The present invention generally relates to locks for overlapping parallel sliding members, such as sliding glass doors and windows, and more particularly to a hinge member having two leaf members, with the leaf members being pivotable between locked and unlocked positions.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,873,693 discloses a prior lock similar to the present invention for overlapping parallel sliding members, and the disclosure of said patent is incorporated herein as if fully set forth herein.
A significant drawback of the prior lock was its complex and expensive, yet non-intuitive and delicate, detent pin. The necessity of withdrawing the spring loaded pin prior to pivoting the leaves was not immediately apparent. Persons unfamiliar with the operation of the prior lock would typically force the lock open without first withdrawing the pin, thereby breaking the pin.
Thus, an object of this invention is to provide a simple inconspicuous element attached to one member of overlapping parallel sliding members, which may be positioned to permit free sliding of the overlapping members with respect to each other, and positioned in another position to obstruct or prevent movement of said overlapping sliding members with respect to each other.
A further object of this invention is to provide a hinge type member having one leaf thereof permanently secured to one of overlapping sliding members, and the second leaf thereof pivotal between locked and unlocked positions to permit sliding of said overlapping members in the unlocked position; and, when turned a 90 degree angle to the locked position, to abut the face of one of said overlapping members to prevent displacement there between; and, a resistance mechanism for lightly-resisting pivoting of said pivotal leaf member against displacement or rotation, the resistance mechanism being indestructible in normal operation without pre-manipulation of any portion of the lock prior to pivoting movement.
A still further object of this invention is to provide a device as described which will be simple and economical in construction and efficient and durable in use.
A lock for overlapping parallel sliding members has a hinge member having two leaves. The two leaves include a fixed leaf permanently secured to one of overlapping sliding members, and a pivotal leaf pivotally moveable between locked and unlocked positions, to permit sliding of said overlapping members in the unlocked position, and, when turned an about 90 degree angle to the locked position, to abut the face of one of said overlapping members to prevent displacement there between. A resistance mechanism is provided for lightly-resisting pivoting of said pivotal leaf against displacement or rotation in the locked position, said resistance mechanism being indestructible in normal operation without pre-manipulation of any portion of the lock prior to pivoting movement.
A more complete understanding of the invention and its advantages will be apparent from the Detailed Description taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings, in which:
Referring initially to
Lock 10 includes a hinge member 14 having two leaves 16, 18. The two leaves 16, 18 include a fixed leaf 16 permanently secured to one of overlapping sliding members, for example, door 14 in
The lock is constructed such that the pivotal leaf permits sliding of the overlapping members in the unlocked position, and, when turned an about 90 degree angle to the locked position, to abut the face of one of said overlapping members as shown in
A resistance mechanism 20 is provided for lightly-resisting pivoting of the pivotal leaf 18 against displacement or rotation in the locked position. The resistance mechanism 20 is indestructible in normal operation without pre-manipulation of any portion of the lock prior to pivoting movement.
In one embodiment, the resistance mechanism is two-state, providing for lightly-resisting pivoting of said pivotal leaf against displacement or rotation in both the locked and unlocked positions. It will be appreciated that resistance against pivoting is only necessary in the locked position, for security reasons. Resistance to pivoting in the unlocked position is ordinarily desirable in order to prevent accidental locking and to present the user with a tactile indication that the lock is unlocked.
Referring now to
In the illustrated embodiment, the cam 22 is located on the fixed leaf 16 and the follower 28 is located on the pivotal leaf 18, though a reversed arrangement is possible with equivalent effect.
In one embodiment, follower 28 is formed of a deformable material such as thermoplastic resin. Then, the follower 28 is dimensioned to permit increased elastic deformation thereof by the cam 22 during pivoting relative movement of the leaves, as best shown in
Cam 22 has a rounded corner 30 between flattened lobes 24, 26. Rounded corner 30 is displaced radially from the hinge axis 32 (
In one embodiment, the follower 28 extends from a raised central portion 34 of the pivotal leaf, which enables symmetric loading of the leaves and their hinge structures. It will be recognized that a resistance mechanism with a similar function could be formed with equivalent yet different structure.
In one embodiment, the pivotal leaf 18 has having an outer longitudinal edge 36 (
The entire lock may be made of injection-molded polycarbonate, though other materials will also be suitable.
In operation, the locked position is illustrated in
The resistance mechanism 20 is provided for lightly-resisting pivoting of the pivotal leaf 18 against displacement or rotation in the locked position. “Lightly-resisting” is, of course, a relative term, and in this context is defined to mean resistance firm enough to prevent movement of the pivotal member 16 by wind vibration, pet contact, or repeated, determined attempts by an intruder to open the locked door or window from outside, yet light enough to permit ready and comfortable manipulation by the inside user.
In contrast to the prior locks with spring-loaded pins, the resistance mechanism of the present invention is indestructible in normal operation without pre-manipulation of any portion of the lock prior to pivoting movement. Thus, where the prior lock required pre-manipulation of the spring-loaded pin to prevent its destruction, in contrast, the present lock may be directly moved between locked and unlocked positions, and vice versa, indefinitely, without any preliminary manipulation at all and without destruction of any part of the resistance mechanism.
It will be understood that each of the elements described above, or two or more together, may also find a useful application in other types of constructions differing from the type described above.
While the invention has been illustrated and described as embodied in a lock for parallel overlapping members, it is not intended to be limited to the details shown, since it will be understood that various omissions, modifications, substitutions and changes in the forms and details of the device illustrated and in its operation can be made by those skilled in the art without departing in any way from the spirit of the present invention.
Without further analysis, the foregoing will so fully reveal the gist of the present invention that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily adapt it for various applications without omitting features that, from the standpoint of prior art, fairly constitute essential characteristics of the generic or specific aspects of this invention.
What is claimed as new and desired to be protected by Letters Patent is set forth in the appended claims.
Whereas, the present invention has been described with respect to a specific embodiment thereof, it will be understood that various changes and modifications will be suggested to one skilled in the art and it is intended to encompass such changes and modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2629466 | Nardulli | Feb 1953 | A |
2855772 | Hillgren | Oct 1958 | A |
2920914 | Jenkins | Jan 1960 | A |
3174783 | Russell | Mar 1965 | A |
3625557 | Jensen | Dec 1971 | A |
3661413 | Silva | May 1972 | A |
3837693 | Adickes | Sep 1974 | A |
4171835 | Conley et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4300795 | Jennings | Nov 1981 | A |
4428605 | Follows | Jan 1984 | A |
4436328 | Chernosky | Mar 1984 | A |
4715644 | Lobanoff et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4981348 | Prillard | Jan 1991 | A |
4993772 | Charen | Feb 1991 | A |
5059016 | Lawassani et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5117073 | Mischenko | May 1992 | A |
5203596 | Stevens | Apr 1993 | A |
5542721 | Allen | Aug 1996 | A |
5649309 | Wilcox et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5927997 | Ruland et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6000735 | Jourdenais | Dec 1999 | A |
6119019 | Phelps | Sep 2000 | A |
6704585 | Hiebel | Mar 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
411107607 | Apr 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020007531 A1 | Jan 2002 | US |