NETWORK SYSTEM FOR HYBRID AC/DC GRIDS

Abstract

A network system includes a hybrid AC/DC-grid and a network control component. The hybrid AC/DC-grid includes an AC grid; a DC grid; and at least one converter configured to connect the AC grid with the DC grid. The network control component is configured to control the hybrid AC/DC-grid by applying a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO PRIOR APPLICATION

Priority is claimed to European Patent Application No. EP 18 207 443.5, filed on Nov. 21, 2018, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.

FIELD

The invention relates to a network system. The network system can include a hybrid AC/DC-grid and a network control component, configured to control the hybrid AC/DC-grid by applying a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model. The invention further relates to a method for controlling a hybrid AC/DC-grid, a program element, and a computer readable medium.

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, electrical power is transmitted over AC (alternating current) grids because of the easy conversion of the voltage amplitudes using transformers. Often, more or less centralized power plants produce the current which is transmitted over an AC grid to stations using an up-conversion of the voltage at the power plants and a down conversion at the stations. Different stages may be applied.

DC (direct current) on the other side provides less losses and are more suited and more cost-efficient for long distances. Nowadays, the DC voltage conversion is relatively easy using power switches based on, e.g. inverters. Further, DC is easier to handle and to control compared to AC because it has no reactive power, which has, e.g., an effect on the reaction time of control measures.

Renewable energy sources often make use of the DC power transmission technology. The increasing number renewable energy sources, which are for a high percentage spread land-based or from off shore wind parks overland, and therefore often have to be transmitted over long distances resulting in a high number of DC grids. Multi-terminal systems connect a plurality of DC grids. Multiterminal systems are difficult to realize using line commutated converters because reversals of power are affected by reversing the polarity of DC voltage, which can affect all converters connected to the system.

With a hybrid AC/DC infrastructure, existing and new grids may be connected together, and the benefits of each grid type may be exploited. However, the grids may interfere each other which may result in unbalanced power distribution and unwanted loads in the network components.

SUMMARY

In an embodiment, the present invention provides a network system including a hybrid AC/DC-grid and a network control component. The hybrid AC/DC-grid includes an AC grid; a DC grid; and at least one converter configured to connect the AC grid with the DC grid. The network control component is configured to control the hybrid AC/DC-grid by applying a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the present invention will be described in even greater detail below based on the exemplary figures. The present invention is not limited to the exemplary embodiments. All features described and/or illustrated herein can be used alone or combined in different combinations in embodiments of the present invention. The features and advantages of various embodiments of the present invention will become apparent by reading the following detailed description with reference to the attached drawings which illustrate the following:

FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a network system according to an embodiment.

FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a method according to an embodiment.

FIG. 3 shows an electric circuit model for branches according to an embodiment.

FIG. 4 shows a diagram with the DC voltage for different types of control for an AC/DC converter according to an embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In an embodiment, the above-discussed problems are solved with a network system including a hybrid AC/DC-grid and a network control component. The hybrid AC/DC-grid includes an AC grid, a DC grid, and at least one converter configured to connect the AC grid with the DC grid. The network control component is configured to control the hybrid AC/DC-grid by applying a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model.

In an embodiment, the above-discussed problems are solved with a method for controlling a hybrid AC/DC-grid in a network system. The method can include: defining a set of optimization criterions; estimating state variables of the hybrid AC/DC-grid by applying a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model; and adjusting control variables of the hybrid AC/DC-grid according to a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model. The set of optimization criterions includes: minimal generation cost, minimal losses, minimal voltage angle differences, minimal voltage amplitude deviation, minimal reactive power in the AC grid, minimal redispatch cost, a combination thereof, or minimum number of control actions.

According to an embodiment, a network system is provided, comprising a hybrid AC/DC-grid. The hybrid AC/DC-grid in turn comprises an AC grid, a DC grid, and at least one converter configured to connect the AC grid with the DC grid. The network system further comprises a network control component, configured to control the hybrid AC/DC-grid by applying a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model.

The AC and the DC grids may be high voltage grids for dispatching power from power sources to consumers. Power sources may be generators of power plants or generators of renewable energy sources as, e.g., wind turbines or solar plants. An AC/DC converter may be positioned between an AC node of the AC grid and a DC node of the DC grid. The AC/DC converter may be able to convert in both directions, i.e., AC into DC or DC into AC. For example, an AC generator provides AC to the AC node of a local AC grid to which further components are connected. The AC current in the AC node is converted by the AC/DC converter to DC with a certain voltage magnitude so that the power may, as an example, be transmitted via long distance lines to a further converter which converts the DC into AC and provides the DC power to a further local AC grid. The grids have to be supervised, e.g., in terms of admissible maximum and minimum power, currents and voltages, variations of the currents and voltages, the ratio of active power and reactive power, etc. The relations of the power and further parameters in the AC and DC grid are in general non-linear due to, e.g. the phase rotations of the current and voltage in the AC grid, phase rotations by tap changers, or due to, e.g., quadratic terms when calculating the active or the reactive power.

The network control component in the security constrained non-linear network therefore applies an electrical model taking into account the power transfer in each component expressed in equations for the currents, voltages and power. These parameters are limited to maximum and/or minimum values so that the security constraints are fulfilled.

According to an embodiment, a network system is provided, wherein the non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model comprises an N-k security criterion, where k is an positive integer value.

A critical situation may occur in case of a sudden outage of a component which may lead to overcurrent or overvoltage. E.g., if one of the branches connected to a node fails, the remaining branches have not to be loaded out of their limits. In another example, a generator may fail. Then, there has to be a so-called spinning reserve, i.e. margin. Such a requirement is considered in a security assessment applying an N-1 criterion in a power system analysis. The N-1 criterion is a deterministic method in the security assessment to ensure that the system remains in a safe state or that the system is transferred into a safe state in the case of one outage. The N-1 criterion may also be expanded to N-2 or, generally spoken, to N-k, where k is an positive integer, covering cases where more than a single outage occur.

According to an embodiment, the N-k security criterion comprises a preventive mode and/or a corrective mode. In a preventive mode, the maximum and minimum values for the voltages, currents, active and reactive power, the maximum or minimum values are to be chosen such that an outage of one component does not lead to a violation of the constraints regarding further components to fulfill the security constraints. These variables are controlled either directly or indirectly in such a way that the constraints for the remaining operable components are still fulfilled and the system remains in a stable and secure state. In a corrective mode, the constraints may be violated in case of an outage. However, the variables are controlled such that, e.g., within a pre-defined time span, their values are led inside their constraint limits again. Therefore, by controlling the variables in a corrective way a stable and secure state of the network system is obtained.

According to an embodiment, a security criterion defines at least one constraint on at least one of the following variables: active power, reactive power, voltage magnitude or phase, current magnitude or phase. Depending on the type of component, including whether it is an AC or an DC component, different variables may be controlled. E.g., for an AC branch, there may exist an active power constraint, an reactive power constraint and a constraint for the phase difference between the current and the voltage, whereas for a DC branch, there may exist a constraint regarding the active power only.

According to an embodiment, the hybrid AC/DC-grid comprises further a plurality of grid components of different type; wherein the types of the grid components include busbars, lines, generators, transformers, breakers, storage devices, shunts, AC/DC converters, or loads; and wherein the network control component is configured to estimate the hybrid AC/DC-grid state defined by state variables of the hybrid AC/DC-grid components for determining the optimal power flow. The model takes into account each of the components; and for each component the state of the component is estimated. The state may be a vector or a matrix comprising the state variables. The state may furthermore be calculated in a deterministic and/or stochastic way, and may be a result of a control loop or a filter loop.

According to an embodiment the state variables are complex voltage levels, power flows, transformer status, breaker status, generator status, or converter status or a combination thereof. Complex voltage levels are, e.g., the AC or DC magnitudes of the voltages regarding also their phase or the phase differences between the voltage and the current; and power flows are signed, i.e. directional, active or reactive power levels of each of the components. Next to these state variables, the state comprises the status of transformer, breaker, generator and/or converter, comprising current tap changer level, on/off-status, etc.

According to an embodiment, the network control component is configured to adjust the hybrid AC/DC-grid state by control variables for providing the optimal power flow. The control variables are independent whereas the above-mentioned AC/DC-grid state variables depend on the control variables.

According to an embodiment, the control variables define setpoints for generator active power, generator reactive power, converter active power, and converter reactive power, transformer tap magnitude or phase, Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS) status and storage control.

According to an embodiment, the network control component is configured to apply a statistical model for loads or renewable generation for predetermining the optimal power flow. Statistical models may include a possible non-deterministic behavior of the grid, taking into account, e.g., a different power consumption or power generation as, e.g., solar power at different times of a day and allows thus for estimating control variables in advance.

According to an embodiment, the optimal power flow is based on an optimization criterion, wherein the optimization criterion is one of: minimal generation cost, minimal losses, minimal voltage angle differences, minimal voltage amplitude deviation, minimal reactive power in the AC grid, or minimal redispatch cost, or on an combination thereof or minimum number of control actions. In other words, a single criterion, or a combination of two or more criterions may be selected, e.g., by the operator. The optimization may follow a priority of the criterions, which may be pre-determined or also be determined by the operator, or may be an overall optimization such as obtained by the least squares method.

According to an embodiment, a network control component of a network system configured to control a hybrid AC/DC-grid by applying a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model is provided. That is, the equations of the model for determining the state and control variables of the components of the grid are non-linear or kept non-linear, respectively. The equations comprise, e.g., the power balance of the active and reactive power in an AC node taking into account, e.g., the lines, power transformers, and shunt components, and further the generators, the power from the AC/DC converters and the total load connected to the node. For the active power in a DC node, e.g., power converters and lines connected to the node may be taken into account. The voltage magnitude and phase may be constrained to minimum and maximum values. The model may further comprise constraint equations for the maximum and minimum active and reactive power of the generator. Branches, which are generic passive components that transfer current from one node to another, may be modeled according to Kirchhoff s circuit law using, e.g. a double bi-pole model. The double bi-pole model may also take into account tap changers, modelled by a gain and a complex rotation. Tap changer control variables may defined voltages and gains constraint to minimum and maximum values. Converters transfer power in both directions, i.e. from AC to DC grids or vice versa. The converter model may take into account the power balance between the AC and DC ports and the losses caused by the electronic devices. Active and reactive power may be control variables which are constrained to minimum and maximum values.

According to an example, the security-constraint of the network control element comprises an N-k, e.g., an N-1 security criterion. For example, regarding the control variables, it may be possible to define a finite deviation of the control variables setpoints in order to compensate an outage. The deviation is dependent on the contingency that has happened so that a corrective action is performed to remove the violation. By doing this, a corrective security-constrained power flow is obtained. A further N-1 method may be a preventive security-constrained optimal power flow in which a single value for each control variable is defined. The state constraints remain fulfilled, even if an outage occurs so that no corrective action is necessary.

According to an embodiment, a method for controlling a hybrid AC/DC-grid in a network system described above is provided, the method comprising the steps of: defining a set of optimization criterions; estimating state variables of the hybrid AC/DC-grid by applying a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model; adjusting control variables of the hybrid AC/DC-grid according to a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model; wherein the set of optimization criterions comprises: minimal generation cost, minimal losses, minimal voltage angle differences, minimal voltage amplitude deviation, minimal reactive power in the AC grid, or minimal redispatch cost, or a combination thereof or minimum number of control actions. The method includes security-constraints that take into account an N-1, or generally an N-k criterion where k is an positive integer number. The security constraints furthermore take into account limits for active and reactive power levels, complex voltage levels and currents by applying, e.g. inequality equations defining maximum and minimum values.

In a first example of an N-1 case, a generator fails: in order to maintain the supply-demand balance the other generators in the grid have to compensate for the outage and thus there may be higher power flows over long distances in the grid. This may lead to overloaded lines and violations of the admissible voltage band, i.e., the corresponding state variables would violate their limits. In a second example of an N-1 case, a line or a transformer fails: In this case, power flows have to be redirected over other lines, which may also lead to overloaded lines as described above and may lead to constraint violations. The N-1 criterion assesses the security risk and the system is configured such the constraints are either not violated or fulfilled due to a corrective action.

According to an embodiment, in the method for controlling a hybrid AC/DC-grid in a network system, the step of estimating state variables of the hybrid AC/DC-grid further comprises applying a statistical load model; and the step of adjusting control variables of the hybrid AC/DC-grid comprises predetermining the control variables for optimizing the power flow in advance.

According to an embodiment, a program element, which, when being executed by a processor of a network control component, instructs the hybrid AC/DC-grid to perform the steps of the method described above.

According to an embodiment, a computer readable medium is provided on which such a program element is stored.

FIG. 1 shows a network system 100 with an AC grid 110 and a DC grid 120. A voltage source converter (VSC) 103, connected to an AC node and to a DC node 127 connects the AC grid and the DC grid. A node is a generic declaration to define a junction between two or more items. To the AC node only the AC components can be connected, and to the DC node only DC components can be connected. The converter 103 is part of the AC system 105 and of the DC system 106. The hybrid AC/DC grid comprises therefore the AC grid 110, the DC grid 120, and the converter 103. The network system further comprises a network control component 104 configured to control the hybrid AC/DC-grid 101, 102, 103. The AC grid 110 comprises further branches 111, 112, 113 (power transformers, cables, overhead lines), a generator 114, a shunt circuit 115 (constant admittance), and a load 116. The DC grid in this example may further comprise branches 121, 122, and 123. The power flow may take place from the generator 114 to the AC branches 111, 112, 113, to the load 116 (constant active and reactive power), and via converter 103 to the DC node 127 and the DC branches 121, 122, and 123. The power may also flow from the DC grid to the AC grid as illustrated by the bi-directional arrows in FIG. 1. The positive reference is used when the power goes inside the node. The network control component may collect the state information of the grid components and set control variables of the components to control by applying a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model so that an optimization. In FIG. 1 only one component is shown for each component type. However, the network may comprise further components, and especially more than one component of a type, e.g., converter.

The components in FIG. 1 may be modelled, for example, by a one-phase-system model as described in the following as an example.

With the one-phase-system model a mono-phase system or a multiphase system can be evaluated. In order to evaluate a multiphase system, the system must be balanced and symmetric to consider only the positive sequence using, e.g. the Fortescue transformation. The model may not use the differential time dependent components inside the power balance equations so that only (sinusoidal) steady state or sequential-time (sinusoidal) steady state analyses can be performed. The variables and the equations may be expressed in complex polar form.

The variables are split into two parts: control (or independent) set of variables as, e.g., power setpoint (P and Q) for active or controlled device, tap changer and/or phase changer position for power transformers and state (or dependent) set of variables as, e.g., voltage magnitude and phase for every AC and DC node;

In the following an exemplary model for the network system components is given.

Nodes

An AC node may be modelled by an active power balance equation and a reactive power equation. The active power balance can be expressed by the following equation:

$\underset{\underset{\mathrm{network}\mathrm{components}+\mathrm{shunts}\mathrm{components}}{}}{-p\left(v_{n,AC,c},{\vartheta }_{n,c},{\delta }_{b,c},{\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)}+p_{g,c}+p_{h,AC,c}-p_n=0$

In the above equation, the first term regards the power that flows from the node into the branches (line, power transformers and shunt components); the second term regards the active power coupled in from the generators connected to the node; the third component regards the power from the AC/DC converters connected to the node and the last component is the total load.

In the same way, the reactive power balance may be defined as follows:

$\underset{\underset{\mathrm{network}\mathrm{components}+\mathrm{shunts}\mathrm{components}}{}}{-q\left(v_{n,AC,c},{\vartheta }_{n,c},{\delta }_{b,c},{\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)}+q_{g,c}+q_{h,c}-q_n=0$

For the DC nodes, the balance equation for the reactive power does not exist and therefore, there is only one single equation for the node representing the power converters and lines connected to the node.

$\underset{\underset{\mathrm{network}\mathrm{components}}{}}{-p\left(v_{n,DC,c}\right)}+p_{h,DC,c}=0$

Regarding the voltage magnitude and phase, for each AC node the following inequality constraints may be defined:

v_n,AC,min≤v_n,c≤v_n,AC,max

−2π≤ϑ_n,c≤2π

Generators

The generator capability can be defined as a surface with the following limits (inequality constraints), where p_gc and q_gc are the control variables:

p_g,min≤p_g,c≤p_g,max

q_g,min≤q_g,c≤q_g,max

p _g,c ² +q _g,c ² −s _g ²≤0

q _g,c −m _g,pos p _g,c −z _g,pos≤0

−q_g,c+m_g,negp_g,c+z_g,neg≤0

Branches

In an embodiment, a branch is a generic passive component able to transfer current from one node to another according to the Kirchhoft's circuit laws. The double bi-pole model with PI scheme may be used. This model can be usefully applied for overhead lines, cables, power transformers (with and without tap changer and/or phase shifter) and for DC overhead lines and cables. The tap changer and phase shifter are installed on node “from” and both can be modelled with a pure gain δ and a complex rotation e^jϑ. For a generic branch b, contingency c and defining i as node “from” and j as node “to”, is possible to define the relationship between the current and voltage (both in complex/matrix format):

$\left[\frac{\stackrel{\_}{i_i}}{i_j}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{cc}\stackrel{\_}{y_{\mathrm{ii}}}{\delta }_{b,c}^2& \stackrel{\_}{y_{\mathrm{ij}}}{\delta }_{b,c}e^{j{\vartheta }_{b,c}}\\ \stackrel{\_}{y_{\mathrm{ji}}}{\delta }_{b,c}e^{-j{\vartheta }_{b,c}}& \stackrel{\mathrm{\_\_}}{y_{\mathrm{jj}}}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}\stackrel{\_}{v_i}\\ \stackrel{\_}{v_j}\end{array}\right]$

Exploiting the symmetry of the model, the matrix component with ii subscript is equal to the component jj and, in the same way, the component ij is equal to the component ji. Starting from the input parameters, it is possible to write the components that describe the double bi-pole with the following transformation:

$\hspace{1em}\{\begin{array}{cc}\stackrel{\_}{y_{\mathrm{ii}}}=\stackrel{\_}{y_{\mathrm{jj}}}=g_{\mathrm{ii}}+{\mathrm{jb}}_{\mathrm{ii}}& \begin{array}{c}{g}_{\mathrm{ii}}=\frac{g_b}{2}+\frac{r_b}{r_b^2+x_b^2}\\ b_{\mathrm{ii}}=\frac{b_b}{2}-\frac{x_b}{r_b^2+x_b^2}\end{array}\\ \stackrel{\_}{y_{\mathrm{ij}}}=\stackrel{\_}{y_{\mathrm{ji}}}=g_{\mathrm{ij}}+{\mathrm{jb}}_{\mathrm{ij}}& \begin{array}{c}{g}_{\mathrm{ij}}=-\frac{r_b}{r_b^2+x_b^2}\\ b_{\mathrm{ij}}=+\frac{x_b}{r_b^2+x_b^2}\end{array}\end{array}$

The double bi-pole model can be represented with the electric circuit 300 shown in FIG. 3 including a current source 301 with gain δ and complex rotation e^jϑ, resistance r_b 202, reactance x_b 303, suceptances b_b/2 305, 307 and conductances g_b/2 304, 307.

For the tap changer control variables and/or for the phase shifter control variable, the following inequality constraints are defined according to the limits of the power transformer:

ϑ_b,min≤ϑ_b,c≤ϑ_b,max

δ_b,min≤δ_b,c≤δ_b,max

In general, defining v as voltage magnitude and ϑ as phase on node i and j for the contingency case c, is possible to define the currents that are flowing on these nodes as follow (in real and imaginary parts):

$\left\{\stackrel{\_}{i_i}\right\}\begin{array}{c}=v_i{\delta }_{b,c}^2\left(g_{\mathrm{ii}}\cos \left({\vartheta }_i\right)-b_{\mathrm{ii}}\sin \left({\vartheta }_i\right)\right)\\ +v_j{\delta }_{b,c}(g_{\mathrm{ij}}\left(\cos \left({\vartheta }_j\right)\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)-\sin \left({\vartheta }_j\right)\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right)\\ -b_{\mathrm{ij}}\left(\sin \left({\vartheta }_j\right)\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)+\cos \left({\vartheta }_j\right)\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right))\end{array}$ $\left\{\stackrel{\_}{i_i}\right\}\begin{array}{c}=v_i{\delta }_{b,c}^2\left(g_{\mathrm{ii}}\sin \left({\vartheta }_i\right)-b_{\mathrm{ii}}\cos \left({\vartheta }_i\right)\right)\\ +v_j{\delta }_{b,c}(g_{\mathrm{ij}}\left(\sin \left({\vartheta }_j\right)\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)-\cos \left({\vartheta }_j\right)\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right)\\ -b_{\mathrm{ij}}\left(\cos \left({\vartheta }_j\right)\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)+\sin \left({\vartheta }_j\right)\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right))\end{array}$ $\left\{\stackrel{\_}{i_j}\right\}\begin{array}{c}=v_j\left(g_{\mathrm{ii}}\cos \left({\vartheta }_j\right)-b_{\mathrm{ii}}\sin \left({\vartheta }_j\right)\right)\\ +v_i{\delta }_{b,c}(g_{\mathrm{ij}}\left(\cos \left({\vartheta }_i\right)\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)-\sin \left({\vartheta }_i\right)\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right)\\ -b_{\mathrm{ij}}\left(\sin \left({\vartheta }_i\right)\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)+\cos \left({\vartheta }_i\right)\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right))\end{array}$ $\left\{\stackrel{\_}{i_j}\right\}\begin{array}{c}=v_j\left(g_{\mathrm{ii}}\sin \left({\vartheta }_j\right)-b_{\mathrm{ii}}\cos \left({\vartheta }_j\right)\right)\\ +v_i{\delta }_{b,c}(g_{\mathrm{ij}}\left(\sin \left({\vartheta }_i\right)\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)-\cos \left({\vartheta }_i\right)\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right)\\ -b_{\mathrm{ij}}\left(\cos \left({\vartheta }_i\right)\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)+\sin \left({\vartheta }_i\right)\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right))\end{array}$

The square of magnitude of current is equal to (inequality constraints):

|i_i|²=f(v_i,v_j,ϑ_i,ϑ_j,δ_b,c,ϑ_b,c)={i_i}²+ℑ{i_i}²≤i_b,max²

|i_j|²=f(v_i,v_j,ϑ_i,ϑ_j,δ_b,c,ϑ_b,c)={i_j}²+ℑ{i_j}²≤i_b,max²

Due to the presence of the tap changer and the transversal components, the square of magnitude of current i can be different from the square of magnitude of current.

In the same way, it is possible to define the active and reactive power that flows through the branch with the following equations:

$p_{\mathrm{ij}}=g_{\mathrm{ii}}v_i^2{\delta }_{b,c}^2+v_iv_j{\delta }_{b,c}\left(\left(g_{\mathrm{ij}}\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)-b_{\mathrm{ij}}\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right)\cos \left({\vartheta }_i-{\vartheta }_j\right)+\left(g_{\mathrm{ij}}\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)+b_{\mathrm{ij}}\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right)\sin \left({\vartheta }_i-{\vartheta }_j\right)\right)\le p_{b,\mathrm{ma}x}$ $q_{\mathrm{ij}}=-b_{\mathrm{ii}}v_i^2{\delta }_{b,c}^2+v_iv_j{\delta }_{b,c}\left(\left(g_{\mathrm{ij}}\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)-b_{\mathrm{ij}}\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right)\sin \left({\vartheta }_i-{\vartheta }_j\right)-\left(g_{\mathrm{ij}}\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)+b_{\mathrm{ij}}\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right)\cos \left({\vartheta }_i-{\vartheta }_j\right)\right)$ $p_{\mathrm{ij}}=g_{\mathrm{jj}}v_j^2+v_jv_i{\delta }_{b,c}\left(\left(g_{\mathrm{ji}}\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)+b_{\mathrm{ji}}\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right)\cos \left({\vartheta }_j-{\vartheta }_i\right)+\left(-g_{\mathrm{ji}}\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)+b_{\mathrm{ji}}\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right)\sin \left({\vartheta }_j-{\vartheta }_i\right)\right)\le p_{b,\mathrm{ma}x}$ $q_{\mathrm{ji}}=-b_{\mathrm{jj}}v_j^2+v_jv_i{\delta }_{b,c}\left(\left(g_{\mathrm{ji}}\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)+b_{\mathrm{ji}}\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right)\sin \left({\vartheta }_j-{\vartheta }_i\right)-\left(-g_{\mathrm{ji}}\sin \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)+b_{\mathrm{ji}}\cos \left({\vartheta }_{b,c}\right)\right)\cos \left({\vartheta }_j-{\vartheta }_i\right)\right)$

The square of the apparent power can be calculated as follow (inequality constraints):

s _ij ² =f(v_i,v_j,ϑ_i,ϑ_j,δ_b,c,ϑ_b,c)=p_ij²+q_ij²≤s_b,max²

s _ji ² =f(v_i,v_j,ϑ_i,ϑ_j,δ_b,c,ϑ_b,c)=p_ji²+q_ji²≤s_b,max²

The difference between s_ij and s_ji results from the power loss inside the branch. According to the positive direction of the power, the active and reactive losses can be calculated as sum of the power from node i-j and node j-i. In particular:

p _loss =p _ij +p _ji =+g _ii(v_i²δ_b,c²+v_j²)+2g_ijv_iv_jδ_b,c(cos(ϑ_b,c)cos(ϑ_i−ϑ_j)+sin(ϑ_b,c)sin(ϑ_i, ϑ_j))

q _loss =q _ij +q _ji =−b _ii(v_i²δ_b,c²+v_j²)−2b_ijv_iv_jδ_b,c(cos(ϑ_b,c)cos(ϑ_i−ϑ_j)+sin(ϑ_b,c)sin(ϑ_i−ϑ_j))

Moreover, for each branch, it is possible to define a limit regarding the deviation of the phase between the node i and the node j. This inequality constraint is represented by the following equation:

Δϑ_b,min≤ϑ_i−ϑ_j≤Δϑ_b,min

For the DC branches, only the longitudinal resistance rb has been considered. In this case, the above equations can be simplified as follow (inequality constraints):

{l_l}=g_iiv_i+g_ijv_j=g_ii(v_i−v_j)≤i_b,maxℑ{l_l}=0

{l_j}=g_iiv_j+g_ijv_i=g_ii(v_j−v_i)≤i_b,maxℑ{l_j}=0

The power can then expressed (inequality constraints) in the following way:

p _ij =g _ii v _i ² +g _ij v _i v _j =g _ii(v_i²−v_iv_j)≤p_b,max

p _ji =g _ii v _j ² +g _ij v _i v _j =g _ii(v_j²−v_jv_i)≤p_b,max

Finally, the power loss inside the branch can be calculated:

p _loss =p _ij +p _ji =g _ii(v_i²+v_j²−2v_iv_j)

Converters

The converter station is the component that is able to transfer power in both directions, from AC to DC grids and from DC grids into AC grids. The converter model takes into account the power balance between the AC and DC ports with the losses due to the power electronic devices. The converter capability is defined as a surface with the following limits:

p_h,min≤p_h,AC,c≤p_h,max

q_h,min≤q_h,c≤q_h,max

i_h,AC,c²≤i_h,max²

where p_h,AC,c and q_h,c are the control variables. The power balance equation is written in the following equation. The state variable p_h,AC,c, that takes the losses inside the converter into account, is always greater than zero. This means that the power from AC or DC side must be negative (like a load) in order to supply the losses.

p _h,AC,c +p _h,DC,c +p _h,loss,c=0

The power losses are calculated by the empiric formula that makes a relationship between i_h,Ac,c and p_h,loss,c. The alpha, beta and gamma parameters for each converter come from a quadratic model.

α_h+β_hi_h,AC,c+γ_hi_h,AC,c²−p_h,loss,c=0

In order to evaluate i_h,AC,c the following power balance equation is used, where the v_h,AC,c is the voltage magnitude for that AC node where the converter is installed.

p _h,AC,c ² +q _h,c ²−3v_h,AC,c²i_h,AC,c²=0

In order to explore different working configuration, for each converter is possible to define four operation modes that create a relationship between the DC power and the DC voltage. These operation modes are illustrated in FIG. 4 showing the DC power/DC voltage plane. The working configurations can be:

• a) Free: there is no correlation between the DC power and voltage.
• b) Droop control 401: there is a linear correlation between the DC power and DC voltage. The intercept and slope parameters can set independently.
• c) Fixed voltage 403: this means that the DC voltage magnitude doesn't change due to DC power setpoint modification.
• d) Fixed power 402: this means that the DC power level doesn't change due to DC voltage magnitude modification.

Moreover, for the DC node, where the converter is installed, it is mandatory, in an embodiment, to define if the node is a monopole or bi-pole. In case of a bi-pole definition, the power balance equations are modified in order to transfer the same power but with halved current values (dual symmetrical voltage). For the dual unsymmetrical voltage it is necessary to define two converters and two different DC nodes.

A network system is provided, including a hybrid AC/DC-grid. The hybrid AC/DC-grid in turn comprises an AC grid, a DC grid, and at least one converter configured to connect the AC grid with the DC grid. The network system further includes a network control component, configured to control the hybrid AC/DC-grid by applying a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model.

While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive. It will be understood that changes and modifications may be made by those of ordinary skill within the scope of the following claims. In particular, the present invention covers further embodiments with any combination of features from different embodiments described above and below. Additionally, statements made herein characterizing the invention refer to an embodiment of the invention and not necessarily all embodiments.

The terms used in the claims should be construed to have the broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the foregoing description. For example, the use of the article “a” or “the” in introducing an element should not be interpreted as being exclusive of a plurality of elements. Likewise, the recitation of “or” should be interpreted as being inclusive, such that the recitation of “A or B” is not exclusive of “A and B,” unless it is clear from the context or the foregoing description that only one of A and B is intended. Further, the recitation of “at least one of A, B and C” should be interpreted as one or more of a group of elements consisting of A, B and C, and should not be interpreted as requiring at least one of each of the listed elements A, B and C, regardless of whether A, B and C are related as categories or otherwise. Moreover, the recitation of “A, B and/or C” or “at least one of A, B or C” should be interpreted as including any singular entity from the listed elements, e.g., A, any subset from the listed elements, e.g., A and B, or the entire list of elements A, B and C.

Claims

1. A network system, comprising: a hybrid AC/DC-grid; comprising an AC grid;a DC grid;at least one converter configured to connect the AC grid with the DC grid;a network control component, configured to control the hybrid AC/DC-grid by applying a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model.

2. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model comprises an N-k security criterion; wherein k is a positive integer number; and wherein the N-k security criterion comprises a preventive mode and/or a corrective mode.

3. The network system according to claim 1 wherein a security criterion defines at least one constraint on at least one of the following variables: active power, reactive power, voltage magnitude or phase, current magnitude or phase.

4. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the hybrid AC/DC-grid comprises further a plurality of grid components of different type; wherein the types of the grid components include busbars, lines, generators, transformers, breakers, storage devices, shunts, AC/DC converters, or loads; and wherein the network control component is configured to estimate the hybrid AC/DC-grid state defined by state variables of the hybrid AC/DC-grid components for determining the optimal power flow.

5. The network system according to claim 4, wherein the state variables are complex voltage levels, power flows, transformer status, breaker status, generator status, or converter status or a combination thereof

6. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the network control component is configured to adjust the hybrid AC/DC-grid state by control variables for providing the optimal power flow; and wherein the control variables define setpoints for generator active power, generator reactive power, converter active power, and converter reactive power, transformer tap magnitude or phase, Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS) status and storage control.

7. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the network control component is configured to apply a statistical model for loads or renewable power generation for predetermining the optimal power flow.

8. The network system according to claim 1, wherein the optimal power flow is based on an optimization criterion, wherein the optimization criterion is one of: minimal generation cost, minimal losses, minimal voltage angle differences, minimal voltage amplitude deviation, minimal reactive power in the AC grid, or minimal redispatch cost, or an combination thereof or minimum number of control actions.

9. The network control component of a network system according to claim 1, configured to control a hybrid AC/DC-grid by applying a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow.

10. A method for controlling a hybrid AC/DC-grid in a network system according to claim 1, the method comprising the steps: defining a set of optimization criterions;estimating state variables of the hybrid AC/DC-grid by applying a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model;adjusting control variables of the hybrid AC/DC-grid according to a full non-linear security-constrained optimal power flow model;wherein the set of optimization criterions comprises: minimal generation cost, minimal losses, minimal voltage angle differences, minimal voltage amplitude deviation, minimal reactive power in the AC grid, or minimal redispatch cost, or a combination thereof or minimum number of control actions.

11. The method for controlling a hybrid AC/DC-grid in a network system according to claim 10, wherein: the step of estimating state variables of the hybrid AC/DC-grid further comprises applying a statistical load model; andthe step of adjusting control variables of the hybrid AC/DC-grid comprises predetermining the control variables for optimizing the power flow in advance.

12. A processing system comprising one or more processors configured to provide, alone or in combination, for execution of the method of claim 10.

13. A non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions thereon, which, upon being executed by one or more processors, alone or in combination, provide for execution of the method of claim 10.