Patent Grant
11576753
The present invention generally relates to the field of orthodontics, and more particularly to the design of multilayer dental positioning appliances.
An objective of orthodontics is to move a patient's teeth to positions where function and/or aesthetics are optimized. Traditionally, appliances such as braces are applied to a patient's teeth by a treating practitioner and the set of braces exerts continual force on the teeth and gradually urges them toward their intended positions. Over time and with a series of clinical visits and reactive adjustments to the braces by the practitioner, the appliances to move the teeth toward their final destination.
More recently, alternatives to conventional orthodontic treatment with traditional affixed appliances (e.g., braces) have become available. For example, systems including a series of preformed appliances/aligners have become commercially available from Align Technology, Inc., San Jose, Calif., under the trade name Invisalign® System. The Invisalign® System is described in numerous patents and patent applications assigned to Align Technology, Inc. including, for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,450,807, and 5,975,893, as well as on the company's website, which is accessible on the World Wide Web (see, e.g., the url invisalign.com”). The Invisalign® System includes designing and/or fabricating multiple, and sometimes all, of the aligners to be worn by the patient before the aligners are administered to the patient and used to reposition the teeth (e.g., at the outset of treatment). Often, designing and planning a customized treatment for a patient makes use of computer-based 3-dimensional planning/design tools, such as Treat™ software from Align Technology, Inc. The design of the aligners relies on computer modeling of the patient's teeth in a series of planned successive tooth arrangements, and the individual aligners are designed to be worn over the teeth, such that each aligner exerts force on the teeth and elastically repositions the teeth to each of the planned tooth arrangements.
While recently developed orthodontic treatment technologies, such as those described above, represent a considerable advancement in the field of orthodontics, additional advancements remain of interest. For example, in some instances it may be advantageous to develop materials that improve properties of the appliances/aligners used for orthodontic treatment. As such, there is a need for shell aligners that can, for example, produce more continuous force and better bring a patient's teeth into a desired occlusion.
The present invention provides multilayer orthodontic positioning appliances, as well as related methods and systems. The disclosed multilayer appliances include a removable orthodontic tooth positioning appliance having teeth receiving cavities shaped to directly receive at least some of the patient's teeth and apply a resilient positioning force to the patient's teeth. The multilayer appliances can include a hard polymer layer disposed between two soft polymer layers. The multilayer dental appliances of the present invention, among many aspects, provide, for example, improved material performance, stress relaxation properties and longer working range. In addition, the mechanical properties of the materials and appliances described herein can improve orthodontic treatments by, for example, reducing the need for midcourse corrections during treatment and the number of aligners used for a given treatment.
The disclosed methods include methods for making multilayer dental appliances. The disclosed systems including a plurality of appliances having teeth receiving cavities shaped to directly receive at least some of the patient's teeth and apply a resilient positioning force to the patient's teeth. The appliances can be successively worn by a patient to move teeth from one arrangement to a successive arrangement. At least one of the appliances in the system can include a hard polymer layer disposed between two soft polymer layers.
For a fuller understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention, reference should be made to the ensuing detailed description and accompanying drawings. Other aspects, objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the drawings and detailed description that follows.
In the following description, various embodiments of the present invention will be described. For purposes of explanation, specific configurations and details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. However, it will also be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without the specific details. Furthermore, well-known features may be omitted or simplified in order not to obscure the embodiment being described.
Multilayer orthodontic positioning appliances are provided, as well as related methods and systems. During orthodontic treatment, it may be necessary to apply forces to a tooth to generate movement of the tooth to, for example, bring the patient's teeth into a better occlusion in a mesial or distal direction. The presently disclosed appliances, methods, and systems provide means by which such forces can be applied during orthodontic treatment where appliances having teeth receiving cavities are used, such as preformed appliances/aligners available from Align Technology, Inc., San Jose, Calif., under the trade name Invisalign® System. As provided by the present invention, the aligners that include multilayer sheets can, for example, provide increased durability of the aligners so that they can better withstand wear due to aligner reinsertion and removal and other mechanical stresses put on the aligner during treatment. In addition, the aligners have improved elastic properties that allow for less degradation in the shape of the teeth receiving cavities during a stage of treatment. For example, during a multistage orthodontic treatment, the force exerted by an aligner to perform defined tooth movement can degrade and may cause the treatment to include more aligners to reach a final ideal arrangement and/or result in a mid-course correction that could be prevented by using aligners with improved physical properties, such as those provided herein.
In one embodiment, the present invention provides a dental appliance for positioning a patient's teeth. The dental appliance can include a removable orthodontic tooth positioning appliance having teeth receiving cavities shaped to directly receive at least some of the patient's teeth and apply a resilient positioning force to the patient's teeth, the appliance comprising a hard polymer layer disposed between a first soft polymer layer and a second soft polymer layer.
In another embodiment, the present invention provides an orthodontic system for positioning a patient's teeth. The orthodontic system can include a plurality of incremental position adjustment appliances having teeth receiving cavities shaped to directly receive at least some of the patient's teeth and apply a resilient positioning force to the patient's teeth, wherein the appliances are successively worn by a patient to move teeth from one arrangement to a successive arrangement, and wherein at least one of the appliances comprises a hard polymer layer disposed between a first soft polymer layer and a second soft polymer layer.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides a method of making a dental appliance for positioning a patient's teeth. The method can include providing a sheet comprising a hard polymer layer of polymeric material disposed between a first soft polymer layer and a second soft polymer layer, providing a positive model of the patient's teeth in a target position; and fabricating an appliance as a negative of the positive model comprising thermoforming the sheet over the positive model.
Referring now to the drawings, in which like reference numerals represent like parts throughout the several views,
An appliance can be designed and/or provided as part of a set of a plurality of appliances. In such an embodiment, each appliance may be configured so a tooth-receiving cavity has a geometry corresponding to an intermediate or final tooth arrangement intended for the appliance. The patient's teeth can be progressively repositioned from an initial tooth arrangement to a target tooth arrangement by placing a series of incremental position adjustment appliances over the patient's teeth. A target tooth arrangement can be a planned final tooth arrangement selected for the patient's teeth at the end of all planned orthodontic treatment. Alternatively, a target arrangement can be one of many intermediate arrangements for the patient's teeth during the course of orthodontic treatment, which may include where surgery is recommended, where inter-proximal reduction (IPR) is appropriate, where a progress check is scheduled, where anchor placement is best, where palatal expansion is desirable, etc. As such, it is understood that a target tooth arrangement can be any planned resulting arrangement for the patient's teeth that follows one or more incremental repositioning stages. Likewise, an initial tooth arrangement can be any initial arrangement for the patient's teeth that is followed by one or more incremental repositioning stages. The adjustment appliances can be generated all at the same stage or in sets or batches, e.g., at the beginning of a stage of the treatment, and the patient wears each appliance until the pressure of each appliance on the teeth can no longer be felt or has resulted in the maximum amount of expressed tooth movement for that given stage. A plurality of different appliances (e.g., set) can be designed and even fabricated prior to the patient wearing any appliance of the plurality. After wearing an appliance for an appropriate period of time, the patient replaces the current appliance with the next appliance in the series until no more appliances remain. The appliances are generally not affixed to the teeth and the patient may place and replace the appliances at any time during the procedure (e.g., patient-removable appliances). The final appliance or several appliances in the series may have a geometry or geometries selected to overcorrect the tooth arrangement, i.e., have a geometry which would (if fully achieved) move individual teeth beyond the tooth arrangement which has been selected as the “final.” Such over-correction may be desirable in order to offset potential relapse after the repositioning method has been terminated, i.e., to permit movement of individual teeth back toward their pre-corrected positions. Over-correction may also be beneficial to speed the rate of correction, i.e., by having an appliance with a geometry that is positioned beyond a desired intermediate or final position, the individual teeth will be shifted toward the position at a greater rate. In such cases, the use of an appliance can be terminated before the teeth reach the positions defined by the appliance.
In general, structures, methods and systems of the present invention utilize a multilayer sheet for use in orthodontic appliances. The multilayer sheet can include three layers, in which a hard polymer layer is disposed between two soft polymer layers. The multilayer sheets used in the present invention can be used in making dental aligners having improved durability for use, e.g., to the elastic properties of the multilayer sheet when formed into an aligner. In addition, the bonding strength between the layers further improves the durability of the aligners, for example, by withstanding teeth grinding by a patient.
Suitable polymeric materials for the hard polymer layer can include a polyester, a co-polyester, a polycarbonate, a thermoplastic polyurethane, a polypropylene, a polyethylene, a polypropylene and polyethylene copolymer, an acrylic, a cyclic block copolymer, a polyetheretherketone, a polyamide, a polyethylene terephthalate, a polybutylene terephthalate, a polyetherimide, a polyethersulfone, a polytrimethylene terephthalate or a combination thereof (e.g., a blend of at least two of the listed hard polymeric materials). In some embodiments, the hard polymer layer of the appliances can include polymeric materials, such as a polycarbonate, a co-polyester, a polyester, and a thermoplastic polyurethane. In some embodiments, the hard layer can be composed of multiple hard layers, e.g., two or three hard polymer layers 24-1, 24-2, 24-N co-extruded to form one hard layer.
The hard polymer layer of the appliances of the present invention can have a variety of physical properties that can, e.g., improve treatment options for a practitioner. For example, physical properties such as tensile strength, elongation at yield, elongation at break, tensile modulus, flexural modulus, stress relaxation over time, and light transmission can each be specifically tailored for a particular application. In some embodiments, the hard polymer layer of the appliances can have a physical property of at least one of a tensile strength at yield of between about 4000 pounds per square inch (psi) and 6500 psi, an elongation at yield of greater than about 4%, an elongation at break of greater than about 70%, a tensile modulus of greater than about 150,000 psi, a flexural modulus greater than about 150,000 psi, a stress relaxation at 24 hours testing in a wet environment (e.g., between about 90%-100% relative humidity) is greater than 10%, and a light transmission between 400 nm and 800 nm of greater than about 75%.
Suitable polymeric materials for the soft polymer layers of the appliance can include a styrenic block copolymer (SBC), a silicone rubber, an elastomeric alloy, a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE), a thermoplastic vulcanizate (TPV) elastomer, a polyurethane elastomer, a block copolymer elastomer, a polyolefin blend elastomer, a thermoplastic co-polyester elastomer, a thermoplastic polyamide elastomer, or a combination thereof (e.g., a blend of at least two of the listed soft polymeric materials). The soft polymer layers can be the same material or a different material. In certain embodiments, the first soft polymer layer and the second soft polymer layer are the same polymeric material.
The soft polymer layers of the appliances can have a variety of physical properties. For example, physical properties such as hardness, ultimate tensile strength, elongation at break, tensile modulus, compression set, flexural modulus, and light transmission can each be specifically tailored for a particular application. In some embodiments, the soft polymer layers of the appliances can independently have a physical property of at least one of a hardness of about 60A to about 85D, an ultimate tensile strength of greater than about 5000 psi, an elongation at break of greater than about 200%, a compression set at about 70° C. of greater than 40% after 24 hours, a flexural modulus of greater than about 35,000 psi, and a light transmission between 400 nm and 800 nm of greater than about 75%.
As described herein, the layers of the appliances can include a hard polymer layer disposed between two soft polymer layers. In one embodiment, the multilayer appliances can include a hard polymer layer of one type of material (e.g., a co-polyester), and two soft polymer layers of other types of material that can be the same or different (e.g., two soft polymer layers of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer). In some embodiments, the multilayer appliances can also include a hard polymer layer of at least two layers of polymer material. For example, the hard polymer layer can include several polymer layers laminated together to form the hard polymer layer. The laminated hard polymer layer can include at least two layers of any combination of the following polymer materials: a polyester, a co-polyester, a polycarbonate, a thermoplastic polyurethane, a polypropylene, a polyethylene, a polypropylene and polyethylene copolymer, an acrylic, a cyclic block copolymer, a polyetheretherketone, a polyamide, a polyethylene terephthalate, a polybutylene terephthalate, a polyetherimide, a polyethersulfone, and a polytrimethylene terephthalate. Similarly, in some embodiments, the multilayer appliances can include a soft polymer layer of at least two layers of polymer material. For example, the soft polymer layers 22, 26 can include a layer of several polymer layers 22-1, 22-2, 22-N and 26-1, 26-2, 26-N, respectively, laminated together. The laminated soft polymer layers can include at least two layers of any combination of the following polymer materials: a styrenic block copolymer (SBC), a silicone rubber, an elastomeric alloy, a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE), a thermoplastic vulcanizate (TPV) elastomer, a polyurethane elastomer, a block copolymer elastomer, a polyolefin blend elastomer, a thermoplastic co-polyester elastomer, and a thermoplastic polyamide elastomer.
The tooth positioning appliances can be fabricated using a variety of methods. For example, methods for making the appliances can include thermoforming a multilayer sheet into an aligner by heating the sheet and then molding the sheet to a particular configuration. Exemplary methods for fabricating the appliances, including those utilized in the Invisalign® System, are described in numerous patents and patent applications assigned to Align Technology, Inc. including, for example, in U.S. application Ser. No. 13/186,374 as well as on the company's website, which is accessible on the World Wide Web (see, e.g., the url invisalign.com”).
One or a series of physical tooth models, such as the model described above, may be used in the generation of elastic repositioning appliances for orthodontic treatment. Similar to the process above, each of the appliances can be generated by thermoforming a multilayer polymeric material over a mold of a desired tooth arrangement to form a dental appliance. The tooth positioning appliance of the desired tooth arrangement generally conforms to a patient's teeth but is slightly out of alignment with the initial tooth configuration. Placement of the elastic positioner over the teeth applies controlled forces in specific locations to gradually move the teeth into the desired configuration. Repetition of this process with successive appliances comprising new configurations eventually moves the teeth through a series of intermediate configurations to a final desired configuration.
The present invention includes a variety of methods for fabricating dental appliances.
Multilayer sheets of the present invention were analyzed and determined to provide a variety of improved properties for aligners used in orthodontic treatment. As further described herein, the multilayer sheets formed into aligners can, for example, provide increased durability of the aligners so that they can better withstand wear due to teeth grinding and other mechanical stresses put on the aligner during treatment. In addition, the aligners have improved elastic properties that allow for less degradation in the shape of the teeth receiving cavities during a stage of treatment. For example, during a multistage orthodontic treatment, the capability of an aligner to force tooth movement can degrade and may cause the treatment to include more aligners to reach a final ideal arrangement and/or result in a mid-course correction that could be prevented by using aligners with improved physical properties, such as those provided herein.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing embodiments (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. The term “connected” is to be construed as partly or wholly contained within, attached to, or joined together, even if there is something intervening. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate embodiments and does not pose a limitation on the scope unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of at least one embodiment.
Variations of the embodiments described herein may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for embodiments to be constructed otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, suitable embodiments include all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is contemplated as being incorporated into some suitable embodiment unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined not with reference to the above description, but instead should be determined with reference to the pending claims along with their full scope or equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/043,065, filed Jul. 23, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/476,622, filed Mar. 31, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,052,176, issued Aug. 21, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/470,681, filed May 14, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,655,691, issued May 23, 2017, the entire contents of each are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2467432 | Kesling | Apr 1949 | A |
| 3407500 | Kesling | Oct 1968 | A |
| 3600808 | Reeve | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3660900 | Andrews | May 1972 | A |
| 3683502 | Wallshein | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3738005 | Cohen et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3763109 | Witsiepe et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3766146 | Witsiepe et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3860803 | Levine | Jan 1975 | A |
| 3916526 | Schudy | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3922786 | Lavin | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3950851 | Bergersen | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3983628 | Acevedo | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4014096 | Dellinger | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4195046 | Kesling | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4253828 | Coles et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4324546 | Heitlinger et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4324547 | Arcan et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4346195 | Hornbaker et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4348178 | Kurz | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4410595 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4478580 | Barrut | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4500294 | Lewis | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4504225 | Yoshii | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4505673 | Yoshii | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4526540 | Dellinger | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4575330 | Hull | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4575805 | Moermann et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4591341 | Andrews | May 1986 | A |
| 4609349 | Cain | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4611288 | Duret et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4656860 | Orthuber et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4663720 | Duret et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4664626 | Kesling | May 1987 | A |
| 4676747 | Kesling | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4739012 | Hagman | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4742464 | Duret et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4755139 | Abbatte et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4763791 | Halverson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4791156 | Hostettler | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4793803 | Martz | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4798534 | Breads | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4824723 | Campbell et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4836778 | Baumrind et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4837732 | Brandestini et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4843124 | Wolfe, Jr. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4850864 | Diamond | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4850865 | Napolitano | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4856991 | Breads et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4877398 | Kesling | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4880380 | Martz | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4889238 | Batchelor | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4890608 | Steer | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4935635 | O'Harra | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4936862 | Walker et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4937928 | Van Der Zel | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4941826 | Loran et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4964770 | Steinbichler et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4975052 | Spencer et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4983334 | Adell | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5011405 | Lemchen | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5017133 | Miura | May 1991 | A |
| 5024790 | Grossman et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5027281 | Rekow et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5035613 | Breads et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5055039 | Abbatte et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5059118 | Breads et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5100316 | Wildman | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5121333 | Riley et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5125832 | Kesling | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5128870 | Erdman et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5130064 | Smalley et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5131843 | Hilgers et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5131844 | Marinaccio et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5139419 | Andreiko et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5145364 | Martz et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5176517 | Truax | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5184306 | Erdman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5186623 | Breads et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5257203 | Riley et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5273429 | Rekow et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5278756 | Lemchen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5328362 | Watson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5335675 | Wheeler et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5338198 | Wu et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5340309 | Robertson | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342202 | Deshayes | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5368478 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5382164 | Stern | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5395238 | Andreiko et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5431562 | Andreiko et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5440326 | Quinn | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5440496 | Andersson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5447432 | Andreiko et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5452219 | Dehoff et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5454717 | Andreiko et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5456600 | Andreiko et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5474448 | Andreiko et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| RE35169 | Lemchen et al. | Mar 1996 | E |
| 5518397 | Andreiko et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5528735 | Strasnick et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5533895 | Andreiko et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5542842 | Andreiko et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549476 | Stern | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5562448 | Mushabac | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5587912 | Andersson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5605459 | Kuroda et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607305 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5614075 | Andre, Sr. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5621648 | Crump | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5645420 | Bergersen | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5645421 | Slootsky | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5655653 | Chester | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5683243 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5692894 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5725376 | Poirier | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5725378 | Wang | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733126 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5740267 | Echerer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5742700 | Yoon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5799100 | Clarke et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5800174 | Andersson | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5823778 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5848115 | Little et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5857853 | Van Nifterick et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5866058 | Batchelder et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5879158 | Doyle et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5880961 | Crump | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5880962 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5934288 | Avila et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5957686 | Anthony | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5964587 | Sato | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5971754 | Sondhi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5975893 | Chishti et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6015289 | Andreiko et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6044309 | Honda | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6049743 | Baba | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6062861 | Andersson | May 2000 | A |
| 6068482 | Snow | May 2000 | A |
| 6099314 | Kopelman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6123544 | Cleary | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6152731 | Jordan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6183248 | Chishti et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6190165 | Andreiko et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6217325 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6217334 | Hultgren et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6244861 | Andreiko et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6309215 | Phan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6315553 | Sachdeva et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322359 | Jordan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6350120 | Sachdeva et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6382975 | Poirier | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6390812 | Chishti et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6398548 | Muhammad et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6402707 | Ernst | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6450807 | Chishti et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6454565 | Phan et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6482298 | Bhatnagar | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6485298 | Chishti et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6524101 | Phan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6554611 | Shishti et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6572372 | Phan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6629840 | Chishti et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6667101 | Silagy et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6705861 | Chishti et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6705863 | Phan et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6722880 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6746757 | Takagi et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 7121825 | Chishti et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7201575 | Adell et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7354270 | Abolfathi et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7641828 | Desimone et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 8235713 | Phan et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8496473 | Phan et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 9108338 | Sirovskiy et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9655691 | Li et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9655693 | Li et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 10052176 | Li et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 20010041320 | Phan et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020006597 | Andreiko et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020146549 | Kranenburg-Van Dijk et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020192617 | Phan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009252 | Pavlovskaia et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139834 | Nikolskiy et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030190576 | Phan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030224311 | Cronauer | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040128010 | Pavlovskaia et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040146670 | Chin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040170941 | Phan et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050055118 | Nikolskiy et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050082703 | Wrosz | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050100853 | Tadros et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20070148608 | Tadros et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070231765 | Phan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080020337 | Phan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080230938 | Grefenstein et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080248438 | Desimone et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080299507 | Li et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090087808 | Soo et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090130438 | Nassi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090239188 | Ting et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090246724 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090298006 | Schwartz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090306327 | Stewart et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100055639 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20110020761 | Kalili | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110062609 | Desimone et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110069134 | Sakagami et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20120315484 | Riedl et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20150140300 | Pudleiner et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150374464 | Stewart | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160228215 | Li et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20170007362 | Chen et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170202641 | Li et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20190286291 | Wen | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20200290262 | Aguilar Mendez et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 3031677 | May 1979 | AU |
| 517102 | Jul 1981 | AU |
| 5598894 | Jun 1994 | AU |
| 1121955 | Apr 1982 | CA |
| 108394152 | Aug 2018 | CN |
| 2749802 | May 1978 | DE |
| 69327661 | Jul 2000 | DE |
| 102004014023 | Oct 2005 | DE |
| 102010009230 | Aug 2011 | DE |
| 102010036107 | Mar 2012 | DE |
| 202013001392 | Apr 2013 | DE |
| 0091876 | Oct 1983 | EP |
| 0299490 | Jan 1989 | EP |
| 0376873 | Jul 1990 | EP |
| 0490848 | Jun 1992 | EP |
| 0541500 | May 1993 | EP |
| 0667753 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 0774933 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 0731673 | May 2001 | EP |
| 463897 | Jan 1980 | ES |
| 2369828 | Jun 1978 | FR |
| 2652256 | Mar 1991 | FR |
| 1550777 | Aug 1979 | GB |
| S5358191 | May 1978 | JP |
| H0428359 | Jan 1992 | JP |
| H0696486 | Apr 1994 | JP |
| H06256630 | Sep 1994 | JP |
| H07156349 | Jun 1995 | JP |
| 08508174 | Sep 1996 | JP |
| H08508174 | Sep 1996 | JP |
| H11279389 | Oct 1999 | JP |
| 2004099656 | Apr 2004 | JP |
| 2011079284 | Apr 2011 | JP |
| 2201944 | Apr 2003 | RU |
| 2008137623 | Mar 2010 | RU |
| WO-9008512 | Aug 1990 | WO |
| WO-9104713 | Apr 1991 | WO |
| WO-9410935 | May 1994 | WO |
| WO-9711106 | Mar 1997 | WO |
| WO-9832394 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO-9844865 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO-9858596 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO-0180762 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO-0180764 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO-2004041898 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO-2006096558 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO-2010043419 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010074789 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO-2013172812 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International search report with written opinion dated Jun. 28, 2013 for PCT/EP2013/059701. |
| “Polycarbonate,” Encyclopaedia Britannica, Aug. 24, 2017, 1 page, URL: https://www.britannica.com/science/polycarbonate. |
| Bayer Corporation, “TEXIN® 990R,” pp. 1-4, Nov. 2002, Pittsburgh, PA. |
| Campo, E. A. “Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Materials,” from “Selection of Polymeric Materials: Plastics Design Library,” 2008, 4 pages. |
| Emblem, A. “Plastics properties for packaging materials,” from “Packaging Technology: Fundamentals, Materials and Processes,” 2012, 3 pages. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/382,918, filed Apr. 12, 2019. |
| Rekow et al., “CAD/CAM for Dental Restorations—Some of the Curious Challenges,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 38(4):314-318 (Apr. 1991). |
| Wishan, “New Advances in Personal Computer Applications for Cephalometric Analysis, Growth Prediction, Surgical Treatment Planning and Imaging Processing,” Symposium: Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxilofacial Surgery Presented on Sep. 13, 1990. |
| AADR. American Association for Dental Research, Summary of Activities, Mar. 20-23, 1980, Los Angeles, CA, p. 195. |
| Alcaniz, et aL, “An Advanced System for the Simulation and Planning of Orthodontic Treatments,” Karl Heinz Hohne and Ron Kikinis (eds.), Visualization in Biomedical Computing, 4th Intl. Conf., VBC '96, Hamburg, Germany, Sep. 22-25, 1996, Springer-Verlag, pp. 511-520. |
| Alexander et al., “The DigiGraph Work Station Part 2 Clinical Management,” JCO, pp. 402-407 (Jul. 1990). |
| Altschuler, “3D Mapping of Maxillo-Facial Prosthesis,” AADR Abstract #607, 2 pages total, (1980). |
| Altschuler et al., “Analysis of 3-D Data for Comparative 3-D Serial Growth Pattern Studies of Oral-Facial Structures,” IADR Abstracts, Program and Abstracts of Papers, 57th General Session, IADR Annual Session, Mar. 29, 1979-Apr. 1, 1979, New Orleans Marriot, Journal of Dental Research, vol. 58, Jan. 1979, Special Issue A, p. 221. |
| Altschuler et al., “Laser Electro-Optic System for Rapid Three-Dimensional (3D) Topographic Mapping of Surfaces,” Optical Engineering, 20(6):953-961 (1981). |
| Altschuler et al., “Measuring Surfaces Space-Coded by a Laser-Projected Dot Matrix,” SPIE Imaging Applications for Automated Industrial Inspection and Assembly, vol. 182, p. 187-191 (1979). |
| Andersson et al., “Clinical Results with Titanium Crowns Fabricated with Machine Duplication and Spark Erosion,” Acta. Odontol. Scand., 47:279-286 (1989). |
| Andrews, The Six Keys to Optimal Occlusion Straight Wire, Chapters, pp. 13-24 (1989). |
| Baird Equity Research. Align Technology, Inc. (ALGN): Analyst Day Recap. May 30, 2014. 12 pages. |
| Baird Equity Research. Align Technology, Inc. (ALGN): Impressive Quarter/Guide, Momentum Stronger than We Realized. Oct. 18, 2013. 15 pages. |
| Bartels, et al., An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 422-425 (1987). |
| Baumrind, “A System for Craniofacial Mapping Through the Integration of Data from Stereo X-Ray Films and Stereo Photographs,” an invited paper submitted to the 1975 American Society of Photogram Symposium on Close-Range Photogram Systems, University of Ill., Aug. 26-30, 1975, pp. 142-166. |
| Baumrind et al., “A Stereophotogrammetric System for the Detection of Prosthesis Loosening in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” NATO Symposium on Applications of Human Biostereometrics, Jul. 9-13, 1978, SPIE, vol. 166, pp. 112-123. |
| Baumrind et al., “Mapping the Skull in 3-D,” reprinted from J. Calif. Dent. Assoc., 48(2), 11 pages total, (1972 Fall Issue). |
| Baumrind, “Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping: Background, Principles, and Perspectives,” Semin. in Orthod., 7(4):223-232 (Dec. 2001). |
| Begole et al., “A Computer System for the Analysis of Dental Casts,” The Angle Orthod., 51(3):253-259 (Jul. 1981). |
| Bernard et al.,“Computerized Diagnosis in Orthodontics for Epidemiological Studies: A Progress Report,” Abstract, J. Dental Res. Special Issue, vol. 67, p. 169, paper presented at International Association for Dental Research 66th General Session, Mar. 9-13, 1988, Montreal, Canada. |
| Bhatia et al., “A Computer-Aided Design for Orthognathic Surgery,” Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 22:237-253 (1984). |
| Biggerstaff, “Computerized Diagnostic Setups and Simulations,” Angle Orthod., 40(1):28-36 (Jan. 1970). |
| Biggerstaff et al., “Computerized Analysis of Occlusion in the Postcanine Dentition,” Am. J. Orthod., 61(3): 245-254 (Mar. 1972). |
| Biostar Operation & Training Manual. Great Lakes Orthodontics, Ltd. 199 Fire Tower Drive, Tonawanda, New York. 14150-5890, 20 pages total (1990). |
| Blu, et al., “Linear interpolation revitalized”, IEEE Trans. Image Proc., 13(5):710-719 (May 2004. |
| Boedeker.com. Polycarbonate specifications [retrieved on Sep. 10, 2013], Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.boedeker.com/polyc_p.htm. |
| Bourke, “Coordinate System Transformation,” (Jun. 1996), p. 1, retrieved from the Internet Nov. 5, 2004, URL< http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/-pbourke/prolection/coords>. |
| Boyd et al., “Three Dimensional Diagnosis and Orthodontic Treatment of Complex Malocclusions With the Invisalipn Appliance,” Semin. Orthod., 7(4):274-293 (Dec. 2001). |
| Brandestini et al., “Computer Machined Ceramic Inlays: In Vitro Marginal Adaptation,” J. Dent. Res. Special Issue, Abstract 305, vol. 64, p. 208 (1985). |
| Brook et al., “An Image Analysis System for the Determination of Tooth Dimensions from Study Casts: Comparison with Manual Measurements of Mesio-distal Diameter,” J. Dent. Res., 65(3):428-431 (Mar. 1986). |
| Burstone et al., Precision Adjustment of the Transpalatal Lingual Arch: Computer Arch Form IN Predetermination, Am, Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 79, No. 2 (Feb. 1981), pp. 115-133. |
| Burstone (interview), “Dr. Charles J. Burstone on the Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 1),” J. Clin. Orthod., 13(7):442-453 (Jul. 1979). |
| Burstone (interview), “Dr. Charles J. Burstone on the Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 2),” J. Clin. Orthod., 13(8):539-551 (Aug. 1979). |
| Cardinal Industrial Finishes, Powder Coatings information posted at< http://www.cardinalpaint.com> on Aug. 25, 2000, 2 pages. |
| Carnaghan, “An Alternative to Holograms for the Portrayal of Human Teeth,” 4th Int'l. Conf. on Holographic Systems, Components and Applications, Sep. 15, 1993, pp. 228-231. |
| Chaconas et al., “The DigiGraph Work Station, Part 1, Basic Concepts,” JCO, pp. 360-367 (Jun. 1990). |
| Chafetz et al., “Subsidence of the Femoral Prosthesis, A Stereophotogrammetric Evaluation,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., No. 201, pp. 60-67 (Dec. 1985). |
| Chiappone, (1980). Constructing the Gnathologic Setup and Positioner, J. Clin. Orthod, vol. 14, pp. 121-133. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/043,065, filed Jul. 23, 2018. |
| Cottingham, (1969). Gnathologic Clear Plastic Positioner, Am. J. Orthod, vol. 55, pp. 23-31. |
| Crawford, “CAD/CAM in the Dental Office: Does It Work?”, Canadian Dental Journal, vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 121-123 (Feb. 1991). |
| Crawford, “Computers in Dentistry: Part 1 CAD/CAM: The Computer Moves Chairside, Part 2 F. Duret—A Man with a Vision, Part 3 The Computer Gives New Vision—Literally, Part 4 Bytes 'N Bites—The Computer Moves from the Front Desk to the Operatory,” Canadian Dental Journal, vol. 54 (9), pp. 661-666 (1988). |
| Crooks, “CAD/CAM Comes to USC,” USC Dentistry, pp. 14-17 (Spring 1990). |
| Cureton, Correcting Malaligned Mandibular Incisors with Removable Retainers, J. Clin. Orthod, vol. 30, No. 7 (1996) pp. 390-395. |
| Curry et al., “Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping at the Craniofacial Research Instrumentation Laboratory/University of the Pacific,” Semin. Orthod., 7(4):258-265 (Dec. 2001). |
| Cutting et a/., “Three-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Design of Craniofacial Surgical Procedures: Optimization and Interaction with Cephalometric and CT-Based Models,” Plast. 77(6):877-885 (Jun. 1986). |
| DCS Dental AG, “The CAD/CAM ‘DCS Titan System’ for Production of Crowns/Bridges,” DSC Production AG, pp. 1-7 (Jan. 1992. |
| Definition for gingiva. Dictionary.com p. 1-3. Retrieved from the internet Nov. 5, 2004< http://reference.com/search/search?q=gingiva>. |
| Defranco et al., “Three-Dimensional Large Displacement Analysis of Orthodontic Appliances,” J. Biomechanics, 9:793-801 (1976). |
| Dental Institute University of Zurich Switzerland, Program for International Symposium JD on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the CEREC-Method, May 1991, 2 pages total. |
| Dentrac Corporation, Dentrac document, pp. 4-13 (1992). |
| Dent-X posted on Sep. 24, 1998 at< http://www.dent-x.com/DentSim.htm>, 6 pages. |
| Doyle, “Digital Dentistry,” Computer Graphics World, pp. 50-52, 54 (Oct. 2000). |
| DuraClearTM product information, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab, 1 page (1997). |
| DURET et al., “CAD/CAM Imaging in Dentistry,” Curr. Opin. Dent., 1:150-154 (1991). |
| Duret et al., “CAD-CAM in Dentistry,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 117:715-720 (Nov. 1988). |
| Duret, “The Dental CAD/CAM, General Description of the Project,” Hennson International Product Brochure, 18 pages total, Jan. 1986. |
| Duret,“Vers Une Prosthese Informatisee,” (English translation attached), Tonus, vol. 75, pp. 55-57 (Nov. 15, 1985). |
| Economides, “The Microcomputer in the Orthodontic Office,” JCO, pp. 767-772 (Nov. 1979). |
| Elsasser, Some Observations on the History and Uses of the Kesling Positioner, Am. J. Orthod. (1950) 36:368-374. |
| English translation of Japanese Laid-Open Publication No. 63-11148 to inventor T. Ozukuri (Laid-Open on Jan. 18, 1998) pp. 1-7. |
| Felton et al., “A Computerized Analysis of the Shape and Stability of Mandibular Arch Form,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92(6):478-483 (Dec. 1987). |
| Friede et al., “Accuracy of Cephalometric Prediction in Orthognathic Surgery,” Abstract of Papers, J. Dent. Res., 70:754-760 (1987). |
| Futterling et a/., “Automated Finite Element Modeling of a Human Mandible with Dental Implants,” JS WSCG '98 —Conference Program, retrieved from the Internet:< http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/papers98/Strasser 98.pdf>, 8 pages. |
| Gao et al., “3-D element Generation for Multi-Connected Complex Dental and Mandibular Structure,” Proc. Intl Workshop on Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality, pp. 267-271 (Jun. 12, 2001). |
| Gim-Alldent Deutschland, “Das DUX System: Die Technik,” 2 pages total (2002). |
| Gottleib et al., “JCO Interviews Dr. James A. McNamura, Jr., on the Frankel Appliance: Part 2: Clinical 1-1 Management, ”J. Clin. Orthod., 16(6):390-407 (Jun. 1982). |
| Grayson, “New Methods for Three Dimensional Analysis of Craniofacial Deformity, Symposium: JW Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxiiofacial Surgery,” AAOMS, 3 pages total, (Sep. 13, 1990). |
| Guess et al., “Computer Treatment Estimates in Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery,” JCO, pp. 262-28 (Apr. 1989). |
| Heaven et a/., “Computer-Based Image Analysis of Artificial Root Surface Caries,” Abstracts of Papers, J. Dent. Res., 70:528 (Apr. 17-21, 1991). |
| Highbeam Research, “Simulating Stress Put on Jaw,” Tooling & Production [online], Nov. 1996, n pp. 1-2, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, URL http://static.highbeam.com/t/toolingampproduction/november011996/simulatingstressputonfa . . . >. |
| Hikage, “Integrated Orthodontic Management System for Virtual Three-Dimensional Computer Graphic Simulation and Optical Video Image Database for Diagnosis and Treatment Planning”, Journal of Japan KA Orthodontic Society, Feb. 1987, English translation, pp. 1-38, Japanese version, 46(2), pp. 248-269 (60 pages total). |
| Hoffmann, et al., “Role of Cephalometry for Planning of Jaw Orthopedics and Jaw Surgery Procedures,” (Article Summary in English, article in German), Informatbnen, pp. 375-396 (Mar. 1991). |
| Hojjatie et al., “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Glass-Ceramic Dental Crowns,” J. Biomech., 23(11):1157-1166 (1990). |
| Huckins, “CAD-CAM Generated Mandibular Model Prototype from MRI Data,” AAOMS, p. 96 (1999). |
| Important Tip About Wearing the Red White & Blue Active Clear Retainer System, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab, 1 page 1998). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 18, 2014 for International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/037745. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 30, 2013 for International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/037745. |
| JCO Interviews, Craig Andreiko , DDS, MS on the Elan and Orthos Systems, JCO, pp. 459-468 (Aug. 1994). |
| JCO Interviews, Dr. Homer W. Phillips on Computers in Orthodontic Practice, Part 2, JCO. 1997; 1983:819-831. |
| Jerrold, “The Problem, Electronic Data Transmission and the Law,” AJO-DO, pp. 478-479 (Apr. 1988). |
| Jones et al., “An Assessment of the Fit of a Parabolic Curve to Pre- and Post-Treatment Dental Arches,” Br. J. Orthod., 16:85-93 (1989). |
| JP Faber et al., “Computerized Interactive Orthodontic Treatment Planning,” Am. J. Orthod., 73(1):36-46 (Jan. 1978). |
| Kamada et.al., Case Reports on Tooth Positioners Using LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber, J. Nihon University School of Dentistry (1984) 26(1): 11-29. |
| Kamada et.al., Construction of Tooth Positioners with LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber and Some Case KJ Reports, J. Nihon University School of Dentistry (1982) 24(1):1-27. |
| Kanazawa et al., “Three-Dimensional Measurements of the Occlusal Surfaces of Upper Molars in a Dutch Population,” J. Dent Res., 63(11):1298-1301 (Nov. 1984). |
| Kesling, Coordinating the Predetermined Pattern and Tooth Positioner with Conventional Treatment, KN Am. J. Orthod. Oral Surg. (1946) 32:285-293. |
| Kesling et al., The Philosophy of the Tooth Positioning Appliance, American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral surgery. 1945; 31:297-304. |
| Kleeman et al., The Speed Positioner, J. Clin. Orthod. (1996) 30:673-680. |
| Kochanek, “Interpolating Splines with Local Tension, Continuity and Bias Control,” Computer Graphics, ri 18(3):33-41 (Jul. 1984). KM Oral Surgery (1945) 31 :297-30. |
| Kunii et al., “Articulation Simulation for an Intelligent Dental Care System,” Displays 15:181-188 (1994). |
| Kuroda et al., Three-Dimensional Dental Cast Analyzing System Using Laser Scanning, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. (1996) 110:365-369. |
| Laurendeau, et al., “A Computer-Vision Technique for the Acquisition and Processing of 3-D Profiles of 7 KR Dental Imprints: An Application in Orthodontics,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 10(3):453-461 (Sep. 1991. |
| Leinfelder, et al., “A New Method for Generating Ceramic Restorations: a CAD-CAM System,” J. Am. 1-1 Dent. Assoc., 118(6):703-707 (Jun. 1989). |
| Lubrizol.com. I sop last 2530 data sheet [retrieved on Sep. 10, 2013], Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.lubrizol.com/Medicai/TDS/Isoplast-2530.pdf. |
| Manetti, et al., “Computer-Aided Cefalometry and New Mechanics in Orthodontics,” (Article Summary in English, article in German), Fortschr Kieferorthop. 44, 370-376 (Nr. 5), 1983. |
| Mccann, “Inside the ADA,” J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 118:286-294 (Mar. 1989). |
| Mcnamara et al., “Invisible Retainers,” J. Cfin. Orthod., pp. 570-578 (Aug. 1985). |
| Mcnamara et al., Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatment in the Mixed Dentition, Needham Press, pp. 347-353 (Jan. 1993). |
| Moermann et al., “Computer Machined Adhesive Porcelain Inlays: Margin Adaptation after Fatigue Stress,” IADR Abstract 339, J. Dent. Res., 66(a):763 (1987). |
| Moles, “Correcting Mild Malalignments—As Easy as One, Two, Three,” AOA/Pro Corner, vol. 11, No. 1, 2 pages (2002). |
| Mormann et al., “Marginale Adaptation von adhasuven Porzellaninlays in vitro,” Separatdruck aus: Schweiz. Mschr. Zahnmed. 95: 1118-1129, 1985. |
| Nahoum, “The Vacuum Formed Dental Contour Appliance,” N. Y. State Dent. J., 30(9):385-390 (Nov. 1964). |
| Nash, “CEREC CAD/CAM Inlays: Aesthetics and Durability in a Single Appointment,” Dent. Today, 9(8):20, 22-23 (Oct. 1990). |
| Nishiyama et al., “A New Construction of Tooth Repositioner by LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber,” J. Nihon Univ. Sch. Dent., 19(2):93-102 (1977). |
| Paul et al., “Digital Documentation of Individual Human Jaw and Tooth Forms for Applications in Orthodontics, Oral Surgery and Forensic Medicine” Proc. of the 24th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON '98), Sep. 4, 1998, pp. 2415-2418. |
| Pinkham, “Foolish Concept Propels Technology,” Dentist, 3 pages total, Jan./Feb. 1989. |
| Pinkham, “Inventor's CAD/CAM May Transform Dentistry,” Dentist, 3 pages total, Sep. 1990. |
| Plastics.ides.com. Polyurethane Thermoset Elastomer Typical Properties Generic [retrieved on Jul. 27, 2014], Retrieved from the Internet: http://plastics.ides.com/generics/57/c/t/polyurethane-thermoset-elastomer-tsu- properties-processing. |
| Ponitz, “Invisible Retainers,” Am. J. Orthod., 59(3):266-272 (Mar. 1971). |
| PROCERA Research Projects, “PROCERA Research Projects 1993—Abstract Collection,” pp. 3-7; 28 (1993). |
| Proffit et al., Contemporary Orthodontics, (Second Ed.), Chapter 15, Mosby Inc., pp. 470-533 (Oct. 1993. |
| Raintree Essix & ARS Materials, Inc., Raintree Essix, Technical Magazine Table of contents and Essix Appliances,< http:// www.essix.com/magazine/defaulthtml> Aug. 13, 1997. |
| Redmond et al., “Clinical Implications of Digital Orthodontics,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 117(2):240-242 (2000). |
| Rekow, “A Review of the Developments in Dental CAD/CAM Systems,” (contains references to Japanese efforts and content of the papers of particular interest to the clinician are indicated with a one line summary of their content in the bibliography), Curr. Opin. Dent., 2:25-33 (Jun. 1992). |
| Rekow, “CAD/CAM in Dentistry: A Historical Perspective and View of the Future,” J. Can. Dent. Assoc., 58(4):283, 287-288 (Apr. 1992). |
| Rekow, “Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Dentistry: A Review of the State of the Art,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 58(4):512-516 (Oct. 1987). |
| Rekow, “Dental CAD-CAM Systems: What is the State of the Art?”, J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 122:43-48 1991. |
| Rekow et al., “Comparison of Three Data Acquisition Techniques for 3-D Tooth Surface Mapping,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 13(1):344-345 1991. |
| Rekow, “Feasibility of an Automated System for Production of Dental Restorations, Ph.D. Thesis,” Univ. of Minnesota, 244 pages total, Nov. 1988. |
| Richmond et al., “The Development of a 3D Cast Analysis System,” Br. J. Orthod., 13(1):53-54 (Jan. 1986). |
| Richmond et al., “The Development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): Reliability and Validity,” Eur. J. Orthod., 14:125-139 (1992). |
| Richmond, “Recording the Dental Cast in Three Dimensions,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92(3):199-206 (Sep. 1987). |
| Rudge, “Dental Arch Analysis: Arch Form, A Review of the Literature,” Eur. J. Orthod., 3(4):279-284 1981. |
| Sakuda et al., “Integrated Information-Processing System In Clinical Orthodontics: An Approach with Use of a Computer Network System,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 101(3): 210-220 (Mar. 1992). |
| Schellhas et al., “Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Surgical Planning,” Arch. Otolamp!. Head Neck Sur9., 114:438-442 (Apr. 1988). |
| Schroeder et al., Eds. The Visual Toolkit, Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey (1998) Chapters 6, 8 & 9, (pp. 153-210,309-354, and 355-428, respectively. |
| Shilliday, (1971). Minimizing finishing problems with the mini-positioner, Am. J. Orthod. 59:596-599. |
| Siemens, “CEREC—Computer-Reconstruction,” High Tech in derZahnmedizin, 14 pages total (2004). |
| Sinclair, “The Readers' Corner,” J. Clin. Orthod., 26(6):369-372 (Jun. 1992). |
| Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, CEREC 3D, Manuel utiiisateur, Version 2.0X (in French), 2003,114 pages total. |
| Stifel. TAM Survey. Properly Aligning Expectations Ahead of 4Q13 Guidance. Align Technology, Inc. Oct. 10, 2013. 12 pages. |
| Stoll et al., “Computer-aided Technologies in Dentistry,” (article summary in English, article in German), Dtsch Zahna'rztl Z 45, pp. 314-322 (1990). |
| Sturman, “Interactive Keyframe Animation of 3-D Articulated Models,” Proceedings Graphics Interface '84, May-Jun. 1984, pp. 35-40. |
| The Choice Is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee HI Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for doctors. http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/doctorhtml>, 5 pages (May 19, 2003). |
| The Choice is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee HJ Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for patients,< http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/patients.html>, 2 pages (May 19, 2003). |
| The Choice Is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information, 6 pages (2003). |
| The Red, White & Blue Way to Improve Your Smile! Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for patients, 2 pages 1992. |
| Truax L., “Truax Clasp-Less(TM) Appliance System,” Funct. Orthod., 9(5):22-4, 26-8 (Sep.-Oct. 1992). |
| Tru-Tain Orthodontic & Dental Supplies, Product Brochure, Rochester, Minnesota 55902, 16 pages total (1996). |
| U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, “Automated Crown Replication Using Solid Photography SM,” Solid Photography Inc., Melville NY, Oct. 1977, 20 pages total. |
| U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, “Holodontography: An Introduction to Dental Laser Holography,” School of Aerospace Medicine Brooks AFB Tex, Mar. 1973, 37 pages total. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/050,342, filed Jun. 20, 1997, 41 pages total. |
| Van Der Linden, “A New Method to Determine Tooth Positions and Dental Arch Dimensions,” J. Dent. Res., 51(4):1104 (Jul.-Aug. 1972). |
| Van Der Linden et al., “Three-Dimensional Analysis of Dental Casts by Means of the Optocom,” J. Dent. Res., p. 1100 (Jul.-Aug. 1972). |
| Van Der Zel, “Ceramic-Fused-to-Metal Restorations with a New CAD/CAM System,” Quintessence Int., 24(11):769-778 (1993. |
| Varady et al., “Reverse Engineering of Geometric Models—An Introduction,” Computer-Aided Design, 29(4):255-268,1997. |
| Verstreken et al., “An Image-Guided Planning System for Endosseous Oral Implants,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 17(5):842-852 (Oct. 1998). |
| Warunek et al., Physical and Mechanical Properties of Elastomers in Orthodonic Positioners, Am J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop, vol. 95, No. 5, (May 1989) pp. 399-400. |
| Warunek et.al., Clinical Use of Silicone Elastomer Applicances, JCO (1989) XXIII(10):694-700. |
| Wells, Application of the Positioner Appliance in Orthodontic Treatment, Am. J. Orthodont. (1970) 58:351-366. |
| Williams, “Dentistry and CAD/CAM: Another French Revolution,” J. Dent. Practice Admin., pp. 2-5 (Jan./Mar. 1987). |
| Williams, “The Switzerland and Minnesota Developments in CAD/CAM,” J. Dent. Practice Admin., pp. 50-55 (Apr./Jun. 1987. |
| WSCG'98—Conference Program, “The Sixth International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics and Visualization '98,” Feb. 9-13, 1998, pp. 1-7, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, URL<http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/wscg98.h>. |
| Xia et al., “Three-Dimensional Virtual-Reality Surgical Planning and Soft-Tissue Prediction for Orthognathic Surgery,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., 5(2):97-107 (Jun. 2001). |
| Yamamoto et al., “Optical Measurement of Dental Cast Profile and Application to Analysis of Three-Dimensional Tooth Movement in Orthodontics,” Front. Med. Biol. Eng., 1(2):119-130 (1988). |
| Yamamoto et al., “Three-Dimensional Measurement of Dental Cast Profiles and Its Applications to Orthodontics,” Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 12(5):2051-2053 (1990). |
| Yamany et al., “A System for Human Jaw Modeling Using Intra-Oral Images,” Proc. of the 20th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Nov. 1, 1998, vol. 2, pp. 563-566. |
| Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); I. The D.P. Concept and Implementation of Transparent Silicone Resin (Orthocon),” Nippon Dental Review, 452:61-74 (Jun. 1980). |
| Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); II. The D.P. Manufacturing Procedure and Clinical Applications,” Nippon Dental Review, 454:107-130 (Aug. 1980). |
| Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); III. The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 1, Dental and Functional Reversed Occlusion Case Reports,” Nippon Dental Review, 457:146-164 (Nov. 1980). |
| Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); III.—The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 2. Skeletal Reversed Occlusion Case Reports,” Nippon Dental Review, 458:112-129 (Dec. 1980). |
| You May Be a Candidate for This Invisible No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances—Pro Lab product information for patients, 2 pages (2002). |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/835,101, filed Mar. 30, 2020. |
| Larson, Kent “Can You Estimate Modulus From Durometer Hardness for Silicones?” Dow White Paper, 2019 The Dow Chemical Company, Form No. 11-3716-01A S2D, pp. 1-5. |
| Material Data Sheet of Ecdel 9966. 3 pages total (Year: 2020). |
| “Overview of Materials for PETG Copolyester” 2 pages (http://www.nnatweb.conn/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=4de1c85bb946406a86c52b688e3810d0&ckck=1) (webpage retrieved on Oct. 27, 2020) (Year: 2020). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190159870 A1 | May 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16043065 | Jul 2018 | US |
| Child | 16264420 | US | |
| Parent | 15476622 | Mar 2017 | US |
| Child | 16043065 | US | |
| Parent | 13470681 | May 2012 | US |
| Child | 15476622 | US |
