Photochromic polyurethane laminate

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11420426
  • Patent Number
    11,420,426
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 2, 2016
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 23, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
A photochromic polyurethane laminate that is constructed to solve certain manufacturing difficulties involved in the production of plastic photochromic lenses is disclosed. The photochromic laminate includes at least two layers of a resinous material and a photochromic polyurethane layer that is interspersed between the two resinous layers and which contains photochromic compounds. The polyurethane layer is formed by curing a mixture of a solid thermoplastic polyurethane, at least one isocyanate prepolymer, at least one photochromic compound, and a stabilizing system.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Field of the Invention


The present invention relates generally to a photochromic laminate that can be applied to polymeric surfaces or can be used by itself as a photochromic element. The invention also relates to a photochromic laminate that is capable of withstanding high temperatures and can be incorporated into plastic lenses by means of injection molding. The invention further relates to a photochromic laminate that is excellent in both control of thickness and surface smoothness of the photochromic layer, and thereof exhibits uniform darkness at the activated state.


Description of the Related Art


Photochromic articles, particularly photochromic plastic materials for optical applications, have been the subject of considerable attention. In particular, photochromic ophthalmic plastic lenses have been investigated because of the weight advantage and impact resistance they offer over glass lenses. Moreover, photochromic transparencies, e.g. window sheets, for vehicles such as cars, boats and airplanes, have been of interest because of the potential safety features that such transparencies offer.


The use of polycarbonate lenses, particularly in the United States, is widespread. The demand for sunglasses that are impact resistant has increased as a result of extensive outdoor activity. Materials such as polycarbonate have not historically been considered optimal hosts for photochromic dyes due to slow activation rate, slow fading (bleeching) rate, and low activation intensity.


Nonetheless, there are several existing methods to incorporate photochromic properties into lenses made from materials such as polycarbonate. One method involves applying to the surface of a lens a coating containing dissolved photochromic compounds. For example, Japanese Patent Application 3-269507 discloses applying a thermoset polyurethane coating containing photochromic compounds on the surface of a lens. U.S. Pat. No. 6,150,430 also discloses a photochromic polyurethane coating for lenses.


Another method involves coating a lens with a base coating. An imbibing process described in U.K. Pat. No. 2,174,711 or U.S. Pat. No. 4,968,454 is used to imbibe a solution containing photochromic compounds into the base coating material. The most commonly used base material is polyurethane.


However, the two methods described above, which involve coating the lens after it is molded, have significant shortcomings. For example, typically a coating of about 25 μm or more is needed to incorporate a sufficient quantity of photochromic compounds into the base in order to provide the desired light blocking quality when the compounds are activated. This relatively thick coating is not suited for application on the surface of a segmented, multi-focal lens because an unacceptable segment line and coating thickness nonuniformity around the segment line are produced, and the desirable smooth surface quality is affected.


Lenses made from plastic materials such as polycarbonate are produced by an injection molding process and insert (also known as in-mold decoration) injection molding is used to incorporate photochromic properties into the lenses. Insert injection molding is a process whereby a composition is injection molded onto an insert in the mold cavity. For example, as disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,328,446, a photochromic laminate is first placed inside a mold cavity. Polycarbonate lens material is next injected into the cavity and fused to the back of the photochromic laminate, producing a photochromic polycarbonate lens. Because the photochromic function is provided by a thin photochromic layer in the laminate, it is practical to make photochromic polycarbonate lenses with any kind of surface curvature by the insert injection molding method.


Transparent resin laminates with photochromic properties have been disclosed in many patents and publications, for example, Japanese Patent Applications 61-276882, 63-178193, 4-358145, and 9-001716; U.S. Pat. No. 4,889,413; U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002-0197484; and WO 02/093235. The most commonly used structure is a photochromic polyurethane host layer bonded between two transparent resin sheets. Although the use of polyurethane as a photochromic host material is well known, photochromic polyurethane laminates designed especially for making photochromic polycarbonate lenses through the insert injection molding method are unique.


Problems associated with conventional insert injection molding techniques in the manufacture of photochromic lens are polyurethane bleeding and poor replication of segment lines. “Bleeding” occurs from the deformation of the polyurethane layer during processing. In particular, bleeding occurs when the polyurethane layer melts and escapes from its position between the two transparent sheets of the laminate during the injection molding process. The inventors have discovered that bleeding most frequently results from an excess amount of polyurethane and from using too soft a material. The inventors have also discovered that poor replication of segment lines occurs when the layer of polyurethane is too thick and movement of the laminate occurs as pressure from the mold is applied.


In order to prevent the bleeding problem, it is preferred to have the polyurethane cross-linked. However, cross-linked polyurethane, once made, is difficult to be laminated between transparent resin sheets. A convenient method to incorporate cross-linked polyurethane is to start with a liquid polyurethane system such as the one described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002-0197484. To make the laminate efficiently, a web coat-laminate line such as the one described in Japan Patent Laid Open 2002-196103, is usually used. The state of the art coating equipment is capable of coating a uniform layer of liquid polyurethane mixture. However, this layer will only be partially solidified (or cured) at the moment of in-line lamination. Any possible surface defects of resin sheet and lamination rollers are easily transferred to the soft polyurethane layer during lamination. The most often seen defects in the polyurethane layer include thickness un-evenness across the web and thin spots due to uneven pressure at lamination or improper handling. In order to have the polyurethane layer firm enough to withstand the necessary pressure during lamination, it needs to be cured for a certain amount of time, which slows down the processing or renders the continues web coating-laminating impossible.


Therefore, the need exists to overcome the problems and shortcomings associated with existing polyurethane laminates having photochromic properties and methods of making these laminates.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The need and shortcomings of the existing laminates and methods of manufacturing these laminates are met by the polyurethane laminate and method in accordance with the present invention.


It is an object of the present invention to provide a transparent photochromic polyurethane laminate that has improved thickness uniformity and surface smoothness, so that the darkness or light transmission at the activated state is uniform.


It is another object of the present invention to provide a photochromic polyurethane laminate that exhibits dimensional stability under high temperature and high pressure, so that it can be used to produce a plastic photochromic lens though an insert injection molding process.


The objects are achieved by the transparent photochromic polyurethane laminate in accordance with the present invention. One embodiment of the present invention comprises a polyurethane layer including photochromic compounds having first and second sides, a front transparent resin sheet is bonded to the first side of the polyurethane photochromic layer, and a back transparent resin sheet is bonded to the second side of the polyurethane photochromic layer. The front and back transparent resin sheets may be bonded to the polyurethane layer with or without additional adhesive such as epoxies and the acrylate types. The front and back transparent resin sheets are preferably made of the same material as the lens base. That is, if the lens base material is polycarbonate, it is preferred to have polycarbonate resin sheets bonded to the polyurethane photochromic layer. If the lens base material is cellulose acetate butyrate, then it is preferred to have cellulose acetate butyrate resin sheets bonded to the polyurethane photochromic layer. Any clear, transparent plastic resin may be used for the base and resin sheets, for example, polysulfones, polyacrylates and polycycloolefins. The term “front resin sheet” means that the resin sheet is facing the mold cavity to duplicate the front (convex) surface of the whole lens. By the term “back”, we mean that the resin sheet is facing the lens base. The term “lens base” means the portion of the lens that is molded onto the laminate to form the main portion of the lens.


The objects of the present invention are further achieved by the careful design of the polyurethane composition used to host the photochromic dyes. The polyurethane layer material comprises a) a solid thermoplastic polyurethane, b) at least one aliphatic isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer, and c) at least one photochromic compound selected from a group consisting of spiropyrans, spiroxizines, fulgides, fulgimides, and naphthopyrans. The thermoplastic polyurethane has a theoretical NCO index from 90 to 105, and a molecular weight (number averaged) of from 9,000 to 100,000. The isocyanate prepolymer has a NCO content of from 1.0% to 10.0%, by weight. The weight ratio of the thermoplastic polyurethane vs. the isocyanate prepolymer is in the range from 1:9 to 9:1. The photochromic compound(s) counts for 0.1% to 5% of the total polyurethane, by weight.


To enhance the fatigue resistance of the photochromic compounds, stabilizers such as antioxidants, light stabilizers, and UV absorbers are added in the polyurethane layer.


The photochromic laminate is preferably made through a cast-lamination process. All components described above are dissolved in a suitable solvent, cast on a release liner. After the solvent is evaporated substantially, the thermoplastic polyurethane portion will provide the cast polyurethane film enough rigidity to go through the lamination process without any deformation. After lamination, the polyurethane prepolymer will provide further curability by reacting with active hydrogen atoms in the system to enhance the dimensional stability of the polyurethane layer under high temperature and high pressure.


Although the photochromic laminate according to this invention is especially suitable for making photochromic polycarbonate lenses through the insert injection molding process, other non-limiting uses include photochromic transparencies such as goggles and face shields.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a photochromic polyurethane laminate having two transparent resin sheets bonded to a photochromic polyurethane layer formed by curing a mixture of a solid thermoplastic polyurethane, at least one isocyanate prepolymer, at least one photochromic compound, and a stabilizing system. The thermoplastic polyurethane has a theoretical NCO index of from 90 to 105, and a molecular weight (number averaged) of from 20,000 to 100,000. The isocyanate prepolymer has a NCO content of from 1.0% to 10.0%, by weight. The weight ratio of the thermoplastic polyurethane vs. the isocyanate prepolymer in the photochromic polyurethane composition is in the range from 1:9 to 9:1. The photochromic compound(s) counts for 0.1% to 5% of the total polyurethane, by weight.


To enhance the fatigue resistance of the photochromic compounds, stabilizers such as antioxidants, light stabilizers, and UV absorbers are added in the polyurethane layer.


The photochromic laminate is preferably made through a cast-lamination process. All components described above are dissolved in a suitable solvent, cast on a release liner. After the solvent is evaporated substantially, the thermoplastic polyurethane portion will provide the cast polyurethane film enough rigidity to go through the lamination process without any deformation. After lamination, the polyurethane prepolymer will provide further curability by reacting with active hydrogen atoms such as those of terminal hydroxyl groups, moisture, urethane groups, and urea groups in the system to enhance the dimensional stability of the polyurethane layer under high temperature and high pressure.


Transparent Resin Sheets


The material used to make the transparent resin sheet is not limited so long as it is a resin with high transparency. In case the photochromic polyurethane laminate of the present invention is incorporated into a thermoplastic article such as a spectacle lens, the transparent resin sheets of the laminate is preferably of a resin material that is thermally fusible to the article base material so that the photochromic laminate is tightly integrated with the article base when produced with the insert injection molding process. Thus, it is more preferred to have same kind of material for both the article base and the transparent resin sheets.


Suitable sheet resin materials include polycarbonate, polysulfone, cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB), polyacrylates, polyesters, polystyrene, copolymer of an acrylate and styrene, blends of compatible transparent polymers. Preferred resins are polycarbonate, CAB, polyacrylates, and copolymers of acrylate and styrene. A polycarbonate-based resin is particularly preferred because of high transparency, high tenacity, high thermal resistance, high refractive index, and most importantly, and especially its compatibility with the article base material when polycarbonate photochromic lenses are manufactured with the photochromic polyurethane laminate of the present invention and the insert injection molding process. A typical polycarbonate based resin is polybisphenol-A carbonate. In addition, examples of the polycarbonate based resin include homopolycarbonate such as 1,1′-dihydroxydiphenyl-phenylmethylmethane, 1,1′-dihydroxydiphenyl-diphenylmethane, 1,1′-dihydroxy-3,3′-dimethyldiphe-nyl-2,2-propane, their mutual copolymer polycarbonate and copolymer polycarbonate with bisphenol-A.


While the thickness of a transparent resin sheet is not particularly restricted, it is typically 2 mm or less, and preferably 1 mm or less but not less than 0.025 mm.


Thermoplastic Polyurethane


As the thermoplastic polyurethane, it is preferably made from a diisocyanate, a polyol, and a chain extender. Thermoplastic polyurethanes of this kind are known and may be obtained, for example, in accordance with U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,963,679 and 4,035,213, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.


The thermoplastic polyurethane used in the present invention is particularly prepared from a composition comprising a) an aliphatic isocyanate having a functionality of 2, b) at least one high molecular weight polyol having a nominal functionality of 2 and a molecular weight of from 500 to 6000 g/mole, preferably from 700 to 3000 g/mol, and counting for from about 50% to about 98% by weight, preferably from 70% to 95%, of the total isocyanate reactive species in the composition, and c) at least one low molecular weight diol having a molecular weight of from 62 to 499, and counting for from about 2% to about 50% by weight, preferably from 5% to 30%, of the total isocyanate reactive species in the composition.


Polyols


The polyols of the present invention are those conventionally employed in the art for the preparation of polyurethane cast elastomers. Naturally, and often times advantageously, mixtures of such polyols are also possible. Examples of the suitable polyols include polyether polyols, polyester polyols, polyurethane polyols, polybutadiene polyol, and polycarbonate polyols, while polyether and polyester types are preferred.


Included among suitable polyether polyols are polyoxyethylene glycol, polyoxypropylene glycol, polyoxybutylene glycol, polytetramethylene glycol, block copolymers, for example, combinations of polyoxypropylene and polyoxyethylene glycols, poly-1,2-oxybutylene and polyoxyethylene glycols, poly-1,4-tetramethylene and polyoxyethylene glycols, and copolymer glycols prepared from blends or sequential addition of two or more alkylene oxides. The polyalkylene polyether polyols may be prepared by any known process such as, for example, the process disclosed in Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 7, pp. 257-262, published by Interscience Publishers, Inc. (1951), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.


Polyethers which are preferred include the alkylene oxide addition products of polyhydric alcohols such as ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, trimethylene glycol, 1,2-butanediol, 1,5-pentanediol, 1,6-hexanediol, 1,7-heptanediol, hydroquinone, resorcinol glycerol, glycerine, 1,1,1-trimethylol-propane, 1,1,1-trimethylolethane, pentaerythritol, 1,2,6-hexanetriol, .alpha.-methyl glucoside, sucrose, and sorbitol. Also included within the term “polyhydric alcohol” are compounds derived from phenol such as 2,2-bis (4-hydroxyphenyl)-propane, commonly known as Bisphenol A.


The suitable polyester polyols include the ones which are prepared by polymerizing ε-caprolactone using an initiator such as ethylene glycol, ethanolamine and the like. Further suitable examples are those prepared by esterification of polycarboxylic acids. Further suitable polyester polyols include reaction products of polyhydric, preferably dihydric alcohols to which trihydric alcohols may be added and polybasic, preferably dibasic carboxylic acids. Instead of these polycarboxylic acids, the corresponding carboxylic acid anhydrides or polycarboxylic acid esters of lower alcohols or mixtures thereof may be used for preparing the polyesters. The polycarboxylic acids may be aliphatic, cycloaliphatic, aromatic and/or heterocyclic and they may be substituted, e.g., by halogen atoms, and/or unsaturated. The following are mentioned as examples: succinic acid; adipic acid; suberic acid; azelaic acid; sebacic acid; phthalic acid; isophthalic acid; trimellitic acid; phthalic acid anhydride; tetrahydrophthalic acid anhydride; hexahydrophthalic acid anhydride; tetrachlorophthalic acid anhydride, endomethylene tetrahydrophthalic acid anhydride; glutaric acid anhydride; maleic acid; maleic acid anhydride; fumaric acid; dimeric and trimeric fatty acids such as oleic acid, which may be mixed with monomeric fatty acids; dimethyl terephthalates and bis-glycol terephthalate. Suitable polyhydric alcohols include, e.g., ethylene glycol; propylene glycol-(1,2) and -(1,3); butylene glycol-(1,4) and -(1,3); hexanediol-(1,6); octanediol-(1,8); neopentyl glycol; (1,4-bis-hydroxymethylcyclohexane); 2-methyl-1,3-propanediol; 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol; triethylene glycol; tetraethylene glycol; polyethylene glycol; dipropylene glycol; polypropylene glycol; dibutylene glycol and polybutylene glycol, glycerine and trimethlyolpropane. A preferred polyester polyol is polycaprolactone polyol having an average molecular weight from 500 to 6,000, and preferably from 700 to 3,000.


Diols


Suitable diols are those polyols listed above having a functionality of 2 and a molecular weight of from 62 to 499. Preferred diols are 1,4-butane-diol and 1,3-propane-diol.


Isocyanates


The diisocyanate component is preferably an aliphatic diisocyanate. The aliphatic diisocyanate is selected from the group consisting of 1,4-tetramethylene diisocyanate, 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, 1,12-dodecamethylene diisocyanate, cyclohexane-1,3- and -1,4-diisocyanate, 1-isocyanato-2-isocyanatomethyl cyclopentane, 1-isocyanato-3-isocyanatomethyl-3,5,5-trimethyl-cyclohexane (isophorone diisocyanate or IPDI), bis-(4-isocyanatocyclohexyl)-methane, 2,4′-dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate, 1,3- and 1,4-bis-(isocyanatomethyl)-cyclohexane, bis-(4-isocyanato-3-methylcyclohexyl)-methane, .alpha.,.alpha.,.alpha.′,.alpha.′-tetramethyl-1,3- and/or -1,4-xylylene diisocyanate, 1-isocyanato-1-methyl-4(3)-isocyanatomethyl cyclohexane, 2,4- and/or 2,6-hexahydrotoluylene diisocyanate, and mixtures thereof. Bis-(4-isocyanatocyclohexl)-methane is the preferred diisocyanate in occurrence with the method of the present invention.


The polymerization process to make the thermoplastic polyurethane can be carried out in one-pot fashion, that is, all starting materials are initially added into the reaction vessel. The polymerization process can also be carried out with a prepolymer approach. That is, a polyurethane prepolymer terminated with isocyanate groups is first obtained by reacting a stoichiometrically in excess diisocyanate with a polyol. Suitable equivalent ratio of diisocyanate to polyol in the present invention is from 1.2:1.0 to 8.0:1.0. A chain extender of diol is then mixed with the prepolymer to complete the reaction. The NCO index of the thermoplastic polyurethane, formed from the quotient, which is multiplied by 100, of the equivalent ratio of isocyanate groups to the sum of the hydroxyl groups of polyol and chain extender is within a range of 90 to 105, preferably between 92 and 101.


Catalysts such as organotin or other metallic soaps may be added in the mixture to make a thermoplastic polyurethane. Example catalysts include dibutyltin dilaurate, stannous octoate, and cobalt naphthenate.


Isocyanate Prepolymer


The isocyanate prepolymer used in the photochromic polyurethane composition of the present invention is prepared in the same way as the prepolymer used to prepare the thermoplastic polyurethane in a prepolymer method described above. Preferably, the polyol and the isocyanate used to make the isocyanate prepolymer is the same as the polyol to make the thermoplastic polyurethane. More preferably, the isocyanate is an aliphatic diisocyanate described in the previous sections, and the polyol is a polyester polyol having a molecular weight between 700 and 3,000. The molecular weight (number averaged) of the isocyanate prepolymer is preferably between 1,000 and 6,000, and more preferably between 1,500 and 4,000. As an isocyanate group terminated prepolymer, its NCO content is between 1.0% and 10.0%, preferably between 2.0% and 8.0%.


When mixing the isocyanate prepolymer and the thermoplastic polyurethane together, the mixing ratio by weight is in the range from 1:9 to 9:1, preferably from 1:3 to 3:1.


Photochromic Compounds


Suitable photochromic compounds in the context of the invention are organic compounds that, in solution state, are activated (darken) when exposed to a certain light energy (e.g., outdoor sunlight), and bleach to clear when the light energy is removed. They are selected from the group consisting essentially of benzopyrans, naphthopyrans, spirobenzopyrans, spironaphthopyrans, spirobenzoxzines, spironaphthoxazines, fulgides and fulgim ides. Such photochromic compounds have been reported which, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,658,502, 5,702,645, 5,840,926, 6,096,246, 6,113,812, and 6,296,785; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/038,350, all commonly assigned to the same assignee as the present invention and all incorporated herein by reference.


Among the photochromic compounds identified, naphthopyran derivatives are preferred for optical articles such as eyewear lenses. They exhibit good quantum efficiency for coloring, a good sensitivity and saturated optical density, an acceptable bleach or fade rate, and most importantly good fatigue behavior. These compounds are available to cover the visible light spectrum from 400 nm to 700 nm. Thus, it is possible to obtain a desired blended color, such as neutral gray or brown, by mixing two or more photochromic compounds having complementary colors under an activated state.


More preferred are naphtho[2,1b]pyrans and naphtho[1,2b]pyrans represented by the following generic formula:




embedded image


Substituents on various positions of the aromatic structure are used to tune the compounds to have desired color and fading rate, and improved fatigue behavior. For example, a photochromic dye may contain a polymerizable group such as a (meth)acryloyloxy group or a (meth)allyl group, so that it can be chemically bonded to the host material through polymerization.


The quantity of photochromic compound(s) incorporated into the polyurethane layer of the present invention is determined by the desired light blockage in the activated state and the thickness of the polyurethane layer itself. The preferred outdoor visible light transmission of sunglasses is preferably between 5% and 50%, more preferably between 8% and 30%, most preferably between 10% and 20%. Preferably, the amount of total photochromic substance incorporated into or applied on the polyurethane layer may range from about 0.1 wt. % to about 5 wt. % of the total polyurethane, and more preferably from about 0.5 wt. % to about 3.0 wt. %. If the thickness of the polyurethane layer is 100 μm, between about 0.5 wt. % to about 1 wt. % of photochromic compound(s) is needed to achieve an outdoor light transmission of between 10% and 20%. The amount of photochromic compound(s) needed is inversely proportional to the thickness of the polyurethane layer. In other words, to achieve the same outdoor light transmission the thicker the polyurethane layer, the lower the concentration of photochromic compound(s) needed. The concentration of the photochromic compound(s) also depends on the color intensity of the photochromic compound(s) at the activated state.


Stabilizers


Additives such as antioxidants and light stabilizers are incorporated into the polyurethane layer in order to improve the fatigue resistance of the photochromic compounds. Hindered amines are usually used as light stabilizers, and hindered phenols are usually used as antioxidants. Preferred hindered amine light stabilizers include, bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl)-sebacate, or a condensation product of 1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidinol, tridodecyl alcohol and 1,2,3,4-butanetetra caboxylic acid as tertiary hindered amine compounds. Preferred phenol antioxidants include, 1,1,3-tris(2-methyl-4-hydorxy-5-t-butylphenyl)butane, tetrakis-[methylene-3-(3′,5′-di-t-butyl-4′-hydroxy-phenyl)propionate]methane, and 1,3,5-tris(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hyroxybenzyl)-1,-3,5-triazine-2,4,6-(1H,3H,5H)-trione. Phenol antioxidants that contain 3 or more hindered phenols are preferable.


Process to Make the Laminate


A photochromic laminate having a polyurethane layer in between two transparent resin sheets in accordance with the present invention may be produced through a variety of processes. Depending on the nature of the starting material to the polyurethane, processes such as casting-lamination (also referred to in the art as coating-lamination), and extrusion-lamination may be used.


To the photochromic polyurethane composition of the present invention, a novel casting-lamination process has been developed by the inventors. The process essentially comprises: a) preparing a solvent casting solution by dissolving a solid thermoplastic polyurethane, at least one isocyanate polyurethane prepolymer, at least one photochromic compound, and optional stabilizers in a proper solvent; b) cast the solution on a release liner film; c) remove the solvent from the cast film to a substantially dry state to form a photochromic polyurethane film; d) transfer-laminate the photochromic polyurethane film between two transparent resin sheets; e) cure the photochromic polyurethane film, thereby forming a photochromic polyurethane laminate.


To cast a photochromic polyurethane film, a thermoplastic polyurethane, an isocyanate prepolymer, selected photochromic compounds and other necessary additives are first dissolved in a suitable solvent or in a mix of solvents to form a cast solution. The solid concentration in such a solution is usually 15% to 50%, by weight, and the solution has a viscosity suitable for coating. For example, suitable viscosity of the cast solution for using a slot die method is within the range from 500 cPs to 5000 cPs. Examples of suitable solvents that may be used to dissolve polyurethanes include cyclohexane, toluene, xylene and ethyl benzene, esters such as ethyl acetate, methyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, n-propyl acetate, isobutyl acetate, n-butyl acetate, isoamyl acetate, methyl propionate and isobutyl propionate, ketones such as acetone, methylethyl ketone, diethyl ketone, methylisobutyl ketone, acetyl acetone and cyclohexyl ketone, ether esters such as cellosolve aetate, diethylglycol diaetate, ethyleneglycol mono n-butylether acetate, propylene glycol and monomethylether acetate, tertiary alcohols such as diacetone alcohol and t-amyl alcohol and tetrahydrofuran. Ethyl acetate, methyl ethyl ketone, cyclohexane, tetrahydrofuran, toluene and combinations thereof are preferable.


The solution is then cast on a release liner by using a method known to those skilled in the art, such as slot-die, knife-over-roll, reverse-roll, gravure, etc. Slot die and knife-over-film are referred. Slot die method is especially preferred due to its capability to handle wide range of solution viscosity and to cast uniform films. A release liner may consist of a base film and a release coating or simply a film itself. Films with surface energy low enough to provide easy release of the cast film can be used by itself. Examples include low energy polyolefins and fluoropolymers. Most commercially available release liners are based on polyester film coated with a release coating. The release coating has a proper surface energy so that a cast solution or coating forms a uniform film (e.g., without beading) on it. At the same time the release coating does not provide good adhesion to the dried film so that the film can be easily peeled off. Release coatings include silicone (siloxane) based and non-silicone base such as fluoropolymers. A liner based on polyester (PET) with cured siloxane release coating is preferred due to the dimensional stability, flatness, handling, solvent resistance, low cost. Suitable liners should have a thickness of from 25 micrometers to 130 micrometers.


The wet photochromic polyurethane film cast on the release liner is sequentially dried in a forced air oven system. The solvent will be substantially evaporated so that the solvent retention in the photochromic polyurethane film is low enough to not cause any defects (e.g., bubbling) in the future laminate. The solvent retention preferably is less than 2 wt. %, more preferably less than 1 wt. %, and most preferably less than 0.5 wt. %. Conventional methods such as hot air dryers may be used to evaporate the solvent before lamination. The drying conditions, such as temperature and air flow rate in the oven, for a desired solvent retention value depends on the nature of the solvent, the thickness of the cast film, the type of the release liner, and the web speed. The drying conditions should not be so aggressive to cause any surface defects in the cast film. Example defects are blisters (bubbles) and orange peel. Preferably, the drying oven system has multi-zones whose drying conditions are controlled separately.


The thickness of the dried photochromic polyurethane layer is from about 5 micrometers to about 150 micrometers. For using the photochromic laminate in an insert injection molding process to make plastic photochromic lenses, the thickness of the photochromic polyurethane is preferably between 5 micrometers and 80 micrometers. The thickness variation of the photochromic polyurethane layer should be controlled in order to produce a uniform light blockage at the activated state. A thickness variation of less than 15% over the width of the laminate is required and preferably less than 10% and more preferably less than 5%.


The transfer-lamination of the dried photochromic polyurethane film to two transparent resin sheets to form a laminate of the polyurethane film between the two resin sheets, may be done by either a sequential lamination process or an in-line lamination process. In a sequential lamination process, the dried polyurethane film on the release liner is first laminated to the first transparent resin sheet through a first lamination station. The semi-laminate consisting of the release liner, the polyurethane film, and the resin sheet, is then wound up on a core. The wind is then brought to a second lamination station where the release liner is peeled off and the second transparent sheet is laminated to the polyurethane film to form the final photochromic polyurethane laminate. The first and the second lamination stations may be the same one. The lamination may be conducted between two chrome coated steel rolls or between one steel roll and one rubber roll, although the later is preferred.


According to the findings of the inventors, an in-line lamination process is more preferred. In such a process, the second transparent resin sheet is immediately laminated to the semi-laminate without first winding the semi-laminate. The in-line lamination may be done with two two-roll lamination stations, or more conveniently be conducted on one three-roll setup in which the first roll and the second roll form a first nip, and the second roll and the third roll form a second nip. The dried polyurethane film on the release liner is first laminated to the first transparent resin sheet through the first nip. Without forming and winding a semi-laminate, the release liner is peeled off, and the second transparent resin sheet is immediately laminated to the exposed side of the polyurethane film on the first transparent resin sheet, through the second nip. This in-line lamination process will significantly increase the productivity. It also eliminates an extra winding step and reduces the possibilities of defects in the polyurethane film associated with the winding step. Example defects are de-lamination between the polyurethane film and the transparent resin sheet, impressions in the polyurethane film caused by possible external particles under winding pressure.


The photochromic polyurethane laminate thus formed according to the present invention needs to be cured before application. The curing is preferably carried in two stages: a) ambient curing for 1 day to 1 week, b) post curing at elevated temperature of from 50° C. to 130° C. for 8 hours to 1 week.


