Non-contact voltage sensor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11193958
  • Patent Number
    11,193,958
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 19, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 7, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
A sensor for detecting voltage of a power cable includes a housing configured to be coupled around at least a portion of the power cable. A first conductive element supported by the housing is configured to be electrically coupled to the power cable when the housing is coupled around at least a portion of the power cable. A first capacitive element supported by the housing is electrically interconnected with the first conductive element. A second capacitive element supported by the housing is electrically interconnected with the first conductive element. A processor determines a cable capacitance of the power cable based upon alternatively sensing an electrical characteristic (i) the first capacitive element and the second capacitive element and (ii) the first capacitive element without the second capacitive element. The sensor determines the voltage of the power cable based upon the determined cable capacitance.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a non-contact voltage sensor.


Currents in each of the branch circuits in a facility are typically measured by connecting a current sensor to sense the current flowing in each of the branch power cables exiting the facility's power distribution panel. Generally, a current sensor comprises a sensing transformer installed on an electrical conductor of interest and an electronic circuit that produces an output representative of the electrical current carried by the conductor. The current sensor may be an individual meter for a single circuit or a networked meter that can be temporarily connected, respectively, to each of a plurality of circuits to periodically and momentarily monitor the current in each circuit.


The typical sensing transformer used to sense the electrical current flowing in a power cable comprises a coil of wire wrapped around the cross-section of a magnetically permeable core that encircles the power cable. A sensing transformer with a hinged, split toroidal core is often used because the transformer can be easily affixed to an installed power cable without disconnecting the power cable from a connected device, such as, a circuit breaker in a distribution panel. Cota, U.S. Pat. No. 5,502,374 discloses a split core sensing transformer comprising a toroidal housing divided into a pair of housing halves. Each half of the housing retains a half of the toroidal core of the transformer. The housing halves are interconnected by a hinge located near one end of each half of the housing. The hinge permits pivoting of the housing halves to separate the ends of the housing halves opposite the hinge. The power conductor is passed between the separated ends of the housing halves and the housing halves are then pivoted together encircling the centrally positioned power conductor with the two halves of the toroidal core. On the ends of the housing halves opposite the hinge, a ridge on one housing half and a matching recess on the other half of the housing form a latch to hold the hinged housing halves closed around the power conductor.


Often it is desirable to monitor the voltage signals of the power cables in order to provide energy and/or power quality measurements. Typically, measuring the voltage of the power cables involve the use of a direct electrical connection with one or more of the power cables. The direct connection is time consuming to install and requires compliance with safety requirements that greatly increase the cost, installation time, and risks involved. The safety requirements are heightened when the wire has high voltages. In addition, requirements related to wiring and fusing may further complicate the installation.


In other cases, measuring the voltage of the power cables involve the use of non-contact capacitive voltage measurements. Such non-contact capacitive voltage measurements are typically of relatively low accuracy as a result of the instability of capacitances in the power cables resulting from physical and environmental conditions. For example, the physical and environmental conditions may be due to dimensional changes, clamping proximity, and dielectric variations of the insulation material of the power cables.


In other cases, measuring the voltage of power cables involves the use of relatively high accuracy non-contact voltage measurement techniques. However, such non-contact voltage measurement techniques are comparatively large, cumbersome to use, and expensive due to their complexity.


It is desirable to have relatively high accuracy in the voltage measurements, while retaining the benefits that occur as a result of the non-contact capacitive voltage measurements.


The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be more readily understood upon consideration of the following detailed description of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective schematic of a split core sensing transformer.



FIG. 2 illustrates a front view of an electrical distribution panel including a plurality of sensing transformers arranged to encircle branch electrical conductors.



FIG. 3 illustrates a side elevation of a split core sensing transformer.



FIG. 4 illustrates a side elevation of the separated segments of the split core sensing transformer of FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 illustrates a section view of the split core sensing transformer of FIG. 1 taken along line 5-5.



FIG. 6 illustrates a section view of the split core sensing transformer of FIG. 1 taken along line 6-6.



FIG. 7 illustrates a section view of the split core sensing transformer of FIG. 1 taken along line 7-7.



FIG. 8 illustrates a current transformer together with an associated input circuit.



FIG. 9 illustrates a conductor together with a non-contact capacitive based voltage sensor.



FIG. 10 illustrates a graph of the power cable capacitance versus the cable diameter.



FIGS. 11A-11D illustrate graphs of the power cable capacitance versus the cable diameter.



FIG. 12 illustrates another conductor together with a non-contact capacitive based voltage sensor.



FIG. 13 illustrates another conductor together with a non-contact capacitive based voltage sensor.



FIG. 14 illustrates a non-linear graph of the power cable capacitance versus voltage level.



FIG. 15 illustrates non-contact capacitive based voltage sensor circuits and a graph of the power cable capacitance versus voltage levels for the sensor circuits.



FIG. 16 illustrates a conductor together with a non-contact capacitive based voltage sensor that includes a switch.



FIG. 17 illustrates a conductor together with a non-contact capacitive based voltage sensor that includes a switch and a stray capacitance.



FIG. 18 illustrates a housing with a non-contact capacitive plate.



FIG. 19 illustrates multiple different non-contact capacitive plates.



FIG. 20 illustrates a housing with an alignment structure for a non-contact capacitive plate.



FIG. 21 illustrates a housing with a shield structure.



