This disclosure relates generally to the field of optical communications and in particular to optoelectronic receivers.
Optoelectronic receivers are an essential component of contemporary optical communications systems and a variety of types have been developed and deployed. Of these types, optoelectronic receivers which employ avalanche photo detector (APD) technologies generally exhibit high sensitivity but poor power-handling capabilities. Optoelectronic receivers which employ pin photo detector technologies typically require an optical pre-amplifier or electronic amplifier to boost input signal levels which unfortunately generates noise and signal delays.
An advance is made in the art by an integrated InP heterojunction phototransistor-amplifier (HPT-amplifier) optoelectronic receiver and associated methods.
A more complete understanding of the disclosure may be realized by reference to the accompanying drawing in which:
The following merely illustrates the principles of the various embodiments. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise various arrangements which, although not explicitly described or shown herein, embody the principles of the embodiments and are included within their spirit and scope.
Furthermore, all examples and conditional language recited herein are principally intended expressly to be only for pedagogical purposes to aid the reader in understanding the principles of the embodiments and the concepts contributed by the inventor(s) to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions.
Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the invention, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass both structural and functional equivalents thereof. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include both currently known equivalents as well as equivalents developed in the future, i.e., any elements developed that perform the same function, regardless of structure.
Thus, for example, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the diagrams herein represent conceptual views of illustrative structures depicting the principles of the embodiments.
Turning now to
In this embodiment shown, the base-collector junction of the HPT employs a uni-carrier design using a thin waveguide base region to detect optical signals and uses electron carriers for amplification and transport of detected optical signals. The diluted waveguide 120 and spot-size converter are integrated with the HPT thereby enhancing coupling efficiency to an optical fiber (not specifically shown) while delivering high optical power with low guiding loss. As will be described, mm-wave high power optoelectronic receivers may advantageously be produced when MM-UTC-HPTs are integrated with other high-speed HBTs.
Uni-Travel-Carrier photodiodes—as generally employed in embodiments according to the present disclosure—may utilize a very thin p+ absorption region in a reversed-biased photodiode in which photo-generated holes as majority carriers respond very fast within dielectric relaxation time, while photo-generated electrons drift quickly through thick depletion regions. Advantageously, UTC photodiodes exhibit a high cut-off frequency up to 325 GHz while accepting very high power optical signals. (See, for example, T. Ishibaashi et al., “Uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes”, Tech. Dig. Ultrafast Electronics and Optoelectronics” Opt. Soc. Amer., Washington, D.C., 166-168, 1997; Ito et al., “InP/InGaAs Uni-Traveling-Carrier Photodiode with 310 GHz Bandwidth”, Electronics Letters, v.36, pp. 1809-1810, 12 Oct. 2000).
Turning now to
While not specifically shown in
As compared with conventional hybrid integration of high power UTC detectors, the integrated UTC-HPT according to the present embodiment may advantageously reduce and/or eliminate lossy high-frequency interconnects of RF cabling and bond wires. In addition, the single chip implementation—as already noted—provides superior gain at mm-wave frequencies as light is delivered into the intrinsic base absorption region through the integrated InP optical waveguide 230. Guided light traversing the waveguide 230 produces photocurrent directly in the base region of the HPT 220, bypassing high base spreading resistance in the transistor. As a result, high frequency performance at mm-wave frequencies is realized.
At this point, a number of features of the OEIC shown in
Turning now to
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that one exemplary approach to the fabrication of structures employed according to the present disclosure involves a deep etched mesa waveguide for distributing light to the individual phototransistors. In the schematic cross section of
Advantageously, cladding may be formed by InP layers. As shown in
While various thickness(s) of the particular layers shown in
As may now be understood and appreciated, a broadband low-noise amplifier is needed in the receiver of an optical transmission system to convert a relatively small photodetector current into a rather large voltage sufficient to drive successive electrical circuits, such as a demultiplexer or a clock-and-data-recovery circuit (CDR). As already noted, in the OEIC such as that shown in
Turning now to
With continued reference to
Continuing with this discussion of
One result of this photo-receiver/pre-amplifier architecture—and as can be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art—is that as the propagating light encounters successive HPT-Amplifier stages, a portion of that light is “tapped-off” and results in the production of an electrical current added to that already in the electrical waveguide. Consequently, as the optical signal input to the optical waveguide gets smaller as it traverses the optical waveguide, the electrical output gets (much) larger. Consequently, the bandwidth of a device so constructed exhibits an enhanced bandwidth along with an increase in isolation between input and output.
It is notable that when describing the device shown in
Turning now to
As shown in
From the MMI coupler 677, the input optical signals (optical signals and local oscillator signals) are directed to the optical waveguides 610[1], 610[2] along which the light signals propagate. Accordingly, when a portion of the propagating light 660[1], 661[1] encounters a first differential HPT-Amplifier stage 630[1], an electrical current e1 is produced in the electrical waveguide 620[1] while an electrical current ē1 is produced in the electrical waveguide 620[2] through the effect of the HPT-amplifier stage 630[1].
When the remaining portion(s) of the propagating light 660[2], 661[2] encounters a second differential HPT-Amplifier stage 630[2], an electrical current e2 is produced in the electrical waveguide 620[1] while an electrical current ē2 is produced in the electrical waveguide 620[2] through the effect of the HPT-amplifier stage 630[2]. Similarly, when a further remaining portion of the propagating light 660[n], 661[n] encounters a final differential HPT-Amplifier stage 630[n], an electrical current en is produced in the electrical waveguide 620[1] while an electrical current ē2 is produced in the electrical waveguide 620[2] through the effect of the HPT-amplifier stage 630[n].
Similarly to the case with the single ended device described previously—with the balanced device shown in FIG. 6—as the optical input gets smaller, the electrical output and electrical output (OVERBAR) get (much) larger. As a result, the bandwidth of a device so constructed may exhibit an enhanced bandwidth along with an increase in isolation between input and output.
Finally turning now to
Notably, the exemplary configuration shown in
At this point, while we have discussed and described the invention using some specific examples, those skilled in the art will recognize that our teachings are not so limited. Accordingly, the invention should be only limited by the scope of the claims attached hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6538785 | Kim et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6704480 | Worchesky et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6885792 | Eggleton et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7366368 | Morrow et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7676124 | Heinz-Gunter | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7720389 | Yokoyama | May 2010 | B2 |
7907847 | Tanushi et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20020039465 | Skinner | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020041734 | Worchesky et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030087466 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040014508 | Chen | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040052445 | Forrest et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040120648 | Kwon et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050110108 | Patel et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20070014508 | Chen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20090304390 | Tanushi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100028011 | Kaneda et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100166427 | Jeong | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110042553 | Masini et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100254651 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |