Patent Grant
10697030
This application is the national phase of, and claims priority to, International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2014/003320, filed Dec. 11, 2014, which designated the U.S. and which claims priority to German Patent Application Number DE 10 2013 113 913.2, filed Dec. 12, 2013. These applications are each incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
The invention relates to a plant complex for steel production and to a method for operating the plant complex.
Pig iron is obtained in a blast furnace from iron ores, additives such as coke and other reducing agents such as coal, oil, gas, biomasses, recycled waste plastics or other substances containing carbon and/or hydrogen. CO, CO2, hydrogen and water vapour inevitably occur as products of the reduction reactions. Apart from the aforementioned constituents, a blast-furnace top gas drawn off from the blast-furnace process often has a high content of nitrogen. The amount of gas and the composition of the blast-furnace top gas are dependent on the feedstock and the operating mode and are subject to fluctuations. Typically, however, blast-furnace top gas contains 35 to 60% by volume N2, 20 to 30% by volume CO, 20 to 30% by volume CO2 and 2 to 15% by volume H2. Around 30 to 40% of the blast-furnace top gas produced in the production of the pig iron is generally used for heating up the hot air for the blast-furnace process in air heaters; the remaining amount of top gas may also be used externally in other areas of the works for heating purposes or for electricity generation.
In the converter steel mill, which is arranged downstream of the blast-furnace process, pig iron is converted into crude steel. By blowing oxygen onto liquid pig iron, troublesome impurities such as carbon, silicon, sulphur and phosphorus are removed. Since the oxidation processes cause an intense development of heat, scrap is often added in amounts of up to 25% with respect to the pig iron as a coolant. Furthermore, lime is added for forming slag and an alloying agent. A converter gas that has a high content of CO and also contains nitrogen, hydrogen and CO2 is drawn off from the steel converter. A typical converter gas composition has 50 to 70% by volume CO, 10 to 20% by volume N2, about 15% by volume CO2 and about 2% by volume H2. The converter gas is either burned off or, in the case of modern steel mills, captured and passed on to be used for providing energy.
The plant complex may optionally be operated in combination with a coking plant. In this case, the plant complex described at the beginning additionally comprises a coke-oven plant, in which coal is converted into coke by a coking process. In the coking of coal into coke, a coke-oven gas occurs, containing high hydrogen content and considerable amounts of CH4. Typically, coke-oven gas contains 55 to 70% by volume H2, 20 to 30% by volume CH4, 5 to 10% by volume N2 and 5 to 10% by volume CO. In addition, the coke-oven gas has fractions of CO2, NH3 and H2S. In practice, the coke-oven gas is used in various areas of the works for heating purposes and in the power-generating process for electricity generation. In addition, it is known to use coke-oven gas together with blast-furnace top gas or with converter gas for producing syngases. According to a method known from WO 2010/136313 A1, coke-oven gas is separated into a hydrogen-rich gas stream and a residual gas stream containing CH4 and CO, the residual gas stream being fed to the blast-furnace process and the hydrogen-rich gas stream being mixed with blast-furnace top gas and processed further into a syngas. It is known from EP 0 200 880 A2 to mix converter gas and coke-oven gas and use them as a syngas for methanol synthesis.
In an integrated metallurgical plant that is operated in combination with a coking plant, approximately 40 to 50% of the raw gases that occur as blast-furnace top gas, converter gas and coke-oven gas are used for chemical engineering processes. Approximately 50 to 60% of the gases produced are fed to the power-generating plant and used for electricity generation. The electricity produced in the power-generating plant covers the electricity demand for the production of pig iron and crude steel. Ideally, the energy balance is closed, so that, apart from iron ores and carbon in the form of coal and coke as sources of energy, no further energy input is necessary and, apart from crude steel and slag, no product leaves the plant complex.
One object of the invention includes further improving the cost-effectiveness of the overall process and providing a plant complex with which it is possible to reduce the costs for steel production.
According to one embodiment of the invention, a plant complex for steel production comprises a blast furnace for producing pig iron, a converter steel mill for producing crude steel, a gas-conducting system for gases that occur in the production of pig iron and/or in the production of crude steel, and also a power-generating plant for electricity generation. The power-generating plant is designed as a gas-turbine power-generating plant or gas-turbine and steam-turbine power-generating plant that is operated with a gas that comprises at least a partial amount of the blast-furnace top gas that occurs in the production of pig iron in the blast furnace and/or a partial amount of the converter gas that occurs in the converter steel works.
Proceeding from a plant complex for producing steel comprising a blast furnace for producing pig iron, a converter steel mill for producing crude steel, a gas-conducting system for gases that occur in the production of pig iron and/or in the production of crude steel, and a power-generating plant for electricity generation, according to the invention a chemical or biotechnological plant is provided, connected to the gas-conducting system and arranged in parallel with the power-generating plant with respect to the gas supply. According to the invention, the gas-conducting system comprises an operationally controllable gas diverter for dividing the streams of gas that are fed to the power-generating plant and the chemical or biotechnological plant. Also the subject of the invention is a method for operating a plant complex that has a blast furnace for producing pig iron, a converter steel mill, a power-generating plant and a chemical plant or biotechnological plant. According to the method according to one embodiment of the invention, at least a partial amount of the blast-furnace top gas that occurs in the production of pig iron in the blast furnace and/or a partial amount of the converter gas that occurs in the production of crude steel is used as a useful gas for operating the power-generating plant and the chemical plant or biotechnological plant. Externally obtained electricity and power-generating plant electricity, which is produced by the power-generating plant of the plant complex, is used to cover the electricity demand of the plant complex. This involves establishing the proportion of electricity accounted for by the externally obtained electricity with respect to the overall electricity demand of the plant complex as a variable process parameter and establishing the amount of useful gas fed to the power-generating process in dependence on this process parameter. The part of the useful gas that is not used for electricity generation is used after a gas-conditioning operation as a syngas for producing chemical products or is fed after a gas-conditioning operation to a biotechnological plant and used for biochemical processes.
In the chemical plant, chemical products can be produced from syngases that respectively contain the components of the end product. Chemical products may be for example ammonia or methanol or else other hydrocarbon compounds.
For producing ammonia, a syngas that contains nitrogen and hydrogen in the correct ratio must be provided. The nitrogen can be obtained from blast-furnace top gas. Blast-furnace top gas or converter gas may be used as the hydrogen source, hydrogen being produced by conversion of the CO fraction by a water-gas-shift reaction (CO+H2O≈CO2+H2). For producing hydrocarbon compounds, for example methanol, it is necessary to provide a syngas consisting substantially of CO and/or CO2 and H2 that contains the components carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide and hydrogen in the correct ratio. The ratio is often described by the module (H2−CO2)/(CO+CO2). The hydrogen may be produced for example by conversion of the CO fraction in the blast-furnace top gas by a water-gas-shift reaction. Converter gas may be used for providing CO. Blast-furnace top gas and/or converter gas may serve as a source of CO2.
Within the scope of the invention, a biotechnological plant may also be used instead of a chemical plant for producing products from syngas. The plant concerned is a plant for the fermentation of syngas. The syngas is used biochemically by way of a fermentation process, it being possible to produce products such as alcohols (ethanol, butanol), acetone or organic acids. These products, which are produced by fermentation of syngas, are also only mentioned by way of example in the present case.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the plant complex additionally comprises a coke-oven plant. If the production of pig iron and the production of crude steel are operated in combination with a coking plant, a partial amount of the blast-furnace top gas that occurs in the production of pig iron and/or a partial amount of the converter gas that occurs in the converter steel mill may be mixed with a partial amount of the coke-oven gas that occurs in the coke-oven plant and the mixed gas may be used as a useful gas. A mixture of coke-oven gas and blast-furnace top gas or a mixed gas comprising coke-oven gas, converter gas and blast-furnace top gas may be used for producing a syngas, for example for ammonia synthesis. A mixed gas comprising coke-oven gas and converter gas or a mixed gas comprising coke-oven gas, converter gas and blast-furnace top gas is suitable for producing hydrocarbon compounds. The described chemical products that can be produced in a chemical plant from blast-furnace top gas, converter gas and coke-oven gas are only application examples for explaining the variants of the method that are described herein.
The raw gases—coke-oven gas, converter gas and blast-furnace top gas—may be conditioned individually or in combinations as a mixed gas and then fed to the chemical plant as syngases. The conditioning of coke-oven gas in particular comprises a cleaning of the gas to separate out troublesome contents, in particular tar, sulphur and sulphur compounds, aromatic hydrocarbons (BTX) and high-boiling hydrocarbons. A gas-conditioning operation is also necessary for producing the syngas. In the course of the gas conditioning, the proportion of the components CO, CO2 and H2 within the raw gas is changed. The gas conditioning comprises for example pressure swing adsorption for separating out and enriching H2 and/or a water-gas-shift reaction for converting CO into hydrogen and/or a steam reformer for converting the CH4 fraction into CO and hydrogen in the coke-oven gas.
In the case of the method according to the invention, at least a partial amount of the blast-furnace top gas that occurs in the production of pig iron in the blast furnace and/or a partial amount of the converter gas that occurs in the converter steel mill is used as raw gas, in order to produce products, that is to say substances of value, from them by chemical reactions in a chemical plant or by biochemical processes in a biotechnological plant. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the plant is operated in combination with a coking plant and coke-oven gas is integrated in the use. As a consequence of using part of these gases, the plant complex has a deficit of electricity, which has to be obtained externally. The externally obtained electricity may originate from conventional power-generating plants or be obtained from renewable energy sources. Preferably, the externally obtained electricity is obtained completely or at least partially from renewable energy and originates for example from wind turbine generator plants, solar plants, geothermal power-generating plants, hydroelectric power-generating plants, tidal power-generating plants and the like. To achieve operation of the plant complex that is as cost-effective as possible, at times of low electricity prices, electricity is bought in and used for supplying to the plant complex, and the part of the useful gas that is not used for electricity generation is used for producing chemical products after a gas-conditioning operation in a chemical plant and/or a biotechnological plant. At times of high electricity prices, on the other hand, the useful gas is completely or at least mostly fed to the power-generating plant in order to produce electricity for supplying to the plant complex. The chemical plant or biotechnological plant is correspondingly operated at a lower output at times of high electricity prices. A closed-loop control system is provided for operating the method, establishing the alternating operation of the power-generating plant on the one hand and the chemical plant or biotechnological plant on the other hand in dependence on a variable process parameter. The process parameter is preferably determined in dependence on a function that includes the price for the externally obtained electricity and the costs for producing the power-generating plant electricity as variables.
The method according to the invention makes it possible for the plant complex to be operated cost-effectively. The method according to the invention thereby also makes use in particular of the fact that the efficiency of a power-generating process for producing electricity is worse than the efficiency of a chemical plant or a biotechnological plant in which chemical products are produced by chemical reactions or by biochemical processes from syngas.
The product output of the power-generating plant can be controlled between 20% and 100%, in dependence on the amount of useful gas fed to the power-generating process. A gas-turbine power-generating plant or gas-turbine and steam-turbine power-generating plant is preferably used as the power-generating plant.
The product output of the chemical plant or of the biotechnological plant is controlled in dependence on the amount of mixed gas fed to these plants. A major challenge for the chemical plant is that of finding a way of operating dynamically with changing plant loads. The way of operating with changing plant loads can be realized in particular by the chemical plant having a plurality of small units arranged in parallel, which are individually switched on or off depending on the available stream of useful gas.
The use of a biotechnological plant has the advantage that a biotechnological plant is more flexible with respect to load changes than a chemical plant.
The plant complex for steel production that is represented in
In the blast furnace 1, pig iron 6 is obtained substantially from iron ore 4 and reducing agents 5, in particular coke and coal. Reduction reactions cause the production of a blast-furnace top gas 7, which contains nitrogen, CO, CO2 and H2 as the main constituents. In the converter steel mill 2 that is arranged downstream of the blast-furnace process, pig iron 6 is converted into crude steel 8. By blowing oxygen onto the liquid pig iron, troublesome impurities, in particular carbon, silicon and phosphorus, are removed. For cooling, scrap may be added in amounts of up to 25% with respect to the amount of pig iron. Furthermore, lime is added for forming slag and an alloying agent. At the top of the converter, a converter gas 9 that has a very high proportion of CO is drawn off.
The power-generating plant 3 is designed as a gas-turbine power-generating plant or gas-turbine and steam-turbine power-generating plant and is operated with a gas that comprises at least a partial amount of the blast-furnace top gas 7 that occurs in the production of pig iron in the blast furnace 1 and a partial amount of the converter gas 9 that occurs in the converter steel works 2. A gas-conducting system is provided for carrying the gases.
According to the overall balance represented in
According to the representation in
In the case of the plant complex represented in
The externally obtained electricity 14 is preferably obtained completely or at least partially from renewable energy and originates for example from wind turbine generator plants, solar plants, hydroelectric power-generating plants and the like. The process parameter on the basis of which the amount of useful gas N1 that is fed to the power-generating process is established is determined in dependence on a function that includes the price for the externally obtained electricity and the costs for producing the power-generating plant electricity 15 as variables. To achieve operation of the plant complex that is as cost-effective as possible, at times of low electricity prices, electricity is brought in as external electricity 14 and used for supplying electricity to the plant complex, the part of the useful gas N2 that is not used for producing electricity being fed to the chemical or biotechnological plant 11 and used for producing chemical products 16 after a gas-conditioning operation. At times of high electricity prices, the raw gases 7, 9 that occur in the production of pig iron and the production of crude steel are fed to the power-generating plant 3 in order to produce electricity for supplying to the plant complex. The chemical plant 11 or the alternatively provided biotechnological plant is correspondingly operated at a lower output at times of high electricity prices.
The product output of the power-generating plant 3 is controlled between 20% and 100%, in dependence on the amount of useful gas N1 fed to the power-generating process. The product output of the chemical plant 11 or of the biotechnological plant is controlled in dependence on the amount of useful gas N2 fed to this plant. A major challenge for the chemical plant 11 is that of finding a way of operating dynamically with changing loads. This can be realized by the chemical plant 11 having a plurality of small units arranged in parallel, which are individually switched on or off depending on the available amount of useful gas N2.
In the exemplary embodiment of
During the operation of the plant represented in
The blast-furnace top gas 7, the converter gas 9 and the coke-oven gas 20 may be combined with one another in any way desired. The combination of gas streams 7, 9, 20 depends on the desired syngas or the product that is to be produced in the chemical plant 11 or the biotechnological plant by using the syngas.
For example, it is possible within the scope of the invention that blast-furnace top gas 7 and converter gas 9 are mixed, that a syngas is produced from the mixed gas after a gas-conditioning operation and that conditioned coke-oven gas 20 is additionally admixed with the syngas or the cleaned mixed gas before the further processing to form the syngas.
Furthermore, there is the possibility that a syngas is produced from blast-furnace top gas 7 after a gas-conditioning operation and that conditioned coke-oven gas 20 is additionally admixed with the syngas or the cleaned blast-furnace top gas before the further processing to form the syngas.
Finally, there is the possibility that a syngas is produced from converter gas 9 after a gas-conditioning operation and that conditioned coke-oven gas 20 is additionally admixed with the syngas or the cleaned converter gas before the further processing to form the syngas.
In the case of the operating mode represented in
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2013 113 913 | Dec 2013 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2014/003320 | 12/11/2014 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2015/086154 | 6/18/2015 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20020134507 | DeDontney et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20060027043 | Zendejas-Martinez | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20090249922 | Soyland | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100317074 | Simpson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110266726 | DePuy | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120186268 | Johnfe et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120226080 | Meyer-Pittroff | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130045517 | Oakley et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20140343339 | Schodel | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20160348195 | Achatz | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 511892 | Mar 2013 | AT |
| 2752291 | Aug 2010 | CA |
| 2848250 | Mar 2013 | CA |
| 2858631 | Jun 2013 | CA |
| 1311825 | Sep 2001 | CN |
| 2401909 | Jul 1975 | DE |
| 273857 | Nov 1989 | DE |
| 102010049639 | May 2012 | DE |
| 102011077819 | Dec 2012 | DE |
| 102013113913 | Jun 2015 | DE |
| 102013113921 | Jun 2015 | DE |
| 102013113942 | Jun 2015 | DE |
| 102013113950 | Jun 2015 | DE |
| 102013113958 | Jun 2015 | DE |
| 102013113980 | Jun 2015 | DE |
| 200880 | Nov 1986 | EP |
| 244551 | Mar 1990 | EP |
| 2543743 | Jan 2013 | EP |
| 2816096 | Jun 2013 | EP |
| 2657215 | Oct 2013 | EP |
| 908021 | Mar 1946 | FR |
| 2420568 | Oct 1979 | FR |
| 61275101 | Dec 1986 | JP |
| 2011225969 | Nov 2011 | JP |
| 2125613 | Jan 1999 | RU |
| 0005421 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| 2010136313 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2011018124 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011116141 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2014202557 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| 2015086148 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| 2015086149 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| 2015086150 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| 2015086151 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| 2015086152 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| 2015086153 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| 2015086154 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| EP 0200880 machine translation of the description (Year: 1986). |
| PCT Application No. PCT/EP2014/003320 International Search Report dated Feb. 18, 2015, 7 pages. |
| PCT Application No. PCT/EP2014/003320 Written Opinion dated Jun. 18, 2015, 13 pages. |
| DE Application No. 102013113913.2, English Translation of Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2014, 12 pages. |
| DE Application No. 102013113913.2, English Translation of Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2015, 8 pages. |
| Heat 11> Passion for Heat Transfer, ISBN 978-3-642-36513-3, English Translation, 2 pages. |
| Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe, Iron and Steel Works of the Future, Waste Gases from Iron and Steel Works, dated Jun. 21, 2013, English Translation, 13 pages. |
| Aleris's Site in Koblenz—A Model for Resource and Energy Efficiency, in Aluminium, dated Jul. 8, 2014, English Translation, 4 pages. |
| GE Jenbacher GmbH Co OHG, Energy It's in Our Nature, Jenbacher Gas Engines for CO2 Fertilisation in Greenhouses, GE Imagination at Work, dated 2008, English Translation, 4 pages. |
| Schmole et al., Ecological Hot Metal Production Using Coke Plant and Blast Furnace Route, La Revue de Metallurgie-CIT, Mar. 1, 2005, pp. 171-182, Bd. 102, Nr. 3, 1, XP001230940, Paris, FR. |
| Canadian Application No. 2,930,471, Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Canadian Application No. 2,930,471, Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2017, 6 pages. |
| EP Application No. 14815582.3, Official Communication dated Aug. 29, 2018. |
| Third Party Observation dated Jul. 6, 2018. |
| Ghanbari et al., Optimal Design and Operation of a Steel Plant Integrated with a Polygeneration System, AIChE Journal, Oct. 2013, vol. 59, No. 10. |
| Canadian Application No. 2,930,471, Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2018. |
| Russian Application No. 2016128081, Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2018. |
| Canadian Application No. 2,930,471, Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2019, 4 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160348195 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
