The present invention is directed to environmentally friendly shot for use in hunting and fishing. More particularly, the present invention is directed to a lead-free shot which avoids toxicity inherent in such mixtures.
Environmental concerns regarding the effects of lead, on humans and wildlife, have led to creation of a number of formulations used in formulating shot for shot gun shells and fishing weights which are non-toxic, i.e., which do not contain lead or other potentially harmful ingredients.
The present invention is directed to a non-toxic shot for use with fish and game, said non-toxic shot consisting essentially of 20-60% by weight tin; 40-60% by weight tungsten; and 0-10% by weight iron. Iron is added as a convenience for the Wildlife Commission, since leaded shot will be non-magnetic. The presence of iron will magnetize the shot and make it easily identifiable as a non-toxic formulation. The resulting shot formulation has a density which mimics that of conventional lead shot so the resulting pellets behave in a similar manner.
Another aspect of the present invention is a method of manufacturing the formulation used in making this non-toxic shot comprising the steps of a) combining powdered tin, powdered tungsten and powdered iron, 95% of all metallic particles having a particle size less than 325 mesh; powdered flux with in which 99.9% of the particles are less than 100 mesh; b) compaction forming the shot from the powdered metal mixture at 20-40 tons per square inch pressure; and, c) sintering the formed shot at a temperature in the range of 350 and 425° F. driving off the flux and enhancing bonding of the metallic components.
Various other features, advantages and characteristics of the present invention will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after a reading of the following specification.
A non-toxic formulation which has proven satisfactory for use with fish and game is comprised of various amounts of tungsten, tin and iron. It is preferred that these ingredients be mixed in quantities as follows: tungsten 40-60% by weight; tin 20-60% by weight; iron 0-10% by weight. While this formulation makes the iron component optional, a more preferred formula has a lower limit of 5%. This is to facilitate checking by the Fish and Game Commission, since magnetic formulaes are non-toxic or, stated more accurately, toxic (lead-containing) formulations are non-magnetic. The most preferred formulation comprises 38% by weight tin, 56% by weight tungsten and 6% by weight iron.
This formulation is made by the process of combining powdered tin, powdered tungsten and powdered iron, the particle size of each component having 95% by weight of particles being less than 325 mesh, together with a powdered flux of which 99.9% by weight has particles less than 100 mesh. A flux which has proven beneficial for this application is powdered ACRAWAX C available from Lanza Inc. of Fairlawn, N.J. (ACRAWAX is a registered trademark of Lanza Inc.) The purpose of the flux is to facilitate the proper blending of the metallic particles during sintering. The flux is added during the blending of the metallic particles in an amount ranging from 0.3-0.5% by weight of the metallic particles. The mixture is then compacted with pressures in the 20-40 ton per square inch range. The compaction formed material, is then sintered in a temperature range between 375 and 425° F. which bonds the metallic components and vaporizes the flux.
Various changes, alternatives and modifications will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art following a reading of the foregoing specification. It is intended that any such changes, alternatives and modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims be considered part of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5399187 | Mravic et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
6517774 | Bray et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6536352 | Nadkarni et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551375 | Siddle et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
7059233 | Amick | Jun 2006 | B2 |
20010053331 | Le Floc'h et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020124759 | Amick | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030056620 | Siddle et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040216589 | Amick | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050016411 | Amick | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050066850 | Leblanc et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 03033751 | Apr 2003 | WO |