from the transducer to the first input transducer. The first input transducer can be configured to detect at least one of a sound diffraction cue from a pinna of the ear of the user or a head shadow cue from a head of the user when the first input transducer is positioned at least one of inside the ear canal or near the opening of the ear canal.
In many embodiments, the first input transducer is coupled to the at least one output transducer to vibrate an eardrum of the ear in response to high frequency sound localization cues above a resonance frequency of the ear canal. The second input transducer is coupled to the at least one output transducer to vibrate the eardrum in response sound frequencies at or below the resonance frequency of the ear canal. The resonance frequency of the ear canal may comprise frequencies within a range from about 2 to 3 kHz.
In many embodiments, the first input transducer is coupled to the at least one output transducer to vibrate the eardrum with a resonance gain for first sound frequencies corresponding to the resonance frequencies of the ear canal and a cue gain for sound localization cue comprising frequencies above the resonance frequencies of the ear canal, and wherein the cue gain is greater than the resonance gain to minimize feedback.
In many embodiments, the first input transducer is coupled to the at least one output transducer to vibrate the eardrum with a first gain for first sound frequencies corresponding to the resonance frequencies of the ear canal. The second input transducer is coupled to the at least one output transducer to vibrate the eardrum with a second gain for the sound frequencies corresponding to the resonance frequencies of the ear canal, and the first gain is less than the second gain to minimize feedback.
In many embodiments, the second input transducer is configured to detect low frequency sound without high frequency localization cues from a pinna of the ear when placed outside the car canal to minimize feedback from the transducer. The low frequency sound may comprise frequencies below about 3 kHz.
In many embodiments, the device comprises circuitry coupled to the first input transducer, the second input transducer and the at least one output transducer, and the circuitry is coupled to the first input transducer and the at least one output transducer to transmit high frequency sound comprising frequencies above about 4 kHz from the first input transducer to the user. The circuitry can be coupled to the second input transducer and the at least one output transducer to transmit low frequency sound comprising frequencies below about 4 kHz from the second input transducer to the user. The circuitry may comprise at least one of a sound processor or an amplifier coupled to the first input transducer, the second input transducer and the at least one output transducer to transmit high frequencies from the first input transducer and low frequencies from the second input transducer to the user so as to minimize feedback.
In many embodiments, the at least one output transducer comprises a first transducer and a second transducer, in which the first transducer is coupled to the first input transducer to transmit high frequency sound and the second transducer coupled to the second input transducer to transmit low frequency sound.
In many embodiments, the first input transducer is coupled to the at least one output transducer to transmit first frequencies to the user with a first gain and the second input transducer is coupled to the at least one output transducer to transmit second frequencies to the user with a second gain.
In many embodiments, the at least one output transducer comprises at least one of an acoustic speaker configured for placement inside the ear canal, a magnet supported with a support configured for placement on an eardrum of the user, an optical transducer supported with a support configured for placement on the eardrum of the user, a magnet configured for placement in a middle ear of the user, and an optical transducer configured for placement in the middle ear of the user. The at least one output transducer may comprise the magnet supported with the support configured for placement on an eardrum of the user, and the at least one output transducer may further comprises at least one coil configured for placement in the ear canal to couple to the magnet to transmit sound to the user. The at least one coil may comprises a first coil and a second coil, in which the first coil is coupled to the first input transducer and configured to transmit first frequencies from the first input transducer to the magnet, and in which the second coil is coupled to the second input transducer and configured to transmit second frequencies from the second input transducer to the magnet. The at least one output transducer may comprise the optical transducer supported with the support configured for placement on the eardrum of the user, and the optical transducer may further comprise a photodetector coupled to at least one of a coil or a piezo electric transducer supported with the support and configured to vibrate the eardrum.
In many embodiments, the first input transducer is configured to generate a first audio signal and the second input transducer is configured to generate a second audio signal and wherein the at least one output transducer is configured to vibrate with a first gain in response to the first audio signal and a second gain in response to the second audio signal to minimize feedback.
In many embodiments, the device further comprises wireless communication circuitry configured to transmit near-end speech from the user to a far-end person when the user speaks. The wireless communication circuitry can be configured to transmit the near-end sound from at least one of the first input transducer or the second input transducer. The wireless communication circuitry can be configured to transmit the near-end sound from the second input transducer. A third input transducer can be coupled to the wireless communication circuitry, in which the third input transducer configured to couple to tissue of the patient and transmit near-end speech from the user to the far end person in response to bone conduction vibration when the user speaks.
In many embodiments, the device further comprises a second device for use with a second contralateral ear of the user. The second device comprises a third input transducer configured for placement inside a second ear canal or near an opening of the second ear canal to detect second high frequency localization cues. A fourth input transducer is configured for placement outside the second ear canal. A second at least one output transducer is configured for placement inside the second ear canal, and the second at least one output transducer is acoustically coupled to the third input transducer when the second at least one output transducer is positioned in the second ear canal. The fourth input transducer is positioned away from the second ear canal opening to minimize feedback when the third input transducer detects the second high frequency localization cues. The combination of the first and second input transducers on an ipsilateral ear and the third and fourth input transducers on a contralateral ear can lead to improved binaural hearing.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a communication device for use with an ear of a user. The device comprises a first at least one input transducer configured to detect sound. A second input transducer is configured to detect tissue vibration when the user speaks. Wireless communication circuitry is coupled to the second input transducer and configured to transmit near-end speech from the user to a far-end person when the user speaks. At least one output transducer is configured for placement inside an ear canal of the user, in which the at least one output transducer is coupled to the first input transducer to transmit sound from the first input transducer to the user.
In many embodiments, the first at least one input transducer comprises a microphone configured for placement at least one of inside an car canal or near an opening of the ear canal to detect high frequency localization cues. Alternatively or in combination, the first at least one input transducer may comprise a microphone configured for placement outside the ear canal to detect low frequency speech and minimize feedback from the at least one output transducer.
Tn many embodiments, the second input transducer comprises at least one of an optical vibrometer or a laser vibrometer configured to generate a signal in response to vibration of the eardrum when the user speaks.
In many embodiments, the second input transducer comprises a bone conduction sensor configured to couple to a skin of the user to detect tissue vibration when the user speaks. The bone conduction sensor can be configured for placement within the ear canal.
In many embodiments, the device further comprises an elongate support configured to extend from the opening toward the eardrum to deliver energy to the at least one output transducer, and a positioner coupled to the elongate support. The positioner can be sized to fit in the ear canal and position the elongate support within the ear canal, and the positioner may comprise the bone conduction sensor. The bone conduction sensor may comprise a piezo electric transducer configured to couple to the ear canal to bone vibration when the user speaks.
In many embodiments, the at least one output transducer comprises a support configured for placement on an eardrum of the user.
In many embodiments, the wireless communication circuitry is configured to receive sound from at least one of a cellular telephone, a hands free wireless device of an automobile, a paired short range wireless connectivity system, a wireless communication network, or a WiFi network.
Tn many embodiments, the wireless communication circuitry is coupled to the at least one output transducer to transmit far-end sound to the user from a far-end person in response to speech from the far-end person.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide an audio listening system for use with an ear of a user. The system comprises a canal microphone configured for placement in an ear canal of the user, and an external microphone configured for placement external to the ear canal. A transducer is coupled to the canal microphone and the external microphone. The transducer is configured for placement inside the ear canal on an eardrum of the user to vibrate the eardrum and transmit sound to the user in response to the canal microphone and the external microphone.
In many embodiments, the transducer comprises a magnet and a support configured for placement on the eardrum to vibrate the eardrum in response to a wide bandwidth signal comprising frequencies from about 0.1 kHz to about 10 kHz.
In many embodiments, the system further comprises a sound processor coupled to the canal microphone and configured to receive an input from the canal microphone. The sound processor is configured to vibrate the eardrum in response to the input from the canal microphone. The sound processor can be configured to minimize feedback from the transducer.
In many embodiments, the sound processor is coupled to the external microphone and configured to vibrate the eardrum in response to an input from the external microphone.
Tn many embodiments, the sound processor is configured to cancel feedback from the transducer to the canal microphone with a feedback transfer function.
In many embodiments, the sound processor is coupled to the external microphone and configured to cancel noise in response to input from the external microphone. The external microphone can be configured to measure external sound pressure and wherein the sound processor is configured to minimize vibration of the eardrum in response to the external sound pressure measured with the external microphone. The sound processor can be configured to measure feedback from the transducer to the canal microphone and wherein the processor is configured to minimize vibration of the eardrum in response to the feedback.
Tn many embodiments, the external microphone is configured to measure external sound pressure, and the canal microphone is configured to measure canal sound pressure and wherein the sound processor is configured to determine feedback transfer function in response to the canal sound pressure and the external sound pressure.
In many embodiments, the system further comprises an external input for listening.
In many embodiments, the external input comprises an analog input configured to receive an analog audio signal from an external device.
In many embodiments, the system further comprises a bone vibration sensor to detect near-end speech of the user.
Tn many embodiments, the system further comprises wireless communication circuitry coupled to the transducer and configured to vibrate the transducer in response to far-end speech.
In many embodiments, the system further comprises a sound processor coupled to the wireless communication circuitry and wherein the sound processor is configured to process the far-end speech to generate processed far-end speech, and the processor is configured to vibrate the transducer in response to the processed far-end speech.
In many embodiments, wireless communication circuitry is configured to receive far-end speech from a communication channel of a mobile phone.
In many embodiments, the wireless communication circuitry is configured to transmit near-end speech of the user to a far-end person.
In many embodiments, the system further comprises a mixer configured to mix a signal from the canal microphone and a signal from the external microphone to generate a mixed signal comprising near-end speech, and the wireless communication circuitry is configured to transmit the mixed signal comprising the near-end speech to a far-end person.
In many embodiments, the sound processor is configured to provide mixed near-end speech to the user.
In many embodiments, the system is configured to transmit near-end speech from a noisy environment to a far-end person.
Tn many embodiments, the system further comprises a bone vibration sensor configured to detect near-end speech, the bone vibration sensor coupled to the wireless communication circuitry, and wherein the wireless communication circuitry is configured to transmit the near-end speech to the far-end person in response to bone vibration when the user speaks.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a method of transmitting sound to an ear of a user. High frequency sound comprising high frequency localization cues is detected with a first microphone placed at least one of inside an ear canal or near an opening of the car canal. A second microphone is placed external to the car canal. At least one output transducer is placed inside the ear canal of the user. The at least one output transducer is coupled to the first microphone and the second microphone and transmits sound from the first microphone and the second microphone to the user.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide a device to detect sound from an ear canal of a user. The device comprises a piezo electric transducer configured for placement in the ear canal of the user.
In many embodiments, the piezo electric transducer comprises at least one elongate structure configured to extend at least partially across the ear canal from a first side of the ear canal to a second side of the ear canal to detect sound when the user speaks, in which the first side of the car canal can be opposite the second side. The at least one elongate structure may comprise a plurality of elongate structures configured to extend at least partially across the long dimension of the ear canal, and a gap may extend at least partially between the plurality of elongate structures to minimize occlusion when the piezo electric transducer is placed in the canal.
In many embodiments, the device further comprises a positioner coupled to the transducer, in which the positioner is configured to contact the ear canal and support the piezoelectric transducer in the ear canal to detect vibration when the user speaks. The at least one of the positioner or the piezo electric transducer can be configured to define at least one aperture to minimize occlusion when the user speaks.
In many embodiments, the positioner comprises an outer portion configured extend circumferentially around the piezo electric transducer to contact the ear canal with an outer perimeter of the outer portion when the positioner is positioned in the ear canal.
In many embodiments, the device further comprises an elongate support comprising an elongate energy transmission structure, the elongate energy transmission structure passing through at least one of the piezo electric transducer or the positioner to transmit an audio signal to the eardrum of the user, the elongate energy transmission structure comprising at least one of an optical fiber to transmit light energy or a wire configured to transmit electrical energy.
In many embodiments, the piezo electric transducer comprises at least one of a ring piezo electric transducer, a bender piezo electric transducer, a bimorph bender piezo electric transducer or a piezoelectric multi-morph transducer, a stacked piezoelectric transducer with a mechanical multiplier or a ring piezoelectric transducer with a mechanical multiplier or a disk piezo electric transducer.
In another aspect, embodiments of the present invention provide an audio listening system having multiple functionalities. The system comprises a body configured for positioning in an open ear canal, the functionalities include a wide-bandwidth hearing aid, a microphone within the body, a noise suppression system, a feedback cancellation system, a mobile phone communication system, and an audio entertainment system.
FIGS. 10D1 shows a canal microphone coupled to first transducer and an external microphone coupled to a second transducer to provide gain in response to frequency as in
FIGS. 10D2 shows the canal microphone coupled to a first transducer comprising a first coil wrapped around a core and the external microphone coupled to a second transducer comprising second a coil wrapped around the core, as in FIG. 10D1;
Embodiments of the present invention provide a multifunction audio system integrated with communication system, noise cancellation, and feedback management, and non-surgical transduction. A multifunction hearing aid integrated with communication system, noise cancellation, and feedback management system with an open ear canal is described, which provides many benefits to the user.
System 10 comprises a sound processor. The sound processor is coupled to the canal microphone CM to receive input from the canal microphone. The sound processor is coupled to the external microphone EM to receive sound input from the external microphone. An amplifier can be coupled to the external microphone EM and the sound processor so as to amplify sound from the external microphone to the sound processor. The sound processor is also coupled to the direct audio input. The sound processor is coupled to an output transducer configured to vibrate the middle ear. The output transducer may be coupled to an amplifier. Vibration of the middle ear can induce the stapes of the ear to vibrate, for example with velocity, such that the user perceives sound. The output transducer may comprise, for example, the EARLENS™ transducer described by Perkins et al in the following US patents and application Publications: U.S. Pat. No. 5,259,032; 20060023908; 20070100197, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference and may include subject matter suitable for combination in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention. The EARLENS™ transducer may have significant advantages due to reduced feedback that can be limited to a narrow frequency range. The output transducer may comprise an output transducer directly coupled to the middle ear, so as to reduce feedback. For example, the EARLENS™ transducer can be coupled to the middle ear, so as to vibrate the middle ear such that the user perceives sound. The output transducer of the EARLENS™ can comprise, for example a core/coil coupled to a magnet. When current is passed through the coil, a magnetic field is generated, which magnetic field vibrates the magnet of the EARLENS™ supported on the eardrum such that the user perceives sound. Alternatively or in combination, the output transducer may comprise other types of transducers, for example, many of the optical transducers or transducer systems described herein.
System 10 is configured for an open ear canal, such that there is a direct acoustic path from the acoustic environment to the eardrum of the user. The direct acoustic path can be helpful to minimize occlusion of the ear canal, which can result in the user perceiving his or her own voice with a hollow sound when the user speaks. With the open canal configuration, a feedback path can exist from the eardrum to the canal microphone, for example the EL Feedback Acoustic Pathway. Although use of a direct drive transducer such as the coil and magnet of the EARLENS™ system can substantially minimize feedback, it can be beneficial to minimize feedback with additional structures and configurations of system 10.
As noted above, acoustic feedback can travel from the EARLENS™ EL to the canal microphone CM. The acoustic feedback travels along the acoustic feedback path to the canal microphone CM, such that a feedback sound pressure PFB is incident on canal microphone CM. The canal microphone CM senses sound pressure from the desired signal PCM and the feedback sound pressure PFB. The feedback sound pressure PFB can be canceled by generating an error signal EFB. A feedback transfer function HFB is shown from the output of the sound processor to the input to the sound processor, and an error signal e is shown as input to the sound processor. Sound processor SP may comprise a signal generator SG. HFB can be estimated by generating a wide band signal with signal generator SG and nulling out the error signal e. HFB can be used to generate an error signal EFB with known signal processing techniques for feedback cancellation. The feedback suppression may comprise or be combined with known feedback suppression methods, and the noise cancellation may comprise or be combined with known noise cancellation methods.
The sound processor can be configured to pass an output current IC through the coil which minimizes motion of the eardrum. The current through the coil for a desired PTM2 can be determined with the following equation and approximation:
IC=PTM1/RTM2=(PTM1/REFF)mA
where PEFF comprises the effective pressure at the tympanic membrane per milliamp of the current measured on an individual subject.
The ear canal transfer function HC may comprise a first ear canal transfer function HC1 and a second car canal transfer function HC2. As the canal microphone CM is placed in the ear canal, the second ear canal transfer function HC2 may correspond to a distance along the ear canal from ear canal microphone CM to the eardrum. The first ear canal transfer function Hc1 may correspond to a portion of the ear canal from the ear canal microphone CM to the opening of the ear canal. The first ear canal transfer function may also comprise a pinna transfer function, such that first ear canal transfer function Hc1 corresponds to the ear canal sound pressure PCM at the canal microphone in response to the free field sound pressure PCM after the free field sound pressure has been diffracted by the pinna so as to provide sound localization cues near the entrance to the ear canal.
The above described noise cancellation and feedback suppression can be combined in many ways. For example, the noise cancellation can be used with an input, for example direct audio input during a flight while the user listens to a movie, and the surrounding noise of the flight cancelled with the noise cancellation from the external microphone, and the sound processor configured to transmit the direct audio to the transducer, for example adjusted to the user's hearing profile, such that the user can hear the sound, for example from the movie, clearly.
The piezo electric positioner may comprise many known piezoelectric materials, for example at least one of Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF), PVF, or lead zirconate titanate (PZT).
System 10 may comprise a behind the ear unit, for example BTE unit 700, connected to elongate support 750. The BTE unit 700 may comprise many of the components described above, for example the wireless circuitry, the sound processor, the mixer and a power storage device. The BTE unit 700 may comprise an external microphone 748. A canal microphone 744 can be coupled to the elongate support 750 at a location 746 along elongate support 750 so as to position the canal microphone at least one of inside the near canal or near the ear canal opening to detect high frequency sound localization cues in response to sound diffraction from the Pinna. The canal microphone and the external microphone may also detect head shadowing, for example with frequencies at which the head of the user may cast an acoustic shadow on the microphone 744 and microphone 748.
Positioner 710 is adapted for comfort during insertion into the user's ear and thereafter. Piezoelectric positioner 710 is tapered proximally (and laterally) toward the ear canal opening to facilitate insertion into the ear of the user. Also, piezoelectric positioner 710 has a thickness transverse to its width that is sufficiently thin to permit piezoelectric positioner 710 to flex while the support is inserted into position in the ear canal. However, in some embodiments the piezoelectric positioner has a width that approximates the width of the typical car canal and a thickness that extends along the car canal about the same distance as coil assembly 740 extends along the ear canal. Thus, as shown in
Positioner 710 permits sound waves to pass and provides and can be used to provide an open canal hearing aid design. Piezoelectric positioner 710 comprises several spokes and openings formed therein. In an alternate embodiment, piezoelectric positioner 710 comprises soft “flower” like arrangement. Piezoelectric positioner 710 is designed to allow acoustic energy to pass, thereby leaving the ear canal mostly open.
Wire 812 and wire 814 are resilient members and are sized and comprise material selected to elastically flex in response to small deflections and provide support to coil assembly 819. Wire 812 and wire 814 are also sized and comprise material selected to deform in response to large deflections so that elongate support 810 can be deformed to a desired shape that matches the ear canal. Wire 812 and wire 814 comprise metal and are adapted to conduct heat from coil assembly 819. Wire 812 and wire 814 are soldered to coil 816 and can comprise a different gauge of wire from the wire of the coil, in particular a gauge with a range from about 26 to about 36 that is smaller than the gauge of the coil to provide resilient support and heat conduction. Additional heat conducting materials can be used to conduct and transport heat from coil assembly 819, for example shielding positioned around wire 812 and wire 814. Elongate support 810 and wire 812 and wire 814 extend toward the driver unit and are adapted to conduct heat out of the ear canal.
Although an electromagnetic transducer comprising coil 819 is shown positioned on the end of elongate support 810, the piezoelectric positioner and elongate support can be used with many types of transducers positioned at many locations, for example optical electromagnetic transducers positioned outside the ear canal and coupled to the support to deliver optical energy along the support, for example through at least one optical fiber. The at least one optical fiber may comprise a single optical fiber or a plurality of two or more optical fibers of the support. The plurality of optical fibers may comprise a parallel configuration of optical fibers configured to transmit at least two channels in parallel along the support toward the eardrum of the user.
The at least one piezoelectric positioner, for example piezoelectric positioner 830, can improve optical coupling between the light source and a device positioned on the eardrum, so as to increase the efficiency of light energy transfer from the output energy transducer, or emitter, to an optical device positioned on the eardrum. For example, by improving alignment of the distal end 810D of the support that emits light and a transducer positioned at least one of on the eardrum or inside the middle ear, for example positioned on an ossicle of the middle ear. The device positioned on the eardrum may comprise an optical transducer assembly OTA. The optical transducer assembly OTA may comprise a support configured for placement on the eardrum, for example molded to the eardrum and similar to the support used with transducer EL. The optical transducer assembly OTA may comprise an optical transducer configured to vibrate in response to transmitted light λT. The transmitted light λT may comprise many wavelengths of light, for example at least one of visible light or infrared light, or a combination thereof. The optical transducer assembly OTA vibrates on the eardrum in response to transmitted light λT. The at least one piezoelectric positioner and elongate support 810 comprising an optical fiber can be combined with many known optical transducer and hearing devices, for example as described in U.S. U.S. 2006/0189841, entitled “Systems and Methods for Photo-Mechanical Hearing Transduction”; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,289,639, entitled “Hearing Implant”, the full disclosure of which are incorporated herein by reference and may include subject matter suitable for combination in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention. The piezoelectric positioner and elongate support may also be combined with photo-electro-mechanical transducers positioned on the ear drum with a support, as described in U.S. Pat. Ser. Nos. 61/073,271; and 61/073,281, both filed on Jun. 17, 2008, the full disclosure of which are incorporated herein by reference and may include subject matter suitable for combination in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
In specific embodiments, elongate support 810 may comprise an optical fiber coupled to piezoelectric positioner 830 to align the distal end of the optical fiber with an output transducer assembly supported on the eardrum. The output transducer assembly may comprise a photodiode configured to receive light transmitted from the distal end of support 810 and supported with support component 30 placed on the eardrum, as described above. The output transducer assembly can be separated from the distal end of the optical fiber, and the proximal end of the optical fiber can be positioned in the BTE unit and coupled to the light source. The output transducer assembly can be similar to the output transducer assembly described in U.S. 2006/0189841, with piezoelectric positioner 830 used to align the optical fiber with the output transducer assembly, and the BTE unit may comprise a housing with the light source positioned therein.
A first microphone for high frequency sound localization, for example canal microphone 974, is positioned inside the ear canal to detect high frequency localization cues. A BTE unit is coupled to the body 910. The BTE unit has a second microphone, for example an external microphone positioned on the BTE unit to receive external sounds. The external microphone can be used to detect low frequencies and combined with the high frequency microphone input to minimize feedback when high frequency sound is detected with the high frequency microphone, for example canal microphone 974. A bone vibration sensor 920 is supported with shell 966 to detect bone conduction vibration when the user speaks. An outer surface of bone vibration sensor 920 can be disposed along outer surface of shell 966 so as to contact tissue of the ear canal, for example substantially similar to an outer surface of shell 966 near the sensor to minimize tissue irritation. Bone vibration sensor 920 may also extend through an outer surface shell 966 to contact the tissue of the ear canal. Additional components of system 10, such as wireless communication circuitry and the direct audio input, as described above, can be located in the BTE unit. The sound processor may be located in many places, for example in the BTE unit or within the ear canal.
The transmitter assembly 960 has shell 966 configured to mate with the characteristics of the individual's ear canal wall. Shell 966 can be preferably matched to fit snug in the individual's ear canal so that the transmitter assembly 960 may repeatedly be inserted or removed from the ear canal and still be properly aligned when re-inserted in the individual's ear. Shell 966 can also be configured to support coil 964 and core 962 such that the tip of core 962 is positioned at a proper distance and orientation in relation to the transducer 926 when the transmitter assembly is properly installed in the ear canal. The core 962 generally comprises ferrite, but may be any material with high magnetic permeability.
In many embodiments, coil 964 is wrapped around the circumference of the core 962 along part or all of the length of the core. Generally, the coil has a sufficient number of rotations to optimally drive an electromagnetic field toward the transducer. The number of rotations may vary depending on the diameter of the coil, the diameter of the core, the length of the core, and the overall acceptable diameter of the coil and core assembly based on the size of the individual's ear canal. Generally, the force applied by the magnetic field on the magnet will increase, and therefore increase the efficiency of the system, with an increase in the diameter of the core. These parameters will be constrained, however, by the anatomical limitations of the individual's ear. The coil 964 may be wrapped around only a portion of the length of the core allowing the tip of the core to extend further into the ear canal.
One method for matching the shell 966 to the internal dimensions of the ear canal is to make an impression of the ear canal cavity, including the tympanic membrane. A positive investment is then made from the negative impression. The outer surface of the shell is then formed from the positive investment which replicated the external surface of the impression. The coil 964 and core 962 assembly can then be positioned and mounted in the shell 966 according to the desired orientation with respect to the projected placement of the transducer 926, which may be determined from the positive investment of the ear canal and tympanic membrane. Other methods of matching the shell to the ear canal of the user, such as imaging of the user may be used.
Transmitter assembly 960 may also comprise a digital signal processing (DSP) unit 972, microphone 974, and battery 978 that are supported with body 910 and disposed inside shell 966. A BTE unit may also be coupled to the transmitter assembly, and at least some of the components, such as the DSP unit can be located in the BTE unit. The proximal end of the shell 966 has a faceplate 980 that can be temporarily removed to provide access to the open chamber 986 of the shell 966 and transmitter assembly components contained therein. For example, the faceplate 980 may be removed to switch out battery 978 or adjust the position or orientation of core 962. Faceplate 980 may also have a microphone port 982 to allow sound to be directed to microphone 974. Pull line 984 may also be incorporated into the shell 966 of faceplate 980 so that the transmitter assembly can be readily removed from the ear canal. In some embodiments, the external microphone may be positioned outside the ear near a distal end of pull line 984, such that the external microphone is sufficiently far from the ear canal opening so as to minimized feedback from the external microphone.
In operation, ambient sound entering the pinna, or auricle, and car canal is captured by the microphone 974, which converts sound waves into analog electrical signals for processing by the DSP unit 972. The DSP unit 972 may be coupled to an input amplifier to amplify the signal and convert the analog signal to a digital signal with a analog to digital converter commonly used in the art. The digital signal can then be processed by any number of known digital signal processors. The processing may consist of any combination of multi-band compression, noise suppression and noise reduction algorithms. The digitally processed signal is then converted back to analog signal with a digital to analog converter. The analog signal is shaped and amplified and sent to the coil 964, which generates a modulated electromagnetic field containing audio information representative of the audio signal and, along with the core 962, directs the electromagnetic field toward the magnet of the transducer EL. The magnet of transducer EL vibrates in response to the electromagnetic field, thereby vibrating the middle-ear acoustic member to which it is coupled, for example the tympanic membrane, or, for example the malleus 18 in FIGS. 3A and 3B of U.S. 2006/0023908, the full disclosure of which has been previously incorporated herein by reference.
In many embodiments, face plate 980 also has an acoustic opening 970 to allow ambient sound to enter the open chamber 986 of the shell. This allows ambient sound to travel through the open volume 986 along the internal compartment of the transmitter assembly and through one or more openings 968 at the distal end of the shell 966. Thus, ambient sound waves may reach and vibrate the eardrum and separately impart vibration on the eardrum. This open-channel design provides a number of substantial benefits. First, the open channel minimizes the occlusive effect prevalent in many acoustic hearing systems from blocking the ear canal. Second, the natural ambient sound entering the ear canal allows the electromagnetically driven effective sound level output to be limited or cut off at a much lower level than with a design blocking the ear canal.
With the two microphone embodiments, for example the external microphone and canal microphone as described herein, acoustic hearing aids can realize at least some improvement in sound localization, because of the decrease in feedback with the two microphones, which can allow at least some sound localization. For example a first microphone to detect high frequencies can be positioned near the ear canal, for example outside the ear canal and within about 5 mm of the ear canal opening, to detect high frequency sound localization cues. A second microphone to detect low frequencies can be positioned away from the ear canal opening, for example at least about 10 mm, or even 20 mm, from the ear canal opening to detect low frequencies and minimize feedback from the acoustic speaker positioned in the ear canal.
In some embodiments, the BTE components can be placed in body 910, except for the external microphone, such that the body 910 comprises the wireless circuitry and sound processor, battery and other components. The external microphone may extend from the body 910 and/or faceplate 980 so as to minimize feedback, for example similar to pull line 984 and at least about 10 mm from faceplate 980 so as to minimize feedback.
The canal microphone and external microphone may be used with many known transducers to provide at least some high frequency localization cues with an open ear canal, for example surgically implanted output transducers and hearing aides with acoustic speakers. For example, the canal microphone feedback pressure PFB(canal, Acoustic) when an acoustic speaker transducer placed near the eardrum shows a resonance similar to transducer EL and has a peak near 2-3 kHz. The external microphone feedback pressure PFB(External, Acoustic) is lower than the canal microphone feedback pressure PFB(canal, Acoustic) at all frequencies, such that the external microphone can be used to detect sound comprising frequencies at or below the resonance frequencies of the ear, and the canal microphone may be used to detect high frequency localization cues at frequencies above the resonance frequencies of the ear canal. Although the canal microphone feedback pressure PFB(Canal, Acoustic) is greater for the acoustic speaker output transducer than the canal microphone feedback pressure PFB(Canal, EL) for the EARLENS™ transducer EL, the acoustic speaker may deliver at least some high frequency sound localization cues when the external microphone is used to amply frequencies at or below the resonance frequencies of the ear canal.
The gain profiles comprise an input sound to the microphone and an output sound from the output transducer to the user, such that the gain profiles for each of the canal microphone and external microphone can be achieved in many ways with many configurations of at least one of the microphone, the circuitry and the transducer. The gain profile for sound input to the external microphone may comprise low pass components configured with at least one of a low pass microphone, low pass circuitry, or a low pass transducer. The gain profile for sound input to the canal microphone may comprise low pass components configured with at least one of a high pass microphone, high pass circuitry, or a high pass transducer. The circuitry may comprise the sound processor comprising a tangible medium configured to high pass filter the sound input from the canal microphone and low pass filter the sound input from the external microphone.
FIGS. 10D1 shows a canal microphone coupled to first transducer TRANSDUCER1 and an external microphone coupled to a second transducer TRANSDUCER2 to provide gain in response to frequency as in
FIGS. 10D2 shows the canal microphone coupled to a first transducer comprising a first coil wrapped around a core, and the external microphone coupled to a second transducer comprising second a coil wrapped around the core, as in FIG. 10D1. A first coil COIL1 is wrapped around the core and comprises a first number of turns. A second coil COIL2 is wrapped around the core and comprises a second number of turns. The number of turns for each coil can be optimized to produce a first output peak for the first transducer and a second output peak for the second transducer, with the second output peak at a frequency below the a frequency of the first output peak. Although coils are shown, many transducers can be used such as piezoelectric and photostrictive materials, for example as described above. The first transducer may comprise at least a portion of the second transducer, such that first transducer at least partially overlaps with the second transducer, for example with a common magnet supported on the eardrum.
The first input transducer, for example the canal microphone, and second input transducer, for example the external microphone, can be arranged in many ways to detect sound localization cues and minimize feedback. These arrangements can be obtained with at least one of a first input transducer gain, a second input transducer gain, high pass filter circuitry for the first input transducer, low pass filter circuitry for the second input transducer, sound processor digital filters or output characteristics of the at least one output transducer.
The canal microphone may comprise a first input transducer coupled to at least one output transducer to vibrate an eardrum of the ear in response to high frequency sound localization cues above the resonance frequencies of the ear canal, for example resonance frequencies from about 2 kHz to about 3 kHz. The external microphone may comprise a second input transducer coupled to at least one output transducer to vibrate the eardrum in response sound frequencies at or below the resonance frequency of the ear canal. The resonance frequency of the ear canal may comprise frequencies within a range from about 2 to 3 kHz, as noted above.
The first input transducer can be coupled to at least one output transducer to vibrate the eardrum with a first gain for first sound frequencies corresponding to the resonance frequencies of the ear canal. The second input transducer can be coupled to the at least one output transducer to vibrate the eardrum with a second gain for the sound frequencies corresponding to the resonance frequencies of the ear canal, in which the first gain is less than the second gain to minimize feedback.
The first input transducer can be coupled to the at least one output transducer to vibrate the eardrum with a resonance gain for first sound frequencies corresponding to the resonance frequencies of the ear canal and a cue gain for sound localization cue comprising frequencies above the resonance frequencies of the car canal. The cue gain can be greater than the resonance gain to minimize feedback and allow the user to perceive the sound localization cues.
The displacement of the eardrum and optical transducer assembly can be measured with second input transducer which comprises at least one of an optical vibrometer, a laser vibrometer, a laser Doppler vibrometer, or an interferometer configured to generate a signal in response to vibration of the eardrum. A portion of the transmitted light λT can be reflected from at the eardrum and the optical transducer assembly OTA and comprises reflected light λR. The reflected light enters second optical fiber 1110B and is received by an optical detector coupled to a distal end of the second optical fiber 1110B, for example a laser vibrometer detector coupled to detector circuitry to measure vibration of the eardrum. The plurality of optical fibers may comprise a third optical fiber for transmission of light from a laser of the laser vibrometer toward the eardrum. For example, a laser source comprising laser circuitry can be coupled to the proximal end of the support to transmit light toward the ear to measure eardrum displacement. The optical transducer assembly may comprise a reflective surface to reflect light from the laser used for the laser vibrometer, and the optical wavelengths to induce vibration of the eardrum can be separate from the optical wavelengths used to measure vibration of the eardrum. The optical detection of vibration of the eardrum can be used for near-end speech measurement, similar to the piezo electric transducer described above. The optical detection of vibration of the eardrum can be used for noise cancellation, such that vibration of the eardrum is minimized in response to the optical signal reflected from at least one of eardrum or the optical transducer assembly.
Elongate support 1110 and at least one positioner, for example at least one of positioner 1130 or positioner 1140, or both, can be configured to position support 1110 in the ear canal with the electromagnetic energy transducer positioned outside the ear canal, and the microphone positioned at least one of in the ear canal or near the ear canal opening so as to detect high frequency spatial localization clues, as described above. For example, the output energy transducer, or emitter, may comprise a light source configured to emit electromagnetic energy comprising optical frequencies, and the light source can be positioned outside the ear canal, for example in a BTE unit. The light source may comprise at least one of an LED or a laser diode, for example. The light source, also referred to as an emitter, can emit visible light, or infrared light, or a combination thereof. The light source can be coupled to the distal end of the support with a waveguide, such as an optical fiber with a distal end of the optical fiber 1110D comprising a distal end of the support. The optical energy delivery transducer can be coupled to the proximal portion of the elongate support to transmit optical energy to the distal end. The positioner can be adapted to position the distal end of the support near an eardrum when the proximal portion is placed at a location near an ear canal opening. The intermediate portion of elongate support 1110 can be sized to minimize contact with a canal of the ear between the proximal portion to the distal end.
The at least one positioner, for example positioner 1130, can improve optical coupling between the light source and a device positioned on the eardrum, so as to increase 10 the efficiency of light energy transfer from the output energy transducer, or emitter, to an optical device positioned on the eardrum. For example, by improving alignment of the distal end 1110D of the support that emits light and a transducer positioned at least one of on the eardrum or in the middle ear. The at least one positioner and elongate support 1110 comprising an optical fiber can be combined with many known optical transducer and 15 hearing devices, for example as described in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/248,459, entitled “Systems and Methods for Photo-Mechanical Hearing Transduction”, the full disclosure of which has been previously incorporated herein by reference, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,289,639, entitled “Hearing Implant”, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The positioner and elongate support may also be combined with photo-electro-mechanical 20 transducers positioned on the ear drum with a support, as described in U.S. Pat. Ser. Nos. 61/073,271; and 61/073,281, both filed on Jun. 17, 2008, the full disclosures of which have been previously incorporated herein by reference.
In specific embodiments, elongate support 1110 may comprise an optical fiber coupled to positioner 1130 to align the distal end of the optical fiber with an output transducer assembly supported on the eardrum. The output transducer assembly may comprise a photodiode configured to receive light transmitted from the distal end of support 1110 and supported with support component 30 placed on the eardrum, as described above. The output transducer assembly can be separated from the distal end of the optical fiber, and the proximal end of the optical fiber can be positioned in the BTE unit and coupled to the light source. The output transducer assembly can be similar to the output transducer assembly described in U.S. 2006/0189841, with positioner 1130 used to align the optical fiber with the output transducer assembly, and the BTE unit may comprise a housing with the light source positioned therein.
Although an electromagnetic transducer comprising coil 1119 is shown positioned on the end of elongate support 1110, the positioner and elongate support can be used with many types of transducers positioned at many locations, for example optical electromagnetic transducers positioned outside the ear canal and coupled to the support to deliver optical energy along the support, for example through at least one optical fiber. The at least one optical fiber may comprise a single optical fiber or a plurality of two or more optical fibers of the support. The plurality of optical fibers may comprise a parallel configuration of optical fibers configured to transmit at least two channels in parallel along the support toward the eardrum of the user.
While the exemplary embodiments have been described above in some detail for clarity of understanding and by way of example, a variety of additional modifications, adaptations, and changes may be clear to those of skill in the art. Hence, the scope of the present invention is limited solely by the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/682,329, filed Nov. 13, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,863,286; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/173,869, filed Oct. 29, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,516,950; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/804,995, filed Nov. 6, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,154,352; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/949,495, filed Nov. 23, 2015; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/768,825, filed Feb. 15, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,226,083; which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/251,200, filed Oct. 14, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,401,212; which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(c) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/979,645 filed Oct. 12, 2007; the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2763334 | Starkey | Sep 1956 | A |
| 3209082 | McCarrell et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
| 3229049 | Goldberg | Jan 1966 | A |
| 3440314 | Eldon | Apr 1969 | A |
| 3449768 | Doyle et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
| 3526949 | Frank | Sep 1970 | A |
| 3549818 | Justin | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3585416 | Howard | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3594514 | Robert | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3710399 | Hurst | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3712962 | Epley | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3764748 | Branch et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3808179 | Gaylord | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3870832 | Fredrickson | Mar 1975 | A |
| 3882285 | Nunley et al. | May 1975 | A |
| 3965430 | Brandt | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3985977 | Beaty et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4002897 | Kleinman et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4031318 | Pitre | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4061972 | Burgess | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4075042 | Das | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4098277 | Mendell | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4109116 | Victoreen | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4120570 | Gaylord | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4207441 | Ricard et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4248899 | Lyon et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4252440 | Fedors et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4281419 | Treace | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4303772 | Novicky | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4319359 | Wolf | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4334315 | Ono et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4334321 | Edelman | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4338929 | Lundin et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4339954 | Anson et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4357497 | Hochmair et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4375016 | Harada | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4380689 | Giannetti | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4428377 | Zollner et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4524294 | Brody | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4540761 | Kawamura et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4556122 | Goode | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4592087 | Killion | May 1986 | A |
| 4606329 | Hough | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4611598 | Hortmann et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4628907 | Epley | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4641377 | Rush et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4652414 | Schlaegel | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4654554 | Kishi | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4689819 | Killion | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4696287 | Hortmann et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4729366 | Schaefer | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4741339 | Harrison et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4742499 | Butler | May 1988 | A |
| 4756312 | Epley | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4759070 | Voroba et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4766607 | Feldman | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4774933 | Hough et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4776322 | Hough et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4782818 | Mori | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4800884 | Heide et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4800982 | Carlson | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4817607 | Tatge | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4840178 | Heide et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4845755 | Busch et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4865035 | Mori | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4870688 | Voroba et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4918745 | Hutchison | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4932405 | Peeters et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4936305 | Ashtiani et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4944301 | Widin et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4948855 | Novicky | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4957478 | Maniglia et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4963963 | Dorman | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4982434 | Lenhardt et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4999819 | Newnham et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5003608 | Carlson | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5012520 | Steeger | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5015224 | Maniglia | May 1991 | A |
| 5015225 | Hough et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5031219 | Ward et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5061282 | Jacobs | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5066091 | Stoy et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5068902 | Ward | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5094108 | Kim et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5117461 | Moseley | May 1992 | A |
| 5142186 | Cross et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5163957 | Sade et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5167235 | Seacord et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5201007 | Ward et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5220612 | Tibbetts et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5259032 | Perkins et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5272757 | Scofield et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5276910 | Buchele | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5277694 | Leysieffer et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5282858 | Bisch et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5296797 | Bartlett | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5298692 | Ikeda et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5338287 | Miller et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5360388 | Spindel et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5378933 | Pfannenmueller et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5402496 | Soli et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5411467 | Hortmann et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5424698 | Dydyk et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5425104 | Shennib | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5440082 | Claes | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5440237 | Brown et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5455994 | Termeer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5456654 | Ball | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5531787 | Lesinski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5531954 | Heide et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5535282 | Luca | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5554096 | Ball | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5558618 | Maniglia | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5571148 | Loeb et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5572594 | Devoe et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5606621 | Reiter et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5624376 | Ball et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5654530 | Sauer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5692059 | Kruger | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5699809 | Combs et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5701348 | Shennib et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5707338 | Adams et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5715321 | Andrea et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5721783 | Anderson | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5722411 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5729077 | Newnham et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5740258 | Goodwin-Johansson | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5742692 | Garcia et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5749912 | Zhang et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5762583 | Adams et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5772575 | Lesinski et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774259 | Saitoh et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5782744 | Money | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5788711 | Lehner et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5795287 | Ball et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5797834 | Goode | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5800336 | Ball et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5804109 | Perkins | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5804907 | Park et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814095 | Mueller et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5824022 | Zilberman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5825122 | Givargizov et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5836863 | Bushek et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5842967 | Kroll | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5851199 | Peerless et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5857958 | Ball et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5859916 | Ball et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5868682 | Combs et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5879283 | Adams et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888187 | Jaeger et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5897486 | Ball et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5899847 | Adams et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5900274 | Chatterjee et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5906635 | Maniglia | May 1999 | A |
| 5913815 | Ball et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5922017 | Bredberg et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5922077 | Espy et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5935170 | Haakansson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940519 | Kuo | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5949895 | Ball et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5951601 | Lesinski et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5984859 | Lesinski | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987146 | Pluvinage et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6001129 | Bushek et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005955 | Kroll et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6011984 | Van et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6024717 | Ball et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6038480 | Hrdlicka et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045528 | Arenberg et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6050933 | Bushek et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6067474 | Schulman et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6068589 | Neukermans | May 2000 | A |
| 6068590 | Brisken | May 2000 | A |
| 6072884 | Kates | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6084975 | Perkins | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6093144 | Jaeger et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6135612 | Clore | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6137889 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139488 | Ball | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6153966 | Neukermans | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6168948 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174278 | Jaeger et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6175637 | Fujihira et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6181801 | Puthuff et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6190305 | Ball et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6190306 | Kennedy | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6208445 | Reime | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6216040 | Harrison | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6217508 | Ball et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219427 | Kates et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6222302 | Imada et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6222927 | Feng et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6240192 | Brennan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241767 | Stennert et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6259951 | Kuzma et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6261224 | Adams et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264603 | Kennedy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6277148 | Dormer | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6312959 | Datskos | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6339648 | McIntosh et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6342035 | Kroll et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6354990 | Juneau et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6359993 | Brimhall | Mar 2002 | B2 |
| 6366863 | Bye et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374143 | Berrang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6385363 | Rajic et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6387039 | Moses | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6390971 | Adams et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6393130 | Stonikas et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6422991 | Jaeger | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6432248 | Popp et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434246 | Kates et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434247 | Kates et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6436028 | Dormer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6438244 | Juneau et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445799 | Taenzer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6473512 | Juneau et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6475134 | Ball et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6491622 | Kasic, II et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6491644 | Vujanic et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6491722 | Kroll et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6493453 | Glendon | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6493454 | Loi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6498858 | Kates | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6507758 | Greenberg et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6519376 | Biagi et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6523985 | Hamanaka et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6536530 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6537200 | Leysieffer et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6547715 | Mueller et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6549633 | Westermann | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6549635 | Gebert | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6554761 | Puria et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6575894 | Leysieffer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6592513 | Kroll et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6603860 | Taenzer et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6620110 | Schmid | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6626822 | Jaeger et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6629922 | Puria et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6631196 | Taenzer et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6643378 | Schumaier | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6663575 | Leysieffer | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6668062 | Luo et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6676592 | Ball et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6681022 | Puthuff et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6695943 | Juneau et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6697674 | Leysieffer | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6724902 | Shennib et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6726618 | Miller | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6726718 | Carlyle et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6727789 | Tibbetts et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6728024 | Ribak | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6735318 | Cho | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6754358 | Boesen et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6754359 | Svean et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6754537 | Harrison et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6785394 | Olsen et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6792114 | Kates et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6801629 | Brimhall et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6829363 | Sacha | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6831986 | Kates | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6837857 | Stirnemann | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6842647 | Griffith et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6888949 | Vanden et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6900926 | Ribak | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6912289 | Vonlanthen et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6920340 | Laderman | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6931231 | Griffin | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6940988 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6940989 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6942989 | Felkner et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| D512979 | Corcoran et al. | Dec 2005 | S |
| 6975402 | Bisson et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6978159 | Feng et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7020297 | Fang et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7024010 | Saunders et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7043037 | Lichtblau et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7050675 | Zhou et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7050876 | Fu et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7057256 | Mazur et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7058182 | Kates | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7058188 | Allred | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7072475 | Denap et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7076076 | Bauman | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7095981 | Voroba et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7167572 | Harrison et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7174026 | Niederdrank et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7179238 | Hissong | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7181034 | Armstrong | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7203331 | Boesen | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7239069 | Cho | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7245732 | Jorgensen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7255457 | Ducharme et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7266208 | Charvin et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7289639 | Abel et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7313245 | Shennib | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7315211 | Lee et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7322930 | Jaeger et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7349741 | Maltan et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7354792 | Mazur et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7376563 | Leysieffer et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7390689 | Mazur et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7394909 | Widmer et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7421087 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7424122 | Ryan | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7444877 | Li et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7547275 | Cho et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7630646 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7645877 | Gmeiner et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7668325 | Puria et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7747295 | Choi | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7778434 | Juneau et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7809150 | Natarajan et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7822215 | Carazo et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7826632 | Von Buol et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7853033 | Maltan et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7867160 | Pluvinage et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7883535 | Cantin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7885359 | Meltzer | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7955249 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7983435 | Moses | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8090134 | Takigawa et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8099169 | Karunasiri | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8116494 | Rass | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8128551 | Jolly | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8157730 | LeBoeuf et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8197461 | Arenberg et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8204786 | LeBoeuf et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8233651 | Haller | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8251903 | LeBoeuf et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8284970 | Sacha | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8295505 | Weinans et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8295523 | Fay et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8320601 | Takigawa et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8320982 | LeBoeuf et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8340310 | Ambrose et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8340335 | Shennib | Dec 2012 | B1 |
| 8391527 | Feucht et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8396235 | Gebhardt et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8396239 | Fay et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8401212 | Puria et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8401214 | Perkins et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8506473 | Puria | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8512242 | LeBoeuf et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8526651 | Lafort et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8526652 | Ambrose et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8526971 | Giniger et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8545383 | Wenzel et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8600089 | Wenzel et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8647270 | LeBoeuf et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8652040 | LeBoeuf et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8684922 | Tran | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8696054 | Crum | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8696541 | Pluvinage et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8700111 | LeBoeuf et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8702607 | LeBoeuf et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8715152 | Puria et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8715153 | Puria et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8715154 | Perkins et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8761423 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8787609 | Perkins et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8788002 | LeBoeuf et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8817998 | Inoue | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8824715 | Fay et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8837758 | Knudsen | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8845705 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8855323 | Kroman | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8858419 | Puria et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8885860 | Djalilian et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8886269 | LeBoeuf et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8888701 | LeBoeuf et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8923941 | LeBoeuf et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8929965 | LeBoeuf et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8929966 | LeBoeuf et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8934952 | LeBoeuf et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8942776 | LeBoeuf et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8961415 | LeBoeuf et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8986187 | Perkins et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8989830 | LeBoeuf et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9044180 | LeBoeuf et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9049528 | Fay et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9055379 | Puria et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9131312 | LeBoeuf et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9154891 | Puria et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9211069 | Larsen et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9226083 | Puria et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9277335 | Perkins et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9289135 | LeBoeuf et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9289175 | LeBoeuf et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9301696 | LeBoeuf et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9314167 | LeBoeuf et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9392377 | Olsen et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9427191 | LeBoeuf | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9497556 | Kaltenbacher et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9521962 | LeBoeuf | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9524092 | Ren et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9538921 | LeBoeuf et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9544700 | Puria et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9564862 | Hoyerby | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9591409 | Puria et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9749758 | Puria et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9750462 | LeBoeuf et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9788785 | LeBoeuf | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9788794 | LeBoeuf et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9794653 | Aumer et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9794688 | You | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9801552 | Romesburg | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9808204 | LeBoeuf et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9924276 | Wenzel | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9930458 | Freed et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9949035 | Rucker et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9949039 | Perkins et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9949045 | Kure et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9961454 | Puria et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9964672 | Phair et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10003888 | Stephanou et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10034103 | Puria et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10143592 | Goldstein | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10154352 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10178483 | Teran et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10206045 | Kaltenbacher et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10237663 | Puria et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10284964 | Olsen et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10286215 | Perkins et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10292601 | Perkins et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10306381 | Sandhu et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10492010 | Rucker et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10511913 | Puria et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10516946 | Puria et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10516949 | Puria et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10516950 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10516951 | Wenzel | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10531206 | Freed et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10555100 | Perkins et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10609492 | Olsen et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10743110 | Puria et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10779094 | Rucker et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10863286 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 11057714 | Puria et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
| 11058305 | Perkins et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
| 11070927 | Rucker et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
| 11102594 | Shaquer et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
| 11153697 | Olsen et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
| 11166114 | Perkins et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
| 11212626 | Larkin et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
| 11252516 | Wenzel | Feb 2022 | B2 |
| 11259129 | Freed et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
| 11310605 | Puria et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
| 11317224 | Puria | Apr 2022 | B2 |
| 11337012 | Atamaniuk et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
| 11350226 | Sandhu et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
| 20010003788 | Ball et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20010007050 | Adelman | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010024507 | Boesen | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010027342 | Dormer | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010029313 | Kennedy | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010053871 | Zilberman et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020025055 | Stonikas et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035309 | Leysieffer | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020048374 | Soli et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020085728 | Shennib et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020086715 | Sahagen | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020172350 | Edwards et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183587 | Dormer | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030021903 | Shlenker et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055311 | Neukermans et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064746 | Rader et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030081803 | Petilli et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097178 | Roberson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125602 | Sokolich et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030142841 | Wiegand | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208099 | Ball | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208888 | Fearing et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040093040 | Boylston et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121291 | Knapp et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158157 | Jensen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040165742 | Shennib et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040166495 | Greinwald, Jr. et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167377 | Schafer et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040190734 | Kates | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040202339 | O'Brien, Jr. et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040202340 | Armstrong et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040208333 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040234089 | Rembrand et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040234092 | Wada et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236416 | Falotico | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040240691 | Grafenberg | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050018859 | Buchholz | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050020873 | Berrang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050036639 | Bachler et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038498 | Dubrow et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050088435 | Geng | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101830 | Easter et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050111683 | Chabries et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050117765 | Meyer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050190939 | Fretz | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050196005 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222823 | Brumback et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050226446 | Luo et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267549 | Della et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050271870 | Jackson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288739 | Hassler et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060058573 | Neisz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060062420 | Araki | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060074159 | Lu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060075175 | Jensen et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161227 | Walsh et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161255 | Zarowski et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060177079 | Baekgaard et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060177082 | Solomito et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060183965 | Kasic, II et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060231914 | Carey, III et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060233398 | Husung | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060237126 | Guffrey et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247735 | Honert et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256989 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060278245 | Gan | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070030990 | Fischer | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070036377 | Stirnemann | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070076913 | Schanz | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083078 | Easter et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070100197 | Perkins et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127748 | Carlile et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127752 | Armstrong | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127766 | Combest | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135870 | Shanks et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070161848 | Dalton et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070191673 | Ball et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070201713 | Fang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070206825 | Thomasson | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070223755 | Salvetti et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225776 | Fritsch et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070236704 | Carr et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250119 | Tyler et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070251082 | Milojevic et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070258507 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070286429 | Grafenberg et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080021518 | Hochmair et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051623 | Schneider et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080054509 | Berman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080063228 | Mejia et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080063231 | Juneau et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077198 | Webb et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080089292 | Kitazoe et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080107292 | Kornagel | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080123866 | Rule et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080130927 | Theverapperuma et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080188707 | Bernard et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080298600 | Poe et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080300703 | Widmer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090016553 | Ho et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090023976 | Cho et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090043149 | Abel et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090076581 | Gibson | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090131742 | Cho et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090141919 | Spitaels et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090149697 | Steinhardt et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090157143 | Edler et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090175474 | Salvetti et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090246627 | Park | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090253951 | Ball et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090262966 | Vestergaard et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090281367 | Cho et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090310805 | Petroff | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090316922 | Merks et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100036488 | De, Jr. et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100085176 | Flick | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100103404 | Remke et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100114190 | Bendett et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100145135 | Ball et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100171369 | Baarman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100172507 | Merks | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177918 | Keady et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100222639 | Purcell et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100260364 | Merks | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100272299 | Van Schuylenbergh et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100290653 | Wiggins et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100322452 | Ladabaum et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110062793 | Azancot et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110069852 | Arndt et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110084654 | Julstrom et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110112462 | Parker et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110116666 | Dittberner et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125222 | Perkins et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110130622 | Ilberg et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110144414 | Spearman et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110152602 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110164771 | Jensen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110196460 | Weiss | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110221391 | Won et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110249845 | Kates | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110249847 | Salvetti et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110257290 | Zeller et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110258839 | Probst | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110271965 | Parkins et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120008807 | Gran | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120038881 | Amirparviz et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120039493 | Rucker et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120092461 | Fisker et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120114157 | Arndt et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120140967 | Aubert et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120217087 | Ambrose et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120236524 | Pugh et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120263339 | Funahashi | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130004004 | Zhao et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130034258 | Lin | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130083938 | Bakalos et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130089227 | Kates | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130195300 | Larsen et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130230204 | Monahan et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130303835 | Koskowich | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130308782 | Dittberner et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130308807 | Burns | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130343584 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130343585 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130343587 | Naylor et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140084698 | Asanuma et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140107423 | Yaacobi | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140153761 | Shennib et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140169603 | Sacha et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140177863 | Parkins | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140194891 | Shahoian | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140254856 | Blick et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140286514 | Pluvinage et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140288356 | Van Vlem | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140288358 | Puria et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296620 | Puria et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140321657 | Stirnemann | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140379874 | Starr et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150021568 | Gong et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150049889 | Bern | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150117689 | Bergs et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150124985 | Kim et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150201269 | Dahl | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150222978 | Murozaki | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150245131 | Facteau et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150358743 | Killion | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160008176 | Goldstein | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160064814 | Jang et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160087687 | Kesler et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160094043 | Hao et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160277854 | Puria et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160309265 | Pluvinage et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160309266 | Olsen et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160330555 | Vonlanthen et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170040012 | Goldstein | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170095202 | Facteau et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170180888 | Andersson et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170195806 | Atamaniuk et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170257710 | Parker | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20180077503 | Shaquer et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180077504 | Shaquer et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180213331 | Rucker et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180262846 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180317026 | Puria | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180376255 | Parker | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190158961 | Puria et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190166438 | Perkins et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190230449 | Puria | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190239005 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190253811 | Unno et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190253815 | Atamaniuk et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190269336 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20200037082 | Perkins et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200068323 | Perkins et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200084551 | Puria et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200092662 | Wenzel | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200092664 | Freed et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200128338 | Shaquer et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200186941 | Olsen et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200186942 | Flaherty et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200304927 | Shaquer et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200336843 | Lee et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200374639 | Rucker et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20200396551 | Dy et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20210029451 | Fitz et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
| 20210029474 | Larkin et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
| 20210186343 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210266686 | Puria et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
| 20210306777 | Rucker et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
| 20210314712 | Shaquer et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
| 20210392449 | Flaherty et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
| 20210400405 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
| 20220007114 | Perkins et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
| 20220007115 | Perkins et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
| 20220007118 | Rucker et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
| 20220007120 | Olsen et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
| 20220046366 | Larkin et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
| 20220086572 | Flaherty et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
| 20220150650 | Rucker | May 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2004301961 | Feb 2005 | AU |
| 2242545 | Sep 2009 | CA |
| 1176731 | Mar 1998 | CN |
| 101459868 | Jun 2009 | CN |
| 101489171 | Jul 2009 | CN |
| 102301747 | Dec 2011 | CN |
| 105491496 | Apr 2016 | CN |
| 2044870 | Mar 1972 | DE |
| 3243850 | May 1984 | DE |
| 3508830 | Sep 1986 | DE |
| 102013114771 | Jun 2015 | DE |
| 0092822 | Nov 1983 | EP |
| 0242038 | Oct 1987 | EP |
| 0291325 | Nov 1988 | EP |
| 0296092 | Dec 1988 | EP |
| 0242038 | May 1989 | EP |
| 0296092 | Aug 1989 | EP |
| 0352954 | Jan 1990 | EP |
| 0291325 | Jun 1990 | EP |
| 0352954 | Aug 1991 | EP |
| 1035753 | Sep 2000 | EP |
| 1435757 | Jul 2004 | EP |
| 1845919 | Oct 2007 | EP |
| 1955407 | Aug 2008 | EP |
| 1845919 | Sep 2010 | EP |
| 2272520 | Jan 2011 | EP |
| 2301262 | Mar 2011 | EP |
| 2752030 | Jul 2014 | EP |
| 3101519 | Dec 2016 | EP |
| 2425502 | Jan 2017 | EP |
| 2907294 | May 2017 | EP |
| 3183814 | Jun 2017 | EP |
| 3094067 | Oct 2017 | EP |
| 3006079 | Mar 2019 | EP |
| 2455820 | Nov 1980 | FR |
| 2085694 | Apr 1982 | GB |
| S60154800 | Aug 1985 | JP |
| S621726 | Jan 1987 | JP |
| S6443252 | Feb 1989 | JP |
| H09327098 | Dec 1997 | JP |
| 2000504913 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2004187953 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2004193908 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2005516505 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2006060833 | Mar 2006 | JP |
| 100624445 | Sep 2006 | KR |
| WO-9209181 | May 1992 | WO |
| WO-9501678 | Jan 1995 | WO |
| WO-9621334 | Jul 1996 | WO |
| WO-9736457 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO-9745074 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO-9806236 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| WO-9903146 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| WO-9915111 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO-0022875 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO-0022875 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO-0150815 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO-0158206 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO-0176059 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO-0158206 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO-0239874 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO-0239874 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO-03030772 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO-03063542 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO-03063542 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004010733 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO-2005015952 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005107320 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006014915 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006037156 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006039146 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006042298 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006071210 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006075169 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006075175 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006118819 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006042298 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007023164 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO-2009046329 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009047370 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009049320 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009056167 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009062142 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009047370 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009125903 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009145842 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009146151 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009155358 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009155361 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009155385 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO-2010033932 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010033933 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010077781 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010147935 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010148345 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| WO-2011005500 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| WO-2012088187 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012149970 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| WO-2013016336 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO-2016011044 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| WO-2016045709 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO-2016146487 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO-2017045700 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO-2017059218 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO-2017059240 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO-2017116791 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO-2017116865 | Jul 2017 | WO |
| WO-2018048794 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO-2018081121 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO-2018093733 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO-2019055308 | Mar 2019 | WO |
| WO-2019173470 | Sep 2019 | WO |
| WO-2019199680 | Oct 2019 | WO |
| WO-2019199683 | Oct 2019 | WO |
| WO-2020176086 | Sep 2020 | WO |
| WO-2021003087 | Jan 2021 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Folkeard, et al. Detection, Speech Recognition, Loudness, and Preference Outcomes With a Direct Drive Hearing Aid: Effects of Bandwidth. Trends Hear. Jan.-Dec. 2021; 25: 1-17. doi: 10.1177/2331216521999139. |
| Knight, D. Diode detectors for RF measurement. Paper. Jan. 1, 2016. [Retrieved from 1-16 online] (retrieved Feb. 11, 2020) abstract, p. 1; section 1, p. 6; section 1.3, p. 9; section 3 voltage-double rectifier, p. 21; section 5, p. 27. URL: g3ynh.info/circuits/Diode_det.pdf. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 24, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/682,329. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 14, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/173,869. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 25, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/173,869. |
| Office action dated Jan. 24, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/682,329. |
| Asbeck, et al. Scaling Hard Vertical Surfaces with Compliant Microspine Arrays, The International Journal of Robotics Research 2006; 25; 1165-79. |
| Atasoy [Paper] Opto-acoustic Imaging, for BYM504E Biomedical Imaging Systems class at ITU, downloaded from the Internet www2.itu.edu.td—cilesiz/courses/BYM504- 2005-OA504041413.pdf, 14 pages. |
| Athanassiou, et al. Laser controlled photomechanical actuation of photochromic polymers Microsystems. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2003; 5:245-251. |
| Autumn, et al. Dynamics of geckos running vertically, The Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 260-272, (2006). |
| Autumn, et al., Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae, www.pnas.orgycgiydoiyl0.1073ypnas.192252799 (2002). |
| Ayatollahi, et al. Design and Modeling of Micromachined Condenser MEMS Loudspeaker using Permanent Magnet Neodymium-Iron-Boron (Nd-Fe-B). IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics, 2006. ICSE '06, Oct. 29, 2006-Dec. 1, 2006; 160-166. |
| Baer, et al. Effects of Low Pass Filtering on the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise for People With and Without Dead Regions at High Frequencies. J. Acost. Soc. Am 112 (3), pt. 1, (Sep. 2002), pp. 1133-1144. |
| Best, et al. The influence of high frequencies on speech localization. Abstract 981 (Feb. 24, 2003) from www.aro.org/abstracts/abstracts.html. |
| Birch, et al. Microengineered systems for the hearing impaired. IEE Colloquium on Medical Applications of Microengineering, Jan. 31, 1996; pp. 2/1-2/5. |
| Boedts. Tympanic epithelial migration, Clinical Otolaryngology 1978, 3, 249-253. |
| Burkhard, et al. Anthropometric Manikin for Acoustic Research. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 58, No. 1, (Jul. 1975), pp. 214-222. |
| Camacho-Lopez, et al. Fast Liquid Crystal Elastomer Swims Into the Dark, Electronic Liquid Crystal Communications. Nov. 26, 2003; 9 pages total. |
| Carlile, et al. Frequency bandwidth and multi-talker environments. Audio Engineering Society Convention 120. Audio Engineering Society, May 20-23, 2006. Paris, France. 118: 8 pages. |
| Carlile, et al. Spatialisation of talkers and the segregation of concurrent speech. Abstract 1264 (Feb. 24, 2004) from www.aro.org/abstracts/abstracts.html. |
| Cheng, et al. A Silicon Microspeaker for Hearing Instruments. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 2004; 14(7):859-866. |
| Dictionary.com's (via American Heritage Medical Dictionary) online dictionary definition of ‘percutaneous’. Accessed on Jun. 3, 2013. 2 pages. |
| Merriam-Webster's online dictionary definition of ‘percutaneous’. Accessed on Jun. 3, 2013. 3 pages. |
| Datskos, et al. Photoinduced and thermal stress in silicon microcantilevers. Applied Physics Letters. Oct. 19, 1998; 73(16):2319-2321. |
| Decraemer, et al. A method for determining three-dimensional vibration in the ear. Hearing Res., 77:19-37 (1994). |
| Dundas et al. The Earlens Light-Driven Hearing Aid: Top 10 questions and answers. Hearing Review. 2018;25(2):36-39. |
| Ear. Downloaded from the Internet. Accessed Jun. 17, 2008. 4 pages. URL: http://wwwmgs.bionet.nsc.ru/mgs/gnw/trrd/thesaurus/Se/ear.html. |
| Edinger, J.R. High-Quality Audio Amplifier With Automatic Bias Control. Audio Engineering; Jun. 1947; pp. 7-9. |
| European search report and opinion dated Sep. 25, 2013 for EP Application No. 08837672.8. |
| Fay. Cat eardrum mechanics. Ph.D. thesis. Dissertation submitted to Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Stanford University. May 2001; 210 pages total. |
| Fay, et al. Cat eardrum response mechanics. Mechanics and Computation Division. Department of Mechanical Engineering. Stanford University. 2002; 10 pages total. |
| Fay, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a light-based contact hearing device for the hearing impaired. Otol Neurotol. Jul. 2013;34(5):912-21. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827de4b1. |
| Fay, et al. The discordant eardrum, PNAS, Dec. 26, 2006, vol. 103, No. 52, p. 19743-19748. |
| Fletcher. Effects of Distortion on the Individual Speech Sounds. Chapter 18, ASA Edition of Speech and Hearing in Communication, Acoust Soc.of Am. (republished in 1995) pp. 415-423. |
| Freyman, et al. Spatial Release from Informational Masking in Speech Recognition. J. Acost. Soc. Am., vol. 109, No. 5, pt. 1, (May 2001); 2112-2122. |
| Freyman, et al. The Role of Perceived Spatial Separation in the Unmasking of Speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 106, No. 6, (Dec. 1999); 3578-3588. |
| Fritsch, et al. EarLens transducer behavior in high-field strength MRI scanners. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Mar. 2009;140(3):426-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.10.016. |
| Galbraith et al. A wide-band efficient inductive transdermal power and data link with coupling insensitive gain IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. Apr. 1987;34(4):265-75. |
| Gantz, et al. Broad Spectrum Amplification with a Light Driven Hearing System. Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings, 2016 (Chicago). |
| Gantz, et al. Light Driven Hearing System: A Multi-Center Clinical Study. Association for Research in Otolaryngology Annual Meeting, 2016 (San Diego). |
| Gantz, et al. Light-Driven Contact Hearing Aid for Broad Spectrum Amplification: Safety and Effectiveness Pivotal Study. Otology & Neurotology Journal, 2016 (in review). |
| Gantz, et al. Light-Driven Contact Hearing Aid for Broad-Spectrum Amplification: Safety and Effectiveness Pivotal Study. Otology & Neurotology. Copyright 2016. 7 pages. |
| Ge, et al., Carbon nanotube-based synthetic gecko tapes, p. 10792-10795, PNAS, Jun. 26, 2007, vol. 104, No. 26. |
| Gennum. GA3280 Preliminary Data Sheet: VoyageurTD Open Platform DSP System for Ultra Low Power Audio Processing. Oct. 2006; 17 pages. Downloaded from the Internet: http://www.sounddesigntechnologies.com/products/pdf/37601DOC.pdf. |
| Gobin, et al. Comments on the physical basis of the active materials concept. Proc. SPIE 2003; 4512:84-92. |
| Gorb, et al. Structural Design and Biomechanics of Friction-Based Releasable Attachment Devices in Insects. IntegrComp Biol. Dec. 2002. 42(6):1127-1139. doi: 10.1093/icb/42.6.1127. |
| Hakansson, et al. Percutaneous vs. transcutaneous transducers for hearing by direct bone conduction (Abstract). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Apr. 1990;102(4):339-44. |
| Hato, et al. Three-dimensional stapes footplate motion in human temporal bones. Audiol. Neurootol., 8:140-152 (Jan. 30, 2003). |
| Hofman, et al. Relearning Sound Localization With New Ears. Nature Neuroscience, vol. 1, No. 5, (Sep. 1998); 417-421. |
| International search report and written opinion dated Dec. 24, 2008 for PCT/US2008/079868. |
| Izzo, et al. Laser Stimulation of Auditory Neurons: Effect of Shorter Pulse Duration and Penetration Depth. Biophys J. Apr. 15, 2008;94(8):3159-3166. |
| Izzo, et al. Laser Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve. Lasers Surg Med. Sep. 2006;38(8):745-753. |
| Izzo, et al. Selectivity of Neural Stimulation In the Auditory System: A Comparison of Optic and Electric Stimuli. J Biomed Opt. Mar.-Apr. 2007;12(2):021008. |
| Jackson, et al. Multiphoton and Transmission Electron Microscopy of Collagen in Ex Vivo Tympanic Membranes. Ninth Annual Symposium on Biomedical Computation at Stanford (BCATS). BCATS 2008 Abstract Book. Poster 18:56. Oct. 2008. URL: http://www.stanford.edu/˜puria1/BCATS08.html. |
| Jian, et al. A 0.6 V, 1.66 mW energy harvester and audio driver for tympanic membrane transducer with wirelessly optical signal and power transfer. InCircuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Jun. 1, 2014. 874-7. IEEE. |
| Jin, et al. Speech Localization. J. Audio Eng. Soc. convention paper, presented at the AES 112th Convention, Munich, Germany, May 10-13, 2002, 13 pages total. |
| Khaleghi, et al. Attenuating the ear canal feedback pressure of a laser-driven hearing aid. J Acoust Soc Am. Mar. 2017;141(3):1683. |
| Khaleghi, et al. Attenuating the feedback pressure of a light-activated hearing device to allows microphone placement at the ear canal entrance. IHCON 2016, International Hearing Aid Research Conference, Tahoe City, CA, Aug. 2016. |
| Khaleghi, et al. Characterization of Ear-Canal Feedback Pressure due to Umbo-Drive Forces: Finite-Element vs. Circuit Models. ARO Midwinter Meeting 2016, (San Diego). |
| Khaleghi, et al. Mechano-Electro-Magnetic Finite Element Model of a Balanced Armature Transducer for a Contact Hearing Aid. Proc. MoH 2017, Mechanics of Hearing workshop, Brock University, Jun. 2017. |
| Khaleghi, et al. Multiphysics Finite Element Model of a Balanced Armature Transducer used in a Contact Hearing Device. ARO 2017, 40th ARO MidWinter Meeting, Baltimore, MD, Feb. 2017. |
| Kiessling, et al. Occlusion Effect of Earmolds with Different Venting Systems. J Am Acad Audiol. Apr. 2005;16(4):237-49. |
| Killion, et al. The case of the missing dots: AI and SNR loss. The Hearing Journal, 1998. 51(5), 32-47. |
| Killion. Myths About Hearing in Noise and Directional Microphones. The Hearing Review. Feb. 2004; 11(2):14, 16, 18, 19, 72 & 73. |
| Killion. SNR loss: I can hear what people say but I can't understand them. The Hearing Review, 1997; 4(12):8-14. |
| Lee, et al. A Novel Opto-Electromagnetic Actuator Coupled to the tympanic Membrane. J Biomech. Dec. 5, 2008;41(16):3515-8. Epub Nov. 7, 2008. |
| Lee, et al. The optimal magnetic force for a novel actuator coupled to the tympanic membrane: a finite element analysis. Biomedical engineering: applications, basis and communications. 2007; 19(3):171-177. |
| Levy, et al. Characterization of the available feedback gain margin at two device microphone locations, in the fossa triangularis and Behind the Ear, for the light-based contact hearing device. Acoustical Society of America (ASA) meeting, 2013 (San Francisco). |
| Levy, et al. Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech. Ear Hear. Sep.-Oct. 2015;36(5):e214-24. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000161. |
| Levy et al. Light-driven contact hearing aid: a removable direct-drive hearing device option for mild to severe sensorineural hearing impairment. Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Tahoe City, CA, Jul. 2017. 4 pages. |
| Lezal. Chalcogenide glasses—survey and progress. Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials. Mar. 2003; 5(1):23-34. |
| Mah. Fundamentals of photovoltaic materials. National Solar Power Research Institute. Dec. 21, 1998, 3-9. |
| Makino, et al. Epithelial migration in the healing process of tympanic membrane perforations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1990; 247: 352-355. |
| Makino, et al., Epithelial migration on the tympanic membrane and external canal, Arch Otorhinolaryngol (1986) 243:39-42. |
| Markoff. Intuition + Money: An Aha Moment. New York Times Oct. 11, 2008, page BU4, 3 pages total. |
| Martin, et al. Utility of Monaural Spectral Cues is Enhanced in the Presence of Cues to Sound-Source Lateral Angle. JARO. 2004; 5:80-89. |
| McElveen et al. Overcoming High-Frequency Limitations of Air Conduction Hearing Devices Using a LIGHT-DRIVEN Contact Hearing Aid. Poster presentation at The Triological Society, 120th Annual Meeting at COSM, Apr. 28, 2017; San Diego, CA. |
| Michaels, et al., Auditory epithelial migration on the human tympanic membrane: II. The existence of two discrete migratory pathways and their embryologic correlates. Am J Anat. Nov. 1990. 189(3):189-200. DOI: 10.1002/aja.1001890302. |
| Moore, et al. Perceived naturalness of spectrally distorted speech and music. J Acoust Soc Am. Jul. 2003;114(1):408-19. |
| Moore, et al. Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Ear Hear. Dec. 2008;29(6):907-22. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181824616. |
| Moore. Loudness perception and intensity resolution. Cochlear Hearing Loss, Chapter 4, pp. 90-115, Whurr Publishers Ltd., London (1998). |
| Murphy, et al. Adhesion and anisotropic friction enhancements of angled heterogeneous micro-fiber arrays with spherical and spatula tips. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. vol. 21. No. 12-13. Aug. 2007. pp. 1281-1296. DOI: 10.1163/156856107782328380. |
| Murugasu, et al. Malleus-to-footplate versus malleus-to-stapes-head ossicular reconstruction prostheses: temporal bone pressure gain measurements and clinical audiological data. Otol Neurotol. Jul. 2005;26(4):572-82. DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000178151.44505.1b. |
| Musicant, et al. Direction-dependent spectral properties of cat external ear: new data and cross-species comparisons. J Acoust Soc Am. Feb. 1990. 87(2):757-781. DOI: 10.1121/1.399545. |
| National Semiconductor. LM4673 Boomer: Filterless, 2.65W, Mono, Class D Audio Power Amplifier. Nov. 1, 2007. 24 pages. [Data Sheet] downloaded from the Internet: URL: http://www.national.com/ds/LM/LM4673.pdf. |
| Nishihara, et al. Effect of changes in mass on middle ear function. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Nov. 1993;109(5):889-910. |
| Notice of allowance dated May 1, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,825. |
| “Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 30, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/804,995.”. |
| Notice of allowance dated Aug. 25, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,825. |
| Notice of allowance dated Nov. 27, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,200. |
| O'Connor, et al. Middle ear Cavity and Ear Canal Pressure-Driven Stapes Velocity Responses in Human Cadaveric Temporal Bones. J Acoust Soc Am. Sep. 2006;120(3):1517-28. |
| Office Action dated May 8, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/949,495. |
| Office action dated May 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,200. |
| Office action dated Jul. 17, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,825. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/949,495. |
| Office action dated Nov. 14, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,200. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/804,995. |
| Office action dated Dec. 31, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,825. |
| Park, et al. Design and analysis of a microelectromagnetic vibration transducer used as an implantable middle ear hearing aid. J. Micromech. Microeng. vol. 12 (2002), pp. 505-511. |
| Perkins, et al. Light-based Contact Hearing Device: Characterization of available Feedback Gain Margin at two device microphone locations. Presented at AAO-HNSF Annual Meeting, 2013 (Vancouver). |
| Perkins, et al. The EarLens Photonic Transducer: Extended bandwidth. Presented at AAO-HNSF Annual Meeting, 2011 (San Francisco). |
| Perkins, et al. The EarLens System: New sound transduction methods. Hear Res. Feb. 2, 2010; 10 pages total. |
| Perkins, R. Earlens tympanic contact transducer: a new method of sound transduction to the human ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun. 1996;114(6):720-8. |
| Poosanaas, et al. Influence of sample thickness on the performance of photostrictive ceramics, J. App. Phys. Aug. 1, 1998; 84(3):1508-1512. |
| Puria et al. A gear in the middle ear. ARO Denver CO, 2007b. |
| Puria, et al. Cues above 4 kilohertz can improve spatially separated speech recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2011, 129, 2384. |
| Puria, et al. Extending bandwidth above 4 kHz improves speech understanding in the presence of masking speech. Association for Research in Otolaryngology Annual Meeting, 2012 (San Diego). |
| Puria, et al. Extending bandwidth provides the brain what it needs to improve hearing in noise. First international conference on cognitive hearing science for communication, 2011 (Linkoping, Sweden). |
| Puria, et al. Hearing Restoration: Improved Multi-talker Speech Understanding. 5th International Symposium on Middle Ear Mechanics In Research and Otology (MEMRO), Jun. 2009 (Stanford University). |
| Puria, et al. Imaging, Physiology and Biomechanics of the middle ear: Towards understating the functional consequences of anatomy. Stanford Mechanics and Computation Symposium, 2005, ed Fong J. |
| Puria, et al. Malleus-to-footplate ossicular reconstruction prosthesis positioning: cochleovestibular pressure optimization. Otol Nerotol. May 2005; 26(3):368-379. DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000169788.07460.4a. |
| Puria, et al. Measurements and model of the cat middle ear: Evidence of tympanic membrane acoustic delay. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 104(6):3463-3481 (Dec. 1998). |
| Puria, et al., Mechano-Acoustical Transformations in A. Basbaum et al., eds., The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference, v3, p. 165-201, Academic Press (2008). |
| Puria, et al. Middle Ear Morphometry From Cadaveric Temporal Bone MicroCT Imaging. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium, Zurich, Switzerland, Jul. 27-30, 2006, Middle Ear Mechanics In Research and Otology, pp. 260-269. |
| Puria, et al. Sound-Pressure Measurements In The Cochlear Vestibule of Human-Cadaver Ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1997; 101 (5-1): 2754-2770. |
| Puria, et al. Temporal-Bone Measurements of the Maximum Equivalent Pressure Output and Maximum Stable Gain of a Light-Driven Hearing System That Mechanically Stimulates the Umbo. Otol Neurotol. Feb. 2016;37(2):160-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000941. |
| Puria, et al. The EarLens Photonic Hearing Aid. Association for Research in Otolaryngology Annual Meeting, 2012 (San Diego). |
| Puria, et al. The Effects of bandwidth and microphone location on understanding of masked speech by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. International Conference for Hearing Aid Research (IHCON) meeting, 2012 (Tahoe City). |
| Puria, et al. Tympanic-membrane and malleus-incus-complex co-adaptations for high-frequency hearing in mammals. Hear Res. May 2010;263(1-2):183-90. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.10.013. Epub Oct. 28, 2009. |
| Puria. Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am. May 2003;113(5):2773-89. |
| Puria, S. Middle Ear Hearing Devices. Chapter 10. Part of the series Springer Handbook of Auditory Research pp. 273-308. Date: Feb. 9, 2013. |
| Qu, et al. Carbon nanotube arrays with strong shear binding-on and easy normal lifting-off. Science. Oct. 10, 2008. 322(5899):238-342. doi: 10.1126/science.1159503. |
| Robles, et al. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev. Jul. 2001;81(3):1305-52. |
| Roush. SiOnyx Brings “Black Silicon” into the Light; Material Could Upend Solar, Imaging Industries. Xconomy, Oct. 12, 2008, retrieved from the Internet: www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/10/12/sionyx-brings-black-silicon-into-the-light-material-could-upend-solar-imaging-industries 4 pages total. |
| Rubinstein. How cochlear implants encode speech. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Oct. 2004. 12(5):444-448. DOI: 10.1097/01.moo.0000134452.24819.c0. |
| School of Physics Sydney, Australia. Acoustic Compliance, Inertance and Impedance. 1-6. (2018). http://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/jw/compliance-inertance-impedance.htm. |
| Sekaric, et al. Nanomechanical resonant structures as tunable passive modulators. Applied Physics Letters. May 2002. 80(19):3617-3619. DOI: 10.1063/1.1479209. |
| Shaw. Transformation of Sound Pressure Level From the Free Field to the Eardrum in the Horizontal Plane. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 56, No. 6, (Dec. 1974), 1848-1861. |
| Shih, et al. Shape and displacement control of beams with various boundary conditions via photostrictive optical actuators. Proc. IMECE. Nov. 2003; 1-10. |
| Smith. The Scientist and Engineers Guide to Digital Signal Processing. California Technical Publishing. 1997. Chapter 22. pp. 351-372. |
| Song, et al. The development of a non-surgical direct drive hearing device with a wireless actuator coupled to the tympanic membrane. Applied Acoustics. Dec. 31, 2013;74(12):1511-8. |
| Sound Design Technologies. Voyager TD Open Platform DSP System for Ultra Low Power Audio Processing—GA3280 Data Sheet. Oct. 2007. 15 pages. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.sounddes.com/pdf/37601 DOC.pdf. |
| Spolenak, et al. Effects of contact shape on the scaling of biological attachments. Proc. R. Soc. A. 2005;461:305-319. |
| Stenfelt, et al. Bone-Conducted Sound: Physiological and Clinical Aspects. Otology & Neurotology, Nov. 2005; 26 (6):1245-1261. |
| Struck, et al. Comparison of Real-world Bandwidth in Hearing Aids vs Earlens Light-driven Hearing Aid System. The Hearing Review. TechTopic: EarLens. Hearingreview.com. Mar. 14, 2017. pp. 24-28. |
| Stuchlik, et al. Micro-Nano Actuators Driven by Polarized Light. IEEE Proc. Sci. Meas. Techn. Mar. 2004; 151(2):131-136. |
| Suski, et al. Optically activated ZnO/SiO2/Si cantilever beams. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. Sep. 1990. 24(3): 221-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-4247(90)80062-A. |
| Takagi, et al. Mechanochemical Synthesis of Piezoelectric PLZT Powder. KONA. 2003; 51(21):234-241. |
| Thakoor, et al. Optical microactuation in piezoceramics. Proc. SPIE. Jul. 1998; 3328:376-391. |
| Thompson. Tutorial on microphone technologies for directional hearing aids. Hearing Journal. Nov. 2003; 56(11):14-16, 18, 20-21. |
| Tzou, et al. Smart Materials, Precision Sensors/Actuators, Smart Structures, and Structronic Systems. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures. 2004; 11:367-393. |
| Uchino, et al. Photostricitve actuators. Ferroelectrics. 2001; 258:147-158. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/173,869 Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2019. |
| Vickers, et al. Effects of Low-Pass Filtering on the Intelligibility of Speech in Quiet for People With and Without Dead Regions at High Frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Aug. 2001; 110(2):1164-1175. |
| Vinge. Wireless Energy Transfer by Resonant Inductive Coupling. Master of Science Thesis. Chalmers University of Technology. 1-83 (2015). |
| Vinikman-Pinhasi, et al. Piezoelectric and Piezooptic Effects in Porous Silicon. Applied Physics Letters, Mar. 2006; 88(11): 111905-1-111905-2. DOI: 10.1063/1.2186395. |
| Wang, et al. Preliminary Assessment of Remote Photoelectric Excitation of an Actuator for a Hearing Implant. Proceeding of the 2005 IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference, Shanghai, China. Sep. 1-4, 2005; 6233-6234. |
| Web Books Publishing, “The Ear,” accessed online Jan. 22, 2013, available online Nov. 2, 2007 at http://www.web-books.com/eLibrary/Medicine/Physiology/Ear/Ear.htm. |
| Wiener, et al. On the Sound Pressure Transformation by the Head and Auditory Meatus of the Cat. Acta Otolaryngol. Mar. 1966; 61(3):255-269. |
| Wightman, et al. Monaural Sound Localization Revisited. J Acoust Soc Am. Feb. 1997;101(2):1050-1063. |
| Wiki. Sliding Bias Variant 1, Dynamic Hearing (2015). |
| Wikipedia. Headphones. Downloaded from the Internet. Accessed Oct. 27, 2008. 7 pages. URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headphones. |
| Wikipedia. Inductive Coupling. 1-2 (Jan. 11, 2018). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_coupling. |
| Wikipedia. Pulse-density Coupling. 1-4 (Apr. 6, 2017). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-density_modulation. |
| Wikipedia. Resonant Inductive Coupling. 1-11 (Jan. 12, 2018). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonant_inductive_coupling#cite_note-13. |
| Yao, et al. Adhesion and sliding response of a biologically inspired fibrillar surface: experimental observations, J. R. Soc. Interface (2008) 5, 723-733 doi:10.1098/rsif.2007.1225 Published online Oct. 30, 2007. |
| Yao, et al. Maximum strength for intermolecular adhesion of nanospheres at an optimal size. J R Soc Interface. Nov. 6, 2008;5(28):1363-70. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0066. |
| Yi, et al. Piezoelectric Microspeaker with Compressive Nitride Diaphragm. The Fifteenth IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2002; 260-263. |
| Yu, et al. Photomechanics: Directed bending of a polymer film by light. Nature. Sep. 11, 2003;425(6954):145. DOI: 10.1038/425145a. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/356,217, inventors Imatani; Kyle et al., filed Jun. 23, 2021. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210274293 A1 | Sep 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60979645 | Oct 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12251200 | Oct 2008 | US |
| Child | 13768825 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16682329 | Nov 2019 | US |
| Child | 17077808 | US | |
| Parent | 16173869 | Oct 2018 | US |
| Child | 16682329 | US | |
| Parent | 15804995 | Nov 2017 | US |
| Child | 16173869 | US | |
| Parent | 14949495 | Nov 2015 | US |
| Child | 15804995 | US | |
| Parent | 13768825 | Feb 2013 | US |
| Child | 14949495 | US |
