All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The devices and methods described herein relate to passive nasal devices that provide positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) when secured in contact with the wearer's nose or nasal passages. These devices are lightweight, easy to apply, effective, and may be safely worn while sleeping.
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) refers to pressure in the airway at the end of expiration that exceeds atmospheric pressure. Positive end-expiratory pressure has been used clinically mainly as a way to recruit or stabilize lung units and improve oxygenation in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure. Traditionally, PEEP has been achieved using devices that apply continuous positive airway pressure (referred to as ventilators or CPAP devices), wherein both the inspiratory and expiratory portions of the circuit are pressurized above atmospheric pressure. However, CPAP devices (including modified devices such as “C-FLEX” devices manufactured by Respironics) are expensive, uncomfortable and cumbersome, leading to limited application and patient compliance.
Numerous disease states may benefit from the modification of patient respiration to induce PEEP, including heart failure, sleep apnea and other sleep disorders, hypertension, snoring, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchitis, asthma, and many others.
Heart failure, or congestive heart failure (CHF), is a common clinical syndrome that represents the end-stage of a number of pulmonary and cardiac disease states. Heart failure is a degenerative condition that occurs when the heart muscle weakens and the ventricle no longer contracts normally. The heart can then no longer adequately pump blood to the body including the lungs. This may lead to exercise intolerance, or may cause fluid retention with subsequent shortness of breath or swelling of the feet. Over four million people are diagnosed with heart failure in the United States alone. Morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure is high.
Sleep apnea is defined as the temporary absence or cessation of breathing during sleep. Airflow must be absent for some period of time longer than the usual inter-breath interval, typically defined as ten seconds for adults and eight seconds (or more than two times the normal respiratory cycle time) for infants. There are different varieties of sleep apnea, including central, obstructive, complex, and mixed. In central sleep apnea, the patient makes no effort to breathe. In obstructive apnea, ventilatory effort is present, but no airflow results, because of upper airway closure. In mixed apnea, there is initially no ventilatory effort (suggestive of central sleep apnea), but an obstructive sleep apnea pattern becomes evident when ventilatory effort resumes. Finally, hypopnea is a temporary decrease in inspiratory airflow relative to the previous several inspirations. The terms sleep apnea and/or sleep disordered breathing may refer to hypopnea.
Hypertension refers to elevated blood pressure, and is a very common disease. Hypertension is characterized by elevated systolic and/or diastolic blood pressures. Despite the prevalence of hypertension and its associated complications, control of the disease is far from adequate. Only a third of people with hypertension control their blood pressure adequately. This failure reflects the inherent problem of maintaining long-term therapy for a usually asymptomatic condition, particularly when the therapy may interfere with the patient's quality of life, and when the immediate benefits of the therapy are not obvious to the patient.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) includes chronic bronchitis, emphysema and asthma. In both chronic bronchitis and emphysema, airflow obstruction limits the patient's airflow during exhalation. COPD is a progressive disease characterized by a worsening baseline respiratory status over a period of many years with sporadic exacerbations often requiring hospitalization. Early symptoms include increased sputum production and sporadic acute exacerbations characterized by increased cough, purulent sputum, wheezing, dyspnea, and fever. As the disease progresses, the acute exacerbations become more frequent. Late in the course of the disease, the patient may develop hypercapnia, hypoxemia, erythrocytosis, cor pulmonale with right-sided heart failure, and edema.
Chronic bronchitis is characterized by a chronic cough with sputum production leading to obstructed expiration. Pathologically, there may be mucosal and submucosal edema and inflammation and an increase in the number and size of mucus glands. Emphysema is characterized by destruction of the lung parenchyma leading to loss of elastic recoil, reduced tethering of airways, and obstruction to expiration. Pathologically, the distal airspaces are enlarged.
Asthma is another chronic lung condition, characterized by difficulty in breathing. People with asthma have extra-sensitive or hyper-responsive airways. The airways react by obstructing or narrowing when they become inflamed or irritated. This makes it difficult for the air to move in and out of the airways, leading to respiratory distress. This narrowing or obstruction can lead to coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath, and/or chest tightness. In some cases, asthma may be life threatening.
In all of these diseases, current medical and surgical therapies are not completely effective, and there is considerable room for improvement. Two therapies that are used to treat these diseases are pulmonary rehabilitation (including pursed-lip breathing) and non-invasive mechanical ventilation.
Pulmonary rehabilitation is frequently used to treat patients suffering from a variety of medical ailments such as those mentioned. For example, COPD patients are taught new breathing techniques that reduce hyperinflation of the lungs and relieve expiratory airflow obstruction. One of the goals of this training is to reduce the level of dyspnea. Typically, these new breathing techniques include diaphragmatic and pursed-lip breathing. Pursed-lip breathing involves inhaling slowly through the nose and exhaling through pursed-lips (as if one were whistling), taking two or three times as long to exhale as to inhale. Most COPD patients instinctively learn how to perform pursed-lip breathing in order to relieve their dyspnea. Moreover, patients with asthma and other respiratory ailments, and even normal people during exercise, have been shown to use pursed-lip breathing, especially during times of exertion.
It is widely believed that producing a proximal obstruction (e.g., pursing the lips) splints open the distal airways that have lost their tethering in certain disease states. In other words, airways that would normally collapse during respiration remain open when the patient breathes through pursed-lips. Moreover, by increasing exhalation time, respiratory rate can be reduced and, in some cases, made more regular.
The medical literature has confirmed the utility of pursed-lip breathing in COPD patients. Specifically, it has been found that pursed-lip breathing by COPD patients results in a reduction in respiratory rate, an increase in tidal volumes, and an improvement of oxygen saturation. All of these effects contribute to a reduction in patient dyspnea. However, pursed-lip breathing requires conscious effort. Thus, the patient cannot breathe through pursed-lips while sleeping. As a result, the patient can still become hypoxic at night and may develop pulmonary hypertension and other sequelae as a result. Furthermore, the patient has to constantly regulate his own breathing. This interferes with his performing of other activities because the patient must pay attention to maintaining pursed-lip breathing.
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is another method of treating diseases that benefit from regulation of the patient's respiration. NPPV refers to ventilation delivered by a nasal mask, nasal prongs/pillows or face mask. NPPV eliminates the need for intubation or tracheostomy. Outpatient methods of delivering NPPV include bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP or bilevel) ventilator devices, or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices.
NPPV can deliver a set pressure during each respiratory cycle, with the possibility of additional inspiratory pressure support in the case of bi-level devices. NPPV has been shown to be very efficacious in such diseases as sleep apnea, heart failure, and COPD, and has become increasingly used in recent years. Many patients use CPAP or BIPAP at night while they are sleeping.
However, most patients experience difficulty adapting to nocturnal NPPV, leading to poor compliance. Mask discomfort is a very common problem for patients new to NPPV, because of the high pressures on the nose, mouth, and face, and because of uncomfortably tight straps. Nasal congestion and dryness are also common complaints that may vary by season. The nasal bridge can become red or ulcerated due to excessive mask tension. Eye irritation and acne can also result. Still other patients experience abdominal distention and flatulence. Finally, air leakage through the mouth is also very common in nasal NPPV patients, potentially leading to sleep arousals.
Both pursed-lip breathing and the use of NPPV have been shown to offer significant clinical benefits to patients with a variety of medical illnesses, including but not limited to COPD, heart failure, pulmonary edema, sleep apnea (both central and obstructive) and other sleep disordered breathing, cystic fibrosis, asthma, cardiac valve disease, arrhythmias, anxiety, and snoring. Expiratory resistance is believed to provide the bulk of clinical improvements when using pursed-lip breathing and NPPV, through a variety of physiologic mechanisms. In contrast, inspiratory support is not believed to offer clinical benefits in many patients. For example, in COPD, expiratory resistance facilitates expiration, increases tidal volume, decreases respiratory rate, and improves gas exchange. In the case of heart failure, it is felt that positive pressure in the airways (due to expiratory resistance) reduces pulmonary edema and improves lung compliance, decreases preload and afterload, increases pO2, and decreases pCO2. In many disease states, expiratory resistance helps maintain a more stable respiratory rate that can have profound clinical effects to the patient.
It would therefore be desirable to have a medical device and/or procedure that mimics the effect of pursed-lip breathing and/or the benefits of non-invasive ventilation without suffering from the drawbacks described above.
Described herein are nasal respiratory devices and methods for treating a variety of medical diseases through the use of such devices. For example, described herein are nasal respiratory devices for inducing positive end-expiratory pressure adapted to be secured, e.g., removably, and in some cases adhesively, secured, in communication with a nasal cavity. These devices may include an opening or passageway, and an airflow resistor in communication with the opening/passageway, wherein the airflow resistor is configured to have a non-zero threshold pressure for opening during expiration so that the airflow resistor is closed during expiration when the pressure across the airflow resistor is below the threshold pressure for opening, but the airflow resistor opens during expiration when the airflow resistor exceeds the threshold pressure for opening during expiration. These devices may also include a holdfast configured to secure the airflow resistor in communication with the nasal cavity without covering the subject's mouth.
Although the airflow resistors described herein may be referred to as closed during expiration at pressures below the threshold, it should be understood that there may be some airflow, even at low pressures, by design, in some variations. Thus, closure of the airflow resistor typically means that the valve of the airflow resistor is in a closed position, though some air may pass through the device, including the airflow resistor (non-zero flow).
The devices described herein may be adhesive, and may be configured to secure over, across and/or slightly within one or both of a subject's nostrils. These devices may include an adhesive holdfast that extends roughly perpendicular to a body (e.g., valve body, cone) housing a dual airflow resistor (valve) that includes an inspiratory valve component and an expiratory valve component. For example, the inspiratory valve component may be a flap-valve that opens during inhalation through the device, and the expiratory valve component may be a piston-type valve including a bias preventing the valve from opening until the expiratory pressure exceeds a threshold. In some variations the inspiratory valve is nested in the expiratory valve.
The variations described herein are particularly well suited for use as nasal respiratory valves, and especially valves that may be used by a sleeping or recumbent patient. For example, the valves described herein may be adapted to be worn comfortably on the patient's face. Such adaptations include the use of the holdfast configurations described herein, the overall low profile of the devices, and the shape of the device, including the body (cone) region.
Any appropriate threshold pressure for opening during expiration may be used. For example, the threshold pressure for opening (which may also be referred to as the threshold for opening) of the airflow resistor may be less than about 20 cm H2O, less than about 15 cm H2O, less than about 13 cm H2O, less than about 10 cm H2O, less than about 8 cm H2O, more than about 4 cm H2O, or between a range of pressures. For example, the threshold pressure for opening may be between about 0.5 cm H2O and about 20 cm H2O, or between about 0.5 cm H2O and about 15 cm H2O, or between about 4 cm H2O and about 20 cm H2O. The threshold for opening is typically much less than the pressure resulting from coughing, sneezing, or the like.
In some variations, the airflow resistor may further comprise a non-zero threshold pressure for closing during expiration, such that the airflow resistor closes during expiration when the pressure across the airflow resistor falls below the threshold pressure for closing. Any appropriate threshold pressure for closing during expiration may be used. For example, the threshold pressure for closing during expiration may be greater than about 1 cm H2O, greater than about 2 cm H2O, greater than about 3 cm H2O, greater than about 4 cm H2O, greater than about 10 cm H2O, etc. In some variations, the threshold pressure for closing during expiration is between a range of values, such as between about 0.5 cm H2O and about 20 cm H2O, between about 0.5 cm H2O and about 15 cm H2O, between about 0.5 cm H2O and about 10 cm H2O, between about 0.5 cm H2O and about 5 cm H2O. The threshold pressure for closing during expiration may be approximately the same as the threshold pressure for opening during expiration, or it may be different.
The passive nasal respiratory devices for inducing positive end-expiratory pressure described herein may be adapted to be secured in communication with a nasal cavity so that the body of the device (housing at least one of the expiratory and/or inspiratory valves forming the airflow resistor) is communication with one or more nasal passage, so that the airflow resistor is closed during expiration when the pressure across the valve is below the threshold pressure for opening, but the valve opens during expiration when the pressure across the valve exceeds the threshold pressure for opening during expiration. These devices may also include a holdfast configured to secure the airflow resistor only in communication with a nasal cavity, or with both nasal cavities (e.g., but not the mouth). The airflow resistor may include a flap valve and a biased valve configured as a nested valve, a bistable valve, and the like.
Also described herein are passive nasal respiratory devices for inducing positive end-expiratory pressure adapted to be secured in communication with a nasal cavity that include a passageway through a housing and an airflow resistor in communication with the housing, where the airflow resistor has a first valve configured to open during inspiration and close during expiration and a second valve configured to open during exhalation and close during inspiration, and the second valve is configured so that it does not open until the pressure across the second valve exceeds a non-zero threshold pressure for opening. These devices may also include a holdfast extending from the body of the device in a direction roughly perpendicular to the direction of air through the housing. The holdfast may be an adhesive holdfast configured to secure the airflow resistor in communication with the nasal cavity.
A passive nasal device (or passive airflow resistor) typically does not include active elements (e.g., powered elements) or driven airflow, as from pressurized gas, fans, or the like. Thus, a passive airflow resistor may be configured to provide resistance based on the mechanical operation of the airflow resistor during inhalation and exhalation through the device.
In some variations, the second valve is nested with the first valve. The first valve or the second valve (or both) may be a flap valve. The second valve may be a biased valve (including but not limited to a biased flap valve). The second valve may be a bistable valve.
These passive nasal respiratory devices for inducing positive end-expiratory pressure may be adapted to be secured in communication with one or both nasal cavities.
Any of the passive nasal PEEP devices described herein may be used to treat a disorder. Methods of treating a disorder with these devices may include the steps of securing one or the devices described herein in communication with a subject's nasal cavity without covering the subject's mouth, wherein the respiratory device comprises an airflow resistor configured to have a non-zero threshold pressure for opening during expiration so that the airflow resistor is closed during expiration when the pressure across the valve is below the threshold pressure for opening, but the airflow resistor opens during expiration when the pressure across the airflow resistor exceeds the threshold pressure for opening during expiration, and allowing the subject to breathe at least partly through the nasal respiratory device. The disorder treated may be selected from the group consisting of: respiratory disorders, sleep disorders, gastroenterologic disorders, and cardiovascular disorders.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
The passive nasal PEEP devices described herein may be used to create positive end expiratory pressure during respiration (PEEP) effect in a subject wearing the device are described. These respiratory devices are referred to as passive nasal PEEP devices or simply as “devices.” The devices and methods described herein may be useful to treat a variety of medical disease states, and may also be useful for non-therapeutic purposes. The devices and methods described herein are not limited to the particular embodiments described. It is also to be understood that the examples and particular embodiments described are not intended to be limiting.
As used in this specification, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.
As used herein a passive nasal device is one that does not require the addition of a pressurized source of respiratory gas to operate as described (e.g., to apply PEEP and limit exhalation more than inhalation).
Any of the valves described herein can also be placed on a mask that fits on the nose or on a mask that fits on the nose and mouth. Such a mask may be held onto the head by adhesive or alternatively with straps or the like. Such a mask may be reusable or disposable by the patient. For example,
Thus, in
For example, in
Finally
In the exploded view of
As mentioned above, in any of these variations the device may be used with a mask, rather than directly attaching to the nostril. For example,
Threshold Pressure
In some embodiments, a pre-loaded spring (forming part of the expiratory valve of the airflow resistor) selectively restricts the opening of the expiratory valve. Expiratory flow is possible only when the pressure of the patient's airstream exceeds the cracking pressure of the valve. Selection of a spring that has a large preload distance relative to maximum valve displacement ensures that the expiratory pressure provided to the patient stays close to constant as airflow increases, instead of the pressure increasing significantly with increasing pressure. A ratio of preload distance to maximum valve displacement between 2:1 to 8:1 has been found to be effective for this purpose. The spring may be a compression spring, extension spring, or torsion spring. Other embodiments utilize magnets, rather than springs, to provide an expiratory threshold valve.
Inspiratory Resistance
In some embodiments, the inspiratory and expiratory valves are nested, rather than acting in parallel. Nesting both the inspiratory and expiratory valves increases the cross-sectional area available to each valve. (If the valves are acting in parallel, an increase in the cross-section area occupied by one valve reduces the area available for the other valve). Increasing the cross-sectional areas for the inspiratory valve is important because higher cross-sectional area enables lower inspiratory resistance. Minimizing inspiratory resistance of the inspiratory valve is important, as this can be the major contributor to inspiratory resistance of the entire device. Minimizing inspiratory resistance of the device is critical, as this minimizes the pressure drop across the device during inspiration, thereby causing a sleep apnea patient's airway pressure to be less negative, and therefore less likely to collapse. Also, increasing the cross-sectional area available for the expiratory valve is important because it increases the force of spring that can be used to achieve a given threshold pressure. This enables use of a stiffer, easier to manufacture spring.
Moisture frequently condenses on the inner surfaces of PEEP valve devices. This moisture can be present between the inspiratory valve flapper and the valve seat of the piston, and it can increase the pressure required to open the inspiratory valve. In some embodiments, the side of the flapper facing the valve seat of the piston, and the valve seat of the flapper, have a hydrophobic surface. These hydrophobic surfaces may be attained by high surface roughness, by a low surface energy coating, or other means.
Device Thickness
Minimizing the distance that the device protrudes out of the nostrils may be important for several reasons: minimizing the visual presence of the device, in order to make it less obtrusive and more acceptable for users; reducing the likelihood that the device will rub against other objects such as a pillow during sleep; and reduce the likelihood that the device would contact a male patient's facial hair.
In some embodiments, the housing for the compression spring in the piston extends beyond the plane of the valve seat, and protrudes into the nose cone of the body. Positioning the spring in this way, instead of placing the spring so its full length extended above the piston's valve seat, and did not protrude into the nose cone of the body, enables the overall device height to be reduced.
In some embodiments, the piston, body, and endcap components are made from a high stiffness plastic. High stiffness plastics that could be selected for these parts include Vectra liquid crystal polymer, polyether ether ketone, carbon filled nylon, and glass filled nylon. In other embodiments, the piston, body, and endcap components are made from a metal. Aluminum or stainless steel alloys could be selected for these parts.
Seal at Low Expiratory Flow
To maintain positive pressure in the airway, during end-expiratory pause, it is desirable for the device to maintain a therapeutic level of pressure at low expiratory flow rates.
In some embodiments, the inspiratory valve flapper is an elastomer. A highly compliant elastomer that is capable of significant strain before plastic deformation occurs, is well suited for this application. Such a material helps insure that the inspiratory valve flapper will not be deformed (for example, during assembly), which could cause a leak path between the flapper and the valve seat of the piston, and thus prevent adequate pressure from being maintained at low expiratory flow rates.
In some embodiments, the inspiratory valve flapper is adhered to the piston with an adhesive that has a negligible or low shrinkage rate. Shrinkage of the adhesive for this joint could distort the surface of the flapper and cause leakage paths. In other embodiments, the inspiratory valve flapper is retained from translating during inspiration by a retaining feature or part. In these embodiments, no adhesive contacts the inspiratory valve flapper.
In some embodiments, the inspiratory valve flapper has an interference fit with the piston's spring cylinder. This overlap may impart residual stresses in the flapper that bias it to a closed position. In other embodiments, the inspiratory valve flapper does not have an interference fit with any other parts. The lack of interference fit may reduce distortions to the flapper and reduce leak paths at low flow.
In some embodiments, the piston's valve seat is not flat. In some embodiments, the valve seat has an arc along the major axis. In this embodiment, the curvature of the piston's valve seat prevents a leak path from being exposed when the ends of inspiratory valve flapper bend due to gravity. In other embodiments, the valve seat has an arc along the minor axis. This curvature reduces the magnitude of bending of the inspiratory valve flapper along the major axis due to gravity, thus reducing the potential leak path.
Nasal Cannula Attachment
It is desirable for the nasal PEEP valve device to be able to integrate with a nasal cannula, in order to facilitate monitoring of nasal pressure during a sleep study.
The nasal cannula compatible embodiment of the body contains a housing for connecting to nasal cannula tubing, and a passageway with fluid communication between the housing and the inner surface of the nose cone, which is in constant fluid communication with the patients nasal passage when the device is in use. This enables the measurement of intranasal pressure. Measurement of intranasal pressure provides accurate data on the pressure delivered to the patient during expiration, whereas other potential measurement systems may not output the actual pressure delivered to the patient. Additionally this system provides accurate data on the pressure drop across the device during inspiration which may be helpful for healthcare practitioner to monitor.
In some embodiments, the tubing housing of the nasal cannula compatible body and the passageway to the inner surface of the nose cone are not concentric. This avoids adding unnecessary height to the body's valve seat, thus enabling the overall height of the device to be minimized.
It is important for the facial adhesive to be easy to apply for the patient. Even with nasal cannula tubing extending from the nasal PEEP valve device, it must be easy to achieve a good seal with the facial adhesive. In order to accomplish this, in some embodiments the housing for the nasal cannula tubing is angled between the major and minor axes of the device. In other embodiments, the housing for the nasal cannula tubing is angled towards the endcap (and away from the nose cone), in order to provide the patient with more space in which to apply the facial adhesive.
Noise
It is important for the device to make as little noise as possible during use, in order to avoid disturbing the patient and their bed partner.
The flapper alignment guides in the nose cone of the body restrict the bending of the inspiratory valve flapper during inspiration. The presence of these guides greatly reduces vibration and noise during inspiration.
Nose Cone Stiffness
During use, the nose cone of the body sits in the patient's nostrils. It is desirable for the nose cone to have as thin walls as possible, in order to maximize the cross-sectional area of the nose cone. On the other hand, it is desirable for the nose cone to be stiff and for it to be resistant to plastic deformation. To address this, in some embodiments of the nose cone there is a beam across the minor axis connecting the two sides of the cone. This provides a stiff, deformation-resistant cone with thin walls.
Stiction Between Piston and Body
Moisture frequently condenses on the surface of the piston's valve seat and the body's valve seat. It is possible for such condensation to cause stiction at the beginning of expiration, which causes the patient for experience a “popping” sensation. It is desirable to minimize or eliminate this effect.
In some embodiments, the contact surface area of the body's valve seat is minimized. In some embodiments, the contact surface is a rim with a sharp angle, approximating a line contact. In other embodiments, the contact surface is a series of small nubs that protrude above the surface of the rest of the body's valve seat.
In some embodiments, piston's valve seat and the body's valve seat are constructed to be hydrophobic. This results in less water adhering to the surfaces, as well as weaker water-solid interactions. Two methods that may be used to make these surfaces hydrophobic are application of a rough surface finish and application of a low surface energy coating.
In some embodiments, a compliant element allows one side of the piston's valve seat to open before the other, reducing the stiction force that must be overcome at a given instant in time.
Binding in Bearing
In some iterations of the device, binding in the bearing between the piston and the endcap caused an uneven exhalation with the sensation of “popping”
In some embodiments, a circular bearing is used (rather than a square bearing, for example), to reduce the chance of bearing binding due to rotation.
In some embodiments, the male bearing surface of the piston and female bearing surface of the endcap are constructed to have a low coefficient of friction.
In some embodiments, the male bearing surface of the piston is tapered, providing greater play when less of the bearing surface is engaged.
In some embodiments, there is a large pathway providing fluid communication between the outside of the device and the inner wall of the body, providing expiratory flow a pathway to directly exit the device after passing through the expiratory valve. This may reduce the proportion of the moist expiratory airflow that passes over the bearing, and thereby reduce the water deposited on the bearing.
Combination Therapy
In some methods of treatment of sleep disordered breathing patients with nasal PEEP valves, a means to restrain the patients mouth in a closed position, such as a chin strap, is used in conjunction.
Patient Selection
In some methods of treatment of sleep disordered breathing patients with nasal PEEP valves, patients are selected for this therapy based on nasal resistance screening or upper airway resistance screening.
Oral-Nasal Therapy
In some embodiments and methods, a threshold valve through which inspiration is less restricted than expiration, is applied to either the nose or mouth, and the other is sealed to prevent air leaks.
In other embodiments, a threshold valve through which inspiration is less restricted than expiration, is applied to both the nose and mouth.
Auto-Titrating PEEP Valve
In some embodiments and methods, a threshold valve for treating sleep disordered breathing comprises: a sensor, an actuator, an adjustable expiratory valve, and an inspiratory valve. In these embodiments and methods, the threshold valve would continually adjust the expiratory pressure delivered to the patient, based on the information received by the sensor related to the efficacy of the treatment. Among the advantages of an auto-titrating PEEP valve are:
The ability for a patient to have customized therapy delivered to treat their sleep disordered breathing. The ability for a patient to receive varying levels of pressure over the course of a night. At any time, the patient would receive no more pressure than necessary, thereby minimizing discomfort.
Additionally, some embodiments and methods of the auto-titrating PEEP valve have a ramp function, whereby pressure is reduced while the patient is attempting to fall asleep, and subsequently increased once the patient is asleep. In some embodiments, a timer is used to support the implementation of this ability. In other embodiments, a sensor to detect whether the patient is sleeping is used.
Diagnostic Devices
It may also be desirable to titrate the appropriate pressure to use in treating sleep disordered breathing using a threshold valve.
In some embodiments and methods, a threshold valve can be adjusted to provide multiple pressure settings.
In some embodiments and methods, the pressure settings are adjusted manually, by moving part of the device while it is attached to the patient. For example, a sleep technician can rotate a knob on the device, thereby changing the preload of a spring, and adjusting the expiratory threshold pressure. In other embodiments and methods, the pressure settings can be adjusted without physically touching the device, thereby avoiding waking the patient up. For example, the sleep technician can select a pressure from a digital interface, and this pressure is communicated to the device via wires or wirelessly. The device contains a microcontroller and adjusts the expiratory threshold pressure in accordance to the new input signal.
In some embodiments and methods, the pressure settings are discrete. In others, pressure settings cover a continuous range.
In some embodiments and methods, a respiratory support device that provides active pressure delivers expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) to a patient, in order to titrate the pressure needed for a threshold expiratory valve to treat sleep disordered breathing.
In some embodiments and methods, an auto-titrating threshold valve is used for titration of sleep disordered breathing patients.
As used herein in the specification and claims, including as used in the examples and unless otherwise expressly specified, all numbers may be read as if prefaced by the word “about” or “approximately,” even if the term does not expressly appear. The phrase “about” or “approximately” may be used when describing magnitude and/or position to indicate that the value and/or position described is within a reasonable expected range of values and/or positions. For example, a numeric value may have a value that is +/−0.1% of the stated value (or range of values), +/−1% of the stated value (or range of values), +/−2% of the stated value (or range of values), +/−5% of the stated value (or range of values), +/−10% of the stated value (or range of values), etc. Any numerical range recited herein is intended to include all sub-ranges subsumed therein.
This patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/721,928, filed on Nov. 2, 2012, and titled “PASSIVE NASAL PEEP DEVICES,” which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. This patent application also claims priority as a continuation-in-part to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/877,836, filed on Sep. 8, 2010 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,238,113), and titled “NASAL RESPIRATORY DEVICES FOR POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/811,401, filed on Jun. 7, 2007, titled “NASAL RESPIRATORY DEVICES FOR POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE” (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,806,120), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/298,640, filed on Dec. 8, 2005, titled “NASAL RESPIRATORY DEVICES” (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,735,492), which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/634,715, filed on Dec. 8, 2004, which are herein incorporated by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/811,401 also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/811,814, filed on Jun. 7, 2006, titled “RESPIRATORY DEVICES.” Each of the above patents and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
69396 | Curtis | Oct 1867 | A |
628111 | McHatton | Jul 1899 | A |
669098 | Overshiner | Mar 1901 | A |
675275 | Gunning | May 1901 | A |
718785 | McNary | Jan 1903 | A |
746869 | Moulton | Dec 1903 | A |
774446 | Moulton | Nov 1904 | A |
810617 | Carence | Jan 1906 | A |
1819884 | Fores | Aug 1931 | A |
2198959 | Clarke | Apr 1940 | A |
2237954 | Wilson | Apr 1941 | A |
2264153 | Rowe | Nov 1941 | A |
2274886 | Carroll | Mar 1942 | A |
2282681 | Stotz | May 1942 | A |
2335936 | Hanlon | Dec 1943 | A |
2433565 | Korman | Dec 1947 | A |
2448724 | McGovney | Sep 1948 | A |
2593315 | Kraft | Apr 1952 | A |
2672138 | Oarlock | Mar 1954 | A |
2751906 | Irvine | Jun 1956 | A |
2777442 | Zelano | Jan 1957 | A |
3145711 | Beber | Aug 1964 | A |
3315701 | Stilwell | Apr 1967 | A |
3370305 | Goott et al. | Feb 1968 | A |
3451392 | Cook et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
3463149 | Albu | Aug 1969 | A |
3513839 | Vacante | May 1970 | A |
3556122 | Laerdal | Jan 1971 | A |
3616802 | Marinaccio | Nov 1971 | A |
3657855 | Swezey | Apr 1972 | A |
3695265 | Brevik | Oct 1972 | A |
3710799 | Caballero | Jan 1973 | A |
3722509 | Nebel | Mar 1973 | A |
3747597 | Olivera | Jul 1973 | A |
3802426 | Sakamoto | Apr 1974 | A |
3884223 | Keindl | May 1975 | A |
3902621 | Hidding | Sep 1975 | A |
4004584 | Geaney | Jan 1977 | A |
4030491 | Mattila | Jun 1977 | A |
4040428 | Clifford | Aug 1977 | A |
4054134 | Kritzer | Oct 1977 | A |
4062358 | Kritzer | Dec 1977 | A |
4094316 | Nathanson | Jun 1978 | A |
4143872 | Havstad et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4212296 | Schaar | Jul 1980 | A |
4220150 | King | Sep 1980 | A |
4221217 | Amezcua | Sep 1980 | A |
4226233 | Kritzer | Oct 1980 | A |
4240420 | Riaboy | Dec 1980 | A |
4267831 | Aguilar | May 1981 | A |
4325366 | Tabor | Apr 1982 | A |
4327719 | Childers | May 1982 | A |
RE31040 | Possis | Sep 1982 | E |
4354489 | Riaboy | Oct 1982 | A |
4403616 | King | Sep 1983 | A |
4456016 | Nowacki et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4487207 | Fitz | Dec 1984 | A |
4533137 | Sonne | Aug 1985 | A |
4582058 | Depel et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4584997 | Delong | Apr 1986 | A |
4601465 | Roy | Jul 1986 | A |
4640277 | Meyer et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4651873 | Stolcenberg et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4702374 | Kelner | Oct 1987 | A |
4718554 | Barbato | Jan 1988 | A |
4739987 | Nicholson | Apr 1988 | A |
4759356 | Muir | Jul 1988 | A |
4822354 | Elosegui | Apr 1989 | A |
4823828 | McGinnis | Apr 1989 | A |
4854574 | Larson | Aug 1989 | A |
4860766 | Sackner | Aug 1989 | A |
4862903 | Campbell | Sep 1989 | A |
4908028 | Colon et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4913138 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4919138 | Nordenstroom | Apr 1990 | A |
4973047 | Norell | Nov 1990 | A |
4979505 | Cox | Dec 1990 | A |
4984302 | Lincoln | Jan 1991 | A |
4984581 | Stice | Jan 1991 | A |
5016425 | Weick | May 1991 | A |
5033312 | Stupecky | Jul 1991 | A |
5038621 | Stupecky | Aug 1991 | A |
5052400 | Dietz | Oct 1991 | A |
5059208 | Coe et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5074293 | Lott et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5078739 | Martin | Jan 1992 | A |
5092781 | Casciotti et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5117820 | Robitaille | Jun 1992 | A |
5197980 | Gorshkov et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5255687 | McKenna | Oct 1993 | A |
5383470 | Kolbly | Jan 1995 | A |
5385542 | Rawlings | Jan 1995 | A |
5391205 | Knight | Feb 1995 | A |
5392773 | Bertrand | Feb 1995 | A |
5394867 | Swann | Mar 1995 | A |
5414627 | Wada et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415660 | Campbell et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425359 | Liou | Jun 1995 | A |
5459544 | Emura | Oct 1995 | A |
5522382 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5535739 | Rapoport et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5562641 | Flomenblit et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568808 | Rimkus | Oct 1996 | A |
5572994 | Smith | Nov 1996 | A |
5598839 | Niles et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607469 | Frey | Mar 1997 | A |
5649533 | Oren | Jul 1997 | A |
5665104 | Lee | Sep 1997 | A |
5727546 | Clarke et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5730122 | Lurie | Mar 1998 | A |
5740798 | McKinney | Apr 1998 | A |
5743256 | Jalowayski | Apr 1998 | A |
5763979 | Mukherjee et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5775335 | Seal | Jul 1998 | A |
5782896 | Chen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797920 | Kim | Aug 1998 | A |
5803066 | Rapoport | Sep 1998 | A |
5803121 | Estes | Sep 1998 | A |
5823187 | Estes et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5848590 | Smith | Dec 1998 | A |
5865170 | Moles | Feb 1999 | A |
5876434 | Flomenblit et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878743 | Zdrojkowski et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890998 | Hougen | Apr 1999 | A |
5899832 | Hougen | May 1999 | A |
5910071 | Hougen | Jun 1999 | A |
5911756 | Debry | Jun 1999 | A |
5947119 | Reznick | Sep 1999 | A |
5954766 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957978 | Blom | Sep 1999 | A |
5992006 | Datsikas | Nov 1999 | A |
6004342 | Filis | Dec 1999 | A |
6058932 | Hughes | May 2000 | A |
6083141 | Hougen | Jul 2000 | A |
D430667 | Rome | Sep 2000 | S |
6119690 | Pantaleo | Sep 2000 | A |
6165133 | Rapoport et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176234 | Salter | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177482 | Cinelli et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189532 | Hely et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6213955 | Karakasoglu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219997 | Friberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230708 | Radko | May 2001 | B1 |
6258100 | Alferness et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287290 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293951 | Alferness et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6311839 | Lo | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328038 | Kessler et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6369126 | Cinelli et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6398775 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6439233 | Geertsema | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6484725 | Chi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500095 | Hougen | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510846 | O'Rourke | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6527761 | Soltesz et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6561188 | Ellis | May 2003 | B1 |
6562057 | Santin | May 2003 | B2 |
6568387 | Davenport et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6573421 | Lemaire | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6581598 | Foran et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585639 | Kotmel et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592594 | Rimbaugh et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592995 | Topolkaraev et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6595215 | Wood | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6609516 | Hollander et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6626172 | Karow et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626179 | Pedley | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631721 | Salter et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6679264 | Deem et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694979 | Deem et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6722360 | Doshi | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726598 | Jarvis et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6737160 | Full et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6769432 | Keifer | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6776162 | Wood | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6776163 | Dougill et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6811538 | Westbrook et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6841716 | Tsutsumi | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6848446 | Noble | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863066 | Ogle | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6866652 | Bierman | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872439 | Fearing et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6913017 | Roberts | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921574 | Cinelli et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6997177 | Wood | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011723 | Full et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7013896 | Schmidt | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7047969 | Noble | May 2006 | B2 |
7156098 | Dolezal et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175723 | Jones et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7178524 | Noble | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7201169 | Wilkie et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
D542407 | Stallard et al. | May 2007 | S |
7263996 | Yung Ho | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7334581 | Doshi | Feb 2008 | B2 |
D566834 | Barton | Apr 2008 | S |
7422014 | Smith | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7506649 | Doshi et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7559326 | Smith et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7578294 | Pierro et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7640934 | Zollinger et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7735491 | Doshi et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7735492 | Doshi et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7762252 | Prete | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7798148 | Doshi et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806120 | Loomas et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7856979 | Doshi et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7880051 | Madsen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7987852 | Doshi et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7992563 | Doshi | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7992564 | Doshi et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7992566 | Pflueger et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8020700 | Doshi et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8061357 | Pierce et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8215308 | Doshi et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8235046 | Doshi et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8240309 | Doshi et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8251066 | Ho et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8281557 | Doshi et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291909 | Doshi et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8302606 | Doshi et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8302607 | Pierce et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8365736 | Doshi et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8707955 | Doshi | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20010051799 | Ingenito | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056274 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020062120 | Perkins et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077593 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020112729 | DeVore et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020157673 | Kessler et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030024527 | Ginn | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050648 | Alferness et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030070682 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030106555 | Tovey | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030106556 | Alperovich et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030140925 | Sapienza et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149387 | Barakat et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154988 | DeVore et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158515 | Gonzalez et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030195552 | Santin | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030209247 | O'Rourke | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040016432 | Genger et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040020489 | Gillespie et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040020492 | Dubrul et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040020493 | Wood | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040055606 | Hendricksen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040112379 | Djupesland | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123868 | Rutter | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040149615 | Eisenbraun | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040230108 | Melker | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254491 | Ricciardelli | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261791 | Horian | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261798 | Rimkus | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010125 | Joy et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050011524 | Thomlinson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033344 | Dillard et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050051170 | Koo | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066965 | Cronk et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076910 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050133039 | Wood | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050211250 | Dolezal et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050279351 | Lewis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050284479 | Schrader et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000472 | Fenton | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060016450 | Pearson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060085027 | Santin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060169285 | Bovo | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060180149 | Matarasso | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060266361 | Hernandez | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060278238 | Borody | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060283461 | Lubke et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016123 | Jensen | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070051364 | Jacobson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070095349 | Hansmann et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070175478 | Brunst | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070227542 | Kashmakov et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070283962 | Doshi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287976 | Sherrill | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070295338 | Loomas | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080023007 | Dolezal et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080032119 | Feldhahn et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080041397 | Hirs | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080053460 | Wilson | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080078383 | Richards et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080087286 | Jones | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080099021 | Moore | May 2008 | A1 |
20080135044 | Freitag et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080142014 | Jiang | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080142018 | Doshi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080221470 | Sather et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090139530 | Landis et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090145441 | Doshi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090194100 | Minagi | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090194109 | Doshi et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090308398 | Ferdinand et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100326447 | Loomas et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110005520 | Doshi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110067709 | Doshi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110108041 | Sather et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110203598 | Favet et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110218451 | Lai et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110240038 | Doshi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110290256 | Sather et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120285470 | Sather et al. | Nov 2012 | A9 |
20140109907 | Doshi et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140345623 | Pierce et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20160128863 | Loomas et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20180085246 | Loomas et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0434258 | Jun 1991 | EP |
1157663 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1205203 | May 2002 | EP |
1481702 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1917993 | May 2008 | EP |
2862614 | May 2005 | FR |
2096574 | Oct 1982 | GB |
2324729 | Apr 1998 | GB |
52-123786 | Oct 1977 | JP |
55-122742 | Sep 1980 | JP |
58-136345 | Aug 1983 | JP |
63-189257 | Dec 1988 | JP |
7-47126 | Feb 1995 | JP |
3059270 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2001-299916 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002-153489 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-219174 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-345963 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002-345966 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2005-40589 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005-505355 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2008-136496 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008-522763 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2048820 | Nov 1995 | RU |
1586709 | Aug 1990 | SU |
WO 9012614 | Nov 1990 | WO |
WO 9308777 | May 1993 | WO |
WO 9517220 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9533520 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9846310 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9903395 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 0029066 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0050121 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0067848 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0102042 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0113839 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0113908 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0149371 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0187170 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0189381 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0238038 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 03022124 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03034927 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2004084998 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2005000805 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2006040585 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2007023607 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007129814 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007134458 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007146133 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Doshi et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/545,865 entitled “Nasal Devices,” filed Jul. 10, 2012. |
Witt et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 61/141,251 entitled “System, Method, and Respiration Appliance for Supporting the Airway of a Subject,” filed Dec. 30, 2008. |
http://chinookmed.com/index.cfm/fa/product.display&Product_ID=275; accessed Nov. 28, 2007. |
Mahadevia, A. K. et al., Effects of expiratory positive airway pressure on sleep-induced respiratory abnormalities in patients with hypersomnia-sleep apnea syndrome, Am Rev Respir Dis 1983, vol. 128, pp. 708-711, Oct. 1983. |
Dillard, D. et al., Evaluation of a novel intra-bronchial valve to produce lung volume reduction, World Congress of Bronchology, Jun. 2002 (figs. 1-4 available upon request). |
Hakel et al.; Nasal obturator for velopharyngeal dysfunction in dysarthria: technical report on a one-way valve; Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology; vol. 12; No. 4; pp. 155-159; Dec. 2004. |
Suwaki et al.; Nasal speaking valve: a device for managing velopharyngeal incompetence; Journal of Oral Rehabilitation; vol. 35(1); pp. 73-78; Jan. 2008. |
Suwaki et al.; The effect of nasal speaking valve on the speech under experimental velopharyngeal incompetence condition; Journal of Oral Rehabilitation; vol. 35(5); pp. 361-369; May 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140128761 A1 | May 2014 | US | |
20160361067 A9 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61721928 | Nov 2012 | US | |
60634715 | Dec 2004 | US | |
60811814 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11811401 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 12877836 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12877836 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 14071582 | US | |
Parent | 11298640 | Dec 2005 | US |
Child | 11811401 | US |