The invention relates to imaging processing, and in particular, feedback systems and methods for detecting an obstruction in a detection area.
Nuclear medical imaging is widely used due to the ease of collecting multiple data sets simultaneously during an imaging period. Emissions of a distributed radioactive tracer inside an organism are collected by detectors, converted into signals, and used to generate a complete image of the organism.
Generally, in single photon emission computerize tomography (SPECT), also referred to as a gamma camera system, scintillation detectors are placed relatively close to a patient during the image acquisition process. In some respects, light rails may be placed along each side of a scintillation detector surface to provide feedback signals to a motion control system that can automatically position the scintillation detectors at the closest proximity between the detector's surface and an object being imaged, such as a patient. The placement is important as the closer the detector is to the patient, the better the image quality. Also, maintaining a patient's safety is important with respect to the detector's placement. The detectors can each weigh upwards of 1000 pounds. Therefore, the placement of the detector in proximity of the patient is such that any contact with the patient may trigger a touch sensor and shut down the motion of the detectors.
Current SPECT systems employ a two level light rail system that includes arrays of infrared light emitting diodes (IR LEDs). Because each IR LED transmits its beam in a wedge shape across the surface of a detector collimator, several IR LEDs may be arranged on both sides of the light rails in light transmitter and receiver such that all wedge beams can interleave and generate a continuous plane over the surface of the detector collimator. Generally, the IR LEDS and IR photodiodes may be sequentially scanned by a microcontroller for real-time sensing response as well as well as to prevent cross-talk between each light plane.
However, component parametric variations including sensitivity of the photodiodes and light intensity of the IR LEDs require component sorting and complex calibration scheme in order to function properly. Additionally, tight tolerance is required to assemble the IR LEDs and IR photodiodes on long printed circuit boards (PCBs) to meet the specified light plane sensitivity. Further, the PCBs are difficult to manufacture and handle.
Aside from the hardware limitations of current SPECT implementations, factors such as signal connection reliability may be compromised due to a large number of signal interfaces that are needed between the light rails and the microcontroller.
In accordance with the teachings of the present disclosure, disadvantages and problems associated with existing light rails in imaging systems may be substantially reduced or eliminated. The present disclosure provides system and method for dynamically detecting an obstruction in a detection area. In one respect, a method for detecting an obstruction across a detection area is provided. The method may include projecting a plane across substantially a first portion of the detection area onto a light guide. The light energy received by the light guide may subsequently be guided to a photo detector, and the projected plane, and more particularly the electromagnetic or light energy may be evaluated.
The method may also provide evaluating light energy of a second portion the detection plane to determine a reference light energy, which may subsequently be differentially compared with the light energy of the projected plane to determine an obstruction in the detection area.
In some respects, a dual plane configuration may be provided. A first plane may be projected across a portion of the detection area and the light energy may be obtained. A second plane may also be projected across a similar portion of the detection area and a light energy may be obtained. The light energies from the first and second planes may be differentially compared with a reference light energy to determine an obstruction in the detection area.
It is understood that the methods of the present disclosure may include instructions that may be executed on a tangible computer media.
The present disclosure also provides a system comprising a detection system and a processor coupled to the detection system. The detection system may include, without limitation, a light source, at least one light guide embedded in a light rail, and a reference photo detector. The light guide may be operably configured to receive light from the light source and guide the light to at least one photo detector embedded in the light rail. The reference photo detector may sample light from a portion of the detection area, and both light energies (e.g., the reference light energy sampled by the reference photo detector and the light energy received by the photo detector embedded in the light rail) may be differentially evaluated by the processor.
The embodiments will be explained in greater detail in the text which follows by means of diagrammatically represented embodiments in the drawing without the invention being restricted to these embodiments.
Preferred embodiments and their advantages are best understood by reference to
The present disclosure provides an improvement in light rail design in a non-circular orbit that may be used, for example, in medical imaging systems. Referring to
Detection system 100 also includes light source 104, such as a line light source or other suitable electromagnetic light sources known in the art, coupled to light rail 102b. It is noted that light source 104 may also be coupled to light rail 102a, or alternatively, a light source may be provided for each light rail. It is also noted that detection system 100 may include one or more light sources. For example, one or more light sources may be added if necessary to provide coverage across the detection area. The light source(s) may either be multiplexed or modulated by a separate carrier as needed to carry avoid co-channel interference.
In operation, light source 104 may project at least one plane, and in some embodiments, two planes across the detection area. To determine the distance of detector system 100 relative to an object being imaged, the detector may utilize the object's position between the two projected planes. In other words, the distance of the detector to the object may be controlled by maintaining the position of the object between the two projected planes of light source 104.
In one respect, light source 104 may be a low power laser with line generator optics which may project a plane, such as, lower plane 108a that may intersects an object during scanning, as seen in
In some respects, a dual light plane embodiment may be used. Referring to
As seen in
The light received at either photo detector 120a and 120b (and similar component(s) in housing 102b) may be processed into an image and may subsequently compared with a reference image. A reference image may be obtained by sampling the detection area when light source 104 is not in operation, i.e., light source 104a may not be on. Alternatively, a reference image may be obtained by sampling an area not covered by a projected plane. For example, referring to
Referring to
In one respect, a detector system may be positioned using a motion controller (e.g., motion control unit 160 of
In step 202 of
In step 204, an area not being covered by the projected lines of step 202 may be evaluated. In one embodiment, a photo detector may be used to sample the area that does not include a projected plane. For example, a photo detector coupled to the light source may be used to capture the reference light. Alternatively or in addition, the light guides and photo detectors of the rails may be used to collect the reference light. The light captured by the photo detector may subsequently be processed and a reference image may be generated.
It is noted that step 204 may be performed prior to step 200 or 202 such that the ambient light of the detection area, prior to the projecting of lines may be captured and processed as a reference image.
Next, the captured light or electromagnetic energy from the photo detector (from both step 202 and 204) may be evaluated in step 206 followed by a possible adjustment of the detector's position in step 208. In one embodiment, a processor (e.g., processor 150 coupled to detection system 100 of
In optional step 208, the position of the detector may be adjusted. The position of the detector relative to the object may depend on whether one or all of the projected lines are obstructed. For example, in an embodiment where two lines are projected, both lines may be evaluated. If both lines are broken, the light energy may be reduced, and the object may be too close to detector and may interfere with the imaging process. If both lines are not broken, the detector may not be close enough to an object and may need to be repositioned. If only one line is broken, the detector's position may be situated as close as possible to the object. As such, in step 208, the detector may remain as positioned in step 200.
As used in this disclosure, “tangible computer readable media” means any instrumentality, or aggregation of instrumentalities that may retain data and/or instructions for a period of time. Tangible computer readable media may include, without limitation, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), a PCMCIA card, flash memory, direct access storage (e.g., a hard disk drive or floppy disk), sequential access storage (e.g., a tape disk drive), compact disk, CD-ROM, DVD, and/or any suitable selection of volatile and/or non-volatile memory and/or storage.
The computer-readable media may be embodied internally or externally on a hard drive, ASIC, CD drive, DVD drive, tape drive, floppy drive, network drive, flash drive, USB drive or the like. Further, the computer-readable media may be any computing device capable of executing instructions for implementing the method shown, for example, in
In some embodiments, the computer-readable media may be a networked device and may constitute a terminal device running software from a remote server, wired or wirelessly. Input from a user or system components may be gathered through one or more known techniques such as a keyboard and/or mouse. Output, if necessary, may be achieved through one or more known techniques such as an output file, printer, facsimile, e-mail, web-posting, or the like. Storage may be achieved internally and/or externally and may include, for example, a hard drive, CD drive, DVD drive, tape drive, floppy drive, network drive, flash, or the like. The computer readable-media may use any type of monitor or screen known in the art, for displaying information. For example, a cathode ray tube (CRT) or liquid crystal display (LCD) can be used. One or more display panels may also constitute a display. In other embodiments, a traditional display may not be required, and computer readable-media may operate through appropriate voice and/or key commands.
This application incorporates by reference in its entirety to U.S. patent application having a docket number of 2007P16539US, entitled “Multi-Level Light Curtain with Structure Light Sources and Imaging Sensors,” by Patanit Sanpitak, filed on Aug. 3, 2007.