This Application is related to co-pending applications Ser. Nos. 11/512,474 and PCT/US07/76965 filed concurrently herewith.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates in general to DC motor starting circuits and more particularly to DC motor starting circuits that are testable on-line.
2. Background of the Invention
One of the new generation advanced passive nuclear power plants supplied by Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, Pittsburgh, Pa. known as the AP1000 plant, has no class 1E AC power source. The plan is to use the 125 VDC power station batteries to operate safety grade valves to control various aspects of the nuclear power generation process. The intent is to use DC motors to operate valves that are either to large for solenoid powered operators or which must have a “fail-as-is” characteristic. A suitable DC motor starter is not commercially available to meet the particular requirements of nuclear class 1E equipment.
Additionally, the trend has been to increase the operating fuel cycles of nuclear plants to enhance their efficiency. This mode of operation puts a further strain the reliability of the nuclear components due to the extended time between outages during which the equipment may be serviced.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide a solid state reversing DC motor starter that can meet the stringent requirements of nuclear safety systems.
Furthermore, it is an object of this invention to provide such a solid state reversing DC motor starter that is testable on-line to ensure its integrity.
Further, it is an object of this invention to provide such a DC motor starter that is immune to single failure caused spurious actuations.
It is also an object of this invention to provide such a DC motor starter that is testable on-line without requiring motion of the motor.
The foregoing objects are achieved by a solid state DC motor starter in accordance with this invention, that has a test capability that will test a plurality of the components of the solid state DC motor starter while the motor starter is connected between a power source and a motor that the motor starter actuates, without actuating the motor. The motor starter includes a main switch for turning on and off the solid state DC motor starter and the motor and a test circuit for testing the motor starter's internal components, in parallel with the main switch. The test circuit includes a current reducing component, a test switch in series with the current reducing component that connects a reduced current to the motor windings, and a means for monitoring the voltage downstream of the output of the respective plurality of components. Preferably, the reduced current is below the value of current that will cause actuation of the motor and is approximately 50 mA or less and the current reducing component is a resistor in the order of 2,500 ohms.
Desirably, the solid state motor starter of this invention includes a reversing circuit connected between the main switch and the motor. The reversing circuit is responsive to an OPEN input to connect a winding of the motor to the main switch with a first polarity and is responsive to a CLOSE input to connect the motor winding to the main switch with a second polarity wherein the reversing circuit cannot be energized unless the main switch is turned on and a signal is received at either the OPEN input or the CLOSE input. Preferably, the OPEN input and the CLOSE input are interlocked so that a signal cannot be communicated through the OPEN input and the CLOSE input at the same time. In one preferred embodiment the OPEN input or the CLOSE input that is not blocked by the interlock, is latched in an on condition for a predetermined period of time. When in the testing mode, if a signal is received at either the OPEN input or the CLOSE input and the main switch is turned on while the test switch is on, the motor will actuate.
Preferably the solid state motor starter of this invention includes a control logic circuit wherein the control logic assures a signal is received at either the OPEN input or the CLOSE input before the main switch is turned on. Desirably, the logic circuit will turn off the main switch, the OPEN input and the CLOSE input for a predetermined period of time if a signal is received at either the OPEN input or the CLOSE input at a time when the other of the OPEN input or the CLOSE input is on. Advantageously, the predetermined period of time is sufficient to allow the motor to stop and any electrical transients to subside. Following the predetermined period of time the control logic circuit will issue the signal to a one of the OPEN input or CLOSE input that will cause the motor to reverse direction from the last actuation and turn on the main switch. Typically, the predetermined period of time is approximately one second or longer.
Desirably the reversing circuit comprises a plurality of reversing polarity switches and the control logic circuit turns off the reversing polarity switches a predetermined interval after the main switch is turned off. The predetermined time interval is long enough to allow transients due to inductive current switching to subside before the reversing polarity switches are turned off. During a test of the main switch the reversing polarity switches are turned off so that current only flows through the shunt winding of the motor so that no motor motion occurs. In another embodiment the main switch includes a snubber circuit in parallel to dissipate inductive transients.
A further understanding of the invention can be gained from the following description of the preferred embodiments when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
And
The new generation of passive nuclear plants offered by Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, Pittsburgh, Pa., are designed to not have any safety grade AC power sources. To the extent that power is needed for plant safety following a design basis event, it will be provided from storage batteries. Some of the safety class valves are designed to be operated by DC motors drawing power from these batteries. Therefore, it is necessary to have a reversing DC motor starter to control these valves. State of the art motor operated valves rely on AC motors. Therefore, reversing DC motor starters, particularly those meeting the specific requirements for nuclear safety grade equipment, are not commercially available. Accordingly, there is a need for such reversing DC motors starters, particularly those meeting the specific requirements for nuclear safety grade equipment, whose reliability can be verified on-line.
Operating nuclear plants use motor starters based on electro-mechanical contactors to switch the motor current. These contactors typically have reliability issues due to the arcing that occurs when high currents are interrupted. These issues are aggravated in DC circuits because there is no inherent voltage and current reversal to extinguish the arc. This invention satisfies the foregoing needs by employing present state of the art power semiconductors that have sufficient capacity to switch motor currents. For example, insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBT), such as those manufactured by Powerex, Inc., Youngwood, Pa. can switch 600A at 600V.
A motor starter includes all components necessary to control the motor's starting, running and stopping, including protection from short circuits and overload conditions. For the AP1000 plant, the motor operated valves will have DC motors with compound windings (combination series and shunt) ranging in size from 1 HP up to 20 HP and perhaps larger. The motor size is determined to achieve a 25 second (or less) stroke time at 80% of nominal voltage. This invention provides a motor starter capable of satisfying the needs of such an application with the following characteristics:
The last capability has typically not been required for operating power plants. Traditionally, testing of the motor starter is usually done in conjunction with that of the valve itself by actually stroking the valve over its range of motion. However, in some cases, it is not practical to do such a test while the plant is at power due to the effects of opening or closing the valve on the nuclear power generation process. In such cases, the test frequency is made to coincide with plant outages. The resulting decrease in reliability has heretofore been tolerated, however, that becomes less acceptable as the operating fuel cycles are lengthened. If the motor starter is testable at more frequent intervals, then its reliability can be improved.
In the circuit 10, shown in
To limit the starting current to 250 percent of the rated current, the total circuit resistance must be:
During the time delay when this resistor is conducting, it will dissipate 4.3 kW and must be sized accordingly. The setting of the time delay before the turn on of the D IGBT device 12 will be determined for each motor based on the motor's acceleration, but will be in the order of 1 second.
The IGBT device E is provided for the purpose of testing the motor starter without running the motor. When the E is turned on the series resistor R2 is placed across the open main switch C (and D). This resistor will have a value of approximately 2500 ohms thus limiting the current through the motor windings to approximately 50 mA. When E is first turned on the voltage measured across the F1-L2 terminals will be that which is determined by the voltage divider consisting of R3 and the motor shunt winding 16. This will be a specific value for each motor size. Then by turning on the A1-A2 IGBT pair, the low current is sent through the motor series winding 18 and armature M. The voltage across the F1-L2 terminal will drop to 6.25÷LRA volts. This test confirms the connectivity to the motor and the functionality of the A1-A2 IGBT devices. Next, the A1-A2 IGBT devices are turned off and the B1-B2 IGBTs are turned on. This confirms the functionality of the B1-B2 IGBT devices. Finally, the B1-B2 and E IGBTs are turned off and the C device is turned on followed by, after the set time delay, the turn on of the device D. The initial voltage across the F1-L2 will be slightly less than the line voltage, with a small but perceptible increase in voltage at the time of the delay setting. This test confirms the functionality of the C and D IGBT devices. Since the A and B devices are all off during the last step of the test, current only flows through the shunt winding 16 of the motor, hence no motion occurs. The combination of the test steps also prove the functioning of the motor starter logic.
