Non-mechanical valves for fluidic systems

Abstract
Methods devices and systems that employ non-mechanical valve modules for controlling directing fluid and other material movement through integrated microscale channel network. These non-mechanical valve modules apply forces that counter the driving forces existing through a given channel segment, via fluidly connected channel segments, so as to selectively arrest flow of material within the given channel segment.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Microfluidic devices, systems and methods have been gaining acceptance as potentially providing a quantum leap forward in analytical chemical and biochemical processes. In particular, these systems have generally offered the promise of miniaturization, integration and automation to processes that have previously been performed using techniques that have not substantially changed in decades.




To a large extent, the advance of microfluidic technology has been due, at least in part, to the microfabrication technologies as used in the electronics industry, that are used to fabricate intricate networks of microscale channels and chambers in solid substrates. The field has also benefited substantially from development of methods, devices and systems for precisely controlling the movement and direction of fluids, and other materials within these channel networks.




Early researchers focused efforts on minimizing control elements from the macroscale world, e.g., valves, pumps, etc. While these developments were interesting from a technical standpoint, they presented numerous additional problems associated with the cost and complexity of manufacturing those elements.




In the mid 90s, integrated electrokinetic control of fluid or other material movement was developed, which gave rise to the “virtual valve” concept. In brief, through the controlled application of electric fields, one could precisely control the movement of fluids or other materials through interconnected channel structures. These methods generally relied upon the convergence of electric fields at an intersecting point to dictate which components would flow into the intersection, and what the relative quantities of those components would be.




While these pioneering developments were fundamental to the inception of the microfluidics industry, the first commercial versions of these systems typically required flowing materials in each of the various channels that were communicating at common intersection points or channel regions. In a number of particular applications, it would be generally desirable to more definitively control material flow in interconnected channels. For examples, in some cases, it would be desirable to entirely arrest the flow of material along a particular channel, while allowing continued flow in another cannel that is in communication with the first. Further, it would be desirable to obtain these control aspects, without having to include complex structures, such as mechanical valves, pumps, or the like. The present invention meets these and a variety of other important needs.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is generally directed to methods, devices and systems that utilize non-mechanical valves for use in microfluidic channel systems. Thus, in at least a first aspect, the invention provides a method of controlling material flow in a microscale channel. In accordance with this method, a first channel segment is provided that has first and second ends. A second channel segment is also provided communicating with the first channel segment at a first fluid junction, the first fluid junction being disposed between the first and second ends of the first channel segment. A third channel segment is additionally provided communicating with the first channel segment at a second fluid junction, the second fluid junction being disposed between the first fluid junction and the second end of the first channel segment. A differential driving force is applied between the first and second ends of the first channel segment. In addition, a second differential driving force is applied through the second channel segment that is sufficient to substantially eliminate a differential driving force between the first end of the first channel segment and the first fluid junction, while a third differential driving force is selectively applied through the third channel segment sufficient to substantially eliminate a differential driving force between the second fluid junction and the second end of the first channel segment.




In a related aspect, valve modules are provided, e.g., in microfluidic devices and systems, that include, for example, the channel elements set forth above, in combination with a flow controller that is coupled to at least one end of the first channel and also coupled to the second and third channels. The flow controller is set to apply the first, second and third driving forces set forth above to operate the valve module.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES





FIG. 1

is a schematic illustration of a simple valve module in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 1A

schematically illustrates the channel layout while

FIG. 1B

enumerates the various driving force differentials present within that channel layout.





FIG. 2

is a schematic illustration of a multiplexed microfluidic device that includes the valve modules of the present invention in conjunction with a high-throughput sampling and analysis functionalities in the device.





FIG. 3

is a schematic illustration of an overall system in accordance with the present invention.





FIGS. 4A

,


4


B and


4


C are schematic illustrations of a channel layout for a device including two pipetting elements, e.g., inlets and outlets, and valve modules for independently controlling flow into and out of those pipettors (FIG.


4


A), as well as the operation of that channel structure in drawing material in (

FIG. 4B

) and expelling material (

FIG. 4C

) from the device.





FIGS. 5A and 5B

are, respectively, a CAD drawing of a channel layout and a schematic illustration of that layout that incorporates valving modules in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 6

schematically illustrates the operation of the valving modules in the channel illustrated in FIG.


5


A.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is generally directed to microfluidic structures, and particularly, channel structures that include an integrated valve module. As used herein, the phrase “valve module” refers to a series of interconnected channels that, when operated in an appropriate manner, functions to arrest flow of fluids or other materials in at least one of the interconnected channels in the network. The valve modules employed in the methods and systems of the present invention employ no mechanical or moving parts within the channel structure, and operate primarily by presenting a force at an end of a channel segment that is sufficient to block flow within that channel segment, without erecting a physical structure barrier to that flow.




In general, the valve module includes a main channel segment that is in fluid communication with at least two other channel segments to make up the valve module. As used herein, a channel segment means an enclosed fluidic conduit or channel, and may encompass an entire length of a channel, e.g., spanning from one terminus (e.g., intersected or unintersected terminus, i.e., a dead-end or terminus at a port or reservoir) to the other, or it may be any portion or subset of the overall length of the entire channel.




A simplified schematic of the valve module


100


is illustrated in FIG.


1


A. As shown, the main channel segment


102


is intersected by a first channel segment


104


at a first fluid junction


106


and a second channel segment


108


that intersects main channel segment


102


at fluid junction


110


. For ease of illustration, the various channel segments in valve module


100


are shown connecting various reservoirs, although as noted previously and in many preferred aspects, these channel segments terminate at intersections with other channels in an overall system in which a valve module is desired. As shown, main channel segment


102


spans between reservoirs


112


and


114


, while channel segment


104


connects reservoir


116


to fluid junction


106


at channel segment


102


. Similarly, channel segment


108


connects reservoir


118


with fluid junction


110


at channel segment


102


. The two fluid junctions divide channel segment


102


into three sub-segments


102




a


,


102




b


and


102




c.






In operation, the valve module operates to selectively arrest overall flow of material along the length of channel segment


102


, e.g., between reservoirs


112


and


114


, and particularly from reservoir


112


, and toward reservoir


114


. As used herein, the term material typically denotes fluids, ions, macromolecules, cells, particles (beads, viruses, etc), or the like, provided that material is of a size sufficient to fit within the channel segments. The materials may be disposed within fluids, gels, fluidic polymer solutions, or any other medium capable of permitting movement of the material, either through the medium or as a component during bulk movement of the medium.




Flow along the main channel segment


102


is generated by applying a differential driving force along the channel segment


102


. Differential driving forces are typically any force that will cause movement of the material along the channel segment and include pressure differentials, electrokinetic differentials, or the like. A general circuit diagram can be generated for the valve module in FIG.


1


A and is shown in

FIG. 1B

with the various force differential indicated adjacent each channel segment or sub-segment. As shown, the main channel includes three different driving force differentials labeled Δ


1


, Δ


2


, and Δ


3


. Force differentials applied through each of channel segments


104


and


108


are indicated by Δ


4


and Δ


5


, respectively. In the operation of the valve modules of the present invention, a differential driving force is applied through main channel segment to cause movement of material from one end, e.g., reservoir


112


, toward the other end, e.g., reservoir


114


. As shown in

FIG. 1B

, the differential driving force is the sum of Δ


1


, Δ


2


, and Δ


3


(or for the entire channel segment, Δ


Total


). In the open mode, e.g., where fluid or other material is flowing along the length of channel segment


102


, there is substantially no differential force applied through channels


104


and


108


. Phrased differently, Δ


4


and Δ


5


each substantially equal zero. In the closed mode, e.g., where flow through channel segment


102


is to be arrested, the differential forces applied through channels


104


and


108


are changed. In particular, the differential through channel segment


104


, e.g., Δ


4


, is changed so as to eliminate the differential driving force across segment


102




a


, e.g., Δ


1


is brought to approximately zero. In the case of pressure based flow, this is done by applying a pressure differential through channel


104


that yields a pressure at the first fluid junction


106


that is equal to the pressure at reservoir


112


, and thus, the difference between the two is zero. This will have the effect of arresting flow within channel segment


102




a


, e.g., flow into the valve module, but will not arrest flow through channel segment


102




c.






In order to arrest flow into and out of the valve module, a driving force differential is applied through channel segment


108


that results in the driving force differential across channel segment


102




c


, e.g., Δ


3


, being brought to substantially zero. As described with the inlet side of the valve, e.g., fluid junction


106


, in a pressure based flow format above, the control of flow through the outlet side of the valve, e.g., fluid junction


110


, is accomplished by changing the pressure at the second fluid junction


110


to match the pressure at reservoir


114


. As can be readily appreciated, while a pressure differential still exists between reservoirs


112


and


114


, that entire differential is effectively tapped off into channels


104


and


108


. That is, the entire pressure differential exists between fluid junction


106


and fluid junction


110


.




Although not a preferred method of operation, it will be readily appreciated that the valve modules, in certain circumstances, may include only a subset of the channels shown in FIG.


1


. For example, where it is only necessary to stop flow from reservoir


112


, without regard to the efflux through channel segment


102




c


, one can operate to stop that flow by applying sufficient pressure through channel


104


to reduce Δ


1


to zero, without applying any pressures to eliminate Δ


3


. While this will arrest flow through segment


102




a


, it will not stop the flow through channel


102




c


, replacing the flow from reservoir


112


with flow from reservoir


116


.




In order to apply the requisite driving forces to the various channels, in order to open and close the valve modules, the systems of the invention include a flow controller that is operably coupled to the various channels through which the driving force is to be applied. As noted herein, as the driving force can vary depending upon the application, so too can the flow controller. For example, electrokinetically driven systems typically employ electrokinetic flow controllers, while pressure driven systems employ pressure controllers.




In turn, the operable connection between the flow controller and the various channels will depend upon the nature of the flow controller. For example, operable connection between an electrokinetic flow controller and a channel typically involves the use of an electrical connection between an electrical power supply within the controller and an appropriate access point to the channel in question. In general, such connections involve electrodes that are disposed in electrical contact with fluid that is in or fluidly coupled to the channel, e.g., in a reservoir at a channel terminus, such that an electric field can be applied through the channel in question, or an associated channel whereby an appropriate driving force may be created through the channel in question.




In pressure based systems, operable connection typically includes a sealed conduit between a pressure and/or vacuum pump within the controller, and a terminus of the channel or channels in question. A variety of sealing connections, e.g., using o-rings, press fittings, or the like, can be readily produced for coupling a pressure or vacuum line to a reservoir in a microfluidic device.




In addition to the source of the driving force, e.g., an electrical power supply or a pressure or vacuum source, the controllers also typically include, or are operably coupled to a processor that permits the programming or “setting” of the controller for operation of the various valve modules of the device. In particular, and with reference to

FIG. 1A and 1B

, the processor may include appropriate programming to instruct the various pressure sources within the controller to delivered selected pressures to, e.g., reservoir


112


,


116


,


118


, and optionally


114


, so as to arrest flow of material from reservoir


112


to reservoir


114


. As noted, this involves applying sufficient pressure or vacuum to reservoirs


116


and


118


to reduce Δ


1


and Δ


3


, respectively, to approximately zero, based upon the pressure differential that exists between reservoir


112


and


114


. As noted, such programming may be based upon a feedback indicator within the system, e.g., that indicates when flow is arrested in each of channel portions


102




a


and


102




c


. Alternatively, the programming applies appropriate pressure or vacuum that was predetermined to be the appropriate level, either based upon empirical testing or calculated fluidic properties of the fluid/channel system that is being used, e.g., based upon the cross-sectional area and length of the channel segments as well as the viscosity of the fluid. The processor may be internal to the flow controller or it may be embodied in a separate computer, e.g., a PC running a Pentium, Pentium II, Pentium Pro or Celeron processor.




An exemplary system structure is schematically illustrated in FIG.


3


. As shown, the overall system


300


includes a microfluidic device


302


that incorporates the valve module(s) of the invention. A flow controller


304


is operably coupled to the various channels of the device, e.g., through control lines


306


(e.g., electrical connections or vacuum/pressure lines). A processor


308


is also typically coupled to or integral with the controller to instruct the appropriate delivery of driving forces to the various channels of the device to ensure proper operation.




One of the advantageous uses of the valve modules of the present invention is in systems that include multiple interconnected parallel processing channel systems. Specifically, the valve modules are particularly useful where one would like to arrest flow in one channel network while permitting continued flow in a fluidly connected second channel network. Such systems are useful where long term storage, incubation, or the like is desired for materials being moved through certain of the microfluidic channels in a more complex network of channels. One of the advantages of such a system is that it reduces the amount of material dispersion that would result from long term movement of material plugs or volumes through a channel system. In particular, while one could extend the amount of time a material is kept in one channel network, e.g., to prolong incubation, reaction or the like, by simply providing an extended length channel system, the dispersion of moving materials within such channels would substantially reduce the efficiency of transporting discrete slugs of material in those systems, as dispersion is related, at least in part, to the movement of the material through the channel network. As such, it is useful to be able to arrest flow, and thereby reduce the amount of dispersion that the material is subjected to when prolonged incubation and/or reaction is desired.




An example of a multiplexed channel system


200


, e.g., with two interconnected analytical channel systems incorporating valve modules is illustrated in FIG.


2


. As shown, two channel networks


202


and


204


each include a separate valve module


206


and


208


, respectively. Each of the channel networks


202


and


204


are in communication at an inlet channel segment


210


, as well as in a detection channel segment


214


, e.g., that includes a detection zone


216


.




In preferred embodiments, at the inlet end of the overall system


200


is provided, e.g., a capillary sampling element (not shown), for bringing test materials into the overall system. The inlet from the capillary element to the channel network is illustrated as inlet


212


. Other sources of the material to be transported through the channel networks may optionally or additionally provided, e.g., as reservoirs fluidly coupled to the inlet end of the overall system, e.g., reservoirs


218


and


220


. For example, where each of the channel networks is intended to perform a particular enzyme assay on different test compounds, the enzyme and substrate used in the assay reaction is optionally provided in one or more reservoirs that are fluidly coupled to the inlet channel segment


210


. As test materials are brought into the system, they are mixed with the enzyme and substrate mixture.




These multiplexed systems are particularly useful in the context of high-throughput analytical operations, e.g., high-throughput pharmaceutical screening, high-throughput genetic analysis, and the like. In particular, multiple, e.g., from 2 to 100 or more, different analyses can be processed concurrently in different channel networks within the same device, allowing economies of reduced scale and increased speed to be accomplished. By way of example, high-throughput pharmaceutical screening operations are readily performed, e.g., as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,942,443 and 6,046,056, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.




These methods typically employ flowing components of a biochemical system that is the subject of the screen, e.g., a biological assay. Such components typically include enzymes, substrates, receptors, ligands, antibodies and antigens, whole cells, cell fractions, or any of a wide variety of other system components that are desired to be screened against. Within the flowing system, is a labeling function, e.g., a fluorogenic substrate for a given enzyme, a binding indicator label, or the like, that produces a steady state signal indicative of the normal level of activity of the provided biological system components.




When a test compound, e.g., a pharmaceutical candidate, is introduced into the flowing system, where that compound affects the biological activity, it will result in a deviation in the steady state signal of that system, and the compound can be identified as an effector of that system, e.g., an inhibitor.




In the context of the screening example, each of the different channel networks shown in

FIG. 2

could have different biological system components flowing through the channels, which are then subjected to screening the same compounds, or they include the same biological system components and have different test compounds introduced into them.




Alternatively, each different channel system could be used to perform a same genetic analysis on a different target sample or nucleic acid sequence, e.g., amplification and genotyping or separation based analysis.




Although generally described in terms of drawing materials into a fluid conduit and incubating it there, the valve systems of the invention are also optionally used in selectively drawing in fluids and expelling fluids from fluid conduits, e.g., microscale fluidic devices. In particular, there are a number of applications that would benefit from first drawing material into a microscale channel containing device, performing some manipulation on that material, and then expelling that material into a separate instrument. For example, in certain applications, i.e., proteomics, one may wish to first separate macromolecules, followed by injection of those materials into a mass spec. In order to draw material into a chip typically requires a negative pressure differential between the sample well, which is typically at ambient pressure, and the channel into which the material is drawn. However, expulsion of material from a channel typically requires a positive pressure differential from the channels of the device to the ultimate destination of the material, again, which is often at or near ambient pressure. As such, there is generally a need to have both low and high pressure regions within an interconnected channel structure. While this could be done readily with mechanical valves, the complexity and expense of manufacturing such valves is often prohibitive. The non-mechanical valves described herein are particularly useful for segregating pressure effects among interconnected channels in a single channel network, and are therefore particularly suited to use in channel networks that include both input and output functions.




Regardless of the application for the particular device or system, the ability to separately and completely control flow of material within separate but interconnected channel structures is highly advantageous. In operation, the system illustrated in

FIG. 2

functions as described with respect to the valve module illustrated in FIG.


1


. For example, a set pressure differential is optionally applied between the inlet channel and the detection channel, e.g., by applying a vacuum to reservoir


222


. When the overall system is not subjected to any control, e.g., all reservoirs and sampling elements are open to ambient pressure, this would result in flow from all reservoirs and the sampling element toward reservoir


222


, which flow would vary among the various channels depending upon their resistance to such flow, e.g., as dictated by their cross-sectional areas, length, etc. However, while the valve modules are in the “open” or flowing mode, pressures, positive or negative, will be applied so as to eliminate pressure differentials along the valve module channels, e.g., channels


224


and


226


, resulting in no net flow of material from these channels toward reservoir


222


. Accordingly, the material flowing along each of channels


202


and


204


, when the valve modules are open, will be made up of only the material flowing into those channels from the inlet channel, e.g., material coming from the sampling element and from reservoirs


218


and


220


.




Each of the valve modules may then be independently operated to arrest the flow of any material through its associated channel network by switching the valve module to the closed configuration, e.g., as described with respect to FIG.


1


. In closing valve module


206


, flow of all material between the inlet channel


210


and the detection channel


214


through channel


202


is arrested, without affecting any of the material flow between the inlet channel


210


and the detection channel


214


through channel


204


. In application, reaction materials such as biological system components, e.g., flowed from reservoirs


218


and


220


are flowed into one channel, e.g., channel


202


, along with a test compound plug introduced from the sampling element via inlet


212


. Flow into channel


202


is selected by leaving valve module


206


in an open configuration while putting valve module


208


in the closed configuration, forcing flow along channel


202


. All of these reagents mix within the inlet channel


210


and reaction channel


202


. Flow is then arrested within channel


202


by closing valve module


206


as described above, to allow the various components to incubate within that channel without the original test compound material being subjected to excessive dispersion. Arresting flow is done when the reaction materials of interest are within the reaction channel, e.g., channel


202


, but not between the channels of the valve module, e.g., channels


224


and


226


, as flow continues within channel


202


, between those channels.




While the systems are readily employed to screen against premixed reagents, e.g., mixtures that are supplied into the channel from a premixed reagent well, e.g., via a sampling element, in preferred aspects, at least some reagents are provided in sources that are integrated into the overall channel network, e.g., reservoirs


218


and


220


, and are thus mixed within the channel network.




While the first test compound is being incubated in channel


202


, a second test compound is drawn into inlet channel


210


and mixed with reaction components from reservoirs


218


and


220


and directed through channel


204


by virtue of valve module


208


being in the open configuration and valve module


206


being in the closed configuration. Once the reagents are flowed into channel


204


, then flow through that channel is arrested by closing valve module


206


.




Once sufficient reaction or incubation time has passed, valve module


206


may be opened allowing the reaction mixture to flow into detection channel


214


and past detection window


216


, where the results of the incubation/reaction are detected. This is then repeated for the second set of reaction components in channel


204


by closing valve module


206


and opening valve module


208


. Although illustrated with two channels and valve modules, this multiplexing can include much larger numbers of reaction channels and valve modules, e.g., from about 2 to about 100 or more, preferably, from about 4 to about 50, and more preferably, from about 10 to about 50. Similarly, although illustrated with both a common inlet channel and a common outlet/detection channel, it will be appreciated that multiplexed systems, e.g., those including more than one reaction channel segment, may include a single inlet and multiple detection channels, or multiple inlets and a single detection channel, or multiple inlets and multiple detection channels.




As noted previously, the valve modules of the invention are optionally used in devices and systems that include both input and output functions.

FIG. 4A

provides a schematic illustration of a device channel layout useful in this application. As shown, the device's channel network


400


includes a main reaction channel


402


. While illustrated as a single reaction channel region, this is simply for ease of description. It will be readily appreciated that greater complexity is optionally included in the reaction channel portion of the device, e.g., including side channels that intersect a given reaction channel for the addition or removal of reagents, application of electric fields, etc. The reaction channel is shown coupled at one end to a pipettor element


404


that optionally functions as an input capillary or conduit, and at the other end to another pipettor element


406


that optionally functions as an output capillary or dispensing nozzle. Two valve modules are provided coupled to the reaction channel to control both the input and output functions. In particular, the first valve module, made up of channel segments


408


,


402




a


and


410


, controls the drawing of fluids into the reaction channel. The second valve module made up of channel segments


412


,


402




b


and


414


controls the output function. The driving pressures for each of the input and output functions are supplied through channel segments


416


and


418


, respectively. As can be seen, the input driver channel is connected to the reaction channel downstream of the point at which the output driver channel is connected to the reaction channel. This simply ensures that material can be moved far enough into the device by the input driving force, that the other driving channel can act upon it, e.g., drive it to the output capillary. The structure of the pipettor elements may take a variety of different forms, including tubular capillaries having lumens or channels disposed therethrough that are attached to a body structure of a microfluidic device such that the lumens or channels provided in fluid communication with channels of that device. Alternatively, the pipettor elements may be integral portions of the body structure, e.g., shaped from the body structure's forming materials and provided with an appropriate fluid conduit disposed therethrough.




The operation of the input and output functions is illustrated in

FIGS. 4B and 4C

, respectively. As shown in

FIG. 4A

, material is drawn into the main channel


402


through input capillary


404


by applying a negative pressure to the channel through input driving channel


416


and its associated port, as indicated by arrows


420


and


422


. The pressures in the input control valve module (channel segments


408


and


410


) are controlled in order to ensure that the valve channels do not perturb the flow of material into the reaction channel, e.g., little or no flow is occurring in the valve module channels


408


and


410


. In order to prevent material from being drawn into the reaction channel from the outlet capillary


406


, the output control valve module is controlled to stop such flow, e.g., the valve is activated by applying appropriate pressures to the channel segments


412


,


414


and


402




b


, as indicated by arrow


424


, and as previously described herein. A lack of flow in a given channel segment is indicated by an X across the particular channel segment.




When it is desired to expel material through the output capillary (or alternatively, through another channel in place of the output capillary, e.g., into another associated channel or channel network), the negative pressure is removed from the input driving channel. At the same time, the output valve is deactivated and the input control valve is activated as shown by arrow


426


, to close off the flow through the input side of the reaction channel


402


and allow flow through the output side of the reaction channel


402


. The fluid is then driven out of the outlet capillary


406


by applying a positive pressure to the output driving channel


418


, as indicated by arrows


428


and


430


.




Alternatively, two pipettor capillaries may be used in conjunction with the valving scheme of the invention. In particular, two, three, four or more, eight or more, or twelve or more capillaries may be provided fluidly connected to a common, e.g., interconnected, channel network, to function as input capillaries or variously input and output capillaries. As used herein, the term “capillaries” generally refers to microscale fluidic components. In the case of pipettors and nozzles, such capillaries typically terminate in an open end or another receptacle, e.g., a reservoir, well, test tube, or input port for other instrumentation. In preferred aspects, such capillaries may be embodied in a tubular capillary elements that are coupled to an overall body structure that includes the channel network that includes the valve module. However, a number of other capillary, pipettor and nozzle configurations are envisioned as being useful in conjunction with the invention.




Using the valving methods and modules described herein, materials can be independently drawn into the channel network via these different pipettor elements and subjected to the same, similar or entirely different manipulations within the same channel network. In particularly preferred aspects, materials are drawn into a reaction channel and flow is slowed or arrested in order to permit incubation of those materials. During this incubation, different materials are drawn into another reaction channel, and again, flow through the reaction channel is arrested or slowed. Using the valve modules described herein, these different materials may be optionally drawn into the various reaction channels through the same or different pipettor elements.




Regulation of the driving force differentials applied through the channels of the system optionally employs a variety of different methods, depending upon the nature of the differential driving force employed. For example, where pressure differentials are employed as the driving force, then pressure and/or vacuum sources are used to supply those differentials. Alternatively, where electrokinetic forces are employed as the differential driving forces, then electrical controllers are employed to deliver the differential forces through the various channels of the device or system.




In the case of pressure-based systems, operation of the overall system including a valve module typically involves the application of a negative or positive pressure source that is operably coupled to one of the inlet side or outlet side of the overall system, e.g., reservoir


112


or


114


, respectively, in FIG.


1


. Pressure control also involves the use of controllable pressure sources (positive and/or negative) operably coupled to the reservoirs in the valve module, e.g., reservoirs


116


and


118


, where the pressure source or sources coupled to the inlet and outlet sides of the channel system are independently controllable from each other and/or the pressure sources coupled to the valve module. Examples of systems that include multiple, independently controllable pressure sources are described in, e.g., published International Patent Application No. WO 01/63270, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. Typically, such systems employ multiple independent pressure pumps, e.g., syringe pumps that are separately operably coupled to each of the reservoirs at which more active and precise control of pressures is desired, e.g., the valve module reservoirs and at least one of the inlet and/or outlet side reservoirs. Control of flow can be accomplished either by monitoring flow while adjusting relative flow rates until the desired flow profile is achieved, or by predetermining the parameters of the control system and channel network, and operating within those parameters (see, e.g., PCT Application NO WO 01/63270, incorporated above).




Determination of the flow rate applied, e.g., to ensure that a valve is closed, may be carried out automatically, e.g., through the incorporation of optical sensors, chemical sensors, or the like within the channels of the device. Alternatively, a particular channel network may be pre-characterized in terms of the necessary differential forces needed to achieve each of the flow profiles desired in an operation, e.g., opening and closing valves, etc. Such pre-characterization may be based upon operational experience and data for the system being used, or it may be determined based upon the calculated expectations of the system, e.g., based upon the resistance of each of the channel segments (based upon length and cross-section) to flow under the conditions of the application, e.g., fluidic properties (viscosity) or electrical properties (conductivity).




In the case of electrical differential driving forces, control systems typically employ a number of independently regulatable voltage or current sources to apply voltage differentials through channel segments to drive material movement through those channels. Examples of controllers employing such regulatable voltage and/or current sources are described in, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,800,690 (which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes) and are also generally commercially available, e.g., the 2100 Bioanalyzer from Agilent Technologies (Palo Alto, Clif.). Controlling voltages are supplied through electrodes that are individually contacted with the material within the reservoirs in the channel network. These electrodes are then typically coupled to separate power supplies that are controlled to apply the desired voltage differential through a given channel segment. Such control is typically accomplished through an appropriate software program script that dictates when and to what extent, voltages are applied to the various electrodes.




In the context of electrical motive force, electrical currents are applied through the various channel segments. These currents are applied in such fashion as to yield the flow profiles described above. For example, where the valve module shown in

FIG. 1

is operated with an electrokinetic differential driving force, e.g., material movement is caused by a voltage differential across (or a current flow through) a channel segment. By way of example, a first voltage difference is applied across channel


102


, e.g., between reservoirs


112


and


114


, to drive material movement along the channel


102


, electrokinetically. This will result in a different voltage at each of intersections


106


and


110


. When the valve is switched off, a voltage is applied at reservoir


116


that raises the voltage at intersection


106


to equal the voltage applied at reservoir


112


, eliminating any voltage differential (and current flow) between these two points. Concurrently, a voltage is applied at reservoir


118


that changes the voltage at intersection


110


to equal the voltage applied at reservoir


114


, yielding net zero voltage difference between intersection


110


and reservoir


114


.




Voltages may be applied in accordance with channel segments that are pre-characterized to yield the desired voltage at the intersections, e.g., by knowing the resistance of each channel segment, or by empirically determining that the desired voltages are achieved, e.g., by looking for arrested material movement. Alternatively, these methods are controlled by applying current controlled methods, e.g., where one monitors current between reservoir


112


and intersection


106


, and intersection


110


and reservoir


114


. When that current equals zero in each case, the valve would be fully closed. Current control methods and systems for use in microfluidic systems are described in, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,800,690, previously incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.




EXAMPLES




Demonstration of Non-Mechanical Valve Function




A single sipper chip was designed to demonstrate the integration of the valve module in a microfluidic channel system. FIGS


5


A and


5


B shows a CAD layout and a schematic diagram of the microfluidic chip


500


, respectively. The single depth chip of 8 μm consisted of two two-way on-off valve modules,


502


and


504


, that operate independently to direct flow through the desired channels. The valve module


502


consists of microchannels


506


,


508


, and


510


, and valve module


504


consists of microchannels


512


,


514


, and


516


. The width, length, and hydrodynamic resistance of the channels are summarized in the Table 1, below. Detection of the operations in the chip is carried out at detection window


540


. The channels that make up the valve module were designed with high fluidic resistances in order to improve the performance of the valve. Sample materials are brought into the channel network via an integrated capillary or pipettor element


528


, (not shown in

FIG. 5A

, but represented by its junction point


528




a


with the channel network in the chip


500


).




Simultaneous control of positive or negative pressure level at the reagent reservoirs is achieved with the use of a multiport pressure controller. The multiport control system independently sets the pressure and voltage or current at all 8 reservoirs of the device. Each reservoir is coupled to an independent peristaltic pump through a flexible tubing. Fluid flows from the sipper to reservoir


530


through channel


518


when valve module


502


is open and


504


is closed, and through channel


520


to reservoir


530


when valve module


502


is closed and


504


is open.












TABLE 1











The dimensions and resistances of the microchannels shown in

FIG. 5















Channels




Width (μm)




Length (mm)




Resistance* (g/cm


4


s)



















518





31





20




2.1 × 10


11








506





31





16.1




1.7 × 10


11








508





31





20




2.1 × 10


11








510





31





14.4




1.52 × 10


10









522





66





9.4




3.9 × 10


10








524





66





13.2




5.4 × 10


10








526





66





23.9




9.8 × 10


10








512





31





14.3




1.5 × 10


11








514





31





20




2.1 × 10


11








516





31





16.1




1.7 × 10


11








520





31





20




2.1 × 10


11








528




(Sipper)




20




(diameter)




20




5.1 × 10


10













*Values based on a fluid viscosity of 1 cp.













The running buffer used for the experiments on the chip was 50 mM CAPS at pH 10. Flow visualization in the microchannels was achieved by adding 1.8 μm diameter fluorescence beads to the buffer sipped from the microtiter plate. The initial setting of the pressure at each reservoir was determined from the design spreadsheet for the chip where the governing equations of the hydrodynamic flow in the channels are solved. Flow visualization was subsequently used to make any additional adjustment to the calculated pressures in order to optimize the performance of the valves.




To test the performance of the valve module integrated on chip, 50 mM CAPS buffer containing 1.8 μm diameter fluorescence beads is sipped through the capillary. Using a Caliper microfluidic developer Station equipped with a multiport pressure controller, two alternating scripts were written to open and close the two valves to direct flow from the sipper to reservoir


530


through either channel


518


or channel


520


. As illustrated in

FIG. 6A

, the valve module


502


is maintained in the open position and valve module


504


is closed by setting the reservoir pressures. Under these conditions the fluid flows from the sipper


528


to well


530


through channel


518


only while flow is prevented through channel


520


. Alternatively, as shown in

FIG. 6B

, the flow can be directed to reservoir


530


through channel


520


when the valve module


502


is closed and


504


is open. Again, an “X” indicates stopped flow within a given channel segment. The pressure settings for these two cases are summarized in Table 2, below.












TABLE 2











The reservoir pressure values for the two cases illustrated






in

FIG. 6A and 6B


















P at 530




P at 532




P at 534




P at 536




P at 538






Condition




(psig)




(psig)




(psig)




(psig)




(psig)



















Valve A




−3.09




−2.60




−1.43




1.79




−4.6






open






Valve B






closed






Valve B




−3.29




−4.99




1.98




−1.39




−2.49






open






Valve A






closed














Visual observation of the operation of the system, under a microscope confirmed that the valves could be used to selectively substantially shut off flow into one channel while allowing flow in the other connected channel.




All publications and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference. Although the present invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity and understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A microfluidic device for sampling and dispensing material, comprising:a body structure having at least a first channel network disposed therein, the first channel network comprising at least a first valve module, wherein the valve module comprises first, second and third channel segments in the channel network, the second and third channel segments intersecting the first channel segment at an inlet end and an outlet end of the first channel segment, the inlet and outlet ends of the first channel segment forming inlet and outlet sides of the valve module; and first and second pipettor elements fluidly connected to the first channel network, wherein the first pipettor element is fluidly connected to the first channel network on an inlet side of the valve module, and the second pipettor element is fluidly coupled to the first channel network on an outlet side of the valve module.
  • 2. The microfluidic device of claim 1, further comprising one or more pressure sources operably coupled to the second and third channel segments for selectively permitting or preventing flow into the valve module from the inlet side or flow out of the valve module from the outlet side.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/056,219, filed Jan. 24, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,681,788, which claims priority to Provisional Patent Application No. 60/264,788, filed Jan. 29, 2001, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (56)
Number Name Date Kind
4390403 Batchelder Jun 1983 A
4459267 Bunce et al. Jul 1984 A
4908112 Pace Mar 1990 A
5126022 Soane et al. Jun 1992 A
5304487 Wilding et al. Apr 1994 A
5498392 Wilding et al. Mar 1996 A
5571410 Swedberg et al. Nov 1996 A
5573651 Dasgupta et al. Nov 1996 A
5585069 Zanzucchi et al. Dec 1996 A
5593838 Zanzucchi et al. Jan 1997 A
5603351 Cherukuri et al. Feb 1997 A
5635358 Wilding et al. Jun 1997 A
5637469 Wilding et al. Jun 1997 A
5699157 Parce Dec 1997 A
5716852 Yager et al. Feb 1998 A
5750015 Soane et al. May 1998 A
5800690 Chow et al. Sep 1998 A
5858187 Ramsey et al. Jan 1999 A
5858195 Ramsey Jan 1999 A
5869004 Parce et al. Feb 1999 A
5876675 Kennedy Mar 1999 A
5880071 Parce et al. Mar 1999 A
5882465 McReynolds Mar 1999 A
5885470 Parce et al. Mar 1999 A
5932100 Yager et al. Aug 1999 A
5942443 Parce et al. Aug 1999 A
5948227 Dubrow Sep 1999 A
5955028 Chow Sep 1999 A
5958694 Nikiforov Sep 1999 A
5959291 Jensen Sep 1999 A
5965001 Chow et al. Oct 1999 A
5965410 Chow et al. Oct 1999 A
5976336 Dubrow et al. Nov 1999 A
5979868 Wu et al. Nov 1999 A
5989402 Chow et al. Nov 1999 A
6001229 Ramsey Dec 1999 A
6001231 Kopf-Sill Dec 1999 A
6010607 Ramsey Jan 2000 A
6010608 Ramsey Jan 2000 A
6012902 Parce Jan 2000 A
6033546 Ramsey Mar 2000 A
6039211 Slater et al. Mar 2000 A
6042709 Parce et al. Mar 2000 A
6046056 Parce et al. Apr 2000 A
6062261 Jacobson et al. May 2000 A
6074725 Kennedy Jun 2000 A
6100541 Nagle et al. Aug 2000 A
6120666 Jacobson et al. Sep 2000 A
6149787 Chow et al. Nov 2000 A
6156181 Parce et al. Dec 2000 A
6221226 Kopf-Sill Apr 2001 B1
6231737 Ramsey et al. May 2001 B1
6235175 Dubrow et al. May 2001 B1
6235471 Knapp et al. May 2001 B1
6280589 Manz et al. Aug 2001 B1
6342142 Ramsey Jan 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
9405414 Mar 1994 WO
9604547 Feb 1996 WO
9702357 Jan 1997 WO
0045172 Aug 2000 WO
0163270 Aug 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (41)
Entry
Chien, R-C. et al., “Multiport Flow-Control System for Lab-on-a-Chip Microfluidic Devices,” J. Anal. Chem. (2001) 371:106-111.
Dasgupta, P.K. et al., “Electroosmosis: A Reliable Fluid Propulsion System for Flow Injection Analysis,” Anal. Chem. (1994) 66:1792-1798.
Effenhauser, C.S. et al., “Glass Chips for High-Speed Capillary Electrophoresis Separations with Submicrometer Plate Heights,” Anal. Chem. (1993) 65: 2637-2642.
Effenhauser, C.S. et al., “High Speed Separation of Antisense Oligonucleotides on a Micromachined Capillary Electrophoresis Device,” Anal. Chem. (1994) 66: 2949-2953.
Effenhauser, C.S. et al., “Integrated Capillary Electrophoresis on Flexible Silicone Microdevices: Analysis of DNA Restriction Fragments and Detection of Single DNA Molecles on Microships,” Anal. Chem. (1997) 69: 3451-3457.
Fan, Z.H. et al., “Micromachining of Capillary Electrophoresis Injectors and Separators on Glass Chips and Evaluation of Flow at Capillary Intersections,” Anal. Chem. (1994) 66: 177-184.
Fister, J.C. III et al., “Counting Single Chromophore Molecles for Ultrasensitive Analysis and Separations on Microchip Devices,” Anal. Chem. (1998) 70: 431-437.
Hadd, A.G. et al., “Microfluidic Assays of Acetylcholinesterase,” Anal. Chem. (1999) 71: 5206-5212.
Harrison, D.J. et al., “Capillary Electrophoresis and Sample Injection Systems Integrated on a Planar Glass Chip,” Anal. Chem. (1992) 64:1926-1932.
Harrison, D.J. et al., “Towards miniaturized electrophoresis and chemical analysis systems on silicon: an alternative to chemical sensors,” Sensors and Actuators (1993) 107-116.
Harrison, D.J. et al., “Micromachining a Miniaturized Capillary Electrophoresis-Based Chemical Analysis System on a Chip,” Science (1993) 261:895-897.
Harrison, D.J. et al., “Integrated Electrophoresis Systems for Biochemical Analyses,” Sensors and Actuators (1994) 21-24.
Jacobson, S.C. et al., “Effects of Injection Schemes and Column Geometry on the Performance of Microchip Electrophoresis Devices,” Anal. Chem. (1994) 66(7):1107-1113.
Jacobson, S.C. et al., “High-Speed Separations on a Microchip,” Anal. Chem. (1994) 66: 1114-1118.
Jacobson, S.C. et al., “Open Channel Electrochromatography on a Microchip,” Anal. Chem. (1994) 66:2369-2373.
Jacobson, S.C. et al., “Precolumn Reactions with Electrophoretic Analysis Integrated on a Microchip,” Anal. Chem. (1994) 66: 4127-4132.
Jacobson, S.C. et al., “Microchip Electrophoresis with Sample Stacking,” Electrophoresis (1995) 16: 481-486.
Jacobson, S.C. et al., “Fused Quartz Substrates for Microchip Electrophoresis,” Anal. Chem. (1995) 67: 2059-2063.
Jacobson, S.C. et al., “Integrated Microdevice for DNA Restriction Fragment Analysis,” Anal. Chem. (1996) 68: 720-723.
Jacobson, S.C. et al., “Electrokinetic Focusing in Microfabricated Channel Structures,” Anal. Chem. (1997) 69: 3212-3217.
Jacobson, S.C. et al., “Microfluidic Devices for Electrokinetically Driven Parallel and Serial Mixing,” Anal. Chem. (1999) 71: 4455-4459.
Manz, A. et al., “Miniaturized Total Chemical Analysis Systems: A Novel Concept for Chemical Sensing,” Sensors and Actuators B1 (1990) 244-248.
Manz, A. et al., “Micromachining of Monocrystalline Silicon and Glass for Chemical Analysis Systems,” Trends in Analytical Chemistry (1991) 10:144-149.
Manz, A. et al., “Planar Chips Technology for Miniaturization and Integration of Separation Techniques into Monitoring Systems,” Journal of Chromatography (1992) 593:253-258.
Manz, A. et al., “Planar Chips Technology for Miniaturization of Separation Systems: A Developing Perspective in Chemical Monitoring,”.
Manz, A. et al., “Electroosmotic Pumping and Electrophoretic Separations for Miniaturized Chemical Analysis Systems,” J. Micromach. Microeng. (1994) 4: 257-265.
Manz, A. et al., “Parallel Capillaries for High Throughput in Electrophoretic Separations and Electroosmotic Drug Discovery Systems,” International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators (1997) 915-918.
McCormick, R.M. et al., “Microchannel Electrophoretic Separations of DNA in Injection-Molded Plastic Substrates,” Anal. Chem. (1997) 69: 2626-2630.
Moore, A.W. et al., “Microchip Separations of Neutral Species via Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary Chromatography,” Anal. Chem. (1995) 67: 4184-4189.
Ramsey, J.M. et al., “Microfabricated Chemical Measurement Systems,” Nature Medicine (1995) 1:1093-1096.
Salimi-Moosavi, H. et al., “Biology Lab-on-a-Chip for Drug Screening,” Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop (1998) 350-353.
Sandoval, J.E. et al., “Method for the Accelerated Measurement of Electroosmosis in Chemically Modified Tubes for Capillary Electrophoresis,” Anal. Chem. (1996) 68(17):2771-2775.
Seiler, K. et al., “Planar Glass Chips for Capillary Electrophoresis: Repetitive Sample Injection, Quantitation, and Separation Efficiency,” Anal. Chem. (1993) 65:1481-1488.
Seiler, K. et al., “Electroosmotic Pumping and Valveless Control of Fluid Flow within a Manifold of Capillaries on a Glass Chip,” Anal. Chem. (1994) 66:3485-3491.
Ueda, M. et al., “Imaging of a Band for DNA Fragment Migrating in Microchannel on Integrated Microchip,” Materials Science and Engineering C (2000) 12:33-36.
Wang, C. et al., “Integration of Immobilized Trypsin Bead Beds for Protein Degestion within a Microfluidic Chip Incorporating Capillary Electrophoresis Separations and an Electrospray Mass Spectrometry Interface,” Rapid Commin. Mass Spectrom. (2000) 14:1377-1383.
Woolley, A.T. et al., “Ultra-High-Speed DNA Fragment Separations Using Microfabricated Capillary Array Electrophoresis Chips,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1994) 91:11348-11352.
Woolley, A.T. et al., “Functional Integration of PCR Amplification and Capillary Electrophoresis in a Microfabricated DNA Analysis Device,” Anal. Chem. (1996) 68: 4081-4086.
Woolley, A.T. et al., “High-Speed DNA Genotyping Using Microfabricated Capillary Array Electrophoresis Chips,” Anal. Chem. (1997) 69:2181-2186.
Woolley, A.T. et al., “Capillary Electrophoresis Chips with Integrated Electrochemical Detection,” Anal. Chem. (1998) 70: 684-688.
Zhang, B. et al., “Microfabricated Devices for Capillary Electrophoresis-Electrospray Mass Spectrometry,” Anal. Chem. (1999) 71:3258-3264.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/264788 Jan 2001 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10/056219 Jan 2002 US
Child 10/702069 US