FIG. 22 illustrates an identification structure for a non-contact capacitive plate.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring in detail to FIGS. 1-7 where similar parts are identified by like reference numerals, a sensing transformer 20 comprises a magnetically permeable toroidal core 22 that substantially encircles a power conductor 26 (or more than one power conductor) that is connected to conduct an electrical current to be measured. The core 22 is a ferrous torus typically having a rectangular or circular cross-section. One or more turns of wire 28 (or more than one wire) are wrapped around the cross-section of a sector 24 (indicated by a bracket) of the toroidal core 22.


A changing current (i.e. alternating current) in a power conductor produces a changing magnetic field around the conductor which, in turn, induces a magnetic flux in the magnetically permeable core of a sensing transformer encircling the power conductor. The magnetic flux in the toroidal core induces a current in the wire windings that is representative of the current flowing in the power conductor. Thus, the power conductor is the primary winding and the wire winding is the secondary winding of the sensing transformer. The ends of the wire winding are electrically connected to a burden resistor that converts the current signal received from the secondary winding of the sensing transformer to a voltage signal representing the current flowing in the conductor.


To measure the current in several branch circuits in a facility, sensing transformers are installed on each of the respective branch power conductors. Referring to FIG. 2, the sensing transformers 61 are typically installed on the branch power conductors 62 at the distribution panel 60 where the branch power conductors are connected to circuit breakers 64 that protect the branch circuitry from high current. The plurality of circuit breakers 64 are usually arranged immediately adjacent to each other in the distribution panel and are typically connected to bus bars 66 that are, in turn, connected to the input conductors 68 bringing power from the power grid to the distribution panel.


Referring to FIGS. 1-7, the split core sensing transformer 20 preferably comprises at least two separable transformer segments 30, 32. Each segment comprises a respective segment housing 34, 36 and a sector of a magnetically permeable toroidal core 38, 34 that, when installed, will substantially encircle an electrical power conductor 26. One or more turns of wire 28 is wrapped around the cross-section of a sector of the toroidal core 22. An alternating current in a conductor 26 passing through the central aperture 48 of the transformer 20 produces a changing magnetic field around the conductor that induces a magnetic flux in the magnetically permeable core 22. The magnetic flux, in turn, induces a current in the wire windings 28 on the core 22. The ends of the wire winding 28 are electrically connected through a cable 42 to a burden resistor (not shown) that converts the current signal received from the wire winding 28 of the sensing transformer 20 to a voltage signal representing the current flowing in the conductor.


The magnetically permeable core 22 comprises a ferrous material and is constructed of sectors 38, 40 that when arranged end-to-end form, substantially, a torus. The core 22 has a planar cross-section bounded by a closed curve that is typically rectangular or circular. The torus is the result of rotating the planar cross-section about an axis that lies in the plane of the cross-section but does intersect the plane of the cross-section. Each sector 38, 40 of the core 22 includes a curved inner surface 46 which will, when the sectors are arranged end-to-end, define the central aperture 48 of the sensing transformer 20. An exemplary sensing transformer includes a toroidal core of 3% silicon steel, grain oriented, with an outside diameter of 1.375 inches, an inside diameter of 1.125 inches, and a depth of 0.50 inches in a direction parallel to the axis about which the cross-section of the torus is rotated.


The sectors of the toroidal core 38, 40 are retained within respective separable housing segments 34, 36 that substantially sheath the cross-section of the toroidal core sectors. The housing segment 36 that encloses the core sector 40 that is wrapped with the wire winding 28 includes an extended portion 50 that encloses the connections of the wire winding to the conductors in the cable 42 that conducts signals from the wire winding to the instrumentation and provides an anchor for the cable.


A substantially tubular projecting portion 52 (indicated by a bracket) of walls of one of the housing segments 30 projects beyond the ends of the sector of the core 38 retained in the housing segment. The projecting portions 52 are enlarged to provide an interior sufficiently large to slidably accept in mating engagement the ends of the housing 36 of the other transformer segment 32. One of the housing segments 36 also includes a raised ridge 54 projecting from either side of the housing adjacent to the ends of the segment. Each of the raised ridges 54 is arranged to engage a corresponding aperture 56 in the wall of the mating housing segment 36 to prevent the engaged segments from separating. The surfaces of the housing segments 30, 32 that define the central aperture of sensing transformer 20 also include a plurality of resiliently flexible triangular fingers 58 projecting radially inward to provide a central opening for the power conductor 26. If the power conductor is larger than the opening provided by the ends of the triangular fingers 58, the fingers will bend resiliently outward to accommodate the power conductor. Typically, the housing is made of an electrically insulating thermoplastic material such as nylon, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), or polycarbonate.


To install the split core transformer 20 on a power conductor 26, the conductor is positioned between the separated segments 30, 32 of the transformer housing adjacent the surfaces that will form the central aperture 48 of transformer. The cooperating ends of the housing segments 34, 36 are aligned and the segments 30, 32 are pressed into mating engagement. When the housings 34, 36 of the segments 30, 32 are fully engaged, the two sectors 38, 40 of the core substantially encircle the power conductor 26 and the cooperating ridges 54 on the side of the housing of one segment mate with the corresponding apertures 56 in the housing of the other segment. Interference of the ridges 54 with a surface of the apertures 56 resists separation of the segments. The sensing transformer can be removed from the power conductor by inserting a screwdriver or other tool between the segment housings to release the mated ridges and apertures, permitting the segments to be separated. Signals from the sensing transformer are transmitted to the appropriate instrumentation through the cable 42. The housing may be omitted, if desired. A non-split core transformer with or without an associated housing may be used, if desired. The current transformer may be connected to the system by one or more flexible wires, the current transformer may be supported by a circuit board, a plurality of current transformers may be supported by a circuit board, or any other suitable configuration.


Referring to FIG. 8, the ends of the secondary windings of a transformer (split core, non-split core, high magnetically permeable material, low magnetically permeable material, etc.) 100a and 100b of the transformer 102 are electrically connected to an input circuit 110. The input circuit 110 may be included within a housing associated with the current transformer, may be included as a part of the current transformer, may be included on a circuit board proximate the current transformer, may be included on a circuit board not proximate the current transformer, may be included on a circuit board upon which the current transformer is supported, or any other suitable configuration. The input circuit 110 is designed to convert the voltage signal received from the transformer 102 (such as imposed across a resistor) to either a signal representative of the changing current in the power cable or a circuit condition at the output terminals 104a and 104b representative of the changing current in the power cable. The signal or circuit condition is provided to transmission lines 106 and 108 which are connected to an associated control panel or other electronic device. For example, the signal could be a current signal, voltage signal, or some sort of frequency modulation, amplitude modulation, or digital encoding. The circuit condition, for example, could be a short circuit, open circuit, or other suitable type of condition. The input circuit may be designed and constructed in any manner, so long as it converts the output signal from the transformer to an appropriate corresponding signal or circuit condition.


The current transformer(s) and the associated input circuit may be calibrated in some manner so that there is a known relationship between the changing current levels of the power conductor, and the resulting induced current and/or voltage in the wire. The calibration should model the relationship between the changing current levels and the induced current so that the changing current levels may be accurately estimated. Such calibration may be performed in a manual manner by changing the physical properties of the current transformer until it is within desirable tolerances. Similarly, this calibration relationship may be in the form of one or more scaling factors, one or more functions, one or more look up tables, and/or one or more electronic components to tune the calibration. The calibration factors, functions, tables, and/or electronic components may be included together with the current transformer or otherwise provided in association with the current transformer so that a suitable calibration may be achieved. In addition to the calibration, it is desirable to calibrate the scale of the output of the input circuit.


While the measurement of the current is a desirable characteristic to determine, it is also desirable to determine the voltage of the power cables using a non-contact capacitive based technique. In this manner, the voltage of the power cables may be determined with sufficient accuracy without the need to break the insulation barrier of the transmission line to provide a direct electrical connection to the conductor(s) contained therein.


In some cases, measuring the voltage of the power cables involve the use of non-contact capacitive voltage measurements. Such non-contact capacitive voltage measurements are typically of relatively low accuracy as a result of the instability of capacitances in the power cables resulting from physical and environmental conditions. For example, the physical and environmental conditions may be due to dimensional changes, clamping proximity, and dielectric variations of the insulation material of the power cables.


It is desirable to have relatively high accuracy in the voltage measurements, while retaining the benefits that occur as a result of the non-contact capacitive voltage measurements.


Referring to FIG. 9, an illustration of a non-contact voltage sensor 200 is illustrated together with one or more capacitive elements wrapped around the power cable 220, an oscillator 230, a buffer, and a current monitor 210. While the capacitive element 220 may be affixed to the conductor by wrapping the capacitive element around part of the power cable, this results in a problematic installation that includes inherent safety considerations, especially for high voltage environments. In general, a two plate capacitance equation is C=0.224*K*A/d where C is pF, K is a dielectric constant, A is area in square inches, and d is separation in inches. For power cables, the dielectric contact is typically around 2, and the wire insulation thickness defines the plate separation. The plate area is defined by the conductive coupling which may take several forms. One of the forms of conductive coupling around an insulated wire under test may be an array of several conductive blocks or leaves forming a multi-sided iris opening. Another form of conductive coupling is a conductive strap that is wrapped around the insulated wire under test. Another form of conductive coupling is a clamshell style fixture that clamps around the wire. Preferably, the capacitive element is supported by a housing proximate the power cable. Such non-contact capacitive voltage measurements accuracy is affected by variations in the nature of the dielectric material, such as its thickness and material. Further, the capacitive accuracy is further dependent upon the ambient temperature, and the temperature of the dielectric material.


Referring also to FIG. 10, it is believed to be generally understood that as the diameter of the power cable increases together with its insulation encapsulating the conductor(s) therein, the capacitance between the insulation and the conductor of the power cable increases. In this manner, it is desirable to determine such capacitance of the power cable, which may be referred to as Cx for reference purposes. With the capacitance of the power cable Cx being known or otherwise determined in some manner, then the value of Cx together with another capacitor with a known value, which may be referred to as Cl for reference purposes, may be used in combination therewith. With a comparison between Cx and Cl, such as using a voltage divider network, an output voltage level between the two capacitances may be sensed. As the charge on the capacitor Cx of the power conductor varies as a result of the change in the voltage level of the power conductor, the output voltage level between the two capacitances of Cx and Cl changes. The output voltage level is representative of the voltage level in the power conductor.


