1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a PET/MRI device and a PET device, and more particularly to a PET/MRI device that can obtain a PET image and an MRI image almost simultaneously in a short time, and a PET device whose PET detector can be brought close to a measurement object for improved sensitivity.
2. Description of the Related Art
PET/CT devices such as shown in
Instead of the CT device, an MRI device which can obtain morphological images without radiation exposure is receiving attention. A PET/MRI device capable of obtaining both PET and MRI images has been under research and development. In particular, there has been developed a PET/MRI device of semiconductor light receiving element type in which all the detector units of the PET device are arranged within the static magnetic field of the MRI, using magnetically insensitive avalanche photodiodes (APDs) or Geiger mode APDs (also referred to as SiPMs) as the light receiving elements, and this PET/MRI device can be applied to those for small animals and for the heads (See the following non-patent and patent documents: Schlyer D et al. “A Simultaneous PET/MRI scanner based on RatCAP in small animals,” IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Volume: 5, pp. 3256-3259, 2007; Schlemmer H W et al. “Simultaneous MR/PET Imaging of the Human Brain: Feasibility Study,” Radiology, 2008: 248, 1028-1035; Judenhofer M S et al. “Simultaneous PET-MRI: a new approach for functional and morphological imaging,” Net Med 2008, 14(4): 459-65; U.S. Pat. No. 7,626,392 B2; U.S. Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008/0287772 A1; and U.S. Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2009/0108206 A1).
Given detectors of the same sensitivity, the PET device typically increases in sensitivity as the detectors are located closer to the patient and as the field of view in the direction of the body axis of the patient (referred to as axial field of view) is widened. The axial field of view of the PET device as wide as the effective axial field of view of the MRI device (30 to 40 cm or so), which is determined by the stable area of the static magnetic field, has had the problem of insufficient sensitivity of the PET device, requiring a PET measurement time longer than the MRI measurement time (typically several minutes).
The present invention has been achieved in order to solve the foregoing conventional problem. It is thus a first object of the present invention to make it possible to obtain a PET image and an MRI image almost simultaneously in a short time.
A second object of the present invention is to improve the sensitivity of the PET detector.
The foregoing first object of the present invention has been achieved by the provision of a PET/MRI device including: an MRI device that has a measurement port; a PET detector that is insertable into the measurement port; and a mechanism that is capable of sliding the PET detector into and out of the measurement port of the MRI device, MRI measurement being allowed during PET measurement.
The PET detector may have a measurement field of view having a width wider than that of the MRI device in a longitudinal direction of a measurement object.
The PET detector may be movable through the measurement port with the measurement object.
The foregoing second object has been achieved by the PET detector being attached to a bed of the measurement object for integral movement.
The PET/MRI device may include a mechanism that is capable of sliding the PET detector in a longitudinal direction of the bed on which the measurement object is put.
An MRI RF coil may be attached to inside the PET detector.
The MRI RF coil attached to inside the PET detector may be a transmitter coil, a receiver coil, a transmitter-receiver two-way coil, or a coil that includes both a transmitter coil and a receiver coil.
The width of the measurement field of view of the PET detector may be extended to cover the measurement object at least from its head to its trunk.
The PET detector may be divided in the longitudinal direction of the measurement object.
Detector rings that constitute the PET detector, and/or detector units that constitute the detector rings, may be arranged at nonuniform intervals.
PET detectors having different resolutions and/or sensitivities may be used for the head and the trunk, respectively.
The PET detector for a head may have a resolution higher than that of the PET detector for a trunk.
The PET detector for the head may include a detector ring that has an inner diameter smaller than that of a detector ring that constitutes the PET detector for the trunk.
The PET detector may have an opening in at least an eye-covering area near the head of the measurement object.
A detector ring that constitutes the PET detector near a trunk of the measurement object may have a sectional shape such that its size in a thickness direction of the measurement object is different from that in a width direction perpendicular to the thickness direction so that the detector approaches a surface of the trunk.
The detector ring that constitutes the PET detector near the trunk of the measurement object may include an arched upper half portion and an arched lower half portion in the thickness direction of the measurement object, the arched upper half portion having a radius of curvature smaller than that of the arched lower half portion.
The detector ring that constitutes the PET detector may have a detector ring that has an arched upper half portion in the thickness direction of the measurement object, the arched upper half portion being openable at least in part.
The arched upper half portion may be opened in a double-door configuration.
The arched upper half portion may be opened in a single-door configuration.
The arched upper half portion and a remaining arched lower half portion may be separable from each other.
The detector ring that constitutes the PET detector may have an arched upper half portion in the thickness direction of the measurement object, the arched upper half portion being variable in size and/or in shape according to the measurement object.
The PET detector for a head may be movable with respect to and/or detachable from the PET detector for a trunk.
The PET measurement may be started before the PET detector starts being slid into the MRI measurement port, and ended after the PET detector ends being slid to a retracted position of the measurement object after end of the MRI measurement, whereby PET measurement time is maximized.
The PET detector may include a mechanism for sliding inside the measurement port independent of a sliding movement of the measurement object, so that the PET detector can slide at a moving speed lower than that at which the measurement object slides.
The PET/MRI device may include a slide mechanism that is capable of retracting the PET detector into the MRI measurement port so as to facilitate loading and unloading of the measurement object onto/from the bed and setup of the measurement object.
The PET measurement may be started immediately before start of the MRI measurement and ended immediately after end of the MRI measurement, or PET data that is collected from immediately before the start of the MRI measurement to immediately after the end of the MRI measurement may be used for PET image reconstruction processing, so as to improve simultaneity between the PET measurement and the MRI measurement.
The second object of the present invention has also been achieved by the attachment of a PET detector to a bed of a measurement object.
The present invention also provides a PET device including a belt-like PET detector that is composed of detector units connected by links, the detector units being freely changeable in layout according to a shape of a measurement object.
The links may have a function of allowing rotation and a change in distance between the detector units.
The links may include an encoder so that a relationship in spatial position coordinates between adjoining detector units is obtainable.
The PET device may include an inner frame so that the detector units constituting the belt-like PET detector are located in predetermined positions.
A plurality of types of the inner frame may be prepared in advance according to size and/or shape of the measurement object.
The present invention also provides an image reconstruction system which calculates a system matrix element for use in an image reconstruction operation by: referring to a relationship in spatial position coordinates between adjoining ones of detector units that are connected into a belt-like PET detector by links, the relationship being acquired from encoders attached to the links; referring to spatial position coordinates of the detector units constituting the belt-like PET detector, the coordinates being determined by an inner frame for locating the detector units in predetermined positions; or referring to spatial position coordinates of the detector units, determined by an arched upper half portion of the PET detector.
System matrices corresponding to respective layout patterns of the detector units may be calculated in advance and stored in a storing device, the layout patterns being uniquely determined by types of the inner frame or the arched upper half portion of the PET detector.
According to the present invention, it is possible to bring the PET detector close to the patient and/or make the effective measurement field of view of the PET detector wider than that of the MRI device, so that a PET image and an MRI image are obtained almost simultaneously in a short time.
The PET detector can be attached to the bed of the measurement object so that the PET detector comes closer to the measurement object for even higher sensitivity.
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
As shown in
The MRI field of view M is determined by the area where the static magnetic field is stable, which is typically 30 to 40 cm or so. The PET field of view P can be extended to improve the sensitivity of the PET measurement. A PET image of sufficient image quality can thus be obtained in a PET measurement time comparable to the MRI measurement time.
The PET detector 210 is capable of stable operation in the MRI magnetic field environment. Examples include APD-bottomed scintillator blocks, and a Depth-of-Interaction (DOI) detectors having a three-dimensional array of semiconductor light receiving elements on the surface of a three-dimensional array of small scintillator elements, which has been proposed by the inventors in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2009-121929 and in Y. Yazaki, H. Murayama, N. Inadama, A. Ohmura, H. Osada, F. Nishikido, K. Shibuya, T. Yamaya, E. Yoshida, T. Moriya, T. Yamashita, and H. Kawai, “Preliminary study on a new DOI PET detector with limited number of photo-detectors,” The 5th Korea-Japan Joint Meeting on Medical Physics, Sep. 10-12, 2008, Jeju, Korea, YI-R2-3, 2008. DOI detectors can be used to suppress a drop in resolution even in close proximity. The closer access can also reduce resolution degradation due to angular deviations, as well as increase the solid angle to improve the sensitivity even with a relatively small number of detectors.
In the present embodiment, the PET detector 210 is integrated with a bed 20. That is, part of the PET detector 210 also functions as a bed. Since the PET detector can be brought closest to the patient, the solid angle increases for improved sensitivity and fast measurement.
The RF coil 304 is installed so as to cover the PET field of view P and most of the axial field of view. The RF coil 304 is arranged inside (within the inner diameter of) the PET detector 210 since the closer the RF coil 304 is to the patient 10, the higher the signal S/N ratio becomes. Another reason is to prevent electrical noise and the like from the PET detector 210. The RF coil is highly transparent to annihilation radiations. The presence of the RF coil 304 thus has only a limited impact on the PET measurement.
The bed 20 may be moved by a bed moving device 22 at constant speed or step by step.
In
The actual Tp is determined by the following formula:
Tm≤Tp≤Tpmax. (1)
According to the procedure of
The MRI measurement start position and the MRI measurement end portion need not necessarily be set at the respective ends of the MRI field of view M. For example, as in a modification shown in
As shown in
During the MRI measurement, the bed may be slid step by step, not at constant speed.
In
The foregoing first embodiment has dealt with the case where the PET detector 210 has a uniform configuration in the longitudinal direction of the measurement object, or the direction of the body axis of the patient 10 here. As in a second embodiment shown in
In the present embodiment, the head PET detector 212 and the body PET detector 214 are fixed to the bed 20 so that they can be horizontally moved with the patient 10 by the bed moving device 22.
Coincidence measurement between the head PET detector 212 and the body PET detector 214 can prevent a drop in the accuracy of the reconstructed image near the border between the head PET detector 212 and the body PET detector 214.
The head PET detector 212 and the body PET detector 214 may be spaced apart by using the technology of the open PET device that the inventors have proposed in WO 2009/133628 A1. In the absence of the space as in
The RF coil may be a transmitter-receiver two-way coil, a transmitter coil, or a receiver coil. The RF coil and the PET detector may be formed as separate members. When the RF coil and the PET detector are integrated as shown in
In
In the present embodiment, the head PET detector 212 is fixed to the bed 20. The body PET detector 214 can be horizontally moved by a PET detector moving device 220, independent of the bed 20. In the diagrams, 320 designates rollers that support the PET detector 214 in the patient port 302.
The head PET detector 212 and the body PET detector 214 have different center positions in the patient port 302 of the MRI device 300. The bed moving device 22 may include a bed up-down mechanism 26 so that the head PET detector 212 and the head RF coil 312 can be slid and moved up and down with the patient 10. The body PET detector 214 and the body RF coil 314 are only moved to slide horizontally, without up and down movements.
The PET detector may be made of a combination of detectors of different resolutions depending on the locations.
As in a sixth embodiment shown in
As in a seventh embodiment shown in
The cells in the diagrams represent scintillator blocks or detector units.
In an eighth embodiment shown in
Since the PET detector is heavy in weight, it may be divided into several sections as shown in
As in a modification shown in
Alternatively, as in a ninth embodiment shown in
As in a tenth embodiment shown in
As shown in
With reference to
Specifically, the encoders 236 provide relative angular information on the joints between the detectors. The information is transmitted to the image reconstruction WS 400. The detector coordinates are initially determined by detector coordinate calculation processing. The system matrix is then calculated based on the detector coordinates. For the image reconstruction processing, a whole system matrix calculated may be read at a time. Or, necessary system matrix elements may be calculated by on-the-fly processing when needed.
As in an eleventh embodiment shown in
The belt-like PET detector 230 may not only allow free rotations of the detector units 204, but also make the distances between the detector units 204 variable as in a twelfth embodiment shown in
As in a modification of the twelfth embodiment shown in
Now, a description will be given of the image reconstruction processing when various sizes of arched upper half detectors 224 and inner frames 30 are prepared in advance and appropriate ones are selected according to the patient's body type (size and shape) as in the ninth embodiment shown in
As shown in
The belt-like PET detectors may be used not only for the head and body, but also for some specific areas.
For example, dynamic function measurement on the head, using a head PET device (not shown in the diagram), is not easy to perform since arterial blood needs to be sampled at time intervals of several seconds to several minutes. The combined use of the head PET device and the belt-like PET detector wound around the arm can facilitate the dynamic function measurement since it is possible without arterial blood sampling to measure the concentration and flow rate of RI flowing through the arteries in the arm. Aside from arterial blood sampling, the belt-like PET detector also allows area-specific high-precision diagnostic imaging. Examples of the area include the arms as well as the feet, joints, neck, and breast.
In a fourteenth embodiment shown in
As in a fifteenth embodiment shown in
According to the present embodiment, the bed 20 and the PET detector 210 can be slid at different speeds so that a wider field of view corresponding to the width of the field of view F of the RF coil can be measured by PET and MRI.
Vp=(P−M)/T, and (2)
Vb=(F−M)/T, (3)
where T=the MRI measurement time=the PET measurement time.
The fifteenth embodiment has dealt with the case where the PET detector is integrated in the direction of the body axis. As in a sixteenth embodiment shown in
Vp=(B+H−M)/T, and (4)
Vb=(F−M)/T, (5)
where T=the MRI measurement=the PET measurement time.
As in a seventeenth embodiment shown in
More specifically, for patient setup, as shown in
Next, the RF coils 312 and 314 and the head PET detector 212 are attached as shown in
Finally, as shown in
After the examination, the patient can be evacuated in order reverse to the foregoing.
While the diagrams show the configuration where the patient enters the MRI patient port 302 head first, the MRI patient port 302 may be entered feet first.
As in an eighteenth embodiment shown in
According to the present invention, it is possible to perform PET and MRI concurrent examinations and a whole-body PET/MRI examination with extremely high utility.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2010-52389 | Mar 2010 | JP | national |
This is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 14/061,143 filed Oct. 23, 2013, which is a Division of application Ser. No. 12/959,893 filed Dec. 3, 2010, now abandoned, which claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2010-52389 filed Mar. 9, 2010, now Japanese Patent No. 5598956. The disclosure of the prior applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7626392 | Nistler et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7750311 | Daghighian | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7759647 | Grazioso | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7847552 | Haworth | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8073527 | Eberler | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8467845 | Martin | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8525116 | Schulz | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8816686 | Park | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20030078489 | DeSilets | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040097800 | Crosetto | May 2004 | A1 |
20050020898 | Vosniak | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060052685 | Cho | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060293584 | Kojima | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070014391 | Mostafavi | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070055127 | Ladebeck | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078329 | Vija | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100225 | Maschke | May 2007 | A1 |
20070102641 | Schmand | May 2007 | A1 |
20070238950 | Vija | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080024127 | Nagao | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033279 | Ladebeck et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080088309 | Eberler | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080146914 | Polzin | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080214927 | Cherry et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080230705 | Rousso et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080269594 | Paul | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080287772 | Declerck et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090005671 | Kreischer | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018431 | Feiweier | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090108206 | Breuer | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090278535 | Takizawa | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100010337 | Hagen | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100102813 | Schulz | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100217112 | Choi | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110043206 | Kimura | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110092792 | Birman | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110224534 | Yamaya | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120223715 | Park | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130307535 | Taracila | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130324836 | Yamaya | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20170168127 | Yamaya | Jun 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 138 866 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2000214263 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2007163373 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2008089396 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008525161 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008232913 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009121929 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2009186315 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009236726 | Oct 2009 | JP |
0187140 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2006071922 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007147233 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008129666 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009125309 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009128131 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Schlyer et al., “A Simultaneous PET/MRI Scanner Based on RatCAP in Small Animals,” 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, vol. 5, 2007, pp. 3256-3259. |
Schlemmer et al., “Simultaneous MR/PET Imaging of the Human Brain: Feasibility Study,” Radiology, vol. 248, No. 3, Sep. 2008, pp. 1028-1035. |
Judenhofer et al., “Simultaneous PET-MRI: a new approach for functional and morphological imaging,” Nature Medicine, vol. 14, No. 4, Apr. 2008, pp. 459-465. |
Yazaki et al., “Preliminary Study on a New DOI PET Detector with Limited Number of Photo-Detectors,” The 5th Korea-Japan Joint Meeting on Medical Physics, Sep. 10-12, 2008. |
Yamamoto et al., “Design and performance from an integrated PET/MRI system for small animals,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 89-98, 2010. |
Cherry, “The 2006 Henry N. Wagner Lecture: Of Mice and Men (and Positrons)—Advances in PET Imaging Technology,” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 47, No. 11, pp. 1735-1745, 2006. |
Dec. 2, 2011 European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 10194990.7. |
Hammer et al., “MR-PET: Sub-millimeter MR and PET images in the Same Scanner,” Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 6th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition, Apr. 1998, p. 256. |
Maramraju et al. “Simultaneous MRI/PET image acquisition from an MRI compatible Positron Emission Tomography system,” Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 17th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition, Apr. 2009, p. 592. |
Catana et al. “Simultaneous MR and PET Imaging of Human Brain Tumors Using an Integrated MR-PET Scanner,” Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 17th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition, Apr. 2009, p. 140. |
Jun. 6, 2011 Partial European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 10194990.7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170168127 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12959893 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 14061143 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14061143 | Oct 2013 | US |
Child | 15403657 | US |