The present invention generally relates to turbulent fluid flow, and more particularly to a baffle for generating multiple helical vortices in a fluid stream beneficial in a wide variety of industrial applications.
The creation of turbulence within a fluid stream has many industrial applications. For example, the creation of turbulence generally enhances the mixing of two fluid streams. The mixing of fluids has applicability to a wide range of industrial processes including for example burner designs that rely on the mixing of a fuel with air. In such burner designs, as well as many other industrial processes that rely on the mixing of two fluid streams, the mixing of the fluid streams may be achieved or enhanced by channeling the streams through a static mixer. A static mixer typically includes one or more baffle plates or other similar elements that create or generate turbulent flow zones within the static mixer that facilitate mixing of the fluid streams.
The creation of turbulence within a flow stream may also be desirable in applications where contact or near contact between a fluid and a surface results in some benefit. By way of example, heat exchangers generally rely on the contact or near contact between a fluid stream and a surface to effectuate heat transfer to or from the surface via the fluid stream. One such heat exchanger is a shell-and-tube heat exchanger wherein one fluid stream flows through one or more inner tubes and another fluid stream flows through an outer tube or shell containing the inner tubes. Heat transfer between the two fluid streams is across the wall on the inner tube(s) and thus contact or near contact between the fluid streams and the wall of the inner tube(s) enhances heat transfer therebetween. In this regard, shell-and-tube heat exchanges may include one or more baffle plates or other similar elements (typically on the shell side of the heat exchanger, for example) that create or generate turbulent flow zones within the heat exchanger that enhance heat transfer between the fluid streams.
One particular industrial application where creating turbulence so as to bring a fluid stream in contact with or adjacent to a surface occurs in the water treatment industry. In this industry, for example, ultraviolet light reactors are used to treat contaminated water. Typically, ultraviolet light reactors include an inner tube and an outer tube concentrically disposed about the inner tube. A UV light source is typically disposed within the inner tube and the inner tube is formed from a suitable material that allows UV light to pass therethrough. Contaminated water flows through the passage between the inner and outer tubes and is exposed to the UV light to effect treatment of the water.
One or more baffle plates may be located along the axis of the reactor. In conventional designs, the baffle plates are configured as generally flat or planar disc plates having an outer periphery and an aperture formed therethrough that defines an inner periphery (e.g., a washer). The planar disc plates are positioned so that the outer periphery engages the inner surface of the outer tube and the inner tube is disposed through the aperture such that the outer surface of the inner tube is adjacent, but spaced from the inner periphery in the plate to form a gap therebetween. In this way, as the contaminated water flows along the passage between the inner and outer tubes it has to pass through the gap between the inner tube and inner periphery of the baffle plate(s). The reduction in cross-sectional area as the water flows through the gap results in an increase in the local fluid velocity of the water. When this relatively fast moving fluid contacts the relatively slow moving fluid behind or downstream of the baffle plate, the shear created by the differential velocity forms toroidal vortices (e.g., similar to smoke rings) that move in the downstream direction.
While generally successful for certain water treatment applications, there are a number of drawbacks to conventional ultraviolet light reactors that limit their use in a broader range of water treatment applications. For example, the ultraviolet light reactors are generally effective for high UV transmittance fluids but lose their effectiveness as the ability of the UV light to penetrate the water diminishes. Accordingly, ultraviolet light reactors are most effective for water with low solids content. For water with relatively high solids content, the UV light will penetrate into the fluid only a short distance (as little as 0.1 mm in some applications). Thus, some of the water borne particles may have little or no exposure to the UV light. For effective treatment in these high solids content applications then, it is necessary to bring the water borne particles near the inner tube from where the UV light emanates.
Planar disc plates as described above and the toroidal vortices they generate provide relatively low improvement to the treatment of high solids content contaminated water. In this regard, it is believed that toroidal vortices are relatively unstable and do not permit different water borne particles to enter and leave the toroidal vortex as it moves downstream. As a result, relatively few water borne particles are brought into proximity to the inner tube, even though turbulent vortex generation occurs. Moreover, because relatively few water borne particles are brought into proximity to the inner tube, effective treatment of high solids content water via UV treatment may not be achieved.
In addition to the above, planar disc plates are often currently utilized in ultraviolet light reactors to direct at least a component of the fluid flow transversely across the inner tube. Such transverse flow results in a lateral loading force and associated bending moments on the inner tube. In current designs, the inner tubes are typically formed from rather brittle quartz tubes that are susceptible to fracture induced by the bending moments. As a result, attempts to increase the turbulence and vortex shedding to improve water treatment by increasing the flow rate through the reactor is limited by the allowable bending stress limitations of the inner tube.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved baffle design and apparatus utilizing such baffles that address these and other drawbacks of existing devices.
In one embodiment, a baffle that addresses the shortcomings of existing baffles includes a body member having a first surface, a second opposed surface, and an outer peripheral edge. An aperture is formed through the body member so as to define an inner peripheral edge. The inner peripheral edge is distorted so as to be non-planar. For example, the inner peripheral edge may include a plurality of undulations having a plurality of peaks and valleys. In one exemplary embodiment, the inner peripheral edge is sinusoidal.
In an alternate baffle design, the baffle includes a body member having a first surface, a second opposed surface, and an outer peripheral edge. The outer peripheral edge is distorted so as to be non-planar. For example, the outer peripheral edge may include a plurality of undulations having a plurality of peaks and valley. In one exemplary embodiment, the outer peripheral edge is sinusoidal.
The baffles in accordance with embodiments of the invention may be incorporated into various apparatus so as to provide certain benefits or advantages. In one embodiment, an apparatus includes a first conduit having a first end, a second end, and a first channel extending therebetween. At least one baffle is disposed in the first channel and includes a body member having a first surface, a second opposed surface, and an outer peripheral edge. At least one aperture is formed through the body member to define an inner peripheral edge. The inner peripheral edge is distorted so as to be non-planar. For example, the inner peripheral edge may include a plurality of undulations having a plurality of peaks and valleys. In one exemplary embodiment, the inner peripheral edge is sinusoidal.
A second conduit may be disposed in the first conduit and includes a first end, a second end, and a second channel extending therebetween. The second conduit extends through the aperture in the baffle so as to define a gap between the second conduit and the inner peripheral edge of the baffle. In addition, at least one baffle may be disposed in the second channel and includes a body member having a first surface, a second opposed surface, and an outer peripheral edge. The outer peripheral edge is distorted so as to be non-planar. For example, the outer peripheral edge may include a plurality of undulations having a plurality of peaks and valley. In one exemplary embodiment, the outer peripheral edge is sinusoidal.
In one exemplary embodiment, an ultraviolet light reactor for treating a contaminated fluid includes a first fluid conduit having a first end, a second end, and a first fluid channel extending therebetween, and a second conduit disposed in the first conduit and having a first end, a second end, and a second fluid channel extending therebetween. An ultraviolet light source is disposed in the second channel and emanates ultraviolet light that passes through the second conduit to expose the contaminated fluid flowing through the first fluid channel to ultraviolet light. To enhance the treatment process, at least one baffle is disposed in the first fluid channel and includes a body member having a first surface, a second opposed surface, and an outer peripheral edge. An aperture is formed through the body member so as to define an inner peripheral edge. The inner peripheral edge is distorted so as to be non-planar.
In another exemplary embodiment, a heat exchanger includes a first fluid conduit having a first end, a second end, and a first fluid channel extending therebetween, and a second fluid conduit having a first end, a second end, and a second fluid channel extending therebetween. At least one baffle is disposed in the first fluid channel and includes a body member having a first surface, a second opposed surface, and an outer peripheral edge. At least one aperture is formed through the body member to define an inner peripheral edge and receives the second fluid conduit therethrough so as to define a gap between the second conduit and the inner peripheral edge of the baffle. The inner peripheral edge is distorted so as to be non-planar.
In still another exemplary embodiment, a static mixer for mixing a first fluid with a second fluid includes a fluid conduit having a first end, a second end, and a fluid channel extending therebetween. At least one baffle is disposed in the fluid channel and includes a body member having a first surface, a second opposed surface, and an outer peripheral edge. At least one aperture is formed through the body member to define an inner peripheral edge. The inner peripheral edge is distorted so as to be non-planar.
These and other objects, advantages and features of the invention will become more readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with a general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the invention.
Referring now to the drawings, and to
To overcome many of the drawbacks of conventional ultraviolet light reactors as detailed above, especially for high solids content contaminated water, the number of water borne particles brought into proximity to the outer surface 30 of inner tube 12 should be increased relative to existing reactors. To this end, the ultraviolet light reactor 10 includes at least one, and preferably a plurality of baffles 32 disposed in the fluid channel 22 in spaced-apart relation along longitudinal axis 16. As described in greater detail below, each of the baffles 32 generate a plurality of helical vortices that increase the number of water borne particles that are brought into proximity to the outer surface 30 of the inner tube 12.
Each of the baffles 32 is substantially the same and a description of one such baffle 32 will suffice for a description of the remaining baffles. As shown in
As illustrated in
To this end and in an advantageous aspect of the invention, at least the inner peripheral edge 42 of baffle 32 has a non-planar configuration, i.e., the points that define the inner peripheral edge 42 do not lie in a single plane. Instead, and as best shown in
The number of crests and troughs 54, 56 along inner peripheral edge 42 may vary depending on the particular application. For example, in one exemplary embodiment the inner peripheral edge 42 may include four sinusoids resulting in four such crests and troughs 54, 56. Other applications may have more or less as dictated by the requirements or desires in those applications. Thus, the invention is not limited to a specific number of crests or troughs 54, 56. Moreover, the amplitude of the crests and troughs 54, 56 may also vary depending on the particular application. Furthermore, the distortion of the inner peripheral edge 42 to form the crests and troughs 54, 56 may extend outwardly along baffle 32 toward outer peripheral edge 38. For example, in one embodiment, the distortion of the inner peripheral edge 42 extends to the outer peripheral edge 38 so that the outer peripheral edge 38 also defines a plurality of crests and troughs (
By configuring the inner peripheral edge 42 with a plurality of undulations provides improved mixing of the contaminated water 24 in the fluid channel 22 that brings an increased number of water borne particles in proximity to the outer surface 30 of the inner tube 12. In particular, the undulations in the inner peripheral edge 42 form pairs of counter-rotating helical vortices having rotational axes generally parallel to the longitudinal axis 16 of the reactor 10 as will now be explained.
As shown schematically in
Some of the aspects of the vortices 62a, 62b may be manipulated depending on the specific application. For example, the cross-dimension of the vortices 62a, 62b may be varied by varying the pitch (wavelength) 68 of the undulations along the inner peripheral edge 42 (i.e., the distance between adjacent crests 54 or peaks in the configuration of the inner peripheral edge 42). The rotational velocity of the vortices 62a, 62b may also be varied by varying the pitch 68. Additionally, the rotational velocity of the vortices 62a, 62b may also be varied by varying the peak fluid velocity as the water moves through the gap 52. This may be done, for example, by varying the bulk flow rate of the water moving through the reactor 10. Alternatively, the peak fluid velocity may be varied by varying the cross-sectional area of the fluid flow path through the baffle 32. For example, decreasing the width of the gap 52 will generally increase the peak fluid velocity through the baffle 32, and increasing the width of the gap 52 will generally decrease the peak fluid velocity through the baffle 32. The pitch, peak velocity, and other aspects may be manipulated to achieve the desired characteristics for vortices 62a, 62b.
In addition to that noted above concerning the increased number of water borne particles baffle 32 brings in proximity to the outer surface 30 of the inner tube 12, baffle 32 provides additional benefits relative to existing reactor designs. By way of example, baffle 32 results in substantially no lateral loading and the associated bending stresses on the inner tube 12. This in turn allows the fluid velocity to be increased without a limitation imposed by the fracture limits of the inner tube 12. Thus, the reactor 10 incorporating baffle(s) 32 may operate at higher fluid velocities as compared to current reactors. At higher fluid velocities, the reactor 10 is capable of treating a greater volume of contaminated water relative to current reactors in a given period of time. Moreover, due to the higher operating velocities, the number of water borne particles that flow near or adjacent the inner tube 12 so as to expose or re-expose the particles to the UV light emanating therefrom is even further increased. Thus, the efficacy of the UV treatment may be improved.
For clarity of disclosure and discussion, aspects of the invention have been discussed herein primarily in the context of an ultraviolet light reactor for water treatment applications. It will be understood and appreciated that the baffle 32 and the resulting vortex generation associated therewith are applicable to a wide variety of industrial processes and are not limited to the water treatment application described above. Additional applications of the baffle will now be described.
For example, in another embodiment, the baffle 32 may be used in a static mixer to mix two fluid streams. As shown in
The outer cross-dimension of the baffle 32 is sized relative to an inner cross-dimension of the tube 82 and closely received therein to effectively prevent fluid from flowing around the outer peripheral edge 38 of the baffle 32. In this embodiment, an inner tube may be omitted such that the two fluid streams 92, 94 pass through the central aperture 40 in baffle 32. As described in detail above, the undulating configuration of at least the inner peripheral edge 42 of the baffle 32 generates counter-rotating helical vortices similar to vortices 62a, 62b shown in
In one exemplary application, the static mixer 80 may be used in industrial processes utilizing gas or liquid burners. In these applications, effective mixing of a fuel stream with an air stream is important for efficient operation of the burner. The static mixer 80, however, is not limited to such an application as the mixer may be beneficial in virtually any situation where two or more fluid streams are to be mixed together for industrial or commercial purposes.
In another alternate embodiment of a static mixer (not shown), an inner tube may extend through the central apertures in the baffles 32, much like that shown in
Another application that may gain the benefit of the baffle 32 is in heat exchangers, and more particularly, shell-and-tube heat exchanges which are used in a wide range of industrial applications. As shown in
Similar to that shown in
The embodiments described thus far utilize a baffle with the undulations formed on the inner peripheral edge of the baffle. The invention, however, is not limited to such a configuration. In another embodiment, and as illustrated in
Baffle 140 may be utilized, for example, in a static mixer similar to that shown in
The outer cross-dimension of the baffle 188 is sized relative to the inner cross-dimension of the outer tube 172 and closely received therein to effectively prevent fluid from flowing around the outer peripheral edge 194 of the baffle 188. In this embodiment, the baffle 188 includes a plurality of apertures 196, each receiving one of the inner tubes 174 therethrough. The apertures 196 are sized relative to the inner tubes 174 such that the inner peripheral edge 198 is spaced from the outer surface 200 of the inner tubes 174 to define a gap 202 therebetween. In a manner similar to that described above for
While the present invention has been illustrated by a description of various preferred embodiments and while these embodiments have been described in some detail, it is not the intention of the inventor to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. The various features of the invention may be used alone or in numerous combinations depending on the needs and preferences of the user.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
395638 | Stuart | Jan 1889 | A |
934572 | Reis | Sep 1909 | A |
1398063 | Brown | Nov 1921 | A |
1553093 | Modine | Sep 1925 | A |
1561044 | Alexander | Nov 1925 | A |
1612930 | Lochen | Jan 1927 | A |
1689446 | Miller et al. | Oct 1928 | A |
1713020 | Bowne | May 1929 | A |
1927325 | Ritter | Sep 1933 | A |
1940804 | Karmaxin | Dec 1933 | A |
1971842 | Young | Aug 1934 | A |
2085132 | Underwood | Jun 1937 | A |
2091593 | Herz | Aug 1937 | A |
2206440 | Henry | Jul 1940 | A |
2321719 | West | Jun 1943 | A |
2575321 | Traver | Nov 1951 | A |
2615766 | De Loss | Oct 1952 | A |
2667337 | Chapman | Jan 1954 | A |
2670011 | Bertin et al. | Feb 1954 | A |
2779383 | Johnson | Jan 1957 | A |
2873098 | Morgan | Feb 1959 | A |
2908338 | Hanrahan | Oct 1959 | A |
3061721 | Brenner | Oct 1962 | A |
3143401 | Jurgen | Aug 1964 | A |
3212521 | Jean | Oct 1965 | A |
3217533 | Able | Nov 1965 | A |
3266780 | Waters | Aug 1966 | A |
3297305 | Walden | Jan 1967 | A |
3300971 | Qualman et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3361412 | Cole, III | Jan 1968 | A |
3400758 | Lee | Sep 1968 | A |
3417975 | Williams et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3439737 | Betts et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3450199 | Warrell | Jun 1969 | A |
3462597 | Young | Aug 1969 | A |
3515207 | Lu | Jun 1970 | A |
3519070 | Bappler | Jul 1970 | A |
3526391 | Church, Jr. | Sep 1970 | A |
3527940 | Bernard et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3559748 | Shelton | Feb 1971 | A |
3618910 | Arndt | Nov 1971 | A |
3623577 | Scharlack | Nov 1971 | A |
3633663 | Tafel | Jan 1972 | A |
3645330 | Albright et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3657087 | Scott | Apr 1972 | A |