While the capacitance Cx is thought to be linear with increasing measurement frequency, it turns out under further investigation that the capacitance Cx differs significantly with sampling frequency between cable brands. Referring to FIG. 11A, at generally 50/60 hertz, the measured capacitances of various cable brands Cx tends to be generally linearly grouped. Referring to FIG. 11B, at generally 10 kilohertz, the measured capacitances of various cable brands Cx tends to begin to scatter. Referring to FIG. 11C, at generally 100 kilohertz, the relationship between the capacitance of the power cable Cx tends to exhibit a plurality of distinct relationships depending upon the nature of the specific power cable. Referring to FIG. 11D, at generally 10 megahertz the relationship between the capacitance of the power cable Cx tends to exhibit a more distinct plurality of distinct relationships depending upon the nature of the power cable. The dependency of the sampling frequency is thought to be based upon plastizers, colorants, elastomers, recycled materials, and cross linking. Moreover, these characteristics are generally unknown to the purchaser of the power cable and may change for the same power cables manufactured at different times.


With the applied voltage to the power cable at a relatively low primary frequency such as 50/60 Hertz, it is desirable to sample the capacitance at that same frequency. Using the actual applied voltage in normal operation accomplishes this goal. This simplifies the circuit by removing the oscillator 230, buffer and current monitor 210.


Referring to FIG. 12, a conductive member 300 encircles at least a portion of the power conductor to form a capacitance Cx across the dielectric material 310 between the conductive member 300 and the conductor 320. The conductive member 300 is interconnected to a capacitor Cl 330. The capacitor Cl 330 is connected to a voltage potential, such as ground or neutral or otherwise. An output voltage 340 may be selected at the terminal of the capacitor Cl 330, which is representative of the voltage level of the conductor 320. To prevent phase shift, the output voltage 340 is buffered by an operational amplifier 350 to provide a phase-correct output voltage 360. Typically, the capacitance Cx is on the order of 10 picofarads. The capacitor Cl 330 is selected to form a suitable capacitive voltage divider, 10 nanofarads in this case. Other values may be switched in for variable voltage range selection. In this manner, the result of the capacitive divider between Cx and Cl is generally 1,000 to 1. The capacitance Cl (or otherwise an effective capacitance network) is preferably generally between 100 to 1 and 10,000 to 1 of Cx.


Referring to FIG. 13, an additional capacitive element Cn 400 is preferably included between the output voltage 340 and the capacitance of the conductor Cx. Preferably, the value of the capacitive element Cn 400 is within 75% of the value of the capacitance Cx. With the modified capacitive divider network, there remains the unknown for the capacitive value of Cx. For example, for a 10 pF capacitance Cx, the capacitive element Cn 340 is preferably between 2.5 pF and 17.5 pF.


Referring to FIG. 14, with the modified capacitive divider network, rather than a generally linear relationship along the values of Cx that occurs without including capacitor Cn, a curved relationship exists along the values of Cx with respect to the output voltage 340. In this manner, there is a non-linear relationship among the values of Cx with respect to the output voltage.


Referring to FIG. 15, a pair of different circuit topologies are illustrated. The first circuit topology includes a capacitor Cl with an output voltage 1. The second circuit topology includes capacitors CI and Cn with an output voltage 2, where the first and second voltage outputs are selected from the same electrical potential. The two circuits may be separate from one another, if desired. The output from the output voltage 1 (the dashed line) and the output voltage 2 (the solid curved line) are illustrated superimposed on the same graph, with the changing capacitance Cx of the conductor. The value of the capacitive elements may be selected so that the upper portion of the plots coverage at a value insubstantially greater than the anticipated value of the capacitance of the power conductor. The slopes of the two plots in this range are substantially different from one another and accordingly the capacitance Cx can be determined with some confidence in its accuracy. Typically, this is the upper third of the range of the plot. The slopes of the two plots in the middle third of the range of the plot have large Cx change between the two sets of values, and leaves considerable uncertainty in the actual value of Cx. The slops of the two plots in the lower third of the range of the plot are generally not useful in determining Cx.


Referring to FIG. 16, one technique to determine Cx is to selectively measure both the first output voltage and the second output voltage by alternatively including the capacitance Cn in the circuit using a switch 410. The switch 410 may effectively electrically interconnect the two terminals of the capacitance Cn to form a short circuit when measuring the second output voltage. Based upon the first and second output voltages, one with capacitance Cn included and another with Cn not included, the approximate value of the power conductor capacitance Cx may be determined. Alternatively, a pair of different circuits may be used to determine a pair of different output voltages from which Cx may be determined. Preferably, the switch 410 is switched between shorting and not shorting the capacitor Cn 400 at the rate previously described.


Referring to FIG. 17, stray capacitances Cs 430 will occur in the fixturing and should be kept small. In this example, the stray capacitance Cs should be preferably less than 2 pF. To the extent that stray capacitance Cs 430 is generally known in its value, to the extent that stray capacitance Cs is general relatively small, and to the extent that stray capacitance Cs is relatively constant under different conditions, then the stray capacitance Cs is more readily accounted for in the estimation of the capacitance Cx to increase the accuracy of the measurements.


To maintain control over the stray capacitance Cs, it is preferable not to use a foil material wrapped around the conductor because it tends to incur substantial flexing and bubbling during temperature variations. Rather, it is desirable to use a mechanical fixture, such as for example a split core housing illustrated in FIGS. 1-7.


Referring to FIG. 18, it is desirable to form the capacitive conductor 300 of the non-contact voltage sensor on the exterior surface of the opening defined by the split-core housing, preferably using a plating process. The capacitive conductor may be on an interior surface or supported therein, if desired. In this manner, the conductor is preferably not readily removable from the housing. The remaining electronics associated with the non-contact voltage sensor are preferably enclosed within the housing. The capacitive conductor 300 meaintained in a fixed position relative to the housing tends to reduce the variability of the stray capacitance Cs.


Referring to FIG. 19, in another embodiment the capacitive conductor 300 of the non-contact voltage sensor may be selected from a plurality of different sizes to accommodate cables of different diameters. For example, a first size may be a relatively long length capacitive conductor that provides for a relatively small capacitance Cx of smaller cables. For example, a second size may be a medium length capacitive conductor that provides for a medium capacitance Cx of medium cables. For example, a third size may be a relatively short length capacitive conductor that provides for a relatively large capacitance Cx of large cables. Each of the first size, second size, and third size capacitive conductors may be sized to be suitable to be engaged within the opening of the same split-core housing, attached the capacitive conductors may extend beyond the width of the housing. In this manner, the same housing, with a selected capacitive conductor engaged, may be used to effectively sense the voltage of the power cable using a non-contact capacitive sensing technique. This selection among the different capacitive conductor facilitates a suitable value of the capacitance so that a more accurate Cx is determined. This capacitive conductor tends to reduce the variability of the stray capacitance Cs. Also, the selected capacitive conductor may be automatically electrically connected to the circuit upon engagement with the housing.


Referring to FIG. 20, in another embodiment the enclosure may include an alignment structure 500, such as a plurality of ribs or otherwise a web structure arranged around the central opening. The alignment structure facilitates maintaining the power conductor in a centralized position. In addition, the alignment structure preferably includes some flexibility. Moreover, preferably each of the set of capacitive conductors may be selectively included together with alignment structure. This capacitive conductor tends to reduce the variability of the stray capacitance Cs.


Referring to FIG. 21, to further reduce the effects of the stray capacitance Cs, it is preferable to include a shield conductor 520 that may substantially encircle the power conductor. When closed, there may include a tab 530 or other structure that effectively ensures that the shield conductor forms a closed loop. The capacitive conductor may be maintained within the shield conductor 520 and preferably extends beyond the shield conductor 520 in its width. The capacitive conductor may be maintained external to the shield conductor 520 and preferably extends beyond the shield conductor 520 in its width.


Referring to FIG. 22, the capacitive conductor may be identified by an electrical structure together with a processor. The electrical structure may include plated-on conductors such that a combination of one or more of the conductors being shorted may be used to identify the corresponding capacitive conductor. By way of example, a binary coded technique using 4 conductors may be used to identify up to 16 different parameters including cable capacitance range and stray capacitance. Other electrical and/or mechanical structures may be used to identify the corresponding capacitive conductor associated with the particular housing.


As previously described, it is to be understood that the non-contact voltage sensor may self-calibrate on a periodic basis or otherwise self-calibrate on a substantially continual basis. Moreover, after the non-contact voltage sensor is engaged with the power cable, it does not require any calibration to properly measure the voltage levels and self-calibrates over time to maintain the calibration. In this manner, the non-contact voltage sensor may compensate for thermal drift, mechanical movement, or otherwise. Moreover, the non-contact voltage sensor has low power consumption permitting effective self-powering by a corresponding transformer.


By way of example, one calculation that may be used to determine the capacitance based upon Vin=(Vout−B2)*A2/Cx for the linear relationship, and Vin=(Vcap−B1)*A1*(Cx+Cn+Cs)/Cx for the non-linear relationship. The differences between the two measurements facilitates the determination of Cx as Cx=((Vout−B2)*A2/(Vcap−B1)*A1)−Cn−Cs. Both of the measurements preferably use a 50 hertz to 60 hertz voltage under test as the excitation voltage to reduce the dielectric contact variations with frequency. Moreover, the housing may provide a power output signal based upon the voltage levels and the current levels. Other measurement circuit topologies may likewise be used, together with other capacitive elements, together with inductive elements, together with resistive elements, together with active elements, etc.


In some embodiments, the system may include two or more phases of a multi-phase system.


All the references cited herein are incorporated by reference.


The terms and expressions which have been employed in the foregoing specification are used therein as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, it being recognized that the scope of the invention is defined and limited only by the claims which follow.

Claims
  • 1. A sensor for determining voltage of a signal within a power cable, where said signal has a fundamental frequency, comprising: (a) a housing configured to be coupled around at least a portion of said power cable;(b) at least one conductive element supported by said housing and configured to be electrically coupled to said signal within said power cable when said housing is positioned around at least a portion of said power cable;a first capacitive element supported by said housing and electrically interconnected with said at least one conductive element;a second capacitive element supported by said housing and electrically interconnected with said first capacitive element which is electrically interconnected with said at least one conductive element, where said second capacitive element is not directly electrically interconnected with any of said at least one conductive element;a processor determining a cable capacitance of said power cable based upon, a single input from said first capacitive element and said second capacitive element, alternatively sensing an electrical characteristic of: said first capacitive element and said second capacitive element resulting in a first characteristic relationship between said cable capacitance and said voltage, at a position electrically located between the first capacitive element and the second capacitive element, as said voltage changes over time based upon a sampling frequency that is substantially the same as said fundamental frequency of said signal;said first capacitive element without said second capacitive element resulting in a second characteristic relationship between said cable capacitance and said voltage, at said position electrically located between the first capacitive element and the second capacitive element, as said voltage changes over time based upon said sampling frequency that is substantially the same as said fundamental frequency of said signal; andwherein said determining said cable capacitance is based upon a relationship between said first characteristic relationship and said second characteristic relationship;said sensor determining said voltage of said signal of said power cable based upon said determined cable capacitance.
  • 2. The sensor of claim 1 further comprising a switch element supported by said housing that selectively includes said second capacitive element in determining said electrical characteristic.
  • 3. The sensor of claim 1 wherein said electrical characteristic is a voltage level set by said first capacitive element.
  • 4. The sensor of claim 3 wherein a buffered electrical characteristic is based upon said electrical characteristic.
  • 5. The sensor of claim 1 wherein said first capacitive element has a capacitance value between 100 to 1 and 10,000 to 1 of said cable capacitance.
  • 6. The sensor of claim 1 wherein said second capacitive element has a capacitance value within 75% of the value of said cable capacitance.
  • 7. The sensor of claim 1 wherein said first capacitive element and said second capacitive element are arranged in a voltage divider configuration.
  • 8. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the plurality of conductive elements are supported by said housing in a fixed relationship with respect to said housing.
  • 9. The sensor of claim 8 wherein the plurality of conductive elements are supported by an exterior surface of said housing.
  • 10. The sensor of 14 wherein the plurality of conductive elements are affixed to said housing using a plating process.
  • 11. The sensor of claim 8 wherein the plurality of conductive elements are detachably engageable with said housing.
  • 12. The sensor of claim 11 wherein the plurality of conductive element elements are selectable from a plurality of different sizes and engageable with said housing.
  • 13. The sensor of claim 11 wherein characteristics of the plurality of conductive elements are determined by said processor.
  • 14. The sensor of claim 13 wherein the plurality of conductive element elements are determined based upon a modifiable electrical structure.
  • 15. The sensor of claim 13 wherein the plurality of conductive element elements are determined based upon a modifiable mechanical structure.
  • 16. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the plurality of conductive elements are operatively connected via a hinge to the housing.
  • 17. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the plurality of conductive elements are triangle shaped.
  • 18. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the plurality of conductive elements are semi-circular shaped.
  • 19. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the housing is made of an electrically insulating thermoplastic material such as nylon, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), or polycarbonate.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/466,783, filed Mar. 3, 2017,

US Referenced Citations (286)
Number Name Date Kind
1100171 Brown Jun 1914 A
1455263 Oberfell May 1923 A
1569723 Dickinson Jan 1926 A
1800474 Scherer Apr 1931 A
1830541 Harris Nov 1931 A
1871710 Lenehan Aug 1932 A
2059594 Massa Nov 1936 A
2412782 Palmer Dec 1946 A
2428613 Boyajian Oct 1947 A
2663190 Ilgenfritz Dec 1953 A
2746295 Lubkin May 1956 A
2802182 Godshalk et al. Aug 1957 A
2852739 Hansen Sep 1958 A
2943488 Strobel et al. Jul 1960 A
3190122 Edwards Jun 1965 A
3243674 Gotthold Mar 1966 A
3287974 Ciemochowski Nov 1966 A
3374434 Perry Mar 1968 A
3493760 Hoadley Feb 1970 A
3512045 Tipton et al. May 1970 A
3584294 Siwko Jun 1971 A
3593078 Domshy et al. Jul 1971 A
3696288 Carman Oct 1972 A
3728705 Atkins Apr 1973 A
3769548 Pardue Oct 1973 A
3772625 Raupach Nov 1973 A
3861411 Mitchell et al. Jan 1975 A
3955701 Fisch May 1976 A
4001647 Klein et al. Jan 1977 A
4001758 Esper et al. Jan 1977 A
4030058 Riffe et al. Jun 1977 A
4048605 McCollum Sep 1977 A
4096436 Cook et al. Jun 1978 A
4107519 Bicek Aug 1978 A
D249883 Collins Oct 1978 S
4151578 Bell Apr 1979 A
4158217 Bell Jun 1979 A
4158810 Leskovar Jun 1979 A
4177496 Bell et al. Dec 1979 A
4198595 Milkovic Apr 1980 A
4207604 Bell Jun 1980 A
4215278 Barbier et al. Jul 1980 A
4227419 Park Oct 1980 A
4241237 Paraskevakos et al. Dec 1980 A
4249264 Crochet et al. Feb 1981 A
4250449 Shum Feb 1981 A
4253336 Pietzuch Mar 1981 A
4258348 Belfer et al. Mar 1981 A
4297741 Howell Oct 1981 A
4328903 Baars May 1982 A
4354155 Speidel et al. Oct 1982 A
4359672 Hart Nov 1982 A
4362580 Kane et al. Dec 1982 A
4363061 Vaerewyck et al. Dec 1982 A
4371814 Hannas Feb 1983 A
4373392 Nagamoto Feb 1983 A
4384289 Stillwell et al. May 1983 A
4386280 Ricaud et al. May 1983 A
4388668 Bell et al. Jun 1983 A
4393714 Schmidt Jul 1983 A
4398426 Park et al. Aug 1983 A
4408175 Nelson et al. Oct 1983 A
4413193 Crockett Nov 1983 A
4413230 Miller Nov 1983 A
4426673 Bell et al. Jan 1984 A
4432238 Tward Feb 1984 A
4491790 Miller Jan 1985 A
4492919 Milkovic Jan 1985 A
4495463 Milkovic Jan 1985 A
4506199 Asche Mar 1985 A
4558310 McAllise Dec 1985 A
4558595 Kompelien Dec 1985 A
4574266 Valentine Mar 1986 A
4605883 Cockroft Aug 1986 A
4621532 Takagi et al. Nov 1986 A
4660407 Takami et al. Apr 1987 A
4709339 Fernandes Nov 1987 A
4739229 Heiler, Jr. Apr 1988 A
4746809 Coleman et al. May 1988 A
4754365 Kazahaya Jun 1988 A
4757416 Wilkerson Jul 1988 A
4758774 Crawford et al. Jul 1988 A
4758962 Fernandes Jul 1988 A
4783748 Swarztrauber et al. Nov 1988 A
4794327 Fernandes Dec 1988 A
4808910 Kessi Feb 1989 A
D301331 Rhodin May 1989 S
4851803 Hahn Jul 1989 A
4855671 Fernandes Aug 1989 A
4874904 DeSanti Oct 1989 A
4890318 Crane et al. Dec 1989 A
4926105 Mischenko May 1990 A
4939451 Baran et al. Jul 1990 A
4944187 Frick et al. Jul 1990 A
4956588 Ming Sep 1990 A
4970476 Kitagawa Nov 1990 A
4972167 Fujioka Nov 1990 A
4992709 Griffin Feb 1991 A
4999575 Germer Mar 1991 A
5003278 May Mar 1991 A
5006846 Granville Apr 1991 A
5014908 Cox May 1991 A
5039970 Cox Aug 1991 A
5051601 Atobe et al. Sep 1991 A
5066904 Bullock Nov 1991 A
5079510 Komatsu et al. Jan 1992 A
D323815 Bouteiller Feb 1992 S
5099193 Moseley et al. Mar 1992 A
5122735 Porter et al. Jun 1992 A
5148348 White Sep 1992 A
5181026 Granville Jan 1993 A
5196784 Estes, Jr. Mar 1993 A
D335488 Suzuki et al. May 1993 S
5223790 Baran et al. Jun 1993 A
5267122 Glover et al. Nov 1993 A
5296819 Kuroiwa et al. Mar 1994 A
5311138 Ott et al. May 1994 A
5317274 Nakagawa et al. May 1994 A
5323256 Banks Jun 1994 A
5337206 Kadah Aug 1994 A
5365462 McBean Nov 1994 A
D354945 Dellavecchia et al. Jan 1995 S
5384712 Oravetz et al. Jan 1995 A
5385060 Wang Jan 1995 A
5391983 Lusignan et al. Feb 1995 A
5397970 Rowlette et al. Mar 1995 A
5410920 Westwick May 1995 A
5426360 Maraio et al. Jun 1995 A
5430438 Joos et al. Jul 1995 A
5444183 Gehrs et al. Aug 1995 A
5450765 Stover Sep 1995 A
5467012 Nystrom Nov 1995 A
5471359 Simpson et al. Nov 1995 A
5473234 Richardson Dec 1995 A
5473244 Libove Dec 1995 A
5548209 Lusignan et al. Aug 1996 A
5563506 Fielden et al. Oct 1996 A
5572073 Burgess et al. Nov 1996 A
5578927 Perelle Nov 1996 A
5592989 Lynn et al. Jan 1997 A
5596652 Piatek et al. Jan 1997 A
5604315 Briefer et al. Feb 1997 A
5612499 Andrew et al. Mar 1997 A
5677476 McCarthy et al. Oct 1997 A
5705989 Cota et al. Jan 1998 A
5712558 Saint-Cyr Jan 1998 A
5753983 Dickie et al. May 1998 A
5784249 Pouliot Jul 1998 A
5808846 Holce et al. Sep 1998 A
5844138 Cota Dec 1998 A
5861683 Engel et al. Jan 1999 A
5880677 Lestician Mar 1999 A
5880918 Horbelt et al. Mar 1999 A
5905439 McIntyre May 1999 A
5909087 Bryde et al. Jun 1999 A
5920190 Peterson et al. Jul 1999 A
5920191 Maniero et al. Jul 1999 A
5922939 Cota Jul 1999 A
5994892 Turino et al. Nov 1999 A
5995911 Hart Nov 1999 A
D419964 Holce et al. Feb 2000 S
6020702 Farr Feb 2000 A
6029524 Klauder et al. Feb 2000 A
6044430 MacDonald Mar 2000 A
6046550 Ference et al. Apr 2000 A
6064192 Redmyer May 2000 A
6091023 O'Donnell Jul 2000 A
6122972 Crider Sep 2000 A
6124791 Wolf Sep 2000 A
D431534 Holce et al. Oct 2000 S
6133709 Puchianu Oct 2000 A
6133723 Feight Oct 2000 A
6137418 Zuercher et al. Oct 2000 A
6146109 Davis et al. Nov 2000 A
6236949 Hart May 2001 B1
6269317 Schachner et al. Jul 2001 B1
6308140 Dowling et al. Oct 2001 B1
6330516 Kammeter Dec 2001 B1
6331821 Holce et al. Dec 2001 B1
6344951 Sato et al. Feb 2002 B1
6351206 Schweiger et al. Feb 2002 B1
6373238 Lewis et al. Apr 2002 B2
6377430 Holce et al. Apr 2002 B2
6380696 Sembhi et al. Apr 2002 B1
6384946 Pitsch et al. May 2002 B1
6404166 Puchianu Jun 2002 B1
6414241 O'Donnell Jul 2002 B1
D466078 Bowman Nov 2002 S
6496378 Holce et al. Dec 2002 B2
6504357 Hemminger et al. Jan 2003 B1
6504695 Holce et al. Jan 2003 B1
6549859 Ward Apr 2003 B1
6591482 Fleege et al. Jul 2003 B1
D478313 Bowman Aug 2003 S
6615147 Jonker et al. Sep 2003 B1
6636028 Lavoie et al. Oct 2003 B2
6657424 Voisine et al. Dec 2003 B1
6737854 Bruno et al. May 2004 B2
6756776 Perkinson et al. Jun 2004 B2
6774803 Tiffin Aug 2004 B1
6809509 Bruno et al. Oct 2004 B2
6815942 Randall et al. Nov 2004 B2
6825771 Bruno et al. Nov 2004 B2
6856515 Holce et al. Feb 2005 B2
6861683 Rissing et al. Mar 2005 B2
6871827 Petak et al. Mar 2005 B2
6888712 Holce et al. May 2005 B2
6889271 Germer et al. May 2005 B1
6937003 Bowman et al. Aug 2005 B2
6950292 Holce et al. Sep 2005 B2
6988043 Randall Jan 2006 B1
7006934 Jonker et al. Feb 2006 B2
7053497 Sodemann et al. May 2006 B2
7157899 Bruno Jan 2007 B2
7161345 Bruno Jan 2007 B2
7193428 Baron et al. Mar 2007 B1
7212930 Bruno May 2007 B2
7221145 Bowman et al. May 2007 B2
7230414 Bruno Jun 2007 B2
7239810 Seely et al. Jul 2007 B2
7274187 Loy Sep 2007 B2
7282889 Freed et al. Oct 2007 B2
7310049 Bowman Dec 2007 B2
7312686 Bruno Dec 2007 B2
7312964 Tchernobrivets Dec 2007 B2
7330022 Bowman et al. Feb 2008 B2
7333345 Holce et al. Feb 2008 B2
7352287 Rupert Apr 2008 B2
7359809 Bruno Apr 2008 B2
7447603 Bruno Nov 2008 B2
7453267 Westbrock, Jr. et al. Nov 2008 B2
7474088 Bowman et al. Jan 2009 B2
7652871 Caggiano et al. Jan 2010 B2
8085055 Rupert Dec 2011 B2
8193803 Bose et al. Jun 2012 B2
8212548 Parker et al. Jul 2012 B2
8212549 McNulty et al. Jul 2012 B2
8294453 Bowman Oct 2012 B2
8405383 Agrawal et al. Mar 2013 B2
8421443 Bitsch et al. Apr 2013 B2
8610438 Sykora et al. Dec 2013 B1
8612792 Fu et al. Dec 2013 B2
8837118 McGrail Sep 2014 B2
8878475 Bonvin et al. Nov 2014 B2
8964360 Trout Feb 2015 B2
8988062 Sykora et al. Mar 2015 B2
9146264 Cook Sep 2015 B2
9329659 Cook May 2016 B2
9395344 Sheley Jul 2016 B2
9424975 Cook et al. Aug 2016 B2
9577443 Gach et al. Feb 2017 B2
9588148 Cook et al. Mar 2017 B2
9607749 Cook et al. Mar 2017 B2
20010040446 Lapinksi Nov 2001 A1
20040227503 Bowman Nov 2004 A1
20050240362 Randall Oct 2005 A1
20050275397 Lightbody Dec 2005 A1
20060085144 Slota et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060103548 Borkowski et al. May 2006 A1
20060164096 Kwon Jul 2006 A1
20060181242 Freed Aug 2006 A1
20060238932 Westbrock Oct 2006 A1
20070153438 Caggiano et al. Jul 2007 A1
20080303511 Grno Dec 2008 A1
20090115400 Hunter May 2009 A1
20090115620 Hunter May 2009 A1
20090295370 Parker Jun 2009 A1
20100117626 Wertz et al. May 2010 A1
20100176960 Bitsch Jul 2010 A1
20100207604 Bitsch Aug 2010 A1
20100235122 McCrea Sep 2010 A1
20100308792 Rupert Dec 2010 A1
20110098985 Lawson Apr 2011 A1
20110181124 Uesaka Jul 2011 A1
20120112681 Bonvin May 2012 A1
20120221278 Cook Aug 2012 A1
20120235667 Agrawal et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130024714 Fu et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130027818 McGrail Jan 2013 A1
20130144545 Fu et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130294014 Irons Nov 2013 A1
20140239964 Gach et al. Aug 2014 A1
20150028848 Lynch et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150206645 Cook Jul 2015 A1
20150293549 Lal et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160069937 Johnson Mar 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
10 2010 052346 May 2012 DE
1531334 May 2005 EP
2993480 Mar 2016 EP
2014088562 Jun 2014 WO
2016175123 Nov 2016 WO
2016176315 Nov 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
European Search Report prepared by the European Patent Office for EP 18158821, dated Aug. 6, 2018, 12 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180252749 A1 Sep 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62466783 Mar 2017 US