The invention relates to the field of drug delivery into the eye.
The eye is a complex organ with a variety of specialized tissues that provide the optical and neurological processes for vision. Accessing the eye for medical treatment is hindered by the small size and delicate nature of the tissues. The posterior region of the eye, including the retina, macula and optic nerve, is especially difficult to access due to the recessed position of the eye within the orbital cavity. In addition, topical eye drops penetrate poorly into the posterior region, further restricting treatment options.
The suprachoroidal space is a potential space in the eye that is located between the choroid, which is the inner vascular tunic, and the sclera, the outer layer of the eye. The suprachoroidal space extends from the anterior portion of the eye near the ciliary body to the posterior end of the eye near the optic nerve. Normally the suprachoroidal space is not evident due to the close apposition of the choroid to the sclera from the intraocular pressure of the eye. Since there is no substantial attachment of the choroid to the sclera, the tissues separate to form the suprachoroidal space when fluid accumulation or other conditions occur. The suprachoroidal space provides a potential route of access from the anterior region of the eye to treat the posterior region.
The present invention is directed to drug formulations for administration to the suprachoroidal space and an apparatus to deliver drugs and other substances in minimally invasive fashion to the suprachoroidal space.
Drug formulations are provided characterized by a zero shear viscosity of at least 300,000 mPas. A subclass of the drug formulations is further characterized by a viscosity of not more than about 400 mPas at 1000 s−1 shear rate.
For injection into the suprachoroidal space of an eye comprising a biologically active substance and a thixotropic polymeric excipient that acts as a gel-like material to spread after injection and uniformly distribute and localize the drug in a region of the suprachoroidal space. In one embodiment, gel-like material crosslinks after injection into the suprachoroidal space. The biologically active substance may comprise microparticles or microspheres. The polymeric excipient may comprise hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate, gelatin, polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate, dermatin sulfate, polyethylene oxide, polyethylene glycol, polypropylene oxide, polypropylene glycol, alginate, starch derivatives, a water soluble chitin derivative, a water soluble cellulose derivative or polyvinylpyrollidone.
In another embodiment, a drug formulation is provided for delivery to the suprachoroidal space of an eye comprising a biologically active substance and microspheres with an outer diameter in the range of about 1 to 33 microns. The microparticles or microspheres additionally may comprise a controlled release coating and/or a tissue affinity surface.
The biologically active substance preferably comprises an antibiotic, ‘a steroid, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent, a neuroprotectant, an anti-VEGF agent, or a neovascularization suppressant.
Devices are also provided for minimally invasive delivery of a drug formulation into the suprachoroidal space of the eye comprising a needle having a leading tip shaped to allow passage through scleral tissues without damage to the underlying choroidal tissues, and a sensor to guide placement of the tip to deliver the formulation adjacent to or within the suprachoroidal space.
The sensor may provide an image of the scleral tissues. The sensor preferably responds to ultrasound, light, or differential pressure.
In another embodiment, devices are provided for minimally invasive delivery of a drug formulation into the suprachoroidal space of the eye comprising a needle having a leading tip shaped to allow passage through scleral tissues, and an inner tip that provides an inward distending action to the choroid upon contacting the choroid to prevent trauma thereto.
Methods are provided for administering drugs to the eye comprising placing a formulation comprising a biologically active substance and a polymer excipient in the suprachoroidal space such that the excipient gels after delivery to localize said biologically active substance. The formulation may be placed in a posterior or anterior region of the suprachoroidal space.
In another embodiment, method are provided for administering drugs to a posterior region of the eye comprising placing a formulation comprising a biologically active substance comprising microspheres or microparticles with an outer diameter in the range of about 1 to 33 microns in an anterior region of the suprachoroidal space such that the microspheres or microparticles subsequently migrate to the posterior region. The formulation preferably comprises a polymer excipient to uniformly disperse the microparticles or microspheres in the suprachoroidal space.
In another embodiment, a method is provided of administering drugs in the suprachoroidal space of the eye comprising the steps of placing a needle in scleral tissues toward the suprachoroidal space at a depth of at least half of the scleral thickness, and injecting a drug formulation through the needle into the sclera such that the formulation dissects the scleral tissues adjacent to the suprachoroidal space and enters the suprachoroidal space.
In the methods disclosed herein, the formulation preferably comprises a thixotropic polymer.
The present invention comprises drug formulations, devices and related methods to access the suprachoroidal space of an eye for the purpose of delivering drugs to treat the eye. Specifically, the invention relates to drug formulations designed for suprachoroidal space administration to treat the eye, including specific regions of the eye by localization of the delivered drug. The invention also relates to the design and methods of use for a minimally invasive device to inject drug formulations and drug containing materials directly into the suprachoroidal space through a small needle.
A biologically active substance or material is a drug or other substance that affects living organisms or biological processes, including use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease or use to affect the structure or any function of the body. A drug formulation contains a biologically active substance.
As used herein, the anterior region of the eye is that region of the eye that is generally readily accessible from the exposed front surface of the eye in its socket. The posterior region of the eye is generally the remaining region of the eye that is primarily surgically accessed through a surface of the eye that is unexposed, thus often requiring temporary retraction of the eye to gain access to that surface.
Formulations:
The drug formulations of the invention provide compatibility with the suprachoroidal space environment and may be formulated to control the distribution of the biologically active substance by migration of the formulation as well as provide for sustained release over time. The drug formulation comprises one or more biologically active substances formulated with physiologically compatible excipients that are administered, typically by injection, into the suprachoroidal space of an eye. Suitable biologically active substances include antibiotics to treat infection, steroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory compounds to treat inflammation and edema, neuroprotectant agents such as calcium channel blockers to treat the optic nerve and retinal agents such as anti-VEGF compounds or neo-vascular suppressants to treat macular degeneration.
Formulations for Localized Treatment:
For treatment of a localized region of the eye, for example, to treat a macular lesion, the posterior retina, or the optic nerve, the drug may be prepared in a formulation to limit migration after delivery and delivered to the region of the lesion. While not intending to be bound by a particular theory, we observe that drug microparticles typically travel toward the posterior region of the suprachoroidal space under physiological conditions, presumably due to uveal-scleral fluid flow within the space. Such drug microparticles may be fabricated with sufficient size and optionally with tissue surface affinity to limit drug migration. Tissue surface affinity may be modified by the addition of polymeric or lipid surface coatings to the microparticles, or by the addition of chemical or biological moieties to the microparticle surface. Tissue affinity is thereby obtained from surface charge, hydrophobicity, or biological targeting agents such as antibodies or integrins that may be incorporated to the surface of the microparticles to provide a binding property with the tissues to limit drug migration. Alternatively or in combination, the drug may be formulated with one or more polymeric excipients to limit drug migration. A polymeric excipient may be selected and formulated to act as a viscous gel-like material in-situ and thereby spread into a region of the suprachoroidal space and uniformly distribute and retain the drug. The polymer excipient may be selected and formulated to provide the appropriate viscosity, flow and dissolution properties. For example, carboxymethylcellulose is a weakly thixotropic water soluble polymer that may be formulated to an appropriate viscosity at zero shear rate to form a gel-like material in the suprachoroidal space. The thixotropic effect of the polymer may be enhanced by appropriate chemical modification to the polymer to increase associative properties such as the addition of hydrophobic moieties, the selection of higher molecular weight polymer or by formulation with appropriate surfactants. Preferred is the use of highly associative polymeric excipients with strong thixotropic properties such as hyaluronic acid to maximize the localization and drug retaining properties of the drug formulation while allowing the formulation to be injected through a small gauge needle. The dissolution properties of the drug formulation may be adjusted by tailoring of the water solubility, molecular weight, and concentration of the polymeric excipient in the range of appropriate thixotropic properties to allow both delivery through a small gauge needle and localization in the suprachoroidal space. The polymeric excipient may be formulated to increase in viscosity or to cross-link after delivery to further limit migration or dissolution of the material and incorporated drug. For example, a highly thixotropic drug formulation will have a low viscosity during injection through a small gauge needle, but dramatically increases in effective viscosity once in the supra-choroidal space at zero shear conditions. Hyaluronic acid, a strongly thixotropic natural polymer, when formulated at concentrations of 1 to 2 weight percent demonstrates a viscosity of approximately 300,000 to 7,000,000 mPas at zero shear and viscosity of 150 to 400 mPas at a shear rate of 1000 s−1, typical of injection though a small gauge needle, with the exact viscosity depending of the molecular weight. Chemical methods to increase the molecular weight or degree of crosslinking of the polymer excipient may also be used to increase localization of the drug formulation in-situ, for example the formulation of hyaluronic acid with bisepoxide or divinylsulfone crosslinking agents. The environment in the suprachoroidal space may also be used to initiate an increase in viscosity or cross-linking of the polymer excipient, for example from the physiologic temperature, pH or ions associated with the suprachoroidal space. The gel-like material may also be formulated with surface charge, hydrophobicity or specific tissue affinity to limit migration within the suprachoroidal space.
Water soluble polymers that are physiologically compatible are suitable for use as polymeric excipients according to the invention include synthetic polymers such as polyvinylalcohol, polyvinylpyrollidone, polyethylene glycol, polyethylene oxide, polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate, polypropylene glycol and propylene oxide, and biological polymers such as cellulose derivatives, chitin derivatives, alginate, gelatin, starch derivatives, hyaluronic acid, chondroiten sulfate, dermatin sulfate, and other glycosoaminoglycans, and mixtures or copolymers of such polymers. The polymeric excipient is selected to allow dissolution over time, with the rate controlled by the concentration, molecular weight, water solubility, crosslinking, enzyme lability and tissue adhesive properties of the polymer. Especially advantageous are polymer excipients that confer the formulation strong thixotropic properties to enable the drug formulation to exhibit a low viscosity at high shear rates typical of delivery through a small gauge needle to facilitate administration, but exhibit a high viscosity at zero shear to localize the drug in-situ.
To treat an anterior region of the eye, a polymeric excipient to limit drug migration may be combined with a drug and injected into the desired anterior region of the suprachoroidal space.
One method for treating the posterior region of the eye comprises administration of a drug formulation with localizing properties directly to the posterior region of the suprachoroidal space. Drug formulations may be delivered to the posterior region of the suprachoroidal space by using a flexible microcannula placed in an anterior region of the suprachoroidal space with subsequent advancement of the distal tip to the posterior region prior to delivery of the drug and a localizing excipient. Similarly, a flexible microcannula may be advanced to the center of a desired treatment area such as a macular lesion prior to delivery of a drug formulation with properties to localize the administered drug.
Treatment of a localized region of the eye, especially the posterior region, is facilitated by the use of drug preparations of the present invention in combination with administration devices to deliver the preparation locally to various regions of the suprachoroidal space with a flexible device as described in U.S. patent application 60/566,776 by the common inventors, incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Formulations for Migration to a Posterior Region:
For treatment of the posterior region of the eye, for example, to treat the entire macula, choroid or the optic nerve, the drug may be prepared in a form to allow migration after delivery and delivered to an anterior region of the suprachoroidal space. The drug may be formulated in soluble form, with a rapid dissoluting polymeric excipient or as small microparticles or microspheres to allow drug migration after administration. If a polymeric excipient is used, a low viscosity, rapidly absorbed formulation may be selected to distribute the drug uniformly in the region of administration to minimize areas of overly high drug concentration, and subsequently dissolution of the excipient to allow drug migration to the posterior region of the suprachoroidal space. Of particular utility is the use of such a polymeric excipient in combination with drug microparticles or microspheres. Such use of drug migration is advantageous as the drug may be injected into an anterior region of the eye easily accessible by the physician, and used to treat a posterior region distant from the injection site such as, the posterior choroid and macula. Preferred microparticles or microspheres are those with an outer diameter in the range of about 1 to 33 microns.
Sustained Release:
The use of drug microparticles, one or more polymeric excipients or a combination of both, may also be applied to confer sustained release properties to the drug formulation. The drug release rate from the microparticles may be tailored by adjusting drug solubility or application of a controlled release coating. The polymeric excipient may also provide sustained release from incorporated drugs. The polymeric excipient may, for example, be selected to limit drug diffusion or provide drug affinity to slow drug release. The dissolution rate of the polymeric excipient may also be adjusted to control the kinetics of its effect on sustained release properties.
Delivery Devices:
A device for minimally invasive delivery of drugs to the suprachoroidal space may comprise a needle for injection of drugs or drug containing materials directly to the suprachoroidal space. The device may also comprise elements to advance the needle through the conjunctiva and sclera tissues to or just adjacent to the suprachoroidal space without perforation or trauma to the inner choroid layer. The position of the leading tip of the delivery device may be confirmed by non-invasive imaging such as ultrasound or optical coherence tomography, external depth markers or stops on the tissue-contacting portion of the device, depth or location sensors incorporated into the device or a combination of such sensors. For example, the delivery device may incorporate a sensor at the leading tip such as a light pipe or ultrasound sensor to determining depth and the location of the choroid or a pressure transducer to determine a change in local fluid pressure from entering the suprachoroidal space.
The leading tip of the delivery device is preferably shaped to facilitate penetration of the sclera, either by cutting, blunt dissection or a combination of cutting and blunt dissection. Features of the device may include energy delivery elements to aid tissue penetration such as ultrasound, high fluid pressure, or tissue ablative energy at the distal tip. The outer diameter of the tissue contacting portion of the device is preferably about the size of a 20 to 25 gauge needle (nominal 0.0358 to 0.0203 inch outer diameter) to allow minimally invasive use without requiring additional features for tissue dissection or wound closure. Suitable materials for the delivery device include high modulus materials such as metals including stainless steel, tungsten and nickel titanium alloys, and structural polymers such as nylon, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyimide and polyetheretherketone, and ceramics. The tissue contacting portions of the device may also comprise surface treatments such as lubricious coatings to assist in tissue penetration or energy reflective or absorptive coatings to aid in location and guidance during medical imaging.
The needle may be mounted or slidably disposed at a shallow angle to a plate or fixation mechanism to provide for localization and control of the angle and depth of insertion. The plate, such as shown in
Elements to seal the needle tract during injection such as a flexible flange or vacuum seal along the tract may also be incorporated to aid delivery. Referring to
The device may also comprise elements to mechanically open the suprachoroidal space, in order to allow injection of microparticulate drugs or drug delivery implants which are larger than can be delivered with a small bore needle. In one embodiment, such a delivery device may comprise a first element provided to penetrate the scleral tissue to a specified depth, and a second element, which can advance, and atraumatically distend the choroid inwards, maintaining a pathway to the suprachoroidal space. The second element may be disposed within or placed adjacent to the first element. An embodiment of a device having such elements is shown in
Referring to
In another embodiment, the delivery device comprises a thin walled needle fabricated with a short, high angle bevel at the leading tip to allow the bevel to be advanced into or through scleral tissues. Maintaining the beveled section with the opening directed inward prevents the drug from being expressed away from the suprachoroidal space. Various types of access and delivery may be achieved through the precise placement of the needle tip into or through the scleral tissues. If the needle is advanced through the sclera and into the suprachoroidal space, the needle may then be used for direct injections into the space or to serve as an introducer for the placement of other devices such as a microcannula. If the needle is placed in close proximity to the inner boundary of the sclera, injection of drug formulations through the needle will allow fluid dissection or flow through any remaining interposing scleral tissue and delivery to the suprachoroidal space. An embodiment of a device useful in such manner is shown in
In
In one embodiment, the delivery device may allow a specific angle of entry into the tissues in order to provide a tissue pathway that will maintain the tract within the sclera, or penetrate to the suprachoroidal space without contacting the choroid. Referring to
In one embodiment, a system for obtaining minimally invasive access to the suprachoroidal space comprises an access cannula and an optical device used to determine the location of the access cannula distal tip in the tissue tract providing direct feedback upon entry to the suprachoroidal space. The color differential between the sclera (white) and the choroid (brown) may be used to provide location information or OCT methods may be used to determine the distance to the choroid interface from the sclera. The optical device may be incorporated within a microcannula, or may be an independent device such as a microendoscope or a fiber optic sensor and transducer capable of detecting the tissue properties. The optical signal may be sent to a camera and monitor for direct visualization, as in the case of an endoscope, or to an optical signal processing system, which will indicate depth by signaling the change in tissue properties at the tip of the optical fiber. The access microcannula may be a needle or introducer-type device made of metal or plastic. The distal end of the access cannula is suitable to pierce ocular tissue. If independent, the optical device will be removed from the access microcannula after cannulation to allow access to the space for other devices or for an injectate to administer treatment. An embodiment of such a system is shown in
In another embodiment, the optical device of the system comprises a focal illumination source at the distal tip. The amount of light scatter and the intensity of the light will vary depending upon the type of tissues and depth of a small light spot traversing the tissues. The change may be seen from the surface by the observing physician or measured with a sensor. The focal spot may be incorporated as an illuminated beacon tip on a microcannula. Referring to
Of particular utility with a delivery device are drug formulations as previously described that are compatible with the delivery device. Drug in microparticulate form are preferred to be substantially smaller than the lumen diameter to prevent lumen obstruction during delivery. Microparticles of average outer dimension of approximately 10 to 20% of the device lumen at maximum are preferred. A useful formulation includes microspheres or microparticles with an outer diameter in the range of about 1 to 33 microns. Also preferred is the use of a polymeric excipient in the drug formulation to enable the formulation to be injected into the scleral tissues adjacent to the suprachoroidal space, with subsequent dissection of the tissue between the distal tip and the suprachoroidal space by the excipient containing fluid to form a flow path for the drug into the suprachoroidal space. Formulations with thixotropic properties are advantageous for passage through a small needle lumen as well as for fluid dissection of scleral tissue.
The following examples are provided only for illustrative purposes and are not intended to limit the invention in any way.
Fluorescent dyed polystyrene microspheres (Firefli™, Duke Scientific, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif.) suspended in phosphate-buffered saline were used as model drug to evaluate the size range in which particulates will migrate in the suprachoroidal space from the anterior region to the posterior region.
An enucleated human cadaver eye was radially incised to the choroid in the pars plana region, which is in the anterior portion of the eye. Using a syringe terminated with a blunt 27 gauge needle, 0.15 mL of a 1% by volume microsphere suspension (mean diameter 6 micron) was delivered into the anterior region of the suprachoroidal space. The needle was withdrawn and the incision sealed with cyanoacrylate adhesive.
The eye was then perfused for 24 hours with phosphate buffered saline at 10 mm Hg pressure by introducing into the anterior chamber a 30 gauge needle attached to a reservoir via infusion tubing. The reservoir was placed on a lab jack and elevated to provide constant perfusion pressure. Several hours prior to examination, the eye was placed into a beaker of glycerin to clarify the scleral tissue by dehydration, allowing direct visualization of the suprachoroidal space.
The microspheres were visualized using a stereofluorescence microscope (Model MZ-16, Leica, Inc.) with fluorescence filters selected for the microsphere fluorescence. Under low magnification (7 to 35×) the microspheres could be clearly seen in a stream-like pattern running from the site of instillation back toward the optic nerve region, collecting primarily in the posterior region of the suprachoroidal space.
The experiment was repeated using microsphere suspensions of 1, 6, 10, 15, 24 and 33 micron diameter with the same resulting pattern of migration and distribution to the posterior region of the eye.
The experiment of Example 1 was repeated, except that a mixture of 6 and 33 micron diameter fluorescent microspheres as a model drug was suspended in a polymeric excipient comprising a surgical viscoelastic (Healon 5, Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.), a 2.3% concentration of sodium hyaluronic acid of 4,000,000 Daltons molecular weight, with thixotropic properties of a zero shear viscosity of 7,000,000 mPas and 400 mPas viscosity at 1000 s1 shear rate. The mixture was introduced into the suprachoroidal space in the manner of Example 1. After 24 hour perfusion, the microspheres resided solely in the suprachoroidal space at the anterior instillation site and did not show evidence of migration, demonstrating the localizing effect of the thixotropic polymeric excipient.
To demonstrate the effect of polymeric excipient viscosity on drug localization, the experiment of Example 1 was repeated, except that bevacizumab (Avastin™, Genentech), an anti-VEG antibody, was adsorbed onto 5 micron diameter carboxylated fluorescent microspheres and mixed at equal volumes with one of three hyaluronic acid based surgical viscoelastics (Healon, Healon GV, Healon 5, Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.), each with a different viscosity and thixotropic properties. (Healon, 300,000 mPas viscoscity at zero shear rate, 150 mPas viscosity at 1000 s−1 shear rate; Healon GV, 3,000,000 mPas viscosity at zero shear rate, 200 mPas at 1000 s−1 shear rate; Healon 5, 7,000,000 mPas viscosity at zero shear rate, 400 mPas viscosity at 1000 s−1 shear rate.) Each mixture was introduced into the anterior region of the suprachoroidal space at the pars plana in the anterior region of the eye in the manner of Example 1. After 24 hours perfusion, the microspheres in Healon and Healon GV were found to be in process of migration to the posterior region of the suprachoroidal space with the formulation found at both the pars plana site of instillation and the posterior pole. The microspheres in Healon 5 remained dispersed in the viscoelastic localized at the original injection site in the pars plana region of the suprachoroidal space.
The experiment of Example 1 was repeated, except that bevacizumab (Avastin™, Genentech) was covalently crosslinked using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylamino propyl)carbodiimide (EDAC, Sigma-Aldrich) onto 5 micron diameter carboxylated fluorescent microspheres and mixed at equal volumes with one of three surgical viscoelastics (Healon, Healon GV, Healon 5, Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.), each with a different viscosity and thixotropic properties as in Example 3. The mixture was introduced into the suprachoroidal space at the pars plana in the manner of Example 1. After 24 hour perfusion the microspheres remained exclusively in the pars plana region of the suprachoroidal space for all viscoelastic carriers.
To demonstrate the effect of a crosslinking polymeric excipient on drug localization, the experiment of Example 1 was repeated, except that 10 micron diameter fluorescent microspheres were mixed into a 4% alginate solution and introduced into the suprachoroidal space at the pars plana region. Before sealing the incision site an equal volume of 1 M CaCl2 solution was instilled at the site of the microsphere/alginate suspension to initiate crosslinking of the alginate excipient. The mixture was allowed to gel for 5 minutes before perfusing as in Example 1. The microspheres remained exclusively at the site of instillation, dispersed in the crosslinked polymer excipient.
A drug containing injectate was prepared by suspending 1.5 mg of Triamcinolone acetonide in microparticulate form, in 15 microliters of Healon viscoelastic (Advanced Medical Optics, Irvine Calif.) with a zero shear viscosity of 300,000 mPas and a viscosity of 150 mPas at a shear rate of 1000 s−1. Forty porcine subjects were placed under anesthesia and the right eye prepared and draped in a sterile manner. A conjunctival peritomy was made near the superior limbus, exposing and providing surgical access to a region of sclera. A small radial incision was made in the sclera, exposing bare choroid. A flexible microcannula with a 360 micron diameter tip and 325 micron diameter body (iTrack microcannula, iScience Interventional Corp.) was inserted in to the scleral incision and advanced in a posterior direction to a target region behind the macula. The drug suspension was injected into the posterior region of the suprachoroidal space, and was observed to form a layer between the choroid and sclera at the target region. The microcannula was retracted and the scleral and conjunctival incisions closed with 7-0 Vicryl suture. The subjects were observed and eyes tissues recovered at 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 4 days, 7 days, 14 days, 30 days and 90 days. Angiographic, histologic, and photographic studies of the subjects demonstrated no sign of posterior segment pathology. Recovered samples of choroid demonstrated significant concentration of the drug, in the range of at least 1 mg per gram of tissue at all recovery time periods.
A drug-containing formulation comprising 20 mL Healon 5 and 50 mL (1.5 mg) bevacizumab (Avastin™, Genentech) was prepared. Eighteen porcine subjects were anesthetized and the right eye prepared and draped in a sterile manner. A conjunctival peritomy was made near the superior limbus, exposing and providing surgical access to a region of sclera. A small radial incision was made in the sclera, exposing bare choroid. A flexible microcannula with a 360 micron diameter tip and 325 micron diameter body (iTrack microcannula, iScience Interventional Corp.) was inserted in to the scleral incision and advanced in a posterior direction to a target region behind the macula. The drug formulation was injected into the posterior region of the suprachoroidal space, and was observed to form a layer between the choroid and sclera at the target region. The microcannula was retracted and the scleral and conjunctival incisions closed with 7-0 Vicryl suture. Another 18 porcine subjects were anesthetized and each received a 50 mL bolus of bevacizumab via injection into the vitreous. Both groups of test subjects were evaluated and sacrificed at 0.5, 7, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days post-injection. Serum samples were taken and tested for bevacizumab using an enzyme-based immunoassay. Higher plasma levels of bevacizumab were found in the intravitreally injected subjects and for longer duration of time than the suprachoroidal delivery group. The right globes were removed and dissected in order to quantitate bevacizumab in specific tissues and regions using an enzyme-based immunoassay. The enzyme immunoassay demonstrated that bevacizumab delivered via intravitreal injection was distributed throughout eye, but when delivered suprachoroidally remained largely in the retina and choroid, with little found in the vitreous and anterior chamber.
The experiment of Example 1 was repeated, except a drug formulation 0.2 mL of Healon 5, 0.6 mL of Avastin, and 24 mg of triamcinolone acetonide was prepared to provide a treatment with both anti-inflammatory and anti-VEGF properties. An approximately 5 mm long incision was made longitudinally in the pars plana region transecting the sclera, exposing the choroid of a cadaver globe that had been clarified by immersion in glycerol for approximately 30 minutes and perfused with saline at 12 mm Hg pressure. The flexible microcannula of Example 6 was primed with the drug formulation and the microcannula tip was inserted into the suprachoroidal space through the scleral incision. With the aid of the fiber optic beacon at the microcannula tip, the distal end of the microcannula was steered toward the posterior pole of the globe, stopping approximately 5 mm short of the optic nerve. Using a Viscoelastic Injector (iScience Interventional), 70 microliters of the drug formulation was injected into the posterior region of the suprachoroidal space. The microcannula was removed by withdrawing though the pars plana incision. The mixture was visible though the clarified sclera, and formed a deposit near the optic nerve with the mixture also following the catheter track. The incision was sealed with cyanoacrylate (Locktite 4011) and the globe perfused again with saline at 12 mm Hg for 3 hours. The sclera was re-cleared by immersion in glycerol to examine the administered drug formulation. The drug formulation was observed by microscopy to have formed a layer of dispersed drug within the polymer excipient in the posterior region of the suprachoroidal space.
A series of experiments were performed to evaluate minimally invasive delivery of substances to the suprachoroidal space. The goal of the experiments was to use non-invasive imaging and fluid dissection as a means of delivering substances through scleral tissue and into the suprachoroidal space, without having direct penetration into the suprachoroidal space.
Human cadaver eyes were obtained from an eye bank and were prepared by inflating the eyes to approximately 20 mm Hg pressure with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). A delivery needle was fabricated using stainless steel hypodermic tubing, 255 mm ID×355 mm OD. The needle distal tip was ground into a bi-faceted short bevel point, 400 um in length and at an angle of 50°. The fabricated needle was then silver-soldered into a standard 25 gauge×1 inch hypodermic needle to complete the assembly.
The needle was gently advanced into scleral tissue at an acute angle)(<10° with respect to the surface of the eye. The needle entry was started in the pars plana region approximately 4 mm from the limbus, and the needle advanced posteriorly in scleral tissue to create a tract between 5 and 6 mm long without penetrating through the sclera into the suprachoroidal space. A high resolution ultrasound system (iUltrasound, iScience Surgical Corp.) was used to guide and verify placement of the needle tip within scleral tissues and to document the injections.
In the first set of experiments, a polymeric excipient alone comprising a hyaluronic acid surgical viscoelastic (Healon 5, Advanced Medical Optics, Inc) was injected. In a second set of experiments, the viscoelastic was mixed in a 1:1 ratio with a 1% aqueous solution of 10 micron diameter polystyrene microspheres (Duke Scientific, Inc) to represent a model microparticulate drug. The viscoelastic and the mixture were delivered through the needle using a screw driven syringe (ViscoInjector, iScience Surgical Corp.) in order to control delivery volume and injection pressure. The injections were made with the needle bevel turned inwards towards the center of the globe. Multiple locations on three cadaver eyes were used for the experiments.
In the first experiments, the needle tract was approximately 3 to 4 mm in length and the injectate was observed to flow back out the tract. With placement of the needle tip in a longer tract, higher injection pressure was obtained and allowed the injectate to dissect through the remaining interposing layers of the sclera and deliver to the suprachoroidal space. Through trials it was found that needle tip placement in the outer layers of the sclera (<½ scleral thickness) resulted in the delivery of the viscoelastic into an intra-scleral pocket or sometimes through to the outer surface of the globe. With the needle tip approaching the basement of the sclera, the injections dissected through the remaining interposing scleral tissue, entered the suprachoroidal space and spread to fill the suprachoroidal space in the region of the injection.
An experiment was performed to use micro-endoscopic imaging to allow minimally invasive access to the suprachoroidal space in a human cadaver eye. A custom fabricated, flexible micro-endoscope (Endoscopy Support Services, Brewster N.Y.) with an outer diameter of 350 microns containing an imaging bundle with 1200 pixels was mounted on a micrometer adjusted stage. The stage was mounted on a vertical stand allowing for controlled up and down travel of the endoscope. The micro-endoscope was attached to a ½″ chip CCD camera and then to a video monitor. A 20 gauge hypodermic needle was placed over the endoscope to provide a means for piercing the tissues for access.
The camera was turned on and an external light source with a light pipe (Model MI-150, Dolan Jenner, Boxborough, Mass.) was used to provide transcleral imaging illumination. The needle was advanced until the distal tip was in contact with the scleral surface of a human cadaver whole globe approximately 4 mm posterior of the limbus. The micro-endoscope was then lowered until the white scleral surface could be seen through the end of the needle. The needle was then slowly advanced into the scleral tissue by slight back-and-forth rotation. As the needle was advanced in this manner, the endoscope was lowered to follow the tract created by the needle. At or within the sclera, the endoscopic image was seen as white or whitish-grey. As the needle pierced the scleral tissues, the image color changed to dark brown indicating the presence of the dark choroidal tissues, demonstrating surgical access of the suprachoroidal space.
An experiment was performed to use fiber-optic illuminated guidance to allow minimally invasive access to the suprachoroidal space in a human cadaver eye. A flexible microcannula with an illuminated distal tip (iTrack-250A, iScience Interventional, Menlo Park, Calif.) was placed into a 25 gauge hypodermic needle. The microcannula comprised a plastic optical fiber that allowed for illumination of the distal tip. The microcatheter fiber connector was attached to a 635 nm (red) laser diode fiber optic illuminator (iLumin, iScience Interventional) and the illuminator turned on to provide a steady red light emanating for the microcannula tip. The microcannula was fed through the 25 gauge needle up to the distal bevel of the needle but not beyond.
The needle was slowly advanced in the pars plana region of a human cadaver whole globe until the needle tip was sufficiently embedded in the scleral tissues to allow a slight advancement of the microcannula. The illumination from the microcannula tip was seen clearly as the scleral tissues diffused the light to a significant extent. As the needle was advanced slowly, the microcannula was pushed forward at the same time. When the hypodermic needle tip pierced through sufficient scleral tissue to reach the suprachoroidal space, the red light of the microcannula tip immediately dimmed as the illuminated tip passed out of the diffusional scleral tissues and into the space beneath. The microcannula was advanced while keeping the needle stationary, thereby placing the microcannula tip into the suprachoroidal space. Further advancement of the microcannula in a posterior direction in the suprachoroidal space could be seen transclerally as a focal red spot without the broad light diffusion seen when the tip was inside the scleral tissues. Using a high frequency ultrasound system (iUltraSound, iScience Interventional), the location of the microcannula in the suprachoroidal space was confirmed.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/217,455, filed Mar. 30, 2021, now abandoned, which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/741,473, filed Jan. 13, 2020, now abandoned, which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/709,941, filed Feb. 21, 2007, now abandoned, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/776,903, filed Feb. 22, 2006, the entire contents of each are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1527291 | Guillermo et al. | Feb 1925 | A |
2187259 | Barnhart | Jan 1940 | A |
2623521 | Shaw | Dec 1952 | A |
2841145 | Epps | Jul 1958 | A |
2939459 | Lazarte et al. | Jun 1960 | A |
3376999 | De Hart et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3477432 | Shaw et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3739947 | Baumann et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3762540 | Baumann et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3788320 | Dye | Jan 1974 | A |
3838690 | Friedman | Oct 1974 | A |
3892311 | Sneider | Jul 1975 | A |
3962430 | O'Neill | Jun 1976 | A |
3964482 | Gerstel et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4226328 | Beddow | Oct 1980 | A |
4230112 | Smith | Oct 1980 | A |
4303071 | Smith | Dec 1981 | A |
4317448 | Smith | Mar 1982 | A |
4377897 | Eichenbaum et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4383530 | Bruno | May 1983 | A |
4417887 | Koshi | Nov 1983 | A |
4432964 | Shell et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4501363 | Isbey, Jr. | Feb 1985 | A |
4525346 | Stark | Jun 1985 | A |
4564016 | Maurice et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4573993 | Hoag et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4601708 | Jordan | Jul 1986 | A |
4615331 | Kramann | Oct 1986 | A |
4662870 | Augustine et al. | May 1987 | A |
4662878 | Lindmayer | May 1987 | A |
4689040 | Thompson | Aug 1987 | A |
4708147 | Haaga | Nov 1987 | A |
4717383 | Phillips et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4736850 | Bowman et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4755169 | Sarnoff et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4795432 | Karczmer | Jan 1989 | A |
4804371 | Vaillancourt | Feb 1989 | A |
4826490 | Byrne et al. | May 1989 | A |
4826871 | Gressel et al. | May 1989 | A |
4883483 | Lindmayer | Nov 1989 | A |
4889529 | Haindl | Dec 1989 | A |
4941874 | Sandow et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4966773 | Gressel et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5015240 | Soproni et al. | May 1991 | A |
5023087 | Yau-Young | Jun 1991 | A |
5024662 | Menes et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5025811 | Dobrogowski et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5057072 | Phipps | Oct 1991 | A |
5066276 | Wang | Nov 1991 | A |
5098389 | Cappucci | Mar 1992 | A |
5100394 | Dudar et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5104381 | Gresl et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5137447 | Hunter | Aug 1992 | A |
5164188 | Wong | Nov 1992 | A |
5172807 | Dragan et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5181909 | McFarlane | Jan 1993 | A |
5206267 | Shulman | Apr 1993 | A |
5211638 | Dudar et al. | May 1993 | A |
5273530 | Del Cerro et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5279564 | Taylor | Jan 1994 | A |
5284474 | Adair | Feb 1994 | A |
5295972 | Mischenko | Mar 1994 | A |
5300084 | Johnson | Apr 1994 | A |
5312361 | Zadini et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320609 | Haber et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5354286 | Mesa et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5358489 | Wyrick | Oct 1994 | A |
5364373 | Waskonig et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5364374 | Morrison et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5364734 | Pawlowski et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5395310 | Untereker et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5397313 | Gross | Mar 1995 | A |
5399159 | Chin et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5401247 | Yoon | Mar 1995 | A |
5407070 | Bascos et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5409457 | Del Cerro et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5443505 | Wong et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454409 | McAffer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5527306 | Haining | Jun 1996 | A |
5538503 | Henley | Jul 1996 | A |
5547467 | Pliquett et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5575780 | Saito | Nov 1996 | A |
5632740 | Koch et al. | May 1997 | A |
5658256 | Shields | Aug 1997 | A |
D383049 | Concari et al. | Sep 1997 | S |
5667491 | Pliquett et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5681825 | Lindqvist et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5752942 | Doyle et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766198 | Li | Jun 1998 | A |
5766242 | Wong et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767079 | Glaser et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779668 | Grabenkort | Jul 1998 | A |
5788679 | Gravlee, Jr. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792099 | DeCamp et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5817075 | Giungo | Oct 1998 | A |
5824072 | Wong | Oct 1998 | A |
5839715 | Leinsing | Nov 1998 | A |
5893397 | Peterson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5911223 | Weaver et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919158 | Saperstein et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5951520 | Burzynski et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5952378 | Stjernschantz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968022 | Saito | Oct 1999 | A |
6003566 | Thibault et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6039093 | Mrotzek et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6059111 | Davila et al. | May 2000 | A |
6083199 | Thorley et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6139534 | Niedospial, Jr. et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143329 | Kim | Nov 2000 | A |
6149623 | Reynolds | Nov 2000 | A |
6154671 | Parel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159218 | Aramant et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6189580 | Thibault et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209738 | Jansen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6258078 | Thilly | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280470 | Peyman | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299603 | Hecker et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309347 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309374 | Hecker et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319225 | Sugita et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319240 | Beck | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334856 | Allen et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6378526 | Bowman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378714 | Jansen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379340 | Zinger et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387078 | Gillespie, III | May 2002 | B1 |
6397849 | Bowman et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413245 | Yaacobi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432090 | Brunel | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6491670 | Toth | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494865 | Alchas | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503231 | Prausnitz et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6503240 | Niedospial, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517523 | Kaneko et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524581 | Adamis | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530904 | Edwards et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540725 | Ponzi | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6544246 | Niedospial, Jr. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546283 | Beck et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551299 | Miyoshi et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558361 | Yeshurun | May 2003 | B1 |
6564630 | Klemp | May 2003 | B1 |
6568439 | Se et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569123 | Alchas et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6571837 | Jansen et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6601721 | Jansen et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611707 | Prausnitz et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6622864 | Debbs et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626309 | Jansen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6638244 | Reynolds | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6656433 | Sasso | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6715520 | Andreasson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729370 | Norton et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6738526 | Betrisey et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6743211 | Prausnitz et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6773916 | Thiel et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
D499153 | Kuo | Nov 2004 | S |
6832994 | Niedospial, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6875205 | Leinsing | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883222 | Landau | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6918889 | Brunel | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6929623 | Stone | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936053 | Weiss | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6957745 | Thibault et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6979316 | Rubin et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6997917 | Niedospial, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025389 | Cuschieri et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025774 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7150735 | Hickle | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7207965 | Simon | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207980 | Christian et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7211062 | Kwon | May 2007 | B2 |
7214212 | Pommereau et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226439 | Prausnitz et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7316676 | Peyman et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326194 | Zinger et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7425207 | Miller et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7435237 | Tan | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7468057 | Ponzi | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7470257 | Norton et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7488308 | Lesch, Jr. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7510547 | Fangrow | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510548 | Fangrow | Mar 2009 | B2 |
D590690 | Bertini | Apr 2009 | S |
D598543 | Vogel et al. | Aug 2009 | S |
7569035 | Wilmot et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7615041 | Sullivan et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7632261 | Zinger et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7648482 | Edwards et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7648491 | Rogers | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7678077 | Harris et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7678078 | Peyman et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7722581 | Peyman | May 2010 | B2 |
7799009 | Niedospial, Jr. et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7879018 | Zinger et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7914803 | Chowhan et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918814 | Prausnitz et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7918874 | Siegal | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7947660 | Clark et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7967772 | McKenzie et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7975733 | Horppu et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7981101 | Walsh | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8003124 | Varner et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009162 | Takatori | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8016809 | Zinger et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8025653 | Capitaine et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8034105 | Stegmann et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8070739 | Zinger et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8099162 | Roy | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8114110 | Bednarek et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8123729 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8123736 | Kraushaar et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8128960 | Kabra et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8137312 | Sundar et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8157784 | Rogers | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8162914 | Kraushaar et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8167863 | Yow | May 2012 | B2 |
8172830 | Christian et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8173617 | Clark et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8177768 | Leinsing | May 2012 | B2 |
8187248 | Zihlmann | May 2012 | B2 |
8192408 | Nazzaro et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8197435 | Prausnitz et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8197443 | Sundar et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8197459 | Jansen et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8221353 | Cormier et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8225826 | Horppu et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8235967 | Chevallier et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
D667111 | Robinson | Sep 2012 | S |
8257336 | Zihlmann | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8262641 | Vedrine et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8287494 | Ma | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8303599 | Hess et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
D672506 | Szymanski | Dec 2012 | S |
8323227 | Hamatake et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8328772 | Kinast et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337421 | Freeman et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337509 | Schieber et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8348924 | Christian et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8403941 | Peterson et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409165 | Niedospial, Jr. et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425473 | Ho et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8430862 | Peyman et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8448786 | Tomes et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8460242 | Paques et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8469939 | Fangrow, Jr. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8475404 | Foshee et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8480646 | Nord et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8506515 | Burns et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8512309 | Shemesh et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529492 | Clauson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8535333 | De Juan, Jr et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8540692 | Fangrow | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8545430 | Silvestrini | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8545554 | Novakovic et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562545 | Freeman et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571802 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8574214 | Kuhn et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8574217 | Peyman | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8602959 | Park et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8608723 | Lev et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8617121 | Lanin et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8628508 | Weitzel et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8632589 | Helmy | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636713 | Prausnitz et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8652118 | Peyman | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8663167 | Bartha | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8663303 | Horvath et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8668676 | Chang | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685435 | Nivaggioli et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702659 | Lanin et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8727117 | Maasarani | May 2014 | B2 |
8747365 | De Sausmarez Lintell | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752598 | Denenburg et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8758306 | Lopez et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8795226 | Kuhn et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8808225 | Prausnitz et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8808242 | Paques et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
D713958 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2014 | S |
8821870 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
D715125 | Hung | Oct 2014 | S |
8852137 | Horvath et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8864740 | Schabbach et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
D718602 | Musser | Dec 2014 | S |
D719256 | Ohashi | Dec 2014 | S |
8920375 | Gonnelli | Dec 2014 | B2 |
D726908 | Yu et al. | Apr 2015 | S |
D733289 | Blanchard et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
D740098 | Kuo et al. | Oct 2015 | S |
9180044 | Touchard et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9180047 | Andino et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
D750223 | Andino et al. | Feb 2016 | S |
9539139 | Andino et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9572800 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9636253 | Andino et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9636332 | Zarnitsyn et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9664926 | Mitsui | May 2017 | B2 |
9770361 | Andino et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9788995 | Prausnitz et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9931330 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9937075 | Andino et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9956114 | Andino et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10188550 | Andino et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10390901 | Godfrey et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10517756 | Andino et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10555833 | Andino et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10632013 | Prausnitz et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10722396 | Andino et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10905586 | Prausnitz et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10952894 | Hammack et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10973681 | Andino et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
20010008961 | Hecker et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010051798 | Hochman | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020042594 | Lum et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052580 | Ooyauchi | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082527 | Liu et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082543 | Park et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020108875 | Feinberg et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112981 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020142459 | Williams et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156413 | Williams et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030009113 | Olson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030050602 | Pettis et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030083645 | Angel et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088204 | Joshi | May 2003 | A1 |
20030139729 | Stegmann et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030171722 | Paques et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030233070 | De La Serna et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019331 | Yeshurun | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039253 | Peyman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049150 | Dalton et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059256 | Perez | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040072105 | Yeshurun et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106904 | Gonnelli et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122359 | Wenz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040141925 | Bosch et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040164454 | Gartstein et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186084 | Alam et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199130 | Chornenky | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215347 | Hayes | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249404 | Haefliger | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265365 | Daddona et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050009910 | Hughes et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033230 | Alchas et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055083 | Carranza et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065137 | Jani et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070819 | Poux et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050089545 | Kuwano et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101582 | Lyons et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101882 | Leira et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101967 | Weber et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137525 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148034 | Hariri et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171507 | Christian et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181017 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203575 | Carson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209565 | Yuzhakov et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050244462 | Farooq | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050244463 | Huang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050244469 | Whitcup et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050245906 | Makower et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256499 | Pettis et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050281862 | Karakelle et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013859 | Yamada et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060032768 | Hamai et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036318 | Foulkes | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060055090 | Lee et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084942 | Kim et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060086689 | Raju | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089607 | Chen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060141049 | Lyons et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173418 | Rinaudo et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178614 | Nemati | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189608 | Bingaman | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195187 | Stegmann et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060202385 | Xu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229562 | Marsh et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233858 | Tzekov et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259008 | Orilla | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271025 | Jones et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016103 | Calasso et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070060927 | Longson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073197 | Prausnitz et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070082841 | Higuchi et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093742 | Higuchi et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093877 | Beecham et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070149944 | Tashiro et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070151882 | Cocheteux et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178197 | LaRue et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191863 | De Juan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202116 | Burnie et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202186 | Yamamoto | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070224278 | Lyons et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225654 | Hess et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233037 | Gifford, et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260201 | Prausnitz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270745 | Nezhat et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270768 | Dacquay et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282405 | Wong, Jr. et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287985 | Estes et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299386 | Peyman | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080008762 | Robinson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015539 | Pieroni et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027371 | Higuchi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033351 | Trogden et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058704 | Hee | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058717 | Spector | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065002 | Lobl et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071246 | Nazzaro et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082841 | Juenemann et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097335 | Trogden et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097346 | Charles | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097390 | Dacquay et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080131484 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152694 | Lobl et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177239 | Li et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183123 | Behar-Cohen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080200883 | Tomono | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208255 | Siegal | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228127 | Burns et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234625 | Dacquay et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080300634 | Gray | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030381 | Lind et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076463 | Attinger | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081277 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082321 | Edelman et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082713 | Friden | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088721 | De Bizemont et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105749 | De Juan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090148527 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090187167 | Sexton et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090259180 | Choi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287161 | Traub et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090312782 | Park | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010004 | Van Emelen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100010452 | Paques et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100012537 | Farrar et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100015158 | Robinson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030150 | Paques et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057011 | Charles | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074925 | Carmon | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074957 | Robinson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100081707 | Ali et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100098772 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100054 | Cormier et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100152646 | Girijavallabhan et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152667 | Kietzmann | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152676 | Clements et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160889 | Smith et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100173866 | Hee et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191176 | Ho et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191177 | Chang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100211079 | Aramant | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241102 | Ma | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256597 | Prausnitz et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100312120 | Meier | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318034 | Goncalves | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004265 | Wenger et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022023 | Weitzel et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110060310 | Prestrelski et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110112546 | Juan, Jr. et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110152775 | Lopez et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166531 | Stroumpoulis et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202012 | Bartlett | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213317 | Chen et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238075 | Clauson et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110243999 | Dellamary et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264028 | Ramdas et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282298 | Agian et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288492 | Holmqvist | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295152 | Sasaki et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306923 | Roy | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120004245 | May et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120008327 | Brennan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120024987 | Nagele | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120029360 | Hendriks et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035524 | Silvestrini | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059346 | Sheppard et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078224 | Lerner et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120083727 | Barnett | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095414 | Lanin et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095438 | Lanin et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101475 | Wilmot et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116306 | Heald et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123351 | Lanin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123386 | Tsals | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123437 | Horvath et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123440 | Horvath et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123473 | Hernandez | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130207 | O'Dea et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136318 | Lanin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150128 | Zhao | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120157880 | Haselby et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165723 | Horvath et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191064 | Conston et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197208 | Bruggemann et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197218 | Timm | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203193 | Rogers | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220917 | Silvestrini et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226260 | Prausnitz et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120232522 | Prausnitz et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120259288 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265149 | Lerner et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271272 | Hammack et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120296307 | Holt et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130035662 | Decker et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130040895 | Robinson et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041265 | Sostek et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130060202 | Thorley et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130065888 | Cetina-Cizmek et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130072900 | Colantonio | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079716 | Thorley et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130096533 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130102973 | Thorley et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130116523 | Jung et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138049 | Kemp et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130140208 | Hemmann | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150803 | Shetty et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130190694 | Barrow-Williams et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130211335 | Paques et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130216623 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218102 | Iwase et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218269 | Schachar et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226103 | Papiorek | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130237910 | Shetty et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130237916 | Hanson et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245600 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253416 | Rotenstreich | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130289545 | Baerveldt et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130295006 | Christoforidis et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130331786 | Hofmann | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130338612 | Smith et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140010823 | Robinson et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012226 | Hochman | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140018771 | Shekalim | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140027326 | Peruzzo | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031833 | Novakovic et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140039391 | Clarke et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140039413 | Jugl et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140078854 | Head et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140088552 | Soni et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140094752 | Hiles | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140102927 | Liversidge | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140107566 | Prausnitz et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114243 | Smith et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140124528 | Fangrow | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135716 | Clarke et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140194834 | Passaglia | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140200518 | Ekman et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140224688 | Slemmen et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140231287 | Tomes et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140236098 | Mica et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140243754 | Clarke et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140249539 | Mica et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140257207 | Clarke et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140261727 | Mansour et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140261877 | Ivosevic et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276482 | Astafieva et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276649 | Ivosevic et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140296802 | Geiger et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309599 | Schaller | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140323979 | Henley et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140323985 | Hourmand et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330213 | Hourmand et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350479 | Hourmand et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140353190 | Okihara et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150013827 | Kuhn | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150013835 | Cordes | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150025474 | Riedel et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150038905 | Andino et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150045731 | Gupta et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150045744 | Gupta et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150051545 | Henderson et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150051581 | Andino et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150110717 | Distel et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150129456 | Miller et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150133415 | Whitcup | May 2015 | A1 |
20150157359 | Shinzato et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150209180 | Prausnitz et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150223977 | Oberkircher et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150258120 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150297609 | Shah et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150320596 | Gifford, III et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160015895 | Blondino et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160015908 | Uemura et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160022486 | Clauson et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160106584 | Andino et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160106587 | Jarrett et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160166819 | Simmers | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160193080 | Hammack et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160199581 | Cachemaille et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160206628 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160213662 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160310417 | Prausnitz et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160331738 | Jarrett et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160354239 | Roy | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160354244 | Horvath et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170086725 | Woo et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170095369 | Andino et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170216228 | Asgharian et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170224435 | Godfrey et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170224534 | Andino et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170273827 | Prausnitz et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170290702 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170333416 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170340560 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180028358 | Andino et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180028516 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180042765 | Noronha et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180042767 | Andino et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180092897 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180325884 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180333297 | Andino et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190000669 | Hammack et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190231592 | Andino et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190240208 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190269702 | White et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190290485 | Andino et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190307606 | Andino et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190350755 | Andino et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200030143 | Andino et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200061357 | Jung et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200237556 | Prausnitz et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200330269 | Bley et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200390692 | Yamamoto et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210022918 | Prausnitz et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210169689 | Bley et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210212940 | Yamamoto | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210220173 | Andino et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210366311 | Fisher et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210393436 | Prausnitz et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220062040 | Hammack et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220062041 | Hammack et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220280386 | Andino et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2639322 | Mar 2009 | CA |
1229679 | Sep 1999 | CN |
1604799 | Apr 2005 | CN |
1608587 | Apr 2005 | CN |
1674954 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1681547 | Oct 2005 | CN |
1706365 | Dec 2005 | CN |
1736474 | Feb 2006 | CN |
1946445 | Apr 2007 | CN |
101031256 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101052434 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101351239 | Jan 2009 | CN |
201192452 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101559249 | Oct 2009 | CN |
201356711 | Dec 2009 | CN |
201591741 | Sep 2010 | CN |
101854891 | Oct 2010 | CN |
101959519 | Jan 2011 | CN |
103037802 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103209733 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103857431 | Jun 2014 | CN |
204364577 | Jun 2015 | CN |
006961 | Jun 2006 | EA |
1188456 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1568359 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2193821 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2307055 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2001525826 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2009183441 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009531298 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2010234034 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2013543418 | Dec 2013 | JP |
5828535 | Dec 2015 | JP |
20040096561 | Nov 2004 | KR |
14351 | Jul 2000 | RU |
2344767 | Jan 2009 | RU |
2353393 | Apr 2009 | RU |
2428956 | Sep 2011 | RU |
WO-9208406 | May 1992 | WO |
WO-9220389 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO-9401124 | Jan 1994 | WO |
WO-9412217 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO-9609838 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO-9851348 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO-0007530 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0007565 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0117589 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-0141685 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO-02058769 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO-03002094 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO-03024507 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-03039633 | May 2003 | WO |
WO-2004000389 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2004105864 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2005011741 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO-2005032510 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO-2005046641 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005069831 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO-2005072701 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO-2005074942 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO-2005107845 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2006004595 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO-2006020714 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2006042252 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2006058189 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO-2006128034 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2006138719 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO-2007069697 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO-2007099406 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2007100745 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2007130105 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2007131050 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2007150018 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2008082637 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2009067325 | May 2009 | WO |
WO-2009105534 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO-2009114521 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO-2010009034 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO-2010054660 | May 2010 | WO |
WO-2010132751 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO-2011057065 | May 2011 | WO |
WO-2011123722 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO-2011139713 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO-2012019136 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO-2012051575 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO-2012118498 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO-2012125869 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO-2012125872 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO-2012162459 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO-2013050236 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO-2013098166 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO-2013151904 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO-2014028285 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO-2014036009 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO-2014179698 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO-2014197317 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO-2015015467 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO-2015095772 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO-2015110660 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO-2015195842 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO-2015196085 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO-2016042162 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO-2016042163 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO-2017120600 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO-2017120601 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO-2017139375 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO-2017190142 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO-2017192565 | Nov 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abbott Laboratories Inc., Abbott Park, Illinois, USA, Abbott Medical Optics, “HEALON5 OVD,” 2004, [online]. Retrieved from the Interent: URL: http://abbottmedicaloptics.com/products/cataract/ovds/healon5-viscoelastic. Retrieved from the Internet on: Aug. 16, 2016, 5 pages. |
Al-Shaikh, B. et al., 2007, “Essentials of Anaesthetic Equipment,” Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 3rd Edition, 7 pages. |
Amaratunga, A. et al., “Inhibition of Kinesin Synthesis and Rapid Anterograde Axonal Transport in Vivo by an Antisense Oligonucleotide,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Aug. 1993, vol. 268, No. 23, pp. 17427-17430. |
Anthem, USA, “Medical Policy. Suprachoroidal Injection of a Pharmacologic Agent,” Last Review Date: Nov. 14, 2013, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.anthem.com/medicalpolicies/policies/mp_pw_b076412.htm. Retrieved from the Internet on: Oct. 24, 2014, American Medical Association, 3 pages. |
Beer, P. J. et al., “Photographic Evidence of Vitreous Wicks After Intravitreal Injections,” Retina Today, 2(2):24-39 (Mar. 2007). |
Berglin, L. C. et al., “Tracing of Suprachoroidally Microneedle Injected Labled Drugs and Microbeads in Human, Pig and Rabbit Tissue Using Liquid Nitrogen Snap-Freeze Thaw and Lypholization Techniques,” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci., 51:E-Abstract 5330 (2010), 2 pages. |
Brown, D. M., “Aflibercept for Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema,” Retina Today, Jul./Aug. 2011, pp. 59-60. |
Bunnelle, E., “Syringe Diameters,” [online] 2005. Cchem.berkeley.edu. Available at: http://www.cchem.berkeley.edu/rsgrp/Syringediameters.pdf [Accessed Mar. 11, 2022], 3 pages. |
Careforde Healthcare, B Braun Glass Loss-Of-Resistance Syringes # 332158—10cc Glass Loss-Of-Resistance Syringe, Luer Slip Metal Tip, 10/cs, (2014), 2 pages. |
Careforde Inc., Careforde Healthcare, Chicago, IL, “B Braun Glass Loss-Of-Resistance Syringes # 332155—5cc Glass Loss-Of-Resistance Syringe, Luer Lock Metal Tip, 10/cs,” [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://careforde.com/b-braun-glass-loss-of-resistance-syringes-332155-5cc-glass-loss-of-resistance-syringe-luer-lock-metal-tip-10-cs/. Retrieved from the Internet on: Oct. 16, 2014, (2014), 2 pages. |
Careforde Inc., Careforde Healthcare, Chicago, IL, “B Braun Perifix Plastic Loss-Of-Resistance Syringes # 332152—8cc Plastic Luer Lock Loss-of-Resistance Syringe, 50/cs,” [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://careforde.com/b-braun-perifix-plastic-loss-of-resistance-syringes-332152-8cc-plastic-luer-lock-loss-of-resistance-syringe-50-cs/. Retrieved from the Internet on: Oct. 16, 2014, (2014), 2 pages. |
Choy, Y. B. et al., “Mucoadhesive microdiscs engineered for ophthalmic drug delivery: effect of particle geometry and formulation on preocular residence time,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 49:4808-4815 (2008). |
Dinning, W. J., “Steroids and the eye-indications and complications,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 52, 1976, pp. 634-638. |
Dogliotti, A. M., “Research and Clinical Observations on Spinal Anesthesia: With Special Reference to the Peridural Technique,” Current Researches in Anesthesia & Analgesia, Mar.-Apr. 1933, vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 59-65. |
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Ophthalmology, “Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone,” Jul. 2010, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.dbh.nhs.uk/Library/Patient_Information_Leaflets/WPR32110%20IIT%20No%20crops.pdf, 2 pages. |
Edwards, A. et al., “Fiber matrix model of sclera and corneal stroma fordrug delivery to the eye,” AIChE Journal, 44(1):214-225 (1998). |
Einmahl, et al., “Evaluation of a novel biomaterial in the suprachoroidal space of the rabbit eye” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 43, Issue 5, 2002, pp. 1533-1539. |
Einmahl, S. et al., “Ocular biocompatibility of a poly(ortho ester) characterized by autocatalyzed degradation,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 67(1):44-53 (2003). |
“Epidural,” Wikipedia [online], retrieved from the internet on Sep. 3, 2014, URL: http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidural, 21 pages. |
Examination Report for Indian Application No. 201917009102, dated Jul. 16, 2021, 6 pages. |
Examination Report for Singapore Application No. 11201509051V, dated Feb. 1, 2017, 4 pages. |
Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2014259694, dated May 24, 2018, 2 pages. |
Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2015230874, dated Jul. 28, 2017, 11 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 07751620.1, dated Jan. 15, 2013, 10 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 11777924.9, dated Feb. 4, 2015, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13833318.2, dated Apr. 1, 2016, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 14791646.4, dated Nov. 21, 2016, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 14808034.4, dated Jan. 23, 2017, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15810459.6, dated Apr. 16, 2018, 11 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17750694.6, dated Sep. 2, 2019, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17880800.2, dated Jun. 2, 2020, 13 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18176149.5, dated Jan. 22, 2019, 10 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18176172.7, dated Feb. 6, 2019, 11 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18199418.7, dated Jul. 5, 2019, 9 pages. |
Falkenstein, I. A et al., “Comparison of visual acuity in macular degeneration patients measured with Snellen and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy study charts,” Ophthalmology 115(2):319-323 (Feb. 2008). |
Feldkamp, L. A. et al., “Practical cone-beam algorithm,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 1(6):612-619 (1984). |
First Examination Report for Indian Application No. 10270/DELNP/2015, dated Apr. 5, 2021, 7 pages. |
First Examination Report for Indian Application No. 3345/KOLNP/2008, dated May 21, 2015, 3 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200780014501.3, dated Mar. 11, 2010, 6 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201110093644.6, dated Mar. 26, 2012, 11 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201180060268.9, dated Oct. 10, 2014, 9 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201480025034.4, dated Apr. 24, 2018, 10 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201510144330.2, dated Apr. 5, 2016, 17 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201610805842.3, dated Jul. 21, 2017, 4 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201780062253.3, dated Dec. 25, 2020, 22 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201910430078.X, dated Feb. 1, 2021, 8 pages. |
Furrer, P. et al., “Ocular tolerance of preservatives and alternatives,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 53(3):263-280 (2002). |
Geroski, D. H. et al., “Drug delivery for posterior segment eye disease,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 41(5):961-964 (2000). |
Gilger, B. C. et al., “Treatment of acute posterior uveitis in a porcine model by injection of triamcinolone acetonide into the suprachoroidal space using microneedles,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 54(4):2483-2492 (2013). |
Gilger, et al., “A Novel Bioerodible Deep Scleral Lamellar Cyclosporine Implant for Uveitis,” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, vol. 47, Issue 6, 2006, pp. 2596-2605. |
Habib, A. S. et al., “The AutoDetect Syringe Versus the Glass Syringe for the Loss of Resistance Technique in Parturients,” Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, Oct. 2007, 2 pages. |
Haller, J. A. et al., “Evaluation of the safety and performance of an applicator for a novel intravitreal dexamethasone drug delivery system for the treatment of macular edema,” Retina, 29(1):46-51 (2009). |
Haller, J. A., “Intraocular Steroids in the Office. New formulations offer preservative-free triamcinolone without relying on compounding pharmacies,” Retinal Physician [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.retinalphysician.com/supplements/2009/february-2009/special-edition/intraocular-steroids-in-the-office, Feb. 1, 2009, 4 pages. |
Hanekamp, S. et al., “Inhibition of Corneal and Retinal Angiogenesis by Organic Integrin Antagonists After Intrascleral or Intravitreal Drug Delivery,” Invest Ophthalmol Vis. Sci., 43: E-Abstract 3710, ARVO (2002), 2 pages. |
Harvardapparatus.com. 2011. Syringe Selection Guide, [online] Available at:https://www.harvardapparatus.com/media/harvard/pdf/Syringe%20Selection%20Guide.pdf, [Accessed Mar. 11, 2022], 4 pages. |
Heller, J., Ocular delivery using poly(ortho esters), Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev., 57(14):2053-2062 (2005). |
Hogan et al., Chapter Eight, Choroid, In Histology of the Human Eye, 9 pages (1971). |
HomeCEU, “How Does Iontophoresis Work?”, [Online], Retrieved from the Internet: https://www.homeceuconnection.com/blog/how-does-iontophoresis-work/, 2018, 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2007/004874, dated Jun. 4, 2008, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2007/068055, dated Nov. 7, 2007, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/033987, dated Feb. 14, 2012, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/056433, dated Apr. 25, 2012, 17 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/056863, dated Nov. 26, 2013, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/036590, dated Dec. 10, 2014, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/040254, dated Oct. 31, 2014, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/036715, dated Jan. 19, 2016, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/017014, dated Apr. 27, 2017, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/030439, dated Aug. 1, 2017, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/030609, dated Oct. 6, 2017, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/046553, dated Dec. 13, 2017, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/065796, dated Apr. 12, 2018, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2021/054395, dated Mar. 14, 2022, 16 pages. |
Invitation pursuant to Article 94(3) and Rule 71(1) for European Application No. 07751620.1, dated Feb. 29, 2016, 3 pages. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for International Application No. PCT/US2021/054395, dated Dec. 2021, 4 pages. |
Invitation to Respond to Written Opinion for Singapore Application No. 200805936-2, dated Oct. 15, 2012, 7 pages. |
Jain, A., “Pseudo loss of resistance in epidural space localization: A complication of subcutaneous emphysema or simply a faulty technique,” Saudi J. Anaseth, 5(1):108-109 (2011) (Abstract). |
Jiang, J. et al., “Coated Microneedles for Drug Delivery to the Eye,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 48(9):4038-4043 (2007). |
Jiang, J. et al., “Intrascleral drug delivery to the eye using hollow microneedles,” Pharmaceutical Research, 26(2):395-403 (2009). |
Jiang, J. et al., “Measurement and Prediction of Lateral Diffusion within Human Sclera,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 47(7):3011-3016 (2006). |
Kadam, R. S. et al., “Suprachoroidal delivery in a rabbit ex vivo eye model: influence of drug properties, regional differences in delivery, and comparison with intravitreal and intracameral routes,” Molecular Vision, 19:1198-1210 (May 2013). |
Karim, R. et al., “Interventions for the treatment of uveitic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Clinical Ophthalmology, 7:1109-1144 (2013). |
Kim, S. H. et al., “Assessment of Subconjunctival and Intrascleral Drug Delivery to the Posterior Segment Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, vol. 48, No. 2, Feb. 2007, pp. 808-814. |
Lee, C. H. et al., “Thixotropic property in pharmaceutical formulations,” Journal of Controlled Release (2009) 136:88-98. |
Lee, S-B et al., “Drug delivery through the sclera: effects of thickness, hydration and sustained release systems,” Experimental Eye Research, 78:599-607 (2004). |
Lindfield, D. et al., “Suprachoroidal Devices in Glaucoma. The Past, Present, and Future of Surgery for Suprachoroidal Drainage,” Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today Europe, [online], Oct. 2013, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://bmctoday.net/crstodayeurope/2013/10/article.asp?f=suprachoroidal-devices-in-glaucoma. Retrieved from the Internet on: Oct. 24, 2014, Bryn Mawr Communications LLC, Wayne, PA, USA, 3 pages. |
Loewen, N., “The suprachoroidal space in glaucoma surgery,” Jul. 2012, 4 pages. |
Maurice, D., “Review: Practical Issues in Intravitreal Drug Delivery,” J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther., 17(4):393-401 (2001). |
McAllister, D. V. et al., “Microfabricated needles fortransdermal delivery of macromolecules and nanoparticles: Fabrication methods and transport studies,” Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Science, vol. 100, No. 24, 2003, pp. 13755-13760. |
Norman, D., Epidural analgesia using loss of resistance with air versus saline: Does it make a difference? Should we reevaluate our practice?, AANA Journal, 71(6):449-453 (Dec. 2003). |
Notice of Opposition for European Application No. 14791646.4, dated Mar. 29, 2022, 38 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2016-068174, dated Mar. 1, 2017, 8 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2016-512068, dated Mar. 26, 2018, 4 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2016-574090, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 18 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2018-142345, dated Jun. 6, 2019, 6 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2018-557826, dated Mar. 29, 2021, 13 pages. |
Notification of Reason for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2008-556462, dated Jul. 24, 2012, 15 pages. |
Notification of Reason(s) for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2013-534049, dated Sep. 1, 2015, 11 pages. |
Office Action for Brazilian Application No. 112012027416-3, dated Nov. 14, 2021, 4 pages. |
Office Action for Brazilian Application No. 112015027762-4, dated Jan. 28, 2022, 19 pages. |
Office Action for Brazilian Application No. PI 0708133-2, dated Feb. 26, 2019, 11 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 162010, dated Aug. 25, 2015, 1 page. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2797258, dated Nov. 21, 2016, 3 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,882,184, dated Aug. 18, 2020, 3 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,882,184, dated Jan. 24, 2020, 6 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,882,184, dated May 1, 2019, 3 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,911,290, dated Jun. 18, 2020, 5 pages. |
Office Action for Eurasian Application No. 201592109, dated Apr. 1, 2016, 4 pages. |
Office Action for Eurasian Application No. 201592109, dated Jan. 31, 2018, 2 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 07751620.1, dated Dec. 11, 2014, 5 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 07751620.1, dated Sep. 13, 2013, 7 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 11776049.6, dated Oct. 25, 2016, 4 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 11777924.9, dated Oct. 1, 2019, 5 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 13833318.2, dated Apr. 20, 2021, 4 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 13833318.2, dated Aug. 26, 2020, 5 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 14791646.4, dated Dec. 4, 2017, 5 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 14791646.4, dated Feb. 11, 2020, 5 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 14791646.4, dated Sep. 17, 2018, 5 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 14808034.4, dated Nov. 8, 2017, 4 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 17755007.6, dated Jun. 25, 2021, 6 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 17880800.2, dated Apr. 14, 2022, 10 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 18176172.7, dated Feb. 7, 2020, 4 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 18199418.7, dated May 18, 2022, 5 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 18199418.7, dated Nov. 10, 2020, 5 pages. |
Office Action for Indian Application No. 10099/DELNP/2012, dated Jul. 2, 2019, 5 pages. |
Office Action for Israeli Application No. 242395, dated Aug. 10, 2020, 12 pages. |
Office Action for Israeli Application No. 242395, dated May 7, 2019, 7 pages. |
Office Action for Israeli Application No. 264764, dated Feb. 28, 2022, 7 pages. |
Office Action for Korean Application No. 10-2015-7034411, dated Nov. 16, 2020, 8 pages. |
Office Action for Mexican Application No. MX/a/2015/015282, dated May 15, 2019, 8 pages. |
Office Action for New Zealand Application No. 714172, dated Dec. 12, 2018, 3 pages. |
Office Action for New Zealand Application No. 714172, dated Feb. 1, 2018, 4 pages. |
Office Action for New Zealand Application No. 714172, dated Jul. 24, 2018, 4 pages. |
Office Action for Russian Application No. 2012147341, dated Feb. 26, 2015, 8 pages. |
Office Action for Russian Application No. 2017101660, dated Mar. 5, 2019, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Apr. 12, 2016, 25 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Dec. 14, 2018, 17 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Dec. 27, 2016, 28 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Feb. 11, 2015, 14 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Jan. 16, 2018, 32 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Jun. 24, 2014, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Mar. 23, 2011, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Oct. 27, 2011, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/743,535, dated Aug. 19, 2010, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/743,535, dated Dec. 29, 2009, 6 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,768, dated Jun. 10, 2011, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,775, dated Feb. 12, 2015, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,775, dated Jul. 3, 2014, 12 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,246, dated Oct. 28, 2013, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/453,407, dated Mar. 20, 2013, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,218, dated Jul. 5, 2016, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,288, dated Oct. 6, 2015, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/136,657, dated Dec. 16, 2016, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,687, dated May 19, 2016, 6 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/424,685, dated Dec. 12, 2016, 15 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/424,685, dated Jun. 10, 2016, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/523,243, dated Feb. 27, 2015, 14 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,310, dated Jul. 14, 2017, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/894,161, dated Apr. 6, 2018, 19 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/894,161, dated Dec. 27, 2016, 17 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/894,161, dated Sep. 20, 2017, 21 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/383,582, dated May 5, 2017, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/398,538, dated Apr. 16, 2019, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/398,538, dated Jul. 20, 2018, 12 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/427,823, dated Apr. 20, 2017, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/427,823, dated Jul. 20, 2018, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/427,823, dated Sep. 27, 2017, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,065, dated Jan. 28, 2020, 24 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,065, dated Jun. 11, 2021, 18 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,065, dated Jun. 13, 2019, 30 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,065, dated Nov. 27, 2020, 23 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/675,035, dated Jun. 11, 2020, 14 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/708,779, dated Jul. 15, 2019, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/872,206, dated May 1, 2020, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/872,206, dated Oct. 19, 2020, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/946,838, dated Jun. 27, 2019, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/178,162, dated Jun. 10, 2020, 18 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/178,162, dated May 11, 2021, 48 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/178,162, dated May 16, 2022, 55 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/381,213, dated May 31, 2019, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/591,067, dated Nov. 18, 2019, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/826,443, dated Jun. 1, 2020, 6 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/217,455, dated Jun. 23, 2021, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/217,455, dated Oct. 21, 2021, 15 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/523,168, dated Mar. 7, 2022, 11 pages. |
Olsen, T., “Drug Delivery to the Suprachoroidal Space Shows Promise,” Retina Today, pp. 36-39 (Mar./Apr. 2007). |
Olsen, T. W. et al., “Cannulation of the Suprachoroidal Space: A Novel Drug Delivery Methodology to the Posterior Segment,” American J. Opthamology, 142(5):777-787 (2006). |
Ozkiris, A., “Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection for the Treatment of Posterior Uveitis,” Ocular Immunology and Inflammation, vol. 14, Issue 4, pp. 233-238 (May 2006), Published online: Jul. 8, 2009 (Abstract). |
Partial European Search Report for European Application No. 18176172.7, dated Oct. 30, 2018, 13 pages. |
Partial Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 15810459.6, dated Dec. 22, 2017, 13 pages. |
Patel, S. et al., “Drug Binding to Sclera,” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci., 50:E-Abstract 5968 (2009), 2 pages. |
Patel, S. et al., “Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery Using Microneedles,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 49:E-Abstract 5006 (2008), 2 pages. |
Patel, S. R. et al., “Intraocular Pharmacokinetics of Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery Administered Using Hollow Microneedles,” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci., 51:E-Abstract 3796 (2010), 2 pages. |
Patel, S. R. et al., “Targeted administration into the suprachoroidal space using a microneedle for drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 53(8):4433-4441 (Jul. 2012). |
Patel, S. R. et al., “Suprachoroidal drug delivery to the back of the eye using hollow microneedles,” Pharmaceutical Research, 28(1):166-176 (2011). Published online: Sep. 21, 2010. |
Patel, S. R., “Suprachoroidal drug delivery to the eye using hollow microneedles,” Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, May 2011, 177 pages. |
Penkov, M. A. et al., “A ten-year experience with usage of the method of supra-choroidal administration of medicinal substances,” Oftalmol. Zh., 35(5):281-285 (1980) (Translated from Russian). |
Prausnitz, et al., “Permeability of Cornea, Sclera, and Conjunctiva: A Literature Analysis for Drug Delivery to the Eye”, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 87, Issue 12, 1998, pp. 1479-1488. |
Prausnitz, M. R. et al., “Measurement and prediction of transient transport across sclera for drug delivery to the eye,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 37(8):2903-2907 (1998). |
Prausnitz, M. R., “Microneedles for Ocular Drug Delivery,” Review of Olsen, T., Drug Delivery to the Suprachoroidal Space Shows Promise, Retina Today, Mar./Apr. 2007, p. 39. |
Preliminary Office Action for Brazilian Application No. 112012027416-3, dated Jul. 11, 2021, 2 pages. |
Preliminary Office Action for Brazilian Application No. 112015027762-4, dated Jan. 17, 2020, 6 pages. |
Preliminary Rejection for Korean Application No. 10-2021-7023167, dated Aug. 17, 2021, 7 pages. |
Rowe-Rendleman, C. L. et al., “Prophylactic Intra-Scleral Injection of Steroid Compounds in Rabbit Model of Retinal Neovascularization,” Invest Ophthalmol Vis. Sci.,43:E-Abstract 3872, ARVO (2002), 2 pages. |
Saberski, L. R. et al., “Identification of the epidural space: Is loss of resistance to air a safe technique? A review of the complications related to the use of air,” Regional Anesthesia, 22(1):3-15 (1997). |
Sallam, A. et al., “Repeat intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injections in uveitic macular oedema,” Acta Ophthalmologica, 90(4):e323-e325 (2012). |
Scott, I. U. et al., “Baseline characteristics and response to treatment of participants with hemiretinal compared with branch retinal or central retinal vein occlusion in the standard care vs. corticosteroid for retinal vein occlusion (SCORE),” Arch. Ophthalmol., 130(12):1517-1524 (Dec. 2012). |
Search Report and Written Opinion for Singapore Application No. 11201509051V, dated Nov. 2, 2016, 6 pages. |
Search Report and Written Opinion for Singapore Application No. 200805936-2, dated Jun. 8, 2010, 13 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200780014501.3, dated Aug. 26, 2010, 10 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201110093644.6, dated Sep. 7, 2012, 8 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201180060268.9, dated Jun. 18, 2015, 4 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201510144330.2, dated Dec. 20, 2016, 13 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201910430078.X, dated Aug. 18, 2021, 5 pages. |
Shuler, R. K. et al., “Scleral Permeability of a Small, Single-Stranded Oligonucleotide,” Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 20(2):159-168 (2004) (Abstract). |
Stein, L. et al., “Clinical gene therapy for the treatment of RPE65-associated Leber congenital amaurosis,” Expert Opin. Biol. Ther., Mar. 2011, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 429-439. |
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC for European Application No. 07751620.1, dated Jun. 13, 2017, 8 pages. |
Supplementary Search Report for Singapore Application No. 200805936-2, dated May 26, 2011, 8 pages. |
Supplementary Search Report for Singapore Application No. 200805936-2, dated May 6, 2011, 8 pages. |
Syringepump.com. 2012. NE-300 Just Infusion™ Syringe Pump, [online] Available at: https://www.syringepump.com/download/NE-3008rochure.pdf [Accessed Mar. 11, 2022], 5 pages. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201110093644.6, dated Dec. 14, 2012, 3 pages. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201180060268.9, dated Feb. 5, 2016, 6 pages. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201510144330.2, dated Jun. 28, 2017, 3 pages. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201910430078.X, dated Mar. 29, 2022, 12 pages. |
Wang, P. M. et al., “Minimally Invasive Extraction of Dermal Interstitial Fluid for Glucose Monitoring Using Microneedles,” Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 7(1):131-141 (2005). |
You, X. D. et al., “Chitosan drug delivery system implanting into suprachoroidal space for perforating ocular injury in rabbits,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, 5(1):74-76 (2005) [English Abstract]. |
Final Rejection Office Action for US Appl. No. 17/523,168 dated Aug. 30, 2022, 20 pages. |
Mansoor, S. et al., “Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of Triamcinolone Acetonide Following Suprachoroidal Injection into the Rabbit Eye In Vivo Using a Microneedle,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract, Apr. 2011, vol. 52, 6585, 2 pages. |
Office Action for Chinese application No. CN201910430078, dated Jul. 7, 2022, 7 pages. |
Office Action for Israel application No. IL20210286808, dated Oct. 20, 2022, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220347014 A1 | Nov 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60776903 | Feb 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17217455 | Mar 2021 | US |
Child | 17711495 | US | |
Parent | 16741473 | Jan 2020 | US |
Child | 17217455 | US | |
Parent | 11709941 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 16741473 | US |