1. The Field of the Invention
This invention has applications in telecommunications and spectroscopy
2. The Relevant Technology
The emergence of DWDM technology as a viable solution to bandwidth bottlenecks in current and future optical networks has generated a need for spectrally tunable optical components. In particular, tunable laser sources that can be deployed along with high speed, intensity modulator components are required. Several different technologies and approaches have been adopted in an effort to provide a low-cost, high performance, tunable laser sources that meet the specifications called for by today's network operators.
A number of tunable laser implementations make use of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) for their successful operation. These include ECLs and DFB arrays where a mechanical adjustment allows selection of the desired laser wavelength. The DFB array approach has particular attractions in that well-understood, reliable DFB laser technology is used, albeit in array form. In this implementation, up to 12 DFBs are fabricated on the same chip with a separation of around 10 μm between adjacent lasers. The center wavelength, at fixed temperature, is offset by approximately 3 nm between adjacent lasers and each laser can be temperature tuned to cover 3 nm. Thus, full C band tuning can be realized by selectively tuning the lasers within their local thermal range and switching to the adjacent laser as required.
However, the spatial offset of the individual lasers within the array makes efficient coupling to a single optical fiber difficult. A single lens can be used to collect and collimate the light from each of the DFB laser sources but the spatial offset results in a varying angle on the collimated beam. This leads to a spatial offset when the beams are focused onto a single optical fiber that is located in a fixed position in the focal plane of a second lens. Thus, efficient coupling can only be obtained for the DFB laser at the center of the array.
The above situation can be remedied by incorporating a beam steering element in the optical path between a collimating lens and a focus lens. Typically, this could be a MEMS mirror that can be electrostatically tuned via application of a control voltage. This approach suffers from vibration issues that are known to plague MEMS type implementations.
As a result, one object of this invention is to provide a low cost, low power consumption, multiplexing solution to coupling of an array of DFB lasers (spatially and spectrally offset). The described approach removes the need for a complicated MEMS beam steering mirror and reduces sensitivity to vibration effects, etc.
In one aspect of the invention an optical transmitter includes a laser array comprising a plurality of lasers spatially offset from one another and each having a laser output having a unique wavelength. A first prism is positioned to impart a first angular shift to the laser outputs to produce first angularly shifted outputs. A second prism is positioned to impart a second angular shift to the first angularly shifted outputs to produce second angularly shifted outputs. The second angular shift is in a direction opposite the first angular shift. An output lens is positioned to receive a first output of the second angularly shifted outputs incident on the lens. An index modulating element is coupled to one of the first and second prisms and a controller is electrically coupled to the index modulating element. The controller is programmed to selectively power the index modulating element an amount effective to alter one of the first and second angular shifts sufficiently to cause a second output of the second angularly shifted outputs to be incident on the lens.
In another aspect of the invention, an optical spectrum reshaper is positioned between the second prism and the lens. The optical spectrum reshaper has at least one transmission edge aligned with the wavelength at least one of the lasers.
In another aspect of the invention the transmitter includes an array of first photodiodes and a second photodiode. A tap splitter is positioned between the second prism and the optical spectrum reshaper and is configured to divert a portion of the second angularly shifted outputs onto the array of first photodiodes and configured to divert a portion of light reflected from the optical spectrum reshaper onto the second photodiode. The controller is electrically coupled to the array of first photodiodes and is programmed to control power supplied to the index modulating element according to outputs of the array of first photodiodes. The controller is also electrically coupled to the plurality of lasers and operable to control the wavelengths of the plurality of lasers according to a ratio of an output of the second photo diode and a combination of the outputs of the array of first photodiodes.
These and other features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention as set forth hereinafter.
These and other objects and features of the present invention will be more fully disclosed or rendered obvious by the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, which is to be considered together with the accompanying drawings wherein:
As described by the present invention, a thermally tuned beam steering element can be used in the optical path. A prism fabricated from a thermo-optic material can effectively act as an optical beam steering element by controlling the temperature. This beam steering element can be incorporated into various optical subassemblies to provide improved functionality e.g. wavelength tunable lasers.
This approach allows lower cost and simpler implementation while avoiding vibration-induced detrimental effects.
More particularly, by inserting a prism into the collimated beam path, it is possible to vary the angle of the beam by changing the refractive index of the prism material. Preferably, this can be done in an isotropic fashion by using a high dn/dT material such as a crystalline semiconductor such as Silicon, Gallium Arsenide or Indium Phosphide. Silicon is particularly convenient due to its ease of processing and low optical loss in the 1550 nm region when in pure, un-doped crystalline form.
It can be shown that the following equation holds for the prism beam steering function:
sin θ4=sin α√{square root over (n2 sin2θ)}1−cos α sin θ1
The above equation shows that the exit angle of the beam is dependent on the input angle, the prism angle and the refractive index of the prism material. For practical use, the refractive index can be varied via the thermo-optic effect. As an example, the graph shown in
Upon passing through the prism interfaces, the beam width in the horizontal direction is magnified according to the equation below:
where the angles are defined as in
Passing the beam through the steering prism causes aberration and beam quality degrades, leading to a reduction in fiber coupling efficiency. This problem can be avoided by passing the beam through a second “correction” prism to “undo” the aberration. This restores the original optical beam shape and quality but the beam angle variation still remains. The design of the second “correction” prism (located either before or after the diffraction grating) can be arranged that it corrects for aberration induced by the steering prism plus aberration/beam shaping induced by the grating itself.
A typical implementation uses crystalline Silicon as the prism material with anti-reflection coatings on the interacting surfaces. Temperature control of the prism is efficiently achieved by mounting the prism onto a thermally insulative base that has been patterned with a metal strip heater. A thermistor is located on the top surface of the prism to allow temperature monitoring and feedback. The power consumption can be minimized by keeping the dimensions of the prism as small as possible for the given optical beam size. Angles of incidence and exit also have an impact on possible prism dimensions.
Other potential component implementations can be developed based on the optical beam steering element. These include variable optical attenuators, beam shutters, tunable filters, and other external cavity laser designs (using SOA as gain medium).
A preferred embodiment that uses the optical beam steering element is in a tunable laser design that is based on a DFB laser array.
An optical beam steering approach as applied to a tunable laser based on a DFB array is shown in
The principle of operation is based on spatial multiplexing of the light emitted by each individual DFB array element (different emission wavelengths) using the diffraction grating. The grating is designed to multiplex the array elements for a set condition of wavelengths and array pitch. The function of the beam steering prism is to compensate for the shift in wavelength when each DFB array element is tuned by varying the temperature of the laser.
From
The DFB array is designed such that the emission wavelength of each element is offset from its nearest neighbor by 3 nm. Thus, a 12 DFB array can cover a spectral range of 36 nm, assuming that each individual element is capable of tuning 3 nm via temperature variation. The spatial (resulting in beam angle) and spectral offset between adjacent array elements can be used to design a grating that compensates for the beam angle induced by the collimating lens.
The invention can be implemented using a range of diffraction grating options: (1) transmission type, (2) reflection type, or (3) hologram type. Types 1 and 2 are generally surface relief style geometries. Type 3 is fabricated by inducing spatially-dependent refractive index changes within a transparent material (often a crystalline material).
The well-known equation for a grating is:
mλ=d(sin α+sin β) (1)
where m is the diffracted order, λ is the incident wavelength, d is the spacing between adjacent grooves on the grating surface, α is the angle of incidence and β is the diffracted angle.
For the arrangement shown in
mλ=d sin β (2)
To perform the necessary multiplexing function required as described above, the angular dispersion of the grating should satisfy the relation below:
where units are in nm/rad.
This matches the angular dispersion from the DFB array combined with collimating lens. Using equations (2) and (3), and a center wavelength of 1550 nm, the value of β is calculated as 59.9°. i.e. the transmitted beam exits the grating at a nominal angle of 59.9°. The most efficient operation of the grating occurs when the refraction of the mini-prism that constitutes a groove (in the grating) lies in the same direction as the diffraction given by the grating equation. Applying Snell's Law to the interface between the groove facet and air (see
n sin θ=sin(θ+β) (4)
where n is the refractive index of the grating material.
Combining the grating equation and Snell's law provides the relationship between the blaze angle βB and the groove angle θ
The transmission grating design for the preferred embodiment can be derived from the above equations.
The invention could also be implemented using a holographically written (formed) grating with a similar geometry to the transmission grating described above.
A modification to the preferred embodiment uses an optical beam steering prism alone (with no grating component) to compensate for spatial/spectral offset of two or more DFB array elements. In this case, the prism beam steering element is required to compensate for angular deviation of 0.2° per DFB array element. Multiplexing of up to 3 array elements should be possible with a reasonable amount of electrical power consumption for the heater and no significant degradation in coupling efficiency. This assumes that the effect of refractive index dispersion of Silicon is negligible.
In addition to thermo-optical effects which steers the direction of the beam of light we also claim the use of prisms made of electro-optic and magneto-optic materials to achieve the same. In electro-optic approach an electrical voltage could be applied to the prism (made out of materials such as LiNbO3, SrxBa1-xNb2O3 (SBN:x) etc. The voltage can be applied to any two surfaces to induce an electro-optic index change. Similarly the prism may be made of magneto-optic materials whose effective index of refraction could be changed by applying a magnetic field to the material via a coil adjacent to the prism.
Numerous advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Among other things, the advantages of the invention include low cost, simple implementation, beam steering with no moving parts, low power consumption (related to prism size, material, etc.). These advantages lead to cost savings and performance enhancement in tunable laser systems based around the prism optical beam steering element.
Referring to
In the illustrated embodiment, the lasers 14a-14d are formed on a common substrate, such as a semiconductor suitable for optical applications, such as InP. The lasers 14a-14d are parallel to one another and emit parallel to one another. Each laser 14a-14d is offset from an adjacent laser 14a-14d in a direction perpendicular to the output beams by an offset distance. As a result, the lasers 14a and 14d located on opposing ends of the array 12 are offset by a multiple of the offset between adjacent lasers.
A collimating lens 16 is positioned to receive output beams 18 from the lasers 14a and to output corresponding collimated beams 20. In the illustrated embodiment, a single collimating lens 16 is used. Due to the spatial offset of the lasers 14a-14d the collimated beams 20 are angularly shifted relative to one another and an optical axis of the collimating lens upon exiting the collimating lens 16. The angular offset may be reduced by means of a tunable prism pair discussed below. In some embodiments, an optical isolator 22 is positioned between the collimating lens 16 and the laser array 12 to reduce back reflection.
Table 1 shows examples of beam angle dependence on the focal length of the collimating lens 16. In the example of Table 1, it is assumed that the maximum lateral offset of the 4th DBR laser element is 20 um from the optical axis of the lens.
A first prism 24a and a second prism 24b may be used to correct for the difference in angles of collimated beams 20 for the different lasers 14a-14d. The first prism 24a includes an input face 26a and an output face 28a at an angle 30 with respect to one another. The input face 26a is positioned to receive the collimated beams 20 and angularly shifted beams 32 are emitted from an output face 28a.
The second prism 24b includes an input face 26b and an output face 28b at at an angle 30 with respect to one another. The angle 30 of the second prism 24b is preferably nominally equal to the angle 30 of the prism 24a, as constrained by manufacturing limitations, e.g. within 5%, preferably within 2%. The input face 26a is positioned to receive the first angularly shifted beams 32 and second angularly shifted beams 34 are emitted from the output face 28b.
The second prism 24b substantially restores the original optical beam shape and quality after the original beam has been reshaped and spread by the first prism 24a. The design of the second “correction” prism 26b can be arranged that it reduces aberration induced by the steering prism 24a while still preserving an angular shift.
In a preferred embodiment, the input face 26a of the first prism 24a is substantially parallel (e.g. within +/−2 degrees from parallel) to the output face 28b of the second prism 24b and the output face 28a of the first prism 24a is substantially parallel (e.g. within +/−2 degrees from parallel) to the input face 26b of the first prism 24b.
An index modulating element 36 is positioned on one of the first and second prisms 24a, 24b. The index modulating element 36 may be embodied as a heater or thermoelectric cooler where the prisms 24a, 24b are formed of a thermooptic material. In embodiments where the prisms 24a, 24b are formed of an electrooptic material, the index modulating element 36 may be embodied as an electrode for receiving a voltage or current. The index modulating element 36 is used to control the angle of the second angularly shifted outputs 34 in order to compensate for the spatial offset of the lasers 14a-14d.
The size of the prisms 24a, 24b may be chosen according to a focal length of the collimating lens 16. A larger focal length may advantageously reduce the difference in the angles of the collimated beams 20. However, the larger focal length may also result in a larger collimated beam size and subsequent larger aperture requirements on all the components in the optical train. Furthermore, an oblique angle of the input face 26a of the first prism 24a relative to the collimated beam 20 results in a large beam size and a corresponding large prism size. Tables 2 and 3 illustrate details of beam size and prism length. One possible configuration is an f=1 mm collimating lens 16, which is used in one embodiment.
Performance for prisms 24a, 24b formed of silicon having a refractive index of 3.48 and temperature sensitivity of 1.8 e−4, is outlined in Table 4, below. In Table 4, prism angle refers to the angle of the normal vector of the input face 26a of the first prism 24a relative to the optical axis of the collimating lens 16. Input angle refers to the angle between a direction of propagation of one of the collimated beams 20 relative to the same normal vector. Δn refers to the index in one of the prisms 24a, 24b in order to compensate for a given input angle and ΔT refers to the temperature change required to achieve a given Δn. As is apparent from Table 4, manageable relative coupling losses and efficiency drops may be achieved using the prism pair 24a, 24b.
In some embodiments, a tap splitter 38 diverts a fraction of the light in the second angularly shifted outputs 34 toward an array of first photodiodes 40. The array 40 includes two or more photodiodes 40a, 40b disposed adjacent one another along a line perpendicular to a propagation direction of the diverted beam 42 from the tap splitter 38. The amplitude of the outputs of the array 40 indicate the angle of the diverted beam 42, inasmuch as changing the angle of the beam 42 will change the amount of the beam 42 incident on each diode of the array 40. A controller receives the outputs from the array 40 and controls power supplied to the index modulating element 36 such that a ratio of the outputs conforms to a pre-calibrated value.
The portion of the second angularly shifted beam 34 that is transmitted through the tap splitter 38 is incident on an optical spectrum reshaper (OSR) 46, which outputs a filtered beam 48. The OSR 46 may be embodied as one or more filters, including, but not limited to, a single cavity filter, coupled multi-cavity (CMC) filter, a thin film coupled multi-cavity filter, a periodic multi-cavity etalon, a fiber Bragg grating, a ring resonator filter, or any other optical element having a wavelength-dependent loss. The OSR 46 may also comprise a fiber, a Gire-Tournois interferometer, or some other element with chromatic dispersion. The OSR 46 may be fabricated as a solid optical element or may include gas-filled gaps, such as an OSR 46 embodied as a periodic multi-cavity etalon. In such embodiments, xenon, or other gas may be present in the gas-filled gaps.
A portion of the light not transmitted by the OSR 46 is reflected back toward the tap splitter 38. A diverted portion 54 of the back reflected beam is incident on a second photodiode 44. The output of the photodiode 44 indicates the spectral position of the second angularly shifted beam inasmuch as the amount of reflected light is dependent on its wavelength relative to the transmission function of the OSR 46. Accordingly, a controller may receive the output of the photodiode 44 and tune the lasers 14a-14d such that a ratio of the output of the photodiode 44 and a combination of the outputs of the array of first photodiodes 40 approaches a pre-calibrated value. For example, the outputs of the first photodiodes 40 may be averaged prior to calculating a ratio of the average of the outputs of the array of first photo diodes 40 and an output of the second photodiode 44.
The output of the OSR 46 may be incident on an output lens 56 that focuses the filtered beam 48 with respect to coupling optics 58 that couple the filtered beam to an output fiber. The filtered beam 48 is then transmitted over the fiber to a receiver.
Referring to
The controller 60 may also be electrically coupled to a second TEC 50b on which the prisms 24a, 24b are mounted. The controller 60 may control current supplied to the TEC 50b to compensate for changes in environmental temperature and to tune the angular shift of the prisms 24a, 24b.
Referring to
As shown in
In order to perform the filtering function with respect to the signal frequency pair 70, the transmission function may be shifted such that the transmission function is represented by dotted line 72. The base frequency 74 and peak frequency 76 are therefore located on a transmission edge with the base frequency 74 experiencing greater attenuation.
Wide tunability of the transmitter 10 may therefore be accomplished by tuning one of the transmission edges of the OSR 46 such that one or both of a desired base and/or peak frequency lie thereon, or the transmission edge lies therebetween. One of the lasers 14a-14d having the desired base and peak frequency within its tuning range may then be tuned such that frequency modulated signals emitted therefrom have frequency excursions between the base and peak frequency.
Referring again to
The controller 60 also receives an output from the second photodiode 44. The controller may be programmed to calculate a ratio of the output of the second photodiode 44 and a combination of the outputs of the array of first photodiodes 40, such as an average. The controller 60 may drive power supplied to stripe heaters 78 such that the ratio of the outputs approaches a pre-calibrated value indicating that the base or peak frequency of the selected laser is equal to or within a predetermined offset amount from the set frequency.
The above mentioned steps of making adjustments to operation of the transmitter 10 according to outputs of the thermistor 52, array of first photodiodes 40, and the second photodiode 44 may be performed continuously during operation of the transmitter 10.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/786,839, filed Feb. 25, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3324295 | Harris | Jun 1967 | A |
3973216 | Hughes et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3999105 | Archey et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4038600 | Thomas et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4561119 | Epworth | Dec 1985 | A |
4671604 | Soref | Jun 1987 | A |
4754459 | Westbrook | Jun 1988 | A |
4805235 | Henmi | Feb 1989 | A |
4841519 | Nishio | Jun 1989 | A |
4896325 | Coldren | Jan 1990 | A |
4908833 | Chraplyvy et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4914667 | Blonder et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5088097 | Ono et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5119393 | Oka et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5136598 | Weller et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5170402 | Ogita et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5177630 | Goutzoulis et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5212710 | Kaneda et al. | May 1993 | A |
5293545 | Huber | Mar 1994 | A |
5305134 | Tsushima et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5325378 | Zorabedian | Jun 1994 | A |
5325382 | Emura et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5371625 | Wedding et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5394429 | Yamada et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5412474 | Reasenberg et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416629 | Huber | May 1995 | A |
5434693 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5450432 | Okuda | Sep 1995 | A |
5459799 | Weber | Oct 1995 | A |
5465264 | Buhler et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477368 | Eskildsen et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5550667 | Krimmel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5568311 | Matsumoto | Oct 1996 | A |
5592327 | Gabl et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5642371 | Tohyama et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5696859 | Onaka et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5737104 | Lee et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5777773 | Epworth et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5805235 | Bedard | Sep 1998 | A |
5856980 | Doyle et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5920416 | Beylat et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5946129 | Xu et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953139 | Nemecek et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5953361 | Borchert | Sep 1999 | A |
5974209 | Cho et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991323 | Adams et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6018275 | Perrett et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6081361 | Adams et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088373 | Hakki | Jul 2000 | A |
6091743 | Yang | Jul 2000 | A |
6096496 | Frankel | Aug 2000 | A |
6104851 | Mahgerefteh | Aug 2000 | A |
6115403 | Brenner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6148017 | Borchert et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157025 | Katagiri et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6188499 | Majima | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6222861 | Kuo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6271959 | Kim et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282003 | Logan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298186 | He | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331991 | Mahgerefteh | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6351585 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353623 | Munks | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359716 | Taylor | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6421151 | Berger | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6459518 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473214 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486440 | Crafts et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6506342 | Frankel | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522809 | Takabayashi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6563623 | Penninckx et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577013 | Glenn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6580739 | Coldren | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6618513 | Evankow, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628690 | Fish et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6650667 | Nasu et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654564 | Colbourne et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658031 | Tuganov et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665351 | Hedberg et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6687278 | Mason et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690686 | Delfyett | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6738398 | Hirata | May 2004 | B2 |
6748133 | Liu et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6778307 | Clark | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785308 | Dyer et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6807215 | Lam et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810047 | Oh et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815786 | Ogasawara et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6834134 | Brennan et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836487 | Farmer et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847758 | Watanabe | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6943951 | Kikuchi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947206 | Tsadka et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963685 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7013090 | Adachi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027470 | May | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7054538 | Mahgerefteh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7073956 | Shin et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076170 | Choa | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7123846 | Tateyama et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7164865 | Tatsuno et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7187821 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7263291 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7280721 | McCallion et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7352968 | Tayebati | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7356264 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376352 | Tayebati | May 2008 | B2 |
7406266 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406267 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7433605 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7474858 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7474859 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7477851 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7480464 | McCallion et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492976 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7502532 | McCallion et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505694 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515626 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7536113 | Matsui et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7542683 | Matsui et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555225 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7558488 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7564889 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7609977 | Matsui et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613401 | Matsui et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7616902 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7630425 | Tayebati et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639955 | Zheng et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7657179 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663762 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7697186 | McCallion et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7697847 | Matsui et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7742542 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760777 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7778295 | Matsui et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809280 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7860404 | Matsui et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7869473 | Ye et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7941057 | Mahgerefteh et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962044 | McCallion et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962045 | McCallion et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7991291 | Matsui et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8068742 | Cole et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20010012430 | Usami et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010048705 | Kitaoka et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020012369 | Nasu et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020044738 | Jablonski | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020048290 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020063930 | Blauvelt | May 2002 | A1 |
20020122256 | Mitamura et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020131047 | Zarrabian et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020154372 | Chung et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159490 | Karwacki | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020176659 | Lei et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030002099 | Sayyah et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030002120 | Choa | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030063647 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067952 | Tsukiji et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077031 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030099018 | Singh et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030147114 | Kang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161370 | Buimovich et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169787 | Vurgaftman et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030193974 | Frankel et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210912 | Leuthold | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008933 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008937 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040036943 | Freund et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040076199 | Wipiejewski et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081386 | Morse et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040086012 | Kitaoka et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040096221 | Mahgerefteh et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109698 | Kim et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040218890 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234200 | Jennings et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050074244 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100345 | Welch et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111852 | Mahgerefteh et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050152702 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163512 | Tayebati et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169638 | Tayebati et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050169642 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050175356 | McCallion et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050196177 | Moran | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050206989 | Marsh | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213993 | Kazemi-Nia et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050249509 | Nagarajan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265733 | Kao et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271394 | Whiteaway et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286829 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286909 | Kish, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002718 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008272 | Abeles et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018666 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060029358 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029396 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029397 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060078336 | McNicol et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060078338 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060120416 | Hu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060193636 | Katagiri et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060228120 | McCallion et al. | Oct 2006 | A9 |
20060233556 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239306 | Donanhoe | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060274993 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070064759 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070286608 | Matsui et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002990 | McCallion et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037608 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080159747 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080166134 | McCallion et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181619 | Heismann | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187325 | McCallion et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193132 | Matsui et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193144 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080240180 | Matsui et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247763 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247765 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090003842 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090060526 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080905 | Olsson | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090196631 | Daghighian et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090238224 | Ye | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090269069 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100008679 | Cole | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100098436 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100279447 | Matsui et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100311195 | Matsui et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2510352 | Mar 2010 | CA |
1236891 | Dec 1999 | CN |
200380108289.9 | Nov 2007 | CN |
200380108289.9 | Aug 2008 | CN |
200380108289.9 | Nov 2008 | CN |
200580015245.0 | Sep 2009 | CN |
200580012705.4 | Mar 2010 | CN |
200580015245.0 | Mar 2010 | CN |
2005800378071 | May 2010 | CN |
200880009551.7 | Jul 2010 | CN |
0524758 | Jul 1992 | EP |
602659 | Jun 1994 | EP |
05731268.8 | Jan 2008 | EP |
05764209.2 | Jun 2009 | EP |
05731268.8 | May 2010 | EP |
2 107 147 | Apr 1983 | GB |
58-075340 | May 1983 | JP |
62-189832 | Aug 1987 | JP |
09-214427 | Aug 1997 | JP |
11-031859 | Feb 1999 | JP |
2000105313 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001-036477 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-284711 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001291928 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001320328 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002243935 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002267834 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002267998 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-311235 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2004-551835 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2004-551835 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2009-504345 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2009-504345 | Oct 2010 | JP |
102008-7027139 | Apr 2010 | KR |
9905804 | Feb 1999 | WO |
0104999 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0117076 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0118919 | Mar 2001 | WO |
03005512 | Jul 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alexander et al., Passive Equalization of Semiconductor Diode Laser Frequency Modulation, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Jan. 1989, 11-23, vol. 7, No. 1. |
Binder, J. et al., 10 Gbit/s-Dispersion Optimized Transmission at 1.55 um Wavelength on Standard Single Mode Fiber, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Apr. 1994, 558-560, vol. 6, No. 4. |
Hyryniewicz, J.V., et al., Higher Order Filter Response in Coupled Microring Resonators, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Mar. 2000, 320-322, vol. 12, No. 3. |
Koch, T. L. et al., Nature of Wavelength Chirping in Directly Modulated Semiconductor Lasers, Electronics Letters, Dec. 6, 1984, 1038-1039, vol. 20, No. 25/26. |
Kurtzke, C., et al., Impact of Residual Amplitude Modulation on the Performance of Dispersion-Supported and Dispersion-Mediated Nonlinearity-Enhanced Transmission, Electronics Letters, Jun. 9, 1994, 988, vol. 30, No. 12. |
Li, Yuan P., et al., Chapter 8: Silicon Optical Bench Waveguide Technology, Optical Fiber Communications, 1997, 319-370, vol. 111B, Lucent Technologies, New York. |
Little, Brent E., Advances in Microring Resonators, Integrated Photonics Research Conference 2003. |
Mohrdiek, S. et al., 10-Gb/s Standard Fiber Transmission Using Directly Modulated 1.55-um Quantum-Well DFB Lasers, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Nov. 1995, 1357-1359, vol. 7, No. 11. |
Morton, P.A. et al., “38.5km error free transmission at 10Gbit/s in standard fibre using a low chirp, spectrally filtered, directly modulated 1.55um DFB laser”, Electronics Letters, Feb. 13, 1997, vol. 33(4). |
Prokais, John G., Digital Communications, 2001, 202-207, Fourth Edition, McGraw Hill, New York. |
Rasmussen, C.J., et al., Optimum Amplitude and Frequency-Modulation in an Optical Communication System Based on Dispersion Supported Transmission, Electronics Letters, Apr. 27, 1995, 746, vol. 31, No. 9. |
Shalom, Hamutal et al., On the Various Time Constants of Wavelength Changes of A DFB Laser Under Direct Modulation, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Oct. 1998, pp. 1816-1822, vol. 34, No. 10. |
Wedding, B., Analysis of fibre transfer function and determination of receiver frequency response for dispersion supported transmission, Electronics Letters, Jan. 6, 1994, 58-59, vol. 30, No. 1. |
Wedding, B., et al., 10-Gb/s Optical Transmission up to 253 km Via Standard Single-Mode Fiber Using the Method of Dispersion-Supported Transmission, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Oct. 1994, 1720, vol. 12, No. 10. |
Yu, et al., Optimization of the Frequency Response of a Semiconductor Optical Amplifier Wavelength Converter Using a Fiber Bragg Grating, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Feb. 1999, 308-315, vol. 17, No. 2. |
Corvini, P.J. et al., Computer Simulation of High-Bit-Rate Optical Fiber Transmission Using Single-Frequency Lasers, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Nov. 1987, 1591-1596, vol. LT-5, No. 11. |
Lee, Chang-Hee et al., Transmission of Directly Modulated 2.5-Gb/s Signals Over 250-km of Nondispersion-Shifted Fiber by Using a Spectral Filtering Method, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Dec. 1996, 1725-1727, vol. 8, No. 12. |
Matsui, Yasuhiro et al, Chirp-Managed Directly Modulated Laser (CML), IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Jan. 15, 2006, pp. 385-387, vol. 18, No. 2. |
Nakahara, K. et al, 40-Gb/s Direct Modulation With High Extinction Ratio Operation of 1.3-μm InGaA 1 as Multiquantum Well Ridge Waveguide Distributed Feedback Lasers, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Oct. 1, 2007, pp. 1436-1438, vol. 19 No. 19. |
Sato, K. et al, Chirp Characteristics of 40-Gb/s Directly Modulated Distributed-Feedback Laser Diodes, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Nov. 2005, pp. 3790-3797, vol. 23, No. 11. |
Dischler et al., Experimental Assessment of a Direct Detection Optical OFDM System Targeting 10Gb/s and Beyond, Optical Fiber Communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, Feb. 24-28, 3 pages, San Diego, CA. |
Dong Jae Shin, et al., Low-cost WDM-PON with Colorless Bidirectional Tranceivers, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Jan. 2006, pp. 158-165, vol. 24, No. 1. |
Freund et al, 30 Gbit/s RZ 8-PSK Transmission over 2800 km Standard Single Mode Fibre without Inline dispersion Compensation, 2007, 3 pages. |
Kikuchi, Nobuhiko et al., Experimental Demonstration of Incoherent Optical Multilevel Staggered-APSK (Amplitude- and Phase-Shift Keying) Signaling, Optical Fiber Communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, Feb. 24-28, 2008, 3 pages, San Diego, CA. |
Kiyoshi Fukuchi, Proposal and Feasibility Study of a 6-level PSK modulation format based system for 100 Gg/s migration, 2007, 3 pages. |
Lammert et al., MQW DBR Lasers with Monolithically Integrated External-Cavity Electroabsorption Modulators Fabricated Without Modification of the Active Region, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 9, No. 5, May 1997, pp. 566-568. |
Mahgerefteh, D. and Fan, F., Chirp-managed-laser technology delivers > 250-km reach, Lightwave Online, 2005, PennWell Corporation. Accessed online Jul. 1, 2009 at: http://www.finisar.com/download—31wMeaCML—Application%20White%20Paper-LW.pdf. |
Mahgerefteh et al., Chirp managed laser (CML): A compact transmitter for dispersion tolerant 10 Gb/s networking applications; Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2006 and the 2006 National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference. OFC 2006, Mar. 5-10, 2006; Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/OFC.2006.215459. |
Sekine, Kenro et al., Advanced Multi-level Transmission Systems, Optical Fiber Communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, Feb. 24-28, 2008, 3 pages, San Diego, CA. |
Tokle, Torger et al., Advanced Modulation Formats for Transmission Systems, Optical Fiber Communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, Feb. 24-28, 2008, 3 pages, San Diego, CA. |
Wesstrom et al., State-of-the-art performance of widely tunable modulated grating Y-branch lasers; Optical Fiber Communiation Conference, 2004. OFC 2004, vol. 1, no., pp. 2 vol. (1800), Feb. 23-27, 2004; doi: 10.1109/OFC.2004.1349295. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/964,315, Aug. 25, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/964,315, Feb. 4, 2011, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/964,321, Aug. 25, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/964,321, Dec. 29, 2010, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/014,676, Oct. 4, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/014,676, Mar. 18, 2011, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,957, Nov. 5, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,957, Apr. 25, 2011, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,573, Oct. 6, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,675, Oct. 27, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,675, Mar. 24, 2011, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,678, Dec. 8, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,678, May 6, 2011, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/047,017, Jun. 1, 2010, Restriction Requirement. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/047,017, Aug. 6, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/047,017, Sep. 27, 2010, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/053,344, Apr. 1, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/053,344, Sep. 3, 2010, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/115,337, Mar. 4, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/115,337, Aug. 20, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/115,337, Oct. 28, 2010, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,137, Dec. 2, 2010, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/839,310, Apr. 28, 2011, Ex Parte Quayle Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/566,471, Jan. 20, 2011, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/126,717, Apr. 7, 2011, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/110,071, May 12, 2011, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/014,676 Supplemental Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 29, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,573 Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 7, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/126,717 Office Action mailed Apr. 7, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/566,471 Office Action mailed Jul. 27, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,957, Oct. 26, 2011, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/126,717, Sep. 12, 2011, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/839,310, Sep. 27, 2011, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/566,471, Dec. 5, 2011, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/857,465, Nov. 18, 2011, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/171,201, Jul. 19, 2011, Notice of Allowance. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080291950 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60449917 | Feb 2003 | US | |
60463063 | Apr 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10786839 | Feb 2004 | US |
Child | 12188407 | US |