If the solvent selected to dissolve the photochromic polyurethane composition does not whiten the transparent resin sheet, a direct cast on the resin sheet may be employed. In this case, a simple two-roll lamination setup is acceptable for making a photochromic polyurethane laminate.


In an alternative process, the photochromic layer from a thermoplastic polyurethane and isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer may be co-extruded utilizing a single- or twin-screw extruder. The extruded photochromic polyurethane film will then be immediately hot-laminated between two transparent resin sheets to form the photochromic polyurethane laminate. The photochromic compounds and other additives may be incorporated into the polyurethane during the resin synthesis stage or melt-mixed prior to extrusion.


Although the photochromic laminate according to the present invention is especially suitable for making photochromic polycarbonate lenses through the insert injection molding process described in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,328,446, it can also be used as-is for other photochromic transparencies such as goggles and face shields. The photochromic laminate may also be incorporated into other types of eyewear lenses such as cast resin lenses with a process described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,286,419.


The photochromic polyurethane laminate in accordance with the present invention will now be illustrated with reference to the following examples, which are not to be construed as a limitation upon the scope of the invention in any way.


In the examples, all values are expressions of weight %. CR49 and CR59 are tradenames of photochromic dyes available from Corning Corp. Grey-762 is proprietary grey photochromic dye. Irganox-1010 as an antioxidant, Tinuvin-144 and Tinuvin-765 as light stabilizers are available from CIBA (Tarrytown, N.Y., US).


To visually evaluate the activation and the photochromic polyurethane layer uniformity, a photochromic laminate or lens was exposed to UV irradiation (12 mw/m2) for 5 minutes.


Example 1

Preparation of Isocyanate Polyurethane Prepolymer A: In a 3-necked flask equipped with an overhead stirrer, thermocouple, and a vacuum adapter, 393.5 g (3 equivalents) of 4,4′-dicyclohexylmethanediisocyanate (H12MDI, available from Bayer as Desmodur W) was charged into the reactor and stirred at ambient temperature. 1000 g (2 equivalents) of a polycaprolactone diol having an OH number of 112 mg KOH/g and a number average molecular weight of about 1000 g/mole (available from Dow Chemical as Tone™ 2221) was preheated in an oven to 80° C. and added to the reactor. The mixture was allowed to stir for about 15 minutes, before adding 6 g of dibutyltin dilaurate catalyst (available from Air Products as T-12). The reaction flask was evacuated (<0.1 mm HG) and held at 90° C. for 6 hours. An aliquot of the prepolymer was withdrawn and titrated for isocyanate content using standard n-butyl amine titration. The isocyanate content was found to be 2.92% (theory; 3.0%).


Example 2

Preparation of Isocyanate Polyurethane Prepolymer B: In a 3-necked flask equipped with an overhead stirrer, thermocouple, and a vacuum adapter, 613.0 g (4.67 equivalents) of 4,4′-dicyclohexylmethanediisocyanate (H12MDI, available from Bayer as Desmodur W) was charged into the reactor and stirred at ambient temperature. 1000 g (2 equivalents) of a polycaprolactone diol having an OH number of 112 mg KOH/g and a number average molecular weight of about 1000 g/mole (available from Dow Chemical as Tone™ 2221) was preheated in an oven to 80° C. and added to the reactor. The mixture was allowed to stir for about 15 minutes, before adding 8 g of dibutyltin dilaurate catalyst (available from Air Products as T-12). The reaction flask was evacuated (<0.1 mm HG) and held at 90° C. for 6 hours. An aliquot of the prepolymer was withdrawn and titrated for isocyanate content using standard n-butyl amine titration. The isocyanate content was found to be 6.75% (theory; 7.0%).


Preparation of Thermoplastic Polyurethane: A thermoplastic polyurethane having a theoretical NCO index of 95 was prepared as following. The isocyanate prepolymer B (927.2 g) prepared in Example 2 was heated in vacuo (<0.1 mm HG) with stirring to 80° C. and 1,4-butane-diol (72.8 g) as the chain extender and 3 g of dibutyltin dilaurate catalyst were combined with the prepolymer while keeping stirring. The mixture was stirred for 30 seconds and subsequently poured into a Teflon lined tray. The tray containing the casting was cured in an oven at 85° C. for 24 hours.


Example 4

A solution was first made by dissolving 4 g of the thermoplastic polyurethane prepared in Example 3 in 16 g of anhydrous tetrahydrofuran. To the solution was further added 4 g of the isocyanate prepolymer prepared in Example 1, 0.14 g of CR49 dye, 0.02 g CR59 dye, 0.17 g each of Irganox-1010, Tinuvin-144, and Tinuvin-765. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 hours before cast on an easy release liner (available from CPFilms as T-50) with draw bar targeting a 38 micrometer dry film thickness. The solvent in the cast film was evaporated at 60° C. for 5 minutes with airflow above the film. The dried film was transfer-laminated between two 0.3 mm thick polycarbonate sheets (available from Teijin as PC-1151) with a bench top roller laminator. After 4 days under ambient, the laminate was cured at 70° C. for 3 days.


The laminate was cut into a 76 mm disc and used to make a segmented multi-focal polycarbonate photochromic lens. After the insert injection molding process with common molding parameters, the finished lens had an acceptable thin, crisp segment line. No polyurethane bleeding from the laminate was observed. The lens showed quick and uniform photochromic activation. No any lamination defects were observed.


Example 5

A solution having 28.2% solid, was first prepared by dissolving 1950 g of the thermoplastic polyurethane prepared as in Example 3 in 7550 g of anhydrous tetrahydrofuran. To the solution was further added 780 g of the isocyanate prepolymer prepared as in Example 1, 59 g each of “762” dye, Irganox-1010, Tinuvin-144, and Tinuvin-765. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 hours then set overnight before cast on an easy release liner (available from Saint-Gobain as 8310) at a web speed of 5.5 feet per minute in a pilot coater equipped with a slot die, a two-zone drying oven, and a three-roll lamination station. The solvent in the cast film was evaporated at 70° C. for 1 minute and 120° C. for another minute with forced airflow above the film. The dried film was 38 micrometer thick and had a solvent retention of 0.1%. It was transfer-laminated between two 0.3 mm thick polycarbonate sheets (available from Teijin as PC-1151) with an in-line process (without winding the semi-laminate of the release liner, polyurethane film, and the first polycarbonate sheet). After 4 days in ambient (22° C. and 35%˜50% RH), the laminate was cured at 70° C. for 3 days.


The laminate was cut into 76 mm discs and used to make a segmented multi-focal polycarbonate photochromic lenses. After the insert injection molding process with common molding parameters, the finished lens had an acceptable thin, crisp segment line. No polyurethane bleeding from the laminate was observed. The lens showed quick and uniform photochromic activation. No any lamination defects were observed.


Example 6

A solution having 35.3% solid, was first prepared by dissolving 1950 g of the thermoplastic polyurethane prepared as in Example 3 in 7742 g of anhydrous tetrahydrofuran. To the solution was further added 1950 g of the isocyanate prepolymer prepared as in Example 1, 68 g of CR49 dye, 10 g CR59 dye, 85 g each of Irganox-1010, Tinuvin-144, and Tinuvin-765. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 hours then set overnight, then cast directly on a first 0.3 mm thick polycarbonate sheet (available from Teijin as PC1151) at a web speed of 5.5 feet per minute in a pilot coater equipped with a slot die, a two-zone drying oven, and a three-roll lamination station. The solvent in the cast film was evaporated at 94° C. for 1 minute and 127° C. for another minute with forced airflow above the film. The dried film was 25 micrometer thick and had a solvent retention of 0.1%. A second 0.3 mm thick polycarbonate sheet was laminated on the exposed side of the dried polyurethane film on the first polycarbonate sheet. After 4 days in ambient (22° C. and 35% 50% RH), the laminate was cured at 70° C. for 3 days. The laminate obtained was clear. No solvent whitening on the polycarbonate sheets was seen.


Comparison Example 1

To 10 g of Hysol® (Loctite) U-10FL urethane adhesive resin are dissolved 1.5% of “762” dye, 2.0% of Tinuvin 144, and 2.0% of Tinuvin 765. Then, 9.1 g of Hysol® U-10FL urethane adhesive hardener is mixed in to form a liquid adhesive.


The adhesive was coated with a draw bar directly on a polycarbonate sheet (0.3 mm thick, available from Teijin as 1151) to form a 38 micrometer cast film. Another polycarbonate sheet was laminated onto the adhesive through a bench top roller laminator. Some adhesive was squeezed out. The laminate was allowed to cure at room temperature overnight, then is post cured at 65° C. for 10 hours.


When the photochromic laminate was activated, thin spots (lightly activated due to thinner spots in the polyurethane layer) and non-uniformity of activation due to thickness gradient across the laminate were observed.


Comparison Example 2

Example 4 was followed, except the isocyanate prepolymer was neglected. The photochromic polyurethane layer was 38 micrometers thick. The laminate showed uniform photochromic activation. No lamination defects were observed. However, when molded into a polycarbonate lens as in Example 4, severe polyurethane bleeding was observed at the edge of the laminate.


The foregoing detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise embodiments disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art to which this invention pertains. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A photochromic polyurethane layer prepared from a mixture comprising a polyurethane, an isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer, and a photochromic compound; the polyurethane having a number average molecular weight from 9,000 to 100,000 and prepared from a composition comprising: an aliphatic diisocyanate comprising 4,4′-dicyclohexylmethanediiso-cyanate;a polyester polyol; anda chain extender;the isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer prepared from a composition comprising: an aliphatic diisocyanate comprising 4,4′-dicyclohexylmethanediiso-cyanate; anda polyester polyol;wherein a mixing ratio of the polyurethane and the isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer by weight is in a range from 1:9 to 9:1 and said polyurethane comprises terminal hydroxyl groups, urethane groups and urea groups having active hydrogen atoms to react with said isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer after lamination to provide further curability of said photochromic polyurethane layer.
  • 2. The photochromic polyurethane layer of claim 1 wherein the polyurethane and the isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer are prepared from the same aliphatic diisocyanate.
  • 3. The photochromic polyurethane layer of claim 1 wherein the polyurethane and the isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer are prepared from the same polyester polyol.
  • 4. The photochromic polyurethane layer of claim 1 wherein the polyurethane and the isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer are prepared from different polyester polyols.
  • 5. The photochromic polyurethane layer of claim 1 wherein the polyurethane is prepared from a composition comprising a polycaprolactone.
  • 6. The photochromic polyurethane layer of claim 1 wherein the polyurethane is prepared from a composition comprising a polycaprolactone having a number average molecular weight of about 1000 grams per mole.
  • 7. The photochromic polyurethane layer of claim 1 wherein the polyurethane is prepared from a composition comprising a diol as a chain extender having a molecular weight in the range of approximately 62 to 499 grams per mole.
  • 8. The photochromic polyurethane layer of claim 1 wherein the polyurethane is prepared from a composition comprising 1,4-butane-diol as the chain extender.
  • 9. The photochromic polyurethane layer of claim 1 wherein the isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer is prepared from a composition comprising a polycaprolactone.
  • 10. The photochromic polyurethane layer of claim 1 wherein the isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer is prepared from a composition comprising a polycaprolactone having a number average molecular weight of about 1000 grams per mole.
  • 11. The photochromic polyurethane layer of claim 1 wherein the polyester polyol has an OH number of 112 milligrams KOH per gram to prepare said polyurethane and said isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer.
  • 12. The photochromic polyurethane layer of claim 1 wherein the photochromic compound is selected from a group consisting of: benzopyrans, naphthopyrans, spirobenzopyrans, spironaphthopyrans, spirobenzoxzines, spironaph-thoxazines, fulgides and fulgim ides.
  • 13. A photochromic laminate for use in eyeglasses comprising: a first resin sheet;a second resin sheet;a photochromic polyurethane film having a first side bonded to the first resin sheet and a second side bonded to the second resin sheet;the photochromic polyurethane film prepared from a composition comprising: a polyurethane having a number average molecular weight from 9,000 to 100,000 and prepared from a composition comprising: an aliphatic diisocyanate comprising 4,4′-dicyclohexylmethane-diisocyanate;a polyester polyol; anda chain extender;an isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer prepared from a composition comprising: an aliphatic diisocyanate comprising 4,4′-dicyclohexylmethanediiso-cyanate; anda polyester polyol; anda photochromic compound;wherein a mixing ratio of the polyurethane and the isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer by weight is in a range from 1:9 to 9:1 and said polyurethane comprises terminal hydroxyl groups, urethane groups, and urea groups having active hydrogen atoms to react with said polyurethane prepolymer after lamination to provide further curability of said photochromic polyurethane film between the first resin sheet and the second resin sheet.
  • 14. The photochromic laminate of claim 13 wherein the first resin sheet and the second resin sheet comprise polycarbonate.
  • 15. The photochromic laminate of claim 13 wherein the polyurethane and the isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer are prepared from the same polyester polyol.
  • 16. The photochromic laminate of claim 13 wherein the polyurethane is prepared from a composition comprising a polycaprolactone having a number average molecular weight of about 1000 grams per mole.
  • 17. The photochromic laminate of claim 13 wherein the photochromic compound is selected from a group consisting of: benzopyrans, naphthopyrans, spirobenzopyrans, spironaphthopyrans, spirobenzoxzines, spironaph-thoxazines, fulgides and fulgim ides.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/563,985 filed Dec. 8, 2014 entitled Photochromic Polyurethane Laminate (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,052,849 issued Aug. 21, 2018), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/645,696 filed Oct. 5, 2012 entitled Photochromic Polyurethane Laminate (now U.S. Pat. 8,906,183 issued Dec. 9, 2014), which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/938,275 filed Sep. 9, 2004 entitled Photochromic Polyurethane Laminate (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,298,671 issued Oct. 30, 2012), which claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/501,820 filed Sep. 9, 2003 entitled Photochromic Laminate; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/501,819 filed Sep. 9, 2003 entitled Photochromic Film And Method Of Manufacture, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (250)
Number Name Date Kind
2443286 Weston Jun 1948 A
2618200 Clave et al. Nov 1952 A
3051054 Crandon Aug 1962 A
3284539 McElroy Nov 1966 A
3560076 Ceppi Feb 1971 A
3711417 Schuler Jan 1973 A
3786119 Ortlieb Jan 1974 A
3806462 Bloom Apr 1974 A
3833289 Schuler Sep 1974 A
3846013 Cohen Nov 1974 A
3877798 Tolar et al. Apr 1975 A
3878282 Bonis et al. Apr 1975 A
3939222 Dieterich Feb 1976 A
3940304 Schuler Feb 1976 A
3963679 Ullrich et al. Jun 1976 A
3988610 Street Oct 1976 A
3989676 Gerkin et al. Nov 1976 A
4008031 Weber Feb 1977 A
4012232 Uhlmann et al. Mar 1977 A
4035213 Thoma et al. Jul 1977 A
4035524 Fritsch Jul 1977 A
4035527 Deeg Jul 1977 A
4046586 Uhlmann et al. Sep 1977 A
4085919 Sullivan Apr 1978 A
4091057 Weber May 1978 A
4106861 Brewer et al. Aug 1978 A
4160853 Ammons Jul 1979 A
4166043 Uhlmann et al. Aug 1979 A
4170567 Chu et al. Oct 1979 A
4211590 Steward et al. Jul 1980 A
4251476 Smith Feb 1981 A
4268134 Gulati et al. May 1981 A
4364878 Laliberte et al. Dec 1982 A
4367170 Uhlmann et al. Jan 1983 A
4409169 Bartholdsten et al. Oct 1983 A
4440672 Chu Apr 1984 A
4442061 Matsuda et al. Apr 1984 A
4490495 Weber Dec 1984 A
4495015 Petcen Jan 1985 A
4519763 Matsuda et al. May 1985 A
4540534 Grendol Sep 1985 A
4585819 Reischle Apr 1986 A
4590144 Schornick et al. May 1986 A
4628134 Gould et al. Dec 1986 A
4645317 Frieder et al. Feb 1987 A
4650533 Parker et al. Mar 1987 A
4679918 Ace Jul 1987 A
4699473 Chu Oct 1987 A
4756973 Sakagami et al. Jul 1988 A
4767647 Bree Aug 1988 A
4781452 Ace Nov 1988 A
4793703 Fretz, Jr. Dec 1988 A
4828769 Maus et al. May 1989 A
4839110 Kingsbury Jun 1989 A
4856857 Takeuchi et al. Aug 1989 A
4867553 Frieder Sep 1989 A
4873029 Blum Oct 1989 A
4882438 Tanaka et al. Nov 1989 A
4883548 Onoki Nov 1989 A
4889412 Clere et al. Dec 1989 A
4889413 Ormsby Dec 1989 A
4892403 Merle Jan 1990 A
4892700 Guerra et al. Jan 1990 A
4898706 Yabe et al. Feb 1990 A
4900242 Maus et al. Feb 1990 A
4917851 Yamada et al. Apr 1990 A
4927480 Vaughan May 1990 A
4933119 Weymouth, Jr. Jun 1990 A
4944584 Maeda et al. Jul 1990 A
4955706 Schmidthaler et al. Sep 1990 A
4960678 Tanaka et al. Oct 1990 A
4961894 Yabe et al. Oct 1990 A
4962013 Tateoka et al. Oct 1990 A
4968545 Fellman et al. Nov 1990 A
4969729 Merle Nov 1990 A
4985194 Watanabe Jan 1991 A
4992347 Hawkins et al. Feb 1991 A
4994208 McBain et al. Feb 1991 A
5015523 Kawashima et al. May 1991 A
5017698 Machida et al. May 1991 A
5049321 Galic Sep 1991 A
5049427 Starzewski et al. Sep 1991 A
5051309 Kawaki et al. Sep 1991 A
5073423 Johnson et al. Dec 1991 A
5106998 Tanaka et al. Apr 1992 A
5120121 Rawlings et al. Jun 1992 A
5130058 Tanaka et al. Jul 1992 A
5147585 Blum Sep 1992 A
5149181 Bedford Sep 1992 A
5175201 Forgione et al. Dec 1992 A
5188787 King et al. Feb 1993 A
5214453 Giovanzana May 1993 A
5223862 Dasher et al. Jun 1993 A
5246989 Iwamoto et al. Sep 1993 A
5252450 Schwerzel et al. Oct 1993 A
5266447 Takahashi et al. Nov 1993 A
5268231 Knapp-Hayes Dec 1993 A
5286419 Van Ligten et al. Feb 1994 A
5288221 Stoerr et al. Feb 1994 A
5292243 Gibbemeyer Mar 1994 A
5327180 Hester, III et al. Jul 1994 A
5336261 Barrett et al. Aug 1994 A
5349065 Tanaka et al. Sep 1994 A
5391327 Ligas et al. Feb 1995 A
5405557 Kingsbury Apr 1995 A
5430146 Tanaka et al. Jul 1995 A
5433810 Abrams Jul 1995 A
5434707 Dalzell et al. Jul 1995 A
5435963 Backovan et al. Jul 1995 A
5449558 Hasegawa et al. Sep 1995 A
5489359 Yamane Feb 1996 A
5523030 Kingsbury Jun 1996 A
5531940 Gupta et al. Jul 1996 A
5578142 Hattori et al. Nov 1996 A
5631720 Guglielmetti et al. May 1997 A
5658502 Hughes Aug 1997 A
5699182 Alfekri Dec 1997 A
5702645 Hughes Dec 1997 A
5702813 Murata et al. Dec 1997 A
5708063 Imura et al. Jan 1998 A
5728758 Smith Mar 1998 A
5751481 Dalzell et al. May 1998 A
5757459 Bhalakia et al. May 1998 A
5770115 Misura Jun 1998 A
5800744 Munakata Sep 1998 A
5821287 Hu Oct 1998 A
5827614 Bhalakia et al. Oct 1998 A
5840926 Hughes Nov 1998 A
5851328 Kohan Dec 1998 A
5851585 Gupta et al. Dec 1998 A
5854710 Rao et al. Dec 1998 A
5856860 Bhalakia et al. Jan 1999 A
5872648 Sanchez et al. Feb 1999 A
5906704 Matsuura May 1999 A
5951939 Chernyak et al. Sep 1999 A
6025026 Smith et al. Feb 2000 A
6068797 Hunt May 2000 A
6074579 Greshes Jun 2000 A
6083597 Kondo Jul 2000 A
6096246 Chan et al. Aug 2000 A
6107395 Rosthauser Aug 2000 A
6113812 Hughes Sep 2000 A
6113813 Goudjil Sep 2000 A
6114437 Brown et al. Sep 2000 A
6138286 Robrahn et al. Oct 2000 A
6145984 Farwig Nov 2000 A
6146578 Van Ert et al. Nov 2000 A
6150430 Walters et al. Nov 2000 A
6165392 Kobuchi et al. Dec 2000 A
6166129 Rosthauser et al. Dec 2000 A
6177032 Smith et al. Jan 2001 B1
6180033 Greshes Jan 2001 B1
6187444 Bowles, III et al. Feb 2001 B1
6254712 Enlow et al. Jul 2001 B1
6256152 Coldrey et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258310 Sardanopoli et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264782 Oshima et al. Jul 2001 B1
6287698 Zhu et al. Sep 2001 B1
6296785 Nelson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309313 Peter Oct 2001 B1
6319433 Kohan Nov 2001 B1
6328446 Bhalakia et al. Dec 2001 B1
6333073 Nelson et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334681 Perrott et al. Jan 2002 B1
6353078 Murata et al. Mar 2002 B1
6367930 Santelices et al. Apr 2002 B1
6390621 Maki et al. May 2002 B1
6391231 Evans et al. May 2002 B1
6416690 Soane et al. Jul 2002 B1
6441077 Border et al. Aug 2002 B1
6503997 Saito Jan 2003 B1
6521146 Mead Feb 2003 B1
6547390 Bernheim et al. Apr 2003 B1
6585373 Evans et al. Jul 2003 B2
6608215 Quin Aug 2003 B2
6613433 Yamamoto et al. Sep 2003 B2
6698884 Perrott et al. Mar 2004 B2
6770324 Hooker Aug 2004 B2
6797383 Nishizawa et al. Sep 2004 B2
6807006 Nakagoshi Oct 2004 B2
6814896 Bhalakia et al. Nov 2004 B2
6863844 Engardio et al. Mar 2005 B2
6863848 Engardio et al. Mar 2005 B2
6971116 Takeda et al. Nov 2005 B2
7004583 Miniutti et al. Feb 2006 B2
7008568 Qin Mar 2006 B2
7021761 Künzler et al. Apr 2006 B2
7025457 Trinh et al. Apr 2006 B2
7025458 Vu Apr 2006 B2
7036932 Boulineau et al. May 2006 B2
7048997 Bhalakia et al. May 2006 B2
7077985 Maki et al. Jul 2006 B2
7104648 Dahi et al. Sep 2006 B2
7258437 King et al. Aug 2007 B2
7335702 La Dous Feb 2008 B2
7350917 Kawai et al. Apr 2008 B2
7465414 Knox et al. Dec 2008 B2
7500749 Vu Mar 2009 B2
8298671 Qin et al. Oct 2012 B2
8367211 Qin et al. Feb 2013 B2
8906183 Qin et al. Dec 2014 B2
9081130 Fan et al. Jul 2015 B1
9163108 Vu et al. Oct 2015 B2
20010009721 Kawashima Jul 2001 A1
20010035935 Bhalakia et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020006505 Nishizawa Jan 2002 A1
20020009599 Welch et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020164486 Guse Nov 2002 A1
20020197484 Nishizawa et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030008149 Moravec Jan 2003 A1
20030184863 Nakagoshi Oct 2003 A1
20040125335 Vu Jul 2004 A1
20040126587 Maki Jul 2004 A1
20040156086 Nishizawa et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040176522 Schaetzle Sep 2004 A1
20040180211 Moravec Sep 2004 A1
20040207809 Blackbum et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040249076 Slark Dec 2004 A1
20050009964 Sugimura et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050165163 Krebs Jul 2005 A1
20050168689 Knox Aug 2005 A1
20050168690 Kawai et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050222363 Krebs Oct 2005 A1
20050233153 Qin et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060065989 Druffel et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060146278 Vu Jul 2006 A1
20060187411 Boulineau et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060192306 Giller et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060226401 Xiao Oct 2006 A1
20060244909 Maki et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060264563 Hanrahan et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060269741 Izumi et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070001327 Chiu Jan 2007 A1
20070122626 Qin et al. May 2007 A1
20070177100 Knox Aug 2007 A1
20070197750 Gibanel Aug 2007 A1
20070291345 Kumar et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080114098 Griswold May 2008 A1
20080251204 Burckhardt Oct 2008 A1
20090312515 Uchida et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100124631 Horio et al. May 2010 A1
20110070432 Qin et al. Mar 2011 A1
20120135241 Yesuda et al. May 2012 A1
20120136148 Lu May 2012 A1
20130004775 Vu et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130127079 Hanimann et al. May 2013 A1
20140005304 Suresh et al. Jan 2014 A1
20150098057 Qin Apr 2015 A1
20150309209 Fan et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160011337 Vu et al. Jan 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (50)
Number Date Country
2003225785 Sep 2003 AU
2004270746 Mar 2005 AU
10235090 Feb 2004 DE
0 050 594 Apr 1982 EP
0 134 633 Mar 1985 EP
0 299 509 Jan 1989 EP
0 415 716 Jun 1991 EP
0 552 498 Jul 1993 EP
0 665 250 Aug 1995 EP
0 814 956 Jan 1998 EP
1 162 482 Dec 2001 EP
1 273 935 Jan 2003 EP
1 673 655 Jun 2015 EP
2 174 711 Nov 1986 GB
56013139 Feb 1981 JP
58173181 Oct 1983 JP
60-195515 Oct 1985 JP
61-005910 Jan 1986 JP
61-032004 Feb 1986 JP
61-236521 Oct 1986 JP
61-276882 Dec 1986 JP
63-061203 Mar 1988 JP
63-178193 Jul 1988 JP
64-22538 Jan 1989 JP
03-132701 Jun 1991 JP
03 282445 Dec 1991 JP
32-69507 Dec 1991 JP
4-358145 Dec 1992 JP
05 032965 Feb 1993 JP
62-38689 Aug 1994 JP
06-316689 Nov 1994 JP
07 048363 Feb 1995 JP
90-01716 Jan 1997 JP
2002196103 Jul 2002 JP
2004 034609 Feb 2004 JP
2000-0046496 Jul 2000 KR
WO 8100769 Mar 1981 WO
WO 9515845 Jun 1995 WO
WO 9634735 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9837115 Aug 1998 WO
WO 0149478 Jul 2001 WO
WO 02093235 Nov 2002 WO
WO 03002683 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03078148 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2004011235 Feb 2004 WO
WO 2004068217 Aug 2004 WO
WO 2005023529 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2006094313 Sep 2006 WO
WO 2007041347 Apr 2007 WO
WO 2007041347 Sep 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)
Entry
Folatjar, D.A. and Horn, K., “Polycarbonates,” in Techniques de l'Ingénieur, traité Plastiques et Composites vol. AM3 (Trmenstrial), Blanc, André, ed., Apr. 14, 2007, 15 pp.
Orcolite, Press release: “ORCOLITE® Releases the Industry's first Prescription Polarized Polycarbonate lens—PolarPoly™,” Oct. 2, 1995, Azusa, California, 2 pages.
Mitsubishi Engineering Plastics Corp., Material Safety Data sheet, Jun. 1, 1995, 4 pages.
Narisawa, H. et al., “Photocontrol of orientation of photochromic dichroic dyes in cholesteric polymer films,” Macromol. Chem.. Phys. 196, May 1995, pp. 1419-1430.
Sisido, M. et al., “Induced Circular Dichroism from Cholesteric Polypeptide Films Doped withan Azobenzene Derivative,” Macromolecules, 1993, 26 pp. 1424-2428.
Frames Product Guide, “Lenses,” Jan. 1993, 2 pages.
Krongauz, V.A. “Chapter 21: Environmental Effects on Organic Photochromic Systems,” in Studies in Organic Chemistry 40, Dürr, H., Bouas-Laurent, H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1990, pp. 793-821.
Asakura Shoten Co., LTD, publisher, “10.5.3 Types of eyeglass lenses,” Extract from “Kougaku Gijutsu Handbook”, supplementary edition. Fifth Edition published Aug. 10, 1980, 4 pages.
MGC, “Coated Film Insert Injection Process,” Oct. 1988, pp. 122-128, Rev. 1993.8, Lot No. 93 08 2000 DPR.
McGraw-Hill Book Company, “Eye glasses,” in McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology, 1960, pp. 172-173.
Japanese Publication, undated.
KB Co. Publication, undated.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160370518 A1 Dec 2016 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60501820 Sep 2003 US
60501819 Sep 2003 US
Divisions (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14563985 Dec 2014 US
Child 15256351 US
Parent 10938275 Sep 2004 US
Child 13645696 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13645696 Oct 2012 US
Child 14563985 US