Neurosurgical instruments

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10857327
  • Patent Number
    10,857,327
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 12, 2016
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 8, 2020
    3 years ago
Abstract
A catheter assembly for insertion into the brain. The assembly comprises a first length of tubing made of a first material. A second material surrounds the first length of tubing, the second material being more flexible than the first material and having a hardness of less than 50 Rockwell E. The second material provides damping to the first length of tubing.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to apparatus for use in neurosurgery, in particular it relates to the design and use of catheters that are used to deliver therapeutic agents to the Central Nervous System.


The blood-brain barrier represents a considerable hurdle to the delivery of therapeutic agents to the nervous system. The term therapeutic agent includes substances which have a therapeutic effect, such as pharmaceutic compounds, genetic materials, biologics (i.e. preparations synthesized from living organisms such as stem cells). The development of techniques to bypass this barrier could revolutionize the management of Parkinson's, Huntingdon's and Alzheimer's disease as well as Glioblastoma Multiforme. Novel agents that could potentially suppress or even reverse the underlying pathological processes of these conditions have been developed. However, the limitations of these therapeutic agents lie in their inability to cross the blood-brain barrier and consequently their failure to reach the necessary structures within the brain when delivered by conventional methods (e.g. oral or intravenously).


Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) allows the delivery of a therapeutic agent directly to the central nervous system, without the requirement of the therapeutic agent, crossing the blood brain barrier. CED utilizes fine intracranial catheters and low infusion rates to impart drugs directly into the brain extracellular space. In contrast to direct intraparenchymal injection, encapsulated cells and biodegradable polymers, CED does net depend on diffusion. The use of a carefully designed cannula with a precisely controlled infusion rate leads to the development of a pressure gradient, along which a therapeutic agent passes directly into the extracellular space. Consequently, it is possible to achieve controlled, homogeneous distribution even for relatively large molecules, over large volumes of the brain and spinal cord.


DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

International patent application WO 03/077764 discloses the implantation of a catheter in a human or non-human brain for intraparenchymal drug delivery. A drug may thus be pumped intermittently or continuously through the catheter to the desired brain target. For long term drug delivery, a pump containing a reservoir may be implanted subcutaneously and the reservoir refilled as necessary percutaneously through a palpable port.


The paper ‘Focal delivery during direct infusion to brain: role of flow rate, catheter diameter, and tissue mechanics’ published in Am J Physical Regal Integr Comp Physical Vol 277, Issue 4, R1218-R1229, October 1999 describes factors that govern drug delivery by direct interstitial infusion.


This paper discloses that at low flow rates of fluid through an implanted catheter it can be assumed that all the infused solution is delivered to the target tissue. However, at high flow rates, the solution can flow back up the catheter shaft leaking to the surface and reducing delivery to the tissue.


At these high flow rates, the infusate creates pressure on the tissue surrounding the catheter and causes the tissue to move away from the surface of the catheter, thereby creating an annular space extending along a portion of the catheter length. If the annular space is sufficiently long, it can become an extended source of infusate and distort the spherical symmetry of the infusate distribution. In extreme cases, this annular space may extend to the brain surface, resulting in loss of infusate directly into the cerebrospinal fluid.


The principal limitation of CED is that the distribution of drugs through the extracellular space can be unpredictable. The key factors affecting drug distribution of therapeutic agent by CED are catheter design, infusion flow-rate, site of catheter placement, charge of therapeutic agent and non-specific therapeutic agent binding. Although there have been a number of clinical trials attempting to administer therapies or biologically active agents to patients with neurodegenerative diseases, using this technique, the available evidence suggests that the catheters being used are incompatible with successful CED.


One of the key elements in the unpredictability of the distribution of the drug is back flow of the infused agent along the catheter's insertion track. The paper ‘Convection enhanced delivery of therapeutics for brain disease and its optimization’ Neurosurg Focus 20 (3):E12,2006-06-28 discloses that such back flow can happen for one of two reasons. First, backflow can occur if the catheter has mechanically disrupted the tissue enough to allow a gap to form around its outer wall. In such cases, the infused agent simply back flows along the gap, thereby reducing the percentage of infusate reaching its intended target. This backflow could also lead to scalp necrosis or the development of antibodies.


Even when no gap has formed during catheter insertion or when the tissue has sealed against the outer wall, a second type of backflow can occur. During this intrinsic backflow, pressure associated with the infusion process pushes against the tissues and causes them to separate minutely from the catheter, until the shear forces in the tissue balance the pressure field and the retrograde axial flow stops.


The applicants aim to reduce the amount of backflow by using a catheter of small diameter as disclosed in WO 03/077785. Fused silica is a preferred material for the catheter due to its low viral binding properties. These properties are important as therapeutic agents may be viral based for example herpes simplex virus which could bind to a substrate such as a catheter causing inefficient delivery. However, it has been shown that only a small percentage of a viral infusion would bind to fused silica and hence this is a preferred material for delivery.


When fluid flows through the catheter under pressure the catheter undergoes a vibration. A catheter made of stiff material such as fused silica has a high natural frequency. When fluid is surging through the catheter it undergoes high frequency, small amplitude vibration. This vibration of the catheter causes the gap between the catheter and its surrounding tissue to increase, thereby increasing backflow.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A first aspect of the present invention provides a catheter assembly for insertion into the brain, the assembly comprising a first length of tubing made of a first material, the first length of tubing being surrounded by a second material, the second material being more flexible than the first material and having a hardness of less than 50 Rockwell E.


In a preferred embodiment, the second material comprises a second length of tubing concentric with the first length of tubing. Alternatively, the second material may be part of the first length of tubing.


The assembly may comprise an additional length of tubing, the additional length of tubing being concentric with the first length of tubing, wherein an annular gap is created between the first length of tubing and the additional length of tubing.


The additional length of tubing may be made of a material which is more flexible than the first material.


The first length of tubing may extend further than the additional length of tubing.


A second aspect of the invention provides a catheter assembly for insertion into the brain, the assembly comprising inner and outer concentric length of tubing with an annular gap between them.


Preferably the inner and outer lengths of concentric tubing are both stiff. The outer length of catheter may have a module of elasticity of greater than 30 GPa.


The inner length of tubing may comprise fused silica. The outer tube may comprise fused silica. The outer tube may comprise stainless steel. The inner length of tubing has a polyimide coating.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the following drawings:



FIG. 1 illustrates a side view of a guide tube;



FIG. 2 illustrates a side view of an inner tube;



FIG. 3 illustrates a side view of a catheter;



FIG. 4A is a side view of the assembled guide tube, inner tube and catheter;



FIG. 4B illustrates the assembled guide tube, inner tube and catheter inserted into the brain; and



FIG. 5 a cross section of the ends of the catheter, inner tube and guide tube inserted into the brain.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS


FIGS. 1-3 illustrate a guide tube, inner tube and catheter respectively according to the present invention.


The guide tube 10 is shown in FIG. 1 and comprises a length of tube 12 with a hub 14 at one end. In this example it is made from a polyurethane plastic such as carbothane 55DB20. However, it may be made from any material which is biocompatible and sufficiently rigid at room temperature to maintain its central aperture. In this example, the tube 12 has an outer diameter of 0.6 mm and an inner diameter of 0.5 mm.


The guide tube is inserted into: the brain through an aperture (e.g. burr hole) in the skull created by the surgeon. Once the length of tubing is inserted into the brain, the hub can be attached to the patient's skull, for example by bonding into a burr hole in the skull using an acrylic cement. A wire may be used to guide the guide tube into place, as disclosed in WO03/07784. Before insertion, the guide tube is cut to a length short of the target. The distal end of the guide tube will typically fall several millimetres short of the target.


The hub of the guide tube is preferably domed and has a cut out slit 16 which links the central aperture of the tube to a side of the hub.


The inner tube 18 is illustrated in FIG. 2 and comprises two connected lengths of tubing, the distil tubing 20, which in this example has an outer diameter of 0.42 mm and an inner diameter of 0.2 mm and proximal tubing 22 which has a larger diameter. A stop element 24 links the proximal and distil tubing. The distal and proximal lengths of tubing are typically made of a polyurethane plastic, such as carbothane 85AB20, although other material could also be used. The stop element 24 is in this case also constructed using polyurethane plastic, such as carbothane 72DB20. Again other suitable materials may be used.


The stop element 24 has a central body 26 which is generally cylindrical and a pair of diametrically opposed wings 28,30 each containing a countersunk hole 32,34 whereby the stop element may be screwed to the outer surface of the skull of the patient. The inner tube with distal and proximal lengths of tubing and stop element is described in more detail in WO03/077785.


The stop element has two roles. Firstly, when the inner tube is inserted into the guide tube, the stop element abuts against the hub of the guide tube, thereby forming a stop and defining the length of the distil tubing which extends from the tubing of the guide tube. Secondly, the wings of the stop element are used to fix the inner tube to the skull of the patient.


The role of fixing the inner tube to the skull of the patient may be accomplished by alternative means. For example, a pair of wings may be provided on the proximal tubing, for example by overmoulding onto the tubing. These wings may be provided with apertures to receive screws which when screwed into the skull fix the wings and proximal tubing in place. This arrangement allows one wing to be folded onto the other, so that a single screw is inserted through both apertures of the wings. This arrangement has the advantage that it causes some clamping of the catheter within the proximal tubing.


The catheter 36 is illustrated in FIG. 3 and comprises a fine length of tubing 38 and is typically made from fused silica. Alternative materials may be used which are inert and have low viral binding properties. The fused silica typically has an outer diameter of 0.2 mm and an inner diameter of 0.1 mm. The catheter is provided at one end with a barb 40 which acts as a stop. This may be directly moulded onto the catheter and may be made from a polyurethane plastic such as carbothane.


The barb 40 has a stepped cylindrical profile with a central aperture. A region of greatest diameter 41 has straight sides which form a stop against which the end of the proximal tubing abuts when the catheter is inserted into the inner tubing. On either side of the region of greatest diameter is a cylindrical portion 43 with a waisted 45 portion of decreased diameter. In use, tubing is pushed over the cylindrical portion until it abuts the region of greatest diameter 41. As the tubing passes over the waisted portion 45 it deforms to form a seal. As the catheter 36 is inserted into the inner tubing 18, the end of the proximal tubing 22 is pushed over one of the cylindrical portions 43. Connector tubing (not shown) which connects the catheter to a pump may be attached to the other cylindrical portion of the barb in the same manner.


In order to perform neurosurgery, the surgeon needs, in the first instance, to understand the patient's neuroanatomy and hence identify the position of the desired target. This is normally achieved by fixing a stereotactic reference frame to the patient's head, elements of which can be seen on diagnostic images, and from which measurements can be made. The stereotactic frame then acts as a platform from which an instrument is guided to a desired target using a stereoguide that is set to the measured co-ordinates. Once an instrument is guided to the desired target treatment can begin. This is described in more detail in WO03/077784.


The guide tube is inserted into the brain using the secured stereoguide and fixed in place as described above. FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate the assembled guide tube 10, inner tubing 18 and catheter 36. FIG. 4A is the assembly outside the skull and FIG. 4B is the assembly with the catheter inserted into the brain 42. FIG. 4B illustrates the hub 14 of the guide tube 10 fixed in place in a hole in the skull 44 by bone cement 46. The inner tube is inserted into the guide tube by inserting the distil tubing 20 into the guide tube 10 until the stop element 24 abuts the hub 14 of the guide tube. The stop element 24 thus acts as a stop to control the amount the length of the inner tubing which is inserted into the brain. The catheter 36 is inserted into the inner tube and is pushed through until its barb abuts the end of the proximal tubing 22 of the inner tubing.


Once the guide tube, inner tube and catheter are all inserted, the proximal tubing containing the catheter extending out of the skull from the hub of the guide tube are bent through 90 degrees so that the stop element lies flat against the skull, as illustrated in FIG. 4B. This is then fixed in position using screws 48 passing through the countersunk holes. The cut out slit 16 in the hub 14 of the guide tube allows this 90 degree bend. Further clamping may be provided by additional fixing means on the inner tube (such as wings over moulded on the inner tube) through which screws may be attached to the skull.


The length of guide tube, inner tube and catheter are arranged so that the inner tube extends into the brain further than the guide tube (e.g. 10 mm) and the catheter extends into the brain further than the inner tube (e.g. 10 mm).


With the guide tube, inner tube and catheter all in place, the catheter can be connected to a pump (not shown) via connector tubing which connects to the barb of the catheter.


This arrangement has the advantage that it minimizes vibration of the catheter this is described in more detail below with reference to FIG. 5, which shows an enlarged view of the end of the catheter, inner tubing and guide tube inserted into the brain.


When the guide tube is inserted into the brain it will fill with cerebro spinal fluid (CSF). The amount of cerebro spinal fluid in the guide tube will vary along its length. When inner tube and catheter are inserted into the guide tube, an annular gap 50 is created between the tubing 12 of the guide tube and the distil tubing 20 of the inner tubing and this annular gap will contain the cerebro spinal fluid. In this example the annular gap 50 is approximately 0.01 mm. As therapeutic agent is pumped to the end of the catheter and into the brain tissue, some backflow may occur along the cuter surface of the catheter and inner tubing and some therapeutic agent in this backflow may pass by capillary action into the annular gasp between the inner and cater tubing. The fluid between the inner tubing and guide tube has a damping action and reduces vibration of the catheter and inner tubing. Thus this arrangement of concentric tubing and an annular gap between the tubing creates a damping effect.


In this embodiment the catheter is made from a relatively stiff material, i.e. fused silica, whereas the inner tubing is made from a more flexible material (i.e. carbothane 85AB20). The use of a more flexible material in the inner tubing than the catheter also provides a damping effect, thus reducing or eliminating vibration of the inner and outer tubing.


In an alternative embodiment, the fused silica catheter could be over moulded with a more flexible substance, such as a polyurethane plastic to create the same effect.


The Thermedics Carbothane™ PC-3572D-B20 Polycarbonate based polythurane Biomedical Elaster has a hardness of 71 shore D. Materials with a stiffness of less than 50 Rockwell E provide sufficient damping.


Another suitable material is PEEK optima (manufactured by INVIBIO) which has a Rockwell (M) hardness of 99 (in its granular form).


The guide tubs is also made of a more flexible material than the catheter (i.e. carbothane 85AB20) and this also contributes to the damping effect.


The inner tube is not essential to the invention and the catheter may toe inserted directly into the guide tube. The flexible material of the guide tube and the annular gap between the guide tube and catheter both provide damping to the catheter.


The inner tube may be fabricated from a stiff material, for example having a modulus of elasticity of greater than 30 GPa. For example fused silica, which has a modulus of elasticity of 35-40 GPa or stainless steel suitable for surgical instruments or implant surgery which has a modulus of elasticity of 190-200 GPa. With a stiff inner tube, the damping is provided by the fluid in the annular gap between the catheter and the inner tubing. Alternatively, catheter may be inserted directly into a guide tube, without an inner tube, in which case the guide tube may be fabricated from a stiff material having the properties described above.

Claims
  • 1. A catheter assembly for insertion into a brain cortex, the assembly comprising: a catheter comprising a distal opening for delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain cortex at a target site;an inner element receiving the catheter; anda guide tube receiving the inner element, wherein:a length of the inner element received in the guide tube is movable axially relative to the guide tube and is stiffer than equivalent lengths of the catheter and the guide tube, andwhen the distal opening of the catheter is located at the target site, at least part of the inner element and at least part of the guide tube are located within the brain cortex.
  • 2. A catheter assembly according to claim 1, wherein the inner element is made of stiff material.
  • 3. A catheter assembly according to claim 2, wherein the stiff material is stainless steel.
  • 4. A catheter assembly according to claim 2, wherein the stiff material is fused silica.
  • 5. A catheter assembly according to claim 1, wherein the inner element is an inner tube.
  • 6. A catheter assembly according to claim 1, wherein the catheter is a stiff-tipped catheter.
  • 7. A catheter assembly according to claim 6, wherein the catheter comprises a fused silica tip.
  • 8. A catheter assembly according to claim 1, wherein the catheter is made of PEEK material.
  • 9. A catheter assembly according to claim 1, wherein the catheter is arranged to extend into the brain cortex beyond distal ends of the inner element and the guide tube.
  • 10. A catheter assembly according to claim 1, wherein the length of the inner element received in the guide tube is longer than a width of the inner element.
  • 11. A catheter assembly for insertion into a brain cortex, the assembly comprising: a catheter comprising a distal opening for delivery of therapeutic agents to a target site within the brain cortex;an inner tube receiving the catheter; andan outer tube receiving the inner tube,wherein the inner and outer tubes are arranged such that, when inserted in the brain cortex with the distal opening of the catheter located to deliver therapeutic agents to the target site: at least part of the inner tube and at least part of the outer tube are located within the brain cortex, andbrain matter integrates into the catheter assembly between the catheter and the outer tube to aid formation of a seal between the catheter assembly and the brain cortex, which prevents reflux of the therapeutic agents, delivered into the brain cortex through the catheter, along the inner and outer tubes.
  • 12. A catheter assembly according to claim 11, wherein the lengths of the catheter, the inner tube, and the outer tube are arranged such that the inner tube extends into the brain cortex further than the outer tube and the catheter extends into the brain cortex further than the inner tube.
  • 13. A catheter assembly according to claim 11, wherein the catheter is made of material such that a distal portion of the catheter is stiffer than a proximal portion of the catheter.
  • 14. A catheter assembly according to claim 11, wherein the catheter assembly includes an annular gap between the inner tube and the outer tube.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
0616411.5 Aug 2006 GB national
Parent Case Info

This is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 12/310,210 filed Feb. 17, 2009, which in turn is a National Phase of International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2007/003178 filed Aug. 20, 2007, which claims the benefit of British Patent Application No. 0616411.5 filed Aug. 18, 2006. The disclosure of the prior applications is hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (49)
Number Name Date Kind
4230123 Hawkins, Jr. Oct 1980 A
4613324 Ghajar Sep 1986 A
4659329 Annis Apr 1987 A
4850974 Bickelhaupt et al. Jul 1989 A
5207648 Gross May 1993 A
5312356 Engelson et al. May 1994 A
5380290 Makower et al. Jan 1995 A
5409455 Belden Apr 1995 A
5437644 Nobles Aug 1995 A
5759173 Preissman et al. Jun 1998 A
5797858 Rourke Aug 1998 A
5891100 Fleckenstein Apr 1999 A
6030369 Engelson et al. Feb 2000 A
6080134 Lotti et al. Jun 2000 A
6086008 Gray et al. Jul 2000 A
6203526 McBeth et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203537 Adrian Mar 2001 B1
6217557 H.ang.kansson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6582400 Hawk et al. Jun 2003 B1
6609020 Gill Aug 2003 B2
6652548 Evans et al. Nov 2003 B2
6926711 Lentz et al. Aug 2005 B2
20030009208 Snyder Jan 2003 A1
20030055447 Lee et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030093011 Jalisi May 2003 A1
20030109823 Hobot et al. Jun 2003 A1
20040073154 Borgesen Apr 2004 A1
20040215143 Brady et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215162 Putz Oct 2004 A1
20050004554 Osborne Jan 2005 A1
20050004556 Pursley Jan 2005 A1
20050061329 Tran et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050154297 Gill Jul 2005 A1
20050256508 Hall Nov 2005 A1
20060025752 Broaddus Feb 2006 A1
20060129126 Kaplitt et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060135945 Bankiewicz Jun 2006 A1
20060217664 Hattler Sep 2006 A1
20070016100 Miller Jan 2007 A1
20070276340 Poston et al. Nov 2007 A1
20090088695 Kapur et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090143764 Nelson Jun 2009 A1
20090198218 Gill et al. Aug 2009 A1
20100318061 Derrick et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100318064 Derrick et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110282319 Gill Nov 2011 A1
20130158578 Ghodke et al. Jun 2013 A1
20140171760 Singh et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140171902 Singh et al. Jun 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (29)
Number Date Country
1672649 Sep 2005 CN
0 266 091 May 1988 EP
0 643 979 Mar 1995 EP
0 597 341 Jan 1997 EP
1155708 Nov 2001 EP
1155708 Feb 2003 EP
2258437 Dec 2010 EP
2 530 958 Feb 1984 FR
1 530 324 Oct 1978 GB
2 008 411 Jun 1979 GB
2 132 898 Jul 1984 GB
2 330 078 Apr 1999 GB
2 355 665 May 2001 GB
2005-323658 Nov 2005 JP
2009-507531 Feb 2009 JP
2010-501233 Jan 2010 JP
9934855 Jul 1999 WO
9955408 Nov 1999 WO
03077764 Sep 2003 WO
0377784 Sep 2003 WO
03077785 Sep 2003 WO
2005035043 Apr 2005 WO
2007024841 Mar 2007 WO
2007133776 Nov 2007 WO
2008020241 Feb 2008 WO
2007024841 Apr 2009 WO
2009101397 Aug 2009 WO
2012031275 Mar 2012 WO
2012031275 Aug 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (35)
Entry
Morrison et al.; “Focal delivery during direct infusion to brain: role of flow rate, catheter diameter, and tissue mechanics;” The Journal of American Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology; Oct. 1999; pp. 1218-1229; vol. 277—Issue No. 4; Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Raghavan et al; “Conviction-enhanced delivery of therapeutics for brain disease, and its optimization;” Neurosurgical Focus; Apr. 2006; pp. 1-13; vol. 20—Issue No. 3.
Apr. 12, 2013 Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 13 00 1067.
Bankiewicz, Krys S. et al. “Convection-Enhanced Delivery of AAV Vector in Parkinsonian Monkeys; in Vivo Detection of Gene Expression and Restoration of Dopaminergic Function Using Pro-Drug Approach.” Experimental Neurology, vol. 164, pp. 2-14, 2000.
Barua, Neil. U. et al. “Intrastratial Convection-Enhanced Delivery Results in Widespread Perivascular Distribution in a Pre-Clinical Model” Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, vol. 9:2, pp. 1-12, 2012.
Bienemann A. et al. “The Development of an Implantable Catheter System for Chronic or Intermittent Convection-Enhanced Delivery.” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 203, pp. 284-291, 2012.
Bobo, H. R. et al. “Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Macromolecules in the Brain”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, pp. 2076-2080, 1994.
Chen, Michael Y. et al. “Variables Affecting Convection-Enhanced Delivery to the Striatum: A Systematic Examination of Rate of Infusion, Cannula Size, Infusate Concentration, and Tissue-Cannula Sealing Time”. Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 90, pp. 315-320, 1999.
Degen, Jeffrey W. et al. “Safety and Efficacy of Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Gemcitabine or Carboplatin in a Malignant Glioma Model in Rats.” Journal of Neurosurgery , vol. 99, pp. 893-898, 2003.
Gill, Steven S. et al. “Direct Brain Infusion of Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Parkinson Disease.” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 589-595, 2003.
Krauze, Michal T. et al. “Effects of the Perivascular Space on Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Liposomes in Primate Putamen”. Experimental Neurology, vol. 196, pp. 104-111, 2005.
Krauze, Michal T. et al. “Reflux-Free Cannula for Convection-Enhanced High-Speed Delivery of Therapeutic Agents”. Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 103, pp. 923-929, 2005.
Lang, Anthony E. et al. “Randomized Controlled Trial of Intraputamenal Glial Cell Line-Derived Factor Infusion in Parkinson Disease”. Annals of Neurology, vol. 59, pp. 459-466, 2006.
Lidar, Zvi et al. Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Paclitaxel for the Treatment of Recurrent Malignant Glioma: A Phase I/II Clinical Study. Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 100, pp. 472-479, 2004.
Richardson, Mark R. et al. “Interventional MRI-Guided Putaminal Delivery of AAV2-GDNF for a Planned Clinical Trial in Parkinson's Disease” Molecular Therapy, vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 1048-1057, 2011.
Sebastian, Waldy S. et al. “Safety and Tolerability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Convection-Enhanced Delivery of AAV2-HAADC With a Novel Delivery Platform in Nonhuman Primate Striatum”. Human Gene Therapy, vol. 23, pp. 210-217, 2012.
Sillay, Karl et al. “Benchmarking the ERG Valve Tip and MRI Interventions Smart Flow Neurocatheter Convection-Enhanced Delivery System's Performance in a Gel Model of the Brain: Employing Infusion Protocols Proposed for Gene Therapy for Parkinson's Disease”. Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 9: 026009, pp. 1-13, 2012.
Tanner, Phillip G. et al. “Effects of Drug Efflux on Convection-Enhanced Paclitaxel Delivery to Malignant Gliomas: Technical Note”. Neurosurgery, vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 880-882, 2007.
White, Edward et al. “An Evaluation of the Relationships Between Catheter Design and Tissue Mechanics in Achieving High-Flow Convection-Enhanced Delivery”. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 199, pp. 87-97, 2011.
White, E. et al. “A Robust MRI-Compatible System to Facilitate Highly Accurate Stereotactic Administration of Therapeutic Agents to Targets Within the Brain of a Large Animal Model”. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 105, pp. 78-87, 2010.
Yin, Dali et al. “Optimized Cannula Design and Placement for Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Rat Striatum”. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 187, pp. 46-51, 2010.
Yin, Dali et al. “Cannula Placement for Effective Convection-Enhanced Delivery in the Nonhuman Primate Thalamus and Brainstem: Implications for Clinical Delivery of Therapeutics”. Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 113, pp. 240-248, 2010.
Dec. 21, 2012 Search Report issued in British Patent Application No. 1215092.6.
Oct. 3, 2013 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2013/051973.
Nov. 8, 2016 Office Action issued in European Patent Application No. 13 742 700.1.
Apr. 25, 2017 Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201380044196.8.
Jun. 6, 2017 Office Action issued in Indian Patent Application No. 1149/DELNP/2009.
Jun. 27, 2017 Office Action issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-523612.
Sep. 12, 2017 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/416,177.
Feb. 28, 2018 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/416,177.
Sep. 11, 2018 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/416,177.
Oct. 2, 2019 Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/416,177.
May 6, 2019 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/416,177.
Mar. 26, 2020 Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/416,177.
May 11, 2020 Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/416,177.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160346505 A1 Dec 2016 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12310210 US
Child 15235632 US