This invention relates to the field of integrated circuit fabrication. More particularly, this invention relates to the formation of fuses.
Fuses are used in integrated circuits to customize their functions. As the term is used herein, “integrated circuit” includes devices such as those formed on monolithic semiconducting substrates, such as those formed of group IV materials like silicon or germanium, or group III-V compounds like gallium arsenide, or mixtures of such materials. The term includes all types of devices formed, such as memory and logic, and all designs of such devices, such as MOS and bipolar. The term also comprehends applications such as flat panel displays, solar cells, and charge coupled devices.
One desired use of fuses is for circuit repair where the fuse activates redundant cells that take the place of a failed portion of the device. The fuse provides a simple and permanent way to change the circuit, and takes up very little area on the integrated circuit as compared to fully programmable approaches.
One approach for device repair would be to test the integrated circuit first to determine what portions of the device are not working. From this information the fuses that need to be blown in order to isolate the failed sections from use and activate appropriate replacement cells can be calculated. The fuses are then cut such as by using a programmable laser tool.
There are several requirements for designing, building and using fuses in integrated circuits. For example, the fuse construction must be compatible with processes being used to manufacture the integrated circuit. Also, additional processing to build the fuse must be minimized, because every additional step adds manufacturing costs and potential yield killing defects. The fuse must be able to be broken consistently with a high yield, and remain electrically open over the lifetime of the device. Similarly, unbroken fuses must maintain a reliable electrical connection over the life time of the device. Further, the process for opening the fuses must be reliable, inexpensive, and selective to the specific fuse to be opened.
These constraints tend to create a variety of problems in regard to the fabrication and use of fuses. For example, the ability to form consistent hole depths in the oxide above the fuse bank requires tighter process control to be placed on the etch and deposition steps. Additional steps are required to open the oxide above the fuse bank (Masking and Etch steps). The laser spot size sets the fuse to fuse spacing, window opening, and damage region, which tends to result in a large fuse structure. The suppression of oxide damage requires a crack arresting ring of interconnect metal surrounding the fuse bank. The large opening and damage region in the fuse bank provides an entry point for impurity diffusion into the circuit area below, which can degrade the reliability of the part.
With current methods it is difficult to meet all of these requirements at the same time. As a result, fuse integrations tend to require many compromises with respect to yield, additional processing steps, and cost. This significantly limits the usefulness of fuses to control integrated circuits.
Fabrication of the fuse structure depicted in
Another issue with the laser blown aluminum fuse is that the yield and reliability are dependent on many factors that can vary during manufacturing. This includes the thickness and width of the aluminum fuse link, the thickness of the oxide remaining over the fuse, and the laser power that is applied to open the fuse.
A further drawback of the aluminum fuse is that it takes a relatively considerable amount of energy to break it. As a result, the passivation layer above the fuses tends to be damaged, which can affect the reliability of neighboring fuses that are not intended to be broken. In addition, any electrical interconnect or transistor in the area below the broken fuse can be damaged by the breaking process, which means that area cannot be used for other electronic elements, and becomes wasted space in the integrated circuit design.
Thus, for some of the reasons described above, current electrical fuse technology is not widely accepted as a means of circuit or memory repair. One concern with the use of fuse technology for circuit repair is the stability of the fuse structure in regard to varying temperature, electrical, and radiation conditions over time. Another concern is the generally-unknown length of time that the fuse structure can sustain the open or closed (0 or 1) circuit setting with which it is programmed.
Another detriment of aluminum fuse architecture is the fact that the blown fuse is not passivated after it is blown and the circuit may become reconnected due to environmental conditions (moisture or metals in the packaging material) forming the connection between the severed links. Also, under high tensile stress conditions aluminum metal migration can take place and reconnect the blown fuse links.
In
These drawbacks of the existing fuse processes are addressed by generally limiting the number of fuses that are used in an integrated circuit, or by using programmable circuits, which take up more space on the integrated circuit, but tend to be a more robust technology. Further, the use of programmable circuits adds considerably to design and manufacturing costs.
What is needed, therefore, is a system for programming integrated circuits that overcomes problems such as those described above, at least in part.
The above and other needs are met by a method of forming a carbon nanotube fuse by depositing a carbon nanotube layer, then depositing a cap layer directly over the carbon nanotube layer. The cap layer is formed of a material that has an insufficient amount of oxygen to significantly oxidize the carbon nanotube layer under operating conditions, and is otherwise sufficiently robust to protect the carbon nanotube layer from oxygen and plasmas. A photoresist layer is formed over the cap layer, and the photoresist layer is patterned to define a desired size of fuse. Both the cap layer and the carbon nanotube layer are completely etched, without removing the photoresist layer, to define the fuse having two ends in the carbon nanotube layer. Just the cap layer is etched, without removing the photoresist layer, so as to reduce the cap layer by a desired amount at the edges of the cap layer under the photoresist layer, without damaging the carbon nanotube layer. The photoresist layer is removed, and electrically conductive contacts are formed on each of the two ends of the fuse.
The advantages of this method include fuses that can be created with fewer and less expensive process steps than prior art methods. In addition, the carbon nanotube layer can be formed very thin, so passivation planarity over the integrated circuit is preserved. Further, the carbon nanotube layer can conduct a great deal of heat, so it can melt the contacting metal layers, such as the fuse contacts, and sever the electrical continuity of the fuse structure. Once connected or disconnected, the carbon nanotube layer is very stable, in a manner that it will not reform a conductive link. The steps and materials used to form the fuse according to the methods described herein are compatible with existing integrated circuit processing equipment and integration schemas.
According to another aspect of the invention there is described a method of severing an electrically conductive fuse having a link between two contacts that are disposed on distal ends of the link, the method comprising the step of passing a current between the two contacts and through the link, where the current is sufficient to create a Joule heating effect within the link sufficient to cause at least one of the two contacts to ablate and sever electrical continuity with the end of the link, without the link structurally changing.
According to yet another aspect of the invention there is described a carbon nanotube fuse comprising a carbon nanotube layer, a cap layer formed directly over the carbon nanotube layer, where the cap layer is formed of a material that has an insufficient amount of oxygen to significantly oxidize the carbon nanotube layer under operating conditions, and is otherwise sufficiently robust to protect the carbon nanotube layer from oxygen and plasmas, the cap layer formed at a smaller size than the carbon nanotube layer, to expose a contact area at distal ends of the carbon nanotube layer, and electrically conductive contacts disposed on each of the two distal ends of the carbon nanotube layer and in electrical continuity with the carbon nanotube layer through the contact area, where the contact area is of a size sufficient for at least one of the contacts to ablate from the carbon nanotube layer upon application of a current that causes a Joule heating effect in the carbon nanotube layer.
Further advantages of the invention are apparent by reference to the detailed description when considered in conjunction with the figures, which are not to scale so as to more clearly show the details, wherein like reference numbers indicate like elements throughout the several views, and wherein:
Recent development of electronic grade conductive carbon nanotube materials enable an alternate approach for making fuses that is potentially cheaper and more reliable, while still being compatible with existing integrated circuit processes. This invention applies to the formation of fuses using a carbon nanotube layer that is compatible with existing integrated circuit fabrication methods. The sequence and structure for making the carbon nanotube fuses is detailed with reference to the figures.
In
A cap layer 20 is formed, as depicted in
In
As depicted in
Some of the features of this invention include the use of a conductive carbon nanotube layer 18 to form the fuse 24. The carbon nanotube layer 18 is preferably in contact with or under-lapping metal contact structures 30. The carbon nanotube fuse 24 is preferably disposed between two metal contacts 30 with dimensions such that one contact 30 or the other is less than a maximum distance at which one contact 30 or the other will readily melt and separate from the fuse 24, and the fuse blowing operation is thereby made relatively insensitive to any critical alignment between the carbon nanotube fuse 24 and the metal contacts 30.
The carbon nanotube layer 18 is placed or patterned before the metal contact layer 26. A protective material like silicon carbide or silicon nitride is placed on top of the carbon nanotube fuse 24 as a cap layer 20 to protect it during patterning of the metal contacts 28 and 30. The protective cap layer 20 is etched in an undercutting process to achieve a targeted amount of carbon nanotube layer 18 to be revealed for the carbon nanotube 24 to metal contact 30. The fuse 24 can alternately be broken with a current pulse so that the connection between the carbon nanotube layer 18 and metal contacts 30 is broken, or with laser heating so that either the connection between the carbon nanotube layer 18 and metal contacts 30 is broken or the carbon nanotube layer 18 itself is broken.
The advantages of this method include fuses 24 that can be created with fewer and less expensive process steps than prior art methods. In addition, the carbon nanotube layer 18 is very thin, so passivation planarity over the integrated circuit 10 is preserved. Further, the carbon nanotube layer 18 can conduct a great deal of heat, so it can melt the contacting metal layers, such as the fuse contacts 30, and sever the electrical continuity of the fuse structure 24. Once connected or disconnected, the carbon nanotube layer 18 is very stable, in a manner that it will not reform a conductive link. The steps and materials used to form the fuse 24 according to the methods described herein are compatible with existing integrated circuit processing equipment and integration schemas. In addition, the prober version of the fuse 24 as depicted in
The exact sequence and materials used for fabricating the fuse 24 and surrounding structures can be varied to carry out the same basic schema, by using different metal layer materials and different dielectric materials, within the constraints as generally described herein.
The foregoing description of preferred embodiments for this invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Obvious modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings. The embodiments are chosen and described in an effort to provide the best illustrations of the principles of the invention and its practical application, and to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the invention as determined by the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally, and equitably entitled.
This application claims priority on provisional patent application 60/680,901, filed May 5, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1407785 | Cole | Feb 1922 | A |
6057637 | Zettl et al. | May 2000 | A |
6277318 | Bower et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6342276 | You et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6409567 | Amey, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422450 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423583 | Avouris et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6495116 | Herman | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6495258 | Chen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6515339 | Shin et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6528020 | Dai et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6574130 | Segal et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6630772 | Bower et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643165 | Segal et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6645628 | Shiffler, Jr. et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6706402 | Rueckes et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6707098 | Hofmann et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6784028 | Reuckes et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6808746 | Dai et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6833558 | Lee et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6835591 | Rueckes et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836424 | Segal et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6858197 | Delzeit | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6863942 | Ren et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6894359 | Bradley et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899945 | Smalley et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6911682 | Reuckes et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918284 | Snow et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919592 | Segal et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919740 | Snider | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921575 | Horiuchi et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924538 | Jaiprakash et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944054 | Rueckes et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6946410 | French et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6990009 | Bertin et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995046 | Rueckes et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7015500 | Choi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7057402 | Cole et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7161218 | Bertin et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7161403 | Bertin | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7329931 | Bertin | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339401 | Bertin et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7416993 | Segal et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20010004979 | Han et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020160111 | Sun et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020175390 | Goldstein et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030004058 | Li et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030122111 | Glatkowski | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030177450 | Nugent | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200521 | DeHon et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040005723 | Empedocles et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040007528 | Bakajin et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023253 | Kunwar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041154 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040043527 | Bradley et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040071949 | Glatkowski et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099438 | Arthur et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104129 | Gu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040181630 | Jaiprakash et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040253167 | Silva et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265550 | Glatkowski et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050047244 | Rueckes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050052894 | Segal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050053525 | Segal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050056825 | Bertin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050056866 | Bertin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050056877 | Rueckes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058590 | Sen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058797 | Sen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058834 | Rueckes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059176 | Rueckes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059210 | Rueckes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062035 | Bertin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062062 | Bertin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062070 | Bertin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063210 | Segal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063244 | Bertin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065741 | Segal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074926 | Bertin et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050095938 | Rosenberger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101112 | Rueckes et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050128788 | Segal et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050174842 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050191495 | Rueckes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050237781 | Bertin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050269553 | Sen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050269554 | Sen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282516 | Bertin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060044035 | Bertin | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060061389 | Bertin | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060125033 | Segal et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060128049 | Jaiprakash et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060183278 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193093 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060204427 | Ghenciu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231865 | Rueckes et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060237805 | Segal et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060250843 | Bertin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060250856 | Bertin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060255834 | Bertin | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258122 | Whitefield et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264053 | Yates | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276056 | Ward et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281256 | Carter et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281287 | Yates et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060292716 | Gu et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070004191 | Gu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070018260 | Jaiprakash et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070030721 | Segal et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070063740 | Bertin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070108482 | Bertin et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080012047 | Bertin et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080142850 | Bertin et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080157126 | Bertin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080159042 | Bertin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186756 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080191742 | Bertin | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080231413 | Bertin et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080251723 | Ward et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 364 933 | Feb 2002 | GB |
2000-203821 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2001-035362 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2004-090208 | Mar 2004 | JP |
WO-9839250 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO-9965821 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO-0103208 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-00245113 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-00248701 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-03016901 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO-03034142 | Apr 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060258122 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60680901 | May 2005 | US |