Patent Grant
10022422
The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted in ASCII format via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Apr. 7, 2016, is named 35224-724.303_SL.txt and is 82,255 bytes in size.
Seasonal influenza infection is a major health concern for first-world and developing nations alike. Each year in the United States, five- to twenty-percent of the population gets the flu, more than 200,000 people are hospitalized from flu complications, and about 36,000 people die from flu. Worldwide, influenza causes tens of millions of respiratory illnesses and 250,000 to 500,000 deaths each year. New strains of avian influenza that are transmissible to humans are a critical concern for global health because these flu strains could yield pandemic disease for which no immunity exists, potentially resulting in millions of fatalities. “Avian flu” refers to a pathogenic avian influenza subtype that is highly contagious among birds and causes high mortality among domestic poultry. Outbreaks of avian flu among poultry and wild birds are ongoing in a number of countries, and at least three subgroups of avian flu viruses have infected humans to date. While avian flu infections of humans are rare, and most cases have been associated with direct poultry contact during outbreaks among livestock, infection in humans is very serious when it does occur: to date, over half of all reported human cases have been fatal. Since first reported in Hong Kong in 1996, the World Health Organization has carefully tracked avian flu and instances of animal-to-human influenza transmission, with confirmed cases reported from China, Indonesia, and Southeast Asia; Pakistan; Iraq; Egypt; and elsewhere, with 385 cases resulting in 243 deaths worldwide. While there is no evidence of sustained human-to-human transmission, instances of human-to-human spread of avian flu may have occurred. Since all influenza viruses have the ability to rapidly mutate, there is considerable concern that avian flu may be able to infect humans more easily and become communicable from one person to another. Also, avian flu virus strains have not infected many humans worldwide, so there is little or no immune protection against these strains in the human population; therefore, an influenza pandemic could easily occur if sustained avian flu virus transmission were to develop.
Three classes of influenza viruses, A, B and C, are responsible for human flu, with influenza A and B viruses causing seasonal epidemics of disease almost every winter. Influenza A viruses are divided into subtypes based on characteristics of two proteins, hemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N), on the surface of the virus. There are 16 different hemagglutinin subtypes and 9 different neuraminidase subtypes, with H1N1 and H3N2 being the most common subtypes found in humans. The avian flu virus refers to influenza A H5N1. Influenza A is a negative-sense (3′ to 5′) single-stranded RNA virus. Its viral genome, which encodes 11 proteins (HA, NA, NP, M1, M2, NS1, NEP, PA, PB1, PB1-F2, PB2) in its RNA, cannot be translated into protein directly; rather, the virus depends on its RNA-dependent RNA polymerase to transcribe its genome to positive-sense RNA prior to translation. RNA-dependent RNA polymerases have no mammalian counterpart, which renders species selectivity less problematic in the development of therapeutics that target this enzyme. Other examples of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases include polioviral 3Dpol, vesicular stomatitis virus L, and hepatitis C virus NS5b; the latter is an active target for development of hepatitis C antiviral therapies. Unlike current flu targets (e.g., neuraminidase for Tamiflu), the influenza RNA polymerase is highly conserved and therefore less likely to suffer the resistance issues that current drugs face.
Recently, researchers reported the first atomic-resolution structural details of the influenza protein RNA polymerase, a critical enzyme for viral replication and a novel target for both therapeutic intervention and prophylaxis during influenza outbreaks (He, X., et al., Nature, 2008. 454: p. 1123-6; Obayashi, E., et al., Nature, 2008. 454: p. 1127-31). The influenza RNA-dependent RNA polymerase is a heterotrimer of three subunits, PA, PB1, and PB2, with the 310-helical N-terminal region of PB1 binding between the “jaws” of the PA protein. The PB1 helix is thought to be important for complex formation and nuclear transport and inhibits influenza A viral replication by interfering with polymerase activity. Recently, the PB2 subunit has also been shown to play an essential role in activity of the viral polymerase complex, for instance through contacts with the PB1 subunit. See Sugiyama et al, EMBO Journal, 2009, 28, 1803-1811. However, little is known about compounds capable of interfering with the binding and activity of these proteins. In general, there remains a need for therapeutic methods of treating viral diseases in which RNA-dependent RNA polymerases play a role, and for compositions and methods capable of modifying the activity such polymerases.
The present invention addresses these and other needs. In one aspect, the present invention provides a peptidomimetic macrocycle capable of binding to a viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Such a macrocycle may, for example, be capable of disrupting the assembly of subunits of a viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase complex. In one embodiment, such a macrocycle may compete with the binding of a peptide of the sequence MDVNPTLLFLKVPAQ (SEQ ID NO: 1) or MERIKELRNLM (SEQ ID NO: 2) to said viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. In one embodiment, a peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention comprises an amino acid sequence which is at least about 60%, 80%, 90%, or 95% identical to the amino acid sequence MDVNPTLLFLKVPAQ (PB1) (SEQ ID NO: 1) or MERIKELRNLM (PB2) (SEQ ID NO: 2). Alternatively, the amino acid sequence of said peptidomimetic macrocycle is identified and optimized for its ability to bind to either the PB1 peptide binding site of the PA protein or the PB2 peptide binding site of the PB1 protein, for example through affinity selection with the PA or PB1 target protein or by structure-based design, with such a mechanism of action being confirmed by biophysical/structural studies and/or competitive displacement assays with the PB1 or PB2 peptide. In some embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycle comprises a helix, such as a 310 helix or an α-helix. In other embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycle comprises an α,α-disubstituted amino acid. A peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention may comprise a crosslinker linking the α-positions of at least two amino acids. At least one of said two amino acids may be an α,α-disubstituted amino acid.
In some embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycle has the formula:
wherein:
each A, C, D, and E is independently a natural or non-natural amino acid;
B is a natural or non-natural amino acid, amino acid analog,
[—NH-L3-CO—], [—NH-L3-SO2—], or [—NH-L3-];
R1 and R2 are independently —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heteroalkyl, or heterocycloalkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-;
R3 is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, optionally substituted with R5;
L is a macrocycle-forming linker of the formula -L1-L2-;
L1 and L2 are independently alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, cycloalkylene, heterocycloalkylene, cycloarylene, heterocycloarylene, or [—R4—K—R4—]n, each being optionally substituted with R5;
each R4 is alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, cycloalkylene, heterocycloalkylene, arylene, or heteroarylene;
each K is O, S, SO, SO2, CO, CO2, or CONR3;
each R5 is independently halogen, alkyl, —OR6, —N(R6)2, —SR6, —SOR6, —SO2R6, —CO2R6, a fluorescent moiety, a radioisotope or a therapeutic agent;
each R6 is independently —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, a fluorescent moiety, a radioisotope or a therapeutic agent;
R7 is —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, optionally substituted with R5, or part of a cyclic structure with a D residue;
R8 is —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, optionally substituted with R5, or part of a cyclic structure with an E residue;
v and w are independently integers from 1-1000;
u, x, y and z are independently integers from 0-10; and
n is an integer from 1-5.
In other embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycle may comprise a crosslinker linking a backbone amino group of a first amino acid to a second amino acid within the peptidomimetic macrocycle. For example, the invention provides peptidomimetic macrocycles of the formula (IV) or (IVa):
wherein:
each A, C, D, and E is independently a natural or non-natural amino acid;
B is a natural or non-natural amino acid, amino acid analog,
[—NH-L3-CO—], [—NH-L3-SO2—], or [—NH-L3-];
R1 and R2 are independently —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heteroalkyl, or heterocycloalkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-, or part of a cyclic structure with an E residue;
R3 is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, optionally substituted with R5;
L1 and L2 are independently alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, cycloalkylene, heterocycloalkylene, cycloarylene, heterocycloarylene, or [—R4—K—R4—]n, each being optionally substituted with R5;
each R4 is alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, cycloalkylene, heterocycloalkylene, arylene, or heteroarylene;
each K is O, S, SO, SO2, CO, CO2, or CONR3;
each R5 is independently halogen, alkyl, —OR6, —N(R6)2, —SR6, —SOR6, —SO2R6, —CO2R6, a fluorescent moiety, a radioisotope or a therapeutic agent;
each R6 is independently —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, a fluorescent moiety, a radioisotope or a therapeutic agent;
R7 is —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, optionally substituted with R5;
v and w are independently integers from 1-1000;
u, x, y and z are independently integers from 0-10; and
n is an integer from 1-5.
In some embodiments, x+y+z is 2, 3, 5 or 6.
Additionally, the invention provides a method of treating influenza virus infection in a subject comprising administering to the subject a peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention. Also provided is a method of preventing infection by an influenza virus in a subject comprising administering to the subject a peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention, or a method of inhibiting the activity of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of an influenza virus in a subject comprising administering to the subject such a peptidomimetic macrocycle.
All publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
As used herein, the term “macrocycle” refers to a molecule having a chemical structure including a ring or cycle formed by at least 9 covalently bonded atoms.
As used herein, the term “peptidomimetic macrocycle” or “crosslinked polypeptide” refers to a compound comprising a plurality of amino acid residues joined by a plurality of peptide bonds and at least one macrocycle-forming linker which forms a macrocycle between a first naturally-occurring or non-naturally-occurring amino acid residue (or analog) and a second naturally-occurring or non-naturally-occurring amino acid residue (or analog) within the same molecule. Peptidomimetic macrocycle include embodiments where the macrocycle-forming linker connects the α carbon of the first amino acid residue (or analog) to the α carbon of the second amino acid residue (or analog). The peptidomimetic macrocycles optionally include one or more non-peptide bonds between one or more amino acid residues and/or amino acid analog residues, and optionally include one or more non-naturally-occurring amino acid residues or amino acid analog residues in addition to any which form the macrocycle. A “corresponding uncrosslinked polypeptide” when referred to in the context of a peptidomimetic macrocycle is understood to relate to a polypeptide of the same length as the macrocycle and comprising the equivalent natural amino acids of the wild-type sequence corresponding to the macrocycle.
As used herein, the term “stability” refers to the maintenance of a defined secondary structure in solution by a peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention as measured by circular dichroism, NMR or another biophysical measure, or resistance to proteolytic degradation in vitro or in vivo. Non-limiting examples of secondary structures contemplated in this invention are helices, β-turns, and β-pleated sheets. In general, the term “helix” or “helical” is used to refer to any type of helical secondary structure, including 310-helices, α-helices, and π-helices.
As used herein, the term “helical stability” refers to the maintenance of helical structure by a peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention as measured by circular dichroism or NMR. For example, in some embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention exhibit at least a 1.25, 1.5, 1.75 or 2-fold increase in helicity as determined by circular dichroism compared to a corresponding uncrosslinked macrocycle.
The term “α-amino acid” or simply “amino acid” refers to a molecule containing both an amino group and a carboxyl group bound to a carbon which is designated the α-carbon. Suitable amino acids include, without limitation, both the D- and L-isomers of the naturally-occurring amino acids, as well as non-naturally occurring amino acids prepared by organic synthesis or other metabolic routes. Unless the context specifically indicates otherwise, the term amino acid, as used herein, is intended to include amino acid analogs.
The term “naturally occurring amino acid” refers to any one of the twenty amino acids commonly found in peptides synthesized in nature, and known by the one letter abbreviations A, R, N, C, D, Q, E, G, H, I, L, K, M, F, P, S, T, W, Y and V.
The term “amino acid analog” or “non-natural amino acid” refers to a molecule which is structurally similar to an amino acid and which can be substituted for an amino acid in the formation of a peptidomimetic macrocycle. Amino acid analogs include, without limitation, compounds which are structurally identical to an amino acid, as defined herein, except for the inclusion of one or more additional methylene groups between the amino and carboxyl group (e.g., α-amino β-carboxy acids), or for the substitution of the amino or carboxy group by a similarly reactive group (e.g., substitution of the primary amine with a secondary or tertiary amine, or substitution or the carboxy group with an ester).
A “non-essential” amino acid residue is a residue that can be altered from the wild-type sequence of a polypeptide (e.g., a BH3 domain or the p53 MDM2 binding domain) without abolishing or substantially altering its essential biological or biochemical activity (e.g., receptor binding or activation). An “essential” amino acid residue is a residue that, when altered from the wild-type sequence of the polypeptide, results in abolishing or substantially abolishing the polypeptide's essential biological or biochemical activity.
A “conservative amino acid substitution” is one in which the amino acid residue is replaced with an amino acid residue having a similar side chain. Families of amino acid residues having similar side chains have been defined in the art. These families include amino acids with basic side chains (e.g., K, R, H), acidic side chains (e.g., D, E), uncharged polar side chains (e.g., G, N, Q, S, T, Y, C), nonpolar side chains (e.g., A, V, L, I, P, F, M, W), beta-branched side chains (e.g., T, V, I) and aromatic side chains (e.g., Y, F, W, H). Thus, a predicted nonessential amino acid residue in a polypeptide, for example, is preferably replaced with another amino acid residue from the same side chain family. Other examples of acceptable substitutions are substitutions based on isosteric considerations (e.g. norleucine for methionine) or other properties (e.g. 2-thienylalanine for phenylalanine).
The term “member” as used herein in conjunction with macrocycles or macrocycle-forming linkers refers to the atoms that form or can form the macrocycle, and excludes substituent or side chain atoms. By analogy, cyclodecane, 1,2-difluoro-decane and 1,3-dimethyl cyclodecane are all considered ten-membered macrocycles as the hydrogen or fluoro substituents or methyl side chains do not participate in forming the macrocycle.
The symbol “” when used as part of a molecular structure refers to a single bond or a trans or cis double bond.
The term “amino acid side chain” refers to a moiety attached to the α-carbon in an amino acid. For example, the amino acid side chain for alanine is methyl, the amino acid side chain for phenylalanine is phenylmethyl, the amino acid side chain for cysteine is thiomethyl, the amino acid side chain for aspartate is carboxymethyl, the amino acid side chain for tyrosine is 4-hydroxyphenylmethyl, etc. Other non-naturally occurring amino acid side chains are also included, for example, those that occur in nature (e.g., an amino acid metabolite) or those that are made synthetically (e.g., an α,α di-substituted amino acid).
The term “α,α di-substituted amino” acid refers to a molecule or moiety containing both an amino group and a carboxyl group bound to a carbon (the α-carbon) that is attached to two natural or non-natural amino acid side chains.
The term “polypeptide” encompasses two or more naturally or non-naturally-occurring amino acids joined by a covalent bond (e.g., an amide bond). Polypeptides as described herein include full length proteins (e.g., fully processed proteins) as well as shorter amino acid sequences (e.g., fragments of naturally-occurring proteins or synthetic polypeptide fragments).
The term “macrocyclization reagent” or “macrocycle-forming reagent” as used herein refers to any reagent which may be used to prepare a peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention by mediating the reaction between two reactive groups. Reactive groups may be, for example, an azide and alkyne, in which case macrocyclization reagents include, without limitation, Cu reagents such as reagents which provide a reactive Cu(I) species, such as CuBr, CuI or CuOTf, as well as Cu(II) salts such as Cu(CO2CH3)2, CuSO4, and CuCl2 that can be converted in situ to an active Cu(I) reagent by the addition of a reducing agent such as ascorbic acid or sodium ascorbate. Macrocyclization reagents may additionally include, for example, Ru reagents known in the art such as Cp*RuCl(PPh3)2, [Cp*RuCl]4 or other Ru reagents which may provide a reactive Ru(II) species. In other cases, the reactive groups are terminal olefins. In such embodiments, the macrocyclization reagents or macrocycle-forming reagents are metathesis catalysts including, but not limited to, stabilized, late transition metal carbene complex catalysts such as Group VIII transition metal carbene catalysts. For example, such catalysts are Ru and Os metal centers having a +2 oxidation state, an electron count of 16 and pentacoordinated. Additional catalysts are disclosed in Grubbs et al., “Ring Closing Metathesis and Related Processes in Organic Synthesis” Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 446452, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,811,515. In yet other cases, the reactive groups are thiol groups. In such embodiments, the macrocyclization reagent is, for example, a linker functionalized with two thiol-reactive groups such as halogen groups.
The term “halo” or “halogen” refers to fluorine, chlorine, bromine or iodine or a radical thereof.
The term “alkyl” refers to a hydrocarbon chain that is a straight chain or branched chain, containing the indicated number of carbon atoms. For example, C1-C10 indicates that the group has from 1 to 10 (inclusive) carbon atoms in it. In the absence of any numerical designation, “alkyl” is a chain (straight or branched) having 1 to 20 (inclusive) carbon atoms in it.
The term “alkylene” refers to a divalent alkyl (i.e., —R—).
The term “alkenyl” refers to a hydrocarbon chain that is a straight chain or branched chain having one or more carbon-carbon double bonds. The alkenyl moiety contains the indicated number of carbon atoms. For example, C2-C10 indicates that the group has from 2 to 10 (inclusive) carbon atoms in it. The term “lower alkenyl” refers to a C2-C6 alkenyl chain. In the absence of any numerical designation, “alkenyl” is a chain (straight or branched) having 2 to 20 (inclusive) carbon atoms in it.
The term “alkynyl” refers to a hydrocarbon chain that is a straight chain or branched chain having one or more carbon-carbon triple bonds. The alkynyl moiety contains the indicated number of carbon atoms. For example, C2-C10 indicates that the group has from 2 to 10 (inclusive) carbon atoms in it. The term “lower alkynyl” refers to a C2-C6 alkynyl chain. In the absence of any numerical designation, “alkynyl” is a chain (straight or branched) having 2 to 20 (inclusive) carbon atoms in it.
The term “aryl” refers to a 6-carbon monocyclic or 10-carbon bicyclic aromatic ring system wherein 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 atoms of each ring are substituted by a substituent. Examples of aryl groups include phenyl, naphthyl and the like.
The term “arylalkyl” or the term “aralkyl” refers to alkyl substituted with an aryl. The term “arylalkoxy” refers to an alkoxy substituted with aryl.
“Arylalkyl” refers to an aryl group, as defined above, wherein one of the aryl group's hydrogen atoms has been replaced with a C1-C5 alkyl group, as defined above. Representative examples of an arylalkyl group include, but are not limited to, 2-methylphenyl, 3-methylphenyl, 4-methylphenyl, 2-ethylphenyl, 3-ethylphenyl, 4-ethylphenyl, 2-propylphenyl, 3-propylphenyl, 4-propylphenyl, 2-butylphenyl, 3-butylphenyl, 4-butylphenyl, 2-pentylphenyl, 3-pentylphenyl, 4-pentylphenyl, 2-isopropylphenyl, 3-isopropylphenyl, 4-isopropylphenyl, 2-isobutylphenyl, 3-isobutylphenyl, 4-isobutylphenyl, 2-sec-butylphenyl, 3-sec-butylphenyl, 4-sec-butylphenyl, 2-t-butylphenyl, 3-t-butylphenyl and 4-t-butylphenyl.
“Arylamido” refers to an aryl group, as defined above, wherein one of the aryl group's hydrogen atoms has been replaced with one or more —C(O)NH2 groups. Representative examples of an arylamido group include 2-C(O)NH2-phenyl, 3-C(O)NH2-phenyl, 4-C(O)NH2-phenyl, 2-C(O)NH2-pyridyl, 3-C(O)NH2-pyridyl, and 4-C(O)NH2-pyridyl,
“Alkylheterocycle” refers to a C1-C5 alkyl group, as defined above, wherein one of the C1-C5 alkyl group's hydrogen atoms has been replaced with a heterocycle. Representative examples of an alkylheterocycle group include, but are not limited to, —CH2CH2-morpholine, —CH2CH2-piperidine, —CH2CH2CH2-morpholine, and —CH2CH2CH2-imidazole.
“Alkylamido” refers to a C1-C5 alkyl group, as defined above, wherein one of the C1-C5 alkyl group's hydrogen atoms has been replaced with a —C(O)NH2 group. Representative examples of an alkylamido group include, but are not limited to, —CH2—C(O)NH2, —CH2CH2—C(O)NH2, —CH2CH2CH2C(O)NH2, —CH2CH2CH2CH2C(O)NH2, —CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2C(O)NH2, —CH2CH(C(O)NH2)CH3, —CH2CH(C(O)NH2)CH2CH3, —CH(C(O)NH2)CH2CH3, —C(CH3)2CH2C(O)NH2, —CH2—CH2—NH—C(O)—CH3, —CH2—CH2—NH—C(O)—CH3—CH3, and —CH2—CH2—NH—C(O)—CH═CH2.
“Alkanol” refers to a C1-C5 alkyl group, as defined above, wherein one of the C1-C5 alkyl group's hydrogen atoms has been replaced with a hydroxyl group. Representative examples of an alkanol group include, but are not limited to, —CH2OH, —CH2CH2OH, —CH2CH2CH2OH, —CH2CH2CH2CH2OH, —CH2CH2CH2 CH2CH2OH, —CH2CH(OH)CH3, —CH2CH(OH)CH2CH3, —CH(OH)CH3 and —C(CH3)2CH2OH.
“Alkylcarboxy” refers to a C1-C5 alkyl group, as defined above, wherein one of the C1-C5 alkyl group's hydrogen atoms has been replaced with a —COOH group. Representative examples of an alkylcarboxy group include, but are not limited to, —CH2COOH, —CH2CH2COOH, —CH2CH2CH2COOH, —CH2CH2CH2CH2COOH, —CH2CH(COOH)CH3, —CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2COOH, —CH2CH(COOH)CH2CH3, —CH(COOH)CH2CH3 and —C(CH3)2CH2COOH.
The term “cycloalkyl” as employed herein includes saturated and partially unsaturated cyclic hydrocarbon groups having 3 to 12 carbons, preferably 3 to 8 carbons, and more preferably 3 to 6 carbons, wherein the cycloalkyl group additionally is optionally substituted. Some cycloalkyl groups include, without limitation, cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl, cyclopentenyl, cyclohexyl, cyclohexenyl, cycloheptyl, and cyclooctyl.
The term “heteroaryl” refers to an aromatic 5-8 membered monocyclic, 8-12 membered bicyclic, or 11-14 membered tricyclic ring system having 1-3 heteroatoms if monocyclic, 1-6 heteroatoms if bicyclic, or 1-9 heteroatoms if tricyclic, said heteroatoms selected from O, N, or S (e.g., carbon atoms and 1-3, 1-6, or 1-9 heteroatoms of O, N, or S if monocyclic, bicyclic, or tricyclic, respectively), wherein 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 atoms of each ring are substituted by a substituent. Examples of heteroaryl groups include pyridyl, furyl or furanyl, imidazolyl, benzimidazolyl, pyrimidinyl, thiophenyl or thienyl, quinolinyl, indolyl, thiazolyl, and the like.
The term “heteroarylalkyl” or the term “heteroaralkyl” refers to an alkyl substituted with a heteroaryl. The term “heteroarylalkoxy” refers to an alkoxy substituted with heteroaryl.
The term “heteroarylalkyl” or the term “heteroaralkyl” refers to an alkyl substituted with a heteroaryl. The term “heteroarylalkoxy” refers to an alkoxy substituted with heteroaryl.
The term “heterocyclyl” refers to a nonaromatic 5-8 membered monocyclic, 8-12 membered bicyclic, or 11-14 membered tricyclic ring system having 1-3 heteroatoms if monocyclic, 1-6 heteroatoms if bicyclic, or 1-9 heteroatoms if tricyclic, said heteroatoms selected from O, N, or S (e.g., carbon atoms and 1-3, 1-6, or 1-9 heteroatoms of O, N, or S if monocyclic, bicyclic, or tricyclic, respectively), wherein 0, 1, 2 or 3 atoms of each ring are substituted by a substituent. Examples of heterocyclyl groups include piperazinyl, pyrrolidinyl, dioxanyl, morpholinyl, tetrahydrofuranyl, and the like.
The term “substituent” refers to a group replacing a second atom or group such as a hydrogen atom on any molecule, compound or moiety. Suitable substituents include, without limitation, halo, hydroxy, mercapto, oxo, nitro, haloalkyl, alkyl, alkaryl, aryl, aralkyl, alkoxy, thioalkoxy, aryloxy, amino, alkoxycarbonyl, amido, carboxy, alkanesulfonyl, alkylcarbonyl, and cyano groups.
In some embodiments, the compounds of this invention contain one or more asymmetric centers and thus occur as racemates and racemic mixtures, single enantiomers, individual diastereomers and diastereomeric mixtures. All such isomeric forms of these compounds are included in the present invention unless expressly provided otherwise. In some embodiments, the compounds of this invention are also represented in multiple tautomeric forms, in such instances, the invention includes all tautomeric forms of the compounds described herein (e.g., if alkylation of a ring system results in alkylation at multiple sites, the invention includes all such reaction products). All such isomeric forms of such compounds are included in the present invention unless expressly provided otherwise. All crystal forms of the compounds described herein are included in the present invention unless expressly provided otherwise.
As used herein, the terms “increase” and “decrease” mean, respectively, to cause a statistically significantly (i.e., p<0.1) increase or decrease of at least 5%.
As used herein, the recitation of a numerical range for a variable is intended to convey that the invention may be practiced with the variable equal to any of the values within that range. Thus, for a variable which is inherently discrete, the variable is equal to any integer value within the numerical range, including the end-points of the range. Similarly, for a variable which is inherently continuous, the variable is equal to any real value within the numerical range, including the end-points of the range. As an example, and without limitation, a variable which is described as having values between 0 and 2 takes the values 0, 1 or 2 if the variable is inherently discrete, and takes the values 0.0, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001, or any other real values ≥0 and ≤2 if the variable is inherently continuous.
As used herein, unless specifically indicated otherwise, the word “or” is used in the inclusive sense of “and/or” and not the exclusive sense of “either/or.”
The term “on average” represents the mean value derived from performing at least three independent replicates for each data point.
The term “biological activity” encompasses structural and functional properties of a macrocycle of the invention. Biological activity is, for example, structural stability, helicity (including, e.g. alpha-helicity), affinity for a target, resistance to proteolytic degradation, cell penetrability, intracellular stability, in vivo stability, or any combination thereof.
The details of one or more particular embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Design of Peptidomimetic Macrocycles
In general, peptidomimetic macrocycles are prepared that target or interact with proteins that a virus needs for infection or replication within a host cell. Such viruses may be, for example, influenza viruses belonging to Orthomyxoviridae family of viruses. This family also includes Thogoto viruses and Dhoriviruses. There are several types and subtypes of influenza viruses known, which infect humans and other species. Influenza type A viruses infect people, birds, pigs, horses, seals and other animals, but wild birds are the natural hosts for these viruses. Influenza type A viruses are divided into subtypes and named on the basis of two proteins on the surface of the virus: hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). For example, an “H7N2 virus” designates an influenza A subtype that has an HA 7 protein and an NA 2 protein. Similarly an “H5N1” virus has an HA 5 protein and an NA 1 protein. There are 16 known HA subtypes and 9 known NA subtypes. Many different combinations of HA and NA proteins are possible. Only some influenza A subtypes (i.e., H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2) are currently in general circulation among people. Other subtypes are found most commonly in other animal species. For example, H7N7 and H3N8 viruses cause illness in horses, and H3N8 also has recently been shown to cause illness in dogs.
Antiviral agents according to the invention can be used to protect high-risk groups (hospital units, institutes caring for elderly, immuno-suppressed individuals), and on a case by case basis. A potential use for antiviral agents is to limit the spread and severity of the future pandemics whether caused by avian H5N1 or other strains of influenza virus. Avian influenza A viruses of the subtypes H5 and H7, including H5N1, H7N7, and H7N3 viruses, have been associated with high pathogenicity, and human infection with these viruses have ranged from mild (H7N3, H7N7) to severe and fatal disease (H7N7, H5N1). Human illness due to infection with low pathogenicity viruses has been documented, including very mild symptoms (e.g., conjunctivitis) to influenza-like illness. Examples of low pathogenicity viruses that have infected humans include H7N7, H9N2, and H7N2.
Influenza B viruses are usually found in humans but can also infect seals. Unlike influenza A viruses, these viruses are not classified according to subtype. Influenza B viruses can cause morbidity and mortality among humans, but in general are associated with less severe epidemics than influenza A viruses. Although influenza type B viruses can cause human epidemics, they have not caused pandemics.
Influenza type C viruses cause mild illness in humans and do not cause epidemics or pandemics. These viruses can also infect dogs and pigs. These viruses are not classified according to subtype.
Influenza viruses differ from each other in respect to cell surface receptor specificity and cell tropism, however they use common entry pathways. Charting these pathways and identification of host cell proteins involved in virus influenza transmission, entry, replication, biosynthesis, assembly, or exit allows the development of general agents against existing and emerging strains of influenza. The agents may also prove useful against unrelated viruses that use similar pathways. For example, the agents may protect airway epithelial cells against a number of different viruses in addition to influenza viruses.
In one embodiment the targeted virus is an adenovirus. Adenoviruses most commonly cause respiratory illness; symptoms of respiratory illness caused by adenovirus infection range from the common cold syndrome to pneumonia, croup, and bronchitis. Patients with compromised immune systems are especially susceptible to severe complications of adenovirus infection. Acute respiratory disease (ARD), first recognized among military recruits during World War II, can be caused by adenovirus infections during conditions of crowding and stress. Adenoviruses are medium-sized (90-100 nm), nonenveloped icosohedral viruses containing double-stranded DNA. There are 49 immunologically distinct types (6 subgenera: A through F) that can cause human infections. Adenoviruses are unusually stable to chemical or physical agents and adverse pH conditions, allowing for prolonged survival outside of the body. Some adenoviruses, such as AD2 and Ad5 (species C) use clathrin mediated endocytosis and macropinocytosis for infectious entry. Other adenoviruses, such as Ad3 (species B) use dynamin dependent endocytosis and macropinocytosis for infectious entry.
In one embodiment the targeted virus is a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). RSV is the most common cause of bronchiolitis and pneumonia among infants and children under 1 year of age. Illness begins most frequently with fever, runny nose, cough, and sometimes wheezing. During their first RSV infection, between 25% and 40% of infants and young children have signs or symptoms of bronchiolitis or pneumonia, and 0.5% to 2% require hospitalization. Most children recover from illness in 8 to 15 days. The majority of children hospitalized for RSV infection are under 6 months of age. RSV also causes repeated infections throughout life, usually associated with moderate-to-severe cold-like symptoms; however, severe lower respiratory tract disease may occur at any age, especially among the elderly or among those with compromised cardiac, pulmonary, or immune systems. RSV is a negative-sense, enveloped RNA virus. The virion is variable in shape and size (average diameter of between 120 and 300 nm), is unstable in the environment (surviving only a few hours on environmental surfaces), and is readily inactivated with soap and water and disinfectants.
In one embodiment the targeted virus is a human parainfluenza virus (HPIV). HPIVs arc second to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) as a common cause of lower respiratory tract disease in young children. Similar to RSV, HPIVs can cause repeated infections throughout life, usually manifested by an upper respiratory tract illness (e.g., a cold and/or sore throat). HPIVs can also cause serious lower respiratory tract disease with repeat infection (e.g., pneumonia, bronchitis, and bronchiolitis), especially among the elderly, and among patients with compromised immune systems. Each of the four HPIVs has different clinical and epidemiologic features. The most distinctive clinical feature of HPIV-1 and HPIV-2 is croup (i.e., laryngotracheobronchitis); HPIV-1 is the leading cause of croup in children, whereas HPIV-2 is less frequently detected. Both HPIV-1 and -2 can cause other upper and lower respiratory tract illnesses. HPIV-3 is more often associated with bronchiolitis and pneumonia. HPIV-4 is infrequently detected, possibly because it is less likely to cause severe disease. The incubation period for HPIVs is generally from 1 to 7 days. HPIVs are negative-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses that possess fusion and hemagglutinin-neuraminidase glycoprotein “spikes” on their surface. There are four serotypes types of HPIV (1 through 4) and two subtypes (4a and 4h). The virion varies in size (average diameter between 150 and 300 nm) and shape, is unstable in the environment (surviving a few hours on environmental surfaces), and is readily inactivated with soap and water.
In one embodiment the targeted virus is a coronavirus. Coronavirus is a genus of animal virus belonging to the family Coronaviridae. Coronaviruses are enveloped viruses with a positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome and a helical symmetry. The genomic size of coronaviruses ranges from approximately 16 to 31 kilobases, extraordinarily large for an RNA virus. The name “coronavirus” is derived from the Latin corona, meaning crown, as the virus envelope appears under electron microscopy to be crowned by a characteristic ring of small bulbous structures. This morphology is actually formed by the viral spike peplomers, which are proteins that populate the surface of the virus and determine host tropism. Coronaviruses are grouped in the order Nidovirales, named for the Latin nidus, meaning nest, as all viruses in this order produce a 3′ co-terminal nested set of subgenomic mRNA's during infection. Proteins that contribute to the overall structure of all coronaviruses are the spike, envelope, membrane and nucleocapsid. In the specific case of SARS a defined receptor-binding domain on S mediates the attachment of the virus to its cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2.
In one embodiment the targeted virus is a rhinovirus. Rhinovirus (from the Greek rhin-, which means “nose”) is a genus of the Picornaviridae family of viruses. Rhinoviruses are the most common viral infective agents in humans, and a causative agent of the common cold. There are over 105 serologic virus types that cause cold symptoms, and rhinoviruses are responsible for approximately 50% of all cases. Rhinoviruses have single-stranded positive sense RNA genomes of between 7.2 and 8.5 kb in length. At the 5′ end of the genome is a virus-encoded protein, and like mammalian mRNA, there is a 3′ poly-A tail. Structural proteins are encoded in the 5′ region of the genome and non structural at the end. This is the same for all picornaviruses. The viral particles themselves are not enveloped and are icosahedral in structure.
Any secondary structure of a viral protein (or of a host cell protein involved in viral infectivity) can form the basis of the methods of the invention. For example, a viral proteins comprising a secondary structure which is a helix may be used to design peptidomimetic macrocycles based on said helix.
In one embodiment, the peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention is designed based on the PB1 or PB2 sequence of an influenza virus. The PB1 sequence is highly conserved across all known strains of influenza A virus, which may result in less drug resistance should than that observed with the current standard of care. An alignment of the first 25 N-terminal amino acids of PB1 from the NCBI data bank's 2,485 influenza A virus strains (Ghanem, 2007) demonstrates the remarkable sequence conservation in the PA interaction domain of PB1. Therefore, antiviral therapies based on the PB1 sequence may block most if not all, influenza A virus strains. Additionally, sequence modification of a peptidomimetic macrocycle based on these few variations in PB1 may enable an antiviral cocktail of PB1 inhibitors to eliminate resistance due to escape mutants.
A non-limiting exemplary list of sequences suitable for macrocyclization as well as macrocyclic peptides for use in the present invention is given below:
Peptidomimetic Macrocycles of the Invention
In some embodiments, a peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention has the Formula (I):
wherein:
each A, C, D, and E is independently a natural or non-natural amino acid;
B is a natural or non-natural amino acid, amino acid analog,
[—NH-L3-CO—], [—NH-L3-SO2—], or [—NH-L3-];
R1 and R2 are independently —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heteroalkyl, or heterocycloalkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-;
R3 is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, optionally substituted with R5;
L is a macrocycle-forming linker of the formula -L1-L2-;
L1 and L2 are independently alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, cycloalkylene, heterocycloalkylene, cycloarylene, heterocycloarylene, or [—R4—K—R4—]n, each being optionally substituted with R5;
each R4 is alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, cycloalkylene, heterocycloalkylene, arylene, or heteroarylene;
each K is O, S, SO, SO2, CO, CO2, or CONR3;
each R5 is independently halogen, alkyl, —OR6, —N(R6)2, —SR6, —SOR6, —SO2R6, —CO2R6, a fluorescent moiety, a radioisotope or a therapeutic agent;
each R6 is independently —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, a fluorescent moiety, a radioisotope or a therapeutic agent;
R7 is —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, optionally substituted with R5, or part of a cyclic structure with a D residue;
R8 is —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, optionally substituted with R5, or part of a cyclic structure with an E residue;
v and w are independently integers from 1-1000;
u, x, y and z are independently integers from 0-10; and
n is an integer from 1-5.
In one example, at least one of R1 and R2 is alkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-. In another example, both R1 and R2 are independently alkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-. In some embodiments, at least one of R4 and R2 is methyl. In other embodiments, R1 and R2 are methyl.
In some embodiments of the invention, x+y+z is at least 2. In other embodiments of the invention, x+y+z is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10. Each occurrence of A, B, C, D or E in a macrocycle or macrocycle precursor of the invention is independently selected. For example, a sequence represented by the formula [A]x, when x is 3, encompasses embodiments where the amino acids are not identical, e.g. Gln-Asp-Ala as well as embodiments where the amino acids are identical, e.g. Gln-Gln-Gln. This applies for any value of x, y, or z in the indicated ranges. Similarly, when u is greater than 1, each compound of the invention may encompass peptidomimetic macrocycles which are the same or different. For example, a compound of the invention may comprise peptidomimetic macrocycles comprising different linker lengths or chemical compositions.
In some embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention comprises a secondary structure which is a helix and R8 is —H, allowing intrahelical hydrogen bonding. In some embodiments, at least one of A, B, C, D or E is an α,α-disubstituted amino acid. In one example, B is an α,α-disubstituted amino acid. For instance, at least one of A, B, C, D or E is 2-aminoisobutyric acid. In other embodiments, at least one of A, B, C, D or E is
In other embodiments, the length of the macrocycle-forming linker L as measured from a first Cα to a second Cα is selected to stabilize a desired secondary peptide structure, such as a helix formed by residues of the peptidomimetic macrocycle including, but not necessarily limited to, those between the first Cα to a second Cα.
In one embodiment, the peptidomimetic macrocycle of Formula (I) is:
wherein each R1 and R2 is independently H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heteroalkyl, or heterocycloalkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo.
In related embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycle of Formula (I) is:
Exemplary embodiments of the macrocycle-forming linker L are shown below.
In some embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention have the Formula (II):
wherein:
each A, C, D, and E is independently a natural or non-natural amino acid;
B is a natural or non-natural amino acid, amino acid analog,
[—NH-L3-CO—], [—NH-L3-SO2—], or [—NH-L3-];
R1 and R2 are independently H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heteroalkyl, or heterocycloalkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo;
R3 is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, optionally substituted with R5;
L is a macrocycle-forming linker of the formula
L1, L2 and L3 are independently alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, cycloalkylene, heterocycloalkylene, cycloarylene, heterocycloarylene, or [—R4—K—R4—]n, each being optionally substituted with R5;
each R4 is alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, cycloalkylene, heterocycloalkylene, arylene, or heteroarylene;
each K is O, S, SO, SO2, CO, CO2, or CONR3;
each R5 is independently halogen, alkyl, —OR6, —N(R6)2, —SR6, —SOR6, —SO2R6, —CO2R6, a fluorescent moiety, a radioisotope or a therapeutic agent;
each R6 is independently —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, a fluorescent moiety, a radioisotope or a therapeutic agent;
R7 is —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, optionally substituted with R5, or part of a cyclic structure with a D residue;
R8 is —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, optionally substituted with R5, or part of a cyclic structure with an F residue;
v and w are independently integers from 1-1000;
u, x, y and z are independently integers from 0-10; and
n is an integer from 1-5.
In one example, at least one of R1 is alkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-. In another example, both R1 and R2 are independently alkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo. In some embodiments, at least one of R1 and R2 is methyl. In other embodiments, R1 and R2 are methyl.
In some embodiments of the invention, x+y+z is at least 2. In other embodiments of the invention, x+y+z is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10. Each occurrence of A, B, C, D or E in a macrocycle or macrocycle precursor of the invention is independently selected. For example, a sequence represented by the formula [A]x, when x is 3, encompasses embodiments where the amino acids are not identical, e.g. Gln Asp Ala as well as embodiments where the amino acids are identical, e.g. Gln Gln Gln. This applies for any value of x, y, or z in the indicated ranges.
In some embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention comprises a secondary structure which is a helix and R8 is —H, allowing intrahelical hydrogen bonding. In some embodiments, at least one of A, B, C, D or F is an α,α-disubstituted amino acid. In one example, B is an α,α-disubstituted amino acid. For instance, at least one of A, B, C, D or E is 2-aminoisobutyric acid. In other embodiments, at least one of A, B, C, D or E is
In other embodiments, the length of the macrocycle-forming linker L as measured from a first Cα to a second Cα is selected to stabilize a desired secondary peptide structure, such as a helix formed by residues of the peptidomimetic macrocycle including, but not necessarily limited to, those between the first Cα to a second Cα.
Exemplary embodiments of the macrocycle-forming linker L are shown below.
In other embodiments, the invention provides peptidomimetic macrocycles of Formula (III):
wherein:
each A, C, D, and E is independently a natural or non-natural amino acid;
B is a natural or non-natural amino acid, amino acid analog,
[—NH-L4-CO—], [—NH-L4-SO2—], or [—NH-L4-];
R1 and R2 are independently —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heteroalkyl, or heterocycloalkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-;
R3 is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, unsubstituted or substituted with R5;
L1, L2, L3 and L4 are independently alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, cycloalkylene, heterocycloalkylene, cycloarylene, heterocycloarylene or [—R4—K—R4—]n, each being unsubstituted or substituted with R5;
K is O, S, SO, SO2, CO, CO2, or CONR3;
each R4 is alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, cycloalkylene, heterocycloalkylene, arylene, or heteroarylene;
each R5 is independently halogen, alkyl, —OR6, —N(R6)2, —SR6, —SOR6, —SO2R6, —CO2R6, a fluorescent moiety, a radioisotope or a therapeutic agent;
each R6 is independently —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, a fluorescent moiety, a radioisotope or a therapeutic agent;
R7 is —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, unsubstituted or substituted with R5, or part of a cyclic structure with a D residue;
R8 is —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, unsubstituted or substituted with R5, or part of a cyclic structure with an E residue;
v and w are independently integers from 1-1000;
u, x, y and z are independently integers from 0-10; and
n is an integer from 1-5.
In one example, at least one of R1 and R2 is alkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-. In another example, both R1 and R2 are independently alkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-. In some embodiments, at least one of R1 and R2 is methyl. In other embodiments, R1 and R2 are methyl.
In some embodiments of the invention, x+y+z is at least 2. In other embodiments of the invention, x+y+z is 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10. Each occurrence of A, B, C, D or E in a macrocycle or macrocycle precursor of the invention is independently selected. For example, a sequence represented by the formula [A]x, when x is 3, encompasses embodiments where the amino acids are not identical, e.g. Gln-Asp-Ala as well as embodiments where the amino acids are identical, e.g. Gln-Gln-Gln. This applies for any value of x, y, or z in the indicated ranges.
In some embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention comprises a secondary structure which is a helix and R8 is —H, allowing intrahelical hydrogen bonding. In some embodiments, at least one of A, B, C, D or E is an α,α-disubstituted amino acid. In one example, B is an α,α-disubstituted amino acid. For instance, at least one of A, B, C, D or E is 2-aminoisobutyric acid. In other embodiments, at least one of A, B, C, D or E is
In other embodiments, the length of the macrocycle-forming linker [-L1-S-L2-S-L3-] as measured from a first Cα to a second Cα is selected to stabilize a desired secondary peptide structure, such as a helix (including, but not limited to a 310 helix or an α-helix) formed by residues of the peptidomimetic macrocycle including, but not necessarily limited to, those between the first Cα to a second Cα.
Macrocycles or macrocycle precursors are synthesized, for example, by solution phase or solid-phase methods, and can contain both naturally-occurring and non-naturally-occurring amino acids. See, for example, Hunt, “The Non-Protein Amino Acids” in Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Amino Acids, edited by G. C. Barrett, Chapman and Hall, 1985. In some embodiments, the thiol moieties are the side chains of the amino acid residues L-cysteine, D-cysteine, α-methyl-L cysteine, α-methyl-D-cysteine, L-homocysteine, D-homocysteine, α-methyl-L-homocysteine or α-methyl-D-homocysteine. A bis-alkylating reagent is of the general formula X-L2-Y wherein L2 is a linker moiety and X and Y are leaving groups that are displaced by —SH moieties to form bonds with L2. In some embodiments, X and Y are halogens such as I, Br, or Cl.
In other embodiments, D and/or E in the compound of Formula I, II or III are further modified in order to facilitate cellular uptake. In some embodiments, lipidating or PEGylating a peptidomimetic macrocycle facilitates cellular uptake, increases bioavailability, increases blood circulation, alters pharmacokinetics, decreases immunogenicity and/or decreases the needed frequency of administration.
In other embodiments, at least one of [D] and [E] in the compound of Formula I, II or III represents a moiety comprising an additional macrocycle-forming linker such that the peptidomimetic macrocycle comprises at least two macrocycle-forming linkers. In a specific embodiment, a peptidomimetic macrocycle comprises two macrocycle-forming linkers.
In the peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention, any of the macrocycle-forming linkers described herein may be used in any combination with any of the sequences shown in Tables 1-4 and also with any of the R substituents indicated herein.
In some embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention comprises at least one helical motif, such as a 310 or an α-helix motif. For example, A, B and/or C in the compound of Formula I, II or III include one or more helices. As a general matter, helices include between 3 and 4 amino acid residues per turn. In some embodiments, the helix of the peptidomimetic macrocycle includes 1 to 5 turns and, therefore, 3 to 20 amino acid residues. In specific embodiments, the helix includes 1 turn, 2 turns, 3 turns, 4 turns, or 5 turns. In some embodiments, the macrocycle-forming linker stabilizes a helix motif included within the peptidomimetic macrocycle. Thus, in some embodiments, the length of the macrocycle-forming linker L from a first Cα to a second Cα is selected to increase the stability of a helix. In some embodiments, the macrocycle-forming linker spans from 1 turn to 5 turns of the helix. In some embodiments, the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 1 turn, 2 turns, 3 turns, 4 turns, or 5 turns of the helix. In some embodiments, the length of the macrocycle-forming linker is approximately 5 Å to 9 Å per turn of the helix, or approximately 6 Å to 8 Å per turn of the helix. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 1 turn of a helix, the length is equal to approximately 5 carbon-carbon bonds to 13 carbon-carbon bonds, approximately 7 carbon-carbon bonds to 11 carbon-carbon bonds, or approximately 9 carbon-carbon bonds. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 2 turns of a helix, the length is equal to approximately 8 carbon-carbon bonds to 16 carbon-carbon bonds, approximately 10 carbon-carbon bonds to 14 carbon-carbon bonds, or approximately 12 carbon-carbon bonds. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 3 turns of a helix, the length is equal to approximately 14 carbon-carbon bonds to 22 carbon-carbon bonds, approximately 16 carbon-carbon bonds to 20 carbon-carbon bonds, or approximately 18 carbon-carbon bonds. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 4 turns of a helix, the length is equal to approximately 20 carbon-carbon bonds to 28 carbon-carbon bonds, approximately 22 carbon-carbon bonds to 26 carbon-carbon bonds, or approximately 24 carbon-carbon bonds. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 5 turns of a helix, the length is equal to approximately 26 carbon-carbon bonds to 34 carbon-carbon bonds, approximately 28 carbon-carbon bonds to 32 carbon-carbon bonds, or approximately 30 carbon-carbon bonds. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 1 turn of a helix, the linkage contains approximately 4 atoms to 12 atoms, approximately 6 atoms to 10 atoms, or approximately 8 atoms. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 2 turns of the helix, the linkage contains approximately 7 atoms to 15 atoms, approximately 9 atoms to 13 atoms, or approximately 11 atoms. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 3 turns of the helix, the linkage contains approximately 13 atoms to 21 atoms, approximately 15 atoms to 19 atoms, or approximately 17 atoms. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 4 turns of the helix, the linkage contains approximately 19 atoms to 27 atoms, approximately 21 atoms to 25 atoms, or approximately 23 atoms. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 5 turns of the helix, the linkage contains approximately 25 atoms to 33 atoms, approximately 27 atoms to 31 atoms, or approximately 29 atoms. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 1 turn of the helix, the resulting macrocycle forms a ring containing approximately 17 members to 25 members, approximately 19 members to 23 members, or approximately 21 members. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 2 turns of the helix, the resulting macrocycle forms a ring containing approximately 29 members to 37 members, approximately 31 members to 35 members, or approximately 33 members. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 3 turns of the helix, the resulting macrocycle forms a ring containing approximately 44 members to 52 members, approximately 46 members to 50 members, or approximately 48 members. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 4 turns of the helix, the resulting macrocycle forms a ring containing approximately 59 members to 67 members, approximately 61 members to 65 members, or approximately 63 members. Where the macrocycle-forming linker spans approximately 5 turns of the helix, the resulting macrocycle forms a ring containing approximately 74 members to 82 members, approximately 76 members to 80 members, or approximately 78 members.
In other embodiments, the invention provides peptidomimetic macrocycles of Formula (IV) or (IVa):
wherein:
each A, C, D, and E is independently a natural or non-natural amino acid;
B is a natural or non-natural amino acid, amino acid analog,
[—NH-L3-CO—], [—NH-L3-SO2—], or [—NH-L3-];
R1 and R2 are independently —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heteroalkyl, or heterocycloalkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-, or part of a cyclic structure with an E residue;
R3 is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, optionally substituted with R5;
L is a macrocycle-forming linker of the formula -L4-L2-;
L1 and L2 are independently alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, cycloalkylene, heterocycloalkylene, cycloarylene, heterocycloarylene, or [—R4—K—R4—]n, each being optionally substituted with R5;
each R4 is alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, cycloalkylene, heterocycloalkylene, arylene, or heteroarylene;
each K is O, S, SO, SO2, CO, CO2, or CONR3;
each R5 is independently halogen, alkyl, —OR6, —N(R6)2, —SR6, —SOR6, —SO2R6, —CO2R6, a fluorescent moiety, a radioisotope or a therapeutic agent;
each R6 is independently —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, a fluorescent moiety, a radioisotope or a therapeutic agent;
R7 is —H, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, heteroalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, cycloaryl, or heterocycloaryl, optionally substituted with R5;
v and w are independently integers from 1-1000;
u, x, y and z are independently integers from 0-10; and
n is an integer from 1-5.
In one example, at least one of R1 and R2 is alkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-. In another example, both R1 and R2 are independently alkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-. In some embodiments, at least one of R1 and R2 is methyl. In other embodiments, R1 and R2 are methyl.
In some embodiments of the invention, x+y+z is at least 1. In other embodiments of the invention, x+y+z is at least 2. In other embodiments of the invention, x+y+z is 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10. Each occurrence of A, B, C, D or E in a macrocycle or macrocycle precursor of the invention is independently selected. For example, a sequence represented by the formula [A]x, when x is 3, encompasses embodiments where the amino acids are not identical, e.g. Gln-Asp-Ala as well as embodiments where the amino acids are identical, e.g. Gln-Gln-Gln. This applies for any value of x, y, or z in the indicated ranges.
In some embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention comprises a secondary structure which is a helix and R is —H, allowing intrahelical hydrogen bonding. In some embodiments, at least one of A, B, C, D or E is an α,α-disubstituted amino acid. In one example, 13 is an α,α-disubstituted amino acid. For instance, at least one of A, B, C, D or E is 2-aminoisobutyric acid. In other embodiments, at least one of A, B, C, D or E is
In other embodiments, the length of the macrocycle-forming linker L as measured from a first Cα to a second Cα is selected to stabilize a desired secondary peptide structure, such as a helix (including a 310 helix or α-helix) formed by residues of the peptidomimetic macrocycle including, but not necessarily limited to, those between the first Cα to a second Cα.
Exemplary embodiments of the macrocycle-forming linker -L1-L2- are shown below.
Preparation of Peptidomimetic Macrocycles
Peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention may be prepared by any of a variety of methods known in the art. For example, any of the residues indicated by “X” in Table 1 may be substituted with a residue capable of forming a crosslinker with a second residue in the same molecule or a precursor of such a residue.
Various methods to effect formation of peptidomimetic macrocycles are known in the art. For example, the preparation of peptidomimetic macrocycles of Formula I is described in Schafmeister et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122:5891-5892 (2000); Schafmeister & Verdine, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122:5891 (2005); Walensky et al, Science 305:1466-1470 (2004); and U.S. Pat. No. 7,192,713. The α,α-disubstituted amino acids and amino acid precursors disclosed in the cited references may be employed in synthesis of the peptidomimetic macrocycle precursor polypeptides. For example, the “S5-olefin amino acid” is (S)-α-(2′-pentenyl) alanine and the “R8 olefin amino acid” is (R)-α-(2′-octenyl) alanine. Following incorporation of such amino acids into precursor polypeptides, the terminal olefins are reacted with a metathesis catalyst, leading to the formation of the peptidomimetic macrocycle.
In other embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention are of Formula IV or IVa. Methods for the preparation of such macrocycles are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,202,332.
In some embodiments, the synthesis of these peptidomimetic macrocycles involves a multi-step process that features the synthesis of a peptidomimetic precursor containing an azide moiety and an alkyne moiety; followed by contacting the peptidomimetic precursor with a macrocyclization reagent to generate a triazole-linked peptidomimetic macrocycle. Such a process is described, for example, in U.S. application Ser. No. 12/037,041, filed on Feb. 25, 2008. Macrocycles or macrocycle precursors are synthesized, for example, by solution phase or solid-phase methods, and can contain both naturally-occurring and non-naturally-occurring amino acids. See, for example, Hunt, “The Non-Protein Amino Acids” in Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Amino Acids, edited by G. C. Barrett, Chapman and Hall, 1985.
In some embodiments, an azide is linked to the α-carbon of a residue and an alkyne is attached to the α-carbon of another residue. In some embodiments, the azide moieties are azido-analogs of amino acids L-lysine, D-lysine, alpha-methyl-L-lysine, alpha-methyl-D-lysine, L-omithine, D-ornithine, alpha-methyl-L-omithine or alpha-methyl-D-ornithine. In another embodiment, the alkyne moiety is L-propargylglycine. In yet other embodiments, the alkyne moiety is an amino acid selected from the group consisting of L-propargylglycine, D-propargylglycine, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-4-pentynoic acid, (R)-2-amino-2-methyl-4-pentynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-5-hexynoic acid, (R)-2-amino-2-methyl-5-hexynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-6-heptynoic acid, (R)-2-amino-2-methyl-6-heptynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-7-octynoic acid, (R)-2-amino-2-methyl-7-octynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-8-nonynoic acid and (R)-2-amino-2-methyl-8-nonynoic acid.
In some embodiments, the invention provides a method for synthesizing a peptidomimetic macrocycle, the method comprising the steps of contacting a peptidomimetic precursor of Formula V or Formula VI:
with a macrocyclization reagent;
wherein v, w, x, y, z, A, B, C, D, E, R1, R2, R7, R8, L1 and L2 are as defined for Formula (II); R12 is —H when the macrocyclization reagent is a Cu reagent and R12 is —H or alkyl when the macrocyclization reagent is a Ru reagent; and further wherein said contacting step results in a covalent linkage being formed between the alkyne and azide moiety in Formula III or Formula IV. For example, R12 may be methyl when the macrocyclization reagent is a Ru reagent.
In the peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention, at least one of R1 and R2 is alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heteroalkyl, or heterocycloalkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-. In some embodiments, both R1 and R2 are independently alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, heteroalkyl, or heterocycloalkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-. In some embodiments, at least one of A, B, C, D or E is an α,α-disubstituted amino acid. In one example, B is an α,α-disubstituted amino acid. For instance, at least one of A, B, C, D or E is 2-aminoisobutyric acid.
For example, at least one of R1 and R2 is alkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-. In another example, both R1 and R2 are independently alkyl, unsubstituted or substituted with halo-. In some embodiments, at least one of R1 and R2 is methyl. In other embodiments, R1 and R2 are methyl. The macrocyclization reagent may be a Cu reagent or a Ru reagent.
In some embodiments, the peptidomimetic precursor is purified prior to the contacting step. In other embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycle is purified after the contacting step. In still other embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycle is refolded after the contacting step. The method may be performed in solution, or, alternatively, the method may be performed on a solid support.
Also envisioned herein is performing the method of the invention in the presence of a target macromolecule that binds to the peptidomimetic precursor or peptidomimetic macrocycle under conditions that favor said binding. In some embodiments, the method is performed in the presence of a target macromolecule that binds preferentially to the peptidomimetic precursor or peptidomimetic macrocycle under conditions that favor said binding. The method may also be applied to synthesize a library of peptidomimetic macrocycles.
In some embodiments, the alkyne moiety of the peptidomimetic precursor of Formula V or Formula VI is a sidechain of an amino acid selected from the group consisting of L-propargylglycine, D-propargylglycine, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-4-pentynoic acid, (R)-2-amino-2-methyl-4-pentynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-5-hexynoic acid, (R)-2-amino-2-methyl-5-hexynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-6-heptynoic acid, (R)-2-amino-2-methyl-6-heptynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-7-octynoic acid, (R)-2-amino-2-methyl-7-octynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-8-nonynoic acid, and (R)-2-amino-2-methyl-8-nonynoic acid. In other embodiments, the azide moiety of the peptidomimetic precursor of Formula V or Formula VI is a sidechain of an amino acid selected from the group consisting of ε-azido-L-lysine, ε-azido-D-lysine, ε-azido-α-methyl-L-lysine, ε-azido-α-methyl-D-lysine, δ-azido-α-methyl-L-omithine, and δ-azido-α-methyl-D-ornithine.
In some embodiments, x+y+z is 2, and A, B and C are independently natural or non-natural amino acids. In other embodiments, x+y+z is 3 or 6, and A, B and C are independently natural or non-natural amino acids.
In some embodiments, the contacting step is performed in a solvent selected from the group consisting of protic solvent, aqueous solvent, organic solvent, and mixtures thereof. For example, the solvent may be chosen from the group consisting of H2O, THF, THF/H2O, tBuOH/H2O, DMF, DIPEA, CH3CN or CH2Cl2, ClCH2CH2Cl or a mixture thereof. The solvent may be a solvent which favors helix formation.
Alternative but equivalent protecting groups, leaving groups or reagents are substituted, and certain of the synthetic steps are performed in alternative sequences or orders to produce the desired compounds. Synthetic chemistry transformations and protecting group methodologies (protection and deprotection) useful in synthesizing the compounds described herein include, for example, those such as described in Larock, Comprehensive Organic Transformations, VCH Publishers (1989); Greene and Wuts, Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 2d. Ed., John Wiley and Sons (1991); Fieser and Fieser, Fieser and Fieser's Reagents for Organic Synthesis, John Wiley and Sons (1994); and Paquette, ed., Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis, John Wiley and Sons (1995), and subsequent editions thereof.
In some embodiments, peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention have the structure (SEQ ID NOS 59-62, respectively, in order of appearance):
The influenza PB1 peptidomimetic macrocycles shown above are also identified as SP-8, SP-16, SP-13 and SP-41, respectively. In other embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention has the structure (SEQ ID NOS 63-65, respectively, in order of appearance):
Preparation of Peptidomimetic Macrocycles.
The peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention are made, for example, by chemical synthesis methods, such as described in Fields et al., Chapter 3 in Synthetic Peptides: A User's Guide, ed. Grant, W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, N.Y., 1992, p. 77. Hence, for example, peptides are synthesized using the automated Merrifield techniques of solid phase synthesis with the amine protected by either tBoc or Fmoc chemistry using side chain protected amino acids on, for example, an automated peptide synthesizer (e.g., Applied Biosystems (Foster City, Calif.), Model 430A, 431, or 433).
One manner of producing the peptidomimetic precursors and peptidomimetic macrocycles described herein uses solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS). The C-terminal amino acid is attached to a cross-linked polystyrene resin via an acid labile bond with a linker molecule. This resin is insoluble in the solvents used for synthesis, making it relatively simple and fast to wash away excess reagents and by-products. The N-terminus is protected with the Fmoc group, which is stable in acid, but removable by base. Side chain functional groups are protected as necessary with base stable, acid labile groups.
Longer peptidomimetic precursors are produced, for example, by conjoining individual synthetic peptides using native chemical ligation. Alternatively, the longer synthetic peptides are biosynthesized by well known recombinant DNA and protein expression techniques. Such techniques are provided in well-known standard manuals with detailed protocols. To construct a gene encoding a peptidomimetic precursor of this invention, the amino acid sequence is reverse translated to obtain a nucleic acid sequence encoding the amino acid sequence, preferably with codons that are optimum for the organism in which the gene is to be expressed. Next, a synthetic gene is made, typically by synthesizing oligonucleotides which encode the peptide and any regulatory elements, if necessary. The synthetic gene is inserted in a suitable cloning vector and transfected into a host cell. The peptide is then expressed under suitable conditions appropriate for the selected expression system and host. The peptide is purified and characterized by standard methods.
The peptidomimetic precursors are made, for example, in a high-throughput, combinatorial fashion using, for example, a high-throughput polychannel combinatorial synthesizer (e.g., Thuramed TETRAS multichannel peptide synthesizer from CreoSalus, Louisville, Ky. or Model Apex 396 multichannel peptide synthesizer from AAPPTEC, Inc., Louisville, Ky.).
The following synthetic schemes are provided solely to illustrate the present invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention, as described herein. To simplify the drawings, the illustrative schemes depict azido amino acid analogs ε-azido-α-methyl-L-lysine and ε-azido-α-methyl-D-lysine, and alkyne amino acid analogs L-propargylglycine, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-4-pentynoic acid, and (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-6-heptynoic acid. Thus, in the following synthetic schemes, each R1, R2, R7 and R8 is —H; each L1 is —(CH2)4—; and each L2 is —(CH2)—. However, as noted throughout the detailed description above, many other amino acid analogs can be employed in which R1, R2, R7, R8, L1 and L2 can be independently selected from the various structures disclosed herein.
Synthetic Scheme 1 describes the preparation of several compounds of the invention. Ni(II) complexes of Schiff bases derived from the chiral auxiliary (S)-2-[N—(N′-benzylpropyl)amino]benzophenone (BPB) and amino acids such as glycine or alanine are prepared as described in Belokon et al. (1998), Tetrahedron Asymm. 9:4249-4252. The resulting complexes are subsequently reacted with alkylating reagents comprising an azido or alkynyl moiety to yield enantiomerically enriched compounds of the invention. If desired, the resulting compounds can be protected for use in peptide synthesis.
In the general method for the synthesis of peptidomimetic macrocycles shown in Synthetic Scheme 2, the peptidomimetic precursor contains an azide moiety and an alkyne moiety and is synthesized by solution-phase or solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) using the commercially available amino acid N-α-Fmoc-L-propargylglycine and the N-α-Fmoc-protected forms of the amino acids (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-4-pentynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-6-heptynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-6-heptynoic acid, N-methyl-ε-azido-L-lysine, and N-methyl-ε-azido-D-lysine. The peptidomimetic precursor is then deprotected and cleaved from the solid-phase resin by standard conditions (e.g., strong acid such as 95% TFA). The peptidomimetic precursor is reacted as a crude mixture or is purified prior to reaction with a macrocyclization reagent such as a Cu(I) in organic or aqueous solutions (Rostovtsev et al. (2002), Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41:2596-2599; Tornoe et al. (2002), J. Org. Chem. 67:3057-3064; Deiters et al. (2003), J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:11782-11783; Punna et al. (2005), Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44:2215-2220). In one embodiment, the triazole forming reaction is performed under conditions that favor helix formation. In one embodiment, the macrocyclization step is performed in a solvent chosen from the group consisting of H2O, THF, CH3CN, DMF, DIPEA, tBuOH or a mixture thereof. In another embodiment, the macrocyclization step is performed in DMF. In some embodiments, the macrocyclization step is performed in a buffered aqueous or partially aqueous solvent.
In the general method for the synthesis of peptidomimetic macrocycles shown in Synthetic Scheme 3, the peptidomimetic precursor contains an azide moiety and an alkyne moiety and is synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) using the commercially available amino acid N-α-Fmoc-L-propargylglycine and the N-α-Fmoc-protected forms of the amino acids (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-4-pentynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-6-heptynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-6-heptynoic acid, N-methyl-ε-azido-L-lysine, and N-methyl-ε-azido-D-lysine. The peptidomimetic precursor is reacted with a macrocyclization reagent such as a Cu(I) reagent on the resin as a crude mixture (Rostovtsev et al. (2002), Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41:2596-2599; Tornoe et al. (2002), J. Org. Chem. 67:3057-3064; Deiters et al. (2003), J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:11782-11783; Punna et al. (2005), Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44:2215-2220). The resultant triazole-containing peptidomimetic macrocycle is then deprotected and cleaved from the solid-phase resin by standard conditions (e.g., strong acid such as 95% TFA). In some embodiments, the macrocyclization step is performed in a solvent chosen from the group consisting of CH2Cl2, ClCH2CH2Cl, DMF, THF, NMP, DIPEA, 2,6-lutidine, pyridine, DMSO, H2O or a mixture thereof. In some embodiments, the macrocyclization step is performed in a buffered aqueous or partially aqueous solvent.
In the general method for the synthesis of peptidomimetic macrocycles shown in Synthetic Scheme 4, the peptidomimetic precursor contains an azide moiety and an alkyne moiety and is synthesized by solution-phase or solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) using the commercially available amino acid N-α-Fmoc-L-propargylglycine and the N-α-Fmoc-protected forms of the amino acids (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-4-pentynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-6-heptynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-6-heptynoic acid, N-methyl-ε-azido-L-lysine, and N-methyl-ε-azido-D-lysine. The peptidomimetic precursor is then deprotected and cleaved from the solid-phase resin by standard conditions (e.g., strong acid such as 95% TFA). The peptidomimetic precursor is reacted as a crude mixture or is purified prior to reaction with a macrocyclization reagent such as a Ru(II) reagents, for example Cp*RuCl(PPh3)2 or [Cp*RuCl]4 (Rasmussen et al. (2007), Org. Lett. 9:5337-5339; Zhang et al. (2005), J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127:15998-15999). In some embodiments, the macrocyclization step is performed in a solvent chosen from the group consisting of DMF, CH3CN and THF.
In the general method for the synthesis of peptidomimetic macrocycles shown in Synthetic Scheme 5, the peptidomimetic precursor contains an azide moiety and an alkyne moiety and is synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) using the commercially available amino acid N-α-Fmoc-L-propargylglycine and the N-α-Fmoc-protected forms of the amino acids (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-4-pentynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-6-heptynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-2-methyl-6-heptynoic acid, N-methyl-ε-azido-L-lysine, and N-methyl-ε-azido-D-lysine. The peptidomimetic precursor is reacted with a macrocyclization reagent such as a Ru(H) reagent on the resin as a crude mixture. For example, the reagent can be Cp*RuCl(PPh3)2 or [Cp*RuCl]4 (Rasmussen et al. (2007), Org. Lett. 9:5337-5339; Zhang et al. (2005), J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127:15998-15999). In some embodiments, the macrocyclization step is performed in a solvent chosen from the group consisting of CH2Cl2, ClCH2CH2Cl, CH3CN, DMF, and THF.
The present invention contemplates the use of non-naturally-occurring amino acids and amino acid analogs in the synthesis of the peptidomimetic macrocycles described herein. Any amino acid or amino acid analog amenable to the synthetic methods employed for the synthesis of stable triazole containing peptidomimetic macrocycles can be used in the present invention. For example, L-propargylglycine is contemplated as a useful amino acid in the present invention. However, other alkyne-containing amino acids that contain a different amino acid side chain are also useful in the invention. For example, L-propargylglycine contains one methylene unit between the α-carbon of the amino acid and the alkyne of the amino acid side chain. The invention also contemplates the use of amino acids with multiple methylene units between the α-carbon and the alkyne. Also, the azido-analogs of amino acids L-lysine, D-lysine, alpha-methyl-L-lysine, and alpha-methyl-D-lysine are contemplated as useful amino acids in the present invention. However, other terminal azide amino acids that contain a different amino acid side chain are also useful in the invention. For example, the azido-analog of L-lysine contains four methylene units between the α-carbon of the amino acid and the terminal azide of the amino acid side chain. The invention also contemplates the use of amino acids with fewer than or greater than four methylene units between the α-carbon and the terminal azide. Table 2 shows some amino acids useful in the preparation of peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention.
Table 2 shows exemplary amino acids useful in the preparation of peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention.
In some embodiments the amino acids and amino acid analogs are of the D-configuration. In other embodiments they are of the L-configuration. In some embodiments, some of the amino acids and amino acid analogs contained in the peptidomimetic are of the D-configuration while some of the amino acids and amino acid analogs are of the L-configuration. In some embodiments the amino acid analogs are α,α-disubstituted, such as α-methyl-L-propargylglycine, α-methyl-D-propargylglycine, ε-azido-alpha-methyl-L-lysine, and ε-azido-alpha-methyl-D-lysine. In some embodiments the amino acid analogs are N-alkylated, e.g., N-methyl-L-propargylglycine, N-methyl-D-propargylglycine, N-methyl-ε-azido-L-lysine, and N-methyl-ε-azido-D-lysine.
In some embodiments, the —NH moiety of the amino acid is protected using a protecting group, including without limitation -Fmoc and -Boc. In other embodiments, the amino acid is not protected prior to synthesis of the peptidomimetic macrocycle.
In other embodiments, peptidomimetic macrocycles of Formula III are synthesized. The preparation of such macrocycles is described, for example, in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/957,325, filed on Dec. 17, 2007. The following synthetic schemes describe the preparation of such compounds. To simplify the drawings, the illustrative schemes depict amino acid analogs derived from L- or D-cysteine, in which L1 and L3 are both —(CH2)—. However, as noted throughout the detailed description above, many other amino acid analogs can be employed in which L1 and L3 can be independently selected from the various structures disclosed herein. The symbols “[AA]m”, “[AA]n”, “[AA]o” represent a sequence of amide bond-linked moieties such as natural or unnatural amino acids. As described previously, each occurrence of “AA” is independent of any other occurrence of “AA”, and a formula such as “[AA]m” encompasses, for example, sequences of non-identical amino acids as well as sequences of identical amino acids.
In Scheme 6, the peptidomimetic precursor contains two —SH moieties and is synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) using commercially available N-α-Fmoc amino acids such as N-α-Fmoc-S-trityl-L-cysteine or N-α-Fmoc-S-trityl-D-cysteine. Alpha-methylated versions of D-cysteine or L-cysteine are generated by known methods (Seebach et al. (1996), Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 35:2708-2748, and references therein) and then converted to the appropriately protected N-α-Fmoc-S-trityl monomers by known methods (“Bioorganic Chemistry: Peptides and Proteins”, Oxford University Press, New York: 1998, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference). The precursor peptidomimetic is then deprotected and cleaved from the solid-phase resin by standard conditions (e.g., strong acid such as 95% TFA). The precursor peptidomimetic is reacted as a crude mixture or is purified prior to reaction with X-L2-Y in organic or aqueous solutions. In some embodiments the alkylation reaction is performed under dilute conditions (i.e. 0.15 mmol/L) to favor macrocyclization and to avoid polymerization. In some embodiments, the alkylation reaction is performed in organic solutions such as liquid NH3 (Mosberg et al. (1985), J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107:2986-2987; Szewczuk et al. (1992), Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 40: 233-242), NH3/MeOH, or NH3/DMF (Or et al. (1991), J. Org. Chem. 56:3146-3149). In other embodiments, the alkylation is performed in an aqueous solution such as 6M guanidinium HCL, pH 8 (Brunel et al. (2005), Chem. Commun. (20):2552-2554). In other embodiments, the solvent used for the alkylation reaction is DMF or
In Scheme 7, the precursor peptidomimetic contains two or more —SH moieties, of which two are specially protected to allow their selective deprotection and subsequent alkylation for macrocycle formation. The precursor peptidomimetic is synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) using commercially available N-α-Fmoc amino acids such as N-α-Fmoc-S-p-methoxytrityl-L-cysteine or N-α-Fmoc-S-p-methoxytrityl-D-cysteine. Alpha-methylated versions of D-cysteine or L-cysteine are generated by known methods (Seebach et al. (1996), Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 35:2708-2748, and references therein) and then converted to the appropriately protected N-α-Fmoc-S-p-methoxytrityl monomers by known methods (Bioorganic Chemistry: Peptides and Proteins, Oxford University Press, New York: 1998, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference). The Mmt protecting groups of the peptidomimetic precursor are then selectively cleaved by standard conditions (e.g., mild acid such as 1% TFA in DCM). The precursor peptidomimetic is then reacted on the resin with X-L2-Y in an organic solution. For example, the reaction takes place in the presence of a hindered base such as diisopropylethylamine. In some embodiments, the alkylation reaction is performed in organic solutions such as liquid NH3 (Mosberg et al. (1985), J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107:2986-2987; Szewczuk et al. (1992), Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 40:233-242), NH3/MeOH or NH3/DMF (Or et al. (1991), J. Org. Chem. 56:3146-3149). In other embodiments, the alkylation reaction is performed in DMF or dichloroethane. The peptidomimetic macrocycle is then deprotected and cleaved from the solid-phase resin by standard conditions (e.g., strong acid such as 95% TFA).
In Scheme 8, the peptidomimetic precursor contains two or more —SH moieties, of which two are specially protected to allow their selective deprotection and subsequent alkylation for macrocycle formation. The peptidomimetic precursor is synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) using commercially available N-α-Fmoc amino acids such as N-α-Fmoc-S-p-methoxytrityl-L-cysteine, N-α-Fmoc-S-p-methoxytrityl-D-cysteine, N-α-Fmoc-S—S-t-butyl-L-cysteine, and N-α-Fmoc-S—S-t-butyl-D-cysteine. Alpha-methylated versions of D-cysteine or L-cysteine are generated by known methods (Secbach et al. (1996), Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 35:2708-2748, and references therein) and then converted to the appropriately protected N-α-Fmoc-S-p-methoxytrityl or N-α-Fmoc-S—S-t-butyl monomers by known methods (Bioorganic Chemistry: Peptides and Proteins, Oxford University Press, New York: 1998, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference). The S—S-tButyl protecting group of the peptidomimetic precursor is selectively cleaved by known conditions (e.g., 20% 2-mercaptoethanol in DMF, reference: Galande et al. (2005), J. Comb. Chem. 7:174-177). The precursor peptidomimetic is then reacted on the resin with a molar excess of X-L2-Y in an organic solution. For example, the reaction takes place in the presence of a hindered base such as diisopropylethylamine. The Mmt protecting group of the peptidomimetic precursor is then selectively cleaved by standard conditions (e.g., mild acid such as 1% TFA in DCM). The peptidomimetic precursor is then cyclized on the resin by treatment with a hindered base in organic solutions. In some embodiments, the alkylation reaction is performed in organic solutions such as NH3/MeOH or NH3/DMF (Or et al. (1991), J. Org. Chem. 56:3146-3149). The peptidomimetic macrocycle is then deprotected and cleaved from the solid-phase resin by standard conditions (e.g., strong acid such as 95% TFA).
In Scheme 9, the peptidomimetic precursor contains two L-cysteine moieties. The peptidomimetic precursor is synthesized by known biological expression systems in living cells or by known in vitro, cell-free, expression methods. The precursor peptidomimetic is reacted as a crude mixture or is purified prior to reaction with X-L2-Y in organic or aqueous solutions. In some embodiments the alkylation reaction is performed under dilute conditions (i.e. 0.15 mmol/L) to favor macrocyclization and to avoid polymerization. In some embodiments, the alkylation reaction is performed in organic solutions such as liquid NH3 (Mosberg et al. (1985), J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107:2986-2987; Szewczuk et al. (1992), Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 40:233-242), NH3/MeOH, or NH3/DMF (Or et al. (1991), J. Org. Chem. 56:3146-3149). In other embodiments, the alkylation is performed in an aqueous solution such as 6M guanidinium HCL, pH 8 (Brunel et al. (2005), Chem. Commun. (20):2552-2554). In other embodiments, the alkylation is performed in DMF or dichloroethane. In another embodiment, the alkylation is performed in non-denaturing aqueous solutions, and in yet another embodiment the alkylation is performed under conditions that favor helical structure formation. In yet another embodiment, the alkylation is performed under conditions that favor the binding of the precursor peptidomimetic to another protein, so as to induce the formation of the bound helical conformation during the alkylation.
Various embodiments for X and Y are envisioned which are suitable for reacting with thiol groups. In general, each X or Y is independently be selected from the general category shown in Table 5. For example, X and Y are halides such as —Cl, —Br or —I. Any of the macrocycle-forming linkers described herein may be used in any combination with any of the sequences shown in Tables 1-4 and also with any of the R-substituents indicated herein.
The present invention contemplates the use of both naturally-occurring and non-naturally-occurring amino acids and amino acid analogs in the synthesis of the peptidomimetic macrocycles of Formula (III). Any amino acid or amino acid analog amenable to the synthetic methods employed for the synthesis of stable bis-sulfhydryl containing peptidomimetic macrocycles can be used in the present invention. For example, cysteine is contemplated as a useful amino acid in the present invention. However, sulfur containing amino acids other than cysteine that contain a different amino acid side chain are also useful. For example, cysteine contains one methylene unit between the α-carbon of the amino acid and the terminal —SH of the amino acid side chain. The invention also contemplates the use of amino acids with multiple methylene units between the α-carbon and the terminal —SH. Non-limiting examples include α-methyl-L-homocysteine and α-methyl-D-homocysteine. In some embodiments the amino acids and amino acid analogs are of the D-configuration. In other embodiments they are of the L-configuration. In some embodiments, some of the amino acids and amino acid analogs contained in the peptidomimetic are of the D-configuration while some of the amino acids and amino acid analogs are of the L-configuration. In some embodiments the amino acid analogs are α,α-disubstituted, such as α-methyl-L-cysteine and α-methyl-D-cysteine.
The invention includes macrocycles in which macrocycle-forming linkers are used to link two or more —SH moieties in the peptidomimetic precursors to form the peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention. As described above, the macrocycle-forming linkers impart conformational rigidity, increased metabolic stability and/or increased cell penetrability. Furthermore, in some embodiments, the macrocycle-forming linkages stabilize a helical secondary structure of the peptidomimetic macrocyles. The macrocycle-forming linkers are of the formula X-L2-Y, wherein both X and Y are the same or different moieties, as defined above. Both X and Y have the chemical characteristics that allow one macrocycle-forming linker -L2- to bis alkylate the bis-sulfhydryl containing peptidomimetic precursor. As defined above, the linker -L2- includes alkylene, alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, cycloalkylene, heterocycloalkylene, cycloarylene, or heterocycloarylene, or —R4—K—R4—, all of which can be optionally substituted with an R5 group, as defined above. Furthermore, one to three carbon atoms within the macrocycle-forming linkers other than the carbons attached to the —SH of the sulfhydryl containing amino acid, are optionally substituted with a heteroatom such as N, S or O.
The L2 component of the macrocycle-forming linker X-L2-Y may be varied in length depending on, among other things, the distance between the positions of the two amino acid analogs used to form the peptidomimetic macrocycle. Furthermore, as the lengths of L1 and/or L3 components of the macrocycle-forming linker are varied, the length of L2 can also be varied in order to create a linker of appropriate overall length for forming a stable peptidomimetic macrocycle. For example, if the amino acid analogs used are varied by adding an additional methylene unit to each of L1 and L3, the length of L2 are decreased in length by the equivalent of approximately two methylene units to compensate for the increased lengths of L1 and L3.
In some embodiments, L2 is an alkylene group of the formula —(CH2)n—, where n is an integer between about 1 and about 15. For example, n is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10. In other embodiments, L2 is an alkenylene group. In still other embodiments, L2 is an aryl group.
Table 4 shows additional embodiments of X-L2-Y groups.
Additional methods of forming peptidomimetic macrocycles which are envisioned as suitable to perform the present invention include those disclosed by Mustapa, M. Firouz Mohd et al., J. Org. Chem (2003), 68, pp. 8193-8198; Yang, Bin et al. Bioorg Med. Chem. Left. (2004), 14, pp. 1403-1406; U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,851; U.S. Pat. No. 5,446,128; U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,483; U.S. Pat. No. 6,713,280; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,202,332. In such embodiments, aminoacid precursors are used containing an additional substituent R— at the alpha position. Such aminoacids are incorporated into the macrocycle precursor at the desired positions, which may be at the positions where the crosslinker is substituted or, alternatively, elsewhere in the sequence of the macrocycle precursor. Cyclization of the precursor is then effected according to the indicated method.
In some embodiments, it is desirable to modify the configuration of the resulting peptidomimetic macrocycle. For instance, when a 310 helical configuration is more desirable, additional substitutions or modifications to the macrocycle can be made to induce or bias such conformations, such as substituting 2-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib) for one or more amino acids in the sequence of the invention. See, for example, Boal et. al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6986-6987. In one embodiments, the helical macrocycle of the invention comprises at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more Aib substitutions.
Assays
The properties of the peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention are assayed, for example, by using the methods described below. In some embodiments, a peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention has improved biological properties relative to a corresponding polypeptide lacking the substituents described herein.
Assay to Determine Helicity.
In solution, the secondary structure of polypeptides with helical domains will reach a dynamic equilibrium between random coil structures and helical structures, often expressed as a “percent helicity”. Thus, for example, unmodified helical domains may be predominantly random coils in solution, with helical content usually under 25%. Peptidomimetic macrocycles with optimized linkers, on the other hand, possess, for example, a helicity that is at least two-fold greater than that of a corresponding uncrosslinked polypeptide. In some embodiments, macrocycles of the invention will possess a helicity of greater than 50%. To assay the helicity of peptidomimetic macrocyles of the invention, the compounds are dissolved in an aqueous solution (e.g. 50 mM potassium phosphate solution at pH 7, or distilled H2O, to concentrations of 25-50 μM). Circular dichroism (CD) spectra are obtained on a spectropolarimeter (e.g., Jasco J-710) using standard measurement parameters (e.g. temperature, 20° C.; wavelength, 190-260 nm; step resolution, 0.5 nm; speed, 20 nm/sec; accumulations, 10; response, 1 sec; bandwidth, 1 nm; path length, 0.1 cm). The helical content of each peptide is calculated by dividing the mean residue ellipticity (e.g. [Φ]222obs) by the reported value for a model helical decapeptide (Yang et al. (1986), Methods Enzymol. 130:208)).
Assay to Determine Melting Temperature (Tm).
A peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention comprising a secondary structure such as a helix exhibits, for example, a higher melting temperature than a corresponding uncrosslinked polypeptide. Typically peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention exhibit Tm of >60° C. representing a highly stable structure in aqueous solutions. To assay the effect of macrocycle formation on melting temperature, peptidomimetic macrocycles or unmodified peptides are dissolved in distilled H2O (e.g. at a final concentration of 50 μM) and the Tm is determined by measuring the change in ellipticity over a temperature range (e.g. 4 to 95° C.) on a spectropolarimeter (e.g., Jasco J-710) using standard parameters (e.g. wavelength 222 nm; step resolution, 0.5 nm; speed, 20 nm/sec; accumulations, 10; response, 1 sec; bandwidth, 1 nm; temperature increase rate: 1° C./min; path length, 0.1 cm).
Protease Resistance Assay.
The amide bond of the peptide backbone is susceptible to hydrolysis by proteases, thereby rendering peptidic compounds vulnerable to rapid degradation in vivo. Peptide helix formation, however, typically buries the amide backbone and therefore may shield it from proteolytic cleavage. The peptidomimetic macrocycles of the present invention may be subjected to in vitro trypsin proteolysis to assess for any change in degradation rate compared to a corresponding uncrosslinked polypeptide. For example, the peptidomimetic macrocycle and a corresponding uncrosslinked polypeptide are incubated with trypsin agarose and the reactions quenched at various time points by centrifugation and subsequent HPLC injection to quantitate the residual substrate by ultraviolet absorption at 280 nm. Briefly, the peptidomimetic macrocycle and peptidomimetic precursor (5 mcg) are incubated with trypsin agarosc (Pierce) (S/E ˜125) for 0, 10, 20, 90, and 180 minutes. Reactions are quenched by tabletop centrifugation at high speed; remaining substrate in the isolated supernatant is quantified by HPLC-based peak detection at 280 nm. The proteolytic reaction displays first order kinetics and the rate constant, k, is determined from a plot of ln [S] versus time (k=−1×slope).
Ex Vivo Stability Assay.
Peptidomimetic macrocycles with optimized linkers possess, for example, an ex vivo half-life that is at least two-fold greater than that of a corresponding uncrosslinked polypeptide, and possess an ex vivo half-life of 12 hours or more. For ex vivo serum stability studies, a variety of assays may be used. For example, a peptidomimetic macrocycle and a corresponding uncrosslinked polypeptide (2 meg) are incubated with fresh mouse, rat and/or human serum (2 mL) at 37° C. for 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours. To determine the level of intact compound, the following procedure may be used: The samples are extracted by transferring 100 μl of sera to 2 ml centrifuge tubes followed by the addition of 10 μL of 50% formic acid and 500 μL acetonitrile and centrifugation at 14,000 RPM for 10 min at 4±2° C. The supernatants are then transferred to fresh 2 ml tubes and evaporated on Turbovap under N2<10 psi, 37° C. The samples are reconstituted in 100 μL, of 50:50 acetonitrile:water and submitted to LC-MS/MS analysis.
In Vitro Binding Assays.
To assess the binding and affinity of peptidomimetic macrocycles and peptidomimetic precursors to acceptor proteins, a fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) issued, for example. The FPA technique measures the molecular orientation and mobility using polarized light and fluorescent tracer. When excited with polarized light, fluorescent tracers (e.g., FITC) attached to molecules with high apparent molecular weights (e.g. FITC-labeled peptides bound to a large protein) emit higher levels of polarized fluorescence due to their slower rates of rotation as compared to fluorescent tracers attached to smaller molecules (e.g. FITC-labeled peptides that are free in solution).
For example, fluoresceinated peptidomimetic macrocycles (25 nM) are incubated with the acceptor protein (25-1000 nM) in binding buffer (140 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCL, pH 7.4) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Binding activity is measured, for example, by fluorescence polarization on a luminescence spectrophotometer (e.g. Perkin-Elmer LS50B). Kd values may be determined by nonlinear regression analysis using, for example, Graphpad Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, Calif.). A peptidomimetic macrocycle of the invention shows, in some instances, similar or lower Kd than a corresponding uncrosslinked polypeptide.
In Vitro Displacement Assays to Characterize Antagonists of Peptide-Protein Interactions.
To assess the binding and affinity of compounds that antagonize the interaction between a peptide and an acceptor protein, a fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) utilizing a fluoresceinated peptidomimetic macrocycle derived from a peptidomimetic precursor sequence is used, for example. The FPA technique measures the molecular orientation and mobility using polarized light and fluorescent tracer. When excited with polarized light, fluorescent tracers (e.g., FITC) attached to molecules with high apparent molecular weights (e.g. FITC-labeled peptides bound to a large protein) emit higher levels of polarized fluorescence due to their slower rates of rotation as compared to fluorescent tracers attached to smaller molecules (e.g. FITC-labeled peptides that are free in solution). A compound that antagonizes the interaction between the fluoresceinated peptidomimetic macrocycle and an acceptor protein will be detected in a competitive binding FPA experiment.
For example, putative antagonist compounds (1 nM to 1 mM) and a fluoresceinated peptidomimetic macrocycle (25 nM) are incubated with the acceptor protein (50 nM) in binding buffer (140 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCL, pH 7.4) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Antagonist binding activity is measured, for example, by fluorescence polarization on a luminescence spectrophotometer (e.g. Perkin-Elmer LS50B). Kd values may be determined by nonlinear regression analysis using, for example, Graphpad Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, Calif.).
Any class of molecule, such as small organic molecules, peptides, oligonucleotides or proteins can be examined as putative antagonists in this assay.
Binding Assays in Intact Cells.
It is possible to measure binding of peptides or peptidomimetic macrocycles to their natural acceptors in intact cells by immunoprecipitation experiments. For example, intact cells are incubated with fluoresceinated (FITC-labeled) compounds for 4 hrs in the absence of serum, followed by serum replacement and further incubation that ranges from 4-18 hrs. Cells are then pelleted and incubated in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 7.6], 150 mM NaCl, 1% CHAPS and protease inhibitor cocktail) for 10 minutes at 4° C. Extracts are centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 minutes and supernatants collected and incubated with 10 μl goat anti-FITC antibody for 2 hrs, rotating at 4° C. followed by further 2 hrs incubation at 4° C. with protein A/G Sepharose (50 μl of 50% bead slurry). After quick centrifugation, the pellets are washed in lysis buffer containing increasing salt concentration (e.g., 150, 300, 500 mM). The beads are then re-equilibrated at 150 mM NaCl before addition of SDS-containing sample buffer and boiling. After centrifugation, the supernatants are optionally electrophoresed using 4%-12% gradient Bis-Tris gels followed by transfer into Immobilon-P membranes. After blocking, blots are optionally incubated with an antibody that detects FITC and also with one or more antibodies that detect proteins that bind to the peptidomimetic macrocycle.
Cellular Penetrability Assays.
A peptidomimetic macrocycle is, for example, more cell penetrable compared to a corresponding uncrosslinked macrocycle. Peptidomimetic macrocycles with optimized linkers possess, for example, cell penetrability that is at least two-fold greater than a corresponding uncrosslinked macrocycle, and often 20% or more of the applied peptidomimetic macrocycle will be observed to have penetrated the cell after 4 hours. To measure the cell penetrability of peptidomimetic macrocycles and corresponding uncrosslinked macrocycle, intact cells are incubated with fluoresceinated peptidomimetic macrocycles or corresponding uncrosslinked macrocycle (10 μM) for 4 hrs in serum free media at 37° C., washed twice with media and incubated with trypsin (0.25%) for 10 min at 37° C. The cells are washed again and resuspended in PBS. Cellular fluorescence is analyzed, for example, by using either a FACS Calibur flow cytometer or Cellomics' KineticScan® HCS Reader.
In Vivo Stability Assay.
To investigate the in vivo stability of the peptidomimetic macrocycles, the compounds are, for example, administered to mice and/or rats by IV, IP, PO or inhalation routes at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 50 mg/kg and blood specimens withdrawn at 0′, 5′, 15′, 30′, 1 hr, 4 hrs, 8 hrs and 24 hours post-injection. Levels of intact compound in 25 μL of fresh scrum are then measured by LC-MS/MS as above.
In Vitro Testing for Inhibition of Influenza Replication
This influenza antiviral evaluation assay examines the effects of compounds at designated dose-response concentrations. See also Noah, J. W., W. Severson, D. L. Noah, L. Rasmussen, E. L. White, and C. B. Jonsson, Antiviral Res, 2007. 73(1): p. 50-9. Malin Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells are used in the assay to test the efficacy of the compounds in preventing the cytopathic effect (CPE) induced by influenza infection. Either Ribavirin or Tamiflu is included in each run as a positive control compound. Subconfluent cultures of MDCK cells are plated into 96-well plates for the analysis of cell viability (cytotoxicity) and antiviral activity (CPE). Drugs are added to the cells 24 hours later. At a designated time, the CPE wells also receive 100 tissue culture infectious doses (100 TCID50s) of titered influenza virus. 72 hours later the cell viability is determined. The effective compound concentrations which reduce viral-induced CPE by 25% (IC25), 50% (IC50), and 90% (IC90) are calculated by regression analysis with semi-log curve fitting. Cell viability is assessed using CellTiter-Glo (Promega). The toxic concentration of drug that reduces cell numbers by 50% and 90% (IC50 and TC90, respectively) are calculated as well. Selectivity (therapeutic) indices (SI=TC/IC) are also calculated.
In Vivo Testing for Inhibition of Influenza Replication
In vivo testing of compounds of the invention can be performed, including testing on mammals such as rats or ferrets. Because ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) are naturally susceptible to infection with human influenza A and B viruses and their disease resembles that of human influenza, these animals have been widely used as a model for influenza virus pathogenesis and immunity studies. Sec Sidwell, R. W. and D. F. Smec, Antiviral Res, 2000. 48(1): p. 1-16; and Colacino, J. M., D. C. DeLong, J. R. Nelson, W. A. Spitzer, J. Tang, F. Victor, and C. Y. Wu, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1990. 34(11): p. 2156-63. Ferrets are also the model of choice for the study of avian influenza virus H5N1 pathogenesis in mammals. See also Zitzow, L. A., T. Rowe, T. Morken, W.-J. Shieh, S. Zaki, and J. M. Katz, Pathogenesis of Avian Influenza A (H5N1) Viruses in Ferrets. 2002. p. 4420-4429. The activities of the PB1 Stapled Peptides can be compared to Ribavirin or Oseltamivir as a positive control.
Briefly, young adult male or female ferrets (five ferrets for each treatment group) that are serologically negative by hemagglutination inhibition assay for currently circulating human influenza A or B viruses are quarantined at least 4 days prior to infection in a BSL-3+ animal holding area, where they are housed in cages contained in bioclean portable laminar flow clean room enclosures (Lab Products, Seaford, Del.). Prior to infection, baseline temperatures are measured twice daily for at least 3 days. Ferrets are anesthetized with ketamine (25 mg/kg), xylazine (2 mg/kg), and atropine (0.05 mg/kg) by the intramuscular route and infected intranasally (i.n.) with virus/ml in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) delivered to the nostrils. Control animals are mock-infected with an equivalent dilution (1:30) of noninfectious allantoic fluid. Stapled Peptides are administered i.v. or i.p. one hour after virus infection.
Temperatures are measured twice daily using either a rectal thermometer or a subcutaneous implantable temperature transponder (BioMedic Data Systems, Inc., Seaford, Del.) with pre-infection values averaged to obtain a baseline temperature for each ferret. The change in temperature (in degrees Celsius) is calculated at each time point for each animal. Clinical signs of sneezing (before anesthesia), inappetence, dyspnea, and level of activity are assessed. A scoring system is also used to assess the activity level, and based on the daily scores for each animal in a group a relative inactivity index will be calculated. Rectal temperature and activity scores are used to assess the severity of influenza infection and the ability of Stapled Peptides to prevent flu symptoms.
Assaying Inhibition of Viral Polymerase Complex Assembly and Activity.
The technique of Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (“BiFC”) may be used to assay the compounds of the invention. In this technique, N- and C-terminal fragments of fluorescent proteins (e.g. GFP or its derivatives) are fused to interacting proteins. The two non-functional halves of the fluorophore, following the expression in cells, are brought into close proximity as a result of the specific protein interactions, which initiates folding of the fragments into an active protein and results in a detectable fluorescent signal at the site of the protein-protein complex. Thus, through BiFC, the specific interaction between PB1 and PA subunits can be visualized, quantified and localized within live cells. By disrupting PB1-PA interaction with a compound of the invention, the BiFC signal will be reduced, indicative of the presence of potential inhibitors targeting the assembly of PB1-PA complex. See Hemerka et. al., J. Virol. 2009, 3944-3955.
Pharmaceutical Compositions and Routes of Administration
The peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention also include pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives or prodrugs thereof. A “pharmaceutically acceptable derivative” means any pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester, salt of an ester, pro-drug or other derivative of a compound of this invention which, upon administration to a recipient, is capable of providing (directly or indirectly) a compound of this invention. Particularly favored pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives are those that increase the bioavailability of the compounds of the invention when administered to a mammal (e.g., by increasing absorption into the blood of an orally administered compound) or which increases delivery of the active compound to a biological compartment (e.g., the brain or lymphatic system) relative to the parent species. Some pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives include a chemical group which increases aqueous solubility or active transport across the gastrointestinal mucosa.
In some embodiments, the peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention are modified by covalently or non-covalently joining appropriate functional groups to enhance selective biological properties. Such modifications include those which increase biological penetration into a given biological compartment (e.g., blood, lymphatic system, central nervous system), increase oral availability, increase solubility to allow administration by injection, alter metabolism, and alter rate of excretion.
Pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the compounds of this invention include those derived from pharmaceutically acceptable inorganic and organic acids and bases. Examples of suitable acid salts include acetate, adipate, benzoate, benzenesulfonate, butyrate, citrate, digluconate, dodecylsulfate, formate, fumarate, glycolate, hemisulfate, heptanoate, hexanoate, hydrochloride, hydrobromide, hydroiodide, lactate, maleate, malonate, methanesulfonate, 2-naphthalenesulfonate, nicotinate, nitrate, palmoate, phosphate, picrate, pivalate, propionate, salicylate, succinate, sulfate, tartrate, tosylate and undecanoate. Salts derived from appropriate bases include alkali metal (e.g., sodium), alkaline earth metal (e.g., magnesium), ammonium and N-(alkyl)4+ salts.
For preparing pharmaceutical compositions from the compounds of the present invention, pharmaceutically acceptable carriers include either solid or liquid carriers. Solid form preparations include powders, tablets, pills, capsules, cachets, suppositories, and dispersible granules. A solid carrier can be one or more substances, which also acts as diluents, flavoring agents, binders, preservatives, tablet disintegrating agents, or an encapsulating material. Details on techniques for formulation and administration are well described in the scientific and patent literature, see, e.g., the latest edition of Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, Maack Publishing Co, Easton Pa.
In powders, the carrier is a finely divided solid, which is in a mixture with the finely divided active component. In tablets, the active component is mixed with the carrier having the necessary binding properties in suitable proportions and compacted in the shape and size desired.
Suitable solid excipients are carbohydrate or protein fillers include, but are not limited to sugars, including lactose, sucrose, mannitol, or sorbitol; starch from corn, wheat, rice, potato, or other plants; cellulose such as methyl cellulose, hydroxypropylmethyl-cellulose, or sodium carboxymethylcellulose; and gums including arabic and tragacanth; as well as proteins such as gelatin and collagen. If desired, disintegrating or solubilizing agents are added, such as the cross-linked polyvinyl pyrrolidone, agar, alginic acid, or a salt thereof, such as sodium alginate.
Liquid form preparations include solutions, suspensions, and emulsions, for example, water or water/propylene glycol solutions. For parenteral injection, liquid preparations can be formulated in solution in aqueous polyethylene glycol solution.
The pharmaceutical preparation is preferably in unit dosage form. In such form the preparation is subdivided into unit doses containing appropriate quantities of the active component. The unit dosage form can be a packaged preparation, the package containing discrete quantities of preparation, such as packeted tablets, capsules, and powders in vials or ampoules. Also, the unit dosage form can be a capsule, tablet, cachet, or lozenge itself; or it can be the appropriate number of any of these in packaged form.
When the compositions of this invention comprise a combination of a peptidomimetic macrocycle and one or more additional therapeutic or prophylactic agents, both the compound and the additional agent should be present at dosage levels of between about 1 to 100%, and more preferably between about 5 to 95% of the dosage normally administered in a monotherapy regimen. In some embodiments, the additional agents are administered separately, as part of a multiple dose regimen, from the compounds of this invention. Alternatively, those agents are part of a single dosage form, mixed together with the compounds of this invention in a single composition.
Methods of Use
Generally, the invention discloses peptidomimetic macrocycles useful in the treatment of viral disorders. For example, peptidomimetic macrocycles derived from the PB1 helix sequence, or peptidomimetic macrocycles that bind selectively to the PB1 peptide binding site of the PA protein, may selectively inhibit influenza RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. Peptidomimetic macrocycles derived from the PB2 helix sequence, or peptidomimetic macrocycles that bind selectively to the PB2 peptide binding site of the PB1 protein, may selectively inhibit influenza RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. When administered within a therapeutic window after infection, such peptidomimetic macrocycles may reduce the severity or duration of an influenza infection. When administered prophylactically, such peptidomimetic macrocycles may prevent infection by influenza viruses and thereby decrease the spread of influenza and reduce large-scale epidemics.
In one aspect, the present invention provides novel peptidomimetic macrocycles that are useful in competitive binding assays to identify agents which bind to the natural ligand(s) of the proteins or peptides upon which the peptidomimetic macrocycles am modeled. For example, in the PB1/PA system, labeled peptidomimetic macrocycles based on PB1 can be used in a PA binding assay along with small molecules that competitively bind to PA. Competitive binding studies allow for rapid in vitro evaluation and determination of drug candidates specific for the PB1/PA system. Such binding studies may be performed with any of the peptidomimetic macrocycles disclosed herein and their binding partners.
In other aspects, the present invention provides for both prophylactic and therapeutic methods of treating a subject infected with, at risk of, or susceptible to an influenza virus. These methods comprise administering an effective amount of a compound of the invention to a warm blooded animal, including a human. Tn some embodiments, the administration of the compounds of the present invention prevents the proliferation or transmission of an influenza virus.
As used herein, the term “treatment” is defined as the application or administration of a therapeutic agent to a patient, or application or administration of a therapeutic agent to an isolated tissue or cell line from a patient, who has a disease, a symptom of disease or a predisposition toward a disease, with the purpose to cure, heal, alleviate, relieve, alter, remedy, ameliorate, improve or affect the disease, the symptoms of disease or the predisposition toward disease.
In some embodiments, peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention are used to treat diseases induced by influenza viruses. Like other viruses, the replication of influenza virus involves six phases; transmission, entry, replication, biosynthesis, assembly, and exit. Entry occurs by endocytosis, replication and vRNP assembly takes place in the nucleus, and the virus buds from the plasma membrane. In the infected patient, the virus targets airway epithelial cells.
The methods described herein are also useful for development and/or identification of agents for the treatment of infections caused by viruses such as Abelson leukemia virus, Abelson murine leukemia virus, Abelson's virus, Acute laryngotracheobronchitis virus, Adelaide River virus, Adeno associated virus group, Adenovirus, African horse sickness virus, African swine fever virus, AIDS virus, Aleutian mink disease parvovirus, Alpharetrovirus, Alphavirus, ALV related virus, Amapari virus, Aphthovirus, Aquareovirus, Arbovirus, Arbovirus C, arbovirus group A, arbovirus group B, Arenavirus group, Argentine hemorrhagic fever virus, Argentine hemorrhagic fever virus, Arterivirus, Astrovirus, Ateline herpesvirus group, Aujezky's disease virus, Aura virus, Ausduk disease virus, Australian bat lyssavirus, Aviadenovirus, avian erythroblastosis virus, avian infectious bronchitis virus, avian leukemia virus, avian leukosis virus, avian lymphomatosis virus, avian myeloblastosis virus, avian paramyxovirus, avian pneumoencephalitis virus, avian reticuloendotheliosis virus, avian sarcoma virus, avian type C retrovirus group, Avihepadnavirus, Avipoxvirus, B virus, B19 virus, Babanki virus, baboon herpesvirus, baculovirus, Barmah Forest virus, Bebaru virus, Berrimah virus, Betaretrovirus, Birnavirus, Bittner virus, BK virus, Black Creek Canal virus, bluetongue virus, Bolivian hemorrhagic fever virus, Boma disease virus, border disease of sheep virus, boma virus, bovine alphaherpesvirus 1, bovine alphaherpesvirus 2, bovine coronavirus, bovine ephemeral fever virus, bovine immunodeficiency virus, bovine leukemia virus, bovine leukosis virus, bovine mammillitis virus, bovine papillomavirus, bovine papular stomatitis virus, bovine parvovirus, bovine syncytial virus, bovine type C oncovirus, bovine viral diarrhea virus, Buggy Creek virus, bullet shaped virus group, Bunyamwera virus supergroup, Bunyavirus, Burkitt's lymphoma virus, Bwamba Fever, CA virus, Calicivirus, California encephalitis virus, camelpox virus, canarypox virus, canid herpesvirus, canine coronavirus, canine distemper virus, canine herpesvirus, canine minute virus, canine parvovirus, Cano Delgadito virus, caprine arthritis virus, caprine encephalitis virus, Caprine Herpes Virus, Capripox virus, Cardiovirus, caviid herpesvirus 1, Cercopithecid herpesvirus 1, cercopithecine herpesvirus 1, Cercopithecine herpesvirus 2, Chandipura virus, Changuinola virus, channel catfish virus, Charkville virus, chickenpox virus, Chikungunya virus, chimpanzee herpesvirus, chub reovirus, chum salmon virus, Cocal virus, Coho salmon reovirus, coital exanthema virus, Colorado tick fever virus, Coltivirus, Columbia SK virus, common cold virus, contagious ecthyma virus, contagious pustular dermatitis virus, Coronavirus, Corriparta virus, coryza virus, cowpox virus, coxsackie virus, CPV (cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus), cricket paralysis virus, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, croup associated virus, Cryptovirus, Cypovirus, Cytomegalovirus, cytomegalovirus group, cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus, deer papillomavirus, deltaretrovirus, dengue virus, Densovirus, Dependovirus, Dhori virus, diploma virus, Drosophila C virus, duck hepatitis B virus, duck hepatitis virus 1, duck hepatitis virus 2, duovirus, Duvenhage virus, Deformed wing virus DWV, eastern equine encephalitis virus, eastern equine encephalomyelitis virus, ER virus, Ebola virus, Ebola-like virus, echo virus, echovirus, echovirus 10, echovirus 28, echovirus 9, ectromelia virus, EEE virus, EIA virus, EIA virus, encephalitis virus, encephalomyocarditis group virus, encephalomyocarditis virus, Enterovirus, enzyme elevating virus, enzyme elevating virus (LDH), epidemic hemorrhagic fever virus, epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus, Epstein-Barr virus, equid alphaherpesvirus 1, equid alphaherpesvirus 4, equid herpesvirus 2, equine abortion virus, equine arteritis virus, equine encephalosis virus, equine infectious anemia virus, equine morbillivirus, equine rhinopneumonitis virus, equine rhinovirus, Eubenangu virus, European elk papillomavirus, European swine fever virus, Everglades virus, Eyach virus, felid herpesvirus 1, feline calicivirus, feline fibrosarcoma virus, feline herpesvirus, feline immunodeficiency virus, feline infectious peritonitis virus, feline leukemia/sarcoma virus, feline leukemia virus, feline panleukopenia virus, feline parvovirus, feline sarcoma virus, feline syncytial virus, Filovirus, Flanders virus, Flavivirus, foot and mouth disease virus, Fort Morgan virus, Four Corners hantavirus, fowl adenovirus 1, fowlpox virus, Friend virus, Gammaretrovirus, GB hepatitis virus, GB virus, German measles virus, Getah virus, gibbon ape leukemia virus, glandular fever virus, goatpox virus, golden shinner virus, Gonometa virus, goose parvovirus, granulosis virus, Gross' virus, ground squirrel hepatitis B virus, group A arbovirus, Guanarito virus, guinea pig cytomegalovirus, guinea pig type C virus, Hantaan virus, Hantavirus, hard clam reovirus, hare fibroma virus, HCMV (human cytomegalovirus), hemadsorption virus 2, hemagglutinating virus of Japan, hemorrhagic fever virus, hendra virus, Henipaviruses, Hepadnavirus, hepatitis A virus, hepatitis B virus group, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus, hepatitis delta virus, hepatitis E virus, hepatitis F virus, hepatitis G virus, hepatitis nonA nonB virus, hepatitis virus, hepatitis virus (nonhuman), hepatoencephalomyelitis reovirus 3, Hepatovirus, heron hepatitis B virus, herpes B virus, herpes simplex virus, herpes simplex virus 1, herpes simplex virus 2, herpesvirus, herpesvirus 7, Herpesvirus ateles, Herpesvirus hominis, Herpesvirus infection, Herpesvirus saimiri, Herpesvirus suis, Herpesvirus varicellae, Highlands J virus, Hirame rhabdovirus, hog cholera virus, human adenovirus 2, human alphaherpesvirus 1, human alphaherpesvirus 2, human alphaherpesvinis 3, human B lymphotropic virus, human betaherpesvirus 5, human coronavirus, human cytomegalovirus group, human foamy virus, human gammaherpesvirus 4, human gammaherpesvirus 6, human hepatitis A virus, human herpesvirus 1 group, human herpesvirus 2 group, human herpesvirus 3 group, human herpesvirus 4 group, human herpesvirus 6, human herpesvirus 8, human immunodeficiency virus, human immunodeficiency virus 1, human immunodeficiency virus 2, human papillomavirus, human T cell leukemia virus, human T cell leukemia virus I, human T cell leukemia virus II, human T cell leukemia virus DI, human T cell lymphoma virus I, human T cell lymphoma virus II, human T cell lymphotropic virus type 1, human T cell lymphotropic virus type 2, human T lymphotropic virus I, human T lymphotropic virus II, human T lymphotropic virus III, Ichnovirus, infantile gastroenteritis virus, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus, infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus, infectious pancreatic necrosis virus, influenza virus A, influenza virus B, influenza virus C, influenza virus D, influenza virus pr8, insect iridescent virus, insect virus, iridovirus, Japanese B virus, Japanese encephalitis virus, JC virus, Junin virus, Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, Kemerovo virus, Kilham's rat virus, Klamath virus, Kolongo virus, Korean hemorrhagic fever virus, kumba virus, Kysanur forest disease virus, Kyzylagach virus, La Crosse virus, lactic dehydrogenase elevating virus, lactic dehydrogenase virus, Lagos bat virus, Langur virus, lapine parvovirus, Lassa fever virus, Lassa virus, latent rat virus, LCM virus, Leaky virus, Lentivirus, Leporipoxvirus, leukemia virus, leukovirus, lumpy skin disease virus, lymphadenopathy associated virus, Lymphocryptovirus, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, lymphoproliferative virus group, Machupo virus, mad itch virus, mammalian type B oncovirus group, mammalian type B retroviruses, mammalian type C retrovirus group, mammalian type D retroviruses, mammary tumor virus, Mapuera virus, Marburg virus, Marburg-like virus, Mason Pfizer monkey virus, Mastadenovirus, Mayaro virus, ME virus, measles virus, Menangle virus, Mengo virus, Mengovirus, Middelburg virus, milkers nodule virus, mink enteritis virus, minute virus of mice, MLV related virus, MM virus, Mokola virus, Molluscipoxvirus, Molluscum contagiosum virus, monkey B virus, monkeypox virus, Mononegavirales, Morbillivirus, Mount Elgon bat virus, mouse cytomegalovirus, mouse encephalomyelitis virus, mouse hepatitis virus, mouse K virus, mouse leukemia virus, mouse mammary tumor virus, mouse minute virus, mouse pneumonia virus, mouse poliomyelitis virus, mouse polyomavirus, mouse sarcoma virus, mouscpox virus, Mozambique virus, Mucambo virus, mucosal disease virus, mumps virus, murid betaherpesvirus 1, murid eytomegalovirus 2, murine cytomegalovirus group, murine encephalomyelitis virus, murine hepatitis virus, murine leukemia virus, murine nodule inducing virus, murine polyomavirus, murine sarcoma virus, Muromegalovirus, Murray Valley encephalitis virus, myxoma virus, Myxovirus, Myxovirus multiforme, Myxovirus parotitidis, Nairobi sheep disease virus, Nairovirus, Nanimavirus, Nariva virus, Ndumo virus, Neethling virus, Nelson Bay virus, neurotropic virus, New World Arenavirus, newborn pneumonitis virus, Newcastle disease virus, Nipah virus, noncytopathogenic virus, Norwalk virus, nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV), nipple neck virus, O'nyong'nyong virus, Ockelbo virus, oncogenic virus, oncogenic viruslike particle, oncomavirus, Orbivirus, Orf virus, Oropouche virus, Orthohepadnavirus, Orthomyxovirus, Orthopoxvirus, Orthoreovirus, Orungo, ovine papillomavirus, ovine catarrhal fever virus, owl monkey herpesvirus, Palyam virus, Papillomavirus, Papillomavirus sylvilagi, Papovavirus, parainfluenza virus, parainfluenza virus type 1, parainfluenza virus type 2, parainfluenza virus type 3, parainfluenza virus type 4, Paramyxovirus, Parapoxvirus, paravaccinia virus, Parvovirus, Parvovirus B19, parvovirus group, Pestivirus, Phlebovirus, phocine distemper virus, Picodnavirus, Picornavirus, pig cytomegalovirus-pigconpox virus, Piry virus, Pixuna virus, pneumonia virus of mice, Pneumovirus, poliomyelitis virus, poliovirus, Polydnavirus, polyhedral virus, polyoma virus, Polyomavirus, Polyomavirus bovis, Polyomavirus cercopitheci, Polyomavirus hominis 2, Polyomavirus maccacac 1, Polyomavirus muris 1, Polyomavirus muris 2, Polyomavirus papionis 1, Polyomavirus papionis 2, Polyomavirus sylvilagi, Pongine herpesvirus 1, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus, porcine parvovirus, porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus, porcine type C virus, pox virus, poxvirus, poxvirus variolac, Prospect Hill virus, Provirus, pseudocowpox virus, pseudorabies virus, psittacinepox virus, quailpox virus, rabbit fibroma virus, rabbit kidney vaculolating virus, rabbit papillomavirus, rabies virus, raccoon parvovirus, raccoonpox virus, Ranikhet virus, rat cytomegalovirus, rat parvovirus, rat virus, Rauscher's virus, recombinant vaccinia virus, recombinant virus, reovirus, reovirus 1, reovirus 2, reovirus 3, reptilian type C virus, respiratory infection virus, respiratory syncytial virus, respiratory virus, reticuloendotheliosis virus, Rhabdovirus, Rhabdovirus carpia, Rhadinovirus, Rhinovirus, Rhizidiovirus, Rift Valley fever virus, Riley's virus, rinderpest virus, RNA tumor virus, Ross River virus, Rotavirus, rougeole virus, Rous sarcoma virus, rubella virus, rubeola virus, Rubivirus, Russian autumn encephalitis virus, SA 11 simian virus, SA2 virus, Sabia virus, Sagiyama virus, Saimirine herpesvirus 1, salivary gland virus, sandfly fever virus group, Sandjimba virus, SARS virus, SDAV (sialodacryoadenitis virus), sealpox virus, Semliki Forest Virus, Seoul virus, sheeppox virus, Shope fibroma virus, Shope papilloma virus, simian foamy virus, simian hepatitis A virus, simian human immunodeficiency virus, simian immunodeficiency virus, simian parainfluenza virus, simian T cell lymphotrophic virus, simian virus, simian virus 40, Simplexvirus, Sin Nombre virus, Sindhis virus, smallpox virus, South American hemorrhagic fever viruses, sparrowpox virus, Spumavirus, squirrel fibroma virus, squirrel monkey retrovirus, SSV 1 virus group, STLV (simian T lymphotropic virus) type I, STLV (simian T lymphotropic virus) type II, STLV (simian T lymphotropic virus) type III, stomatitis papulosa virus, submaxillary virus, suid alphaherpesvirus 1, suid herpesvirus 2, Suipoxvirus, swamp fever virus, swinepox virus, Swiss mouse leukemia virus, TAC virus, Tacaribe complex virus, Tacaribe virus, Tanapox virus, Taterapox virus, Tench reovirus, Theiler's encephalomyelitis virus, Theiler's virus, Thogoto virus, Thottapalayam virus, Tick borne encephalitis virus, Tioman virus, Togavirus, Torovirus, tumor virus, Tupaia virus, turkey rhinotracheitis virus, turkeypox virus, type C retroviruses, type D oncovirus, type 17 retrovirus group, ulcerative disease rhabdovirus, Una virus, Uukuniemi virus group, vaccinia virus, vacuolating virus, varicella zoster virus, Varicellovirus, Varicola virus, variola major virus, variola virus, Vasin Gishu disease virus, VEE virus, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus, Venezuelan hemorrhagic fever virus, vesicular stomatitis virus, Vesiculovirus, Vilyuisk virus, viper retrovirus, viral haemorrhagic septicemia virus, Visna Maedi virus, Visna virus, volepox virus, VSV (vesicular stomatitis virus), Wallal virus, Warrego virus, wart virus, WEE virus, West Nile virus, western equine encephalitis virus, western equine encephalomyelitis virus, Whataroa virus, Winter Vomiting Virus, woodchuck hepatitis B virus, woolly monkey sarcoma virus, wound tumor virus, WRSV virus, Yaba monkey tumor virus, Yaba virus, Yatapoxvirus, yellow fever virus, and the Yug Bogdanovac virus. In one embodiment an infectome will be produced for each virus that includes an inventory of the host cellular genes involved in virus infection during a specific phase of viral infection, such cellular entry or the replication cycle.
For some viruses a great deal of progress has been made in the elucidation of the steps involved during infection of host cells, and any of these steps may be targeted using peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention. For example, experiments initiated in the early 1980s showed that influenza virus follows a stepwise, endocytic entry program with elements shared with other viruses such as alpha- and rhabdoviruses (Marsh and Helenius 1989; Whittaker 2006). The steps include: 1) Initial attachment to sialic acid containing glycoconjugates receptors on the cell surface; 2) signaling induced by the virus particle; 3) endocytosis by clathrin-dependent and clathrin-independent cellular mechanism; 4) acid-induced, hemaglutinin (HA)-mediated penetration from late endosomes; 5) acid-activated, M2 and matrix protein (M1) dependent uncoating of the capsid; and, 6) intra-cytosolic transport and nuclear import of vRNPs. These steps depend on assistance from the host cell in the form of sorting receptors, vesicle formation machinery, kinase-mediated regulation, organelle acidification, and, most likely, activities of the cytoskeleton.
Influenza attachment to the cells surface occurs via binding of the HA1 subunit to cell surface glycoproteins and glycolipids that carry oligosaccharide moieties with terminal sialic acid residues (Skehel and Wiley 2000). The linkage by which the sialic acid is connected to the next saccharide contributes to species specificity. Avian strains including H5N1 prefer an a-(2,3)-link and human strains a-(2,6)-link (Matrosovich 2006). In epithelial cells, binding occurs preferentially to microvilli on the apical surface, and endocytosis occurs at base of these extensions (Matlin 1982). Whether receptor binding induces signals that prepare the cell for the invasion is not yet known, but it is likely because activation of protein kinase C and synthesis of phopshatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PI3P) are required for efficient entry (Sieczkarski et al. 2003; Whittaker 2006).
Endocytic internalization occurs within a few minutes after binding (Matlin 1982; Yoshimura and Ohnishi 1984). In tissue culture cells influenza virus makes use of three different types of cellular processes; 1) preexisting clathrin coated pits, 2) virus-induced clathrin coated pits, and 3) endocytosis in vesicles without visible coat (Matlin 1982; Sieczkarski and Whittaker 2002; Rust et al. 2004). Video microscopy using fluorescent viruses showed the virus particles undergoing actin-mediated rapid motion in the cell periphery followed by minus end-directed, microtubule-mediated transport to the perinuclear area of the cell. Live cell imaging indicated that the virus particles first entered a subpopulation of mobile, peripheral early endosomes that carry them deeper into the cytoplasm before penetration takes place (Lakadamyali et al. 2003; Rust et al. 2004). The endocytic process is regulated by protein and lipid kinases, the proteasome, as well as by Rabs and ubiquitin-dependent sorting factors (Khor et al. 2003; Whittaker 2006).
The membrane penetration step is mediated by low pH-mediated activation of the trimeric, metastable HA, and the conversion of this Type I viral fusion protein to a membrane fusion competent conformation (Maeda et al. 1981; White et al. 1982). This occurs about 16 min after internalization, and the pH threshold varies between strains in the 5.0-5.6 range. The target membrane is the limiting membrane of intermediate or late endosomes. The mechanism of fusion has been extensively studied (Kielian and Rey 2006). Further it was observed that fusion itself does not seem to require any host cell components except a lipid bilayer membrane and a functional acidification system (Maeda et al. 1981; White et al. 1982). The penetration step is inhibited by agents such as lysosomotropic weak bases, carboxylic ionophores, and proton pump inhibitors (Malin 1982; Whittaker 2006).
To allow nuclear import of the incoming vRNPs, the capsid has to be disassembled. This step involves acidification of the viral interior through the amantadine-sensitive M2-channels causes dissociation of M1 from the vRNPs (Bukrinskaya et al. 1982; Martin and Helenius 1991; Pinto et al. 1992). Transport of the individual vRNPs to the nuclear pore complexes and transfer into the nucleus depends on cellular nuclear transport receptors (O'Neill et al. 1995; Cros et al. 2005). Replication of the viral RNAs (synthesis of positive and negative strands), and transcription occurs in complexes tightly associated with the chromatin in the nucleus. It is evident that, although many of the steps are catalyzed by the viral polymerase, cellular factors are involved including RNA polymerase activating factors, a chaperone HSP90, hCLE, and a human splicing factor UAP56. Viral gene expression is subject to complex cellular control at the transcriptional level, a control system dependent on cellular kinases (Whittaker 2006).
The final assembly of an influenza particle occurs during a budding process at the plasma membrane. In epithelial cells, budding occurs at the apical membrane domain only (Rodriguez-Boulan 1983). First, the progeny vRNPs are transported within the nucleoplasm to the nuclear envelope, then from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, and finally they accumulate in the cell periphery. Exit from the nucleus is dependent on viral protein NEP and M1, and a variety of cellular proteins including CRM1 (a nuclear export receptor), caspases, and possibly some nuclear protein chaperones. Phosphorylation plays a role in nuclear export by regulating M1 and NEP synthesis, and also through the MAPK/ERK system (Bui et al. 1996; Ludwig 2006). G protein and protein kinase signaling is involved in influenza virus budding from infected host cells (Hui E. and Nayak D, 2002).
The three membrane proteins of the virus are synthesized, folded and assembled into oligomers in the ER (Doms et al. 1993). They pass through the Golgi complex; undergo maturation through modification of their carbohydrate moieties and proteolytic cleavage. After reaching the plasma membrane they associate with M1 and the vRNPs in a budding process that results in the inclusion of all eight vRNPs and exclusion of most host cell components except lipids.
Influenza infection is associated with activation of several signaling cascades including the MAPK pathway (ERK, JNK, p38 and BMK-1/ERK5), the IkB/NF-kB signaling module, the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade, and programmed cell death (Ludwig 2006). These result in a variety of effects that limit the progress of infection such as transcriptional activation of IFNb, apoptotic cell death, and a block in virus escape of from late endosomes (Ludwig 2006).
Peptidomimetic macrocycles were synthesized, purified and analyzed as previously described (Walensky et al (2004) Science 305:1466-70; Walensky et al (2006) Mol Cell 24:199-210; Bernal et al (2007) J. Am Chem Soc. 9129, 2456-2457) and as indicated below. The macrocycles used in this study are shown in Table 5. The corresponding uncrosslinked polypeptides represent the natural counterparts of the peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention.
Alpha,alpha-disubstituted non-natural amino acids containing olefinic side chains were synthesized according to Williams et al. (1991) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113:9276; Schafmeister et al. (2000) J. Am. Chem Soc. 122:5891 and Verdine et al PCT WO 2008/121767. Peptidomimetic macrocycles were designed by replacing two or more naturally occurring amino acids with the corresponding synthetic amino acids. Substitutions were made at the i and i+3, i and i+4, i and i+6, and i and i+7 positions. Macrocycles were generated by solid phase peptide synthesis followed by olefin metathesis-based crosslinking of the synthetic amino acids via their olefin-containing side chains.
In the sequences shown, the following abbreviations are used: “Nle” represents norleucine, “Aib” represents 2-aminoisobutyric acid, “Ac” represents acetyl, and “Pr” represents propionyl. Amino acids represented as “$” are alpha-Me S5-pentenyl-alanine olefin amino acids connected by an all-carbon i to i+4 crosslinker comprising one double bond. Amino acids represented as “$r5” are alpha-Me R5-pentenyl-alanine olefin amino acids connected by an all-carbon i to i+4 crosslinker comprising one double bond. Amino acids represented as “$s8” are alpha-Me S8-octenyl-alanine olefin amino acids connected by an all-carbon i to i+7 crosslinker comprising one double bond. Amino acids represented as “$r8” are alpha-Me R8-octenyl-alanine olefin amino acids connected by an all-carbon i to i+7 crosslinker comprising one double bond. “Ahx” represents an aminocyclohexyl linker. The crosslinkers are linear all-carbon crosslinker comprising eight or eleven carbon atoms between the alpha carbons of each amino acid. Amino acids represented as “$/” are alpha-Me S5-pentenyl-alanine olefin amino acids that are not connected by any crosslinker. Amino acids represented as “$/r5” are alpha-Me R5-pentenyl-alanine olefin amino acids that are not connected by any crosslinker. Amino acids represented as “$/s8” are alpha-Me S8-octenyl-alanine olefin amino acids that are not connected by any crosslinker. Amino acids represented as “$/r8” are alpha-Me R8-octenyl-alanine olefin amino acids that are not connected by any crosslinker.
The non-natural amino acids (R and S enantiomers of the 5-carbon olefinic amino acid and the S enantiomer of the 8-carbon olefinic amino acid) were characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (Varian Mercury 400) and mass spectrometry (Micromass LCT). Peptide synthesis was performed either manually or on an automated peptide synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, model 433A), using solid phase conditions, rink amide AM resin (Novabiochem), and Fmoc main-chain protecting group chemistry. For the coupling of natural Fmoc-protected amino acids (Novabiochem), 10 equivalents of amino acid and a 1:1:2 molar ratio of coupling reagents HBTU/HOBt (Novabiochem)/DIEA were employed. Non-natural amino acids (4 equiv) were coupled with a 1:1:2 molar ratio of HATU (Applied Biosystems)/HOBt/DIEA. Olefin metathesis was performed in the solid phase using 10 mM Grubbs catalyst (Blackewell et al. 1994 supra) (Strem Chemicals) dissolved in degassed dichloromethane and reacted for 2 hours at room temperature. Isolation of metathesized compounds was achieved by trifluoroacetic acid-mediated deprotection and cleavage, ether precipitation to yield the crude product, and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Varian ProStar) on a reverse phase C18 column (Varian) to yield the pure compounds. Chemical composition of the pure products was confirmed by LC/MS mass spectrometry (Micromass LCT interfaced with Agilent 1100 HPLC system) and amino acid analysis (Applied Biosystems, model 420A).
The synthesized peptides include a norleucine replacement for methionine to avoid issues with unwanted thioether oxidation. In several peptides, the proline residue is replaced with a 2-aminoisobutyric acid residue (Aib) to increase helicity, and the effect of Glu-to-Arg substitution on cell penetrability was also explored. The N-termini of the synthetic peptides were acetylated, while the C-termini were amidated. Table 5 shows a list of peptidomimetic macrocycles of the invention prepared.
The ex vivo serum stability of several PB1 peptidomimetic macrocycles was tested by incubating them at 5000 ng/mL (2 μM at MW=2500) with fresh human serum at 37° C. and taking samples at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours. At each time point the samples were flash-frozen until analysis in duplicate, then extracted by transferring 100 μl of sera to 2 ml centrifuge tubes followed by the addition of 10 μL of 50% formic acid and 500 μL acetonitrile and centrifugation at 14,000 RPM for 10 min at 4±2° C. After protein precipitation, the supernatants were then transferred to fresh 2 ml tubes and evaporated on Turbovap under N2 at <10 psi, 37° C. The samples were reconstituted in 100 μL of 50:50 acetonitrile/water and quantified by LC-MS/MS analysis. The response for each compound was normalized to estimate a percent decrease in concentration versus time; the results are shown in
Several PB1 peptidomimetic macrocycles were tested for PK properties in single N dose in rats. The in-life portion of the study was conducted at ViviSource Laboratories (Waltham, Mass.). A single intravenous dose of 3 mg/kg Stapled Peptide formulated in water continuing 5% PEG-400 and 2% Dextrose was administered to a pair of jugular vein-cannulated male Sprague-Dawley rats. The N dose was mostly well-tolerated and animals appeared healthy within the study duration. Blood samples were collected over thirteen sampling times up to 24 hours and the plasma samples were shipped on dry ice to Tandem Bioanalytical Facilities, Inc. (Woburn, Mass.) for the analytical phase of the study.
Quantification in plasma samples was preceded by the preparation of sample extracts by combining 50 μl of ammonium hydroxide (14.5 M ammonia), 1 mL of a 1:1 acetonitrile/methanol solution, and 50 μl of internal standard with 50 μl of each plasma sample. The mixtures were centrifuged to separate liquid supernatant from solid precipitate and supernatants were dried at 40° C. under flowing nitrogen gas. The dried sample extracts were reconstituted in 50 μl of a 1:1 water/methanol solution that contained 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid. Plasma sample extracts were analyzed by a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method that utilized an API 5000 (Applied Biosystems) instrument operated in positive ionization mode at a temperature of 500° C. using a multiple reaction monitoring mode of detection (MRM). The analytical column for liquid chromatography was a Varian Metasil C18, 50 mm×2 mm and mobile phases A (0.1% formic acid in water) and B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) were pumped at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Quantification in plasma extracts was made by linear regression analysis employing a pure reference standard Stapled Peptide diluted in normal rat plasma to prepare eight calibration standards over the working concentration range of 20-10,000 ng/ml. The calibration standards were extracted in identical fashion as sample extracts and analyzed before and after the sample extracts.
Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental model using the PK Functions add-in for Microsoft Excel. The terminal elimination half-life was calculated as ln(2)/(λz), where the rate constant (λz) was calculated as −1 times the estimated slope of the log-concentration versus time data over 2-12 hr. AUC values (hr*ng/ml) were calculated by statistical moment and linear trapezoidal approximation methods over time points of 0-24 hours and 24 hour concentration values were divided by (λz) was added in order to extrapolate AUMC and AUC values to infinite time. Total body clearance (per kg body weight) was calculated as dose divided by AUC. The volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) was calculated as the product of clearance and mean residence time (MRT=AUC/AUMC). The PK results are shown graphically in
An experiment was also performed to compare different modes of administration. Subcutaneous injection of peptidomimetic macrocycle was performed and compared to intravenous administration. Two groups of two animals each were injected subcutaneously with a 3 mg/kg dose. Plasma was collected at regular time points (e.g. 5, 20 minutes; 1, 2, 4, 8 12, and 48 hours) and the samples were analyzed as indicated above. The results are plotted in
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.
This application is a continuation application of Ser. No. 14/853,894, filed Sep. 14, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/129,118, filed Nov. 1, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,175,047, which is a U.S. National Phase Application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT/US2010/021091, filed Jan. 14, 2010, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/144,706, filed Jan. 14, 2009, the content of each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4000259 | Garsky | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4191754 | Nutt et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4438270 | Bey et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4730006 | Bohme et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 5120859 | Webb | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5245009 | Kornreich et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5364851 | Joran | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5446128 | Kahn | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5622852 | Korsmeyer | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5650133 | Carvalho et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5663316 | Xudong | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5672584 | Borchardt et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5708136 | Burrell et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5710245 | Kahn | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5731408 | Hadley et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5750767 | Carpino et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5811515 | Grubbs et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5817752 | Yu | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824483 | Houston, Jr. et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5834209 | Korsmeyer | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5840833 | Kahn | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5851775 | Barker et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5856445 | Korsmeyer | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5859184 | Kahn et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5874529 | Gilon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5922863 | Grubbs et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5955593 | Korsmeyer | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5965703 | Horne et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5998583 | Korsmeyer | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6030997 | Eilat et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031072 | Blaschuk et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031073 | Yu | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6043339 | Lin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6046289 | Komazawa et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6051554 | Hornik et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6054556 | Huby et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6153391 | Picksley et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6169073 | Halazonetis et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6177542 | Ruoslahti et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6184344 | Kent et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6204361 | Carpino et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6271198 | Braisted et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6287787 | Houghten et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6326354 | Gross et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6348558 | Harris et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6495674 | Lemke et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6569993 | Sledeski et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6610657 | Goueli | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6613874 | Mazur et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6686148 | Shen et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6703382 | Wang et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6713280 | Huang et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6849428 | Evans et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6875594 | Muir et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 7064193 | Cory et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7083983 | Lane et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7084244 | Gilon et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7115372 | Shen et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7183059 | Verdine et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7192713 | Verdine et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7202332 | Arora et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7247700 | Korsmeyer et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7538190 | Robinson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7705118 | Arora et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7723469 | Walensky et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7745573 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7786072 | Verdine et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7838711 | Herweck et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7875601 | O'Reilly et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7932397 | Hock et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7960506 | Nash | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7981998 | Nash | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7981999 | Nash | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8071541 | Arora et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8124726 | Robinson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8198405 | Walensky et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8324428 | Verdine et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8389484 | Shen et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8399405 | Nash et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8524653 | Nash et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8592377 | Verdine et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8609809 | Nash | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8637686 | Nash | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8796418 | Walensky et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8808694 | Nash et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8859723 | Guerlavais et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8871899 | Wang et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8889632 | Bernal et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8895699 | Verdine et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8927500 | Guerlavais et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8957026 | Verdine et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8987414 | Guerlavais et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9023988 | Nash | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9096684 | Kawahata et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9163330 | Verdine et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9175045 | Nash et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9175047 | Huw et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9175056 | Nash | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9206223 | Nash et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9273099 | Walensky et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9394336 | Nash et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9458202 | Nash et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9464115 | Walensky et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9493509 | Nash et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9505801 | Verdine et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9505804 | Guerlavais et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9522947 | Kawahata et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9527896 | Bernal et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9556227 | Verdine et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9604919 | Darlak et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9675661 | Nash et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9845287 | Darlak et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 20030166138 | Kinsella et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040023887 | Pillutla et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038901 | Basler et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040067503 | Tan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040106159 | Kern et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040106548 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040115135 | Quay | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040152708 | Li et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040171809 | Korsmeyer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040235746 | Hawiger et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050119167 | Abbenante et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222427 | Sharpless et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050250680 | Walensky et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060008848 | Verdine et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060014675 | Arora et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060073518 | Timmerman et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060111411 | Cooper et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060148715 | Tweardy | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060293380 | Nantermet et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070020620 | Finn et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070117154 | Deslongchamps et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070161544 | Wipf et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070197772 | Arora et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203057 | Doherty et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20080081831 | Gour et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080213175 | Kolb et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080234183 | Hallbrink et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080262200 | Nash | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090047711 | Nash | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090088553 | Nash | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090149630 | Walensky et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090176964 | Walensky et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090275519 | Nash et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090326192 | Nash et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100081611 | Bradner et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100168388 | Bernal et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100184628 | Nash | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100184645 | Verdine et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100210515 | Nash et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100216688 | Nash et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100234563 | Arora et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100273704 | Korsmeyer et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100291040 | Lobel et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100298201 | Nash et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110028753 | Verdine et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110046043 | Wang et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110065915 | Malcolmson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110144303 | Nash et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110144306 | Verdine et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110223149 | Nash et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110245175 | Arora et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110245477 | Hoveyda et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110250685 | Nash | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110263815 | Nash | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120040889 | Nash et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120082636 | Walensky et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101047 | Nash et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120115783 | Nash et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120115793 | Nash et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120172311 | Nash et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120178700 | Nash et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120264674 | Nash et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120270800 | Verdine et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130005943 | Arora et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130023646 | Nash et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130072439 | Nash et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130123196 | Arora et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130177979 | Turkson | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130211046 | Verdine et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20140005118 | Verdine et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140011979 | Verdine et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140051828 | Arora et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140128581 | Darlak et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140162339 | Verdine et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140235549 | Moellering et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140256912 | Moellering et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296160 | Walensky et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140323701 | Nash et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140378390 | Guerlavais et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150038430 | Nash et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150051155 | Guerlavais et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150056612 | Shen et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150119551 | Bernal et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150183825 | Guerlavais et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150225471 | Liang et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150239937 | Verdine et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150284437 | Verdine et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160031936 | Nash | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160052970 | Guerlavais et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160068573 | Nash et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160095896 | Nash | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160096873 | Nash et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160101145 | Annis et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160108089 | Nash et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160115204 | Huw et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160137710 | Kawahata et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160193283 | Chen et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160251399 | Nash et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160257716 | Guerlavais et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160289274 | Nash | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160304564 | Nash | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160333049 | Chen et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170002042 | Annis et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170008930 | Walensky et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170015716 | Walensky et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170037086 | Kawahata et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170037105 | Samant | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170066714 | Darlak et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170066799 | Verdine et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170081379 | Bernal et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170088581 | Verdine et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170107252 | Guerlavais et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170114098 | Aivado et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170212125 | Nash et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170226177 | Kawahata et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170266254 | Nash et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170281720 | Guerlavais et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170296620 | Nash | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170298099 | Nash et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170360881 | Samant et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1252808 | May 2000 | CN |
| 1583730 | Feb 2005 | CN |
| 0467699 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 0467699 | Feb 1993 | EP |
| 0729972 | Sep 1996 | EP |
| 1452868 | Sep 2004 | EP |
| 1541692 | Jun 2005 | EP |
| 1602663 | Dec 2005 | EP |
| 1597585 | Jun 2011 | EP |
| 2002524391 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| WO-8909233 | Oct 1989 | WO |
| WO-9213878 | Aug 1992 | WO |
| WO-9301203 | Jan 1993 | WO |
| WO-9319176 | Sep 1993 | WO |
| WO-9425482 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| WO-9500534 | Jan 1995 | WO |
| WO-9602642 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| WO-9628449 | Sep 1996 | WO |
| WO-9634878 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| WO-9700267 | Jan 1997 | WO |
| WO-9713537 | Apr 1997 | WO |
| WO-9730072 | Aug 1997 | WO |
| WO-9737705 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO-9801467 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| WO-9846631 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO-9914259 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO-9934833 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO-9934850 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO-0006187 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO-0006187 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO-02064790 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO-02072597 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO-02064790 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO-03059933 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO-03070892 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO-03106491 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO-03059933 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004026896 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004041275 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004058804 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004077062 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO-03070892 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO-03106491 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004077062 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005007675 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO-2004077062 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005012335 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005040202 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005044839 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005040202 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005007675 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005044839 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005085457 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005090388 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005118620 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005118625 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005118634 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006038208 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO-2005118634 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006078161 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006103666 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006103666 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO-2006038208 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007141533 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007144886 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO-2008013454 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008045238 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008061192 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008074895 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008076904 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008061192 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008095063 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008104000 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008121767 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008104000 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008137633 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008121767 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009042237 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009089004 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009099677 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009108261 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009110952 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009126292 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009099677 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009149214 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009108261 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010011313 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010033879 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010034026 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010034028 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010034029 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010034031 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010034032 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010034034 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010060112 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010068684 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010083347 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO-2011008260 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011038049 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011047215 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| WO-2012021874 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012021875 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012021876 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012040459 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012122059 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012173846 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012174423 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| WO-2013033645 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013059525 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013059530 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013123266 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013123267 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| WO-2014052647 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| WO-2014055564 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| WO-2014071241 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO-2014138429 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO-2015157508 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO-2016049355 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO-2016049359 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO-2016154058 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO-2017004548 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO-2017004591 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO-2017023933 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO-2017040990 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO-2017044633 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO-2017218949 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Andrews et al. Forming Stable Helical Peptide Using Natural and Artificial Amino Acids. Tetrahedron. 1999;55:11711-11743. |
| Angel & Karin, “The Role of Jun, Fos and the AP-1 Complex in Cell-proliferation and Transformation,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1072:129-157 (1991). |
| Angell, et al. Peptidomimetics via copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloadditions. Chem Soc Rev. Oct. 2007;36(10):1674-89. |
| Angell, et al. Ring closure to beta-turn mimics via copper-catalyzed azide/alkyne cycloadditions. J Org Chem. Nov. 11, 2005;70(23):9595-8. |
| Annis, et al. A general technique to rank protein-ligand binding affinities and determine allosteric versus direct binding site competition in compound mixtures. J Am Chem Soc. Dec. 1, 2004;126(47):15495-503. |
| Annis, et al. ALIS: An affinity selection-mass spectrometry system for the discovery and characterization of protein-ligand Interactions. Mass Spectrometry in Medicinal Chemistry: Applications in Drug Discovery (2007): 121-156. |
| Armstrong et al., X = Y-ZH Systems as potential 1,3-dipoles. 5. Intramolecular cycloadditions of imines of a-amino acid esters. Tetrahedron. 1985;41(17):3547-58. |
| Arora, “Design, Synthesis, and Properties of the Hydrogen Bond Surrogate-based Artificial Alpha-helices,” American Chemical Society Meeting, San Diego (Mar. 2005) (oral). |
| Arora, “Hydrogen Bond Surrogate Approach for the Synthesis of Short α-Helical Peptides,” American Chemical Society Meeting, Philadelphia (Aug. 2004) (abstract of oral presentation). |
| Arosio, et al. Click chemistry to functionalise peptidomimetics. Tetrahedron Letters. 2006; 47:3697-3700. |
| Austin et al., “A Template for Stabilization of a Peptide α-Helix: Synthesis and Evaluation of Conformational Effects by Circular Dichroism and NMR,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119:6461-6472 (1997). |
| Babine et aL, Molecular Recognition of Proteinminus signLigand Complexes: Applications to Drug Design. Chem Rev. Aug. 5, 1997;97(5):1359-1472. |
| Baell, J.B. Prospects for Targeting the Bcl-2 Family of Proteins to Develop Novel cytotoxic drugs. Biochem Pharmacol. Sep. 2002;64(5-6):851-63. |
| Bakhshi, et al. Cloning the chromosomal breakpoint of t(14;18) human lymphomas: clustering around JH on chromosome 14 and near a transcriptional unit on 18. Cell. Jul. 1985;41(3):899-906. |
| Banerji et al. Synthesis of Cyclic β-Turn Mimics from L-Pro-Phe/Phe-L-Pro Derived Di- and Tripeptides via Ring Closing Metathesis: The Role of Chirality of the Phe Residue During Cyclization. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002; 43:6473-6477. |
| Bang et al., Total chemical synthesis of crambin. J Am Chem Soc. Feb. 11, 2004;126(5):1377-83. |
| Barker, et al. Cyclic RGD peptide analogues as antiplatelet antithrombotics. J Med Chem. May 29, 1992;35(11):2040-8. (Abstract only). |
| Belokon et al., Chiral Complexes of Ni(II), Cu(II) and Cu(I) as Reagents, Catalysts and Receptors for Asymmetric Synthesis and Chiral Recognition of Amino Acids. Pure & Appl Chem. 1992;64(12):1917-24. |
| Belokon, et al. Improved procedures for the synthesis of (S)-2-[N-(N′- benzylprolyl)amino]benzophenone (BPB) and Ni(II) complexes of Schiff's bases derived from BPB and amino acids. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, vol. 9, Issue 23, Dec. 11, 1998, pp. 4249-4252. |
| Berendsen et al. A glimpse of the Holy Grail? Science 282(5389):642-643 (1998). |
| Berge et al. Pharmaceutical Salts. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 66(1):1-19 (Jan. 1977). |
| Bernal, et al. Reactivation of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway by a stapled p53 peptide. J Am Chem Soc. Mar. 7, 2007;129(9):2456-7. |
| Biagini et al., Cross-metathesis of Unsaturated a-amino Acid Derivatives. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans. 1998;1:2485-99. |
| Bierzynski et al. A salt bridge stabilizes the helix formed by isolated C-Peptide of RNase A. PNAS USA. 1982;79:2470-2474. |
| Blackwell, et al. Highly Efficient Synthesis of Covalently Cross-Linked Peptide Helices by Ring-Closing Metatheis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 1998; 37(23):3281-3284. |
| Blackwell, et al. Ring-closing metathesis of olefinic peptides: design, synthesis, and structural characterization of macrocyclic helical peptides. J Org Chem. Aug. 10, 2001;66(16):5291-302. |
| Boal, et al. Facile and E-selective intramolecular ring-closing metathesis reactions in 3(10)-helical peptides: a 3D structural study. J Am Chem Soc. Jun. 6, 2007;129(22):6986-7. Epub May 11, 2007. |
| Bock, et al. 1,2,3-Triazoles as peptide bond isosteres: synthesis and biological evaluation of cyclotetrapeptide mimics. Org Biomol Chem. Mar. 21, 2007;5(6):971-5. |
| Boguslavsky, et al. Effect of peptide conformation on membrane permeability. J Pept Res. Jun. 2003;61(6):287-97. |
| Bossy-Wetzel et al. Assays for cytochrome c release from mitochondria during apoptosis. Methods Enzymol. 322:235-242 (2000). |
| Bossy-Wetzel, et al. Detection of apoptosis by annexin V labeling. Methods Enzymol. 2000;322:15-8. |
| Bracken et al. Synthesis and nuclear magnetic resonance structure determination of an alpha-helical, bicyclic, lactam-bridged hexapeptide. JACS. 1994;116:6431-6432. |
| Bradley et al. Limits of cooperativity in a structurally modular protein: response of the Notch ankyrin domain to analogous alanine substitutions in each repeat. J Mol Biol. 324(2):373-386 (2002). |
| Brea, et al. Synthesis of omega-(hetero)arylalkynylated alpha-amino acid by Sonogashira-type reactions in aqueous media. J Org Chem. Sep. 29, 2006;71(20):7870-3. |
| Brunel, et al. Synthesis of constrained helical peptides by thioether ligation: application to analogs of gp41. Chemical communications. 2005;20:2552-2554. |
| Burfield & Smithers, “Desiccant Efficiency in Solvent Drying. 3. Dipolar Aprotic Solvents,” J. Org. Chem. 43(20):3966-3968 (1978). |
| Burrage, et al. Biomimetic synthesis of lantibiotics. Chemistry. Apr. 14, 2000;6(8):1455-66. |
| Cabezas & Satterthwait, “The Hydrogen Bond Mimic Approach: Solid-phase Synthesis of a Peptide Stabilized as an α-Helix with a Hydrazone Link,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121:3862-3875 (1999). |
| Cantel, et al. Synthesis and Conformational Analysis of a Cyclic Peptide Obtained via i to i+4 Intramolecular Side-Chain to Side-Chain Azide-Alkyne 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition. JOC Featured Article. Published on the web May 20, 2008. |
| Carlson et al., Specificity landscapes of DNA binding molecules elucidate biological function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. Mar. 9, 2010;107(10):4544-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914023107. Epub Feb. 22, 2010. |
| CAS Registry No. 2176-37-6, STN Entry Date Nov. 16, 1984. |
| CAS Registry No. 2408-85-7, STN Entry Date Nov. 16, 1984. |
| CAS Registry No. 4727-05-3, STN Entry Date Nov. 16, 1984. |
| CAS Registry No. 561321-72-0, STN Entry Date Aug. 6, 2003. |
| CAS Registry No. 721918-14-5, STN Entry Date Aug. 4, 2004. |
| Chakrabartty et al., “Helix Capping Propensities in Peptides Parallel Those in Proteins,” Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 90:11332-11336 (1993). |
| Chakrabartty et al., “Helix Propensities of the Amino Acids Measured in Alanine-based Peptides without Helix-stabilizing Side-chain Interactions,” Protein Sci. 3:843-852 (1994). |
| Chang et al. Stapled α-helical peptide drug development: A potent dual inhibitor of MDM2 and MDMX for p53-dependent cancer therapy PNAS 2013 110 (36) E3445-E3454; published ahead of print Aug. 14, 2013, doi:10.1073/pnas.1303002110. |
| Chapman et al., “A Highly Stable Short α-Helix Constrained by a Main-chain Hydrogen-bond Surrogate,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:12252-12253 (2004). |
| Chapman, et al. Optimized synthesis of hydrogen-bond surrogate helices: surprising effects of microwave heating on the activity of Grubbs catalysts. Org Lett. Dec. 7, 2006;8(25):5825-8. |
| Chen et al., Determination of the helix and beta form of proteins in aqueous solution by circular dichroism. Biochemistry. Jul. 30, 1974;13(16):3350-9. |
| Chen, et al. Determination of the Secondary Structures of Proteins by Circular Dichroism and Optical Rotatory Dispersion. Biochemistry. 1972; 11(22):4120-4131. |
| Chen et al., “Structure of the DNA-binding Domains from NFAT, Fos and Jun Bound Specifically to DNA,” Nature 392:42-48 (1998). |
| Chin & Schepartz, “Design and Evolution of a Miniature Bcl-2 Binding Protein,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40(20):3806-3809 (2001). |
| Chin et al., “Circular Dichroism Spectra of Short, Fixed-nucleus Alanine Helices,” Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 99(24):15416-15421 (2002). |
| Chittenden, et al. A conserved domain in Bak, distinct from BH1 and BH2, mediates cell death and protein binding functions. EMBO J. Nov. 15, 1995;14(22):5589-96. |
| Chène et al., “Study of the Cytotoxic Effect of a Peptidic Inhibitor of the p53-hdm2 Interaction in Tumor Cells,” FEBS Lett. 529:293-297 (2002). |
| Chène, P., “Inhibiting the p53-MDM2 Interaction: An Important Target for Cancer Therapy,” Nat Rev. Cancer 3:102-109 (2003). |
| Choi, et al. Application of azide-alkyne cycloaddition ‘click chemistry’ for the synthesis of Grb2 SH2 domain-binding macrocycles. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. Oct. 15, 2006;16(20):5265-9. |
| Chu, et al. Peptide-formation on cysteine-containing peptide scaffolds. Orig Life Evol Biosph. Oct. 1999;29(5):441-9. |
| Clark et al., Supramolecular Design by Covalent Capture. Design of a Peptide Cylinder via Hydrogen-Bond-Promoted Intermolecular Olefin Metathesis. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:12364-65. |
| Cleary, et al. Nucleotide sequence of a t(14;18) chromosomal breakpoint in follicular lymphoma and demonstration of a breakpoint-cluster region near a transcriptionally active locus on chromosome 18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov. 1985;82(21):7439-43. |
| Cline, et al. Effects of As(III) binding on alpha-helical structure. J Am Chem Soc. Mar. 12, 2003;125(10):2923-9. |
| Colacino, et al. Evaluation of the anti-influenza virus activities of 1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-ylcyanamide (LY217896) and its sodium salt. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Nov. 1990;34(11):2156-63. |
| Colaluca et al., NUMB controls p53 tumour suppressor activity. Nature. Jan. 3, 2008;451(7174):76-80. doi: 10.1038/nature06412. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,846, filed Jun. 12, 2012. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/655,442, filed Oct. 18, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/201,235, filed Jul. 1, 2016. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/229,517, filed Aug. 5, 2016. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/233,796, filed Aug. 10, 2016. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/240,505, filed Aug. 18, 2016. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/256,130, filed Sep. 2, 2016. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/257,807, filed Sep. 6, 2016. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/259,947, filed Sep. 8, 2016. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/278,824, filed Sep. 28, 2016. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/287,513, filed Oct. 6, 2016. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/332,492, filed Oct. 24, 2016. |
| Cory et al., “The Bcl-2 Family: Roles in Cell Survival and Oncogenesis,” Oncogene 22:8590-8607 (2003). |
| Cox et al., Insulin receptor expression by human prostate cancers. Prostate. Jan. 1, 2009;69(1):33-40. doi: 10.1002/pros.20852. |
| Cusack et al. 2,4,6-Tri-isopropylbenzenesulphonyl Hydrazide: A convenient source of Di-Imide. Tetrahedron. 1976;32:2157-2162. |
| Danial, et al. Cell death: critical control points. Cell. 2004; 116:204-219. |
| Darnell, Transcription factors as targets for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. Oct. 2002;2(10):740-9. |
| Daugherty & Gellman, “A Fluorescence Assay for Leucine Zipper Dimerization: Avoiding Unintended Consequences of Fluorophore Attachment,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121:4325-4333 (1999). |
| Definition of Analog from http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/omd?query=analog. pp. 1-5. Accessed Jul. 7, 2005. |
| Degterev et al. Identification of Small-molecule Inhibitors of Interaction between the BH3 Domain and Bcl-xL. Nature Cell Biol. 3:173-182 (2001). |
| Deiters, et al. Adding amino acids with novel reactivity to the genetic code of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Am Chem Soc. Oct. 1, 2003;125(39):11782-3. |
| Deng, et al. Cross-Coupling Reaction of lodo-1,2,3-triazoles Catalyzed by Palladium. Synthesis 2005(16): 2730-2738. |
| Designing Custom Peptide. SIGMA Genosys (pp. 1-2) (Accessed Dec. 16, 2004). |
| Dimartino et al, “A General Approach for the Stabilization of Peptide Secondary Structures,” American Chemical Society Meeting, New York (Sep. 2003) (poster). |
| Dimartino et al. Solid-phase synthesis of hydrogen-bond surrogate-derived alpha-helices. Org Lett. Jun. 9, 2005 9;7(12):2389-92. |
| Duronio, Insulin receptor is phosphorylated in response to treatment of HepG2 cells with insulin-like growth factor I. Biochem J. Aug. 15, 1990;270(1):27-32. |
| Eckert & Kim, “Mechanisms of Viral Membrane Fusion and Its Inhibition,” Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70:777-810 (2001). |
| Erez, et al. Induction of apoptosis in cultured endothelial cells by a cadherin antagonist peptide: involvement of fibroblast growth factor receptor-mediated signalling. Exp Cell Res. Apr. 1, 2004;294(2):366-78. Abstract only. |
| Erlanson, et al. Facile synthesis of cyclic peptides containing di-, tri-, tetra-, and Pentasulfides. Tetrahedron Letters. 1998; 39(38):6799-6802. |
| European office action dated Aug. 20, 2012 for EP Application No. 09730445.5. |
| Felix et al., “Synthesis, Biological Activity and Conformational Analysis of Cyclic GRF Analogs,” Int. J. Pep. Protein Res. 32:441-454 (1988). |
| Feng et al. Solid-phase SN2 macrocyclization reactions to form beta-turn mimics. Org Lett. Jul. 15, 1999;1(1):121-4. |
| Fields, et al. Chapter 3 in Synthetic Peptides: A User's Guide. Grant W.H. Freeman & Co. New York, NY. 1992. p. 77. |
| Fieser, et al. Fieser and Fieser's Reagents for Organic Synthesis. John Wiley and Sons. 1994. |
| File Hcaplus on STN. AN No. 1990:532752. Burger et al. Synthesis of a-(trifluoromethyl)-substituted a-amino acids. Part 7. An efficient synthesis for a-trifluoromethyl-substituted w-carboxy a-amino acids. Chemiker-Zeitung (1990), 114(3), 101-4. Abstract only, date Oct. 1990. |
| Fischer, et al. Apoptosis-based therapies and drug targets. Cell Death and Differentiation. 2005; 12:942-961. |
| Folkers, et al. Methods and principles in medicinal chemistry. Eds. R. Mannhold, H. Kubinyi, and H. Timmerman. Wiley-VCH, 2001. |
| Formaggio et al., Inversion of 3(10)-helix screw sense in a (D-alpha Me)Leu homo-tetrapeptide induced by a guest D-(alpha Me)Val residue. J Pept Sci. Nov.-Dec. 1995;1(6):396-402. |
| Freedman, et al. Structural basis for recruitment of CBP/p300 by hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 16, 2002;99(8):5367-72. |
| Fulda, et al. Extrinsic versus intrinsic apoptosis pathways in anticancer chemotherapy. Oncogene. Aug. 7, 2006;25(34):4798-811. |
| Furstner et al., Alkyne Metathesis: Development of a Novel Molybdenum-Based Catalyst System and Its Application to the Total Synthesis of Epothilone A and C. Chem Euro J. 2001 ;7(24):5299-5317. |
| Furstner, et al. Mo[N(t-Bu)(AR)]3 Complexes as catalyst precursors: In situ activation and application to metathesis reactions of alkynes and diynes. J Am chem Soc. 1999; 121:9453-54. |
| Furstner, et al. Nozaki—Hiyama—Kishi reactions catalytic in chromium. J Am Chem Soc. 1996; 118:12349-57. |
| “Fustero, et al. Asymmetric synthesis of new beta,beta-difluorinated cyclic quaternary alpha-amino acid derivatives. Org Lett. Aug. 31, 2006;8(18):4129-32.” |
| Galande, et al. Thioether side chain cyclization for helical peptide formation: inhibitors of estrogen receptor-coactivator interactions. Journal of Peptide Research. 2004; 63(3): 297-302. |
| Galande, et al. An effective method of on-resin disulfide bond formation in peptides. Journal of combinatorial chemistry. 2005;7(2):174-177. |
| Gallivan et al., A neutral, water-soluble olefin metathesis catalyst based on an N-heterocyclic carbene ligand. Tetrahedron Letters. 2005;46:2577-80. |
| Galluzzi, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring cell death in higher eukaryotes. Cell Death Differ. Aug. 2009;16(8):1093-107. Epub Apr. 17, 2009. |
| Gante, Peptidomimetics—Tailored Enzyme Inhibitors. J Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1994;33:1699-1720. |
| García-Echeverría et al., “Discovery of Potent Antagonists of the Interaction between Human Double Minute 2 and Tumor Suppressor p53,” J. Med. Chem. 43:3205-3208 (2000). |
| Geistlinger & Guy, “An Inhibitor of the Interaction of Thyroid Hormone Receptor β and Glucocorticoid Interacting Protein 1,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123:1525-1526 (2001). |
| Gemperli et al., “Paralog-selective Ligands for Bcl-2 Proteins,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127:1596-1597 (2005). |
| Ghadiri & Choi, “Secondary Structure Nucleation in Peptides. Transition Metal Ion Stabilized α-Helices,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112:1630-1632 (1990). |
| Ghanem, et al. Peptide-mediated interference with influenza A virus polymerase. J Virol. Jul. 2007;81(14):7801-4. |
| Giannis et aL, Peptidomimetics for Receptor Ligands—Discovery, Development, and Medical Perspectives. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1993;32:1244-67. |
| Giorello, et al. Inhibition of cancer cell growth and c-Myc transcriptional activity by a c-Myc helix 1-type peptide fused to an internalization sequence. Cancer Res. Aug. 15, 1998;58(16):3654-9. |
| Glover & Harrison, “Crystal Structure of the Heterodimeric bZIP Transcription Factor c- Fos-c-Jun Bound to DNA,” Nature 373:257-261 (1995). |
| Goncalves, et al. On-resin cyclization of peptide ligands of the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1 by copper(I)-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar azide-alkyne cycloaddition. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. Oct. 15, 2007;17(20):5590-4. |
| Goodson et al., Potential Growth Antagonists. I. Hydantoins and Disubstituted Glycines. J Org Chem. 1960;25:1920-24. |
| Greene, et al. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 2nd Ed. John Wiley and Sons. 1991. |
| Greenfield et al. Computed circular dichroism spectra for the evaluation of protein conformation. Biochemistry. Oct. 8, 1969;(10):4108-4116. |
| Greenlee et al., A General Synthesis of a-vinyl-a-amino acids. Tetrahedron Letters. 1978;42:3999-40002. |
| Grubbs, et al. Ring-Closing Metathesis and Related Processes in Organic Synthesis. Acc. Chem. Res., 1995, 28 (11), pp. 446-452. |
| Guinn et al., Synthesis and characterization of polyamides containing unnatural amino acids. Biopolymers. May 1995;35(5):503-12. |
| Gupta et al., Long-term effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha treatment on insulin signaling GUPTA pathway in HepG2 cells and HepG2 cells overexpressing constitutively active Akt/PKB. J Cell Biochem. Feb. 15, 2007;100(3):593-607. |
| Hanessian, et al. Structure-based design and synthesis of macroheterocyclic peptidomimetic inhibitors of the aspartic protease beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme (BACE). J Med Chem. Jul. 27, 2006;49(15):4544-67. |
| Hara, S. et al. ‘Synthetic studies on halopeptins, anti-inflammatory cyclodepsipeptides’, Peptide Science. 2006 (vol. date 2005), 42nd, pp. 39-42. |
| Hase; et al., “1,6-Aminosuberic acid analogs of lysine- and arginine-vasopressin and -vasotocin. Synthesis and biological properties. J Am Chem Soc. May 17, 1972;94(10):3590-600.” |
| He, et al. Crystal structure of the polymerase PA(C)-PB1(N) complex from an avian influenza H5N1 virus. Nature. Aug. 28, 2008;454(7208):1123-6. Epub Jul. 9, 2008. |
| Hecht, S.M., ed. Bioorganic Chemistry: Peptides and Proteins. Oxford University Press. New York; 1998. |
| Hein, et al. Copper(I)-Catalyzed Cycloaddition of Organic Azides and 1-lodoalkynes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48(43):8018-21. |
| Hermerka, et al. Detection and characterization of influenza A virus PA-PB2 interaction through a biomolecular fluorescence complementation assay. J Virol. Apr. 2009;83(8):3944-55. Epub Feb. 4, 2009. |
| Hiroshige, et al. Palladium-mediated macrocyclisations on solid support and its applica- tions to combinatorial synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995; 117:11590-11591. |
| Horne, et al. Heterocyclic peptide backbone modifications in an alpha-helical coiled coil. J Am Chem Soc. Dec. 1, 2004;126(47):15366-7. |
| Hoveyda et al., “Ru Complexes Bearing Bidentate Carbenes: From Innocent Curiosity to Uniquely Effective Catalysts for Olefin Metathesis,” Org. Biomolec. Chem. 2:8-23 (2004). |
| Hunt, S. The Non-Protein Amino Acids. In: Barrett G.C., ed. Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Amino Acids. New York; Chapman and Hall; 1985. |
| “Sidwell, R. W. et al., In vitro and in vivo assay systems for study of influenza virus inhibitors. Antiviral Res, 2000. 48(1): p. 1-16”. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/062004, dated Apr. 9, 2015. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/062929, dated Apr. 16, 2015. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/025544, dated Sep. 24, 2015. |
| International search report and written opinion dated Jan. 7, 2011 for PCT Application No. US2010/049892. |
| International search report and written opinion dated Feb. 16, 2010 for PCT Application No. US2009/057927. |
| International search report and written opinion dated Mar. 5, 2010 for PCT Application No. US2009/057928. |
| International search report and written opinion dated Mar. 8, 2010 for PCT Application No. US09/057925. |
| International search report and written opinion dated Mar. 10, 2010 for PCT Application No. US2009/057930. |
| International search report and written opinion dated May 16, 2008 for PCT Application No. US2007/084838. |
| International search report and written opinion dated Jul. 6, 2010 for PCT Application No. US2010/021091. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/052580, dated May 16, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/025544, dated Sep. 10, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/058680, dated Apr. 23, 2015. |
| International search report dated May 11, 2006 for PCT Application No. US2005/016894. |
| International search report dated Nov. 30, 2009 for PCT Application No. US2009/02225. |
| International search report dated Apr. 28, 2008 for PCT Application No. US2007/87615. |
| International search report dated May 18, 2005 for PCT Application No. US2004/38403. |
| International Search Report dated Sep. 10, 2014 for PCT Application No. US2014/025544. |
| International search report dated Sep. 25, 2008 for PCT Application No. US2008/54922. |
| International Search Report with Opinion dated Dec. 12, 2016 for PCT/US16/40744. |
| Jackson et al. General approach to the synthesis of short alpha-helical peptides. JACS. 1991;113:9391-9392. |
| Jin, et al. Structure-based design, synthesis, and activity of peptide inhibitors of RGS4 GAP activity. Methods Enzymol. 2004;389:266-77. |
| Jin, et al. Structure-based design, synthesis, and pharmacologic evaluation of peptide RGS4 inhibitors. J Pept Res. Feb. 2004;63(2):141-6. |
| Johannesson, et al. Vinyl sulfide cyclized analogues of angiotensin II with high affinity and full agonist activity at the AT(1) receptor. J Med Chem. Apr. 25, 2002;45(9):1767-77. |
| Kanan et al. Reaction discovery enabled by DNA-templated synthesis and in vitro selection. Nature. Sep. 30, 2004;431(7008):545-9. |
| Karle, et al. Structural charateristics of alpha-helical peptide molecules containing Aib residues. Biochemistry. Jul. 24, 1990;29(29):6747-56. |
| Karle. Flexibility in peptide molecules and restraints imposed by hydrogen bonds, the Aib residue, and core inserts. Biopolymers. 1996;40(1):157-80. |
| Karwoski et al., Lysinonorleucine cross-link formation in alpha amino heptenoic acid-substituted peptide derivatives. Biopolymers. 1978;17(5):1119-27. |
| Kaul & Balaram, “Stereochemical Control of Peptide Folding,” Bioorg. Med. Chem. 7:105-117 (1999). |
| Kazmaier, Sythesis of Quaternary Amino Acids Containing 13, y- as well as 7,6-Unsaturated Side Chains via Chelate-Enolate Claisen Rearrangement. Tetrahedron Letters. 1996;37(30):5351-4. |
| Kedrowski, B.L. et al. ‘Thiazoline ring formation from 2-methylcysteines and 2-halomethylalanines’, Heterocycles. 2002, vol. 58, pp. 601-634. |
| Kelso et al., “A Cyclic Metallopeptide Induces α Helicity in Short Peptide Fragments of Thermolysin,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42(4):421-424 (2003). |
| Kelso et al., “α-Turn Mimetics: Short Peptide α-Helices Composed of Cyclic Metallopentapeptide Modules,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:4828-4842 (2004). |
| Kemp et al., “Studies of N-Terminal Templates for α-Helix Formation. Synthesis and Conformational Analysis of (2S,5S,8S,11S)-1-Acetyl-1,4-diaza-3-keto-5-carboxy-10-thiatricyclo[2.8.1.04,8]-tridecane (Ac-Hel1-OH),” J. Org. Chem. 56:6672-6682 (1991). |
| Kemp et al., “Studies of N-Terminal Templates for α-Helix Formation. Synthesis and Conformational Analysis of Peptide Conjugates of (25,5S,8S,11S)-1-Acetyl-1,4-diaza-3-keto-5-carboxy-10-thiatricyclo[2.8.1.04,8]-tridecane (Ac-Hel1-OH),” J. Org. Chem. 56:6683-6697 (1991). |
| Kent. Advanced Biology. Oxford University Press. 2000. |
| Kilby et al., “Potent Suppression of HIV-1 Replication in Humans by T-20, a Peptide Inhibitor of gp41-Mediated Virus Entry,” Nat. Med. 4(11):1302-1307 (1998). |
| Kim et al., Introduction of all-hydrocarbon i,i+3 staples into alpha-helices via ring-closing olefin metathesis. Org Lett. Jul. 2, 2010;12(13):3046-9. doi: 10.1021/011010449. |
| Kim et al., Synthesis of all-hydrocarbon stapled a-helical peptides by ring-closing olefin metathesis. Nat Protoc. Jun. 2011;6(6):761-71. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.324. Epub May 12, 2011. |
| Kotha et al., Modification of constrained peptides by ring-closing metathesis reaction. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. Jun. 4, 2001;11(11):1421-3. |
| Kritzer et al., “Helical β-Peptide Inhibitors of the p53-hDM2 Interaction,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:9468-9469 (2004). |
| Kudaj, et al. An efficient synthesis of optically pure alpha-alkyl-beta-azido- and alpha-alkyl-beta-aminoalanines via ring opening of 3-amino-3-alkyl-2-oxetanones. Tetrahedron Letters. 2007; 48:6794-6797. |
| Kussie et al, “Structure of the MDM2 Oncoprotein Bound to the p53 Tumor Suppressor Transactivation Domain,” Science 274:948-953 (1996). |
| Kutzki et al., “Development of a Potent Bcl-xL Antagonist Based on α-Helix Mimicry,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124:11838-11839 (2002). |
| Kwon, et al. Quantitative comparison of the relative cell permeability of cyclic and linear peptides. Chem Biol. Jun. 2007;14(6):671-7. |
| Lacombe et al. Reduction of olefins on solid support using diimide. Tetrahedron Letters. 1998;39:6785-6786. |
| Larock, R.C. Comprehensive Organic Transformations, New York: VCH Publishers; 1989. |
| Latini, et al. 395 Blocking the interaction between HIF-1alpha and p300 by a 32 amino acid fragment of p35srj inhibits the hypoxia induced transcriptional activity of HIF-1alpha in human U87MG glioma cells. Euro J Canc Suppl. 2004; 2(8):118. |
| Leduc et al., Helix-stabilized cyclic peptides as selective inhibitors of steroid receptor-coactivator interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(20):11273-78. |
| Lee, et al. A novel BH3 ligand that selectively targets Mcl-1 reveals that apoptosis can proceed without Mcl-1 degradation. J Cell Biol. Jan. 28, 2008;180(2):341-355. |
| Letai, et al. Distinct BH3 Domains Either Sensitize or Activate Mitochondrial Apoptosis, Serving as Prototype Cancer Therapeutics. Cancer Cell. 2002; 2:183-192. |
| Li, et al. A convenient preparation of 5-iodo-1,4-disubstituted-1,2,3-triazole: multicomponent one-pot reaction of azide and alkyne mediated by Cul-NBS. J Org Chem. May 2, 2008;73(9):3630-3. doi: 10.1021/jo800035v. Epub Mar. 22, 2008. |
| Li, et al. Structure-based design of thioether-bridged cyclic phosphopeptides binding to Grb2-SH2 domain. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. Mar. 10, 2003;13(5):895-9. |
| Lifson & Roig, “On the Theory of Helix-coil Transition in Polypeptides,” J. Chem. Phys. 34(6):1963-1974 (1961). |
| Liskamp, et al. Conformationally restricted amino acids and dipeptides, (non)peptidomimetics and secondary structure mimetics. Recl Travl Chim Pays-Bas. 1994; 113:1-19. |
| Litowski & Hodges, “Designing Heterodimeric Two-stranded α-Helical Coiled-coils: Effects of Hydrophobicity and α-Helical Propensity on Protein Folding, Stability, and Specificity,” J. Biol. Chem. 277(40):37272-37279 (2002). |
| Luo, et al. Mechanism of helix induction by trifluoroethanol: a framework for extrapolating the helix-forming properties of peptides from trifluoroethanol/water mixtures back to water. Biochemistry. Jul. 8, 1997;36(27):8413-21. |
| Lyu, et al. Capping Interactions in Isolated α Helices: Position-dependent Substitution Effects and Structure of a Serine-capped Peptide Helix. Biochemistry. 1993; 32:421-425. |
| Lyu et al, “α-Helix Stabilization by Natural and Unnatural Amino Acids with Alkyl Side Chains,” Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 88:5317-5320 (1991). |
| Mai, et al. A proapoptotic peptide for the treatment of solid tumors. Cancer Research. 2001; 61:7709-7712. |
| Maillard, et al. Mastermind critically regulates Notch-mediated lymphoid cell fate decisions. Blood. Sep. 15, 2004;104(6):1696-702. Epub Jun. 8, 2004. |
| Mangold, et al. Azidoalanine mutagenicity in Salmonella: effect of homologation and alpha-Mutat Res. Feb. 1989;216(1):27-33.methyl substitution. |
| Mannhold, R et al. Molecular Drug Properties: Measurement and Prediction (Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry). Wiley-VCH; 2007. |
| Marqusee & Baldwin, “Helix Stabilization by Glu- . . . Lys+ Salt Bridges in Short Peptides of De Novo Design,” Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 84:8898-8902 (1987). |
| Marshall et al., Back to the future: ribonuclease A. Biopolymers. 2008;90(3):259-77. |
| Martin, et al. Thermal [2+2] intramolecular cycloadditions of fuller-1,6-enynes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Feb. 20, 2006;45(9):1439-42. |
| McGahon, et al. The end of the (cell) line: methods for the study of apoptosis in vitro. Methods Cell Biol. 1995;46:153-85. |
| McNamara et al. Peptides constrained by an aliphatic linkage between two C(alpha) sites: design, synthesis, and unexpected conformational properties of an i,(i + 4)-linked peptide. J Org Chem. Jun. 29, 2001;66(13):4585-95. |
| Miller & Scanlan, “oNBS-SPPS: A New Method for Solid-phase Peptide Synthesis,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120:2690-2691 (1998). |
| Miller et al., Application of Ring-Closing Metathesis to the Synthesis of Rigidified Amino Acids and Peptides. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118(40):9606-9614. |
| Miller et al., Synthesis of Conformationally Restricted Amino Acids and Peptides Employing Olefin Metathesis. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117(21):5855-5856. |
| Moellering et al., Abstract 69. Computational modeling and molecular optimization of stabilized alpha-helical peptides targeting NOTCH-CSL transcriptional complexes. Nov. 2010; 8(7):30. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6349(10)71774-2. Abstract Only, European Journal of Cancer Supplements, 2010, 8(7). |
| Moellering et al., Direct inhibition of the NOTCH transcription factor complex. Nature. Nov. 12, 2009;462(7270):182-8. Erratum in: Nature. Jan. 21, 2010;463(7279):384. |
| Mosberg, et al. Dithioether-containing cyclic peptides. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1985;107(10):2986-2987. |
| Muchmore, et al. X-ray and NMR structure of human Bcl-xL, an inhibitor of programmed cell death. Nature. May 23, 1996;381(6580):335-41. |
| Muir, Semisynthesis of proteins by expressed protein ligation. Annu Rev Biochem. 2003;72:249-89. Epub Feb. 27, 2003. |
| Mulqueen et al. Synthesis of the thiazoline-based siderophore (5)-desferrithiocin. 1993;48(24):5359-5364. |
| Muppidi et al., Conjugation of spermine enhances cellular uptake of the stapled peptide-based inhibitors of p53-Mdm2 interaction. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. Dec. 15, 2011;21(24):7412-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc1.2011.10.009. Epub Oct. 12, 2011. |
| Mustapa, et al. Synthesis of a Cyclic Peptide Containing Norlanthionine: Effect of the Thioether Bridge on Peptide Conformation. J. Org. Chem. 2003;68(21):8193-8198. |
| Nam et al., Structural basis for cooperativity in recruitment of MAML coactivators to Notch transcription complexes. Cell. Mar. 10, 2006;124(5):973-83. |
| Nelson & Kallenbach, “Persistence of the α-Helix Stop Signal in the S-Peptide in Trifluoroethanol Solutions,” Biochemistry 28:5256-5261 (1989). |
| Ngo et al. Computational complexity, protein structure prediction and the Levinthal Paradox.ln: The Protein Folding Problem and Tertiary Structure Prediction. K.Merz, Jr. and S. LeGrand, eds., 1994, pp. 491-495. |
| Noah, et al. A cell-based luminescence assay is effective for high-throughput screening of potential influenza antivirals. Antiviral Res. Jan. 2007;73(1):50-9. Epub Jul. 28, 2006. |
| Notice of allowance dated Jan. 7, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,057. |
| Notice of allowance dated Jan. 27, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,555. |
| Notice of allowance dated Mar. 22, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/148,976. |
| Notice of allowance dated May 4, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/574,086. |
| Notice of allowance dated May 8, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,673. |
| Notice of allowance dated May 18, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,354. |
| Notice of allowance dated Jun. 1, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,354. |
| Notice of allowance dated Jul. 7, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/981,873. |
| Notice of allowance dated Jul. 19, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,844. |
| Notice of allowance dated Jul. 21, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,679. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 22, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,367. |
| Notice of allowance dated Jul. 28, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/680,905. |
| Notice of allowance dated Aug. 6, 2012 for U.S. App. No. 12/796,212. |
| Notice of allowance dated Oct. 23, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/252,751. |
| Obayashi, et al. The structural basis for an essential subunit interaction in influenza virus RNA polymerse. Nature. Aug. 28, 2008;454(7208):1127-31. Epub Jul. 27, 2008. |
| Office action dated Jan. 10, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/120,370. |
| Office action dated Jan. 26, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/148,976. |
| Office action dated Jan. 27, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/129,118. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/981,873. |
| Office action dated Feb. 4, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,057. |
| Office action dated Feb. 5, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,844. |
| Office action dated Feb. 6, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/680,905. |
| Office action dated Feb. 9, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/420,816. |
| Office action dated Feb. 17, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/796,212. |
| Office action dated Feb. 24, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/252,751. |
| Office action dated Mar. 18, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/678,836. |
| Office action dated Mar. 18, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/097,930. |
| Office action dated Mar. 18, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,367. |
| Office action dated Mar. 22, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,555. |
| Office action dated Mar. 22, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/120,376. |
| Office action dated Mar. 26, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,354. |
| Office action dated Apr. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,673. |
| Office action dated Apr. 26, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/097,930. |
| Office action dated Apr. 28, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,679. |
| Office action dated May 10, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,325. |
| Office action dated May 19, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/140,241. |
| Office action dated Jun. 14, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,504. |
| Office action dated Jun. 18, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,844. |
| Office action dated Jun. 28, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,555. |
| Office action dated Jun. 28, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,057. |
| Office action dated Jul. 15, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,146. |
| Office action dated Jul. 21, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,057. |
| Office action dated Jul. 24, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/252,751. |
| Office action dated Jul. 30, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/097,930. |
| Office action dated Aug. 9, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,673. |
| Office action dated Aug. 10, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,325. |
| Office action dated Aug. 11, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/140,241. |
| Office action dated Aug. 19, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/037,041. |
| Office action dated Sep. 20, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/852,368. |
| Office action dated Sep. 20, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/853,894. |
| Office action dated Sep. 23, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/680,905. |
| Office action dated Oct. 15, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/097,930. |
| Office action dated Oct. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/796,212. |
| Office action dated Oct. 24, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/718,288. |
| Office action dated Oct. 31, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,057. |
| Office action dated Nov. 5, 2002 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/574,086. |
| Office action dated Nov. 8, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/120,386. |
| Office action dated Nov. 16, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,354. |
| Office action dated Nov. 25, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/148,976. |
| Office action dated Dec. 5, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/981,873. |
| Office action dated Dec. 7, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,679. |
| Office action dated Dec. 13, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/690,076. |
| Office action dated Dec. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,844. |
| Office action dated Dec. 29, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,555. |
| O'Shea et al., “Mechanism of Specificity in the Fos-Jun Oncoprotein Heterodimer,” Cell 68:699-708 (1992). |
| O'Neil & DeGrado, “A Thermodynamic Scale for the Helix-forming Tendencies of the Commonly Occurring Amino Acids,” Science 250:646-651(1990). |
| Or et al. Cysteine alkylation in unprotected peptides: synthesis of a carbavasopressin analogue by intramolecular cystein alkylation. J. Org. Chem. Apr. 1991;56(9):3146-3149. |
| Ou, et al. Review of the role of D14-Notch signaling parthway in angiogenesis. Basic Medical Sciences and Clinics. 2008; 28(1):98-105 (in Chinese with English abstract). |
| Pangborn et al., “Safe and Convenient Procedure for Solvent Purification,” Organometallics 15:1518-1520 (1996). |
| Paquette, L.A., ed. Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis. New York; John Wiley & Sons; 1995. |
| Patgiri et al. An orthosteric inhibitor of the Ras-Sos interaction. Nat Chem Bio 7:585-587 (2011). |
| Pattenden, et al. Enantioselective synthesis of 2-alkyl substituted cysteines. 1993;49(10):2131-2138. |
| Pattenden, et al. Naturally occurring linear fused thiazoline-thiazole containing metabolites: total synthesis of (−)-didehydromirabazole A, a cytotoxic alkaloid from blue-green algae. J Chem Soc. 1993;14:1629-1636. |
| Peryshkov, et al. Z-Selective olefin metathesis reactions promoted by tungsten oxo alkylidene complexes. J Am Chem Soc. Dec. 28, 2011;133(51):20754-7. doi: 10.1021/ja210349m. Epub Nov. 30, 2011. |
| Petros et al., “Rationale for Bcl-xL/Bad Peptide Complex Formation from Structure, Mutagenesis, and Biophysical Studies,” Protein Sci. 9:2528-2534 (2000). |
| Phelan, et al. A General Method for Constraining Short Peptides to an α-Helical Conformation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:455-460. |
| Punna, et al. Head-to-tail peptide cyclodimerization by copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Apr. 8, 2005;44(15):2215-20. |
| Qian & Schellman, “Helix-coil Theories: A Comparative Study for Finite Length Polypeptides,” J. Phys. Chem. 96:3987-3994 (1992). |
| Qiu et al., Convenient, Large-Scale Asymmetric Synthesis of Enantiomerically Pure trans-Cinnamylglycine and -a-Alanine. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:2577-82. |
| Rankin, et al. The role of hypoxia-inducible factors in tumorigenesis. Cell Death Differ. Apr. 2008;15(4):678-85. |
| Rasmussen, et al. Ruthenium-catalyzed cycloaddition of aryl azides and alkynes. Org Lett. Dec. 20, 2007;9(26):5337-9. |
| Rich et al., Synthesis of the cytostatic cyclic tetrapeptide, chlamydocin. Tetranderon Letts. 1983;24(48):5305-08. |
| Rink, et al. Lantibiotic Structures as Guidelines for the Design of Peptides That Can Be Modified by Lantibiotic Enzymes. Biochemistry. 2005; 44:8873-8882. |
| Robert, A hierarchical “nesting” approach to describe the stability of alpha helices with side-chain interactions. Biopolymers. 1990;30(3-4):335-47. |
| Roberts, et al. Efficient synthesis of thioether-based cyclic peptide libraries. Tetrahedon Letters. 1998; 39: 8357-8360. |
| Roberts, et al. Examination of methodology for the synthesis of cyclic thioether peptide libraries derived from linear tripeptides. J Pept Sci. Dec. 2007;13(12):811-21. |
| Roehrl et al., “A General Framework for Development and Data Analysis of Competitive High-throughput Screens for Small-molecule Inhibitors of Protein-Protein Interactions by Fluorescence Polarization,” Biochemistry 43:16056-16066 (2004). |
| Roehrl et al., “Discovery of Small-molecule Inhibitors of the NFAT-Calcineurin Interaction by Competitive High-throughput Fluorescence Polarization Screening,” Biochemistry 43:16067-16075 (2004). |
| Roice, et al. High Capacity Poly(ethylene glycol) Based Amino Polymers for Peptide and Organic Synthesis. QSAR & Combinatorial Science. 2004;23(8):662-673. |
| Rojo, et al. Macrocyclic peptidomimetic inhibitors of β-secretase (BACE): First X-ray structure of a macrocyclic peptidomimetic-BACE complex. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006; 16:191-195. |
| Roof, et al. Mechanism of action and structural requirements of constrained peptide inhibitors of RGS proteins. Chem Biol Drug Des. Apr. 2006;67(4):266-74. |
| Rostovtsev, et al. A stepwise huisgen cycloaddition process: copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective “ligation” of azides and terminal alkynes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Jul. 15, 2002;41(14):2596-9. |
| Ruan et al., “Metal Ion Enhanced Helicity in Synthetic Peptides Containing Unnatural, Metal-ligating Residues,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112:9403-9404 (1990). |
| Rudinger J, “Characteristics of the amino acids as components of a peptide hormone sequence,” Peptide Hormones, JA Parsons Edition, University Park Press, Jun. 1976, pp. 1-7. |
| Ruffolo and Shore. Bcl-2 Selectively Interacts with the BID-Induced Open Conformer of BAK, Inhibiting BAK Auto-Oligomerization. J. Biol. Chern. 2003;278(27):25039-25045. |
| Rushe, et al. Structure of a NEMO/IKK-associating domain reveals architecture of the interaction site. Structure. May 2008;16(5):798-808. |
| Rutledge et al., “A View to a Kill: Ligands for Bcl-2 Family Proteins,” Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6:479-485 (2002). |
| Sali et al., Stabilization of protein structure by interaction of alpha-helix dipole with a charged side chain. Nature. Oct. 20, 1988;335(6192):740-3. |
| Sanchez-Garcia, et al. Tumorigenic activity of the BCR-ABL oncogenes is mediated by BCL2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun. 6, 1995;92(12):5287-91. |
| Ösapay & Taylor, “Multicyclic Polypeptide Model Compounds. 2. Synthesis and Conformational Properties of a Highly α-Helical Uncosapeptide Constrained by Three Side-chain to Side-chain Lactam Bridges,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114:6966-6973 (1992). |
| Sattler et al. Structure of Bcl-xL-Back peptide complex: recognition between regulators of apoptosis. Science. 275:983-986 (1997). |
| Schafmeister et al. An all-hydrocarbon crosslinking system for enhancing the helicity and metabolic stability of peptides. J. Am Chem. Soc. 2000;122:5891-5892. |
| Scheffzek et al. The Ras-RasGAP complex: structural basis for GTPase activation and its loss in oncogenic Ras mutants. Science 277(5324):333-338 (1997). |
| Schinzel et al., The phosphate recognition site of Escherichia coli maltodextrin phosphorylase. FEBS Lett. Jul. 29, 1991;286(1-2):125-8. |
| Schmiedeberg et al. Reversible backbone protection enables combinatorial solid-phase ring-closing metathesis reaction (RCM) in peptides. Org Lett. Jan. 10, 2002;4(1):59-62. |
| Scholtz et al., The mechanism of alpha-helix formation by peptides. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1992;21:95-118. |
| Scorrano, et al. A distinct pathway remodels mitochondrial cristae and mobilizes cytochrome c during apoptosis. Dev Cell. Jan. 2002;2(1):55-67. |
| Scott, et al. A Solid-Phase Synthetic Route to Unnatural Amino Acids with Diverse Side-Chain Substitutions. Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2002, vol. 67, No. 9, pp. 2960-2969. |
| Scott et al., Evidence of insulin-stimulated phosphorylation and activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin mediated by a protein kinase B signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun. 23, 1998;95(13):7772-7. |
| Seebach, et al. Self-Regeneration of Stereocenters (SRS)—Applications, Limitations, and Abandonment of a Synthetic Principle. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. 1996;35(23-24):2708-2748. |
| Seebeck, et al. Ribosomal synthesis of dehydroalanine-containing peptides. J Am Chem Soc. Jun. 7, 2006;128(22):7150-1. |
| Shepherd et al., “Single Turn Peptide Alpha Helices with Exceptional Stability in Water,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127:2974-2983 (2005). |
| Shi, et al. The role of arsenic-thiol interactions in metalloregulation of the ars operant. J Biol Chem. Apr. 19, 1996;271(16):9291-7. |
| Sia et al., “Short Constrained Peptides that Inhibit HIV-1 Entry,” Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 99(23):14664-14669 (2002). |
| Singh, et al. Efficient asymmetric synthesis of (S)- and (R)-N-Fmoc-S-trityl-alpha-methylcysteine using camphorsultam as a chiral auxiliary . . . J Org Chem. Jun. 25, 2004;69(13):4551-4. |
| Smith, et al. Design, Synthesis, and Binding Affinities of Pyrrolinone-Based Somatostatin Mimetics. Organic Letters. Jan. 8, 2005, vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 399-402, plus Supporting Information, pp. S1-S39. |
| Solution phase synthesis from http://www.combichemistry.com/solution_phase_synthesis.html. p. 1. Accessed Aug. 6, 2009. |
| Spierings, et al. Connected to death: the (unexpurgated) mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis. Science. 2005; 310:66-67. |
| Stewart, et al. Cell-penetrating peptides as delivery vehicles for biology and medicine. Org Biomol Chem. Jul. 7, 2008;6(13):2242-55. doi: 10.1039/b719950c. Epub Apr. 15, 2008. |
| Still et al., “Rapid Chromatographic Technique for Preparative Separations with Moderate Resolution,” J. Org. Chem. 43(14):2923-2925 (1978). |
| Sugiyama, et al. Structural insight into the essential PB1-PB2 subunit contact of the influenza virus RNA polymerase. EMBO J. Jun. 17, 2009;28(12):1803-11. Epub May 21, 2009. |
| Suzuki, et al. Structure of Bax: coregulation of dimer formation and intracellular localization. Cell. Nov. 10, 2000;103(4):645-54. |
| Szewczuk, et al. Synthesis and Biological activity of new conformationally restricted analogues of pepstatin. Int. J. Peptide Protein. Res. 1992; 40:233-242. |
| Tam, et al. Protein prosthesis: 1,5-disubstituted[1,2,3]triazoles as cis-peptide bond surrogates. J Am Chem Soc. Oct. 24, 2007;129(42):12670-1. |
| Tanaka, Design and synthesis of non-proteinogenic amino acids and secondary structures of their peptides. Yakugaku Zasshi. Oct. 2006:126(10):931-44. Japanese. |
| Taylor. The synthesis and study of side-chain lactam-bridged peptides. Biopolymers. 2002;66(1):49-75. |
| Titus, et al. Human K/natural killer cells targeted with hetero-cross-linked antibodies specifically lyse tumor cells in vitro and prevent tumor growth in vivo. J Immunol. Nov. 1, 1987;139(9):3153-8. |
| Toniolo, Conformationally restricted peptides through short-range cyclizations. Int J Pept Protein Res. Apr. 1990;35(4):287-300. |
| Tornoe et al., Peptidotriazoles on solid phase: [1,2,3]-triazoles by regiospecific copper(i)-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of terminal alkynes to azides. J Org Chem. May 3, 2002;67(9):3057-64. |
| Torres, et al. Peptide tertiary structure nucleation by side-chain crosslinking with metal complexation and double “click” cycloaddition. Chembiochem. Jul. 21, 2008;9(11):1701-5. |
| Trnka & Grubbs, “The Development of L2X2Ru=CHR Olefin Metathesis Catalysts: An Organometallic Success Story,” Acc. Chem. Res. 34:18-29 (2001). |
| Tsuruzoe et al., Insulin receptor substrate 3 (IRS-3) and IRS-4 impair IRS-1- and IRS-2-mediated signaling. Mol Cell Biol. Jan. 2001;21(1):26-38. |
| Tugyi, et al. The effect of cyclization on the enzymatic degradation of herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D derived epitope peptide. J Pept Sci. Oct. 2005;11(10):642-9. |
| Turner et al., “Mitsunobu Glycosylation of Nitrobenzenesulfonamides: Novel Route to Amadori Rearrangement Products,” Tetrahedron Lett. 40:7039-7042 (1999). |
| Tyndall et al. Macrocycles mimic the extended peptide conformation recognized by aspartic, serine, cysteine and metallo proteases. Curr Med Chem. Jul. 2001;8(8):893-907. |
| Tyndall et al., “Proteases Universally Recognize Beta Strands in Their Active Sites,” Chem. Rev. 105:973-999 (2005). |
| Ueki et al., Increased insulin sensitivity in mice lacking p85beta subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jan. 8, 2002;99(1):419-24. Epub Dec. 18, 2001. |
| Ueki et al., Positive and negative regulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent signaling pathways by three different gene products of the p85alpha regulatory subunit. Mol Cell Biol. Nov. 2000;20(21):8035-46. |
| Zitzow, et al. Pathogenesis of avian influenza A (H5N1) viruses in ferrets. J Virol. May 2002;76(9):4420-9. |
| Vaickus et al., Immune markers in hematologic malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. Dec. 1991; 11(4):267-97. |
| Van Maarseveen, et al. Efficient route to C2 symmetric heterocyclic backbone modified cyclic peptides. Org Lett. Sep. 29, 2005;7(20):4503-6. |
| Vassilev, et al. In Vivo Activation of the p53 Pathway by Small-molecule Antagonists of MDM2. Science. 2004; 303:844-848. |
| Verdine et al., Stapled peptides for intracellular drug targets. Methods Enzymol. 2012;503:3-33. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-396962-0.00001-X. |
| Verdine et al. The challenge of drugging undruggable targets in cancer: lessons learned from targeting BCL-2 family members. Clin Cancer Res. 13(24):7264-7270 (2007). |
| Viallet, et al. Tallimustine is inactive in patients with previously treated small cell lung cancer. A phase II trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Lung Cancer. Nov. 1996;15(3):367-73. |
| Vila-Perello, et al. A minimalist design approach to antimicrobial agents based on a thionin template. J Med Chem. Jan. 26, 2006;49(2):448-51. |
| Voet D, Voet JG, Biochemistry, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995, pp. 235-241. |
| von Itzstein et al, “Rational design of potent sialidase-based inhibitors of influenza virus replication,” Nature, Jun. 3, 1993, 363: 418-423. |
| Walensky et al., A stapled BID BH3 helix directly binds and activates BAX. (2006) Mol Cell 24:199-210. |
| Walensky, et al. Activation of apoptosis in vivo by a hydrocarbon-stapled BH3 helix. Science. Sep. 3, 2004;305(5689):1466-70. |
| Walker, et al. General method for the synthesis of cyclic peptidomimetic compounds. Tetrahedron Letters. 2001; 42(34):5801-5804. |
| Wang, et al. BID: a novel BH3 domain-only death agonist. Genes Dev. Nov. 15, 1996;10(22):2859-69. |
| Wang et al. Cell permeable Bcl-2 binding peptides: a chemical approach to apoptosis induction in tumor cells. Cancer Res. Mar. 15, 2000;60(6):1498-502. |
| Wang, et al. “Click” synthesis of small molecule probes for activity-based fingerprinting of matrix metalloproteases. Chem Commun (Camb). Sep. 28, 2006;(36):3783-5. |
| Wang et al. Enhanced metabolic stability and protein-binding properties of artificial alpha helices derived from a hydrogen-bond surrogate: application to Bcl-xL. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Oct. 14, 2005;44(40):6525-9. |
| Wang, et al. Evaluation of biologically relevant short alpha-helices stabilized by a main-chain hydrogen-bond surrogate. J Am Chem Soc. Jul. 19, 2006;128(28):9248-56. |
| Wang, et al. Nucleation and stability of hydrogen-bond surrogate-based alpha-helices. Org Biomol Chem. Nov. 21, 2006;4(22):4074-81. |
| Wang et al., “Recognition of a Protein Receptor with the Hydrogen Bond Surrogate-based Artificial Alpha-helices,” American Chemical Society Meeting, San Diego (Mar. 2005) (poster). |
| Wang et al., “Recognition of a Protein Receptor with the Hydrogen Bond Surrogate-based Artificial Alpha-helices,” Chemical Biology Symposium, Hunter College (Jan. 2005) (poster). |
| Wei, et al. tBID, a membrane-targeted death ligand, oligomerizes BAK to release cytochrome c. Genes Dev. Aug. 15, 2000;14(16):2060-71. |
| Wels, et al. Synthesis of a novel potent cyclic peptide MC4-ligand by ring-closing metathesis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005; 13: 4221-4227. |
| Weng et al., Growth suppression of pre-T acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells by inhibition of notch signaling. Mol Cell Biol. Jan. 2003;23(2):655-64. |
| Wild et al., “Peptides Corresponding to a Predictive α-Helical Domain of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp4I are Potent Inhibitors of Virus Infection,” Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 91:9770-9774 (1994). |
| Williams and Im. Asymmetric Synthesis of Nonsubstituted and α,α-Disubstituted α-Amino Acids via Disatereoselective Glycine Enolate Alkylations. JACS. 1991;113:9276-9286. |
| Williams, et al. A novel family of cyclic peptide antagonists suggests that N-cadherin specificity is determined by amino acids that flank the HAV motif. J Biol Chem. Feb. 11, 2000;275(6):4007-12. |
| Williams, et al. Dimeric versions of two short N-cadherin binding motifs (HAVDI and INPISG) function as N-cadherin agonists. J Biol Chem. Feb. 8, 2002;277(6):4361-7. |
| Woodfin, et al. Interaction of the amino-terminus of an influenza virus protein with mitochondria. Arch Biochem Biophys. Nov. 1, 1993;306(2):427-30. |
| Wu, et al. Modulation of Notch signaling by mastermind-like (MAML) transcriptional co-activators and their involvement in tumorigenesis. Semin Cancer Biol. Oct. 2004;14(5):348-56. |
| Wu, et al. Regiospecific Synthesis of 1,4,5-Trisubstituted-1,2,3-triazole via One-Pot Reaction Promoted by Copper(I) Salt. Synthesis. 2005(8): 1314-1318. |
| Wu, et al. Studies on New Strategies for the Synthesis of Oligomeric 1,2,3-Triazoles. Synlett 2006(4): 0645-0647. |
| Wunderlich, et al. Identification of a PA-binding peptide with inhibitory activity against influenza A and B virus replication. PLoS One. Oct. 20, 2009;4(10):e7517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007517. |
| Yang, et al. Calculation of protein conformation from circular dichroism. Methods Enzymol. 1986;130:208-69. |
| Yang, et al. Synthesis and helical structure of lactam bridged BH3 peptides derived from pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters. 2004;14(6):1403-1406. |
| Yin et al., “Terphenyl-based Helical Mimetics That Disrupt the p53/HDM2 Interaction,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44:2704-2707 (2005). |
| Yu, et al. Synthesis of macrocyclic natural products by catalyst-controlled stereoselective ring-closing metathesis. Nature. Nov. 2, 2011;479(7371):88-93. doi: 10.1038/nature10563. |
| Zamzami et al. The thiol crosslinking agent diamide overcomes the apoptosis-inhibitory effect of Bcl-2 by enforcing mitochondrial permeability transition. Oncogene. Feb. 26, 1998;16(8):1055-63. |
| Zhang, et al. 310 Helix versus alpha-helix: a molecular dynamics study of conformational preferences of Aib and Alanine. J. American Cancer Society. Dec. 1994; 116(26):11915-11921. |
| Zhang, et al. Development of a High-throughput Fluorescence Polarization Assay for Bcl-xL. Anal. Biochem. 2002; 307:70-75. |
| Zhang, et al. Ruthenium-catalyzed cycloaddition of alkynes and organic azides. J Am Chem Soc. Nov. 23, 2005;127(46):15998-9. |
| Zimm & Bragg, “Theory of the Phase Transition between Helix and Random Coil in Polypeptide Chains,” J. Chem. Phys. 31(2):526-535 (1959). |
| Campbell, et al. N-alkylated oligoamide alpha-helical proteomimetics. Org Biomol Chem. May 21, 2010;8(10):2344-51. doi: 10.1039/c001164a. Epub Mar. 18, 2010. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/711,576, filed Sep. 21, 2017. |
| Denmark et al., Cyclopropanation with Diazomethane and Bis(oxazoline)palladium(II) Complexes. J Org Chem. May 16, 1997;62(10):3375-3389. |
| Ellis et al., Design, synthesis, and evaluation of a new generation of modular nucleophilic glycine equivalents for the efficient synthesis of sterically constrained alpha-amino acids. J Org Chem. Oct. 27, 2006;71(22):8572-8. |
| Evans et al., The Rise of Azide—Alkyne 1,3-Dipolar ‘Click’ Cycloaddition and its Application to Polymer Science and Surface Modification. Australian Journal of Chemistry. 2007;60:384-95. |
| Gentle et al., Direct production of proteins with N-terminal cysteine for site-specific conjugation. Bioconjug Chem. May-Jun. 2004;15(3):658-63. |
| Horne, et al. Structural and biological mimicry of protein surface recognition by alpha/beta-peptide foldamers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 1, 2009;106(35):14751-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902663106. Epub Aug. 17, 2009. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2008/058575 dated Oct. 8, 2009. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2009/004260 dated Feb. 3, 2011. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2010/001952 dated Jan. 26, 2012. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/052755, dated Apr. 4 2013. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/042719, dated Jan. 3, 2014. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/042738, dated Jan. 3, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/058575 dated Nov. 17, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2009/004260 dated Oct. 15, 2010. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/001952 dated Feb. 2, 2011. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/052755 dated Apr. 25, 2012. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/042719, dated Nov. 1, 2012. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/042738, dated Oct. 18, 2012. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/062004, dated Apr. 23, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/062929, dated Jan. 30, 2014. |
| Khalil et al., An efficient and high yield method for the N-tert-butoxycarbonyl protection of sterically hindered amino acids. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37(20):3441-44. |
| Kim et al., Stereochemical effects of all-hydrocarbon tethers in i,i+4 stapled peptides. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. May 1, 2009;19(9):2533-6. Epub Mar. 13, 2009. |
| Kimmerlin et al., ‘100 years of peptide synthesis’: ligation methods for peptide and protein synthesis with applications to beta-peptide assemblies. J Pept Res. Feb. 2005;65(2):229-60. |
| Kolb et al., Click Chemistry: Diverse Chemical Function from a Few Good Reactions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Jun. 1, 2001;40(11):2004-2021. |
| Kouzarides, Acetylation: a regulatory modification to rival phosphorylation? EMBO J. Mar. 15, 2000;19(6):1176-9. |
| Liu et al., Chemical Ligation Approach to Form a Peptide Bond between Unprotected Peptide Segments. Concept and Model Study. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116(10):4149-53. |
| Office action dated Jul. 17, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/853,894. |
| Office action dated Jul. 25, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/200,422. |
| Office action dated Aug. 30, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/287,513. |
| Office action dated Sep. 5, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/093,869. |
| Office action dated Sep. 7, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/093,426. |
| Office action dated Nov. 15, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/240,505. |
| Patgiri, et al. A hydrogen bond surrogate approach for stabilization of short peptide sequences in alpha-helical conformation. Acc Chem Res. Oct. 2008;41(10):1289-300. Epub Jul. 17, 2008. |
| Patgiri, et al. Solid phase synthesis of hydrogen bond surrogate derived alpha-helices: resolving the case of a difficult amide coupling. Org Biomol Chem. Apr. 21, 2010;8(8):1773-6. |
| Pellois et al., Semisynthetic proteins in mechanistic studies: using chemistry to go where nature can't. Curr Opin Chem Biol. Oct. 2006;10(5):487-91. Epub Aug. 28, 2006. |
| Seebach, et al. Beta-peptidic peptidomimetics. Acc Chem Res. Oct. 2008;41(10):1366-75. doi: 10.1021/ar700263g. Epub Jun. 26, 2008. |
| Sparey et al., Cyclic sulfamide gamma-secretase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. Oct. 1, 2005;15(19):4212-6. |
| Tolbert et al., New methods for proteomic research: preparation of proteins with N-terminal cysteines for labeling and conjugation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Jun. 17, 2002;41(12):2171-4. |
| Walensky, et al. Hydrocarbon-stapled peptides: principles, practice, and progress. J Med Chem. Aug. 14, 2014;57(15):6275-88. doi: 10.1021/jm4011675. Epub Mar. 6, 2014. |
| Bagnasco, et al. Inhibition of a protein-protein interaction between INI1 and c-Myc by small peptidomimetic molecules inspired by Helix-1 of c-Myc: identification of a new target of potential antineoplastic interest. FASEB J. Apr. 2007;21(4):1256-63. Epub Jan. 10, 2007. |
| Boal et al.,Facile and E-Selective Intramolecular Ring-Closing Metathesis Reactions in 310-Helical Peptides: A 3D Structural Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6986-6987. |
| Brunel, et al. Synthesis of constrained helical peptides by thioether ligation: application to analogs of gp41. Chem Commun (Camb). May 28, 2005;(20):2552-4. Epub Mar. 11, 2005. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/349,478, filed Nov. 11, 2016. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/463,826, filed Mar. 20, 2017. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/493,301, filed Apr. 21, 2017. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/592,517, filed May 11, 2017. |
| Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/625,672, filed Jun. 16, 2017. |
| Dames, et al. Structural basis for Hif-1 alpha /CBP recognition in the cellular hypoxic response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 16, 2002;99(8):5271-6. |
| Draeger, et al. Interaction of the bHLH-zip domain of c-Myc with H1-type peptides. Characterization of helicity in the H1 peptides by NMR. J Biol Chem. Jan. 21, 1994;269(3):1785-93. |
| Extended European Search Report for EP 09800675.2, dated Dec. 6, 2012. |
| Galande, et al. An effective method of on-resin disulfide bond formation in peptides. J Comb Chem. Mar.-Apr. 2005;7(2):174-7. |
| Grandori, et al. The Myc/Max/Mad network and the transcriptional control of cell behavior. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2000;16:653-99. |
| Green, T.W.; Wuts, P.G.M. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed. New York; John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1991. |
| He, X. et al., Crystal structure of the polymerase PAC—PB1N complex from an avian influenza H5N1 virus. Nature, 2008. 454: p. 1123-6. |
| Hewitson, et al. The HIF pathway as a therapeutic target. Drug Discov Today. Aug. 15, 2004;9(16):704-11. |
| Jimi, et al. Selective inhibition of NF-kappa B blocks osteoclastogenesis and prevents inflammatory bone destruction in vivo. Nat Med. Jun. 2004;10(6):617-24. Epub May 23, 2004. |
| Kiessling, et al. Selective inhibition of c-Myc/Max dimerization and DNA binding by small molecules. Chem Biol. Jul. 2006;13(7):745-51. |
| May, et al. Selective inhibition of NF-kappaB activation by a peptide that blocks the interaction of NEMO with the IkappaB kinase complex. Science. Sep. 1, 2000;289(5484):1550-4. |
| Mosberg, et al. Dithioeter-containing cyclic peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985;107(10):2986-2987. |
| Muller, P. Glossary of terms used in physical organic chemistry. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1994, vol. 66, pp. 1077-1184. |
| Nair et al., X-ray structures of Myc-Max and Mad-Max recognizing DNA. Molecular bases of regulation by proto-oncogenic transcription factors. Cell. Jan. 24, 2003;112(2):193-205. |
| Notice of allowance dated Feb. 15, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/852,368. |
| Notice of allowance dated Mar. 2, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/852,368. |
| Notice of allowance dated Mar. 29, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/852,368. |
| Obayashi, E., et al., The structural basis for an essential subunit interaction in influenza virus RNA polymerase. Nature, 2008. 454: p. 1127-31. |
| Office action dated Apr. 17, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/287,513. |
| Office action dated May 26, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/853,894. |
| Rostovtsev et al. A stepwise huisgen cycloaddition process: copper (i)-catalyzed regioselective “ligation” of azides and terminal alkynes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 41(14):2596-2599 (2002). |
| Strickland, et al. Use of cell permeable NBD peptides for suppression of inflammation. Ann Rheum Dis. Nov. 2006;65 Suppl 3:iii75-82. |
| Strnad, et al. IkappaB kinase inhibitors for treating autoimmune and inflammatory disorders: potential and challenges. Trends Pharmacol Sci. Mar. 2007;28(3):142-8. Epub Feb. 6, 2007. |
| Sugiyama K, et al. Structural insight into the essential PB1—PB2 subunit contact of the influenza virus RNA polymerase. The EMBO Journal. 2009;28(12):1803-1811. doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.138. |
| Yang et al. Synthesis and helical structure of lactam bridged BH3 peptides derived from pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. Mar. 22, 2004;14(6):1403-6. |
| Notice of allowance dated Dec. 12, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/287,513. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/093,426 Office action dated Jan. 8, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/093,426 Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 27, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/093,869 Office action dated Jan. 22, 2018. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160250278 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61144706 | Jan 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14853894 | Sep 2015 | US |
| Child | 15093373 | US | |
| Parent | 13129118 | US | |
| Child | 14853894 | US |
