Disclosed embodiments relate to a pivoting/sliding door for vehicles, comprising at least one door leaf and a spindle drive.
EP 1 314 626 discloses the practice of mounting a door leaf on a bearing unit that can be moved in a transverse direction relative to the car body and that also supports the drive motor which, by torque splitting, also moves the door leaf or door leaves via a drive spindle. The door leaf or leaves is/are not only longitudinally movable but also swing-mounted relative to the bearing unit. Although an inward movement perpendicular to the longitudinal movement is achieved in this way, reducing stress on the seals, the mechanical complexity and the problems with maintenance and adjustment make this design fault-prone and uneconomical.
EP 2 165 868 likewise discloses the practice, in the case of a pivoting/sliding door, of arranging a door leaf on a bearing unit that can be moved relative to the car body perpendicularly to the longitudinal movement of the door leaf and thus bringing about the outward movement and the inward movement of the door leaf, likewise together with the spindle drive. As shown by
EP 957 019 discloses the use of four-bar linkages, namely parallelogram linkages, for outward movement/pivoting inward. This avoids translational movements of components but necessitates very complex supporting elements for the door leaf. An endless traction means is used as the actual drive mechanism for the longitudinal movement of the door leaves. Overall, this allows only oblique outward movements and inward movements in the closing end region, thus giving rise to the disadvantages explained below in respect of the seals.
EP 536 528 discloses a device similar to that in EP 957019 on the basis of four-bar linkages, but the drive mechanism extends horizontally a long way beyond the door opening width and accompanies the outward movement. In addition to the space requirement, the large moving mass and the inaccessibility of important parts of the drive system, there is the problem of the seals here too.
Finally, EP 1 336 544 discloses the practice, known per se, of using an “over-center mechanism” in connection with doors for vehicles as well.
In accordance with disclosed embodiments, by virtue of the fact that the direction of rotation of the spindle is the same direction as that of the spindle nut, and the guide rail has, at its closing end, a section which runs in the inward movement direction and which determines the closed position of the door in the longitudinal direction and is directed at right angles to the spindle axis, with the result that the guide element blocks the movement of the spindle nut in the longitudinal direction of the spindle axis in the course of closure.
In accordance with disclosed embodiments, in this way, a connection for conjoint rotation between the spindle and the spindle nut is formed, with the result that the spindle nut is pivoted in a pivoting movement in a rotational direction around the spindle axis and this pivoting movement is used to drive the door leaf as far as the closing position in the inward movement direction and to lock it. In accordance with disclosed embodiments, it is thus possible to provide a simple and reliable door drive through the rotatability of the spindle nut relative to the door leaf.
Disclosed embodiments are explained in greater detail in the figures with reference to an illustrative embodiment for the left-hand half of a spindle drive for a two-leaf door entry. In the figures, which are purely schematic:
Pivoting/sliding doors and the mechanisms and drives thereof have been known for a long time and should therefore not require any explanation where they do not affect the utility of the disclosed embodiments. Just briefly, it should be noted that the door leaves may perform a very wide variety of movements in detail in their movement during opening and closing, depending on the philosophy of the designers and operators, ranging from a purely translational movement, during which a suitably defined door leaf plane is moved in parallel at all times, to extremely different movements of the main closing edge and of the secondary closing edge, wherein the former undergoes an S-shaped movement in the closing end region while the latter undergoes an almost purely rotary movement. The disadvantages and problems mentioned below arise in each of these variants.
In general, it may be observed that the inward and outward movement of the door leaf in known spindle drives for pivoting/sliding doors is often brought about by a guide rail which is curved in the inward movement region. The disadvantage with this solution is that the door seals are ideally not brought up perpendicularly to the sealing plane but at an angle which differs from a right angle.
During the closing process, this leads to an increased expenditure of force and to wear on the seals due to the seals being dragged along the sealing plane. Here, moreover, the inward force for the door is obtained only from the longitudinal force of the spindle nut, leading to shallow curves in the inward movement of the door and thus to undesirably wide sealing surfaces on the secondary closure edge of the door. There are also known drives of the kind mentioned above which use special transmissions with torque splitting, e.g., planetary transmissions, for the inward movement of the door. It is also common to mount the motor unit in such a way that it can rotate about its own axis and to use the torque (counter torque) counteracting the spindle torque for the inward movement and outward movement of the door by means of corresponding devices. The disadvantages with these drive solutions are the high mechanical complexity and the associated production and assembly costs.
Disclosed embodiments provide a spindle drive configured in such a way that the above-mentioned disadvantages are avoided. In other words, by virtue of the fact that the direction of rotation of the spindle is the same direction as that of the spindle nut, and the guide rail has, at its closing end, a section which runs in the inward movement direction and which determines the closed position of the door in the longitudinal direction and is directed at right angles to the spindle axis, with the result that the guide element blocks the movement of the spindle nut in the longitudinal direction of the spindle axis in the course of closure. In this way, a connection for conjoint rotation between the spindle and the spindle nut is formed, with the result that the spindle nut is pivoted in a pivoting movement in a rotational direction around the spindle axis and this pivoting movement is used to drive the door leaf as far as the closing position in the inward movement direction and to lock it. It may therefore be stated that the prior art, as given by the initially mentioned EP 1 314 626, is notional.
It is thus possible to provide a simple and reliable door drive through the rotatability of the spindle nut relative to the door leaf. All previous spindle drives had provided the spindle nut in such a way that it was either fixed for conjoint rotation to the door leaf or to a door leaf supporting part which, according to disclosed embodiments, is not present in this form, and hence made the longitudinal movement “hard”, with all the disadvantages also for the loading of the spindle in the course of the final movement during closure.
In the description, the words “door leaf” and “door wing” are used as synonyms and, for the sake of brevity, only the word “door” is also generally used since there is no risk of confusion with the door as a whole. The inward movement direction corresponds to the direction referred to in many documents as the final direction of the closing movement.
In this disclosure, the terms “front”, “rear”, “up”, “down” etc. are used in the customary form and with reference to the object in the usual position of use thereof. That is to say that, in the case of a weapon, the mouth of the barrel is “at the front”, the bolt or slide is moved toward the “rear” by the explosion gases, that the movement of a door leaf in the closing direction takes place “toward the front” etc. The phrase “the direction of rotation of the spindle is the same direction as that of the spindle nut”, as indicated above, means that the rotation of the spindle nut relative to the spindle axis brings about a slowing of the movement of the door leaf in the direction of the spindle axis during the closing process explained below.
In the description and the claims, “substantially” means a deviation of up to 10% of the indicated value, both downward and upward, if it is physically possible in other respects only in the appropriate direction and, in the case of degree indications (angle and temperature), ±10° is intended thereby.
A full motion cycle of the door, beginning with the door leaf 3 in the open position, is described below with reference to
As is apparent from the figures overall, a door leaf 3 is held by a support mechanism 14, which is known from the prior art and is therefore not explained in greater detail, and is guided in the horizontal plane perpendicular to the plane of the door opening (transverse direction E) by means of a guide rail 4 interacting with a guide element 7 and a connection element 6. Guidance in the horizontal plane parallel to the plane of the door opening (longitudinal direction L) is accomplished by means of a spindle 2 and a spindle nut 1, which likewise acts on the connection element 6. Since they are not part of the disclosed embodiments and have been known to those skilled in the art for decades in various forms and embodiments from the prior art, as is also apparent from the cited literature, the guides in the region of the secondary closing edge 15 and of the lower edge of the door leaf 3 are not illustrated. The same applies to the support mechanism 14 which, although illustrated because of its arrangement in the region of the drive, is not explained in greater detail and can be embodied in many different ways.
A guide element 7 connected in a fixed manner to the door 3, e.g., a roller, is guided in or on the guide rail 4, and therefore the door 3 also follows the entire course of the guide rail 4 by means of the connection element 6.
When the guide element 7 has reached the curved part 9 of the guide rail 4, as shown in
This is shown in
As can be seen from
This rotation process is transferred via the connection element 6 to the door 3 and, in accordance with the crank mechanism principle, is converted into a linear motion of the door 3 in the inward movement direction E, and thus the door 3 is now also closed and locked in the inward movement direction E, as shown in
As illustrated in
To open the door 3, a reversal in the direction of rotation of the drive motor and thus of the spindle 2 is used to pivot the spindle nut 1, which is as it were blocked by the guide rail section 10 in the opening longitudinal direction L, back out of the dead center position, counter to the closing direction of rotation S, by means of the spindle torque, the door 3 is moved outward and moves into the open position; the remainder of the motion sequence already explained is also reversed and, at the end of the opening movement, the drive motor is stopped by appropriate control (sensors, etc.) and the initial position in
Forces which occur close to the end of closing, during the inward movement of the door, are diverted directly to the spindle bearing 5 from the spindle nut 1 through appropriate shaping of the spindle nut 1 and of a stop 8 and thus kept away from the spindle 2 itself, as shown in
As illustrated in
Since, during the outward movement (opening) and the inward movement (closing) of the door, the direction of rotation of the spindle and the spindle nut pivoting movement is in each case the same, the actually effective spindle pitch during the door closing process becomes gradually smaller, as mentioned at the outset, and falls to zero when the door 3 is closed in the longitudinal direction L (guide element in section 10). Given a constant spindle speed, this leads during the closing process to a continuously rising longitudinal closing force at the spindle nut while the closing speed (in direction L) of the spindle nut falls continuously. These effects are advantageous during closing and opening in the case of pivoting/sliding doors: on the one hand, a higher force for pressing the door seals against the vehicle sealing plane is available in the closing region and, on the other hand, the door 3 is closed in a way which reduces the stress on the entire mechanism by virtue of the gradual deceleration of the spindle nut 1.
Since, according to the disclosed embodiments, the inward and outward movement direction of the door 3 in the closing region is directed perpendicularly (vertically, normally) to the longitudinal axis 12 of the spindle 2 and to the sealing plane (represented in the illustrative embodiment by the door leaf plane parallel thereto), rubbing of the door seals on the sealing plane in the closing phase or opening phase is prevented almost completely. In the closing region, the toggle lever effect which comes into effect furthermore assists the door closing process. In the case of double-wing doors, there is end-to-end contact without rubbing relative motion of the seals against one another.
Another advantage that can be achieved according to the disclosed embodiments that, when the door is closed, forces acting perpendicularly to the door surface, specifically forces acting outward, such as those especially which arise due to passengers leaning against the door when trains come together or wagons are overfull, are transmitted directly by the door, via the connection element 6, to the locking mechanism, thereby relieving the load on the longitudinal guides of the door. Another significant advantage for pivoting/sliding doors that can be achieved according to the disclosed embodiments is that, on the one hand, the spindle nut 1 brings about the inward movement of the door 3 during the door closing process and, on the other hand, it simultaneously serves as a locking element. This makes it possible to dispense with additional devices for inward movement of the door and with locking devices, thereby making the entire drive simpler and cheaper both to produce and to operate and adjust.
The drive according to the disclosed embodiments is particularly suitable for streetcars, metros or regional trains and it can be used equally for doors with one door leaf or with two door leaves. In the case of double-wing embodiments, there are likewise no rubbing relative movements between the seals involved.
It can be combined with many types of support mechanisms, and this is an easy matter for a person skilled in the art, given a knowledge of the disclosed embodiments. If the guide 4, 7 is designed with appropriate tolerance for changes in height, it is also possible to use support mechanisms in which there is a change in the height of the door leaf, e.g., due to pivoting mechanisms. In implementation, the spindle can be mounted with axial play in order to trigger a sensor or some similar action by appropriate axial movement at the end of the closing movement.
The guide rail does not have to have the shape of a reverse U but can be designed as a single bar which is contacted on both sides by rollers on the bracket 15, while the support mechanism 14 can be arranged at some other point and the term “curved section” should be interpreted broadly: as illustrated, it can have rectilinear partial regions or, alternatively, partial regions which do not have a constant curvature, or can have combinations thereof. With increasing curvature (curvature inversely proportional to the radius of curvature) in the closing direction, optionally with a continuous increase, similar or identical to a clothoid, gradual braking of the door leaf in direction L and gradual acceleration in direction E is achieved. This entails a particularly gentle change in movement in direction L and, at the same time, forceful inward movement in direction E at the end of the closing movement. However, the essential point is that, ultimately, it makes a transition to a straight-line section running perpendicularly to the spindle axis 12. Here, however, the vertical position of the axes 11 and 12 does not have to be the illustrated position.
In the figures, the connection element 6 is illustrated as situated below the spindle and designed with a matching curvature, but this is not essential. If there is sufficient space available, arrangement above the spindle with an adapted curvature is possible and then also brings the advantage, by virtue of inherent weight and the torque created thereby, of pushing the mechanism into the over-center position.
It should furthermore be pointed out that all the components and elements which are not fundamentally related to the disclosed embodiments are not mentioned in the description but are, of course, present in doors according to the disclosed embodiments, these including assembly brackets, fastening elements such as support brackets or the like, door surrounds, seals, outward-movement devices for the regions around the secondary closing edge 15 and/or the lower edge region of the door leaf, operating elements, drives together with the transmissions and mechanisms thereof, lights, sensors, emergency actuation devices, additional locking and/or unlocking mechanisms, and all the other secondary elements of pivoting/sliding doors.
In summary, it can be stated that, by virtue of the—limited—capacity of the spindle nut to turn relative to the door leaf and the support mechanism, the disclosed embodimetns provide a pivoting/sliding door for vehicles which comprises at least one door leaf 3, a support mechanism 14, a rotatable spindle 2 arranged in a fixed location in the vehicle and having a spindle axis 12 and a spindle nut 1, which is connected to the door leaf 3 via a connection element 6, and comprising a guide rail 4, which has a curved section, is arranged in a fixed location in the vehicle and guides a guide element 7 fixed to the door leaf. It is characterized in that:
a) the curved section 9 of the guide rail 4 is followed by a section which runs perpendicularly to the spindle axis 12,
b) the connection element 6 is connected, in such a way as to be pivotable about axes 11, 13 parallel to the spindle axis 12, both to the spindle nut 1 and to the bracket 15 fixed to the door leaf, and,
c) when the guide element 7 reaches the transition from the curved section 9 to the perpendicular section 10, the door leaf 3 has the closed end position in the longitudinal direction L but is optionally still spaced from the closed end position in an inward movement direction E.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A564/2016 | Dec 2016 | AT | national |
This patent application is a U.S. National Phase of International Patent Application No. PCT/AT2017/060333, filed Dec. 14, 2017, which claims priority to Austrian Patent Application No. A564/2016, filed Dec. 14, 2016, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/AT2017/060333 | 12/14/2017 | WO | 00 |