Patent Grant
11814447
This application is a U.S. national stage application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2019/065993, filed Jun. 18, 2019, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to United Kingdom Application No. GB1810316.8, filed Jun. 22, 2018, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted electronically in ASCII format and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Mar. 15, 2022, is named 178093 SL.txt and is 101,524 bytes in size.
The present invention relates to peptide ligands showing high binding affinity to the Eph receptor tyrosine kinase A2 (EphA2). The invention also includes drug conjugates comprising said peptides, conjugated to one or more effector and/or functional groups, to pharmaceutical compositions comprising said peptide ligands and drug conjugates and to the use of said peptide ligands and drug conjugates in preventing, suppressing or treating a disease or disorder characterised by overexpression of EphA2 in diseased tissue (such as a tumour).
In particular, the invention relates to peptide ligands of this type having novel chemistries for forming two or more bonds between a peptide and a scaffold molecule.
Different research teams have previously tethered peptides to scaffold moieties by forming two or more thioether bonds between cysteine residues of the peptide and suitable functional groups of a scaffold molecule. For example, methods for the generation of candidate drug compounds by linking cysteine-containing peptides to a molecular scaffold as for example tris(bromomethyl) benzene are disclosed in WO 2004/077062 and WO 2006/078161.
The advantage of utilising cysteine thiols for generating covalent thioether linkages in order to achieve cyclisation resides is their selective and biorthogonal reactivity. Thiol-containing linear peptides may be cyclised with a thiol-reactive scaffold compound such as 1, 3, 5 tris-bromomethylbenzene (TBMB) to form Bicyclic Peptides, and the resultant product contains three thioethers at the benzylic locations. The overall reaction of the linear peptide with TBMB to form a looped bicyclic peptide with thioether linkages is shown in
A need exists for alternative chemistries for coupling peptides to scaffold moieties to form looped peptide structures employing suitable replacements of the thioether moiety, thereby achieving compatibility with different peptides, changes in physiochemical properties such as improved solubility, changes in biodistribution and other advantages.
WO2011/018227 describes a method for altering the conformation of a first peptide ligand or group of peptide ligands, each peptide ligand comprising at least two reactive groups separated by a loop sequence covalently linked to a molecular scaffold which forms covalent bonds with said reactive groups, to produce a second peptide ligand or group of peptide ligands, comprising assembling said second derivative or group of derivatives from the peptide(s) and scaffold of said first derivative or group of derivatives, incorporating one of: (a) altering at least one reactive group; or (b) altering the nature of the molecular scaffold; or (c) altering the bond between at least one reactive group and the molecular scaffold; or any combination of (a), (b) or (c).
Our earlier pending applications PCT/EP2017/083953 and PCT/EP2017/083954 filed 20 Dec. 2017 describe bicycle peptides in which one or more thioether linkages to the scaffold molecule have been replaced by alkylamino linkages.
Eph receptor tyrosine kinases (Ephs) belong to a large group of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), kinases that phosphorylate proteins on tyrosine residues. Ephs and their membrane bound ephrin ligands (ephrins) control cell positioning and tissue organization (Poliakov et al. (2004) Dev Cell 7, 465-80). Functional and biochemical Eph responses occur at higher ligand oligomerization states (Stein et al. (1998) Genes Dev 12, 667-678).
Among other patterning functions, various Ephs and ephrins have been shown to play a role in vascular development. Knockout of EphB4 and ephrin-B2 results in a lack of the ability to remodel capillary beds into blood vessels (Poliakov et al., supra) and embryonic lethality. Persistent expression of some Eph receptors and ephrins has also been observed in newly-formed, adult micro-vessels (Brantley-Sieders et al. (2004) Curr Pharm Des 10, 3431-42; Adams (2003) J Anat 202, 105-12).
The de-regulated re-emergence of some ephrins and their receptors in adults also has been observed to contribute to tumor invasion, metastasis and neo-angiogenesis (Nakamoto et al. (2002) Microsc Res Tech 59, 58-67; Brantley-Sieders et al., supra). Furthermore, some Eph family members have been found to be over-expressed on tumor cells from a variety of human tumors (Brantley-Sieders et al., supra); Marme (2002) Ann Hematol 81 Suppl 2, S66; Booth et al. (2002) Nat Med 8, 1360-1).
EPH receptor A2 (ephrin type-A receptor 2) is a protein that in humans is encoded by the EPHA2 gene.
EphA2 is upregulated in multiple cancers in man, often correlating with disease progression, metastasis and poor prognosis e.g.: breast (Zelinski et al (2001) Cancer Res. 61, 2301-2306; Zhuang et al (2010) Cancer Res. 70, 299-308; Brantley-Sieders et al (2011) PLoS One 6, e24426), lung (Brannan et al (2009) Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2, 1039-1049; Kinch et al (2003) Clin Cancer Res. 9, 613-618; Guo et al (2013) J Thorac Oncol. 8, 301-308), gastric (Nakamura et al (2005) Cancer Sci. 96, 42-47; Yuan et al (2009) Dig Dis Sci 54, 2410-2417), pancreatic (Mudali et al (2006) Clin Exp Metastasis 23, 357-365), prostate (Walker-Daniels et al (1999) Prostate 41, 275-280), liver (Yang et al (2009) Hepatol Res. 39, 1169-1177) and glioblastoma (Wykosky et al (2005) Mol Cancer Res. 3, 541-551; Li et al (2010) Tumour Biol. 31, 477-488).
The full role of EphA2 in cancer progression is still not defined although there is evidence for interaction at numerous stages of cancer progression including tumour cell growth, survival, invasion and angiogenesis. Downregulation of EphA2 expression suppresses tumour cancer cell propagation (Binda et al (2012) Cancer Cell 22, 765-780), whilst EphA2 blockade inhibits VEGF induced cell migration (Hess et al (2001) Cancer Res. 61, 3250-3255), sprouting and angiogenesis (Cheng et al (2002) Mol Cancer Res. 1, 2-11; Lin et al (2007) Cancer 109, 332-40) and metastatic progression (Brantley-Sieders et al (2005) FASEB J. 19, 1884-1886).
An antibody drug conjugate to EphA2 has been shown to significantly diminish tumour growth in rat and mouse xenograft models (Jackson et al (2008) Cancer Research 68, 9367-9374) and a similar approach has been tried in man although treatment had to be discontinued for treatment related adverse events (Annunziata et al (2013) Invest New drugs 31, 77-84).
Our earlier pending applications GB1707734.8 filed on 15 May 2017, and GB1721259.8 and GB1721265.5 both filed 19 Dec. 2017, describe bicycle peptide ligands having high binding affinity for EphA2. These applications further describe conjugates of the peptide ligands with therapeutic agents, in particular with cytotoxic agents.
The present inventors have found that replacement of thioether linkages in looped peptides having affinity for EphA2 by alkylamino linkages results in looped peptide conjugates that display similar affinities to EphA2 as the corresponding conjugates made with all thioether linkages. The replacement of thioether linkages by alkylamino linkages is expected to result in improved solubility and/or improved oxidation stability of the conjugates according to the present invention.
Accordingly, in a first aspect the present invention provides a peptide ligand specific for EphA2 comprising a polypeptide comprising three residues selected from cysteine, L-2,3-diaminopropionic acid (Dap), N-beta-alkyl-L-2,3-diaminopropionic acid (N-AlkDap) and N-beta-haloalkyl-L-2,3-diaminopropionic acid (N-HAlkDap), with the proviso that at least one of said three residues is selected from Dap, N-AlkDap or N-HAlkDap, the said three residues being separated by at least two loop sequences, and a molecular scaffold, the peptide being linked to the scaffold by covalent alkylamino linkages with the Dap or N-AlkDap or N-HAlkDap residues of the polypeptide and by thioether linkages with the cysteine residues of the polypeptide when the said three residues include cysteine, such that two polypeptide loops are formed on the molecular scaffold.
Suitably, the peptide ligand comprises an amino acid sequence selected from:
A1-X1-A2-X2-A3
wherein:
A1, A2, and A3 are independently cysteine, L-2,3-diaminopropionic acid (Dap), N-beta-alkyl-L-2,3-diaminopropionic acid (N-AlkDap), or N-beta-haloalkyl-L-2,3-diaminopropionic acid (N-HAlkDap), provided that at least one of A1, A2, and A3 is Dap, N-AlkDap or N-HAlkDap; and
X1 and X2 represent the amino acid residues between the Cysteine, Dap, N-AlkDap or N-HAlkDap residues, wherein each of X1 and X2 independently is a loop sequence of 4, 5, 6 or 7 amino acid residues.
It can be seen that the derivatives of the invention comprise a peptide loop coupled to a scaffold by at least one alkylamino linkage to Dap or N-AlkDap of N-HAlkDap residues and up to two thioether linkages to cysteine.
The prefix “alkyl” in N-AlkDap and N-HAlkDap refers to an alkyl group having from one to four carbon atoms, preferably methyl. The prefix “halo” is used in this context in its normal sense to signify alkyl groups having one or more, suitably one, fluoro-, chloro-, bromo- or iodo-substituents.
When cysteine is present, the thioether linkage(s) provides an anchor during formation of the cyclic peptides as explained further below. In these embodiments, the thioether linkage is suitably a central linkage of the bicyclic peptide conjugate, i.e. in the peptide sequence two residues forming alkylamino linkages in the peptide are spaced from and located on either side of a cysteine residue forming the thioether linkage. The looped peptide structure is therefore a Bicycle peptide conjugate having a central thioether linkage and two peripheral alkylamino linkages. In alternative embodiments, the thioether linkage is placed at the N-terminus or C-terminus of the peptides, the central linkage and the other terminal linkage being selected from Dap, N-AlkDap or N-HAlkDap.
In embodiments of the invention all three of A1, A2, and A3 may suitably be Dap or N-AlkDap or N-HAlkDap. In these embodiments, the peptide ligands of the invention are suitably Bicycle conjugates having a central alkylamino linkage and two peripheral alkylamino linkages, the peptide forming two loops sharing the central alkylamino linkage. In these embodiments, A1, A2, and A3 are suitably all selected from N-AlkDap or N-HAlkDap, most suitably N-AlkDap, because of favourable reaction kinetics with the alkylated Daps.
In embodiments, the peptide ligand of the present invention additionally comprises one or more modifications selected from: N-terminal and/or C-terminal modifications; replacement of one or more amino acid residues with one or more non-natural amino acid residues (such as replacement of one or more polar amino acid residues with one or more isosteric or isoelectronic amino acids; replacement of one or more hydrophobic amino acid residues with other non-natural isosteric or isoelectronic amino acids); addition of a spacer group; replacement of one or more oxidation sensitive amino acid residues with one or more oxidation resistant amino acid residues; replacement of one or more amino acid residues with an alanine, replacement of one or more L-amino acid residues with one or more D-amino acid residues; N-alkylation of one or more amide bonds within the bicyclic peptide ligand; replacement of one or more peptide bonds with a surrogate bond; peptide backbone length modification; substitution of the hydrogen on the α-carbon of one or more amino acid residues with another chemical group, and post-synthetic bioorthogonal modification of amino acids such as cysteine, lysine, glutamate and tyrosine with suitable amine, thiol, carboxylic acid and phenol-reactive reagents.
Suitably, these embodiments may comprise an N-terminal modification using suitable amino-reactive chemistry, and/or C-terminal modification using suitable carboxy-reactive chemistry. For example, the N-terminal modification may comprise the addition of a molecular spacer group which facilitates the conjugation of effector groups and retention of potency of the bicyclic peptide to its target. The spacer group is suitably an oligopeptide group containing from about 5 to about 30 amino acids, such as an Ala, G-Sar10-A (SEQ ID NO: 1) group or bAla-Sar10-A (SEQ ID NO: 2) group. Alternatively or additionally, the N-terminal and/or C-terminal modification comprises addition of a cytotoxic agent.
In all of the peptide sequences defined herein, one or more tyrosine residues may be replaced by phenylalanine. This has been found to improve the yield of the bicycle peptide product during base-catalyzed coupling of the peptide to the scaffold molecule.
Suitably, the peptide ligand of the invention is a high affinity binder of the human, mouse and dog EphA2 hemopexin domain. Suitably the binding affinity ki is less than about 500 nM, less than about 100 nM, less than about 50 nM, less than about 25 nM, or less than about 10 nM. The binding affinity in the context of this specification is the binding affinity as measured by the methods described below.
Suitably, the peptide ligand of the invention is selective for EphA2, but does not cross-react with EphA1, EphA3 or EphA4. Suitably, the binding affinity ki with each of these ligands is greater than about 500 nM, greater than about 1000 nM, or greater than about 10000 nM.
Suitably, the scaffold comprises a (hetero)aromatic or (hetero)alicyclic moiety. Suitably, the scaffold comprises a tris-substituted (hetero)aromatic or (hetero)alicyclic moiety, for example a tris-methylene substituted (hetero)aromatic or (hetero)alicyclic moiety. The (hetero)aromatic or (hetero)alicyclic moiety is suitably a six-membered ring structure, preferably tris-substituted such that the scaffold has a 3-fold symmetry axis. Thus, in certain preferred embodiments, the scaffold is 1,3,5-tris-methylenebenzene scaffold, for example obtained by reacting the peptide with 1,3,5-tris-(bromomethyl)benzene (TBMB). In other preferred embodiments, the scaffold is a 1,3,5-tris-(acetamido)benzene group, which may be derived by coupling the peptide to 1,3,5-tris-(bromoacetamido)benzene (TBAB) as described further below.
The reactive sites are also suitable for forming thioether linkages with the —SH groups of cysteine in embodiments where the third residue is cysteine. The —SH group of cysteine is highly nucleophilic, and in these embodiments it is expected to react first with the electrophilic centres of the scaffold molecule to anchor the peptide to the scaffold molecule, whereafter the amino groups react with the remaining electrophilic centres of the scaffold molecule to form the looped peptide ligand.
In embodiments, the peptide has protecting groups on nucleophilic groups other than the amino groups and —SH groups (when present) intended for forming the alkylamino linkages.
Suitably, the peptide ligands of the invention may be made by a method that comprises reacting, in a nucleophilic substitution reaction, the peptide as defined herein with a scaffold molecule having three or more leaving groups.
In alternative methods, the compounds of the present invention could be made converting two or more side chain groups of the peptide to leaving groups, followed by reacting the peptide, in a nucleophilic substitution reaction, with a scaffold molecule having two or more amino groups.
The nucleophilic substitution reactions may be performed in the presence of a base, for example where the leaving group is a conventional anionic leaving group. The present inventors have found that the yields of cyclised peptide ligands can be greatly increased by suitable choice of solvent and base for the nucleophilic substitution reaction, and furthermore that the preferred solvent and base are different from the prior art solvent and base combinations that involve only the formation of thioether linkages. In particular, the present inventors have found that improved yields are achieved when using a trialkylamine base, i.e. a base of formula NR1R2R3, wherein R1, R2 and R3 are independently C1-C5 alkyl groups, suitably C2-C4 alkyl groups, in particular C2-C3 alkyl groups. Especially suitable bases are triethylamine and diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA). These bases have the property of being only weakly nucleophilic, and it is thought that this property accounts for the fewer side reactions and higher yields observed with these bases. The present inventors have further found that the preferred solvents for the nucleophilic substitution reaction are polar and protic solvents, in particular MeCN/H2O (50:50).
In a further aspect, the present invention provides a drug conjugate comprising the peptide ligand according to the invention conjugated to one or more effector and/or functional groups such as a cytotoxic agent or a metal chelator.
Suitably, the conjugate has the cytotoxic agent linked to the peptide ligand by a cleavable bond, such as a disulphide bond. Suitably, the cytotoxic agent is selected from DM1 or MMAE.
In embodiments, the drug conjugate has the following structure:
Suitably, either: R1, R2, R3 and R4 are all H; or R1, R2, R3 are all H and R4=methyl; or R1, R2=methyl and R3, R4=H; or R1, R3=methyl and R2, R4=H; or R1, R2=H and R3, R4=C1-C6 alkyl.
The linker between the toxin and the bicycle peptide may comprise a triazole group formed by click-reaction between an azide-functionalized toxin and an alkyne-functionalized bicycle peptide structure (or vice-versa). In other embodiments, the bicycle peptide may contain an amide linkage formed by reaction between a carboxylate-functionalized toxin and the N-terminal amino group of the bicycle peptide.
The linker between the toxin and the bicycle peptide may comprise a cathepsin-cleavable group to provide selective release of the toxin within the target cells. A suitable cathepsin-cleavable group is valine-citrulline.
The linker between the toxin and the bicycle peptide may comprise one or more spacer groups to provide the desired functionality, e.g. binding affinity or cathepsin cleavability, to the conjugate. A suitable spacer group is para-amino benzyl carbamate (PABC) which may be located intermediate the valine-citrulline group and the toxin moiety. PABC is a so-called self-immolating group that spontaneously breaks away from the toxin after cleavage of the cleavable group.
Thus, in embodiments, the bicycle peptide-drug conjugate may have the following structure made up of Toxin-PABC-cit-val-triazole-Bicycle:
In further embodiments, the bicycle peptide-drug conjugate may have the following structure made up of Toxin-PABC-cit-val-dicarboxylate-Bicycle:
Wherein (alk) is an alkylene group of formula CnH2n wherein n is from 1 to 10 and may be linear or branched, suitably (alk) is n-propylene or n-butylene.
In another aspect, the invention further provides a kit comprising at least a peptide ligand or conjugate according to the present invention.
In a still further aspect, the present invention provides a composition comprising a peptide ligand or conjugate of the present invention, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, diluent or excipient.
Moreover, the present invention provides a method for the treatment of disease using a peptide ligand, conjugate, or a composition according to the present invention. Suitably, the disease is a neoplastic disease, such as cancer.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides a method for the diagnosis, including diagnosis of disease using a peptide ligand, or a composition according to the present invention. Thus in general the binding of an analyte to a peptide ligand may be exploited to displace an agent, which leads to the generation of a signal on displacement. For example, binding of analyte (second target) can displace an enzyme (first target) bound to the peptide ligand providing the basis for a binding assay, especially if the enzyme is held to the peptide ligand through its active site.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art, such as in the arts of peptide chemistry, cell culture and phage display, nucleic acid chemistry and biochemistry.
Standard techniques are used for molecular biology, genetic and biochemical methods (see Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed., 2001, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.; Ausubel et al., Short Protocols in Molecular Biology (1999) 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention provides a looped peptide structure as defined in claim 1 comprising two peptide loops subtended between three linkages on the molecular scaffold, the central linkage being common to the two loops. The central linkage may be a thioether linkage formed to a cysteine residue of the peptide, or it is an alkylamino linkage formed to a Dap or N-AlkDap or N-HalkDap residue of the peptide. The two outer linkages are suitably alkylamino linkages formed to Dap or N-AlkDap or N-HalkDap residues of the peptide, or one of the outer linkages may be a thioether linkage formed to a cysteine residue of the peptide.
In one embodiment, the peptide ligands of the invention are fully cross-reactive with murine, dog, cynomolgus and human EphA2. In a yet further embodiment, the peptide ligands of the invention are selective for EphA2, but do not cross-react with EphA1, EphA3 or EphA4.
Suitably the binding affinity ki for EphA2 is less than about 500 nM, less than about 100 nM, less than about 50 nM, less than about 25 nM, or less than about 10 nM. Suitably, the binding affinity ki with EphA1, EphA3 and/or EphA4 is greater than about 500 nM, greater than about 1000 nM, or greater than about 10000 nM.
The amino acid sequences of specific peptide ligands according to the present invention are defined in the accompanying claims.
It will be appreciated that modified derivatives of the peptide ligands as defined herein are within the scope of the present invention. Examples of such suitable modified derivatives include one or more modifications selected from: N-terminal and/or C-terminal modifications; replacement of one or more amino acid residues with one or more non-natural amino acid residues (such as replacement of one or more polar amino acid residues with one or more isosteric or isoelectronic amino acids; replacement of one or more non-polar amino acid residues with other non-natural isosteric or isoelectronic amino acids); addition of a spacer group; replacement of one or more oxidation sensitive amino acid residues with one or more oxidation resistant amino acid residues; replacement of one or more amino acid residues with an alanine, replacement of one or more L-amino acid residues with one or more D-amino acid residues; N-alkylation of one or more amide bonds within the bicyclic peptide ligand; replacement of one or more peptide bonds with a surrogate bond; peptide backbone length modification; substitution of the hydrogen on the alpha-carbon of one or more amino acid residues with another chemical group, modification of amino acids such as cysteine, lysine, glutamate/aspartate and tyrosine with suitable amine, thiol, carboxylic acid and phenol-reactive reagents so as to functionalise said amino acids, and introduction or replacement of amino acids that introduce orthogonal reactivities that are suitable for functionalisation, for example azide or alkyn-group bearing amino acids that allow functionalisation with alkyn or azide-bearing moieties, respectively.
In one embodiment, the modified derivative comprises an N-terminal and/or C-terminal modification. In a further embodiment, wherein the modified derivative comprises an N-terminal modification using suitable amino-reactive chemistry, and/or C-terminal modification using suitable carboxy-reactive chemistry. In a further embodiment, said N-terminal or C-terminal modification comprises addition of an effector group, including but not limited to a cytotoxic agent, a radiochelator or a chromophore.
In an embodiment, the N-terminal modification comprises the addition of a molecular spacer group which facilitates the conjugation of effector groups and retention of potency of the bicyclic peptide to its target. The spacer group is suitably an oligopeptide group containing from about 5 to about 30 amino acids, such as an Ala, G-Sar10-A (SEQ ID NO: 1) or bAla-Sar10-A (SEQ ID NO: 2) group. In one embodiment, the spacer group is selected from bAla-Sar10-A (SEQ ID NO: 2).
In one embodiment, the modified derivative comprises replacement of one or more amino acid residues with one or more non-natural amino acid residues. In this embodiment, non-natural amino acids may be selected having isosteric/isoelectronic side chains which are neither recognised by degradative proteases nor have any adverse effect upon target potency.
Alternatively, non-natural amino acids may be used having constrained amino acid side chains, such that proteolytic hydrolysis of the nearby peptide bond is conformationally and sterically impeded. In particular, these concern proline analogues, bulky sidechains, C□-disubstituted derivatives (for example, aminoisobutyric acid, Aib), and cyclo amino acids, a simple derivative being amino-cyclopropylcarboxylic acid.
In a further embodiment, the non-natural amino acid residuesare selected from: 1-naphthylalanine; 2-naphthylalanine; cyclohexylglycine, phenylglycine; tert-butylglycine; 3,4-dichlorophenylalanine; cyclohexylalanine; and homophenylalanine.
In a yet further embodiment, the non-natural amino acid residues are selected from: 1-naphthylalanine; 2-naphthylalanine; and 3,4-dichlorophenylalanine. These substitutions enhance the affinity compared to the unmodified wildtype sequence.
In a yet further embodiment, the non-natural amino acid residues are selected from: 1-naphthylalanine. This substitution provided the greatest level of enhancement of affinity (greater than 7 fold) compared to wildtype.
In one embodiment, the modified derivative comprises replacement of one or more oxidation sensitive amino acid residues with one or more oxidation resistant amino acid residues. In a further embodiment, the modified derivative comprises replacement of a tryptophan residue with a naphthylalanine or alanine residue. This embodiment provides the advantage of improving the pharmaceutical stability profile of the resultant bicyclic peptide ligand.
In one embodiment, the modified derivative comprises replacement of one or more charged amino acid residues with one or more hydrophobic amino acid residues. In an alternative embodiment, the modified derivative comprises replacement of one or more hydrophobic amino acid residues with one or more charged amino acid residues. The correct balance of charged versus hydrophobic amino acid residues is an important characteristic of the bicyclic peptide ligands. For example, hydrophobic amino acid residues influence the degree of plasma protein binding and thus the concentration of the free available fraction in plasma, while charged amino acid residues (in particular arginine) may influence the interaction of the peptide with the phospholipid membranes on cell surfaces. The two in combination may influence half-life, volume of distribution and exposure of the peptide drug, and can be tailored according to the clinical endpoint. In addition, the correct combination and number of charged versus hydrophobic amino acid residues may reduce irritation at the injection site (if the peptide drug has been administered subcutaneously).
In one embodiment, the modified derivative comprises replacement of one or more L-amino acid residues with one or more D-amino acid residues. This embodiment is believed to increase proteolytic stability by steric hindrance and by a propensity of D-amino acids to stabilise □-turn conformations (Tugyi et al (2005) PNAS, 102(2), 413-418).
In all of the peptide sequences defined herein, one or more tyrosine residues may be replaced by phenylalanine. This has been found to improve the yield of the bicycle peptide product during base-catalyzed coupling of the peptide to the scaffold molecule.
In one embodiment, the modified derivative comprises removal of any amino acid residues and substitution with alanines. This embodiment provides the advantage of removing potential proteolytic attack site(s).
It should be noted that each of the above mentioned modifications serve to deliberately improve the potency or stability of the peptide. Further potency improvements based on modifications may be achieved through the following mechanisms:
(for reviews see Gentilucci et al, Curr. Pharmaceutical Design, (2010), 16, 3185-203, and Nestor et al, Curr. Medicinal Chem (2009), 16, 4399-418).
The present invention includes all pharmaceutically acceptable (radio)isotope-labeled compounds of the invention, i.e. compounds of formula (II), wherein one or more atoms are replaced by atoms having the same atomic number, but an atomic mass or mass number different from the atomic mass or mass number usually found in nature, and compounds of formula (I1), wherein metal chelating groups are attached (termed “effector”) that are capable of holding relevant (radio)isotopes, and compounds of formula (1), wherein certain functional groups are covalently replaced with relevant (radio)isotopes or isotopically labelled functional groups.
Examples of isotopes suitable for inclusion in the compounds of the invention comprise isotopes of hydrogen, such as 2H (D) and 3H (T), carbon, such as IT, 13C and 14C, chlorine, such as 36Cl, fluorine, such as 18F, iodine, such as 123I, 125I and 131I, nitrogen, such as 13N and 15N, oxygen, such as 15O, 17O and 18O, phosphorus, such as 32P, sulfur, such as 35S, copper, such as 64 Cu, gallium, such as 67Ga or 68Ga, yttrium, such as 90Y and lutetium, such as 177Lu, and Bismuth, such as 213Bi.
Certain isotopically-labelled compounds of formula (II), for example, those incorporating a radioactive isotope, are useful in drug and/or substrate tissue distribution studies, and to clinically assess the presence and/or absence of the EphA2 target on diseased tissues such as tumours and elsewhere. The compounds of formula (II) can further have valuable diagnostic properties in that they can be used for detecting or identifying the formation of a complex between a labelled compound and other molecules, peptides, proteins, enzymes or receptors. The detecting or identifying methods can use compounds that are labelled with labelling agents such as radioisotopes, enzymes, fluorescent substances, luminous substances (for example, luminol, luminol derivatives, luciferin, aequorin and luciferase), etc. The radioactive isotopes tritium, i.e. 3H (T), and carbon-14, i.e. 14C, are particularly useful for this purpose in view of their ease of incorporation and ready means of detection.
Substitution with heavier isotopes such as deuterium, i.e. 2H (D), may afford certain therapeutic advantages resulting from greater metabolic stability, for example, increased in vivo half-life or reduced dosage requirements, and hence may be preferred in some circumstances.
Substitution with positron emitting isotopes, such as 11C, 18F, 15O and 13N, can be useful in Positron Emission Topography (PET) studies for examining target occupancy.
Incorporation of isotopes into metal chelating effector groups, such as 64Cu, 67Ga, 68Ga, and 177Lu can be useful for visualizing tumour specific antigens employing PET or SPECT imaging.
Incorporation of isotopes into metal chelating effector groups, such as, but not limited to 90Y, 177Lu, and 213Bi, can present the option of targeted radiotherapy, whereby metal-chelator-bearing compounds of formula (II) carry the therapeutic radionuclide towards the target protein and site of action.
Isotopically-labeled compounds of formula (II) can generally be prepared by conventional techniques known to those skilled in the art or by processes analogous to those described in the accompanying Examples using an appropriate isotopically-labeled reagent in place of the non-labeled reagent previously employed.
Specificity, in the context herein, refers to the ability of a ligand to bind or otherwise interact with its cognate target to the exclusion of entities which are similar to the target. For example, specificity can refer to the ability of a ligand to inhibit the interaction of a human enzyme, but not a homologous enzyme from a different species. Using the approach described herein, specificity can be modulated, that is increased or decreased, so as to make the ligands more or less able to interact with homologues or paralogues of the intended target. Specificity is not intended to be synonymous with activity, affinity or avidity, and the potency of the action of a ligand on its target (such as, for example, binding affinity or level of inhibition) are not necessarily related to its specificity.
Binding activity, as used herein, refers to quantitative binding measurements taken from binding assays, for example as described herein. Therefore, binding activity refers to the amount of peptide ligand which is bound at a given target concentration.
Multispecificity is the ability to bind to two or more targets. Typically, binding peptides are capable of binding to a single target, such as an epitope in the case of an antibody, due to their conformational properties. However, peptides can be developed which can bind to two or more targets; dual specific antibodies, for example, as known in the art as referred to above. In the present invention, the peptide ligands can be capable of binding to two or more targets and are therefore multispecific. Suitably, they bind to two targets, and are dual specific. The binding may be independent, which would mean that the binding sites for the targets on the peptide are not structurally hindered by the binding of one or other of the targets. In this case, both targets can be bound independently. More generally, it is expected that the binding of one target will at least partially impede the binding of the other.
There is a fundamental difference between a dual specific ligand and a ligand with specificity which encompasses two related targets. In the first case, the ligand is specific for both targets individually, and interacts with each in a specific manner. For example, a first loop in the ligand may bind to a first target, and a second loop to a second target. In the second case, the ligand is non-specific because it does not differentiate between the two targets, for example by interacting with an epitope of the targets which is common to both.
In the context of the present invention, it is possible that a ligand which has activity in respect of, for example, a target and an orthologue, could be a bispecific ligand. However, in one embodiment the ligand is not bispecific, but has a less precise specificity such that it binds both the target and one or more orthologues. In general, a ligand which has not been selected against both a target and its orthologue is less likely to be bispecific due to the absence of selective pressure towards bispecificity. The loop length in the bicyclic peptide may be decisive in providing a tailored binding surface such that good target and orthologue cross-reactivity can be obtained, while maintaining high selectivity towards less related homologues.
If the ligands are truly bispecific, in one embodiment at least one of the target specificities of the ligands will be common amongst the ligands selected, and the level of that specificity can be modulated by the methods disclosed herein. Second or further specificities need not be shared, and need not be the subject of the procedures set forth herein.
The peptide ligand compounds of the invention comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of, the peptide covalently bound to a molecular scaffold. The term “scaffold” or “molecular scaffold” herein refers to a chemical moiety that is bonded to the peptide at the alkylamino linkages and thioether linkage (when cysteine is present) in the compounds of the invention. The term “scaffold molecule” or “molecular scaffold molecule” herein refers to a molecule that is capable of being reacted with a peptide or peptide ligand to form the derivatives of the invention having alkylamino and, in certain embodiments, also thioether bonds. Thus, the scaffold molecule has the same structure as the scaffold moiety except that respective reactive groups (such as leaving groups) of the molecule are replaced by alkylamino and thioether bonds to the peptide in the scaffold moiety.
In embodiments, the scaffold is an aromatic molecular scaffold, i.e. a scaffold comprising a (hetero)aryl group. As used herein, “(hetero)aryl” is meant to include aromatic rings, for example, aromatic rings having from 4 to 12 members, such as phenyl rings. These aromatic rings can optionally contain one or more heteroatoms (e.g., one or more of N, O, S, and P), such as thienyl rings, pyridyl rings, and furanyl rings. The aromatic rings can be optionally substituted. “(hetero)aryl” is also meant to include aromatic rings to which are fused one or more other aryl rings or non-aryl rings. For example, naphthyl groups, indole groups, thienothienyl groups, dithienothienyl, and 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthyl groups (each of which can be optionally substituted) are aryl groups for the purposes of the present application. As indicated above, the aryl rings can be optionally substituted. Suitable substituents include alkyl groups (which can optionally be substituted), other aryl groups (which may themselves be substituted), heterocyclic rings (saturated or unsaturated), alkoxy groups (which is meant to include aryloxy groups (e.g., phenoxy groups)), hydroxy groups, aldehyde groups, nitro groups, amine groups (e.g., unsubstituted, or mono- or di-substituted with aryl or alkyl groups), carboxylic acid groups, carboxylic acid derivatives (e.g., carboxylic acid esters, amides, etc.), halogen atoms (e.g., Cl, Br, and I), and the like.
Suitably, the scaffold comprises a tris-substituted (hetero)aromatic or (hetero)alicyclic moiety, for example a tris-methylene substituted (hetero)aromatic or (hetero)alicyclic moiety. The (hetero)aromatic or (hetero)alicyclic moiety is suitably a six-membered ring structure, preferably tris-substituted such that the scaffold has a 3-fold symmetry axis.
In embodiments, the scaffold is a tris-methylene (hetero)aryl moiety, for example a 1,3,5-tris methylene benzene moiety. In these embodiments, the corresponding scaffold molecule suitably has a leaving group on the methylene carbons. The methylene group then forms the R1 moiety of the alkylamino linkage as defined herein. In these methylene-substituted (hetero)aromatic compounds, the electrons of the aromatic ring can stabilize the transition state during nucleophilic substitution. Thus, for example, benzyl halides are 100-1000 times more reactive towards nucleophilic substitution than alkyl halides that are not connected to a (hetero)aromatic group.
In these embodiments, the scaffold and scaffold molecule have the general formula:
Where LG represents a leaving group as described further below for the scaffold molecule, or LG (including the adjacent methylene group forming the R1 moiety of the alkylamino group) represents the alkylamino linkage to the peptide in the conjugates of the invention.
In embodiments, the group LG above may be a halogen such as, but not limited to, a bromine atom, in which case the scaffold molecule is 1,3,5-Tris(bromomethyl)benzene (TBMB). Another suitable molecular scaffold molecule is 2,4,6-tris(bromomethyl) mesitylene. It is similar to 1,3,5-tris(bromomethyl) benzene but contains additionally three methyl groups attached to the benzene ring. In the case of this scaffold, the additional methyl groups may form further contacts with the peptide and hence add additional structural constraint. Thus, a different diversity range is achieved than with 1,3,5-Tris(bromomethyl)benzene.
Another preferred molecule for forming the scaffold for reaction with the peptide by nucleophilic substitution is 1,3,5-tris(bromoacetamido)benzene (TBAB):
In other embodiments, the scaffold is a non-aromatic molecular scaffold, e.g. a scaffold comprising a (hetero)alicyclic group. As used herein, “(hetero)alicyclic” refers to a homocyclic or heterocyclic saturated ring. The ring can be unsubstituted, or it can be substituted with one or more substituents. The substituents can be saturated or unsaturated, aromatic or nonaromatic, and examples of suitable substituents include those recited above in the discussion relating to substituents on alkyl and aryl groups. Furthermore, two or more ring substituents can combine to form another ring, so that “ring”, as used herein, is meant to include fused ring systems. In these embodiments, the alicyclic scaffold is preferably 1,1′,1″-(1,3,5-tri azinane-1,3,5-triyOtriprop-2-en-1-one (TATA).
In other embodiments the molecular scaffold may have a tetrahedral geometry such that reaction of four functional groups of the encoded peptide with the molecular scaffold generates not more than two product isomers. Other geometries are also possible; indeed, an almost infinite number of scaffold geometries is possible, leading to greater possibilities for peptide ligand diversification.
The peptides used to form the ligands of the invention comprise Dap or N-AlkDap or N-HAlkDap residues for forming alkylamino linkages to the scaffold. The structure of diaminopropionic acid is analogous to and isosteric that of cysteine that has been used to form thioether bonds to the scaffold in the prior art, with replacement of the terminal —SH group of cysteine by —NH2:
The term “alkylamino” is used herein in its normal chemical sense to denote a linkage consisting of NH or N(R3) bonded to two carbon atoms, wherein the carbon atoms are independently selected from alkyl, alkylene, or aryl carbon atoms and R3 is an alkyl group. Suitably, the alkylamino linkages of the invention comprise an NH moiety bonded to two saturated carbon atoms, most suitably methylene (—CH2—) carbon atoms. The alkylamino linkages of the invention have general formula:
S—R1—N(R3)—R2—P
Wherein:
Certain bicyclic peptide ligands of the present invention have a number of advantageous properties which enable them to be considered as suitable drug-like molecules for injection, inhalation, nasal, ocular, oral or topical administration. Such advantageous properties include:
It will be appreciated that salt forms are within the scope of this invention, and references to peptide ligands of the present invention include the salt forms of said compounds.
The salts of the present invention can be synthesized from the parent compound that contains a basic or acidic moiety by conventional chemical methods such as methods described in Pharmaceutical Salts: Properties, Selection, and Use, P. Heinrich Stahl (Editor), Camille G. Wermuth (Editor), ISBN: 3-90639-026-8, Hardcover, 388 pages, August 2002. Generally, such salts can be prepared by reacting the free acid or base forms of these compounds with the appropriate base or acid in water or in an organic solvent, or in a mixture of the two.
