Optimizing write and wear performance for a memory

Abstract
Determining and using the ideal size of memory to be transferred from high speed memory to a low speed memory may result in speedier saves to the low speed memory and a longer life for the low speed memory.
Description
BACKGROUND

Memory device have many tradeoff's. Memory which is fast may be expensive. Memory which is slow may be inexpensive. As the memory demands of modern applications exceed the physical capacity of customer systems, paging operations to the hard drive quickly make the system and applications appear slow and unresponsive, particularly when switching between tasks or users. In an ideal computer, all the memory would be as fast as possible, but such a computer would be too expensive to be realistic, in addition, there are some applications where cheap, long term storage is all that is needed. As a result, computers have a variety of memory from ultra-fast memory close to the processor to slower memory such as disk based memory. In addition, computers have the ability to add more and different types of memory such as portable hard drives, floppy disks and flash memory devices. Each of these devices have performance and wear characteristics which may be maximized.


SUMMARY

Determining and using the ideal size of memory to be transferred from high speed memory to a low speed memory may result in speedier saves to the low speed memory and a longer life for the low speed memory. For example, some flash memory devices have memory write sizes that minimize the number of erases and writes to the flash memory. Other low speed memory devices may have ideal write sizes that enable large blocks on the low speed memory to store contiguous data. In addition, data may be accessed in fast memory even though the data has been indicated to be sent to lower speed memory.





DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computing system that may operate in accordance with the claims; and



FIG. 2 is a diagram of a method in accordance with the claims.





DESCRIPTION

Although the following text sets forth a detailed description of numerous different embodiments, it should be understood that the legal scope of the description is defined by the words of the claims set forth at the end of this patent. The detailed description is to be construed as exemplary only and does not describe every possible embodiment since describing every possible embodiment would be impractical, if not impossible. Numerous alternative embodiments could be implemented, using either current technology or technology developed after the filing date of this patent, which would still fall within the scope of the claims.


It should also be understood that, unless a term is expressly defined in this patent using the sentence “As used herein, the term ‘______’ is hereby defined to mean . . . ” or a similar sentence, there is no intent to limit the meaning of that term, either expressly or by implication, beyond its plain or ordinary meaning, and such term should not be interpreted to be limited in scope based on any statement made in any section of this patent (other than the language of the claims). To the extent that any term recited in the claims at the end of this patent is referred to in this patent in a manner consistent with a single meaning, that is done for sake of clarity only so as to not confuse the reader, and it is not intended that such claim term by limited, by implication or otherwise, to that single meaning. Finally, unless a claim element is defined by reciting the word “means” and a function without the recital of any structure, it is not intended that the scope of any claim element be interpreted based on the application of 35 U.S.C. § 112, sixth paragraph.



FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a suitable computing system environment 100 on which a system for the steps of the claimed method and apparatus may be implemented. The computing system environment 100 is only one example of a suitable computing environment and is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of the method of apparatus of the claims. Neither should the computing environment 100 be interpreted as having any dependency or requirement relating to any one or combination of components illustrated in the exemplary operating environment 100.


The steps of the claimed method and apparatus are operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with the methods or apparatus of the claims include, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.


The steps of the claimed method and apparatus may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The methods and apparatus may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.


With reference to FIG. 1, an exemplary system for implementing the steps of the claimed method and apparatus includes a general purpose computing device in the form of a computer 110. Components of computer 110 may include, but are not limited to, a processing unit 120, a system memory 130, and a system bus 121 that couples various system components including the system memory to the processing unit 120. The system bus 121 may be any of several types of bus structures including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example, and not limitation, such architectures include Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus also known as Mezzanine bus.


Computer 110 typically includes a variety of computer readable media. Computer readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by computer 110 and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media. By way of example, and not limitation, computer readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes both volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can accessed by computer 110. Communication media typically embodies computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RE, infrared and other wireless media. Combinations of the any of the above should also be included within the scope of computer readable media.


The system memory 130 includes computer storage media in the form of volatile and/or nonvolatile memory such as read only memory (ROM) 131 and random access memory (RAM) 132. A basic input/output system 133 (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer 110, such as during start-up, is typically stored in ROM 131. RAM 132 typically contains data and/or program modules that are immediately accessible to and/or presently being operated on by processing unit 120. By way of example, and not limitation, FIG. 1 illustrates operating system 134, application programs 135, other program modules 136, and program data 137.


The computer 110 may also include other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media. By way of example only, FIG. 1 illustrates a hard disk drive 140 that reads from or writes to non-removable, nonvolatile magnetic media, a magnetic disk drive 151 that reads from or writes to a removable, nonvolatile magnetic disk 152, and an optical disk drive 155 that reads from or writes to a removable, nonvolatile optical disk 156 such as a CD ROM or other optical media. Other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media that can be used in the exemplary operating environment include, but are not limited to, magnetic tape cassettes, flash memory cards, digital versatile disks, digital video tape, solid state RAM, solid state ROM, and the like. The hard disk drive 141 is typically connected to the system bus 121 through a non-removable memory interface such as interface 140, and magnetic disk drive 151 and optical disk drive 155 are typically connected to the system bus 121 by a removable memory interface, such as interface 150.


The drives and their associated computer storage media discussed above and illustrated in FIG. 1, provide storage of computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for the computer 110. In FIG. 1, for example, hard disk drive 141 is illustrated as storing operating system 144, application programs 145, other program modules 146, and program data 147. Note that these components can either be the same as or different from operating system 134, application programs 135, other program modules 136, and program data 137. Operating system 144, application programs 145, other program modules 146, and program data 147 are given different numbers here to illustrate that, at a minimum, they are different copies. A user may enter commands and information into the computer 20 through input devices such as a keyboard 162 and pointing device 161, commonly referred to as a mouse, trackball or touch pad. Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 120 through a user input interface 160 that is coupled to the system bus, but may be connected by other interface and bus structures, such as a parallel port, game port or a universal serial bus (USB). A monitor 191 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 121 via an interface, such as a video interface 190. In addition to the monitor, computers may also include other peripheral output devices such as speakers 197 and printer 196, which may be connected through an output peripheral interface 190.


The computer 110 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 180. The remote computer 180 may be a personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to the computer 110, although only a memory storage device 181 has been illustrated in FIG. 1. The logical connections depicted in FIG. 1 include a local area network (LAN) 171 and a wide area network (WAN) 173, but may also include other networks. Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets and the Internet.


When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 110 is connected to the LAN 171 through a network interface or adapter 170. When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer 110 typically includes a modem 172 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN 173, such as the Internet. The modem 172, which may be internal or external, may be connected to the system bus 121 via the user input interface 160, or other appropriate mechanism. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the computer 110, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. By way of example, and not limitation, FIG. 1 illustrates remote application programs 185 as residing on memory device 181. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.



FIG. 2 may illustrate a method of efficiently storing data where there is a plurality of data storage devices with a hierarchy of data storage speeds. Memory device have many tradeoffs. Memory which is fast may be expensive. Memory which is slow may be inexpensive. In an ideal computer, all the memory would be as fast as possible, but such a computer would be too expensive for a majority of uses. In addition, there are some applications where cheap, long term storage is all that is needed. As a result, computers have a variety of memory from ultra fast memory close to the processor to slower memory such as disk based memory. In addition, computers have the ability to add more and different types of memory such as portable hard drives 140 and flash memory devices 152. Each of these devices have performance and wear characteristics which may be maximized.


For example, flash memory 152 is made in two common forms: NOR flash and NAND flash. Other forms of flash memory 152 are also contemplated. Both types of flash memory 152 and EEPROM wear out after many erase operations, due to wear on the insulating oxide layer around the charge storage mechanism used to store data. A typical NOR flash memory 152 unit may wear out after 10,000-100,000 erase/write operations, a typical NAND flash 152 memory may wear out after 1,000,000. One limitation of flash memory 152 is that, although it can be read or programmed a byte or a word at a time in a random access fashion, it must be erased a “block” at a time. Starting with a freshly erased block, any byte within that block can be programmed. However, once a byte has been programmed, it cannot be changed again until the entire block is erased. When compared to a hard disk drive 140, flash memory 152 is limited in that it has a finite number of erase-write cycles, so that care has to be taken to minimize the number of erase/write cycles.


In other devices, the slowness of the write cycle may be a factor in determining a preferred write size. For example, if there is significant overhead time required to set up a write function, time could be saved by minimizing the number of writes by maximizing the size of the data to be written. Similarly, in some storage devices, repeated small saves can result in data being spread out across the storage device, which may result in longer read times than if the data was stored contiguously as may be the result of fewer, larger saves. In addition, the write cycle may be taxing on the processor and during times of high processor usage, it may make sense to save less frequently with larger storage sizes at less frequent intervals.


Referring again to hard drives 140, if there were no high speed memory, every write to the hard disk 140 may involve a performance hit while the system waits for the hard disk 140 to access the correct location on the hard disk 140 and write the data. This may take at least 10 milliseconds on most drives, which is a long time in the computer world and may really slow down performance as the system waits for the hard disk.


When high speed memory is available such as RAM 132 (also referred to as write caching enabled), when the system sends a write to the hard disk 140, the logic circuit records the write in its much faster cache or high speed memory 132, and then immediately sends back an acknowledgement to the operating system saying, in essence, “finished,” The rest of the system can then proceed on without having to wait for the actuator to position and the disk to spin, and so on which improves performance. However, the drive 140 sends back saying “finished” when it really isn't finished—the data isn't on the disk at all, it's only in the cache 132. The hard disk's 140 logic circuits begin to write the data to the disk, but of course this takes some time.


Typical PC 110 use involves loading programs, and loading and saving data frequently. All of these operations may require access to the hard disk 140. And therefore, hard disk 140 performance becomes an issue. Making the CPU 120 fast enough to process two million instructions while it waits doesn't really gain a user much unless it has something to do with that time. The applications where hard disk 140 performance issues are most important are those that do a lot of reading and writing to the hard disk 140, instead of doing a lot of processing, such as multimedia editing applications, especially those dealing with large audio and video files.


Access time is the metric that represents the composite of all the other specifications reflecting random performance positioning in the hard disk 140. The most common definition is:

Access Time=Command Overhead Time+Seek Time+Settle Time+Latency


Command overhead may refer to the time that elapses from when a command is given to the hard disk 140 until something actually starts happening to fulfill the command. The seek time of a hard disk 140 may measure the amount of time required for the read/write heads to move between tracks over the surfaces of the platters. Switching between tracks requires the head actuator to move the head arms physically, which being a mechanical process, takes a specific amount of time. The amount of time required to switch between two tracks depends on the distance between the tracks. However, there is a certain amount of “overhead” involved in track switching, so the relationship is not linear. It may not take double the time to switch from track 1 to track 3 that it does to switch from track 1 to track 2.


Seek time is normally expressed in milliseconds commonly abbreviated “msec” or “ms”). Of course, in the modern PC 110, a millisecond is an enormous amount of time as high speed system memory such as RAM 132 may have speed measured in nanoseconds, for example (one million times smaller). A 1 GHz processor may (theoretically) execute over one million instructions in a millisecond. Even small reductions in seek times can result in improvements in overall system performance, because the rest of the system is often waiting for the hard disk 140.


The hard disk 140 platters are spinning around at high speed, and the spin speed may not be synchronized to the process that moves the read/write heads to the correct cylinder on a random access on the hard disk 140. Therefore, at the time that the heads arrive at the correct cylinder, the actual sector that is needed may be anywhere. After the actuator assembly has completed its seek to the correct track, the drive 140 may wait for the correct sector to come around to where the read/write heads are located. This time is called latency. Latency is directly related to the spindle speed of the drive and such is influenced solely by the drive's spindle characteristics. Accordingly, any actions that can reduce access time may have a large impact on system performance.


The amount of available RAM 132 may also have an effect on the size of data that is capable of being stored in high speed memory. For example, if a system only has 8 k of high speed RAM 132, more frequent write operations will have to occur than if the system had 512 kb of high speed RAM 132 simply because the RAM 132 cannot store much data.


At block 200, the method may receive data to be stored on a lower speed data storage device. For example, a word processing file may be designated to be stored on a hard drive 140. At block 205, the data may be stored in a high speed memory. For example, the word processing file may be stored in a cache in RAM 132. At block 210, the method may collect additional data in the high speed memory 132 until a preferred amount of data is stored that is destined for a particular lower speed data device such as the hard drive 140. At block 215, the method may store the data in high speed memory 132 until it is of a size that is appropriate write size for a particular storage device. As described previously, the preferred amount of data may vary by device. For example, the preferred write size may be a multiple of 2 raised to a power such as is one of 128 kb, 256 kb, and 512 kb. In the flash memory example, the size may be the size of a flash memory block such that erase/write operations will be minimize by only writing to the flash device when an entire flash block is ready to be stored (rather than multiple erase/write operations). At block 220, once an appropriate write size of data for the particular device is stored in the high speed memory device 132, the data may be written to the lower speed device 140.


At block 225, the method may keep the data in high speed storage 132 until a determination is made that the data no longer is needed in high speed storage 132. For example, if a system has excess RAM 132, it may not tax the system to keep data that has already been written to low speed memory 140 also in high speed memory 132. As the data has already been stored in low speed memory 140, it may not be needed in high speed memory 132, but it may be kept there anyway as a convenience to the user.


At block 230, the method of claim 1, wherein the data to be written to the low speed storage device 140 is backed up on an additional low speed storage device 140. In some instances, a user or a program may instruct that data be stored on a low speed storage device 140. The method may wait for an optimal amount of data before writing to the low speed memory. In the mean time, the low speed memory such as a flash memory unit 152 may be removed from the system. In these cases, it may be beneficial to have a back-up of the data in an additional low speed storage device. The data may be moved from the high speed memory 132 to an additional memory that is lower speed that the high speed memory 132 but higher speed than the low speed memory. At block 235, the method may warn a user that the data has yet to be written to the low speed memory device such as the flash 152 when a low speed memory device has been removed from the system before the data has been written from the high speed memory 132 to the low speed memory device 152. At block 240, the user may be presented the option to write the data from the high speed memory 132 to the low speed memory 152 before the low speed memory device is removed. At block 245, the method may wait until a period of low system activity to write to the low speed storage device.


As an example, the user or method may indicate that a word processing file is to be stored on a flash memory 152. The method may wait for enough data to match the optimal write size for flash memory 152 so the data may not be written to the flash memory 152 immediately if the size of the word processing file is less than the size of the optimal write size. If the flash is removed 152, the user may be warned that the data has yet to be written to the flash memory 152. In addition, the data may be already backed up in a “medium” speed storage device and this backup may be used to keep the data from being overwritten while in the high speed storage device 132.


At block 250, the method may organize the data in the high speed memory 132 such that the write to the low speed memory 140 is more efficient. The organization can be as simple as rearranging the data in the high speed memory 132 to be contiguous such that a transfer to the low speed memory 140 may proceed more efficiently.


At block 255, the method may analyze the data in the high speed memory 132 to determine if any of the data has been replaced with newer data before the data is written to the low speed memory 140. At block 260, the method may analyze the data in the high speed memory 132 to determine whether any of the data to be written to the low speed memory 140 is duplicate data wherein the older duplicate data is not written to the low speed memory 140 device. At block 265, the method may invalidate blocks in the high speed memory 132 when write operations impact those blocks before they have been committed to the low speed device 140.


At block 270, the method may keep an index of data in high speed memory 132 that is to be written to low speed memory 140 and if the data written to be written to the low speed device 140 is resident in the high speed memory 132, the method may serve read requests for the data from the high speed memory 132 without regard as to whether the data has been written to low speed memory 140.


At block 275, the method may test the low speed memory 140 to determine the preferred write size for the low speed memory 140. For example, the method may inquire of a flash memory 152 what is the ideal erase/write size. At block 280, the method may also use indication from the low speed storage device 140 to calculate the preferred write size. For example, in the flash memory 152 example, the method may determine that blocks are erased in 1024 byte increments so the method may determine that save operations should occur in 1024 byte increments. The preferred write size may be related to the preferred erase size of the low speed memory 152.


Although the forgoing text sets forth a detailed description of numerous different embodiments, it should be understood that the scope of the patent is defined by the words of the claims set forth at the end of this patent. The detailed description is to be construed as exemplary only and does not describe every possible embodiment because describing every possible embodiment would be impractical, if not impossible. Numerous alternative embodiments could be implemented, using either current technology or technology developed after the filing date of this patent, which would still fall within the scope of the claims.


Thus, many modifications and variations may be made in the techniques and structures described and illustrated herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present claims. Accordingly, it should be understood that the methods and apparatus described herein are illustrative only and are not limiting upon the scope of the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method performed on a computing device, the method comprising: caching, by the computing device, data in a volatile random access memory, where the data being cached is designated to be stored in first disk-based memory; andbacking-up, by the computing device, a determined first preferred amount of the cached data from the volatile random access memory to an additional memory that comprises flash-based memory or second disk-based memory, the first preferred amount being determined based on a type of the additional memory.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 where the first preferred amount corresponds to a preferred write size of the additional memory.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 further comprising writing a second preferred amount of the cached data to the first disk-based memory.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 where the second preferred amount corresponds to a preferred write size of the first disk-based memory.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 where the backing-up the first preferred amount of the cached data to the flash-based memory or the second disk-based memory is in response to the first preferred amount of the data being cached in the volatile random access memory.
  • 6. The method of claim 5 where the backing-up is further in response to a period of low system activity.
  • 7. The method of claim 5 further comprising determining that a portion of the cached data in the volatile random access memory has been replaced with newer cached data prior to the backing-up.
  • 8. A computing device comprising: at least one processor;volatile random access memory;first disk-based memory; andcomputer-executable instructions that, based on execution by the at least one processor, configure the computing device to perform actions comprising: caching data in the volatile random access memory, where the data being cached is designated to be stored in the first disk-based memory; andbacking-up, by the computing device, a determined first preferred amount of the cached data from the volatile random access memory to an additional memory that comprises flash-based memory or second disk-based memory, the first preferred amount being determined based on a type of the additional memory.
  • 9. The computing device of claim 8 where the first preferred amount corresponds to a preferred write size of the additional memory.
  • 10. The computing device of claim 8, the actions further comprising writing a second preferred amount of the cached data to the first disk-based memory.
  • 11. The computing device of claim 10 where the second preferred amount corresponds to a preferred write size of the first disk-based memory.
  • 12. The computing device of claim 8 where the backing-up the first preferred amount of the cached data to the flash-based memory or the second disk-based memory is in response to the first preferred amount of the data being cached in the volatile random access memory.
  • 13. The computing device of claim 12 where the backing-up is further in response to a period of low system activity.
  • 14. The computing device of claim 12 further comprising determining that a portion of the cached data in the volatile random access memory has been replaced with newer cached data prior to the backing-up.
  • 15. At least one computer storage device comprising: memory that comprises computer-executable instructions that, based on execution by a computing device, configure the computing device to perform actions comprising: caching, by the computing device, data in a volatile random access memory, where the data being cached is designated to be stored in first disk-based memory; andbacking-up, by the computing device, a determined first preferred amount of the cached data from the volatile random access memory to an additional memory that comprises flash-based memory or second disk-based memory, the first preferred amount being determined based on a type of the additional memory.
  • 16. The at least one computer storage device of claim 15, the actions further comprising writing a second preferred amount of the cached data to the first disk-based memory.
  • 17. The at least one computer storage device of claim 16 where the second preferred amount corresponds to a preferred write size of the first disk-based memory.
  • 18. The at least one computer storage device of claim 15 where the backing-up the first preferred amount of the cached data to the flash-based memory or the second disk-based memory is in response to the first preferred amount of the data being cached in the volatile random access memory.
  • 19. The at least one computer storage device of claim 18 where the backing-up is further in response to a period of low system activity.
  • 20. The at least one computer storage device of claim 18 further comprising issuing, after the caching and prior to the backing-up and in response to the additional memory being removed, a warning indicating that the cached data has not yet been backed-up to the additional memory.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation of and claims benefit from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/058,078 that was filed on Oct. 18, 2013, and that is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/303,382 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,914,557), filed Dec. 16, 2005 (Issued Dec. 16, 2014), each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (382)
Number Name Date Kind
4612612 Woffinden Sep 1986 A
4671111 Lemelson Jun 1987 A
5088026 Bozman Feb 1992 A
5175634 Matsuzaki Dec 1992 A
5175834 Sawai Dec 1992 A
5263136 DeAguiar Nov 1993 A
5297258 Hale Mar 1994 A
5307497 Feigenbaum Apr 1994 A
5394531 Smith Feb 1995 A
5398325 Chang Mar 1995 A
5420998 Horning May 1995 A
5454098 Pisello Sep 1995 A
5463739 Albaugh et al. Oct 1995 A
5524230 Sakaue et al. Jun 1996 A
5551002 Rosich Aug 1996 A
5557770 Bhide Sep 1996 A
5561783 Vanka Oct 1996 A
5572660 Jones Nov 1996 A
5574877 Dixit Nov 1996 A
5586290 Hirai Dec 1996 A
5603001 Sukegawa et al. Feb 1997 A
5611067 Okamoto et al. Mar 1997 A
5636355 Ramakrishnan Jun 1997 A
5652857 Shimoi et al. Jul 1997 A
5666532 Saks Sep 1997 A
5668968 Wu Sep 1997 A
5717954 Grieff et al. Feb 1998 A
5720029 Kern et al. Feb 1998 A
5740434 Eastep Apr 1998 A
5751932 Horst et al. May 1998 A
5751990 Krolak May 1998 A
5754782 Masada May 1998 A
5754888 Yang May 1998 A
5758056 Barr May 1998 A
5758174 Crump May 1998 A
5764877 Lomet et al. Jun 1998 A
5806074 Souder et al. Sep 1998 A
5809260 Chardi Sep 1998 A
5809280 Chard et al. Sep 1998 A
5809543 Byers Sep 1998 A
5832515 Ledain Nov 1998 A
5845293 Veghite Dec 1998 A
5860083 Sukegawa Jan 1999 A
5875466 Wakerly Feb 1999 A
5897638 Lasser et al. Apr 1999 A
5897660 Reinders et al. Apr 1999 A
5900022 Kranich May 1999 A
5900870 Malone et al. May 1999 A
5923838 Hongo Jul 1999 A
5937433 Lee Aug 1999 A
5943687 Liedberg Aug 1999 A
5943692 Marberg et al. Aug 1999 A
5991847 Ballard Nov 1999 A
5996054 Ledain et al. Nov 1999 A
6000006 Bruce et al. Dec 1999 A
6018433 Thayne et al. Jan 2000 A
6018746 Hill et al. Jan 2000 A
6021408 Ledain Feb 2000 A
6026027 Terrell et al. Feb 2000 A
6047291 Anderson et al. Apr 2000 A
6073232 Kroeker et al. Jun 2000 A
6092160 Marsters Jul 2000 A
6098075 Becraft et al. Aug 2000 A
6101601 Matthews et al. Aug 2000 A
6108004 Medl Aug 2000 A
6112024 Almond et al. Aug 2000 A
6122685 Bachmat Sep 2000 A
6128627 Mattis Oct 2000 A
6138125 DeMoss Oct 2000 A
6148368 DeKoning Nov 2000 A
6185629 Simpson et al. Feb 2001 B1
6189071 Bachmat Feb 2001 B1
6199195 Goodwin et al. Mar 2001 B1
6209088 Reneris Mar 2001 B1
6230233 Lofgren et al. May 2001 B1
6237065 Banerjia et al. May 2001 B1
6240414 Beizer et al. May 2001 B1
6247026 Waldo et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249841 Sikes et al. Jun 2001 B1
6272534 Guha Aug 2001 B1
6275436 Tobita et al. Aug 2001 B1
6298428 Munroe Oct 2001 B1
6301365 Yamada et al. Oct 2001 B1
6301635 Bothwell et al. Oct 2001 B2
6311232 Cagle et al. Oct 2001 B1
6314433 Mills et al. Nov 2001 B1
6317806 Audityan et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321234 Debrunner Nov 2001 B1
6338056 Dessloch et al. Jan 2002 B1
6338126 Ohran et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345000 Wong et al. Feb 2002 B1
6360330 Mutalik et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366996 Hobson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6370534 Odom et al. Apr 2002 B1
6370541 Chou et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378043 Girkar et al. Apr 2002 B1
6401093 Anand et al. Jun 2002 B1
6408058 Lanet et al. Jun 2002 B1
6418510 Lamberts et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425057 Cherkasova et al. Jul 2002 B1
6434682 Ashton et al. Aug 2002 B1
6438750 Anderson Aug 2002 B1
6454159 Takushima Sep 2002 B1
6463509 Teoman Oct 2002 B1
6477564 Freyssinet et al. Nov 2002 B1
6505205 Kothuri et al. Jan 2003 B1
6513051 Bolosky Jan 2003 B1
6516380 Kenchammana-Hoskote Feb 2003 B2
6519597 Cheng et al. Feb 2003 B1
6535949 Parker Mar 2003 B1
6539456 Stewart Mar 2003 B2
6542904 Crus et al. Apr 2003 B2
6546472 Atkinson Apr 2003 B2
6556983 Altschuler et al. Apr 2003 B1
6557077 Ghosh Apr 2003 B1
6560702 Gharda et al. May 2003 B1
6567889 Dekoning et al. May 2003 B1
6578046 Chang et al. Jun 2003 B2
6609182 Pedrizetti Aug 2003 B1
6611919 Matsuya Aug 2003 B1
6615313 Kato et al. Sep 2003 B2
6625742 Owhadi Sep 2003 B1
6629201 Dempsey Sep 2003 B2
6631474 Cai et al. Oct 2003 B1
6636942 Greco Oct 2003 B2
6640278 Nolan et al. Oct 2003 B1
6647472 Atkinson et al. Nov 2003 B2
6651141 Adrangi Nov 2003 B2
6671699 Black et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671757 Multer et al. Dec 2003 B1
6684229 Luong et al. Jan 2004 B1
6687158 Yano Feb 2004 B2
6694336 Multer et al. Feb 2004 B1
6714935 Delo Mar 2004 B1
6718361 Basani et al. Apr 2004 B1
6721863 Endo Apr 2004 B1
6738789 Multer et al. May 2004 B2
6742097 Woo et al. May 2004 B2
6751658 Haun et al. Jun 2004 B1
6757696 Multer et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760736 Waldo et al. Jul 2004 B2
6769050 Ware et al. Jul 2004 B1
6771536 Li et al. Aug 2004 B2
6772178 Mandal et al. Aug 2004 B2
6782453 Keltcher et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788612 Hsu et al. Sep 2004 B2
6871271 Ohran et al. Mar 2005 B2
6877081 Herger et al. Apr 2005 B2
6879266 Dye et al. Apr 2005 B1
6901499 Aasheim et al. May 2005 B2
6910106 Sechrest Jun 2005 B2
6918022 Li Jul 2005 B2
6920533 Coulson Jul 2005 B2
6928521 Burton Aug 2005 B1
6930919 Lee et al. Aug 2005 B2
6938116 Kim et al. Aug 2005 B2
6941423 Coulson Sep 2005 B2
6959318 Tso Oct 2005 B1
6968450 Rothberg Nov 2005 B1
6996660 Moore Feb 2006 B1
7007072 Guha Feb 2006 B1
7010645 Hetzler et al. Mar 2006 B2
7017037 Fortin et al. Mar 2006 B2
7036040 Nicholson et al. Apr 2006 B2
7039765 Wilkes May 2006 B1
7043610 Horn May 2006 B2
7057942 Suda et al. Jun 2006 B2
7062675 Kemeny Jun 2006 B1
7065627 Dayan et al. Jun 2006 B2
7068575 Gabryjelski Jun 2006 B2
7082495 Dewhitt et al. Jul 2006 B2
7082499 Kamitani Jul 2006 B2
7143120 Oks et al. Nov 2006 B2
7171532 Kodama Jan 2007 B2
7185155 Sechrest et al. Feb 2007 B2
7231497 Trika Jun 2007 B2
7243243 Gedeon Jul 2007 B2
7284149 Fisher Oct 2007 B1
7366740 Sleeman et al. Apr 2008 B2
7366866 Cochran et al. Apr 2008 B2
7380090 Koseki May 2008 B2
7395401 Sanders et al. Jul 2008 B2
7409537 Tsang Aug 2008 B2
7412369 Gupta Aug 2008 B1
7412562 Garney Aug 2008 B2
7451353 Grimsrud Nov 2008 B2
7472230 Prabhu et al. Dec 2008 B2
7490197 Kirshenbaum et al. Feb 2009 B2
7574272 Gibbs et al. Aug 2009 B2
7590795 Sinclair Sep 2009 B2
7620983 Satish Nov 2009 B1
7631140 Saito et al. Dec 2009 B2
7698506 Fair Apr 2010 B1
7698513 Sechrest et al. Apr 2010 B2
7774508 Nakamura et al. Aug 2010 B2
7805571 Kirshenbaum et al. Sep 2010 B2
7814261 Lee Oct 2010 B2
7818701 Kolokowsky Oct 2010 B1
7849502 Bloch Dec 2010 B1
7873782 Terry Jan 2011 B2
7945734 Lahcanski May 2011 B2
7953774 Cong May 2011 B2
8006037 Kirshenbaum et al. Aug 2011 B2
RE42727 Kang Sep 2011 E
8032707 Iyigun Oct 2011 B2
8032723 Sechrest et al. Oct 2011 B2
8041904 Ergan Oct 2011 B2
8074014 Narayanan Dec 2011 B2
8108450 Cong Jan 2012 B2
8135914 Iyigun Mar 2012 B2
8255645 Ergan et al. Aug 2012 B2
8352464 Fotev Jan 2013 B2
8489815 Iyigun et al. Jul 2013 B2
8539186 Sechrest Sep 2013 B2
8631203 Fortin et al. Jan 2014 B2
8756375 Flynn Jun 2014 B2
8909861 Kirshenbaum Dec 2014 B2
8914557 Fortin Dec 2014 B2
9032151 Iyigun May 2015 B2
9317209 Kirshenbaum et al. Apr 2016 B2
9361183 Cong et al. Jun 2016 B2
9448890 Cong et al. Sep 2016 B2
9529716 Fortin Dec 2016 B2
9690496 Kirshenbaum et al. Jun 2017 B2
20010007123 Seguchi Jul 2001 A1
20010007999 Rasmussen et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010047462 Dimitroff et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020004876 Timmer et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020008779 Ju et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020073276 Howard Jan 2002 A1
20020083275 Kawamoto Jun 2002 A1
20020087797 Adrangi Jul 2002 A1
20020087816 Atkinson Jul 2002 A1
20020091702 Mullins Jul 2002 A1
20020108017 Kenchammana-hoskote et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020143521 Call Oct 2002 A1
20020152422 Sharma et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156970 Stewart Oct 2002 A1
20020171966 Ottesen et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020178326 Ohta et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020184311 Traversat et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198891 Li et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020199075 Jacobs Dec 2002 A1
20030009538 Shah et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030041213 Tokar Feb 2003 A1
20030070065 Fleming Apr 2003 A1
20030074524 Coulson Apr 2003 A1
20030074550 Wilks et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030101320 Chauvel et al. May 2003 A1
20030110357 Nguyen et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030125886 Spitaels et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030154314 Mason, Jr. et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030154337 Ohno et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030158839 Faybishenko Aug 2003 A1
20030177305 Hetrick Sep 2003 A1
20030191916 Mcbrearty et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030202377 Harari et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030210601 Lin et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030212660 Kerwin Nov 2003 A1
20030212857 Pacheco et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030217299 Neuman Nov 2003 A1
20040003003 Mccartney et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040003223 Fortin et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010639 Inoue Jan 2004 A1
20040015504 Ahad et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019762 Fukuoka Jan 2004 A1
20040024795 Hind et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040034765 James Feb 2004 A1
20040044776 Larkin Mar 2004 A1
20040044849 Stence Mar 2004 A1
20040059747 Olarig et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064647 Dewhitt et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040068627 Sechrest et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078508 Rivard Apr 2004 A1
20040093463 Shang May 2004 A1
20040103238 Avraham et al. May 2004 A1
20040107200 Sjogren et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040136259 Klint Jul 2004 A1
20040148611 Manion et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153694 Nicholson Aug 2004 A1
20040162950 Coulson Aug 2004 A1
20040168018 Aasheim et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172576 Yoshii et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040174631 Tanaka et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040221030 Huras Nov 2004 A1
20040221089 Sato Nov 2004 A1
20040230743 Ware et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040243612 Bailey Dec 2004 A1
20040267787 Huras et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050005188 Hsu Jan 2005 A1
20050021907 Shimada Jan 2005 A1
20050111260 Nazarian May 2005 A1
20050125708 Simon Jun 2005 A1
20050138282 Garney et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050138283 Garney Jun 2005 A1
20050141284 Futatsuyama Jun 2005 A1
20050145923 Chen et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050149750 Lisanke et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050160223 Chen et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050172067 Sinclair Aug 2005 A1
20050193160 Bhatt Sep 2005 A1
20050204091 Kilbuck et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050228964 Sechrest et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050235119 Sechrest et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050239494 Klassen et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050246487 Ergan Nov 2005 A1
20050251617 Sinclair et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050262378 Sleeman et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050268038 Yasue Dec 2005 A1
20050278481 Lakhani Dec 2005 A1
20050286855 Saitou et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060010293 Schnapp Jan 2006 A1
20060074953 Dettinger Apr 2006 A1
20060075185 Azzarito Apr 2006 A1
20060080553 Hall Apr 2006 A1
20060087893 Nishihara et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060090031 Kirshenbaum et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060106889 Mannby May 2006 A1
20060112195 Aoyama May 2006 A1
20060112215 Kim May 2006 A1
20060136472 Jujjuri Jun 2006 A1
20060136664 Trika Jun 2006 A1
20060143241 Bradshaw Jun 2006 A1
20060155931 Birrell Jul 2006 A1
20060177067 Kim Aug 2006 A1
20060212644 Acton Sep 2006 A1
20060236034 Pomaranski Oct 2006 A1
20060248276 Kilian Nov 2006 A1
20060248387 Nicholson Nov 2006 A1
20060277359 Faber Dec 2006 A1
20070005882 Gallagher Jan 2007 A1
20070011405 Adusumilli Jan 2007 A1
20070033356 Erlikhman Feb 2007 A1
20070035632 Silvernail et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070043787 Cannon Feb 2007 A1
20070043929 Safford Feb 2007 A1
20070061511 Faber Mar 2007 A1
20070073764 Oks et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070150966 Kirshner Jun 2007 A1
20070156954 Trika Jul 2007 A1
20070162700 Fortin Jul 2007 A1
20070207800 Daley Sep 2007 A1
20070208910 Koseki et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233939 Kim Oct 2007 A1
20070266199 Peled Nov 2007 A1
20070294474 Panabaker Dec 2007 A1
20070294504 Peled Dec 2007 A1
20080010401 Royer Jan 2008 A1
20080010415 Sawdey Jan 2008 A1
20080109625 Erlingsson May 2008 A1
20080152485 Long Jul 2008 A1
20080172519 Shmulevich Jul 2008 A1
20080183958 Cheriton Jul 2008 A1
20090112949 Ergan Apr 2009 A1
20090144495 Kirshenbaum et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090150335 Latorre Jun 2009 A1
20090150599 Bennett Jun 2009 A1
20090150611 Fortin Jun 2009 A1
20090287890 Bolosky Nov 2009 A1
20100037001 Langlois Feb 2010 A1
20100070701 Iyigun Mar 2010 A1
20100070747 Iyigun Mar 2010 A1
20100082550 Cong Apr 2010 A1
20100199043 Sechrest et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100199063 Sechrest et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100217929 Kirshenbaum et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100280999 Atluri Nov 2010 A1
20110197016 Cong Aug 2011 A1
20110276743 Kirshenbaum et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110314202 Iyigun Dec 2011 A1
20120047323 Sareen et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120102265 Cong Apr 2012 A1
20120173824 Iyigun Jul 2012 A1
20120290785 Ergan Nov 2012 A1
20140047189 Fortin Feb 2014 A1
20140075126 Fortin et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140237173 Cong et al. Aug 2014 A1
20150058545 Kirshenbaum et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150242321 Iyigun et al. Aug 2015 A1
20160210058 Kirshenbaum et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160342528 Cong et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170132136 Ergan et al. May 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (102)
Number Date Country
1266229 Sep 2000 CN
1266229 Sep 2000 CN
1421003 May 2003 CN
1465009 Dec 2003 CN
0547992 Jun 1993 EP
712067 May 1996 EP
0 744 697 Nov 1996 EP
0744697 Nov 1996 EP
1 960 888 Jan 2013 EP
57-161933 Oct 1982 JP
60-140466 Jul 1985 JP
01-303547 Dec 1989 JP
01303547 Dec 1989 JP
02-039256 Feb 1990 JP
02039256 Feb 1990 JP
03-147157 Jun 1991 JP
03294942 Dec 1991 JP
04-205634 Jul 1992 JP
04246746 Sep 1992 JP
05-059537 Mar 1993 JP
05-064931 Mar 1993 JP
05062329 Mar 1993 JP
05094353 Apr 1993 JP
05-158797 Jun 1993 JP
05158797 Jun 1993 JP
05-225066 Sep 1993 JP
05225066 Sep 1993 JP
05-282889 Oct 1993 JP
05282889 Oct 1993 JP
06-035802 Feb 1994 JP
06035802 Feb 1994 JP
06083708 Mar 1994 JP
06231043 Aug 1994 JP
06236351 Aug 1994 JP
07253935 Oct 1995 JP
08263380 Oct 1996 JP
09106366 Apr 1997 JP
09-146710 Jun 1997 JP
09146710 Jun 1997 JP
09-190382 Jul 1997 JP
09-214028 Aug 1997 JP
10-040170 Feb 1998 JP
10040170 Feb 1998 JP
10091488 Apr 1998 JP
10-154101 Jun 1998 JP
10154101 Jun 1998 JP
0-289155 Oct 1998 JP
11-259361 Sep 1999 JP
11-3316699 Nov 1999 JP
11-338641 Dec 1999 JP
11338641 Dec 1999 JP
2000-148515 May 2000 JP
2000-235544 Aug 2000 JP
2001027967 Jan 2001 JP
2001067258 Mar 2001 JP
2001250315 Sep 2001 JP
2002-007185 Jan 2002 JP
2002259186 Sep 2002 JP
2002-342037 Nov 2002 JP
2003-076498 Mar 2003 JP
2003-085041 Mar 2003 JP
2003076498 Mar 2003 JP
2003-196032 Jul 2003 JP
2003196032 Jul 2003 JP
2003-280950 Oct 2003 JP
2003280950 Oct 2003 JP
2003-316647 Nov 2003 JP
2004-021370 Jan 2004 JP
2004021370 Jan 2004 JP
2004-054845 Feb 2004 JP
2004054845 Feb 2004 JP
2004-192403 Jul 2004 JP
2004-272324 Sep 2004 JP
2004272324 Sep 2004 JP
2005-044010 Feb 2005 JP
2005044010 Feb 2005 JP
2005-222383 Aug 2005 JP
2005339256 Dec 2005 JP
2007-007185 Jan 2007 JP
2007007185 Jan 2007 JP
2008-052321 Mar 2008 JP
1019990019377 Mar 1999 KR
1019990019377 Mar 1999 KR
1020000039727 May 2000 KR
1020000039727 Jul 2000 KR
2010317 Mar 1994 RU
2010317 Mar 1994 RU
190585 Sep 1992 TW
347515 Dec 1998 TW
479194 Mar 2002 TW
502165 Sep 2002 TW
200402628 Feb 2004 TW
200405170 Apr 2004 TW
9318461 Sep 1993 WO
9726600 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9726600 Jul 1997 WO
9810611 Mar 1998 WO
0111486 Feb 2001 WO
0157675 Aug 2001 WO
0175581 Oct 2001 WO
0201365 Jan 2002 WO
0201364 Jan 2002 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (253)
Entry
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/055198, dated Feb. 26, 2010.
Nieplocha, “ARMCI: A Portable Aggregate Remote Memory Copy Interface”, Oct. 30, 2000.
Mitchell, “Managing Cache Coherence in Multiprocessor Computer Systems”, Jul. 10, 2008.
Dove, “Windows XP for Embedded Application”, Jul. 10, 2008.
“NSS Features and Benefits”, Previously Cited as ‘Novell’, Jul. 10, 2008.
EP Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings for Application No. 05103697.8-1952/1594064, Reference EP34979TE900dfi, dated Dec. 17, 2015.
IN First Examination Report for Application No. 26821DELI2005, dated Oct. 20, 2014.
Haining, “Non-Volatile Cache Management for Improving Write Response Time with Rotating Magnetic Media”, Sep. 2000.
MY Adverse Report for Application No. PI 20081667, Aug. 30, 2013.
JP Notice of Reason for Rejection for Application No. 2011-526951, dated Jul. 11, 2014.
CN Office Action for Application No. 200980145878.1, dated Apr. 4, 2014.
JP Final Notification of Reason(s) for Refusal for Application No. 2012-243915, dated Mar. 25, 2014.
CA Office Action for Application No. 2,523,761, dated Feb. 26, 2014.
IN First Examination Report for Application No. 1 0861DELI2005, dated Sep. 10, 2013.
KR Final Notice of Preliminary Rejection for Application No. 10-2008-7014092, dated Nov. 28, 2013.
JP Decision of Refusal for Application No. 2012-111004, dated Jul. 29, 2014.
JP Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Application No. 2011-526951, dated Dec. 16, 2013.
JP Notification of Reason(s) for Refusal for Application No. 2012-111004, dated Nov. 19, 2013.
CN Notice on the Second Office Action for Application No. 200980145878.1, dated Sep. 16, 2013.
TW Search Report for Application No. 101110178, dated Aug. 28, 2014.
JP Examiner's Decision of Refusal for Application No. 2012-243915, dated Jan. 6, 2015.
TW Search Report for Application No. 098129955, dated Jan. 26, 2015.
TW Search Report for Application No. 098138300, dated Sep. 22, 2014.
EP Communication for Application No. 09 826 570.5-1953, Reference FB24586, dated Aug. 17, 2015.
JP Notice of Rejection for Application No. 2003-347607, dated Mar. 26, 2010.
JP Notice of Rejection for Application No. 2003-347507, dated Nov. 30, 2010.
CA Office Action for Application No. 2,442,188, dated Mar. 10, 2010.
AU Examiner's First Report for Application No. 2003243990, dated Jan. 23, 2009.
KR Notice of Preliminary Rejection for Application No. 10-2003-69015, dated Nov. 30, 2009.
MX Office Action for Application No. PA/a/2003/008766, dated Jul. 28, 2007.
EP Communication for Application No. 03 022 573.4-1229, Reference EP28554-/df, dated Jul. 14, 2010.
AU Examiner's First Report for Application No. 2010201717, dated Jun. 28, 2011.
EP Result of Consultation for Application No. 05 109 295.5-2201, Reference EP36830RK900dfi, dated Jun. 12, 2012.
EP Result of Consultation for Application No. 05 109 295.5-2201, Reference EP36830RK900dfi, dated Jun. 15, 2012.
JP Decision to Decline the Amendment for Application No. 2005-135274, dated Jul. 3, 2012.
JP Final Rejection for Application No. 2005-135274, dated Jul. 3, 2012.
JP Notice of Rejection for Application No. 2012-243915, dated Jul. 9, 2013.
CA Office Action for Application No. 2,723,077, dated Jan. 9, 2013.
CN Notice on the Third Office Action for Application No. 200980137190.9, dated Aug. 1, 2013.
CN Decision on Rejection for Application No. 200980136912.9, dated Aug. 1, 2013.
CN Notice on the First Office Action for Application No. 200980137190.9, dated Oct. 24, 2012.
“Referential Integrity Implementation Details and Advantages”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Mar. 1995.
JP Notice of Rejection for Application No. 2005-134492, dated Jan. 25, 2011.
RU Official Action for Application No. 2003129662, dated Nov. 11, 2007.
CN Notice on the First Office Action for Application No. 200980136912.9, dated Jan. 14, 2013.
EP Communication for Application No. 09813565.0-1229 / 2329360 PCT/US2009056419, Reference FB24240, dated Apr. 3, 2012.
EP Communication for Application No. 09826570.5-1229 / 2353081 PCT/US2009063127, Reference FB24586, dated May 29, 2012.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/056419, Reference 325076-03WO, dated Mar. 12, 2010.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/063127, Reference 325668-02WO, dated May 31, 2010.
Allchin, “Microsoft Explains Vista ReadyBoost”, dated Nov. 21, 2006.
Archer, “ReadyBoost Q&A”, Jun. 2, 2006.
Archer, “ReadyBoost—Using Your USB Key to Speed Up Windows Vista”, Apr 14, 2006.
Bisson, “A Hybrid Disk-Aware Spin-Down Algorithm with I/O Subsystem Support”, Apr. 2007.
Darden, “Data Integrity: The Dell/EMC Distinction”, May 2002.
Ekman, “TLB and Snoop Energy-Reduction Using Virtual Caches in Low-Power Chip-Multiprocessors”, Aug. 12, 2002.
Greenan, “CompulsiveFS: Making NVRAM Suitable for Extremely Reliable Storage”, Feb. 2007.
Iyigun, “Managing Cache Data and Metadata”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/271,400, dated Nov. 14, 2008.
Iyigun, “Managing Cache Data and Metadata”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/221,542, filed Aug. 30, 3011.
Iyigun, “Managing Cache Data and Metadata”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/365,093, filed Feb. 2, 2012.
“Non-Volatile Memory Host Controller Interface (NVMHCI) 1.0”, Apr. 14, 2008.
Ohn, “Path Conscious Caching of B+ Tree Indexed in a Shared Disks Cluster”, In Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, Dec. 15, 2006.
Vitter, “External Memory Algorithms”, In Proceedings of the 6th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, Aug. 24, 1998.
Zhu, “Power Aware Storage Cache Management”, May 2005.
Budiu, “A Dual-Disk File System: ext4”, Apr. 16, 1997.
ISCSI, “Performance Evaluations of iSCSI Implementation”, Jan. 10, 2008.
Matthews, “Improving File System Performance with Adaptive Methods”, Fall 1999.
Rosenblum, “The Design and Implementation of a Log-Structured File System”, In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Jul. 24, 1991.
JP Notice of Rejection for Application No. 2011-527865, dated Oct. 16, 2012.
EP Communication and Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. 09814983.4, dated Oct. 10, 2012.
IL Notification of Defects in Patent Application No. 191502, dated Feb. 17, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/186,164, filed Jun. 27, 2002, Fortin.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/304,367, filed Nov. 26, 2002, Nicholson.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/372,734, filed Feb. 21, 2003, DeWhitt.
Texas Instruments, “SN74V263,SN74V273,SN74V283,SN74V293 8192 × 18,16384 × 18, 32768 × 18, 65536 × 18 3.3⋅V CMOS First First⋅Out Memories”, Jun. 2001—Revise Feb. 2003.
Chinese State Intellectual Property Office, Author unknown, CN Notice on Grant of Patent Right for Invention for Application No. 200980136912.9, dated Mar. 20, 2017, pp. 1-2, China.
European Patent Office, Examiner Davide Mandate, EP Communication for Application No. 09826570.5, dated Oct. 11, 2016, 6 pages, Rijswijk, Netherlands.
European Patent Office, Examiner Deane E., EP Summons to attend oral proceedings for Application No. 05103697.8, dated Nov. 11, 2016, 8 pages, Munich, Germany.
European Patent Office, Examiner Philippe Lanches, EP Communication for Application No. 09814983.4, dated Dec. 15, 2016, 7 pages, Germany.
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/229,025”, dated Mar. 11, 2019, 16 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in Indian Patent Application No. 01942/DELNP/2011”, dated Aug. 27, 2018, 5 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 09813565.0”, dated Sep. 1, 2017, 5 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in Indian Patent Application No. 1152/DEL/2003”, dated Nov. 28, 2017, 6 Pages.
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/058,078”, dated Nov. 3, 2014, 9 Pages.
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/058,078”, dated Apr. 8, 2016, 11 Pages.
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/058,078”, dated Mar. 13, 2015, 8 Pages.
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/058,078”, dated Sep. 30, 2015, 10 Pages.
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/058,078”, dated May 19, 2014, 12 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in Israel Patent Application No. 191502”, dated Nov. 3, 2011, 4 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in Indian Patent Application No. 01985/CHENP/2011”, dated Aug. 28, 2018, 5 Pages.
“Decision on Reexamination Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200680047384.6”, dated Mar. 30, 2011, 2 Pages.
“Decision on Reexamination Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980136912.9”, dated Feb. 15, 2016, 22 Pages.
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980136912.9”, dated May 24, 2016, 8 Pages.
“Third Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980136912.9”, dated Sep. 9, 2016, 8 Pages.
“Decision on Reexamination Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980145878.1”, dated Apr. 1, 2016, 12 Pages.
“Third Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980145878.1”, dated May 6, 2016, 7 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in Indian Patent Application No. 00878/MUMNP/2011”, dated Sep. 26, 2018, 5 Pages.
“Office Action Issued Brazilian Patent Application No. BR122016001493-2”, dated Apr. 2, 2018, 5 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in Brazilian Patent Application No. BR122016001493-2”, dated Apr. 12, 2016, 7 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in Brazilian Patent Application No. BR122016001493-2”, dated Aug. 3, 2016, 5 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in Brazilian Patent Application No. BR122016001493-2”, dated Nov. 30, 2017, 7 Pages.
Mihana, Kazuo, “Ready Boost—Are You Believing Such a “Tall Talk”?” In Proceedings of Eighth Urban Legend of Vista, Windows Server World, IDG Japan corporation, vol. 12, Issue 7, Jul. 1, 2007, pp. 42-43.
“Office Action Issued in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2008/007585”, dated Jun. 24, 2011, 3 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in Brazilian Patent Application No. PI0304297-9”, dated Sep. 29, 2015, 9 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in Brazilian Patent Application No. PI0304297-9”, dated Mar. 15, 2016, 5 Pages.
Khan, et al., “A Performance Evaluation of Storing XML Data in Relational Database Management Systems”, WIDM, 2001, 31-38.
Khoshafian, et al., “Object Identify”, OOPSLA'86, 1986, 21, 406-416.
Kiesling, “ODBC in UNIX Environments”, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Dec. 2002, 27(12), 16-22.
King, et al., “TriStarp—An Investigation into the Impementation and Exploitation of Binary Relational Storage Structures”, Proceedings of 8.sup.th (BNCOD) British National Conference on Data Bases, 1990, 64-84
Krouse, “Geometric Models for CAD/CAM”, Machine Design, Jul. 24, 1990, 99-105.
LeBlanc, et al., “Dwign Data Storage and Extraction Using Objects”, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 1993, 1, 31-38.
Leontiev, et al., “On Type Systems for Object-Oriented Database Programming Languages”, ACM Computing Surveys, Dec. 2002, 34(4), 1-50.
Levy, et al., “Incremental Recovery in Main Memory Database Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Dec. 1992, 4(6), 529-540.
Lim, et al., “Transaction Processing in Mobile, Heterogeneous Database Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Nov. 2002, 14(6), 1330-1346
Mallet, et al., “Myrtle: A Set-Oriented Meta-Interpreter Driven by a “Relational” Trace or Deductive Databases Debugging”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1999, 1559, 1-22.
Mariani, “Oggetto: An Object Oriented Database Layered on a Triple Store”, The Computer Journal, 1992, 35(2), 108-118.
McMahon, “SED—A Non-Interactive Text Editor”, Bell Laboratories, Aug. 15, 1978, 10 pages.
Melton, et al., “SQL and Management of External Data”, ACM SIGMOD Record, Mar. 2001, 30(1), 8 pages.
Mitchel, “The Logic of Architecture”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1990, 139-143.
Navathe, “Evolution of Data Modeling for Databases”, Communications of the ACM, Sep. 1992, 35(9), 112-123.
Nelson, et al., “Generic Support for Caching and Disconnected Operation”, 4.sup.th Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems (WWOS-IV), Napa, CA , USA, Oct. 14-15, 1993, 5 pages.
Nijssen, et al, “Conceptual Schema and Relational Database Design”, A Fact Oriented Approach, Department of Computer Science, University of Queensland, Prentice Hall, 1989, 10-33, 42-43, 48-51, 156-170.
Orenstein, et al., “Query Processing in the Object Store Database System”, ACM SIGMOD, International Conference on Management of Data, Jun. 1992, 21(2), 403-412.
Ottogalli, et al., “Visualisation of Distributed Applications for Performance Debugging”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Jan. 2001, 2074, 831-840.
Pachet, et al., “A Combinatorial Approach to Content-Based Music Selection”, Multimedia Computing and Systems, Florence, Jul. 1996, 1, 6 pages.
Papiani, et al. “A Distributed Scientific Data Archive Using the Web, XML and SQL/MED”, SIGMOD Record, Sep. 1999, 28(3), 7 pages.
Ponnekanti, et al., “Online Index Rebuild”, AMC SIMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Dallas, Texas, United States, 2000, 529-538.
Powell, “Object, References, Identifiers. and Equality White Paper”, OMG TC Document 93.7.5, Jul. 2, 1993. 1-24.
Prosise, “2-D Drafting: Why Pay More?”, PC Magazine: The Independent Guide to IBM-Standard Personal Computing, 1993, 12(4), 255-289.
Ramsey, et al., “An Algebraic Approach to File Synchronization”, Software Engineering Notes, Association for Computing Machinery, Sep. 2001, 26(5), 175-185.
Read, III, “Developing the Next Generation Cockpit Display System”, IEEE, Aerospace and Electronics Systems Magazine. Oct. 1996, 11(10), 25-28.
Reiner, et al., “Benefits of X-based Three-Tier Client/Server Model with ESRI Applications”, Virtual Solutions, 1995, 9 pages.
Rosenblum, et al., “The Design and Implementation of a Log-Structured File System”, Proceedings of the 13th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Jul. 24, 1991, 1-15.
Rouse, “CAD Pioneers are Still Trailblazing”, Machine Design, Oct. 22, 1987, 59(25), 117-122.
Roussopoulos, et al., “Using Semantic Networks for Data Base Management”, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 1975, 144-172.
Santos, et al., “Computer Aided Mechanical Engineering Design Environment for Concurrent Design Process”, Proceedings of the 1993 ITEC Workshop on Concurrent Engineering, Simulation in Concurrent Engineering, May 4-6, 1993, 71-83.
Seshadri, “Enhanced Abstract Data Types in Object-Relational Databases”, The VLDB Journal, The International Journal on Very Large Databases, Aug. 1998, 7(3), 130-140.
Simoes, et al, “A RISC—Microcontroller Based Photovoltaic System for Illumination Applications”, Fifteenth Annual IEEE: Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC 2000), New Orleans, LA, USA, Feb. 6-10, 2000, 2, 1151-1156.
Simon, “Strategic Database Technology: Management for the Year 2000”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. 1995, 446 pages.
Singhal, et al., “DDB: An Object Design Data Manager for VLSI CAD”, Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD International conference on Management of data, Washington, D.C., United States, 1993, 467-470.
Sreekanth, et al., “A Specification Environment for Configuring a Discrete-Part Manufacturing System Simulation Infrastructure”, International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Le Touquet , France, Oct. 17-20, 1993, 1, 349-354.
Sreenath, “A Hybrid Computation Environment for Multibody Simulation”, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, Aug. 1992, 34(2), 121-140.
Stevens, “Value in 3-D”, Industry Week, Jan. 8, 1995, 45-46.
Stonebraker, “The Case for Partial Indexes”, SIGMOD Record, Dec. 1989, 18(4), 8 pages.
Strickland, “Intersection of Relational and Object”, Proceedings of the AM/FM International Conference XVII, Mar. 14-17, 1994, 69-75.
Sutherland, et al., “The Hybrid Object—Relational Architecture (HORA): An Integration of Object-Oriented and Relational Technology”, Proceedings of the 1993 ACM/SIGAPP symposium on Applied computing: states of the art and practice, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 1993, 326-333.
Suzuki, et al., “Geometric Modeling for Modeling Products”, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Engineering Graphics and Descriptive Geometry, Vienna Austria, Jul. 11-16, 1988, 2, 237-243.
Taylor, et al. “An Integrated Robot System Architecture”, Proceedings of the IEEE. Jul. 1983, 71(7), 842-856.
Varlamis, et al, “Bridging XML-Schema and Relational Databases, A System for generating and Manipulating Relational Databases using Valid XML documents”, DocEng'01, Nov. 9-10, 2001, 10 pages.
Watanabe, “Knowledge Integration for Architectural Design”, Knowledge-Based Computer-Aided Architectural Design, 1994, 123-146.
Waugh, “Specifying Metadala Standards for Metadata Tool Configuration”, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, Apr. 1998, 30(1-7), 23-32.
Wilcox, “Object Databases—Object Methods in Distributed Computing”, Dr. Dobbs Journal, Nov. 1994, 19(13), 26-34.
Wold, et al., “Content-Based Classification, Search, and Retrieval of Audio”, IEEE Multimedia, 1996, 3(3), 27-36.
Yoshikawa, et al., “XRel: A Path-Based Approach to Storage and Retrieval of XML Documents Using Relational Databases”, ACM Transactional on Internet technology, Aug. 2001, 1(1), 1-29.
EP Communication for Application No. 05103697.8-2201, Reference EP34979TE900dfi, dated Oct. 26, 2007.
EP Communication for Application No. 05103697.8-2201, Reference EP34979TE900dfi, dated Jun. 17, 2008.
EP Communication for Application No. 05103697.8-2201, Reference EP34979TE900dfi, dated Nov. 7, 2008.
JP Notice of Rejection for Application No. 2005-135274, dated Sep. 24, 2010.
JP Notice of Rejection for Application No. 2005-135274, dated Sep. 9, 2011.
Search Report for Taiwan Patent Application No. 094114140, dated Nov. 22, 2011, 2 pages.
Notice of Rejection dated Jan. 25, 2011 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-134492.
“Computervision Launches Design Automation Development Platform for Windows, UNIX Desktop Applications”, PR Newswire, Financial News, Jan. 10, 1995, 3 pages.
“Developer's Guide to Apple Data Detectors—For Version 1.0.2”, Apple Computer, Inc., 1977, 1-34.
“Mechanical Design Software (Buyers Guide)”, Computer-Aided Engineering, Dec. 1993, 12(12), 32-36.
“Oracle 9i SQL Reference”, Release 2 (9.2), Oct. 2002, 29 pages.
Anderson, et al., “Referential Integrity Implementation Details and Advantages”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Mar. 1, 1995, 38(3), 477-487.
Andrews, et al., “Combining Language and Database Advances in an Object-Oriented Development Environment”, Conference on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications, Orlando, Florida, United States, Oct. 4-8, 1987, 430-440.
Ballard, et al., “Improved Recovery From Partial Page Writes of Data Pages”, IBM technical Disclosure Bulletin, May 1, 1993, 36(5), 141-143.
Beard, et al., “Multilevel and Graphical Views of Metadata”, Fifth International Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries, Santa Barbara, California, Apr. 22-24, 1998, 256-265.
Beitner, et al., “Multimedia Support and Authoring in Microcosm: an extended model”, Department of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, 1994, 12 pages.
Berg, “How Do I Create Persistent Java Objects?”, Dr. Dobb's Journal, 1997, 22(4), 98-101.
Bhattacharya, et al., “Coordinating Backup/Recovery and Data Consistency Between Database and File Systems”, International Conference on Management of Data, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, Jun. 4-6, 2002, 12 pages.
Biliris, “The Performance of Three Database Storage Structures for Managing Large Objects”, ACM SIGMOD, 1992, 21(2), 276-285.
Booch, “Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications”, Cummings Publishing Co., 1994, 155-156 and 179-183.
Bracchi, et al., “Binary Logical Associations in Data Modelling”, Modelling in Data Base Management Systems G.M. Nijssen, (ed), Proceeding of the IFIP Working Conference on Modelling in Data Base Management Systems, Freudenstadt, Germany, Jan. 5-8, 1976, 125-147.
Bullock, et al., “Recovery of Data Pages after Partial Page Writes”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Aug. 1991, 34(3), 69-83.
Buneman, et al., “Inheritance and Persistence in Database Programming Languages”, International Conference on Management of Date, Washington, D.C., United States, 1986, 4-15.
Cammarata, et al., “Extending a relational database with deferred referential integrity checking and intelligent joins”, SIGMOD Record USA, Jun. 1989, 18(2), 86-97.
Chien, “Concurrent Aggregates (CA)—Design and Experience with a Concurrent Object—Oriented Language Based on Aggregates”, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, Mar. 1995, 25(2), 174-196.
Chryssostomidis, et al., “Geometric Modeling Issues in Computer Aided Design of Marine Structures”, Marine Technology Society Journal, Dec. 1988, 22(2), 15-33.
Ciccozzi, “Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary”, 1997, 3, 39-40.
D'Andrea, et al., “UniSQL's next-generation object-relational database management system”, ACM SIGMOD Record, Sep. 1996, 25(3), 70-76.
Darby, “Object Serialization in Java 1.1. Making Objects Persistent”, WEB Techniques, 1997, 2(9), 55 and 58-59.
Dietrich, Jr., et al., “TGMS: An Object-Oriented System for Programming Geometry”, Software-Practice and Experience, Oct. 1989, 19(10), 979-1013.
Dobashi, et al, “Skylight for Interior Lighting Design”, Computer Graphics Forum, Aug. 1994, 13(3), 85-96.
Dorsch, “Accel Signs with IBM to Buy Altium PCB Unit”, EDA Licensing, Electronic New, Jan. 16, 1995, 3 pages.
EP Application No. 05103690: Partial European Search Report, dated Apr. 28, 2008, 7 pages.
Fegaras, et al., “Optimizing Object Queries Usingan Effective Calculus”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), Dec. 2000, 25(4), 457-516.
Findler, et al., “Contract soundness for Object-Oriented Languages”, ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA), Nov. 2001, 36(11), 15 pages.
Foley, et al., “Computer Graphics: Principles and Practices”, Second Edition, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1990, Chapter 5 and 9, 201-283.
Friis-Christensen, et al., “Requirements and Research issues in Geographic Data Modeling”, Proceedings of the 9th ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, Nov. 9-10, 2001, 7 pages.
Fuh, et al., “Implementation of SQL3 Structured Types with Inheritance and Value Substitutability”, Digital Symposium Collection 2000 (Abstract only), 2000, 2 pages.
Garret, Jr., et al., “An Object Oriented Environment for Representing Building Design and Construction Data”, Advanced Construction Technology Center, Document No. 89-37-04, Jun. 1989, 1-34.
Goscinski, “Distributed Operating Systems: The Logical Design”, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1991, 306-313.
Harrison, et al., “Structure Editors: User-Defined Type Values and Type Inference”, International Conference on Software Methods and Tools, 2000, Wollongong, NSW , Australia, Nov. 6-9, 2000, 241-247.
Haverlock, “Object Serialization, Java, and C++”, Dr. Dobb's Journal, Aug. 1, 1998, 23(8), 5 pages.
Hay, “Data Model Patterns: Convention of Thought”, Dorset House Publishing, New York, NY, 1996, 47-67 and 235-259.
Hernandez, et al, “The Merge/Purge Problem for Large Databases”, International Conference on Management of Data and Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, May 1995, 24(2), 12 pages.
Hsiao, et al., “DLFM: A Transactional Resource Manager”, International Conference on Management of Data, 2000, 518-528.
Kaneko, et al., “Design of 3D CG Data Model of Move Animation Database System”, Advanced Database Research and Development Series, Proceedings of the Second Far-East Workshop on Future Database Systems, 1992, 2, 364-372.
Kaneko, et al., “Towards Dynamics Animation on Object-Oriented Animation Database System Move”, Advanced Database Research and Development Series, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA), 1993, 4, 3-10.
Katz, “Toward a Unified Framework for Version Modeling in Engineering Databases”, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Dec. 1990, 22(4), 375-408.
Kawabe, et al., “A Framework for 3D Modeling Constraint-Based Description and Non-Manifold Geometric Modeling”, A Collection of Contributions based on Lectures Presented at the 2nd Toyota Conference, Organization of Engineering Knowledge for Product Modeling in Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Japan, Oct. 2-5, 1988, 325-357.
Kempfer, “CAD Jumps on Windows 3.1 Bandwagon”, Computer Aided Engineering, 1993, 24-25.
JP Notice of Reasons for Rejection, Application No. 2008-545888, dated Apr. 19, 2012.
Motoazabu, “IEEE1394: A Dream Interface at the Turning Point”, PC USER, Japan, Oct. 24, 1999.
JP Notice of Rejection for Application No. 2005-306948, dated Mar. 11, 2011.
EP Communication for Application No. 05109295.5-2201, reference EP36830RK900dfi, dated Jun. 8, 2007.
“Memory Accelerator,” NewScientist.com, printed Aug. 26, 2005.
Anderson, “A Case for Buffer Servers,” Hot Topics in Operating Systems, Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Rio Rico, AZ, Mar. 29-30, 1999, XP010355835.
EP Summons to attend oral proceedings, reference EP36830RK900dfi, for Application No. 05109295.5-2201 / 1650666, dated Mar. 8, 2012.
CN First Office Action for Application No. 200680047384.6, dated Jan. 22, 2010.
CN First Office Action for Application No. 200510116208.0, dated Jun. 6, 2008.
CN Decision on Rejection for Application No. 200680047384.6, dated Nov. 11, 2010.
JP Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Application No. 2008-545888, dated Aug. 29, 2012.
EP Provision of the minutes of the oral proceedings for Application No. 05 109 295.5-2201, Reference EP36830RK900dfi, dated Aug. 7, 2012.
EP Decision to refuse a European Patent for Application No. 05 109 295.5-2201, Reference EP36830RK900dfi, dated Aug. 7, 2012.
EP Communication for Application No. 06 839 426.1-1229, Reference FB20211, dated Sep. 2, 2011.
EP Communication for Application No. 06 839 426.1-1229, Reference FB20211, dated Oct. 28, 2011.
Fox, “Invention: The Phantom Car”, NewScientist.com, Aug. 17, 2005.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US06/26373, Reference 313462.07WO, dated May 11, 2007.
CN Notice on the Second Office Action for Application No. 200980137190.9, dated Mar. 20, 2013.
IL Notification of Defects in Patent Application No. 191502, Feb. 17, 2013.
CA Examiner's Report for Application No. 2,523,761, dated Feb. 26, 2013.
JP Notice of Rejection for Application No. 2012-111004, dated May 14, 2013.
KR Reasons for Rejection for Application No. 10-2008-7014092, Reference 314396.08, dated May 30, 2013.
Supplementary European Search Report for EP 06 83 9426 dated May 11, 2009.
Written Opinion for PCT/US2006/048402 dated May 8, 2007.
International Search Report for PCT/US2006/048402 dated May 8, 2007.
AU Examiner's First Report for Application No. 2005219500, Reference 12671530/DBW, dated May 31, 2010.
CN Notice on the First Office Action for Application No. 200980145878.1, dated Jan. 29, 2013.
EP Communication for Application No. 03 022 573.4-1229, Reference EP28554-/df, dated Aug. 2, 2007.
EP Communication for Application No. 03 022 573.4-1229, Reference EP28554-/df, dated Nov. 8, 2007.
EP Communication for Application No. 03 022 573.4-1229, Reference EP28554-/df, dated Oct. 6, 2008.
EP Communication for Application No. 05 109 295.5-2201, Reference EP36830RK900dfi, dated Jan. 28, 2008.
EP Communication for Application No. 05 109 295.5-2201, Reference EP36830RK900dfi, dated Oct. 28, 2008.
EP Communication for Application No. 05 109 295.5-2201, Reference EP36830RK900dfi, dated Jun. 12, 2012.
EP Communication for Application No. 05 109 295.5-2201, Reference EP36830RK900dfi, dated Jun. 15, 2012.
Fortin, “External Memory Devices (EMD)”, Jun. 17, 2004.
Fortin, “Apparatus and Method to Decrease Boot Time and Hibernate Awaken Time of a Computer System Utilizing Disk Spin-Up-Time”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/186,164, filed Jun. 27, 2002.
JP Final Rejection for Application No. 2005-306948, dated Jan. 13, 2012.
Kirshenbaum, “Using External Memory Devices to Improve System Performance” U.S. Appl. No. 10/970,172, filed Oct. 21, 2004.
Kirshenbaum, “Using External Memory Devices to Improve System Performance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,112, filed Feb. 5, 2009.
Kirshenbaum, “Using External Memory Device to Improve System Performance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/775,168, filed May 6, 2010.
Kirshenbaum, “Using External Memory Devices to Improve System Performance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/187,757, filed Jul. 21, 2011.
KR Notice of Preliminary Rejection for Application No. 10-2005-0099666, dated Apr. 30, 2012.
KR Office Action for Application No. 10-2005-0099666, dated Nov. 26, 2012.
RU Official Action for Application No. 2003129662/09(031875), dated Sep. 14, 2007.
Larsen et al., “Improve Programming Performance with Intel® Flash Memory Enhanced Factory Programming,” Intel Corporation 2006, http://www.intel.com/design/Flash/articles/EFP.htm.
“Optimization of CF Host Operation,” SanDisk Corporation 2005, http://www.sandisk.com/pdf/oem/AppNoteCFHostv1.0.pdf.
“Optimizing Program/Erase Times,” Spansion, Sep. 2, 2004, http://www.spansion.com/application_notes/Min_FacProgErase_Accel_AppNote_A0_E.pdf.
CN First Office Action for Application No. 200510083792.4, dated Feb. 1, 2008.
CN Second Office Action for Application No. 200510083792.4, dated Jun. 27, 2008.
EP Communication for Application No. 05103697.8-2201, Reference EP34979TE900dfi, dated May 21, 2007.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170052892 A1 Feb 2017 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14058078 Oct 2013 US
Child 15340826 US
Parent 11303382 Dec 2005 US
Child 14058078 US