This invention relates to particles for use in electrophoretic displays, and to electrophoretic media and displays incorporating such particles. More specifically, this invention relates to particles which enable the use, in electrophoretic media and displays, of organic pigments which, in their normal form, have particle sizes too small for use in electrophoretic media and displays.
The terms “bistable” and “bistability” are used herein in their conventional meaning in the art to refer to displays comprising display elements having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property, and such that after any given element has been driven, by means of an addressing pulse of finite duration, to assume either its first or second display state, after the addressing pulse has terminated, that state will persist for at least several times, for example at least four times, the minimum duration of the addressing pulse required to change the state of the display element. It is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,170,670 that some particle-based electrophoretic displays capable of gray scale are stable not only in their extreme black and white states but also in their intermediate gray states, and the same is true of some other types of electro-optic displays. This type of display is properly called “multi-stable” rather than bistable, although for convenience the term “bistable” may be used herein to cover both bistable and multi-stable displays.
Particle-based electrophoretic displays have been the subject of intense research and development for a number of years. In this type of display, a plurality of charged particles move through a fluid under the influence of an electric field. Electrophoretic displays can have attributes of good brightness and contrast, wide viewing angles, state bistability, and low power consumption when compared with liquid crystal displays. In such electrophoretic displays, an optical property is changed by application of the electric field; this optical property is typically color perceptible to the human eye, but may be another optical property, such as optical transmission, reflectance, luminescence or, in the case of displays intended for machine reading, pseudo-color in the sense of a change in reflectance of electromagnetic wavelengths outside the visible range. Nevertheless, problems with the long-term image quality of these displays have prevented their widespread usage. For example, particles that make up electrophoretic displays tend to settle, resulting in inadequate service-life for these displays.
As noted above, electrophoretic media require the presence of a fluid. In most prior art electrophoretic media, this fluid is a liquid, but electrophoretic media can be produced using gaseous fluids; see, for example, Kitamura, T., et al., “Electrical toner movement for electronic paper-like display”, IDW Japan, 2001, Paper HCS1-1, and Yamaguchi, Y., et al., “Toner display using insulative particles charged triboelectrically”, IDW Japan, 2001, Paper AMD4-4). See also U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0001810; European Patent Applications 1,462,847; 1,482,354; 1,484,635; 1,500,971; 1,501,194; 1,536,271; 1,542,067; 1,577,702; 1,577,703; and 1,598,694; and International Applications WO 2004/090626; WO 2004/079442; and WO 2004/001498. Such gas-based electrophoretic media appear to be susceptible to the same types of problems due to particle settling as liquid-based electrophoretic media, when the media are used in an orientation which permits such settling, for example in a sign where the medium is disposed in a vertical plane. Indeed, particle settling appears to be a more serious problem in gas-based electrophoretic media than in liquid-based ones, since the lower viscosity of gaseous suspending fluids as compared with liquid ones allows more rapid settling of the electrophoretic particles.
Numerous patents and applications assigned to or in the names of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and E Ink Corporation have recently been published describing encapsulated electrophoretic media. Such encapsulated media comprise numerous small capsules, each of which itself comprises an internal phase containing electrophoretically-mobile particles suspended in a liquid suspending medium, and a capsule wall surrounding the internal phase. Typically, the capsules are themselves held within a polymeric binder to form a coherent layer positioned between two electrodes. Encapsulated media of this type are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,930,026; 5,961,804; 6,017,584; 6,067,185; 6,118,426; 6,120,588; 6,120,839; 6,124,851; 6,130,773; 6,130,774; 6,172,798; 6,177,921; 6,232,950; 6,249,271; 6,252,564; 6,262,706; 6,262,833; 6,300,932; 6,312,304; 6,312,971; 6,323,989; 6,327,072; 6,376,828; 6,377,387; 6,392,785; 6,392,786; 6,413,790; 6,422,687; 6,445,374; 6,445,489; 6,459,418; 6,473,072; 6,480,182; 6,498,114; 6,504,524; 6,506,438; 6,512,354; 6,515,649; 6,518,949; 6,521,489; 6,531,997; 6,535,197; 6,538,801; 6,545,291; 6,580,545; 6,639,578; 6,652,075; 6,657,772; 6,664,944; 6,680,725; 6,683,333; 6,704,133; 6,710,540; 6,721,083; 6,724,519; 6,727,881; 6,738,050; 6,750,473; 6,753,999; 6,816,147; 6,819,471; 6,822,782; 6,825,068; 6,825,829; 6,825,970; 6,831,769; 6,839,158; 6,842,167; 6,842,279; 6,842,657; 6,864,875; 6,865,010; 6,866,760; 6,870,661; 6,900,851; 6,922,276; 6,950,200; 6,958,848; 6,967,640; 6,982,178; 6,987,603; 6,995,550; 7,002,728; 7,012,600; 7,012,735; 7,023,420; 7,030,412; 7,030,854; 7,034,783; 7,038,655; 7,061,663; 7,071,913; 7,075,502; 7,075,703; 7,079,305; 7,106,296; 7,109,968; 7,110,163; 7,110,164; 7,116,318; 7,116,466; 7,119,759; 7,119,772; 7,148,128; 7,167,155; 7,170,670; 7,173,752; 7,176,880; 7,180,649; 7,190,008; 7,193,625; 7,202,847; 7,202,991; 7,206,119; 7,223,672; 7,230,750; 7,230,751; 7,236,790; and 7,236,792; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2002/0060321; 2002/0090980; 2003/0011560; 2003/0102858; 2003/0151702; 2003/0222315; 2004/0094422; 2004/0105036; 2004/0112750; 2004/0119681; 2004/0136048; 2004/0155857; 2004/0180476; 2004/0190114; 2004/0196215; 2004/0226820; 2004/0257635; 2004/0263947; 2005/0000813; 2005/0007336; 2005/0012980; 2005/0017944; 2005/0018273; 2005/0024353; 2005/0062714; 2005/0067656; 2005/0099672; 2005/0122284; 2005/0122306; 2005/0122563; 2005/0134554; 2005/0151709; 2005/0152018; 2005/0156340; 2005/0179642; 2005/0190137; 2005/0212747; 2005/0213191; 2005/0219184; 2005/0253777; 2005/0280626; 2006/0007527; 2006/0024437; 2006/0038772; 2006/0139308; 2006/0139310; 2006/0139311; 2006/0176267; 2006/0181492; 2006/0181504; 2006/0194619; 2006/0197736; 2006/0197737; 2006/0197738; 2006/0202949; 2006/0223282; 2006/0232531; 2006/0245038; 2006/0256425; 2006/0262060; 2006/0279527; 2006/0291034; 2007/0035532; 2007/0035808; 2007/0052757; 2007/0057908; 2007/0069247; 2007/0085818; 2007/0091417; 2007/0091418; 2007/0097489; 2007/0109219; 2007/0128352; and 2007/0146310; and International Applications Publication Nos. WO 00/38000; WO 00/36560; WO 00/67110; and WO 01/07961; and European Patents Nos. 1,099,207 B1; and 1,145,072 B1.
Many of the aforementioned patents and applications recognize that the walls surrounding the discrete microcapsules in an encapsulated electrophoretic medium could be replaced by a continuous phase, thus producing a so-called polymer-dispersed electrophoretic display, in which the electrophoretic medium comprises a plurality of discrete droplets of an electrophoretic fluid and a continuous phase of a polymeric material, and that the discrete droplets of electrophoretic fluid within such a polymer-dispersed electrophoretic display may be regarded as capsules or microcapsules even though no discrete capsule membrane is associated with each individual droplet; see for example, the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,866,760. Accordingly, for purposes of the present application, such polymer-dispersed electrophoretic media are regarded as sub-species of encapsulated electrophoretic media.
A related type of electrophoretic display is a so-called “microcell electrophoretic display”. In a microcell electrophoretic display, the charged particles and the fluid are not encapsulated within microcapsules but instead are retained within a plurality of cavities formed within a carrier medium, typically a polymeric film. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,672,921 and 6,788,449, both assigned to Sipix Imaging, Inc.
Although electrophoretic media are often opaque (since, for example, in many electrophoretic media, the particles substantially block transmission of visible light through the display) and operate in a reflective mode, many electrophoretic displays can be made to operate in a so-called “shutter mode” in which one display state is substantially opaque and one is light-transmissive. See, for example, the aforementioned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,130,774 and 6,172,798, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,872,552; 6,144,361; 6,271,823; 6,225,971; and 6,184,856. Dielectrophoretic displays, which are similar to electrophoretic displays but rely upon variations in electric field strength, can operate in a similar mode; see U.S. Pat. No. 4,418,346.
An encapsulated electrophoretic display typically does not suffer from the clustering and settling failure mode of traditional electrophoretic devices and provides further advantages, such as the ability to print or coat the display on a wide variety of flexible and rigid substrates. (Use of the word “printing” is intended to include all forms of printing and coating, including, but without limitation: pre-metered coatings such as patch die coating, slot or extrusion coating, slide or cascade coating, curtain coating; roll coating such as knife over roll coating, forward and reverse roll coating; gravure coating; dip coating; spray coating; meniscus coating; spin coating; brush coating; air knife coating; silk screen printing processes; electrostatic printing processes; thermal printing processes; ink jet printing processes; electrophoretic deposition (see US Patent Publication No. 2004/0226820); and other similar techniques.) Thus, the resulting display can be flexible. Further, because the display medium can be printed (using a variety of methods), the display itself can be made inexpensively.
The requirements for particles used in electrophoretic media are complex. The particles need to provide high optical density even when present only in very thin layers; because the switching speed of an electrophoretic medium (i.e., the time taken at a given voltage for the medium to change from one of its extreme optical states to the other) is proportional to the thickness of the medium, it is desirable to use a thin layer of the electrophoretic material itself, typically of the order of 50 μm or less, and in such thin media there may be only the equivalent of about a 2 μm thick layer of electrophoretic particles present. The electrophoretic particles need to maintain a stable charge, so that they will respond in a predictable manner to an electric field, and must not stick to surfaces with which they come into contact, nor (in the case of electrophoretic media containing particles with charges of both polarities) stick too firmly to particles of opposite charge. It may be difficult to find a single material which meets all the requirements for electrophoretic particles, and it is known to use as electrophoretic particles composite particles having a core of one material and a coating or shell of a different material. For example, the aforementioned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,822,782, 7,002,728, and 7,230,750 describe electrophoretic particles having a core of a pigment, for example titania, carbon black or copper chromite, and a polymer coating. Other types of composite electrophoretic particles are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0044333, and in Japanese Published Applications Nos. 2004-318,006; 2004-233831; 2004-029699; 2004-004469; 2000-227612; and 01-114829.
As already noted, it is desirable that electrophoretic particles provide high optical densities even when present only in very thin layers. To meet this requirement, electrophoretic particles are usually based on pigments; other types of materials, for example polymers colored with dyes, have been used but typically do not provide as high an optical density as is desirable. In electrophoretic media which require colored (as opposed to black and white) particles, it is often difficult to find pigments having a particular desired color. Inorganic pigments, while durable and well suited to use in electrophoretic media, offer a very limited color gamut. Organic pigments are available in a much wider range of colors, but frequently have a particle size much smaller than the wavelength of visible light, and so are of limited utility in light scattering media, such as electrophoretic media.
Accordingly, it is desirable to find a way to permit small particle organic pigments to be used in electrophoretic media and displays, and the present invention provides a composite electrophoretic particle which enables this to be done.
Accordingly, this invention provides a particle for use in an electrophoretic display, the particle comprising a light-scattering inorganic core and a light-transmissive colored shell of an organic pigment. The organic pigment is typically a small particle pigment, i.e., a pigment having an average particle size less than that of visible light, that is to say less than about 700 nm. The particle size of the organic pigment will often be much smaller than this, for example less than about 250 nm and in many cases less than about 100 nm. The light-scattering inorganic core may comprise titania.
The present invention extends to an electrophoretic medium comprising at least one particle of the present invention and a fluid, the particle being capable of moving through the fluid on application of an electric field thereto. The particles and the fluid may be encapsulated in a plurality of capsules or microcells, or present as a plurality of discrete droplets surrounded by a continuous phase comprising a polymeric material, thus forming a polymer-dispersed electrophoretic medium. The electrophoretic medium may comprise a single type of particle in a colored fluid, or two (or more) different types of electrically charged particles; where two different types of electrically charged particles are present, they may bear charges of the same or opposing polarity.
The present invention also extends to an electrophoretic display comprising an electrophoretic medium of the invention and at least one electrode arranged to apply an electric field to the electrophoretic medium.
The displays of the present invention may be used in any application in which prior art electrophoretic displays have been used. Thus, for example, the present displays may be used in electronic book readers, portable computers, tablet computers, cellular telephones, smart cards, signs, watches, shelf labels and flash drives.
The present invention also provides a process for producing a particle of the invention. This process comprises treating a light-scattering (typically white) inorganic pigment (which will form the core of the final particle) with a polymer which adsorbs on both the inorganic pigment and the organic pigment. The organic pigment is then added and allowed to mix with the polymer-coated inorganic pigment, thus forming a particle of the invention, which may be separated by centrifugation and dried. In a preferred form of this process, the composite particle thus produced is provided with a polymer coating in the manner described in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,822,782. To produce such a polymer coating, the composite particle is reacted with a reagent having a functional group capable of reacting with, and bonding to, the composite particle, and also having a polymerizable or polymerization-initiating group. The functional group on the reagent reacts with the particle surface and attaches the polymerizable group thereto. The product of this step is then reacted with at least one monomer or oligomer under conditions effective to cause reaction between the polymerizable or polymerization-initiating group on the composite particle and the at least one monomer or oligomer, thereby causing the formation of polymer bonded to the composite particle. Desirably, the polymerizable group on the reagent is a vinyl group, which is polymerized with the monomer or oligomer by free radical polymerization.
A preferred inorganic pigment for use in the particles of the invention is titania. In the process of the invention, it will typically be desirable to wash excess polymer from the inorganic pigment before contacting the polymer-coated inorganic pigment with the organic pigment. Thorough mixing of the inorganic and organic pigments is generally necessary, and sonication is useful for this purpose. The reagent used in the next step of the process is preferably a silane coupling agent (see the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,822,782 for suitable agents of this type) which can react with both inorganic and organic pigments.
The sole FIGURE of the accompanying drawings shows the response of the AN experimental display of the present invention to 500 and 1000 millisecond pulses of varying voltages and illustrates the electro-optic response of the display, as obtained in the Example below.
As indicated above, the present invention provides a particle for use in an electrophoretic display and comprising a light-scattering inorganic core, for example titania, and a light-transmissive colored shell of an organic pigment. The core should be highly scattering and the shell is desirably formed from a small particle organic pigment. Such a composite particle is highly scattering, because of the properties of the core pigment, but is also highly colored, because of the high weight ratio of organic pigment on the surface. The composite particles of the invention are much more highly colored than a similar core coated with, for example, a small molecule dye. Coating a reflective pigment with a colored organic pigment makes highly saturated, highly reflective pigments available in a wide array of colors. The particles of the present invention are highly scattering, brightly colored pigments that exhibit the advantages of both the inorganic and organic pigments from which they are formed, and allow the construction of electrophoretic media capable of displaying a much wider range of colors than previously accessible.
In one process for producing a particle of the invention, a polymer is chosen such that it will adsorb to both the inorganic and organic pigments, and will not interfere with later steps of the process. Particles of the inorganic core pigment are treated with an excess of the chosen polymer, which adsorbs to the pigment surface. The particles are thoroughly washed to remove the excess polymer. An organic pigment is then added to the particles, and the mixture is allowed to mix with sonication. The coated inorganic pigment is then isolated via centrifugation and allowed to dry, then treated with a silane coupling agent, which bonds the inorganic and organic pigments. Finally, the composite pigment is polymer coated by free radical vinyl polymerization.
Four different composite particles of the present invention were prepared. In all four cases, the core inorganic pigment was titania (R-794 titania available from E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Wilmington Del.). Four different organic pigments were used, namely Hostaperm Red Violet ER-02, Hostaperm Violet RL Special, Hostaperm Red P2GL-WD, and Hostaperm Blue B2G, all available commercially from Clariant Corporation, 500 Washington Street, Coventry R.I. 02816. According to the manufacturer, these organic pigments have average particle sizes in the range of about 50 to 100 nm. Only the preparation of the first composite particle will be described in detail, since the others were produced in an exactly similar manner.
Part A: Coating of Titania with Organic Pigment
A 10% by weight solution of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) was produced by charging a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask with deionized water (180 g) and poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (20 g, from Aldrich Chemical Company, molecular weight approximately 360,000). The flask was then placed on a hot plate with rapid magnetic stirring and low heat (solution temperature of about 45° C.), and mixed for three hours. The flask was removed from the heat, and allowed to cool with continued stirring. A separate 250 mL centrifuge bottle was charged with titania (du Pont R-794, 60 g) and deionized water (180 g). The bottle was shaken vigorously and sonicated for two hours to disperse the pigment. The resultant titania slurry was slowly added to the PVP solution (still under rapid stirring), and the mixture allowed to react overnight. The mixture was then divided between two 750 mL plastic bottles, and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes to isolate the polymer-coated pigment, the supernatant being decanted and discarded. (All centrifuging mentioned in this Example was carried out on a Beckman GS-6 centrifuge, available from Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, Calif. 92834.) Deionized water (approximately 300 g) was added to each centrifuge bottle, and the pigment was redispersed by shaking The bottles were then again centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes, and the supernatant again decanted and discarded. Deionized water (90 g) was added to each bottle, and the pigment was redispersed by sonication to provide a polymer-coated titania dispersion ready for use in the next stage.
A 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask was charged with this polymer-coated pigment dispersion (approximately 60 g of pigment in 180 g of water). In a separate 250 mL plastic bottle, Clariant Hostaperm Red Violet ER-02 organic pigment (20 g) was dispersed in deionized water (180 g) by several hours of sonication. The resultant organic pigment slurry was slowly added to the titania slurry with rapid magnetic stirring. The resultant pigment mixture was stirred for one hour, and then discharged into a 1 L plastic bottle, which was filled with ethanol (approximately 500 mL), and sonicated for three hours. The pigment mixture was then divided between two 750 mL plastic bottles and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes, the supernatant being decanted and discarded. Ethanol (approximately 300 g) was added to each centrifuge bottle, and the pigment redispersed by shaking The bottles were again centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes), and the supernatant again decanted and discarded. The composite pigment thus produced was air dried over night, and then oven dried for two days at 95° C. Finally, the composite pigment was hand ground using a mortar and pestle.
Part B: Surface Functionalization of Composite Pigment
The ground pigment prepared in Part A above (70 g) was dispersed in ethanol (180 g) by high-shear stirring (18.5 krpm for 7.5 minutes) followed by one hour of sonication. Deionized water (55 g) and ammonium hydroxide (2 mL) were added to the resultant slurry, which was then sonicated for a further one hour. Separately, a 1 L Erlenmeyer flask with rapid magnetic stirring was charged with ethanol (480 mL), deionized water (5 mL), and ammonium hydroxide (5.2 mL). 3-(N-styrylmethyl-2-aminoethylamino)propyltrimethoxysilane (55 mL of a 40 percent solution in methanol, from United Chemical Technologies, Inc., 2731 Bartram Road Bristol, Pa. 19007-6893) was added and the mixture stirred for five minutes. The pigment slurry was slowly added to the Erlenmeyer flask, and the resultant reaction mixture was stirred for 15 minutes. The reaction mixture was divided between two 750 mL plastic bottles and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes, the supernatant being decanted and discarded. Ethanol (approximately 500 g) was added to each centrifuge bottle, and the pigment was redispersed by shaking The bottles were again centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes, and the supernatant again decanted and discarded. The silane-functionalized pigment thus produced was air dried over night, and then dried under vacuum at 65° C. for two hours. Finally, the pigment was hand ground using a mortar and pestle.
Part C: Polymer Coating of Composite Pigment
The dried pigment produced in Part B above was dispersed in a mixture of toluene (60 mL) and lauryl methacrylate (60 mL) by high-shear stirring (18.5 krpm for 7.5 minutes). The resultant slurry was transferred to a 250 mL round-bottomed flask provided with rapid magnetic stirring and heated on an oil bath to 65° C. The flask was purged with nitrogen. 4,4′-Azobisisobutyronitrile initiator (AIBN, 0.6 g) was separately dissolved in toluene (12 mL), and added to the reaction flask by pipette. The resultant mixture was allowed to react overnight, under nitrogen and at 65° C. The nitrogen was then removed, and ethyl acetate (approximately 100 mL) was added to the flask. The resultant mixture was divided between two 250 mL plastic bottles, and additional ethyl acetate (approximately 100 mL) was added to each bottle. The bottles were shaken vigorously and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 minutes. An aliquot of the supernatant was then removed for free polymer testing, and the remainder was decanted and discarded. The pigment was washed twice by adding ethyl acetate (approximately 200 mL) to each bottle, shaking vigorously to disperse the pigment, and centrifuging at 3500 rpm for 15 minutes, with the supernatant being decanted and discarded. The resultant polymer-coated pigment was air dried overnight, then dried under vacuum at 65° C. overnight, and hand ground using a mortar and pestle. A 40% by weight dispersion of this polymer-coated pigment in Isopar E was prepared, sonicated for several hours, and mixed on a roll mill overnight.
Part D: Preparation of Internal Phase
An internal phase (180 g, ca. 150 mL) for an encapsulated electrophoretic medium was produced by combining the polymer-coated pigment slurry produced in Part C above (67.50 g) with 90.00 g of a 60 percent by weight stock solution of polymer-coated titania (titania coated with a 95:5 mole percent copolymer of lauryl methacrylate and 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl methacrylate, prepared substantially as described in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,822,782) in Isopar G, a charging agent (Avecia Solsperse 17000, 10% by weight solution in Isopar E, 8.10 g), a surfactant (Span85, 0.41 g), and Isopar E (14.00 g) solvent. This dispersion was mixed on a roll mill overnight.
Part E: Encapsulation and Preparation of Electrophoretic Displays
A 500 mL jacketed reactor was heated to 40° C. and charged with deionized water (240 g) and dry gelatin (10 g). The resultant mixture was allowed to stand for one hour to allow the gelatin to swell. After this period, the gelatin solution was stirred slowly (100 rpm) with an overhead stirrer for thirty minutes. Separately, acacia (10 g) was dissolved in deionized water (98.3 g) and the resultant solution heated to 40° C. Also separately, the internal phase prepared in Part D above was heated to 40° C. and then added, over a period of approximately 2 minutes, to the gelatin solution. The gelatin solution was stirred (350 rpm) during the addition, which was conducted by introducing the internal phase through a dropping funnel, the outlet of which was placed below the surface of the gelatin solution. After the addition of the internal phase was complete, the rate of stirring was increased (to ca. 750 rpm) and the stirring continued for one hour at 40° C. in order to emulsify the internal phase into droplets having an average diameter of about 40 μm.
The emulsion thus produced was diluted with deionized water (153.3 g) warmed to 40° C., and the acacia solution was added. The pH of the resultant mixture was lowered to 4.80 using 10% aqueous acetic acid, and the stirring was continued for a further 40 minutes. The temperature of the mixture was then lowered to 10° C. over the course of two hours, and 2.5 g of 50% glutaraldehyde was added. After this addition, the mixture was gradually warmed to 25° C. and stirred vigorously for a further 12 hours. Finally, stirring was discontinued, and the mixture was discharged into a 750 mL plastic bottle.
The capsules thus produced were separated by size to yield a distribution between 30 and 50 μm diameter, with a mean diameter of about 40 μm; this can be effected by sieving the capsules for 120 seconds on a 38 μm sieve and then for 120 seconds on a 25 μm sieve to produce the final capsule slurry.
The capsule slurry thus produced was centrifuged, and the pH was raised above 8.0 by the addition of a 1% ammonium hydroxide solution. The capsule slurry was then mixed with a polyurethane binder at a ratio of 1 part by weight binder to 8 parts by weight of capsules; a 1% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose in water solution was added as a thickener, with a desired weight fraction of 0.002 HPMC in the slurry; and pure Triton X-100 was added as a surfactant, with a desired weight fraction of 0.001. The resultant slurry was stirred for one hour.
The slurry thus produced was bar coated on to a 5 mil (127 μm) thick polyester film coated on one surface with indium tin oxide, the slurry being coated on to the indium tin oxide covered surface. The coated films were oven dried at 60° C. for 15 minutes to produce an electrophoretic medium approximately 30 μm thick containing essentially a single layer of capsules (see the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,839,158).
From this film, a front-plane laminate (see the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,982,178 for a description of the structure of this laminate) was produced by laminating a doped polyurethane adhesive over the capsule layer. The front plane laminate was then laminated to a segmented graphite backplane comprising a layer of graphite on a polyester film to produce experimental electro-optic displays of the present invention suitable for measurement of their electro-optical properties.
Part F: Pigment Characterization
The final composite pigment (denoted “FCP” in the Table below) of the present invention produced in Part C above, and various intermediate products were subjected to thermogravimetric analysis. The intermediate products tested were:
The Table below shows the weight loss of each material below 400° C. and below 700° C. The columns headed “Δ” show the difference between the weight loss for the relevant product and that for the immediately preceding product, i.e., for the material in the preceding line of the Table.
The data in the Table are completely consistent with the structure of the composite pigments of the present invention discussed above. In the first stage of the process for preparing the composite pigment, the core inorganic pigment is treated with poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP), and between 1.5 and 2.1% by weight of the polymer is adsorbed on the pigment surface. If the radius of the titania particles is assumed to be that claimed by the manufacturer (200 nm), this amount of PVP corresponds to 2.0 to 2.8 mg/m2 of surface. The addition of the organic pigment ER-02 leads to a material that has a very large amount of organic material attached to it, with a total weight loss of 30.4%, almost all at a temperature>400° C. The organic pigment is stated by the manufacturer to have a diameter of 70 nm, with a density of 1.49 g/mL. If one assumes a monolayer coverage of the core pigment by a square, close-packed array of spherical particles of this size, the effective density will be reduced to 0.52*1.49=0.78 g/mL. Thus, if 30.4% of the sample is organic, then 69.6% is titania, with a surface area of 5.22 m2/g. A 70 nm thick layer of pigment on this area would have a volume of 0.36 mL, or about 0.285 g, corresponding to 29% by weight. The observed amount of pigment is (30.4-2.1)=28.3%, in almost exact agreement with this theoretical calculation.
Further reaction with the silane leads to a surface-functionalized pigment with a further increase of organic material of about 1.4%, typical of surface-functionalization reactions of this type. The subsequent polymerization reaction finally results in a polymer grafted composite pigment particle, with a further weight gain of around 10%, observed both in the total weight loss and in the low temperature (<400° C.) region, where grafted polymer shells have previously been observed to volatilize in measurements of this type. The amount of grafted polymer is also similar to that observed in other grafting reactions on simple pigments.
Part G: Electro-Optic Properties
The experimental encapsulated electrophoretic display prepared in Part E above was found to have excellent electro-optic characteristics. In its white state, the electro-optic values were 76.4 L*, 2.7 a* and −2.5 b*, which is a bright, nearly neutral white. In its dark state, the electro-optic values were 52.7 L*, 25.7 a* and −8.6 b*, corresponding to a bright, slightly bluish red. The pure pigment color, as indicated by the color patch supplied by the manufacturer, has 49.1 L*, 60.6 a*, and −9.5 b*. Thus, the color obtained in the device with the composite pigment of the invention is somewhat lighter and desaturated relative to the pure organic pigment, but has a similar hue.
The sole FIGURE of the accompanying drawings shows the response of the experimental display to 500 and 1000 millisecond pulses of varying voltages. This FIGURE illustrates the excellent electro-optic response to the display, with electro-optic saturation (i.e., an extreme optical state) being achieved at voltages of about 8-10 V at these pulse lengths.
From the foregoing, it will be seen that the present invention can provide brightly colored particles for electrophoretic displays using light scattering pigments. This invention may be especially useful for full color patterned displays.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous changes and modifications can be made in the specific embodiments of the invention described above without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is to be interpreted in an illustrative and not in a limitative sense.
This application is a divisional of copending application Ser. No. 11/776,633 filed Jul. 12, 2007 (Publication No. 2008/0013156), which claims benefit of copending Application Ser. No. 60/807,203, filed Jul. 13, 2006. This application is also related to: (a) U.S. Pat. No. 6,822,782;(b) application Ser. No. 11/673,269, filed Feb. 9, 2007 (Publication No. 2007/0128352, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,720); and(d) U.S. Pat. No. 7,230,750. The entire contents of these patents and copending applications, and of all other U.S. patents and published and copending applications mentioned below, are herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3668106 | Ota | Jun 1972 | A |
3756693 | Ota | Sep 1973 | A |
3767392 | Ota | Oct 1973 | A |
3792308 | Ota | Feb 1974 | A |
3870517 | Ota et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3892568 | Ota | Jul 1975 | A |
4418346 | Batchelder | Nov 1983 | A |
5745094 | Gordon, II et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5760761 | Sheridon | Jun 1998 | A |
5777782 | Sheridon | Jul 1998 | A |
5808783 | Crowley | Sep 1998 | A |
5872552 | Gordon, II et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5930026 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961804 | Jacobson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6017584 | Albert et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6054071 | Mikkelsen, Jr. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055091 | Sheridon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6067185 | Albert et al. | May 2000 | A |
6097531 | Sheridon | Aug 2000 | A |
6118426 | Albert et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120588 | Jacobson | Sep 2000 | A |
6120839 | Comiskey et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124851 | Jacobson | Sep 2000 | A |
6128124 | Silverman | Oct 2000 | A |
6130773 | Jacobson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130774 | Albert et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137467 | Sheridon et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144361 | Gordon, II et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6147791 | Sheridon | Nov 2000 | A |
6172798 | Albert et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177921 | Comiskey et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184856 | Gordon, II et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6225971 | Gordon, II et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232950 | Albert et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241921 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249271 | Albert et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252564 | Albert et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262706 | Albert et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262833 | Loxley et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271823 | Gordon, II et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6300932 | Albert | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301038 | Fitzmaurice et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312304 | Duthaler et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6312971 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323989 | Jacobson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327072 | Comiskey et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6376828 | Comiskey | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377387 | Duthaler et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392785 | Albert et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6392786 | Albert | May 2002 | B1 |
6413790 | Duthaler et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422687 | Jacobson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6445374 | Albert et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6445489 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459418 | Comiskey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473072 | Comiskey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480182 | Turner et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6498114 | Amundson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504524 | Gates et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506438 | Duthaler et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6512354 | Jacobson et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6515649 | Albert et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518949 | Drzaic | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6521489 | Duthaler et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6531997 | Gates et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535197 | Comiskey et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538801 | Jacobson et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6545291 | Amundson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6580545 | Morrison et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6639578 | Comiskey et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6652075 | Jacobson | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657772 | Loxley | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664944 | Albert et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
D485294 | Albert | Jan 2004 | S |
6672921 | Liang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680725 | Jacobson | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683333 | Kazlas et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6693620 | Herb et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704133 | Gates et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6710540 | Albert et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721083 | Jacobson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6724519 | Comiskey et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6727881 | Albert et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738050 | Comiskey et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6750473 | Amundson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6753999 | Zehner et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6788449 | Liang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6816147 | Albert | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819471 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822782 | Honeyman et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825068 | Denis et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825829 | Albert et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6825970 | Goenaga et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831769 | Holman et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839158 | Albert et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6842167 | Albert et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6842279 | Amundson | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6842657 | Drzaic et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6864875 | Drzaic et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6865010 | Duthaler et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6866760 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870657 | Fitzmaurice et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6870661 | Pullen et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6900851 | Morrison et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6922276 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6950220 | Abramson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6958848 | Cao et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967640 | Albert et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980196 | Turner et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6982178 | LeCain et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6987603 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995550 | Jacobson et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002728 | Pullen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7012600 | Zehner et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7012735 | Honeyman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023420 | Comiskey et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030412 | Drzaic et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7030854 | Baucom et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034783 | Gates et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7038655 | Herb et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7061663 | Cao et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071913 | Albert et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7075502 | Drzaic et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7075703 | O'Neil et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079305 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7106296 | Jacobson | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7109968 | Albert et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110163 | Webber et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110164 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7116318 | Amundson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7116466 | Whitesides et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7119759 | Zehner et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7119772 | Amundson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7148128 | Jacobson | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7167155 | Albert et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7170670 | Webber | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173752 | Doshi et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7176880 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180649 | Morrison et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190008 | Amundson et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7193625 | Danner et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7202847 | Gates | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7202991 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206119 | Honeyman et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7223672 | Kazlas et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7230750 | Whitesides et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7230751 | Whitesides et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236290 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7236291 | Kaga et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236292 | LeCain et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7242513 | Albert et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7247379 | Pullen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7256766 | Albert et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259744 | Arango et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7280094 | Albert | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7304634 | Albert et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7304787 | Whitesides et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312784 | Baucom et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312794 | Zehner et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312916 | Pullen et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321459 | Masuda et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7327511 | Whitesides et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339715 | Webber et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349148 | Doshi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352353 | Albert et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365394 | Denis et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365733 | Duthaler et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7375875 | Whitesides et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7382363 | Albert et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7388572 | Duthaler et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7391555 | Albert et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7411719 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7411720 | Honeyman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7420549 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7442587 | Amundson et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7443571 | LeCain et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7453445 | Amundson | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7492339 | Amundson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7513813 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7528822 | Amundson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7532388 | Whitesides et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7535624 | Amundson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7545358 | Gates et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551346 | Fazel et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7554712 | Patry et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7561324 | Duthaler et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7583251 | Arango et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20020044333 | Shigehiro et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020060321 | Kazlas et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020090980 | Wilcox et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030102858 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040105036 | Danner et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040112750 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119681 | Albert et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040180476 | Kazlas et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190114 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040263947 | Drzaic et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001810 | Yakushiji et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007336 | Albert et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050012980 | Wilcox et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018273 | Honeyman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050035941 | Albert et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050062714 | Zehner et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050122284 | Gates et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122306 | Wilcox et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122563 | Honeyman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152018 | Abramson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156340 | Valianatos et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050179642 | Wilcox et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050253777 | Zehner et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050255320 | Noguchi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259068 | Nihei et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280626 | Amundson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060038772 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060087479 | Sakurai et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087489 | Sakurai et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087718 | Takagi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060127668 | Jobmann et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132895 | Miyazaki et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060134564 | Chari et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139308 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139310 | Zehner et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139311 | Zehner et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060158109 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176267 | Honeyman et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060181504 | Kawai | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060194619 | Wilcox et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197737 | Baucom et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060197738 | Kawai | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060202949 | Danner et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060209008 | Nihei et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214906 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231401 | Sakurai et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060232531 | Amundson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060238488 | Nihei et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060263927 | Sakurai et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060279527 | Zehner et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070013683 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070035532 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070052757 | Jacobson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070057908 | Jacobson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069247 | Amundson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070085818 | Amundson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091417 | Cao et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091418 | Danner et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070097489 | Doshi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070103427 | Zhou et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109219 | Whitesides et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070146310 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152956 | Danner et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070153361 | Danner et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070200874 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070211002 | Zehner et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211331 | Danner et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070223079 | Honeyman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070247697 | Sohn et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080013155 | Honeyman et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024482 | Gates et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080074730 | Cao et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 099 207 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1 145 072 | May 2003 | EP |
01-114829 | May 1989 | JP |
2000-227612 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2004-004469 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-029699 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-233831 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004-318008 | Nov 2004 | JP |
WO 0036560 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0038000 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0067110 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0107961 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2004079442 | Sep 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110284808 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60807203 | Jul 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11776633 | Jul 2007 | US |
Child | 13198855 | US |