Patent Grant
11883576
The invention relates to systems and methods for making intracycle adjustments to an osmotic agent concentration of peritoneal dialysate inside the peritoneal cavity of a patient. The systems and methods include osmotic agent sources, flow paths, and processors to adjust the osmotic agent concentration of dialysate in the peritoneal cavity of the patient.
Peritoneal Dialysis (PD), including Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD) and Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD), is a dialysis treatment that can be performed at home, either by a patient alone or with a care-giver. PD differs from Hemodialysis (HD) in that blood is not removed from the body and passed through a dialyzer, but rather a catheter is placed in the peritoneal cavity and dialysate introduced directly into the peritoneal cavity. Blood is cleaned inside the patient using the patient's own peritoneum as a type of dialysis membrane.
Osmotic agents in the peritoneal dialysate drive the movement of water from the blood of the patient into the peritoneal cavity for removal. The driving force for water movement is a function of the concentration of the osmotic agent in the peritoneum. Different osmotic agents provide different fluid removal profiles, with certain osmotic agents, such as dextrose, providing a high degree of fluid removal early in a cycle and other osmotic agents, such as icodextrine, providing slower fluid removal over a longer period of time. Use of dextrose in the peritoneal dialysate provides quick fluid removal, followed by a period of reduced fluid removal. However, known systems do not provide any mechanism to change or adjust the osmotic agent composition or concentration once the dialysate is infused into the patient to take advantage of the different fluid removal profiles.
Typical peritoneal dialysis cycles are between one and three hours long, or between one and four hours long in CAPD. The fluid is delivered to the peritoneum and allowed to dwell for given periods of time. During the dwell period, the glucose/dextrose osmotic agent can be transported to the patient's blood through the peritoneum and has an exponential decay in concentration within the peritoneum, meaning that the transport is very effective during the first portion of the cycle but then is much less efficient later in the cycle. As a result, high concentrations of glucose/dextrose may be needed to achieve the overall session goals. The high glucose/dextrose concentrations may cause acceleration of the peritoneum membrane wear out and subjecting the patient to more glucose/dextrose than may be need if the delivery was conducted in a more optimal manner. High glucose/dextrose concentrations can also lead to spikes in blood glucose resulting from the initial high glucose/dextrose concentration in the peritoneal dialysate. These spikes can be problematic for diabetic patients which include about 40-50% of chronic kidney disease patients.
Hence, there is a need for systems and methods that can make an intracycle adjustment to the osmotic agent concentration in the peritoneal cavity of the patient, by either increasing or decreasing the osmotic agent concentration during the dwell period, to increase transport effectiveness. The need extends to increasing transport effectiveness at any point during a cycle. There is a need for a system that can make the intracycle adjustments to reduce the overall number of cycles required for effective therapy or to reduce inefficiencies resulting from repeatedly filling and draining the peritoneal cavity. There is a further need for systems and methods to determine the optimal increase or decrease in osmotic agent concentration during the cycle.
The first aspect of the invention relates to a method for adjusting an osmotic agent concentration in a peritoneal cavity. In any embodiment, the method can include infusing peritoneal dialysate containing an osmotic agent into the peritoneal cavity of a patient; monitoring one or more patient parameters; and adjusting the osmotic agent concentration of the peritoneal dialysate in the peritoneal cavity of the patient by infusing a concentrated osmotic agent solution or by infusing sterile fluid into the peritoneal cavity of the patient using the on-line peritoneal dialysis machine.
In any embodiment, the method can include the step of infusing the concentrated osmotic agent solution into the patient mid-cycle. In any embodiment, the step of infusing the concentrated osmotic agent solution into the patient can occur at any time point during a cycle, e.g., 1/16, ⅛, ¼, ½, ⅞, ¾, 15/16 of a cycle. In any embodiment, the method can include the step of infusing the sterile fluid into the peritoneal cavity of the mid-cycle. In any embodiment, the step of infusing the sterile fluid into the patient can occur at any time point during a cycle, e.g., 1/16, ⅛, ¼, ½, ⅞, ¾, 15/16 of a cycle.
In any embodiment, the method can include the step of sterilizing the concentrated osmotic agent solution prior to infusing the concentrated osmotic agent solution into the peritoneal cavity of the patient.
In any embodiment, the method can include the step of draining a volume of peritoneal dialysate from the peritoneal cavity of the patient prior to the step of infusing the concentrated osmotic agent solution into the peritoneal cavity of the patient.
In any embodiment, the method can include the step of draining a volume of peritoneal dialysate from the peritoneal cavity of the patient prior to the step of infusing sterile fluid into the peritoneal cavity of the patient.
In any embodiment, the method can include the step of determining a change to the osmotic agent concentration based on one or more patient parameters prior to the step of adjusting the osmotic agent concentration.
In any embodiment, the patient parameters can be selected from the group of: blood pressure and intraperitoneal pressure.
In any embodiment, the method can include the steps of determining an intraperitoneal pressure at a first time and at least a second time, and wherein the step of determining a change to the osmotic agent concentration can include determining a change to the osmotic agent concentration based on a change in intraperitoneal pressure.
In any embodiment, the step of adjusting the osmotic agent concentration can include selectively flowing fluid from an osmotic agent source into the peritoneal cavity of the patient.
In any embodiment, the osmotic agent source can contain glucose/dextrose, icodextrin, or combinations thereof.
In any embodiment, the step of adjusting the osmotic agent concentration can include selectively flowing fluid from an osmotic agent source into the peritoneal cavity of the patient at a set time after infusing the peritoneal dialysate into the peritoneal cavity of the patient.
In any embodiment, the peritoneal dialysate can have multiple osmotic agents.
In any embodiment, the peritoneal dialysate can include icodextrin and glucose/dextrose.
In any embodiment, the method can include the steps of draining the peritoneal dialysate from the patient; and infusing a second peritoneal dialysate into the patient; wherein the second peritoneal dialysate has an osmotic agent different from the first peritoneal dialysate.
In any embodiment, the method can include receiving one or more dialysis results from at least one prior dialysis session into a machine readable storage medium; and receiving a dialysis prescription from the prior dialysis session into a machine readable storage medium; and the one or more dialysis results can include a volume of ultrafiltrate removed and a rate of ultrafiltration; and the dialysis prescription can include an adjustment made to the osmotic agent concentration in the peritoneal cavity of the patient during the prior dialysis session.
In any embodiment, the step of adjusting the osmotic agent concentration can include determining a change to the osmotic agent concentration based on the dialysis results from the prior dialysis session and the dialysis prescription from the prior dialysis session.
In any embodiment, the step of infusing a concentrated osmotic agent solution or sterile fluid can be performed at a set time after infusing the peritoneal dialysate into the peritoneal cavity of the patient.
In any embodiment, the steps of monitoring the one or more patient parameters and adjusting the osmotic agent concentration of the peritoneal dialysate can be performed by a processor.
In any embodiment, the patient parameters can be monitored while the peritoneal dialysate is inside the patient during a cycle.
The features disclosed as being part of the first aspect of the invention can be in the first aspect of the invention, either alone or in combination.
The second aspect of the invention is drawn to a system. In any embodiment, the system can include a peritoneal dialysis cycler having either a combined effluent and infusion line or an infusion line and an effluent line, the peritoneal dialysis cycler further having an infusion pump; a peritoneal dialysate generation flow path fluidly connected to the infusion line or combined effluent and infusion line; the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path having: (i) a water source fluidly connected to the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path; (ii) a concentrate source fluidly connected to the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path; (iii) at least a first osmotic agent source fluidly connected to the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path; (iv) an osmotic agent pump positioned on a fluid line between the osmotic agent source and the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path; and (v) a sterilization module positioned in the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path downstream of the osmotic agent source and concentrate source.
In any embodiment, the system can include a processor in communication with the osmotic agent pump and the infusion pump; the processor selectively controlling the osmotic agent pump and infusion pump to adjust an osmotic agent concentration in a peritoneal cavity of a patient.
In any embodiment, the processor can be in communication with at least one sensor; the processor adjusting the osmotic agent concentration based on data received from the at least one sensor.
In any embodiment, the sensor can be selected from the group of: a blood pressure sensor, and a pressure sensor.
In any embodiment, the system can include at least a second osmotic agent source, the first osmotic agent source and second osmotic agent source containing different osmotic agents.
The features disclosed as being part of the second aspect of the invention can be in the second aspect of the invention, either alone or in combination.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used generally have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.
The articles “a” and “an” are used to refer to one or to over one (i.e., to at least one) of the grammatical object of the article. For example, “an element” means one element or over one element.
The term “adjusting” or to “adjust” a dialysis parameter refers to changing any parameter of a peritoneal dialysis session, including changing the concentration of one or more solutes, the temperature, the dwell time, and the number of cycles.
The term “blood pressure” refers to the pressure of blood in the body of a patient and can refer to systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, or a combination thereof.
The term “blood pressure sensor” refers to any sensor capable of determining the blood pressure of a patient. The blood pressure sensor can be implanted, wearable, or an external sensor.
The term “communication” refers to an electronic or wireless link between two components.
The term “comprising” includes, but is not limited to, whatever follows the word “comprising.” Use of the term indicates the listed elements are required or mandatory but that other elements are optional and may be present.
A “concentrated osmotic agent solution” is a solution containing an osmotic agent in a concentration higher than that generally used in peritoneal dialysis.
A “concentrate source” is a source of one or more solutes. The concentrate source can have one or more solutes with a solute concentration greater than the solute concentration to be used for dialysis. The concentrate in the concentrate source can also be lower than the solute concentration generally used in dialysis for generation of low concentration dialysate.
The term “consisting of” includes and is limited to whatever follows the phrase “consisting of.” The phrase indicates the limited elements are required or mandatory and that no other elements may be present.
The term “consisting essentially of” includes whatever follows the term “consisting essentially of” and additional elements, structures, acts or features that do not affect the basic operation of the apparatus, structure or method described.
The terms “control,” “controlling,” or “controls” refers to the ability of one component to direct the actions of a second component.
The term “cycle” or “peritoneal dialysis cycle” refers to the infusion of peritoneal dialysate into a patient, a dwell of the peritoneal dialysate within the peritoneal cavity of the patient, and the removal of the peritoneal dialysate from the peritoneal cavity of the patient. The process of filling and then draining your abdomen can also be seen as an “exchange” used and clean fluids. However, the number, length, and timing of “cycles” or “exchanges” are non-limiting. For example, Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) and Continuous Cycling Peritoneal Dialysis (CCPD) may occur on different schedules, but the process of filling and then draining the peritoneal cavity can be referred to as “cycles” for both CAPD and CCPD. As such, the term is “cycle” or exchange refers to any particular type of dialysis schedule or type.
The terms “determining” and “determine” refer to ascertaining a particular state of a system or variable(s).
A “dialysis prescription” refers to the set parameters of a peritoneal dialysis session or cycle, including the concentration of one or more solutes in the dialysate, the temperature, the dwell time, the number of cycles in a session, or any intra-cycle adjustments made to the dialysate.
The term “dialysis results” refers to any variables measured as a result of dialysis therapy. The dialysis results can include patient variables, such as blood pressure or comfort, or can include therapy variables, such as an amount of ultrafiltrate removed, a rate of ultrafiltration, or any other results.
A “dialysis session” is a set of peritoneal dialysis cycles performed over a time period as part of ongoing therapy. The peritoneal dialysis session can last a day or more, and can include any number of cycles.
The term “downstream” refers to a position of a first component in a flow path relative to a second component wherein fluid will pass by the second component prior to the first component during normal operation. The first component can be said to be “downstream” of the second component, while the second component is “upstream” of the first component.
The term “draining” or to “drain” fluid refers to removing peritoneal dialysate from the peritoneal cavity of a patient.
The term “effluent line” refers to a fluid connector for removing fluid from a peritoneal cavity of a patient. The term effluent line can also refer to a combined effluent and infusion line.
The terms “fluidly connectable,” “fluidly connected,” “fluid connection” “fluidly connectable,” or “fluidly connected” refer to the ability to pass fluid, gas, or mixtures thereof from one point to another point. The two points can be within or between any one or more of compartments, modules, systems, and components, all of any type.
The term “infusing peritoneal dialysate” or to “infuse peritoneal dialysate” refers to the movement of peritoneal dialysate into the peritoneal cavity of a patient
An “infusion line” is a fluid line for carrying peritoneal dialysate into a body cavity or part of a patient such as a peritoneal cavity. The term “infusion line” can also refer to a combined effluent and infusion line.
An “infusion pump” is a pump configured to move fluid through an infusion line into the peritoneal cavity of a patient. The infusion pump can also drain fluid from the peritoneal cavity of the patient.
The term “intraperitoneal pressure” refers to the fluid pressure within the peritoneal cavity of a patient.
The term “machine-readable storage medium” refers to any electronic device capable of storing information in a digital format for reading by a computer, processor, or other electronic device.
The term “mid-cycle” refers to the time period between infusion of peritoneal dialysate into a patient and drainage of the peritoneal dialysate from the patient. As such, mid-cycle infusion of an osmotic agent can occur between the infusion of peritoneal dialysate into a patient and drainage of the peritoneal dialysate from the patient to adjust the present concentration of the osmotic agent in the peritoneum of the patient.
The term “monitoring” or to “monitor” refers to determining a status of a system or patient over time.
An “on-line peritoneal dialysis machine” is a set of components that generate peritoneal dialysate, infuse the peritoneal dialysate into a patient, and drain the peritoneal dialysate from the patient.
An “osmotic agent” is a substance dissolved in water capable of driving a net movement of water by osmosis across a semi-permeable membrane due to concentration differences of the osmotic agent on each side of the semi-permeable membrane.
The term “osmotic agent concentration” refers to the amount of an osmotic agent per unit volume of peritoneal dialysate.
The term “osmotic agent pump” refers to a pump configured to move fluid from an osmotic agent source into a peritoneal dialysate generation flow path.
An “osmotic agent source” refers to a source of osmotic agents in solid and/or solution form. The osmotic agent source can interface with at least one other module found in systems for dialysis. The osmotic agent source can contain at least one fluid pathway and include components such as conduits, valves, filters or fluid connection ports, any of which are fluidly connectable to each other or to a fluid flow path. The osmotic agent source can either be formed as a stand-alone enclosure or a compartment integrally formed with an apparatus for dialysis for containing an osmotic agent source. The osmotic agent concentration in the osmotic agent source can be lower or higher than the osmotic agent concentration generally used in dialysis for generation of low or high osmotic agent concentration dialysate.
A “patient” or “subject” is a member of any animal species, preferably a mammalian species, optionally a human. The subject can be an apparently healthy individual, an individual suffering from a disease, or an individual being treated for a disease.
The term “patient parameter” refers to any data without limitations that gives any medical relevant information about the health status of a patient. A patient physiological parameter can include, but is not limited to, blood pressure, blood solute levels, posture or any other medically relevant information. For example, the physiological parameters can encompasses information such as age, weight, gender, current drug therapies, smoking habits, diet, etc.
The term “peritoneal cavity” refers to a space between the parietal peritoneum and visceral peritoneum of a patient.
“Peritoneal dialysate” is a dialysis solution to be used in peritoneal dialysis having specified parameters for purity and sterility. Peritoneal dialysate is different than the dialysate used in hemodialysis, although peritoneal dialysate may be used in hemodialysis.
A “peritoneal dialysate generation flow path” is a path used in generating dialysate suitable for peritoneal dialysis.
The term “positioned” refers to the location of a component.
The term “pressure sensor” refers to any component capable of determining the force exerted by a fluid.
The term “processor” as used herein is a broad term and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art. The term refers without limitation to a computer system, state machine, processor, or the like designed to perform arithmetic or logic operations using logic circuitry that responds to and processes the basic instructions that drive a computer. In any embodiment of the first, second, third, and fourth invention, the terms can include ROM (“read-only memory”) and/or RAM (“random-access memory”) associated therewith.
The term “pump” refers to any device that causes the movement of fluids or gases by applying suction or pressure.
The term “receiving” or to “receive” means to obtain information from any source.
The term “selectively flowing fluid” refers to operating a system to move fluid in a specified flow path.
A “sensor” is a component capable of determining one or more states of one or more variables in a system.
The term “set time” refers to a predetermined moment or time, or a predetermined amount of time between two events.
The term “sterile fluid” refers to a fluid having a level of chemical or biological contaminants lower than a predetermined safe level for infusion into a patient.
A “sterilization module” is a component or set of components to sterilize a fluid by removing or destroying chemical or biological contaminants.
“Sterilizing” or to “sterilize” refers to the process of removing or destroying chemical or biological contaminants in a fluid.
The term “ultrafiltrate” refers to fluid that is removed from a subject by convection through the peritoneal membrane during peritoneal dialysis.
The term “ultrafiltration,” as used herein, refers to the fluid removal from blood during peritoneal dialysis by passing fluid through the peritoneal membrane.
The term “water source” refers to a source from which potable water can be obtained.
Intracycle Osmotic Agent Adjustments
The method 100 can begin in operation 102. A peritoneal dialysis session can be initiated (such as might occur before or during a first cycle of a session) or already underway (such as might occur before or during a subsequent cycle of a session).
In operation 104, control signals infusing an initial bolus of peritoneal dialysate fluid containing one or more osmotic agents, as well as other solutes, into the peritoneal cavity of a patient can be sent to components of the system. For example, a processor of the system can be in communication with a concentrate source and osmotic agent sources and can control the movement of fluid from the concentrate source and osmotic agent sources to a peritoneal dialysate generation flow path of the system. The processor of the system can control the movement of peritoneal dialysate into the peritoneal cavity through an integrated cycler, thereby delivering the initial bolus of fluid.
In operation 106, a parameter (such as time or a patient parameter) may be monitored. Multiple instances of operation 106 are depicted in operation 106. For example, in operation 106a, a duration of time passed since infusion of the peritoneal dialysate into the peritoneal cavity of the patient may be monitored. Additionally or alternatively, in operation 106b, one or more patient parameters may be received during a current cycle. For example, the processor of the system can monitor one or more patient parameters while the peritoneal dialysate is inside the peritoneal cavity during the current cycle. For example, a blood pressure of the patient may be sensed by a blood pressure sensor and monitored by the processor of the system to monitor for a hypotensive episode. Ultrafiltration at too high of a rate or in too high of a volume may lower the patient's blood pressure, placing the patient in a hypotensive state. Pressure sensors in the catheter of the cycler can determine the intraperitoneal pressure of the patient. One of skill in the art will understand that interabdominal pressure can alternatively or additionally be used to measure pressure. The intraperitoneal pressure can be monitored periodically and used as a surrogate to determine the ultrafiltrate volume at any time during a cycle. The changes in ultrafiltrate volume or ultrafiltration rate as determined by the pressure sensors can be extrapolated to determine the efficiency of the osmotic agent over any period of time. As the efficiency of the osmotic agent decreases, additional osmotic agent can be infused into the patient. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that multiple parameters can monitored. Table 1 contains illustrative examples of parameters and adjustments.
Glucose/dextrose osmotic agents typically used in peritoneal dialysis can be transported to the patient's blood through the peritoneum and has an exponential decay in intraperitoneal concentration, meaning that the transport is very effective during the first portion of the cycle but then is much less efficient later in the cycle. By adding a concentrated osmotic agent solution into the peritoneal cavity of the patient during the dwell time, a lower initial osmotic agent concentration can be used.
In operation 108, a change in one or more osmotic agent concentrations may be determined based on the parameter monitored in operation 106. For example, a change in one or more osmotic agent concentrations may be determined based on the occurrence of the passage of a predetermined period of time. As another example, the processor of the system may calculate an adjustment to the osmotic agent concentration based on the monitored blood pressure.
In operation 110, one or more control signals may be sent to components of the system to adjust the osmotic agent concentration of the peritoneal dialysate in the peritoneal cavity of the patient by infusing a sterile fluid into the peritoneal cavity of the patient. Multiple instances of operation 110 are shown in
In operation 112, the method 110 may end. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the method of
The method 200 can begin in operation 202. In operation 204, one or more control signals initiating a peritoneal dialysis cycle may be issued by the processor of the system. The control signals may cause peritoneal dialysate including one or more osmotic agents to be infused through the infusion line into a peritoneal cavity of the patient thereby delivering an initial bolus of fluid. For example, a processor of the system can be in communication with the concentrate source and osmotic agent sources and can control the movement of fluid from the concentrate source and osmotic agent sources to a peritoneal dialysate generation flow path of the system. The processor of the system can control the movement of peritoneal dialysate into the peritoneal cavity. The method 200 may proceed to operation 206.
In operation 206, a parameter (such as time or a patient parameter) may be received or monitored by the system. For example, a duration of time passed since infusion of the peritoneal dialysate into the peritoneal cavity of the patient may be monitored by the processor to adjust the osmotic agent concentration at a set time after infusion of the peritoneal dialysate. The set time can be any time between infusion of the initial peritoneal dialysate and drainage of the peritoneal dialysate, including at ⅛, ¼, ⅓, ½, ⅔, ¾, ⅝, or ⅞ of the way through the cycle, or any combination thereof. Additionally or alternatively, one or more patient parameters may be received during the current cycle. For example, the processor of the system can monitor one or more patient parameters while the peritoneal dialysate is inside the peritoneal cavity during the current cycle. For example, a blood pressure of the patient may be sensed by a blood pressure sensor and monitored by the processor of the system. Additionally, the intraperitoneal pressure of the patient can be sensed and monitored. The method may proceed to operation 208.
In operation 208, parameters of operation 206 and the amount and/or type of osmotic agents in the peritoneal dialysate when the cycle was initiated may be analyzed. For example, a patient parameter such as blood pressure and/or the osmotic agent concentration of the fluid initially infused into the peritoneal cavity of the patient may be analyzed. As another example, the duration of time passed since infusion of the peritoneal dialysate may be analyzed. The method may proceed to operation 210.
In operation 210, a determination may be made regarding whether an adjustment to the osmotic agent concentration in the peritoneal cavity of the patient is desirable based on the analysis of operation 208. For example, if the patient's blood pressure indicates the patient is experience a hypotensive episode, a determination may be made to dilute the osmotic agent in the peritoneum cavity by controlling the flow of fluid from a the water source into the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path and into the patient. As another example, if a predetermined period of time has passed since the initial infusion of the peritoneal dialysate, the system may determine that a “spike” the fluid in the peritoneal cavity by adding glucose and/or dextrose is desired. If during operation 210, a determination is made that an adjustment to the osmotic agent concentration is desirable, the method 200 may proceed to operation 212. If during operation 210, a determination is made that an adjustment to the osmotic agent concentration is desirable, the method 200 may proceed to operation 212.
In operation 212, a determination may be made regarding whether removal of a volume of peritoneal dialysate from the peritoneal cavity of the patient is desired. For example, in the example where a determination is made to dilute the osmotic agent in the peritoneum by controlling sterile fluid from the water source, draining a volume of peritoneal dialysate from the peritoneal cavity to maintain overall cycle volume and avoid overfilling when adding new fluid may be desirable. In the example where a determination is made to “spike” the fluid in the peritoneal cavity by adding a bolus of concentrated osmotic agent solution, draining a volume of peritoneal dialysate from the peritoneal cavity to avoid overfilling when adding new fluid may be desired. Pressure sensors can be included in the cycler to determine the fullness of the patient prior to infusing new fluids.
If, during operation 212, a determination is made that draining a volume of peritoneal dialysate is desired, the method 200 may proceed to operation 214. In operation 214, one or more control signals causing drainage of some of the fluid in the peritoneal cavity may be issued by the processor of the system. The method may proceed to operation 216. If during operation 212, a determination is made that draining a volume of peritoneal dialysate is not desired, the system may proceed to operation 216.
In operation 216, one or more control signals may be sent to components of the system to adjust the osmotic agent concentration of the peritoneal dialysate in the peritoneal cavity of the patient by infusing a sterile fluid into the peritoneal cavity by selectively flowing fluid from one or more concentrate sources into the patient. For example, the processor of the system may control the movement of concentrate solution from one or more concentrate sources to the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path. Additionally or alternatively, the processor of the system may control the movement of one or more osmotic agents from one or more osmotic agent sources to the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path. Additionally or alternatively, the processor of the system may control the movement of fluid from, e.g., a water source to the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path. Additionally or alternatively, the processor of the system may control the movement of peritoneal dialysate into the peritoneal cavity of the patient through an infusion line.
The system can additionally employ a learning mode. When the patient first utilizes the system, the system can trial various osmotic agent bolus timings to determine the most appropriate for the patient and patient state. The delivery of an osmotic agent bolus “spikes” the peritoneal dialysate with osmotic agent. Various parameters in a given cycle can be varied and recorded. Parameters such as bolus amount, bolus timing, and the number of boluses can be recorded. Performance criteria can include the volume of ultrafiltrate removed and toxin concentration of the effluent. The number of bolus applications can vary between 1 and 5; amount between 10% and 50% of the initial fill volume. The effluent concentration can be evaluated by any techniques known in the art, including any of the sensors.
The peritoneal dialysate generation flow path 304 can include a water source 308, one or more water purification modules 310, a concentrate source 312, one or more osmotic agent sources 340, 342, a sterilization module 314, and the peritoneal dialysis cycler 316. The concentrate source 312 and/or osmotic agent sources 340, 342 can contain one or more solutes. The water source 308, water purification module 310, concentrate source 312, osmotic agent sources 340, 342, sterilization module 314, and peritoneal dialysis cycler 316 can be fluidly connectable to the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path 304. The peritoneal dialysis cycler 316 can include the infusion line 330, and one or more infusion pumps 318 for infusing peritoneal dialysate into the peritoneal cavity 352 of the patient 350 and draining fluid from the peritoneal cavity 352 of the patient 350. One or more processors 322 can adjust an osmotic agent concentration for a current or subsequent cycle of the peritoneal dialysis session. For example, the processor 322 can adjust the movement of osmotic agent solution from the osmotic agent sources 340, 342 to the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path 304.
The water source 308 can be a non-purified water source, such as tap water, wherein the water from the water source 308 can be purified by the system. A non-purified water source can provide water without additional purification, such as tap water from a municipal water source, water that has undergone some level of purification, but does not meet the definition of “purified water” provided, such as bottled water or filtered water. The water source can contain water meeting the WHO drinkable water standards provided in Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 4th edition, 2011. Alternatively, the water source 308 can be a source of purified water, meaning water that meets the applicable standards for use in peritoneal dialysis without additional purification. The system pumps water from the water source to the water purification module 310 to remove chemical contaminants in the fluid in preparation of the dialysate. The water purification module 310 can be a sorbent cartridge containing anion and cation exchange resins and/or activated carbon.
The system can pump the fluid to a sterilization module 314 for sterilization of the peritoneal dialysate prior to infusion into the patient. The sterilization module 314 can include one or more of a first ultrafilter, a second ultrafilter, and a UV light source, or any combination thereof. The sterilization module can be any component or set of components capable of sterilizing the peritoneal dialysate.
The concentrate source 312 and/or osmotic agent sources 340, 342 can contain one or more solutes for generation of the peritoneal dialysate from purified water. The concentrates in the concentrate source 312 and osmotic agent sources 340, 342 are utilized to create a peritoneal dialysis fluid that matches a dialysis prescription. A concentrate pump 348 and osmotic agent pumps 344, 346 in communication with the processor or computing unit controls the movement of concentrates and osmotic agents from the concentrate source 312 and osmotic agent sources 340, 342 into the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path 304. Table 2 provides non-limiting exemplary ranges of commonly used components of peritoneal dialysate. One of skill in the art will understand that alternatives to the components listed in Table 2 can be used. Other osmotic agents can be used in addition to, or in place of, the dextrose, including icodextrine or amino acid solutions, including dialysate with multiple osmotic agents. Further, when infusing concentrated osmotic agent into the peritoneal cavity of the patient, the system can use an osmotic agent concentration significantly higher than shown in
The system can use multiple osmotic agent sources 340, 342 containing different osmotic agents. For example, a first osmotic agent source 340 can contain glucose, while a second osmotic agent source 342 can contain icodextrine. Glucose provides a fast transport while icodextrine provides transport over a longer period of time. The system can use both glucose and icodextrine in a single cycle to give better results over the entire cycle length. Additionally, the system can use the glucose in overnight sessions and use icodextrine in the last CAPD (day) cycle to give a good long transport. For the last cycle within the session, the system can optionally use icodextrine to provide a slow and long acting exchange for a daytime CAPD session. The concentrate sources can infuse each particular concentrate to provide an infused ion concentration that is lower than a prescribed amount for a particular patient. One desired outcome can be to provide a concentration for a particular ion that is lower than a patient's pre-dialysis ion concentration. Additionally, if multiple ion sources are to be delivered by a concentrate source, the present system can selectively dilute a desired ion while maintaining concentration levels for other ions. Hence, the present invention can avoid adjusting down every ion insofar as an added diluent may adversely affect concentrations of ions already in a normal range.
The water source 308, water purification module 310, concentrate source 312, osmotic agent sources 340, 342, and sterilization module 314 can be fluidly connectable to the peritoneal dialysis cycler 316 for immediate delivery of the generated peritoneal dialysate to the patient. Alternatively, a peritoneal dialysate reservoir (not shown) can be included to collect the generated peritoneal dialysate for later use. One or more processors 322 which can be part of a larger computing device 320, can control the movement of fluid from the concentrate source 312 osmotic agent sources 340, 342 to the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path 304, for example, by controlling the pumps 344, 346, 348. The processors 322 can also control one or more pumps 318 in the cycler and a heater (not shown) for heating the peritoneal dialysate prior to infusion. One or more sensors can be included in the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path 304 and/or the infusion line 330 to ensure the therapy delivered to the patient matches a peritoneal dialysate prescription.
Patient parameters can be monitored by the one or more sensors 306. Patient parameters can also be derived from the patient 350 such as by monitoring blood pressure via a sensor 306 monitoring the patient 350. Patient parameters can also be input into the system 300 as a parameter input 354. A sensor 306 can be positioned in the peritoneal dialysate effluent line 302, the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path 304, or in both the peritoneal dialysate effluent line 302 and the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path 304. A sensor 306 can be connected to the patient 350. For example, a blood pressure sensor can be connected to the patient 350. Patient parameters can be derived using the one or more or more sensors 306. Implantable sensors or wearable sensors, such as implantable cardiac rhythm management systems or other sensors can be in communication with the processors 322 to provide the system with patient parameters. The sensors 306 can be separate sensors, a combined sensor positioned along both the peritoneal dialysate infusion line 330 and the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path 304, or combined or separate sensors along a common peritoneal dialysate infusion line and peritoneal dialysate generation flow path. The sensors 306 can be placed at various locations along the peritoneal dialysate infusion line 330 and the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path 304, including within or between the cycler 316, the water source 308, the water purification module 310, the concentrate source 312, the osmotic agent sources 340, 342, and the sterilization module 314, or between the cycler 316 and the peritoneal cavity 352. The sensors 306 can be posited to take measurements directly from the patient 350.
The one or more sensors 306 can include blood pressure sensor to measure blood pressure of a patient 350 during a cycle. The sensor 306 can include a flow sensor to measure a volume of fluid infused and/or removed from a peritoneal cavity 352 of the patient 350. The sensor 306 can include a solute concentration sensor to measure a solute concentration of the fluid infused and/or removed from the patient. The sensor 306 can include a refractive index sensor to measure glucose or other osmotic agent concentration in fluid infused and/or removed from the patient. The sensor 306 can include a conductivity sensor or ion selective electrodes to measure conductivity or solute concentration of fluid infused and/or removed from the patient. The sensor 306 can include a pressure sensor to measure a pressure of fluid infused and/or removed from a patient. The sensor 306 can include a temperature sensor to measure a temperature of fluid infused and/or removed from a patient.
The computing device 320 can include the one or more processors 322, memory 324, and one or more input/output interfaces 326. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the memory 324 can include long-term memory and operating memory, and/or memory serving as both long-term memory and operating memory. The memory 324 can be a machine-readable storage medium. The memory 324 can be in communication with the processor 322 and store instructions that when executed perform methods. The input/output interfaces 326 can include an input interface to receive parameter input 354, an input port to receive information from the one or more sensors 306, and an output port to output control signals adjusting an osmotic agent concentration in a peritoneal cavity 352 of a patient. The processor 322 can be in communication with the at least one sensor 306. As with all features of the present application, intervening components (such as the input/output interface 326) can be present between the processor 322 and the sensor 306. The computing device 320 can be a stand-alone device independent of the peritoneal dialysis cycler 316, or can be a part of peritoneal dialysis cycler 316. The computing device 320 can be a remote device in network communication with the sensor 306, such as via the Internet.
An alternative system for monitoring patient parameters during a peritoneal dialysis session to make modifications within the peritoneal dialysis session can include a peritoneal dialysate regeneration module. An infusion line can be fluidly connected to a peritoneal dialysate generation flow path downstream of a sterilization module. A peritoneal dialysate effluent line can be fluidly connected to the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path upstream of the peritoneal dialysate regeneration module. The peritoneal dialysate regeneration module can include a sorbent cartridge, an electrodialysis unit, one or more ultrafilters, or any other combination of components for removal of contaminants from the dialysate removed from the patient. The used peritoneal dialysate, after regeneration, can be pumped back into the peritoneal dialysate generation flow path for reuse.
Prophetic Example 1
The chart of
In
For each cycle, an initial bolus of fluid 402 equivalent to that generally used in peritoneal dialysis, or between 1.5 and 3 L, can be used but can be infused with less osmotic agent than traditional systems. The amount can be variable and could vary from a typical amount to ⅓ or less. Then, at predefined times, depending on the decay of the osmotic effect, a bolus of fluid and osmotic agent can be added to enhance the therapeutic effect. A portion of the peritoneal dialysate in the peritoneal cavity of the patient can be drained to compensate for the added bolus, and the amount removed could be equivalent to the amount being added (10-50% of initial volume) to maintain overall cycle volume. Removal of a portion of the peritoneal dialysate can also maintain patient comfort, as too much fluid in the peritoneal cavity can distend the belly and feel uncomfortable for the patient.
One skilled in the art will understand that various combinations and/or modifications and variations can be made in the described systems and methods depending upon the specific needs for operation. Moreover, features illustrated or described as being part of an aspect of the invention may be used in the aspect of the invention, either alone or in combination.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/666,631 filed Aug. 2, 2017, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/373,228 filed Aug. 10, 2016, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3602222 | Herndon | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3608729 | Haselden | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3669878 | Marantz | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3669880 | Marantz | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3730183 | Goldsmith | May 1973 | A |
| 3754867 | Guenther | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3850835 | Marantz | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3884808 | Scott | May 1975 | A |
| 3989622 | Marantz | Nov 1976 | A |
| 3989625 | Mason | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4060485 | Eaton | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4371385 | Johnson | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4374382 | Markowitz | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4381999 | Boucher | May 1983 | A |
| 4460555 | Thompson | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4556063 | Thompson | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4562751 | Nason | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4581141 | Ash | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4650587 | Polak | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4661246 | Ash | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4678408 | Mason | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4685903 | Cable | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4747822 | Peabody | May 1988 | A |
| 4750494 | King | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4772560 | Attar | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4799493 | DuFault | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4826663 | Alberti | May 1989 | A |
| 4828693 | Lindsay | May 1989 | A |
| 4976683 | Gauthier | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5032265 | Jha | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5080653 | Voss | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5091642 | Chow | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5092838 | Faict | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5092886 | Dobos-Hardy | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5097122 | Coiman | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5127404 | Wyborny | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5141493 | Jacobsen | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5284470 | Beltz | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5302288 | Meidl | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5305745 | Zacouto | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5318750 | Lascombes | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5468388 | Goddard | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5507723 | Keshaviah | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5643201 | Peabody | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5651893 | Kenley | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5683432 | Goedeke | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5744031 | Bene | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5762782 | Kenley | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5819007 | Elghazzawi | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5902336 | Mishkin | May 1999 | A |
| 5944684 | Roberts | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5987352 | Klein | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6048732 | Anslyn | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6052622 | Holmstrom | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6058331 | King | May 2000 | A |
| 6156002 | Polaschegg | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6230059 | Duffin | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6248093 | Moberg | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254567 | Treu | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6321101 | Holmstrom | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6362591 | Moberg | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363279 | Ben-Haim | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6505075 | Weiner | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6554798 | Mann | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6555986 | Moberg | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6589229 | Connelly | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6602399 | Fromherz | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6609023 | Fischell | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6627164 | Wong | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6645191 | Knerr | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6676608 | Keren | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6689083 | Gelfand | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6706007 | Gelfand | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6711439 | Bradley | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6726647 | Sternby | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6780322 | Bissler | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6818196 | Wong | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6878283 | Thompson | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6887214 | Levin | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6890315 | Levin | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6960179 | Gura | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7074332 | Summerton | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7077819 | Goldau | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7131956 | Pirazzoli | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7175809 | Gelfand | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7207946 | Sirokman | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7208092 | Micheli | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7276042 | Polaschegg | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7399289 | Gelfand | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7404799 | Koh | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7500958 | Asbrink | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7566432 | Wong | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7575564 | Childers | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7610086 | Ke | Oct 2009 | B1 |
| 7674231 | McCombie | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7704361 | Garde | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7736507 | Wong | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7744553 | Kelly | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7754852 | Burnett | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7756572 | Fard | Jul 2010 | B1 |
| 7775983 | Zhang | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7775986 | Roeher | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7776210 | Rosenbaum | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7785463 | Bissler | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7794141 | Perry | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7850635 | Polaschegg | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7857976 | Bissler | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7867214 | Childers | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7896831 | Sternby | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7922686 | Childers | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7922911 | Micheli | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7947179 | Rosenbaum | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7955291 | Sternby | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7967022 | Grant | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7981082 | Wang | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8000000 | Greenberg | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8034161 | Gura | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8070709 | Childers | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8096969 | Roberts | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8105260 | Tonelli | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8183046 | Lu | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8187250 | Roberts | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8197439 | Wang | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8202241 | Karakama | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8246826 | Wilt | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8273049 | Demers | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8282828 | Wallenas | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8292594 | Tracey | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8313642 | Yu | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8317492 | Demers | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8357113 | Childers | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8366316 | Kamen | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8366655 | Kamen | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8404091 | Ding | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8409441 | Wilt | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8496809 | Roger | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8499780 | Wilt | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8500676 | Jansson | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8512271 | Moissl | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8518260 | Raimann | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8521482 | Akonur | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8535525 | Heyes | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8560510 | Brueggerhoff | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8580112 | Updyke | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8597227 | Childers | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8696626 | Kirsch | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8903492 | Soykan | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8926542 | Gerber | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 9700663 | Burbank | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9907897 | Burbank | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 10046100 | Burbank | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 20020016550 | Sweeney | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042561 | Schulman | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020112609 | Wong | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030028089 | Galley | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069481 | Hervy | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030080059 | Peterson | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097086 | Gura | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105435 | Taylor | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030113931 | Pan | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114787 | Gura | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187479 | Thong | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040019312 | Childers | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040060865 | Callan | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068219 | Summerton | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040099593 | DePaolis | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040147900 | Polaschegg | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040168969 | Sternby | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215090 | Erkkila | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050065760 | Murtfeldt | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113796 | Taylor | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050126961 | Bissler | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131331 | Kelly | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050126998 | Childers | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050150832 | Tsukamoto | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050214863 | McDevitt | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234354 | Rowlandson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234357 | Xue | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234381 | Niemetz | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234534 | Rowlandson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050236330 | Nier | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050265895 | Kopelman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050274658 | Rosenbaum | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060025661 | Sweeney | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060025748 | Ye | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060217771 | Soykan | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060058731 | Burnett | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060191850 | Bosetto | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195064 | Plahey | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060226079 | Mori | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241709 | Soykan | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247548 | Sarkar | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060264894 | Moberg | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070007208 | Brugger | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038138 | Gill | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070066928 | Lannoy | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073168 | Zhang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070138011 | Hofmann | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070161113 | Ash | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070175827 | Wariar | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179431 | Roberts | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070213653 | Childers | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070215545 | Bissler | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255250 | Moberg | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276270 | Tran | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080006570 | Gura | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080015487 | Szamosfalvi | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080021337 | Li | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080053905 | Brugger | Mar 2008 | A9 |
| 20080067132 | Ross | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080093276 | Roger | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080200866 | Prisco | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080215247 | Tonelli | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080253427 | Kamen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090020471 | Tsukamoto | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090036825 | Petersen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090101577 | Fulkerson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090124869 | Hu | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090124963 | Hogard | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090127193 | Updyke | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090149776 | Adams | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171261 | Sternby | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090264776 | Vardy | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090275849 | Stewart | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090275883 | Chapman | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090281484 | Childers | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090282980 | Gura | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090314063 | Sternby | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100004588 | Yeh | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100010425 | Yu | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100010429 | Childers | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100042035 | Moissl | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100076398 | Scheurer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100078381 | Merchant | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100078387 | Wong | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100084330 | Wong | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100087771 | Karakama | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094158 | Solem | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100113891 | Barrett | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100114012 | Sandford | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137693 | Porras | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137782 | Jansson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100168546 | Kamath | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217180 | Akonur | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217181 | Roberts | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100224492 | Ding | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100234795 | Wallenas | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100241045 | Kelly | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100264086 | Noack | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312172 | Hoffman | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110017665 | Updyke | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110048949 | Ding et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110066006 | Banet | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110066043 | Banet | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110071465 | Wang | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110077574 | Sigg | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110077575 | Kraemer | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110079558 | Raimann | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110081728 | Putnam | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110087187 | Beck | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110100909 | Stange | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110106003 | Childers | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110130666 | Dong | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137136 | Kotanko | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110141116 | Dalesch | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110144570 | Childers | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184340 | Tan | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110208105 | Brandl | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110272337 | Palmer | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301447 | Park | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301472 | Grober | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120016228 | Kroh | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120029937 | Neftel | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120083729 | Childers | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120085707 | Beiriger | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120115248 | Ansyln | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120135396 | McDevitt | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120181230 | Kloeffel | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120220528 | VanAntwerp | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120258545 | Ash | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120258546 | Marran | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120259276 | Childers | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120273354 | Soykan | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120273415 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120273420 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277546 | Soykan | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277551 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277552 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277604 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277650 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277655 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277722 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120283581 | Olde et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120303079 | Mahajan | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130037465 | Heyes | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130062265 | Balschat | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130116578 | An | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130158461 | Sasaki | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130168316 | Noguchi | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130186759 | Lin | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130193073 | Hogard | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130199998 | Kelly | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130211730 | Wolff | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130213890 | Kelly | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130228517 | Roger | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130231607 | Roger | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130248426 | Pouchoulin | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130274642 | Soykan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130324915 | (Krensky)Britton | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130330208 | Ly | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130331774 | Farrell | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140018727 | Burbank | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140018728 | Plahey | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140042092 | Akonur | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140065950 | Mendelsohn | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140088442 | Soykan | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140110340 | White | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140110341 | White | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140158538 | Collier | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140158588 | Pudil | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140158623 | Pudil | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140190876 | Meyer | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140216250 | Meyer | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140217028 | Pudil | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140217029 | Meyer | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140217030 | Meyer | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140220699 | Pudil | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140314625 | Clift | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150032023 | Soykan | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150080682 | Gerber | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150088047 | Gerber | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150141512 | Kizhakkedathu | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150144539 | Pudil | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150148697 | Burnes | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150149096 | Soykan | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150250427 | Soykan | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150343126 | Merchant | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150352269 | Gerber | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150367054 | Gerber | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160018347 | Drbal | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160143774 | Burnett | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160166753 | Meyer | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160206801 | Gerber | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160331884 | Sigg | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170281848 | Axelsson | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170319768 | Szpara | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180043080 | Gerber | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1273535 | Nov 2000 | CN |
| 1643368 | Jul 2005 | CN |
| 101193667 | Jun 2008 | CN |
| 101300476 | Nov 2008 | CN |
| 201342127 | Nov 2009 | CN |
| 202048893 | Mar 2011 | CN |
| 103037917 | Apr 2013 | CN |
| 103394139 | Nov 2013 | CN |
| 103619372 | Mar 2014 | CN |
| 103717132 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 104174077 | Dec 2014 | CN |
| 104833635 | Aug 2015 | CN |
| 104884102 | Sep 2015 | CN |
| 105008893 | Oct 2015 | CN |
| 105142692 | Dec 2015 | CN |
| 205672288 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 107206147 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 3224823 | Jan 1984 | DE |
| 0266795 | Nov 1987 | EP |
| 0402505 | Dec 1990 | EP |
| 0272414 | Oct 1991 | EP |
| 0330892 | Jul 1994 | EP |
| 1175238 | Nov 2000 | EP |
| 1085295 | Nov 2001 | EP |
| 1281351 | Feb 2003 | EP |
| 2308526 | Oct 2003 | EP |
| 1364666 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1523347 | Jan 2004 | EP |
| 1523350 | Jan 2004 | EP |
| 0906768 | Feb 2004 | EP |
| 1691863 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 2116269 | Feb 2008 | EP |
| 1450879 | Oct 2008 | EP |
| 1514562 | Apr 2009 | EP |
| 2219703 | May 2009 | EP |
| 1592494 | Jun 2009 | EP |
| 2398529 | Nov 2010 | EP |
| 2575827 | Dec 2010 | EP |
| 2100553 | Aug 2011 | EP |
| 2576453 | Dec 2011 | EP |
| 2701580 | Nov 2012 | EP |
| 2701595 | Nov 2012 | EP |
| 1345856 | Mar 2013 | EP |
| 2344220 | Apr 2013 | EP |
| 1351756 | Jul 2013 | EP |
| 2190498 | Jul 2013 | EP |
| 2701596 | Mar 2014 | EP |
| 1582226 | Jan 2016 | EP |
| S55138462 | Oct 1980 | JP |
| S63-143077 | Nov 1987 | JP |
| 2002533170 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2002542900 | Dec 2002 | JP |
| 2003235965 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 2005-533573 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 5-99464 | Oct 2012 | JP |
| 1995003839 | Feb 1995 | WO |
| WO 1998054563 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO1999006082 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| 9937342 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| PCT1124599 | May 2000 | WO |
| 0057935 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO2000057935 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| 2000066197 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| 200170307 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| 2001085295 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| 0185295 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 2002013691 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO 20020053211 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| 2003043677 | May 2003 | WO |
| 2003043680 | May 2003 | WO |
| 2003051422 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| 2004008826 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| 2004009156 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| 2004009158 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| 2004030716 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| 2004030717 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| 2004064616 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| 2005033701 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| 2005061026 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| 2005123230 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2006011009 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006017446 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2007038347 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| 2007089855 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO2009094035 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008037410 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| 2009026603 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2009024566 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| 2009061608 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009094184 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| 2009157877 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| 2009157878 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO2009154955 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 20090154955 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 20100002830 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 2010024963 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2010028860 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2010033314 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2010033699 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2010077851 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| 2010096659 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2010121820 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2011025705 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| 2011026645 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| WO2013022760 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011132046 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| 2011137693 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| WO2011161056 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| 2012042323 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2012050781 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2012051996 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2012073420 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012129501 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| 2012148781 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012148784 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012148786 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012148787 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012148789 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012162515 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| WO2012148788 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| WO 20120148784 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012172398 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2013019179 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 2013019994 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 2013025844 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 2013028809 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 2013101292 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| 2013103607 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| 2013103906 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| 2013110906 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2013110919 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2013114063 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2013121162 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2013140346 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| 2013141896 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| 14066254 | May 2014 | WO |
| 14066255 | May 2014 | WO |
| 14077082 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014121162 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| 2014121163 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| 2014121167 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| 2014121169 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO2014121161 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO 20140121161 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO 20140121169 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO2015081221 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO 20150130205 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO 20150159280 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO2016049542 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| WO-2016080883 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 20160080883 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 20170034452 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017176687 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017176701 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO2018229125 | Dec 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Wollenstein, et al, “Colorimetric gas sensors for the detection of ammonia, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide: current status and research trends”, Sensor and Test Conference 2011, Jan. 2, 2011, pp. 562-567. |
| Written Opinion in Dutch App. No. 2018577, dated Nov. 2, 2017. |
| European Search Report for App. No. 20198933.2, dated Dec. 22, 2020. |
| Brynda, et. al., The detection of toman 2-microglcbuiin by grating coupler immunosensor with three dimensional antibody networks. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 1999, 363-368, 14(4). |
| Wheaton, et al., Dowex Ion Exchange Resins—Fundamentals of Ion Exchange; Jun. 2000, pp. 1-9. http://www.dow.com/scripts/litorder.asp?filepath=liquidseps/pdfs/noreg/177-01837.pdf. |
| Zhong, et. al., Miniature urea sensor based on H(+)-ion sensitive field effect transistor and its application in clinical analysis, Chin. J. Biotechnol., 1992, 57-65. 8(1). |
| PCT/US2012/034331, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 9, 2012. |
| Roberts M, The regenerative dialysis (REDY) sorbent system. Nephrology, 1998, 275-278:4. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,544, dated Apr. 29, 2011. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,541 dated Apr. 29, 2011. |
| Hemametrics, Crit-Line Hematocrit Accuracy, 2003, 1-5, vol. 1, Tech Note No. 11 (Rev. D). |
| Weissman, S., et al., Hydroxyurea-induced hepatitis in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients. Clin. Infec. Dis, (Jul. 29, 1999): 223-224. |
| PCT/US2012/034334, International Search Report, dated Jul. 6, 2012. |
| PCT/US2012/034335, International Search Report, dated Sep. 5, 2012. |
| PCT/US/2012/034327, International Search Report, dated Aug. 13, 2013. |
| PCT/US/2012/034329, International Search Report, dated Dec. 3, 2012. |
| Foley, et al., Long Interdialytic Interval and Martality among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis, N Engl Jrnl Med. 2011:365(12):1099-1107. |
| PCT International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US2014/067650, dated Mar. 9, 2015. |
| Wang, Fundamentals of intrathoracic impedance monitoring in heart failure, Am. J. Cardiology, 2007, 3G-10G: Suppl. |
| PCT/US2014/067650 International Search Report Written Opinion dated Mar. 9, 2015. |
| Bleyer, et al, Kidney International. Jun. 2006; 69(12):2268-2273. |
| Bleyer, et. al., Sudden and cardiac death rated in hemodialysis patients, Kidney International. 1999, 1553-1559: 55. |
| PCT/US2012/034335, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
| PCT/US2012/034303, Internationa Search Report, dated Jul. 6, 2013. |
| PCT/US2012/034332, Internatonal Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
| PCT/US2012/034333, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
| PCT/US2012/034333, International Search Report, dated Aug. 29, 2012. |
| PCT/US2012/034327, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
| PCT/US2012/034330, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
| Culleton, BF et al. Effect of Frequent Nocturnal Hemodialysis vs. Conventional Hemodialysis on Left Ventricular Mass and Quality of Life. 2007 Journal of the American Medical Association 298 (11), 1291-1299. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,722, filed Feb. 1, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,794, filed Feb. 2, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/791,755, filed Mar. 8, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,479, filed Nov. 1, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,792, filed Feb. 2, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,794, filed Feb. 2, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,287, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,429, filed Nov. 1, 2012. |
| Redfield, et. al, Restoration of renal response to atria! natriuretic factor in experimental low-output heat failure, Am. J. Physiol., Oct. 1, 1989, R917-923:257. |
| Rogoza, et. al., Validation of A&D UA-767 device for the self-measurement of blood pressure, Blood Pressure Monitoring, 2000, 227-231, 5(4). |
| PCT/US2012/034329, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
| Lima, et. al., An electrochemical sensor based on nanostructure hollandite-type manganese oxide for detection of potassium ion, Sensors, Aug. 24, 2009, 6613-8625, 9. |
| Maclean, et, al., Effects of hindlimb contraction on pressor and muscle interstitial metabolite responses in the cat, J. App. Physiol., 1998, 1583-1592, 85(4). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,693, filed Feb. 1, 2013. |
| PCT Application, PCT/US2013/020404, filed Jan. 4, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525, published Nov. 1, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/836,973, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/259,655, filed Apr. 23, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/259,589, filed Apr. 23, 2014. |
| PCT/US2014/014357 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 19, 2014. |
| Ronco et al. 2008, Cardiorenal Syndrome, Journal American College Cardiology, 52:1527-1539, Abstract. |
| Overgaard, et. al., Activity-induced recovery of excitability in K+-depressed rat soleus muscle, Am. J. P 280: R48-R55, Jan. 1, 2001. |
| Overgaard. et. al., Relations between excitability and contractility in rate soleusmuscle: role of the NA+-K+ pump and NA+-K-S gradients. Journal of Physiology, 1999, 215-225, 518(1). |
| Zoccali, Pulmonary Congestion Predicts Cardiac Events and Mortality in ESRD, Clinical Epidemiology, J. Am Soc Nephrol 24:639-646, 2013. |
| Coast, et al. 1990, An approach to Cardiac Arrhythmia analysis Using Hidden Markov Models, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 1990, 37(9):826-835. |
| Weiner, et. al., Article: Cardiac Function and Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease, Book: Primer on Kidney Diseases (Author: Greenberg, et al), 2009,499-505, 5th Ed., Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,532, filed Apr. 29, 2011. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,479, published Nov. 1, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525, published Nov. 1, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,530, filed Apr. 29, 2011. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,528, filed Apr. 29, 2011. |
| Velasco, Optimal Fluid Control can Normalize Cardiovascular Risk Markers and Limit Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Thrice Weekly Dialysis Patients, Hemodialysis Intenational, 16:465-472, 2012. |
| Whitman, CKD and Sudden Cardiac Death: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Approaches, J Am Soc Nephrol, 23:1929-1939, 2012. |
| Hall, Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure: United States, 2000-2010, NCHS Data Brief, No. 108, Oct. 2012. |
| Albert, Fluid Management Strategies in Heart Failure, Critical Care Nurse, 32:20-32, 2012. |
| PCT/US2014/065201 International Search Report dated May 26, 2015. |
| Genovesi, et al., Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2009; 24(8):2529-2536. |
| Secemsky, et. al, High prevalence of cardiac autonomic dysfunction and T-wave alternans in dialysis patients. Heart Rhythm, Apr. 2011, 592-598 : vol. 8, No. 4. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,517 IDS, filed Aug. 2, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,517, IDS filed Dec. 2, 2013. |
| Wei, et. al., Fullerene-cryptand coated piezoelectric crystal urea sensor based on urease, Analytica Chimica Acta, 2001,77-85:437. |
| Gambro AK 96 Dialysis Machine Operators Manual, Dec. 2012. p. 1-140. |
| Gambro AK 96 Dialysis Machine Operators Manual, Dec. 2012. p. 141-280. |
| Gambro AK 96 Dialysis Machine Operators Manual, Dec. 2012. p. 281-420. |
| Gambro AK 96 Dialysis Machine Operators Manual, Dec. 2012. p. 421-534. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/368,225, filed Feb. 7, 2012. |
| Leifer et al., A Study on the Temperature Variation of Rise Velocity for Large Clean Bubbles, J. Atmospheric & Oceanic Tech., vol. 17, pp. 1392-1402, Oct. 2000. |
| Talaia, Terminal Velocity of a Bubble Rise in a Liquid Column, World Acad. of Sci., Engineering & Tech., vol. 28, pp. 264-268, Published Jan. 1, 2007. |
| The FHN Trial Group. In-Center. Hemodialysis Six Times per Week versus Three Times per Week, New England Journal of Medicine, 2010 Abstract. |
| PCT/US2012/034332, International Search Report, dated Jul. 5, 2012. |
| Siegenthaler, et al., Pulmonary fluid status monitoring with intrathoracic impedance, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 24:449-451, published Jan. 12, 2011. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,792 dated Apr. 6, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,544. unpublished. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525 dated Aug. 11, 2015. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525 dated Oct. 20, 2016. |
| John Wm Agar: Review: Understanding sorbent dialysis systems, Nephrology, vol. 15, No. 4, Jun. 1, 2010, pp. 406-411. |
| European Office Action in Application 12717020.7 dated Sep. 14, 2016. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/554,272 dated Aug. 8, 2016. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,467 dated Oct. 16, 2013. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,467 dated Mar. 3, 2014. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,490 dated Oct. 22, 2013. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,490 dated Mar. 10, 2014. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,490 dated Jul. 14, 2014. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,490 dated Dec. 5, 2014. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525 dated Sep. 29, 2014. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525 dated May 6, 2015. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,454 dated Oct. 17, 2013. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,454 dated Mar. 10, 2014. |
| Office action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,429 dated Oct. 15, 2015. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,127 dated Feb. 27, 2014. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,127 dated Jul. 6, 2015. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,127 dated Dec. 17, 2015. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/554,338 dated Jun. 7, 2016. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/554,338 dated Sep. 28, 2016. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,127 dated Nov. 8, 2012. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,479 dated Oct. 25, 2014. |
| Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/566,686 dated Apr. 28, 2016. |
| Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201510511657.9 dated Dec. 28, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,454, dated Nov. 1, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,467, published Nov. 1, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,533, dated Nov. 1, 2012. |
| Lakerveld et al, Primary prevention of diabetes mellitus type 2 and cardiovascular diseases using a cognitive behavior program aimed at lifestyle changes in people at risk: Design of a randomized controlled trial, 2008, BMC Endocrine Disorders, 8(6): 1-19. |
| Gordhandas et al, Real-Time Extraction and Analysis of Key Morphological Features in the Electrocardiogram, for Data Compression and Clinical Decision Support, 2004, Computational Physiology, pp. 15-18. |
| European Office Action in Application 12717020.7 dated Dec. 11, 2015. |
| PCT/US2012/034331 International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
| Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201280020932.1 dated Jan. 7, 2015. |
| Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201280020932.1 dated Apr. 3, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,490, published Nov. 1, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,517, dated Nov. 1, 2012. |
| PCT/US2012/034330, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 28, 2012. |
| Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201280020937.4 dated Mar. 22, 2016. |
| Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2014-508434 dated Nov. 16, 2015. |
| Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2014-508434 dated Dec. 8, 2014. |
| Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2014-508434 dated Nov. 4, 2016. |
| Office Action in European Application No. 12717019.9 dated Feb. 16, 2017. |
| Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201510511657.9 dated May 10, 2017. |
| PCT/US2014/065201 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 19, 2016. |
| Office Action in European Application No. EP 12717021.5 dated Feb. 3, 2017. |
| Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201510593695.3 dated Jul. 12, 2017. |
| Office Action in European Application No. EP 12719170.8 dated Jan. 14, 2015. |
| Office Action in Japanese Application No. JP 2014-508437 dated Dec. 8, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/650,497, filed Feb. 7, 2005. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,539, filed Apr. 29, 2011. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,535, filed Apr. 29, 2011. |
| Nedelkov, et. al., Design of buffer exchange surfaces and sensor chips for biosensor chip mass spectrometry, Proteomics, 2002, 441-446, 2(4). |
| European Search Report App 14865374.4, dated Jun. 12, 2017. |
| European Search Report for Application No. 14865128.4 dated Jun. 20, 2017. |
| Green et al., Sudden Cardiac Death in Hemodialysis Patients: an In-Depth Review , Am J Kidney Dis 57(6)921:929; published Apr. 18, 2011. |
| Rajan et al. Generalized Feature Extraction for Time-Varying Autoregressive Models, IEEE Transacion Signal Processing vol. 44, No. 10; published Oct. 1, 1996. |
| Castellanos, et al, Clinical Relevance of Intraperitoneal Pressure in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients, Perit Dial Int. Sep.-Oct. 2017;37(5):562-567. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00267. Epub Jul. 11, 2017. |
| Chinese OA in 201710669452.2 of Oct. 16, 2019. |
| Chinese Office Action for App. No. 201710669451.8, dated Jun. 2, 2020. |
| Chinese Office Action for App. No. 201710669451.8, dated Sep. 12, 2019. |
| Chinese Office Action for App. No. 201710669452.2, dated Dec. 3, 2019. |
| Chinese Office Action for App. No. 201710669454.1, dated Feb. 25, 2020. |
| Chinese Office Action for App. No. 201710669454.1, dated Jul. 3, 2020. |
| Chinese Office Action for App. No. 201710778666.3, dated Jul. 15, 2020. |
| Chinese Office Action for App. No. 201780019237.6, dated May 25, 2020. |
| Chinese Office Action for App. No. 201780019238.0, dated May 7, 2020. |
| Chinese Office Action for App. No. 201780019362.7, dated Jun. 2, 2020. |
| Chinese Office Action for App. No. 201811107614.4, dated Sep. 28, 2020. |
| Chinese Office Action for App. No. 2019071601874110, dated Jul. 19, 2019. |
| Chinese Office Action in App. No. 201480059332.5, dated Mar. 30, 2018. |
| Chinese Office Action in App. No. 201710669452.2, dated May 11, 2020. |
| Dejardin, et al, Intraperitoneal pressure in PD patients: relationship to intraperitoneal volume, body size and PD-related complications, Nephrol Dial Transplant. May 2007;22(5):1437-44. |
| European Office Action for App. No. 12719842.2, dated Jul. 15, 2020. |
| European Office Action for App. No. 14859115.9, dated Mar. 25, 2020. |
| European Office Action for App. No. 17718246.6, dated Apr. 2, 2020. |
| European Office Action for App. No. 17754582.9, dated Aug. 10, 2020. |
| European Search Report for App. No. 17185636.2, dated Mar. 27, 2018. |
| European Search Report for App. No. 14859115.9, dated Jan. 5, 2018. |
| European Search Report for App. No. 17185636.2 dated Jan. 10, 2018. |
| European Search Report for App. No. 17185638.8, dated Dec. 19, 2017. |
| European Search Report for App. No. 17185808.7, dated Jan. 2, 2018. |
| European Search Report for App. No. 17185810.3, dated Dec. 15, 2017. |
| European Search Report for App. No. 17190053.3, dated Jan. 2, 2018. |
| European Search Report for App. No. 17190066.5, dated Jan. 16, 2018. |
| European Search Report for App. No. 17190084.8, dated Feb. 9, 2018. |
| European search report for App. No. 19219612.9, dated Apr. 29, 2020. |
| F. Locatelli, et al: “Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys?” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation., vol. 20, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2005. |
| Heiko Hickstein, et al; “Clinical application of fuzzy-controlled blood pressure stabilization in patients prone to hypotension duirng hemodiaylsis”, Dyalysis & Transplantation, vol. 38, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2009, pp. 58-64. |
| Henderson, et al, “Online Preparation of Sterile Pyrogen-Free Electrolyte Solution,” Trans. Am. Soc. Artif.Intern.Organs, 1978 pp. 465-467. |
| Indian OA of Nov. 21, 2019 in 2981/KOLNP/2013. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for App. No. PCT/US2019/019334, dated Jun. 12, 2019. |
| International Search Report for App. No. PCT/US2019/061670, dated Jan. 15, 2020. |
| Laurent, Jeanpierre, “Continuous Monitoring of Dynamic Systems: Application to Monitoring of Dialyzed Patients” Oct. 30, 2004, received from internet: http://laurent.jeanpierre1.free.fr/recherche/papiers/aista2004.pdf. |
| Office Action for EP App. No.17185808.7, dated Oct. 8, 2019. |
| Office Action for European App. No. 17718241.7, dated Apr. 2, 2020. |
| Office Action for European Application No. 17185636.2, dated Mar. 19, 2020. |
| Office Action in Chinese App. No. 201710778666.3 dated Sep. 19, 2019. |
| Office Action in Chinese App. No. 201780019238.0, dated Sep. 25, 2020. |
| PCT/US2016/058579 International Search Report dated Jan. 31, 2017. |
| PCT/US2016/058579 Written Opinion dated Jan. 31, 2017. |
| PCT/US2017/025868 International Search Report dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
| PCT/US2017/025868 Written Opinion dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
| PCT/US2017/030377 International Search Report dated Sep. 1, 2017. |
| PCT/US2017/030377 Written Opinion dated Sep. 1, 2017. |
| PCTUS20170146199 ISR and written opinion, dated Feb. 19, 2018. |
| PCTUS2017025858 International Search Report dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
| PCTUS2017025858 Written Opinion dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
| PCTUS2017025876 International Search Report dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
| PCTUS2017025876 Written Opinion dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210001031 A1 | Jan 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62373228 | Aug 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15666631 | Aug 2017 | US |
| Child | 17024039 | US |
