Optical manipulation apparatus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12214493
  • Patent Number
    12,214,493
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 10, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 4, 2025
    5 months ago
Abstract
A device configured for radiating a focused electromagnetic beam is proposed. Such device comprises: —a first (101) and a second (102) part having respectively a second n2 and third n3 refractive index and a first W1 and second W2; —a first contact area (100e1) intended to be between a host medium having a first refractive index n1 and in which the micro or nanoparticles are intended to be trapped or moved by a focused electromagnetic beam radiated by the device; —a second contact area (100e2) between the first part and the second part; and —a third contact area (100e3) intended to be between the second part and the host medium. The focused electromagnetic beam results from a combination of at least two beams among a first (NJ1), a second (NJ2) and a third (NJ3) jet beams radiated respectively by the first, second and third contact areas when an incoming electromagnetic wave (IEM) illuminates the device. The device is configured for having a direction of propagation of the focused electromagnetic beam tilted in respect of a direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave.
Description

The present application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2019/084526, entitled “OPTICAL MANIPULATION APPARATUS”, filed on Dec. 10, 2019, which claims benefit from European Patent Application Serial No. 18213584.8, entitled “OPTICAL MANIPULATION APPARATUS FOR TRAPPING OR MOVING MICRO OR NANOPARTICLES”, filed Dec. 18, 2018.


1. FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure relates to the field of optics and photonics, and more specifically to an optical manipulation device that may be used for example for trapping or moving micro or nanoparticles.


The disclosure can be of interest in any field where neutral particles have to be trapped and/or manipulated as for instance in atomic physics, nonlinear physics, biology and medicine, etc.


2. TECHNOLOGICAL BACKGROUND

This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art, which may be related to various aspects of the present invention that are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.


Photonic condensed optical beams, or photonic “nanojets” generally relate to the generation of a transverse beam width smaller than the diffraction limit and to propagation over several wavelengths without significant divergence. The structured field of nanojets may induce specific optical forces providing the possibility for micro or nanoparticles manipulation along the nanojet EM (for “ElectroMagnetic”) field trajectories.


Since optical manipulation devices (like optical tweezers) are a powerful non-invasive tool in biological and medical application, the study of micro or nanoparticles manipulation based on the nanojet has stimulated researchers' interest. However, the previous works regarding nanojet-induced optical forces focused on trapping particles along an axis of symmetry of the device used to generate the nanojet.


Recently, the asymmetric dielectric system creating a curved photonic jet (“photonic hook”) was introduced to generate the optical forces for moving particles in a curved trajectory as disclosed for instance in the article by A. S. Ang, A. Karabchevsky, I. V. Minin, O. V. Minin, S. V. Sukhov and A. S. Shalin: “‘Photonic Hook’ based optomechanical nanoparticle manipulator”, Scient. Rep., 2018. It was demonstrated that a particle could go around a glass obstacle or be stably trapped near glass and gold obstacles, which allows new applications in optical manipulation of micro or nanoparticles.


There is thus a need for a new type of optical manipulation device providing more flexible nanoparticle manipulation, in particular through the generation of curved jet beams.


3. SUMMARY

A particular aspect of the present disclosure relates to a device configured for radiating a focused electromagnetic beam in a dielectric host medium having a first refractive index n1, when an incoming electromagnetic wave illuminates a first face of the device, named illumination face. Such a device comprises:

    • a first material having a second refractive index n2 and having a first width W1 along a direction of extension of the first face, named X-axis; and
    • a second material in contact with the first part and having a third refractive index n3, having a second width W2 along the X-axis,


      with n1<n3<n2, and with W1+W2 being greater than an equivalent wavelength λ in the host medium of the incoming electromagnetic wave. The first and second materials extend along a direction orthogonal to the illumination face, named Z-axis, from the illumination face up to the radiating face of each part, opposite to the illumination face. The first and second materials having respectively a first height H1 and a second height H2 along the Z-axis, where |H2−H1|≤λ/4. The device is configured for having, when the device is in contact with the dielectric host medium and when the incoming electromagnetic wave illuminates the illumination face:
    • a first contact area between the dielectric host medium and the first material, the first contact area radiating a first jet beam in a near field zone;
    • a second contact area between the first material and the second material, the second contact area radiating a second jet beam in the near field zone;
    • a third contact area between the material and the dielectric host medium, the


The focused electromagnetic beam results from a combination of at least two beams among the first, second and third jet beams. The device is configured for having a direction of propagation of the focused electromagnetic beam being tilted in respect of a direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave.


Thus, the present disclosure proposes a new and inventive solution for trapping or moving micro or nanoparticles.


More particularly, when the device comprised in the claimed optical manipulation apparatus is illuminated by the incoming electromagnetic wave, the resulting focused electromagnetic beam (or resulting jet beam) is generated in a direction that is tilted in respect of the direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave. In that case, the electromagnetic field lines of the outgoing focused electromagnetic beam present a curvature allowing the micro or nanoparticles to be trapped or moved, even around or behind objects present in the vicinity of the radiating face of the device from which the focused electromagnetic beam comes out of the device. This allows for a more flexible manipulation of the micro or nanoparticles.


According to one embodiment, the direction of propagation of the focused electromagnetic beam is tilted in respect of a direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave as a function of at least part of:

    • the first n1, second n2 and third n3 refractive indexes;
    • the first W1 and second W2 widths; and
    • the first H1 and second H2 heights.


According to one embodiment, the focused electromagnetic beam results from a combination of the first, second and third jet beams.


According to one embodiment, n3≥√{square root over (n1n2)}, W1=W2 and H1≥HA, with HA a height, along the Z-axis and relative to the illumination face, of the intersection point of the first and second jet beams.


According to one embodiment, n3<√{square root over (n1n2)} and W2>W1.


According to one embodiment, n3<√{square root over (n1n2)}, W2<W1 and H1≥HA, with HA the height, along the Z-axis and relative to the illumination face, of an intersection point of the first and second jet beams.


According to one embodiment, n3>√{square root over (n1n2)}, W2<W1 and H1 is targeted to be equal to HA−λ/2, with HA the height, along the Z-axis and relative to the illumination face, of an intersection point of the first and second jet beams.


According to one embodiment, the height HA fulfils








H
A

=


W
1



tan


Θ

B

1



+

tan


Θ

B

2






,

Θ

B

1







and ΘB2 being respectively radiation tilt angles of the first and second jet beams in respect of the direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave.


Thus, the device is configured for having the focused electromagnetic beam tilted in respect of the direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave e.g. when the incoming electromagnetic wave presents a normal incidence relative to the illumination face of the device.


According to one embodiment, ΘB1 and ΘB2 are targeted to be respectively equal to







9


0



-



Θ

TIR

1


+

α
1


2






and to








9


0



-



Θ

TIR





2


+

α
2


2


,





where angles α1 and α2 are respectively the base angles of the first and second contact areas relative to the X-axis, and where ΘTIR1 and ΘTIR2 are respectively limit angles of refraction associated with the first and third contact areas.


Thus, the device is configured for having the focused electromagnetic beam tilted in respect of the direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave e.g. when the first and second parts have nonvertical contact areas relative to the illumination face.


According to one embodiment,







Θ

TIR

1


=




sin

-
1


(


n
1


n
2


)



and



Θ

TIR

2



=



sin

-
1


(


n
3


n
2


)

.






According to one embodiment, the equivalent wavelength in the host medium, λ, of the incoming electromagnetic wave belongs to the visible light spectrum. For instance, the equivalent wavelength in the host medium of the incoming electromagnetic wave belongs to the range going from 390 nm to 700 nm.


According to one embodiment, at least one of the first and second materials belongs to the group comprising: glass, plastic, a polymer material, oxides and nitrides.


Another particular aspect of the present disclosure relates to an optical manipulation system comprising a device as described above (in any of the disclosed embodiments) and an electromagnetic source configured for generating the incoming electromagnetic wave.


Another particular aspect of the present disclosure relates to the use of a device as described above (in any of the disclosed embodiments) or of an optical manipulation system as described above (in any of the disclosed embodiments) for trapping or moving micro or nanoparticles in the dielectric host medium.





4. LIST OF FIGURES

Other features and advantages of embodiments shall appear from the following description, given by way of indicative and non-exhaustive examples and from the appended drawings, of which:



FIG. 1 illustrates the cross-section view, in the XZ-plane, of a device in contact with a dielectric host medium, the device comprising two parts of two different materials according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 illustrates the dependence on n3 of the angles of deviation of the jet beams generated by the device of FIG. 1 when W1=W2;



FIGS. 3a and 3b illustrate the power density distribution along the X-axis for the jet beams generated by the device of FIG. 1 when λ=550 nm, n1=1, n2=1.8, W1=W2=600 nm, and in the cut-plane Z0=550 nm with n3=1.3 (FIG. 3a); and in the cut-plane Z0=1000 nm with n3=1.6 (FIG. 3b);



FIGS. 4a to 4c illustrate the power density distribution in the XZ-plane for the jet beams generated by the device of FIG. 1 when λ=550 nm, n1=1, n2=1.8, n3=1.6, W1=W2=600 nm, and when H1=H2=400 nm (FIG. 4a), H1=H2=600 nm (FIG. 4b), H1=H2=900 nm (FIG. 4c);



FIG. 4d illustrates the schematic distribution of the main jet beams in FIG. 4c;



FIGS. 5a and 5b illustrate respectively the X and Z coordinates of the hot spot position of the jet beams generated by the device of FIG. 1 when λ=550 nm, n1=1, n2=1.8, W1=W2=300 nm and H1=H2=H for various values of n3 and various values of H;



FIG. 5c illustrates the power density distribution of the hot spot generated by the device of FIG. 1 when λ=550 nm, n1=1, n2=1.8, W1=W2=300 nm and H1=H2=H for various values of n3 and various values of H;



FIGS. 6a and 6b illustrate the X coordinate of the hot spot position of the jet beams generated by the device of FIG. 1 as a function of the equivalent wavelength in the host medium, λ, of the incoming electromagnetic wave when n1=1, n2=1.8, W1=W2=600 nm and when H1=H2=H, respectively for n3=1.3 (FIG. 6a) and for n3=1.6 (FIG. 6b);



FIGS. 7a and 7b illustrate respectively the power density distribution in the XZ-plane and the schematic distribution of the jet beams generated by the device of FIG. 1 when λ=550 nm, n1=1, n2=1.8, n3=1.3, W1=600 nm, W2=1400 nm and H1=H2=400 nm;



FIG. 7c illustrates the schematic distribution of the main jet beams of FIGS. 7a and 7b in the cut-plane Z0=1900 nm and for different values of W2;



FIGS. 8a and 8b illustrate respectively the power density distribution in the XZ-plane and the schematic distribution of the jet beams generated by the device of FIG. 1 when λ=550 nm, n1=1, n2=1.8, n3=1.6, W1=600 nm, W2=1400 nm and H1=H2=400 nm;



FIG. 8c illustrates the power density distribution of the hot spots of the jet beams of FIGS. 8a and 8b as a function of W2;



FIGS. 8d and 8e illustrate respectively the X and Z coordinates of the hot spots of the jet beams of FIGS. 8a and 8b as a function of W2;



FIGS. 9a and 9b illustrate respectively the power density distribution in the XZ-plane and the schematic distribution of the jet beams generated by the device of FIG. 1 when λ=550 nm, n1=1, n2=1.8, n3=1.6, W1=1400 nm, W2=600 nm and H1=H2=400 nm;



FIG. 9c illustrates the schematic distribution of the jet beams generated by the device of FIG. 1 when λ=550 nm, n1=1, n2=1.8, n3=1.6, W1=1960 nm, W2=600 nm, H1=H2=400 nm;



FIG. 9d illustrates the power density distribution of the hot spots of the jet beams of FIGS. 9a and 9b as a function of W1;



FIGS. 10a and 10b illustrate the power density distribution in a XZ-plane of the jet beams generated by the device of FIG. 1 when λ=550 nm, n1=1, n2=1.8, W1=1000 nm, W2=700 nm, H1=H2=900 nm, and when n3=1.3 (FIG. 10a) or n3=1.6 (FIG. 10b);



FIGS. 11a and 11b illustrate the angle of deviation, relative to the direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave, of the focused jet beam generated by the device of FIG. 1 when λ=550 nm, n1=1, n2=1.8, n3=1.6, W1=1000 nm, W2=700 nm, H1=H2=900 nm, and when α=0° (FIG. 11a) or α=10° (FIG. 11b), with α the angle of incidence of the incoming electromagnetic wave relative to the direction normal to the surface of the illuminated face of the device.



FIG. 12 illustrates the cross-section view, in the XZ-plane, of a device comprising two parts of two different materials according to another embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIGS. 13a and 13b illustrate the power density distribution along the X-axis of the jet beams generated by the device of FIG. 12 when λ=550 nm, n1=1, n2=1.8, W1=W2=600 nm, α1=85°, α2=90°, α3=80°, and in the cut-plane Z0=550 nm with n3=1.3 (FIG. 13a); and in the cut-plane Z0=1000 nm with n3=1.6 (FIG. 13b);



FIGS. 14a to 14c illustrate the power density distribution in a XZ-plane of the jet beams generated by the device of FIG. 12 when λ=550 nm, n1=1, n2=1.8, n3=1.6, W1=W2=600 nm, α1=85°, α2=90°, α3=80°, and when H1=H2=400 nm (FIG. 14a), H1=H2=600 nm (FIG. 14b), or H1=H2=900 nm (FIG. 14c);



FIGS. 15a and 15b illustrate the specific height HA as a function of the base angles α1, α2 and α3 of the device of FIG. 12 when n1=1, n2=1.8, n3=1.6 and W1=W2=600 nm;



FIGS. 15c and 15d illustrate the deviation angle Θ86 as a function of the base angles α1, α2 and α3 of the device of FIG. 12 when n1=1, n2=1.8, n3=1.6 and W1=W2=600 nm;



FIG. 16 illustrates the power density distribution along the X-axis and in the cut-plane Z0=1000 nm of the jet beams generated by the device of FIG. 12 for different values of the base angle α3 when λ=550 nm, n1=1, n2=1.8, n3=1.6, W1=W2=600 nm, H1=H2=800 nm, α1=85°, α2=90°;



FIGS. 17a and 17b illustrate the optical forces generated by a single part material having a refractive index of n=n1=n2=1.6 (FIG. 17a), and by an optical manipulation apparatus comprising the device of FIG. 1 when λ=550 nm, n1=1, n2=1.8, n3=1.6, W1=W2=600 nm and when H1=H2=900 nm (FIG. 17b).



FIGS. 18a and 18b illustrate the optical forces generated by a single part material having a refractive index n in presence of an obstacle when n=1.6 and H=900 nm (FIG. 18a), and when n=1.8 and H=900 nm (FIG. 18b);



FIGS. 18c and 18d illustrate the optical forces generated by an optical manipulation apparatus according to the disclosure and in presence of an obstacle when n2=1.8, n3=1.6 and H1=H2=900 nm (FIG. 18c), and when n2=1.8, n3=1.6 and H1=H2=600 nm (FIG. 18d);



FIGS. 19a and 19b illustrate the optical forces generated by a single part material having a refractive index n in presence of an obstacle when n=1.6 and H=900 nm (FIG. 19a), and when n=1.8 and H=900 nm (FIG. 19b);



FIGS. 19c and 19d illustrate the optical forces generated by an optical manipulation apparatus according to the disclosure and in presence of an obstacle when n2=1.8, n3=1.6 and H1=H2=900 nm (FIG. 19c), and when n2=1.8, n3=1.6 and H1=H2=600 nm (FIG. 19d).





The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.


5. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In all of the figures of the present document, the same numerical reference signs designate similar elements and steps.


The present disclosure relates to a technique for generating optical forces through jet beams which field lines exhibit curvatures allowing micro or nanoparticles to be trapped or moved e.g. around obstacles. This is achieved through the use of a device comprising two or more parts of dielectric materials with different refractive indexes. The refractive indexes of the constitutive parts are higher than the surrounding host medium in which the micro or nanoparticles are trapped or moved. The constitutive parts are configured in such a way that at least two of the jet beams, originating from different contact areas (associated with different parts) of the device, recombine and contribute to the formation of a focused electromagnetic beam which direction of propagation is deflected in respect of a direction of propagation of an incoming electromagnetic wave illuminating the device.


Numerical simulations show that the deflection of a generated focused jet beam can be controlled by the parameters of the device in view of the surrounding host medium.


5.1 Topology



FIG. 1 illustrates the cross-section view, in the XZ-plane, of a device 100 comprising a first part 101 and a second part 102 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.


The device 100 is configured to be in contact with a dielectric host medium 103 having a first refractive index n1 and in which the micro or nanoparticles are intended to be trapped or moved by a focused electromagnetic beam radiated by the device 100 when an incoming electromagnetic wave IEM radiated by an electromagnetic source 100s illuminates at least one face of the device 100, named illumination face 100i. More particularly:

    • the first part 101 is made of a first material having a second refractive index n2. The first part 101 has a first width W1 along the X-axis (the X-axis corresponds in the chosen coordinate system to a direction of extension of the illumination face 100i); and
    • the second part 102 is made of a second material having a third refractive index n3, with n1<n3<n2, and having a second width W2 along the X-axis.


For instance, the first and second materials belong to the group comprising glass, plastic, a polymer material, oxides and nitrides.


The first part 101 and the second part 102 are located side by side along the X-axis with W1+W2 greater than the equivalent wavelength in the host medium, λ, of the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM radiated by the electromagnetic source 100s. The first part 101 and second part 102 extend along the Z-axis (the Z-axis is orthogonal to X-axis and thus to the illumination face 100i in the chosen coordinate system) from the illumination face 100i up to another face of the device 100, named radiating face 100r, opposite to the illumination face 100i. The first part 101 and second part 102 have respectively a first height H1 and a second height H2 along the Z-axis.


In the embodiment of FIG. 1, H1=H2. However, in other embodiments, the first height H1 and the second height H2 can be different. Indeed, simulations show that the technical effect of having the electromagnetic field lines of the outgoing focused electromagnetic beam presenting a curvature is achieved as long as |H2−H1|≤λ/4. Indeed, as long as this condition is fulfilled, having a difference between the first height H1 and the second height H2 does not lead to the creation of additional jet beams (or secondary lobes) in the focused electromagnetic beam radiated by the device 100.


Back to FIG. 1, the direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM is orthogonal to the illumination face 100i (i.e. the direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM radiated by the electromagnetic source 100s is parallel to the Z-axis).


However, in other embodiments, the direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM may be tilted relative to the Z-axis as discussed below in relation with FIGS. 11a and 11b.


Back to FIG. 1, the first part 101 and the second part 102 have vertical edges parallel to the Z-axis. The radiating 100r and illumination 100i faces are orthogonal to the Z-axis, which corresponds to a base angle of 90°.


However, in other embodiments, some prismatic structures (with arbitrary base angles) can also be used for the device 100 as discussed below in relation with FIG. 12. Variation of the base angle value provides an additional degree of freedom in the control of the jet beams radiation.


Back to FIG. 1, the device 100 thus comprises:

    • a first contact area 100e1 between the host medium 103 and the first part 101 when the device is in contact with the host medium 103. The first contact area 100e1 contributes to the radiation of a first jet beam, NJ1, in a near field zone of the device 1 when the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM illuminates at least the illumination face 100i;
    • a second contact area 100e2 between the first part 101 and the second part 102. The second contact area 100e2 contributes to the radiation of a second jet beam, NJ2, in the near field zone of the device 1 when the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM illuminates at least the illumination face 100i; and
    • a third contact area 100e3 between the second part 102 and the host medium 103 when the device 100 is in contact with the host medium 103. The third contact area 100e3 contributes to the radiation of a third jet beam, NJ3, in the near field zone of the device 1 when the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM illuminates at least the illumination face 100i.


More particularly, when the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM presents an oblique angle of incidence (i.e. the angle of incidence of the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM relative to a normal of the illumination face 100i), the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM illuminates the illumination face 100i, but also at least another lateral face of the device 100. Whatever the considered slant angles of incidence, the first contact area 100e1, the second contact area 100e2 and the third contact area 100e3 contribute respectively to the radiation of the first jet beam NJ1, of the second jet beam NJ2 and of the third jet beam NJ3. Such jet beams are obtained from the superposition of a plurality of contributions resulting from the diffraction or refraction of the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM by the different faces or contact areas (e.g. between parts) of the device 100. Thus, in any case the first contact area 100e1 contributes to the radiation of the first jet beam Nil, the second contact area 100e2 contributes to the radiation of the second jet beam NJ2 and the third contact area 100e3 contributes to the radiation of the third jet beam NJ3.


Back to FIG. 1, the three jet beams, NJ1, NJ2 and NJ3 can intersect in different hot spots, where a hot spot corresponds to a point of highest EM power in the considered jet, or focused points, which locations are referenced as points A, B and C.


According to the present disclosure, the materials and size of the first part 101 and of the second part 102 can be optimized in order to manage the positions of the jet hot spots, EM powers, directions and angles of deviation of the three jet beams NJ1, NJ2 and NJ3. As a result, the device 100 behaves as if it was radiating a focused electromagnetic beam resulting from the combination of at least two beams among said first jet beam NJ1, second jet beam NJ2 and third jet beam NJ3. The device 100 can thus be configured for having a direction of propagation of the focused electromagnetic beam being tilted in respect of a direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave as a function of at least part of:

    • the first refractive index n1, the second refractive index n2 and the third refractive index n3;
    • the first width W1 and the second width W2; and
    • the first height H1 and the second height H2.


      5.2 Design Principles & Main Performance Characteristics


In this Section, a set of equations is provided for estimating example optimal combinations of materials and dimensions of the blocks for having a jet beam shift (i.e. having a tilt angle relative to the direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave) and deviation. As shown below, the hot spot position and the direction of beam deviation are sensitive to the sizes of constitutive parts. For devices with dimensions larger than a few wavelengths, the Fresnel diffraction phenomenon may have a huge impact.


5.2.1 Main Characteristics of the Generated Jet Beams


Generally, the beam-forming phenomenon appears on a contact area between two materials of different refractive indexes, and is associated with this contact area (e.g. contact area 100e1, 100e2 or 100e3 of the device 100 of FIG. 1) and the illumination face 100i.


More particularly, the jet beam radiation angle can be derived in relation to the Snell's law. For instance, in the case of the first contact area 100e1 of the device 100, when in contact with the dielectric host medium 103, the radiation angle of the first jet beam NJ1 associated with the first contact area 100e1 is determined using the approximate formula:











Θ

B

1






9


0



-

Θ

T

I

R

1



2


,




(
1
)








where







Θ

T

I

R

1


=


sin

-
1


(


n
1


n
2


)






is the corresponding critical angle of refraction under the assumption that n2>n1.


It can be noted that in general, the point of intersection of two jet beams radiated from opposite sides of an element determines the focal length of that element behaving as a microlens. In a first approximation, in the case of a single material element, the focal length of the microlens can be characterized as the function of the width and index ratio of the materials inside and outside the lens. The radiated electromagnetic beam will be directed along the symmetry axis of the element and the focal length of the resulting microlens can be estimated as:










F
=



W
1


γ

2


,




(
2
)








where






γ
=

1

tan


Θ

B

1









and W1 is the width of the element.


Back to FIG. 1, the second jet beam NJ2 associated with the second contact area 101e2 is refracted at the angle ΘB2 into the medium with higher refractive index. Assuming n2>n3, the angle ΘB2 is obtained as:











Θ

B

2






9


0



-

Θ

TIR

2



2


,




(
3
)








where







Θ

TIR

2


=


sin

-
1


(


n
3


n
2


)






is the corresponding limit angle of refraction.


Accordingly, the third jet beam NJ3 associated with the third contact area 101e3 is refracted at the angle ΘB3 with:










Θ

B

3







9


0



-

Θ

T

I

R

3



2

.





(
4
)








where







Θ

TIR

3


=


sin

-
1


(


n
1


n
3


)






is the corresponding limit angle of refraction.


The length and intensity of the three jet beams NJ1, NJ2 and NJ3, are generally different. The maximal intensity and minimal length correspond to the beam with highest ratio between the refractive indexes, which corresponds to the first jet beam NJ1 refracted at the angle ΘB1 when n2>n3>n1.


The behavior of the focused electromagnetic beam radiated by the device 100 may be explained when determining the points of intersection of the three jet beams NJ1, NJ2 and NJ3 radiated respectively at the angles ΘB1, ΘB2 and ΘB3.


The point A of intersection of the first NJ1 and second NJ2 jet beams has the coordinates (WA, HA) in the XoZ coordinate system of FIG. 1. More particularly, based on the previous equations,











W
A



tan



Θ

B

2


·

H
A




,



H
A




W
1



tan


Θ

B

1



+

tan


Θ

B

2










(
5
)







Defining ΘB4 as the angle of deviation of the focal point A from the axis of symmetry 101 as of the first part 101 with width W1,










tan


Θ

B

4







tan


Θ

B

1



-

tan


Θ

B

2




2





(
6
)







In the same way, the first jet beam NJ1 and third jet beam NJ3 intersect at point B with the coordinates (WB, HB), where:











W
B




tan



Θ

B

3


·

H
B



-

W
2



,






H
B





W
1

+

W
2




tan


Θ

B

1



+

tan


Θ

B

3










(
7
)







Defining ΘB5 as the angle of deviation of the focal point B from the axis of a symmetry of the device 100 (i.e. the Z-axis in FIG. 1) with width W1+W2,










tan


Θ

B

5








W
2


tan


Θ

B

1



-


W
1


tan


Θ

B

3






W
1

+

W
2







(
8
)







The second NJ2 and third NJ3 jet beams intersect only if n3 is above a critical value, i.e. if n3≥√{square root over (n1n2)}. In this case the coordinates of the point C are determined as:











W
C




tan







Θ

B

3


·

H
C



-

W
2



,






H
c




W
2



tan


Θ

B

3



-

tan


Θ

B

2










(
9
)







In this case, defining ΘB6 as the angle of deviation of the focal point C from the axis of symmetry 102 as of the second part 102 with width W2,










tan


Θ

B

6







tan


Θ

B

2



+

tan


Θ

B

3




2





(
10
)







The particular case where the three jet beams NJ1, NJ2 and NJ3 intersect at the same point for fixed refractive indexes of the two parts 101, 102 and of the host medium 103 can be obtained as the result of variation of the widths W1, W2 of the two parts 101, 102. In order to get an intersection of the three jet beams NJ1, NJ2 and NJ3 at one point, the ratio W1/W2 has to be equal to:











W
1


W
2






tan


Θ

B

1



+

tan


Θ

B

2






tan


Θ

B

3



-

tan


Θ

B

2









(
11
)







In this case, all three jet beams NJ1, NJ2 and NJ3 contribute to the total generated focused electromagnetic beam radiated by the device 100. Thus, the intensity of the generated focused electromagnetic beam is maximal.


The dependencies of the deviation angles ΘB4-B6 on the refractive index n3 for the fixed value n2=1.8 and W1=W2 are presented in FIG. 2. For the chosen parameters, the critical value n3cr of refractive index n3 is given by, n3cr=√{square root over (n1n2)}=1.34. In that case, the second NJ2 and third NJ3 jet beams intersect when n3>n3cr. So, until n3 reaches this critical value n3cr, the angle ΘB6 has no meaning.


5.2.2 Parametric Study


Based on the identified properties of the device 100 depicted in FIG. 1, the parameters of the device 100 (i.e. the refractive index values, and/or the widths and/or the heights of the first part 101 and of the second part 102) may be adapted in order to obtain a tilt of the generated focused electromagnetic beam (resulting from the combination of at least two beams among the first jet beam NJ1, the second jet beam NJ2 and the third jet beam NJ3) in respect of the direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM radiated by the electromagnetic source 100s.


Impact of the Respective Heights H1 and H2 of the First Part 101 and of the Second Part 102


The following numerical simulations have been performed assuming that H1=H2=H, W1=W2, and W=W1+W2 is greater than the equivalent wavelength in the host medium, λ, of the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM. However, as indicated in relation with FIG. 1, the technical effect of having the electromagnetic field lines of the outgoing focused electromagnetic beam presenting a curvature is achieved even if H1 and H2 are different from each other as long as |H2−H1|≤λ/4.


Under the present assumptions, it can be shown that the hot spots positions of the generated jet beams are almost independent from the height H of the device 100 for n3<√{square root over (n1n2)} as illustrated e.g. in FIG. 3a for n3=1.3.


For n3>√{square root over (n1n2)} and starting from H1≈HA, a shift of the hot spot toward increasing X coordinates is observed. The power density distribution along the X-axis for n3=1.6 is presented in FIG. 3b. For the parameters of the device 100 chosen for the simulation depicted in FIG. 3b, it appears that HA≈772 nm.



FIGS. 4a to 4c display the power density distribution in the XZ-plane for three different heights H=H1=H2 of the device 100 assuming that n3>√{square root over (n1n2)}. The power density distribution in question show that the curvature of the electromagnetic field lines of the outgoing focused electromagnetic beam is achieved by changing the height H of the device 100.



FIG. 4d presents the schematic distribution of the jet beams created by the device 100. It appears that the curvature of the electromagnetic field lines of the outgoing focused electromagnetic beam takes place if H1≥HA and if the focal point A for the first jet beam Nil and the second jet beam NJ2 is close to the radiating surface 100r of the device 100, or even within the device 100 (see FIG. 4d). It can be seen, that in this case the curvature of the electromagnetic field lines of the outgoing focused electromagnetic beam is caused by an interplay of the second jet beam NJ2 and third jet beam NJ3, which are longer but less intensive than the first NJ1 jet beam. The angle of deviation of the generated focused electromagnetic beam is close to the angle ΘB6 of deviation of the focal point C from the axis of symmetry 102 as of the second part 102 with width W2 (dash-dot line 400 in FIG. 4d).



FIGS. 5a and 5b show the dependencies of the hot spots positions of the jet beams generated by the device 100 (along the X and Z axis respectively) on the refractive index n3 for three different heights H=H1=H2 of the device 100. More particularly, the light gray and the dash-dot lines indicate respectively the dependencies of the X and Z coordinates for points A and B on n3. These two curves are obtained using equations (5) and (7). The power density of the hot spots as a function of n3 is presented in FIG. 5c.


The equivalent wavelength in the host medium 2 of the incoming electromagnetic wave influences the hot spots positions of the generated jet beams. FIGS. 6a and 6b show the dependency of the hot spots shift on A for different heights H=H1=H2. For n3=1.3, the shift of the hot spots is almost independent on the wavelength λ. The influence of the dispersion rises with the refractive index n3 (see FIG. 6b for n3=1.6).


Thus, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, the device 100 is configured such as n3≥√{square root over (n1n1)}, W1=W2 and H1≥HA, with HA the Z coordinate of the intersection point of the first jet beam NJ1 and of the second jet beam NJ2 (i.e. the height, along the Z-axis and relative to the illumination face 100i, of the intersection point of the first NJ1 and second NJ2 jet beams). This allows obtaining a tilt of the direction of the generated focused electromagnetic beam which is obtained from a combination of at least two beams among the first jet beam NJ1, the second jet beam NJ2 and the third jet beam NJ3 in respect of the direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM.


Impact of the Respective Widths W1 and W2 of the First Part 101 and of the Second Part 102


This part of the description deals with the influence of the width W1 and W2 of the first part 101 and of the second part 102 of the device 100.


The influence of the width W2 of the second part 102, having the refractive index n3, on the parameters of the generated jet beams is analyzed assuming a fixed width W1 of the first part 101 that has the refractive index n2 (n2>n3>n1).


More particularly, for n3<√{square root over (n1n2)}, two jet beams emerge in the proximity of the radiating face 100r of the device 100 when W2>W1 as illustrated in FIG. 7a. It appears that the angles of deviation of the first jet beam NJ1 (beam number 1 in FIG. 7a) and of the second jet beam NJ2 (beam number 2 in FIG. 7a) are equal to ΘB4 and ΘB5 (see FIG. 7b). Thus, the position and the intensity of the hot spot (i.e. the point of highest intensity in the jet beam) of the second jet beam NJ2 depend on the width W2.


The power density distribution along the X-axis at different widths W2 of the second part 102 of the device 100 is presented in FIG. 7c. It appears that the intensity and length of the second jet beam NJ2 rises with W2. It also appears that increasing the total width W=W1+W2 of the device 100 increases the contribution of the Fresnel diffraction phenomenon into the total response of the system. Thus, the number of side jets of second type (or secondary lobes) deviated at an angle ΘB5 rises as W2 increases.


Alternatively, when n3>√{square root over (n1n2)}, two additional jet beams are obtained (e.g. as in the configuration of FIG. 8a). The angle of deviation of the third jet beam NJ3 (beam number 3 in FIG. 8a) associated with the third contact area 100e3 is equal to ΘB6 (see FIG. 8b). The central jet beam (beam number 4 in FIG. 8a) is directed along the Z-axis (normal to the radiating face 100r of the device). The power density in the hot spots of the jet beams number 2-4 in FIG. 8a and the positions of the corresponding jet beams' hot spots versus the width W2 of the second part 102 are presented in FIGS. 8b to 8e. As discussed above in the case where n3<√{square root over (n1n2)}, the increase of W2 increases the contribution of the Fresnel diffraction phenomenon into the total response of the system. Consequently, the number of side jets of second type (or secondary lobes) deviated at angles ΘB5 (left side when looking at the figures) and ΘB6 (right side when looking at the figures) increases as W2 increases.


Thus, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, the device 100 is configured such that n3<√{square root over (n1n2)}, and W2>W1, independently of the heights H1 and H2 of the first part 101 and of the second part 102 of the device 100 (as long as the condition |H2−H1|≤λ/4 is fulfilled). Such parameters allow obtaining a tilt of the direction of the generated focused electromagnetic beam (that results from a combination of at least two beams among the first jet beam NJ1, the second jet beam NJ2 and the third jet beam NJ3) in respect of the direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM radiated by the electromagnetic source 100s.


There is also an influence of the width W1 of the first part 101 having the refractive index n2, on the parameters of the generated jet beams assuming a fixed width W2 of the second part 102 that has the refractive index n3 (n2>n3>n1).


In fact, a similar behavior can be observed as in the previous case discussed above where W2 was varying for a fixed value of W1. However, in the present case, the side jet beams (or secondary lobes) are deviated toward the angles ΘB4 (for the side jet beams on the left side when looking at the figures) and ΘB6 (for the side jet beams on the right side when looking at the figures). As mentioned above, in accordance with equation (11) the generated focused electromagnetic beam can be intensified based on some particular dimensions of the device 100. For the values of the parameters of the system as chosen in FIGS. 9a-d, the intersection of all the jet beams occurs when W1=1960 nm. In FIG. 9d, the maximal intensity of the generated focused electromagnetic beam corresponds to W1≈1600 nm. The maximal benefit of the intersection of all jet beams at the same point will be observed at W≈λ, where W=W1+W2.


Thus, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, the device 100 is configured such that n3<√{square root over (n1n2)}, W2<W1, and H1≥HA (still with |H2−H1|≤λ/4). Such parameters allow obtaining a tilt of the direction of the generated focused electromagnetic beam (that results from a combination of at least two beams among the first jet beam NJ1, the second jet beam NJ2 and the third jet beam NJ3) in respect of the direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM.


With the sizes W1>W2, the deviation to the right (when looking at the figures) is observed for n3<√{square root over (n1n2)} (e.g. as in the configuration of FIG. 102) and even at lower heights H1, H2 of the parts 101, 102 of the device 100 when n3>√{square root over (n1n2)} as long as H1≈HA−λ/2, (e.g. as in the configuration of FIG. 10b). Several factors are responsible for these phenomena. First of all, increasing the width W1 increases the distance HA. Thus, the main contribution to the total focused electromagnetic beam radiated by the device 100 comes from the longer jet beams NJ2 and NJ3 radiated at the angles ΘB2 and ΘB3.


Thus, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, the device 100 is configured such that n3>√{square root over (n1n2)}, W2<W1, and H1 is targeted to be equal to HA−λ/2 (still with |H2−H1|≤λ/4). Such parameters allow obtaining a tilt of the direction of the generated focused electromagnetic beam (that results from a combination of at least two beams among the first jet beam NJ1, the second jet beam NJ2 and the third jet beam NJ3) in respect of the direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM.


Impact of Illumination Conditions


Examination of power density distributions obtained for different oblique angles of incidence, a, (i.e. the angle of incidence of the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM relative to a normal of the illumination face 100i) shows that the tilt of the direction of the generated focused electromagnetic beam in respect of the normal to the radiating face 100r is sensitive to the height of the device 100.


For example, when the device 100 is in contact with a dielectric host medium 103 such that n1=1, n2=1.8, n3=1.6, W1=1000 nm, W2=700 nm, H1=H2=H=300 nm and α=10°, the tilt angle γ of deviation of the generated focused electromagnetic beam from the normal incidence is equal to 14.49° and remains constant for all wavelengths of incident waves in the theoretical hypothesis of non-dispersive materials. The slight dispersion in the case of α=10° is observed for H=550 nm. Moreover, the angle γ is approximately equal to 17.54°. The dispersion of the system rises with the height H. The comparison of FIG. 11a and FIG. 11b shows that for H=900 nm, the dispersion for normal illumination is lower than the dispersion for an oblique one. Moreover, for α=10°, the angle γ of deviation of the generated focused electromagnetic beam changes from ≈21° to ≈18.9° for 450 nm<λ<650 nm. For this height H=H1=H2 of the device 100, the additional deviation is approximately equal to the angle of incidence. A similar behavior of the generated focused electromagnetic beam takes place for higher angles of incidence α. But in this case, the dispersion of deviation is higher. In some embodiments, the angle of incidence of the incoming EM wave 100i lays in the range of −20 degrees and +20 degrees. Preferably, such angle lays between −10 degrees and +10 degrees, more preferably between −5 degrees and +5 degrees.


One can note that the present simulations have been performed for H=H1=H2, however, as discussed above, the conclusion remains the same as long as |H2−H1|≤λ/4.


Impact of the Base Angle of the First Part 101 and of the Second Part 102


According to the embodiment of FIG. 12, a device 100′ with nonvertical edges (i.e. edges not parallel to the Z-axis) is considered whereas the radiating 100r and illumination 100i faces both remain orthogonal to the Z-axis. αj (with j equal to 1, 2 or 3) represent the base angles of the contact areas 100e1, 100e2 and 100e3. With αj different from 90°, the device 100′ may correspond to a double-material prismatic device in contact with a dielectric host medium 103, with a refractive index n1<n3<n2.


It can be shown that for the device 100′ with the base angles αj greater than 90°−ΘBj, with j equal to 1, 2 or 3, the corresponding jet beam radiation angle can be determined using the approximate formula:










Θ
Bj





90


-

Θ
TIRj
*


2





(
12
)








where the angles θ′TIRj are the critical angles of refraction from the nonvertical edges, or contact areas 100e1, 100e2 and 100e3.


To get the approximate formula for θ′TIRj, the changing of the position of the contact areas compared to the configuration of the device 100 of FIG. 1 is considered. As a result, the corresponding jet beams radiation angle can be estimated as:










Θ
Bj




90


-



Θ
TIRj

+

α
j


2






(
13
)







These expressions can then be injected into the equations (4)-(11) for having a description of the behavior of the jet beams associated with the contact areas 100e1, 100e2 and 100e3 of the device 100′.


To consider the effect of the first part 101′ and of the second part 102′ with nonvertical contact areas 100e1, 100e2 and 100e3, simulation results are discussed below that show the influence of the height H1=H2=H of the first part 101′ and of the second part 102′ on the generated jet beams when the total width W′=W′1+W′2 is such that W′>λ with W′1=W′2. It is seen that the hot spot position is almost independent from the height H′ of the device 100′ that is in contact with the dielectric host medium 103 when n3<√{square root over (n1n2)} (see FIG. 13a for n3=1.3). For n3>√{square root over (n1n2)} starting from the specific height H≈HA, a deviation of the hot spot to the right (when looking at the figure) is observed. The power density distribution along the X-axis for n3=1.6 is presented in FIG. 13b. For the parameters of the device 100′ and of the dielectric host medium 103 chosen in those FIGS. 13a and 13b, HA≈718.96 nm.



FIGS. 14a to 14c display the power density distribution in the XZ-plane for 3 different heights H′=H′1=H′2 of the device 100′ with n3>√{square root over (n1n2)}. It can be shown that for the device 100′ with nonvertical contact areas 100e1, 100e2 and 100e3, the deviation of the generated focused electromagnetic beam can also be achieved by changing the height H′=H′1=H′2 of the device 100′.


More particularly, FIGS. 15a to 15d represent the height HA and the deviation angle ΘB6 as obtained based on equations (5) and (10). FIG. 15a shows that varying the angle α1 at fixed angles α2 and α3 affects only the specific height HA without changing the angle ΘB6 (for the parameters chosen for the simulation plotted in FIG. 15a, ΘB6=22°). Conversely, decreasing or increasing the base angle α2 leads to the changing of both parameters HA and ΘB6 as can be seen in FIGS. 15b and 15c. For the minimal angle α2 a maximal deviation of the corresponding jet beam at minimal height H′=H′1=H′2 of the device 100′ is obtained.


As can be seen in FIG. 15d, changing the base angle α3 affects the specific height HA (for the parameters chosen for the simulation plotted in FIG. 15d HA=718.96 nm). The maximal deviation is observed for the minimal angle α3.



FIG. 16 gives the power density distribution along the X-axis in the cut-plane Z0=1000 nm for four different values of the angle α3, with λ=550 nm, with α1=85°, α2=90° and with the device 100′ having H′=H′1=H′2 greater than HA.


5.3 Optical Manipulation Apparatus



FIGS. 17a to 19d relate to subwavelength optical manipulation of micro or nanoparticles by the curved jet beams generated by a device (e.g. device 100 or 100′) according to the disclosure.


More particularly, the optical forces acting on arbitrary micro or nanoparticles can be obtained by approximating the particle by an electric dipole.


This method applies for Rayleigh particles (particles much smaller than the incident wavelength) as detailed for instance in the article by P. Chaumet and M. Nieto-Vesperinas: “Time-averaged total force on a dipolar sphere in an electromagnetic field,” Opt. Lett. 25, 1065-1067 (2000).


Using the dipole approximation for the subwavelength radius of the sphere, the force can be obtained as:









F
=



1
2



Re


(
χ
)






i



Re


(


E
i

·



E
i
*



)




+


1
2



Im


(
χ
)






i




Im


(


E
i

·







E
i
*



)


.








(
14
)








where






χ
=

π


n
m
2



a
3





m
2

-
1



m
2

+
2








is the particle's complex polarizability,







m
=


n
p


n
m



,

n
p






is the refractive index of the material of the particle, nm is the refractive index of the medium outside the particle and a is the radius of the particle.


The forces produced by the deviated jet beams in the presence or not of obstacles 1800 have been simulated using Comsol software and based on the dipolar approximation for gold particles with a radius of 0.03 μm and a dielectric permittivity ε=−11.208+1.31184i. Further, those forces have been simulated on one hand for a single material device 1710 having a refractive index n, and for the dual-material device 100 of FIG. 1.


In FIGS. 17a and 17b, the device is illuminated by a TM (for “Transverse magnetic”) polarized incoming electromagnetic wave IEM with λ=550 nm and α=0° (i.e. the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM has a direction of propagation orthogonal to the illumination face 100i of the device 100). The single material device 1710 is made of the same material as the first part 101 of the device 100, i.e. n=n1=n2. Further, the single material device 1710 has the same width W as the device 100, with W=W1+W2=2*600 nm (W1=W2), and the same height H=H1=H2=900 nm. The streamlines and arrows show the trajectories and directions of the optical forces obtained using the dipolar approximation. It is possible to see that in case of double material device 100, it is possible to transport the particles along the curved trajectory.


Referring to FIGS. 18a to 19d, an obstacle 1800 is placed along the jet beams paths. The length of the obstacle 1800 in X-direction coincides with the width W1 of the first part 101 of the device 100. However, the obstacle 1800 is shifted between the axis of symmetry of the obstacle 1800 and the axis of symmetry the first part 101 by an offset equal to W1/4. The same configuration is used for the single material device 1710. The simulations correspond to an obstacle 1800 made of glass with a refractive index 1.8 and a thickness equal to λ/8 placed at the distance 5λ/8 in the case of FIGS. 18a to 18d, and made of metal (which is a perfect electric conductor) with the same thickness λ/8 placed at the distance 3λ/8 in the case of FIGS. 19a to 19d. The presence of the obstacle 1800 leads to the disruption of the jet beams and to valuable changing in the trajectory. By increasing the refractive index of the single material device 1710, the curved trajectory is obtained but the forces pushing the particle away from the device 100 are very small. Only the double-material device 100 (here with the height H=H1=H2=900 nm) can generate the deviated jet beam. In that case, the particles can move along the curved trajectory around the obstacle. This effect was obtained for both type of obstacles 1800 (i.e. glass and metal). Moreover, in case of a conducting obstacle 1800, trapping locations near the obstacle can be obtained (white circle referred 1900 in FIG. 19c).


Thus, such double-material device 100, 100′ according to the disclosure (in any of its embodiments discussed above) can be used as an elementary part of an optical manipulation apparatus (e.g. an optical tweezer) 1700 for trapping or moving micro or nanoparticles in the dielectric host medium 103. For instance, the equivalent wavelength in the host medium, λ, of the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM belongs to the visible light spectrum (e.g. the wavelength in the host medium 2 lays between 400 nm and 700 nm, or equivalently the frequency of the incoming IEM wave lays between 430 THz to 790 THz). Thus, devices with nano-scale dimensions can be obtained for forming visible light wave patterns. In other embodiments, the frequency of the incoming IEM wave belongs to the group comprising:

    • radio waves, i.e. between 30 Hz to 300 GHz;
    • microwaves, i.e. 1 GHz to 100 GHz;
    • terahertz radiations, i.e. 100 GHz to 30 THz;
    • infrared, i.e. 300 GHz to 430 THz; and
    • ultraviolet, i.e. 790 THz to 30 PHz.
    • In those embodiments, the size of the device 100, 100′ is thus scaled according to the wavelength of the incoming IEM wave in order to achieve the tilt of the generated focused electromagnetic beam.


In some embodiments, an optical manipulation system comprises the optical manipulation apparatus 1700 and the electromagnetic source 100s for radiating the incoming electromagnetic wave IEM that illuminates the illumination face 100i of the device 100, 100′ (in any of its embodiments discussed above).

Claims
  • 1. A device configured to radiate a focused electromagnetic beam in a dielectric host medium having a first refractive index n1 when an incoming electromagnetic wave illuminates a first face of the device, wherein the device comprises: a first material having a second refractive index n2 and having a first width W1 along a first direction of extension of the first face; anda second material in contact with the first material and having a third refractive index n3, wherein the second material has a second width W2 along the first direction,where n1<n3<n2, and where W1+W2 is greater than a wavelength λ in the host medium of the incoming electromagnetic wave, the first material and the second material extending along a second direction orthogonal to the first face from the first face up to a radiating face of each material, opposite to the first face, the first material and the second material having respectively a first height H1 and a second height H2 along the second direction, where |H2−H1|≤λ/4;wherein the device comprises, when the device is in contact with the dielectric host medium and when the incoming electromagnetic wave illuminates the first face: a first contact area between the dielectric host medium and the first material, the first contact area radiating a first jet beam in a near field zone;a second contact area between the first material and the second material, the second contact area radiating a second jet beam in the near field zone; anda third contact area between the second material and the dielectric host medium, the third contact area radiating a third jet beam in the near field zone,wherein the focused electromagnetic beam results from a combination of at least two beams among the first jet beam, the second jet beam, and the third jet beam, wherein a direction of propagation of the focused electromagnetic beam is tilted with respect to a direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave.
  • 2. The device according to claim 1, wherein the direction of propagation of the focused electromagnetic beam is tilted with respect to a direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave as a function of at least part of: the first refractive index n1, the second refractive index n2, and the third refractive index n3;the first width W1 and the second width W2; andthe first height H1 and the second height H2.
  • 3. The device according to claim 1, wherein the focused electromagnetic beam results from a combination of the first jet beam, the second jet beam, and the third jet beam.
  • 4. The device according to claim 1, wherein n3≥√{square root over (n1n2)},wherein W1=W2, andwherein H1≥HA, with HA a height, along the second direction and relative to the first face, of the intersection point of the first jet beam and the second jet beam.
  • 5. The device according to claim 1, wherein n3<√{square root over (n1n2)} and wherein W2>W1.
  • 6. The device according to claim 1, wherein n3<√{square root over (n1n2)},wherein W2<W1, andwherein H1≥HA, with HA the height, along the Z-axis and relative to the first face, of an intersection point of the first jet beam and the second jet beam.
  • 7. The device according to claim 1, wherein n3<√{square root over (n1n2)},wherein W2<W1, andwherein H1 is targeted to be equal to HA−λ/2, with HA the height, along the second direction and relative to the first face, of an intersection point of the first jet beam and the second jet beam.
  • 8. The device according to claim 4, wherein the height
  • 9. The device according to claim 8, wherein ΘB1 is equal to
  • 10. The device according to claim 9, wherein
  • 11. The device according to claim 1, wherein the wavelength λ in the host medium of the incoming electromagnetic wave belongs to the visible light spectrum.
  • 12. The device according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the first material and second the material is selected from the group consisting of glass, plastic, a polymer material, oxides, and nitrides.
  • 13. An optical manipulation system comprising: a device configured to radiate a focused electromagnetic beam in a dielectric host medium having a first refractive index n1 when an incoming electromagnetic wave illuminates a first face of the device, wherein the device comprises:a first material having a second refractive index n2 and having a first width W1 along a first direction of extension of the first face; anda second material in contact with the first material and having a third refractive index n3, wherein the second material has a second width W2 along the first direction,where n1<n3<n2, and where W1+W2 is greater than a wavelength λ in the host medium of the incoming electromagnetic wave, the first material and the second material extending along a second direction orthogonal to the first face from the first face up to a radiating face of each material, opposite to the first face, the first material and the second material having respectively a first height H1 and a second height H2 along the second direction, where |H2−H1|≤λ/4;wherein the device comprises, when the device is in contact with the dielectric host medium and when the incoming electromagnetic wave illuminates the first face: a first contact area between the dielectric host medium and the first material, the first contact area radiating a first jet beam in a near field zone;a second contact area between the first material and the second material, the second contact area radiating a second jet beam in the near field zone; anda third contact area between the second material and the dielectric host medium, the third contact area radiating a third jet beam in the near field zone,wherein the focused electromagnetic beam results from a combination of at least two beams among the first jet beam, the second jet beam, and the third jet beam, wherein a direction of propagation of the focused electromagnetic beam is tilted with respect to a direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave; andan electromagnetic source configured to generate the incoming electromagnetic wave.
  • 14. The device according to claim 1, wherein the device is configured to trap or move microparticles or nanoparticles in the dielectric host medium.
  • 15. A method comprising: trapping or moving micro or nanoparticles in a dielectric host medium,wherein trapping or moving the micro or nanoparticles in the dielectric host medium uses a device configured to radiate a focused electromagnetic beam in a dielectric host medium having a first refractive index n1 when an incoming electromagnetic wave illuminates a first face of the device, wherein the device comprises: a first material having a second refractive index nz and having a first width W1 along a first direction of extension of the first face; anda second material in contact with the first material and having a third refractive index n3, wherein the second material has a second width W2 along the first direction,where n1<n3<n2, and where W1+W2 is greater than a wavelength λ in the host medium of the incoming electromagnetic wave, the first material and the second material extending along a second direction orthogonal to the first face from the first face up to a radiating face of each material, opposite to the first face, the first material and the second material having respectively a first height H1 and a second height H2 along the second direction, where |H2−H1|≤μ/4;wherein the device comprises, when the device is in contact with the dielectric host medium and when the incoming electromagnetic wave illuminates the first face: a first contact area between the dielectric host medium and the first material, the first contact area radiating a first jet beam in a near field zone;a second contact area between the first material and the second material, the second contact area radiating a second jet beam in the near field zone; anda third contact area between the second material and the dielectric host medium, the third contact area radiating a third jet beam in the near field zone,wherein the focused electromagnetic beam results from a combination of at least two beams among the first jet beam, the second jet beam, and the third jet beam, wherein a direction of propagation of the focused electromagnetic beam is tilted with respect to a direction of propagation of the incoming electromagnetic wave.
  • 16. The device according to claim 1, wherein the host medium surrounds the device.
  • 17. The optical manipulation system according to claim 13, wherein the host medium surrounds the device.
  • 18. The method according to claim 15, wherein the host medium surrounds the device.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
18213584 Dec 2018 EP regional
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2019/084526 12/10/2019 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2020/126708 6/25/2020 WO A
US Referenced Citations (89)
Number Name Date Kind
3718383 Moore Feb 1973 A
6099146 Imamura Aug 2000 A
6721485 Nakamura Apr 2004 B1
6891147 Goto May 2005 B2
7142363 Sato Nov 2006 B2
7394535 Chen Jul 2008 B1
7738346 Ooi Jun 2010 B2
8885997 Nguyen Nov 2014 B2
9099370 Nishiwaki Aug 2015 B2
9140602 Narasimhan Sep 2015 B2
9297939 Palanchoke Mar 2016 B2
9383582 Tang Jul 2016 B2
9419036 Saitou Aug 2016 B2
9564469 Kim Feb 2017 B2
9766467 Sohn Sep 2017 B2
9827209 Kostamo Nov 2017 B2
9880393 Kim Jan 2018 B2
9891436 Wall Feb 2018 B2
10534115 Calafiore Jan 2020 B1
10866360 Khorasaninejad Dec 2020 B2
11163175 Boriskin Nov 2021 B2
11204452 Paniagua Dominguez Dec 2021 B2
11275252 Boriskin Mar 2022 B2
11396474 Drazic Jul 2022 B2
11573356 Shramkova Feb 2023 B2
11604363 Damghanian Mar 2023 B2
20040198582 Borrelli Oct 2004 A1
20050002611 Levola Jan 2005 A1
20060124833 Toda Jun 2006 A1
20060250933 Asada Nov 2006 A1
20090190094 Watanabe Jul 2009 A1
20090205090 Mimouni Aug 2009 A1
20100091376 Sano Apr 2010 A1
20100134890 Chen Jun 2010 A1
20100188537 Hiramoto Jul 2010 A1
20110043918 Crouse Feb 2011 A1
20110235166 Zhu Sep 2011 A1
20120147373 Kamimura Jun 2012 A1
20130099343 Toshikiyo Apr 2013 A1
20130099434 Yano Apr 2013 A1
20130250421 Wakabayashi Sep 2013 A1
20130322810 Robbins Dec 2013 A1
20140192409 Yamaguchi Jul 2014 A1
20150063753 Evans Mar 2015 A1
20150219842 Sqalli Aug 2015 A1
20150286060 Roh Oct 2015 A1
20150301333 Levesque Oct 2015 A1
20150323800 Nam Nov 2015 A1
20150362641 Boyraz Dec 2015 A1
20150362841 Zelsacher Dec 2015 A1
20160033697 Sainiemi Feb 2016 A1
20160047951 Eckstein Feb 2016 A1
20160054172 Roh Feb 2016 A1
20160064172 Kirbawy Mar 2016 A1
20160064448 Shin Mar 2016 A1
20160070062 Lipson Mar 2016 A1
20160172390 Numata Jun 2016 A1
20160231568 Saarikko Aug 2016 A1
20160274281 Lutolf Sep 2016 A1
20170006278 Vandame Jan 2017 A1
20170012078 Han Jan 2017 A1
20170090206 Kim Mar 2017 A1
20170092668 Kim Mar 2017 A1
20170092676 Yun Mar 2017 A1
20170097510 Sohn Apr 2017 A1
20170098672 Yun Apr 2017 A1
20170179178 Park Jun 2017 A1
20170201658 Rosenblatt Jul 2017 A1
20170212348 Fu Jul 2017 A1
20170307886 Stenberg Oct 2017 A1
20170315346 Tervo Nov 2017 A1
20170351111 Jeong Dec 2017 A1
20180113313 Tekolste Apr 2018 A1
20180231771 Schuck, III Aug 2018 A1
20180252850 Aoki Sep 2018 A1
20180259691 Wang Sep 2018 A1
20180354844 Drazic Dec 2018 A1
20190101700 Boriskin Apr 2019 A1
20190121239 Singh Apr 2019 A1
20190243233 Boriskin Aug 2019 A1
20190257986 Paniagua Dominguez Aug 2019 A1
20200066811 Cha Feb 2020 A1
20200233223 Shramkova Jul 2020 A1
20200348526 Boriskin Nov 2020 A1
20210041609 Shramkova Feb 2021 A1
20210041709 Damghanian Feb 2021 A1
20210088802 Murakami Mar 2021 A1
20210233291 Shramkova Jul 2021 A1
20220059250 Shramkova Feb 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (80)
Number Date Country
1319191 Oct 2001 CN
1502050 Jun 2004 CN
1606704 Apr 2005 CN
1661478 Aug 2005 CN
1693928 Nov 2005 CN
1756972 Apr 2006 CN
1762009 Apr 2006 CN
1898584 Jan 2007 CN
101114031 Jan 2008 CN
101114032 Jan 2008 CN
101241202 Aug 2008 CN
101263378 Sep 2008 CN
101359094 Feb 2009 CN
101467021 Jun 2009 CN
101611333 Dec 2009 CN
101688929 Mar 2010 CN
102498374 Jun 2012 CN
101799589 May 2013 CN
103119498 May 2013 CN
104718479 Jun 2015 CN
105074511 Nov 2015 CN
105765421 Jul 2016 CN
106331445 Jan 2017 CN
106772734 May 2017 CN
106932845 Jul 2017 CN
107462983 Dec 2017 CN
108508506 Sep 2018 CN
108885354 Nov 2018 CN
108919399 Nov 2018 CN
109073885 Dec 2018 CN
109891318 Jun 2019 CN
1406098 Apr 2004 EP
1542043 Jun 2005 EP
1904827 Apr 2008 EP
2196729 Jun 2010 EP
2229938 Sep 2010 EP
2955753 Dec 2015 EP
3223062 Sep 2017 EP
3223063 Sep 2017 EP
3240046 Nov 2017 EP
3312646 Apr 2018 EP
3312660 Apr 2018 EP
3312674 Apr 2018 EP
3339938 Jun 2018 EP
3385219 Oct 2018 EP
3499278 Jun 2019 EP
3540479 Sep 2019 EP
3540499 Sep 2019 EP
3540499 Sep 2019 EP
3588150 Jan 2020 EP
3591700 Jan 2020 EP
3671293 Jun 2020 EP
3671322 Jun 2020 EP
2529003 Feb 2016 GB
2003005129 Jan 2003 JP
2014134564 Jul 2014 JP
2016500160 Jan 2016 JP
2017063198 Mar 2017 JP
200502570 Jan 2005 TW
201042286 Dec 2010 TW
03007032 Jan 2003 WO
2003025635 Mar 2003 WO
2004094326 May 2005 WO
2007031991 Mar 2007 WO
2009083977 Jul 2009 WO
2014036537 Mar 2014 WO
2014044912 Mar 2014 WO
2017116637 Jul 2017 WO
2017116637 Jul 2017 WO
2017131983 Aug 2017 WO
2017162880 Sep 2017 WO
2017162882 Sep 2017 WO
2017180403 Oct 2017 WO
2017180403 Oct 2017 WO
2018052750 Mar 2018 WO
2018102582 Jun 2018 WO
2018102582 Jun 2018 WO
2018102834 Jun 2018 WO
2020128030 Jun 2020 WO
2021053182 Mar 2021 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (88)
Entry
Gennarelli, G.et al., “A uniform asymptotic solution for the diffraction by a right-angled dielectric wedge” IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation, vol. 59 No. 3, Mar. 2011 pp. 898-903 (6 pages).
Wang, P. et al., “Ultra-high-sensitivity color imaging via a transparent diffractive-filter array and computational optics: supplementary material.” Optica, Oct. 2015 (9 pages).
Fontaine, R. “The state-of-the-art of mainstream CMOS image sensors.” In Proceedings of the International Image Sensors Workshop, 2015 (4 pages).
Wang, P. et al., “Computational single-shot hyper-spectral imaging based on a microstructured diffractive optic.” In 2016 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO), IEEE, 2016 (2 pages).
Palanchoke, U. et al., “Spectral sorting of visible light using dielectric gratings.” Optics Express 25, No. 26, Dec. 2017 pp. 33389-33399 (11 pages).
Rakovich, Y. P. et al., “Photonic Nanojets in Coupled Microcavities.” In The European Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, p. JSV2_3. Optical Society of America, 2009 (1 page).
Yang, J. et al., “Polychromatic see-through near-eye display design with two waveguides and a large field-of-view.” In Optics, Photonics and Digital Technologies for Imaging Applications IV, vol. 9896, p. 989605. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2016 (7 pages).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/EP2019/084526 dated Jun. 16, 2021, 11 pages.
Liu , Cheng-Yang, “Photonic Jets Produced by Dielectric Micro Cuboids”. Applied Optics, vol. 54, Issue 29, (2015), pp. 8694-8699.
Varghese, B. et al., “Influence of an edge height on the diffracted EM field distribution.” In 2019 21st International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), pp. 1-4. IEEE, 2019.
Shramkova, O. et al. “Photonic nanojet generated by dielectric multi-material microstructure” META Jul. 2019, (2 pages).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/EP2019/063802 dated Dec. 29, 2020, 8 pages.
Genevet, Patrice, et. al., “Recent Advances In Planar Optics: From Plasmonic To Dielectric Metasurfaces”. Optica, vol. 4, No. 1, Jan. 2017, pp. 139-152.
Aieta, Francesco, et. al., “Multiwavelength Achromatic Metasurfaces By Dispersive Phase Compensation”. Sciencexpress, 2015, (8 pages).
Khorasaninejad, Mohammadreza, et. al., “Achromatic Metasurface Lens At Telecommunication Wavelengths”. Nano Letters, 2015, (5 pages).
Deng, Zi-Lan, et. al., “Wide-Angle And High-Efficiency Achromatic Metasurfaces For Visible Light”. Optical Express, vol. 24, No. 20 pp. 23118-23128 (12 pages).
Avayu, Ori, et. al., “Composite Functional Metasurfaces For Multispectral Achromatic Optics”. Nature Communications, 2017, pp. 1-7 (7 pages).
Nishiwaki, Seiji, et. al., “Efficient Colour Splitters for High-Pixel-Density Image Sensors”. Nature Photonics, vol. 7, Mar. 2013, pp. 240-246.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/EP2019/085489, dated Jan. 30, 2020, 11 pages.
Yi, Jianjia, et. al., “Coherent Beam Control With An All-Dielectric Transformation Optics Based Lens”. Scientific Reports, vol. 6, No. 1, Jan. 5, 2016, pp. 1-8.
Zhao, Yanhui, et. al., “Beam Bending Via Plasmonic Lenses”. Optics Express, vol. 18, No. 22, Oct. 25, 2010, pp. 23458-23465.
Jun, Young Chul, et. al., “Optical Manipulation With Plasmonic Beam Shaping Antenna Structures”. Advances in OptoElectronicsm, (2012).
Khorasaninejad, Mohammadreza, et. al., “Super-Dispersive Off-Axis Meta-Lenses For Compact High Resolution Spectroscopy”. Nano Letters, vol. 16, No. 6, (2016), pp. 3732-3737.
Liu, Zhaowei, et. al., “Tuning The Focus Of A Plasmonic Lens By The Incident Angle”. Applied Physics Letters, vol. 88, No. 17, (2006), pp. 171108-1-171108-2.
Chen, Yiguo, et. al., “Engineering The Phase Front Of Light With Phase-Change Material Based Planar Lenses”. Scientific Reports vol. 5, No. 1, Mar. 2, 2015, pp. 1-7.
Kong, Soon-Cheol, et. al., “Photonic Nanojet-Enabled Optical Data Storage”. Optical Society of America, Optics Express, vol. 16, No. 18, Sep. 1, 2008, pp. 13713-13719.
Pacheco-Peña, V., et. al., “Terajets Produced By Dielectric Cuboids”. Applied Physics Letters 105, 084102, (2014), doi: 10.1063/1.4894243, 5 pages.
Pacheco-Peña, V., et. al., “Multifrequency Focusing And Wide Angular Scanning Of Terajets”. Optical Society of America, Optics Letters, vol. 40, No. 2, (2015), 5 pages.
Itagi, A. V., et. al., , “Optics of Photonic Nanojets”. Optical Society of America. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A , Vo.22, Dec. 2005 pp. 2847-2858 (12 pages).
Heifetz, Alexander, et. al., “Subdiffraction Optical Resolution Of A Gold Nanosphere Located Within The Nanojet Of A Mie-Resonant Dielectric Microsphere”. Optical Express, vol. 15, No. 25, (2007), 17334-17342.
Devilez, Alexis, et. al., “Three-Dimensional Subwavelength Confinement Of Light With Dielectric Microspheres”. Optics Express, vol. 17, No. 4, Feb. 16, 2009, pp. 2089-2094.
Shen, Yuecheng, et. al., “Ultralong Photonic Nanojet Formed By A Two-Layer Dielectric Microsphere”. Optical Letters, Optical Society of America, vol. 39, No. 14, Jul. 15, 2014, 4120-4123.
Ruiz, César Méndez, et. al., “Detection Of Embedded Ultrasubwavelength-Thin Dielectric Features Using Elongated Photonic Nanojets”. Optical Express, vol. 18, No. 16, Aug. 2, 2010, pp. 16805-16812.
Geints, Yuri E., et. al., “Photonic Nanojet Calculations In Layered Radially Inhomogeneous Micrometer-Sized Spherical Particles”. Optical Society of America, vol. 28, No. 8, Aug. 2011, 1825-1830.
Gu, Guoqiang, et. al. “Super-Long Photonic Nanojet Generated from Liquid-Filled Hollow Microcylinder”. Optical Society of America, Optical Letters, vol. 40, No. 4, Feb. 15, 2015, pp. 625-628.
Mao, Xiurun, et. al., “Tunable Photonic Nanojet Formed By Generalized Luneburg Lens”. Optics Express, vol. 23, No. 20, (2015), pp. 26426-26433.
Geints, Yu, E., et. al., “Modeling Spatially Localized Photonic Nanojets From Phase Diffraction Gratings”. Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 119, No. 15, Apr. 21, 2016, pp. 153101-1-153101-6.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/EP2019/055679 dated May 16, 2019, 10 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/EP19/055679 dated Sep. 15, 2020, 6 pages.
Kotlyar, Victor, et. al., “Photonic Nanojets Generated Using Square-Profile Microsteps”. Optical Society of America, Applied Optics, vol. 53, No. 24, Aug. 20, 2014, pp. 5322-5329.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/EP2019/055905 dated May 22, 2019, 12 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/EP2019/055905 dated Sep. 15, 2020, 8 pages.
Xiao, Jiasheng, et. al., “Design Of Achromatic Surface Microstructure For Near-Eye Display With Diffractive Waveguide”. Optics Communications, vol. 452, (2019), pp. 411-416.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/EP2019/063802 dated Sep. 16, 2019, 14 pages.
Ang, Angeleene S., et. al., “‘Photonic Hook’ Based Optomechanical Nanoparticle Manipulator”. Scientific Reports, vol. 8. No. 2029, Published online: Feb. 1, 2018, pp. 1-7.
Chaumet, P. C., et. al., “Time-Averaged Total Force On A Dipolar Sphere In An Electromagnetic Field”. Optics Letters, vol. 25, No. 15, (2000), pp. 1065-1067 (3 pages).
Xu, Chen, et. al., “Photon Nanojet Lens: Design, Fabrication and Characterization”. Nanotechnology, vol. 27, No. 16, Mar. 4, 2016, pp. 1-6.
Yue, Liyang, et. al., “Photonic Hook: A New Curved Light Beam”. Optics Letters, vol. 43, No. 4, Feb. 2018, pp. 771-774 (5 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority PCT/EP2019/084526 dated Mar. 10, 2020, 15 pages.
Boriskin, Artem, et. al., “Near Field Focusing By Edge Diffraction”. Optics Letters, vol. 43, No. 16, Aug. 2018, pp. 4053-4056 (4 pages).
Shramkova, Oksana, et. al., “Localized Photonic Jets Generated By Step-Like Dielectric Microstructures”. IEEE 20th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), (2018), pp. 1-4. (4 pages).
Liu, Cheng-Yang, et. al., “Localized Photonic Nanojets Formed By Core-Shell Diffraction Gratings”. Integrated Optics: Physics and Simulations III, International Society for Optics and Photonics, vol. 10242, (2017), p. 102420W (4 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/EP2019/063739 dated Aug. 8, 2019, (11 pages).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/EP2019/063739 dated Jan. 5, 2021, (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/EP2019/086776 dated Mar. 6, 2020, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2021/057273 dated Jun. 30, 2021 (15 pages).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/EP2019/085489 dated Jun. 16, 2021, (8 pages).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/EP2019/086776 dated Jun. 16, 2021, (9 pages).
Teranishi, N. et al.,“Evolution of optical structure in image sensors.” In 2012 International Electron Devices Meeting, pp. 24-1. IEEE, 2012 (4 pages).
Nishiwaki, S. et al., “Highly Sensitive Image Sensors Using Micro Color Splitters.” ITE Technical Report vol. 37 No. 47, Dec. 2014 (2 pages).
Chen, Q. et al., “Nanophotonic image sensors.” Small 12, No. 36, 2016: 4922-4935 (14 pages).
Neves, A. A. R., “Photonic nanojets in optical tweezers.” Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 162, Mar. 17, 2015 (20 pages).
Eisen, L., et al., “Total internal reflection diffraction grating in conical mounting.” Optics communications 261, No. 1, 2006, pp. 13-18 (6 pages).
J. R. DeVore, “Refractive Indices of Rutile and Sphalerite,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 41, pp. 416-419, 1951 (4 pages).
Evola, T., “Diffractive optics for virtual reality displays.” Journal of the Society for Information Display 14, No. 5, 2006 pp. 467-475 (9 pages).
Zhang, Li, et al., “CE4-related: History-based Motion Vector Prediction”, Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, Document: JVET-K0104-v5, 11th Meeting: Ljubljana, SI, Jul. 10-18, 2018 (7 pages).
Tao, Z. et al., “Design of polarization-dependent color filters based on all-dielectric metasurfaces for dynamic modulation of color HSV”, 11th International Congress on Engineered Materials Platforms for Novel Wave Phenomena (Metamaterials), 2017, 3 pages.
Lotti, F. et al., “Nanoparticle-based metasurfaces for angular-independent spectral filtering applications”, 2017 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC), 2017.
Mahani, F. F., et al., “Optimization of plasmonic color filters for CMOS image sensors by genetic algorithm”, 2nd Conference on Swarm Intelligence and Evolutionary Computation (CSIEC), 2017, 4 pages.
Gordon, James P., “Radiation Forces and Momenta in Dielectric Media”, Phys. Rev. A vol. 8, 14—Published Jul. 1, 1973, 8 pages. Available online at: http://totuvach.free.fr/Articles/gordon73.pdf.
Wang, Hoatian, et al., “Trapping and manipulating nanoparticles in photonic nanojets”, Optics Letters vol. 41 No. 7, Apr. 2016, 4 pages.
Cui, Xudong, et al., “Optical forces on metallic nanoparticles induced by a photonic nanojet”, Optics Express, vol. 16, Issue 18, Oct. 2008, p. 13560-13568 (9 pages).
Zheng, Zhu, et al., “Optical trapping with focused Airy beams”, Applied Optics vol. 50, Issue 1, 2011, pp. 43-49 (7 pages).
Siviloglou, Georgios A., et al., “Accelerating finite energy Airy beams”, Apr. 15, 2007, vol. 32, No. 8, Optics Letters, pp. 979-981 (3 pages).
Čižmámar, Thomas, et al., “Optical conveyor belt for delivery of submicron objects” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 86, Issue 17, Apr. 25, 2005, 3 pages.
V. Garces-Chavez, et al., “Simultaneous micromanipulation in multiple planes using a self-reconstructing light beam”, Nature vol. 419, Sep. 12, 2002, 145-147 (3 pages).
Bosanac, Lana, et al., “Efficient Optical Trapping and Visualization of Silver Nanoparticles”, Nano Letters 2008, vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 1486-1491 (6 pages).
Ashkin, A., et al., “Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles”, Optics Letters vol. 11, Issue 5, May 1986 pp. 288-290 (3 pages).
Ahskin, A., et al., “Optical trapping and manipulation of viruses and bacteria”, SCIENCE, Mar. 1987, vol. 235, Issue 4795, pp. 1517-1520 (4 pages).
Block, Steven M., et al., “Bead movement by single kinesin molecules studied with optical tweezers”, Nature, vol. 348, Nov. 1990 pp. 348-352 (5 pages).
Jones, P. H., et al., “Trapping and manipulation of microscopic bubbles with a scanning optical tweezer”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, Issue 8, Aug. 21, 2006 (3 pages).
X. Tsampoula, et al., “Femtosecond cellular transfection using a nondiffracting light beam”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 91, Issue 5, Jul. 30, 2007 (3 pages).
Siviloglou, Georgios A., et al., “Observation of Accelerating Airy Beams”, Physics Review Letters, vol. 99, Issue 21♯Published Nov. 20, 2007 (4 pages).
Berry, M. V., et al., “Nonspreading wave packets”, American Journal of Physics, vol. 47, Iss. 3, Mar. 1979 (4 pages).
Yannopapas, Vassilios, “Photonic nanojets as three-dimensional optical atom traps: A theoretical study”, Optics Communications, vol. 285, Issue 12, pp. 2952-2955, Jun. 1, 2012, 3 p.
Zhang, Peng, et al., “Trapping and guiding microparticles with morphing autofocusing Airy beams”, Optics Letters, vol. 36, No. 15, Aug. 2011, pp. 2883-2885 (3 pages).
Liu, Yujie, et al., “Total internal reflection diffraction grating in conical mounting and its application in planar display”, International Conference on Photonics and Optical Engineering (icPOE 2014), vol. 9449, pp. 9449-9449-6, 2015 (6 pages).
Zhanjun, Yan, et al., “Virtual display design using waveguide hologram in conical mounting configuration.” Optical Engineering, Sep. 2011, 50:50-50-9 (8 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220059250 A1 Feb 2022 US