Nonvolatile memory

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6277689
  • Patent Number
    6,277,689
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 11, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 21, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A nonvolatile memory cell is formed in an embedded P-well without the necessity of including an overlaying control gate. As a result, normal logic process technology may be utilized to form the nonvolatile memory cell. Through the use of substrate hot electron injection and the formation of a lateral bipolar transistor whose emitter acts as a charge injector, programming efficiency is improved and the necessary programming voltages and currents can be reduced from the relatively high voltages and currents used in other devices.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates generally to nonvolatile memories and particularly to electrically erasable nonvolatile memories.




Nonvolatile memory cells are advantageous since they retain recorded information even when the power to the memory is turned off. There are several different types of nonvolatile memories including erasable programmable read only memories (EPROMs), electrically erasable and programmable read only memories (EEPROMs) and flash EEPROM memories. EPROMs are erasable through light exposure but are electrically programmable by channel electron injection onto a floating gate. Conventional EEPROMs have the same programming functionality, but instead of being light erasable they can be erased and programmed by electron tunneling. Thus, information may be stored in these memories, retained when the power is off, and the memories may be erased for reprogramming, as necessary, using appropriate techniques. Flash EEPROMs are block erased, typically giving them better read access times than regular EEPROMs.




Currently, flash memories have gained considerable popularity. For example, flash memories are often utilized to provide on-chip memory for microcontrollers, modems and SMART cards and the like where it is desirable to store codes that may need fast updating.




While flash memories and EEPROMs are closely related, in many instances flash memories are preferred because their smaller cell size means that they can be made more economically. However, flash memories and EEPROMs often have very similar cell attributes.




Nonvolatile memory cells differ in certain respects from the transistors that are generally utilized in electronic components called logic devices, such as microcontrollers, that work with the memory cells. Logic devices are formed of transistors that use a single gate electrode. Nonvolatile memories usually include two gate electrodes, known as the control and floating gate electrodes, situated one over the other. Because of this structural difference, nonvolatile memories and logic devices may be made by different processes. This may contribute to a substantial increase in process complexity and manufacturing cost.




Particularly with an EEPROM, the electrical programming of the cells normally requires substantial potentials to be applied to the cells. These potentials induce electron tunneling from an N+ region onto the floating gate. Additional complexity may arise from the need to provide substantially larger voltages to memory cells than are needed for normal transistor operation.




While the industry has come to accept the need for separate process technologies for logic and nonvolatile memories and while those in the industry have also come to appreciate that significant voltages are needed to program EEPROMs and significant currents to program flash EEPROMs, there would be a substantial demand for a nonvolatile memory which was both electrically erasable and programmable without the need for special process technologies or for relatively higher programming voltages and higher currents.




Furthermore, with the conventional FLASH EEPROMs, the electrical programming of the cells normally requires high current to be applied to the cells. A relatively minute amount of this electron current becomes injected from the drain depletion region onto the floating gate. Therefore, the injection efficiency (e.g., 10


−6


to 10


−9


) is relatively low. The requirement of high current adds additional complexity because of the design of the high current pump operated at low voltage.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, an electrically erasable and programmable read-only memory includes a sensing cell with a floating gate electrode, a channel, a source and a drain. A bipolar transistor is adapted to supply electrons for programming the floating gate electrode by substrate hot electron injection of electrons on to the floating gate electrode through the channel depletion region. The bipolar transistor is arranged such that its collector is also the biased depletion region of the channel of the sensing cell.




In accordance with still another aspect, a nonvolatile memory includes a semiconductor layer of a first conductivity type. A first well of a second conductivity type opposite to the first conductivity type is formed in the semiconductor layer. The first well is an N-well biased to a potential equal to or more positive than Vss. A second well of the first conductivity type is embedded in the first well. The second well is a negatively biased P-well. A memory cell is formed in the second well. The cell includes a floating gate, a source and a drain. The source and drain are of the second conductivity type.




In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, a memory cell includes a semiconductor layer having a N-well. A P-well is embedded in the N-well. The sense transistor has a floating gate and a bipolar transistor arranged to inject electrons into the substrate. The injected (pump) electrons can be accelerated by the electric field under the sense transistor channel and get injected onto the floating gate.




In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, a method for programming a memory cell includes the step of turning off a select transistor. Carriers are caused to be injected onto the floating gate by substrate hot carrier injection.




In accordance with still another aspect of the present invention, a method for programming a memory cell includes the step of generating substrate electrons using a bipolar transistor. Substrate electrons are accelerated by the electric field under the channel and are injected onto the floating gate of the memory cell. These accelerated electrons are called substrate “hot” electrons.




In accordance with but another aspect of the present invention, a method for forming a memory cell includes the step of forming a floating gate over a channel in a substrate. A diffusion is formed in the substrate spaced from the channel underneath the floating gate and extending under the floating gate. A source and drain are formed for the cell, arranged substantially transversely to the length of the floating gate.




In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a nonvolatile memory comprises a sense transistor having a floating gate. A coupling capacitor is formed at one end of the floating gate. The coupling capacitor is arranged to control the potential on the floating gate. The floating gate is free of an overlaying control gate electrode. A tunneling capacitor is formed at another end of the floating gate. The tunneling capacitor provides a path for electrons to be removed from the floating gate. It also acts as part of a charge injector for supplying electrons to the channel region under the sense transistor. The tunneling capacitor includes a junction forming the emitter of a lateral bipolar transistor, the biased depletion region of the sense transistor channel under said floating gate acting as the collector of the lateral bipolar transistor.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING





FIG. 1

is a schematic depiction of one embodiment;





FIG. 2

is a top plan view showing the layout of a semiconductor implementation of the embodiment shown in

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is a cross-sectional view taken generally along the line 3—3 in

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view taken generally along the line 4—4 in

FIG. 2

; and





FIG. 5

is a schematic depiction of an array configuration for the cell shown in FIG.


1


.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Referring to the drawing wherein like reference characters are used for like parts throughout the several views, a memory cell


10


, shown in

FIG. 1

, includes a tunneling capacitor


18


, a sense transistor


12


, a select transistor


16


, and a coupling capacitor


14


. This structure is advantageously implemented on a semiconductor layer having situated thereon an electrically isolated floating gate


22


.




The tunneling capacitor


18


is controlled by the flash node


24


, and the coupling capacitor


14


is controlled by the control node


28


. The drain


29


of the sense transistor


12


is connected to the drain node


26


and the source


31


of select transistor


16


is connected to the source node


30


. The gate


33


of the select transistor


16


is connected to the select node


32


.




One layout for implementing the cell


10


, shown in

FIG. 2

, includes the flash node


24


which is implemented as a contact and a diffusion


25


which is typically an N-type diffusion. The floating gate


22


extends over the diffusion


25


to define the tunneling capacitor


18


. Similarly, the floating gate


22


extends over the diffusion


27


to define the coupling capacitor


14


. The control node


28


for the coupling capacitor


14


may be implemented by a contact, as shown in FIG.


2


.




The drain node


26


may include a contact as illustrated in

FIG. 2

which connects to a diffusion


29


. The source node


30


may be implemented by a contact as illustrated. The source of the sense transistor


12


and the drain of the select transistor


16


are common as indicated at


20


in FIG.


2


. The gate electrode of the select transistor


16


is formed as the conductive layer


33


which connects to a contact (not shown). A single pair of a source


30


and drain


26


contacts are operative to form two transistors with separate gates


22


and


33


.




The relationship of the sense transistor


12


and select transistor


16


is illustrated in FIG.


3


. The floating gate


22


forms the gate of a transistor having a drain


29


and a common junction


20


. Similarly, the gate


33


acts to control conduction between the source


31


and the common junction


20


. The sense transistor


12


includes a channel


47


while the select transistor


16


includes a channel


35


. In the illustrated embodiment, the channels


47


and


35


are P-type semiconductor material and are part of a P-well


34


. The P-well


34


in turn is formed in an N-well


36


. Finally, the N-well


36


is formed in a P-type substrate


38


. The P-well may be negatively biased, as indicated at


70


, and the N-well


36


may be positively biased, as indicated at


72


. The N-well


36


may be biased to a potential equal to or more positive than Vss.




Referring now to

FIG. 4

, the configuration of floating gate


22


in connection with the tunneling capacitor


18


and coupling capacitor


14


can be explained. The floating gate


22


extends over a pair of field oxide regions


50




a


,


50




b


which extend generally parallel to the source-to-drain direction of the sense transistor


12


and select transistor


16


. At one end in

FIG. 4

, the floating gate


22


forms the tunneling capacitor


18


by its interaction with the underlying region


25


which may be an N+ diffusion. A tunneling oxide


42


separates the floating gate


22


from the diffusion


25


. Similarly, the gate oxide


40


separates the floating gate


22


from the channel


47


. Finally, the floating gate


22


is separated by the oxide


51


from the diffusion


27


of the coupling capacitor


14


. Thus the floating gate


22


is part of a sense transistor


12


and the capacitors


14


and


18


.




The cell


10


may be described as a flash EEPROM utilizing high efficiency substrate hot electron injection for programming and Fowler-Nordheim tunneling for erasure. The process of substrate hot electron injection is well described in T. H. Ning, C. M. Osburn, and H. W. Yu “Emission Probability of Hot Electrons from Silicon into Silicon Dioxide”, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 48, p.286, (1977); Boaz Eitan, James L. McCreary, Daniel Amrany, Joseph Shappir, “Substrate Hot-electron Injection EPROM”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. ED-31, No. 7, p.934, (July 1984); I. C. Chen, C. Kaya, and J. Paterson, “Band-to-Band Tunneling Induced Substrate Hot-electron (BBISHE) injection: A New Programming Mechanism for Nonvolatile Memory Devices”, IEDM (1989) p.263; and C. Y. Hu, D. L. Kencke, S. K. Benerjee, “Substrate-current-induced Hot Electron (SCIHE) Injection: A New Convergence Scheme for FLASH Memory,” IEDM (1995), p.283. Each of these articles is hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.




Programming is achieved by high efficiency substrate hot electron injection. As indicated in

FIG. 4

, substrate electrons, indicated at


60


, are generated by forward biasing the diffusion


25


which is separated from the sense transistor


12


by the field oxide


50




a


. Some of the substrate electrons


60


diffuse through the region underneath the field oxide


50




a


to the channel region


47


underneath the sense transistor


12


. For cells that need to be programmed, the channel region


47


is biased such that a depletion region


48


is formed. When an electron gets to the depletion region


48


, it is accelerated by an electric field, Vcs, which is the difference between the channel


47


potential (potential of the surface inversion region) and the P-well


34


potential. Some of these electrons gain sufficient energy, in excess of the effective oxide barrier height potential, to be injected onto the floating gate


22


. For cells that are not to be programmed, the channel-to-P-well potential is less than the effective oxide barrier height. In such case, the electrons would not gain sufficient energy to overcome the barrier height and are not injected onto the floating gate


22


.




The diffusion


25


, the P-region under the field oxide


50




a


and the biased depletion region


48


under the sense transistor


12


form a lateral bipolar transistor


62


. The bipolar transistor


62


acts as a charge injector, injecting substrate electrons from the diffusion


25


onto the floating gate


22


. With the diffusion


25


as the emitter, the P-region under the field oxide


50




a


as the base, the collector is the depletion region


48


. The depletion region


48


is controlled by the N+ source


20


and N+ drain


29


, and the P-well


34


potential. Since the channel region


47


acts as the channel for reading the sense transistor


12


and as the collector of the bipolar transistor


62


during programming, a compact cell layout is achieved.




The efficiency of substrate hot electron injection is a function of a number of characteristics. Considering the depletion region


48


, electrons scatter with lattice phonon scattering across the depletion region


48


with a certain electron mean free path. Some of these electrons, without much scattering, gain sufficient energy to overcome the effective barrier height and are injected onto the floating gate


22


. Some electrons gain less energy than the effective barrier height and are not injected onto the floating gate


22


. The injection efficiency is a strong function of the doping concentrations and the channel-to-P-well potential, Vcs.




Since the cell


10


is situated in a P-well


34


embedded in an N-well


36


, during programming the floating gate


22


is capacitively coupled to a higher voltage through the coupling capacitor


14


by raising the diffusion


27


to Vpp, which may be from 7 to 14 volts. The voltage that the floating gate


22


attains is a function of the voltage on the floating gate when both the nodes


24


and


28


are at ground, plus the coupling ratio times the voltage on the node


28


. The coupling ratio to first order is approximately equal to the capacitance of the capacitor


14


divided by the sum of the capacitances of the coupling capacitor


14


, the tunneling capacitor


18


and the capacitance between the floating gate


22


and the channel region


47


.




When the select transistor


16


is off, the sense transistor drain


29


potential can be forced close to the supply potential Vcc or higher. Since the select transistor


16


is off, the source


20


potential follows the channel


47


potential. The channel


47


potential is the potential of the surface inversion region of the channel region. When the potential of the floating gate


22


is one sense transistor


12


threshold voltage higher than the drain


29


potential, the channel potential is the same as the drain potential. On the other hand, when the floating gate


22


potential is less than the drain


29


potential plus the sense transistor


12


threshold voltage, the channel potential is the difference between the floating gate


22


voltage and the sense transistor


12


threshold voltage.




The well potential is the voltage


70


applied to the P-well


34


. Since the P-well is embedded in an N-well


36


, and the N-well is set at a voltage


72


approximately Vss or higher, the P-well potential Vp can be biased negatively, typically negative one to negative two volts. Moreover, it is usually less than the effective oxide barrier height to avoid any potential disturb problem.




The potential difference between the channel


47


region and the P-well


34


potential (Vp)


70


is the voltage across the depletion region


48


. For cells to be programmed, the drain


29


voltage is raised high, typically close to Vcc. A depletion region


48


in the channel


47


underneath the sense transistor


12


is formed with a voltage drop equal to the channel potential minus the P-well potential


70


.




For those cells that are not to be programmed, the drain voltage


29


is set to zero volts. The voltage drop across the depletion region


48


then is equal to the absolute value of Vp, which is typically less than the effective oxide barrier height.




Cell


10


erasure is achieved by Fowler-Nordheim tunneling from the floating gate


22


to the node


24


. The node


24


is therefore called the flash node. During erasure, the floating gate


22


is capacitively coupled through the capacitor


14


to a potential close to ground by forcing the diffusion


27


to ground. As for the diffusion


25


, it is charged to a positive potential (Vpp) of from 7 to 14 volts. The voltage across the capacitor


18


is the difference between the floating gate


22


potential and the diffusion


25


potential. When the difference exceeds 8 to 10 volts, sufficient tunneling current is generated and the floating gate


22


can be erased to a negative potential in the time frame of a few milliseconds to a few seconds, depending on the tunneling oxide


42


thickness.




Reading the programming state of the cell


10


may be accomplished as follows. For the selected row the floating gate


22


is capacitively coupled to a higher potential by forcing the diffusion


27


to a potential of 1.8 to 5 volts. The floating gate


22


is coupled to a potential Vfg which can be calculated as being equal to the sum of the floating gate potential when both nodes


24


and


28


are held at ground, plus the potential on the control node


28


times the coupling ratio.




The drain


29


potential during reading is limited to a voltage of less than 2 volts. This is to avoid any read disturb.




For the selected cell to be read, the select node


32


is forced to Vcc, and the source node


30


is forced to ground. The unselected gates


33


and the nodes


28


,


30


and


32


are also forced to ground. The unselected column


26


is also forced to ground.




When these potentials are applied to the selected cell, a current flows through the sense transistor


12


. This current is then fed to a current sense amplifier (not shown) If the voltage on the floating gate


22


is greater than the threshold voltage on the sense transistor


12


, and a higher current, perhaps greater than


20


microamps flows, the cell state is detected as the conducting state. When the potential of the floating gate is less than the threshold voltage, a lower current, for example or less than one microamp flows, and a nonconducting state is detected.




A detected conducting state can be called a one state. A nonconducting state can be called the zero state.




The operation of the cell in programming, reading and erasing, for an exemplary embodiment, is summarized in the following example:















Cell Operation















Erase




Program




Read


















(Selected)




(Unselected)




(Select)




(Unselected)




(Select)




(Unselected)





















FLASH (24)




Vpp




Vss




Vs




Vs or Vss




Vss




Vss






Drain (26)




Float




Float




≧Vcc




*0 or ≧Vcc




˜1.5 V




*0 or ˜1.5 V






Source (30




Float




Float




Float




Float




Vss




Vss






Select (32)




Vss




Vss




Vss




Vss




Vcc




Vss






Control (28)




Vss




Vss




Vpp




Vss




2-5 V




Vss






N-well (36)




Vcc




Vcc




Vcc to Vss




Vcc to Vss




Vcc




Vcc






P-well (34)




Vss




Vss




Vss to −2




Vss to −2




Vss




Vss











*0 is for an unselected column.













Vs is the node voltage set by the injection current level, ranging from a few nanoamps to a few tens of microamps depending on the programming speed requirement. Typically it would be from tens of milliseconds to tens of microseconds. Vbias is the bias on the P-well


34


which can be Vss or it can be forced to −1 to −2 volts to enhance injection efficiency. A suitable on-chip circuit for generating two negative bias potentials, one to bias the diffusion


31


and the other to negatively bias the P-well


34


, can be found in L. A. Glasser and D. W. Dobberpuhl, “The Design and Analysis of VLSI Circuits”, (December 1985), published by Addison-Wesley, at pages 301-329, hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein. Vss is the external ground potential.




While the cell


10


may be utilized as a single element as shown in

FIG. 1

, it can also be connected as an array as shown in FIG.


5


. In the array, a plurality of cells


10


,


10




a


,


10




b


,


10




c


,


10




d


and,


10




e


are depicted. The flash node


24


is formed by connecting all of the flash nodes of cells in the same row as one single node. This enables all cells on the same row to be erased and programmed at the same time.




The control node


28


is formed by connecting all the control nodes of the individual cells in the same row together as a single node. This enables the floating gate


22


for all cells on the same row to rise to a relatively high potential (Vpp) during programming, such as 7-14 volts, at the same time and close to Vcc during read. All cells on the same row (which can be byte wide or page wide) can then be programmed together.




The source node


36


is formed by connecting the source lines for all the cells on the same row together. Similarly, the select gate node


32


can be formed by connecting together all the cells of the same row as a single node.




The drain node


26


is formed by connecting all the drain nodes for cells in the same column together as a single node. This node leads to the sense amplifier (not shown).




The cells in the array maybe formed using conventional process technologies such as a single poly, double metal process. Because there is no control gate electrode, a process technology that is completely compatible with normal logic process technology may be utilized.




The illustrative parameters set forth herein contemplate a 0.35 μm or higher feature size with Vcc potentials of 2.7 volts or higher. As the technology permits lowering voltages and smaller feature sizes, the parameters herein would scale accordingly.




The starting substrate material is typically P-type (100) silicon, for example having a resistivity range of 10-25 ohm-cm. The P-well


34


is embedded in an N-well


36


in the so-called triple well process. The P-well


34


has a typical well depth of, for example, 2 to 4 μm with an average doping concentration, for example, in the range of 1×10


16


to 5×10


16


atoms per cubic centimeter.




The N-well has a typical well depth of, for example, 4-8 μm. The doping concentration may be from 4×10


15


to 1×10


16


atoms per cubic centimeter. The triple well is formed by the P-well


34


counterdoping the N-well


36


.




The formation of the elements in the triple well is as follows. An N-well implant is done, for example, with phosphorous (P


31


) with a typical dose of 1.0 to 1.5×10


13


atoms per square centimeter and energies from 160 Kev to about 100 Kev. The N-well implant is driven using a high temperature step which may typically be 6 to 12 hours at 1125 to 1150° C. The N-well


36


is then counterdoped with a P-well implant. Typical dosages for the P-well implant could be 1.5 to 2.5×10


13


atoms per square centimeter with energies of 30 Kev to 180 Kev using a species such as boron (B11).




The N-well


36


and P-well


34


are then driven, typically 6 to 10 hours at 1125 to 1150° C. This sets the wells to the desired doping concentrations and depths.




After well formation, standard logic field oxide formation and channel stop formation steps are applied. The field oxide


50


and implant doses are adjusted to achieve a field threshold of 7 to 14 volts, which is determined by the Vpp level for programming and erasing and by logic process capability. After field oxide and channel stop formation, the N+ diffusions


25


and


27


are formed using an ion implant, such as a phosphorus implant, with an energy of 30-60 Kev and a dose of 1.2×10


14


to 2.5×10


14


atoms per square centimeter. This may be followed by an anneal cycle of 925 to 1000° C. for 15 to 35 minutes.




