1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to nuclear medicine devices, in particular the calibration of scintillation cameras to correct for non-uniformities in energy distribution as a function of position across the camera field of view.
2. Description of the Background Art
Nuclear medicine is a unique medical specialty wherein radiation is used to acquire images that show the function and anatomy of organs, bones or tissues of the body. Radiopharmaceuticals are introduced into the body, either by injection or ingestion, and are attracted to specific organs, bones or tissues of interest. Such radiopharmaceuticals produce gamma photon emissions that emanate from the body. One or more detectors are used to detect the emitted gamma photons, and the information collected from the detector(s) is processed to calculate the position of origin of the emitted photon from the source (i.e., the body organ or tissue under study). The accumulation of a large number of emitted gamma photons allows an image of the organ or tissue under study to be displayed.
The detector or camera of the “Anger” type is generally comprised of a scintillation crystal and an array of photo-multiplier tubes. The radiation photons interact with the scintillation crystal, which in turn produces light events or flashes of multiple light photons. The light from the crystal is detected by the array of photomultiplier tubes, which outputs a signal proportional to the energy of the incident gamma. The signal is then processed by a computer and stored as image data in a memory, which data is in turn translated into an image for viewing on a display monitor or printed out as a hard copy.
However, inaccuracies are introduced into the camera imaging due to the manufacturing process as well as the physical characteristics of the detecting apparatus. The major distortions are linearity errors, or spatial distortion, and energy non-uniformity across the face of the crystal. Spatial distortion generally arises from the fact that the geometric coordinates of light events occurring either at the edges of or between adjacent photomultiplier tubes in a photodetector array will be computed differently than the coordinates of events occurring directly over the center of a photomultiplier tube, due to the physical limitations of the photomultiplier tube. Therefore, when a radiation source interacts with the scintillation crystal at one x-y coordinate, it will appear in the image as a different x-y coordinate. Linearity correction methods to remedy such distortions, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,745,345 to Muehllehner, (incorporated herein by reference) generally are known in the art. Similarly, energy non-uniformity corrections also are generally known in the art, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,323,977 to Arseneau (incorporated herein by reference).
Uniformity distortions are present when the sensitivity of the detector to the energy of incident photons varies across the face of the crystal depending on its coordinate position, as opposed to energy variations in the radiation source. Addressing non-uniformity during manufacture would not be practicable and would drive up cost. However, uniformity is one of the most important specifications of gamma cameras and is used as a major indicator of image quality.
During scanning of a radiation source, there may be emissions or scattered events from unwanted sources, which if recorded can negatively affect the precision of the resulting image. Energy windows have been employed to prevent the recordation of energy events outside the window, thereby accepting only radiation emissions of a specified energy, which are added to the image data being accumulated. However, due to non-uniformities across the scintillation crystal, emissions with appropriate energy may appear to fall outside the energy window and so will not be recorded by the apparatus, thereby introducing image deterioration.
Current methods that attempt to correct non-uniformity, such as the so-called gradient procedure, improve uniformity but at the expense of linearity. Often, as uniformity is improved, the linearity distortion increases as well. Current methods do not adequately address the relationship between energy correction and linearity correction. If uniformity is corrected before linearity correction, uniformity correction cannot be achieved in totality. Consequently there exists a need in the art for achieving total uniformity while not compromising the linearity correction.
Embodiments of the current invention decouple geometric and energy correction to maximize optimal linearity and uniformity characteristics of a nuclear medicine imaging apparatus. Advancements in computing power, such as the recently developed Foresight hardware, enable more sophisticated algorithms in real time computation than have been previously allowed. Such newly available computational abilities enable new methodologies and systems for correcting distortions.
Embodiments of the present invention enable calibration of scintillation devices providing for linearity correction while achieving total uniformity. This is realized by use of a scintillation camera and a processor unit. First a generic energy map (GZmap) is obtained, which normalizes the energy for each event position. A linear correction is then applied to the generic Zmap to correct geometrical distortions, by use of dot pattern imaging. With use of the corrected generic Zmap, listmode flood data can be framed as an energy histogram matrix, wherein the spectrum of each pixel can be described, and is therefore a 3D matrix. A Twin Zmap (TZmap) then can be constructed by optimizing the boundaries of the energy window for each pixel, such that the energy of each pixel is equal to the average energy over the center field of view. This calibration is conducted using Co57, and therefore the energy spectrum can be scaled to achieve the same uniformity with other radiation source types.
Embodiments of the present invention are shown by way of example and not limitation in the accompanying figures, in which:
a) shows the grids obtained by the linearity dot pattern associated with the initial generic Zmap;
b) shows grids obtained from the linearity dot pattern images;
c) illustrates grid warping;
a) is a graph of a calibrated standard energy spectrum;
b) is a graph of an energy spectrum to be calibrated in accordance with the calibrated spectrum of
a) shows a flood image acquired with a Zmap obtained with use of the present invention; and
b) shows a flood image acquired by use of the new generic Zmap and Twin Zmap in accordance with the present invention.
While the present invention may be embodied in many different forms, a number of illustrative embodiments are described herein with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as providing examples of the principles of the invention and such examples are not intended to limit the invention to preferred embodiments described herein and/or illustrated herein.
One embodiment of an overall process according to the present invention is shown in
One calibration process to build a corrected GZmap in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is shown in
After the initial GZmap is obtained, it is corrected for linearity errors. A dot pattern image is acquired, wherein radiation sources are arranged in a particular pattern for detection by the scintillation crystal. This arrangement of the dot pattern is known and can be compared to the obtained image to calculate the resulting distortion. The detected dot pattern is corrected by the initial GZmap, and then compared with the known dot pattern to identify linearity distortions and generate Linearity Correction (LC) coefficients. The LC coefficients then are applied to the initial GZmap to result in a refined GZmap.
One embodiment of this process is illustrated more specifically in
{circumflex over (x)}=r(x, y) (1)
and
ŷ=s(x, y) (2)
For each quadrilateral region in the initial GZmap, the corresponding grid from the dot pattern can be identified. Using the two sets of grids, a pair of bilinear equations can be modeled so that
r(x, y)=c1x+c2y+c3xy+c4 (3)
and
s(x, y)=c5x+c6+c7xy+c8 (4)
Since there are a total of eight known tie points, four on the mesh of the initial GZmap matrix and four on the measured detector matrix, these equations can be easily solved for the eight coefficients ci, wherein i=1, 2, . . . 8. The coefficients constitute the model used to transform all pixels within the quadrilateral region characterized by the tie points used to obtain the coefficients.
Finally, the warped GZmap matrix can be expressed as
{circumflex over (Z)}=z({circumflex over (x)}, ŷ) (5)
Correcting the initial GZmap for linearity produces the refined GZmap, whereafter TZmap calibration then can be performed. One embodiment of the calibration process for building a TZmap is shown in
The energy peak of the spectrum is then located, and the window size is adjusted such that the area under each pixel is equal. From this, the flood uniformity can be obtained. Normalizing the window boundaries to unit energy gives the TZmap.
Locating the peak and adjusting the upper and lower boundary of the energy window for each pixel can be seen in
In Equation (6), f(x, y, t) is the energy spectrum at the detector image location (x, y) and t is the energy in keV, which is represented as the horizontal axis in
A(x, y)=0.9p(x, y) (7)
and
B(x, y)=1.1p(x, y) (8)
The average energy over the Center Field of View (CFOV) can be calculated as
where Δ is the area of the FOV. Then the calibration is that for any pixel (x, y), a and b can be optimized such that
C(a, b, x, y)=
The new boundary (a′, b′) is scaled for all pixels, therefore the new energy spectrum can be calibrated without acquiring any new flood data. Once energy is calibrated using the Co57, any other energy spectrum can be scaled to achieve the same uniformity. Therefore, for scanning patients or target subjects where the radiation source may not be Co57, such scaling would be required for proper imaging.
An example of the advantages of the invention can be seen in
The invention having been described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the same may be varied in many ways without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Any and all such modifications that would be apparent to those of skill in the art are intended to be covered by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4323977 | Arseneau | Apr 1982 | A |
4808826 | Lim et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4866615 | Ichihara | Sep 1989 | A |
4899054 | Barfod | Feb 1990 | A |
5371672 | Motomura et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
20050072928 | Wang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070252079 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |