Cavity quantum electrodynamics (cQED) is the study of the interaction between light and matter inside a resonant cavity. The matter may be an atom, ion, molecule, or other type of quantum particle that couples to light. The quantum particle may be trapped near the waist of an excited mode of the cavity, giving rise to intracavity optical tweezers.
In cavity quantum electrodynamics (cQED), it is frequently ideal to engineer the single-particle cooperativity η to be as large as possible. Defined as η=g2/κΓ, the cooperativity η quantifies the competition between (i) coherent information exchange at rate g between a cavity and an atom (e.g., a neutral atom or ion) located within the cavity and (ii) the decoherence rates Γ and κ of the atom and cavity, respectively. Increasing the cooperativity η increases the photon collection probability Pc=η/(1+η) that the atom emits into (or absorbs from) a mode of the cavity as opposed to free space. Increasing the cooperativity η also reduces the failure rate 2π/η1/2 of cavity-mediated quantum information transfer between two atoms trapped in separate optical cavities.
Another way to express the cooperativity is η≈0.2 λ2/w02, where
is the cavity finesse, w0 is the diffraction-limited waist of the cavity mode, and λ is the wavelength of the atomic transition and cavity resonance. The finesse
can be interpreted as the number of round trips that light in the optical cavity makes before lost due to absorption, scatter, or transmission through a cavity mirror. This alternative expression for η can be interpreted geometrically: the resonant cross-section that an atom presents for absorption of light is ˜λ2 and the area of the cavity mode going past the atom is ˜w02. Therefore, for each pass of the cavity light past the atom, the absorption probability is ˜λ2/w02. The optical cavity enhances this single-pass absorption probability by the number of passes
.
Prior-art optical cavities used for cQED achieve a high cooperativity η by employing a relatively large waist w0 and very high finesse . Such optical cavities (e.g., see
, these prior-art optical cavities are challenging to align and stabilize. Furthermore, specialized handling techniques are needed to prevent airborne particulate matter (e.g., dust) from landing on the mirror surfaces; such contamination reduces the finesse
by increasing scatter. Similarly, mounting the optical cavity inside a vacuum chamber, as needed for atom trapping, puts stringent cleanliness requirements on the vacuum system to prevent contaminants (e.g., oil) from landing on the mirrors.
One aspect of the present embodiments is the realization that increasing the single-particle cooperativity η places no significant restrictions on the cavity length L. The idea that cQED requires a small mode volume V is a misnomer that arose by writing the Purcell factor as FP=3λ3 Q/(4π2V). The Purcell factor FP quantifies how much an emitter's spontaneous emission rate is enhanced when it is located inside a resonant cavity having quality factor Q. The expression makes small mode volume V seem advantageous to increasing the Purcell factor FP, but ignores the fact that the Q drops as the cavity length L decreases. What is relevant for cQED is actually the finesse =Qc/2Lfc, where fc is the resonant frequency of the cavity mode. When written in terms of the finesse
and assuming that the mode volume V˜Lw02, the Purcell factor FP is identical, up to unit factors, to the cooperativity η and therefore only depends on
, λ, and w0. Thus, for a fixed value of λ there are only two independent experimental parameters that control the cooperativity η: the finesse
and the waist w0.
The present embodiments include an optical cavity that uses intracavity lenses to achieve a waist w0 that is smaller than that achieved with the prior-art optical cavities described above. Since η∝1/w02, the smaller waist w0 results in a significantly larger single-particle cooperativity η that may be used to lower the finesse . For example, the optical cavity can generate a waist of w0≈500 nm at λ=780 nm (the D2 transition for Rb), yielding a cooperativity of η≈9.4 for a finesse of only
=20. This value of the cooperativity η is so large that an atom trapped near the waist emits a photon ten times faster into the optical cavity than into free space. When the atom is implemented as a qubit, the emitted photon has a greater-than-90% probability of being collected by the optical cavity. Furthermore, due to the lower finesse
, the cavity length L only needs to be stabilized to within λ/(2
)=λ/20, making the optical cavity easier to align and stabilize than prior-art optical cavities. Also due to the lower finesse
, additional optical components can be placed within the cavity without significantly degrading the finesse
. The lower finesse
also eases requirements on handling, assembly, and vacuum cleanliness since an increase in optical scatter off of surface contaminants no longer significantly degrades the finesse
.
The increase in photon collection probability Pc will substantially improve state detection of tweezer-array apparatus and cQED setups. Accordingly, the present embodiments may be used to create a photonic-matter interface that efficiently converts quantum information between photonic qubits and matter-based qubits (e.g., trapped ions, neutral atoms, defects in diamond, etc.). Two of these interfaces could be used to optically couple matter-based qubits located in spatially separated traps or even separate vacuum systems. Such an optical coupling system could increase the number of qubits in a quantum computer, thereby improving qubit scaling. For example, the optical coupling setup could be used to efficiently transfer optical information between spatially disparate ion traps, thereby enabling quantum computing beyond the melting-size limit of a single ion crystal.
Another application of the present embodiments is sensing with color centers. Here, the optical cavity improves light gathering, thereby enabling faster, more accurate readout of the color center state. Such a scanning-cavity microscope would rely upon a small waist w0 rather than high finesse, greatly relaxing material constraints. As another application, the optical cavity could be used for an orders-of-magnitude speed-up in state detection for atom-array quantum simulators and computers, thereby enabling optically-mediated non-local gates and real-time feedback-based error correction.
Resonant light coupled into the optical cavity 100 can excite a cavity mode 104 having a diffraction-limited waist w0 that is located between the mirrors 102(1) and 102(2). The waist w0 is the minimum 1/e2 intensity radius of the cavity mode 104 and is therefore the location of the highest peak intensity of the cavity mode 104. Along the optical axis 110, the waist Wo occurs at a focal point 112. For confocality (i.e., L=R), the focal point 112 occurs midway between the mirrors 102(1) and 102(2).
One way to increase the cooperativity η∝& λ2/w2 is to decrease the waist w0. This can be achieved with the optical cavity 100 by decreasing the radius of curvature R of the mirrors 102(1) and 102(2). However, due to limitations in fabrication (i.e., machining, turning, polishing, etc.), R is typically greater than or equal to 1 cm. Another way to increase the cooperativity η is to increase the finesse
. This can be achieved with the optical cavity 100 by increasing the reflectivity of the mirrors 102(1) and 102(2). However, very high values of finesse
require exceptionally clean optical surfaces since scatter from dust and other particulates degrades the finesse
. As a result, the mirrors 102(1) and 102(2) must be carefully handled in a dust-free environment (e.g., a cleanroom) and operated inside a vacuum chamber.
The optical cavity 300 has a cavity mode 304 with a first section 308(1) that extends longitudinally between the first front face 314(1) and the first intracavity lens 310(1), a second section 308(2) that extends longitudinally between the second front face 314(2) and the second intracavity lens 310(2), and a center section 308(3) that extends longitudinally between the first intracavity lens 310(1) and the second intracavity lens 310(2).
In
One advantage of the optical cavity 300 is that the mirrors 302(1) and 302(2) can be planar. Planar mirrors are easier to manufacture and procure than curved mirrors. In the prior-art optical cavity 100 of
The dramatic increase in cooperativity η that can be achieved with the optical cavity 300 may be used to reduce the finesse , thereby avoiding many of the challenges of working with the high-reflectivity mirrors used to make high-finesse cavities. In some embodiments, the finesse
of the optical cavity 300 is less than 100. Such low finesses can be achieved with conventional mirrors that are readably available and do not require superpolishing. Compared to their high-finesse counterparts, low-finesse cavities are also less susceptibility to loss arising from dust and particulate matter landing on the mirror surfaces. Accordingly, the mirrors 302(1) and 302(2) do not need to be placed in vacuum or handled differently from conventional mirrors.
can easily exceed 104. For example, the ringdown trace shown in
=18,400±150.
In general, the size of the waist w0 depends on the numerical aperture (NA) of the intracavity lenses 310(1) and 310(2). In one embodiment, each of the lenses 310(1) and 310(2) is a microscope objective, which can advantageously achieve NAs up to 0.9. Thus, microscope objectives can generate some of the smallest waists. However, because microscope objectives have multiple optical elements, they produce greater intracavity loss when compared to lenses with fewer elements, even when these optical elements are superpolished and anti-reflection coated. Typically, an anti-reflection-coated objective has a single-pass loss of at least 10%, which limits the highest finesse to F˜18.
In general, each of the intracavity lenses 310(1) and 310(2) can be any type of lens or lens assembly known in the art. Examples include, but are not limited to, biconvex lenses, plano-convex lenses, doublets (e.g., achromats), triplets, and Fresnel lenses. The lenses 310(1) and 310(2) may be of the same type or different types. Where the lenses 310(1) and 310(2) are of the same type, they may have different parameters (e.g., numerical aperture, focal length, clear aperture, etc.), similar parameters, or a combination thereof. Thus, while
One or both of the mirrors 302(1) and 302(2) may serve as a coupler. For example, in
In
In one embodiment, one or both of the curved mirrors 602(1) and 602(2) is replaced with a planar mirror and lens. One or more additional lenses (e.g., a telescope or beam expander) may be placed between the first mirror 602(1) and first lens 310(1) to further shape the cavity mode 604. Similarly, one or more additional lenses may be placed between the second mirror 602(2) and first lens 310(2).
Advantageously, placing the mirrors 302(1) and 302(2) outside of the vacuum chamber 702 allows them to be easily adjusted for alignment. For example, each of the mirrors 302(1) and 302(2) may be mounted on a conventional mirror mount with tip and tilt adjustment. By comparison, most prior-art optical cavities that use concave mirrors (e.g., the optical cavity 100 of
To allow light to pass through, the vacuum chamber 702 may include a first window 704(1) and second window 704(2). One or both of the windows 704(1) and 704(2) may be anti-reflection coated to reduce intracavity loss that lowers finesse . In another embodiment, only one of the intracavity lenses 310(1) and 310(2) is located inside the vacuum chamber 702, the other being located outside the vacuum chamber 702. In another embodiment, both of the lenses 310(1) and 310(2) are located outside of the vacuum chamber 702 such that the waist w0 is located inside the vacuum chamber 702.
In some embodiments, the optical cavity 700 includes an intracavity modulator 710 that, when electrically driven with a modulation signal 712, modulates the light within the optical cavity 700. The modulator 710 may be used, for example, to integrate the optical cavity 700 with an optical communication system (not shown). The modulator 710 may be an acousto-optic modulator, electro-optic modulator, spatial-light modulator, or similar type of electrically-controlled nonlinear optical device. In the example of
In
Since the first and second longitudinal modes are excited simultaneously, interference terms between the first and second longitudinal modes affect time-averaging. In this case, a time-averaged mode structure 1006 of the combined first and second longitudinal modes is longitudinally smooth, i.e., no longer exhibits a standing-wave pattern. Instead, the mode structure 1006 has only one potential minimum for trapping atoms (i.e., at the waist w0), similar to a traveling-wave optical dipole trap. For this reason, the mode structure 1006 is also referred to herein as an intracavity optical dipole trap 1010. By comparison, each of the standing waves 1002 and 1004 has several potential minima that prevents atoms trapped in these different potential minima from interacting with each other (e.g., via collisions).
In one embodiment, the first and second optical frequency components excite two adjacent longitudinal modes of the optical cavity. Here, “adjacent” means that the first longitudinal mode is characterized by a first integer mode number n1 and the second longitudinal mode is characterized by a second integer mode number n2, where n2=n1+1 or n2=n1−1. Thus, the resonant frequencies of the two adjacent longitudinal modes differ by approximately one free-spectral range of the cavity. In other embodiments, the first and second longitudinal modes are not adjacent.
The first and second optical frequency components may be two frequency components of a single laser beam. Alternatively, the first and second optical frequency components may be two separate monochromatic (i.e., single frequency) laser beams. For example, a first monochromatic laser beam may be coupled into the optical cavity through the first mirror 302(1) while a second monochromatic laser beam is coupled into the optical cavity through the second mirror 302(2). Furthermore, the longitudinally smooth mode structure 1006 can be produced by simultaneously exciting more than two longitudinal modes of the optical cavity. For example, a single monochromatic laser beam can be modulated (e.g., amplitude, phase, or frequency modulated) at the free spectral range of the optical cavity to simultaneously excite several adjacent longitudinal modes.
The optical cavities of
Neighboring pairs of the mirrors 302 define an optical axis therebetween. The closed path has a plurality of “arms”, each extending along the optical axis of each neighboring pair of mirrors 302. For example, in
In the example of
Features described above as well as those claimed below may be combined in various ways without departing from the scope hereof. The following examples illustrate possible, non-limiting combinations of features and embodiments described above. It should be clear that other changes and modifications may be made to the present embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention:
(A1) An optical cavity includes a plurality of mirrors positioned to reflect light along a closed path. First and second mirrors of the plurality of mirrors define an optical axis therebetween. The optical cavity also includes first and second intracavity lenses located along the optical axis. A mode of the optical cavity has a waist located between the first and second intracavity lenses.
(A2) In the optical cavity denoted (A1), the finesse is 1000 or less.
(A3) In either of the optical cavities denoted (A1) and (A2), the waist is ten microns or less.
(A4) In any of the optical cavities denoted (A1) to (A3), the first and second intracavity lenses have a similar numerical aperture.
(A5) In any of the optical cavities denoted (A1) to (A4), each of the first and second intracavity lenses is a microscope objective or an aspheric lens.
(A6) In any of the optical cavities denoted (A1) to (A5), each of the first and second intracavity lenses has at least one surface that is anti-reflection coated at a wavelength of the light.
(A7) In any of the optical cavities denoted (A1) to (A6), one or both of the first and second intracavity lenses having a numerical aperture greater than or equal to 0.5.
(A8) In any of the optical cavities denoted (A1) to (A7), the plurality of mirrors includes three or more mirrors forming a ring cavity.
(A9) In any of the optical cavities denoted (A1) to (A7), the first and second mirrors forming a Fabry-Perot cavity.
(A10) In the optical cavity denoted (A9), the first mirror and first intracavity lens are separated by a first distance. The second mirror and second intracavity lens are separated by a second distance that is different than the first distance.
(A11) In either one of the optical cavities denoted (A9) and (A10), one or both of the first and second mirrors is planar.
(A12) In any of the optical cavities denoted (A9) to (A11), the first mirror includes a substrate with opposing front and rear surfaces that are polished. The first mirror also includes a high-reflectivity coating applied to the front surface.
(A13) In the optical cavity denoted (A12), the first mirror includes an anti-reflection coating on the rear surface.
(A14) In any of the optical cavities denoted (A1) to (A13), the optical cavity further includes a translation stage that, when actuated, translates the first intracavity lens transversely to the optical axis.
(A15) In any of the optical cavities denoted (A1) to (A14), the optical cavity further includes a second translation stage that, when actuated, translates the second intracavity lens transversely to the optical axis.
(A16) In any of the optical cavities denoted (A1) to (A15), the optical cavity further includes a vacuum chamber within which the first and second intracavity lenses are mounted.
(A17) In the optical cavity denoted (A16), the vacuum chamber includes a first vacuum window located between the first intracavity lens and the first mirror. The vacuum chamber also includes a second vacuum window located between the second intracavity lens and the second mirror. The first and second mirrors are located outside of the vacuum chamber.
(B1) A method for cavity quantum electrodynamics includes confining one or more nonlinear emitters near the waist of any of the optical cavities denoted (A1) to (A17).
(B2) In the method denoted (B1), the one or more nonlinear emitters are selected from the group consisting of: atoms, solid-state color centers, and quantum dots.
(B3) In either of the methods denoted (B1) and (B2), the method further includes reading out the one or more nonlinear emitters using the optical cavity.
(B4) In any of the methods denoted (B1) to (B3), the method further includes entangling the one or more nonlinear emitters with a photon that is coupled into the optical cavity.
(B5) In any of the methods denoted (B1) to (B4), the method further includes driving the one or more nonlinear emitters to deterministically generating a single photon that is emitted into a mode of the optical cavity.
(B6) In the method denoted (B5), the one or more nonlinear emitters includes one or more atoms. Said driving includes driving cavity-vacuum-assisted Raman transitions of the one or more atoms between a first hyperfine ground state and a second hyperfine ground state.
(B7) In any of the methods denoted (B1) to (B6), the one or more nonlinear emitters includes one or more atoms. Said confining comprises trapping the one or more atoms.
(B8) In the method denoted (B7), said trapping includes magnetically trapping the one or more atoms.
(B8) In either of the methods denoted (B7) and (B8), said trapping includes optically trapping the one or more atoms.
(B9) In the method denoted (B8), said optically trapping includes optically trapping the one or more atoms in an intracavity optical dipole trap created by the optical cavity.
(B10) In the method denoted (B9), the method further includes generating the intracavity optical dipole trap by coupling laser light into the optical cavity to excite one or mode longitudinal modes of the optical cavity.
(B11) In the method denoted (B10), the one or more longitudinal modes include two adjacent longitudinal modes of the optical cavity.
(B12) In any of the methods denoted (B8) to (B11), said optically trapping comprises optically trapping a plurality of atoms in the intracavity optical dipole trap. The method further includes driving the plurality of atoms with near-resonant cooling light to induce collisional blockade that removes, from the intracavity dipole trap, pairs of the plurality of atoms. Said driving continues until only one of the plurality of atoms remains in the intracavity optical dipole trap.
Changes may be made in the above methods and systems without departing from the scope hereof. It should thus be noted that the matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings should be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense. The following claims are intended to cover all generic and specific features described herein, as well as all statements of the scope of the present method and system, which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall therebetween.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/362,242, filed on Mar. 31, 2022, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2023/016393 | 3/27/2023 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63362242 | Mar 2022 | US |