After the formation of the N+ diffusions


25


and


27


, the gate oxide


40


and the tunnel oxide


42


are formed. For example, a 70 to 90 A dry oxide may be grown across the wafer followed by a resist masking step. The resist may cover everything except the tunnel oxide


42


region and the periphery N channel and P channel regions. The N and P channel threshold adjustment implants are then done into all the areas that are not covered by resist. A buffered oxide etch (BOE) is used to etch off the oxide in the region that is not covered by resist. After resist removal, a dry oxide is grown to a thickness 85 to 100 Angstroms, for example, at 900° C. in partial oxygen followed by a 975 to 1050° C. anneal. This forms a gate oxide


40


with a typical thickness of 120 to 150 Angstroms and a tunnel oxide


42


of 85 to 100 Angstroms.




The floating gate


22


may then be formed of polysilicon, silicide or metals after the oxide


40


has been grown. Standard gate patterning is used and source/drain implant steps follow the gate patterning. This sequence forms two capacitors and two transistors. The tunnel oxide


42


is sandwiched between two electrodes, the N+ diffusion


25


and the floating gate


22


. This forms the tunneling capacitor


18


. The gate oxide


40


sandwiched between the floating gate


22


and the N+ diffusion


27


forms the coupling capacitor


14


. The gate oxide


40


that is sandwiched between the floating gate and the channel region


47


forms the sense transistor


12


. The select transistor


16


is formed by the gate oxide


40


and the select gate


33


.




With the completion of these capacitor and transistor structures, all subsequent processing for contacts and interconnect layers follows standard logic rear end processing.




While a number of parameters and levels were provided in the foregoing description, those skilled in the art will appreciate that these parameters and levels are merely for illustration purposes. For example, by reversing the conductivity types of the doped junctions and the bias polarities, a cell structure using substrate hot hole injection may be implemented. It is intended that the appended claims cover all modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.



Claims
  • 1. A method for forming a memory cell comprising:forming a floating gate over a channel in a substrate; forming a diffusion in said substrate spaced from said channel underneath said floating gate and extending under said floating gate; forming a source and drain for said cell arranged substantially transversely to the length of said floating gate; and forming said cell in a P-well embedded in an N-well, and providing for negative biasing of said P-well.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 including the step of forming a pair of capacitors associated with the ends of said floating gate.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 including the step of forming a select transistor having a common junction with said source of said cell.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 including the step of forming said cell without providing a control gate over said floating gate.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 including the step of forming a field oxide region on one side of said cell.
  • 6. The method of claim 5 including forming a lateral bipolar transistor extending under said field oxide region.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 including the step of forwarding biasing the emitter of said bipolar transistor for programming.
  • 8. A method for forming a memory cell comprising:forming a floating gate over a channel in a substrate; forming a source and drain for said cell arranged substantially transversely to the length of said floating gate; and forming a lateral bipolar transistor and biasing the emitter of said bipolar transistor to program said memory cell.
  • 9. The method of claim 8 including forming a diffusion in said substrate spaced from said channel and extending under said floating gate.
  • 10. The method of claim 8 including forming a pair of capacitors associated with the ends of said floating gate.
  • 11. The method of claim 10 including forming a select transistor having a common junction with said cell.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 including forming said cell without providing a control gate over the floating gate.
  • 13. The method of claim 8 including forming said cell in a P-well embedded in an N-well and negatively biasing said P-well.
  • 14. The method of claim 8 including forming a field oxide region on one side of said cell and forming said lateral bipolar transistor extending under said field oxide region.
Parent Case Info

This is a divisional of prior application Ser. No. 08/840,303 filed Apr. 11, 1997 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,896,315.

US Referenced Citations (6)
Number Name Date Kind
5301150 Sullivan et al. Apr 1994
5440159 Larsen et al. Aug 1995
5504706 D'Arrigo et al. Apr 1996
5514889 Cho et al. May 1996
5736764 Chang Apr 1998
5742542 Lin et al. Apr 1998
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
0 493 640 A1 Jul 1992 EP
0776 049 A1 May 1997 EP
285777 Sep 1996 TW
WO 9400881 Jan 1994 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Diorio et al., “A Single-Transistor Silicon Synapse”, IEEE Transactions On Electron Devices, vol. 43, No. 11, Nov. 1996 (pp. 1972-1980).