The present invention relates to optical detectors incorporating avalanche photodiodes (APDs).
APD detectors used in fibre optic receivers can be very vulnerable to high input optical power due to their internal optical gain and the overload capability of the electronics (TIA) downstream thereof. Failure of the APD is a power effect, caused by Joule heating within the detector.
It is an aim of the present invention to provide a new APD optical detector with which the APD is effectively protected against the risk of damage and failure from optical overload.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided an optical detector including an avalanche photodiode (APD) and protection circuitry for protecting the APD from excessive power dissipation therewithin, wherein the protection circuitry includes a switching element connected in parallel with the APD, which switching element is switched from a high resistance state to a low resistance state if the level of current through the APD exceeds a predetermined level, and wherein switching back of the switching element to the high resistance state is dependent on a reset signal from a controller.
One embodiment includes the following additional features. The protection circuitry also includes a comparator whose output controls said switching element, wherein said comparator receives at its non-inverting input a voltage signal dependent on sum of the levels of current through the APD and the switching element and at its inverting input a reference voltage signal, and wherein the protection circuitry is configured such that switching of said switching element into the low resistance state has the effect of reducing the bias across the APD whilst not reducing the sum of the levels of current through the APD and the switching element, such that in the absence of said reset signal the switching element is latched in the low resistance state. The protection circuitry includes a resistor in series with both the APD and the switching element, the resistance value of the resistor being selected in relation to that of the APD and switching element such that switching the switching element into the low resistance state has the effect of reducing the bias voltage across the APD. The reset signal reduces the bias voltage across the APD and the switching element, whereby the sum of the levels of current through the APD and the switching element drops and said switching element is switched back into the high resistance state. After reducing said bias voltage the controller initiates ramping of said bias voltage back to a normal operation level. The output of the comparator is also connected to an input of the controller.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an optical detector including an avalanche photodiode (APD), and protection circuitry for protecting the APD from excessive power dissipation therewithin, wherein in the event that the level of current through the APD exceeds a predetermined level as a result of an optical overload, the protection circuitry switches the APD bias voltage to a relatively low bias voltage at which said optical overload can nonetheless still be detected, and wherein switching back of the APD bias voltage to a higher voltage state is dependent on a reset signal from a controller.
In one embodiment, the optical detector further includes a current monitor connected in series with the APD, and wherein the current monitor provides an output signal indicative of the APD current both under normal operation conditions and said overload condition.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an optical detector including an avalanche photodiode (APD)5 and protection circuitry for protecting the APD from excessive power dissipation therewithin by switching the APD to a relatively low voltage power supply if the level of current through the APD exceeds a predetermined level, and wherein switching back of the APD to a higher voltage power supply is dependent on a reset signal from a controller.
One embodiment includes the following additional features. The protection circuitry includes a comparator which receives at its inverting input a voltage signal dependent on the level of current through the APD and at its non-inverting input a reference voltage signal, and wherein the protection circuitry is configured such that said reference voltage signal is automatically reduced when the APD is switched to the relatively low voltage power supply such that in the absence of said reset signal the APD is latched in a low bias voltage state even if the level of current through the APD falls back below said predetermined level. The protection circuitry includes a diode connected in series across the output and non-inverting input of the comparator. The diode is connected in series with a switch element across the output and non-inverting input of the comparator, said switch element being switchable between high and low resistance states, and wherein the controller resets the protection circuitry by activating said switch element so as to switch it first to said high-resistance state whereby the APD is switched back to a higher voltage power supply, and then switching it back to said low-resistance state. The low voltage power supply is one at which the controller can still determine the level of current through the APD. The controller receives via a current monitor, amplifier and analogue-digital converter a digital input representative of the current through the APD, and upon determination that the current has dropped below a predetermined level indicating removal of optical overload sends said reset signal to switch the APD back to a higher voltage power supply.
Another embodiment includes the following features. The controller also controls a variable optical attenuator (VOA) in the optical path to the APD. Upon recognition of a switch of the APD to the low voltage power supply the controller sets the VOA to maximum attenuation and switches the APD to a higher voltage power supply.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided the use of the optical detector described above for measuring the power of an optical signal whilst protecting the APD from optical overload.
Embodiments of the invention are hereunder described in detail, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
With reference to
An explanation of the operation of the detector of the first embodiment is provided by
The use of a combination of hardware and software controls in this first embodiment provides good overload protection for the APD based optical receiver. The hardware side includes a fast switch which preferable has a response time of less than 1 us. The software side monitors the input optical power and adjusts the APD bias accordingly. The use of a switch to connect APD anode to ground also simplifies the protection circuitry and reduces the number of components to a minimum. This can be very important for APD receivers used in TxRx module applications (such as SFP and XFP) where the board space and power consumption is very critical.
Features of this first embodiment include: (i) switching the APD anode to ground when the input power exceeds a pre-set threshold; (ii) Self-latching to keep the protection switch in the on-state while the software runs the protection routine; and (iii) intelligent multi-mode operation of the APD charge pump.
In
U1 is a 5 to 38V DAC controlled switch-mode PSU. Output volts developed across C2.
U2 is a current sensor with a transfer ratio =IVAmA
U3B is a high-speed comparator. Threshold voltage is set by R5/R6=2 volts, which corresponds to APD bias-current of 2 mA.
In normal operation, the APD bias current is <<2 mA and the APD is biased to the required voltage. If bias current exceeds 2 mA, the comparator output-goes high and rapidly turns on FET Q1A. This shorts out the APD. Any charge generated in the APD flows through Q1A to ground. Power supply current also flows through Q1A via R1. Assuming the APD was biased at >6V, current >2 mA still flows through the current sensor and the comparator output remains high, holding Q1A on, hence the circuit is latched in the protect state. The output of the comparator is also connected to an input port of the microprocessor, so that it recognises the latched trip state.
To reset the latched condition, the microprocessor turns down the bias voltage (via DAC) so that current through the current sensor drops below 2 mA and Q1A turns off. The APD will now be biased at low voltage (<6V). The microprocessor can now restart the bias control loop, which ramps the bias voltage. If the overload is still present, APD current will increase. If it exceeds 2 mA, the cycle will repeat. The processor retry period can be selected as appropriate, for example in the order of 10˜100 ms.
Response time of the latch is preferably <<1 us.
The traces show the following:
As shown by the traces, the time for the MAX4008 to respond is t2−t1=70 ns, and the comparator/FET switching time is t4−13=80 ns, making a total circuit delay of only 150 ns.
As shown in
An example of the operation of the detector of this second embodiment is provided by
The effect of the analogue protection circuitry is to re-bias the APD to a level where the power dissipated in the APD is significantly reduced enabling high levels of optical input power to be accommodated without catastrophic failure of the APD. The optical overload can be monitored during the protected state.
The APD is biased in a high voltage state VAPD through a current monitor circuit which provides current to a sense resistor RSense. The voltage produced across the sense resistor is divided by R1 and R2 to provide a signal to the negative input of the comparator. In normal operation, the signal is below the comparator set voltage defined by R3 and R4 and the output of the comparator is pulled high by the pull-up resistor. Under optical overload conditions, the signal voltage at the junction of R1 and R2 exceeds the comparator set voltage and the comparator output changes from a high to a low voltage, causing current to flow through D1 and the closed switch SW2 forcing the voltage at the comparator positive input to fall to approximately one diode drop above ground potential. The low output signal causes switch SW1 to change the bias to the APD to the protected bias condition, most usually a low voltage at which avalanche operation of the photo-detector does not occur, producing a lower photo current and reducing the power dissipated in the photo-detector, preventing device failure. Operation under these conditions allows continued monitoring of the photo-current to ensure removal of the overload condition before re-setting the APD bias. The ratio of R1 to R2 is chosen to ensure that the signal sent to the negative input of the comparator does not fall below the voltage on the positive input after the overload signal has been removed, forcing the comparator to latch in the protected state. The output of the comparator may be used to monitor the setting of the protected state. Opening of the switch SW2 removes the current through diode D1 allowing the comparator set voltage to be reset to the value defined by R3 and R4. If the overload is still present, the comparator output remains low and the APD remains under low bias conditions. If the optical overload has been removed the output of the comparator circuit is pulled high by the pull-up resistor and the switch SW1 resets to the high voltage bias for normal APD operation.
The APD bias under the protected state may be held at a value suitable for the particular device to be protected. Leaving the bias circuit open in the protect state may allow a greater degree of protection although the ability to monitor the photo-current under these conditions is removed.
Features of this second embodiment include: (1) Switching of APD bias voltage from M3-M10 level (high bandwidth, normally operating level) to low level (approx M1) allowing continuous monitoring of the overload; and (2) Circuit is latching and reset from external control.
The output voltage is used to drive a comparator (MAX986EXK-T) circuit which has hysteresis such that when it is set, by a detection of a high enough current (say 110% of the maximum expected current), it remains turned on. In this condition it redirects the bias to the APD to be from the normal operating voltage (typically in the range of 19 to 26V) to a much lower value, at which the APD is operating in PIN mode. It has been observed that a voltage of 9V should ensure that the devices are always properly operating in the PIN mode. In such conditions, the current is reduced by at least a factor of 3, and more likely a factor of 10 from the normal operating condition. The photo-current is still monitored by the microprocessor. When the microprocessor determines that the current is less than the allowable operating maximum current, the APD is re-biased to a suitable level dependent on the input current. The turn on sequence could use both (i) a variable optical attenuator (VOA) upstream of the APD to attenuate the optical signal and (ii) appropriate bias conditions for the APD. The circuit is reset to use the higher APD operating bias by the application of a positive going pulse from the microprocessor. To avoid an unstable turn on/turn off sequence in the bias redirection circuit, the resetting is only allowed to exist for a transient time (˜6 us) by means of an RC high pass feed to the reset switch.
In
The APD is specified to 0 dBm. At this condition the gain will be set to M3. The input power is ImW and therefore the photo-current is 3 mA. This is the maximum specified current for the TIA. The power dissipated in the detector is 57 mW assuming a bias of 19 volts. This may be deemed to be the maximum safe level for the detector. Therefore, if the protection circuit is activated, the voltage is cut to 9V and the current is divided by approximately a factor of three, assuming the device operates in the PIN mode. Under these conditions the current is reduced to 1 mA and the power dissipation is reduced to 9 mW.
The protection circuit activates within the thermal time constant of the APD, which typically ranges from a few microseconds to a few tens of microseconds.
The input power required to produce 57 mW at M1 and 9 volts bias is 6.55 mW corresponding to about 8 dBm.
The protection afforded to the APD is not reliant on the VOA. Longer term protection with the VOA fully attenuating would constitute greater protection.
The microprocessor restores a safe power up procedure once it recognises that the unit has received a power overload. This could be done by looking for the loss of power alarm or loss of signal alarm. An alternative way is to simply sense an ADC level near to maximum, say greater than 1008. The signal required to achieve 2 mA (max sense voltage of 2V) is about −1.6 dBm at M3, so for greater input power levels the VOA is preferably in circuit.
The resolution of the ADC (1Obit) and the minimum safe setting of the low power level indicating low light level conditions will limit the ability of the microprocessor to recognise that the APD is detecting a real signal rather than just dark current leakage. A sensible minimum value would be 10 ADC points, corresponding to 2O mV sense voltage which is 2O uA current (for a Ik sense resistor). This puts the lower sense limit at −27 dBm.
Trace C shows the rising transient between 0 and 2.5V. Trace D shows the output to the APD falling from 23.6V to 9V. With this given level of overdrive, the delay is about 450 ns. This delay increases slightly with reduced overdrive, but with an overdrive level corresponding to 1OO uA (0.1V) the response time is still less than 600 ns. The response is not determined by the base level of the input signal. If the base level was at 1.9V (equivalent to 1.9 mA) then the increase to 2V would initiate the transition in a similar time.
The reset line also monitors the output of the comparator circuit and detects when this is sent low as indicating an overload situation. An example of a sequence of events is:
If the overload is still present, the reset pulse from the microprocessor will fail to reset the analogue protection circuit. Also, if required, the +9V supply could be isolated from the APD supply switch. This would enable the supply to be open circuited, possibly affording a higher level of protection. Under these conditions the microprocessor would not be able to determine the photocurrent and therefore will not recognise whether the overload still exists. However, it is still possible to bring the receiver back on line in a protected state by selecting M3 bias conditions and inserting maximum VOA attenuation. These could then be backed off until a useable signal is received. The APD gain and the VOA setting can then be used to verify if the overload is still present.
AC coupling of the reset pulse is used because during the reset pulse the hysteresis is disconnected. The overload signal detected would trip the protection circuit, cutting its gain. If this were to a level, because V=9 volts instead of 19V and M=I instead of 3-10, at which the overload condition was no longer satisfied, the unit would immediately return to the high gain state, whereupon the overload would again be sensed and the unit would trip itself again. This oscillation would proceed for the duration of the reset signal. By using a very short reset signal, the extent of this undefined state can be reduced.
The optical detectors described above have particular use in, for example, applications where a very high optical power may be applied to an APD receiver over a period of about less than 100 us (such as switching on a EDFA in a real system or an optical attenuator in a test lab).
The applicant draws attention to the fact that the present invention may include any feature or combination of features disclosed herein either implicitly or explicitly or any generalisation thereof, without limitation to the scope of any definitions set out above. In view of the foregoing description it will be evident to a person skilled in the art that various modifications may be made within the scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0423669.1 | Oct 2004 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB05/04072 | 10/21/2005 | WO | 6/7/2006 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60625589 | Nov 2004 | US |