The invention relates generally to spectroscopic methods. More particularly, the invention relates to the diagnosis of disease in tissue using spectral analysis and/or image analysis.
Spectral analysis is used to diagnose disease in tissue. For example, data from spectral scans performed on the tissue of a patient are used to screen tissue for disease. Some diagnostic procedures include the application of a chemical contrast agent to the tissue in order to enhance the image and/or spectral response of the tissue for diagnosis. In an acetowhitening procedure, acetic acid is used as the contrast agent. Use of a contrast agent enhances the difference between data obtained from normal tissue and data obtained from abnormal or diseased tissue.
Current techniques do not suggest an optimal time period following application of a contrast agent within which to obtain spectral and/or image data for the diagnosis of disease, nor do current techniques suggest how such an optimal time period could be determined.
The invention provides optimal criteria for selecting spectral and/or image data from tissue that has been treated with a contrast agent for disease screening. In particular, it has been discovered that the sensitivity and specificity of optical diagnostic screening is improved by obtaining optical data at optimal time points after application of a contrast agent.
Accordingly, methods of the invention provide optimal windows in time for obtaining spectral data from tissue that has been treated with a contrast agent in order to improve the results of disease screening. The invention further provides methods for identifying such windows in the context of any optical diagnostic screen. Additionally, the invention provides methods for disease screening using kinetic data obtained across multiple diagnostic windows. Methods of the invention allow an optical diagnostic test to focus on data that will produce the highest diagnostic sensitivity and specificity with respect to the tissue being examined. Thus, the invention allows the identification of specific points in time after treatment of a tissue when spectral and/or image data most accurately reflects the health of the tissue being measured.
Time windows for observing selected spectral data may be determined empirically or from a database of known tissue responses to optical stimulation. For example, in one aspect the invention comprises building and using classification models to characterize the state of health of an unknown tissue sample from which optical signals are obtained. As used herein, an optical signal may comprise a discrete or continuous electromagnetic signal or any portion thereof, or the data representing such a signal. Essentially, optical diagnostic windows are based upon the points at which classification models perform best. In practice, optimal diagnostic windows of the invention may be predetermined segments of time following application of a contrast agent to a tissue. Optimal diagnostic windows may also be points in time at which an optical measurement meets a predetermined threshold or falls within a predetermined range, where the optical measurement represents the change of an optical signal received from the tissue following application of a contrast agent. For example, a window may be selected to include points in time at which the change in optical signal intensity from an initial condition is maximized. Finally, the optical measurement upon which a window is based may also reflect the rate of change in a spectral property obtained from the tissue.
In a preferred embodiment, optimal windows are determined by obtaining optical signals from reference tissue samples with known states of health at various times following application of a contrast agent. For example, one embodiment comprises obtaining a first set of optical signals from tissue samples having a known disease state, such as CIN 2/3 (grades 2 and/or 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia); obtaining a second set of optical signals from tissue samples having a different state of health, such as non-diseased; and categorizing each optical signal into “bins” according to the time it was obtained in relation to the time of application of contrast agent. The optical signal may comprise, for example, a reflectance spectrum, a fluorescence spectrum, a video image intensity signal, or any combination of these.
A measure of the difference between the optical signals associated with the two types of tissue is then obtained, for example, by determining a mean signal as a function of wavelength for each of the two types of tissue samples for each time bin, and using a discrimination function to determine a weighted measure of difference between the two mean optical signals obtained within a given time bin. This provides a measure of the difference between the mean optical signals of the two categories of tissue samples—diseased and healthy—weighted by the variance between optical signals of samples within each of the two categories.
In one embodiment, the invention further comprises developing a classification model for each time bin. After determining a measure of difference between the tissue types in each bin, an optimal window of time for differentiating between tissue types is determined by identifying at least one bin in which the measure of difference between the two tissue types is substantially maximized. For example, an optimal window of time may be chosen to include every time bin in which the respective classification model provides an accuracy of 70% or greater. Here, the optimal window describes a period of time following application of a contrast agent in which an optical signal can be obtained for purposes of classifying the state of health of the tissue sample with an accuracy of at least 70%.
An analogous embodiment comprises determining an optimal threshold or range of a measure of change of an optical signal to use in obtaining (or triggering the acquisition of) the same or a different signal for predicting the state of health of the sample. Instead of determining a specific, fixed window of time, this embodiment includes determining an optimal threshold of change in a signal, such as a video image whiteness intensity signal, after which an optical signal, such as a diffuse reflectance spectrum and/or a fluorescence spectrum, can be obtained to accurately characterize the state of health or other characteristic of the sample. An embodiment includes monitoring reflectance and/or fluorescence at a single or multiple wavelength(s), and upon reaching a threshold change from the initial condition, obtaining a full reflectance and/or fluorescence spectrum for use in diagnosing the region of tissue. This method allows for reduced data retrieval and monitoring since, in an embodiment, it involves continuous tracking of a single, partial-spectrum or discrete-wavelength “trigger” signal (instead of multiple, full-spectrum scans), followed by the acquisition of one or more spectral scans for use in diagnosis. Alternatively, the trigger may include more than one discrete-wavelength or partial-spectrum signal. The diagnostic data obtained will generally be more extensive than the trigger signal, and may include one or more complete sets of spectral data. The measure of change used to trigger obtaining one or more optical signals for tissue classification may be a weighted measure, and/or it may be a combination of measures of change of more than one signal. The signal(s) used for tissue classification/diagnosis may comprise one or more reflectance, fluorescence, and/or video signals. In one embodiment, two reflectance signals are obtained from the same region in order to provide a redundant signal for use when one reflectance signal is adversely affected by an artifact such as glare or shadow. Use of multiple types of classification signals may provide improved diagnostic accuracy over the use of a single type of signal. In one embodiment, a reflectance, fluorescence, and a video signal from a region of a tissue sample are all used in the classification of the region.
In a further embodiment, instead of determining an optimal threshold or range of a measure of change of an optical signal, an optimal threshold or range of a measure of the rate of change of an optical signal is determined. For example, the rate of change of reflectance and/or fluorescence is monitored at a single or multiple wavelength(s), and upon reaching a threshold rate of change, a full reflectance spectrum and/or fluorescence spectrum is acquired for use in diagnosing the region of tissue. The measure of rate of change used to trigger obtaining one or more optical signals for tissue classification may be a weighted measure, and/or it may be combination of measures of change of more than one signal. For example, the measured rate of change may be weighted by an initial signal intensity.
The invention also provides methods of disease screening using kinetic data from optical signals obtained at various times following application of a contrast agent. These methods comprise techniques for using specific features of fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectra from reference cervical tissue samples of known states of health in order to diagnose a region of a tissue sample. These techniques allow monitoring of a particular optical signal from a test sample during a specified period of time following application of contrast agent to obtain pertinent kinetic data for characterizing the sample. For example, two or more time-separated measures of video intensity, fluorescence, and/or reflectance are obtained for a test sample at times between which it is known that an increase or decrease indicative of a given state of health occurs. It is therefore possible to determine whether this increase or decrease has occurred for the test sample, thereby indicating the sample may have a given state of health. Alternatively or additionally, a video, reflectance, and/or fluorescence signal from a test sample may be monitored over time to determine a time at which the signal reaches a maximum or minimum value. The time following application of contrast agent at which this minimum or maximum is reached can then be used to determine indication of a disease state in the test sample.
In one embodiment, data used as a baseline in determining an increase, decrease, maximum, or minimum as discussed above is not obtained before, but is obtained immediately following application of contrast agent to the tissue. In one case, the time period immediately following application of contrast agent is about ten seconds, and in another case, it is about five seconds, although other time periods are possible. This may be done to avoid error caused by movement of tissue or movement of the optical signal detection device upon application of contrast agent, particularly where such movement is not otherwise compensated for. Movement of tissue may cause error where a change from an initial condition is being monitored and the region of the tissue corresponding to the location at which the initial signal was obtained shifts following application of contrast agent.
The objects and features of the invention can be better understood with reference to the drawings described below, and the claims. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the drawings, like numerals are used to indicate like parts throughout the various views.
The invention relates to methods for determining a characteristic of a tissue sample using spectral data and/or images obtained within an optimal window of time following the application of a chemical agent to the tissue sample. The invention provides methods of determining optimal windows of time. Similarly, the invention provides methods of determining criteria, based on a spectral amplitude or rate of amplitude change, for triggering the acquisition of an optical signal for classifying tissue. Finally, the invention comprises methods of diagnosing a tissue sample using spectral data and/or images obtained within an optimal window.
Application of the invention allows the diagnosis of regions of a tissue sample using various features of the time response of fluorescence and/or reflectance spectra following the application of a contrast agent such as acetic acid. For example, it is possible to diagnose a region of a tissue sample by determining a time at which a minimum value of fluorescence spectral intensity is reached following application of a contrast agent.
Methods of the invention are also used to analyze tissue samples, including cervical tissue, colorectal tissue, gastroesophageal tissue, urinary bladder tissue, lung tissue, or other tissue containing epithelial cells. The tissue may be analyzed in vivo or ex vivo, for example. Tissue samples are generally divided into regions, each having its own characteristic. This characteristic may be a state of health, such as intraepithelial neoplasia, mature and immature metaplasia, normal columnar epithelia, normal squamous epithelia, and cancer. Chemical contrast agents which are used in practice of the invention include acetic acid, formic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, Lugol's iodine, Shiller's iodine, methylene blue, toluidine blue, indigo carmine, indocyanine green, fluorescein, and combinations comprising these agents. In embodiments where acetic acid is used, concentrations between about 3 volume percent and about 6 volume percent acetic acid are typical, although in some embodiments, concentrations outside this range may be used. In one embodiment, a 5 volume percent solution of acetic acid is used as contrast agent.
Optical signals used in practice of the invention comprise, for example, fluorescence, reflectance, Raman, infrared, and video signals. Video signals comprise images from standard black-and-white or color CCD cameras, as well as hyperspectral imaging signals based on fluorescence, reflectance, Raman, infrared, and other spectroscopic techniques. For example, an embodiment comprises analyzing an intensity component indicative of the “whiteness” of a pixel in an image during an acetowhitening test.
A preferred embodiment uses optical signals obtained from tissue samples within optimal windows of time. Obtaining an optical signal may comprise actually acquiring a signal within an optimal window of time, or, of course, simply triggering the acquisition of an optical signal within an optimal window of time. The optimal window of time may account for a delay between the triggering of the acquisition of a signal, and its actual acquisition. An embodiment of the invention may comprise determining an optimal window of time in which to trigger the acquisition of an optical signal, as well as determining an optimal window of time in which to actually acquire an optical signal.
One embodiment comprises determining an optimum time window in which to obtain spectra from cervical tissue such that sites indicative of grades 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3) can be separated from non-CIN 2/3 sites. Non-CIN 2/3 sites include sites with grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 1), as well as NED sites (which include mature and immature metaplasia, and normal columnar and normal squamous epithelia). Alternately, sites indicative of high grade disease, CIN 2+, which includes CIN 2/3 categories, carcinoma in situ (CIS), and cancer, may be separated from non-high-grade-disease sites. In general, for any embodiment in which CIN 2/3 is used as a category for classification or characterization of tissue, the more expansive category CIN 2+ may be used alternatively. One embodiment comprises differentiating amongst three or more classification categories. Exemplary embodiments are described below and comprise analysis of the time response of diffuse reflectance and/or 337-nm fluorescence spectra of a set of reference tissue samples with regions having known states of health, as listed in the Appendix Table, to determine temporal characteristics indicative of the respective states of health. These characteristics are then used in building a model to determine a state of health of an unknown tissue sample. Other embodiments comprise analysis of fluorescence spectra using other excitation wavelengths, such as 380 nm and 460 nm, for example.
While the invention is particularly shown and described herein with reference to specific examples and specific embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Diffuse reflectance and/or 337-nm fluorescence emission spectra are taken from cervical tissue samples that are categorized as CIN 2/3 (having grades 2 and/or 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia), CIN 1 and NED (no evidence of disease, confirmed by pathology, including normal squamous tissue, normal columnar tissue, immature metaplasia tissue, and mature metaplasia tissue). All spectra are filtered then placed in the time bins indicated in Table 1. Data affected by arifacts such as glare, shadow, or obstructions may be removed and/of compensated for by using the technique disclosed in the co-owned U.S. patent application entitled, “Method and Apparatus for Identifying Spectral Artifacts,” filed on Sep. 13, 2002, and identified by attorney docket number MDS-033, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Means spectra and standard deviations are calculated for the spectra in each time bin. Although not shown in this example, some embodiments use spectral and/or image data obtained at times greater than 180 s following application of contrast agent.
Data from
The fluorescence intensity in the NED group continues to drop over the time period studied while some recovery is seen in the fluorescence intensity of the CIN 2/3 group.
The fluorescence and reflectance kinetics are similar for the CIN 2/3 group but differ for the NED group. Partial recovery (return toward initial condition) is noted in both the reflectance and the fluorescence curves at all 3 wavelengths for CIN 2/3 tissue, as shown in the curves labeled 352, 354, 356, 372, 374, and 376 in FIG. 3C and FIG. 3D. However, partial recovery is noted only in the reflectance curves for NED tissue (curves 326, 328, and 330 of FIG. 3B), while the NED fluorescence intensities continue to drop (curves 310, 312, and 314 of FIG. 3A).
The magnitude of change in the time response of reflectance and fluorescence data following application of acetic acid is different between the CIN 2/3 group and the NED group. The relative maximum change in reflectivity at about 425 nm is about twice as large for CIN 2/3 (i.e. line segment 274 in
The time to reach the maximum change in fluorescence is delayed for NED spectra. This is shown by comparing curves 310, 312, and 314 of
The fluorescence line-shape changes with time post acetic acid, particularly at later times where a valley at about 420 nm and a band at about 510 nm become more distinct. The valley at about 420 nm is shown in
In one embodiment, an optimal window for obtaining spectral and/or image data is a period of time in which there is a peak “whitening” as seen in image and/or reflectance data. In another embodiment, an optimal window is a period of time in which there is a peak “darkening” of fluorescence of the tissue. Still another embodiment uses a subset of the union of the two optimal windows above.
The magnitude of the acetodarkening effect for fluorescence is similar independent of tissue type, as shown in FIG. 4B. The time to reach a minimum fluorescence is different for different tissue classes, with normal squamous tissue (curve 462) having the slowest response and normal columnar tissue (curve 460) having the fastest response. The response for CIN 2/3 (curve 454), CIN 1 (curve 456), and metaplastic tissues (curve 458) are very similar. There is partial recovery from the acetic acid effect in the CIN 2/3 group (curve 454).
An embodiment of the invention comprises determining an optimum window for obtaining diagnostic spectral data using fluorescence and/or reflectance time-response data as shown in the above figures, and as discussed above. In one embodiment, an optimum window is determined by tracking the difference between spectral data of various tissue types using a discrimination function.
In one embodiment, the discrimination function shown below in Equation (1) is used to extract differences between tissue types:
The quantity μ corresponds to the mean optical signal and σ corresponds to the standard deviation. In one embodiment, the optical signal includes diffuse reflectance. In another embodiment, the optical signal includes 337-nm fluorescence emission spectra. Other embodiments use fluorescence emission spectra at another excitation wavelength such as 380 nm and 460 nm. In still other embodiments, the optical signal is a video signal, Raman signal, or infrared signal. Some embodiments comprise using difference spectra calculated between different phases of acetowhitening, using various normalization schema, and/or using various combinations of spectral data and/or image data as discussed above.
One embodiment comprises developing linear discriminant analysis models using spectra from each time bin as shown in Table 1. Alternatively, nonlinear discriminant analysis models may be developed. Generally, models are trained using reflectance and fluorescence data separately, although some embodiments comprise use of both data types to train a model. In exemplary embodiments discussed below, reflectance and fluorescence intensities are down-sampled to one value every 10 nm between 360 and 720 nm. A model is trained by adding and removing intensities in a forward manner, continuously repeating the process until the model converges such that additional intensities do not appreciably improve tissue classification. Testing is performed by a leave-one-spectrum-out jack-knife process.
In one embodiment, discrimination function ‘spectra’ are calculated from the reflectance spectra of CIN 2/3 and non-CIN 2/3 tissues shown in FIG. 5. In one example, discrimination function spectra comprise values of the discrimination function in Equation (1) determined as a function of wavelength for sets of spectral data obtained at various times.
Performing multivariate linear regression analysis addresses wavelength interdependence in the development of a classification model. An application of one embodiment comprises classifying data represented in the CIN 2/3, CIN 1, and NED categories in the Appendix Table into CIN 2/3 and non-CIN 2/3 categories by using classification models developed from the reflectance data shown in FIG. 5. Here, reflectance intensities are down-sampled to one about every 10 nm between about 360 nm and about 720 nm. The model is trained by adding intensities in a forward-stepped manner. Testing is performed with a leave-one-spectrum-out jack-knife process. The result of this analysis shows which wavelengths best separate CIN 2/3 from non-CIN 2/3, as shown in table 2 for an exemplary embodiment.
The two best models for separating CIN 2/3 and non-CIN 2/3 for this embodiment include the model using reflectance data obtained at peak CIN 2/3 whitening (from about 60 s to about 80 s) and the model using reflectance data from the latest time measured (from about 160 s to about 180 s post acetic acid). The first model uses input wavelengths between about 360 and about 600 nm, while the second model uses more red-shifted wavelengths between about 490 and about 650 nm. This is consistent with the behavior of the discrimination function spectra shown in FIG. 6.
In one embodiment, discrimination function ‘spectra’ are calculated from the fluorescence spectra of CIN 2/3 and non-CIN 2/3 tissues shown in FIG. 8. In one example, discrimination function spectra comprise values of the discrimination function in Equation (1) determined as a function of wavelength for sets of spectral data obtained at various times.
Performing multivariate linear regression analysis addresses wavelength interdependencies in the development of a classification model. An application of one embodiment comprises classifying data represented in the CIN 2/3, CIN 1, and NED categories in the Appendix Table into CIN 2/3 and non-CIN 2/3 categories by using classification models developed from the fluorescence data shown in FIG. 8. Fluorescence intensities are down-sampled to one about every 10 nm between about 360 and about 720 nm. The model is trained by adding intensities in a forward manner. Testing is performed by a leave-one-spectrum-out jack-knife process. The result of this analysis shows which wavelengths best separate CIN 2/3 from non-CIN 2/3, as shown in Table 3 for an exemplary embodiment.
The two best models for separating CIN 2/3 and non-CIN 2/3 for this embodiment include the method using data obtained at peak CIN 2/3 whitening (60-80 s) and the model using data at the time measured (160-180 s post acetic acid). The first model uses input wavelengths between about 360 and about 670 nm, while the second model uses wavelengths between about 370 and about 720 nm. This is consistent with the discrimination function spectra shown in FIG. 9.
Another embodiment comprises classifying data represented in the CIN 2/3, CIN 1, and NED categories in the Appendix Table into CIN 2/3 and non-CIN 2/3 categories by using fluorescence divided by diffuse reflectance spectra. Models are developed based on time post acetic acid. Ratios of fluorescence to reflectance are down-sampled to one every 10 nm between about 360 and about 720 nm. The model is trained by adding intensities in a forward manner. Testing is performed by a leave-one-spectrum-out jack-knife process. For this analysis, the model is based on intensities at about 360, 400, 420, 430, 560, 610, and 630 nm. In general, the results are slightly better than a model based on fluorescence alone. Improved performance is noted from spectra acquired at about 160 s post acetic acid.
The exemplary embodiments discussed above demonstrate that the ability to distinguish between non-CIN 2/3 and CIN 2/3 fluorescence and reflectance spectra is improved with the application of acetic acid or other contrast agent. For the peak-whitening LDA model using reflectance data, the highest accuracy for the exemplary applications of the embodiments discussed herein is obtained at about 70 s following introduction of acetic acid, while accuracies greater than about 70% are obtained with spectra collected in a window between about 30 s and about 130 s. The predictive ability of the fluorescence models in the examples above tend to be less than that of the reflectance models for the examples discussd above. Accuracies greater than 70% are obtained with fluorescence at times greater than about 160 s post acetic acid. The intensity of fluorescence continuously drop over the measurement period in the non-CIN groups while partial recovery occurs at all 3 emission wavelengths in the CIN 2/3 group, suggesting that fluorescence spectral data obtained at times greater than about 180 s is useful in diagnosing CIN 2/3.
As an alternative to the techniques discussed above, other kinetics-based approaches may be used to determine classification models and, hence, corresponding optimum windows for classification of tissue samples. The time response of fluorescence intensity or the time response of reflectance following application of contrast agent, as shown in FIG. 3 and
An embodiment of the invention comprises determining and using a relative amplitude change and/or rate of amplitude change as a trigger for obtaining diagnostic optical data from a sample. The trigger can also be used to determine an optical window of time for obtaining such diagnostic optical data. By using statistical and/or heuristic methods such as those discussed herein, it is possible to relate more easily-monitored relative changes or rates-of-change of one or more optical signals from a tissue sample to corresponding full spectrum signals that can be used in characterizing the state of health of a given sample. For example, by performing a discrimination function analysis, it may be found for a given tissue type that when the relative change in reflectance at a particular wavelength exceeds a threshold value, the corresponding full-spectrum reflectance can be obtained and then used to accurately classify the state of health of the tissue. In addition, the triggers determined above may be converted into optimal time windows for obtaining diagnostic optical data from a sample.
The figures discussed herein include time-response fluorescence and reflectance data obtained following application of a contrast agent to tissue. In addition to an acetowhitening effect observed in the reflectance data, an “acetodarkening” effect is observed in the fluorescence data. For example, the fluorescence intensity of diseased regions decreases to a minimum at about 70 s to about 130 s following application of acetic acid. Thus, the presence of a minimum fluorescence intensity within this window of time, as well as the accompanying increase in fluorescence from this minimum, may be used to indicate disease. An embodiment of the invention comprises a method of identifying a characteristic of a region of a tissue sample including applying a contrast agent to a region of a tissue sample, obtaining at least two values of fluorescence spectral intensity corresponding to the region, determining whether the fluorescence spectral intensity corresponding to the region increases after a predetermined time following the applying step, and identifying a characteristic of the region based at least in part on the determining step. In an embodiment, the obtaining step comprises obtaining a fluorescence spectral intensity signal corresponding to the region as a function of time following the applying step. In an embodiment, the method further comprises determining whether the fluorescence spectral intensity corresponding to the region decreases following the applying step, then increases after the predetermined time. In an embodiment, the predetermined time is about 80 seconds.
An embodiment comprises a method of identifying a characteristic of a region of a tissue sample comprising applying a contrast agent to a region of a tissue sample, obtaining a fluorescence spectral intensity signal from the region of the tissue sample, determining an elapsed time following the applying step at which the fluorescence spectral intensity signal has a minimum value, and identifying a characteristic of the region based at least in part on the elapsed time.
An embodiment comprises a method of identifying a characteristic of a region of a tissue sample comprising applying a contrast agent to a region of a tissue sample, obtaining a reflectance signal from the region of the tissue sample, determining a change in reflectance spectral intensity corresponding to the region of the tissue sample following the applying step, and identifying a characteristic of the region based at least in part on the change in reflectance spectral intensity. In an embodiment, the change in reflectance spectral intensity corresponding to the region comprises a change relative to an initial condition of the region.
An embodiment comprises a method of identifying a characteristic of a region of a tissue sample comprising applying a contrast agent to a region of a tissue sample, obtaining an optical signal from the region of the tissue sample, determining a rate of change of the optical signal corresponding to the region of the tissue sample, and identifying a characteristic of the region based at least in part on the rate of change. In an embodiment, the optical signal comprises fluorescence spectral intensity at a given wavelength. In an embodiment, the optical signal comprises reflectance spectral intensity at a given wavelength.
An embodiment comprises a method of identifying a characteristic of a region of a tissue sample comprising applying a contrast agent to a region of a tissue sample, obtaining a fluorescence signal from the region of the tissue sample, obtaining a reflectance signal from the region of the tissue sample, and identifying a characteristic of the region based at least in part on the fluorescence signal and the reflectance signal.
An embodiment comprises obtaining an optical signal from 499 regions, each region having a diameter of approximately 1 mm, covering an area of tissue about 25 mm in diameter. An embodiment may also comprise obtaining a video image of about 480 by about 560 pixels covering the same 25-mm diameter area of tissue.
1TT 022 = Normal columnar tissue; TT 025 = Normal squamous tissue; NEDPath1 = NED = Metaplasia, TT_022, and TT_025.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/394,696, filed Jul. 9, 2002, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3013467 | Minsky | Dec 1961 | A |
3632865 | Haskell et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3809072 | Ersek et al. | May 1974 | A |
3890462 | Limb et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3963019 | Quandt et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
D242393 | Bauman | Nov 1976 | S |
D242396 | Bauman | Nov 1976 | S |
D242397 | Bauman | Nov 1976 | S |
D242398 | Bauman | Nov 1976 | S |
4017192 | Rosenthal et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4071020 | Puglise et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4198571 | Sheppard | Apr 1980 | A |
4218703 | Netravali et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4254421 | Kreutel, Jr. | Mar 1981 | A |
4273110 | Groux | Jun 1981 | A |
4357075 | Hunter | Nov 1982 | A |
4397557 | Herwig et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4515165 | Carroll | May 1985 | A |
4549229 | Nakano et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4558462 | Horiba et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4641352 | Fenster et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4646722 | Silverstein et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4662360 | O'Hara et al. | May 1987 | A |
4733063 | Kimura et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4741326 | Sidall et al. | May 1988 | A |
4753530 | Knight et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4768513 | Suzuki | Sep 1988 | A |
4800571 | Konishi | Jan 1989 | A |
4844617 | Kelderman et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4845352 | Benschop | Jul 1989 | A |
4852955 | Doyle et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4877033 | Seitz, Jr. | Oct 1989 | A |
4878485 | Adair | Nov 1989 | A |
4891829 | Deckman et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4930516 | Alfano et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4945478 | Merickel et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4965441 | Picard | Oct 1990 | A |
4972258 | Wolf et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4974580 | Anapliotis | Dec 1990 | A |
4979498 | Oneda et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4997242 | Amos | Mar 1991 | A |
5003979 | Merickel et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5011243 | Doyle et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5022757 | Modell | Jun 1991 | A |
5028802 | Webb et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5032720 | White | Jul 1991 | A |
5034613 | Denk et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5036853 | Jeffcoat et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5042494 | Alfano | Aug 1991 | A |
5048946 | Sklar et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5054926 | Dabbs et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5065008 | Hakamata et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5071246 | Blaha et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5074306 | Green et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5083220 | Hill | Jan 1992 | A |
5091652 | Mathies et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5101825 | Gravenstein et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5120953 | Harris | Jun 1992 | A |
5122653 | Ohki | Jun 1992 | A |
5132526 | Iwasaki | Jul 1992 | A |
5139025 | Lewis et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5154166 | Chikama | Oct 1992 | A |
5159919 | Chikama | Nov 1992 | A |
5161053 | Dabbs | Nov 1992 | A |
5162641 | Fountain | Nov 1992 | A |
5162941 | Favro et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5168157 | Kimura | Dec 1992 | A |
5192980 | Dixon et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5193525 | Silverstein et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
RE34214 | Carlsson et al. | Apr 1993 | E |
5199431 | Kittrell et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5201318 | Rava et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5201908 | Jones | Apr 1993 | A |
5203328 | Samuels et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5225671 | Fukuyama | Jul 1993 | A |
5235457 | Lichtman et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5237984 | Williams, III et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239178 | Derndinger et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5248876 | Kerstens et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253071 | MacKay | Oct 1993 | A |
5257617 | Takahashi | Nov 1993 | A |
5260569 | Kimura | Nov 1993 | A |
5260578 | Bliton et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5261410 | Alfano et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5262646 | Booker et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5274240 | Mathies et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5284149 | Dhadwal et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5286964 | Fountain | Feb 1994 | A |
5289274 | Kondo | Feb 1994 | A |
5294799 | Aslund et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5296700 | Kumagai | Mar 1994 | A |
5303026 | Strobl et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306902 | Goodman | Apr 1994 | A |
5313567 | Civanlar et al. | May 1994 | A |
5319200 | Rosenthal et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5321501 | Swanson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5324979 | Rosenthal | Jun 1994 | A |
5325846 | Szabo | Jul 1994 | A |
5329352 | Jacobsen | Jul 1994 | A |
5337734 | Saab | Aug 1994 | A |
5343038 | Nishiwaki et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5345306 | Ichimura et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5345941 | Rava et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349961 | Stoddart et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5398685 | Wilk et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402768 | Adair | Apr 1995 | A |
5406939 | Bala | Apr 1995 | A |
5413092 | Williams, III et al. | May 1995 | A |
5413108 | Alfano | May 1995 | A |
5415157 | Welcome | May 1995 | A |
5418797 | Bashkansky et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419311 | Yabe et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419323 | Kittrell et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421337 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5421339 | Ramanujam et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5424543 | Dombrowski et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5450857 | Garfield et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5451931 | Miller et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5458132 | Yabe et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458133 | Yabe et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467767 | Alfano et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5469853 | Law et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477382 | Pernick | Dec 1995 | A |
5480775 | Ito et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5493444 | Khoury et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496259 | Perkins | Mar 1996 | A |
5507295 | Skidmore | Apr 1996 | A |
5516010 | O'Hara et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519545 | Kawahara | May 1996 | A |
5529235 | Bolarski et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5536236 | Yabe et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545121 | Yabe et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551945 | Yabe et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556367 | Yabe et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562100 | Kittrell et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5579773 | Vo-Dinh et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5582168 | Samuels et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587832 | Krause | Dec 1996 | A |
5596992 | Haaland et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5599717 | Vo-Dinh | Feb 1997 | A |
5609560 | Ichikawa et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5612540 | Richards-Korum et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623932 | Ramanujam et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5643175 | Adair | Jul 1997 | A |
5647368 | Zeng et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5662588 | Lida | Sep 1997 | A |
5685822 | Harhen | Nov 1997 | A |
5690106 | Bani-Hashemi et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693043 | Kittrell et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695448 | Kimura et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697373 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699795 | Richards-Kortum | Dec 1997 | A |
5704892 | Adair | Jan 1998 | A |
5707343 | O'Hara et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713364 | DeBaryshe et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717209 | Bigman et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5730701 | Furukawa et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733244 | Yasui et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735276 | Lemelson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746695 | Yasui et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768333 | Abdel-Mottaleb | Jun 1998 | A |
5769792 | Palcic et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773835 | Sinofsky et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5791346 | Craine et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795632 | Buchalter | Aug 1998 | A |
5800350 | Coppleson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807248 | Mills | Sep 1998 | A |
5813987 | Modell et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817015 | Adair | Oct 1998 | A |
5830146 | Skladnev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833617 | Hayashi | Nov 1998 | A |
5840035 | Heusmann et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842995 | Mahadevan-Jansen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855551 | Sklandnev et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860913 | Yamaya et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863287 | Segawa | Jan 1999 | A |
5865726 | Katsurada et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876329 | Harhen | Mar 1999 | A |
5920399 | Sandison et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5921926 | Rolland et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929985 | Sandison et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931779 | Arakaki et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938617 | Vo-Dinh | Aug 1999 | A |
5941834 | Skladnev et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5983125 | Alfano et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989184 | Blair | Nov 1999 | A |
5991653 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995645 | Soenksen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6021344 | Lui et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6058322 | Nishikawa et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069689 | Zeng et al. | May 2000 | A |
6083487 | Biel | Jul 2000 | A |
6091985 | Alfano et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6095982 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6096065 | Crowley | Aug 2000 | A |
6099464 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104945 | Modell et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119031 | Crowley | Sep 2000 | A |
6124597 | Shehada et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6146897 | Cohenford et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6169817 | Parker et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187289 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208887 | Clarke et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6241662 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243601 | Wist | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246471 | Jung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246479 | Jung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258576 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285639 | Maenza et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312385 | Mo et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317617 | Gilhuijs et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
D453832 | Morrell et al. | Feb 2002 | S |
D453962 | Morrell et al. | Feb 2002 | S |
D453963 | Morrell et al. | Feb 2002 | S |
D453964 | Morrell et al. | Feb 2002 | S |
6377842 | Pogue et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385484 | Nordstrom et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6411835 | Modell et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411838 | Nordstrom et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
D460821 | Morrell et al. | Jul 2002 | S |
6421553 | Costa et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427082 | Nordstrom et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6571118 | Utzinger et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574502 | Hayashi | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6760613 | Nordstrom et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
20020007122 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007123 | Balas et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020107668 | Costa et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127735 | Kaufman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020177777 | Nordstrom et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183626 | Nordstrom et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030095721 | Clune et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030144585 | Kaufman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040007674 | Schomacker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010187 | Schomacker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010195 | Zelenchuk | Jan 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 135 134 | Mar 1985 | EP |
0 280 418 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0 335 725 | Oct 1989 | EP |
0 444 689 | Sep 1991 | EP |
0 474 264 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0 641 542 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0 689 045 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0 737 849 | Oct 1996 | EP |
08-280602 | Oct 1996 | JP |
1 223 092 | Apr 1986 | SU |
WO 9219148 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 9314688 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO 9426168 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9500067 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9504385 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9705473 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 9830889 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 9748331 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9805253 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9824369 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9841176 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9918847 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9920313 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9920314 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9947041 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9957507 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 9957529 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0015101 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0041615 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0057361 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0059366 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0074556 | Dec 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040023406 A1 | Feb 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60394696 | Jul 2002 | US |