The present invention relates to optical systems for scanning of deflecting a light beam, and in particular to systems which comprise periodically moving reflective elements, such as oscillating mirrors.
Certain devices such as wafer defect scanners, laser printers, document scanners, projectors and the like make use of a narrow collimated laser beam that is usually scanned across a flat surface along a straight line path. A typical optical scanning system for this purpose employs a rotating or oscillating flat mirror to deflect the beam. The collimated input beam is aimed perpendicular to the scanning mirror's rotational axis, so that the main deflected ray sweeps a plane in space. The beam strikes the flat surface in a spot that scans along a straight line path. Beam collimation generally ensures that the spot size remains substantially the same at both the center and edges of the flat surface.
Several systems have been proposed in the art. Some of which are the following:
U.S. Pat. No. 5,291,273 describes a non-contact diameter measuring device for measuring the diameter of a stationary or rotating round object by measuring the difference in the angle of reflection of a light beam scanned along part of the circumference of the object. The scanning beam is repeatedly translated across the object and the angle of the reflected beam is detected. The distance the beam passes across the object is translated into a signal which is proportional to the diameter.
GB 2247090 discloses a scanner for use in a thermal imaging system which comprises an oscillating mirror and a powered optical system used in a double-pass mode to transmit radiation between a detector and a focal plane. During the first pass rays normal to the detector are brought to a focus on the surface of the mirror and after reflection are once more wandered parallel by the second pass. A real image of the detector is formed which on movement of the oscillating mirror scans a flat field with a telecentric pupil.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,168,386 describes a flat-field telecentric scan system, having a planar scanning reflector situated in a light path and mounted for movement about a scan axis, a concave spherical mirror fixed in a position in the light path, and a lens or mirror with spherical surface placed in the light path for providing a flat-field scan.
However, there is still a need for a compact solution which can provide a good quality images and can be applicable also to relatively small devices such as hand held projectors and the like.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a device to allow scanning and projecting the scanned image with microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) having limited mirror area.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a solution that can provide a high quality of projected images that can be used among others in hand held projectors.
Other objects of the invention will become apparent as the description of the invention proceeds.
In accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention there is provided an optical device for projecting a light beam comprising:
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the concave reflective surface of the optical device has a two dimensional curvature formed by the circular shape extending along one of its axis and by a another shape extending along another of its axis and wherein the other shape is selected from among the group consisting of a circular shape, a parabolic shape and an elliptic shape. Preferably, the two dimensional curvature is made of two spherical shapes, and optionally, each of the two spherical shapes has a different curvature radius then the other.
According to another preferred embodiment of the invention, at least one of the reflectors i.e. at least one of group comprising the first planar reflector, the concave reflective surface and the second planar reflector, comprises reflective microelectromechanical systems (MEMS).
FIG. 1—presents a schematic view of an optical device operative to project a laser beam onto a target surface, construed in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2—presents another schematic view of the optical device presented in
FIG. 3—illustrates a schematic view of a beam exiting the device presented in
FIGS. 4A to 4C—show schematic views of beams reflected from the fixed concave mirror toward the vertical mirror;
FIGS. 5A to 5C—demonstrate schematic views of beams reflected from the horizontal mirror toward the fixed concave mirror;
FIG. 6—presents a schematic view of a beam reflected from the focusing Lens toward the horizontal mirror;
FIG. 7—presents a schematic view of beam focusing at the axis of symmetry;
FIG. 8—illustrates the device used as a model for the mathematical analysis provided;
FIG. 9—shows a simplification of the model by focusing on a point perpendicular to z-axis;
FIG. 10—presents a system where the origin of the axis is set to be at the middle of the two poles;
FIG. 11—presents a mathematical solution for a set of parameters substituted in the model presented; and
FIG. 12—presents a parabola-family solution that satisfies the model demonstrated.
A better understanding of the present invention is obtained when the following non-limiting detailed examples are considered in conjunction with the attached drawings.
With reference to
For the convenience of the reader, the drawings show only one ray being at the center of the laser's beam's ray bundle. The planar horizontal reflector 4 is disposed with its rotational axis along the Z axis and the rays of the laser beam 12 are incident on reflector 4 at an angle of α as shown in
The concave mirror 6 is fixed in position. It is disposed in cylindrical symmetry along the z axis and designed in such a way that the asymptotic line of mirror 6 at the point where the center of the Gaussian beam incidents the mirror meets the z axis at an angle of
Mirror 6 is thus adapted to intercept laser beam 12′ and redirecting the light as beam 12″ from the fixed concave mirror 6 orthogonally to the axis of symmetry z toward vertical mirror 8. Mirror 6 in our example has a spherical reflective surface which is characterized by a radius of curvature. In order to obtain the projection of the image onto target surface (e.g. a screen) 10, the spacing between the point of intersection of the laser beam 12 with the planar scan mirror 4 and mirror 6 should equal to the spherical radius of mirror 6. Beam 12″ that is reflected from the concave mirror 6 when horizontal mirror 4 rotates along axis z, creates a plane orthogonal to z axis when reaching vertical mirror 8. Since the vertical mirror is flat, the beam that hits the vertical mirror will result in another reflected plane. Looking via the “Z” axis as illustrated in
For the sake of clarity, the description of the operation of the above described set up will start from the screen and going backward towards the emitting laser.
The beam 14 exiting the vertical mirror 8 (
Next,
A typical value for h=1 cm is
Let us now consider the following mathematical solution demonstrating a design of an optical device in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Let us first simplify the model by focusing on a point perpendicular to z-axis (as shown in
The top (centered) ellipse has been derived by using:
So in order to solve the above equation we need two equations. The first equation uses the following relationship:
R2y=D2+R2z
Whereas the second equation makes use of the fact that the point
can be found on the ellipse:
Thus,
For the case of: D=50 cm, d=6 cm, α=30° we shall assume a parabola solution as shown in
y=−kz2+c
The two parameters of the parabola could be derived from the following constrains:
1. For the nominal value of entry angle, α, ray should meet the parabola at the same z value as the center of the vertical mirror.
2. At that point the tangent of the parabola should be equal to −β.
For the first constrain we have:
For the second constrain we have:
In the last equation we used the identity of α=2β. Substituting the last result in the equation set for the first constrain, one would get:
So that the solution for the parabola is:
Substituting α=15° and h=10 mm:
Y=−0.049133381Z2+10.08819045
While for α=30° and h=10.39 mm:
Y=−0.044658199Z2+10.79422863
Thus, the solution reached is a parabola-family as shown in
The present invention provides an arrangement that allows two mirrors to be placed apart from each other while optically conceived as if they are located one inside the other, so that any similar arrangement that would yield a similar result should be considered within the scope of the present invention. Furthermore, the examples described above provide an analytical solution for obtaining the geometrical parameters required to construct an optical device in accordance with the present invention. However, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, similar processes may be applied in similar ways in order to obtain such parameters, for example through well known computer ray-tracing programs which may be used to specify the best scan mirror tilt, the radii of curvature of the concave mirror, etc.
It is to be understood that the above description only includes some embodiments of the invention and serves for its illustration. Numerous other ways for constructing the optical device provided by the present invention may be devised by a person skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention, and are thus encompassed by the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
185355 | Aug 2007 | IL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2008/001135 | 8/18/2008 | WO | 00 | 2/18/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/024969 | 2/26/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3647956 | Buck et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3669522 | Anderson | Jun 1972 | A |
3748014 | Beiser | Jul 1973 | A |
3801180 | MaGuire et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
4111531 | Lavelle et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4368488 | Sakamoto | Jan 1983 | A |
4497540 | Breckinridge et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4997242 | Amos | Mar 1991 | A |
5168386 | Galbraith | Dec 1992 | A |
5291273 | Gelbart | Mar 1994 | A |
5565979 | Gross | Oct 1996 | A |
5726752 | Uno et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5907442 | Matsuda | May 1999 | A |
5920361 | Gibeau et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6211988 | Engelhardt et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6433908 | Seel | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6836381 | Giles et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6859329 | Kobayashi | Feb 2005 | B2 |
20020122260 | Okazaki et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20070109509 | Lee | May 2007 | A1 |
20080130077 | Park et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1388747 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1785769 | May 2007 | EP |
2143933 | Feb 1973 | FR |
2247090 | Feb 1992 | GB |
2001257834 | Sep 2001 | JP |
WO2006035378 | Apr 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110149360 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |