Skolnick et al. From genes to protein structure and function: novel applications of computational approaches in the genomic era. Trends in Biotech 18(1): 34-39, 2000.* |
Bork, A. Powers and pitfalls in sequence analysis: the 70% hurdle. Genome Res 10: 398-400, 2000.* |
Doerks et al. Protein annotation: detective work for function prediction. Trends in Genetics 14(6): 248-250, 1998.* |
Smith et al. The challenges of genome sequence annotation or “The devil is in the details”. Nature Biotech 15: 1222-1223, 1997.* |
Brenner, S.E. Errors in genome function. Trends in Genetics 15(4): 132-133, 1999.* |
Bork et al. Go hunting in sequence databases but watch out for the traps. Trends in Genetics. 12(10): 425-427, 1996.* |
Wells. J.A. Additivity of mutational effects in proteins. Biochemistry 29 (37): 8509-8517, 1990.* |
Ngo et al. Computational complexity, protein structure prediction, and the Levinthal paradox. The Protein Folding Problem and Tertiary Structure Prediction, pp. 492-495, 1994.* |
Lerche, C., et al; “Molecular Cloning and Functional Expression of KCNQ5, a Potassium Channel Subunit That May Contribute to Neuronal M-current Diversity”; The Journal of Biological Chemistry; Jul. 21, 2000; pp. 22395-22400; vol. 275; No. 29; The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.; United States. |
Schroeder, B., et al; “KCNQ5, a Novel Potassium Channel Broadly Expressed in Brain Mediates M-Type Currents”; The Journal of Biological Chemistry; Aug. 4, 2000; pp 24089-24095; vol. 275; No. 31; The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.; United States. |