3743250 | Fitzhugh et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3746216 | Frederick | Jul 1973 | A |
3752453 | Doyne | Aug 1973 | A |
3775234 | Rich | Nov 1973 | A |
3782694 | Shano | Jan 1974 | A |
4008045 | Free | Feb 1977 | A |
4032114 | Kolm et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4085491 | Mathwig | Apr 1978 | A |
4120350 | Norton | Oct 1978 | A |
4172019 | Woodbridge | Oct 1979 | A |
4208136 | King | Jun 1980 | A |
4215454 | Anthony | Aug 1980 | A |
4258782 | Kao | Mar 1981 | A |
4259021 | Goudy, Jr. | Mar 1981 | A |
4327671 | Zimmer, Sr. | May 1982 | A |
4423703 | Esselman et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4434846 | Lu | Mar 1984 | A |
4467206 | Taylor et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4592390 | Boyd | Jun 1986 | A |
4597916 | Chen | Jul 1986 | A |
4604247 | Chen et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4637457 | Wepfer | Jan 1987 | A |
4710326 | Seah | Dec 1987 | A |
4726695 | Showalter | Feb 1988 | A |
4729665 | Goudy, Jr. | Mar 1988 | A |
4740334 | Rukovena, Jr. | Apr 1988 | A |
4753833 | Fishgal et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4815531 | Presz et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4834173 | Weiss et al. | May 1989 | A |
4848920 | Heathe et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4907725 | Durham | Mar 1990 | A |
4922114 | Boehme | May 1990 | A |
4929088 | Smith | May 1990 | A |
5047634 | Guelin et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5056586 | Bemisderfer | Oct 1991 | A |
5063000 | Mix | Nov 1991 | A |
5181561 | Ayers et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5230656 | Paterson et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5255737 | Gentry et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5312694 | Sugawara | May 1994 | A |
5322569 | Titus et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5528044 | Hutchison | Jun 1996 | A |
5540848 | Engelhard | Jul 1996 | A |
5675153 | Snowball | Oct 1997 | A |
5696380 | Cooke et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5785845 | Colaiano | Jul 1998 | A |
5800059 | Cooke et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5866910 | Cooke et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5915472 | Takikawa et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5994705 | Cooke et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000841 | Cooke et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6015229 | Cormack et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6224759 | Whitby et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6375128 | Condon et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6420715 | Cormack et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6454952 | Thorpe | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464936 | Mowat et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6657205 | Wong | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6672260 | Sun | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6796335 | Hubbard et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6874769 | Lantz et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7143838 | Piccat | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7166850 | Brunet et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7497270 | Bruce | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510172 | Kojima | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7540955 | Hatch et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7874376 | Piccat | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7992651 | Bruce | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20020038620 | Gentilhomme | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20070243798 | Annen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090108222 | Spiers et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090206006 | Allam | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100326894 | Palmgren et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110162856 | Bruce | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120102902 | Gallagher et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
36 18 062 | Dec 1987 | DE |
3618062 | Dec 1987 | DE |
0 299 433 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0299433 | Jan 1989 | EP |
1 780 176 | May 2007 | EP |
62106834 | May 1987 | JP |
0024556 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0024556 | May 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Axel Brunold; International Search Report and Written Opinion; Jul. 8, 2008; 11 pages; European Patent Office. |
European Patent Office, EP Office Action received in corresponding EP Application Serial No. 08732910.8-2307 issued Jul. 12, 2010, 4 pages. |
Official Action issued in European Patent Application No. 08732910.8, dated Feb. 1, 2011, 5 pages. |
European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 12177545.6, dated Sep. 24, 2012, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080277009 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |