This application is a 35 U.S.C. 371 national stage filing of International Application No. PCT/GB2011/052192, filed on Nov. 11, 2011, which claims priority to United Kingdom Patent Application No. 1020351.1, filed on Dec. 1, 2010. The contents of the aforementioned applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to optical waveguide arrangements and is more particularly, but not exclusively, concerned with optical waveguide arrangements for multimode interference (MMI) couplers.
In the field of optical telecommunication, optical couplers (e.g. MMI couplers) are commonly used as the optical splitters and recombiners in optical circuits such as Mach-Zehnder modulators (MZMs). Normally input and output waveguides are provided for guiding optical signals through the couplers.
a is a schematic illustration of a 2×2 MMI coupler in plan view. As is well known, for a specific design of MMI the MMI length and waveguide pitch (centre-to-centre spacing) of the input 12 and output waveguides 4 are necessarily related to the width of the MMI.
b is a schematic illustration of an idealised input/output ridge waveguide of a 2×2 MMI coupler shown in vertical cross-section. This idealised rectangular waveguide ridge profile is generally not practically achievable at reduced ridge dimensions The input waveguides 12 are formed on a semiconductor substrate comprising a lower confinement (cladding) layer 1, a waveguide core layer 2 deposited on the lower confinement layer 1 and an upper confinement (cladding) layer 3 deposited on the waveguide core layer 2. One or more of these layers is selectively etched, over predetermined widths, W, to define ridges which form the waveguides 12. The etching process also defines an etched gap 5 between two waveguides 12, which controls the profile of the waveguide structure.
In an optical circuit it is advantageous to miniaturize the size of the MMI in order to provide a more compact circuit. In order to reduce the length of the MMI shown in
c shows schematically the variation of the etched depth as a function of the etched gap for the waveguides 12 shown in
d is a schematic cross-section of a pair of input ridge waveguides of a 2×2 MMI coupler in which the ridge etch depth is dependent upon the waveguide gap. As can be seen, the ridge profile is asymmetric and an inside wall 6 of each waveguide 12 is not vertical. The waveguides 12 are therefore individually left-right asymmetric. One of the effects of such an asymmetrical arrangement is polarisation rotation. In this case, the state of polarisation of the light propagating in each of the two input waveguides is rotated in opposite directions, and so will become unequal between the two waveguides. The disadvantage of this, for example, in the case that the 2×2 MMI is used as a recombiner in an MZ interferometer, is that the light from the two input waveguides will not interfere completely, leading to a degradation of the extinction ratio of the interferometer.
Furthermore, waveguides which do not have substantially the same profile/shape (at the input and output of the MMI) can lead to degradation of the performance of the coupler. In particular, the required imaging of the input optical modes to the desired output optical modes, which is achieved by means of the multi-mode optical interference behaviour of the coupler, is impaired if either the input or output waveguides are incorrectly positioned or are not matched. This impairment may take the form of increased optical loss (reduction in optical power), or in errors in the relative optical power or in the relative optical phase between the signals at each of the MMI waveguide outputs. In addition, when the input/output waveguides do not have the same ridge profile over a significant length leading to the MMI, their propagation characteristics are different. This could lead to imbalance in a MZ interferometer in which the waveguides are contained.
A possible solution to the polarisation rotation is to etch the waveguides to a deeper depth so as to ensure a vertical sidewall at the waveguide-core for closely-spaced waveguides. However, this solution is not possible in many practical cases, because of an upper limit for the maximum waveguide etched depth for widely spaced waveguides which may arise from other optical circuit design considerations.
Thus there is a need for a waveguide arrangement design which will address the disadvantages associated with etch-process induced asymmetries in the shape of closely spaced waveguides.
It is one of the objects of the present invention to provide a simple design for such a waveguide arrangement to reduce the disadvantages associated with etch-process induced asymmetries in the shape of closely spaced waveguides.
According to one aspect of the invention there is provided an optical waveguide arrangement comprising an active ridge waveguide structure formed by etching of a substrate, and an auxiliary waveguide-like structure formed on the substrate adjacent to the waveguide structure to control the etched profile over the cross-section of the active waveguide structure. The substrate may be a semiconductor substrate.
Such an arrangement reduces the disadvantageous effects (e.g. polarisation rotation) caused by the waveguides having asymmetric transverse cross-sections. The arrangement helps to ensure that all input/output waveguides to the MMI have substantially the same ridge profile and are individually symmetric (left-right mirror symmetry).
The auxiliary structure may be arranged on the substrate to impart a symmetric active waveguide profile. Conveniently the auxiliary structure is arranged on the substrate to produce symmetric ridges in the active waveguide structure.
The use of the auxiliary waveguide structures provides a more symmetric etched ridge waveguide profile. This can be achieved by etching the active waveguides and the auxiliary waveguides in close proximity to each other. The use of the symmetric waveguides at an input and an output of the MMI coupler ensures that the optical modes are correctly aligned when the optical signal launches into and exits the MMI coupler. This arrangement thereby improves the performance of the MMI coupler.
Alternatively or additionally the auxiliary structure may be arranged on the substrate to control the etched profile along the length of the active waveguide structure. Preferably the auxiliary structure is arranged to control the etched profile by variation of a gap between the active waveguide structure and the auxiliary structure. Conveniently the auxiliary structure is arranged to vary the etched profile to produce a transition between a strongly guided active waveguide and a weakly guided active waveguide.
This arrangement ensures that the above transition is smooth and is carried out within the same processing step.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of manufacturing an optical waveguide arrangement comprising:
In order that the invention may be more fully understood, a number of embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
a is a schematic illustration of a 2×2 MMI coupler in plan view;
b is a schematic illustration of a known input/output ridge waveguide of a 2×2 MMI coupler;
c shows the variation of the etched depth as a function of the etched gap for commonly-used semiconductor etch processes, for the waveguides shown in
d is a schematic illustration of a closely spaced input/output ridge waveguide of a 2×2 MMI coupler with etched waveguide depth and sidewall slope dependent upon the spacing between the adjacent waveguides;
a is a plan view of a 1×2 MMI coupler having standard input and output waveguides;
b is a plan view of a 1×2 MMI coupler having a standard input waveguide and auxiliary balanced output waveguides;
a is a plan view of a 2×2 MMI coupler shown in
b is a plan view of a 2×2 MMI coupler having auxiliary balanced or symmetric input waveguides and standard output waveguides;
a is a plan view of input waveguides to a 4×4 MMI coupler having standard input waveguides arranged in a configuration in which only two of the four waveguides are actively used;
b is a plan view of the input waveguides to a 4×4 MMI coupler having additional auxiliary balanced or symmetric input waveguides in a configuration in which two of the four waveguides are actively used;
a is a plan view of the output waveguides to a 4×4 MMI coupler having four standard output waveguides;
b is a plan view of the output waveguides to a 4×4 MMI coupler having auxiliary balanced or symmetric output waveguides;
a is a plan view of a strong-to-weak waveguide coupler having auxiliary balancing waveguides adjacent to the active waveguide to control the waveguide ridge profile along its length;
b shows the strong-to-weak waveguide coupler of
a to
As can be seen from
The variation of the etched depth as a function of the etched gap for the waveguides of
a is a plan view of a 1×2 MMI coupler having a standard input waveguide 12 and standard output waveguides 4.
a is a plan view of a 2×2 MMI coupler having two standard input waveguides 12 and two standard output waveguides 4. This figure shows a partial arrangement of the standard input waveguide 12 but the complete arrangement of the standard output waveguides 4.
a is a plan view of the input to a 4×4 MMI coupler having two active input waveguides 12 and two inactive (terminated) input waveguides, labelled 12a.
a is a plan view of the output waveguides of a 4×4 MMI coupler having four standard output waveguides 4.
It will be appreciated to those skilled in the art that it is necessary to form a transition between strongly and weakly guide waveguides. In one embodiment, the arrangement of the auxiliary balancing waveguides adjacent to the active input/output waveguides controls the etched profile of the active input/output waveguides along their length. On this basis, a smooth transition from a weakly guided waveguide to a strongly guided waveguide or vice versa can be achieved by variation of the etched gap between the active input/output waveguide and the auxiliary waveguide. A closer etched gap produces a weakly guided active waveguide having a shallower etched depth, which does not penetrate the waveguide core layer. By contrast, a larger etched gap produces a deeply etched trench to result in a strongly guided active waveguide. The deeply etched trench extends through the upper confinement layer, the waveguide core layer and partially through the lower confinement layer. This variation of the etched gaps can be controlled along the length of the waveguides within the same processing step.
a is a plan view of a waveguide element which forms a transition from a strong to weakly-guided waveguide having auxiliary balancing waveguides 8 adjacent to an input active waveguide 12. The etched gaps between the auxiliary and input waveguides are varied along the length of the waveguides to produce a transition from a strongly guided active waveguide to a weakly guided active waveguide. Similar arrangements are also possible for a transition from a weak to a strongly-guided active waveguide.
b shows the strong-to-weak waveguide transition of
One possible application of this transition to a weakly guided waveguide is to act as a mode-filter, in which any higher-order modes which may propagate within the strongly-guided waveguide become unconfined within the weakly-guided waveguide, and so do not propagate over any significant distance within the weakly-guided waveguide.
It will be appreciated that there are other possible applications of auxiliary waveguides. For example, a single auxiliary waveguide alongside an active waveguide could be used to form an asymmetric waveguide profile deliberately. Such asymmetric waveguides may be used to generate polarisation rotation.
In an exemplary embodiment,
S1: Depositing a dielectric etch mask on a top surface of a semiconductor substrate comprising the upper confinement layer 3, the waveguide core layer 2 and the lower confinement layer 1, as shown in
S2: Defining a dielectric etch mask on the top surface of the semiconductor substrate by standard photolithography and the dielectric etch process, as shown in
S3: Deeply etching the semiconductor substrate (by the dry etch process) so that the etched trench extends through the upper confinement layer 3, the waveguide core layer 2 and partially through the lower confinement layer 1, as shown in
S4: Varying the etched gap 5 between two waveguides along their length and at the same time using the same dry etch technique, as shown in
It will be appreciated that the etched depth of an isolated active waveguide (the active waveguide without accompanying auxiliary waveguides) can also be controlled along its length within the same dry etched processing step by adjusting the width or the gap of its adjacent etch channel. In such an arrangement, as the channel width or the gap is reduced, there will be a transition from a strongly guided waveguide (deeply etched) to a slab waveguide.
It will be noted that the foregoing description is directed to arrangements having ridge waveguides. However, it will be appreciated that the same principles may be applied to the other arrangements, such as those having buried ridge waveguides, for example.
It will be further noted that the foregoing description is generally directed to arrangements having semiconductor waveguides. However, it will be appreciated that other arrangements may be also possible in which the waveguides may be manufactured using other materials including dielectric material such as silica, for example.
Although the invention has been described in terms of preferred embodiments as set forth above, it should be understood that these embodiments are illustrative only and that the claims are not limited to those embodiments. Those skilled in the art will be able to make modifications and alternatives in view of the disclosure which are contemplated as falling within the scope of the appended claims. Each feature disclosed or illustrated in the present specification may be incorporated in the invention, whether alone or in any appropriate combination with any other feature disclosed or illustrated herein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1020351.1 | Dec 2010 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2011/052192 | 11/11/2011 | WO | 00 | 5/9/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/072998 | 6/7/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4049944 | Garvin et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
6950581 | Bandyopadhyay | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7116880 | Liu et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
8644653 | Evans | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20060013551 | Foresi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20080304528 | Yamamoto et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20120051687 | Evans | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120281942 | Jinnouchi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130223790 | Jones et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1873583 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2028735 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2007-233294 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007233294 | Sep 2007 | JP |
WO2010025264 | Mar 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2011/052192 dated Mar. 7, 2012, 10 pages. |
GB Search Report, Application No. GB1020351.1 dated Mar. 29, 2011, 2 pages. |
Hill, Martin T., et al.; Journal of Lightwave Technology, “Optimizing Imbalance and Loss in 2×2 3-dB Multimode Interference Couplers via Access Waveguide Width,” vol. 21, No. 10, Oct. 2003, pp. 2305-2313. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130223790 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |