Packaging technology for Power Amplifier modules and Front Ends, particularly those employed in modern wireless communication networks, is moving towards a more compact and low cost packaging technology, and hence wireless circuitry must be modified and designed around the strengths of this technology.
Often circuitry, in particular, but not limited to, wireless circuitry, occupies relatively large and expensive real estate on a module board. Thus, there is a strong for technologies with improved designs which can reduce the size and thus the cost of these module boards.
An embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus, comprising an integrated circuit, wherein a first portion of the integrated circuit may be placed on a first substrate and a second portion of the integrated circuit may be placed on a second substrate stacked adjacent the first substrate and wherein the first portion and the second portion of the integrated circuit may be interconnected. The first substrate may be comprised of low dielectric material and the distance between the first and the second substrate may be sufficiently large to facilitate high impedance functions and components. In an embodiment of the present invention, the integrated circuit may further comprise printing inductors on the first substrate thereby enabling them to be high Q inductors and printed spiral arms may be stacked vertically on both the top and bottom surface of the first substrate thereby creating high Q inductors.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a method, comprising placing a first portion of an integrated circuit on a first substrate, placing a second portion of an integrated circuit on a second substrate that stacked adjacent the first substrate, and interconnecting the first portion and the second portion of the integrated circuit. The present method may further comprise placing the first and the second substrate at a predetermined distance that enables high impedance functions and components and stacking printed spiral arms vertically on both the top and bottom surface of the first substrate thereby creating high Q inductors. The present method may also comprise placing critical and difficult to design RF functions and building blocks on the first substrate due to ease of access and using distinct dielectric constants with different heights from a ground plane by the first and the second substrates associated with the first and second portions of the circuit.
Another embodiment of the present invention further provides an integrated circuit, comprising a first portion including at least one output match connected to at least one harmonic filter on a first substrate, a second portion on a second substrate positioned adjacent the first substrate and including at least one power amplifier connected to at least one bias and power controller which is further connected to an antenna switch and wherein the first and second substrates further comprise at least one interconnect connecting the first portion and the second portion.
The present invention is described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Additionally, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the drawing in which the reference number first appears.
Although the present invention is not limited to only RF circuits, current design approaches for RF circuits designed for markets such as wireless products all use a single substrate onto which all components and traces are placed on. Although the substrates may have multi-layers of conductors, there is only one layer available to place components during the creation of a multi-chip module (MCM). This not only limits the size reduction, but RF performance is limited due to the sharing of one common substrate. Some components and functions work best on high impedance substrates that are thick, low dielectric constant and low loss. Other components prefer low impedance substrates that are thin and high dielectric.
Further, on conventional 2D package designs, it is extremely difficult to print high Q inductors. In an embodiment of the present invention, the multiple levels of the present 3D approach allows the construction of inductors with spirals above each other in a stacked fashion, which increases Q substantially.
Although methods for designing wireless RF circuitry on the 3D packaging technologies are described herein, it is understood that the present invention is not limited to any particular circuit (such as RF) or any particular packaging structure. Often wireless circuitry occupies relatively large and expensive real estate on the module board. By applying certain design topologies on the 3D packages such as stackable substrates, we can efficiently reduce the size and thus the cost of these modules. The 3D approach for circuit design has many advantages; it reduces the area that a typical circuit occupies by simplifying the routing and the tuning of the circuits as illustrated herein. More specifically, but not by way of limitation, it is critical to strategically partition the circuit in regards to what is placed on a lower substrate and what is placed on an upper substrate(s). Careful selection of the functions and components on each level allows the minimization of the number of interconnects needed in the z-axis between levels. Minimization of z-axis connections/routing saves board space (each connection utilizes a finite area), minimizes loss (interconnects typically have greater loss (due to dissimilar materials, discontinuities and impedance variations) as compared to x- or y-axis connections that can be made with simple printed traces on the substrate) and reduces cost (smaller boards required, less interconnect hardware such as solder balls or SMD components). The 3D stackable substrate also provides additional levels for the dies and other components to be mounted on as well.
The 3D stackable approach for RF circuitry has many RF advantages; it permits the lower substrate to be very thin, and hence provides a better thermal dissipation and better thermal stability for the Power Amplifiers, as well as a better RF ground. This is only possible since the upper levels of the 3D stackable substrates can be utilized for the matching networks, filters and other passive networks that are sensitive to the substrate thickness and prefer high impedance/low dielectric substrates. Although not limited in this respect, one potential stacking of substrates and partitioning of circuits is as follows:
An embodiment of the present invention provides that the partitioning between the top and bottom substrate for a mobile phone radio transmitter may be as follows: The bottom substrate may contain two power amplifiers, (one for both high bands and one for both low bands) a CMOS Power and Bias Controller, and a single pole six throw antenna switch. The top substrate may contain two output matching networks, two couplers, and harmonic filters. The major advantages of this partitioning strategy are as follows:
Although detailed descriptions of one partitioning is given in the next section, it is understood that this is merely an illustrative embodiment and is only one of numerous partitioning techniques to give these RF benefits as other divisions of functions and components may also capitalize on the high impedance (low dielectric/increased height) of the top substrate(s) and low impedance (high dielectric/decreased height) of the lower substrate(s).
Turning now to the figures,
Turning now to
While the present invention has been described in terms of what are at present believed to be its preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that various modifications to the disclose embodiments can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C Section 119 from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/653,162, filed Feb. 15, 2005, entitled, “Wireless RF Circuitry Optimized for 3D Packaging Technologies.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5312790 | Sengupta et al. | May 1994 | A |
5427988 | Sengupta et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5486491 | Sengupta et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5593495 | Masuda et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5635433 | Sengupta | Jun 1997 | A |
5635434 | Sengupta | Jun 1997 | A |
5640042 | Koscica et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5693429 | Sengupat et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5694134 | Barnes | Dec 1997 | A |
5766697 | Sengupta et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5830591 | Sengupta et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5846893 | Sengupta et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5886867 | Chivukula et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5990766 | Zhang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6074971 | Chiu et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6377142 | Chiu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377217 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377440 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6404614 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6492883 | Liang et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6514895 | Chiu et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525630 | Zhu et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531936 | Chiu et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535076 | Partridge et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6538603 | Chen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556102 | Sengupta et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6590468 | du Toit et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6597265 | Liang et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6914480 | Arai et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6977546 | Stapleton | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985712 | Yamakawa et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7305223 | Liu et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7418251 | Liu | Aug 2008 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060214165 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60653162 | Feb 2005 | US |