Pneumatic tire having a load dependent adaptive footprint shape

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6564839
  • Patent Number
    6,564,839
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, November 1, 2000
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 20, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to a radial ply tire (230) with a tread (232) subdivided transversely into a central portion (250) having central ribs (260a,260b), shoulder portions (254a, 254b) having shoulder ribs (270a,270b) and intermediate portions (252a, 252b) having intermediate ribs between the central portion and the shoulder portions. The tread has intermediate grooves (262a,262b) between the central ribs and the intermediate ribs (266a,266b) and shoulder decoupling grooves (264a,264b) between the intermediate ribs and the shoulder ribs (270a,270b). The shoulder decoupling grooves having a depth (D1) being less than the intermediate decoupling grooves whereby the footprint width of the tread surface can expand from first width (NLFPW) under normal load to a second width (HLFPW) under heavy load.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The present invention relates to an improved pneumatic tire and tread therefore, and more specifically to the contact of the tread with the ground during dynamic operating conditions.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The prior art incorporates the concept that the width of a tire footprint is designed to be load dependent. Moreover, as discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,782,438 ('438) and U.S. Pat. No. 3,949,797 ('797), when the tread of a pneumatic tire runs in a straight line, resistance to rolling increases as a function of the speed of travel. This resistance increases very rapidly (essentially exponentially) with increasing speed. The result is as the speed of tire travel increases, it is important that the effective width of the tire footprint., i.e. the tread on the ground, be as narrow as possible to minimize the dissipation of energy due to cyclic deformation of the tread. Cyclic deformation of the tread rubber causes heating of the pneumatic tire and the tread, in particular. By reducing frictional resistance, fuel consumption related to rolling resistance is reduced.




Further as discussed in the ('438) and ('797) patents, the phenomenon known as “aquaplaning” or “hydroplaning” occurs on a road surface covered with a layer of liquid, and specifically water, in which, the water cannot be evacuated fast enough from under the wheels of a vehicle traveling at a high speed by the grooves or designs in the tread of the pneumatic tires. As a consequence, the tires of the vehicle are lifted or separated from the ground and are supported only by the layer of liquid. This in turn, results in practically complete loss of adherence of the tire to the ground and consequently, the loss of steering or directional control of the vehicle and the risk of skidding, swerving, and serious accidents. The critical speed at which such a dangerous phenomenon may occur is a function of various parameters or factors such as the inflation pressure of the pneumatic tire, the vehicle load on the tire, the depth of the tread design of each pneumatic tire, the effective width of running contact (the tire footprint) with the road, etc. The critical speed is an inverse function of the effective width of tire footprint with the road such that a narrower footprint (a narrower tread) on the ground results in a higher critical speed, which is preferable for decreasing the risk of the “aquaplaning” phenomenon. It can be stated, however, if the effective running contact or footprint, i.e. the tread is narrow, the pressure in the area of contact with the ground is generally higher.




In addition, a narrower tread may be less stable and adversely effect the vehicle behavior during turning. For example, while turning a vehicle through a curve at a relatively high speed, the centrifugal force and possibly other passive forces of inertia or the lateral or transverse reaction acting on each tire, tend to make the tires tilt to the side, so that a portion (radially internal with respect to turning) of the tread of each pneumatic tire, which is initially in contact with the ground, rises and separates from the ground. As the speed increases, the tread adheres to the ground by smaller and smaller portions of the footprint (radially exterior with respect to turning) which increases the risk of skidding. Consequently, a narrow tread, i.e., a small effective width of running contact or small footprint, is generally undesirable to the safety of travel during turning.




It is therefore seen that the requirements or conditions for maintaining an optimum route or optimum behavior of an automobile vehicle are contradictory and relatively incompatible for straight-line travel and turning, since in straight-line travel it is important that the effective width of running contact with the ground or the tread of each pneumatic tire tread be as narrow as possible, while it must, in contrast, be as wide as possible for turning motion.




Moreover, during braking, a wider contact width of the tire footprint is preferred so as to increase frictional force and thus yield a shorter braking distance.




An example of a variable tread design is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,823,855 ('855) to Goergen et al., having a common assignee with the present invention. The '855 Patent discloses “a tire according to the invention that due to its cross-sectional shape and preferred tread geometry, the tire will operate to provide preferred performance characteristics at different operating loads and in different operating conditions. For example, when the tire is mounted upon a small all-purpose vehicle and operated on a paved roadway at everyday commuting loads, which are far less than the tires rated load, the central portion CP of the tread is almost exclusively in contact with the roadway. The higher net-to-gross ratio of this central portion of the tread provides good tread wear and on-highway handling. When the tire is operated under higher loads and/or off-the-road the laterally outer zones OP


1


, OP


2


of the tread also come into operation to provide greater traction in mud or sand and improve off-highway handling. The varying stiffness of the block elements across the tread also contributes to the performance characteristics of the tire under varying operating conditions.”




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a radial ply tire with a carcass having a crown region, two sidewalls extending from a first end of the sidewalls radially inward from the surface of the crown region, and two beads disposed at a second end of the sidewalls and one or more plies extending through the crown region and between the beads and wrapped thereabout. A belt structure overlies the crown region of the carcass and a tread overlies the belt structure and is secured to the sidewalls in the shoulder portions. The tread is subdivided transversely into a central portion having central ribs, shoulder portions having shoulder ribs and intermediate portions having intermediate ribs between the central portion and the shoulder portions. The tread has first and second intermediate grooves between the central ribs and the intermediate ribs. First and second shoulder decoupling grooves are disposed between the intermediate ribs and the shoulder ribs. The tread may or may not have a central groove. The first and second shoulder decoupling grooves having a depth (D


1


) being 40% to 70% the depth (D


2


) of the first and second intermediate grooves whereby the footprint width of the tread surface can expand from first width (NLFPW) under normal load to a second width (HLFPW) under heavy load wherein the second width is 10% to 40% greater than the first width.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Reference will be made in detail to preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The drawings are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Certain elements in some of the drawings may be illustrated not-to-scale for illustrative clarity.




In the drawings, the hundredth's place of each reference number usually matches the Figure number, and similar elements are usually referred to by similar reference numbers. For example, element


199


in FIG.


1


and element


299


in

FIG. 2

might indicate corresponding or substantially similar elements.




The same element appearing in different figures is usually given the same reference number in all figures.




In a single drawing, similar elements may be assigned the same number, and may be distinguished from each other by a letter suffix.




For illustrative clarity, the cross-sectional views presented herein may be in the form “near-sighted” cross-sectional views, omitting certain background lines that would otherwise be visible in a true cross-sectional view.




The structure, operation, and advantages of the invention will become further apparent upon consideration of the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:





FIG. 1

shows a cross-section of a prior art pneumatic radial ply tire, showing its profile as it would be when inflated but not resting on a road surface (unloaded);





FIG. 2

shows a cross-section of a portion of a pneumatic radial ply tire of the present invention as it would be when inflated and mounted on a wheel rim;





FIG. 3A

shows a comparison of the cross-section of the tire of

FIG. 2

before loading (as dotted line) and the tire of

FIG. 2

when it is deflected on a roadway (as solid line) at normal load;





FIG. 3B

shows a comparison of the cross-section of the tire of

FIG. 2

before loading (as dotted line) and the tire of

FIG. 2

when it is deflected on a roadway (as solid line) at high load (during a braking for example);





FIG. 4

is a graph showing the comparison of the footprint width under load of the standard prior art tire of

FIG. 1

compared to the tire of the present invention as shown in

FIG. 2

;





FIGS. 5A

,


5


B,


5


C and


5


D show the variation of the footprints of tires of the present invention when subjected to a normal load and a braking load compared to the footprints of prior art tires as shown in

FIG. 1

; and





FIGS. 6A

,


6


B, and


6


C show the comparison of the footprints of a prototype tire of the present invention under increasing load.











DEFINITIONS




“Axial” and “axially” means the directions that are parallel to the tire axis.




“Bead” means an annular tensile member that is associated with holding the tire to the rim. The beads are wrapped by ply cords and shaped, with or without other reinforcement elements such as flippers, chippers, apexes or fillers, toe guards and chafers.




“Belt Structure” or “Belts” means at least two annular layers or plies of parallel cords, woven or unwoven, underlying the tread, unanchored to the bead, and having both left and right cord angles in the range from 17° to 27° with respect to the equatorial plane of the tire.




“Breakers” or “tire breakers” means the same as belt or belt structure or reinforcement belts.




“Carcass” means the tire structure apart from the belt structure, tread and underlay over the plies, but including the beads.




“Carcass cord” means ply cord.




“Circumferential” means directions extending along the perimeter of the surface of the annular tread perpendicular to the axial direction.




“Cord” means one of the reinforcement strands of which the plies in the tire are comprised.




“Equatorial Plane” or “EP” means the plane perpendicular to the tire's axis of rotation and passing through the center of its tread.




“Footprint” means the contact patch or area of contact of the tire tread with a flat surface at zero speed and under normal load and pressure.




“Lateral” means in the direction parallel with the tire axis.




“Loaded” used as an adjective for any parameter refers to that parameter for a tire that is loaded—i.e. inflated, mounted on a vehicle, and resting on a surface.




“Meridional” refers to a tire profile cut along a plane that includes the tire's rotational axis.




“Normal Inflation Pressure” means the specific design inflation pressure and load assigned by the appropriate standards organization for the service condition for the tire.




“Normal Load” means the specific design inflation pressure and load assigned by the appropriate standards organization for the service condition for the tire.




“Ply” means a layer of rubber-coated parallel cords.




“Radial” means in a direction orthogonal to the tire axis.




“Radial Ply Tire” means a belted or circumferentially-restricted pneumatic tire in which at least one ply has cords which extend from bead to bead and are laid at cord angles between 65° and 90° with respect to the equatorial plane of the tire.




“Section Height” means the radial distance from the nominal rim diameter to the outer diameter of the tire at its equatorial plane.




“Section Width” means the maximum linear distance parallel to the axis of the tire and between the exterior of its sidewalls when and after it has been inflated at normal pressure for 24 hours, but unloaded, excluding elevations of the sidewalls due to labeling, decoration or protective bands.




“Shoulder” means the upper portion of sidewall just below the tread edge.




“Sidewall” is the portion of a tire between the tread and the bead.




“Tangential” and “tangentially” refer to segments of circular curves that intersect at a point through which can be drawn a single line that is mutually tangential to both circular segments.




“Tire crown” means the tread, tread shoulders and adjacent portions of the sidewalls.




“Tread contour” means the shape of a tire tread as viewed in axial cross section.




“Tread Width” means the arc length of the tread surface in the plane that includes the axis of rotation of the tire.




“Unloaded” used as an adjective for any parameter refers to that parameter for a tire that is unloaded—i.e. inflated and not resting on a surface.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Prior Art Construction





FIG. 1

shows a meridional cross-section of a prior art pneumatic radial tire


110


for a vehicle, showing its profile as it would be when inflated to normal inflation pressure and not resting on a road surface (“unloaded”). The tire


110


has a tread


112


, a belt structure (“belts”)


114


comprising one or more belts


115




a,




115




b,


and a carcass


116


. The carcass


116


has two inextensible annular beads


118




a,




118




b,


a radial ply


120


extending between and wrapped around the beads, and two sidewalls


122




a,




122




b.


The ply


120


passes near the tire's inner circumferential surface


124


and is reinforced with high modulus synthetic carcass cords (not shown). The section where each sidewall


122




a,




122




b


meets the edge of the tread


112


is a shoulder


126




a,




126




b,


respectively. The radially outermost surface


128


of the tread


112


forms a crown


130


. The radially innermost points of the tire


110


are toes


132




a,




132




b.






Preferred Embodiment





FIG. 2

is a meridional cross-section of the tire


230


, in accordance with the present invention, showing its profile as it would be when inflated and unloaded, and showing various dimensional specifications. In general terms, the tire


230


is designed in such a way that the footprint width W (the distance between the tire shoulders that is in contact with the roadway) increases progressively with the applied load. That is, as the load becomes lower, the footprint width becomes progressively narrower and as the load gets higher, the footprint width gets progressively wider. The tires characteristic of having its footprint increase progressively is an important aspect of the invention in that even the load generated by light braking will benefit from an increased footprint width. Under very heavy braking, i.e. high load, the entire tread width between the shoulders forms the footprint which is quite wider than the footprint under normal load. The width vs load curve is to be s-shaped (

FIG. 4

) so as to avoid excessive sensitivity to small load variations, as normally encountered in driving conditions. Furthermore, in order to maximize the performance potential of the tire, the extended tread width can be approximately equal to the section width (SW) of the tire. For practical reasons, the tread width is preferably no wider than the section width (SW) of the tire because the tire could rub against the wheel well of the vehicle on which it is mounted.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, the tire


230


has a tread


232


, a belt structure (“belts”)


234


comprising two or more belts


236


,


238


and a carcass


240


. The carcass


240


has two inextensible annular beads


218




a,




218




b,


a radial ply


220


extending between and wrapped around the beads and two sidewalls


242




a,




242




b.


The ply


220


passes near the tire's inner circumferential surface


244


and is reinforced with high modulus synthetic or other carcass cords (not shown). Where each sidewall


242




a,




242




b


joins the tread


232


is a shoulder region


246




a,




246




b,


respectively. The section of the tread


232


between the shoulder regions


246




a,




246




b


forms a crown


248


.




The tread


232


is subdivided transversely into a central portion


250


, which is disposed symmetrically about the equatorial plane EP, intermediate portions


252




a,




252




b,


which intersect the central portion and extend outward toward shoulder portions


254




a,




254




b,


respectively, of the tire


230


. In the central portion


250


, the outer central surface


256


which comprises surfaces


256




a


and


256




b,


has preferably one circumferential, peripheral, central groove


258


which is symmetrically disposed about the equatorial plane EP and forms central ribs


260




a,




260




b,


of width W


3


, between central groove


258


and intermediate, circumferential, peripheral, grooves


262




a,




262




b.


The central groove


258


is not a prerequisite and may be deleted. Central groove has a depth of D


3


and a width of W


4


. The intermediate portions


252




a,




252




b,


extend between intermediate grooves


262




a,




262




b,


respectively, and shoulder decoupling groove


264




a,




264




b,


respectively, and form intermediate ribs


266




a,




266




b,


respectively. The intermediate ribs


266




a,




266




b


each have an intermediate outer surface


268




a,




268




b


preferably of an equal width W


5


which projects less radially to the outside of the tire than the central outer surface


256


of the central portion


250


. The shoulder portions


254




a,




254




b


extend between the shoulder decoupling groove


264




a,




264




b


and the intersection of the tread


232


with the sidewalls


242




a,




242




b,


respectively, and form shoulder ribs


270




a,




270




b,


respectively. The decoupling groove


264




a,




264




b


are preferably disposed above the ends of the upper breaker


236


of the belt package


234


. However, it is within the terms of the present invention for the ends of the breaker


236


to extend outward of the decoupling grooves


264




a,




264




b


towards the shoulder portions


254




a,




254




b


or inward of the decoupling grooves towards the intermediate portions


252




a,




252




b


by a distance of 1% to 5% of the footprint width under normal load (NLFPW). If the ends of the breaker


236


only extend in the intermediate portions


252




a,




252




b a


distance to the decoupling grooves


264




a,




264




b


of more than 5% of the footprint width under normal load (NLFPW), the tire would have poor operating characteristics as far as treadwear, high speed and stability are concerned. Conversely, if the ends of the breaker


236


extend into the shoulder portions


254




a,




254




b


a distance from the decoupling grooves


264




a,




264




b


of more than 5% of the footprint width under normal load (NLFPW), the tire would have poor operating characteristics because of a poor durability at the breaker ending location and higher weight. The shoulder ribs


270




a,




270




b


each have a shoulder outer surface


272




a,




272




b,


which projects less radially to the outside of the tire than the adjacent intermediate outer surface


268




a,




268




b


of the intermediate ribs


266




a,




266




b


or the central outer surface


256


of the central ribs


260




a,




260




b.


The shoulder outer surface


272




a,




272




b


of the shoulder portions


254




a,




254




b,


respectively, extend less radially outward from the axis of rotation AR than the intermediate outer surface


268




a,




268




b


of the intermediate portions


252




a,




252




b


so that in the normally loaded, inflated state, the shoulder portions


254




a,




254




b


do not contact the road surface.




Referring again to

FIG. 2

, the intermediate grooves


262




a,




262




b


have a width W


1


that is relatively wide, such as 30% to 50% of the central rib width W


3


and a depth D


2


that is approximately equal to the depth D


3


of groove


258


and relatively deep, such as 6 mm to 9 mm. The intermediate grooves


262




a,




262




b


constitute a flexible joint or decoupling means between the intermediate ribs


266




a,




266




b


and the central ribs


260




a,




260




b,


respectively.




An important aspect of the present invention relates to the shoulder decoupling grooves


264




a,




264




b


which allow the shoulder ribs to contact the road surface during heavy loading. The shoulder decoupling grooves


264




a,




264




b,


which separate the shoulder portions


254




a,




254




b


from the intermediate portions


252




a,




252




b,


respectively, can have a width W


2


between 40% and 100% of the width W


1


of the intermediate grooves


262




a,




262




b.


In essence, the shoulder decoupling groove should be as wide as needed to prevent groove closure for the expected maximal load. The shoulder decoupling grooves can have a depth D


1


, which is in the range of 30% to 100% and most preferably between 40% to 70% the depth D


2


of the intermediate grooves


262




a,




262




b.


If the depth D


1


is greater than 100% of the depth D


2


, then the tire would have poor operating characteristics because, as the decoupling effect becomes very important, the shoulder portions


254




a,




254




b


would touch the road even at low or normal loads, thus disabling the sought after beneficial action of the shoulder rib. Also, durability of the breaker package could be affected. Conversely, if the depth D


1


is less than 30% of the depth D


2


, then the tire would have poor operating characteristics because, as the decoupling effect would be prevented from occurring, the shoulder portions


254




a,




254




b


would be structurally prevented from touching the ground even at high braking load.




The shoulder portions


254




a,




254




b


intersect the sidewalls


242




a,




242




b,


respectively, to form an undercut section


274




a,




274




b


to provide flexibility in the shoulder sections so that the outer shoulder surface


272




a,




272




b


of the shoulder ribs


270




a,




270




b


can move into contact with the road surface during high loading, as shown in FIG.


3


B. Undercut section


274




a,




274




b


are defined as curves tangent to the sidewalls


242




a,




242




b,


and joining the edges of the shoulder portions


254




a


and


154




b


respectively. Moreover, the outer surface of the undercut sections


274




a,




274




b


forms with the outer shoulder surface


272




a,




272




b


an angle “a” between 180 degrees and 270 degrees. This feature allows tuning of the wanted maximum contact width, while being limited by mechanical strength considerations.




Referring again to

FIG. 2

, the outer surfaces


256




a,




256




b


of the central ribs


260




a,




260




b


or outer surface


256


of central rib


260


are relatively flat and have an axial contour defined by an internal curve having radius RC. The current example is based on a single radius of curvature, which does not preclude using multiple radii. The intermediate ribs


266




a,




266




b,


which are separated from the central ribs


260




a,




260




b


by the intermediate decoupling grooves


262




a,




262




b,


respectively, have an intermediate outer surface


268




a,




268




b


forming a curved contour defined by a radius of curvature RI, which, like RC, is large but less than the radius RC. The shoulder ribs


270




a,




270




b


are separated from the intermediate ribs


266




a,




266




b,


respectively, and have an outer surface


272




a,




272




b


with a radius of curvature RS that is less than both the radius of curvature RI of the intermediate ribs


266




a,




266




b


and the radius RC of the central ribs


260




a,




260




b.


As illustrated in

FIG. 2

, the central rib outer surface, the intermediate rib outer surfaces, and the shoulder rib outer surfaces form a single continuous curved contour line.




Referring now to

FIG. 3A

, there is illustrated the tire


230


of

FIG. 2

in dotted lines when the tire is inflated at a normal pressure and mounted but not under load and in solid lines when inflated at normal pressure and under a normal load. Referring now to

FIG. 3B

, there is illustrated the tire


230


of

FIG. 2

in dotted lines when the tire is inflated at a normal pressure and mounted but not under load and in solid lines when inflated at normal pressure and under a heavy load to aid in discerning the differences in contour of the tire under normal load and heavy load conditions. The novel construction of tire


230


enables the footprint width to increase progressively with applied load. That is, the tire is symmetric so that the shoulder ribs


270




a,




270




b


are not in contact with the road surface during normal loading, but contribute to the widening of the footprint and thus the dry braking performance under heavy load as shown in the solid cross section of

FIG. 3B. A

further advantage of the shoulder ribs


270




a,




270




b


not being in contact with the road during normal operation is that the problems of steering due to uneven road contact patterns is greatly reduced. Another advantage of the variable adaptive footprint is that the progressive increase in the amount of tread on the road does not provide sudden on-off contact, but rather a progressive adaptation for optimal benefits. This can be visualized on the footprint width versus loading ratio curve, as shown in FIG.


4


. When the load fluctuates in normal driving, the footprint width does not change very much. However, when the load substantially increases and exceeds the expected braking load threshold under normal conditions, the footprint width suddenly increases. Heavier braking will then further increase the footprint width up to the maximum width, which is approximately equal to the section width SW, as made possible by the shape of the shoulder rib. This desired behavior gives to that curve a unique s-shape. Note that it is not desirable for a constantly changing footprint width because of the uneven wear that might ensue. Also, since the shoulder decoupling grooves


264




a,




264




b


are disposed essentially over the ends of the belt


236


and are shallow, the belt package


234


does not require extra widening toward the shoulder portions


254




a,




254




b


of the tire, which reduces durability problems and tire weight. The extended width of the tread during maximum load, as shown in

FIG. 3B

, is at the maximum equal to the section width SW of the tire under nominal inflation pressure.




Referring to

FIG. 4

, there is illustrated an example of how the footprint width increases with increased load in the present tire as compared with the increased footprint in the prior art tire. We define the loading ratio as the ratio between the dynamic load seen by the tire in service conditions and the standard load the tire has to statically carry when fitted on the vehicle. As shown, the footprint width of the adaptive width tire shown in

FIGS. 2 and 3

(A,B) maintains a similar width under a low loading ratio but increases evenly as the loading ratio exceeds 1, whereas the prior art tire maintains a substantially even footprint width as the loading ratio exceeds 1.




The variation in the footprint shape between a standard tire and a tire with an adaptive footprint is also shown in

FIGS. 5A

,


5


B,


5


C and


5


D (FIGS.


5


A-


5


D).

FIG. 5A

shows a prior art tire under normal load and

FIG. 5B

shows the same tire under heavier braking load. Note that under both normal and heavier loads, the width of the footprint remains substantially the same. However, under a heavier load, the length of the footprint does increase as is generally known in the prior art, which is of marginal benefit for braking performance.

FIG. 5C

shows an adaptive footprint shaped tire of the present invention under standard load and

FIG. 5D

shows the latter tire under heavy braking load. With the tire of the present invention, under heavy braking load not only does the footprint shape lengthen, but is also becomes substantially wider, i.e., up to the section width of the tire. This is a graphic illustration of the advantage of the present invention because the increased width of the footprint is very important in braking. At the same time, it is important to limit the amount of tread, i.e., the footprint on the road during normal operation to increase fuel economy.




Referring to

FIGS. 6A

,


6


B and


6


C, there is illustrated the footprint of a prototype tire according to the present invention having a load dependent variable footprint width as described herein. A notable feature is that a constant footprint shape is maintained throughout the applied load spectrum. The different loading conditions are set forth in Chart 1 hereinbelow for a 135/70R16 tire. Note as the load increases from simply being inflated and mounted on a rim in FIG.


6


A through normal loading conditions in FIG.


6


B and finally heavy braking conditions in

FIG. 6C

, the footprint becomes progressively longer and wider.















CHART 1
















FIG. 6A






FIG. 6B





FIG. 6C




















VEHICLE LOAD




EMPTY




NORMAL




BRAKING







CONDITION:







FP-WIDTH:




 89 mm




 94 mm




120 mm







FP-LENGTH




122 mm




143 mm




177 mm















Regarding the performance of this prototype, and how it compares with a prior art tire of the same dimension, the following chart (Chart 2) proves that the two main claims of this new design are reached (the results are normalized around the prior art construction):















CHART 2














Prior Art




Preferred embodiment

















Rolling Resistance Performance:




100




107






Dry braking performance:




100




104














While the tread


232


is shown to be symmetrical relative to the equatorial plane EP of the tire


230


, the tread may be non-symmetrical, in which case both the intermediate portions


252




a,




252




b


and the shoulder portions


254




a,




254




b


can be non-symmetrical and have different and unequal widths, depending on the design. These portions will anyway still be separated by shoulder decoupling grooves.




While the invention has been described in combination with embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing teachings. Accordingly, the invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations as fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A radial ply tire having a crown region, two sidewalls extending radially inward from a first end of the sidewalls at axially outer shoulder portions of the crown region to beads disposed at a second end of the sidewalls, a carcass having one or more plies extending through the crown region and between the beads and wrapped thereabout, a belt structure overlying the crown region of the carcass, and a tread overlying the belt structure and secured to the sidewalls in the shoulder portions, the tire characterized by:the tread being subdivided transversely into a central portion having at least one central rib, shoulder portions having shoulder ribs, and intermediate portions having intermediate ribs between the central portion and the shoulder portions; the tread having first and second intermediate grooves between the central portion and the intermediate portions; the tread having first and second shoulder decoupling grooves between the intermediate portions and the shoulder portions; a radially outer surface of the tread being subdivided transversely into at least one central rib outer surface, intermediate rib outer surfaces, and shoulder rib outer surfaces wherein the at least one central rib outer surface has a first radius, the intermediate rib outer surfaces have a second radius less than the first radius, and the shoulder rib outer surfaces have a third radius less than the second radius such that when the tire is inflated and mounted on a wheel rim the central rib outer surface, the intermediate rib outer surfaces, and the shoulder rib outer surfaces form a single continuous curved contour lines; and the first and second shoulder decoupling grooves having a depth being 30% to 100% of the depth of the first and second intermediate grooves, whereby a footprint width of the tread can expand from a first footprint width under normal load to a second footprint width under heavy load wherein the second footprint width is 10% to 40% greater than the first footprint width.
  • 2. The tire of claim 1 wherein the first and second shoulder decoupling grooves have a width being 40% to 100% of the width of the first and second intermediate grooves.
  • 3. The tire of claim 2 wherein the first and second shoulder decoupling grooves have a depth being 40% to 70% of the depth of the first and second intermediate grooves.
  • 4. The tire of claim 1 further including undercut sections where the shoulder portions intersect the sidewalls to provide flexibility in the shoulder portions to enhance the ability of the shoulder ribs to move into contact with a road surface during heavy loading.
  • 5. The tire of claim 4 wherein the undercut sections have curved surfaces between axially outer edges of the shoulder portions and the sidewalls so that the curved surfaces are tangent to the sidewalls and form an angle between 180 degrees and 270 degrees with the axially outer edges of the shoulder portions.
  • 6. The tire of claim 1 wherein the central portion is disposed symmetrically about an equatorial plane of the tire.
  • 7. The tire of claim 1 wherein the central portion has a central groove which is symmetrically disposed about an equatorial plane of the tire and forms two central ribs.
  • 8. The tire of claim 1 wherein:the third radius is less than the second radius such that when the tire is in a normally loaded condition the intermediate rib outer surfaces are in contact with the road surface but the shoulder rib outer surfaces are not in contact with the road surface, and when the tire is in a heavy loaded condition the intermediate rib outer surfaces and the shoulder rib outer surfaces are in contact with the road surface.
  • 9. The tire of claim 1 wherein the tread is non-symmetrical about the equatorial plane EP of the tire.
  • 10. The tire of claim 1 wherein each of the shoulder portions has no more than two shoulder ribs.
  • 11. The tire of claim 1 wherein:the belt structure comprises one or more belts; and at least a radially outermost belt of the one or more belts has first and second axially outer belt ends that are axially disposed relative to a point below the first and second shoulder decoupling grooves, respectively, such that the first and second axially outer belt ends are disposed within 5% of the first footprint width on either axial side of the point below the first and second shoulder decoupling grooves, respectively.
  • 12. The tire of claim 11 wherein the first and second axially outer belt ends of at least the radially outermost belt of the one or more belts are axially disposed below the first and second shoulder decoupling grooves, respectively.
US Referenced Citations (24)
Number Name Date Kind
3782438 Mirtain Jan 1974 A
3949797 Mirtain et al. Apr 1976 A
3980118 Kinas Sep 1976 A
3982579 Mirtain Sep 1976 A
4079768 Verdier Mar 1978 A
4124052 Beauchamp Nov 1978 A
RE30549 Mirtain et al. Mar 1981 E
4265287 Abe et al. May 1981 A
4281702 Grosch et al. Aug 1981 A
4456046 Miller Jun 1984 A
4567929 Els et al. Feb 1986 A
4570691 Martus Feb 1986 A
4662416 Yagi et al. May 1987 A
4722378 Corolla et al. Feb 1988 A
4823855 Goergen et al. Apr 1989 A
4881586 Shinomiya Nov 1989 A
5115849 Corner May 1992 A
5119857 Kukimoto Jun 1992 A
5174214 Oda et al. Dec 1992 A
5178698 Shibata Jan 1993 A
5435364 Hasegawa et al. Jul 1995 A
5660652 Young et al. Aug 1997 A
5733393 Hubbell et al. Mar 1998 A
5849118 Matsumoto Dec 1998 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
2153774 May 1973 DE
2128232 Nov 1973 DE
320143 Jun 1989 EP
1431691 Apr 1976 GB
60-64003 Apr 1985 JP
2-34404 Feb 1990 JP
3-189211 Aug 1991 JP
4-87802 Mar 1992 JP
6-171313 Jun 1994 JP
WO 9914064 Mar 1999 WO