The logic necessary to accomplish the motor starter functions, including test, is shown in
The remaining components of the motor starter are the protection devices that prevent over current conditions. The first is a magnetic operated circuit breaker 36 shown in
The second protection device is a thermal overload relay 38. It provides a contact output 40 to the valve control logic performed by the Component Interface Module 42 illustrated in
Both of these protection devices are commercially available from various electrical equipment manufacturers as standard catalog items.
The preferred implementation of a motor operated valve controller using the solid state motor starter of this invention is shown in
The logic to control the valve that is driven from this motor starter is shown in
All of the Component Interface Module 42 inputs, the output states and various internal logic states are made available to the distributed processor of the instrumentation and control system via a remote input/output bus for the purpose of state signalization (indication), alarm generation and discrepancy logic.
Thus, this invention provides an on-line testable solid state reversing DC motor starter that can meet the requirements for nuclear safety grade equipment while enhancing reliability. While specific embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various modifications and alternatives to those details could be developed in light of the overall teachings of the disclosure. Accordingly, the particular embodiments disclosed are meant to be illustrative only and not limiting as to the scope of the invention, which is to be given the full breath of the appended claims and any and all equivalence thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3505581 | Montross et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
3551774 | Rusch | Dec 1970 | A |
3562617 | Meier et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3569806 | Brailsford | Mar 1971 | A |
3656136 | Blair | Apr 1972 | A |
3693047 | Hamstra | Sep 1972 | A |
3791473 | Rosen | Feb 1974 | A |
3893029 | Vensel et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3936744 | Perlmutter | Feb 1976 | A |
4008422 | Sodekoda et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4217526 | Farr | Aug 1980 | A |
4257092 | Prines et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4393338 | Jones et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4459548 | Lentz et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4467261 | Lamaster | Aug 1984 | A |
4544869 | Pittaway | Oct 1985 | A |
4549121 | Gale | Oct 1985 | A |
4622499 | Squires et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4879502 | Endo et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5023527 | Erdman et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5087865 | Nelson, III | Feb 1992 | A |
5126642 | Shahrodi | Jun 1992 | A |
5223779 | Palaniappan | Jun 1993 | A |
5243243 | Andrews | Sep 1993 | A |
5267138 | Shores | Nov 1993 | A |
5341080 | Agut Sanz | Aug 1994 | A |
5416399 | Brunson | May 1995 | A |
5568033 | Brunson | Oct 1996 | A |
5608301 | Inaniwa et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5661382 | Enami et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5672944 | Gokhale et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5701089 | Perkins | Dec 1997 | A |
5703768 | Kanna et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5814965 | Randall | Sep 1998 | A |
5828559 | Chen | Oct 1998 | A |
5859506 | Lemke | Jan 1999 | A |
5929617 | Brokaw | Jul 1999 | A |
6038114 | Johnson | Mar 2000 | A |
6166500 | Makaran | Dec 2000 | A |
6294888 | Becker | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304045 | Muszynski | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321030 | Cummins | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6777941 | Thibedeau et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6815920 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6842669 | Bednar et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6914413 | Bertness et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924613 | Jonsson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6969962 | Oe | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6984950 | Jonsson et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006338 | Mayhew et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7126341 | Bertness et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130170 | Wakefield et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7154276 | Bertness | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7262579 | Shepard | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7319579 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323833 | Mir | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7336044 | Churchett et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7342371 | Zuzuly et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20040104696 | Oe | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040155622 | Mayhew et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050185350 | Wakefield et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050200326 | Mayhew et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070145917 | Baer et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070170289 | Okada et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070188125 | Shepard | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080007270 | Xiao et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080043500 | Asano et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080054831 | Cook | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080054840 | Cook | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080056688 | Harrington | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080074157 | Horai et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080054857 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |