This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/493,291, titled “Systems and Methods for Dynamically Generating a Privacy Summary,” filed on Jul. 25, 2006, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/906,961, titled “Systems and Methods for Network Authentication,” filed on Mar. 13, 2007. The disclosures of both of the above U.S. patent applications are incorporated by reference herein.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to internet applications, and particularly to using an internet-based social network to provide a social context to a user's interaction with a third-party software application.
2. Description of Related Art
Providers of internet-based social networks currently allow third-party software developers to develop applications that can interact with the social network. However, the social networks provide only limited information, and do not offer a social context to the application. That is, a user of the third-party application does not see what other users of the social network are doing, or access information about other users of the social network that is not publicly available information.
There is no currently available platform that a third-party developer of a software application may use to develop an application that draws a social context from information available in the social network.
The present invention provides a system and method for providing a social context to software applications. According to one embodiment of the invention, a user of a social network may authorize access by an external software application to information available in the social network. When the user of the social network uses the external application, the application contacts the social network provider for permission to access the information available in the social network. If access has been authorized, the application incorporates the information from the social network into its interaction with the user, providing a social context to the user's interaction with the application.
The present invention provides a platform for using a social network to provide a social context to a software application that is external to the social network, such as an application developed by a third-party developer rather than the social network provider and/or which does not reside within the social network or social network provider. A social context comprises information that personalizes the interaction of a user with the software application.
A social network provider may offer access to a platform according to the present invention to a third-party developer of a software application, so that the developer may design an application that draws a social context from the social network. Such an application may then incorporate privacy-controlled information about users of the social network, allowing the user of the application to experience the social context provided by the social network provider.
For example, a user of a social network may also wish to use a third-party software application that displays book reviews. If the user has authorized the social network provider to provide information associated with the user in the social network to an external application, then the user may access that information through the book review application. For example, the user may use the application to find book reviews on that application created by people with whom he has established connections in the social network. If the social network normally collects its own data on books, location, or any other set of its own data accessible through the provided application programming interface, the user may incorporate that data into his use of the third party application as well.
The social network provider 102 may comprise any user or entity that provides social networking services, for example, communication services, dating services, or other services for social interaction. For example, the social network provider 102 may host a website that allows one or more users 106 to communicate with one another via the website. In one instance, the user 106A may communicate with the user 106B via a social networking website associated with the social network provider 102 that offers the user an opportunity to connect or reconnect with one or more other users 106B-106N who attended, for example, the same university as the user 106A.
According to some embodiments, a developer of an application 104 may contact the social network provider 102 and request an application key from the developer. The social network provider 102 may review the developer's proposed application 104 and approve interaction between the application 104 and the social network. Review and approval may take any desired form; for example, they may require review by a person or they may be automatic.
The application 104 may be any type of application, so that, for example, those that display still or moving images, those that play sounds such as music or speech, those for financial management, for calendaring, or for any purpose are within the scope of the invention. The application 104 may be written in any natural and/or computer language or languages.
When a user 106A encounters the application 104 and uses it in a way that requests access to information from the social network provider 102, the social network provider 102 checks to see whether the user of the application has provided authorization for access to the information by the application 104.
In some embodiments, a user of a social network may authorize external use of information available in the social network over which he has control. For example, the information may be associated with his user profile, account, userid (a piece of unique user identification), or any other data or data structure representing the user. Exemplary authorization methods include, but are not limited to, those in which: (1) the user opens an infinite session with the social network (as described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/906,961, titled “Systems and Methods for Network Authentication,” filed on Mar. 13, 2007); and (2) the user logs into the social network and through a checkbox menu or other display selects authorization settings for some or all of his information in the social network. Authorization may occur before or during the user's access to application 104, and may persist indefinitely until altered by the user or by the social network provider 102. Alternatively, for example, the login process of the social network may start a clock that results in the expiration of the authorization after some time period; after expiration, a new authorization would be required. Thus, the user of the application 104 may be, but need not be, actively using the social network (for instance, through a window open on his computer's desktop) while accessing information available in the social network through the application 104.
Information available in the social network for use with the application 104 may be subject to privacy settings selected by the users 106 of the social network (as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/493,291, titled “Systems and Methods for Dynamically Generating a Privacy Summary,” filed on Jul. 25, 2006). The privacy settings selections may be set either as a part of the authorization process described above, or independently. In such a case, the application 104 should be designed to incorporate privacy-controlled information about users 106 of the social network into the interaction of user 106A with the application 104, so that the privacy settings set by the user 106A in the social network are incorporated into the interactions of user 106A or other users with the application 104.
In an exemplary embodiment, interaction 204 between a user 106A and a social network provider 102 comprises the authorization process described above, in which user 106A authorizes the access of information about user 106A by the application 104. Interaction 204 may optionally also comprise the selection of privacy settings by user 106A. Interaction 206 comprises one or more instances of access of data in the social network by the application 104. For example, an application 104 that dynamically updates information from the social network will have frequent, multiple interactions 206 with the social network provider 102; such interactions 206 may be mediated or otherwise processed by one or more application processing interfaces as shown in
The social network provider 102 includes a user information database 302, a verification module 304, and an application programming interface 306, and may optionally also include a privacy settings selections component 308. The user information database 302 stores data associated with each user 106A-106N of the social network, which may be accessible by a third-party application under appropriate conditions. When a user 106A authorizes access to one or more external applications, and/or selects or updates privacy settings associated with his information, the user information database 302 updates the data associated with user 106A. Accordingly, authorizations and privacy settings selections are stored in association with each user 106. Authorizations, privacy settings selections and other user 106 information may be stored, modified, added, or otherwise embodied or captured in any storage medium.
The verification module 304 verifies that the user 106A of an application 104 attempting to access information from the social network has authorized use of that information, as discussed herein.
The application programming interface 306 communicates with the application 104 over the network 108. The application 104 communicates various types of information, such as requests for information about user 106A, requests for information about one or more users 106B-106N, and optionally updates of information about user 106A, to the social network provider 102 through the application programming interface 306. Any type of application programming interface 306 is within the scope of various embodiments.
Optionally, a privacy settings selections component 308 receives privacy settings selections from a user 106, such as user 106A. The privacy settings selections component 308 updates the user information database 302 with the privacy settings selected by the user 106A.
Although the social network provider 102 is described as being comprised of various components (such as the user information database 302, the verification module 304, the application programming interface 306 and the privacy settings selections component 308), fewer or more components may comprise the social network provider 102 and still fall within the scope of various embodiments.
The social network provider 102 may provide any type of social network. That is, a social network may comprise users grouped according to any type of category, such as friends, users living near each other, and fellow alumni. The user may specify the networks and groupings, and/or the networks and groupings may be predetermined by the social network provider 102. Thus, a user 106A may be related to a user 106N in various ways through the social network, for example, by being included with user 106N in a group of users living in the Boston area.
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5796967 | Filepp et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5937413 | Hyun | Aug 1999 | A |
5987440 | O'Neil et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6029141 | Bezos et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
7013292 | Hsu | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7076458 | Lawlor et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076504 | Handel et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7249123 | Elder | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7269590 | Hull | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272603 | Fujita et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7369862 | Kim et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7610287 | Dean et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7685236 | Harik et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7802290 | Bansal et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
20010037721 | Hasegawa et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020059201 | Work | May 2002 | A1 |
20030145093 | Oren | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030222918 | Coulthard | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030225632 | Tong et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233542 | Benaloh | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019807 | Freund | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024846 | Randall | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040078591 | Teixeira et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088177 | Travis | May 2004 | A1 |
20040148275 | Achlioptas | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172455 | Green et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050021750 | Abrams | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050060417 | Rose | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050096048 | Clare et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114759 | Williams | May 2005 | A1 |
20050154639 | Zetmeir | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159970 | Buyukkokten | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171799 | Hull | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171955 | Hull | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177385 | Hull | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197846 | Pezaris | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198020 | Garland | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198031 | Pezaris | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198305 | Pezaris | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203807 | Bezos | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210395 | Wakita et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216300 | Appelman | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216550 | Paseman | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234781 | Morgenstern et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235062 | Lunt | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050256756 | Lam | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004789 | Lunt et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060021009 | Lunt | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060041543 | Achlioptas | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060042483 | Work | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060048059 | Etkin | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052091 | Onyon | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068767 | Bhakta et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074863 | Kishore et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080613 | Savant | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085419 | Rosen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060136419 | Brydon | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143068 | Calabria | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143183 | Goldberg | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149740 | Tsutazawa et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161599 | Rosen | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184617 | Nicholas | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190281 | Kott | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060194186 | Nanda | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060215690 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218225 | Hee Voon | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229063 | Koch | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060230061 | Sample | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247940 | Zhu | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060248573 | Pannu | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256008 | Rosenberg | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265227 | Sadamura | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060288401 | Wilson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293976 | Nam | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070021111 | Celik | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070174389 | Armstrong | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191058 | Vanska et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208916 | Tomita | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070266118 | Wilkins | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282959 | Stern | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282987 | Fischer | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005076 | Payne | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010343 | Escaffi | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033776 | Marchese | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040428 | Wei | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080070697 | Robinson | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086458 | Robinson | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080137859 | Jagadeesan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080209482 | Meek et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090076912 | Rajan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090221307 | Wolak et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100030734 | Chunilal | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100094878 | Soroca et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002-7456 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2003-331045 | Nov 2003 | JP |
WO 2006019752 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006050278 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2007052285 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007070676 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007142063 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Jones (Jones et al., “Facebook: Threats to Privacy”, Dec. 2005 found at http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/student-papers/fall05-papers/facebook.pdf). |
XBOX (the electronic reference dated Jul. 2006, found on http://forums.xobx-scene.com/index.php?showtopic=532027). |
ChipIn (“Social Networking to ChipIn to a Good Cause” electronic reference, Jun. 2006, found at http://www.businessdesignstudio.com/resources/blogger/2006/06/social-networking-to-chipin-to-good.html). |
XuQa (“Trending Stories”, Aug. 2006, found at http://mashable.com/2006/08/15/xuqa-combines-social-networking-with-games). |
Flores, Fernando et al. “Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction.” In ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), vol. 6, Issue 2, Apr. 1988. |
ChipIn. ChipIn: The easy way to collect money [online], Dec. 15, 2006 http://web.archive.org/web/20061215090739/www.chipin.com/overview. |
Parzek, E. Social Networking to ChipIn to a Good Cause [online]. Business Design Studio, Jun. 29, 2006 http://www.businessdesignstudio.com/resources/blogger/2006/06social-networking-tochipin-to-good.html. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2008/073202, Nov. 10, 2008, 8 Pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, First Office Action, Application No. 2008-80103393.1, Sep. 13, 2011, nine pages. |
Australian Government, IP Australia, Patent Examination Report No. 2, Patent Application No. 2008261648, Dec. 17, 2012, three pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Chinese Patent Application No. 2008-80103393.1, Feb. 1, 2013, eleven pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, PRC Application No. 2008-80019930.4, Feb. 28, 2012, twelve pages. |
Australian Patent Office, Examiner's First Report, Australian Patent Application No. 2008-286781, May 28, 2012, two pages. |
Chinese State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Chinese Patent Application No. 2008-80103393.1, Jun. 5, 2012, ten pages. |
Australian Government, IP Australia, Patent Examination Report No. 3, Patent Application No. 2008261648, May 16, 2013, three pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Office Action, Canadian Patent Application No. 2,695,545, May 3, 2013, seven pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action, Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-521182, May 14, 2013, ten pages. |
European Patent Office Communication, European Patent Office Application No. 08770901.0, Jul. 19, 2011, one page. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/066787, Oct. 22, 2008, six pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, First Office Action, Application No. 2008-80019930.4, Mar. 9, 2011, eleven pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Grounds for Rejection, Japanese Patent Application No. P2010-512362, Jul. 17, 2012, 4 pages. |
Australian Patent Office, Examiner's First Report, Australian Patent Application No. 2008261648, Jan. 23, 2012, two pages. |
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/138,212, Mar. 22, 2011, fifteen pages. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report, European Patent Application No. 08797914.2, Dec. 14, 2011, five pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Fourth Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 200880103393.1, Jul. 31, 2013, twelve pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 200880103393.1, Jan. 17, 2014, sixteen pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action, Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-521182, Feb. 18, 2014, eight pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090049525 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |