Particle sensor with variable-speed blower

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • RE37353
  • Patent Number
    RE37,353
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 25, 1997
    27 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 4, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed is a particle sensor having a light beam with a beam long axis and an air flow tube with an inlet end and a particle exit mouth. In an aspect of the invention, the cross-sectional area of the flow passage at the inlet end is greater than the cross-sectional area of the exit mouth. This enlarged area dramatically reduces pressure drop along the tube. The exit mouth is in registry with the light beam and is elongate in a direction substantially parallel to the beam long axis. Thus, particles flowing through the mouth pass through the beam. In another aspect, the invention includes a centrifugal blower which is light in weight and which may be battery powered.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates generally to air quality and, more particularly, to instruments for assaying airborne particulates.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Particle counters and sensors are used to detect light scattered by particles entrained in a stream of fluid, e.g., in an air stream. Such counters and sensors draw air (with entrained particles) from a room, for example, and flow such air along a tube and through an illuminated sensor “view volume” to obtain information about the number and size of such particles. Such information results from an analysis of the very small amounts of light reflectively “scattered” by the particle as it moves through the view volume.




Some types of sensors flow such air along an enclosed transparent tube; others “project” the air and accompanying particles at a particular flow rate (often measured in cubic feet per minute) from one tube across an open space to another tube. In sensors of the latter type, there is no tube wall (however transparent such wall may be) to impair light scattering and collecting. In other words, the particle is briefly illuminated by a very-small-diameter light beam is it “flies” through an open space.




Among other uses, particle counters incorporating particle sensors are used to obtain a measure of air quality by providing information as to the number and size of particles present in some specified volume of air, e.g., a cubic meter of air. Even work environments which appear to human observation to be clean—business offices, manufacturing facilities and the like—are likely to have substantial numbers of microscopic airborne particles. While such particles are not usually troublesome to the human occupants, they can create substantial problems in certain types of manufacturing operations.




For example, semiconductors and integrated chips are made in what are known as “clean rooms,” the air in which is very well filtered. In fact, clean rooms are usually very slightly pressurized using extremely clean air so that particle-bearing air from the surrounding environs does not seep in. And the trend in the semiconductor and integrated chip manufacturing industry is toward progressively smaller products.




A small foreign particle which migrates into such a product during manufacture can cause premature failure or outright product rejection even before it is shipped to a customer. This continuing “miniaturization” requires corresponding improvements in clean-room environments (and in the related measuring instruments) to help assure that the number and size of airborne particles are reduced below previously-acceptable levels. While known particle counters and sensors have been generally acceptable for their intended purpose, certain disadvantages exist.




A disadvantage of known particle sensors involves the air passage, usually circular, along which air and entrained particles flow. In particular, such passage has a very small cross-sectional area. As a result, the pressure differential between the ends of the passage (sometimes referred to as the “pressure drop” across the passage) is quite high. It is not unusual to encounter a pressure drop in the range of 25-70 inches of water at a flow rate of about one cubic foot per minute (CFM). In the field of particle sensors, a pressure drop of 25-70 inches of water at that air flow rate is typical.




(Parenthetically, measuring pressure in inches of water is common. An analogy is found in older style blood pressure measuring devices which include a column of mercury contained in and visible through a graduated glass tube. Blood pressure is measured in “millimeters of mercury” and in such older style devices, blood pressure was equal to the column height. Blood pressure is still measured in millimeters of mercury but a different type of gauge is used to make the measurement.)




Because of the typical pressure drop along the very-small-area air flow passage, known sensors require a motor-driven positive displacement vacuum pump, usually of the diaphragm or vane type, to create enough vacuum to overcome such pressure drop. The necessary electric drive motor and vacuum pump are likely to be relatively heavy. And the motor requires outlet-sourced power; battery power is not practical because of the relatively large amount of power consumed. And because such a sensor requires an electrical cord and plug, it is not so readily moved from site to site, especially remote sites.




While the pressure drop along the air flow passage can be reduced by increasing the passage cross-sectional area, there is another design constraint which militates against that approach. To help assure accuracy in particle sensing and counting, all (or substantially all) of the air-entrained particles flowing along the passage must pass through the beam of light. Usually, the “flight path” of particles is perpendicular to such beam. However, the light beam is preferably sharply focused and its diameter is very small, e.g., less than about 0.1 inch. Therefore, the diameter of the air flow passage cannot be appreciably larger than that of the light beam and still assure that most or all of the particles will pass through the light beam and be detected.




The invention addresses these seemingly intractable difficulties and inconsistent design parameters in a unique and imaginative way.




OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION




It is an object of the invention to provide an improved particle sensor overcoming some of the problems and shortcomings of the prior art.




Another object of the invention is to provide an improved particle sensor in which the air flow passage exhibits exceptionally low pressure drop at a flow rate of about one CFM.




Another object of the invention is to provide an improved particle sensor in which substantially all of the particles are directed through the light beam.




Yet another object of the invention is to provide an improved particle sensor which is lighter in weight than comparable conventional sensors.




Still another object of the invention is to provide an improved particle sensor which is battery powered and highly portable, even to remote sites. How these and other objects are accomplished will become more apparent from the following descriptions and from the drawing.




The invention is an improvement in a particle sensor of the type having a light beam with a beam long axis and also having an air flow tube with (a) an inlet end, and (b) a particle exit mouth. In the improvement, the cross-sectional area of the flow passage at the inlet end is quite large and is greater than the cross-sectional area of the exit mouth. And the exit mouth is elongate in a direction substantially parallel to the beam long axis and, preferably, is “race-track” shaped and has first and second side edges which are generally parallel to one another.




The flow passage (of relatively large area) dramatically reduces the pressure drop along the tube. And the long, relatively narrow exit mouth (about as wide as the width of the light beam) helps assure that particles flowing through the mouth pass through the beam.




More specifically, the air flow tube has an inlet portion and a nozzle portion. The latter has a first inlet section which has a minimum cross-sectional area, i.e., an area less than that of any section along the length of the inlet portion. Further, the nozzle portion has a first nozzle section which has a maximum cross-sectional area, i.e., an area greater than that of any section along the nozzle portion.




In a highly preferred embodiment, the cross-sectional area of the first inlet section is no less than the cross-sectional area of the first nozzle section. Additionally, the inlet portion has an enlarged second inlet section having a cross-sectional area greater than that of the first inlet section. The first inlet section and the first nozzle section have substantially the same shape, e.g., circular.




In another aspect of the invention, the sensor air flow tube extends along a flow axis and the sensor has an air blower (preferably a centrifugal blower) rather than the conventional positive-displacement vacuum pump. The blower has an inlet opening which is substantially circular and in concentric registry with the flow axis. In fact, the new sensor has several component parts “stacked” along the flow axis so that particle flow from the inlet portion to the blower is in a straight line.




In another aspect, the new sensor makes unique use of a small centrifugal blower. Such blowers are used in applications other than particle sensors and are employed for their output flow rather than for their ability to “pull a vacuum.” In the invention, it is the blower air entry port, not the flow-emanating exhaust port which is of interest. The air entry port is in flow communication with the exit mouth and the blower thereby provides the pressure differential between the inlet end and the exit mouth of the air flow tube.




In fact, substantially all of the air passing through the blower (preferably a centrifugal blower) is drawn from and first through the air flow tube. In that way, the sensor is substantially unaffected by blower-generated contaminants.




The sensor has a sensing cavity and a blower cavity separated from the sensing cavity by a wall. The wall has an aperture through it and the blower is mounted to an annular plate having an opening through it. The aperture and the opening are also in registry with the flow axis.




In yet other aspects of the invention, the air blower is battery powered. While battery-powered air blowers per se are known, earlier designers in the field of particle sensors have never appreciated how to construct an air flow path with sufficiently low pressure drop along its length that a very low power blower could be used and still provide very good air flow rate. A preferred blower is of the adjustable speed type for selecting an air flow rate. Speed adjustment may include closed loop control in connection with a flow meter.




Other detail of the invention are set forth in the following detailed description and in the drawing.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING





FIG. 1

is a side elevation view of the new sensor. Parts are broken away and other parts are shown in cross-section.





FIG. 2

is an elevation view of the new sensor taken along the viewing plane


2





2


of FIG.


1


. The upper and lower portions and the cover of the sensor are slightly spaced from one another and parts are broken away.





FIG. 3

is a bottom view of the sensor taken along the viewing plane


3





3


of FIG.


2


. Parts are broken away, other parts are shown in cross-section and yet other parts are omitted.





FIG. 4

is an elevation view of the sensor taken along the viewing plane


4





4


of FIG.


2


. The parts shown as slightly spaced in

FIG. 2

are fully assembled in FIG.


4


.





FIG. 5

is a spatial perspective view of aspects of the sensor shown in

FIGS. 1-4

.





FIG. 6

is a side elevation view in cross-section of the inlet portion of the sensor air flow tube.





FIG. 7

is an end elevation view of the inlet portion shown in

FIG. 6

taken along the viewing plane


7





7


thereof.





FIG. 8

is a side elevation view of the nozzle portion of the sensor air flow tube.





FIG. 9

is an end elevation view of the nozzle portion shown in

FIG. 8

taken along the viewing plane


9





9


thereof.





FIG. 10

is a top plan view of the nozzle portion shown in

FIGS. 8 and 9

taken along the viewing plane


10





10


of FIG.


8


.





FIG. 11

is a side elevation view in cross-section of the inlet portion of

FIGS. 6 and 7

and the nozzle portion of

FIGS. 8-10

assembled to one another.





FIG. 12

is a cross-section view of the inlet portion of the air flow tube taken along the viewing plane


12





12


of FIG.


11


.





FIG. 13

is a cross-section view of the inlet portion of the air flow tube taken along the viewing plane


13





13


of FIG.


11


.





FIG. 14

is a cross-section view of the nozzle portion of the air flow tube taken along the viewing plane


14





14


of FIG.


11


.





FIG. 15

is an alternate embodiment of the exit mouth of the sensor air flow tube.





FIG. 16

is another alternate embodiment of the exit mouth of the sensor air flow tube.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Referring first to

FIGS. 1 through 5

, the improved sensor


10


includes a sensing portion


11


with a sensor block


13


and a light-scatter sensing cavity


15


. The cavity


15


has a reflecting mirror


17


, e.g., an elliptical mirror, and a detector


19


mounted to receive scattered light


24


scattered by a particle


23


and reflected by the mirror


17


. Referring also to

FIGS. 6-11

, an air flow tube


25


is mounted to the block


13


, extends along a flow axis


27


and includes a slightly tapered inlet end


29


for attaching one end of a length of hose


31


. A probe (not shown) is attached to the other end of the hose


31


and air with entrained particles flows through the hose


31


and the flow tube


25


and is expelled at the exit mouth


33


.




The sensing portion


11


also includes a laser diode assembly


35


which provides a very thin, substantially cylindrical beam of light


21


along a beam axis


37


. The axis


39


, the beam long axis


37


and the flow axis


27


are preferably orthogonal; that is, they are mutually perpendicular.




As best seen in

FIGS. 2 and 3

, the sensor


10


also has a housing


22


with a blower portion


41


including a blower cavity


43


in which is mounted an air blower


45


with an electric drive motor


47


attached thereto. Such motor may be AC or DC, the latter for easier battery-powered portability. Battery power is provided to the motor


47


through the leads


49


. A printed circuit board


51


provides closed loop feedback control for speed regulation at a set point selected using the flow sensor


53


. Speed control is by pulse width modulation.




The bottom cover


55


of the cavity


43


has an exhaust filter


57


through which must pass all air flowing through the sensor


10


. The filter


57


helps avoid contaminating the environment (which may be a “clean room”) with particulates sloughed from the blower


45


itself and/or drawn in through the air flow tube


25


.




Before describing particular details of a preferred air flow tube


25


, an overview comment will be helpful. In general, the air flow tube


25


has a relatively large cross-sectional area


58


at its inlet end


29


. Viewed from left to right in

FIG. 11

, such cross-sectional area


58


remains substantially constant along a first segment


59


of the tube


25


and then gradually diminishes at a second segment


61


. Its smallest cross-sectional area is at the exit mouth


33


. The following more detailed description is based upon that general configuration.




Referring particularly now to

FIGS. 6-11

, the air flow tube


25


includes an inlet portion


63


(which is generally T-shaped in cross-section) and a nozzle portion


65


, the upstream end


67


of which is snugly fitted into a pocket


69


formed in the downstream end


71


of the portion


63


. Particularly, the upstream end


67


abuts an annular shoulder


73


, the inward edge


75


of which defines an area


76


having substantially the same size and shape as the area


76


defined by the inner surface


77


of the upstream end


67


. Preferably, those areas


76


are circular and of substantially the same diameter.




The area of the passage


79


in the inlet portion


63


gradually increases from the shoulder


73


leftward as viewed in FIG.


11


. The passage


79


attains maximum area


58


at a location


81


between the inlet end


29


and the segment


61


. In a highly preferred arrangement, the segment


61


resembles a truncated cone.




Certain features of the preferred air flow tube


25


will now be described using a few “sections,” i.e. profiled like cross-sectional views as aspects of the tube


25


would appear if cut through by an intersecting plane. Referring now to

FIGS. 11-14

, the inlet portion


63


has a first inlet section


83


of minimum cross-sectional area


76


. That is, the cross-sectional area


76


of the inlet section


83


is less than the comparable area at any other section along the length of the inlet portion


63


. And the inlet portion


63


has a second inlet section


85


having a cross-sectional area


58


greater than that of the first inlet section


83


. This relationship is apparent from a comparison of

FIGS. 12 and 13

.




The nozzle portion


65


has a first nozzle section


87


of maximum cross-sectional area. The area of section


87


is as great or greater than the comparable area of any other section along the length of the nozzle portion


65


. And a visual comparison of

FIGS. 13 and 14

demonstrates that the cross-sectional area of the first inlet section


83


is no less than (and is preferable about equal to) the cross-sectional area of the first nozzle section


87


.




In one highly preferred embodiment, the interior passage


79


of the air flow tube


25


is circular in cross-section along most of its length, i.e., up to that part of the nozzle portion


65


at which such portion


65


necks down and fans out to define the exit mouth


33


. As best seen in

FIG. 9

, a preferred exit mouth


33


has an area


62


and first and second side edges


89


a and


89


b, respectively, which are generally parallel to one another. The mouth


33


has rounded end edges


91


and the resulting mouth shape resembles that of a face track.




While the exit mouth


33


shown in

FIG. 9

is preferred, there are other possibilities. For example,

FIG. 15

shows an ovoid mouth


33


and

FIG. 16

shows a somewhat bow-shaped mouth


33


. However, it is preferred that the maximum width “W” of any mouth


33


be about equal to or at least not appreciably greater than the diameter of the beam of light


21


. Maintaining that width relationship helps assure that all or substantially all of the air-entrained particles


23


flowing out of the exit mouth


33


pass through the beam of light


21


. On the other hand, an elongate exit mouth


33


helps assure reduced pressure drop as compared to, say, a circular exit mouth having a diameter about equal to the diameter of the light beam


21


.




And there are also other relationships that characterize the preferred embodiment. Referring to

FIGS. 5 and 9

, the exit mouth


33


has a major axis


93


and a minor axis


95


generally normal to one another. The mouth


33


is oriented so that the major axis


93


is generally parallel to and spaced slightly from the beam long axis


37


. Considered another way, the exit mouth


33


is elongate in a direction substantially parallel to the beam long axis


37


.




Referring again to

FIGS. 1

,


2


and


3


, the cavities


15


and


43


are separated by a wall


97


having a wall aperture


99


. The blower


45


is mounted to an annular plate


101


which has an opening


102


through it and the blower


45


itself has a side air entry port


103


through which the blower


45


draws air for expulsion through the exhaust port


105


. In a preferred arrangement, the wall aperture


99


, the plate opening


102


and the air entry port


103


are in registry with the flow axis


27


and, most preferably, are generally concentric with such axis


27


.




From the foregoing, it is to be appreciated that all of the air passing through the blower


45


is drawn from and first through the air flow tube


25


. Blower-generated contaminants, e.g., paint chips, metal “fines” and the like, do not contaminate the air stream and do not enter the sensing cavity


15


where they might impair the accuracy of the sensor


10


. To put it another way, the blower


45


is used “inside out” with respect to its conventional use mode.




The blower air entry port


103


on the intake side of the cage-like rotor is in flow communication with the exit mouth


33


. The blower


45


thereby provides, in the form of a pressure differential between the inlet end


29


and the exit mouth


33


of the air flow tube


25


, the “motive force” moving air through the tube


25


.




Referring again to the FIGURES, in operation, the blower


45


is energized and air (usually with at least some particles


23


entrained therein) is drawn into the inlet end


29


of the air flow tube


25


. The air-propelled particles


23


are expelled from the exit mouth


33


and “fly” through the laser light beam of light


21


. Beam of light


21


reflected by such particles


23


is received by the mirror


17


and reflected to a detector


19


for electronic analysis.




Air and entrained particles


23


continues to flow through the aperture


99


, the opening


102


and the port


103


in the blower


45


and is discharged by the blower


45


through its exhaust port


105


. Such air is urged through a coarse filter disc


107


which helps “smooth” air flow from turbulent to laminar flow. A major portion of the air is then simply exhausted through the openings and “free-flows” through the blower cavity


43


and exhaust filter


57


at the bottom of such cavity.




A relatively small percentage of the air from the blower exhaust port


105


enters a barbed fitting


109


and flows along the tubing


111


and through the flow sensor


53


. From the sensor


53


, such air flows along the tubing


113


and back into the blower cavity


43


from which it, too, free-flows out the exhaust filter


57


.




It has been found that the new sensor


10


exhibits no greater pressure drop than 7-10 inches of water along the air flow tube and, more typically, such pressure drop is about 3 inches of water. This is a startling contrast to the pressure drop of 25-70 inches of water exhibited by prior art sensors.




While the principles of the invention have been described in connection with a few preferred embodiments, it is to be understood clearly that such embodiments are by way of example and are not limiting.



Claims
  • 1. A particle sensor using scattered light for analyzing airborne particles entrained in air drawn from an environment into the particle sensor, such sensor including:a variable-speed centrifugal blower having a housing, a motor and an exhaust port; an opening in the blower housing; a particle detection system including a sensing portion having a light-scatter sensing cavity; an air flow tube and a low-pressure-drop nozzle in air flow communication with the sensing cavity and with the opening in the blower housing; a circuit connected to the motor for providing a speed-controlling variable voltage to the motor; a flow sensor for providing a speed-affecting signal to the circuit; an exhaust filter interposed between the exhaust port and the environment; and wherein: the particle detection system further includes (a) a light source, (b) a device directing light scattered by a particle entering the cavity through the air flow tube and the nozzle, and (c) a detector for receiving light directed by the device; and the air flowing in the sensing cavity through the air flow tube is drawn through such sensing cavity by the centrifugal blower, flows at a flow rate dependent upon the speed of the blower motor and is discharged from the particle sensor through the exhaust filter.
  • 2. The particle sensor of claim 1 wherein:the air flow tube extends along a linear flow axis; path;the opening in the blower housing is an air inlet port; and the rate at which air flows along the air flow tube and into the opening in the blower housing is dependent upon the speed of the blower motor.
  • 3. The particle sensor of claim 2 wherein:the circuit is of the closed loop feedback type; air flows along an air the flow path which includes the air flow tube, the opening of the blower housing and the blower exhaust port; and a sensing device is in communication with the air flow path for providing a feedback signal to the circuit.
  • 4. A particle sensor using scattered light for analyzing airborne particles entrained in air drawn from an environment into the particle sensor, such sensor including:a light source providing a beam of light illuminating a particle in the sensor; a particle detection system having a sensing cavity with a detector for receiving light scattered by the particle and a single air flow tube having an exit mouth flowing air through the beam of light; a light-directing device directing light scattered by the particle entering the cavity through the air flow tube and the exit mouth and passing through the beam of light; a detector for receiving light scattered by the particle and directed to the detector by the light-directing device;a centrifugal blower powered by a variable-speed blower motor for flowing air through the sensing cavity and having an exhaust port; a device connected to the motor for controlling the speed of the motor; a single air flow tube in air flow communication with the environment, the sensing cavity and the blower; the air flow tube is in air flow communication with the environment, the sensing cavity and the blower; the blower flows air and the particle entrained therein through the exit mouth and the sensing cavity; a speed control device, independent of the particle detection system, connected to the motor for controlling the speed of the motor and the velocity of the air flowing through the exit mouth and through the beam of light;and wherein:the air flow tube has an inlet opening in flow communication with the environment and such opening is the sole inlet for air flowing through the particle sensor beam of light; the air flowing flows through the sensing cavity flows at a flow rate dependent upon the speed of the blower motor; all of the air is exhausted through the exhaust port to the environment;the air flow tube, sensing cavity and centrifugal blower are in series; andair flow flowing through the air flow tube and the sensing cavity exit mouth is moved solely by the centrifugal blower.
  • 5. A particle sensor using scattered light for analyzing airborne particles entrained in air drawn from an environment into the particle sensor, such sensor including:a variable-speed centrifugal blower driven by a motor and having an exhaust port; a particle detection system including a sensing portion having a light-scatter sensing cavity; a laser beam of light extending along a beam axis; an air flow tube at an angle to the beam axis and having an exit mouth in air flow communication with the sensing cavity and with the blower, the exit mouth being the sole source of airborne particles directed through the beam of light; an electrical circuit connected to the motor for providing a speed-controlling variable voltage to the motor, thereby controlling the velocity of the air through the exit mouth and the beam of light; a flow sensor coupled to the circuit for providing a speed-affecting signal thereto; and wherein: the circuit is of the closed loop feedback type; the blower includes a housing; the blower housing has an exhaust port; air flows along an air flow path which includes the air flow tube and the exhaust port; and a sensing device is in communication with the air flow path for providing a feedback signal to the circuit and wherein: the particle detection system further includes (a) a device directing light scattered by a particle entering the cavity through the air flow tube and the exit mouth and passing through the beam of light, and (b) a detector for receiving light directed by the device; the centrifugal blower draws air through the air flow tube at a flow rate dependent upon the speed of the blower motor; and all of the air passing through the beam of light is exhausted through the exhaust port.
  • 6. The particle sensor of claim 5 wherein:the exit mouth flows air toward the beam of light; the blower has a housing including an air inlet port; and the rate at which air flows along the air flow tube and into the air inlet port is dependent upon the speed of the blower motor.
  • 7. A particle sensor using scattered light for analyzing solid airborne particles entrained an air drawn from an environment into the particle sensor, such sensor including;a light source emitting a beam of light for illuminating a particle in the sensor; a particle detection system having a sensing cavity with a detector for receiving light scattered by the particle; a centrifugal blower powered by a variable-speed motor and flowing air through the sensing cavity; a device, independent of the particle detection system, connected to the motor for controlling the speed of the motor; a single air flow tube having an exit mouth for exhausting air through the beam of light, the air having solid airborne particles entrained therein, such air flow tube being in air flow communication with the environment, the sensing cavity and the blower; and wherein: the air flow tube has an inlet opening in flow communication with the environment and such opening is the sole inlet for flowing, through the beam of light, the air carrying particles to be analyzed; the air flowing through the sensing cavity flows at a flow rate dependent upon the speed of the blower motor; and the air flow tube, sensing cavity and centrifugal blower are in series.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/364,389 filed on Dec. 23, 1994, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,515,164 which, in turn, is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/109,007 filed on Aug. 19, 1993, and now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (15)
Number Name Date Kind
2535181 Way Dec 1950
3248551 Frommer Apr 1966
3678847 Ludewig, Jr. et al. Jul 1972
3739180 Carlson Jun 1973
3840304 Hirafugi Oct 1974
3984786 Pike Oct 1976
4132894 Yule Jan 1979
4273443 Hogg Jun 1981
4571079 Knollenberg Feb 1986
4746215 Gross May 1988
4842406 VonBargen Jun 1989
4984889 Sommer Jan 1991
5011286 Petralli Apr 1991
5033851 Sommer Jul 1991
5351855 Nelson et al. Oct 1994
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
E G & G Rotron Custom Division, Woosdstock, NY; “Low Voltage (4.8-12VDC) Electronically Communtated D.C. Model R203 ECDC”-#1001, Jan., 1991.
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/616456 Mar 1996 US
Child 08/917257 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/364389 Dec 1994 US
Child 08/616456 US
Parent 08/109007 Aug 1993 US
Child 08/364389 US
Reissues (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/616456 Mar 1996 US
Child 08/917257 US