This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/710,315 (published as 2013/0148112), entitled “Electron-bombarded charge-coupled device and inspection systems using EBCCD detectors”, filed on Dec. 10, 2012, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/658,758, entitled “Electron-bombarded CCD and inspection systems using electron-bombarded CCD detectors”, filed on Jun. 12, 2012, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/792,166 (published as 2013/0264481), entitled “Back-illuminated sensor with boron layer”, filed on Mar. 10, 2013, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/947,975 (published as 2014/0034816), entitled “PHOTOCATHODE INCLUDING SILICON SUBSTRATE WITH BORON LAYER”, filed on Jul. 22, 2013. All of the above applications are incorporated by reference herein.
Photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) and electron-bombarded charge-coupled devices (EBCCDs) using alkali metal photocathodes and infra-red sensitive III-V semiconductor (such as GaAs) photocathodes are known in the art for use at infra-red and visible wavelengths. Only alkali metal photocathodes have found widespread use for ultra-violet (UV) wavelengths.
When an incident photon 101 is absorbed by the photocathode 102, there is a reasonably high probability (typically between about 10% and 50% in practical devices) of one or more electrons 103 being ejected from the photocathode 102. The focusing electrode 104 deflects the electrons 103 so that most of them will strike the first dynode. When an electron 103 strikes a dynode 105, it will usually cause multiple (typically about 10) secondary electrons to be ejected from that dynode 105.
Although
UV wavelengths of about 350 nm and shorter correspond to photon energies of about 3.5 eV and greater. When high energy photons are absorbed by the photocathode 102, electrons 103 with an energy of one, or several, eV are generated. Those electrons, after leaving the photocathode 102 and accelerated by an electric field, travel towards dynodes 105 and anode 106 (or an image sensor in an electron-bombarded image sensor). Because of a spread in magnitude and direction of their velocities due to their initial kinetic energy (e.g. one or more eV), the electrons 103 spread laterally as they travel towards the next surface. Moreover, these photoelectrons also arrive at different times at that surface.
In an image sensor, these different arrival times cause blurring of the image. In the PMT 100, these different arrival times slow the response time of the PMT because a single absorbed photon results in a pulse of current that is spread out in time due, at least in part, to the spread in arrival times of the electrons. A further disadvantage of the PMT 100 is that, in order to detect single photons, multiple stages of gain (dynodes 105) are required so that the signal from a single photon is greater than the background noise. Multiple dynodes further slow the response time of the PMT 100. Furthermore, detection of single photons with most conventional photocathodes requires a period of dark adaptation time after exposure to bright light before dark current settles down to a low level. Some photocathodes require cooling to reduce the dark current to levels that allow reliable detection of single photons.
Therefore, a need arises for a photocathode with high quantum efficiency at UV wavelengths, while generating electrons with a low energy spread. A need also arises for a PMT incorporating this efficient, low-electron-energy-spread photocathode. A need also arises for a PMT with single-photon sensitivity, fast response and quick recovery to full sensitivity from high levels of light. A need also arises for an electron-bombarded image sensor, such as an electron bombarded charge coupled device (CCD) or an electron bombarded CMOS image sensor, that has high quantum efficiency, high spatial resolution and low noise. A need also arises for a dark-field wafer, photomask, or reticle inspection system using UV wavelengths and incorporating a high efficiency, low noise PMT, EBCCD, or electron-bombarded CMOS image sensor.
A photomultiplier tube incorporating an efficient, low-electron-energy-spread photocathode is described. This photomultiplier tube includes a semiconductor photocathode and a photodiode. Notably, the photodiode includes a p-doped semiconductor layer, a n-doped semiconductor layer formed on a first surface of the p-doped semiconductor layer to form a diode, and a pure boron layer formed on a second surface of the p-doped semiconductor layer. A gap between the semiconductor photocathode and the photodiode may be less than about 1 mm or less than about 500 μm.
In one embodiment, the semiconductor photocathode can include gallium nitride. For example, the semiconductor photocathode may include one or more p-doped gallium nitride layers. In another embodiment, the semiconductor photocathode can include silicon. Such a semiconductor photocathode can further include a pure boron coating on at least one surface.
A system for inspecting a sample is also described. This system includes a laser system for generating light. First components direct that light to the sample. Second components direct light from the sample to one or more detectors. At least one detector includes a photomultiplier tube, which incorporates an efficient, low-electron-energy-spread photocathode as described herein.
The PMT and image sensors described herein have higher gain than prior art devices without dynodes or microchannel plates, and a faster response time than prior-art devices that use dynodes or microchannel plates. The image sensors described herein can have higher spatial resolution than prior art devices of similar gain. The PMT and image sensors described herein are simpler than many prior art devices and thus may be less expensive to manufacture and may have a longer operational life.
Small defects scatter low levels of light. More sensitive detectors allow dark-field inspection systems to detect smaller defects or particles. Detectors with better spatial resolution allow dark-field inspection systems to detect smaller defects or particles. Detectors with faster response time allow systems to run faster and reduce the inspection time, thereby increasing the value of those systems to end users.
In some embodiments, the gap between photocathode 202 and photodiode 205 may be a few mm. In some preferred embodiments, the gap between photocathode 202 and photodiode 205 may be about 1 mm, or a few hundred μm.
In some embodiments, focusing electrode 204 may be used to ensure that a high percentage of the electrons 203 ejected from the photocathode 202 are directed towards to the photodiode 205. The focusing electrode 204 may be particularly useful when the gap between the photocathode 202 and the photodiode 205 is larger than about 1 mm. In some embodiments, when the gap between the photocathode 202 and the photodiode 205 is about 1 mm or smaller, the focusing electrode 204 may not be needed. The focusing electrode 204 may comprise a cylinder, a mesh, or another electrode structure.
In preferred embodiments, photocathode 202 comprises a GaN photocathode or a boron-coated silicon photocathode. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/947,975 (published as 2014/0034816), entitled “PHOTOCATHODE INCLUDING SILICON SUBSTRATE WITH BORON LAYER”, filed on Jul. 22, 2013 by Chuang et al., describes exemplary boron-coated silicon photocathodes suitable for use in the improved PMT described herein. In other embodiments, photocathode 202 may include one or more alkali metals or may comprise another photocathode material known in the art. Photocathode 202 may be a transmissive photocathode, as illustrated in
In some transmission-mode photocathode embodiments, an anti-reflection layer 309 may be deposited on a first surface of the substrate 301. In some embodiments, the anti-reflection layer 309 may comprise one or more layers including magnesium fluoride (MgF2), silicon dioxide (SiO2), and/or hafnium oxide (HfO2).
In some embodiments, a buffer layer 302 is formed (e.g. grown or deposited) on a second surface of the substrate 301. When substrate 301 is a doped gallium nitride (GaN) substrate, then the buffer layer may not be needed. In preferred embodiments, the buffer layer 302 is a layer of Aluminum nitride (AlN) about 5 to 20 nm thick.
On top of the buffer layer 302 (or substrate 301, if the buffer layer 302 is not present) are a plurality of doped GaN layers 303 and 304. First doped GaN layer 303 can include a p-doped layer of GaN having a high doping concentration of about 1018 atoms cm−3. The preferred p-type dopant for first doped GaN layer 303 is magnesium (Mg). Second p-doped GaN layer 304 can include a much lower dopant concentration, e.g. a dopant concentration of approximately 5×1016 atoms cm−3. In some embodiments, additional p-doped GaN layers may be placed between layers 303 and 304. Each of those additional layers should have a dopant concentration with intermediate values between those of layers 303 and 304 so as to form a step-wise decreasing dopant concentration from layer 303 to layer 304. For example, if layer 303 has a dopant concentration of about 1018 atoms cm−3 and layer 304 has a dopant concentration of about 5×1016 atoms cm−3, then a layer (not shown) with a dopant concentration of about 2×1017 atoms cm−3 could be placed between the layers 303 and 304. In preferred embodiments, the thicknesses of the p-doped GaN layer should be similar to one another. The total thickness of all the p-doped GaN layers (e.g. if just two layers are used, then the sum of the thicknesses of layers 303 and 304) should be determined to maximize the quantum efficiency. For example, for a photocathode that has maximum sensitivity in the deep UV, the total thickness of all p-doped GaN layers may be about 180 nm. Exemplary GaN photocathodes are described in “Optimizing GaN photocathode structure for higher quantum efficiency”, Optik, 123, pp 756-768 (2012). In one embodiment, a standard Cs:O activation layer 306 can be deposited on the surface of the photocathode 300 from which electrons are ejected.
When intended for use as a transmission mode photocathode, the surface of the silicon on the side from which the light 318 is incident may, optionally, be coated with an anti-reflection (AR) layer 313. An exemplary AR layer 313 may include one or more layers of transparent or semi-transparent materials, such as MgF2, SiO2, Al2O3 and HfO2. For some embodiments intended for operation at deep UV or vacuum UV wavelengths in transmission mode, a thin pure boron layer 312 may be present between the AR layer 313 and the silicon 311. This pure boron layer 312 may be between about 2 nm and 4 nm thick.
The silicon 311 is coated with a thin pure boron layer 314 on the surface from which electrons are ejected. The pure boron layer 314 is preferably between about 2 nm and 20 nm thick. In one embodiment, a standard Cs:O (cesium:oxygen) activation layer 316 can be deposited on the surface of the photocathode from which electrons are ejected.
An exemplary silicon photocathode structure suitable for use in a PMT or an electron-bombarded image sensor system is described in the above-cited U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/947,975 (published as 2014/0034816), entitled “PHOTOCATHODE INCLUDING SILICON SUBSTRATE WITH BORON LAYER”, filed on Jul. 22, 2013.
Photodiode 400 comprises a pn or pin junction formed by a p-doped semiconductor layer 404 (anode) contacting an n-doped semiconductor layer 403 (cathode). In preferred embodiments, the n-doped semiconductor layer 403 is lightly n-doped (designated as N-doped in
Electrical connections 401 are made to the anode and cathode. To have a low resistance contact to the cathode, a highly n-doped semiconductor layer 402 (designated N+ doped in
In one embodiment, a thick pure boron layer 406 (e.g. approximately 2 nm to 20 nm) can be directly formed on top of the p-doped semiconductor layer 404. The pure boron layer 406 allows low energy electrons to penetrate into the p-doped semiconductor layer 404. It is important that the pure boron layer 406 cover the entire area where electrons will be incident and be pinhole free, thereby preventing the growth of a native oxide film on the surface of the semiconductor. Note that a native oxide film would charge up when hit by electrons and could repel low energy electrons, thereby greatly reducing the sensitivity of the photodiode when the PMT operates at a low voltage. Operation of the PMT at a low voltage is important because it allows a small gap between the photocathode and the photodiode, which speeds the response time of the PMT as the electrons take less time to cross that gap. Furthermore, a low voltage difference between the photocathode and photodiode 400 minimizes sputtering and damage to the pure boron layer 406 and the p-doped semiconductor layer 404 that can be caused by high energy electrons.
The quality of the pure boron layer 406 is critical to the optimal performance of the photodiode. The surface of p-doped semiconductor layer 404 should be clean of contaminants and native oxide prior to deposition of the pure boron layer. More details on boron deposition can be found in “Chemical vapor deposition of a-boron layers on silicon for controlled nanometer-deep p+-n junction formation,” Sarubbi et al., J. Electron. Material, vol. 39, pp. 162-173 (2010). In preferred embodiments, the photodiode 400 is operated reverse biased (i.e. the anode is slight negative relative to the cathode) in order to have a fast response and low dark current.
Coated on the inside surface of the window, or placed immediately adjacent to that inside surface, is a photocathode 504. The photocathode material may be substantially similar to any photocathode material known in the art for use in photomultiplier, image intensifier, or prior-art EBCCD detectors. In preferred embodiments, the photocathode 504 may comprise one or more alkali metals such as cesium, and/or may comprise a semiconductor such GaN, GaAs, or silicon. The photocathode 504 can be held at a negative voltage 503 relative to a solid-state image sensor 502, which is positioned near the bottom surface of sealed tube 505. In some embodiments, the negative voltage 503 may be approximately 500 V; in other embodiments, it may be a few hundred volts or approximately 1000 V. In preferred embodiments, the negative voltage 503 is between 100 V and 1500 V.
The solid-state image sensor 502 can be a thinned CCD or CMOS image sensor oriented so that the electrons impinge first on its back-side surface. The back-side of solid-state image sensor 502 includes a layer of boron deposited directly on the epi layer of the image array. In some embodiments, a thin (few nm) layer of a conductive material, such as a refractory metal, is deposited on the boron layer to prevent charge-up of the sensor surface. A refractory metal such as titanium, tungsten, tantalum, rhodium, ruthenium, vanadium or chromium, has advantages compared with non-refractory metals because refractory metals' hardness makes them resistant to sputtering by the electrons, and they are relatively resistant to oxidation at room temperature. In some embodiments, the solid-state image sensor 502 is a time-delay integration (TDI) CCD. In some embodiments, the solid-state image sensor 502 comprises a linear array of electron-sensitive elements. In other embodiments, the solid-state image sensor 502 comprises a two-dimensional array of electron sensitive elements. In some preferred embodiments, the solid-state image sensor 502 is held close to ground potential (shown).
When light 510 is incident on the electron-bombarded image sensor system 501, one or more photoelectrons 520 are emitted from the photocathode 504. These photoelectrons are emitted in substantially all directions, but they are accelerated towards the solid-state image sensor 502 by the potential difference between the photocathode 504 and the solid-state image sensor 502. In preferred embodiments, the gap between the photocathode 504 and the solid-state image sensor 502 is less than 1 mm. In some embodiments, the gap is approximately 500 μm.
Incorporating the solid-state image sensor 502 having one of the structures and/or fabricated in accordance with any of the methods described herein enables the electron-bombarded image sensor system 501 to operate with a low potential difference between the photocathode 504 and the solid-state image sensor 502, and yet have high gain because electrons are more easily able to penetrate through the boron layer (of the image sensor 502) than through a silicon dioxide layer. Because boron-doped silicon, boron silicide, and boron are all at least partially conductive, charging of the surface under electron bombardment is minimized or avoided. The sensitivity to charge up can be further reduced by a conductive or metallic layer on top of the boron layer as described herein.
In prior art EBCCD sensors, the gap between the photocathode and the image sensor is typically 1-2 mm. Such a large gap allows significant transverse motion of the electrons as they travel from the photocathode to the image sensor due to energy of the electrons as they emerge from the photocathode. A gap of 1-2 mm or more is necessary because of the large potential difference between the photocathode and the image sensor (typically about 2000 V or more). Reducing the potential difference between the photocathode and the image sensor allows a smaller gap to be used. Furthermore, the lower energy of the electrons means that there is less spreading of the electrons created within the solid-state image sensor.
The low energy of the electrons arriving at the image sensor 502 means that the probability of atoms being ablated from its surface is low to zero. Furthermore, the energy of the electrons arriving at the solid state image sensor 502 is not enough to generate X-rays from the silicon, thereby avoiding the generation of spurious signals in nearby pixels of the image sensor 502.
Collisions of low energy electrons with residual gas atoms in the vacuum created in the sealed tube 505 will generate fewer ions as compared with high energy electrons. Furthermore, due to the low potential difference between the photocathode 504 and the image sensor 502, those ions will have less kinetic energy when they strike the photocathode and will ablate less photocathode material.
More details of the image sensor system 501 can be found in U.S. Published Application 2013/0264481, entitled “Back-illuminated sensor with boron layer”, filed Mar. 10, 2013 and published Oct. 10, 2013. Additional details of electron-bombarded image sensors that can be incorporated into the image sensor system 501 can be found in U.S. Published Application 2013/0148112, entitled “Electron-bombarded charge-coupled device and inspection systems using EBCCD detectors”, filed on Dec. 10, 2012 and published Jun. 13, 2013. Both of these applications are incorporated by reference herein.
As shown in
More details and alternative embodiments of the image sensor 600 as well as methods of fabricating the image sensor 600 can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/792,166 (published as 2013/0264481), entitled “Back-illuminated sensor with boron layer”, filed Mar. 10, 2013.
The collection system 710 includes a lens 712 for collecting light scattered from the illumination line 705 and a lens 713 for focusing the light coming out of the lens 712 onto a device 714. The device 714 may include an array of light sensitive detectors (such as an array of PMTs) or an electron-bombarded image sensor. In preferred embodiments, the PMTs or electron-bombarded image sensor comprise a boron coated detector, such as a boron-coated photodiode, or a boron-coated image sensor as described herein. In preferred embodiments, the PMT or image sensor may further comprise a GaN or silicon photocathode as described herein. The linear array of detectors within the device 714 can be oriented parallel to the illumination line 715. In one embodiment, multiple collection systems can be included, wherein each of the collection systems includes similar components, but differ in orientation.
For example,
The resulting focused laser beam 802 is then reflected by a beam folding component 803 and a beam deflector 804 to direct the beam 805 towards the surface 801. In a preferred embodiment, the beam 805 is substantially normal or perpendicular to the surface 801, although in other embodiments, the beam 805 may be at an oblique angle to the surface 801.
In one embodiment, the beam 805 is substantially perpendicular or normal to the surface 801 and the beam deflector 804 reflects the specular reflection of the beam from the surface 801 towards the beam turning component 803, thereby acting as a shield to prevent the specular reflection from reaching detectors (described below). The direction of the specular reflection is along line SR, which is normal to the surface 801 of the sample. In one embodiment where the beam 805 is normal to the surface 801, this line SR coincides with the direction of the beam 805, where this common reference line or direction is referred to herein as the axis of surface inspection system 800. Where the beam 805 is at an oblique angle to the surface 801, the direction of specular reflection SR would not coincide with the incoming direction of the beam 805; in such instance, the line SR indicating the direction of the surface normal is referred to as the principal axis of the collection portion of the surface inspection system 800.
Light scattered by small particles is collected by a mirror 806 and directed towards an aperture 807 and a detector 808. Light scattered by large particles are collected by lenses 809 and directed towards an aperture 810 and a detector 811. Note that some large particles will scatter light that is also collected and directed to the detector 808, and similarly some small particles will scatter light that is also collected and directed to the detector 811, but such light is of relatively low intensity compared to the intensity of scattered light the respective detector is designed to detect. In one embodiment, the either or both detectors 808 and 811 can include a PMT or an array of PMTs as described herein. In another embodiment, either or both detectors 808 and 811 include an electron-bombarded image sensor as described herein. In one embodiment, inspection system can be configured for use in detecting defects on unpatterned wafers. U.S. Pat. No. 6,271,916, which issued on Aug. 7, 2011 and is incorporated by reference herein, describes surface inspection system 800 in further detail.
In the oblique illumination channel 912, the second polarized component is reflected by a beam splitter 905 to a mirror 913, which reflects such beam through a half-wave plate 914 and focused by optics 915 to the sample 909. Radiation originating from the oblique illumination beam in the oblique illumination channel 912 and scattered by the sample 909 is also collected by a paraboloidal mirror 910 and focused to a detector 911, which has a pinhole entrance. The pinhole and the illuminated spot (from the normal and oblique illumination channels on the sample 909) are preferably at the foci of a paraboloidal mirror 910. Note that curved mirrored surfaces having shapes other than paraboloidal shapes may also be used.
The paraboloidal mirror 910 collimates the scattered radiation from the sample 909 into a collimated beam 916. The collimated beam 916 is then focused by an objective 917 through an analyzer 918 to the detector 911. The detector 911 may include one or more light sensitive detectors, such as one or more PMTs or electron-bombarded image sensors as described herein. An instrument 920 can provide relative motion between the beams and the sample 909 so that spots are scanned across the surface of the sample 909. U.S. Pat. No. 6,201,601, which issued on Mar. 13, 2001 and is incorporated by reference herein, describes inspection system 900 in further detail.
The various embodiments of the structures, methods, and systems described above are illustrative only of the principles of this invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular embodiments described. For example, the photocathode of the PMT or electron-bombarded image may comprise any type of photocathode known in the art. In another example, a PMT or electron-bombarded image sensor as described herein may be incorporated into any metrology or inspection system, not limited to the specific systems described herein. In yet another example, an inspection system incorporating a PMT or electron-bombarded image sensor as described herein may use a broad-band light source such as a laser-pumped plasma light source or an arc lamp, rather than a laser as in the illustrative examples herein. Thus, the invention is limited only by the following claims and their equivalents.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/198,175, entitled “PHOTOMULTIPLIER TUBE, IMAGE SENSOR, AND AN INSPECTION SYSTEM USING A PMT OR IMAGE SENSOR” by Chuang et al. and filed on Mar. 5, 2014, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/807,058, entitled “PMT, Image Sensor, and an Inspection. System Using a PMT or Image Sensor”, filed on Apr. 1, 2013, and incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3755704 | Spindt et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3870917 | Cuny | Mar 1975 | A |
3947707 | Shannon | Mar 1976 | A |
4099198 | Howorth et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4210922 | Shannon | Jul 1980 | A |
4275326 | Houtkamp | Jun 1981 | A |
4297587 | Baker | Oct 1981 | A |
4348690 | Jastrzebski | Sep 1982 | A |
4467189 | Tsuchiya | Aug 1984 | A |
4555731 | Zinchuk | Nov 1985 | A |
4644221 | Gutierrez | Feb 1987 | A |
4760031 | Janesick | Jul 1988 | A |
4853595 | Alfano | Aug 1989 | A |
5054683 | Haisma et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5120949 | Tomasetti | Jun 1992 | A |
5144630 | Lin | Sep 1992 | A |
5227313 | Gluck et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5315126 | Field | May 1994 | A |
5376810 | Hoenk et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5563702 | Emery et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5717518 | Shafer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719069 | Sparks | Feb 1998 | A |
5731584 | Beyne | Mar 1998 | A |
5742626 | Mead et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5760809 | Malhotra | Jun 1998 | A |
5760899 | Eismann | Jun 1998 | A |
5852322 | Speckbacher | Dec 1998 | A |
5940685 | Loomis et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5965910 | Wood | Oct 1999 | A |
5999310 | Shafer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013399 | Nguyen | Jan 2000 | A |
6064759 | Buckley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6162707 | Dinh | Dec 2000 | A |
6201601 | Vaez-Iravani et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6271916 | Marxer et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278119 | Nikzad et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285018 | Aebi | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297879 | Yang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307586 | Costello | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6346700 | Cunningham et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362484 | Beyne | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373869 | Jacob | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6403963 | Nikzad et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6545281 | McGregor | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6608676 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6711283 | Soenksen | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6837766 | Costello | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7005637 | Costello et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7039157 | Fujii et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7126699 | Wihl | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7130039 | Vaez-Iravani et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7283166 | Billman | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7313155 | Mu et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7345825 | Chuang et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352457 | Kvamme et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7446474 | Maldonado | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7465935 | Urano et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7525649 | Leong et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7528943 | Brown et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7586108 | Nihtianov et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7609309 | Brown et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7741666 | Nozaki et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7750280 | Hwang et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7791170 | Chiang et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7800040 | Blacksberg et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7875948 | Hynecek | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7928382 | Hatakeyama et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7952633 | Brown et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7985658 | Lei et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7999342 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8017427 | Manabe | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8138485 | Nihtianov et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8309443 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8323406 | Bondokov | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8450820 | Nanver | May 2013 | B2 |
8455971 | Chen et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8513587 | Wang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8514587 | Zhang | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8629384 | Biellak et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8665536 | Armstrong | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8686331 | Armstrong | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8755417 | Dribinski | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8803075 | Menge et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8873596 | Dribinski | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8891079 | Zhao et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8896917 | Armstrong | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8929406 | Chuang et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8976343 | Genis | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20010017344 | Aebi | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020191834 | Fishbaine | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030222579 | Habib et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040021061 | Bijkerk | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040056279 | Niigaki | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040227070 | Bateman et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050122021 | Smith | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050167575 | Benz et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050264148 | Maldonado et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060054778 | Suhling | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060055321 | Maldonado et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069460 | Smith et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060170324 | Machuca | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070002465 | Chuang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070034987 | Costello et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070096648 | Nakajima | May 2007 | A1 |
20070103769 | Kuwabara | May 2007 | A1 |
20070188744 | Leslie | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070291810 | Luo et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080044932 | Samoilov et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080182092 | Bondokov et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080267241 | Brown et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080315092 | Kley | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080315121 | Nihtianov et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090021717 | Nihtianov et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090091752 | Terasawa et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090108207 | Liu | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125242 | Choi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090128912 | Okada | May 2009 | A1 |
20090168152 | Gelernt et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090180176 | Armstrong et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090324234 | Kashima | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100102213 | Garris | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103409 | Ohshima | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100148667 | Niigaki et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100188655 | Brown et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100301437 | Brown et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110073982 | Armstrong et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110101219 | Uchiyama et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116077 | Chuang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110169116 | Nanver et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110234790 | True | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110256655 | Nikzad et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261354 | Sinfield | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110291109 | Wraback | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120012811 | DeFlumere | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120012957 | Larsen | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120034816 | Woods | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120081684 | Den Oef et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120132823 | Menge | May 2012 | A1 |
20120160993 | Nevet | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170021 | Walsh | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120200216 | Okazaki et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120228485 | Iwakiri et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120268722 | Nihtianov et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130009069 | Okada | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130016346 | Romanovsky et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130017205 | Giaccia et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130020491 | Mazzillo | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130056843 | Lee | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077086 | Chuang | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130082241 | Kub | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130088706 | Chuang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130126705 | Maleev | May 2013 | A1 |
20130148112 | Chuang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169957 | Wolf | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130176552 | Brown et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130194445 | Brown et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130264481 | Chern et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130270663 | Lin et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130313440 | Chuang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130320211 | Park et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336574 | Nasser-Ghodsi et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140034816 | Chuang | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140111799 | Lei et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140158864 | Brown et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140203386 | Bui | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204963 | Chuang et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140226140 | Chuang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140246595 | Menge | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140291493 | Chuang | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140305367 | Chuang et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140362203 | Delaney | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150007765 | Dribinski | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150177159 | Brown et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150200216 | Muramatsu | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150268176 | Deng et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150275393 | Bondokov et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150294998 | Nihtianov | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160056606 | Chuang et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
746871 | May 2000 | EP |
602983 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1939917 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2346094 | Jul 2011 | EP |
H0511287 | Jan 1993 | JP |
10-171965 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2003043533 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2004-031452 | Jan 2004 | JP |
200786108 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007249092 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007298932 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2009-117454 | May 2009 | JP |
100688497 | Mar 2007 | KR |
100826407 | May 2008 | KR |
2297070 | Apr 2007 | RU |
9532518 | Nov 1995 | WO |
9617372 | Jun 1996 | WO |
2007035858 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2011091159 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2014067754 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kenneth W. Tobin Inspection in Semiconductor Manufacturing Webster's Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, vol. 10, pp. 242-262, Wiley & Sons, NY, NY, 1999. |
Stevanovic, A CMOS Image Sensor for High-Speed Imaging, 2000 IEEE int'l. Solid-State Circuits Conf., 3 pgs. |
Sobieski, Stanley, “Intensified Charge Coupled Devices for Ultra Low Light Level Imaging”, NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, SPIE vol. 78 (1976) Low Light Level Devices, pp. 73-77. |
Paetzel, Activation of Silicon Wafer by Excimer Laser, 18th IEEE Conf. Advanced Thermal Processing of Semiconductors-RTP 2010, 5 pgs. |
Fu, Xiaoqian, “Higher Quantum Efficiency by Optimizing GaN Photocathode Structure”, 978-1-4244-6644-3/10/© 2010 IEEE, pp. 234-235. |
Nanver, Lis K. “Silicon Photodiodes for Low Penetration Depth Beams such as DUV/VUV/EUV Light and Low-Energy Electrons”, Advances in Photodiodes, G. Betta, ed., Mar. 22, 2011, pp. 205-224, www.intechopen.com. |
Sarubbi, F. et al. “Chemical Vapor Deposition of α-Boron Layers on Silicon for Controlled Nanometer-Deep p+ n Junction Formation”, J. Electron. Mat., vol. 39, No. 2, Feb. 2010, pp. 162-173. |
Nanver, Lis K. et al. “Pure-Boron Chemical-Vapor-Deposited Layers: a New Material for Silicon Device Processing”, 18th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Thermal Processing of Semiconductors (RTP), Sep. 28, 2010-Oct. 1, 2010, pp. 136-139. |
Hecht, Eugene, Optics, 2nd Edition, Adelphi University, 1987, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., 3 pages. |
Hecht, Eugene, Optics, 4th Edition, India: Pearson Education Pte, Ltd. reprint 2004, 4 pages. |
Martinelli, Ramon U. “Infrared Photoemission from Silicon”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 16, No. 7, Apr. 1, 1970, pp. 261-262. |
Martinelli, Ramon U. “Reflection and Transmission Secondary Emission from Silicon”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 17, No. 8, Oct. 15, 1970, pp. 313-314. |
Henderson, Brian S. “Study of Negative Electron Affinity GaAs Photocathodes”, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, TX, Aug. 7, 2009, 18 pages. |
Allen, F. G. et al. “Work Function, Photoelectric Threshold, and Surface States of Atomically Clean Silicon”, Physical Review, vol. 127, No. 1, Jul. 1, 1962, pp. 150-158. |
Howorth, J. R. et al. “Transmission silicon photoemitters and electron multipliers,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 9, No. 5, Apr. 1, 1976, pp. 785-794. |
Fu et al. “Optimizing GaN photocathode structure for higher quantum efficiency”, Optik, vol. 123, No. 9, May 2012, pp. 756-768. |
Sarubbi F et al: “Pure boron-doped photodiodes: a solution for radiation detection in EUV lithography”, Proceedings of the 38th European Solid-State Device Research Conference: Edinburgh International Conference Centre, Endiburgh, Scotland, UK, Sep. 15-19, 2008, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, US, Sep. 15, 2008, pp. 278-281. |
Raoult, F. et al., “Efficient generation of narrow-bandwidth picosecond pulses by frequency doubling of femtosecond chirped pulses”, Jul. 15, 1998 / ol. 23, No. 14 / Optics Letters, pp. 1117-1119. |
Sakic, Agata, “Boron-layer silicon photodiodes for high-efficiency low-energy electron detection”, Solid-State Electronics 65-66 (2011), pp. 38-44. |
Omatsu, Takashige et al., “High repetition rate Q-switching performance in transversely diode-pumped Nd doped mixed gadolinium yttrium vanadate bounce laser”, Optics Express vol. 14, Issue 7, pp. 2727-2734, Apr. 3, 2006. |
Nihtianov, 61/720700—Certified Copy corres to PCT/EP2013/071080, pp. 1-44, (May 2014). |
Fanton, J. T., et al., “Multiparameter Measurements of Thin Films Using beam-profile reflectometry”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 73, No. 11, p. 7035 (1993). |
Leng, et al., “Simultaneous Measurement of Six Layers in a Silicon on Insulator Film Stack Using Spectrophotometry and Beam Profile Reflectometry,”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 81, No. 8, p. 3570 (1997). |
Huang, Back-Side Illuminated Photogate CMOS . . . , IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 11, No. 9, Sep. 2011, 5 pgs. |
Nikzad, Delta-doped CCDs High QE with long-term stability . . . ; SPIE vol. 2198 (1994) pp. 907-915. |
Niclass, Design and Characterization of a CMOS 3-D . . . , IEEE Journal Solid-State Circuits, vol. 40, No. 9, Sep. 2005, 8 pgs. |
Herriott, Folded Optical Delay Lines, Applied Optics 4, #8, pp. 883-889 (1965). |
Itzler, InP-based Geiger-mode . . . , Proc. SPIE vol. 7320 (2000), 12 pgs. |
Grubisic, New Silicon Reach-Through Avalanche . . . , MIPRO 2013, May 20-24, 2013, pp. 48-54. |
Dulinski, Tests of a backside illuminated monolithic CMOS pixel . . . , Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 546 (2005) 274-280, 7 pgs. |
Armstrong, The Quest for the Ultimate Vacuum Tube, Spectrum IEEE, Dec. 2015, 4 pgs. |
Ding, Field Emission from Silicon, MIT 2001, 277 pgs. |
Unknown, Field Emitter Review, 7 pgs in Japanese. |
Koike, Field Emitter Equipped With a Suppressor to Control Emission Angel, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 34, No. 5, May 2013, 3 pgs. |
Nagao, Cathod Technologies for Field Emission Displays, IEJ Trans 2006; 1:171-178, 8 pgs. |
Nagao, Fabrication of a Field Emitter Array with a Built-In Einzel Lens, JJAP 48 (2008) 06FK02, 4 pgs. |
Neo, Electron Optical Properties of Microcolumn with Field Emitter, JJAP 52 (2013) 036603, 5 pgs. |
Rakhshandehroo, Fabrication of a self-aligned silicon field emission . . . , JVSTB, 16, 765 (1998); doi: 10.1116/1,589900, 6 pgs. |
Rakhshandehroo, Field emission from gated Si emitter tips with precise . . . , JVSTB, 15, 2777 (1997); doi: 10.1116/1.589726, 6 pgs. |
Sato, Fabrication and characterization of HfC coated . . . , J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2194), published Jul. 31, 2003, 5 pgs. |
Serbun, Stable field emission of single B-doped . . . , JVSTB, 31, 02B101 (2013); doi: 10.1116/1.4765088, 7 pgs. |
Fowler, Electron Emission in Intense Electric Fields, Mar. 31, 1928, 9 pgs. |
Utsumi, Vacuum Microelectrnoics: What's New and Exciting, IEEE vol. 38, No. 10, Oct. 1991, 8 pgs. |
Herriott, Off-Axis Paths . . . , Applied Optics 3, #4, pp. 523-526 (1964). |
KLA-Tencor Corporation, filed U.S. Appl. No. 62/059,368, filed Oct. 3, 2014 and entitled “183nm Laser and Inspection System”. |
Pain; et al., “Pain et al., “A Back-Illuminated Megapixel CMOS Image Sensor”, Jun. 9, 2005, IEEE Workshop on Charge-Coupled Devices and Advanced Image Sensors, Karuizawa, Japan, 4 pgs.” |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160300701 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61807058 | Apr 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14198175 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 15189871 | US |