Implementations of the present disclosure are generally directed to a storage assembly. More particularly, implementations of the present disclosure are directed to an assembly including multiple gas storage tanks, with each tank coupled to a separate sub-assembly that includes a pressure gauge, shutoff valve, and pressure relief device (PRD).
In general, an innovative aspect of the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in a gas storage assembly that includes a plurality of gas storage tanks, each respective gas storage tank coupled to a respective sub-assembly including: a pressure gauge that measures and displays the pressure in the respective gas storage tank; a pressure relief device (PRD) that relieves pressure in the respective gas storage tank; and a shutoff valve that controls the flow of gas to and from the respective gas storage tank.
These and other implementations can each optionally include one or more of the following innovative features: the assembly further includes a cover that at least partly covers at least one side of the assembly, wherein the cover includes an opening to provide visibility to each respective pressure gauge; the gas is compressed natural gas; the assembly is attached to the tailgate of, or anywhere else on, a refuse collection vehicle; the gas is a fuel for a refuse collection vehicle; the sub-assembly further includes a supply line coupled to the respective gas storage tank and configured to supply a flow of gas to and from the respective gas storage tank; the sub-assembly further includes a vent line configured for venting gas from the respective gas storage tank; the pressure relief device is coupled to the vent line; and/or the sub-assembly further includes a port coupled to the respective gas storage tank, and the port is configured to provide a flow of gas to the respective gas storage tank.
Another innovative aspect of the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in vehicle tank pressure control system that includes multiple pressure gauges, each configured to measure and display the pressure of a respective gas storage tank of a plurality of gas storage tanks mounted on and coupled to a vehicle to supply gas for combustion to propel the vehicle; multiple pressure relief devices (PRD), each PRD coupled to a respective one of the pressure gauges to relieve pressure in a respective one of the plurality of gas storage tanks; and multiple shutoff valves, each shutoff valve coupled to a respective one of the pressure gauges to control a flow of gas to and from a respective one of the gas storage tanks.
These and other implementations can each optionally include one or more of the following innovative features: the system further includes a cover configured to at least partly cover at least one side of a plurality of associated gas storage tanks, and the cover defines one or more openings to provide visibility to the pressure gauges; the system is configured for use with tanks containing compressed natural gas; the system is secured to a tailgate of a refuse collection vehicle; the system is coupled to a drive system of a refuse collection vehicle; the system further includes multiple gas supply lines, each supply line coupled to a respective one of the PRDs for coupling to an associated gas storage tank to supply a flow of gas to and from the associated gas storage tank; the system further includes multiple vent lines, each vent line coupled to a respective one of the PRDs for coupling to an associated gas storage tank and to vent gas from the associated gas storage tank; and/or the system further includes multiple ports, each port coupled to an associated gas storage tank to provide a flow of gas to and from the associated gas storage tank.
It is appreciated that aspects and features in accordance with the present disclosure can include any combination of the aspects and features described herein. That is, aspects and features in accordance with the present disclosure are not limited to the combinations of aspects and features specifically described herein, but also include any combination of the aspects and features provided.
The details of one or more implementations of the present disclosure are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages of the present disclosure will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Implementations of the present disclosure are directed to an assembly including multiple gas storage tanks, with each tank coupled to a separate sub-assembly that includes a pressure gauge, shutoff valve, and pressure relief device (PRD). In some implementations, the assembly may be employed to store gas, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), to be used as fuel for the operation of a vehicle such as a refuse collection vehicle (RCV). Implementations may be employed with respect to any suitable type of RCV, with any suitable type of body and/or hopper variants. For example, the RCV may be: an automated side loader (ASL) vehicle, a front loader (e.g., for dumpster type containers) with or without a Curotto-Can™), a rear loader, and/or a roll-off vehicle. The RCV can be employed to collect refuse from residential locations, commercial locations, and/or any other suitable type of location. The RCV can alternatively be described as a garbage truck or a garbage collection vehicle.
Implementations may provide for compliance with the requirements of NFPA 52 (2016 version). Implementations also provide the following advantages. Implementations enable the monitoring of the pressure of each individual tank when the manual tank valve is closed using a dedicated pressure gauge per tank. This contrasts with traditional solutions that employ a single gauge for monitoring the overall pressure of an assembly of multiple tanks, and therefore fail to provide a mechanism for determining the individual tank pressures regardless of tank valve position. Implementations also enable the opening or closing of each individual tank as needed using each tank's dedicated valve. This can be especially useful to dedicate certain tanks' gas supply as a reserve, close off certain tank(s) for shipping, and/or for other purposes. Implementations also enable the defueling of individual and/or multiple tanks as needed instead of defueling all tanks for maintenance purposes. This can be accomplished closing individual tank valves. The above advantages are unavailable in traditional, previously available solutions, which employ a single, common pressure gauge for multiple tanks.
As shown in these examples, implementations can also include suitable plumbing to connect the various components to one another. In some implementations, the assembly 300 can be attached to a tailgate of a RCV. In some instances, each tank can have a manual shutoff valve and a PRD mounted on them, and can be shipped as such an assembly by a tank manufacturer. With a different PRD setup and valve combination provided by the implementations described herein, one of the ports on the manual valve can become the live port and can be used to monitor pressure by way of the connecting tubes and pressure gauge. This can be configured individually for each tank. Implementations provide for the following: 1) a pressure gauge on each tank, and the tubes, fittings, and hardware used to connect them; 2) a sub-assembly that includes, along with the pressure gauge, a (e.g., manual) shutoff valve and PRD integrated with the valve in the sub-assembly; and 3) cutouts (e.g., openings) in the side covers 306 to make gauges visible.
When gas is filled to the tanks from a main supply line, the gas passes into the tank from the inlet/outlet port. In some examples, one of the top two ports on the valve is used as the inlet/outlet, and the other may be plugged. The tanks can all be connected in parallel. When the (e.g., manual) shutoff valve is closed, the inlet/outlet ports are also closed and the gas cannot come in or go out of the tanks. In some examples, the bottom two side ports are live at all times, even when the shutoff valve is closed, and are connected to the tank but not to the system when the valve is closed. One of the two live ports at the bottom side can be used to insert a PRD. The other port can be live all the time and can be used to read individual tank pressure when the shutoff valve is closed. When the shutoff valve is open, the gauge can show system pressure and not individual tank pressure. In some examples, there is one gauge mounted on each tank in a similar way as shown in the figure. Orientation may be varied as suitable. The bottom port can be closed with a plug. In some examples, the top two and bottom two ports of the valve are not connected to each other internally.
In some implementations, instead of manual pressure gauges electrical components can be used to monitor pressure. In some implementations, a small piece of tube can be inserted between the valve and the PRD to provide a different configuration. Some implementations may also employ a different valve and/or PRD. A different kind of mechanical/electrical pressure monitoring device can be used, as appropriate.
In previously available solutions, there is no PRD on the manual valve itself and at the other end of the CNG tank. Instead, in previously available solutions: 1) there are two PRDs connected together with a live line running from one of the valve live port; 2) there are two PRDs which are shared between two tanks; 3) all tanks are connected together with common live line; and 4) there is a common pressure gauge which indicates if there is any pressure in the tanks. These previously available solutions provide the following disadvantages: 1) given the way both PRDs are connected, in order to vent both of them have to trigger; 2) there are fewer PRDs overall to cover a greater range of area (e.g., in case of local fire); 3) it is not possible to isolate/shut down selected tanks if needed as reserve or any other purposes; 4) defueling of the complete system is required in case any maintenance or repair is needed, causing a loss of much time and waste of fuel; and 5) many live CNG lines which stay pressurized even when tank valves are closed. The implementations described herein improve on these disadvantages as described above.
While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the disclosure or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular implementations. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate implementations may also be implemented in combination in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation may also be implemented in multiple implementations separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination may in some examples be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or variation of a sub-combination.
A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, various forms of the flows shown above may be used, with steps re-ordered, added, or removed. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claim(s).
The application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/577,875, titled “Multiple Gas Tank Assembly with Individual Pressure Monitoring,” filed on Sep. 20, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,207,974, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/734,434, titled “Multiple Gas Tank Assembly with Individual Pressure Monitoring,” filed on Sep. 21, 2018. The entire contents of the foregoing applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2574177 | Godet | Nov 1951 | A |
2895560 | Lynn | Jul 1959 | A |
3134603 | Rogers | May 1964 | A |
3565201 | Petsinger | Feb 1971 | A |
5330031 | Hill et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5527098 | McKinney et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5549096 | Swenson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554976 | Miyauchi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558246 | Ross, Jr. | Sep 1996 | A |
5611316 | Oshima et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5658117 | McKinney et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5787920 | Krasnov | Aug 1998 | A |
5829418 | Tamura et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6041762 | Sirosh et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6095367 | Blair et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112760 | Scott et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6213243 | Studebaker et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6257360 | Wozniak et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268803 | Gunderson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279612 | Warth | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6291770 | Casperson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6367573 | Scott | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390075 | Yamazaki et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401698 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412588 | Scott et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418962 | Wozniak et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6439334 | Myers et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6467466 | Maekawa et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481751 | Davis, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6502660 | Scott et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6527075 | Izuchukwu et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532684 | Tunnev et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6595569 | McKinney | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6957171 | White et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7137474 | Yokote | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7159738 | Luongo | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7270209 | Suess | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7322345 | Saito et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7426935 | Schwan et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7543667 | Hwang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7624753 | Suess et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7648787 | Suematsu et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
RE41142 | Blair et al. | Feb 2010 | E |
7882587 | Tagliaferri | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7976067 | Naganuma | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8020430 | Farnsworth | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8443820 | Ulrey et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8539972 | Xu | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8690191 | Gentry | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9064401 | Grant et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9252440 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9284895 | Naidu et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9454856 | Ahmad et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9533569 | McKinney | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9579969 | Crist et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9592731 | Hanlin et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9694671 | Wildarube et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9850845 | Sloan et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9981551 | McKinney | May 2018 | B2 |
10914401 | Shroff et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
20010032628 | Goto et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032747 | DePoy et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020096212 | Yamada et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040091345 | Flerchinger et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20070023215 | Ueda | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080098562 | Tagliaferri | May 2008 | A1 |
20080156809 | Mizuno et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20100047047 | Mayer et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100078244 | Pursifull | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100252353 | Tsubokawa | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110288738 | Donnelly | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120115061 | Tsubokawa | May 2012 | A1 |
20120228307 | Simmons | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120280481 | Gentry | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130092436 | Silc et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130092694 | Green | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130104997 | Harper | May 2013 | A1 |
20130199499 | Pursifull | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130199863 | Robbins | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130238226 | Slaynnaker et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140061266 | Milton | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140069972 | Willemsen | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140109974 | Zoz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140217107 | Sloan et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140367954 | McKinney | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140373531 | Wong | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150112506 | Hanlin | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150129338 | Green | May 2015 | A1 |
20160023548 | Crist et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160177857 | Sarikaya et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160257196 | Green | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160273472 | Ariie et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170106746 | McKinney | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170158050 | Crist et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170282710 | Sloan et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170297425 | Wildqrube et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180065476 | McKinney | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180111477 | Sloan et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180195638 | Shroff et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190023127 | McKinney | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20200094673 | Shroff et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
107388030 | Nov 2017 | CN |
2172985 | Oct 1986 | GB |
2008137643 | Jun 2008 | JP |
Entry |
---|
[No Author], “Momentum CNG Fuel System,” available no later than Sep. 21, 2018, 1 page. |
Pehrson et al., “NFPA 52: Vehicular Natural Gas Fuel Systems Code,” 2016 ed., Apr. 2016, 78 pages. |
Undated photographs taken by Fab Industries (now Agility) of a Labrie Refuse Vehicle With an Auxiliary CNG Holder added to the tailgate (12 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220250467 A1 | Aug 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62734434 | Sep 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16577875 | Sep 2019 | US |
Child | 17557750 | US |