The present invention is directed to a nozzle for use in a rotational casting machine used for applying one or more coats of liquid elastomer, such as polyurethane, to a rotating body, such as a pipe, cylinder, and the like, whereby an elastomer covering or coating is applied to the exterior or interior of the pipe, cylinder, or the like. The body being coated may be used in steel or paper mills, or many other industries, in order to protect the body proper during end-use, as well as for providing other desired properties. Rotational casting machines, that rotationally mount a body to be coated with polyurethane or other liquid elastomer, are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,601,881 and 5,658,386-Grimm, et al., and include a translational and vertically-adjustable mixing head in which is formed the polyurethane to be used for coating the body. Polyurethane chemicals such as polyols, isocyanates, catalysts, etc. are metered to the mixing head. In this process the liquid materials are dispensed onto the body being coated and react very quickly to produce the solid polyurethane that will cover or coat the body. The hardness of the elastomer-coating is controlled by the types of polyols used and their mixture-ratio, along with the corresponding adjustment of the amount of isocynate added to the mixture in the mixing head, in order to obtain hardness in both Shore A to Shore D ranges. The hardness desired for the elastomer depends upon many factors, such as end-use of the body being coated.
A considerable problem with rotational casting machines is the trade-off of forming a liquid polyurethane having a desired viscosity and reactivity in order to prevent run-off or dripping of the applied elastomer from the body being coated during the coating process, and the need to prevent the clogging of the dispensing head attached to, and forming part of, the mixing head during the coating-application process. If the viscosity is made too great or reactivity too fast, then the dispensing head tends to become clogged faster, requiring more frequent down-time in order to unclog and clean the dispensing head. Presently-used dispensing heads, such as that disclosed in above-mentioned U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,601,881 and 5,658,386, are sheet-die extruders or nozzles, which sheet-die nozzles are provided with an exit slot the width of the nozzle, in order to ensure that a wider swath of coat-application is applied. However, the problem with these prior-art dispensers is that each hypothetical section of the liquid elastomer exiting the dispensing head at the exit thereof has not, typically, had the same dwell-time in the dispensing nozzle along the width and the length thereof, whereby there is not ensued that the exothermically formed elastomer has the same properties throughout when applied to the body to be coated. Minimum dwell-time and uniform discharge from the nozzle in order to ensure equality and sameness of properties throughout is a highly desirable property in order to prevent build up, hardening or curing of the liquid elastomer therein and the concomitant clogging of the nozzle and exterior build up of whiskers or “stalactites” due to differential residence-time of the material in the nozzle. Moreover, the height and width of the slit of these sheet-die nozzles are dependent upon the viscosity and/or the reactivity of the material being dispensed, thus necessitating the replacement of one sheet-die with another one having a different slit-height and slit-width when materials of differing viscosity/reactivity are used. However, even changing sheet-dies in order to accommodate materials of different viscosity/reactivity in order to prevent frequent clogging of the sheet-die in order to obtain the desired coating thickness, has still not solved the problem of the frequent clogging and associated frequent down-times when sheet-die nozzles are used. This may be attributed to the fact that the flow of the material in the dispensing nozzle is not laminar, causing variation in dwell-time of the liquid in the nozzle, such that the dwell-time for some segments of the liquid are greater than a required minimum, leading to at least partial solidification of those segments in the interior of the nozzle. Over time, a build-up of solidified material develops, causing clogging at or near the exit, as well as interiorly thereof which forms the build up of solidified whiskers or “stalactites” of reacted material that interferes with the material deposition on the body.
In conjunction with the need for a relatively thin exit stream of liquid material from the nozzle to ensure adequate support for the mass of the applied liquid material to the body to be coated, the rotational speed of the body being coated, and the relative translational speed between the nozzle and rotating body, must be coordinated with the speed of the liquid material exiting from the nozzle. If the rotational speed of the rotating body were to be too great in comparison to the exit speed of the liquid material from the nozzle-exit, then the applied coat may be thinner than required, and require additional coating layers to be applied to the rotating body, reducing the efficiency of the process, and also would cause air to become entrapped in the applied liquid, causing air blisters to form, since there would not be enough time for the applied stream to push out the air between the applied stream and the surface of the rotating body. On the other hand, if the rotational speed were to slow, then productivity and efficiency of the process would be adversely affected, would also increase the likelihood of premature curing, causing the eventual clogging of the nozzle, and uneven application of the coating to the rotating body. Similarly, if the relative translational motion between the exit-nozzle and the rotating body were too great, then air blisters would form, and, in addition, an applied coating of liquid material thinner than is required and optimal would be formed. Similarly, if the relative translational motion between the exit-nozzle and the rotating body were too slow, the efficiency and productivity of the process would be adversely affected, and would also cause an applied coating that would be too thick, thus causing dripping of the applied liquid from the body being coated, as well as potentially uneven thickness of the applied coat.
The need and requirement for optimal correspondence between exit speed of the liquid from the nozzle, the thickness of the exiting stream of liquid, the rotational speed of the rotating body being coated relative to this exit speed of the liquid from the nozzle, and the relative translational speed between the nozzle and the rotating body being coated has imposed significant constraints as to linear distance the exit of the nozzle of the rotating casting machine may be from the surface of the rotating body being coated. Presently-used rotational casting machines provide an outer limit of only approximately 5 mm. of the nozzle-exit from the surface of the rotating body being coated. A distance greater than 5 mm. has been found to cause excessive clogging of the nozzle, with a concomitant increase of downtime of the machine for unclogging the nozzle. This excessive clogging ensues from the fact that as the nozzle-exit distance from the surface to be coated is increased, the exit-speed of the liquid must be increased in order to compensate therefor. The increase in speed of the liquid through the nozzle increases turbulent flow in the nozzle, thus increasing the dwell-time of the liquid in the nozzle, and the increased curing thereof in the nozzle, with the ensuing clogging of the nozzle, as discussed hereinabove. Besides the increased clogging of the nozzle, air blisters form in the applied coating of liquid, for the reasons described hereinabove due to the increased exit speed of the liquid from the nozzle-exit.
Another considerable problem with the sheet-die nozzle of
It is the primary objective of the present invention to provide an improved nozzle for a rotational casting machine, which nozzle overcomes the above-mentioned drawbacks and limitations of prior-art nozzles for rotational casting machines.
It also the primary objective of the present invention to provide such an improved nozzle for a rotational casting machine, which nozzle increases the efficiency and productivity of the rotational casting machine, reduces downtime thereof, more effectively coats cylindrical bodies, is able to effectively coat cylindrical bodies of smaller diameter than hitherto possible, and is better able to prevent air-blistering of the coating.
Toward these and other ends, the liquid-dispensing nozzle for rotational casting machines comprises a liquid-flow interior passageway that changes shape along the longitudinal axis thereof from inlet to outlet, but which maintains a constant cross-sectional area throughout the changing cross-sectional shapes, whereby laminar flow occurs throughout the interior flow-passageway of the nozzle, to thus minimize the dwell-time of the liquid in the nozzle, and, thereby, considerably reduce and minimize clogging of the nozzle.
In accordance with the nozzle of the present invention, the exit or outlet thereof is formed as a narrow, elongated slit or opening, in the manner somewhat similar to the slit or opening of the prior-art sheet-die nozzle, in order to maintain the advantages thereof. However, the interior passageway of the nozzle continually changes shape from the inlet to the outlet thereof, in order to ensure a constant cross-sectional area of the interior passageway along the length thereof, and in order to arrive at the desired narrow, elongated outlet, ensuring consistent pressure of the liquid across the entire area, whereby laminar flow of the liquid is achieved with the concomitant reduced dwell-time of the liquid polyurethane therein, in order to reduce in-nozzle reaction and subsequent clogging of the nozzle.
Reference is had to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring now to the drawings in greater detail, and to
In accordance with the nozzle of the present invention, the nozzle of the invention defines one main, unbranched interior passageway 50 through which the liquid from the mixing head is dispensed onto a rotating body held by the rotational casting machine. The interior passageway of the nozzle of the invention periodically changes cross-sectional shape, as further described hereinbelow. The interior flow passageway is so configured as to ensure that the flow of the liquid is entirely laminar therethrough. This laminar flow ensures the shortest possible dwell-time of any hypothetical element of liquid therein. Since the liquid polyurethane has been formed by exothermic reaction in the mixing head via the metered in chemical reactants, and since the liquid has a short, reaction time once exiting the mixing head, any delay of passage through the nozzle would cause the liquid to solidify within the nozzle passageway, to cause the clogging thereof, as has been the problem with prior-art, rotational casting machine dispensing nozzles, as described hereinabove. By ensuring laminar flow throughout the length of the passageway of the nozzle of the invention, dwell time is reduced, and the concomitant reaction of the liquid and clogging of the passageway thereby is greatly reduced as compared to prior art rotational casting machine dispensing nozzles.
Referring now to
Referring again to
It is to be understood that the length of the interior passageway 50 of the nozzle 40 may vary depending on a number of factors, such as the type of pre-polymers used, the specific liquid elastomer applied, the size and type of body to be coated, and the like. The length of two inches for the passageway 50 shown in the drawings and described above has been given by way of example only, and is not meant nor intended to be limiting. Moreover, the actual various cross-sectional shapes in the interior passageway 50 shown in the drawings and discussed hereinabove, where the cross-sectional area of each such shape is the same as another, are shown by way of example, and is not intended to exclude other shapes and cross-sectional areas, as long as the cross-sectional area of each such shape is the same as another such shape, in order to ensure equality of dwell-time of each hypothetical section of flowing liquid polyurethane therein, where the outlet-opening 52 is of such size and shape so as to ensure a spray or application of liquid elastomer coating, such as polyurethane, to a body that allows the drying of the liquid polyurethane on the body being coated before dripping occurs, which also ensures an even thickness to the applied coating, and which also prevents air-blistering. Owing to this constancy of cross-sectional area along the length of the interior passageway 50 after the venturi-flow inlet-section, the flow through the entire interior passageway is substantially laminar, having a Reynolds number of less than 2100.
With the nozzle 40 of the present invention, it is possible to coat bodies of smaller diameter as compared with the prior-art nozzles of
It is, also, noted that the nozzle of the invention may be provided with one or more additional interior passageways identical to interior passageway 50 if increased liquid-elastomer deposition rates are desired, as, for example, when coating extra large and/or long bodies. In this modification, the plurality of interior passageways 50 would preferably be equally-spaced apart along the width of the main housing of the nozzle.
For the example given above, with the cross-sectional shapes and dimensions shown in the
The inlet and outlet cross-sections are both considered to be in x-y planes, separated by a distance dz in the z-axis, where each point on the inlet is matched up with a point on the outlet. Create a new cross-section profile using the following equations to transform each point of the inlet/outlet profile.
Xnew=(Xinlet+Xoutlet)/2
Ynew=(Yinlet+Youtlet)/2
Determine the cross-sectional area of the new profile. Then, to calculate all of the new cross-sections, use the following algorithm:
n=8(Anew/Ainlet−1)
For each z in the range {Zinlet . . . Zoutlet}
t=(z−Zinlet)/(Zoutlet−Zinlet)
If t is in the range {0 . . . 0.50}, then
p=2 t2
s=(−2n1)4+nt2+1)−0.5
If t is in the range {0.50 . . . 1}, then
p=1−2(1−t)2
s=(−2n(t−1)4+n(t−1)2+1)0.5
For each (x, y) point in the inlet/outlet profiles
x=s[(1−p)xinlet+pxoutlet]
y=s[(1−p)yinlet+pyoutlet]
Next (x, y) point
Next z
Software code listing for performing the above-detailed algorithm is as follows:
Copyright Kastalon, Inc. 2003
While a specific embodiment of the invention has been shown and described, it is to be understood that numerous changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The dispensing nozzle described hereinabove may have applications and uses in machines other than rotational casting apparatuses, and may also have application and use in the dispensing of other fluids, whether liquid or gas, and not just elastomers.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
873301 | Cummings et al. | Dec 1907 | A |
2945739 | Lehmicke | Jul 1960 | A |
3834629 | Hellman et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
4141507 | Rump | Feb 1979 | A |
4151955 | Stouffer | May 1979 | A |
4300723 | Prasthofer | Nov 1981 | A |
4466854 | Hawerkamp | Aug 1984 | A |
4494698 | Brown et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4565515 | Maier | Jan 1986 | A |
4689003 | Schreiner et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4721251 | Kondo et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4741286 | Itoh et al. | May 1988 | A |
4758397 | Schreiner et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4801955 | Miura et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4852773 | Standlick et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4982896 | Crow | Jan 1991 | A |
5028006 | DeWinter et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5031426 | Wilson | Jul 1991 | A |
5470515 | Grimm et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5490554 | Moritz | Feb 1996 | A |
5587117 | Eisen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5601881 | Grimm et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5658386 | Grimm et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5704982 | Oudard et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5895689 | Gajewski | Apr 1999 | A |
5895806 | Gajewski | Apr 1999 | A |
5902540 | Kwok | May 1999 | A |
6394369 | Goenka et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6464154 | Heaslip et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050230505 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |