Time-to-digital conversion (TDC) of phase or time differences between two events, for example a clock signal and a synchronization signal or more generally between two clock signals, can be performed with sub-gate delay resolution by processing the phase differences between the signals in the digital domain. Accuracy better than the least significant bit (LSB) resolution of the time-to-digital converters can be achieved. The time measurements are not affected by the presence of a dead zone between the events.
A time-to-digital converter (TDC) detects a temporal characteristic or a phase of a signal to be measured with respect to a reference clock, or between signals representing two temporal events, using a time difference measurement between for example two events. The resulting single signal represents the time (or phase) difference as a pulse with a width equaling the time interval between these events. A major limitation for time-to-digital converter (TDC), in particular flash TDCs, is that as the time difference approaches zero (Δt→0), the resulting pulse cannot be determined. This limitation is referred to as a dead zone or blind zone. In ordinary phase comparators, the dead zone results from the non-zero response times of the logic gates of the comparator, meaning that time differences smaller than these response times are not detected.
To provide a more complete understanding of the present disclosure and features and advantages thereof, reference is made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts, in which:
A time-to-digital converter (TDC) detects a phase or time relationship between signals, each representing a temporal event. A pair of TDCs with multiple clock phases from an open loop gate based ring oscillator, DLL, or PLL are used to independently quantize two signals so that the information may then be digitally filtered to an accuracy better than the linearity and precision of a single TDC alone. Digitally processing the signals and averaging the results takes an otherwise difficult analog quantizer problem and moves it to the digital domain where savings in power and chip area can be easily achieved without sacrificing accuracy. Sample clock phases are derived from an open loop oscillator (OLO).
In certain embodiments a method is provided that discloses measuring phase delays between analog input signal events, which includes the steps of clocking a plurality of time-to-digital converters (TDC) with at least one common clock phase from a sample clock; receiving a first input signal event with a first of the TDCs and generating a first time-quantized digital output signal, and receiving a second input signal event with a second of the TDCs and generating a second time-quantized digital output signal; forming a difference between the first and second time-quantized digital output signals, and determining from the difference a temporal separation between the input signal events.
In certain embodiments a circuit for measuring phase delays between input signal events is provided that includes a plurality of time-to-digital converters (TDC), each TDC receiving a respective input signal event and generating a respective time-quantized digital output signal; a sample clock clocking the plurality of TDCs with at least one common phase from a sample clock, and an adder forming a difference between the time-quantized digital output signals from different TDCs and determining therefrom a temporal separation between the input signal events.
In some approaches, a deliberate time or phase offset, which biases the operation point of the phase detector away from the dead zone, was introduced into either the clock signal or the compared signal prior to presentation to the TDC. In other approaches, sub-picosecond (ps) time resolution for Δt measurements can be achieved by using a gated-ring-oscillator (GRO); however, a CMOS gate delay of even as low as 6 picoseconds still makes high-speed circuits with TDCs difficult to implement. The oscillator is enabled at a start event and its phase is then ideally frozen at a stop event. On the next start event, the oscillator ideally begins oscillating at the previous phase. However, gate leakage significantly limits the ability to preserve phase from the stop event even to the next start event, which causes a dead zone. Since leakage generally gets worse as the geometry gets smaller, i.e., for faster circuits, the performance of the GRO architecture can be significantly diminished. It would therefore be desirable to provide an improved system and method for determining phase alignment or a time difference between two clock signals, in particular when the time difference is less than the response time of logic gates.
SR (set-reset) latches, like D-flip-flops, may be used in analog-to-digital converters (ADC) or TDCs to sample the synchronization signal (hereinafter e1) with a signal or pulse from a reference clock (hereinafter e2). The SR latch and D-flip-flop may respond to a rising edge of the respective signals. When another device or circuit sends a synchronization signal and the synchronization and reference signals arrive at approximately the same time, i.e., the edges of the e1 and e2 signals are almost perfectly aligned, the setup time of the flop would be violated and no reliable output pulse would be generated.
In the specification, the terms “time” or “timing” and “phase” are used synonymously when describing relationships, for example delays, between two or more signals or their characteristic features such as rising or falling edges associated with temporal events.
To address this problem, it is proposed to first digitize or quantize both the e1 and e2 signals independently with respective TDCs and to form the difference between the quantized signals in the digital domain. The temporal characteristic of the e1 and e2 signals is assumed to vary relatively slowly during the quantization (this slow variation will hereinafter also be referred to as quasi static) so that the signals can be oversampled which increases the time resolution and may thus prevent a dead zone and produce processing gain. Noise is spread from DC to the half the frequency of the time events being measured, and can be removed by digital filtering. Sample clock jitter has virtually no effect on the computed digital difference signal as long as the TDCs quantizing the events use the same clock signals for sampling the difference measurement. Jitter can be shown to be actually beneficial by allowing a time resolution of the phase difference below the least significant bit (LSB) of the TDCs.
The proposed approach enables the use of temporally less precise, and noisier sample clocks and TDCs with less time resolution, both of which reduce the overall power consumption of the chip while actually improving the accuracy of the phase and frequency relationship between different circuits on the same chip or on different chips.
For a better understanding of the inventive concept in view of time-resolution limitations of a flash TDC,
In some approaches, when setup and hold time violations were detected, i.e., when a dead zone was present due to a substantially perfect alignment between the e1 and the e2 signals, the phase of one of the signals, i.e., e1, was deliberately adjusted, so that the phase of the e2 signal could be recovered and the converters resynchronized. The e2 signal may be considered as the sample clock, whereas the e1 signal may be a divided version of the e2 signal having, for example, a clock period that is an integer multiple of the reference clock period. In other words, the e1 signal has a much lower frequency, and the idea is to capture the phase of the e1 signal and to align multiple TDCs to the same e1 signal and hence to the same reference clock. In a phase locked loop, a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) would be servo'ed to match the e1 signal.
As mentioned above, due to the setup and hold requirements for the digital circuits, in particular the TDCs, the frequency range for operating the digital circuits to accurately capture the phase of the e1 signal with respect to a reference clock, in this example e2, is limited. A first step in the process is therefore to overcome the setup and hold requirements and to accurately capture the timing or phase relationship, in particular when the phases are already closely aligned. The next step is then to be able to capture the e1 signal regardless of its phase relationship to the reference e2 signal and to measure the time between the two signals e1 and e2, for example between their rising edges, with much higher accuracy than can be provided by a single (one-shot or flash) TDC. In other words, the effect of inherent setup and hold requirements on the measurement is thus eliminated and the accuracy of measurement of the phase relationship between these two signals, i.e. of the time difference Δt, is greatly increased. The time difference Δt may thereafter be used to align the output phases of the TDCs. For example, since the detected time difference between the TDCs is essentially a phase detector, the output Δt may be used to control a DCO (digitally controlled oscillator).
According to some embodiments of the disclosure illustrated in
Although the embodiments depicted in
The sample clock 32 in
According to some embodiments of the disclosure; the exemplary TDCs 31, 33 may sample a large number of e2 and e1 signals or pulses over time and average the respective sampled signals. For example, when using a pair of TDC's with for example 100 ps per sample accuracy and averaging over for example 100 samples, the relative phases can now be measured with substantially higher accuracy, for example 1 ps, since the accuracy for a static or quasi-static phase relationship between e1 and e2 increases with the number of samples being averaged. Assuming Δt is not changing very fast during the time multiple samples are acquired, hereinafter referred to as quasi-static, an instantaneous high-precision measurement of Δt becomes unnecessary, thus obviating the need for using a higher-accuracy one-shot (flash) TDC which may take up a large area on the chip and consume a significant amount of power.
One proposed approach disclosed herein for improving the time resolution of the time-difference signal Δt determined by the aforementioned exemplary two TDCs will now be explained with reference to enhancing the LSB voltage resolution of an ADC. For example, an N-bit ADC having an inherent resolution of one LSB has due to the presence of quantization noise, thermal noise, reference noise, clock jitter, etc. an effective number of bits (ENOB) that is less than N. Oversampling is a common method used for improving ADC resolution. For example, when using an N-bit ADC without oversampling, an input signal of 100 Hz is sampled at 200 Hz (2×100 Hz), which is the minimum required Nyquist sampling rate, fs, to get the digital output with the native ENOB of the ADC. When oversampling with a factor of k=16, the same 100-Hz input signal is sampled at 3200 Hz (k×2×100 Hz). The samples obtained by oversampling are thereafter low-pass filtered and decimated using a digital filter to reduce noise. The signal at the frequency band of interest is not affected by the filter, and the result is an improved SNR of SNR (dB)=(6.02×N)+1.76+10×log 10 (k). When quantization noise is modeled as white noise that is additive to the input signal while sampling, an oversampling factor k of 256 (=28) can increase the resolution of a 12-bit ADC to 16 bits.
The same reasoning can now be applied, mutatis mutandis, to time-to-digital converters (TDC). In other words, oversampling increases the time resolution of the TDCs and the process gain. Furthermore, because both TDCs 31, 33 operate from the same sample clock 32, the clock 32 need not be a low jitter source and does not need to be synchronous to the events being quantized. As with a conventional gated ring oscillator (GRO), the oscillator clock rate may not and need not have an integer relation to the start/stop events. In fact it is advantageous for the sample rate and the event rates to have a non-integer relationship so that they are non-coherent, i.e., not phase-locked. Furthermore, if the clock 32 is implemented as an open loop oscillator (OLO) and has a form of analog or digital control, its frequency can be changed to prevent phase locking, which will be described below with reference to
According to some embodiments of the disclosure; the inventors have realized that jitter in the sample clock 32 can be constructive in terms of measurement accuracy because the TDCs 31, 33 share the same sample clock phases (labelled taps in
The benefit of maintaining a non-coherent phase relation is that using the full range of the sampling circuits within the TDC is much like using the full range of an ADC with voltage dither. The described TDCs have no range limit so if the sampled events trigger on all of multiple sampling circuits within the TDC, this suppresses sample mismatch and TDC nonlinearity by avoiding the static timing/phase situation in which the event is captured repetitively by a single sampling circuit. Again this takes advantage of oversampling and linearization through dither, wherein non-linearities are converted to noise and averaged.
Voltage dither in ADCs refers to a random noise (white noise), which is added to the input before conversion. It causes the state of the LSB to randomly oscillate between 0 and 1 in the presence of very low levels of input, rather than stick to a fixed value. Rather than simply cutting off the signal at the LSB level (representing a resolution of 1 bit), the effective range of signals that the ADC can convert is extended, at the expense of a slight increase in noise—effectively the quantization error is diffused across a series of noise values which is far less objectionable than a hard cutoff. The result is an accurate representation of the signal over time. A suitable filter at the output of the system can thus recover this small signal variation.
According to some embodiments of the disclosure illustrated in
A static phase relationship between the open-loop oscillator (OLO) or sample clock 32 in relation to the two signals represented by e1 and e2 may create phase-locking, meaning that the sample clock and the signals e1 and e2 maintain a constant phase relationship over the sampling time, for example when the OLO frequency has an integer relationship to the occurrence of the sampled events. To remedy this problem, according to some embodiments of the disclosure, the phase of the OLO may be unlocked by shifting the OLO frequency by adding frequency control to the OLO, for example by way of an oscillator (sample clock) 62 which is still open loop and may still be quite jittery, but which has a controllably changeable frequency. A digital processor 60 may adjust the frequency of sample clock 62, for example based on the digital output signals from TDCs 61 and 63, on the basis of which Δt between e1 and e2 may then be determined. In addition, the frequency of the oscillator may also be intentionally “dithered”, i.e. intentionally randomized. This additional feature may useful when the “jitter”, i.e. randomized phase changes, is not sufficient for a given application. The digital processor 60 may include an adder 35 (
According to some embodiments of the disclosure illustrated in
The advantages of using OLO TDCs can be summarized as follows:
The result from the determination of Δt, labelled for example “Info” 65 and 75, respectively, in
It should be noted that all of the specifications, dimensions, and relationships outlined herein (e.g., the number of processors, logic operations, etc.) have only been offered for purposes of example and teaching only. Such information may be varied considerably without departing from the spirit of the present disclosure, or the scope of the appended claims. The specifications apply only to one non-limiting example and, accordingly, they should be construed as such. In the foregoing description, example embodiments have been described with reference to particular processor and/or component arrangements. Various modifications and changes may be made to such embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. The description and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than in a restrictive sense.
In certain contexts, the features discussed herein can be applicable to
It should also be noted that in this Specification, references to various features (e.g., elements, structures, modules, components, steps, operations, characteristics, etc.) included in “one embodiment”, “example embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “another embodiment”, “some embodiments”, “various embodiments”, “other embodiments”, “alternative embodiment”, and the like are intended to mean that any such features are included in one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, but may or may not necessarily be combined in the same embodiments.
It should also be noted that the functions related to circuit architectures, illustrate only some of the possible circuit architecture functions that may be executed by, or within, systems illustrated in the FIGURES. Some of these operations may be deleted or removed where appropriate, or these operations may be modified or changed considerably without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. In addition, the timing of these operations may be altered considerably. The preceding operational flows have been offered for purposes of example and discussion. Substantial flexibility is provided by embodiments described herein in that any suitable arrangements, chronologies, configurations, and timing mechanisms may be provided without departing from the teachings of the present disclosure.
Numerous other changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications may be ascertained to one skilled in the art and it is intended that the present disclosure encompass all such changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications as falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Note that all optional features of the device and system described above may also be implemented with respect to the method or process described herein and specifics in the examples may be used anywhere in one or more embodiments.
The “means for” in these instances (above) can include (but is not limited to) using any suitable component discussed herein, along with any suitable software, circuitry, hub, computer code, logic, algorithms, hardware, controller, interface, link, bus, communication pathway, etc. In a second example, the system includes memory that further comprises machine-readable instructions that when executed cause the system to perform any of the activities discussed above.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5208833 | Erhart | May 1993 | A |
5546052 | Austin et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5673206 | Jones, Jr. | Sep 1997 | A |
5699387 | Seto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
7180339 | Lanier | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7332973 | Lee | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7884751 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8275085 | Yi | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8494105 | Patterson | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8558728 | Lemkin | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8674244 | Kim | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8890741 | Dosho | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8963750 | Canard | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9225507 | Lye | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9450594 | Kim | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9520890 | Ben-Bassat | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9548750 | Tertinek | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9634678 | Caffee | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9851696 | Tertinek | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10007235 | Wang | Jun 2018 | B2 |
20030001557 | Pisipaty | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030006750 | Roberts | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050195917 | Staszewski | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070096836 | Lee | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116169 | Robbe et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080238752 | Shimizu | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090072812 | Henzler | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090135975 | Yi | May 2009 | A1 |
20110032013 | Nelson | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120013406 | Zhu | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120306553 | Kim | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120313803 | Dosho | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130058437 | Oshima | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130093470 | Lin | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130169457 | Helio | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130335251 | Dosho | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140104090 | Dosho | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140152484 | Dosho | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140201254 | Jenkins | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140210525 | Jenkins | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140210532 | Jenkins | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140266848 | Henzler | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140320324 | Canard | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140320329 | Dosho | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140340250 | Dosho | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140347205 | Dosho | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140362892 | Richley | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150041625 | Dutton | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150145570 | Perrott | May 2015 | A1 |
20150241850 | Henzler | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150372690 | Tertinek | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160056827 | Vlachogiannakis | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160204781 | Plusquellic | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170085365 | Ravi | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170097613 | Tertinek | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20180115406 | Moore | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20190004563 | Nelson | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190004565 | Nelson | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190007055 | Nelson | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
J. Daniels et al., AD conversion using an Asynchronous Delta-Sigma Modulator and a time-to-digital converter, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (Year: 2008). |
S. Henzler et al. 90nm 4.7ps-Resolution 0.7-LSB Single-Shot Precision and 19pJ-per-Shot Local Passive Interpolation Time-to-Digital Converter with On-Chip Characterization, IEEE, 2008, pp. 548-635. (Year: 2008). |
S. Henzler, Time-to-Digital Converters, Springer Series in Advanced Microelectronics 29, 5 ISBN: 978-90-481-8627-3, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010. |
Francesco Brandonisio et al., First Order Noise Shaping Local-Oscillator Based Time-to-Digital Converter, 17th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems (ICECS), 2010, pp. 41-44. |
Francesco Brandonisio et al., An All-Digital PLL with a First Order Noise Shaping Time-to-Digital Converter, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 30, 2010-Jun. 2, 2010, pp. 241-244. |
Yongsam Moon et al., “A 0.6-2.5-GBaud CMOS tracked 3×oversampling transceiver with dead-zone phase detection for robust clock/data recovery”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (vol. 36 , Issue: 12 , pp. 1974-1983, Dec. 2001). |
Wu-Hsin Chen et al., “Phase Frequency Detector With Minimal Blind Zone for Fast Frequency Acquisition”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs (vol. 57 , Issue: 12, pp. 936-940 ) 2010. |
Kuo-Hsing Cheng et al., “A difference detector PFD for low jitter PLL”, Electronics, Circuits and Systems, 2001. ICECS 2001. The 8th IEEE International Conference on (vol. 1, pp. 43-46). |
Ying Cao et al., “A 1.7mW 11b 1-1-1 MASH ΔΣ time-to-digital converter”, 2011 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (2011, pp. 480-482). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180115406 A1 | Apr 2018 | US |