1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to printhead assemblies.
2. Related Technology
With the wide variety of substances currently utilised as ‘inks’ with printhead technology there is a need for a barrier between the ink and the actuator structures within the printhead. It is desirable that such a barrier prevents the ink from reacting chemically with the actuator structure; this is especially desirable with highly reactive inks. It is also desirable that such a barrier prevents physical interactions, in particular with conductive or metallic inks, which may cause short-circuiting of the printhead where such inks contact the driving electrodes. It is also desirable that the barrier improves ink flow through the printhead. Dirt, dust or other matter that inevitably results from the manufacturing process should be encapsulated during the process in order to prevent such material dislodging and blocking the nozzles during operation of the printhead.
Parylene is known to form a conformal coating within the structure of shared-wall/shear mode printheads of the kind known from EP0277703. It is particularly well suited to page-wide-array designs having a large number of ink inlets and outlets communicating to the channel, as known e.g. from WO 00/29217. It is known to apply Parylene to the printhead to form a layer to eliminate nucleation sites for air bubbles, for example from U.S. Pat. No. 4,947,184 (Spectra Inc.). Details of the Parylene coating process and operating procedures may be found therein.
Within the manufacturing environment it is desirable to protect a printhead actuator from particulate contamination, typically by attaching a nozzle plate at the front of the actuator and a filter at the back.
The present invention relates to the parylene coating of a filter having a larger pore size, the coating process producing a filter of a desired pore size. In one embodiment of the invention a printhead is assembled with a filter and the whole apparatus then coated with a passivating substance such as parylene. In a further embodiment of the invention an ink filter is coated with a passivating substance separately.
According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a method for passivating a printhead assembly comprising: assembling the printhead with at least one filter intended for use with the printhead when in operation to create a printhead assembly; passing a fluid or gaseous coating substance through said printhead assembly via said filter, thus forming a passivating layer over at least some of the surfaces of both the printhead and the filter.
According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided a printhead assembly comprising a printhead and ink filter intended for use with the printhead when in operation characterised by having a conformal layer of a coating material on at least some of the surfaces of both the printhead and the filter.
According to third aspect of the invention there is provided a method for making an improved ink filter for use with a printhead characterised by comprising: passing a fluid or gaseous coating over said filter, thus forming a passivating layer over the filter; the filter comprising pores of characteristic size(s) said pore sizes being reduced to a desired value by the passivating layer.
According to a fourth aspect of the invention there is provided an improved ink filter for use with a printhead characterised by comprising a mesh and a passivating layer over said mesh that defines pores of a desired size.
The present invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Following channel flushing, a blank nozzle plate and filter are attached immediately in order to prevent the ingress of dirt during subsequent processing. This results in increased production yield. This assembly is then taken through the parylene process where a 10 μm layer is added to the outside. The parylene passes along the same path as the ink when the printhead is in use. The process parameters and/or printhead design is tailored to achieve the 3-4 um layer on the actuator walls; a Parylene layer at ca. 10 μm on external surfaces results in a 3-4 μm layer on the channel walls. Moreover, the 10 μm layer, when applied to the 30 μm filter results in the required 10 μm filter having the additional advantage of a lower resistance to fluids as well as improved material compatibility attributable to the Parylene coating of the filter and its mesh.
An advantage to the method according to the first embodiment is that any dirt in the manifold is over-coated and entrapped by the Parylene such that it can no longer cause risks of nozzle blockage or contamination. There is similar encapsulation of any grains of piezoelectric material that might otherwise be dislodged during the life of the product, e.g. due to prolonged ultrasonic agitation.
Another advantage is that since all assembly processes in the actuator ink path are complete prior to the application of the passivating Parylene layer, all materials in the actuator ink path are afforded protection. Thus actuator materials are protected against chemical attack from the ink and the ink is protected from contamination by the actuator materials.
The application of a passivation layer to the rear of the nozzle plate also provides protection to the adhesive (if used) that attaches the nozzle plate.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0510991.3 | May 2005 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2006/001959 | 5/30/2006 | WO | 00 | 11/28/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/129072 | 12/7/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4589000 | Koto et al. | May 1986 | A |
4707705 | Hara et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4947184 | Moynihan et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5426458 | Wenzel et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5548894 | Muto | Aug 1996 | A |
5653901 | Yoshimura | Aug 1997 | A |
6109728 | Kakuda et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6357867 | Hine | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6450627 | Moynihan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6634733 | Daddey | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6808250 | Watanabe | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6880916 | Kim | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7052122 | Hoisington et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7101030 | Clark et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7275817 | Clark et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20060057503 | Bertelsen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0712726 | May 1996 | EP |
0863008 | Sep 1998 | EP |
1138498 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1308196 | May 2003 | EP |
2-500899 | Mar 1990 | JP |
3-169559 | Jul 1991 | JP |
07008725 | May 1995 | JP |
20011300008 | May 2001 | JP |
2004-17415 | Jan 2004 | JP |
WO-9924141 | May 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Parylene Properties & Characteristics, V&P Scientific, Inc. 2010, 4 pages, website: http://www.vp-scientific.com/parylene—properties.htm. |
International Search Report for PCT/GB2006/001959 dated Sep. 8, 2006. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/GB2006/001959, dated Dec. 13, 2007. |
Examination Report for Application No. EP06744023.0, dated Mar. 3, 2012. |
Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2011-17958, dated Jul. 3, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080198198 A1 | Aug 2008 | US |