Acid addition salts (mono- or di-salts) may be formed with a wide variety of acids, both inorganic and organic. Examples of acid addition salts include mono- or di-salts formed with an acid selected from the group consisting of acetic, 2,2-dichloroacetic, adipic, alginic, ascorbic (e.g. L-ascorbic), L-aspartic, benzene sulfonic, benzoic, 4-acetamidobenzoic, butanoic, (+) camphoric, camphor-sulfonic, (+)-(1S)-camphor-10-sulfonic, capric, caproic, caprylic, cinnamic, citric, cyclamic, dodecylsulfuric, ethane-1,2-disulfonic, ethanesulfonic, 2-hydroxyethanesulfonic, formic, fumaric, galactaric, gentisic, glucoheptonic, D-gluconic, glucuronic (e.g. D-glucuronic), glutamic (e.g. L-glutamic), α-oxoglutaric, glycolic, hippuric, hydrohalic acids (e.g. hydrobromic, hydrochloric, hydriodic), isethionic, lactic (e.g. (+)-L-lactic, (±)-DL-lactic), lactobionic, maleic, malic, (−)-L-malic, malonic, (±)-DL-mandelic, methanesulfonic, naphthalene-2-sulfonic, naphthalene-1,5-disulfonic, 1-hydroxy-2-naphthoic, nicotinic, nitric, oleic, orotic, oxalic, palmitic, pamoic, phosphoric, propionic, pyruvic, L-pyroglutamic, salicylic, 4-amino-salicylic, sebacic, stearic, succinic, sulfuric, tannic, (+)-L-tartaric, thiocyanic, p-toluenesulfonic, undecylenic and valeric acids, as well as acylated amino acids and cation exchange resins.
One particular group of salts consists of salts formed from acetic, hydrochloric, hydroiodic, phosphoric, nitric, sulfuric, citric, lactic, succinic, maleic, malic, isethionic, fumaric, benzenesulfonic, toluenesulfonic, sulfuric, methanesulfonic (mesylate), ethanesulfonic, naphthalenesulfonic, valeric, propanoic, butanoic, malonic, glucuronic and lactobionic acids. One particular salt is the hydrochloride salt. Another particular salt is the acetate salt.
If the compound is anionic, or has a functional group which may be anionic (e.g., —COOH may be —COO−), then a salt may be formed with an organic or inorganic base, generating a suitable cation. Examples of suitable inorganic cations include, but are not limited to, alkali metal ions such as Li+, Na+ and K+, alkaline earth metal cations such as Ca2+ and Mg2+, and other cations such as Al3+ or Zn+. Examples of suitable organic cations include, but are not limited to, ammonium ion (i.e., NH4+) and substituted ammonium ions (e.g., NH3R+, NH2R2+, NHR3+, NR4+). Examples of some suitable substituted ammonium ions are those derived from: methylamine, ethylamine, diethylamine, propylamine, dicyclohexylamine, triethylamine, butylamine, ethylenediamine, ethanolamine, diethanolamine, piperazine, benzylamine, phenylbenzylamine, choline, meglumine, and tromethamine, as well as amino acids, such as lysine and arginine. An example of a common quaternary ammonium ion is N(CH3)4+.
Where the compounds of the present invention contain an amine function, these may form quaternary ammonium salts, for example by reaction with an alkylating agent according to methods well known to the skilled person. Such quaternary ammonium compounds are within the scope of the invention.
Several conjugated peptides may be incorporated together into the same molecule according to the present invention. For example two such peptide conjugates of the same specificity can be linked together via the molecular scaffold, increasing the avidity of the derivative for its targets. Alternatively, in another embodiment a plurality of peptide conjugates are combined to form a multimer. For example, two different peptide conjugates are combined to create a multispecific molecule. Alternatively, three or more peptide conjugates, which may be the same or different, can be combined to form multispecific derivatives. In one embodiment multivalent complexes may be constructed by linking together the molecular scaffolds, which may be the same or different.
The peptide ligands of the present invention may be made by a method comprising: providing a suitable peptide and a scaffold molecule; and forming the thioether (when cysteine is present) and alkylamino linkages between the peptide and the scaffold molecule.
The peptides for preparation of the peptide ligands of the invention can be made using conventional solid-phase synthesis from amino acid starting materials, which may include appropriate protecting groups as described herein. These methods for making peptides are well known in the art.
Suitably, the peptide has protecting groups on nucleophilic groups other than the —SH and amine groups intended for forming the alkylamino linkages. The nucleophilicity of amino acid side chains has been subject to several studies, and listed in descending order: thiolate in cysteines, amines in Lysine, secondary amine in Histidine and Tryptophan, guanidino amines in Arginine, hydroxyls in Serine/Threonine, and finally carboxylates in aspartate and glutamate. Accordingly, in some cases it may be necessary to apply protecting groups to the more nucleophilic groups on the peptide to prevent undesired side reactions with these groups.
In embodiments, the method comprises: synthesising a peptide having protecting groups on nucleophilic groups other than the amine groups intended for forming the alkylamino linkages and second protecting groups on the amine groups intended for forming alkylamino linkages, wherein the protecting groups on the amine groups intended for forming alkylamino linkages can be removed under conditions different than for the protecting groups on the other nucleophilic groups, followed by treating the peptide under conditions selected to deprotect the amine groups intended for forming alkylamino linkages without deprotecting the other nucleophilic groups. The coupling reaction to the scaffold is then performed, followed by removal of the remaining protecting groups to yield the peptide conjugate.
Suitably, the method comprises reacting, in a nucleophilic substitution reaction, the peptide having the reactive side chain —SH and amine groups, with a scaffold molecule having three or more leaving groups.
The term “leaving group” herein is used in its normal chemical sense to mean a moiety capable of nucleophilic displacement by an amine group. Any such leaving group can be used here provided it is readily removed by nucleophilic displacement by amine. Suitable leaving groups are conjugate bases of acids having a pKa of less than about 5. Non-limiting examples of leaving groups useful in the invention include halo, such as bromo, chloro, iodo, O-tosylate (OTos), O-mesylate (OMes), O-triflate (OTO or O-trimethylsilyl (OTMS).
The nucleophilic substitution reactions may be performed in the presence of a base, for example where the leaving group is a conventional anionic leaving group. The present inventors have found that the yields of cyclised peptide ligands can be greatly increased by suitable choice of solvent and base (and pH) for the nucleophilic substitution reaction, and furthermore that the preferred solvent and base are different from the prior art solvent and base combinations that involve only the formation of thioether linkages. In particular, the present inventors have found that improved yields are achieved when using a trialkylamine base, i.e. a base of formula NR1R2R3, wherein R1, R2 and R3 are independently C1-C5 alkyl groups, suitably C2-C4 alkyl groups, in particular C2-C3 alkyl groups. Especially suitable bases are triethylamine and diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA). These bases have the property of being only weakly nucleophilic, and it is thought that this property accounts for the fewer side reactions and higher yields observed with these bases. The present inventors have further found that the preferred solvents for the nucleophilic substitution reaction are polar and protic solvents, in particular MeCN/H2O containing MeCN and H2O in volumetric ratios from 1:10 to 10:1, suitably from 2:10 to 10:2 and more suitably from 3:10 to 10:3, in particular from 4:10 to 10:4.
Additional binding or functional activities may be attached to the N or C terminus of the peptide covalently linked to a molecular scaffold. The functional group is, for example, selected from the group consisting of: a group capable of binding to a molecule which extends the half-life of the peptide ligand in vivo, and a molecule which extends the half-life of the peptide ligand in vivo. Such a molecule can be, for instance, HSA or a cell matrix protein, and the group capable of binding to a molecule which extends the half-life of the peptide ligand in vivo is an antibody or antibody fragment specific for HSA or a cell matrix protein. Such a molecule may also be a conjugate with high molecular weight PEGs.
In one embodiment, the functional group is a binding molecule, selected from the group consisting of a second peptide ligand comprising a peptide covalently linked to a molecular scaffold, and an antibody or antibody fragment. 2, 3, 4, 5 or more peptide ligands may be joined together. The specificities of any two or more of these derivatives may be the same or different; if they are the same, a multivalent binding structure will be formed, which has increased avidity for the target compared to univalent binding molecules. The molecular scaffolds, moreover, may be the same or different, and may subtend the same or different numbers of loops.
The functional group can moreover be an effector group, for example an antibody Fc region.
Attachments to the N or C terminus may be made prior to binding of the peptide to a molecular scaffold, or afterwards. Thus, the peptide may be produced (synthetically, or by biologically derived expression systems) with an N or C terminal peptide group already in place. Preferably, however, the addition to the N or C terminus takes place after the peptide has been combined with the molecular backbone to form a conjugate. For example, Fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chloride can be used to introduce the Fmoc protective group at the N-terminus of the peptide. Fmoc binds to serum albumins including HSA with high affinity, and Fmoc-Trp or Fmoc-Lys bind with an increased affinity. The peptide can be synthesised with the Fmoc protecting group left on, and then coupled with the scaffold through the alkylaminos. An alternative is the palmitoyl moiety which also binds HSA and has, for example been used in Liraglutide to extend the half-life of this GLP-1 analogue.
Alternatively, a conjugate of the peptide with the scaffold can be made, and then modified at the N-terminus, for example with the amine- and sulfhydryl-reactive linker N-e-maleimidocaproyloxy) succinimide ester (EMCS). Via this linker the peptide conjugate can be linked to other peptides, for example an antibody Fc fragment.
The binding function may be another peptide bound to a molecular scaffold, creating a multimer; another binding protein, including an antibody or antibody fragment; or any other desired entity, including serum albumin or an effector group, such as an antibody Fc region.
Additional binding or functional activities can moreover be bound directly to the molecular scaffold.
In embodiments, the scaffold may further comprise a reactive group to which the additional activities can be bound. Preferably, this group is orthogonal with respect to the other reactive groups on the molecular scaffold, to avoid interaction with the peptide. In one embodiment, the reactive group may be protected, and deprotected when necessary to conjugate the additional activities.
Accordingly, in a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a drug conjugate comprising a peptide ligand as defined herein conjugated to one or more effector and/or functional groups.
Effector and/or functional groups can be attached, for example, to the N or C termini of the polypeptide, or to the molecular scaffold.
Appropriate effector groups include antibodies and parts or fragments thereof. For instance, an effector group can include an antibody light chain constant region (CL), an antibody CH1 heavy chain domain, an antibody CH2 heavy chain domain, an antibody CH3 heavy chain domain, or any combination thereof, in addition to the one or more constant region domains. An effector group may also comprise a hinge region of an antibody (such a region normally being found between the CH1 and CH2 domains of an IgG molecule).
In a further embodiment of this aspect of the invention, an effector group according to the present invention is an Fc region of an IgG molecule. Advantageously, a peptide ligand-effector group according to the present invention comprises or consists of a peptide ligand Fc fusion having a tβ half-life of a day or more, two days or more, 3 days or more, 4 days or more, 5 days or more, 6 days or more or 7 days or more. Most advantageously, the peptide ligand according to the present invention comprises or consists of a peptide ligand Fc fusion having a tβ half-life of a day or more.
Functional groups include, in general, binding groups, drugs, reactive groups for the attachment of other entities, functional groups which aid uptake of the macrocyclic peptides into cells, and the like.
The ability of peptides to penetrate into cells will allow peptides against intracellular targets to be effective. Targets that can be accessed by peptides with the ability to penetrate into cells include transcription factors, intracellular signalling molecules such as tyrosine kinases and molecules involved in the apoptotic pathway. Functional groups which enable the penetration of cells include peptides or chemical groups which have been added either to the peptide or the molecular scaffold. Peptides such as those derived from such as VP22, HIV-Tat, a homeobox protein of Drosophila (Antennapedia), e.g. as described in Chen and Harrison, Biochemical Society Transactions (2007) Volume 35, part 4, p 821; Gupta et al. in Advanced Drug Discovery Reviews (2004) Volume 57 9637. Examples of short peptides which have been shown to be efficient at translocation through plasma membranes include the 16 amino acid penetratin peptide from Drosophila Antennapedia protein (Derossi et al (1994) J Biol. Chem. Volume 269 p 10444), the 18 amino acid ‘model amphipathic peptide’ (Oehlke et al (1998) Biochim Biophys Acts Volume 1414 p 127) and arginine rich regions of the HIV TAT protein. Non peptidic approaches include the use of small molecule mimics or SMOCs that can be easily attached to biomolecules (Okuyama et al (2007) Nature Methods Volume 4 p 153). Other chemical strategies to add guanidinium groups to molecules also enhance cell penetration (Elson-Scwab et al (2007) J Biol Chem Volume 282 p 13585). Small molecular weight molecules such as steroids may be added to the molecular scaffold to enhance uptake into cells.
One class of functional groups which may be attached to peptide ligands includes antibodies and binding fragments thereof, such as Fab, Fv or single domain fragments. In particular, antibodies which bind to proteins capable of increasing the half-life of the peptide ligand in vivo may be used.
RGD peptides, which bind to integrins which are present on many cells, may also be incorporated.
In one embodiment, a peptide ligand-effector group according to the invention has a tβ half-life selected from the group consisting of: 12 hours or more, 24 hours or more, 2 days or more, 3 days or more, 4 days or more, 5 days or more, 6 days or more, 7 days or more, 8 days or more, 9 days or more, 10 days or more, 11 days or more, 12 days or more, 13 days or more, 14 days or more, 15 days or more or 20 days or more. Advantageously a peptide ligand-effector group or composition according to the invention will have a tβ half life in the range 12 to 60 hours. In a further embodiment, it will have a tβ half-life of a day or more. In a further embodiment still, it will be in the range 12 to 26 hours.
In one particular embodiment of the invention, the functional group conjugated to the looped peptide is selected from a metal chelator, which is suitable for complexing metal radioisotopes of medicinal relevance. Such effectors, when complexed with said radioisotopes, can present useful agents for cancer therapy. Suitable examples include DOTA, NOTA, EDTA, DTPA, HEHA, SarAr and others (Targeted Radionuclide therapy, Tod Speer, Wolters/Kluver Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011).
Possible effector groups also include enzymes, for instance such as carboxypeptidase G2 for use in enzyme/prodrug therapy, where the peptide ligand replaces antibodies in ADEPT.
In one particular embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the functional group is selected from a drug, such as a cytotoxic agent for cancer therapy. Suitable examples include: alkylating agents such as cisplatin and carboplatin, as well as oxaliplatin, mechlorethamine, cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, ifosfamide; Anti-metabolites including purine analogs azathioprine and mercaptopurine or pyrimidine analogs; plant alkaloids and terpenoids including vinca alkaloids such as Vincristine, Vinblastine, Vinorelbine and Vindesine; Podophyllotoxin and its derivatives etoposide and teniposide; Taxanes, including paclitaxel, originally known as Taxol; topoisomerase inhibitors including camptothecins: irinotecan and topotecan, and type II inhibitors including amsacrine, etoposide, etoposide phosphate, and teniposide. Further agents can include antitumour antibiotics which include the immunosuppressant dactinomycin (which is used in kidney transplantations), doxorubicin, epirubicin, bleomycin and others.
In one further particular embodiment of the invention according to this aspect, the cytotoxic agent is selected from DM1 or MMAE.
DM1 is a cytotoxic agent which is a thiol-containing derivative of maytansine and has the following structure:
Monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) is a synthetic antineoplastic agent and has the following structure:
In one embodiment, the cytotoxic agent is linked to the bicyclic peptide by a cleavable bond, such as a disulphide bond. In a further embodiment, the groups adjacent to the disulphide bond are modified to control the hindrance of the disulphide bond, and by this the rate of cleavage and concomitant release of cytotoxic agent.
Published work established the potential for modifying the susceptibility of the disulphide bond to reduction by introducing steric hindrance on either side of the disulphide bond (Kellogg et al (2011) Bioconjugate Chemistry, 22, 717). A greater degree of steric hindrance reduces the rate of reduction by intracellular glutathione and also extracellular (systemic) reducing agents, consequentially reducing the ease by which toxin is released, both inside and outside the cell. Thus, selection of the optimum in disulphide stability in the circulation (which minimises undesirable side effects of the toxin) versus efficient release in the intracellular milieu (which maximises the therapeutic effect) can be achieved by careful selection of the degree of hindrance on either side of the disulphide bond.
The hindrance on either side of the disulphide bond is modulated through introducing one or more methyl groups on either the targeting entity (here, the bicyclic peptide) or toxin side of the molecular construct.
Thus, in one embodiment, the cytotoxic agent is selected from a compound of formula:
In one embodiment of the compound of the above formula, n represents 1 and R1 and R2 both represent hydrogen (i.e. the maytansine derivative DM1).
In an alternative embodiment of the compound of the above formula, n represents 2, R1 represents hydrogen and R2 represents a methyl group (i.e. the maytansine derivative DM3).
In one embodiment of the compound, n represents 2 and R1 and R2 both represent methyl groups (i.e. the maytansine derivative DM4).
It will be appreciated that the cytotoxic agent can form a disulphide bond, and in a conjugate structure with a bicyclic peptide, the disulphide connectivity between the thiol-toxin and thiol-bicycle peptide is introduced through several possible synthetic schemes.
In one embodiment, the bicyclic peptide component of the conjugate has the following structure:
Compounds of the above formula where R3 and R4 are both hydrogen are considered unhindered and compounds of the above formula where one or all of R3 and R4 represent methyl are considered hindered.
It will be appreciated that the bicyclic peptide of the above formula can form a disulphide bond, and in a conjugate structure with a cytotoxic agent described above, the disulphide connectivity between the thiol-toxin and thiol-bicycle peptide is introduced through several possible synthetic schemes.
In one embodiment, the cytotoxic agent is linked to the bicyclic peptide by the following linker:
When R1, R2, R3 and R4 are each hydrogen, the disulphide bond is least hindered and most susceptible to reduction. When R1, R2, R3 and R4 are each alkyl, the disulphide bond is most hindered and least susceptible to reduction. Partial substitutions of hydrogen and alkyl yield a gradual increase in resistance to reduction, and concomitant cleavage and release of toxin. Preferred embodiments include: R1, R2, R3 and R4 all H; R1, R2, R3 all H and R4=methyl; R1, R2=methyl and R3, R4═H; R1, R3=methyl and R2, R4═H; and R1, R2═H, R3, R4═C1-C6 alkyl.
In one embodiment, the toxin of compound is a maytansine and the conjugate comprises a compound of the following formula:
Further details and methods of preparing the above-described conjugates of bicycle peptide ligands with toxins are described in detail in our published patent applications WO2016/067035 and WO2017/191460. The entire disclosure of these applications is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
The linker between the toxin and the bicycle peptide may comprise a triazole group formed by click-reaction between an azide-functionalized toxin and an alkyne-functionalized bicycle peptide structure (or vice-versa). In other embodiments, the bicycle peptide may contain an amide linkage formed by reaction between a carboxylate-functionalized toxin and the N-terminal amino group of the bicycle peptide.
The linker between the toxin and the bicycle peptide may comprise a cathepsin-cleavable group to provide selective release of the toxin within the target cells. A suitable cathepsin-cleavable group is valine-citrulline.
The linker between the toxin and the bicycle peptide may comprise one or more spacer groups to provide the desired functionality, e.g. binding affinity or cathepsin cleavability, to the conjugate. A suitable spacer group is para-amino benzyl carbamate (PABC) which may be located intermediate the valine-citrulline group and the toxin moiety.
Thus, in embodiments, the bicycle peptide-drug conjugate may have the following structure made up of Toxin-PABC-cit-val-triazole-Bicycle:
In further embodiments, the bicycle peptide-drug conjugate may have the following structure made up of Toxin-PABC-cit-val-dicarboxylate-Bicycle:
wherein (alk) is an alkylene group of formula CnH2n wherein n is from 1 to 10 and may be linear or branched, suitably (alk) is n-propylene or n-butylene.
A detailed description of methods for the preparation of peptide ligand-drug conjugates according to the present invention is given in our earlier applications WO2016/067035 and PCT/EP2017/083954 filed 20 Dec. 2017, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Peptide ligands according to the present invention may be employed in in vivo therapeutic and prophylactic applications, in vitro and in vivo diagnostic applications, in vitro assay and reagent applications, and the like.
In general, the use of a peptide ligand can replace that of an antibody. Derivatives selected according to the invention are of use diagnostically in Western analysis and in situ protein detection by standard immunohistochemical procedures; for use in these applications, the derivatives of a selected repertoire may be labelled in accordance with techniques known in the art. In addition, such peptide ligands may be used preparatively in affinity chromatography procedures, when complexed to a chromatographic support, such as a resin. All such techniques are well known to one of skill in the art. Peptide ligands according to the present invention possess binding capabilities similar to those of antibodies, and may replace antibodies in such assays.
Diagnostic uses include any uses which to which antibodies are normally put, including test-strip assays, laboratory assays and immunodiagnostic assays.
Therapeutic and prophylactic uses of peptide ligands prepared according to the invention involve the administration of derivatives selected according to the invention to a recipient mammal, such as a human. Substantially pure peptide ligands of at least 90 to 95% homogeneity are preferred for administration to a mammal, and 98 to 99% or more homogeneity is most preferred for pharmaceutical uses, especially when the mammal is a human. Once purified, partially or to homogeneity as desired, the selected peptides may be used diagnostically or therapeutically (including extracorporeally) or in developing and performing assay procedures, immunofluorescent stainings and the like (Lefkovite and Pernis, (1979 and 1981) Immunological Methods, Volumes I and II, Academic Press, NY).
Generally, the present peptide ligands will be utilised in purified form together with pharmacologically appropriate carriers. Typically, these carriers include aqueous or alcoholic/aqueous solutions, emulsions or suspensions, any including saline and/or buffered media. Parenteral vehicles include sodium chloride solution, Ringer's dextrose, dextrose and sodium chloride and lactated Ringer's. Suitable physiologically-acceptable adjuvants, if necessary to keep a peptide complex in suspension, may be chosen from thickeners such as carboxymethylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, gelatin and alginates.
Intravenous vehicles include fluid and nutrient replenishers and electrolyte replenishers, such as those based on Ringer's dextrose. Preservatives and other additives, such as antimicrobials, antioxidants, chelating agents and inert gases, may also be present (Mack (1982) Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 16th Edition).
The peptide ligands of the present invention may be used as separately administered compositions or in conjunction with other agents. These can include antibodies, antibody fragments and various immunotherapeutic drugs, such as cyclosporine, methotrexate, adriamycin or cisplatinum, and immunotoxins. Pharmaceutical compositions can include “cocktails” of various cytotoxic or other agents in conjunction with the selected antibodies, receptors or binding proteins thereof of the present invention, or even combinations of selected peptides according to the present invention having different specificities, such as peptides selected using different target derivatives, whether or not they are pooled prior to administration.
The route of administration of pharmaceutical compositions according to the invention may be any of those commonly known to those of ordinary skill in the art. For therapy, including without limitation immunotherapy, the selected antibodies, receptors or binding proteins thereof of the invention can be administered to any patient in accordance with standard techniques. The administration can be by any appropriate mode, including parenterally, intravenously, intramuscularly, intraperitoneally, transdermally, via the pulmonary route, or also, appropriately, by direct infusion with a catheter. The dosage and frequency of administration will depend on the age, sex and condition of the patient, concurrent administration of other drugs, counter-indications and other parameters to be taken into account by the clinician.
The peptide ligands of this invention can be lyophilised for storage and reconstituted in a suitable carrier prior to use. This technique has been shown to be effective and art-known lyophilisation and reconstitution techniques can be employed. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that lyophilisation and reconstitution can lead to varying degrees of activity loss and that use levels may have to be adjusted upward to compensate.
The compositions containing the present peptide ligands or a cocktail thereof can be administered for prophylactic and/or therapeutic treatments. In certain therapeutic applications, an adequate amount to accomplish at least partial inhibition, suppression, modulation, killing, or some other measurable parameter, of a population of selected cells is defined as a “therapeutically-effective dose”. Amounts needed to achieve this dosage will depend upon the severity of the disease and the general state of the patient's own immune system, but generally range from 0.005 to 5.0 mg of selected peptide ligand per kilogram of body weight, with doses of 0.05 to 2.0 mg/kg/dose being more commonly used. For prophylactic applications, compositions containing the present peptide ligands or cocktails thereof may also be administered in similar or slightly lower dosages.
A composition containing a peptide ligand according to the present invention may be utilised in prophylactic and therapeutic settings to aid in the alteration, inactivation, killing or removal of a select target cell population in a mammal. In addition, the selected repertoires of peptides described herein may be used extracorporeally or in vitro selectively to kill, deplete or otherwise effectively remove a target cell population from a heterogeneous collection of cells. Blood from a mammal may be combined extracorporeally with the selected peptide ligands whereby the undesired cells are killed or otherwise removed from the blood for return to the mammal in accordance with standard techniques.
The invention is further described with reference to the following examples.
Materials and Methods
In addition, the following non-natural amino acid precursors were used for the preparation of the DAP and N-MeDAP modified peptides:
Peptide synthesis was based on Fmoc chemistry, using a Symphony and SymphonyX peptide synthesiser manufactured by Peptide Instruments and a Syro II synthesiser by MultiSynTech. Standard Fmoc-amino acids were employed (Sigma, Merck), with appropriate side chain protecting groups: where applicable standard coupling conditions were used in each case, followed by deprotection using standard methodology. Peptides were purified by HPLC and following isolation they were modified with 1,3,5-tris(bromomethyl)benzene (TBMB, Sigma). For this, linear peptide was diluted with H2O up to ˜35 mL, ˜500 μL of 100 mM TBMB in acetonitrile was added, and the reaction was initiated with ˜5 mL of 1 M NH4HCO3 in H2O. The reaction was allowed to proceed for ˜30 −60 min at RT, and quenched with 500 ul of the 1M Cysteine hydrochloride (Sigma) once the reaction had completed (judged by MALDI). Following lyophilisation, the modified peptide was purified in a Gemini C18 column (Phenomenex) using water/acetonitrile with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid as mobile phase. Pure fractions containing the correct cyclised material were pooled, lyophilised and kept at −20° C. for storage.
All amino acids, unless noted otherwise, were used in the L-configurations.
Biological Data
1. Fluorescence Polarisation Measurements
(a) Direct Binding Assay
Peptides with a fluorescent tag (either fluorescein, SIGMA or Alexa Fluor488™, Fisher Scientific) were diluted to 2.5 nM in PBS with 0.01% tween 20 or 50 mM HEPES with 100 mM NaCl and 0.01% tween pH 7.4 (both referred to as assay buffer). This was combined with a titration of protein in the same assay buffer as the peptide to give 1 nM peptide in a total volume of 254 in a black walled and bottomed low bind low volume 384 well plates, typically 54 assay buffer, 104 protein (Table 1) then 10 μL fluorescent peptide. One in two serial dilutions were used to give 12 different concentrations with top concentrations ranging from 500 nM for known high affinity binders to 10 μM for low affinity binders and selectivity assays. Measurements were conducted on a BMG PHERAstar FS equipped with an “FP 485 520 520” optic module which excites at 485 nm and detects parallel and perpendicular emission at 520 nm. The PHERAstar FS was set at 25° C. with 200 flashes per well and a positioning delay of 0.1 second, with each well measured at 5 to 10 minute intervals for 60 minutes. The gain used for analysis was determined for each tracer at the end of the 60 minutes where there was no protein in the well. Data was analysed using Systat Sigmaplot version 12.0. mP values were fit to a user defined quadratic equation to generate a Kd value: f=y min+(y max−y min)/Lig*((x+Lig+Kd)/2−sqrt((((x+Lig+Kd)/2){circumflex over ( )}2)−(Lig*x))). “Lig” was a defined value of the concentration of tracer used.
(b) Competition Binding Assay
Peptides without a fluorescent tag were tested in competition with a peptide with a fluorescent tag and a known Kd (Table 2). Peptides were diluted to an appropriate concentration in assay buffer as described in the direct binding assay with a maximum of 5% DMSO, then serially diluted 1 in 2. Five μL of diluted peptide was added to the plate followed by 104 of human or mouse EphA2 (Table 1) at a fixed concentration which was dependent on the fluorescent peptide used (Table 2), then 104 fluorescent peptide added. Measurements were conducted as for the direct binding assay, however the gain was determined prior to the first measurement. Data analysis was in Systat Sigmaplot version 12.0 where the mP values were fit to a user defined cubic equation to generate a Ki value:
f=y min+(y max−y min)/Lig*((Lig*((2*((Klig+Kcomp+Lig+Comp−Prot*c){circumflex over ( )}2−3*(Kcomp*(Lig−Prot*c)+Klig*(Comp−Prot*c)+Klig*Kcomp)){circumflex over ( )}0.5*COS(ARCCOS((−2*(Klig+Kcomp+Lig+Comp−Prot*c){circumflex over ( )}3+9*(Klig+Kcomp+Lig+Comp−Prot*c)*(Kcomp*(Lig−Prot*c)+Klig*(Comp−Prot*c)+Klig*Kcomp)−27*(−1*Klig*Kcomp*Prot*c))/(2*(4(Klig+Kcomp+Lig+Comp−Prot*c){circumflex over ( )}2−3*(Kcomp*(Lig−Prot*c)+Klig*(Comp−Prot*c)+Klig*Kcomp)){circumflex over ( )}3){circumflex over ( )}0.5)))/3))−(Klig+Kcomp+Lig+Comp−Prot*c)))/((3*Klig)+42*((Klig+Kcomp+Lig+Comp−Prot*c){circumflex over ( )}2−3*(Kcomp*(Lig−Prot*c)+Klig*(Comp−Prot*c)+Klig*Kcomp)){circumflex over ( )}0.5*COS(ARCCOS((−2*(Klig+Kcomp+Lig+Comp−Prot*c){circumflex over ( )}3+9*(Klig+Kcomp+Lig+Comp−Prot*c)*(Kcomp*(Lig−Prot*c)+Klig*(Comp−Prot*c)+Klig*Kcomp)−27*(−1*Klig*Kcomp*Prot*c))/(2*(4(Klig+Kcomp+Lig+Comp−Prot*c){circumflex over ( )}2−3*(Kcomp*(Lig−Prot*c)+Klig*(Comp−Prot*c)+Klig*Kcomp)){circumflex over ( )}3){circumflex over ( )}0.5)))/3))−(Klig+Kcomp+Lig+Comp−Prot*c)))).
“Lig”, “KLig” and “Prot” were all defined values relating to: fluorescent peptide concentration, the Kd of the fluorescent peptide and EphA2 concentration respectively.
The peptide ligands described herein were tested in the above mentioned assays.
A first reference Bicyclic Peptide chosen for comparison of thioether to alkylamino scaffold linkage was designated 55-03-05-N233. It is a bicycle conjugate of a thioether-forming peptide with a trimethylene benzene scaffold. The structure of this bicycle derivative is shown schematically in
Conjugation to 1,3,5-tris(bromomethyl)benzene (TBMB, Sigma) was carried out as follows. The linear peptide was diluted with H2O up to ˜35 mL, ˜500 μL of 100 mM TBMB in acetonitrile was added, and the reaction was initiated with 5 mL of 1 M NH4HCO3 in H2O. The reaction was allowed to proceed for ˜30 −60 min at RT, and lyophilised once the reaction had completed (judged by MALDI). Following lyophilisation, the modified peptide was purified with a Gemini C18 column (Phenomenex), and changing the acid to 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Pure fractions containing the correct TMB-modified material were pooled, lyophilised and kept at −20° C. for storage.
The resulting Bicycle derivative designated 55-03-05-N233 showed high affinity to EphA2. The measured affinity (Ki) to EphA2 of the derivative was 4.12 nM.
A bicycle peptide designated 55-03-05-N314 was made corresponding to the bicycle region of the peptide ligand of Reference Example 1, with replacement of the first and second cysteine residues by DAP residues forming alkylamino linkages to the TBMB scaffold. The structure of this derivative is shown schematically in
The linear peptide used to form this bicycle was as follows:
Cyclisation with TBMB was performed in a mixture of Acetonitrile/water in the presence of DIPEA as the base for 1-16 hours, as described in more detail in PCT/EP2017/083953 and PCT/EP2017/083954 filed 20 Dec. 2017. Unlike the cyclisation of Reference Example 1, the yield is relatively low when using the conventional NaHCO3 as the base.
The measured Ki with EphA2 was 135.5 nM, which demonstrates that the change to alkylamino linkages in this example resulted in relatively little change in binding affinity relative to the thioether linked derivative of Reference Example 1.
A bicycle peptide designated 55-03-05-N316 was made corresponding to the bicycle region of the peptide ligand of Reference Example 1, with replacement of the second and third cysteine residues by DAP residues forming alkylamino linkages to the TBMB scaffold. The structure of this derivative is shown schematically in
The linear peptide used to form this bicycle was as follows:
Cyclisation with TBMB was performed as described in Example 1.
The measured Ki with EphA2 was 604 nM, which demonstrates that the change to alkylamino linkages in this example preserved a relatively high level of binding affinity relative to the thioether-linked derivative of Reference Example 1.
A bicycle peptide designated 55-03-05-N318 was made corresponding to the bicycle region of the peptide ligand of Reference Example 1, with replacement of the first and third cysteine residues by DAP residues forming alkylamino linkages to the TBMB scaffold. The structure of this derivative is shown schematically in
The linear peptide used to form this bicycle was as follows:
Cyclisation with TBMB was performed as described in Example 1.
The measured Ki with EphA2 was 31.5 nM, which demonstrates that the change to alkylamino linkages in this example resulted in only a minimal change in binding affinity relative to the thioether-linked derivative of Reference Example 1.
A first reference Bicyclic Peptide chosen for comparison of thioether to alkylamino scaffold linkage was designated 55-03-05-N238. It is a bicycle conjugate of a thioether-forming peptide with a trimethylene benzene scaffold. The linear peptide before conjugation has sequence:
Conjugation to 1,3,5-tris(bromomethyl)benzene (TBMB, Sigma) was carried out as described in Example 1.
The resulting Bicycle derivative designated 55-03-05-N238 showed high affinity to EphA2. The measured affinity (Ki) to EphA2 of the derivative was 19.7 nM.
A bicycle peptide designated 55-03-05-N315 was made corresponding to the bicycle region of the peptide ligand of Reference Example 2, with replacement of the first and second cysteine residues by DAP residues forming alkylamino linkages to the TBMB scaffold.
The linear peptide used to form this bicycle was as follows:
Cyclisation with TBMB was performed as described in Example 1.
The measured Ki with EphA2 was 640 nM, which demonstrates that the change to alkylamino linkages in this example preserved a significant binding affinity relative to the thioether-linked derivative of Reference Example 2.
A bicycle peptide designated 55-03-05-N317 was made corresponding to the bicycle region of the peptide ligand of Reference Example 2, with replacement of the second and third cysteine residues by DAP residues forming alkylamino linkages to the TBMB scaffold.
The linear peptide used to form this bicycle was as follows:
Cyclisation with TBMB was performed as described in Example 1.
The measured Ki with EphA2 was 425 nM, which demonstrates that the change to alkylamino linkages in this example preserved a significant binding affinity relative to the thioether-linked derivative of Reference Example 2.
A bicycle peptide designated 55-03-05-N319 was made corresponding to the bicycle region of the peptide ligand of Reference Example 2, with replacement of the second and third cysteine residues by DAP residues forming alkylamino linkages to the TBMB scaffold.
The linear peptide used to form this bicycle was as follows:
Cyclisation with TBMB was performed as described in Example 1.
The measured Ki with EphA2 was 17 nM, which demonstrates that the change to alkylamino linkages in this example marginally increases the affinity to EphA2 relative to the thioether-linked derivative of Reference Example 2.
The following reference peptide ligands having a TBMB scaffold with three thioether linkages to cysteine residues of the specified peptide sequences were prepared and evaluated for affinity to EphA2 as described in detail in our earlier application GB201721265.5 filed 19 Dec. 2017.
In view of the results obtained above in Examples 1-6, it is predicted that derivatives of the reference examples A1-A308 according to the present invention, i.e. having alkylamino linkages in place of one or more of the thioether linkages in the reference examples, will also display affinity for EphA2. It is further predicted that derivatives of the reference examples B1-B98 having scaffolds other than TBMB, in particular aromatic scaffolds other than TBMB, will also display affinity for EphA2. All such derivatives having affinity for EphA2 are therefore included within the scope of the present invention.
The following reference peptide ligands having a TATA scaffold with three thioether linkages to cysteine residues of the specified peptide sequences were prepared and evaluated for affinity to EphA2 as described in detail in our earlier application GB201721259.8 filed 19 Dec. 2017.
In view of the results obtained above in Examples 1-6, it is predicted that derivatives of the reference examples B1-B98 according to the present invention, i.e. having alkylamino linkages in place of one or more of the thioether linkages in the reference examples, will also display affinity for EphA2. It is further predicted that derivatives of the reference examples B1-B98 having scaffolds other than TATA, in particular non-aromatic scaffolds other than TATA, will also display affinity for EphA2. All such derivatives having affinity for EphA2 are therefore included within the scope of the present invention.
All publications mentioned in the above specification are herein incorporated by reference. Various modifications and variations of the described aspects and embodiments of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention. Although the present invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention which are apparent to those skilled in the art are intended to be within the scope of the following claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1810316 | Jun 2018 | GB | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2019/065993 | 6/18/2019 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2019/243313 | 12/26/2019 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4650750 | Giese | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4709016 | Giese | Nov 1987 | A |
| 5360819 | Giese | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5516931 | Giese et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5602273 | Giese et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5604104 | Giese et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5610020 | Giese et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5650270 | Giese et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 6326144 | Bawendi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6468808 | Nie et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 7151047 | Chan et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7192785 | Nie et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 8138347 | Knight et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8680022 | Gregory et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8685890 | Winter et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8778844 | Winter et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 9518081 | Winter et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9644201 | Winter et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9657288 | Winter et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9670482 | Winter et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9670484 | Winter et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9868767 | Pei et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9932367 | Stace et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9994617 | Tite et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10118947 | Teufel et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10294274 | Teufel et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10441663 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10532106 | Teufel et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10624968 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10800813 | Tite et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10875894 | Chen et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10919937 | Beswick et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 11306123 | Mudd et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
| 11312749 | Mudd et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
| 11332500 | Mudd et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
| 20020164788 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20050169931 | Kinch et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20090304721 | Kinch | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20120101253 | Heinis | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20150038434 | Yang | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20160031939 | Stace | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20170067045 | Winter et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170190743 | Pei | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170306032 | Gehlsen | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20180311300 | Beswick et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180362585 | Teufel et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180371020 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190134213 | Teufel et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190184025 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190263866 | Chen et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190307836 | Keen et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190389906 | Beswick et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20200255477 | Chen et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20200338203 | Chen et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200354406 | Stephen et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20210040154 | Mudd et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210069287 | Mudd et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210101932 | Chen et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210101933 | Chen et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210101937 | Mudd et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210147484 | Beswick et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210261620 | Teufel et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
| 20210299210 | Keen et al. | Sep 2021 | A2 |
| 20220184222 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
| 20220227811 | Mudd et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO-2001042246 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO-2002088112 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| WO-2003063794 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004005348 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004019973 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004077062 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004089925 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO-2005007623 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005103083 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005113554 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006078161 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006078846 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006122806 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007016176 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007044729 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007053452 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007070514 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007084786 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007129161 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO-2008033561 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008039218 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008109943 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008157490 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2009098450 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009114512 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO-2010089115 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| WO-2011018227 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011090760 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| WO-2012057624 | May 2012 | WO |
| WO-2013050617 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| WO-2014164693 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO-2015171938 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| 2016067035 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO-2016171242 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO-2016174103 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO-2017161069 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO-2017173408 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO-2017182672 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| 2017191460 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| 2018115203 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO-2018115204 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| WO-2018127699 | Jul 2018 | WO |
| WO-2018156740 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO-2018197509 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO-2019025811 | Feb 2019 | WO |
| 2019122860 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| 2019122861 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| 2019122863 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| WO-2019162682 | Aug 2019 | WO |
| 2019193328 | Oct 2019 | WO |
| 2019243313 | Dec 2019 | WO |
| WO-2019243832 | Dec 2019 | WO |
| WO-2019243833 | Dec 2019 | WO |
| 2020084305 | Apr 2020 | WO |
| WO-2020128526 | Jun 2020 | WO |
| 2020201753 | Oct 2020 | WO |
| WO-2020225577 | Nov 2020 | WO |
| 2021019243 | Feb 2021 | WO |
| 2021019245 | Feb 2021 | WO |
| 2021064428 | Apr 2021 | WO |
| 2021105694 | Jun 2021 | WO |
| 2021250418 | Dec 2021 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Annunziata et al., “Phase 1, open-label study of MEDI-547 in patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors,” Invest. New. Drugs. 2013;31(1):77-84. |
| Bennett et al., “Abstract 5855: Bicycle Drug Conjugates Targeting EphA2 for the Treatment of Solid Tumors: Discovery and Selection of BT5528,” Cancer Research, 2018, 4 Pages. |
| Bennett et al., “Development of BT1718, a Bicycle Drug Conjugate (BDC) targeting MT1-MMP for treatment of solid tumours,” European Journal of Cancer. 2016;69(1):S21. |
| Bennett et al., “Development of BT1718, a Bicycle Drug Conjugate (BTC): Profound Efficacy Without Bleeding and Coagulation Abnormalities in Animal Models,” Assocation for Cancer Research Annual Meeting, 2019, 11 pages. |
| Bennett, “BT5528, an EphA2-Targeting Bicycle Toxin Conjugate (BTC): Profound Efficacy Without Bleeding and Coagulation Abnormalities in Animal Models,” Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting, 2019, 11 Pages. |
| Chen et al., “Peptide Ligands Stabilized by Small Molecules,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2014;56(6):1602-1606. |
| Deonarain et al., “Small-Format Drug Conjugates: A Viable Alternative to ADCs for Solid Tumours?” Antibodies (Basel). 2018;7(2):16. |
| Deyle et al., “Phage Selection of Cyclic Peptides for Application in Research and Drug Development,” Accounts of Chemical Research, 2017, vol. 50(8), pp. 1866-1874. |
| Harrison et al., “Abstract 5144: BT1718, a novel bicyclic peptide-maytansinoid conjugate targeting MT1-MMP for the treatment of solid tumors: Design of bicyclic peptide and linker selection,” Cancer Res. 2017;77(13):5144. |
| Mitra et al., “Structure-Activity Relationship Analysis of Peptides Targeting the EphA2 Receptor,” Biochemistry. 2010;49(31):6687-95. |
| Mudd et al., “Identification and Optimization of EphA2-Selective Biccyles for the Delivery of Cytotoxic Payloads,” J Med Chem. 2020; 63(8) 4107-4116. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/GB2018/053678 dated Mar. 20, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/EP2019/065993, mailed by the European Patent Office dated Sep. 24, 2019, 5 Pages. |
| PCT International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/GB2020/051829, mailed by the European Patent Office dated Oct. 30, 2020, 5 Pages. |
| Shi et al., “One-Bead-Two-Compound Thioether Bridged Macrocyclic [gamma]—AApeptide Screening Library Against EphA2,” J. Med. Chem. 2017;60(22):9290-9298. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/771,186, filed Jun. 9, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/590,875, filed Feb. 2, 2022. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/592,966, filed Feb. 4, 2022. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/630,314, filed Jan. 26, 2022. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/630,747, filed Jan. 27, 2022. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/655,822, filed Mar. 22, 2022. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/663,169, filed May 12, 2022. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/779,226, filed May 24, 2022. |
| Wu et al., “Design and Characterization of Novel EphA2 Agonists for Targeted Delivery of Chemotherapy to Cancer Cells,” Chem. Biol. 2015;22(7):876-887. |
| Adams, “Molecular control of arterial-venous blood vessel identity,” J Anat. Jan. 2003;202(1):105-12. |
| Ausiello et al., “Functional topography of discrete domains of human CD38,” Tissue Antigens. Dec. 2000;56(6):539-47. |
| Bennett et al., “Abstract 5854: BT5528, a Bicycle Toxin Conjugate targeting EphA2 has potent anti-tumor activity without bleeding or coagulation abnormalities in preclinical models.” Cancer Res. 2018;78(13 suppl):5854. |
| Bennett et al., “BT5528, a Bicycle Toxin Conjugate targeting EphA2 has potent anti-tumor activity without bleeding or coagulation abnormalities in preclinical models,” AACR Annual Meeting 2018. |
| Bennett et al., “MMAE Delivery Using the Bicycle Toxin Conjugate BT5528,” Mol Cancer Ther. Jul. 2020;19(7):1385-1394. |
| Berge et al., “Pharmaceutical salts,” J Pharm Sci. Jan. 1977;66(1):1-19. |
| Bicycle Therapeutics, “Bicycle Therapeutics to Present New BT1718 Data in the ‘New Drugs on the Horizon’ Session at the 2018 American Association for Cancer Research Meeting,” Press Release. Apr. 3, 2018: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180403005152/en/Bicycle-Therapeutics-Present-New-BT1718-Data-New. |
| Bicycle Therapeutics, “Bicycle Therapeutics to Present on BT5528, a Bicycle Toxin Conjugate Targeting EphA2 for the Treatment of Solid Tumours, at World ADC 2019,” Business Wire Release. Mar. 5, 2019. |
| Bicycle Therapeutics, “Bicycle Therapeutics to Present New BT1718 Data in the “New Drugs on the Horizon” Session at the 2018 American Association for Cancer Research Meeting,” Press Release. Apr. 3, 2018. |
| BicycleTx Limited, “Study BT5528-100 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Associated With EphA2 Expression,” ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04180371. First Posted Nov. 27, 2019; Accessed Dec. 30, 2022: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04180371. |
| Binda et al., “The EphA2 receptor drives self-renewal and tumorigenicity in stem-like tumor-propagating cells from human glioblastomas,” Cancer Cell. Dec. 11, 2012;22(6):765-80. |
| Booth et al., “Crowd control in the crypt,” Nat Med. Dec. 2002;8(12):1360-1. |
| Brannan et al., “EphA2 in the early pathogenesis and progression of non-small cell lung cancer,” Cancer Prev Res (Phila). Dec. 2009;2(12):1039-49. |
| Brantley-Sieders et al., “Eph receptor tyrosine kinases in tumor and tumor microenvironment,” Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10(27):3431-42. |
| Brantley-Sieders et al., “Eph/ephrin profiling in human breast cancer reveals significant associations between expression level and clinical outcome,” PLOS One. 2011;6(9):e24426. |
| Brantley-Sieders et al., “Impaired tumor microenvironment in EphA2-deficient mice inhibits tumor angiogenesis and metastatic progression,” FASEB J. Nov. 2005;19(13):1884-6. |
| Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “What Can I Do to Reduce My Risk of Ovarian Cancer?” Division of Cancer Prevention and Control. Aug. 31, 2022. |
| Chan and Nie, “Quantum dot bioconjugates for ultrasensitive nonisotopic detection,” Science. Sep. 25, 1998;281(5385):2016-8. |
| Chang et al., “Five different anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) antibodies confirm PSMA expression in tumor-associated neovasculature,” Cancer Res. Jul. 1, 1999;59(13):3192-8. |
| Chen et al., “Structurally diverse cyclisation linkers impose different backbone conformations in bicyclic peptides,” Chembiochem. May 7, 2012;13(7):1032-8. |
| Cheng et al., “Blockade of EphA receptor tyrosine kinase activation inhibits vascular endothelial cell growth factor-induced angiogenesis,” Mol Cancer Res. Nov. 2002;1(1):2-11. |
| Cherney et al., “Macrocyclic amino carboxylates as selective MMP-8 inhibitors,” J Med Chem. May 21, 1998;41(11):1749-51. |
| Chiche et al., “Hypoxia-inducible carbonic anhydrase IX and XII promote tumor cell growth by counteracting acidosis through the regulation of the intracellular pH,” Cancer Res. Jan. 1, 2009;69(1):358-68. |
| Dagher et al., “c-Kit and CD38 are expressed by long-term reconstituting hematopoietic cells present in the murine yolk sac,” Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 1998;4(2):69-74. |
| Deaglio et al., “CD38 is a signaling molecule in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells,” Blood. Sep. 15, 2003;102(6):2146-55. |
| Deyle et al., “Phage Selection of Cyclic Peptides for Application in Research and Drug Development.” Acc Chem Res. 2017;50(8):1866-1874. |
| Di, “Strategic approaches to optimizing peptide ADME properties,” AAPS J. Jan. 2015;17(1):134-43. |
| Driggers et al., “The exploration of macrocycles for drug discovery—an underexploited structural class,” Nat Rev Drug Discov. Jul. 2008;7(7):608-24. |
| Dunne et al., “EphA2 Expression Is a Key Driver of Migration and Invasion and a Poor Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer,” Clin Cancer Res. Jan. 1, 2016;22(1):230-242. |
| Duong and Rodan, “The role of integrins in osteoclast function,” J Bone Miner Metab. 1999;17(1):1-6. |
| Funaro et al., “Human CD38 is associated to distinct molecules which mediate transmembrane signaling in different lineages,” Eur J Immunol. Oct. 1993;23(10):2407-11. |
| Funaro et al., “Involvement of the multilineage CD38 molecule in a unique pathway of cell activation and proliferation,” J Immunol. Oct. 15, 1990;145(8):2390-6. |
| Gandhi et al., “MP69-11 Carbonic Anhydrase IX Assay: A Paradigm Shift in Diagnosis of Malignant Cystic Renal Lesions,” J Urol. May 18, 2015;193(4S):e870-e871. |
| Guo et al., “Prognostic significance of combinations of RNA-dependent protein kinase and EphA2 biomarkers for NSCLC,” J Thorac Oncol. Mar. 2013;8(3):301-8. |
| Heinis et al., “Phage-encoded combinatorial chemical libraries based on bicyclic peptides,” Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009;5(7):502-7. |
| Hess et al., “Molecular regulation of tumor cell vasculogenic mimicry by tyrosine phosphorylation: role of epithelial cell kinase (Eck/EphA2),” Cancer Res. Apr. 15, 2001;61(8):3250-5. |
| Hoshino et al., “Mapping of the catalytic and epitopic sites of human CD38/NAD+ glycohydrolase to a functional domain in the carboxyl terminus,” J Immunol. Jan. 15, 1997;158(2):741-7. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/GB2020/051827, dated Oct. 23, 2020. |
| Jackson et al., “A human antibody-drug conjugate targeting EphA2 inhibits tumor growth in vivo,” Cancer Res. Nov. 15, 2008;68(22):9367-74. |
| Jin et al., “(alpha)V(beta)3 Integrin-Targeted Radionuclide Therapy with 64Cu-cyclam-RAFT-c(-RGDfK-)4,” Mol Cancer Ther. Sep. 2016;15(9):2076-85. |
| Kemp and McNamara, “Conformationally restricted cyclic nonapeptides derived from L-cysteine and LL-3-amino-2-piperidone-6-carboxylic acid (LL-Acp), a potent .beta.-turn-inducing dipeptide analog,” J Org Chem. 1985;50(26):5834-8. |
| Kinch et al., “Predictive value of the EphA2 receptor tyrosine kinase in lung cancer recurrence and survival,” Clin Cancer Res. Feb. 2003;9(2):613-8. |
| Kitanaka et al., “CD38 ligation in human B cell progenitors triggers tyrosine phosphorylation of CD19 and association of CD19 with lyn and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase,” J Immunol. Jul. 1, 1997;159(1):184-92. |
| Kitanaka et al., “CD38-mediated signaling events in murine pro-B cells expressing human CD38 with or without its cytoplasmic domain,” J Immunol. Feb. 15, 1999;162(4):1952-8. |
| Konopleva et al., “Ligation of cell surface CD38 protein with agonistic monoclonal antibody induces a cell growth signal in myeloid leukemia cells,” J Immunol. Nov. 1, 1998;161(9):4702-8. |
| Kumagai et al., “Ligation of CD38 suppresses human B lymphopoiesis,” J Exp Med. Mar. 1, 1995;181(3):1101-10. |
| Lee and Aarhus, “ADP-ribosyl cyclase: an enzyme that cyclizes NAD+ into a calcium-mobilizing metabolite,” Cell Regul. Mar. 1991;2(3):203-9. |
| Lee et al., “ADP-ribosyl cyclase and CD38. Multi-functional enzymes in Ca+2 signaling,” Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997;419:411-9. |
| Lee et al., “Structural determination of a cyclic metabolite of NAD+ with intracellular Ca2+—mobilizing activity,” J Biol Chem. Jan. 25, 1989;264(3):1608-15. |
| Li et al., “Up-regulation of EphA2 and down-regulation of EphrinA1 are associated with the aggressive phenotype and poor prognosis of malignant glioma,” Tumour Biol. Oct. 2010;31(5):477-88. |
| Lin et al., “EphA2 overexpression is associated with angiogenesis in ovarian cancer,” Cancer. Jan. 15, 2007;109(2):332-40. |
| Loktev et al., “Multicyclic Peptides as Scaffolds for the Development of Tumor Targeting Agents,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, 2017, vol. 24, pp. 2141-2155. |
| Lund et al., “CD38 signaling in B lymphocytes is controlled by its ectodomain but occurs independently of enzymatically generated ADP-ribose or cyclic ADP-ribose,” J Immunol. Mar. 1, 1999;162(5):2693-702. |
| Mallone et al., “Signaling through CD38 induces NK cell activation,” Int Immunol. Apr. 1, 2001;13(4):397-409. |
| Marmé, “VEGFs, angiopoietins, Ephrins and their receptors: putative targets for tumor therapy?” Ann Hematol. 2002;81 Suppl 2:S66. |
| Merritt et al., “Analysis of EphA2 expression and mutant p53 in ovarian carcinoma,” Cancer Biol Ther. Oct. 2006;5(10):1357-60. |
| Morra et al., “CD38 is functionally dependent on the TCR/CD3 complex in human T cells,” FASEB J. May 1998;12(7):581-92. |
| Morrison, “Chemical Strategies for Bicyclic Peptide Formation,” Univ. of Leeds, Sep. 2015, pp. 1-60. |
| Mudali et al., “Patterns of EphA2 protein expression in primary and metastatic pancreatic carcinoma and correlation with genetic status,” Clin Exp Metastasis. 2006;23(7-8):357-65. |
| Mulder et al., “Scaffold Optimization in Discontinuous Epitope Containing Protein Mimics of gp120 Using Smart Libraries,” Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, vol. 11, pp. 2676-2684. |
| Nakamoto and Bergemann, “Diverse roles for the Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases in carcinogenesis,” Microsc Res Tech. Oct. 1, 2002;59(1):58-67. |
| Nakamura et al., “EPHA2/EFNA1 expression in human gastric cancer,” Cancer Sci. Jan. 2005;96(1):42-7. |
| Nakamura et al., “Involvement of alpha(v)beta3 integrins in osteoclast function,” J Bone Miner Metab. 2007;25(6):337-44. |
| Nan et al., “Dual function glutamate-related ligands: discovery of a novel, potent inhibitor of glutamate carboxypeptidase II possessing mGluR3 agonist activity,” J Med Chem. Mar. 9, 2000;43(5):772-4. |
| Neri and Supuran, “Interfering with pH regulation in tumours as a therapeutic strategy,” Nat Rev Drug Discov. Sep. 16, 2011;10(10):767-77. |
| Oliver et al., “Mouse CD38 is down-regulated on germinal center B cells and mature plasma cells,” J Immunol. Feb. 1, 1997;158(3):1108-15. |
| Partida-Sánchez et al., “Cyclic ADP-ribose production by CD38 regulates intracellular calcium release, extracellular calcium influx and chemotaxis in neutrophils and is required for bacterial clearance in vivo,” Nat Med. Nov. 2001;7(11):1209-16. |
| Partida-Sánchez et al., “Regulation of dendritic cell trafficking by the ADP-ribosyl cyclase CD38: impact on the development of humoral immunity,” Immunity. Mar. 2004;20(3):279-91. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/GB2018/053676, dated Mar. 21, 2019. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/GB2018/051779, dated Aug. 23, 2018. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/GB2020/050874 dated Jun. 17, 2020. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/GB2021/051451 dated Sep. 22, 2021. |
| Pickens et al., “Practical Considerations, Challenges and Limitations of Bioconjugation via Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition,” Bioconjugate Chem., 2018, vol. 29, pp. 686-701. |
| Pietraszek et al., “Lumican: a new inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-14 activity,” FEBS Lett. Nov. 28, 2014;588(23):4319-24. |
| Poliakov et al., “Diverse roles of eph receptors and ephrins in the regulation of cell migration and tissue assembly,” Dev Cell. Oct. 2004;7(4):465-80. |
| Ramirez et al., “Defining causative factors contributing in the activation of hedgehog signaling in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,” Leuk Res. Oct. 2012;36(10):1267-73. |
| Randall et al., “Expression of murine CD38 defines a population of long-term reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells,” Blood, vol. 87, No. 10, May 1996 (pp. 4057-4067). |
| Remacle et al., “Novel MT1-MMP small-molecule inhibitors based on insights into hemopexin domain function in tumor growth,” Cancer Res. May 1, 2012;72(9):2339-49. |
| Rhodes and Pei, “Bicyclic Peptides as Next-Generation Therapeutics,” Chemistry. Sep. 18, 2017;23(52):12690-12703. |
| Ridderstad and Tarlinton, “Kinetics of establishing the memory B cell population as revealed by CD38 expression,” J Immunol. May 15, 1998;160(10):4688-95. |
| Rodan and Rodan, “Integrin function in osteoclasts,” J Endocrinol. Sep. 1997;154 Suppl:S47-56. |
| Ross and Christiano, “Nothing but skin and bone,” J Clin Invest. May 2006;116(5):1140-9. |
| Rostovtsev et al., “A stepwise huisgen cycloaddition process: copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective “ligation” of azides and terminal alkynes,” Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Jul. 15, 2002;41(14):2596-9. |
| Schülke et al., “The homodimer of prostate-specific membrane antigen is a functional target for cancer therapy,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct. 28, 2003;100(22):12590-5. |
| Smeenk et al., “Reconstructing the discontinuous and conformational (beta)1/(beta)3-loop binding site on hFSH/hCG by using highly constrained multicyclic peptides,” Chembiochem. Jan. 2, 2015;16(1):91-9. |
| Sounni et al., “MT1-MMP expression promotes tumor growth and angiogenesis through an up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression,” FASEB J. Apr. 2002;16(6):555-64. |
| Stein et al., “Eph receptors discriminate specific ligand oligomers to determine alternative signaling complexes, attachment, and assembly responses,” Genes Dev. Mar. 1, 1998;12(5):667-678. |
| Stevenson et al., “Preliminary studies for an immunotherapeutic approach to the treatment of human myeloma using chimeric anti-CD38 antibody,” Blood. Mar. 1, 1991;77(5):1071-9. |
| Sun et al., “Carbohydrate and protein immobilization onto solid surfaces by sequential Diels-Alder and azide-alkyne cycloadditions,” Bioconjug Chem. Jan.-Feb. 2006;17(1):52-7. |
| Supuran, “Carbonic anhydrases: novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators,” Nat Rev Drug Discov. Feb. 2008; 7(2):168-81. |
| Tandon et al., “Emerging strategies for EphA2 receptor targeting for cancer therapeutics.” Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2011;15(1):31-51. |
| Tasch et al., “A unique folate hydrolase, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA): a target for immunotherapy?” Crit Rev Immunol. 2001;21(1-3):249-61. |
| Teitelbaum, “Osteoclasts, integrins, and osteoporosis,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, vol. 18, No. 6, Oct. 2000 (pp. 344-349). |
| Teitelbaum, “Osteoporosis and Integrins,” J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Apr. 2005;90(4):2466-8. |
| Teti et al., “The Role of the AlphaVbeta3 Integrin in the Development of Osteolytic Bone Metastases: A Pharmacological Target for Alternative Therapy?” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 71, No. 4, Oct. 2002 (pp. 293-299). |
| Teufel et al., “Backbone-driven collapse in unfolded protein chains,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 409, No. 2, Jun. 2011 (pp. 250-262). |
| Timmerman et al., “Rapid and quantitative cyclization of multiple peptide loops onto synthetic scaffolds for structural mimicry of protein surfaces,” Chembiochem. May 2005;6(5):821-4. |
| Todisco et al., “CD38 ligation inhibits normal and leukemic myelopoiesis,” Blood, vol. 95, No. 2, Jan. 2000 (pp. 535-542). |
| Uckun, “Regulation of Human B-Cell Ontogeny,” Blood, vol. 76, No. 10, Nov. 1990 (pp. 1908-1923). |
| Upadhyaya, “Activation of CD137 Using Multivalent and Tumour Targeted Bicyclic Peptides,” XP055669343, URL:https://www.bicycletherapeutics.com/wp-content/uploads/PU_2019-Peptide-Congress_publication.pdf, Peptide Congress, Apr. 25, 2019, 25 Pages. |
| Walker-Daniels et al., “Overexpression of the EphA2 tyrosine kinase in prostate cancer,” Prostate, vol. 41, No. 4, Dec. 1999 (pp. 275-280). |
| Wang et al., “Probing for Integrin ?v?3 Binding of RGD Peptides Using Fluorescence Polarization,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 16, No. 3, May-Jun. 2005 (pp. 729-734). |
| Wang, “An exact mathematical expression for describing competitive binding of two different ligands to a protein molecule,” FEBS Lett. Feb. 27, 1995;360(2):111-4. |
| Wind et al., “Measuring carbonic anhydrase IX as a hypoxia biomarker: differences in concentrations in serum and plasma using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay due to influences of metal ions,” Ann Clin Biochem. Mar. 2011;48(Pt 2):112-20. |
| Wu et al., “Structures of the CXCR4 chemokine GPCR with small-molecule and cyclic peptide antagonists,” Science. Nov. 19, 2010;330(6007):1066-71. |
| Wykosky et al., “EphA2 as a Novel Molecular Marker and Target in Glioblastoma Multiforme,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 3, No. 10, Oct. 2005 (pp. 541-551). |
| Xiong et al., “Crystal structure of the extracellular segment of integrin alpha Vbeta3 in complex with an Arg-Gly-Asp ligand,” Science. Apr. 5, 2002;296(5565):151-5. |
| Yang et al., “Overexpression of EphA2, MMP?9, and MVD?CD34 in hepatocellular carcinoma: Implications for tumor progression and prognosis,” Hepatology Research, vol. 39, No. 12, Dec. 2009 (pp. 1169-1177). |
| Yuan et al., “Over-Expression of EphA2 and EphrinA-1 in Human Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Its Prognostic Value for Postoperative Patients,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 54, No. 11, Nov. 2009 (pp. 2410-2417). |
| Zelinski et al., “EphA2 overexpression causes tumorigenesis of mammary epithelial cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, No. 5, Mar. 2001 (pp. 2301-2306). |
| Zhao et al., “Structural basis of specificity of a peptidyl urokinase inhibitor, upain-1,” J Struct Biol. Oct. 2007;160(1):1-10. |
| Zhuang et al., “Elevation of receptor tyrosine kinase EphA2 mediates resistance to trastuzumab therapy,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, No. 1, Jan. 2010 (pp. 299-308). |
| Zilber et al., “CD38 expressed on human monocytes: A coaccessory molecule in the superantigen-induced proliferation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, No. 6, Mar. 2000 (pp. 2840-2845). |
| Zubiaur et al., “CD38 ligation results in activation of the Raf-1/mitogen-activated protein kinase and the CD3-zeta/zeta-associated protein-70 signaling pathways in Jurkat T lymphocytes,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 159, No. 1, Jul. 1997 (pp. 193-205). |
| Zupo et al., “CD38 signaling by agonistic monoclonal antibody prevents apoptosis of human germinal center B cells,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 24, No. 5, May 1994 (pp. 1218-1222). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210261620 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |
