Patent Application
20190038298
The present invention relates to orthopedic methods, systems and prosthetic devices and more particularly relates to surgical templates designed to achieve optimal cut planes in a joint in preparation for installation of a joint implant.
There are various types of cartilage, e.g., hyaline cartilage and fibrocartilage. Hyaline cartilage is found at the articular surfaces of bones, e.g., in the joints, and is responsible for providing the smooth gliding motion characteristic of moveable joints. Articular cartilage is firmly attached to the underlying bones and measures typically less than 5 mm in thickness in human joints, with considerable variation depending on joint and site within the joint. In addition, articular cartilage is aneural, avascular, and alymphatic. In adult humans, this cartilage derives its nutrition by a double diffusion system through the synovial membrane and through the dense matrix of the cartilage to reach the chondrocyte, the cells that are found in the connective tissue of cartilage.
Adult cartilage has a limited ability of repair; thus, damage to cartilage produced by disease, such as rheumatoid and/or osteoarthritis, or trauma can lead to serious physical deformity and debilitation. Furthermore, as human articular cartilage ages, its tensile properties change. The superficial zone of the knee articular cartilage exhibits an increase in tensile strength up to the third decade of life, after which it decreases markedly with age as detectable damage to type II collagen occurs at the articular surface. The deep zone cartilage also exhibits a progressive decrease in tensile strength with increasing age, although collagen content does not appear to decrease. These observations indicate that there are changes in mechanical and, hence, structural organization of cartilage with aging that, if sufficiently developed, can predispose cartilage to traumatic damage.
For example, the superficial zone of the knee articular cartilage exhibits an increase in tensile strength up to the third decade of life, after which it decreases markedly with age as detectable damage to type II collagen occurs at the articular surface. The deep zone cartilage also exhibits a progressive decrease in tensile strength with increasing age, although collagen content does not appear to decrease. These observations indicate that there are changes in mechanical and, hence, structural organization of cartilage with aging that, if sufficiently developed, can predispose cartilage to traumatic damage.
Once damage occurs, joint repair can be addressed through a number of approaches. One approach includes the use of matrices, tissue scaffolds or other carriers implanted with cells (e.g., chondrocytes, chondrocyte progenitors, stromal cells, mesenchymal stem cells, etc.). However, clinical outcomes with biologic replacement materials such as allograft and autograft systems and tissue scaffolds have been uncertain since most of these materials cannot achieve a morphologic arrangement or structure similar to or identical to that of normal, disease-free human tissue it is intended to replace. Moreover, the mechanical durability of these biologic replacement materials remains uncertain.
Usually, severe damage or loss of cartilage is treated by replacement of the joint with a prosthetic material, for example, silicone, e.g. for cosmetic repairs, or metal alloys. Implantation of these prosthetic devices is usually associated with loss of underlying tissue and bone without recovery of the full function allowed by the original cartilage and, with some devices, serious long-term complications associated with the loss of significant amount of tissue and bone can include infection, osteolysis and also loosening of the implant.
As can be appreciated, joint arthroplasties are highly invasive and require surgical resection of the entire, or a majority of the, articular surface of one or more bones involved in the repair. Typically with these procedures, the marrow space is fairly extensively reamed in order to fit the stem of the prosthesis within the bone. Reaming results in a loss of the patient's bone stock and over time subsequent osteolysis will frequently lead to loosening of the prosthesis. Further, the area where the implant and the bone mate degrades over time requiring the prosthesis to eventually be replaced. Since the patient's bone stock is limited, the number of possible replacement surgeries is also limited for joint arthroplasty. In short, over the course of 15 to 20 years, and in some cases even shorter time periods, the patient can run out of therapeutic options ultimately resulting in a painful, non-functional joint.
A variety of tools, such as a guide for making one or more surgical cuts, are currently available to assist surgeons. However, these devices are not designed to substantially conform to the actual shape (contour) of the remaining cartilage in vivo and/or the underlying bone. Thus, use and proper alignment of the tool and integration of the implant can be extremely difficult due to differences in thickness and curvature between the patient's surrounding cartilage and/or the underlying subchondral bone and the prosthesis. Thus, there remains a need for tools that increase the accuracy of cuts made to the bone in a joint in preparation for surgical implantation of, for example, an artificial joint.
The present invention provides novel surgical tools and methods. In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a surgical tool includes a template. The template has at least one contact surface for engaging a surface associated with a joint. The at least one contact surface substantially conforms with the surface. The template further includes at least one guide aperture for directing movement of a surgical instrument.
One embodiment is a system for articular repair that includes a first template having a first surface and a second surface, the first surface conforming with, and substantially a negative of, at least a portion of first side of a joint; a second template having a third surface that conforms with, and is substantially a negative of, a portion of the first side of the joint, the second template including at least one guide for guiding a surgical instrument in making a cut on the first side of the joint; and an attachment mechanism for attaching the second template to the first template.
Other embodiments may include one or more of the following. The first or second template can include a guide for making a vertical cut. The second surface can be at least one of substantially flat, substantially concave, substantially convex, and matched to one of the first or second sides of the joint. The system can include at least one other template, and each of the other templates can be capable of attaching to the second template. The templates can vary in thickness. At least a portion of the first surface can substantially conforms to at least one of uncut subchondral bone, uncut cartilage, and uncut bone of a first or second side of the joint. At least a portion of the second surface can substantially conform to at least one of uncut subchondral bone, uncut cartilage, and uncut bone of a first or second side of a joint. At least a portion of the third surface can substantially conforms to at least one of uncut subchondral bone, uncut cartilage, and uncut bone of a first or second side of a joint. The attachment mechanism can include at least one of a snapfit, dovetail and a cross-pin. The attachment mechanism can allow for rotation relative to one of an anatomical and a biomechanical axis. The joint can be at least one of a hip, knee, ankle, toe joint, shoulder, elbow, wrist, finger joint, spine or spinal joint.
Another embodiment is a system for articular joint repair that includes: a first template having a first surface and a second surface, the first surface substantially a negative of at least a portion of the tibial plateau; a second template having a third surface that is substantially a negative of a portion of the tibia, the second template including at least one guide for guiding a surgical instrument in making a cut on the tibia; and an attachment mechanism for attaching the second template to the first template.
Other aspects of this embodiment may include one or more of the following. The first or second template can include a guide for making a vertical tibial cut. The second surface can be at least one of substantially flat, substantially concave, substantially convex, and matched to one of the tibia and the femur. The system can include at least one other template can have a first surface and a second surface. The first surface can conform with, and be substantially a negative of, at least a portion of the tibial plateau. Each of the other templates can be capable of attaching to the second template, wherein the first template and each of the other templates vary in thickness. At least a portion of the first surface can be substantially a negative of at least one of uncut subchondral bone, uncut cartilage, and uncut bone of a tibia. At least a portion of the second surface can be substantially a negative of at least one of uncut subchondral bone, uncut cartilage, and uncut bone of a tibia. At least a portion of the third surface can be substantially a negative of at least one of uncut subchondral bone, uncut cartilage, and uncut bone of a tibia. The attachment mechanism can include at least one of a snapfit, dovetail and a cross-pin. The attachment mechanism can allow for rotation relative to one of an anatomical and a biomechanical axis. At least one guide can guides a surgical instrument in making a cut on the tibia having a desired slope relative to at least one of a biomechanical and an anatomical axis. The articular joint repair can be a joint resurfacing, including a knee joint resurfacing, a joint replacement or other procedure.
Another embodiment is a system for articular repair that includes a first template having a first surface substantially matching at least a portion of the tibial plateau. The first template can include a medial edge that corresponds to a predetermined location for a vertical tibial cut.
Other embodiments may have one or more of the following. A second template can have a surface substantially matching at least a portion of the tibia, and can include at least one guide for guiding a surgical instrument. The second template can also have an attachment mechanism for attaching the second template to the first template. The first template can include a guide for guiding a surgical instrument. The medial edge can be adapted as a guide for making a vertical tibial cut. The system can have at least one other template having a first surface and a second surface. The first surface can substantially match at least a portion of the tibial plateau. The first template and each of the other templates can vary in thickness. At least a portion of the first surface can substantially match at least one of uncut subchondral bone, uncut cartilage, and uncut bone.
Another embodiment is a kit for testing at least one of ligament balancing and ligament tension, which includes a first template that has at least one surface substantially conforming with at least a portion of a first articular joint surface. The template is configured for placement on the first articular joint surface and between the first articular joint surface and a second articular joint surface, and it has a predefined thickness configured to provide a physical spacer for assessing at least one of ligament balance and ligament tension during a surgical procedure.
Other embodiments can include one or more of the following. The kit can include a second template that has at least one surface substantially conforming with at least the portion of the first articular joint surface. The template can be configured for placement on the first articular joint surface and between the first articular joint surface and the second articular joint surface. The template can have a second predefined thickness configured to provide a physical spacer for assessing at least one of ligament balance and ligament tension during a surgical procedure. The kit can also include additional templates of varying thicknesses. The second template can also have at least one guide for guiding a surgical instrument, and an attachment mechanism for attaching the second template to at least one of the first template and the at least one other template. The kit can be used for articular joints, including a knee joint, a hip joint, a shoulder joint, an elbow joint, a wrist joint, a finger joint, a toe joint, and an ankle joint. At least a portion of the surface can substantially conforms to at least one of uncut subchondral bone, uncut cartilage, and uncut bone.
Another embodiment is a method of partial or total knee replacement or resurfacing that includes: positioning a first surface of a first instrument onto at least a portion of the tibial plateau, the first surface being substantially a negative of at least a portion of the tibial plateau; cross-referencing a second instrument to the first instrument to align position of the second instrument on the tibia, the second instrument including at least one surgical cut guide; and directing a cut using the at least one surgical guide of the second of the second instrument.
Other embodiments can have one or more of the following. The cut can be a tibial cut. The instruments can be templates, surgical tools or other devices. The first instrument can include a guide for making a cut, which can be a vertical or horizontal cut, e.g., on the tibia. The first instrument can include a medial edge that corresponds to a predetermined location for a vertical tibial cut, the method further comprising confirming the proper location of the vertical tibial cut based on the medial edge. At least a portion of the first surface can substantially conform to at least one of uncut subchondral bone, uncut cartilage, and uncut bone. The first surface of the instrument is based, at least in part, on electronic image data of the tibial plateau. Cross-referencing can include attaching the first instrument to the second instrument. The at least one guide of the second instrument can guide a surgical instrument in making a cut on the tibia having a desired slope relative to at least one of a biomechanical and an anatomical axis.
Another embodiment is a method for testing at least one of ligament balancing and ligament tension of a joint that includes: inserting a first template having a first surface onto a first joint surface, the first surface substantially conforming to the first joint surface; and inserting a second template onto the first joint surface, the second template having a first surface that conforms with, and is substantially a negative of, the first joint surface, the second template having a thickness that varies from the first template.
Other embodiments can include one or more of the following. The method can further include selecting one of the first and second templates based on at least one of ligament balancing and ligament tension. The method can also include attaching a third template to the selected template, the third template, including at least one guide for guiding a surgical instrument; positioning the first surface of the selected template onto the first joint surface; and guiding the surgical instrument using the at least one guide. The joint can be one of a knee joint, a hip joint, a shoulder joint, an elbow joint, a wrist joint, a finger joint, a toe joint, and an ankle joint.
Another embodiment is a system for articular repair that includes first and second templates having a first surface that conforms with, and substantially is a negative of, at least a portion of a distal femur. It also includes a second template that has a third surface that conforms with, and is substantially a negative of, a portion of the distal femur. The second template can include at least one guide for guiding a surgical instrument in making a cut on the distal femur, and an attachment mechanism for attaching the second template to the first template.
Other embodiments can include one or more of the following. The first or second templates can include a guide for making a vertical femoral cut. The second surface can be at least one of substantially flat, substantially concave, substantially convex, and matched to one of the tibia and the femur. At least one other template can have a first surface that conforms with, and substantially is a negative of, the at least a portion of the distal femur. Each of the other templates can be capable of attaching to the second template. The first template and each of the other templates can vary in thickness. At least a portion of the first surface can substantially conform to at least one of uncut subchondral bone, uncut cartilage, and uncut bone of a distal femur. At least a portion of the second surface can substantially conform to at least one of uncut subchondral bone, uncut cartilage, and uncut bone of a distal femur. At least a portion of the third surface can substantially conform to at least one of uncut subchondral bone, uncut cartilage, and uncut bone of a tibia. The attachment mechanism can include at least one of a snapfit, dovetail and a cross-pin. The attachment mechanism can allow for rotation relative to one of an anatomical and a biomechanical axis.
Another embodiment is a system for articular repair that includes a first template having a first surface and a second surface, the first surface substantially conforming to at least a portion of the distal femur. The first template includes a medial edge that corresponds to a predetermined location for a vertical femoral or tibial cut.
Other embodiments can have one or more of the following. A second template can have a third surface substantially conforming to at least a portion of the distal femur or tibial plateau. The second template can include at least one guide for guiding a surgical instrument. There can also be an attachment mechanism for attaching the second template to the first template. The first template can include a guide for guiding a surgical instrument. The medial edge can be adapted as a guide for making a vertical tibial or femoral cut. At least one other template can have a first surface and a second surface. The first surface can substantially conform to at least a portion of the tibial plateau. The first template and each of the other templates can vary in thickness. At least a portion of the first surface can substantially conforms to at least one of uncut subchondral bone, uncut cartilage, and uncut bone.
Some embodiments can be used for a partial joint replacement, a total joint replacement, a partial joint resurfacing and a total joint resurfacing. Templates can vary in thickness or curvatures or can be made available in multiple different thicknesses or curvatures. The thickness of the other template can be selected to improve or optimize the position of a bone cut for ligament balancing.
The foregoing features of the invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. Various modifications to the embodiments described will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein can be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein. To the extent necessary to achieve a complete understanding of the invention disclosed, the specification and drawings of all issued patents, patent publications, and patent applications cited in this application are incorporated herein by reference.
3D guidance surgical tools, referred to herein as a 3D guidance surgical templates, that may be used for surgical assistance may include, without limitation, using templates, jigs and/or molds, including 3D guidance molds. It is to be understood that the terms “template,” “jig,” “mold,” “3D guidance mold,” and “3D guidance template,” shall be used interchangeably within the detailed description and appended claims to describe the tool unless the context indicates otherwise.
3D guidance surgical tools that may be used may include guide apertures. It is to be understood that the term guide aperture shall be used interchangeably within the detailed description and appended claims to describe both guide surface and guide elements.
As will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, the practice of the present invention employs, unless otherwise indicated, conventional methods of x-ray imaging and processing, x-ray tomosynthesis, ultrasound including A-scan, B-scan and C-scan, computed tomography (CT scan), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), optical coherence tomography, single photon emission tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) within the skill of the art. Such techniques are explained fully in the literature and need not be described herein. See, e.g., X-Ray Structure Determination: A Practical Guide, 2nd Edition, editors Stout and Jensen, 1989, John Wiley & Sons, publisher; Body CT: A Practical Approach, editor Slone, 1999, McGraw-Hill publisher; X-ray Diagnosis: A Physician's Approach, editor Lam, 1998 Springer-Verlag, publisher; and Dental Radiology: Understanding the X-Ray Image, editor Laetitia Brocklebank 1997, Oxford University Press publisher. See also, The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging (2nd Ed.), Jerrold T. Bushberg, et al.
The present invention may be applied to all joints, such as, without limitation, the knee, hip, shoulder, elbow, wrist, finger, toe, and ankle. Illustratively, the knee and hip joint procedures are discussed below, so as to teach the concept of the design as it would then apply to other joints in the body.
All of the embodiments described herein are applicable partial joint replacement, total joint replacement, and hemiarthroplasty. The embodiments may be combined with standard instrumentation known in the art as well as surgical techniques and robotics known in the art.
i. Knee Joint
Performing a total knee arthroplasty is a complicated procedure. In replacing the knee with an artificial knee, it is important to get the anatomical and mechanical axes of the lower extremity aligned correctly to ensure optimal functioning of the implanted knee.
As shown in
The long axis of the tibia 1936 is collinear with the mechanical axis of the lower extremity 1910. From a three-dimensional perspective, the lower extremity of the body ideally functions within a single plane known as the median anterior-posterior plane (MAP-plane) throughout the flexion-extension arc. In order to accomplish this, the femoral head 1930, the mechanical axis of the femur, the patellar groove, the intercondylar notch, the patellar articular crest, the tibia and the ankle remain within the MAP-plane during the flexion-extension movement. During movement, the tibia rotates as the knee flexes and extends in the epicondylar axis which is perpendicular to the MAP-plane.
A variety of image slices can be taken at each individual joint, e.g., the knee joint 1950-1950n, and the hip joint 1952-1950n. These image slices can be used as described above in Section I along with an image of the full leg to ascertain the axis.
With disease and malfunction of the knee, alignment of the anatomic axis is altered. Performing a total knee arthroplasty is one solution for correcting a diseased knee. Implanting a total knee joint, such as the PFC Sigma RP Knee System by Johnson & Johnson, requires that a series of resections be made to the surfaces forming the knee joint in order to facilitate installation of the artificial knee. The resections should be made to enable the installed artificial knee to achieve flexion-extension movement within the MAP-plane and to optimize the patient's anatomical and mechanical axis of the lower extremity.
First, the tibia 1930 is resected to create a flat surface to accept the tibial component of the implant. In most cases, the tibial surface is resected perpendicular to the long axis of the tibia in the coronal plane, but is typically sloped 4-7° posteriorly in the sagittal plane to match the normal slope of the tibia. As will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, the sagittal slope can be 0° where the device to be implanted does not require a sloped tibial cut. The resection line 1958 is perpendicular to the mechanical axis 1910, but the angle between the resection line and the surface plane of the plateau 1960 varies depending on the amount of damage to the knee.
Once the tibial surface has been prepared, the surgeon turns to preparing the femoral condyle.
The plateau of the femur 1970 is resected to provide flat surfaces that communicate with the interior of the femoral prosthesis. The cuts made to the femur are based on the overall height of the gap to be created between the tibia and the femur. Typically, a 20 mm gap is desirable to provide the implanted prosthesis adequate room to achieve full range of motion. The bone is resected at a 5-7° angle valgus to the mechanical axis of the femur. Resected surface 1972 forms a flat plane with an angular relationship to adjoining surfaces 1974, 1976. The angle θ′, θ″ between the surfaces 1972-1974, and 1972-1976 varies according to the design of the implant.
ii. Hip Joint
As illustrated in
Using anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, measurements are made of the proximal and distal geometry to determine the size and optimal design of the implant.
Typically, after obtaining surgical access to the hip joint, the femoral neck 1982 is resected, e.g. along the line 1990. Once the neck is resected, the medullary canal is reamed. Reaming can be accomplished, for example, with a conical or straight reamer, or a flexible reamer. The depth of reaming is dictated by the specific design of the implant. Once the canal has been reamed, the proximal reamer is prepared by serial rasping, with the rasp directed down into the canal.
Surgical assistance can be provided by using a device, referred to also herein as a surgical tool or template, applied to the outer surface of the articular cartilage or the bone, including the subchondral bone, in order to match the alignment of the articular repair system and the recipient site or the joint. The template may be round, circular, oval, ellipsoid, curved or irregular in shape. The shape can be selected or adjusted to match or enclose an area of diseased cartilage or an area slightly larger than the area of diseased cartilage or substantially larger than the diseased cartilage. The area can encompass the entire articular surface or the weight bearing surface. Such devices are typically preferred when replacement of a majority or an entire articular surface is contemplated.
The template may include at least one guide for guiding a surgical instrument. The at least one guide may direct the surgical instrument in at least one of a cut, a milling, and a drilling. The at least one guide may be, without limitation, a drill hole, a cut planes, a saw plane and the like. The guide may be oriented in a predefined location relative to, without limitation, the contact surface of the template with the articular cartilage or bone, and may be adapted in shape, size or orientation to an implant shape.
Typically, a position of the guide will be chosen that will result in an anatomically desirable cut plane, drill hole, or general instrument orientation for subsequent placement of an articular repair system or for facilitating placement of the articular repair system. Moreover, the template may be designed so that the depth of the drill, reamer or other surgical instrument can be controlled, e.g., the drill cannot go any deeper into the tissue than defined by the device, and the size of the hole in the block can be designed to essentially match the size of the implant. Information about other joints or axis and alignment information of a joint or extremity can be included when selecting the position of these slots or holes. Alternatively, the openings in the template may be made larger than needed to accommodate these instruments. The template may also be configured to conform to the articular shape. The apertures, or openings, provided can be wide enough to allow for varying the position or angle of the surgical instrument, e.g., reamers, saws, drills, curettes and other surgical instruments. An instrument guide, typically comprised of a relatively hard material, can then be applied to the device. The device helps orient the instrument guide relative to the three-dimensional anatomy of the joint.
The template may be a mold that can be made of a plastic or polymer. The template may be produced by rapid prototyping technology, in which successive layers of plastic are laid down, as know in the art. In other embodiments, the template or portions of the template can be made of metal. The template can be milled or made using laser based manufacturing techniques.
The template may be casted using rapid prototyping and, for example, lost wax technique. It may also be milled. For example, a preformed template with a generic shape can be used at the outset, which can then be milled to the patient specific dimensions. The milling may only occur on one surface of the template, preferably the surface that faces the articular surface. Milling and rapid prototyping techniques may be combined.
Curable materials may be used which can be poured into forms that are, for example, generated using rapid prototyping. For example, liquid metal may be used. Cured materials may optionally be milled or the surface can be further refined using other techniques.
Metal inserts may be applied to plastic components. For example, a plastic mold may have at least one guide aperture to accept a reaming device or a saw. A metal insert may be used to provide a hard wall to accept the reamer or saw. Using this or similar designs can be useful to avoid the accumulation of plastic or other debris in the joint when the saw or other surgical instruments may get in contact with the mold. Other hard materials can be used to serve as inserts. These can also include, for example, hard plastics or ceramics.
In another embodiment, the template does not have metallic inserts to accept a reaming device or saw. The metal inserts or guides may be part of an attached device that is typically in contact with the template. A metallic drill guide or a metallic saw guide may thus, for example, have metallic or hard extenders that reach through the mold thereby, for example, also stabilizing any devices applied to the mold against the physical body of the mold.
One or more templates can be used during the surgery. For example, in the hip, a template can be initially applied to the proximal femur that closely approximates the 3D anatomy prior to the resection of the femoral head. The template can include an opening to accommodate a saw. The opening is positioned to achieve an optimally placed surgical cut for subsequent reaming and placement of the prosthesis. A second template can then be applied to the proximal femur after the surgical cut has been made. The second template can be useful for guiding the direction of a reamer prior to placement of the prosthesis. As can be seen in this, as well as in other examples, templates can be made for joints prior to any surgical intervention. However, it is also possible to make templates that are designed to fit to a bone or portions of a joint after the surgeon has already performed selected surgical procedures, such as cutting, reaming, drilling, etc. The template can account for the shape of the bone or the joint resulting from these procedures.
Upon imaging, a physical template of a joint, such as a knee joint, or hip joint, or ankle joint or shoulder joint is generated, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The template can be used to perform image guided surgical procedures such as partial or complete joint replacement, articular resurfacing, or ligament repair. The template may include reference points or opening or apertures for surgical instruments such as drills, saws, burrs and the like.
In order to derive the preferred orientation of drill holes, cut planes, saw planes and the like, openings or receptacles in said template or attachments will be adjusted to account for at least one axis. The axis can be anatomic or biomechanical, for example, for a knee joint, a hip joint, an ankle joint, a shoulder joint or an elbow joint.
In one embodiment, only a single axis is used for placing and optimizing such drill holes, saw planes, cut planes, and or other surgical interventions. This axis may be, for example, an anatomical or biomechanical axis. In a preferred embodiment, a combination of axis and/or planes can be used for optimizing the placement of the drill holes, saw planes, cut planes or other surgical interventions. For example, two axes (e.g., one anatomical and one biomechanical) can be factored into the position, shape or orientation of the 3D guided template and related attachments or linkages. For example, two axes, (e.g., one anatomical and biomechanical) and one plane (e.g., the top plane defined by the tibial plateau), can be used. Alternatively, two or more planes can be used (e.g., a coronal and a sagittal plane), as defined by the image or by the patients anatomy.
Angle and distance measurements and surface topography measurements may be performed in these one or more, preferably two or more, preferably three or more multiple planes, as necessary. These angle measurements can, for example, yield information on varus or valgus deformity, flexion or extension deficit, hyper or hypo-flexion or hyper- or hypo-extension, abduction, adduction, internal or external rotation deficit, or hyper-or hypo-abduction, hyper- or hypo-adduction, hyper- or hypo-internal or external rotation.
Single or multi-axis line or plane measurements can then be utilized to determine preferred angles of correction, e.g., by adjusting surgical cut or saw planes or other surgical interventions. Typically, two axis corrections will be preferred over a single axis correction, a two plane correction will be preferred over a single plane correction and so forth.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, more than one drilling, cut, boring and/or reaming or other surgical intervention is performed for a particular treatment such as the placement of a joint resurfacing or replacing implant, or components thereof. These two or more surgical interventions (e.g., drilling, cutting, reaming, sawing) are made in relationship to a biomechanical axis, and/or an anatomical axis and/or an implant axis. The 3D guidance template or attachments or linkages thereto include two or more openings, guides, apertures or reference planes to make at least two or more drillings, reamings, borings, sawings or cuts in relationship to a biomechanical axis, an anatomical axis, an implant axis or other axis derived therefrom or related thereto.
While in simple embodiments it is possible that only a single cut or drilling will be made in relationship to a biomechanical axis, an anatomical axis, an implant axis and/or an axis related thereto, in most meaningful implementations, two or more drillings, borings, reamings, cutting and/or sawings will be performed or combinations thereof in relationship to a biomechanical, anatomical and/or implant axis.
Instead of a mold, it is to be understood that the surgical tool may be made in a variety of ways, including, without limitation, machining and rapid prototyping. Rapid prototyping is a technique for fabricating a three-dimensional object from a computer model of the object. Typically, a special printer is used to fabricate the prototype from a plurality of two-dimensional layers. Computer software sections the representations of the object into a plurality of distinct two-dimensional layers and then a three-dimensional printer fabricates a layer of material for each layer sectioned by the software. Together the various fabricated layers form the desired prototype. More information about rapid prototyping techniques is available in US Patent Publication No 2002/0079601A1 to Russell et al., published Jun. 27, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference. An advantage to using rapid prototyping is that it enables the use of free form fabrication techniques that use toxic or potent compounds safely. These compounds can be safely incorporated in an excipient envelope, which reduces worker exposure
A variety of techniques can be used to derive the shape of the template, as described above. For example, a few selected CT slices through the hip joint, along with a full spiral CT through the knee joint and a few selected slices through the ankle joint can be used to help define the axes if surgery is contemplated of the knee joint. Once the axes are defined, the shape of the subchondral bone can be derived, followed by applying standardized cartilage loss.
Methodologies for stabilizing the 3D guidance templates will now be described. The 3D guide template may be stabilized using multiple surgical tools such as, without limitation: K-wires;, a drill bit anchored into the bone and left within the template to stabilize it against the bone; one or more convexities or cavities on the surface facing the cartilage; bone stabilization against intra/extra articular surfaces, optionally with extenders, for example, from an articular surface onto an extra-articular surface; and/or stabilization against newly placed cuts or other surgical interventions.
Specific anatomic landmarks may be selected in the design and make of the 3D guide template in order to further optimize the anatomic stabilization. For example, a 3D guidance template may be designed to cover portions or all off an osteophyte or bone spur in order to enhance anchoring of the 3D guide template against the underlying articular anatomy. The 3D guidance template may be designed to the shape of a trochlear or intercondylar notch and can encompass multiple anatomic areas such as a trochlea, a medial and a lateral femoral condyle at the same time. In the tibia, a 3D guide template may be designed to encompass a medial and lateral tibial plateau at the same time and it can optionally include the tibial spine for optimized stabilization and cross-referencing. In a hip, the fovea capitis may be utilized in order to stabilize a 3D guide template. Optionally, the surgeon may elect to resect the ligamentum capitis femoris in order to improve the stabilization. Also in the hip, an acetabular mold can be designed to extend into the region of the tri-radiate cartilage, the medial, lateral, superior, inferior, anterior and posterior acetabular wall or ring. By having these extensions and additional features for stabilization, a more reproducible position of the 3D template can be achieved with resulted improvement in accuracy of the surgical procedure. Typically, a template with more than one convexity or concavity or multiple convexities or concavities will provide better cross-referencing in the anatomic surface and higher accuracy and higher stabilization than compared to a mold that has only few surface features such as a singular convexity. Thus, in order to improve the implementation and intraoperative accuracy, careful surgical planning and preoperative planning is desired, that encompasses preferably more than one convexity, more preferred more than two convexities and even more preferred more than three convexities, or that encompasses more than one concavity, more preferred more than two concavities or even more preferred more than three concavities on an articular surface or adjoined surface, including bone and cartilage outside the weight-bearing surface.
In an even more preferred embodiment, more than one convexity and concavity, more preferred more than two convexities and concavities and even more preferred more then three convexities and concavities are included in the surface of the mold in order to optimize the interoperative cross-referencing and in order to stabilize the mold prior to any surgical intervention.
Turning now to a particular 3D surgical template configuration for a specific joint application (knee joint), which is intended to teach the concept of the design as it would then apply to other joints in the body:
When a total knee arthroplasty is contemplated, the patient can undergo an imaging test, that will demonstrate the articular anatomy of a knee joint, e.g. width of the femoral condyles, the tibial plateau etc. Additionally, other joints can be included in the imaging test thereby yielding information on femoral and tibial axes, deformities such as varus and valgus and other articular alignment. The imaging test may be, without limitation, an x-ray image, preferably in standing, load-bearing position, a CT or spiral CT scan or an MRI scan or combinations thereof. A spiral CT scan may be advantageous over a standard CT scan due to its improved spatial resolution in z-direction in addition to x and y resolution. The articular surface and shape as well as alignment information generated with the imaging test can be used to shape the surgical assistance device, to select the surgical assistance device from a library of different devices with pre-made shapes and sizes, or can be entered into the surgical assistance device and can be used to define the preferred location and orientation of saw guides or drill holes or guides for reaming devices or other surgical instruments. Intraoperatively, the surgical assistance device is applied to the tibial plateau and subsequently the femoral condyle(s) by matching its surface with the articular surface or by attaching it to anatomic reference points on the bone or cartilage. The surgeon can then introduce a reamer or saw through the guides and prepare the joint for the implantation. By cutting the cartilage and bone along anatomically defined planes, a more reproducible placement of the implant can be achieved. This can ultimately result in improved postoperative results by optimizing biomechanical stresses applied to the implant and surrounding bone for the patient's anatomy and by minimizing axis malalignment of the implant. In addition, the surgical assistance device can greatly reduce the number of surgical instruments needed for total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Thus, the use of one or more surgical assistance devices can help make joint arthroplasty more accurate, improve postoperative results, improve long-term implant survival, reduce cost by reducing the number of surgical instruments used. Moreover, the use of one or more surgical assistance device can help lower the technical difficulty of the procedure and can help decrease operating room (“OR”) times.
Thus, surgical tools described herein can also be designed and used to control drill alignment, depth and width, for example when preparing a site to receive an implant. For example, the tools described herein, which typically conform to the joint surface, can provide for improved drill alignment and more accurate placement of any implant. An anatomically correct tool can be constructed by a number of methods and can be made of any material, preferably a substantially translucent and/or transparent material such as plastic, Lucite, silastic, SLA or the like, and typically is a block-like shape prior to molding.
Turning now to
The reusable exterior piece has a superior surface 2322 and an inferior surface 2324 that mates with the first piece 2310. The reusable exterior piece 2320 includes cutting guides 2328, to assist the surgeon in performing the tibial surface cut described above. As shown herein a plurality of cutting guides can be provided to provide the surgeon a variety of locations to choose from in making the tibial cut. If necessary, additional spacers can be provided that fit between the first patient configured, or molded, piece 2310 and the second reusable exterior piece, or cutting block, 2320.
Clearly, the mold may be a single component or multiple components. In a preferred embodiment, one or more components are patient specific while other components such as spacers or connectors to surgical instruments are generic. In one embodiment, the mold can rest on portions of the joint on the articular surface or external to the articular surface. Other surgical tools then may connect to the mold. For example, a standard surgical cut block as described for standard implants, for example in the knee the J&J PFC Sigma system, the Zimmer Nexgen system or the Stryker Duracon system, can be connected or placed on the mold. In this manner, the patient specific component can be minimized and can be made compatible with standard surgical instruments.
The mold may include receptacles for standard surgical instruments including alignment tools or guides. For example, a tibial mold for use in knee surgery may have an extender or a receptacle or an opening to receive a tibial alignment rod. In this manner, the position of the mold can be checked against the standard alignment tools and methods. Moreover, the combined use of molds and standard alignment tools including also surgical navigation techniques can help improve the accuracy of or optimize component placement in joint arthroplasty, such as hip or knee arthroplasty. For example, the mold can help define the depth of a horizontal tibial cut for placement of a tibial component. A tibial alignment guide, for example an extramedullary or intramedullary alignment guide, used in conjunction with a tibial mold can help find the optimal anteroposterior angulation, posterior slope, tibial slant, or varus-valgus angle of the tibial cut. The mold may be designed to work in conjunction with traditional alignment tools known in the art.
The template may include markers, e.g. optoelectronic or radiofrequency, for surgical navigation. The template may have receptacles to which such markers can be attached, either directly or via a linking member.
The templates can be used in combination with a surgical navigation system. They can be used to register the bones associated with a joint into the coordinate system of the surgical navigation system. For example, if a mold for a joint surface includes tracking markers for surgical navigation, the exact position and orientation of the bone can be detected by the surgical navigation system after placement of the mold in its unique position. This helps to avoid the time-consuming need to acquire the coordinates of tens to hundreds of points on the joint surface for registration.
Referring back to
The interior piece 2310 is typically molded to the tibia including the subchondral bone and/or the cartilage. The surgeon will typically remove any residual meniscal tissue prior to applying the mold. Optionally, the interior surface 2312 of the mold can include shape information of portions or all of the menisci.
Turning now to
A guide plate 2326 is provided that extends along the side of at least a portion of the exterior piece 2320. The guide plate 2326 provides one or more slots or guides 2328 through which a saw blade can be inserted to achieve the cut desired of the tibial surface. Additionally, the slot, or guide, can be configured so that the saw blade cuts at a line perpendicular to the mechanical axis, or so that it cuts at a line that is perpendicular to the mechanical axis, but has a 4-7° slope in the sagittal plane to match the normal slope of the tibia.
Optionally, a central bore 2330 can be provided that, for example, enables a drill to ream a hole into the bone for the stem of the tibial component of the knee implant.
As is evident from the views shown in
Turning now to
As illustrated in
Other embodiments and configurations could be used to achieve these results without departing from the scope of the invention.
As will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, more than two pieces can be used, where appropriate, to comprise the system. For example, the patient specific interior piece 2310 can be two pieces that are configured to form a single piece when placed on the tibia. Additionally, the exterior piece 2320 can be two components. The first component can have, for example, the cutting guide apertures 2328. After the resection using the cutting guide aperture 2328 is made, the exterior piece 2320 can be removed and a secondary exterior piece 2320′ can be used which does not have the guide plate 2326 with the cutting guide apertures 2328, but has the aperture 2330 which facilitates boring into the tibial surface an aperture to receive a stem of the tibial component of the knee implant. Any of these designs could also feature the surface configurations shown in
Turning now to
Turning now to
As shown by the dashed lines, the grooves (2442-2450) of the second portion 2440, overlay the apertures of the first layer.
Similar to the designs discussed above with respect to
As illustrated in
In installing an implant, first the tibial surface is cut using a tibial block, such as those shown in
As illustrated in
3D guidance templates may be used to create more that one cut on the same and/or on the opposite articular surface or opposite articular bone, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. These cuts may be cross-referenced with other cuts using one or more guidance template(s).
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the 3D guidance template(s) are utilized to perform more than one cut on the same articular side such as the femoral side of a knee joint. In another embodiment, a 3D guidance template may be utilized to cross reference surgical interventions on an opposing articular surface. In a knee, for example, the first articular surface can be the femoral surface. The opposing articular surface can be the tibial surface or the patella surface. In a hip, the first articular surface can be the acetabulum. The opposing articular surface or the opposing bone can be the proximal femur.
Thus, in a knee, a horizontal femur cut can be cross-referenced with an anterior or posterior femur cut or optionally also chamfer, oblique cuts. Similarly, a tibial horizontal cut can be cross-referenced with any tibial oblique or vertical cuts on the same articular side or surface.
In accordance with another embodiment, one or more femur cuts can be crossed-referenced with one or more tibial cuts. Or, in a hip, one or more acetabular cuts or surgical interventions can be cross-referenced with one or more femoral cuts or surgical interventions such as drilling, reaming or boring. Similarly, in a knee again, one or more femur cuts can be cross-referenced with one or more patella cuts. Any combination and order is possible.
The cross-referencing can occur via attachments or linkages including spacers or hinge or ratchet like devices from a first articular bone and/or cartilage surface, to a second articular, bone and/or cartilage surface. The resulting positioning of the cut on the opposing articular, bone or cartilage surface can be optimized by testing the cut for multiple pose angles or joint positions such as flexion, extension, internal or external rotation, abduction or adduction. Thus, for example, in a knee a distal femur cut can be performed with a mold. Via a linkage or an attachment, a tibial template may be attached thereto or to the cut or other surgical intervention, thus a cross-reference can be related from the femoral cut to a tibial cut or other surgical intervention. Cross-referencing from a first articular surface to a second articular surface via, without limitation, attachments or linkages to a template has the advantage of insuring an optimal alignment between the implant or other therapeutic device components of the first articular surface to that on a second articular surface. Moreover, by cross-referencing surgical interventions on a first articular surface to a second articular surface, improved efficiencies and time savings can be obtained with the resulted surgical procedure.
Cross-referencing the first, the second and, optionally a third or more articular surface, such as in a knee joint, may be performed with a single linkage or attachment or multiple linkages or attachments. A single pose angle or position of a joint or multiple pose angles or positions of a joint may be tested and optimized during the entire surgical intervention. Moreover, any resulting surgical interventions on the opposite, second articular surface, bone or cartilage may be further optimized by optionally cross-referencing to additional measurement tools such as standard alignment guides.
For example, in a knee joint, a 3D template may be utilized to perform one or more surgical interventions on the femoral side, such as a femoral cut. This can then be utilized via a linkage, an attachment or via indirect cross-referencing directly onto the site of surgical intervention, to guide a surgical intervention such as a cut of the tibial side. Prior to performing the surgical intervention on the tibial side, a traditional tibial alignment guide with cross-reference to the medial and lateral malleolus of the ankle turn may be used to optimize the position, orientation and/or depth and extent of the planned surgical intervention such as the cut. For example, cross-referencing to the femoral cut can aid in defining the relative superior inferior height of the tibial cut, while cross-referencing a tibial alignment guide can optionally be utilized to determine the slant of the cut in the interior posterior direction.
An exemplary system and methodology is now described in which a femoral template is used to make a cut on the femur, which is then cross-referenced to properly align a tibial template for making a cut on the tibial plateau. Initially, an electronic image(s) of the leg is obtained using imaging techniques elaborated in above-described embodiments. For example, a pre-operative CT scan of a patient's leg may be obtained to obtain electronic image data.
Image processing is then applied to the image data to derive, without limitation, relevant joint surfaces, axis, and/or cut planes. Image processing techniques may include, without limitation, segmentation and propagation of point clouds.
Relevant biomechanical and/or anatomical axis data may be obtained by identifying, for example, the central femoral head, central knee joint and center of the distal tibia. The cutting planes may then be defined based on at least one of these axis. For example, the tibial implant bearing surface may be defined as being perpendicular to the axis defined by the center of the tibial plateau 2496 and the center of the distal tibia 2497, as illustrated in
The tibial and femoral templates and implants may be designed based, at least in part, on the derived joint surfaces, axis and/or cut planes.
In an exemplary use, the femoral template 2470 is placed on the femoral condyle 2475, for example, when the knee is flexed. The femoral template 2470 may be fixed to the femoral condyle 2475 using, without limitation, anchoring screws/drill pins inserted through drill bushing holes 2471 and 2472. The position of holes 2471 and 2472 on the condyle may be the same used to anchor the final implant to the femur. In various embodiments, the holes 2471 and 2472 may include metal inserts/bushings to prevent degradation when drilling. Fixing the template 2470 to the femoral condyle 2475 advantageously prevents movement of the template during subsequent cutting or other surgical interventions thereby ensuring the accuracy of the resultant surgical cuts.
To assist in accurately positioning the femoral template 2470, a femoral guide reference tool 2473 may be attached to the femoral template 2470, as shown in
Upon proper fixation of the femoral template 2470 to the femoral condyle 2475, a cut to the femoral condyle is made using cut guide surface or element 2474. The cut guide surface or element 2474 may be integral to the femoral template 2470, or may be an attachment to the femoral template 2470, with the attachment made of a harder material than the femoral template 2470. For example, the cut guide surface or element 2474 may be a metal tab that slides onto the femoral template 2470, which may be made, without limitation, of a softer, plastic material.
Upon making the femoral cut and removing the femoral template 2475, a sample implant template 2476 (not the final implant) is optionally positioned on the condyle, as shown in
The sample implant template 2476 includes an attachment mechanism 2494 for attaching the tibial template 2480, thereby cross-referencing the placement of the distal tibial cut with respect to the femoral cut/implant's placement. The attachment mechanism 2494 may be, without limitation, a boss, as shown in
In illustrative embodiments, the thickness of the sample implant template 2476 may not only include the thickness of the final femoral implant, but may include an additional thickness that corresponds to a preferred joint space between tibial and femoral implants. For example, the additional thickness may advantageously provide a desired joint space identified for proper ligament balancing or for flexion, extension, rotation, abduction, adduction, anteversion, retroversion and other joint or bone positions and motion.
Thus, the tibial template 2480 used on the tibia can be cross-referenced to the femoral template 2476, femoral cut and/or sample implant 2474. Similarly, in the hip, femoral templates can be placed in reference to an acetabular mold or vice versa. In general, when two or more articular surfaces will be repaired or replaced, a template can be placed on one or more of them and surgical procedures including cutting, drilling, sawing or rasping can be performed on the other surface or other surfaces in reference to said first surface(s).
An alternative embodiment of a knee implant, system and method is presented herein below. In this embodiment, a library of patient-specific femoral spacing templates are utilized to provide accurate and anatomically-correct ligament balancing, and patient-specific templates, including an alignment tool for placing the vertical cut for the medial edge of the tibial component on tibial plateau, provide precise positioning of the femoral and tibial implants. In a procedure for installing an implant, the joint surfaces are first prepared to receive the templates and the implants. A line may desirably drawn on the femoral end, using, e.g., a marker or electrosurgical pencil, to mark the anterior sulcus. Thereafter, soft tissue cartilage is desirably removed from the anterior sulcus, e.g., using a curved elevator/osteotome, and posterior cartilage is removed also, e.g., using a, e.g., 10 mm blade. Anterior cartilage removal is desirably started in this procedure a small distance, e.g., 1 or 2 mm, below the sulcus line. Cartilage removal may be completed using, e.g., a 5 mm ringed/open curette.
Next, the knee is placed into extension and patient-specific femoral balancing templates are used to properly balance the ligaments in the knee, and in so doing determine the correct locations for the femoral and tibial components. The design (e.g., surface contours, outer geometry) of the femoral balancing templates is desirably derived from patient-specific data, e.g., a CT image of the joint in question. Desirably a plurality of femoral balancing templates, each with a characteristically larger thickness, is provided to enable convenient but accurate ligament balancing. A greater number of femoral balancing templates (i.e., smaller incremental thickness from one template to the next) provides more control over ligament balancing, but fewer femoral balancing templates may be sufficient and also will have the advantage of a less-complex tool set for the surgeon to deal with. A representation of a femoral balancing template 5101 on a femur, featuring split lug 5102, and through-holes 5103 and 5104, is depicted in
The surgeon determines the appropriate femoral balancing template to achieve the desired ligament tensioning in extension, from the choices at hand, and the template is placed on the condylar surface for which it is intended, while the knee is in flexion. Once the femoral balancing template is securely placed in its intended location on the condylar surface (which may include bone and/or cartilage), the knee is placed into extension. Some cartilage may be removed from the tibia if the fit in extension is too tight.
Once the knee has been balanced in extension, a tibial cutting guide 5301, having an interface surface 5302 which conforms to an anterior surface of the tibia 5303, is fitted to the tibia, as shown in
Once proper alignment of tibial cutting guide 5301 is confirmed, drill holes are made through pin holes 5307 and 5308, and the guide is pinned in place by inserting pins 5401 and 5402 into the drill holes, as seen in
Next, the horizontal tibial cut for the tibial implant is made. Cross-pin 5309 is removed, the knee is brought into flexion, and femoral balancing template 5101 is removed, as depicted in
In various embodiments, the top surface of the alignment tool 5801 may be flat, convex, or concave or combinations thereof. The top surface may be, at least in part, patient matched to the tibia or the femur. For example, the top surface may be, at least in part, a copy or near copy of the tibial surface. Alternatively, the top surface of the alignment tool may be, at least in part, a mirror image of one or more femoral condyles. In all of these embodiments, the top surface of the tibial alignment tool 5801 may be derived from the articular cartilage, including normal or diseased cartilage, the subchondral bone, or, optionally, exposed endosteal bone or bone marrow, or combinations thereof.
In another embodiment, the top surface of the alignment tool 5801 may be a mirror image of, at least in part, a femoral implant bearing surface. The femoral implant bearing surface can be a standard (off-the-shelf) bearing surface or can be patient individualized, e.g. to the patient's bone or cartilage or combinations thereof. The top surface of the alignment tool 5801 may be a mirror image to, at least in part, a femoral implant bearing surface in at least one of a coronal plane, a sagittal plane, or combinations thereof.
Before the alignment tool 5801 is placed on the plateau of
In still other embodiments, the patient-specific cut alignment tool 5801 may be used to simply visually confirm the location of a cut, with another cut guide used to actually direct the surgical instrument in making the cut.
In yet other embodiments, the patient-specific cut alignment tool 5801 may be used to properly balance the ligaments in the knee, with or without, for example, the use of the femoral balancing template(s). A plurality of patient-specific cut alignment tools 5801 may be provided, each with a characteristically larger thickness. The top surface of the patient-specific cut alignment tools 5801 may be flat to allow for easier balancing. It may also have a slight curvature to it, which may be convex or concave. Various chips may be inserted, with a chip selected that provides the desired ligament tensioning. For example, each chip may be inserted in turn from, without limitation, thinnest to thickest with the knee in flexion or extension and then taken through the desired range of motion. The anatomic shape of the balancer allows for simplified balancing without the typical complexity of most balancing procedures.
Thus, the patient-specific alignment tool 5801 may fulfill multiple functions: It may be used for guiding a vertical tibial cut, if a partial tibial replacement is contemplated. It may be used for referencing a horizontal tibial cut, when a partial or total knee system is contemplated. In this case, it may be combined it with spacer blocks or femoral balancing tools. It may be used for ligament balancing. Moreover, the patient specific alignment tool 5801 may be made available in various thicknesses, e.g. 1, 2, 3 or 4 mm for testing ligament tension in at least one of flexion or extension or combinations thereof for achieving optimal ligament balancing or soft-tissue or ligament tensioning. The thickness of the balancing chip that is inserted will determine the level at which the horizontal tibial cut is made. For example, with a thicker balancing or navigation chip, the tibial cut will be more superior, i.e. more tibial bone is preserved. With a thinner navigation chip, the tibial cut will be more inferior, i.e. more tibial bone is resected.
In various embodiments, the tibial cut guide may connect to, a selected patient-specific cut alignment tool 5801, which may be applied to one or both articular sides, instead of, or in addition to, the femoral balancing template 5101. For example, a tibial cut guide may include, without limitation, a dovetail feature or other linkage or joint that slides into the patient-specific cut alignment tool 5801. Other interface/connector means known in the art may be used, such as, without limitation, a snap-fit, joints, and/or cross-pins. Any linkage known in the art may be utilized. Some of these joints or linkages may allow for movement or adjustment in one or more directions. The connection between the patient-specific cut alignment tool 5801 and a tibial cut guide may be made at a set distance from, for example, the top of each of the patient-specific cut alignment tools 5801. Subsequently, the thicker the patient-specific cut alignment tool 5801, the less bone is resected off the tibia. The tibial cutting guide may be used to make either or both the horizontal and vertical cuts on the tibial plateau. Thus, the patient specific alignment tool is used to not only determine the location and orientation of the vertical cut, but also the location and height of the horizontal cut. The thickness of the selected patient-specific cut alignment tool 5801, combined with the set position of the connected tibial cut guide relative to the patient-specific cut alignment tool 5801, correctly positions the horizontal cut on the tibia with regard to ligament balancing or ligament tension or soft-tissue tension, taking into account the thickness of the femoral and/or tibial implants to be inserted.
In illustrative embodiments, the interface between the patient-specific cut alignment tool 5801 and the tibial cut guide may impart a desired slope on the cut guide. For example, the top surface of the patient-specific cut alignment tool 5801 to which the tibial cut guide may dovetail into, may be sloped (with the slope determined via patient specific information), such that, without limitation, the tibial surface is resected perpendicular to the long axis of the tibia in the coronal plane, but sloped posteriorly in the sagittal plane to match the normal slope of the tibia. The slope may be imposed by the patient specific cut alignment tool 5801, with the slope transferred into the cut guide via a linkage. The slope may also be set in the tibial cut guide based on patient specific information included in and/or derived from the patient specific cut alignment tool 5801. For example, the slope of the tibial cut guide may be adjustable based on the configuration or other information associated with the patient specific cut alignment tool 5801. The patient specific information can be derived from a preoperative scan or an intraoperative measurement. It will typically be the slope that the patient's tibia showed on the preoperative scan. The scan may be of the same joint or a contra lateral healthy joint. An offset or a threshold may be applied. For example, if the anteroposterior slope in a patient exceeds 7 mm, the maximum allowable value of slope determined by the patient specific alignment tool may be set at 7 mm, i.e. the selected maximum. The maximum can optionally be derived as a function of the measured slope in that patient. If a patient has a preoperative tibial slope of less than 7 degrees, e.g. 4 degrees, the tibial slope in the patient specific alignment tool may be set at a number corresponding to the measured slope, i.e. in this example 4 degrees. Thus, the patient specific alignment tool may not only yield a reference for the orientation of the vertical cut and optionally horizontal cuts of a tibia, but also on the anteroposterior slope desirable in a patient. If a patient has a preoperative tibial slope of greater than 7 degrees, 7 degrees may be set as the maximum and the horizontal tibial cut may be made at a slope of 7 degrees. Other thresholds may be used, e.g. 6 degrees, 8 degrees, etc.
All of the embodiments pertaining to the balancing chip and all other embodiments may be applied to partial knee systems, e.g. medial or lateral unicompartmental tibiofemoral implants, as well as to total knee arthroplasty systems.
The embodiments may be used in the context of a femur first technique, i.e. the femur is prepared prior to preparing the tibia, or a tibia first technique, i.e. the tibia is prepared prior to preparing the femur, or combinations thereof. For example, the alignment tool 5801 may be used initially to balance the joint and to place a horizontal tibial cut, while then moving to the femoral preparation, and finishing the tibia at the end.
All of the embodiments pertaining to the balancing chip and all other embodiments may be applied to a knee joint, but also any other joint in the body. The terms “femur” or “femoral” and “tibia” and “tibial” are strictly illustrative and can also represent other bone or joint geometries. For example, the embodiments and the navigation chip can be applied in a hip (in which case the terms “tibia” and “tibial” can be replaced with “acetabulum” and “acetabular”, and “femur” and “femoral” can be replaced with “femoral head” and “femoral”). The embodiments may be applied in a shoulder (in which case the terms “tibia” and “tibial” can be replaced with “glenoid” and “glenoid”, and “femur” and “femoral” can be replaced with “humeral head” and “humeral”). The same analogies apply to other joints including the elbow, wrist, ankle, foot and hand.
All of the embodiments pertaining to the balancing chip and all other embodiments may be applied to hemiarthroplasty.
All of the embodiments pertaining to the balancing chip and all other embodiments may be used in combination with surgical navigation or robotic surgery. For example, radiofrequency and optical markers may be used for planning femoral and tibial bone cuts, while a balancing chip as described above may be used for ligament balancing or soft-tissue or ligament tensioning. The markers may optionally be connected, directly or via a linkage, to the balancing chip. Moreover, in another example, a robot may be used for planning or directing tibial or femoral bone cuts, while a balancing chip as described above may be used for ligament balancing or soft-tissue or ligament tensioning. The robot may optionally be connected, directly or via a linkage, to the balancing chip or to any other patient specific alignment tool.
With the femoral guide 6001 thus pinned to the femur, a posterior femoral cut in preparation for receiving a femoral implant is made; oscillating saw blade 6701 is moved against horizontal cutting guide 6702 to remove bone in the posterior portion of the condyle (
In illustrative embodiments, three-dimensional guidance templates may be utilized to determine an optimized implant rotation. Examples are provided below with reference to the knee, however it is to be understood that optimizing implant rotation may be applied to other joints as well.
Femoral Rotation:
The optimal rotation of a femoral component or femoral implant for a uni-compartmental, patello femoral replacement or total knee replacement may be ascertained in a number of different ways. Implant rotation is typically defined using various anatomic axes or planes. These anatomic axes may include, without limitation, the transepicondylar axis; the Whiteside line, i.e. the trochlea anteroposterior axis, which is typically perpendicular to at least one of the cuts; and/or the posterior condylar axis.
Other axes include but are not limited to Blumensaat's line, femoral shaft axis, femoral neck axis, acetabular angle, lines tangent to the superior and inferior acetabular margin, lines tangent to the anterior or posterior acetabular margin, femoral shaft axis, tibial shaft axis, transmalleolar axis, posterior condylar line, tangent(s) to the trochlea of the knee joint, tangents to the medial or lateral patellar facet, lines tangent or perpendicular to the medial and lateral posterior condyles, lines tangent or perpendicular to central weight-bearing zone of the medial and lateral femoral condyles, lines transsecting the medial and lateral posterior condyles, for example through their respective centerpoints, lines tangent or perpendicular to the tibial tuberosity, lines vertical or at an angle to any of said lines, lines tangent to or intersecting the cortical bone of any bone adjacent to or enclosed in a joint.
Another approach for optimizing femoral component rotation is a so-called balancing gap technique. With the balancing gap technique, a femoral cut is made parallel to the tibia, i.e. the tibia is cut first typically. Prior to performing the femoral cut, the femoral cut plate is optimized so that the medial and lateral ligament and soft tissue tension are approximately equal.
By measuring the relevant anatomic axis or planes, the optimal implant rotation may be determined. The measurement may be factored into the shape, position or orientation of the 3D guidance template, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Any resultant surgical interventions including cuts, drilling, or sawings are then made incorporating this measurement , thereby achieving an optimal femoral component rotation.
Moreover in order to achieve an optimal balancing, the rotation of the template may be changed so that the cuts are parallel to the tibial cut with substantially equal tension medially and laterally applied.
A 3D guidance template may also be utilized to optimize tibial component rotation for uni-compartmental or total knee replacements, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Tibial component rotation may be measured using a number of different approaches known in the art. In one example of a tibial component rotation measurement, the anteroposterior axis of the tibia is determined. For a total knee replacement, the tibial component can be placed so that the axis of the implant coincides with the medial one-third of the tibial tuberosity. This approach can work well when the tibia is symmetrical.
In another embodiment, the symmetrical tibial component is placed as far as possible posterolateral and externally rotated so that the posteromedial corner of the tibial plateau is uncovered to an extent of between three (3) and five (5) millimeters.
The above examples are only representative of the different approaches that have been developed in the literature. Clearly, other various anatomic, biomechanical axis, plane and area measurements may be performed in order to optimize implant rotation.
In illustrative embodiments, these measurements may be factored into the design of a 3D guidance template and the position, shape or orientation of the 3D guidance template may be optimized utilizing this information. Thus, any subsequent surgical intervention such as cutting, sawing and/or drilling will result in an optimized implant rotation, for example, in the horizontal or in a near horizontal plane.
Example 1 below is included to more fully illustrate the present invention. Additionally, this example provides a single embodiment of the invention and is not meant to limit the scope thereof.
An exemplary surgical technique for use in implanting a novel partial knee resurfacing UKA using customized, single-use instrumentation is described below, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
CT scans of a patient's knee and partial scans of the hip and ankle are utilized to create patient-specific implants and instrumentation. Based on the CT images, the knee anatomy is digitally recreated, the surface topography of the femur and tibia are mapped, and axis deformity is corrected. The same data is used to create cutting and placement guides that are pre-sized and pre-navigated to work with the patient's anatomy and custom implants.
A kit may be provided with the resurfacing implants and disposable instrumentation in a single sterile tray, as shown in
The surgical technique may illustratively include the following steps, described in more detail below: patient positioning and preparation; balancing of the knee; axial & sagittal tibial cuts; femoral preparation; balancing verification & tibial preparation; and trialing & cementing of implant.
Patient Positioning and Preparation
The patient is positioned supine on the table with the leg resting on a foot support around 90 degrees flexion. After a standard short midline skin incision, a medial or lateral parapatellar arthrotomy is performed. The medial (or lateral) sleeve is not released, but typically all femoral and tibial osteophytes, including those in the intercondylar notch are removed.
In extension the sulcus terminalis is marked with a marking pen, where the anterior tibial lip hits the femoral condyle. The femoral cutting block, which is shaped to substantially fit the condyle and represents the size and geometry of the femoral implant is placed on the femoral condyle. Typically, the anterior edge of the femoral cutting block seats about 2-3 mm inferior to the Sulcus terminalis. The round anterior silhouette of the femoral cutting block is marked on the femoral condyle.
The implant is typically designed to the surface of the subchondral bone with a thickness of 3.5 mm. Since it resurfaces the bone plate, substantially all cartilage posterior to the sulcus terminalis, including the posterior condyle, is removed. This may be facilitated, for example, using a 10 millimeter blade, curved elevator, osteotome or a ring-currette, as shown in
Once removal of all residual cartilage on the femur has been concluded, residual cartilage is scraped off the tibial plateau and balancing of the knee is started.
Balancing of the Knee
Four navigation “chips” of varying thicknesses in 1 mm increasing increments are included in the instrument tray. Each chip has an underside that substantially matches the shape and topography of the patient's tibial surface. When inserted into the compartment, the chip will self-seat into a stable position due to its conformity with the anatomic landmarks on the tibia. The top surface of this chip is flat to allow referencing off the distal femor condylar surface during balancing.
Each chip may be inserted in turn, from thinnest to thickest, with the knee in flexion and then taken through the desired range of motion. A chip is then selected that provides the desired ligament tensioning.
Illustratively, an opening under valgus stress of about 1 mm is recommended medially in extension and 90 degrees flexion and about 1-3 mm under varus stress laterally in extension and about 3-5 mm in 90 degrees flexion. The thicker the chip, the less bone is resected off the tibia.
Axial & Sagittal Tibial Cuts
The selected navigation chip connects to a tibial cutting block (also referred herein as the tibial jig). The tibial jig may also optionally connect to an extramedullary alignment guide. The alignment guide may be placed on the leg and the tibial jig is attached to the navigation chip to establish its placement. The tibial jig may then be pinned flush to the anterior tibia.
The tibial cut planes are confirmed with the navigation chip, as shown in
The sagittal tibial cut is performed using the tibial cutting block. The reciprocating saw blade may be left in as shown in
Femoral Preparation
The femoral jig is placed on the distal femur and its position is verified. The femoral jig is designed to conform to the femur in only one location so as to aid in proper positioning.
The femoral jig is then drilled and pinned in place and the posterior femoral cut is performed, as shown in
To complete femoral preparation, an anterior recess may be prepared using a curved osteotome or a 5 mm burr. Illustratively, the most anterior edge of the component submerges 3.5 mm below the subchondral bone plate. The taper starts 10 mm inferior to it. Also the transition from the subchondral bone to the anterior edge of the posterior cut may be rounded, using either a file, burr or osteotome. Smoothening of the edge and placement and depth of recess may then be verified with a femoral trial implant.
Balancing Verification & Tibial Preparation
With the femoral trial implant in place, a spacer block is inserted, such as an 8 mm spacer block, and balance in flexion and extension is evaluated.
The Tibial Template is placed on the tibia and both holes are drilled, pinning the anterior hole only to accommodate instruments for the upcoming fin hole preparation.
Trialing & Cementing of Implant
Multiple 1.5 to 2 mm cement holes may be drilled to enhance cement interdigitation with the femoral cortical surface, and the joint is thoroughly irrigated.
The tibial tray may be cemented first, with all extruded cement removed and then the femoral component may be inserted.
The foregoing description of embodiments of the present invention has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to the practitioner skilled in the art. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the invention and the various embodiments and with various modifications that are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims equivalents thereof
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 15/443,251, filed Feb. 27, 2017, entitled “Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools”, which in turn is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 13/892,547, filed May 13, 2013, entitled “Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools”, which in turn is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 12/398,753, filed Mar. 5, 2009, entitled “Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools”, which in turn claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/034,048, filed Mar. 5, 2008, entitled “Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools,” and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/052,430, filed May 12, 2008, entitled “Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools.” U.S. Ser. No. 12/398,753 is also a continuation in part of U.S. Ser. No. 11/671,745, filed Feb. 6, 2007, entitled “Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools”, which issued Nov. 29, 2011 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,066,708, which in turn claims the benefit of U.S. Ser. No. 60/765,592 entitled “SURGICAL TOOLS FOR PERFORMING JOINT ARTHROPLASTY” filed Feb. 6, 2006; U.S Ser. No. 60/785,168, entitled “SURGICAL TOOLS FOR PERFORMING JOINT ARTHROPLASTY” filed Mar. 23, 2006; and U.S. Ser. No. 60/788,339, entitled “SURGICAL TOOLS FOR PERFORMING JOINT ARTHROPLASTY” filed Mar. 31, 2006. Each of the above-described applications is hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61034048 | Mar 2008 | US | |
| 61052430 | May 2008 | US | |
| 60765592 | Feb 2006 | US | |
| 60785168 | Mar 2006 | US | |
| 60788339 | Mar 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15443251 | Feb 2017 | US |
| Child | 16158036 | US | |
| Parent | 13892547 | May 2013 | US |
| Child | 15443251 | US | |
| Parent | 12398753 | Mar 2009 | US |
| Child | 13892547 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11671745 | Feb 2007 | US |
| Child | 12398753 | US |
