The field of the invention digital imaging.
Several years ago the present inventors pioneered the concept of using digitally captured images to identify objects within the images, and then using such identifications to retrieve information from various databases. Examples include:
In such embodiments it was specifically contemplated that analysis of the images could be performed locally (i.e. on the cell phone, PDA or other device capturing the image), distally at a server, or more preferably using some combination of the two. It was also contemplated that any available database could be accessed to provide the returned information, including publicly accessible databases on the Internet. It was not appreciated, however, that one could integrate these concepts with the searching capabilities of standard Search Engines.
In the 1990s Yahoo!™ introduced the idea of indexing web pages accessible on Internet, and providing a Search Engine that to access the index. Since that time dozens of other searching systems have been developed, which use all manner of various search methods, algorithms, hardware and/or software. All such systems and methods that accept user inputs of Key Information, and then utilize such Key Information to provide the user with information of interest, are referred to herein as Search Engines. The user, of course, can be a natural person, as well as a device (computing or otherwise), algorithm system, organization, or any other entity. In searching for information, a Search Engine can utilize any suitable search domain, including for example:
In a typical search, Key Information is provided to the Search Engine in the form of key words comprising text, numbers, strings, or other machine-readable information types. The Search Engine then searches its indices of web pages for matches, and returns to the user a hyperlinked listing of Internet Uniform Resource Locators (“URLs”), as well as some brief display of context in which the key word(s) are used. The information of interest can sometimes be found in the hyperlinked listing, but is more frequently found by linking directly to the listed web pages.
Providing Key Information to Search Engines in the form of text strings has inherent difficulties. It involves strategy in the selection of the text to be entered, and even with respect to the format of the keywords (for example using wildcards). Another difficulty is that small computing and/or telephony devices (e.g. telephones, both mobile and non-mobile), have small and/or limited keyboards, thus making text entry difficult.
The present invention provides apparatus, systems and methods in which: (a) a digital photograph, video, MPEG, AVI, or other image is captured using a camera equipped cell phone, PDA, or other image capturing device; (b) key words or other search criteria are automatically extracted or derived from image; (c) the search criteria are submitted to a Search Engine to obtain information of interest; and (d) at least a portion of the resulting information is transmitted back locally to, or nearby, the device that captured the image.
Some images so utilized will include symbolic content that is sufficient in and of itself to be relatively non-ambiguous. Such symbolic content, for example, can be a telephone number or a web-site address. In such instances the symbolic content search criteria can advantageously be utilized as a literal in the search criteria. In other instances significant additional processing can be needed. For example, an image of an automobile will likely need to be processed to determine the make and model, and that information (e.g. Mercedes™ S500™) can then be transmitted to the Search Engine to be used as key words for a search. It is also contemplated that processing of some images will result in only best guesses. Thus, a side view of an automobile can not be analyzable into a particular make and model, and in that case the system can provide more generic terms such as SUV or automobile.
In general, the present invention provides technology and processes that can accommodate linking objects and images to information via a network such as the Internet, which require no modification to the linked object. Traditional methods for linking objects to digital information, including applying a barcode, radio or optical transceiver or transmitter, or some other means of identification to the object, or modifying the image or object so as to encode detectable information in it, are not required because the image or object can be identified solely by its visual appearance. The users or devices can even interact with objects by “linking” to them. For example, a user can link to a vending machine by “pointing and clicking” on it. His device would be connected over the Internet to the company that owns the vending machine. The company would in turn establish a connection to the vending machine, and thus the user would have a communication channel established with the vending machine and could interact with it.
The present invention contemplates any suitable decomposition algorithms. Clearly, faster and more accurate algorithms are preferred over slower and less accurate algorithms. It is especially preferred that algorithms are chosen such that at least some processing can take place locally to the device that captures the image. Such processing can in many instances eliminate the need to wirelessly transmit detailed images, and can eliminate reliance on a distal server that might be oversubscribed. Thus, some or all of the image processing, including image/object detection and/or decoding of symbols detected in the image can be distributed arbitrarily between the mobile (client) device and the server. In other words, some processing can be performed in the client device and some in the server, without specification of which particular processing is performed in each, or all processing can be performed on one platform or the other, or the platforms can be combined so that there is only one platform. The image processing can be implemented in a parallel computing manner, thus facilitating scaling of the system with respect to database size and input traffic loading.
It is further contemplated that some suitable algorithms will take into account the position and orientation of an object with respect to the user at the time the image was captured, which can be determined based on the appearance of the object in an image. This can be the location and/or identity of people scanned by multiple cameras in a security system, a passive locator system more accurate than GPS or usable in areas where GPS signals cannot be received, the location of specific vehicles without requiring a transmission from the vehicle, and many other uses.
Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a system and process for identifying digitally captured images without requiring modification to the object.
Another object is to use digital capture devices in ways never contemplated by their manufacturer.
Another object is to allow identification of objects from partial views of the object.
Another object is to provide communication means with operative devices without requiring a public connection therewith.
Various other objects, features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention, along with the accompanying drawings in which like numerals represent like components.
Search Engine-Related Embodiments
In
In general, the portable device 410 captures an image 412 of an object 415; and transmits information 413 regarding the image to the server 420. At least one of the device 410 and the server 420 derives a search term 421A, 421B from at least one of the image 412 and the transmitted information 413, respectively. At least one of the device 410 and the server 420 cause the search term 421A, 421B to be submitted via a network 425 to a search engine 430 that uses an index 432 of web pages or other information. The search engine then uses the search term 421A, 421B to produce a results set 434, and causes at least a portion of the results set 434 to be transmitted back to the portable device 410. In the above discussion it should be appreciated that information regarding the Image can include the entire image, one or more subsets of the image, as well as a name or other information derived from the image, but not contained within the image. It should also be appreciated that one could use a proxy server between his/her portable device and the server. I short, the present application contemplates using any complexity of circuitous communication between the mobile client and server—not necessarily a direct connection.
Device 410 can be a cell phone, PDA, laptop computer, or any other portable device that optically captures an image. By “optically captures” is meant some sort of light sensitive array, the output of which can be processed to comprise a visually perceptible image. Viewed from another perspective, device 410 can be any camera having telephony capability, and especially having cell phone capability. With current technology, device 410 would usually have a lens or other light focusing mechanism although it is contemplated that advances in electronics can eliminate the need for any physical focusing mechanism. The term “optically captures” is not satisfied by a device that has not optical components, and is merely capable of downloading images from the Internet or other sources.
It is certainly contemplated that the cell phone or other device providing the services discussed herein would operate software permitting it to do so. That software could be resident on the device, in external memory (memory card), or paged in as needed.
Object 415 (referred to as a Thing of Interest” in one or more of the priority applications) can be any visually perceptible object, regardless of dimension. Contemplated “two dimensional objects” include objects in which the relevant information is substantially in two dimensional format, which includes advertisements and articles in magazine or other print media, as well as photographs or designs on billboards, street signs, restaurant or other business signs, user manuals, paintings at a museum, and so forth.
Contemplated three dimensional objects include substantially all physical objects in which the relevant information is derived from the shape of the object and/or the appearance of the surface of the object. Thus, an automobile is considered herein to have three dimensions of relevance where the shape or other dimensions convey information about the make and model. Similarly, a window in a building can be considered to have three dimensions of relevance where the identity of the manufacturer or distributor can be gleaned from the overall physical dimensions, detail, and so forth. As another example, a beverage container can be considered to have three dimensions; information can be obtained from the shape of the container but further information can also be obtained from the label, printing, logos, text, or other such visible markings on the container (obtaining information from visible markings on the container enables discrimination between different containers that have identical physical shape). Contemplated three dimensional objects include substantially all physical objects in which the relevant information is derived from changes over time. For example, the speed of a bird or its flight patterns, or a gesture of a person, can be captured in multiple images over a period of time, and can be relevant information, and can be reduced to search terms (referred to as Key Information in one or more of the priority documents) for submission to a search engine. Of course, many objects will be considered to have two, three or four dimensions of relevance herein. Thus, relevant information for an automobile can be provided by each of a two-dimensional logo on the side of the vehicle, the three dimensional shape of the vehicle, and its four dimensional acceleration or handling features.
It is especially contemplated that objects can include animate and inanimate objects. Among animate objects are included faces of people, and biometric information such as the fingerprint pattern on a human finger, an iris of a person, and so forth.
Image 412 is contemplated to be any array of pixels. In most cases the pixels will be regularly arranged, but that is not absolutely necessary. In most cases the pixels also will number greater than 19,200 (160×120), such as 78,800 (320×240) but they can number few than that. More preferred images have greater pixel counts, including for example, 256,000 (640×400), more preferably at least 2 million, and even more preferably at least 4 million. It is not necessary that the image be actually constructed at the portable device. Thus, a statement that “the portable device captures an image of an object” includes situations where the device receives and derives data from light emitted or reflected from the object, even if the data is never presented to a user as a visually perceptible image, and even if the data is sent to a distal server without ever being collected into an image by the device.
The information transmitted to the server can comprise any relevant information regarding the contents of the image. Thus, information 413 could comprise the entire image, or a portion of the image. For example, where a user takes a picture of a bar code (whether 2D, 3D or any other configuration, the device 410 could process the image 412 to remove color and all background except the bar code itself, and then merely send the portion of the image containing the bar code as the transmitted information 413. In other cases it is contemplated that the device 410 could sufficiently process the image 413 to derive one or more keywords, and then send only the keyword(s) as the transmitted information 413. All possible combinations are also contemplated. Thus, a user might take a photograph of a Gucci™ handbag, the device 412 might derive the word “Gucci” from the image, subtract out background except for the handbag, and then transmit: (a) the word “Gucci”; and (b) the image of the handbag as the transmitted information 413. In such instances the process can be iterative. Thus, the device might initially transmit the word “Gucci” as the first transmitted information, receive a results set from the search engine indicating clothing accessories, and then subtract out background except for the handbag, and transmit the image of the handbag as the second transmitted information. As discussed above, it is specifically contemplated that the device 410 could send the server 420 numerical/digital data that is mathematically derived from the image. Examples include image features and characteristics that the server 420 could use in the server recognition process, without transmitting the original image.
As should be apparent by now, the transmitted information need not be limited to image information. Sights, sounds, text, and all sorts of other information can be included in the transmitted information, some of which can be derived directly from the image, and some of which can be derived indirectly from the image. In addition the device 410 can also capture non-visual information such as sounds, and that information can also be transmitted. Thus, it is contemplated that the device could capture the sounds of a frog, capture an image of a lake or forest, and send both to be used as (or further analyzed into) search terms.
Distal server 420 is distal in the sense that it has no hard-wired link to device 410. Server 420 can be a single device, as well as any number of devices coupled together, as for example in a server farm. All manner of suitable servers are contemplated. Thus, servers can use any reasonable hardware, operate using any reasonable software, communications protocols, and so forth.
In terms of interaction with the device, the various analytical tasks discussed above can allocated in any suitable manner between server 420 and device 410. For example, in the iterative operation discussed above with respect to the Gucci™ handbag, it is contemplated that the device 410 could analyze the image sufficiently to transmit the term “Gucci” as an initial search term to the search engine 430, and the server 420 could then undertake the tasks of subtracting out background of the image except for the handbag, and transmitting the image of the handbag as a second search term.
In another example, the server 420 could determine that the original image provided insufficient information, and send a message to the user through the device 410, directing the user to take another image (such as from another angle, closer, or with greater detail.). Indeed, the server 420 could direct the user to take an image of another object entirely, in order to help determine identity of the first object. Thus, the user could take a first image of a payment display at a ball game, provide that image to the server for identification, and then instruct the user to take an image of a credit card against which the user wants to be billed for entrance into the ball game. The server could then process the payment against that credit card, and provide an entry code that the user could type to pass through an electronically controlled gate.
In still another example, a user could use his cell phone to capture an image of a screwdriver set at a hardware store, and the cell phone could transmit the information derived from the image to Google™ or some other search engine to find comparison prices. The server 420 could then instinct the user to turn over the packaging and take another image of the set, this time from the back side of the packaging. In this way there is iterative interaction among the user's device, the server, and the search engine.
It should also be appreciated that there are embodiments in which the search engine never communicates with the portable device. For example, the server might do the search query, get results, and provide them to the portable device, or even to a television or other device besides the portable device.
The phase “search engine” is contemplated herein to include any system dedicated to the indexing, searching and retrieval of information. The most familiar search engines such as Google™, Yaboo!™, MSN™, and Alta Vista™ focus mostly or entirely on indexing web pages from the World Wide Web portion of the Internet. Other search engines, such as Lexis/Nexis™ focus on indexing proprietary collections of data, which can include links to Internet Web pages. The phase “search term” is contemplated herein to include any keys or other information used by the search engines to access their indexing system. In the case of most web based search engines, the keys are currently text. In such instances a user typically enters one or more key words, where the term “key word” is used in an extremely broad sense to include: (a) words that would likely be found in a dictionary; (b) proper names, number strings and other terms that are not found in any dictionary; as well as (c) characters that are interpreted as wild cards, truncations and so forth. Such search engines are already starting to experiment with use of non-text keys, including for example images and/or sounds. All such possible keys fall within the scope of contemplated search terms.
Thus, contemplated search terms include key words, a portion of an image, as well as a logo, bar code or other symbol. It is specifically contemplated that in sonic instances an image will contain a literal of a search terms (e.g. the name of a movie on a movie poster), in some instances an image will not contain such a literal (e.g. a picture of a tree or other plant, where the search term is the name of the plant). In either case the device and/or the server in any combination can perform one or more of the tasks of deriving the search term and submitting it to one or more search engines.
Network 425 can be any workable electronic network, including public and private access networks, and combinations of the two. Preferred networks include the Internet, the upcoming Internet II, cell phone networks, and so forth. Although not expressly shown, the communication lines in
The results set 434 can be of any size and composition, but most likely will be tailored to accommodate the device 410. It does very little good, for example, to transmit dozens of web pages to a cell phone, which has insufficient display area to properly view them. Thus, it is contemplated that the results set 434 can be whittled down or otherwise processed by the server (which of course is indicated generically by numeral 420 and need not be the very same box as utilized earlier in the transmission of the transmitted information 413) before being sent to the device 410. Thus, the server 420 or some other processor can process results before providing them to the device 410, such as where the search terms are submitted to the search engine by the server 420 rather than by the device 410. But the device 410 can also access the search engine directly using search information provided by the server. Four contemplated search modes include the following:
1. The server 420 composes a search URL (consisting of search engine address and key words) and sends it to the portable device 410. The portable device then executes the search engine query by sending the search URL to the search engine, and the search engine sends one or more web pages back to the portable device.
2. The server 420 sends keywords, and optionally also a search engine address, to portable device 410. The portable device composes a search URL, sends the search query to the search engine, and receives one or more web pages in response.
3. The server 420 sends the search query to the search engine, and receives a response. The server optionally processes the search response (which could be in any form) and provides some result to portable device. The result could, for example, comprise a file sent to the portable device, or a web page on some server, with URL of that web page sent to the portable device.
4. In any of the above modes, or in “direct linking” mode, the result might not be a search results page, but instead some other type of information or action. For example, a server could identify an object, and thereupon send a code to another server, which causes an action to occur. An example of this is clicking on a vending machine with a cell phone to buy something from the machine. Another example is clicking on a TV listing in a newspaper, causing the server to change the channel of the television in front of the user.
Thus, a statement that “the search engine causes at least a portion of the results set 434 to be transmitted back to the portable device 410” should be interpreted herein to mean that at least some information relating to the results set, which information can or can not be included verbatim in the results set, is transmitted back to the device, whether directly or indirectly by the search engine. It is particularly contemplated that a results set could include at least one hyperlinked address.
It is specifically contemplated that results sets can include the following types of information; Uniform Resource Locator (URL); Uniform Resource Identifier (URI); Internet Protocol (IP) address; telephone number; radio frequency or channel; television frequency or channel; and physical location or address. The result(s) displayed to the user can be interactive. In such a case, the user can take further action by interacting directly with the object, by linking to a referenced web page, or some combination of the two. Or, as discussed above, the results could cause another server/computer or machine to perform some action, such as dispensing a product or changing a channel.
From a method perspective, methods of using a search engine to obtain information are contemplated comprising: using a cell phone enabled portable device to take an image of an object; running computer software that automatically derives a first search term from at least a portion the image; submitting the first search term to the search engine; and transmitting the information to the device. Some preferred methods further comprise using the device to take a second image of the object; running the computer software to derive a second search term from at least a portion of the second object; and submitting the second search term along with the first search term to the search engine. Other preferred methods include the step of submitting the first search term can advantageously comprise: sending at least the portion of the image to a distal server; running the software on the server; and the server sending the search term to the search engine. Still other preferred methods include a distal server providing the search term(s) to the device, with the device submitting the search term(s) to the search engine.
Analysis of data (whether visual or otherwise) to produce search terms can be accomplished in any suitable manner. Useful techniques include, for example, signal analysis, Fourier analysis, pattern matching, pattern recognition, image recognition, object recognition, wavelet analysis, component analysis, etc.
Search terms can be advantageously derived from attribute(s) including name, type, size, color, position, and location, with the derivation performed by algorithm, table/database look-up, hardware device, or other suitable means. For example, consider an example wherein the object being imaged is a poster for the color version of a movie named “Modern Times,” starring Charlie Chaplin. The device 410 and/or the server 420 can identify as attributes the text “Modern Times Movie Poster” and “Color Version”, and can from that determine search terms such as “Modern Times”, “Colorized”, “Charlie Chaplin”, and “Classic movies”. The attributes and search terms in this case could be determined by a human user, a machine algorithm, or some combination of the two.
In another example, a user takes an image of a notebook computer. An algorithm detects the notebook computer in the image and identities it as being a Model 5, made by ZZZ Corporation. The algorithm then determines the attribute “Z77 Model 5” and the corresponding search terms, “online shopping”, “ZZZ”, “notebook”, and “5”.
An embodiment of particular interest comprises a search using image and/or video input. The device captures one or more of single images, multiple images, motion imagery, and/or video (each and all of these information types are known henceforth as “imagery”). Indeed, the imagery can be captured by more than one electronic imaging device, such as a digital camera, a camera-equipped mobile telephone, or a security camera, or multiple such devices. An object or objects are identified in the imagery via image/object recognition techniques (software and/or hardware). The identity of the object(s) is used to look up, in a table/database, a set of text keywords search terms, which are then provided to a search engine. The search engine returns information addresses (e.g., in the form of a web page with hyperlinks) that are pertinent to the objects identified in the imagery. The user then accesses information and/or computing resources based upon at least one of the information addresses.
Another contemplated embodiment comprises a search using sign language input. Imagery is captured of a person gesturing in sign language. Image/motion recognition techniques are used to translate the sign language into text or other machine-understandable data, such as text. The machine-understandable data is either sent directly to a search engine or is used to determine search terms that in turn are sent to a search engine. The search engine returns information addresses pertinent to the meaning of the sign language or portions thereof.
Still another embodiment comprises search using speech input. There, human speech is captured by a sound capture and/or recording device. Speech recognition processing is then used to recognize the speech and translate it into machine-understandable data (such as text). The machine-understandable data is either sent directly to a search engine or is used to determine search terms that are in turn sent to a search engine. The search engine returns information addresses pertinent to the meaning of the human speech or portions thereof.
An especially preferred embodiment of this invention comprises a search using camera-equipped portable device. There, imagery is captured by a portable device with a network connection (for example, a cellular telephone). Image recognition processing is then used to recognize at least one object in the imagery. The recognition process can be performed in the portable device, in a distant server, or distributed and/or otherwise shared and performed partly in each. Based on the identity of the object(s), text keywords corresponding to the object(s) are retrieved from a database. As with the image recognition, it is preferred that this process occur on a distant server, although it can be performed on the portable device or on a combination of the portable device and the server. The text keywords are then sent to a search engine. This is accomplished by sending the keywords to an Internet search engine web site as an HTTP transaction, with the search keywords embedded in the URL that is sent to the search engine web site. It is preferred that the HTTP transaction be initiated from the portable device, so that the search results are returned directly to the portable device. In this case, the search keywords would generally first be made available on the portable device; if they were determined on the distant server then they are first sent from the server to the portable device. The search engine results are returned to the portable device as a web page which can then be displayed in the web browser of the portable device. If the HTTP transaction was initiated by the server, then the results web page is made available for viewing on the portable device by one or more various means (the address of the results web page can be sent to the portable device, or the entire web page can be sent to the portable device, or the web page can be stored or converted into another form on the server after which the portable device is directed to the address of the stored or converted page, etc.)
Image Analysis
Preferred image analysis techniques are described in the following, in which
In
If the server 20 is physically separate from the device 14 then user acquired images are transmitted from the device 14 to the Image Processor/server 20 using a conventional digital network or wireless network means. If the image 18 has been compressed (e.g. via lossy JPEG DCT) in a manner that introduces compression artifacts into the reconstructed image 18, these artifacts can be partially removed by, for example, applying a conventional despeckle filter to the reconstructed image prior to additional processing.
Image type determination 26 can be accomplished with a discriminator algorithm which operates on the input image 18 and determines whether the input image contains recognizable symbols, such as barcodes, matrix codes, or alphanumeric characters. If such symbols are found, the image 18 is sent to the decode symbol 28 process. Depending on the confidence level with which the discriminator algorithm finds the symbols, the image 18 also can or alternatively contain an object of interest and can therefore also or alternatively be sent to the Object Image branch of the process flow. For example, if an input image 18 contains both a barcode and an object, depending on the clarity with which the barcode is detected, the image can be analyzed by both the Object Image and Symbolic Image branches, and that branch which has the highest success in identification will be used to identify and link from the object.
The image can then be analyzed to determine the location, size, and nature of the symbols in the decode symbol 28. The symbols are preferably analyzed according to their type, and their content information is extracted. For example, barcodes and alphanumeric characters will result in numerical and/or text information.
For object images, one can advantageously perform a “decomposition”, in the input image decomposition step 34, of a high-resolution input image into several different types of quantifiable salient parameters. This allows for multiple independent convergent search processes of the database to occur in parallel, which greatly improves image match speed and match robustness in the database matching 36. The best match 38 from either the decode symbol 28, or the image database matching 36, or both, is then determined. If a specific URL (or other online address) is associated with the image, then an URL Lookup 40 is performed and the Internet address is returned by the URL Return 42. Code examples are set forth in the priority documents, as well as further detail, including segmentation, segment group generation, bounding box generation, geometric, normalization, wavelet decomposition, color cube decomposition, shape decomposition, low-resolution gray-scale image generation, grayscale comparison, wavelet comparison, color cube comparison, and calculation of combined match score.
Preferably, parallel processing is used to divide tasks between multiple CPUs (central processing units) and/or computers. The overall algorithm may be divided in several ways, such as:
Actual implementations can be some combination of the above techniques that optimizes the process on the available hardware.
Another technique employed to maximize speed is data indexing. This technique involves using a priori knowledge of where data resides to only search in those parts of the database that contain potential matches. Various forms of indexing may be used, such as hash tables, data compartmentalization (i.e., data within certain value ranges are stored in certain locations), data sorting, and database table indexing. An example of such techniques is, in the shape comparison algorithm, if a database is to be searched for an entry with an area with a value of A, the algorithm would know which database entries or data areas have this approximate value and would not need to search the entire database.
The terminal 102 is a computing device that has an “image” capture device such as digital camera 103, a video camera, or any other device that an convert a physical object into a digital representation of the object. The imagery can be a single image, a series of images, or a continuous video stream. For simplicity of explanation this document describes the digital imagery generally in terms of a single image, however the invention and this system can use all of the imagery types described above.
After the camera 103 captures the digital imagery of the target object 100, image preprocessing 104 software converts the digital imagery into image data 105 for transmission to and analysis by an identification server 106. Typically a network connection is provided capable of providing communications with the identification server 106. Image data 105 is data extracted or converted from the original imagery of the target object 100 and has information content appropriate for identification of the target object 100 by the object recognition 107, which can be software or hardware. Image data 105 can take many forms, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. Specific examples are given in the priority documents.
The image data 105 is sent from the terminal 102 to the identification server 106. The identification server 106 receives the image data 105 and passes it to the object recognition 107.
The identification server 106 is a set of functions that usually will exist on computing platform separate from the terminal 102, but could exist on the same computing platform. If the identification server 106 exists on a separate computing device, such as a computer in a data center, then the transmission of the image components 105 to the identification server 106 is accomplished via a network or combination of networks, such a cellular telephone network, wireless Internet. Internet, and wire line network. If the identification server 106 exists on the same computing device as the terminal 102 then the transmission consists simply of a transfer of data from one software component or process to another.
Placing the identification server 106 on a computing platform separate from the terminal 102 enables the use of powerful computing resources for the object recognition 107 and database 108 functions, thus providing the power of these computing resources to the terminal 102 via network connection. For example, an embodiment that identifies objects out of a database of millions of known objects would be facilitated by the large storage, memory capacity, and processing power available in a data center; it is very difficult to have such computing power and storage in a portable device. Whether the terminal 102 and the identification server 106 are on the same computing platform or separate ones is an architectural decision that depends on system response time, number of database records, image recognition algorithm computing power and storage available in terminal 102, etc., and this decision must be made for each embodiment of the invention. Based on current technology, in most embodiments these functions will be on separate computing platforms.
The overall function of the identification server 106 is to determine and provide the target object information 109 corresponding to the target object 100, based on the image data 105.
The object recognition 107 and the database 108 function together to:
The object recognition 107 detects and decodes symbols, such as barcodes or text, in the input image. This is accomplished via algorithms, software, and/or hardware components suited for this task. Such components are commercially available (The HALCON software package from MVTec is an example). The object recognition 107 also detects and recognizes images of the target object 100 or portions thereof. This is accomplished by analyzing the image data 105 and comparing the results to other data, representing images of a plurality of known objects, stored in the database 108, and recognizing the target object 100 if a representation of target object 100 is stored in the database 108.
In some embodiments the terminal 102 includes software, such as a web browser (the browser 110), that receives an information address, connects to that informationaddress via a network or networks, such as the Internet, and exchanges information with another computing device at that information address. In consumer applications the terminal 102 can be a portable cellular telephone or Personal Digital Assistant equipped with a camera 103 and wireless Internet connection. In security and industrial applications the terminal 102 can be a similar portable hand-held device or can be fixed in location and/or orientation, and can have either a wireless or wire line network connection.
Other object recognition techniques also exist and include methods that store 3-dimensional models (rather than 2-dimensional images) of objects in a database and correlate input images with these models of the target object is performed by an object recognition technique of which many are available commercially and in the prior art. Such object recognition techniques usually consist of comparing a new input image to a plurality of known images and detecting correspondences between the new input image and one of more of the known images. The known images are views of known objects from a plurality of viewing angles and thus allow recognition of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional objects in arbitrary orientations relative to the camera 103.
It is usually desirable that the database 108 be scalable to enable identification of the target object 100 from a very large plurality (for example, millions) of known objects in the database 108. The algorithms, software, and computing hardware must be designed to function together to quickly perform such a search. An example software technique for performing such searching quickly is to use a metric distance comparison technique for comparing the image data 105 to data stored in the database 108, along with database clustering and multi-resolution distance comparisons. This technique is described in “Fast Exhaustive Multi-Resolution Search Algorithm Based on Clustering for Efficient Image Retrieval,” by Song. Kim, and Ra, 2000.
In addition to such software techniques, a parallel processing computing architecture can be employed to achieve fast searching of large databases. Parallel processing is particularly important in cases where a non-metric distance is used in object recognition 107, because techniques such database clustering and multi-resolution search can not be possible and thus the complete database must be searched by partitioning the database across multiple CPUs.
As described above, the object recognition 107 can also detect identifying marks on the target object 100. For example, the target object 100 can include an identifying number or a barcode. This information can be decoded and used to identify or help identify the target object 100 in the database 108. This information also can be passed on as part of the target object information 109. If the information is included as part of the target object information 109 then it can be used by the terminal 102 or content server 111 to identify the specific target object 100, out of many such objects that have similar appearance and differ only in the identifying marks. This technique is useful, for example, in cases where the target object 100 is an active device with a network connection (such as a vending machine) and the content server establishes communication with the target object 100. A combination with a Global Positioning System can also be used to identify like objects by their location.
The object recognition 107 can be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of both. Examples of each category and additional details are set forth in one or more of the priority documents.
In most embodiments the browser 110 will be a web browser, embedded in the terminal 102, capable of accessing and communicating with web sites via a network or networks such as the Internet. In some embodiments, however, such as those that only involve displaying the identity, position, orientation, or status of the target object 100, the browser 110 can be a software component or application that displays or provides the target object information 109 to a human user or to another software component or application.
In embodiments wherein the browser 110 is a web browser, the browser 110 connects to the content server 111 located at the information address (typically an Internet URL) included in the target object information 109. This connection is effected by the terminal 102 and the browser 110 acting in concert. The content server 111 is an information server and computing system. The connection and information exchanged between the terminal 102 and the content server 111 generally is accomplished via standard Internet and wireless network software, protocols (e.g. HTTP, WAP, etc.), and networks, although any information exchange technique can be used. The physical network connection depends on the system architecture of the particular embodiment but in most embodiments will involve a wireless network and the Internet. This physical network will most likely be the same network used to connect the terminal 102 and the identification server 106.
The content server 111 sends content information to the terminal 102 and browser 110. This content information usually is pertinent to the target object 100 and can be text, audio, video, graphics, or information in any form that is usable by the browser 110 and terminal 102. The terminal 102 and browser 110 send, in some embodiments, additional information to the content server 111. This additional information can be information such as the identity of the user of the terminal 102 or the location of the user of the terminal 102 (as determined from a GPS system or a radio-frequency ranging system). In some embodiments such information is provided to the content server by the wireless network carrier.
The user can perform ongoing interactions with the content server 111. For example, depending on the embodiment of the invention and the applications, the user can:
In some embodiments the content server 111 can reside within the terminal 102. In such embodiments, the communication between the terminal 102 and the content server 111 does not occur via a network but rather occurs within the terminal 102.
In embodiments wherein the target object 100 includes or is a device capable of communicating with other devices or computers via a network or networks such as the Internet, and wherein the target object information 109 includes adequate identification (such as a sign, number, or barcode) of the specific target object 100, the content server 111 connects to and exchanges information with the target object 100 via a network or networks such as the Internet. In this type of embodiment, the terminal 102 is connected to the content server 111 and the content server 111 is connected to the target object 100. Thus, the terminal 102 and target object 100 can communicate via the content server 111. This enables the user to interact with the target object 100 despite the lack of a direct connection between the target object 100 and the terminal 102.
This embodiment can be used for applications such as the following (“user” refers to the person operating the terminal 202, and the terminal 202 is a cellular telephone, PDA, or similar device, and “point and click” refers to the operation of the user capturing imagery of the target object 200 and initiating the transfer of the image data 205 to the identification server 206).
The user “points and clicks” the terminal 202 at a compact disc (CD) containing recorded music or a digital video disc (DVD) containing recorded video. The terminal 202 browser connects to the URL corresponding to the CD or DVD and displays a menu of options from which the user can select. From this menu, the user can listen to streaming audio samples of the CD or streaming video samples of the DVD, or can purchase the CD or DVD.
The user “points and clicks” the terminal 202 at a print media advertisement, poster, or billboard advertising a movie, music recording, video, or other entertainment. The browser 210 connects to the URL corresponding to the advertised item and the user can listen to streaming audio samples, purchase streaming video samples, obtain show times, or purchase the item or tickets.
The user “points and clicks” the terminal 202 at a television screen to interact with television programming in real-time. For example, the programming could consist of a product promotion involving a reduced price during a limited time, users that “point and click” on this television programming during the promotion are linked to a web site at which they can purchase the product at the promotional price. Another example is a interactive television programming in which users “point and click” on the television screen at specific times, based on the on-screen content, to register votes, indicate actions, or connect to a web site through which they perform real time interactions with the on-screen program.
The user “points and clicks” on an object such as a consumer product, an advertisement for a product, a poster, etc., the terminal 202 makes a telephone call to the company selling the product, and the consumer has a direct discussion with a company representative regarding the company's product or service. In this case the company telephone number is included in the target object information 209. If the target object information 209 also includes the company URL then the user can interact with the company via both voice and Internet (via browser 210) simultaneously.
The user “points and clicks” on a vending machine (target object 200) that is equipped with a connection to a network such as the Internet and that has a unique identifying mark, such as a number. The terminal 202 connects to the content server 211 of the company that operates the vending machine. The identification server identifies the particular vending machine by identifying and decoding the unique identifying mark. The identity of the particular machine is included in the target object information 209 and is sent from the terminal 202 to the content server 211. The content server 211, having the identification of the particular vending machine (target object 200), initiates communication with the vending machine. The user performs a transaction with the vending machine, such as purchasing a product, using his terminal 202 that communicates with the vending machine via the content sewer 211.
The user “points and clicks” on part of a machine, such as an aircraft part. The terminal 202 then displays information pertinent to the part, such as maintenance instructions or repair history.
The user “points and clicks” on a magazine or newspaper article and link to streaming audio or video content, further information, etc.
The user “points and clicks” on an automobile. The location of the terminal 206 is determined by a Global Position System receiver in the terminal 206, by cellular network radio ranging, or by another technique. The position of the terminal 202 is sent to the content server 211. The content server provides the user with information regarding the automobile, such as price and features, and furthermore, based on the position information, provides the user with the location of a nearby automobile dealer that sells the car. This same technique can be used to direct users to nearby retail stores selling items appearing in magazine advertisements that users “point and click” on.
For visually impaired people:
This embodiment determines the position and orientation of the target object 300, relative to the Spacecraft, as determined by the position, orientation, and size of the target object 300 in the imagery captured by the camera 303, by comparing the imagery with views of the target object 300 from different orientations that are stored in the database 308. The relative position and orientation of the target object 300 are output in the target object information, so that the spacecraft data system 310 can use this information in planning trajectories and maneuvers.
Thus, specific embodiments and applications of using image-derived information as search criteria for Internet and other search engines have been disclosed. It should be apparent, however, to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those already described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to he restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims. Moreover, in interpreting both the specification and the claims, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. In particular, the terms “comprises” and “comprising” should be interpreted as referring to elements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that the referenced elements, components, or steps can be present, or utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps that are not expressly referenced. Where the specification claims refers to at least one of something selected from the group consisting of A, B, C . . . and N, the text should be interpreted as requiring only one element from the group, not A plus N, or B plus N. etc.
This application is a divisional of Ser. No. 15/169,948 filed Jun. 1, 2016, which is a divisional of Ser. No. 14/569,766, filed Dec. 14, 2014 and issued May 20, 2016 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,360,945 which is a divisional of Ser. No. 14/187,717, filed Feb. 24, 2014 and issued Oct. 6, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,152, 854, which is a divisional of Ser. No. 13/858,897, filed Apr. 8, 2013 and issued Jul. 29, 2014 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,792,750, which is a divisional of Ser. No. 13/705,071, filed Dec. 4, 2012 and issued Aug. 27, 2013 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,520,897, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 13/207,230. filed Aug. 10, 2011 and issued Dec. 4, 2012 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,038, which is a divisional of Ser. No. 13/037,330 filed Feb. 28, 2011 and issued Jul. 10, 2012 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,218,873, which is a divisional of Ser. No. 12/568,130 filed Sep. 28, 2009 and issued Mar. 1, 2011 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,899,252. which is a divisional of Ser. No. 11/204,901 filed Aug. 15, 2005 and issued Mar. 16, 2010 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,680,324, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 09/992,942 filed Nov. 5, 2001 and issued Mar. 21, 2006 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,016,532, which claims priority to provisional application No. 60/317,521 filed Sep. 5, 2001 and provisional application No. 60/246,295 filed Nov. 6 2000. U.S. application Ser. No. 11/204,901 filed Aug. 15, 2005 and issued Mar. 16, 2010 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,680,324 is also a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 10/492,243 filed May 20, 2004 and issued Jan. 13, 2009 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,477,780, which is a national phase entry of PCT/US02/35407 filed Nov. 5, 2002, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 09/992,942, filed Nov. 5, 2001 and issued Mar. 21, 2006 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,016,532, which claims priority to provisional application No. 60/317,521 filed Sep. 5, 2001 and provisional application No. 60/246,295 filed Nov. 6, 2000. U.S. application Ser. No. 11/204,901 filed Aug. 15, 2005 and issued Mar. 16, 2010 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,680,324 also claims priority to provisional application No. 60/630,524 filed Nov. 22, 2004 and provisional application No. 60/625,526 filed Nov. 4, 2004. These and all other referenced patents and applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Where a definition or use of a term in a reference that is incorporated by reference is inconsistent or contrary to the definition of that term provided herein, the definition of that term provided herein is deemed to be controlling.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3800082 | Fish | Mar 1974 | A |
4947321 | Spence et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4991008 | Nama | Feb 1991 | A |
5034812 | Rawlings | Jul 1991 | A |
5241671 | Reed et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5259037 | Plunk | Nov 1993 | A |
5497314 | Novak | Mar 1996 | A |
5576950 | Tonomura et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579471 | Barber et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5594806 | Colbert | Jan 1997 | A |
5615324 | Kuboyama | Mar 1997 | A |
5625765 | Ellenby et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5682332 | Ellenby et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5724579 | Suzuki | Mar 1998 | A |
5742521 | Ellenby et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742815 | Stern | Apr 1998 | A |
5751286 | Barber et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768633 | Allen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768663 | Lin | Jun 1998 | A |
5771307 | Lu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5787186 | Schroeder | Jul 1998 | A |
5815411 | Ellenby et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5832464 | Houvener et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5893095 | Jain et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5894323 | Kain et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897625 | Gustin et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5911827 | Heller | Jun 1999 | A |
5915038 | Abdel-Mottaleb et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917930 | Kayani et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5926116 | Kitano et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933823 | Cullen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933829 | Durst et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933923 | Catlos et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937079 | Franke | Aug 1999 | A |
5945982 | Higashio et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5970473 | Gerszberg et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971277 | Cragun et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978773 | Hudetz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982912 | Fukui et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991827 | Ellenby et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5992752 | Wilz, Sr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6009204 | Ahmad | Dec 1999 | A |
6031545 | Ellenby et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037936 | Ellenby et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6037963 | Denton et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038295 | Mattes | Mar 2000 | A |
6038333 | Wang | Mar 2000 | A |
6045039 | Stinson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055536 | Shimakawa et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061478 | Kanoh et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064335 | Eschenbach | May 2000 | A |
6064398 | Ellenby et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064979 | Perkowski | May 2000 | A |
6072904 | Desai et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081612 | Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6098118 | Ellenby et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108656 | Durst et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6134548 | Gottsman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144848 | Walsh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6173239 | Ellenby | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181817 | Zabih et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182090 | Peairs | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199048 | Hudetz et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202055 | Houvener et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208353 | Ayer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208749 | Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208933 | Lazar | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6256409 | Wang | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278461 | Ellenby et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286036 | Rhoads | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307556 | Ellenby et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307957 | Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317718 | Fano | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6393147 | Danneels et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6396475 | Ellenby et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396537 | Squilla et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396963 | Shaffer et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6404975 | Bopardikar et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405975 | Sankrithi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411725 | Rhoads | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411953 | Ganapathy et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414696 | Ellenby et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430554 | Rothschild | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434561 | Durst, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445834 | Rising, III | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446076 | Burkey et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453361 | Morris | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6490443 | Freeny, Jr. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501854 | Konishi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502756 | Faahraeus | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510238 | Haycock | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6522292 | Ellenby et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522772 | Morrison et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522889 | Aarnio | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526158 | Goldberg | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532298 | Cambier et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6533392 | Koitabashi | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535210 | Ellenby et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542933 | Durst, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563959 | Troyanker | May 2003 | B1 |
6567122 | Anderson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6578017 | Ebersole et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6580385 | Winner et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6597818 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6601026 | Appelt et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6609103 | Kolls | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6650794 | Aoki | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651053 | Rothschild | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658389 | Alpdemir | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674923 | Shih et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6674993 | Tarbouriech | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6675165 | Rothschild | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6689966 | Wiebe | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690370 | Ellenby et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691914 | Isherwood et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6711278 | Gu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714969 | Klein et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724914 | Brundage et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6738630 | Ashmore | May 2004 | B2 |
6744935 | Choi et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748122 | Ihara et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754636 | Walker et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765569 | Neumann et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766363 | Rothschild | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771294 | Pulli et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788800 | Carr et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801657 | Cieplinski | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6804726 | Ellenby et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6822648 | Furlong et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6842181 | Acharya | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853750 | Aoki | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856965 | Stinson et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6865608 | Hunter | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6866196 | Rathus et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6868415 | Kageyama et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6882756 | Bober | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6885771 | Takahashi | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6912464 | Parker | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6925196 | Kass et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950800 | McIntyre et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6956593 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6963656 | Persaud et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968453 | Doyle et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974078 | Simon | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985240 | Benke et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990235 | Katsuyama et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993573 | Hunter | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996251 | Malone et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002551 | Azuma et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7016532 | Boncyk | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016889 | Bazoon | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7016899 | Stern et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7027652 | I'Anson | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7031496 | Shimano et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031536 | Kajiwara | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031875 | Ellenby | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7050653 | Edso et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053916 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062454 | Giannini et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072669 | Duckworth | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7103772 | Jorgensen et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7104444 | Suzuki | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113867 | Stein | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7119831 | Ohto et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121469 | Dorai et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127094 | Elbaum et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7143949 | Hannigan | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7167164 | Ericson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175095 | Pettersson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190833 | Kagehiro et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7224995 | Rhoads | May 2007 | B2 |
7245273 | Eberl et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254548 | Tannenbaum | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7266545 | Bergman et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7283983 | Dooley et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295718 | Park et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7296747 | Rohs | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301536 | Ellenby et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7305354 | Rodriguez et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7309015 | Frantz et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310605 | Janakiraman et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7333947 | Wiebe et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7334728 | Williams | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7345673 | Ericson et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353182 | Missinhoun et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7353184 | Kirshenbaum et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7353990 | Elliot et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7356705 | Ting | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362922 | Nishiyama et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376645 | Bernard | May 2008 | B2 |
7383209 | Hudetz et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7410099 | Fukasawa et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7427980 | Partridge et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7430588 | Hunter | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7477909 | Roth | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7526440 | Walker et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7548915 | Ramer et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7558595 | Angelhag | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7564469 | Cohen | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7580061 | Toyoda | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7595816 | Enright et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7599847 | Block et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7631336 | Diaz | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7641342 | Eberl et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7680324 | Boncyk et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7696905 | Ellenby et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707218 | Gocht et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711598 | Perkowski | May 2010 | B2 |
7720436 | Hamynen et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7734507 | Ritter | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7737965 | Alter et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751805 | Neven et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756755 | Ghosh et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7764808 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765126 | Hudetz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7768534 | Pentenrieder et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7769228 | Bahlmann et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774283 | Das et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7775437 | Cohen | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7797204 | Balent | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7830417 | Liu | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7843488 | Stapleton | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845558 | Beemer et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7853875 | Cohen | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7872669 | Darrell et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7889193 | Platonov et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7896235 | Ramachandran | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7903838 | Hudnut et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7916138 | John et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8090616 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8090657 | Mitchell et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8099332 | Lemay et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8121944 | Norman et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8130242 | Cohen | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8131118 | Jing et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8131595 | Lee et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8187045 | Thibodaux | May 2012 | B2 |
8189964 | Flynn et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8190645 | Bashaw | May 2012 | B1 |
8218874 | Boncyk et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8219146 | Connors et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8219558 | Trandal et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8255291 | Nair | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8312168 | Rhoads et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8320615 | Hamza et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8326031 | Boncyk et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8335351 | Boncyk et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8386918 | Do et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8442500 | Gupta et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8447066 | King et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8477202 | Asano | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8483715 | Chen | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8494274 | Badharudeen et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8497939 | Cuttner | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8523075 | van der Merwe | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542906 | Persson et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8550903 | Lyons et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559671 | Milanfar et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577810 | Dalit et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8588527 | Boncyk et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8605141 | Dialameh et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8626602 | George | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8688517 | Lutnick et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8750559 | Sung et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8751316 | Fletchall | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8756659 | Ruckart | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8798322 | Boncyk | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8824738 | Boncyk et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831279 | Rodriguez et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831677 | Villa-Real | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8838477 | Moshfeghi | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8863183 | Kutaragi et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8903430 | Sands | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8990235 | King | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9024972 | Bronder et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9076077 | Cohen | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9318151 | Lee et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9342748 | Boncyk et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9344774 | McDevitt | May 2016 | B2 |
9360945 | Boncyk | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9578107 | Boncyk et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9589372 | Bean et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
20010011276 | Durst, Jr. et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010032252 | Durst et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044824 | Hunter et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047426 | Hunter | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010053252 | Creque | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020001398 | Shimano et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020006602 | Masters | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019819 | Sekiguchi et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020048403 | Guerreri | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055957 | Ohsawa | May 2002 | A1 |
20020084328 | Kim | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089524 | Ikeda | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090132 | Boncyk et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020102966 | Lev et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020103813 | Frigon | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124188 | Sherman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140988 | Cheatle et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150298 | Rajagopal et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156866 | Schneider | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163521 | Ellenby et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020167536 | Valdes et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030064705 | Desiderio | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095681 | Burg et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030116478 | Laskowski | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030132974 | Bodin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030164819 | Waibel | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040208372 | Boncyk et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050015370 | Stavely et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024501 | Ellenby et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055281 | Williams | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050102233 | Park et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050162523 | Darrell et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050162532 | Toyoda | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050185060 | Neven, Sr. et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050206654 | Vaha-Sipila | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050252966 | Kulas | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060008124 | Ewe et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060038833 | Mallinson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060161379 | Ellenby et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060190812 | Ellenby et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060223635 | Rosenberg | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070109619 | Eberl et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070146391 | Pentenrieder et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070182739 | Platonov et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070230792 | Shashua et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080021953 | Gil | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080133555 | Rhoads et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080157946 | Eberl et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189185 | Matsuo et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080207296 | Lutnick et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080243721 | Joao | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080279481 | Ando | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090027337 | Hildreth | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030900 | Iwasaki | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100045933 | Eberl et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100106720 | Chao et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100188638 | Eberl et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110131241 | Petrou et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173100 | Boncyk et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191211 | Lin | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110282785 | Chin | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120002872 | Boncyk et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011119 | Baheti et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011142 | Baheti et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120027290 | Baheti et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120072353 | Boone et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120095857 | McKelvey et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120231887 | Lee et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120263388 | Vaddadi et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130013414 | Haff | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130046602 | Grigg et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130265450 | Barnes, Jr. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304609 | Keonorasak | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140006165 | Grigg et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140007012 | Govande et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140101048 | Gardiner et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140129942 | Rathod | May 2014 | A1 |
20140162598 | Villa-Real | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150026785 | Soon-Shiong | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150339324 | Westmoreland et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10050486 | Apr 2002 | DE |
0614559 | Jan 1999 | EP |
0920179 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0967574 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1012725 | Jun 2000 | EP |
0920179 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1354260 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1355258 | Oct 2003 | EP |
2264669 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2407230 | Apr 2005 | GB |
S6314297 | Jan 1988 | JP |
H09231244 | Sep 1997 | JP |
H1091634 | Apr 1998 | JP |
H10289243 | Oct 1998 | JP |
H11265391 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2001101191 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001160057 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001256500 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001265970 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001282825 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002197103 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002297648 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003178067 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003323440 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004005314 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004030377 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004118384 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005011180 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005038421 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005049920 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005509219 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2007509392 | Apr 2007 | JP |
9744737 | Nov 1997 | WO |
9749060 | Dec 1997 | WO |
9837811 | Sep 1998 | WO |
9846323 | Oct 1998 | WO |
9916024 | Apr 1999 | WO |
9942946 | Aug 1999 | WO |
9942947 | Aug 1999 | WO |
9944010 | Sep 1999 | WO |
9942946 | Oct 1999 | WO |
9942947 | Dec 1999 | WO |
9967695 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0124050 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0149056 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0163487 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0171282 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0173603 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0201143 | Jan 2002 | WO |
02059716 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02073818 | Sep 2002 | WO |
02082799 | Oct 2002 | WO |
03041000 | May 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Arai T., et al., “PaperLink: A Technique for Hyperlinking from Real Paper to Electronic Content,” CHI 97 Electronic Publications: Papers, Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, Mar. 22-27, 1997, pp. 327-334. |
Bulman J., et al., “Mixed Reality Applications in Urban Environments,” BT Technology Journal, 2004, vol. 22 (3), pp. 84-94. |
Carswell J.D., et al., “An Environment for Mobile Context-Based Hypermedia Retrieval,” IEEE: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 1529-4188/02, 2002, 5 pages. |
Chang S.F., et al., “Visual Information Retrieval from Large Distributed Online Respositories,” Communication of Association for Computing Machinery, ISSN:0001-0782, 1997, vol. 40 (12), pp. 64-71. |
Chang W., et al., “Efficient Resource Selection in Distributed Visual Information Systems,” ACM Multimedia, 1997, pp. 203-213. |
Diverdi S., et al., “ARWin—A Desktop Augmented Reality Window Manager,” UCSB Tech Report 2003-12, University of California Santa Barbara, May 2003, 7 pages. |
Diverdi S., et al., “Level of Detail Interfaces,” Proc. ISMAR 2004, IEEE/ACM IHyf Symp on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Arlington, Virginia, 2004, 2 pages. |
European Search Report for Application No. EP06018047, mailed on Oct. 30, 2008, 2 pages. |
Feiner S., et al., “A Touring Machine: Prototyping 3D Mobile Augmented Reality Systems for Exploring the Urban Environment,” Personal Technologies, 1997, vol. 1 (4), pp. 208-217. |
Fernandez F., “Responsive Environments: Digital Objects in the Landscape,” Thesis submitted to Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Mar, 2004, 124 pages. |
Geiger C., et al., “Mobile AR4ALL,” Proceedings of the IEEE and ACM Intl Symposium on Augmented Reality (ISAR'01), Oct. 29-30, 2001, Columbia University, New York, 2 pages. |
Gevers T., et al., “PicToSeek: Combining Color and Shape Invariant Features for Image Retrieval,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2000, vol. 9 (1), pp. 102-119. |
Haritaoglu I., “InfoScope: Link from Real World to Digital Information Space,” IBM Almaden Research, UbiComp, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2001, vol. 2201, pp. 247-255. |
Hollerer T., et al., “Chapter Nine: Mobile Augmented Reality,” in: Telegeoinformatics: Location Based Computing and Services, Karimi H., eds., Taylor & Francis Books, Ltd., 2004, Chapter 9, 39 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2007/02010, mailed on Nov. 16, 2007, 5 pages. |
Iwamoto T., et al., “Digital Safari Guidebook With Image Retrieval,” International Conference on Advances in Mathematical Computations and Statistical Computing, 1999, vol. 2, pp. 1011-1012. |
Iwamoto T., et al., “u-Photo: A Design and Implementation of a Snapshot Based Method for Capturing Contextual Information,” The Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing Pervasive, 2004, Advances in Pervasive Computing, LinzNienna, Austria, 6 pages. |
Jebara T., et al., “Stochasticks: Augmenting the Billiards Experience With Probabilistic Vision and Wearable Computers,” International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 1997, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 138-145. |
Kangas K., et al., “Using Code Mobility to Create Ubiquitous and Active Augmented Reality in Mobile Computing,” Mobicom, 1999, Seattle, Washington, pp. 48-58. |
Kato H., et al., “Marker Tracking and HMD Calibration for a Video-Based Augmented Reality Conferencing System,” Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE and ACM Intl Workshop on Augmented Reality, San Francisco, California, 1999, pp. 85-94. |
Klinker G., “Augmented Maintenance of Powerplants: A Prototyping Case Study of a Mobile AR System,” International Symposium on Augmented Reality, 2001, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 124-136. |
Levine J.M., “Real-Time Target and Pose Recognition for 3-D Graphical Overlay,” Master's thesis, 1997, 48 pages. |
Ljungstrand P., et al., “WebStickers: Using Physical Tokens to Access, Manage and Share Bookmarks on the Web,” Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Designing Augmented Reality Environments (DARE 2000), 2000, ) pp. 23-31. |
Rekimoto J., et al., “Augment-able Reality: Situated Communication Through Physical and Digital Spaces,” Wearable Computers, Second International Symposium, 1998, pp. 68-75. |
Rekimoto J., et al., “CyberCode: Designing Augmented Reality Environments With Visual Tags,” Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Designing Augmented Reality Environments, 2000, pp. 1-10. |
Rekimoto J., et al., “The World Through the Computer: Computer Augmented Interaction With Real World Environments,” ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 1995, pp. 29-36. |
Rekimoto J., “NaviCam: A Palmtop Device Approach to Augmented Reality,” Fundamentals of Wearable Computers and Augmented Reality, 2001, Barfield and Caudell, Eds., pp. 353-377. |
Rohs M., et al., “A Conceptual Framework for Camera Phone-Based Interaction Techniques,” Pervasive Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, vol. 3468, pp. 171-189. |
Siltanen S., et al., “Implementing a Natural User Interface for Camera Phones Using Visual Tags,” Proceedings of the 7th Australasian User interface conference, 2006, vol. 50, pp. 113-116. |
Smailagic A, et al., “Metronaut: A Wearable Computer With Sensing and Global Communication Capabilities,” First International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Oct. 13-14, 1997, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Digest of Papers, pp. 116-122. |
Smith J.R., et al., “VisualSEEk: A Fully Automated Content- Based Image Query System,” Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Multimedia, ACM New York, 1996, pp. 87-98. |
Starner T., et al., “Augmented Reality Through Wearable Computing,” Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 6, 4, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1997, 24 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP02778730, mailed on May 14, 2007, 3 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP06801326, mailed on Aug. 12, 2008, 8 pages. |
Suzuki G., et al., “u-Photo: Interacting with Pervasive Services Using Digital Still Images,” Pervasive Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3468, 2005, pp. 190-207. |
Toye E., et al., “Interacting with Mobile Services: An Evaluation of Camera-Phones and Visual Tags,” in: Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 11 (2), Springer-Verlag, London Limited, 2007, pp. 97-106. |
Wagner D., et al., “First Steps Towards Handheld Augmented Reality,” Vienna University of Technology, Proceedings of Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Oct. 18-21, 2003, 9 pages. |
Yang J., et al., “Smart Sight: A Tourist Assistant System,” Digest of Papers, Third International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Oct. 18-19, 1999, San Francisco, California, pp. 73-78. |
Yeh T., et al., “Searching the Web with Mobile Images for location Recognition,” IEEE: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'04), 1063-6919/04, 2004, 6 pages. |
Zhang X., et al., “Taking AR Into Large Scale Industrial Environments: Navigation and Information Access With Mobile Computers,” Proceedings of the IEEE and ACM Intl Symposium on Augmented Reality, 2001, pp. 179-180. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170039224 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60630524 | Nov 2004 | US | |
60625526 | Nov 2004 | US | |
60317521 | Sep 2001 | US | |
60246295 | Nov 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15169948 | Jun 2016 | US |
Child | 15298671 | US | |
Parent | 14569766 | Dec 2014 | US |
Child | 15169948 | US | |
Parent | 14187717 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 14569766 | US | |
Parent | 13858897 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 14187717 | US | |
Parent | 13705071 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 13858897 | US | |
Parent | 13037330 | Feb 2011 | US |
Child | 13207230 | US | |
Parent | 12568130 | Sep 2009 | US |
Child | 13037330 | US | |
Parent | 11204901 | Aug 2005 | US |
Child | 12568130 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13207230 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 13705071 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09992942 | Nov 2001 | US |
Child | 11204901 | US | |
Parent | 10492243 | US | |
Child | 09992942 | US | |
Parent | 09992942 | Nov 2001 | US |
Child | 10492243 | US |