The present invention relates generally to integrated circuit devices and, more particularly, to piezoelectronic memory devices having piezoelectronic transistor components.
Field Effect Transistors (FETs) support the standard computer architecture (CMOS) currently used in logic and memory. Their shrinking size over several decades, following Moore's law, led to enormous increases in speed and reductions in voltage, as predicted by Dennard scaling theory. However, starting around 2003, supply voltages could no longer be reduced, and that meant clock speeds had to be limited to prevent excessive power densities. Discovery of a fast, low voltage switching device, based on a different principle of operation, has become critical for the continued pace of information technology.
One way in which the approach could be different would be to have the voltage that controls the switching device transduced into another energy state, such as pressure, which is gated and then transduced back into a voltage or current at the output. With mechanical amplification in the case of pressure transduction, it is possible to have a very small input voltage control a rather large output. The result is a switch for logic and memory that operates at an extremely low power density.
It is also desirable to find a technology that can build multi-layer structures that open up significant new applications, such as high capacity multilayer memories and combinations of logic and memory at different levels optimized to reduce wiring length. Such structures are very difficult to make in CMOS because of the need for all FETs to be formed in single crystal silicon. Technologies based on other materials may allow more three-dimensional structures.
In an exemplary embodiment, a memory element includes a first piezotronic transistor coupled to a second piezotronic transistor; the first and second piezotronic transistors each comprising a piezoelectric (PE) material and a piezoresistive (PR) material, wherein an electrical resistance of the PR material is dependent upon an applied voltage across the PE material by way of an applied pressure to the PR material by the PE material.
In another embodiment, a piezotronic transistor device includes a first piezoelectric (PE) material disposed between a first electrode and a second electrode; a second PE material disposed between the first electrode and a third electrode; a piezoresistive (PR) material disposed between the second electrode and a fourth electrode, wherein an electrical resistance of the PR material is dependent upon an applied voltage across the first PE material by way of an applied pressure to the PR material by the first PE material; and a semi-rigid housing surrounding the PE, PR and electrode materials, the semi-rigid housing in direct physical contact with the first, third and fourth electrodes.
In another embodiment, piezotronic transistor device includes a piezoelectric (PE) material disposed between a first electrode and a second electrode, the PE material also disposed between the first electrode and a third electrode; a first piezoresistive (PR) material disposed between the second electrode and a fourth electrode, wherein an electrical resistance of the first PR material is dependent upon an applied voltage, via the first and second electrodes, across the first PE material by way of an applied pressure to the first PR material by the PE material; a second piezoresistive (PR) material disposed between the third electrode and a fifth electrode, wherein an electrical resistance of the second PR material is dependent upon an applied voltage, via the first and third electrodes, across the PE material by way of an applied pressure to the second PR material by the PE material; and a semi-rigid housing surrounding the PE, PR and electrode materials, the semi-rigid housing in direct physical contact with the first, fourth and fifth electrodes.
In another embodiment, a non-volatile memory element includes a first piezotronic transistor coupled to a second piezotronic transistor; the first and second piezotronic transistors each comprising at least one piezoelectric (PE) material and at least one piezoresistive (PR) material, wherein an electrical resistance of the at least one PR material is dependent upon an applied voltage across the at least one PE material by way of an applied pressure to the at least one PR material by the at least one PE material.
Referring to the exemplary drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several Figures:
a) is a schematic cross-sectional diagram of a 3-terminal, hysteretic piezo-effect transistor (HPET);
b) illustrates electrical symbols for the HPET of
a) is a schematic cross-sectional diagram of a 4-terminal, piezo-effect transistor (4PET);
b) is an electrical symbol for the 4PET of
a) and 7(b) are graphs illustrating the time dependence of the gate-to-common voltage drop across the HPET and the current through the 4PET of the memory element of
a) is a schematic cross-sectional diagram of a dual polarity, piezo-effect transistor (PETDP), in accordance with another embodiment;
b) is an electrical symbol for the PETDP of
a) is a schematic cross-sectional diagram of a dual resistance, piezo-effect transistor (PET2R), in accordance with another embodiment;
b) is an electrical symbol for the PET2R of
Piezotronic memory (PEM) consists of a piezoelectric material (the “PE”) in mechanical contact with a hysteric piezoresistive material (the “PR”) that changes its resistivity upon compression and rarefaction. In operation, PE expansion followed by a return to the initial state compresses the hysteretic PR and causes it to change into a stable state with a low resistance. Conversely, PE contraction changes the PR into a stable state with a high resistance. PEM using hysteric phase change material has been proposed as a memory device in U.S. Pat. No. 7,848,135 to Elmegreen, et al. Additional detailed discussions of piezotronics, including materials for the PE and PR, and simulations of piezoelectronic transistors (PETs), logic inverters, ring oscillators, and flip-flops, may be found in D. M. Newns, B. G. Elmegreen, X.-H. Liu, G. Martyna 2012, “A Low-Voltage High-Speed Electronic Switch Based on Piezoelectric Transduction,” J. Appl. Phys., 111, 084509, and in D. M. Newns, B. G. Elmegreen, X.-H. Liu, G. Martyna 2012, “High Response Piezoelectric and Piezoresistive Materials for Fast, Low Voltage Switching: Simulation and Theory of Novel Transduction Physics at the Nanoscale” Advanced Materials, 24, p. 3672-3677. Further patent related disclosures for other aspects of the PET may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 8,159,854 to Elmegreen, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,247,947 to Elmegreen, et al., and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/176,880.
Important aspects of memory cells for computers, cell phones, and other electronic devices are the maximum density of these cells on a single chip, the total memory capacity, the speed of reads and writes, the energy consumed in reads and writes, the energy consumed in preserving the memory state, and the long-term stability of the storage material. Accordingly, exemplary embodiment disclosed herein provide new designs for PEMs and PETs, as well as new designs for 2-control line and 3-control line PEMs that can be made entirely from piezoelectric and piezoresistive materials without the need for conventional FETs made with CMOS technology. The proposed PEM is fast, dense, and low power, and with certain designs that may be non-volatile as well. Furthermore, the read operation of such devices is non-destructive.
Broadly stated, a PET containing a hysteretic PR material (which has the property of bi-stability) is capable of being switched between two states, one of which has a low PR resistance, and the other of which has a relatively high PR resistance. The hysteretic PET (HPET) acts as the memory storage medium. A second PET serves as the access device (which turns on only in response to the word line), and when OFF protects the memory cell from bit line fluctuations. To minimize interface fracture or depolarization of the PR, the HPET PR is designed to operate under typical conditions at positive pressure. Its standby condition near the center of its hysteresis loop is then held by a continuous positive pressure.
The PE in the HPET operates in or close to unipolar mode for long term stability, meaning that it applies positive or zero pressure under a voltage which does not change sign. The standby mode has an intermediate pressure. One way to implement this, as illustrated in the first two embodiments described below, is to apply a positive bias voltage to the PE to achieve positive pressure during standby. Then, the PE operates with a smaller or larger positive voltage relative to the standby voltage during switching. Another solution, as implemented in a third embodiment, is to apply a positive bias pressure to the PE during standby using a surrounding material under tension, and then to write either by reducing the pressure on the PR by expanding the housing structure with one PE, or by increasing the pressure on the PR by expanding a second PE in contact with the PR.
A basic memory element described herein includes two PETs configured in a cross-point array, with one PET having a hysteric PR layer and the other having a non-hysteric PR layer. With the ability to fabricate several layers of this material, including intervening non-conductive layers with high yield strength, the footprint of each element in a memory array can be small, for example, one PET footprint with two PETs vertically stacked, plus the associated wiring. As described in the Newns, et al. publication mentioned above, Piezotronics has Dennard scaling.
Referring initially to
In the diagram of
In operation, an input voltage coupled to the gate electrode 104 and the common electrode 106 is applied across the PE material 102, which causes an expansion and displacement of the PE crystal material 102 that in turn acts on the PR material 108 via the HYM 112. That is, the induced pressure from the PE crystal material 102 causes an insulator-to-metal transition so that the PR material 108 provides a conducting path between the common electrode 106 and the sense electrode 110. The HYM 112 ensures that the PE crystal material displacement is transmitted to the PR material 108 rather than the surrounding medium 114.
An alternative to the 3-terminal HPET design is illustrated in
The insulator layer 208 separating the “gate −” and “sense 1” terminals may a relatively high Young's modulus, such as in the range of about 60 gigapascals (GPa) to about 250 GPa, for example, a relatively low dielectric constant (e.g., about 4-12), and a high breakdown field. Suitable insulator materials thus include, for example, silicon dioxide (SiO2) or silicon nitride (Si3N4). As further depicted in
The electrodes in the 4-terminal PET may include materials such as strontium ruthenium oxide (SrRuO3 (SRO)), platinum (Pt), tungsten (W) or other suitable mechanically hard conducting materials. The PE 202 may include a relaxor piezoelectric such as PMN-PT (lead magnesium niobate-lead titanate) or PZN-PT (lead zinc niobate-lead titanate) or other PE materials typically made from perovskite titanates. Such PE materials have a large value of displacement/V d33, e.g., d33=2500 pm/V, support a relatively high piezoelectric strain (˜1%), and have a relatively high endurance, making them ideal for the PET application. The PE 202 could also include another material such as PZT (lead zirconate titanate). The PR 212 is a material which undergoes an insulator-to-metal transition under a relatively low pressure in a range such as 0.4-3.0 GPa. Some examples of PR material include samarium selenide (SmSe), thulium telluride (TmTe), nickel disulfide/diselenide (Ni(SxSe1-x)2), vanadium oxide (V2O3) doped with a small percentage of Cr, calcium ruthenium oxide (Ca2RuO4), etc.
A circuit symbol for the 4-terminal PET is shown in
In operation of the 4-terminal PET 200, an input voltage between “gate −” and “gate +” may be always positive or zero. When the input voltage is zero, the PE material 202 has no displacement and the PR material 212 is uncompressed, giving it a high electrical resistance such that the 4-terminal PET 200 is “off”. When a significant positive voltage is applied between “gate −” and “gate +”, the PE material 202 develops a positive strain. That is, the PE material 202 expands upwards along the axis perpendicular to the stack. The upward expansion of the PE material 202 tries to compress the high Young's modulus insulator 208, but the main effect is to compress the more compressible PR material 212. The compressive action is effective because the surrounding high yield strength material 216 strongly constrains the relative motion of the top of the “sense 2” electrode 214 and the bottom of the “gate +” electrode 204. The combined effect of the mechanical compression of the PR material 212 by the constrained stack and the PR material 212 piezoresistive response is to lower the “sense 1” electrode to “sense 2” electrode impedance by about 3-5 orders of magnitude under conditions where the input voltage is the designed line voltage VDD. The PET switch is now “on”.
Referring now to
As summarized in the table of
It should be noted that the common electrode voltage Vc1 is independent of the state of the HPET storage transistor 100 if the ON resistance for the 4PET access transistor 200 is significantly less than the ON resistance in the HPET storage transistor 100; i.e., R2on<<R1on. Also, to avoid excessive leakage current during a write operation, the OFF resistance of the 4PET access transistor 200 should be significantly greater than the ON resistance in the HPET storage transistor 100; i.e., R2off>>R1on. The dynamic range of R1 is assumed to be relatively small to enable these conditions.
In considering a memory array having N columns and M rows, M has to be smaller than R2off/R1on, as follows. The current to write a 0 in a single memory element is the voltage drop from b to ground, which is H, divided by the summed resistance of the 4PET access transistor 200 and the HPET storage transistor 100. The resistance of the on-state 4PET access transistor 200, R2on, is much lower than the on-state resistance in the HPET storage transistor 100, R1on; thus, the HPET storage transistor 100 in the memory element 500 dominates the total resistance regardless of its state. Therefore, the current through all N columns is 0.5 (N·H/R1on) if half the memory cells in a row are in the low resistance (on) state. The leakage current through all of the other rows and all of the columns is 0.5 N(M−1)H/R2off for off resistance R2off in the 4PET access transistor 200. Again, this assumes half the memory elements are in the low resistance state, with R1on<<R2off. The active write current dominates the leakage write current if R2off/R1on>(M−1). This is the resistance constraint mentioned above.
During the read process, leakage current enters each bit line, b, from the rows that are not being read. These rows have resistance R2off in all of their 4PET access transistors 200. There is a voltage drop of H/2 across each combination of 4PET and HPET. If half of the HPETs in a no-read column are in the on state with resistance R1on<<R2off, then the leakage current from the no-read rows in that column is 0.25(M−1)H/R2off. This has to be smaller than the maximum current in that bit line from the read row, which is 0.5H/R1on. Avoidance of contamination of the sense line by the non-read rows therefore requires R2off/R1on>>0.5(M−1), which is the same as the condition for an efficient write, to within a factor of 2.
a) and 7(b) are graphs illustrating the time dependence of the gate-to-contact voltage drop (Vg1−Vc1) across the HPET storage transistor 100 and the current through the 4PET access transistor 200 of the memory element 500 of
In any case, during the switch from Standby to Read, the bit line is assumed to change voltage from 0 to H/2 instantly at some time before the write line changes, and the write line is assumed to increase voltage with time from H/2 to H as (H/2)(2−e−γt) for rate γ. It will be noted that the bit line can change to H/2 one or more clock cycles before the word line voltage starts to increase, because as long as the word line is H/2, the 4PET access transistor 200 is off and the bit line voltage does not reach the HPET storage transistor 100. Specifically,
b) illustrates for the case γ=0.1. Both
The memory cell 500 of
Referring now to
Operation of the memory element 800 is understood with reference to the table in
The steady voltage on the HPET gate as a result of the separate control line 804 removes the possibility that the Vg1−Vc1 write voltage and resulting current may swing into a damaging range (
The write current and leakage currents of the memory element 800 are the same as in the embodiment of
As indicated above, the embodiments described above are examples of volatile PET memory designs, in that the memory states are not preserved upon removal of voltage from the word and bit lines. Accordingly,
As shown in
In this arrangement, the first piezoelectric (PE 1) is in direct force contact with the PR 1008, and the second piezoelectric (PE 2) is in force contact with the surrounding HYM 1012. When there is no voltage drop across either PE, the HYM 1012 and PE combination exert a static pressure on the PR 1008, causing the PR resistance to be in the bi-stable state. When there is a voltage drop across PE 1, from the gate to the common terminal, and the voltage drop across PE 2 is zero, PE 1 expands into the PR 1008 and causes the PR resistance to drop from the bi-stable state to the ON state (conducting, bit value 1). According to
In lieu of the “side by side” arrangement of the first and second PE materials of
Referring now to
As more specifically shown in
b) is an electrical symbol for the PET2R 1200 of
Using the 4-terminal HPETDP device 1000 of
Operation of the memory element 1300 is further understood with reference to the table of
For a read operation in a row, the write line voltage is set to w=H in that row and the b1 potential is set to −∈H/2, which is not low enough to change the state of the HPETDP 100. The current is sensed through the b1 line with a total voltage drop of ∈H/2.
There is a current through both on-state PET2Rs and HPETDPs during the write. If half of the HPETDPs in a row are on, then the current equals 0.5·NH/R1on for a memory with N columns and M rows. The non-write rows have a leakage current through their off-state PET2Rs in the amount of 0.5·N(M−1)H/R2off considering that R2off>>R1on. The write row dominates if R2off/R1on>(M−1), as in the previous designs.
During the read process, leakage current enters each b1 line from the rows that are not being read. These rows have resistance R2off in all of their PET2Rs. There is a voltage drop of ∈H/2 across each combination of PET2R and HPETDP. If half of the HPETDPs in a no-read column are in the on state with resistance R1on<<R2off, then the leakage current from the no-read rows in that column is 0.5 (M−1)∈H/(2R2off). This has to be smaller than the maximum current from the read row, which is ∈H/(2R1on). Avoidance of contamination of the sense line by the non-read rows therefore requires R2off/R1on>>0.5(M−1), as in the previous designs.
In the absence of reading or writing, the memory element 1300 in
Power Requirements and Speed
The energy required to write a row of memory includes charging the word line and all of the attached gate capacitances for that row, as well as charging all the bit lines. To charge a gate in an HPET or PET requires an energy 0.5V2C for voltage V and gate capacitance C in the PE. The capacitance in a PE having an area of (30 nm)2 and a height of 30 nm equals about 0.3 femtofarads (fF) (assuming a dielectric constant of 1000). Each device has two PETs, or 0.6 fF capacitance. The energy required to charge a device is then 0.012 femtojoules (0) for V=0.2 Volts. For a 1000×1000 block of memory, each bit line is about 100 μm long, and considering a capacitance of the wire equal to 2 pF/cm, a bit line capacitance is 20 fF. The single word line wire capacitance of 20 fF is thus dominated by the 2000 gate capacitances on that word line (totaling 600 fF), but the capacitance of the write operation is dominated by that of all the bit lines, which is 20 pF. Thus, the bit line capacitance dominates the energy consumption of the memory, without much dependence on the PET devices themselves.
If the memory is addressed at a rate of 1 GHz for 64 lines in parallel, which have a total capacitance of 1.28 pF, the power required is 0.5V2C×109 Hz, or 25 μW for V=0.2V. This estimate focuses narrowly on the power required locally in the memory block for only 64 bits. The main point is that the power to write all of the PET devices is small compared to the power to charge the bit lines because the capacitance of each bit line exceeds the summed capacitances of the HPET and PET that are being written.
The power to write a PET memory is less than DRAM because the PET operates at a lower voltage, the PET memory is preserved for as long as the bias voltages are applied, and in the third design here, the PET memory is preserved even when all the voltages are zero. For the same wiring capacitance in DRAM, and the same energy per write, the PET power is less than the DRAM power in proportion to the refresh rate. Typically, DRAM has to refresh at a rate of about 16 or more times per second and PETs need far fewer refresh. The lower voltage of the PET memory saves additional energy because energy scales as the square of the voltage for a given capacitance.
Optimal operation of a PET occurs when the RC time is comparable to the sonic time. The sonic time in a PET with 30 nm height is about 10 ps. With the 0.3 fF capacitance given above, this corresponds to a total resistance in the wire and the PR of 30,000 Ohms.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
This invention was made with Government support under Contract No.: N66001-11-C-4109 awarded by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The Government has certain rights in this invention.