Multiplexed time of flight mass spectrometer

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12205813
  • Patent Number
    12,205,813
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 27, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 21, 2025
    12 days ago
Abstract
A method of time of flight (ToF) mass spectrometry comprising: pushing ions into a ToF mass analyser in a plurality of pushes, wherein the time spacing between adjacent pushes is shorter than either the longest flight time, or the range of flight times, of the ions; detecting the ions so as to obtain spectral data; decoding the spectral data to determine first mass spectral data relating to ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser by a first plurality of the pushes (P1-P4), and allocating this first mass spectral data to a first time stamp (t1); and decoding the spectral data to determine second mass spectral data relating to ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser by a second plurality of the pushes (P5-P8), and allocating this second mass spectral data to a second time-stamp (t2); wherein the first and second time-stamps have a time difference therebetween that is shorter than said longest flight time, or said range of flight times (4), in the ToF mass analyser.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a U.S. national phase filing claiming the benefit of and priority to International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2020/050471, filed Feb. 27, 2020, which claims priority from and the benefit of United Kingdom patent application No. 1903779.5 filed on Mar. 20, 2019. The entire contents of these applications are incorporated herein by reference.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to time of flight (ToF) mass spectrometry in which ions are pushed into the ToF mass analyser at a relatively high rate, resulting in a multiplexed ion signal.


BACKGROUND

It is often desirable to separate ions and then analyse them using a ToF mass analyser. For example, ions may be separated by an ion mobility separator (IMS) and analysed by a ToF mass analyser. Historically, typical ToF mass analysers require separation timescales of the order of around 20 μs to 200 μs for mass ranges up to a few thousand, dependent on the ToF mass analyser geometry. In contrast, typical faster IMS peak widths are of the order 0.4 ms to 1 ms, depending on the IMS geometry. The two separation timescales for these devices are therefore well matched, as the ToF separation time scale is significantly shorter than the IMS separation time scale, and hence multiple ToF mass spectra can be individually acquired across the IMS peak. This allows, for example, two dimensional nested data sets to be produced, wherein one dimension is the ToF mass and the other dimension is the IMS separation time.


The advent of ToF mass analysers which have a relatively long flight path has enabled ions to be analysed with a relatively high mass resolution. However, as the ions have a relatively long flight time through such mass analysers, this reduces the rate at which ions can be pushed into the ToF mass analyser without the spectral data for ions from different pushes temporally overlapping. There is therefore difficulty in using such high resolution ToF mass analysis techniques with relatively fast upstream ion separation techniques such as IMS devices or mass filters having a mass transmission window that is scanned at a relatively high rate.


SUMMARY

The present invention provides a method of time of flight (ToF) mass spectrometry comprising: pushing ions into a ToF mass analyser in a plurality of pushes, wherein the time spacing between adjacent pushes is shorter than either the longest flight time, or the range of flight times, of the ions in the ToF mass analyser from any given one of the pushes; detecting the ions with a ToF detector so as to obtain spectral data; decoding the spectral data to determine first mass spectral data relating to ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser by a first plurality of the pushes, and allocating this first mass spectral data to a first time stamp; and decoding the spectral data to determine second mass spectral data relating to ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser by a second plurality of the pushes, and allocating this second mass spectral data to a second time-stamp; wherein the first and second time-stamps have a time difference therebetween that is shorter than said longest flight time, or said range of flight times, in the ToF mass analyser.


Conventionally, ToF mass analysers in which ions have relatively long flight times only sample ions at a relatively low rate so as to avoid ions from different ToF pushes overlapping in time at the detector and causing spectral confusion.


As the method of the present invention produces time stamps having a time difference which is shorter than the longest flight time (or said range of flight times) in the ToF mass analyser, the method is able to intermittently record the mass spectral data at a relatively high rate, even if the longest flight time (or range of flight times) in the ToF mass analyser is relatively long. This allows a relatively high mass resolution ToF mass analyser to be used to sample the ions, whilst profiling a relatively quickly changing ion signal. For example, if ions are separated according to ion mobility or mass to charge ratio upstream of the ToF mass analyser, a relatively short ion peak eluting from the separator may be sampled multiple times by the ToF mass analyser (i.e. multiple timestamps for each peak), even if the longest flight time (or said range of flight times) in the ToF mass analyser is longer than the peak width. Similarly, the technique may be used to sample ions whilst an operational parameter of the spectrometer is being varied with time.


For the avoidance of doubt, said range of flight times is defined as the duration given by subtracting the shortest flight time from the longest flight time.


It is believed that techniques which ultimately produce mass spectral data at a time spacing that is shorter than the longest flight time in the ToF mass analyser are not known.


It is known to push ions into a ToF mass analyser at a relatively high rate using an Encoded Frequency Pulsing (EFP) technique and then decode the resulting signal at the detector using knowledge of the pulse timings. However, such techniques decode the spectral data so as to provide separate mass spectral data for each ToF push. They effectively consider that there are multiple parallel ToF analyses (i.e. one for each push) that are offset in time from each other and ensure that the data from the parallel analyses never mix. Furthermore, problems would be encountered if such EFP techniques were used to profile ions eluting from an upstream ion separator. For example, in order to obtain mass spectral data for any given time point in the upstream separation it is necessary to deconvolve the EFP data. However, deconvolving the data would involve using mass spectral data obtained from ions pushed before and/or after the upstream ion separation time point. As such, the deconvolved data would be temporally blurred and would not accurately reflect how the flux of ions arriving at the detector varies with the upstream ion separation.


In contrast to conventional techniques, in embodiments of the present invention, mixed data from multiple pushes is decoded to produce mass spectral data at a period shorter than the longest flight time in the ToF mass analyser. This allows the data to be kept in the correct time sequence.


The method may comprise performing the first plurality of the pushes before the second plurality of the pushes.


The first plurality of the pushes may be a separate, non-overlapping set of pushes to the second plurality of the pushes.


Said allocating the first mass spectral data to the first time stamp may comprise summing the first mass spectral data and associating it with the first time stamp; and said allocating the second mass spectral data to the second time stamp may comprise summing the second mass spectral data and associating it with the second time stamp.


The method may comprise separating ions according to their ion mobility and/or mass to charge ratio in one or more ion separator and transmitting the separated ions, or ions derived therefrom, to the ToF mass analyser whilst performing said plurality of pushes.


The step of separating ions may comprise separating the ions using a drift time ion mobility separator. Alternatively, or additionally, the step of separating ions may comprise passing the ions through a mass filter having a mass transmission window that is varied with time. Alternatively, or additionally, the step of separating ions may comprise mass selectively ejecting ions from an ion trap towards the ToF mass analyser, wherein the mass or range of masses ejected from the ion trap varies with time.


However, it is contemplated that the ions may alternatively be separated according to a physicochemical property other than ion mobility and/or mass to charge ratio.


It is also contemplated that molecular analyte may be separated according to a physicochemical property by a separator and the eluting analyte ionised to form ions, wherein these ions, or ions derived therefrom, are transmitted to the ToF mass analyser whilst performing said plurality of pushes.


Ions elute from the separator over time as one or more ion peak, and the first and second time-stamps may have a time difference therebetween that is shorter than the width of each of the one or more ion peaks.


For example, the time difference may be shorter than the FWHM of the ion peak.


The ion separator may performs a plurality of ion separation cycles and ions from the ion separator, or ions derived therefrom, may be pushed into the ToF mass analyser a plurality of times during each cycle.


The method may comprise fragmenting or reacting ions from the separation device to produce fragment or product ions, and pushing the fragment or product ions into the ToF mass analyser.


The method may comprise varying an operational parameter of a spectrometer that performs said method such that the ion signal at the detector varies with time, and performing said step of pushing ions into the ToF mass analyser in a plurality of pushes whilst varying said operational parameter.


This allows the ToF mass analyser to profile the response of the ions to the variation of the operational parameter.


The method may comprise transmitting ions in a CID fragmentation device and pushing ions from the fragmentation device, or ions derived therefrom, into the ToF mass analyser in said plurality of pushes; wherein the operational parameter is the collision energy with which ions are subjected to in the fragmentation device.


The method may comprise providing two dimensional nested data sets, wherein one dimension is the mass to charge ratio determined by the ToF mass analyser and the other dimension is either: the separation time from the separator, or the value of the operational parameter.


Ions from any given ToF push may arrive at the ToF detector over a time period during which ions from other ToF pushes also arrive at the ToF detector.


The method may comprise varying the temporal spacing between adjacent ToF pushes for different pairs of adjacent pushes in a known manner; and using the known variation of the temporal spacing between adjacent ToF pushes in said decoding of the spectral data to determine the first and second mass spectral data.


The step of decoding the spectral data to determine the first mass spectral data may comprise decoding spectral data obtained by the detector in a first decoding time range, wherein all of the ions that reach the detector in the first decoding time range come from a first set of ToF pushes, wherein every possible pair of ToF pushes in said first set that are separated from each other by a temporal spacing that is less than said longest flight time, or within said range of flight times, has a unique temporal spacing therebetween. Alternatively, or additionally, said step of decoding the spectral data to determine the second mass spectral data comprises decoding spectral data obtained by the detector in a second decoding time range, wherein all of the ions that reach the detector in the second decoding time range come from a second set of ToF pushes, wherein every possible pair of ToF pushes in said second set that are separated from each other by a temporal spacing that is less than said longest flight time, or within said range of flight times, has a unique temporal spacing therebetween.


Optionally, every possible pair of ToF pushes in said first set has a unique temporal spacing therebetween and/or every possible pair of ToF pushes in said second set has a unique temporal spacing therebetween.


The pushes that occur at least in the duration corresponding to the first plurality of pushes plus said longest flight time, or said range of flight times, may have unique temporal spacings therebetween.


The pattern with which the temporal spacings in this duration vary may be repeated for pushes that occur from the end of this duration.


By unique temporal spacings it is meant that the variation in the temporal spacing between ToF pushes is arranged so that the temporal spacing between any given pair of pushes is not the same as the temporal spacing between any other pair of pushes.


The temporal spacings between pairs of pushes may be further restricted so that the temporal spacing between any given pair of pushes differs from the temporal spacing between any other pair of pushes by more than a predetermined about. The predetermined amount may be, or be based on, a temporal characteristic of the spectrometer, e.g. such as an ADC or TDC sampling period, the detector peak widths or ion arrival time distributions defined by the resolution of the ToF mass analyser. This variation in the pusher spacings may improve the ability to decode the data as it reduces the likelihood of different m/z ions being repeatedly coincident at the ToF detector.


The first decoding time range may correspond to the duration of time defined by the first plurality of pushes plus either said longest flight time, or said range of flight times, of the ions in the ToF mass analyser for any given one of the pushes; and/or the second decoding time range may correspond to the duration of time defined by the second plurality of pushes plus either said longest flight time, or said range of flight times, of the ions in the ToF mass analyser for any given one of the pushes.


The step of decoding the spectral data to determine first mass spectral data may comprise summing the spectral data obtained over the first decoding time range with one or more time shifted version of itself and determining which spectral data in the summed data is coherent; and optionally wherein substantially only the coherent data is assigned to the first time stamp. Alternatively, or additionally, the step of decoding the spectral data to determine second mass spectral data may comprise summing the spectral data obtained over the second decoding time range with one or more time shifted version of itself and determining which spectral data in the summed data is coherent; and optionally wherein substantially only the coherent data is assigned to the second time stamp


Each of the first and/or second plurality of pushes may be a number of pushes selected from: ≥3; ≥4; ≥5; ≥6; ≥7; ≥8; ≥9; or ≥10.


The number of pushes in the first plurality of pushes may be the same as the number of pushes in the second plurality of pushes.


Where n sets of spectral data are obtained, all of the n plurality of pushes may consist of the same number of pushes.


The method may comprise decoding the spectral data to determine third mass spectral data relating to ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser by a third plurality of the pushes, and allocating this third mass spectral data to a third time stamp; wherein the second and third time-stamps have a time difference therebetween that is shorter than said longest flight time, or the range of flight times, in the ToF mass analyser.


Although first, second and third mass spectral data have been described above, the method may determine n sets of spectral data, wherein each nth set of spectral data relates to ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser by a respective nth plurality of the pushes, wherein the nth mass spectral data is allocated to an nth time stamp; and wherein the nth and (n−1)th time-stamps have a time difference therebetween that is shorter than said longest flight time, or the range of flight times, in the ToF mass analyser. The integer n may be ≥4; ≥5; ≥6; ≥7; ≥8; ≥9; or ≥10 The method may comprise decoding the spectral data to determine third mass spectral data relating to ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser by a third plurality of the pushes, and allocating this third mass spectral data to a third time stamp; wherein the second and third time-stamps have a time difference therebetween that is shorter than said longest flight time, or the range of flight times, in the ToF mass analyser; wherein the mean time of the first plurality of pushes is separated by the mean time of the second plurality of pushes by a first duration, and the mean time of the second plurality of pushes is separated from the mean time of a third plurality of pushes by substantially the same first duration.


Similarly, where n sets of spectral data are obtained, the mean time of the nth plurality of pushes may be separated by the mean time of the (n+1)th plurality of pushes by the first duration. This is advantageous as it results in all of the timestamps being equally spaced.


The ToF mass analyser may be a multi-reflecting time of flight mass analyser.


In such an instrument, ions are pushed into the ToF flight region and are reflected between ion mirrors multiple times before the impact on the ToF detector.


The method may comprise using the first mass spectral data at the first time-stamp and/or the time of the first time stamp to identify the ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser in the first plurality of pushes, or to identify ions from which they are derived/Alternatively, or additionally, the method may comprise using the second mass spectral data at the second time-stamp and/or the time of the second time stamp to identify the ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser in the second plurality of pushes, or to identify ions from which they are derived.


For example, if the ions are separated by an ion mobility separator upstream of the ToF mass analyser, then the time of each time-stamp is indicative of the ion mobility of the ions analysed in the respective plurality of pushes associated with that time-stamp. This may be used, optionally together with the mass spectral data for those ions, to identify those ions or ions from which they are derived.


Similarly, in the embodiments in which an operational parameter of the spectrometer is varied, then the time of each time-stamp is indicative of the value of the operational parameter that the ions are subjected to during the respective plurality of pushes associated with that time-stamp. This may be used, optionally together with the mass spectral data for those ions, to identify those ions or ions from which they are derived.


The method may further comprise controlling a computer display or other device based on, e.g. indicate, the identities of the ions.


The present invention also provides a ToF mass spectrometer comprising: a ToF mass analyser having a pusher configured to push ions into the ToF mass analyser in a plurality of pushes, wherein the time spacing between adjacent pushes is shorter than either the longest flight time, or the range of flight times, of the ions in the ToF mass analyser from any given one of the pushes; an ion detector for detecting the ions so as to obtain spectral data; one or more processor configured to decode the spectral data to determine first mass spectral data relating to ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser by a first plurality of the pushes and to store the first mass spectral data associated with a first time-stamp in a memory; and one or more processor configured to decode the spectral data to determine second mass spectral data relating to ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser by a second plurality of the pushes and to store the second mass spectral data associated with a second time-stamp in a memory; wherein the first and second time-stamps have a time difference therebetween that is shorter than said longest flight time, or said range of flight times, in the ToF mass analyser.


The mass spectrometer may be arranged and configured to perform any of the methods described herein.


The sampling rate of long flight time ToF mass analysers are not well suited to profiling peaks produced by fast separators such as ion mobility separators or scanning quadrupoles. Embodiments relate to methods of encoding the pusher pulse so as to result in multiplexed spectra. The multiplexed spectra are decoded in a way that produces ToF mass spectra at a time period (or spacing) that is significantly shorter than the flight time (or range of flight times) of the analysed ions so that the ToF mass spectra profile peaks produced by the fast separator. Separators such as ion mobility separators or scanning quadrupoles, where the eluting peak widths are narrower in time than the ToF flight times (or range of flight times) of ions are of particular interest.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments will now be described, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 illustrates the timings at which ions are pushed into a ToF mass analyser for mass analysis during a conventional IMS-ToF experiment;



FIG. 2 illustrates how multiple sequential IMS-ToF mass spectrometry experiments, each of the type described in relation to FIG. 1, may be combined to produce a nested two dimensional (2D) data set;



FIG. 3 illustrates an IMS-ToF mass spectrometry experiment of the type described in relation to FIG. 1, except wherein the data obtained from sequential ToF pushes are combined;



FIG. 4 illustrates the timings at which ions are pushed into a ToF mass analyser for mass analysis during an IMS experiment, according to an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 5 shows the same technique as FIG. 4, except that it has been extended to show how the data for the fifth to eighth ToF pushes is processed; and



FIGS. 6-10 show schematics of embodiments of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

It is often desirable to separate ions and then analyse them using a Time of Flight (ToF) mass analyser. For example, ions may be separated by an ion mobility separator (IMS) and analysed by a ToF mass analyser. Historically, typical ToF mass analysers require separation timescales of the order of around 20 μs to 200 μs for mass ranges up to a few thousand, dependent on the ToF mass analyser geometry. In contrast, typical faster IMS peak widths are of the order 0.4 ms to 1 ms, depending on the IMS geometry. The two separation timescales for these devices are therefore well matched, as the ToF separation time scale is significantly shorter than the IMS separation time scale, and hence multiple ToF mass spectra can be individually acquired across the IMS peak. This allows, for example, two dimensional nested data sets to be produced, wherein one dimension is the ToF mass and the other dimension is the IMS separation time.


The advent of ToF mass analysers which have a relatively long flight path has enabled ions to be analysed with a relatively high mass resolution. However, as the ions have a relatively long flight time through such mass analysers, this reduces the rate at which ions can be pulsed into the ToF mass analyser. There is therefore difficulty in using such high resolution ToF mass analysis techniques with relatively fast upstream ion separation techniques such as IMS devices or mass filters having a mass transmission window that is scanned at a relatively high rate.


In conventional approaches individual ToF mass spectra are given an individual timestamps as shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2.



FIG. 1 illustrates the timings at which ions are pushed into a ToF mass analyser for mass analysis during an IMS experiment. Ions may be pulsed into an IMS device at time T0 such that they separated according to their ion mobility in the IMS device and elute therefrom. The ions elute and travel into a ToF mass analyser. The pusher of the ToF mass analyser receives the ion beam eluting from the IMS and is pulsed a plurality of times so as to sample the ion beam a corresponding plurality of times. The ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser are mass analysed therein. As shown in FIG. 1, the first push of the ToF pusher (after time T0) is assigned a time t1, the second push of the ToF pusher is assigned a time t2, the third push of the ToF pusher is assigned a time t3, etc. In other words, the nth push of the ToF pusher is assigned a time tn. The duration of time between adjacent pushes is the pusher period and this may be set such that the flight time 2 of the slowest ions through the ToF mass analyser is shorter than the pusher period. Mass spectral data obtained from the nth push may be associated with a corresponding push time tn. The start time T0 and pusher time t1 may be synchronized or asynchronous and the time difference between T0 and t1 may be known, measured or unknown.


In the example shown, N ToF pushes are used to sample the IMS separation, thus giving an IMS separation time at least equal to N multiplied by the pusher period. However, in practice the overall cycle time may be greater than this due to time delays or offsets elsewhere in the ion path.



FIG. 2 illustrates how multiple sequential IMS-ToF mass spectrometry experiments, each of the type described in relation to FIG. 1, may be combined to produce a nested two dimensional (2D) data set. In this example, three IMS experiments (i.e. separations) are shown, each having its own start time T0. Data obtained from the first ToF pushes t1 which occur after the IMS experiments start are summed together and assigned the same time t1, as shown in the lower part of FIG. 2. As previously stated, the time difference between T0 and t1 (for each IMS experiment) may be synchronized or asynchronous and may be known, measured or unknown. Data obtained from the second ToF pushes t2 which occur after the IMS experiments start are summed together and assigned the same time t2. Data obtained from the third ToF pushes t3 are summed together and assigned the same time t3. In other words, data obtained from the nth ToF pushes which occur after the IMS experiments start are summed together and assigned the same time tn. In the illustrated example n is 6, although other integer numbers may be used.



FIG. 3 illustrates an IMS-ToF mass spectrometry experiment of the type described in relation to FIG. 1, except wherein the data obtained from a first series of sequential ToF pushes (e.g. <50 pushes) are combined to produce summed spectra which are given an individual timestamp t1. Data from a second series of sequential ToF pushes are also combined to produce summed spectra which are given an individual timestamp t2. Data from a third series of sequential ToF pushes are combined to produce summed spectra which are given an individual timestamp t3. Data from a fourth series of sequential ToF pushes are combined to produce summed spectra which are given an individual timestamp t4. Although four series of sequential ToF pushes are shown as being summed, fewer or greater numbers may be used. This technique enables the duration between adjacent timestamps (tn) to be relatively large, i.e. larger than the ToF pusher duration. The ToF mass analyser acquisition sampling rate is therefore effectively slowed down such that the ToF mass analyser may be suited to analysing ions that are separated upstream by a relatively slow separation process (e.g. slower than IMS), for example, by a separation process performed by scanning a quadrupole mass filter, by m/z selective ejection from an ion trap, by a differential mobility analyser, or by a wide range of other scanning approaches such as scanned collision energy. The approach shown in FIG. 3 is particularly useful for scenarios where the ToF mass analyser acquisition architecture has a limited total number of time stamps, tN, or time bins.


An important aspect of the approaches shown in FIGS. 1, 2 and 3 is that the pusher period between adjacent ToF pushes is longer than the maximum time of flight 2 through the ToF mass analyser (for the ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser) in any given push. This restriction allows spectra from different ToF pushes to be simply combined as described above, thus proving a two dimensional data set.


However, the drive towards higher ToF mass resolution and improved m/z accuracy has inevitably led to an increase in the separation timescales of ToF mass analysers, i.e. longer ion flight times. In some instances the ToF separations can take multiple milliseconds for the m/z ranges that are of interest. In such cases the timescale of the ToF mass separation may not be well matched to the timescale of the upstream ion separation, and so the separated ions cannot be sampled by the downstream ToF mass analyser at a sufficiently high rate. It is therefore desirable to provide a technique by which a ToF mass analyser having a relatively long ion flight path (i.e. ion flight time) can produce ToF mass spectra at a relatively high period that is compatible with a relatively fast upstream ion separator, and therefore at a period that is significantly shorter than the ToF mass separation timescale for the m/z ranges that are analysed in a given ToF push. This may be achieved by the following embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 4 illustrates the timings at which ions are pushed into a ToF mass analyser for mass analysis during an IMS experiment, according to an embodiment of the invention. Ions may be pulsed into an IMS device at time T0 such that they are separated and elute from the IMS device at times according to their ion mobility. The ions elute and travel into a ToF mass analyser. The pusher of the ToF mass analyser receives the ion beam eluting from the IMS device and is pulsed a plurality of times so as to sample the ion beam a corresponding plurality of times. The ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser are mass analysed therein. As shown in FIG. 4, the ToF pusher is pulsed a plurality of times. The first push of the ToF pusher that is at, or after, time T0 is labelled P1, the second subsequent push of the ToF pusher is labelled P2, the third push of the ToF pusher is labelled P3, and the fourth push of the ToF pusher is labelled P4. The subsequent ToF pushes are not labelled in FIG. 4 but are denoted by vertical lines that are spaced along the horizontal axis. The start time T0 and pusher time t1 may be synchronized or asynchronous and the time difference between T0 and t1 may be known, measured or unknown.


In the embodiment of FIG. 4, the duration of time between each pair of adjacent ToF pushes is set to be significantly shorter than the maximum time of flight of ions analysed in the ToF mass analyser (from the first of those ToF pushes), or to be shorter than the time spread 4 of the range of times of flight (for ions analysed from the first of those ToF pushes). This is illustrated in FIG. 4, wherein arrow 6 represents the time range over which different ions pulsed into the ToF mass analyser by push P1 may be received at the ToF detector, due to their range of mass to charge ratios. This is therefore also the time range over which the ToF detector response may relate to ions from the first ToF push P1. Similarly, arrow 8 illustrates the time range over which the ToF detector response may relate to ions from the second ToF push P2. Arrow 10 illustrates the time range over which the ToF detector response may relate to ions from the third ToF push P3. Arrow 12 illustrates the time range over which the ToF detector response may relate to ions from the fourth ToF push P4. In this embodiment it is assumed that the mass range analysed in each of the different ToF pushes is substantially the same. However, it is contemplated that mass range analysed may vary between ToF pushes and that the time range over which the ToF detector response relates to ions from a given push may vary.


This approach results in mixed or multiplexed ToF mass spectral data, i.e. ions from any given TOF push arrive at the ToF detector over a time period during which ions from other ToF pushes also arrive at the ToF detector. This can be seen from FIG. 4, wherein the time periods 6-12 over which ions arrive at the ToF detector from ToF pushes P1-P4 all overlap with each other for part of their respective time periods. At certain times the detector response may therefore correspond to ion arrivals that might originate from any one of the four pushes P1-P4 (or pushes earlier than P1 or later than P4).


Importantly, the temporal spacing between adjacent ToF pushes is not constant. Rather, the temporal spacing varies such that the duration of time between adjacent pushes varies for different pairs of adjacent pushes, in a known (e.g. predetermined) manner. As will be described further below, the knowledge of how the temporal spacing between adjacent ToF pushes varies is then used to decode or demultiplex the ToF detector responses during the time range 14 over which it receives ions from the first to fourth pushes P1-P4. The resultant decoded spectral data obtained during detector response period 14 (i.e. from pushes P1-P4) is associated with a time stamp t1.


As will be described further below, the variation in the temporal spacing between adjacent ToF pushes may be arranged so that the temporal spacing between any given pair of pushes is not the same as the temporal spacing between any other pair of pushes, i.e. each pair of pushes are separated by a unique temporal spacing. In practice, the temporal spacings between pairs of pushes may be further restricted so that any given pair of pushes differs from the temporal spacing between any other pair of pushes by more than a temporal characteristic of the spectrometer, e.g. by more than an ADC or TDC sampling period, the detector peak widths or ion arrival time distributions defined by the resolution of the ToF mass analyser. This variation in the pusher spacings may improve the ability to decode the data as it reduces the likelihood of different m/z ions being repeatedly coincident at the ToF detector.



FIG. 5 shows the same technique as FIG. 4, except that it has been extended to show how the data for the fifth to eighth ToF pushes P5-P8 is processed. Accordingly, arrow 16 illustrates the time range over which the ToF detector response may relate to ions from the fifth ToF push P5, arrow 18 illustrates the time range over which the ToF detector response may relate to ions from the sixth ToF push P6, arrow 20 illustrates the time range over which the ToF detector response may relate to ions from the seventh ToF push P7, and arrow 22 illustrates the time range over which the ToF detector response may relate to ions from the eighth ToF push P8.


As described in relation to FIG. 4, this approach results in mixed or multiplexed ToF mass spectral data. This can be seen from FIG. 5, wherein the time periods 16-22 over which ions arrive at the ToF detector from ToF pushes P5-P8 all overlap with each other for part of their respective time periods. At certain times the detector response may therefore correspond to ion arrivals that might originate from any one of the four pushes P5-P8. As described in relation to FIG. 4, the temporal spacing between pushes may be varied such that all the different pairs of pushes have different temporal spacings between them. The knowledge of how the temporal spacing between ToF pushes varies with time is then used to decode or demultiplex the ToF detector responses during the time range 24 over which it receives ions from the pushes P5-P8. The resultant decoded spectral data obtained during detector response period 24 (i.e. from pushes P5-P8) is associated with a time stamp t2.


It will be appreciated that the time periods 6-12 over which ions arrive at the ToF detector from ToF pushes P1-P4 overlap with the time periods 16-22 over which ions arrive at the ToF detector from ToF pushes P5-P8, for part of their respective time periods. At certain times the detector response may therefore correspond to ion arrivals that might originate from any one of the pushes P1-P8.


As described above, ions pulsed into the ToF mass analyser in any given ToF push may arrive at the detector up until a time after that ToF push that corresponds to the maximum time of flight of ions in that ToF push. It is therefore possible that a first ion pulsed into the ToF mass analyser in a first ToF push may arrive at the detector at the same time as a second ion pulsed into the ToF mass analyser in a later ToF push, if that second ion has a shorter time of flight than the first ion. If the time difference between another pair of ToF pushes is the same as the time difference between the first and second ToF pushes then, again, the first ion may arrive at the detector at the same time as a second ion, potentially causing information to be lost. It is to be noted that this problem may occur when the time difference between a pair of any two pushes (that are separated by less than the maximum time of flight) corresponds to the time difference between a different pair of any two pushes (that are separated by less than the maximum time of flight). The pushes in each pair of pushes need not be adjacent pushes for the problem to occur.


In order to avoid spectral confusion and minimise information loss, it is desired that all of the ions that reach the detector, in any given detector response decoding time range 14, 24, come from a set of ToF pushes, wherein every possible pair of pushes in said set that are separated from each other by a temporal spacing that is less than the maximum flight time has a unique temporal spacing. In other words, for said set of ToF pushes, all of the permutations of possible pairs of pushes that are separated from each other by a temporal spacing that is less than the maximum flight time are unique. No two such pairs of pushes have the same temporal spacing.


Therefore, the temporal spacing of any given pair of ToF pushes should not match the temporal spacings of any other pair of ToF pushes that are within at least a time range set by the time during which the pushes used in the decoding step occur plus either the maximum flight time of ions analysed in the ToF mass analyser from the first of those ToF pushes, or plus the time spread 4 of the range of times of flight for ions analysed from the first of those ToF pushes. For example, referring to FIG. 4, the temporal spacing of any given pair of (adjacent or non-adjacent) ToF pushes should not match the temporal spacings of any other pair of (adjacent or non-adjacent) ToF pushes that are within at least a time range set by the time during which the pushes P1-P4 used in the decoding step 14 occur plus either the maximum flight time of ions analysed in the ToF mass analyser from the first of those ToF pushes P1, or plus the time spread 4 of the range of times of flight for ions analysed from the first of those ToF pushes P1. Similarly, referring to FIG. 5, the temporal spacing of any given pair of ToF pushes should not match the temporal spacings of any other pair of ToF pushes that are within at least a time range set by the time during which the pushes P5-P8 used in the decoding step 24 occur plus either the maximum flight time of ions analysed in the ToF mass analyser from the first of those ToF pushes P5, or plus the time spread 4 of the range of times of flight for ions analysed from the first of those ToF pushes P5.


Although FIGS. 4-5 illustrate four pushes being used in each decoding step, other numbers of pushes may be used in each decoding step. Also, although FIG. 4 only illustrates two decoding steps, this is purely for illustrative purposes and it will be understood that higher numbers of decoding steps may be used for decoding further subsets of the ToF pushes and so as to provide more than two time stamps.


As described above, a different subset of ToF pushes is used in each decoding step 14, 24. Although not strictly required, embodiments may have the additional restriction that the mean times of adjacent ones of these subsets of pushes are separated by same time difference. For example, the mean time of pushes P1-P4 may be separated by the mean time of pushes P5-P8 by a first duration, and the mean time of pushes P5-P8 may be separated from the mean time of pushes P9-P12 by the same first duration. This results in the timestamps t1, t2, . . . tN being equally spaced which can be desirable. Alternatively, but less preferred, the mean times of adjacent subsets of pushes may be arranged to vary in a known way. This may be desirable in situations where the temporal peak width of the separator (e.g. IMS) varies with time.


The number of pushes used in each decoding step may be the same or different across part of, or the whole of, the separation experiment. It is recognised that practically there is likely to be a limited number of time stamps (t1-tN) available due to the acquisition architecture of the spectrometer. In these circumstances it is desirable to alter or select the number of pushes in each subset of pushes to thereby increase the temporal separation between timestamps and hence cover a longer separation timescale, such as separations upstream of the ToF mass analyser by scanning a mass filter (e.g. quadrupole), by m/z selective ejection from an ion trap or by a relatively long timescale IMS separation. It may be preferred that the number of pushes used in each decoding step may be the same so that the time stamps will be equally spaced.


The ToF pushes may be synchronized with the ToF detector acquisition system, such as an ADC, so that the time difference between any pair of adjacent pushes is a known integer number of sampling points (e.g. ADC sampling points) or time bins. Other, asynchronous or unknown pusher spacings are also recognized as possible, although these complicate the decoding approaches whist offering minimal benefit.


As described above, the start of the push sequence of the ToF mass analyser may be synchronized with the start of the upstream separator (e.g. with the time the ions are pulsed into an IMS device). The upstream separator may perform a plurality of separation cycles, and the ToF mass analyser may sample the ion beam eluting from the separator a plurality of times during each cycle. For each cycle, the start of the push sequence of the ToF mass analyser may be synchronized with the start of the upstream separator. The pusher temporal coding sequence may restart for each cycle.


Whilst many encoding/decoding approaches may be used, embodiments may utilise encoding approaches that employ sequences with unique temporal spacings (as described above) to control the pusher pulse spacings. The decoding approach may involve summing/combining the multiplexed data multiple times with a time shifted version of itself, where the time shifts used are derived from the pusher encoding sequences. After the time shifting step is completed, responses/features in the multi-shifted combined data set may be tested to determine a statistical basis for inclusion in the final spectrum. These approaches work quickly and efficiently, e.g. with data processing architectures found in GPUs and FPGAs, allowing data to be decoded/demultiplexed effectively in real time.


For example, to decode and determine the data relating to ions from pushes P1-P4, data obtained over the decoding time range 14 may be summed with three time-shifted versions of the same data, wherein the three time shifts correspond to the time differences between pushes P1 and P2, between P1 and P3, and between P1 and P4. The detector responses associated with ions of the same m/z but originating from different pushes P1-P4 become coherent and rise above the statistical noise. Ions arriving at the detector in the decoding time range 14 from P5-P8 will not become coherent, due to the above described restrictions on the temporal spacings between adjacent pushes. The coherent mass spectral data (i.e. that due to pushes P1-P4) can then be assigned to timestamp t1 and the remaining data considered as noise and not assigned to t1.


Similarly, to decode and determine the data relating to ions from pushes P5-P8, data obtained over the decoding time range 24 may be summed with three time-shifted versions of the same data, wherein the three time shifts correspond to the time differences between pushes P5 and P6, between P5 and P7, and between P5 and P8. The detector responses associated with ions of the same m/z but originating from different pushes P5-P8 become coherent and rise above the statistical noise. Ions arriving at the detector in the decoding time range 24 from other pushes (before P5 and after P8) will not become coherent, due to the above described restrictions on the temporal spacings between adjacent pushes. The coherent mass spectral data (i.e. that due to pushes P5-P8) can then be assigned to timestamp t2 and the remaining data considered as noise and not assigned to t2.


The pusher timing variation or encoding sequence may be repeated, but subject to the above restrictions. For example, the encoding sequence of P1-P20 can be repeated for P21-P40, as the range of times of flight 4 of the ions (16 pushes) plus the number of pushes to be decoded (4 pushes) prevent ions originating in different pushes becoming coherent.


Embodiments provide a relatively fast ion separator (upstream of the ToF mass analyser) that produces ion peaks for a particular ion population having a FWHM (i.e. a temporal width) in the range between Wmin to Wmax and that is coupled to a ToF mass analyser that has a flight time range for the ion population between Tmin and Tmax, where Tmax>(Wmax/2) or where (Wmax/2)>Tmax>(Wmin/2) and the ToF mass analyser operates at an average pusher period Tpush so that Tpush<(Wmin/12). These restrictions ensure that at least four pushes are used during the decoding process to produce at least three measurements over the FWHM of the peaks generated by the fast separator.


Examples of specific timescales of interest according to embodiments of the invention are peak widths generated by the ion separators (e.g. IMS device or a scanning quadrupole) that are less than 4 ms at FWHM coupled to a ToF mass analyser where the maximum flight times are greater than 2 ms and the ToF pushes at an average pusher period of between 15 μs and 330 μs.


Information obtained during the decoding of data associated with one time stamp can be used to inform the decoding of data associated with another time stamp. For example, the decoded spectrum from a strong region might be used to constrain the decoding in a subsequent or preceding region. Another example is to decode the data associated with two or more time-stamps together with correlated intensities.


Knowledge of the characteristics of the ion separator may be used to inform the decoding process, for example knowledge of how m/z distributions & correlations vary with separation time (e.g. IMS drift time) and sample type may be used. Another example includes knowledge of separation peak widths from the separator.


The techniques described herein are particularly applicable to a wide range of instrument geometries that incorporate ToF mass analysers having a relatively long flight path. For example, a multi-reflecting time of flight mass analyser (MRTOF) may be used as the ToF mass analyser. In such an instrument, ions are pushed into the ToF flight region and are reflected between ion mirrors multiple times before the impact on the ToF detector. Examples of various geometries that may be used according to embodiments of the present invention, with or without an MRTOF mass analyser, are shown in FIGS. 6-10.



FIG. 6 shows a schematic of an embodiment of the present invention comprising an ion source 30, a mass filter 32 (such as a quadrupole mass filter), a fragmentation or reaction device 34 (such as a Collision Induced Dissociation cell) and a ToF mass analyser 36. In use, ions are transmitted from the ion source into the mass filter 32, which is set so as to be capable of only transmitting ions within a certain mass to charge ratio window (which may be a single mass to charge ratio or a range) at any given time. The mass to charge ratio(s) capable of being transmitted by the mass filter 32 at any instant varies with time such that ions of different mass to charge ratio are transmitted the fragmentation or reaction cell 34 at different times. The mass filter 32 therefore effectively separates the ions upstream of the ToF mass analyser 36. The ions are then fragmented or reacted in the fragmentation or reaction cell 34 so as to form fragment or product ions. The fragment or product ions (and remaining precursor ions) are then transmitted into the ToF mass analyser 36 for analysis as described above.



FIG. 7 shows a schematic of an embodiment of the present invention having the same components as FIG. 6, but also an ion mobility separator 38 between the ion source 30 and the fragmentation or reaction device 34. In use, ions are transmitted from the ion source 30 into the IMS device 38, which separates the ions according to their ion mobility. For example, the IMS device 38 may be a drift time IMS device and ions may be pulsed in the IMS device such that ions of different ion mobility are separated by differing levels of interaction with a buffer gas therein. The ions elute from the IMS device 38 according to their ion mobility and may pass into the (optional) mass filter 32. The mass filter 32 may be set so as to be capable of only transmitting ions within a certain mass to charge ratio window (which may be a single mass to charge ratio or a range) at any given time. The mass to charge ratio(s) capable of being transmitted by the mass filter at any instant may remain constant, or may vary with time such that ions of different mass to charge ratio are transmitted the fragmentation or reaction cell 34 at different times. The mass to charge ratio(s) capable of being transmitted by the mass filter 32 at any instant may be scanned, either once or multiple times for each ion mobility separation cycle of the IMS device (e.g. between pulses of ions into the IMS device). The onwardly transmitted ions are then fragmented or reacted in the fragmentation or reaction cell 34 so as to form fragment or product ions. The fragment or product ions (and remaining precursor ions) are then transmitted into the ToF mass analyser 36 for analysis as described above.



FIG. 8 shows a schematic of an embodiment of the present invention having the same components as FIG. 7, except that the IMS device 38 is downstream of the mass filter 32. In use, ions are transmitted from the ion source 30 into the mass filter 32. The mass filter 32 may be set so as to be capable of only transmitting ions within a certain mass to charge ratio window (which may be a single mass to charge ratio or a range) at any given time. The mass to charge ratio(s) capable of being transmitted by the mass filter 32 at any instant may remain constant, or may vary with time such that ions of different mass to charge ratio are transmitted the fragmentation or reaction cell 34 at different times. The mass to charge ratio(s) capable of being transmitted by the mass filter 32 at any instant may be scanned, either once or multiple times. The onwardly transmitted ions then pass into the IMS device 38, which separates the ions according to their ion mobility. For example, the IMS device 38 may be a drift time IMS device and ions may be pulsed in the IMS device such that ions of different ion mobility are separated by differing levels of interaction with a buffer gas therein. The ions elute from the IMS device 38 according to their ion mobility and may pass into the collision or reaction device 34. The ions are then fragmented or reacted in the fragmentation or reaction cell 34 so as to form fragment or product ions. The fragment or product ions (and remaining precursor ions) are then transmitted into the ToF mass analyser 38 for analysis as described above.



FIG. 9 shows a schematic of an embodiment of the present invention having the same components as FIG. 8, except also comprising a collision or reaction device 40 between the mass filter 32 and IMS device 38. This arrangement allows first generation fragment or product ions to be formed in the upstream collision or reaction device 40 and second generation fragment or product ions to be formed in the downstream collision or reaction device 34.



FIG. 10 shows a schematic of an embodiment of the present invention comprising an ion source 30, a mass selective ion trap 42 (such as a quadrupole ion trap), a fragmentation or reaction device 34 (such as a Collision Induced Dissociation cell) and a ToF mass analyser 36. In use, ions are transmitted from the ion source 30 into the ion trap 42, which is set so as to be capable of only ejecting ions within a certain mass to charge ratio window (which may be a single mass to charge ratio or a range) at any given time. The mass to charge ratio(s) capable of being ejected by the ion trap 32 at any instant varies with time such that ions of different mass to charge ratio are ejected from the trap and into the fragmentation or reaction cell 34 at different times. The ion trap 42 therefore effectively separates the ions upstream of the ToF mass analyser 36. The ions are then fragmented or reacted in the fragmentation or reaction cell 34 so as to form fragment or product ions. The fragment or product ions (and remaining precursor ions) are then transmitted into the ToF mass analyser 36 for analysis as described above.


Although several embodiments have been described above which include one or more collision or reaction device 34, 40, it is contemplated that the one or more collision or reaction device may be omitted, for example, and that the ToF mass analyser 36 analyses the precursor ions.


Alternative embodiments are contemplated wherein instead of separating the ions upstream of the ToF mass analyser 36 (or as well as), an operational parameter of the spectrometer is varied (e.g. scanned) with time and the ToF mass analyser 36 profiles the response of the ions. For example, ions may be transmitted into a fragmentation device (e.g. a CID device) and the energy with which the ions are fragmented may be varied over a time period. The ToF mass analyser may analyse the resulting ions a plurality of times over the time period so as to profiles the response of the ions.


The techniques described herein may be operated in tandem with previously established ToF mass spectrometry approaches such as single or multi-gain ADCs, TDCs, peak detecting ADCs, and duty cycle enhancements such as EDC & HDC modes etc.


The above described approaches focus on decoding data associated with adjacent and non-overlapping subsets of pushes (e.g. subset P1-P4 and subset P5-P8). In principle the pushes for different decoding steps could overlap in such a way that the pushes are effectively multiplexed, but still specific and unique to a subset of pushes. In principle the pushes could overlap so that the same push is non-specific to a subset and may be part of multiple subsets. An example of this is a rolling subset of pushes, e.g. one out, one in, etc.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the accompanying claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of time of flight (ToF) mass spectrometry comprising: pushing ions into a ToF mass analyser in a plurality of pushes, wherein the time spacing between adjacent pushes is shorter than either the longest flight time, or the range of flight times, of the ions in the ToF mass analyser from any given one of the pushes;detecting the ions with a ToF detector so as to obtain spectral data;decoding the spectral data to determine first mass spectral data relating to ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser by a first plurality of the pushes, and allocating this first mass spectral data to a first time-stamp, wherein said allocating the first mass spectral data to the first time-stamp comprises summing the first mass spectral data together and associating it with the first time-stamp; anddecoding the spectral data to determine second mass spectral data relating to ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser by a second plurality of the pushes, and allocating this second mass spectral data to a second time-stamp, wherein said allocating the second mass spectral data to the second time-stamp comprises summing the second mass spectral data together and associating it with the second time-stamp;wherein the first time-stamp and the second time-stamps have a time difference therebetween that is shorter than said longest flight time, or said range of flight times, in the ToF mass analyser.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, comprising performing the first plurality of the pushes before the second plurality of the pushes.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, comprising separating ions according to their ion mobility and/or mass to charge ratio in one or more ion separator and transmitting the separated ions, or ions derived therefrom, to the ToF mass analyser whilst performing said plurality of pushes.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein ions elute from the one or more ion separator over time as one or more ion peak, and wherein the first and second time-stamps have a time difference therebetween that is shorter than the width of each of the one or more ion peaks.
  • 5. The method of claim 3, wherein the ion separator performs a plurality of ion separation cycles and ions from the ion separator, or ions derived therefrom, are pushed into the ToF mass analyser a plurality of times during each cycle.
  • 6. The method of claim 3, comprising providing two dimensional nested data sets, wherein one dimension is the mass to charge ratio determined by the ToF mass analyser and the other dimension is the separation time from the one or more ion separator.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, comprising transmitting ions in a CID fragmentation device and pushing ions from the CID fragmentation device, or ions derived therefrom, into the ToF mass analyser in said plurality of pushes, varying an operational parameter of a spectrometer that performs said method such that the ion signal at the ToF detector varies with time, and performing said step of pushing ions into the ToF mass analyser from the CID fragmentation device in a plurality of pushes whilst varying said operational parameter, wherein the operational parameter is the collision energy with which ions are subjected to in the CID fragmentation device.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of decoding the spectral data to determine the first mass spectral data comprises decoding spectral data obtained by the ToF detector in a first decoding time range, wherein all of the ions that reach the ToF detector in the first decoding time range come from a first set of ToF pushes, wherein every possible pair of ToF pushes in the first set of ToF that are separated from each other by a temporal spacing that is less than said longest flight time, or within said range of flight times, has a unique temporal spacing therebetween; and/or wherein said step of decoding the spectral data to determine the second mass spectral data comprises decoding spectral data obtained by the ToF detector in a second decoding time range, wherein all of the ions that reach the ToF detector in the second decoding time range come from a second set of ToF pushes, wherein every possible pair of ToF pushes in the second set of ToF pushes that are separated from each other by a temporal spacing that is less than said longest flight time, or within said range of flight times, has a unique temporal spacing therebetween.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the first decoding time range corresponds to the duration of time defined by the first plurality of pushes plus either said longest flight time, or said range of flight times, of the ions in the ToF mass analyser for any given one of the pushes; and/or wherein the second decoding time range corresponds to the duration of time defined by the second plurality of pushes plus either said longest flight time, or said range of flight times, of the ions in the ToF mass analyser for any given one of the pushes.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, wherein the step of decoding the spectral data to determine first mass spectral data comprises summing the spectral data obtained over the first decoding time range with one or more time shifted version of itself and determining which spectral data in the summed data is coherent; and/or wherein the step of decoding the spectral data to determine second mass spectral data comprises summing the spectral data obtained over the second decoding time range with one or more time shifted version of itself and determining which spectral data in the summed data is coherent.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein pushes that occur at least in the duration corresponding to the first plurality of pushes plus said longest flight time, or said range of flight times, have unique temporal spacings therebetween.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the first and/or second plurality of pushes is a number of pushes selected from: ≥3; ≥4; ≥5; ≥6; ≥7; ≥8; ≥9; or ≥10.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the number of pushes in the first plurality of pushes is the same as the number of pushes in the second plurality of pushes.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, comprising decoding the spectral data to determine third mass spectral data relating to ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser by a third plurality of the pushes, and allocating this third mass spectral data to a third-time-stamp; wherein the second time-stamp and the third time-stamps have a time difference therebetween that is shorter than said longest flight time, or the range of flight times, in the ToF mass analyser; wherein the mean time of the first plurality of pushes is separated by the mean time of the second plurality of pushes by a first duration, and the mean time of the second plurality of pushes is separated from the mean time of a third plurality of pushes by substantially the same first duration.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the ToF mass analyser is a multi-reflecting time of flight mass analyser.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, comprising using the first mass spectral data at the first time-stamp and/or the time of the first time-stamp to identify the ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser in the first plurality of pushes, or to identify ions from which they are derived; and/or comprising using the second mass spectral data at the second time-stamp and/or the time of the second time-stamp to identify the ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser in the second plurality of pushes, or to identify ions from which they are derived.
  • 17. A ToF mass spectrometer comprising: a ToF mass analyser having a pusher configured to push ions into the ToF mass analyser in a plurality of pushes, wherein the time spacing between adjacent pushes is shorter than either the longest flight time, or the range of flight times, of the ions in the ToF mass analyser from any given one of the pushes;an ion detector for detecting the ions so as to obtain spectral data;one or more processor configured to decode the spectral data to determine first mass spectral data relating to ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser by a first plurality of the pushes and to store the first mass spectral data associated with a first time-stamp in a memory, wherein said storing the first mass spectral data associated with the first time-stamp in a memory comprises summing the first mass spectral data together and associating it with the first time-stamp; andone or more processor configured to decode the spectral data to determine second mass spectral data relating to ions pushed into the ToF mass analyser by a second plurality of the pushes and to store the second mass spectral data associated with a second time-stamp in a memory, wherein said storing the second mass spectral data associated with a second time-stamp in the memory comprises summing the second mass spectral data together and associating it with the second time-stamp;wherein the first time-stamp and second time-stamps have a time difference therebetween that is shorter than said longest flight time, or said range of flight times, in the ToF mass analyser.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
1903779 Mar 2019 GB national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/GB2020/050471 2/27/2020 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2020/188236 9/24/2020 WO A
US Referenced Citations (355)
Number Name Date Kind
3898452 Hertel Aug 1975 A
4390784 Browning et al. Jun 1983 A
4691160 Ino Sep 1987 A
4731532 Frey et al. Mar 1988 A
4855595 Blanchard Aug 1989 A
4970390 Szymczak Nov 1990 A
5017780 Kutscher et al. May 1991 A
5107109 Stafford, Jr. et al. Apr 1992 A
5128543 Reed et al. Jul 1992 A
5202563 Cotter et al. Apr 1993 A
5331158 Dowell Jul 1994 A
5367162 Holland et al. Nov 1994 A
5396065 Myerholtz et al. Mar 1995 A
5435309 Thomas et al. Jul 1995 A
5464985 Cornish et al. Nov 1995 A
5619034 Reed et al. Apr 1997 A
5652427 Whitehouse et al. Jul 1997 A
5654544 Dresch Aug 1997 A
5689111 Dresch et al. Nov 1997 A
5696375 Park et al. Dec 1997 A
5719392 Franzen Feb 1998 A
5763878 Franzen Jun 1998 A
5777326 Rockwood et al. Jul 1998 A
5834771 Yoon et al. Nov 1998 A
5847385 Dresch Dec 1998 A
5869829 Dresch Feb 1999 A
5896829 Rothenberg et al. Apr 1999 A
5955730 Kerley et al. Sep 1999 A
5994695 Young Nov 1999 A
6002122 Wolf Dec 1999 A
6013913 Hanson Jan 2000 A
6020586 Dresch et al. Feb 2000 A
6080985 Welkie et al. Jun 2000 A
6107625 Park Aug 2000 A
6160256 Ishihara Dec 2000 A
6198096 Le Cocq Mar 2001 B1
6229142 Bateman et al. May 2001 B1
6271917 Hagler Aug 2001 B1
6300626 Brock et al. Oct 2001 B1
6316768 Rockwood et al. Nov 2001 B1
6337482 Francke Jan 2002 B1
6384410 Kawato May 2002 B1
6393367 Tang et al. May 2002 B1
6437325 Reilly et al. Aug 2002 B1
6455845 Li et al. Sep 2002 B1
6469295 Park Oct 2002 B1
6489610 Barofsky et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504148 Hager Jan 2003 B1
6504150 Verentchikov et al. Jan 2003 B1
6534764 Verentchikov et al. Mar 2003 B1
6545268 Verentchikov et al. Apr 2003 B1
6570152 Hoyes May 2003 B1
6576895 Park Jun 2003 B1
6580070 Cornish et al. Jun 2003 B2
6591121 Madarasz et al. Jul 2003 B1
6614020 Cornish Sep 2003 B2
6627877 Davis et al. Sep 2003 B1
6646252 Gonin Nov 2003 B1
6647347 Roushall et al. Nov 2003 B1
6664545 Kimmel et al. Dec 2003 B2
6683299 Fuhrer et al. Jan 2004 B2
6694284 Nikoonahad et al. Feb 2004 B1
6717132 Franzen Apr 2004 B2
6734968 Wang et al. May 2004 B1
6737642 Syage et al. May 2004 B2
6744040 Park Jun 2004 B2
6744042 Zajfman et al. Jun 2004 B2
6747271 Gonin et al. Jun 2004 B2
6770870 Vestal Aug 2004 B2
6782342 LeGore et al. Aug 2004 B2
6787760 Belov et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794643 Russ, IV et al. Sep 2004 B2
6804003 Wang et al. Oct 2004 B1
6815673 Plomley et al. Nov 2004 B2
6833544 Campbell et al. Dec 2004 B1
6836742 Brekenfeld Dec 2004 B2
6841936 Keller et al. Jan 2005 B2
6861645 Franzen Mar 2005 B2
6864479 Davis et al. Mar 2005 B1
6870156 Rather Mar 2005 B2
6870157 Zare Mar 2005 B1
6872938 Makarov et al. Mar 2005 B2
6888130 Gonin May 2005 B1
6900431 Belov et al. May 2005 B2
6906320 Sachs et al. Jun 2005 B2
6940066 Makarov et al. Sep 2005 B2
6949736 Ishihara Sep 2005 B2
7034292 Whitehouse et al. Apr 2006 B1
7071464 Reinhold Jul 2006 B2
7084393 Fuhrer et al. Aug 2006 B2
7091479 Hayek Aug 2006 B2
7126114 Chernushevich Oct 2006 B2
7196324 Verentchikov Mar 2007 B2
7217919 Boyle et al. May 2007 B2
7221251 Menegoli et al. May 2007 B2
7326925 Verentchikov et al. Feb 2008 B2
7351958 Vestal Apr 2008 B2
7365313 Fuhrer et al. Apr 2008 B2
7385187 Verentchikov et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388197 McLean et al. Jun 2008 B2
7399957 Parker et al. Jul 2008 B2
7423259 Hidalgo et al. Sep 2008 B2
7498569 Ding Mar 2009 B2
7501621 Willis et al. Mar 2009 B2
7504620 Sato et al. Mar 2009 B2
7521671 Kirihara et al. Apr 2009 B2
7541576 Belov et al. Jun 2009 B2
7582864 Verentchikov Sep 2009 B2
7608817 Flory Oct 2009 B2
7663100 Vestal Feb 2010 B2
7675031 Konicek et al. Mar 2010 B2
7709789 Vestal et al. May 2010 B2
7728289 Naya et al. Jun 2010 B2
7745780 McLean et al. Jun 2010 B2
7755036 Satoh Jul 2010 B2
7772547 Verentchikov Aug 2010 B2
7800054 Fuhrer et al. Sep 2010 B2
7825373 Willis et al. Nov 2010 B2
7863557 Brown Jan 2011 B2
7884319 Willis et al. Feb 2011 B2
7932491 Vestal Apr 2011 B2
7982184 Sudakov Jul 2011 B2
7985950 Makarov et al. Jul 2011 B2
7989759 Holle Aug 2011 B2
7999223 Makarov et al. Aug 2011 B2
8017907 Willis et al. Sep 2011 B2
8017909 Makarov et al. Sep 2011 B2
8063360 Willis et al. Nov 2011 B2
8080782 Hidalgo et al. Dec 2011 B2
8093554 Makarov Jan 2012 B2
8237111 Golikov et al. Aug 2012 B2
8354634 Green et al. Jan 2013 B2
8373120 Verentchikov Feb 2013 B2
8395115 Makarov et al. Mar 2013 B2
8492710 Fuhrer et al. Jul 2013 B2
8513594 Makarov Aug 2013 B2
8633436 Ugarov Jan 2014 B2
8637815 Makarov et al. Jan 2014 B2
8642948 Makarov et al. Feb 2014 B2
8642951 Li Feb 2014 B2
8648294 Prather et al. Feb 2014 B2
8653446 Mordehai et al. Feb 2014 B1
8658984 Makarov et al. Feb 2014 B2
8680481 Giannakopulos et al. Mar 2014 B2
8723108 Ugarov May 2014 B1
8735818 Kovtoun et al. May 2014 B2
8772708 Kinugawa et al. Jul 2014 B2
8785845 Loboda Jul 2014 B2
8847155 Vestal Sep 2014 B2
8853623 Verenchikov Oct 2014 B2
8884220 Hoyes et al. Nov 2014 B2
8921772 Verenchikov Dec 2014 B2
8952325 Giles et al. Feb 2015 B2
8957369 Makarov Feb 2015 B2
8975592 Kobayashi et al. Mar 2015 B2
9048080 Verenchikov et al. Jun 2015 B2
9082597 Willis et al. Jul 2015 B2
9082604 Verenchikov Jul 2015 B2
9099287 Giannakopulos Aug 2015 B2
9136101 Grinfeld et al. Sep 2015 B2
9147563 Makarov Sep 2015 B2
9196469 Makarov Nov 2015 B2
9207206 Makarov Dec 2015 B2
9214322 Kholomeev et al. Dec 2015 B2
9214328 Hoyes et al. Dec 2015 B2
9281175 Haufler et al. Mar 2016 B2
9312119 Verenchikov Apr 2016 B2
9324544 Rather Apr 2016 B2
9373490 Nishiguchi et al. Jun 2016 B1
9396922 Verenchikov et al. Jul 2016 B2
9417211 Verenchikov Aug 2016 B2
9425034 Verentchikov et al. Aug 2016 B2
9472390 Verenchikov et al. Oct 2016 B2
9514922 Watanabe et al. Dec 2016 B2
9576778 Wang Feb 2017 B2
9595431 Verenchikov Mar 2017 B2
9673033 Grinfeld et al. Jun 2017 B2
9679758 Grinfeld et al. Jun 2017 B2
9683963 Verenchikov Jun 2017 B2
9728384 Verenchikov Aug 2017 B2
9779923 Verenchikov Oct 2017 B2
9786484 Willis et al. Oct 2017 B2
9786485 Ding et al. Oct 2017 B2
9865441 Damoc et al. Jan 2018 B2
9865445 Verenchikov et al. Jan 2018 B2
9870903 Richardson et al. Jan 2018 B2
9870906 Quarmby et al. Jan 2018 B1
9881780 Verenchikov et al. Jan 2018 B2
9899201 Park Feb 2018 B1
9922812 Makarov Mar 2018 B2
9941107 Verenchikov Apr 2018 B2
9972483 Makarov May 2018 B2
10006892 Verenchikov Jun 2018 B2
10037873 Wang et al. Jul 2018 B2
10141175 Verentchikov et al. Nov 2018 B2
10141176 Stewart et al. Nov 2018 B2
10163616 Verenchikov et al. Dec 2018 B2
10186411 Makarov Jan 2019 B2
10192723 Verenchikov et al. Jan 2019 B2
10290480 Crowell et al. May 2019 B2
10373815 Crowell et al. Aug 2019 B2
10388503 Brown et al. Aug 2019 B2
10593525 Hock et al. Mar 2020 B2
10593533 Hoyes et al. Mar 2020 B2
10622203 Veryovkin et al. Apr 2020 B2
10629425 Hoyes et al. Apr 2020 B2
10636646 Hoyes et al. Apr 2020 B2
11239067 Verenchikov et al. Feb 2022 B2
11295944 Verenchikov Apr 2022 B2
11328920 Hoyes et al. May 2022 B2
20010011703 Franzen Aug 2001 A1
20010030284 Dresch et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020030159 Chernushevich et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020107660 Nikoonahad et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020190199 Li Dec 2002 A1
20030010907 Hayek et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030111597 Gonin et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030232445 Fulghum Dec 2003 A1
20040026613 Bateman et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040084613 Bateman et al. May 2004 A1
20040108453 Kobayashi et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040119012 Vestal Jun 2004 A1
20040144918 Zare et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040155187 Axelsson Aug 2004 A1
20040159782 Park Aug 2004 A1
20040164239 Franzen Aug 2004 A1
20040183007 Belov et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050006577 Fuhrer et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050040326 Enke Feb 2005 A1
20050103992 Yamaguchi et al. May 2005 A1
20050133712 Belov Jun 2005 A1
20050151075 Brown et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050194528 Yamaguchi et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050194531 Chernushevich Sep 2005 A1
20050242279 Verentchikov Nov 2005 A1
20050258364 Whitehouse et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060024720 McLean et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060169882 Pau et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060214100 Verentchikov et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060289746 Raznikov et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070023645 Chernushevich Feb 2007 A1
20070029473 Verentchikov Feb 2007 A1
20070158545 Verentchikov Jul 2007 A1
20070176090 Verentchikov Aug 2007 A1
20070187614 Schneider et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070194223 Sato et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080049402 Han et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080121796 Green et al. May 2008 A1
20080197276 Nishiguchi et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080203288 Makarov et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080290269 Saito et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090090861 Willis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090114808 Bateman et al. May 2009 A1
20090121130 Satoh May 2009 A1
20090206250 Wollnik Aug 2009 A1
20090250607 Staats et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090272890 Ogawa et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090294658 Vestal et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090314934 Brown Dec 2009 A1
20100001180 Bateman et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100044558 Sudakov Feb 2010 A1
20100072363 Giles et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100078551 Loboda Apr 2010 A1
20100096543 Kenny et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100140469 Nishiguchi Jun 2010 A1
20100193682 Golikov et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100207023 Loboda Aug 2010 A1
20100301202 Vestal Dec 2010 A1
20110133073 Sato et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110168880 Risrtroph et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110180702 Flory et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110180705 Yamaguchi Jul 2011 A1
20110186729 Verentchikov et al. Aug 2011 A1
20120168618 Vestal Jul 2012 A1
20120261570 Shvartsburg et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120298853 Kurulugama Nov 2012 A1
20130048852 Verenchikov Feb 2013 A1
20130056627 Verenchikov Mar 2013 A1
20130068942 Verenchikov Mar 2013 A1
20130161506 Ugarov Jun 2013 A1
20130187044 Ding et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130206978 Verenchikov et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130240725 Makarov Sep 2013 A1
20130248702 Makarov Sep 2013 A1
20130256524 Brown et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130313424 Makarov et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130327935 Wiedenbeck Dec 2013 A1
20140005445 Komplin et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140054454 Hoyes et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140054456 Kinugawa et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140084156 Ristroph et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140117226 Giannakopulos May 2014 A1
20140138538 Hieftje et al. May 2014 A1
20140183354 Moon et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140191123 Wildgoose et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140197308 Green Jul 2014 A1
20140239172 Makarov Aug 2014 A1
20140246575 Langridge et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140291503 Shchepunov et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140312221 Verenchikov et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140361162 Murray et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150028197 Grinfeld et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150028198 Grinfeld et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150034814 Brown et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150048245 Vestal et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150060656 Ugarov Mar 2015 A1
20150122986 Haase May 2015 A1
20150144779 Verenchikov May 2015 A1
20150194296 Verenchikov Jul 2015 A1
20150228467 Grinfeld et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150270115 Furuhashi Sep 2015 A1
20150279650 Verenchikov Oct 2015 A1
20150294849 Makarov et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150318156 Loyd et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150364309 Welkie Dec 2015 A1
20150380206 White et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150380233 Verenchikov Dec 2015 A1
20160005587 Verenchikov Jan 2016 A1
20160035552 Verenchikov Feb 2016 A1
20160035558 Verenchikov et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160079052 Makarov Mar 2016 A1
20160225598 Ristroph Aug 2016 A1
20160225602 Ristroph et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160240363 Verenchikov Aug 2016 A1
20170016863 Verenchikov Jan 2017 A1
20170025265 Verenchikov et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170032952 Verenchikov Feb 2017 A1
20170084443 Willis et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170098533 Stewart et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170168031 Verenchikov Jun 2017 A1
20170229297 Green et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170309459 Tsukamoto et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170338094 Verenchikov et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180144921 Hoyes et al. May 2018 A1
20180229297 Funakoshi et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180315589 Oshiro Nov 2018 A1
20180330936 Hoyes et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180366312 Hamish et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180366313 Hoyes et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190019664 Furuhashi et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190180998 Stewart et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190206669 Verenchikov et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190237318 Brown Aug 2019 A1
20190360981 Verenchikov Nov 2019 A1
20200083034 Hoyes et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200090919 Artaev et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200126781 Kovtoun Apr 2020 A1
20200152440 Hoyes et al. May 2020 A1
20200168447 Verenchikov May 2020 A1
20200168448 Verenchikov et al. May 2020 A1
20200243322 Stewart et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200373142 Verenchikov Nov 2020 A1
20200373143 Verenchikov et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200373145 Verenchikov et al. Nov 2020 A1
20230290629 Stewart et al. Sep 2023 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (154)
Number Date Country
2412657 May 2003 CA
101171660 Apr 2008 CN
101369510 Feb 2009 CN
101523548 Sep 2009 CN
102131563 Jul 2011 CN
201946564 Aug 2011 CN
102884608 Jan 2013 CN
103270574 Aug 2013 CN
104067116 Sep 2014 CN
104508475 Apr 2015 CN
105206500 Dec 2015 CN
106463337 Feb 2017 CN
107636795 Jan 2018 CN
107833823 Mar 2018 CN
107851549 Mar 2018 CN
108292587 Jul 2018 CN
4310106 Oct 1994 DE
10116536 Oct 2002 DE
102015121830 Jun 2017 DE
102019129108 Jun 2020 DE
112015001542 Jul 2020 DE
0237259 Sep 1987 EP
1137044 Sep 2001 EP
1566828 Aug 2005 EP
1901332 Mar 2008 EP
2068346 Jun 2009 EP
1665326 Apr 2010 EP
1789987 Sep 2010 EP
1522087 Mar 2011 EP
2599104 Jun 2013 EP
1743354 Aug 2019 EP
3662501 Jun 2020 EP
3662502 Jun 2020 EP
2080021 Jan 1982 GB
2217907 Nov 1989 GB
2274197 Jul 1994 GB
2300296 Oct 1996 GB
2390935 Jan 2004 GB
2396742 Jun 2004 GB
2403063 Dec 2004 GB
2455977 Jul 2009 GB
2476964 Jul 2011 GB
2478300 Sep 2011 GB
2484361 Apr 2012 GB
2484429 Apr 2012 GB
2485825 May 2012 GB
2489094 Sep 2012 GB
2490571 Nov 2012 GB
2495127 Apr 2013 GB
2495221 Apr 2013 GB
2496991 May 2013 GB
2496994 May 2013 GB
2500743 Oct 2013 GB
2501332 Oct 2013 GB
2506362 Apr 2014 GB
2528875 Feb 2016 GB
2555609 May 2018 GB
2556451 May 2018 GB
2556830 Jun 2018 GB
2562990 Dec 2018 GB
2575157 Jan 2020 GB
2575339 Jan 2020 GB
2595530 Dec 2021 GB
2610692 Mar 2023 GB
S6229049 Feb 1987 JP
2000036285 Feb 2000 JP
2000048764 Feb 2000 JP
2003031178 Jan 2003 JP
3571546 Sep 2004 JP
2005538346 Dec 2005 JP
2006049273 Feb 2006 JP
2007227042 Sep 2007 JP
2010062152 Mar 2010 JP
4649234 Mar 2011 JP
2011119279 Jun 2011 JP
4806214 Nov 2011 JP
2013539590 Oct 2013 JP
5555582 Jul 2014 JP
2015506567 Mar 2015 JP
2015185306 Oct 2015 JP
2564443 May 2017 RU
2015148627 May 2017 RU
2660655 Jul 2018 RU
198034 Jun 1967 SU
1681340 Sep 1991 SU
1725289 Apr 1992 SU
199103071 Mar 1991 WO
2013063587 Apr 1992 WO
2013110587 Apr 1992 WO
2013124207 Apr 1992 WO
1998001218 Jan 1998 WO
1998008244 Feb 1998 WO
199939369 Aug 1999 WO
2005001878 Jan 2005 WO
2005043575 May 2005 WO
2006049623 May 2006 WO
2006102430 Sep 2006 WO
2006103448 Oct 2006 WO
2007044696 Apr 2007 WO
2007104992 Sep 2007 WO
2007136373 Nov 2007 WO
2008046594 Apr 2008 WO
2008087389 Jul 2008 WO
2010008386 Jan 2010 WO
2010034630 Apr 2010 WO
2010138781 Dec 2010 WO
2011086430 Jul 2011 WO
2011107836 Sep 2011 WO
2011135477 Nov 2011 WO
2012010894 Jan 2012 WO
2012013354 Feb 2012 WO
2012023031 Feb 2012 WO
2012024468 Feb 2012 WO
2012024570 Feb 2012 WO
2012116765 Sep 2012 WO
13045428 Apr 2013 WO
2013067366 May 2013 WO
13093587 Jun 2013 WO
2013098612 Jul 2013 WO
2013110588 Aug 2013 WO
2014021960 Feb 2014 WO
2014074822 May 2014 WO
2014110697 Jul 2014 WO
2014152902 Sep 2014 WO
2015142897 Sep 2015 WO
2015152968 Oct 2015 WO
2015153622 Oct 2015 WO
2015153630 Oct 2015 WO
2015153644 Oct 2015 WO
2015175988 Nov 2015 WO
2015189544 Dec 2015 WO
2016064398 Apr 2016 WO
2016174462 Nov 2016 WO
2016178029 Nov 2016 WO
2017042665 Mar 2017 WO
2017087470 May 2017 WO
2018073589 Apr 2018 WO
2018109920 Jun 2018 WO
2018124861 Jul 2018 WO
2018183201 Oct 2018 WO
2019030474 Feb 2019 WO
2019030475 Feb 2019 WO
2019030476 Feb 2019 WO
2019030477 Feb 2019 WO
2019058226 Mar 2019 WO
2019162687 Aug 2019 WO
2019202338 Oct 2019 WO
2019229599 Dec 2019 WO
2020002940 Jan 2020 WO
2020021255 Jan 2020 WO
2020121167 Jun 2020 WO
2020121168 Jun 2020 WO
2021011415 Jan 2021 WO
2023285791 Jan 2023 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (43)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/GB2020/050471, mailed May 13, 2020.
Search Report for GB Application No. GB1903779.5, mailed Sep. 20, 2019.
Search Report for GB Application No. GB2002768.6, mailed Jul. 7, 2020.
Author unknown, “Electrostatic lens ,” Wikipedia, Mar. 31, 2017 (Mar. 31, 2017), XP055518392, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phptitle=Electrostatic_lens oldid=773161674 [retrieved on Oct. 24, 2018].
Hussein, O.A et al., “Study the most favorable shapes of electrostatic quadrupole doublet lenses” , AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1815, Feb. 17, 2017 (Feb. 17, 2017), p. 110003.
Guan S., et al. “Stacked-ring electrostatic ion guide”, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Elsevier Science Inc, 7(1): 101-106 (1996).
Yavor, M.I., et al., “High performance gridless ion mirrors for multi-reflection time-of-flight and electrostatic trap mass analyzers”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, vol. 426, Mar. 2018, pp. 1-11.
Doroshenko, V.M., and Cotter, R.J., “Ideal velocity focusing in a reflectron time-of-flight mass spectrometer”, American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 10(10): 992-999 (1999).
Kozlov, B. et al. “Enhanced Mass Accuracy in Multi-Reflecting TOF MS” www.waters.com/ Posters, ASMS Conference (2017).
Kozlov, B. et al. “Multiplexed Operation of an Orthogonal Multi-Reflecting TOF Instrument to Increase Duty Cycle by Two Orders” ASMS Conference, San Diego, CA, Jun. 6, 2018.
Kozlov, B. et al. “High accuracy self-calibration method for high resolution mass spectra” ASMS Conference Abstract, 2019.
Kozlov, B. et al. “Fast lon Mobility Spectrometry and High Resolution TOF MS” ASMS Conference Poster (2014).
Verenchicov, A. N. “Parallel MS-MS Analysis in a Time-Flight Tandem. Problem Statement, Method, and Instrucmental Schemes” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004) ABSTRACT.
Yavor, M. I. “Planar Multireflection Time-Of-Flight Mass Analyser with Unlimited Mass Range” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004) ABSTRACT.
Khasin, Y. I et al. “Initial Experimenatl Studies of a Planar Multireflection Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometer” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004) ABSTRACT.
Verenchicov, A. N et al. “Stability of lon Motion in Periodic Electrostatic Fields” Institute for Analytical Instrumentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2004) ABSTRACT.
Verenchicov, A. N. “The Concept of Multireflecting Mass Spectrometer for Continuous lon Sources” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) ABSTRACT.
Verenchicov, A. N., et al. “Accurate Mass Measurements for Inerpreting Spectra of atmospheric Pressure Ionization” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) ABSTRACT.
Kozlov, B. N. et al., “Experimental Studies of Space Charge Effects in Multireflecting Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometes” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) ABSTRACT.
Kozlov, B. N. et al., “Multireflecting Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometer With an lon Trap Source” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) ABSTRACT.
Hasin, Y. I., et al., “Planar Time-Of-Flight Multireflecting Mass Spectrometer with an Orthogonal lon Injection Out of Continuous lon Sources” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) ABSTRACT.
Lutvinsky Y. I. et al., “Estimation of Capacity of High Resolution Mass Spectra for Analysis of Complex Mixtures” Institute for Analytical Instrucmentation RAS, Saint-Petersburg, (2006) ABSTRACT.
Verenchicov, A. N. et al. “Multiplexing in Multi-Reflecting TOF MS” Journal of Applied Solution Chemistry and Modeling, 6:1-22 (2017).
Reflectron—Wikipedia, Oct. 9, 2015, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index. phptitle=Reflectron oldid=684843442 [retrieved on May 29, 2019].
Scherer, S., et al., “A novel principle for an ion mirror design in time-of-flight mass spectrometry”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 251, No. 1, Mar. 15, 2006.
Sakurai et al., “A New Multi-Passage Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer at JAIST”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A, Elsevier, 427(1-2): 182-186, May 11, 1999. ABSTRACT.
Toyoda et al., “Multi-Turn-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectometers with Electrostatic Sectors”, Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 38: 1125-1142, Jan. 1, 2003.
Wouters et al., “Optical Design of the TOFI (Time-of-Flight Isochronous) Spectrometer for Mass Measurements of Exotic Nuclei”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A, 240(1): 77-90, Oct. 1, 1985.
Stresau, D., et al. “lon Counting Beyond 10ghz Using a New Detector and Conventional Electronics”, European Winter Conference on Plasma Spectrochemistry, Feb. 4-8, 2001, Lillehammer, Norway, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.etp-ms.com/file-repository/21 [retrieved on Jul. 31, 2019].
Kaufmann, R., et al., “Sequencing of peptides in a time-of-flight mass spectrometer: evaluation of postsource decay following matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation (Maldi)”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co. Amsterdam, NL, 31:355-385, Feb. 24, 1994.
Barry Shaulis et al.: “Signal linearity of an extended range pulse counting detector: Applications to accurate and precise U-Pb dating of zircon by laser ablation quadrupole ICP-MS”, G3: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 11(11): 1-12, Nov. 20, 2010.
Author unknown, “Einzel Lens”, Wikipedia [online] Nov. 2020 [retrieved on Nov. 3, 2020]. Retrieved from Internet URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einzel_lens, 2 pages.
Carey, D.C., “Why a second-order magnetic optical achromat works”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 189(203): 365-367 (1981). ABSTRACT.
Sakurai, T. et al., “lon optics for time-of-flight mass spectrometers with multiple symmetry”, Int J Mass Spectrom lon Proc 63(2-3):273-287 (1985). ABSTRACT.
Wollnik, H., and Casares, A., “An energy-isochronous multi-pass time-of-flight mass spectrometer consisting of two coaxial electrostatic mirrors”, Int J Mass Spectrom 227:217-222 (2003). ABSTRACT.
O'Halloran, G.J., et al., “Determination of Chemical Species Prevalent in a Plasma Jet”, Bendix Corp Report Asd- TDR-62-644, U.S. Air Force (1964). ABSTRACT.
Collision Frequency, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collision_frequency accessed Aug. 17, 2021.
Hoyes et al., “Electrostatic gimbal for correction of errors in Time of Flight mass spectrometers”, Waters, 2013.
Verentchikov et al., “Stable ion beam transport through periodic electrostatic structures: linear and non-linear effects”, Physics Procedia vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 87-97, Aug. 2008.
Search Report for United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB2110152.2, mailed Apr. 14, 2022.
Artaev, V., “High resolution multi-reflecting time-of-flight mass analyzer with folded flight path HR MR-TOFMS Ffp”, pp. 1-19, LECO Corporation, httQS:/ /theanalyticalscientist.com/fileadmin/tas/app-notes/2021/ Leco_FOLDED_FLIGHT_PATH_FFP_WHITE_PAPER 209-281-008. pdf (2021).
Verenchikov, A., et al., “Multiplexing in Multi-Reflecting TOF MS”, Journal of Applied Solution Chemistry and Modeling, 6:1-22, (2017).
Willis, P., et al., “Improving duty cycle in the Folded Flight Path high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometer”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, vol. 459, 116467, Nov. 1, 2020.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220165560 A1 May 2022 US